A humbled, even humiliated British Prime Minister Theresa May came to Brussels on Thursday not to dictate the terms of her country’s exit from the European Union, but to plead for a brief extension of its departure.

Ahead of the meeting of E.U. leaders — a nail-biter that was expected to begin midafternoon and could stretch late into the night — attitudes appeared to be hardening against the British leader. Even some E.U. Anglophiles who once held out hope that Britain would change its mind and stay in the union were snapping that the sooner the door slams on the nation’s membership, the better.

It was clear that Britain has not taken back control from Europe, as the hard-line advocates of Brexit envisioned. May arrived not exactly as a supplicant, but as less than an equal.

May asked in a letter Wednesday for a delay of the U.K. departure until the end of June.

“This delay is a matter of personal regret to me,” she told reporters on Thursday, standing in the glass entrance to the summit building, where Britain’s Union Jack may soon be removed from the row of the 28 E.U. members’ flags. “But a short extension would give Parliament the time to make a final choice that delivers on the result of the referendum.”

The Europeans, though, are wary of her coming back again and asking for more. Their trust diminished, they want her to pass the deal before granting her a delay, potentially leaving a final decision until just hours before Britain would otherwise leave on March 29. 

“In principle, we can comply with that wish if next week we did get a positive vote on the withdrawal documents in the British Parliament,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel told German lawmakers before leaving for Brussels.

Left unsaid was what will happen if the withdrawal deal does not clear Parliament — a real possibility, because it already has been defeated twice by historic margins. That would almost certainly force another emergency summit at the end of next week.

Some leaders threatened the worst.

“In case of a no vote, or a no, directly, it will guide everybody to a no-deal for sure,” said French President Emmanuel Macron on his way into the meeting. Economists and political analysts have warned that a no-deal Brexit could result in the halting of trade and travel and a hit to the British and European economies.

In London, May’s allies said she was under “extraordinary pressure.” Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt told the BBC, “No prime minister in living memory has been tested in the way that she has.”

May will have 10 minutes to plead her case Thursday, as 27 other heads of state listen around a ring-shaped table. Then they will go around the circle and each speak their mind. Once they finish their discussion, they will kick May out and decide what to do with her.

In footage of the leaders greeting each other before settling in for business, May joked with Luxembourg’s prime minister, who just minutes before had echoed Macron and threatened to cast Britain out of the E.U. without a deal. She exchanged a tense and unsmiling double-kiss with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, with whom she has tangled.

In past discussions, she has stuck to her talking points, angering other leaders who felt she showed little understanding of their own redlines and considerations. At times, leaders have emerged from meetings with her feeling less charitable than when they entered.

By now, E.U. policymakers have little sympathy for May. They’re fed up with Britain and want it to leave. They no longer hold out hope for a second referendum that could reverse the Brexit decision, preferring to break up and move on. 

“We don’t want in the coming months, in the coming years, to be busy with Brexit,” said Guy Verhofstadt, the European Parliament’s Brexit coordinator, who used to post wistful videos on Twitter appealing Britons to abandon Brexit. “We want to be busy with the renewal of the European Union,” he told reporters before the meeting.

The Europeans are keenly aware that the Brexit chaos is being driven by members of May’s own Conservative party. She has been unable to win over her own cabinet, which now confronts her daily. She is losing control, or has lost control, of the process. That makes them nervous.

Their priority is to find a way for May to win approval for a deal that both she and they believe is the best possible, but that has proven toxic to the House of Commons. If the deal doesn’t work, the Europeans would prefer for the British leader to ask for a much longer extension and declare her willingness to hold elections in May for the European Parliament. She has so far ruled them out for fear of riling hard-line Brexit backers in the Conservative party.

Ahead of the summit, European diplomats were unusually open about their fears for the coming days. Many worried that the economic tornado set off by a sudden British departure could hurt ordinary people across Europe. They expected they, too, would be blamed.

“My lack of answer to my mother or to my friends: ‘Why have you contributed to this mess? Why have you done this? Why haven’t you done anything against it?’ ” said one senior E.U. diplomat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss planning ahead of the meetings. “If that is the scenario, it is the most bitter experience.”

When May triggered the two-year Brexit window, confident Brexiteers said squabbling European countries would quickly succumb to the crack British team of negotiators. Instead, the Europeans have remained unusually united, while the first two British Brexit ministers resigned to protest the deals they themselves agreed on.

May and British lawmakers are now blaming each other for failing to have agreed on how to leave.

On Wednesday night, May appeared at the lectern at 10 Downing Street and charged that lawmakers were blocking Brexit. Speaking directly to the British people, she said: “You are tired of the infighting. You are tired of the political games and the arcane procedural rows.”

She added, “I am on your side.”

Lawmakers across the parties shouted that it was May who had bungled Brexit — and that it was her Conservative party and 75 hard-line Brexiteers who have blocked passage of her exit deal.

Some considered the “us vs. Parliament” message of May’s speech threatening — and no way to persuade wavering critics to swing behind her deal.

Thursday morning, Commons Speaker John Bercow told Parliament, “None of you is a traitor,” adding: “The sole duty of every member of Parliament is to do what he or she thinks is right.”

Wes Streeting, a Labour lawmaker, said May’s message could whip up anger toward members of Parliament, some of whom already receive death threats.

He called May’s speech “incendiary and irresponsible. If any harm comes to any of us, she will have to accept her share of responsibility.”

A Downing Street spokeswoman told reporters that the prime minister’s office “flatly” rejected claims that the prime minister’s statement put lawmakers at risk.

But lawmakers said the rhetoric hurt May’s cause.

“There’s absolutely no chance she is going to win over MPs in sufficient numbers after that statement,” Lisa Nandy, another Labour lawmaker, told the ITV broadcaster. “It was an attack on liberal democracy itself. . . . I will not support a government that takes such a reckless, dangerous approach.”

Sam Gyimah, a Conservative party member of Parliament, told the BBC that May’s new approach was a “low blow.” He said that he would not be blackmailed by and that the deal is still a poor one.

Some of the 48 percent of people who voted to remain in the European Union in the June 2016 Brexit referendum were growing increasingly nervous about what might happen over the next few days.

An online public petition calling on May to cancel Brexit attracted more than half a million signatures in mere hours — and then crashed. The British Parliament’s petitions website went down Thursday morning because of a surge in traffic.

Booth reported from London. Karla Adam in London, Quentin Ariès in Brussels and James McAuley in Paris contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/britain-pleads-for-brexit-delay-as-crucial-european-summit-gets-underway/2019/03/21/824d7a4c-4b4c-11e9-8cfc-2c5d0999c21e_story.html

“);var a = g[r.size_id].split(“x”).map((function(e) {return Number(e)})), s = u(a, 2);o.width = s[0],o.height = s[1]}o.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce((function(e, r) {return e[r.key] = r.values[0],e}), {rpfl_elemid: n.adUnitCode}),e.push(o)} else l.logError(“Rubicon bid adapter Error: bidRequest undefined at index position:” + t, c, d);return e}), []).sort((function(e, r) {return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0)}))},getUserSyncs: function(e, r, t) {if (!A && e.iframeEnabled) {var i = “”;return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? i += “?gdpr=” + Number(t.gdprApplies) + “&gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString : i += “?gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString),A = !0,{type: “iframe”,url: n + i}}},transformBidParams: function(e, r) {return l.convertTypes({accountId: “number”,siteId: “number”,zoneId: “number”}, e)}};function m() {return [window.screen.width, window.screen.height].join(“x”)}function b(e, r) {var t = f.config.getConfig(“pageUrl”);return e.params.referrer ? t = e.params.referrer : t || (t = r.refererInfo.referer),e.params.secure ? t.replace(/^http:/i, “https:”) : t}function _(e, r) {var t = e.params;if (“video” === r) {var i = [];return t.video && t.video.playerWidth && t.video.playerHeight ? i = [t.video.playerWidth, t.video.playerHeight] : Array.isArray(l.deepAccess(e, “mediaTypes.video.playerSize”)) && 1 === e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length ? i = e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0] : Array.isArray(e.sizes) && 0

(CNN)Don’t look now, but a(nother) skinny kid with a funny name is turning heads in the presidential race.

a>*{vertical-align: top; display: inline-block;}
.duval-3>a>div{display: inline-block; font-size:1.0666667rem;width: 80%; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 2%;}
.duval-3>a>img{width: 18%; height: auto;}
@media screen and (max-width:640px){
.duval-3>a>*{display:block; margin: auto;}
.duval-3>a>div{width: 100%;}
.duval-3>a>img{width: 50%;}
}
]]>

    Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/21/politics/pete-buttigieg-2020-campaign/index.html

    “I can assure people there is no point in applying for such a permit,” she said.

    The suspect in the shootings, Brenton H. Tarrant, 28, was a licensed gun owner and member of a local gun club. An official with one gun retailer said his company had sold Mr. Tarrant four firearms along with ammunition between December 2017 — a month after Mr. Tarrant received his gun license — and March 2018.

    But officials still do not know the source of a semiautomatic rifle that can be seen in a video of the attack on Al Noor Mosque, one of the two mosques the gunman targeted. The authorities say that five guns acquired legally, including two semiautomatic assault weapons, were used in the assault.

    On Wednesday, the authorities said that when the suspect was arrested, he had two weapons with him along with explosives and that he was planning to continue his attack.

    His efforts were optimized for internet fame and to broadcast a message of white supremacy. Minutes before the attacks started, he published a manifesto to message boards where white supremacists gather, and included a link to the page where the streaming video of the shooting would appear.

    In addition to gun policy, Ms. Ardern has been arguing nearly every day since the attacks that there is a need for the world’s most powerful tech platforms to take responsibility for spreading messages of hate that lead to violence.

    Leaders in many countries, she said, need to be united in making clear that with profit comes responsibility.

    “There are some things we need to confront collectively as leaders internationally,” she said at a news conference in Christchurch on Wednesday. “We cannot, for instance, allow some of the challenges we face with social media to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.”

    Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/world/asia/new-zealand-gun-ban.html

    The captain of the doomed Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 never received updated training on a Boeing 737 Max 8 simulator, even though the airline had the technology available since January, according to a report.

    The flight crashed earlier this month shortly after takeoff from an airport near Ethiopia’s capital city, killing all 157 people aboard.

    Ethiopian Airlines was ahead of its competitors in implementing the simulator to train would-be pilots of the new plane, according to reports. Yared Getachew, co-pilot of Flight 302, had taken a course on another simulator as recently as October, but not one specifically designated for the Max 8, The New York Times reported, citing someone familiar with Ethiopian Airlines.

    The source told the Times that Getachew was not due for another training until after the crash.

    HERO ‘MIRACLE ON THE HUDSON’ PILOT BLASTS ‘ABSURD’ LACK OF TRAINING IN WAKE OF FATAL ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES CRASH

    U.S.-based manufacturer Boeing, which is now under heightened scrutiny around the world, has said previously pilots who have flown earlier models didn’t need additional training. It wasn’t immediately clear what level of training Getachew’s co-pilot had received nor if the additional simulator training would’ve prevented the fatal crash.

    A subsequent investigation has determined that Flight 302, much like Indonesia’s Lion Air flight, which crashed in October, likely failed after its automated “anti-stall” system inadvertently pushed the plane’s nose downward. A cockpit recording indicates that the pilots weren’t able to fix the problem. U.S. officials are probing why pilot manuals did not address the feature, Reuters reported.

    After the March 10 crash in Ethiopia, countries around the world grounded 737 Max 8 and 9 jets amid internal investigations. European and Canadian regulators this week said this week that they want to do more than simply take the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s word that alterations to a key flight-control system will make the 737 Max safer. Those reviews scramble an ambitious schedule set by Boeing and could undercut the FAA’s reputation around the world.

    LION AIR BOEING 737 MAX 8 WAS REPORTEDLY SAVED OFF BY OFF-DUTY PILOT DAY BEFORE DEADLY CRASH IN INDONESIA

    The FAA published a notification to its counterparts in other countries on Wednesday that Boeing is hoping to have ready by Monday an updated software of the aircraft. The agency said it expects to certify Boeing’s modifications and plans for pilot training in April or May, according to someone briefed on FAA presentations to congressional committees.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    In a statement cited by the Times, a Senate subcommittee on aviation and space said it will hold a hearing next week to “examine challenges to the state of commercial aviation safety, including any specific concerns highlighted by recent accidents.”

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/travel/ethiopian-airlines-pilot-of-doomed-flight-didnt-receive-training-on-new-simulator-report

    “);var a = g[r.size_id].split(“x”).map((function(e) {return Number(e)})), s = u(a, 2);o.width = s[0],o.height = s[1]}o.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce((function(e, r) {return e[r.key] = r.values[0],e}), {rpfl_elemid: n.adUnitCode}),e.push(o)} else l.logError(“Rubicon bid adapter Error: bidRequest undefined at index position:” + t, c, d);return e}), []).sort((function(e, r) {return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0)}))},getUserSyncs: function(e, r, t) {if (!A && e.iframeEnabled) {var i = “”;return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? i += “?gdpr=” + Number(t.gdprApplies) + “&gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString : i += “?gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString),A = !0,{type: “iframe”,url: n + i}}},transformBidParams: function(e, r) {return l.convertTypes({accountId: “number”,siteId: “number”,zoneId: “number”}, e)}};function m() {return [window.screen.width, window.screen.height].join(“x”)}function b(e, r) {var t = f.config.getConfig(“pageUrl”);return e.params.referrer ? t = e.params.referrer : t || (t = r.refererInfo.referer),e.params.secure ? t.replace(/^http:/i, “https:”) : t}function _(e, r) {var t = e.params;if (“video” === r) {var i = [];return t.video && t.video.playerWidth && t.video.playerHeight ? i = [t.video.playerWidth, t.video.playerHeight] : Array.isArray(l.deepAccess(e, “mediaTypes.video.playerSize”)) && 1 === e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length ? i = e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0] : Array.isArray(e.sizes) && 0

    (CNN)Donald Trump, the President who refused to release his tax returns, just made an unexpected gesture towards transparency, saying he’d be happy for Americans to see Robert Mueller’s final report.

      Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/21/politics/donald-trump-robert-mueller-report-public/index.html

      In 2016, Donald Trump overwhelmed 16 qualified Republican primary rivals and became the first major-party presidential nominee without prior political or military experience. Against even greater odds, Trump defeated in the general election a far better funded and politically connected Hillary Clinton.

      What are his chances of repeating that surprising victory in 2020?

      In 2016, Trump had no record to run on. That blank slate fueled claims that such a political novice could not possibly succeed. It also added an element of mystery and excitement, with the possibility that an outsider could come into town to clean up the mess.

      Trump now has a record, not just promises. Of course, his base supporters and furious opponents have widely different views of the Trump economy and foreign policy.

      Yet many independents will see successes since 2017, even if some are turned off by Trump’s tweets. Still, if things at home and abroad stay about the same or improve, without a war or recession, Trump will likely win enough swing states to repeat his 2016 Electoral College victory.

      If, however, unemployment spikes, inflation returns or we get into a war, he may not.

      At about the same time in their respective presidencies, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama had approval ratings similar to Trump’s. In Clinton’s first midterms, Democrats lost 14 more House seats than Republicans lost last November. Democrats under Obama lost 23 more seats in his first midterms than Republicans lost under Trump. Democrats lost eight Senate seats in 1994 during Clinton’s first term. They lost six Senate seats in 2010 during Obama’s first term. Republicans actually picked up two Senate seats last fall.

      Yet Clinton and Obama handily won re-election over, respectively, Bob Dole and Mitt Romney. In other words, the 2020 election is likely Trump’s to win or lose.

      It’s also worth remembering that Trump does not exist in a vacuum. In 2016, many voters preferred Trump because he was not the unpopular Hillary Clinton.

      In 2020, there will be an even starker choice. Trump, now an incumbent, will likely run on the premise that he is the only thing standing between voters and socialism.

      The power of that warning will depend on whether the Democrats continue their present hard-left trajectory or the eventual Democratic nominee manages to avoid getting tagged with what are as of now extreme progressive talking points.

      The Green New Deal, a wealth tax, a top marginal income tax rate of 70 percent, the abolition of ICE, the abolition of the Electoral College, reparations, legal infanticide as abortion, the cancellation of student debt, free college tuition, Medicare for all and the banning of private insurance plans are not winning, 51 percent issues.

      If the Democratic nominee embraces most of these fringe advocacies — or is forced by the hard left to run on some of them — he or she will lose. If the Democrats nominate Sen. Kamala Harris, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Sen. Bernie Sanders or Sen. Cory Booker, Trump will seem moderate by comparison and have more relative experience at both presidential campaigning and governance.

      Also, with a few notable exceptions such as John F. Kennedy and Barack Obama, senators do not have a good record of winning the presidency.

      If the Democrats nominate a veteran politician such as former Vice President Joe Biden, then the two rivals will be more equally matched in appealing to the middle classes.

      Another thing to consider: What will the Mueller investigation and a flurry of House investigations of Trump look like by November 2020?

      If special counsel Robert Mueller concludes that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, then Trump’s charges of a “witch hunt” will more than likely stick. But if Mueller’s investigation proves that Trump negotiated with the Russians to stop the Clinton campaign, Trump will be in considerable trouble.

      At some point, all the progressive obsessions to abort the Trump administration — the efforts to warp the voting of the Electoral College electors; to invoke the 25th Amendment, the Logan Act and the emoluments clause; and to thwart Trump from the inside, as former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and the anonymous New York Times editorialist have detailed — have to show results.

      If they do not by 2020, then these attempts will be seen more as bitter-end vendettas. And they may work in Trump’s favor, making him appear a victim of an unprecedented and extraconstitutional assault. Then, in Nietzschean terms, anything that did not end Trump will only have made him stronger.

      Finally, Trump himself is not static.

      For a while, relative calm has returned to the White House. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, national security adviser John Bolton and Attorney General William Barr are more in sync with Trump’s style and message than the previous holders of those positions.

      Trump himself often displays more self-deprecation. Like other incumbents, Trump may be becoming savvier about the complexities of the job.

      Democrats think 2020 will be an easy win over a controversial and often wounded president. Republicans thought the same thing in 2012.

      (C) 2019 TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.

      Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. His latest book is The Savior Generals from BloomsburyBooks. You can reach him by e-mailing author@victorhanson.com.

       

      Source Article from https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/can_trump_win_again_in_2020_139809.html

      Li “Cindy” Yang the embattled Floridian former spa owner defended President Donald Trump in an interview with ABC News saying: “He’s saying ‘make America great again’.”

      “I totally believed he’s a business person,” she added. “I’m a small business person too. I believe that we will make America great again. ”

      Yang spoke to ABC News days after high-ranking Democrats in the House and Senate sent a letter to the FBI requesting criminal and counterintelligence investigations into her. She told ABC News she is not a Chinese spy or intelligence threat and said the Democrats investigation makes no sense to her.

      Yang said she is “scared” and feels the Democrats are pushing “fake news.”

      She said she is Chinese, doesn’t speak English well and said she is “scared [to] talk.” She has “a picture with the president. That’s the reason I’m sitting here [telling] the people the truth.”

      She told ABC News correspondent Tara Palmeri that Trump and New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft were not clients of the spa during her ownership.

      “That place, I sold it seven years ago,” Yang said referring to her former day spa. “Without the picture, nobody would care that I am the previous owner.”

      Yang also said she never sold access to the president or the Trump family, despite a website that advertised access to the president.

      Evan Turk, one of Yang’s attorneys, told ABC News his client wasn’t “promoting access — she was networking.”

      “There’s a lot of people in this country that take pictures with famous people,” Turk said. “[And] you have to understand that in other countries, a picture is worth a thousand words.”

      Yang also denied being a part of any illegal activity including human trafficking.

      Yang was suddenly thrust into the national spotlight earlier this month in the wake of a Miami Herald report that said she was the previous owner of a massage parlor where Kraft, a longtime Trump friend, allegedly solicited prostitution. Kraft has pleaded not guilty, and Yang’s attorneys stress that Yang sold that particular massage parlor six years prior to Kraft’s arrest.

      Cindy Yang/Facebook
      A photo posted on Facebook shows Cindy Yang with President Donald Trump’s son, Eric Trump.

      But Yang’s story took on a different dimension when she was later identified by Mother Jones as having founded a consulting firm called GY US Investments LLC targeting Chinese businesspeople and advertising among its services access to Trump, his family and administration officials at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago country club.

      The mostly Chinese-language website for the consulting firm has been taken down, but an archived version reviewed by ABC News shows the company suggested it could secure dinners and access to events where Trump and Trump associates were present, according to a translation of the Chinese text.

      Yang’s Facebook page, now disabled, hosted photos of her posing with Trump, Eric Trump and Donald Jr., among others.

      Yang told ABC News she is a big supporter of the president having raised over $31,000 since 2017 and her message to friends and family: “I just tell everybody to raise money.”

      Yang said she is not a member of the President’s Florida club but has attended as either a guest of friends or bought tickets to some of the many charities that host events at Mar-a-Lago.

      “Everybody can go in when you pay the money for the charity,” Yang told ABC.

      Cindy Yang/Facebook
      A photo posted on Facebook shows Cindy Yang with President Donald Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.

      In their letter, Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., Senate Judiciary Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said that the reported allegations against Yang, “if true,” raised “serious counterintelligence concerns.”

      “…[A]lthough Ms. Yang’s activities may only be those of an unscrupulous actor allegedly selling access to politicians for profit, her activities also could permit adversary governments or their agents access to these same politicians to acquire potential material for blackmail or other even more nefarious purposes,” the letter said.

      Michelle Merson, an attorney for Yang, previously told ABC News that Yang was wrongly accused.

      “Mrs. Yang loves this country,” Merson said last week. “She has lived a quiet life, doing good things for herself, her family and her community.”

      The Democrats also asked the FBI to investigate allegations of sex trafficking, though Yang was not arrested in the sting that netted Kraft and has not been accused by wrongdoing by authorities. Merson said no sexual misconduct took place at Yang’s establishments.

      In a statement Tuesday the National Committee of Asian American Republicans, for which Yang had worked since 2015 and until recently, came to her defense. The group, also known as Asian GOP, called Yang one of their “top volunteers,” saying they are unaware of any wrongdoing and suggesting the allegations against Yang were part of a “fierce domestic political fight.”

      Spokespeople for the FBI told ABC News that, by policy, they could not confirm nor deny the existence of any investigation into Yang.

      Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/spa-owner-cindy-yangtrump-make-america-great/story?id=61812328

      Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., a 2020 presidential candidate, is facing blowback on social media for sharing a video of herself working out during a return campaign visit to Iowa.

      The clip shows Gillibrand, 52,  lifting weights at a gym in the Hawkeye State, wearing a shirt that reads, “Just trying to get some ranch.”

      GILLIBRAND, CHAMPION OF #METOO MOVEMENT, SAW AIDE RESIGN IN PROTEST OVER SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASE

      “Good to be back in Iowa. Do you like my new workout shirt?” Gillibrand asked.

      CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

      The shirt’s message refers to a moment on the campaign trail that went viral last month, in which a restaurant patron in Iowa walked past Gillibrand in search of salad dressing while the senator was speaking to a group of voters.

      On Wednesday, Gillibrand’s tweet was the subject of mockery on social media, with some Twitter users accusing her of trying too hard to “relate to the average American.”

      Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gillibrand-pumped-for-return-to-iowa-gets-slammed-for-cringeworthy-workout-video

      The majority of individuals and groups targeted in House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler’s sweeping request for documents as part of an expansive Trump probe have missed the Nadler-imposed deadline to respond, Fox News has learned, raising questions about whether the chairman is facing his own “resistance.”

      Though the powerful Democratic committee chairman touted the responses he’s gotten in a press release and cable news interview this week, GOP committee sources told Fox News that just eight of the 81 agencies, entities and individuals that were sent requests actually met the Monday deadline. The requests came as part of Nadler’s probe into “alleged obstruction of justice, public corruption, and other abuses of power by President Trump” announced earlier this month.

      HOUSE DEMS LAUNCH EXPANSIVE TRUMP PROBE WITH SLEW OF DOCUMENT REQUESTS

      “The way Democrats are characterizing the response to their investigation is an exaggeration of epic proportions,” a source familiar with the investigation told Fox News on Wednesday.

      Earlier this week, Nadler said the committee had received a response from a “large number of the recipients” and many of them had “either sent or agreed to send documents to the Committee.”

      “Those documents already number in the tens of thousands,” Nadler said in a press release Monday.

      On Monday evening, Nadler appeared on MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow,” again saying tens of thousands of documents have been submitted to the committee.

      “A lot of people have responded, entities have responded. Some have said that … they will work with us, some have said they will respond if we give them a subpoena,” Nadler told Maddow on Monday. “We will be talking to people seeing if we can reach accommodations with them. Ultimately, people have to respond to us unless the president personally votes an executive privilege, which is a rare thing.”

      He added: “They have no immunity. They have to respond to us.”

      NADLER: ‘WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THI SIS NOT A DICTATORSHIP’

      But a Republican committee aide told Fox News that only the following individuals and groups have responded: Former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, who submitted 47 pages; former Trump national security adviser J.D. Gordon, who provided 51 pages; the National Rifle Association, which submitted 1,466 pages; Russian lobbyist Rinat Akhmetshin, who attended the infamous 2016 Trump Tower meeting and provided 467 pages; former Trump political adviser Sam Nunberg, who sent 23 pages; former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who sent 2,688 pages; Trump inaugural committee chair Tom Barrack, who sent 3,349 pages; and the 58th Presidential Inaugural Committee, which provided 104 pages.

      The aide also told Fox News that Brittany Kaiser, the former director of Cambridge Analytica, a data company that worked for the Trump campaign, has told the committee she has sent 178 pages by mail in response to her request, but the committee has not yet received those documents. Further, Fox News has learned that former Trump campaign adviser Michael Caputo has responded, but not provided documents.

      While Nadler touted receiving tens of thousands of documents, the GOP aide disputed that count.

      “Either Democrats are deliberately concealing committee records—which confirms they’re invested in partisan inquisitions more than credible oversight—or they are deliberately misrepresenting the facts to the press and American public. Which is it?” the aide said in an email.

      Asked for a comment, a Nadler aide disputed the characterization and cited a Politico story that mentioned a couple other individuals who could cooperate soon. The aide stood by Nadler’s original statement, noting some documents are in transit.

      “We said received or are in transit, and we stand by that 100%” the aide said in an email.

      However, Caputo recently had warned that some targets of Nadler’s probe might not cooperate, including himself.

      “I’m not gonna play,” Caputo said earlier this month on Fox News, adding in a later interview that he would not go back to testify on Capitol Hill.

      “At the end of the day … I’ve been doing this for two years. It’s a long dance,” Caputo said on “Tucker Carlson Tonight last week. “I’ve testified three times under oath. Each time to the same questions, each time cost me half a year’s salary. And here we go again just as my family was waiting to press play on our lives. I’ve got nothing left.”

      Caputo told Fox News on Wednesday that he was actually the first of 81 targets to respond, but ultimately told the committee that he did not have any of the documents they wanted. He does not plan to cooperate further.

      In addition to Caputo, Nadler sent document requests to Trump family members, like Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump and Jared Kushner; former administration figures like former chief of staff Reince Priebus, former national security adviser Michael Flynn, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and former spokeswoman Hope Hicks; along with Trump campaign figures like Brad Parscale and Corey Lewandowski.

      The probe itself cast a wide net, drilling deep into virtually every aspect of Trump’s administration and business ventures — as well as his connections to organizations ranging from the National Rifle Association (NRA) to WikiLeaks.

      Nadler’s letters to Trump’s oldest sons asked questions about events that happened in the White House after their father was elected, including the firing of FBI Director James Comey and discussions surrounding the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

      Several other people related to the Trump Organization were sent letters, including the Trump Organization itself, Allen Weisselberg, the company’s chief financial officer and Rhona Graff, Trump’s longtime assistant. Among other matters, the company officials were asked to provide documents regarding “any loan, financing transaction, or capital investment by the Russian Federation, any Russian national, any Russian business, or any other Russian entity to the Trump Organization.”

      Additionally, Nadler’s panel requested documents from Julian Assange and his website, WikiLeaks, which published emails stolen from Democrats during the 2016 campaign.

      Meanwhile, another powerful Democratic chairman has openly complained that his committee is not getting responses. In a Washington Post op-ed, House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., wrote: “The White House has not turned over a single piece of paper to our committee or made a single official available for testimony during the 116th Congress.” This, in response to a dozen letters Cummings has sent to the White House on various topics.

      Fox News’ Alex Pappas and Gregg Re contributed to this report. 

      Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/top-dems-probe-targets-miss-deadline-document-request

      New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced plans to ban nearly all military-style semi-automatic and assault rifles on Thursday, six days after a gunman killed 50 people at two mosques in Christchurch.

      At a dramatic news conference, Ardern lamented that previous attempts to reform the country’s gun laws had fallen short and declared that “the time for the mass and easy availability of these weapons must end, and today they will.”

      While Ardern characterized the policy as an immediate ban, she then clarified that it would be submitted to Parliament as legislation the first week of April.

      In the meantime, Ardern said, the government will sharply restrict access to “virtually all” such weapons by reclassifying them to require a police permit — which will be denied.

      “I can assure people that there is no point in applying for such a permit,” she said.

      The government will offer generous compensation for New Zealanders to sell their weapons to the government for destruction. She said the buyback program would cost $100 million to $200 million.

      Police Minister Stuart Nash said the legislation would include “narrow exemptions for legitimate business use,” including use by police, the military and “professional pest control.”

      A government statement said the practical effect of the exemptions would be to continue to allow possession of .22 caliber semi-automatic “rimfire” firearms with magazines holding no more than 10 rounds, as well as semi-automatic and pump-action shotguns with non-detachable tubular magazines holding no more than five rounds.

      A student pays respect at a memorial site for the victims of mosque attacks in Christchurch, New Zealand, on March 19.William West / AFP – Getty Images file

      “To owners who have legitimate uses for their guns, I want to reiterate that the actions being announced today are not because of you and are not directed at you,” Ardern said. “Our actions, on behalf of all New Zealanders, are directed at making sure this never happens again.”

      Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/new-zealand-seeks-quick-ban-nearly-all-semi-automatic-weapons-n985686

      The pilots on the doomed Lion Air flight did not appear to understand why the jet was tipping downward and how to correct that problem. One flipped through a technical manual, and the other began to pray, according to the cockpit voice recording.

      An investigation is still underway to determine what caused the crash in Ethiopia. A possible fault in the MCAS system is part of the inquiry, and the authorities in Ethiopia have said that a preliminary review of the “black boxes” — voice recording and flight data — revealed similarities to the Indonesian crash.

      But experts have cautioned that any conclusions at this stage of an investigation are preliminary and could change.

      On Wednesday in Washington, the F.A.A. published a notification to regulators in other countries reiterating that Boeing was preparing a software upgrade for the 737 Max along with training to accompany the updated software.

      The F.A.A. said its review of the new software and training was “an agency priority, as will be the rollout of any software, training or other measures to operators of the 737 Max.”

      The message from the F.A.A. did not reveal any new information about what may have led to the crash in Ethiopia. “Understanding the circumstances that contributed to this accident is critical in developing further actions and returning aircraft to service,” the F.A.A. said.

      In a further sign of scrutiny facing Boeing and the F.A.A., a Senate subcommittee on aviation and space said it was planning a hearing next Wednesday on airline safety.

      “In light of the recent tragedy in Ethiopia and the subsequent grounding of the Boeing 737 Max aircraft, this hearing will examine challenges to the state of commercial aviation safety, including any specific concerns highlighted by recent accidents,” the subcommittee said in a statement.

      Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/world/africa/ethiopian-boeing-training-simulator.html

      Kellyanne and George Conway have spent the last two years on public tenterhooks, navigating a fragile peace as the counselor to President Trump has remained a faithful agent of the White House her husband has publicly admonished. But thanks to Twitter, as with all things in Trump world, the president has forced Kellyanne into an inevitable loyalty test: choosing between her boss and her husband.

      [Read: Kellyanne Conway takes Trump’s side in fracas with husband George]

      In all fairness, it’s shocking that it took this long for our onion-thin skinned president to start shitposting about his most loyal and competent aide’s husband. While it’s almost funny to watch none other than Trump criticize someone’s job as a husband, it indicates that you either leave the White House a hero — or domestic abuser — or survive long enough to be forced through a humiliating loyalty test for no other reason than the president’s ego.

      The ideal route is the rare one traveled by Nikki Haley and Hope Hicks. They managed to skirt the brunt of the palace intrigue that plagues the White House and swiftly departed while still in Trump’s good graces. Then there are those, such as James Mattis, who left with dignity, refusing to cross a hard line of ethics.

      The third, unfortunate camp winds up in the crosshairs of Trump’s ire.

      George Conway should know better than to act as Trump’s armchair therapist, attempting to diagnose the president with mental disorders. While Conway’s well within his rights to critique Trump on the basis of the law or even his behavior, no ethical doctor in the country issues public diagnoses based on external observation. And Conway is not even a doctor. To publicly and repeatedly play with wildfire, knowing that you can directly make your wife’s life hell by provoking her rage-fueled boss, is just selfish.

      But it’s still a marriage, and by default, more sacrosanct than any other relationship in Kellyanne’s life.

      Trump has approximately 100 million detractors per day that he can rip on to get that much needed Twitter catharsis. While George Conway’s been a big player in the Republican Party for about three times as long as Trump’s even been a Republican — just Google search ” George Conway Ann Coulter” or ” George Conway Bill Clinton” if you’re unfamiliar — Trump still has much higher profile critics to dump on if need be. Kellyanne’s been one of his most faithful and proficient senior staffers for more than two years now. He couldn’t just extend her the courtesy of ignoring her husband’s petty tweets?

      Well, no, because this is Trump. Rather than turn a blind eye to a few snide remarks in exchange for keeping one of his greatest assets in the White House, he would gamble on her choosing public humiliation over her marriage.

      As Leo Tolstoy once noted, happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way. We cannot know the inner workings of the Conway marriage, nor are we entitled to. It’s fully possible that they have a don’t ask, don’t tell policy regarding the president in their private relationship, and perhaps this will all blow over. But I know of few happy families built on an agreement where a husband fuels the fire that forces the wife to publicly betray either her boss or her marriage.

      Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/trumps-loyalty-test-to-kellyanne-conway-me-or-your-marriage

      March 20 (Reuters) – The flooding that devastated the U.S. Midwest is likely to last into next week, as rain and melted snow flow into Kansas, Missouri and Mississippi, the National Weather Service said. Floods driven by melting snow in the Dakotas will persist even as Nebraska and Iowa dig out from storms that have killed four people, left one missing and caused more than a billion dollars in damage to crops, livestock and roads.

      “It’s already not looking good downstream for the middle and lower Mississippi and Missouri (rivers) into Kansas, Mississippi and Missouri,” Bob Oravec, a meteorologist with the NWS’s Weather Prediction Center, said early Wednesday.

      The floodwaters have inundated a swath of Iowa and Nebraska along the Missouri River, North America’s longest river. Half of Iowa’s 99 counties have declared states of emergency.

      “That snow pack is still there and it’s going to keep melting, and that’s bad news,” Oravec said.

      About an inch of rain is predicted for Saturday in the region, Oravec said. “It’s not a lot, but any precipitation is bad right now.”

      Vice President Mike Pence toured some of Nebraska Tuesday and promised to help expedite federal help to the region.

      Gabe Schmidt, owner of Liquid Trucking, back right, travels by air boat with Glenn Wyles, top left, Mitch Snyder, bottom right, and Juan Jacobo, bottom left, as they survey damage from the flood waters of the Platte River, in Plattsmouth, Neb., Sunday, March 17, 2019. Hundreds of people remained out of their homes in Nebraska, but rivers there were starting to recede. The National Weather Service said the Elkhorn River remained at major flood stage but was dropping. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

      Gabe Schmidt, owner of Liquid Trucking, right, talks to Glenn Wyles, second right, as they survey by air boat flood damage from the flood waters of the Platte River, in Plattsmouth, Neb., Sunday, March 17, 2019. Hundreds of people remained out of their homes in Nebraska, but rivers there were starting to recede. The National Weather Service said the Elkhorn River remained at major flood stage but was dropping. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

      Gabe Schmidt, owner of Liquid Trucking, top right, travels by air boat with Glenn Wyles, top left, Mitch Snyder, bottom left, and Juan Jacobo, bottom right, as they survey damage from the flood waters of the Platte River, in Plattsmouth, Neb., Sunday, March 17, 2019. Hundreds of people remained out of their homes in Nebraska, but rivers there were starting to recede. The National Weather Service said the Elkhorn River remained at major flood stage but was dropping. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

      Vice President Mike Pence and Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, second right point to flooded areas, with Neb. Gov. Pete Ricketts, left, during a helicopter flight over areas affected by the flooding of the Missouri and Elkhorn Rivers, Tuesday, March 19, 2019, in Nebraska. Pence flew to Omaha, Neb., Tuesday to view damage and to offer support to first responders, volunteers and those displaced by the floods. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

      RETRANSMISSION TO CORRECT SURNAME – Tom Wilke, center, his son Chad, right, and Nick Kenny, load a boat out of the swollen waters of the North Fork of the Elkhorn River after checking on the Witke’s flooded property, in Norfolk, Neb., Friday, March 15, 2019. Heavy rain falling atop deeply frozen ground has prompted evacuations along swollen rivers in Wisconsin, Nebraska and other Midwestern states. Thousands of people have been urged to evacuate along eastern Nebraska rivers as a massive late-winter storm has pushed streams and rivers out of their banks throughout the Midwest. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)




      Nebraska, Iowa and Wisconsin and Mississippi all declared states of emergency after the floods, which stemmed from a powerful winter hurricane last week. The flooding killed livestock, destroyed grains and soybeans in storage and cut off access to farms because of road and rail damage.

      Authorities said they had rescued nearly 300 people in Nebraska alone, with some rivers continuing to rise. Rescuers could be seen in boats pulling pets from flooded homes. Some roadways crumbled to rubble and sections of others were submerged. In Hamburg, Iowa, floodwaters covered buildings.

      $1 BILLION IN DAMAGE

      Nebraska officials estimated flood damage for the state’s agriculture at more than $1 billion so far, according to Craig Head, vice president of issue management at the Nebraska Farm Bureau. Head said that was likely to grow as floodwaters recede.

      “It’s really too early to know for sure how bad this is going to get. But one thing we do know: It’s catastrophic for farmers,” said Matt Perdue, government relations director for the National Farmers Union. “We’re hoping it’s only $1 billion, but that’s only a hope.”

      Nebraska officials estimate the floods have also caused $553 million in damage to public infrastructure and other assets, and $89 million to privately owned assets, according to the state’s Emergency Management Agency on Tuesday.

      The water covered about a third of Offutt Air Force Base near Omaha, Nebraska, home to the U.S. Strategic Command, whose responsibilities include defending against and responding to nuclear attacks.

      The Army Corps of Engineers is distributing 400,000 sandbags to operators of 12 levees along the Missouri River in Missouri and Kansas that are threatened by flooding, the Army Corps said in a news release on Tuesday.

      Roads leading to the Nebraska Public Power District’s Cooper nuclear plant near Brownville were engulfed by floodwaters from the Missouri, but the facility was still operating safely at full power on Tuesday.

      The plant operator was flying staff members and supplies to the plant by helicopter, power district spokesman Mark Becker said.

      Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/weather/2019/03/20/flooding-will-continue-into-next-week-in-storm-ravaged-midwest/23696462/

      “);var a = g[r.size_id].split(“x”).map((function(e) {return Number(e)})), s = u(a, 2);o.width = s[0],o.height = s[1]}o.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce((function(e, r) {return e[r.key] = r.values[0],e}), {rpfl_elemid: n.adUnitCode}),e.push(o)} else l.logError(“Rubicon bid adapter Error: bidRequest undefined at index position:” + t, c, d);return e}), []).sort((function(e, r) {return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0)}))},getUserSyncs: function(e, r, t) {if (!A && e.iframeEnabled) {var i = “”;return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? i += “?gdpr=” + Number(t.gdprApplies) + “&gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString : i += “?gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString),A = !0,{type: “iframe”,url: n + i}}},transformBidParams: function(e, r) {return l.convertTypes({accountId: “number”,siteId: “number”,zoneId: “number”}, e)}};function m() {return [window.screen.width, window.screen.height].join(“x”)}function b(e, r) {var t = f.config.getConfig(“pageUrl”);return e.params.referrer ? t = e.params.referrer : t || (t = r.refererInfo.referer),e.params.secure ? t.replace(/^http:/i, “https:”) : t}function _(e, r) {var t = e.params;if (“video” === r) {var i = [];return t.video && t.video.playerWidth && t.video.playerHeight ? i = [t.video.playerWidth, t.video.playerHeight] : Array.isArray(l.deepAccess(e, “mediaTypes.video.playerSize”)) && 1 === e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length ? i = e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0] : Array.isArray(e.sizes) && 0

      (CNN)An off-duty pilot in the cockpit of a Boeing 737 Max 8 jet jumped in to help crew disable a malfunctioning flight-control system as it experienced difficulties in October, according to Bloomberg.

        Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/20/asia/lion-air-third-pilot-intl/index.html

        One can spend several days trying not to overreact to President Trump’s latest, unprovoked tweetstorm against the late Sen. John McCain R-Ariz., yet still conclude that there is something sick and twisted about Trump’s obsession with the singular American hero Trump disparages.

        Tom Rogan already in these pages has eloquently explained why, fake heel spurs or no fake heel spurs, Trump could never be fit to wear McCain’s discarded shoes. And lawyer George Conway, husband of top Trump aide Kellyanne Conway, has presented a persuasive case that Trump’s fulminations about McCain and other bizarre eruptions are signs of a personality disorder.

        What remains, though, is a reminder that on facts as well as fulminations, Trump’s flip-out against McCain is full of falsehoods.

        First, as many others have noted, Trump repeatedly accused McCain of trying to spread the so-called “Steele dossier” as a way to block Trump’s election, but the undisputed evidence shows McCain didn’t even become aware of the dossier until after Election Day. (Plus, McCain did exactly what a senator should do when provided such material: He turned it over to the FBI, without prejudice. But that’s beside the point about Trump’s dishonesty.)

        [Related: Trump: ‘I was never a fan of John McCain and I never will be’]

        What has not been as adequately refuted is Trump’s allegation that McCain voted against a bill to “repeal and replace” Obamacare, and that McCain’s vote was a big surprise. Neither element of that story is true.

        First, by the time a healthcare bill finally reached a vote in the Senate, it was in no way, shape or form a “repeal and replace” bill. In reality, it was a shell of a bill known as “skinny repeal,” which did next to nothing other than keep a title and fulfill a promise to repeal the individual and employer mandates from Obamacare. The bill, in short, was an absolute sham. On its own terms, as even most of its supporters admitted, it made no sense, but would have thrown the healthcare market into absolute turmoil.

        Instead, skinny repeal was meant only to keep alive the anti-Obamacare effort until something could be concocted behind the closed doors of a conference committee with members of the House.

        As neither the House nor the Senate versions had been vetted in open committee hearings, and as the Senate’s skinny repeal was such a sham anyway, McCain reasoned that whatever emerged from conference committee would be seen by the public as illegitimate. He may or may not have been right in that assessment, but it was not unreasonable. And, as skinny repeal itself was a fraud, McCain was indisputably not breaking his pledge to support a repeal of Obamacare combined with a free-market replacement.

        Not only that, but he believed, correctly, that the one substantive element of skinny repeal, the elimination of the individual mandate, could be accomplished anyway — as, indeed, it was, in the GOP tax reform bill that later became law. Thus, McCain’s vote effectively blocked no GOP progress on that front, none at all.

        Finally, it is just a lie to say McCain had not signaled his intentions, and his reasoning, well in advance. Two days earlier, in his tour de force of a major floor speech upon his return to the Senate from his initial cancer treatment, McCain signaled quite clearly where he stood [with my emphases in Italics]:

        I will not vote for the bill as it is today. It’s a shell of a bill right now. We all know that. I have changes urged by my state’s governor that will have to be included to earn my support for final passage of any bill. I know many of you will have to see the bill changed substantially for you to support it. We’ve tried to do this by coming up with a proposal behind closed doors in consultation with the administration, then springing it on skeptical members, trying to convince them it’s better than nothing, asking us to swallow our doubts and force it past a unified opposition. I don’t think that is going to work in the end. And it probably shouldn’t.”

        And he continued in that vein for several more paragraphs.

        McCain’s argument was one of deepest principle. Even those of us who would have reluctantly voted for skinny repeal in order to keep the whole effort alive could recognize the wisdom in McCain’s position.

        So, McCain did not kill a “repeal and replace” bill, and he blindsided nobody by voting against the bill that finally emerged. Trump is lying about McCain, and it’s time for him to stop it.

        Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/trump-should-stop-attacking-and-lying-about-mccain

        BOSTON — In 1850, a Swiss-born Harvard University professor commissioned what are believed to be the earliest photos of American slaves. 

        The images, known as daguerreotypes and taken in a South Carolina studio, are crude and dehumanizing — and they were used to promote racist beliefs.

        Among the photographed: an African man named Renty and his daughter Delia. They were stripped naked and photographed from several angles. Professor Louis Agassiz, a biologist, had the photos taken to support an erroneous theory called polygenism that he and others used to argue African-Americans were inferior to white people.

        Now, a woman who claims to be a direct descendant of that father and child – Tamara Lanier, the great-great-great granddaughter of Renty – is suing Harvard over the photos.

        She’s accused Harvard of the wrongful seizure, possession and monetization of the images, ignoring her requests to “stop licensing the pictures for the university’s profit” and misrepresenting the ancestor she calls “Papa Renty.”

        The university still owns the photos. Lanier, who resides in Connecticut and filed the suit against Harvard in Middlesex County Superior Court on Wednesday, is seeking an unspecified amount of damages from Harvard. She’s also demanding that the university give her family the photos.

        In an interview with USA TODAY, Lanier said she’s presented Harvard with information about her direct lineage to Renty since around 2011 but the school has repeatedly turned down her requests to review the research.

        “This will force them to look at my information. It will also force them to publicly have the discussion about who Renty was and restoring him his dignity.”

        The suit, which lays out eight different legal claims, cites federal law over property rights, the Massachusetts law for the recovery of personal property and a separate state law about the unauthorized use of a name or picture for advertising purposes.

        It also singles out the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which abolished slavery, arguing that Harvard’s ongoing possession of the photos “reflects and is a continuation of core components or incidents of slavery.”

        “For years, Papa Renty’s slave owners profited from his suffering – it’s time for Harvard to stop doing the same thing to our family,” Lanier said.

        Who was Renty?

        She called Renty a “proud man who, like so many enslaved men, women and children, endured years of unimaginable horrors.”

        “Harvard’s refusal to honor our family’s history by acknowledging our lineage and its own shameful past is an insult to Papa Renty’s life and memory.”

        The suit further claims Harvard has “never sufficiently repudiated Agassiz and his work.”

        Harvard did not immediately return a request for comment shortly after the suit was filed.

        Lanier is represented by the law firms of national civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump of Florida, who has worked high-profile cases for the families of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, as well as Connecticut-based attorney Michael Koskoff.

        The photos taken in 1850 of Renty, Delia and 11 other slaves disappeared for more than a century but were rediscovered in 1976 in the attic of Harvard University’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. 

        One of the photos of Renty, showing him waist-up as he looks defiantly into the camera with a straight face, has four decades later turned into an iconic image of slavery in the U.S.  

        The lawsuit argues that Harvard has used the Renty images to “enrich itself.” The image is on the the cover of a 2017 book, “From Site to Sight: Anthropology, Photography and the Power of Imagery,” published by the Peabody Museum and sold online by Harvard for $40.

        The same photo was also displayed on the program for a 2017 conference that Harvard’s Radcliffe Institute for Advance Study hosted on the school’s relationship with slavery. 

        According to Lanier’s attorneys, Harvard requires that people sign a contract in order to view the photos and pay a licensing fee to the university to reproduce the images.

        Archives: Harvard Law drops controversial seal

        “These images were taken under duress and Harvard has no right to keep them, let alone profit from them,” Koskoff said. “They are the rightful property of the descendants of Papa Renty.”

        He accused Harvard of not wanting to tell the “full story” of how Renty’s image was seized – against the will of slaves for a professor who sought to “prove the inferiority” of the black race.

        “Harvard continues to this day to honor him, and that’s an abomination,” Koskoff said.

        The suit tries to chart how Lanier, a former chief probation officer in Norwich, Connecticut, has on multiple occasion sought to engage the university about the photos to no avail.

        How the lawsuit began

        Her attorneys say it began in 2011 when she wrote a letter to Harvard’s president at the time, Drew Faust, whose “evasive response” did not provide an opportunity to discuss returning the photos to Lanier’s family.

        Five years later, she said she reached out to the student-run Harvard Crimson newspaper, but that its editor relayed that the story had been “killed” due to concerns by the Peabody Museum. 

        In the university’s use of the images, plaintiffs contend that Harvard has “avoided the fact that the daguerreotypes were part of a study, overseen by a Harvard professor, to demonstrate racial inferiority of blacks.”

        “When will they not condone slavery and finally free Renty? Because their actions denote something different than what they might say,” Crump said of Harvard.

        “We are trying to tell as many people throughout America, and especially black people, that Renty does deserve the right to have his image. He was 169 years a slave, but based on this lawsuit, we sought to make sure he would be a slave no more.”

        Agassiz was considered one of the greatest biologists and geologists in the world in the mid-19th century. But his record has become problematic over time. He was an opponent of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. And in fiercely subscribing to polygenism, he held the now-debunked belief that white people and African-Americans came from different species. 

        The photos he commissioned were taken by J.T. Zealy in a studio in Columbia, South Carolina. He published them a month later in an article titled “The Diversity of Origin of the Human Races.”

        Agassiz’s legacy still lives on at Harvard. He founded the school’s Museum of Comparative Zoology and his wife Elizabeth Cary Agassiz, also a Harvard researcher of natural history, was founder and the first president of Radcliffe College, now the Society for the Collegiate Instruction of Women. There’s a street in Cambridge named after Agassiz and a Harvard theater, the Agassiz House. 

        Lanier has spent years researching and talking to genealogical experts who she said have validated her ancestry. 

        Lanier said she began studying her lineage after her mother died in 2010 to follow up on family stories she heard about Papa Renty. She worked with Boston genealogist Chris Child, who is known for tracing ancestors of Barack Obama, according to a 2018 article in the Norwich Bulletin.

        “It was a journey,” she said. “It was important to my mother that I write this story of who Papa Renty was down and to do a family tree.

        “I made a promise to my mother,” she added. 

        According to the newspaper, Lanier said that she believes she can trace her great-grandfather, named Renty Taylor and then Renty Thompson, to a plantation near Columbia, South Carolina, owned by Benjamin Franklin Taylor. This is where the photos are believed to have been taken.

        She said she started providing Harvard evidence that she’s a descendant of Renty but that the school has been “non-responsive.” “Most importantly, I want the true story of who Renty is to be told. That’s all I’ve ever asked for.”

        The Bulletin quoted Pamela Gerardi, the Peabody Museum’s director of external relations, who described the photos as “extremely delicate” and well cared for.

        “We anticipate they will remain here in perpetuity,” she said at the time. “That’s what museums do.”

         

         

        Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/03/20/harvard-university-sued-descendants-slaves-over-photos-renty/3213537002/

        JAKARTA/SINGAPORE/PARIS (Reuters) – The pilots of a doomed Lion Air Boeing 737 MAX scoured a handbook as they struggled to understand why the jet was lurching downwards, but ran out of time before it hit the water, three people with knowledge of the cockpit voice recorder contents said.

        The investigation into the crash, which killed all 189 people on board in October, has taken on new relevance as the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and other regulators grounded the model last week after a second deadly accident in Ethiopia.

        Investigators examining the Indonesian crash are considering how a computer ordered the plane to dive in response to data from a faulty sensor and whether the pilots had enough training to respond appropriately to the emergency, among other factors.

        It is the first time the voice recorder contents from the Lion Air flight have been made public. The three sources discussed them on condition of anonymity.

        Reuters did not have access to the recording or transcript.

        A Lion Air spokesman said all data and information had been given to investigators and declined to comment further.

        The captain was at the controls of Lion Air flight JT610 when the nearly new jet took off from Jakarta, and the first officer was handling the radio, according to a preliminary report issued in November.

        Just two minutes into the flight, the first officer reported a “flight control problem” to air traffic control and said the pilots intended to maintain an altitude of 5,000 feet, the November report said.

        The first officer did not specify the problem, but one source said airspeed was mentioned on the cockpit voice recording, and a second source said an indicator showed a problem on the captain’s display but not the first officer’s.

        The captain asked the first officer to check the quick reference handbook, which contains checklists for abnormal events, the first source said.

        For the next nine minutes, the jet warned pilots it was in a stall and pushed the nose down in response, the report showed. A stall is when the airflow over a plane’s wings is too weak to generate lift and keep it flying.

        The captain fought to climb, but the computer, still incorrectly sensing a stall, continued to push the nose down using the plane’s trim system. Normally, trim adjusts an aircraft’s control surfaces to ensure it flies straight and level.

        “They didn’t seem to know the trim was moving down,” the third source said. “They thought only about airspeed and altitude. That was the only thing they talked about.”

        Boeing Co declined to comment on Wednesday because the investigation was ongoing.

        The manufacturer has said there is a documented procedure to handle the situation. A different crew on the same plane the evening before encountered the same problem but solved it after running through three checklists, according to the November report.

        But they did not pass on all of the information about the problems they encountered to the next crew, the report said.

        The pilots of JT610 remained calm for most of the flight, the three sources said. Near the end, the captain asked the first officer to fly while he checked the manual for a solution.

        About one minute before the plane disappeared from radar, the captain asked air traffic control to clear other traffic below 3,000 feet and requested an altitude of “five thou”, or 5,000 feet, which was approved, the preliminary report said.

        As the 31-year-old captain tried in vain to find the right procedure in the handbook, the 41-year-old first officer was unable to control the plane, two of the sources said.

        The flight data recorder shows the final control column inputs from the first officer were weaker than the ones made earlier by the captain.

        “It is like a test where there are 100 questions and when the time is up you have only answered 75,” the third source said. “So you panic. It is a time-out condition.”

        The Indian-born captain was silent at the end, all three sources said, while the Indonesian first officer said “Allahu Akbar”, or “God is greatest”, a common Arabic phrase in the majority-Muslim country that can be used to express excitement, shock, praise or distress.

        The plane then hit the water, killing all 189 people on board.

        French air accident investigation agency BEA said on Tuesday the flight data recorder in the Ethiopian crash that killed 157 people showed “clear similarities” to the Lion Air disaster. Since the Lion Air crash, Boeing has been pursuing a software upgrade to change how much authority is given to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, or MCAS, a new anti-stall system developed for the 737 MAX.

        The cause of the Lion Air crash has not been determined, but the preliminary report mentioned the Boeing system, a faulty, recently replaced sensor and the airline’s maintenance and training.

        On the same aircraft the evening before the crash, a captain at Lion Air’s full-service sister carrier, Batik Air, was riding along in the cockpit and solved the similar flight control problems, two of the sources said. His presence on that flight, first reported by Bloomberg, was not disclosed in the preliminary report.

        Slideshow (2 Images)

        The report also did not include data from the cockpit voice recorder, which was not recovered from the ocean floor until January.

        Soerjanto Tjahjono, head of Indonesian investigation agency KNKT, said last week the report could be released in July or August as authorities attempted to speed up the inquiry in the wake of the Ethiopian crash.

        On Wednesday, he declined to comment on the cockpit voice recorder contents, saying they had not been made public.

        Reporting by Cindy Silviana in Jakarta, Jamie Freed in Singapore and Tim Hepher in Paris; writing by Jamie Freed; Editing by Gerry Doyle

        Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-indonesia-crash-exclusive/exclusive-cockpit-voice-recorder-of-doomed-lion-air-jet-depicts-pilots-frantic-search-for-fix-sources-idUSKCN1R10FB

        President Trump’s two appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court — Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — were expected to help bring about a “conservative revolution” on the nation’s highest court. But in two out of three rulings by the court Tuesday, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh found themselves on opposing sides.

        The two cases in which the justices did not agree involved an Indian tribe and Washington state taxes, and another involving maritime law.

        Gorsuch, who was nominated by Trump in 2017 to fill the seat Senate Republicans held open for more than a year after Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in 2016, sided with the liberal justices in ruling that the Yakama Nation doesn’t have to pay a Washington state fuel tax. He cited an 1855 treaty that made a “handful of modest promises” to the tribe, including the right to move goods to market freely.

        CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS’ RECENT VOTES RAISE DOUBTS ABOUT ‘CONSERVATIVE REVOLUTION’ ON SUPREME COURT

        Yakama Nation Chairman JoDe Goudy praised the ruling. In a statement cited by NW News Network, he wrote: “Today marks a decision that reinforces the Yakama way of life, both in historical context as well as modern interpretation.”

        Gorsuch’s opinion was joined only by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the leader of the court’s liberal wing. The other three liberal justices voted for the same outcome, but for different reasons.

        Kavanaugh dissented from the Gorsuch and the liberals. He argued that the 1855 treaty merely gave tribal members equal rights to travel.

        The other case that saw Kavanaugh and Gorsuch at odds addressed a lawsuit brought by two Navy veterans who had been exposed to asbestos. Writing the court’s opinion, Kavanaugh said that the makers of pumps, turbines and blowers that required asbestos insulation to operate properly should have warned about the health dangers of asbestos exposure. This is so, Kavanaugh wrote, even though the companies did not manufacture or sell the asbestos to the Navy. The liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts also were in the majority.

        Gorsuch, whose dissent was joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, wrote that the manufacturers “are at risk of being held responsible retrospectively for failing to warn about other people’s products.”

        CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

        Tuesday’s third case demonstrated the more common alliance of the conservative justices. The court’s decision, which saw Gorsuch and Kavanaugh in lockstep with the other conservatives, gave the federal government broader power to detain immigrants who are awaiting deportation anytime after they have been released from prison on criminal charges. The four liberal justices dissented.

        Fox News’ Andrew O’Reilly and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

        Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2-of-3-supreme-court-cases-see-conservative-justices-at-odds-report

        EL PASO, Texas — Immigration officials say a Mexican migrant died Monday after his arrest near an urban border crossing.

        U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced the death Tuesday, saying agents arrested the 40-year-old man early Sunday for re-entering the country illegally. His identity wasn’t released.

        He died at an El Paso hospital after receiving treatment for flu-like symptoms and liver and kidney failure. He’s the fourth migrant to die in CBP custody since December, including an 8-year-old boy and a 7-year-old girl.

        Border Patrol Commissioner Kevin McAleenan said this month the system “is well beyond capacity and remains at the breaking point.”

        In a statement, ACLU Border Rights Center Director Astrid Dominguez said “a transparent and independent investigation into the conditions at CBP detention facilities and its medical care practices is needed immediately.”

        Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/border-patrol-announces-4th-custody-death-migrant-december-n985221

        Mrs. May is hoping she can still salvage something from the wreckage of her Brexit negotiations by making the delay a short one. Extra time would at least stave off the prospect of a disorderly, economically costly Brexit with no deal next week, which Parliament has made clear it wants to avoid.

        Continental economies would be hit too, if not as severely as Britain’s, by a departure without a deal, so European Union leaders are unlikely to rebuff Mrs. May completely. But their patience is being sorely tested.

        Mrs. May is likely to try to return to Parliament next week and stage another vote on her deal, even though it has been rejected twice by lawmakers by large margins.

        Her plan would give Britain power over immigration from Europe at some point, but would tie the country to the European Union’s customs and trade rules until the end of 2020.

        On Monday, the speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, said the prime minister could not put her deal to a third vote this week, citing parliamentary rules devised in 1604 to prohibit multiple votes on the same proposition.

        Depending on what the talks with the European Union yield, Mrs. May could return with a changed proposition by next week, making it harder for Mr. Bercow to block another effort by Mrs. May to get a vote in Parliament.

        If her deal is rejected again by lawmakers, Mrs. May could be forced to change tack, and perhaps allow Parliament to consider other options, like keeping closer economic ties to the European Union.

        Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/world/europe/theresa-may-brexit-european-union.html

        “);var a = g[r.size_id].split(“x”).map((function(e) {return Number(e)})), s = u(a, 2);o.width = s[0],o.height = s[1]}o.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce((function(e, r) {return e[r.key] = r.values[0],e}), {rpfl_elemid: n.adUnitCode}),e.push(o)} else l.logError(“Rubicon bid adapter Error: bidRequest undefined at index position:” + t, c, d);return e}), []).sort((function(e, r) {return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0)}))},getUserSyncs: function(e, r, t) {if (!A && e.iframeEnabled) {var i = “”;return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? i += “?gdpr=” + Number(t.gdprApplies) + “&gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString : i += “?gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString),A = !0,{type: “iframe”,url: n + i}}},transformBidParams: function(e, r) {return l.convertTypes({accountId: “number”,siteId: “number”,zoneId: “number”}, e)}};function m() {return [window.screen.width, window.screen.height].join(“x”)}function b(e, r) {var t = f.config.getConfig(“pageUrl”);return e.params.referrer ? t = e.params.referrer : t || (t = r.refererInfo.referer),e.params.secure ? t.replace(/^http:/i, “https:”) : t}function _(e, r) {var t = e.params;if (“video” === r) {var i = [];return t.video && t.video.playerWidth && t.video.playerHeight ? i = [t.video.playerWidth, t.video.playerHeight] : Array.isArray(l.deepAccess(e, “mediaTypes.video.playerSize”)) && 1 === e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length ? i = e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0] : Array.isArray(e.sizes) && 0

        Washington (CNN)Robert Mueller’s prosecutors dropped yet another head-scratching signal in their latest court filing Tuesday that the special counsel investigation may be wrapping up — or maybe it’s not.

          Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/19/politics/robert-muellers-team-says-its-very-busy-this-week/index.html