Scott Morrison, Australia’s conservative prime minister, pulled off a shock defeat in Australia’s national election Saturday, defying scores of polls that predicted a victory

“I have always believed in miracles,” Mr. Morrison said at his victory party. “Tonight is about every single Australian who depends on their government to put them first. And that is exactly what we are going to do.”

The final result of the election may not be known until late Saturday, Morrison’s coalition won more than 70% of the 74 seats of the 76 needed for a majority, with Labor on just 66 seats.

However, the win by Morrison, who has been friendly with President Donald Trump, signals a swell of populist voters that mirrors similar rises in the UK and America.

A significant block of voter support for Morrison came from outer suburban seats with demographics that closely resemble America’s Rust Belt, according to Reuters. Taking office in August, Morrison became the became Australia’s fifth prime minister in five years, and the latest figure at the front of the country’s tense politics.

Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison with wife Jenny, children Abbey and Lily after winning the 2019 Federal Election, at the Federal Liberal Reception at the Sofitel-Wentworth hotel in Sydney, Australia, May 18, 2019.
AAP Image/Dean Lewins/via REUTERS

Both parties have called for stability amid turbulent national politics

The country’s conservative party has been at the center of swelling tensions in national politics with its hawkish stances on immigration and atmosphere of sexism that has alienated women, who have fled in droves from the party.

Despite the recent controversies, Morrison’s victory secures a continuing foothold for conservative politicians on the national stage.

Morrison pushed the party’s economic and immigration policies while seeking re-election, while his opponent, the Labor Party’s Bill Shorten, presented a vision that included addressing climate change and developing federal interventions into the economy.

These proposals were painted by Morrison as costly and threatening to the country’s economic success, comments that came just over a year after he brought a lump of coal to Parliament to voice his support for industry and rail against what he called “coal-o-phobia.”

Though the country saw carbon emissions fall while the economy grew under a carbon tax passed in 2011, Liberals repealed the tax in 2014 and haven’t offered a comprehensive legislative solution for the environment since.

Shorten also voiced suspicions of Trump and the US that were pushed aside by Morrison’s lively and often combative campaign that drew marked similarities to Trump’s campaign for the 2016 US presidential election.

Morrison’s victory speech had a similarly strong call for support for working-class Australians “who have worked hard every day, they have their dreams, they have their aspirations, to get a job, to get an apprenticeship, to start a business, to meet someone amazing.”

Emphasizing industry, Morrison championed his mission to support Australians’ potential “To start a family, to buy a home, to work hard and provide the best you can for your kids. To save for your retirement.”

He continued, calling his supporters “the quiet Australians.”

Some have pointed to Saturday’s surprise results as another part of the populist wave sweeping international politics.

“I think people have become afraid after a very negative campaign,” Labor supporter Julie Nelson told Reuters at the party’s Melbourne election night function. “They [the Liberals] managed to convince people they should be afraid of change.”

Susan Harris-Rimmer, a law professor at Griffith University in Queensland, told the New York Times that politics had reached a new, “absurd” normal.

“It just seems like it’s been a long time since politics was normal anywhere,” Harris-Rimmer said.

Morrison’s unexpected victory doesn’t exactly spell a certain future for conservative control of the country, as it’s still unclear if politicians close to Morrison can pass policy with an outright majority or will need to court independents for support.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/australian-election-results-prime-minister-morrisons-shock-victory-results-2019-5

Rudy Giuliani says “no one really respects” ex-FBI director James Comey “or wants to hear from him.”

The late-night put-down came Friday after Comey bashed Attorney General William Barr, tweeting that the AG is “sliming his own Department.”

“If there are bad facts, show us,” Comey’s tweet continued. “An AG must act like the leader of the Department of Justice, an organization based on truth. Donald Trump has enough spokespeople.”

Giuliani, one of Trump’s personal lawyers, made his retort about an hour later.

“Someone should tell Jim Comey no one really respects him or wants to hear from him,” the former New York City mayor tweeted. “The Dems wanted him fired when he violated DOJ ethics in sliming Hillary. Rs believe he committed perjury and abused his power as FBI Director.”

Barr on Friday vowed to uncover the origins of the investigation of the Trump campaign. He previously characterized the investigation of Trump staff as “spying.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/05/18/rudy-giuliani-no-one-really-respects-james-comey/

PHILADELPHIA — Former Vice President Joe Biden ripped into Donald Trump during his rally in Philadelphia Saturday afternoon, saying that the president would “squander” the economy he inherited from the last administration.

Biden took credit for the recent economic growth under Trump, claiming that his work with President Barack Obama to pass the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is why the country has been adding jobs and expanding.

“Trump is going to squander this economy he inherited just like he has squandered the money he inherited,” Biden said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-says-trump-is-going-to-squander-the-economy-he-got-from-obama

Dangerous storms fired up in southwest and central Kansas Friday night in what’s shaping up to be an active few-day stretch of stormy weather.

Friday’s isolated storms produced a few large, damaging tornadoes. You can follow updates as storms popped up and advanced below:

Friday nigh wrap

The threat for severe weather begins to weaken as late Friday night roles into early Saturday morning, but several central-Kansas counties remain in tornado watches until 2 a.m.

Another round of severe storms could impact central and eastern Kansas Saturday. The main threats will be large hail and damaging wind gusts.

Another storm system will move into the central plains for the start of the work week. This could bring more severe weather to Kansas on Monday, with large hail, damaging wind gusts and a few tornadoes possible.

The severe weather threat Tuesday moves to the east, into eastern Kansas.

—–

11:45 p.m.

The lone TORNADO WARNING in effect for southern and eastern portions of Barton County is allowed to expire. This storm did produce a tornado that was on the ground for about a minute near the Barton/Stafford County, about six miles south of Great Bend.












Besides the tornado threat, this storm has produced hail and winds of about 60 mph.

We’re getting a closer look at tornado damage from a storm earlier tonight near Bloom in southeast Ford County. The damage was to a home, but there were no reports of injuries.

—–

11:07 p.m.

A tornado is reported near Radium in eastern Pawnee County,moving northeast toward southern Barton County. This is about 11 miles southwest of the Great Bend area. People in Great Bend should practice caution and take shelter.

—–

11 p.m.

Damaging wind gusts is the primary threat associated with a severe thunderstorm near Lincoln and a severe thunderstorm warning continuing until 11:30 p.m. for Ellsworth, Lincoln and Russell counties.











There are reports of tornado damage including snapped and twisted power poles near Lewis in eastern Pawnee County.

—–

10:48 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING is in effect until 11:15 p.m. is in effect Edwards, Pawnee and Stafford counties. Larned is included among cities with this warning. Other towns in the warning include Pleasant Grove, Pleasant Ridge and Radium.

—–

10:40 p.m>

The National Weather Service confirms a large, damage-causing tornado near Zook in rural southeast Pawnee County. This storm is moving northeast at about 35 mph.

The tornado crossed K-19 and is expected to stay east of Larned.

—–

10:28 p.m.

The TORNADO WARNING expires in Russell County. The county remains in a severe thunderstorm warning. This storm carries the potential for more damaging winds. Earlier, 76 mph winds were measured in the city of Russell.

—–

10:13 p.m.

The National Weather Service confirms a large tornado impacting the Kinsley area is moving northeast at about 35 mph. A Storm Team 12 chaser says this tornado damaged two homes southwest of Kinsley, but no one was injured.

In Russell, 76 mph winds were reported. Russell County remains in a TORNADO WARNING until 10:45 p.m. Stafford and Pawnee counties are also in a tornado warning until 10:45.


—–

10:02 p.m.

A wedge tornado was confirmed southwest of Kinsley in Edwards County. This storm is south of Highway 50, moving northeast.

A tornado warning is lifted in Ford County, but we are hearing more reports of damage, this report to a home about four miles south of Windhorst.

——

9:58 p.m.

A new TORNADO WARNING is in effect for Pawnee, Stafford and Russell counties until 10:45 p.m. A storm capable of producing a tornado is moving northeast from near the town of Gorham at about 50 mph.

—–

9:45 p.m.

The tornado warning for eastern Ford County, the northwest corner of Kiowa County and southern portions of Edwards County remains in effect until at least 10 p.m.

There are reports of damage to a shed southwest of the city of Ford.

—–

9:40 p.m.

Our Storm Team 12 spotters say the two tornadoes that were on the ground in southeast Ford County have dissipated, but a new TORNADO WARNING is in effect for eastern Ford County, the northwest corner of Kiowa County and southern portions of Edwards County.

This warning does not include Dodge City nor Greensburg, but people in the Kinsley area should take shelter.

A third tornado did touch down in eastern Ford County, but lifted after a few minutes.

—–

9:25 p.m.

A tornado-producing storm continues to move northeast at about 40 mph. This storm is not threatening Dodge City, but people in the community of Ford should take cover. There have been two tornadoes confirmed with this storm with both on the ground at the same time.

There are damage reports to a home a few miles outside of Bloom.

—–

9:15 p.m.

There are two tornadoes on the ground moving through southeastern Ford County, moving through a rural area southwest of the town of Ford.

These tornadoes are well to the southeast of Dodge City and not moving toward the city.

—–

9:05 p.m.

The tornado in southern Ford County heavily damaged a structure (possibly a home) northeast of Minneola as it remains on the ground, tracking northeast. This tornado also overturned a semi between Minneola and Fowler.

Counties under TORNADO WARNINGS include Ford, Meade, Gray, Hodgeman, Ness and Clark counties.

—–

8:55 p.m.

A tornado touched down in the southern part of Ford County has picked up momentum, moving northeast. This rope tornado northeast of Minneola will not threaten Dodge City.

—–

8:40 p.m.

A brief tornado was reported with a storm north of Fowler in northern Meade County. This storm is moving northeast.

A TORNADO WARNING remains in effect for Meade, Clark, Gray and Ford counties until at least 9:15 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING in Hodgeman County remains in effect until at least 9 p.m. Areas of concern include northern Meade County, north of Fowler and west of Jetmore in Hodgeman County.

—–

8:20 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING is issued for Hodgeman County. Radar indicates rotation with a storm east of Kalvesta. Tennis-ball-sized hail is also a threat with this storm moving northeast at 40 mph.

Earlier this evening, a tornado touched down near Beaver, Okla. Meade County was included in a tornado warning with this storm.

—–

6 p.m.

As of 6 p.m. tonight (Friday), there are no severe thunderstorm warnings nor immediate tornado threats in Kansas.

Storms that Friday afternoon made their way through northwest Kansas did produce at least a pair of tornadoes in southwest Nebraska, the first of which was reported just north of the Kansas/Nebraska line in Hitchcock County.

In central Kansas, moderate rain and lightning are possible with a storm near Salina, moving northeast. These storm is not severe.

While there are no active warnings in Kansas, a tornado watch remains in effect for several northwest counties until at least 10 p.m.

Another storm threat Saturday includes a low tornado threat, a medium threat for large hail and strong winds and a high threat of flooding rains for much of central and eastern Kansas, including the Wichita area.

—–

5:30 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING remains in effect for portions of Hitchcock and Red Willow counties in southwest Nebraska, but the tornado threat is over for Rawlins county in northwest Kansas as this storm continues to move northeast.

The threat for more isolated storms to develop and advance across western Kansas continues as the evening rolls along.

—–

5:15 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING is in effect for north central Rawlins County and southeast Hitchcock County in Nebraska until 5;45 p.m.

The storm capable of producing a tornado is 11 miles north of Atwood and moving northeast at 30 mph.

A tornado watch is in effect until at least 10 p.m. for several western-Kansas counties.

Source Article from https://www.kwch.com/content/news/Another-round-of-severe-storms-hits-Kansas-510090901.html

An increasing number of House Democrats are frustrated by their stalled investigations into President Trump, with an uncooperative chief executive, their own leader’s reluctance about impeachment and courts that could be slow to resolve the standoff.

Democrats have yet to hear from special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who led the nearly two-year investigation into Russia interference in the 2016 election and possible involvement with the Trump campaign. Even with negotiations, the earliest Mueller could testify would be next month.

And any hopes of former White house counsel Donald McGahn facing a congressional panel on Tuesday are slim, as the White House moves to block all current and former aides from cooperating with congressional inquiries.

Weighing all options, Democrats have raised the specter of imposing fines or jailing people who ignore subpoenas, extreme measures that have prompted some legal experts to wonder whether Democrats have a strategy for this constitutional conflict.

A group of House Judiciary Committee Democrats privately have discussed ways to increase pressure on leadership to being impeachment proceedings despite House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s wariness, according to several Democrats who spoke on the condition of anonymity to freely discuss the plan.

“There’s no doubt in my mind that we are all going to come to a point [where more has to be done] — including the speaker,” said Rep. Marcia L. Fudge (Ohio), a senior Democrat. “We respect her leadership and we respect her strategic sense about how these things work, her political sense. But I think we’re all getting to a point where we know something more has to be done.”

The anxious search for next steps comes as Pelosi (D-Calif.) has settled on a long-game approach and most Democrats have fallen in line. She has argued that without Republican and public support for impeachment, the move is largely futile and Democrats should focus on their policy agenda ahead of the 2020 election.

Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Friday rejected a subpoena from House Democrats demanding copies of Trump’s tax returns and the administration again ignored a compulsory measure from the House Intelligence Committee to hand over a still-redacted part of the Mueller report. In total, the White House has moved to block dozens of inquiries, document requests and subpoenas in at least 20 House investigations.

Some Democrats say they’ve had enough. Rep. Jamie B. Raskin (D-Md.), a member of the House Judiciary Committee and Pelosi’s leadership team, said the White House “is treating us like the Mexican government or the prime minister of Luxembourg” rather than an equal branch of government.

Raskin has been encouraging colleagues to try to make the distinction between voting to impeach Trump and voting to begin an impeachment inquiry — the latter of which, investigators argue, could help them secure documents they have struggled to get. 

Raskin said Friday that a debate about opening impeachment proceedings would occur “over the next several weeks.” Asked if he wanted proceedings to begin now, Raskin demurred but said lawmakers have a duty before them: “We are in the process of reasserting our preeminence as a constitutional actor, and the members recognize that we have a weighty, historical and constitutional responsibility to fulfill.”

To be sure, any pro-impeachment faction faces resistance not just from Pelosi but also from dozens of rank-and-file Democrats who are skeptical that such a step makes sense with an election in less than 18 months. Rep. Lois Frankel (D-Fla.) said she was “satisfied” with the pace of the investigative committees.

“Right now, I’m much more worried about what’s happening to women’s rights in this country,” she said. “I mean, listen: Should this guy be president? No. Is there enough there to impeach him? Probably. But I think it’s going to have to be done in an election . . . Impeachment is a very extreme remedy, as much as I cannot stand this guy.”

Some lawmakers are mindful that the closer the country gets to the 2020 election, the less justifiable impeachment becomes.

“As we get into the real campaign, as Democrats land on a candidate . . . all the focus is going to be there rather than on impeachment,” said Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.). He added, though, that there was a flip side to waiting to counter Trump’s stonewalling — calling it an “obvious attempt to run out the clock.”

“And if he were to somehow run out the clock and win, then you go back to the old argument: ‘Look, the voters decided on this,’ ” he said.

Many senior Democrats are hopeful the courts will come to their rescue. A federal judge earlier this week expressed skepticism about Trump’s effort to block his accounting firm from turning over years of financial records to a House panel. The judge promised a quick decision.

But even if the judge acts swiftly in Democrats’ favor, it stands as a legal victory for just one subpoena out of dozens that have been ignored by Trump and his administration. 

Should Democrats try to litigate all of those in court, they could face months, if not years, in limbo as their probes languish, experts say. House Republicans in 2012 held Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to turn over documents pertaining to a gunrunning investigation. The GOP House sued him in civil court to try to get a judge to force compliance, but it took seven years for both parties to settle the case.

It’s one reason some House Democrats have started talking about inherent contempt, a rare step in which the House instructs the sergeant at arms to take an individual into custody for congressional proceedings.

Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), a member of the House Oversight Committee, said that a dragged-out court fight is exactly why it’s vital that House Democrats “short-circuit that time frame.” Democrats on the investigative panels, he said, are not only talking about $20,000-plus fines but also moves to try to disbar lawyers who don’t cooperate with their probes, like McGahn.

“I would say the sentiment for something like this has been growing ” he said. “Our base is furious with the defiance of the Trump administration and absolutely expects us to respond forcefully.” 

On Thursday, however, Pelosi notably sidestepped a chance to endorse those ideas.

“Let’s not leapfrog over what we think should be the path,” Pelosi told reporters, suggesting talk about using inherent contempt was a bit premature. “This is one of the possibilities that is out there — I’m not saying we’re going down that path. . . . I don’t have to have a position.” 

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) earlier in the week also rebuffed questions about the House’s use of inherent contempt to levy fines or incarcerate people outside of a court’s jurisdiction. 

“I don’t think we’re going to jail people and put them in the basement,” he said. “I don’t want to deny that we have inherent contempt authority, but we are somewhat limited in our ability to carry that out.” 

Even if the House slaps fines on Trump officials, the officials could ignore them. And the only way to enforce those fines would be to take them to court — another legal fight that could languish. 

To address ignored subpoenas, Democratic leaders have backed the idea of eventually scheduling one major contempt vote that bundles several citations together — then taking them to court. That means investigators could be waiting for weeks to begin the litigation process. 

In the meantime, several rank-and-file lawmakers are impatient. 

“If we’re going to say that this administration has been unprecedented in its lawlessness and its obstruction, then we need to exercise our power that follows through on that,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). “Everything is there telling us what to do.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/no-mueller-no-mcgahn-and-stalled-investigations-leave-house-democrats-frustrated/2019/05/17/bc3285e4-78ca-11e9-b3f5-5673edf2d127_story.html

In recent days, fears have grown that escalating tensions between Iran and the US could erupt into a military conflict.

The US has increased its military presence in the Persian Gulf, accusing Iran of deploying missiles which could be used to target US forces in the region, and has evacuated US personnel from its embassy in the Iraqi capital Baghdad.

Critics have focused on Trump’s hawkish national security adviser John Bolton, who has been accused of seeking to coax the president into forcing the regime change in Iran that he has long advocated.

But some observers are taking a different view, and see in Trump’s treatment of Iran not as a build-up to conflict, but rather the application of strong-arm negotiating tactics.

Reports indicate that Trump is frustrated with Bolton for his excessively uncompromising treatment of Iran, but the president has over the last two years slowly increased pressure on the country, tearing up the Iran deal brokered between the Obama administration and Tehran, and imposing tough sanctions on the country.

National Security Adviser John Bolton is said to be pushing hard for an armed conflict with Iran.
REUTERS/Leah Millis

In May, the US imposed fresh sanctions on Iran, targeting steel, aluminium and copper exports. The president has vowed to renegotiate a bigger, better deal with Iran, to curb its nuclear ambitions and what he claims is its malign influence in the region.

Observers point to a similar pattern in his treatment of another state where the US is determined to neutralize a nuclear threat: North Korea.

With North Korea, Trump initially threatened the “total destruction” of the state following a series of missile tests by Pyongyang in 2017, then when North Korea agreed to denuclearization talks the president stepped back from threats of military action, and lavished praise on its leader, Kim Jong Un.

An Iranian protestor burns an image of Donald Trump.
(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Read more: Trump has reportedly told senior staff he really doesn’t want to go to war with Iran

With Iran maximum pressure is again being used as leverage to bring Tehran to the negotiating table, they claim. Trump on Thursday tweeted: “I’m sure that Iran will want to talk soon,” and according to multiple reports has told advisers that he wants a diplomatic solution to the current crisis.

“He is trying to rerun the North Korea thing, to be as extreme as he can be up until the point of military action,” Thomas Wright, a Brookings Institution fellow told the New Yorker in an article published Friday.

Wright, however, pointed to a key and terrifying difference: “His advisers then were worried he was going to war, so there was no danger of them pulling him in, whereas, in this case, his adviser wants to drag him in.”

During the presidential election campaign in 2016 Trump sold himself to the electorate as the dealmaker in chief, and observers say he has long prized his ability to face-down opponents and haggle out agreements.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.
Lisi Niesner/Reuters

“I think this is a president that is looking for transactional outcomes and this is a president that would like to be able to demonstrate he can achieve negotiations on very tough issues where his predecessors have failed,” Sanam Vakil, a senior research fellow at Chatham House, a London-based think tank, told Business Insider.

She said that Iran was well aware of the parallels with North Korea: “I would also add that the Iranians have been very carefully watching North Korea and the negotiations to see if this is a model that would fit in their playbook in this way.”

Read more: Pictures showing Iranian paramilitaries loading attack boats with missiles are reportedly behind the US’s sharp escalation of tensions with Tehran

However, Vakil warned that the administration’s “zero sum” approach of ratcheting up the threats was unlikely to result in a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran.

“The Trump strategy is predicated on the idea that doubling down 150% on Iran is the way to bring Iran to the table. I think that is a reflection of their limited understanding of the Islamic Republic, their worldview. So I don’t see backing Iran into a corner with zero sum objectives as being the right strategy,” she said,

According to Vakil, Tehran would expect to see a sign of possible concessions from the US before agreeing to talk, and for bellicose rhetoric to be ratcheted down.

Trump’s tactics with Iran have strong echoes of his approach to North Korea.
Leah Millis/Reuters

Other observers though point out that Iran is more susceptible to economic pressure than North Korea, with its economy hit hard by recent US sanctions to restrict it selling oil on international markets.

“Maximum pressure has been much more effective against Iran than North Korea,” Gary Samore, a professor at Brandeis University and former Obama administration official told the Atlantic.

This is “mainly because Iran is much more vulnerable to trade and financial sanctions than North Korea and because China is quietly doing enough to keep North Korea alive for fear that Kim [Jong] Un will do something desperate if economic pain [gets] too intense,” Samore said.

Iran’s leaders have thus far shown little willingness to reopen negotiations with the US unless it reenters the Obama administration-brokered nuclear agreement, and President Hasan Rouhani in remarks Thursday gave his own summary of US policy.

“In the morning they send their carrier, at night they give us telephone numbers. But we have enough numbers from the Americans,” he remarked.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-using-maximum-pressure-tactics-to-force-iran-to-negotiate-2019-5

Former Vice President Joe Biden will head to Philadelphia Saturday, for the third and final phase of his presidential campaign rollout — making his pitch to unite the country.

Biden will hold his first campaign rally in Eakin’s Oval near the famous “Rocky steps” of the Philadelphia Art Museum Saturday afternoon.

The rally, which was announced the same day Biden officially entered the race in April, will focus on his vision “for unifying America with respected leadership on the world stage — and dignified leadership at home,” according to a press release from the campaign.

The event is seen as an unofficial bookend to the campaign launch.

An excerpt of the speech released by the campaign Saturday morning previews Biden’s pitch on unity. Biden will argue that while some Democrats argue for using anger to chart a path toward victory against President Trump in 2020, Biden will provide “a different path” for members of all political parties, rather than the divisive leadership of the current president.

“Some say Democrats don’t want to hear about unity, that they are angry — and the angrier you are, the better. That’s what they are saying to have to do to win the Democratic nomination. Well, I don’t believe it. I believe Democrats want to unify this nation. That’s what we’ve always been about. Unity,” the excerpt says.

“If the American people want a president to add to our division, to lead with a clenched fist, closed hand and a hard heart, to demonize the opponents and spew hatred — they don’t need me. They already have a President who does just that. I am running to offer our country – Democrats, Republicans and Independents – a different path,” according to the excerpt.

Brian Snyder/Reuters
Democratic 2020 U.S. presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden pauses while speaking at a campaign stop in Manchester, New Hampshire, May 13, 2019.

The rally will be much larger than Biden’s previous events in early voting states like Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada. A campaign official told ABC News that a crowd of 2,000 is expected at the event.

The campaign has placed a heavy focus on Philadelphia as the “birthplace of American democracy,” and the rally location was chosen for that reason.

“It was here that two of the most important documents in the world’s history were written,” another excerpt of Biden’s prepared remarks read.

“In 1776, the Declaration of Independence: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident.’ Those words formed the American creed. Equality. Equity. Fairness. America didn’t live up to that promise for most of its people, for people of color, for women. But we are born of the idea that every single person in this country — no matter where you start in life — there’s nothing that’s beyond your capacity if you work hard enough for it,” the excerpt read.

The campaign announced Thursday Philadelphia would also be home to their headquarters.

“Philadelphia is a thriving city and a testament to the American spirit, built by the ingenuity and tenacity of ordinary people who did extraordinary things. Its storied history and celebrated diversity will serve as an inspiration for Team Biden, and is the ideal setting to continue our fight for the soul of this nation,” Biden’s campaign manager Greg Shultz said in a press release announcing the headquarters.

Both Biden and his wife, Dr. Jill Biden, were born in the key swing state that will be vital for any Democrat taking on Trump to win in 2020, and a Quinnipiac poll out this week indicates Biden has strong appeal among Democrats in the Keystone State. Biden took the top spot in the poll, with 39% of Democratic voters in Pennsylvania naming the former vice president as their preferred candidate.

The poll also found Biden beat Trump in a head-to-head in a match-up in the state, 53% to 42%.

Since announcing his presidential run on April 25, Biden has focused his message on why he decided to run — his view that the country is in a battle for the soul of America, and restoring the middle class as the backbone of the economy.

AP Photo/John Locher
Former Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden speaks at a rally with members of a painters and construction union, Tuesday, May 7, 2019, in Henderson, Nev.

A campaign official tells ABC News that following the rally Saturday, the campaign will shift to a new phase — focusing on Biden’s policy proposals, and what he will do as president.

The rollouts will give “specifics of the policies that Vice President Biden has believed in and has fought for his entire career and will make the centerpiece of a Biden White House,” according to the official.

After Biden’s rally Saturday, the former vice president will travel to Tennessee, Florida and Texas in the coming weeks — three states Trump won in 2016. Biden’s full schedule for those trips has yet to be announced.

Since getting into the race, Biden has taken the top spot all polls of the Democratic field, according to FiveThirtyEight’s poll tracker.

Biden has maintained he will “not speak ill of a fellow Democrat,” but his frontrunner status has put a target on his back from his fellow Democrats. Biden has faced criticism from his opponents on issues from criminal justice reform, to climate change — a sign of what could come in the Democratic debates next month.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/joe-biden-heads-philadelphia-give-pitch-uniting-country/story?id=63089272

The reported plan comes as the Trump administration has already begun releasing some migrants in large groups to Texas cities.

Trump previously threatened to release immigrants in so-called sanctuary cities, which prevent local law enforcement from working with federal immigration authorities.

Clamping down on illegal immigration has been a focus of Trump’s since he was on the 2016 campaign trail. His administration’s zero-tolerance policy and crackdown on immigrants without legal status have resulted in an increase in migrants being detained by border officials.

This week Trump unveiled his newest immigration proposal, which aims to create more “merit-based” policies.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/latino/444370-florida-mayor-offers-solution-to-housing-detained-migrants-bring-them-to-the-trump

Joe Biden is not only the front-runner in 2020 Democratic presidential polls but also the front-runner in media attention, dominating coverage in a way that echoes President Donald Trump’s media saturation after he announced his candidacy in 2015.

The most recent Fox News Democratic primary poll, conducted May 11-14, found Biden leads with 35% support, but he gets an even larger portion of media coverage.

On the cable news networks, the former vice president has received almost as much attention as all the other Democratic presidential candidates combined, according to the political website FiveThirtyEight. The week of April 28, his first full week of campaigning after his April 25 announcement, Biden was mentioned in 2,232, clips while all the other candidates were mentioned in 2,259 clips. The following week, he was mentioned in 1,411 clips while other candidates were mentioned in 1,785 clips.

A Media Research Center analysis of ABC, CBS, and NBC evening news coverage similarly found that Biden dominated broadcast news, commanding 77% of airtime devoted to Democratic candidates in April.

For most of April, Biden wasn’t even a candidate. But Biden led coverage well before he got in the race. The analysis found that he soaked up 23% of airtime before he announced his candidacy from January through March.

Rich Noyes, the research director at the Media Research Center who complied its news coverage data, told the Washington Examiner that Biden’s dominance “is reminiscent of the way Donald Trump became the dominant focus of the media’s coverage of the GOP race in 2015.”

Trump, like Biden, was well-known among voters, due in part to his reality TV television show “The Apprentice.” Both entered a crowded field of lesser-known candidates.

After announcing his campaign in June 2015, Trump received 55% of broadcast coverage of GOP candidates from July 24-Aug. 6 and 72% of coverage from Aug. 7-20, according to the according to the Media Research Center. Another analysis of broadcast coverage in 2015 though Nov. 30 that year by the Tyndall Report, as reported by the Washington Post, found that Trump received more minutes of coverage than the entire Democratic presidential field combined.

Like Trump, who received a hostile media reception from the start, part of Biden’s dominance was driven by negative stories. Multiple women came forward with allegations of unwanted contact from Biden at the beginning of April. Anita Hill made headlines shortly after Biden’s campaign announcement when she criticized Biden for not adequately apologizing for her experience testifying against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991 with allegations of sexual harassment.

“Both candidates surged in the polls as they dominated coverage, and the negativity of the media coverage didn’t seem to affect how likely primary voters regarded them,” Noyes said.

However, Matthew Littman, a Democratic strategist and speechwriter for Biden during his years in the Senate, argued that coverage of Biden in this cycle is fundamentally different that of Trump in 2015.

“Trump dominated the coverage because he made news,” Littman told the Washington Examiner. “Trump fed the audience a constant diet of controversy, so he kept his name out there. Biden is dominating coverage without making news. That will change as the media gets bored of the same story.”

Littman also noted that Trump has publicly criticized Biden, contributing to the boost in attention.

Biden is also known as a “gaffe machine,” and those in the media could also be hoping to capture one of his slip-ups.

“You never know what he’s going to say,” Matt Gorman, a Republican strategist and vice president at consulting firm Targeted Victory, told the Washington Examiner. “There’s an unpredictability there that also appeals to the press.”

The proclivity of the press to focus on certain candidates can favor what becomes an elite group.

“Primary voters are choosing between candidates with essentially similar platforms. Heavy media coverage of just a few of those candidates effectively validates those candidates, so that voters may not consider the broader field,” Noyes said.

Whether Biden can maintain media dominance could depend on how he interacts with the press moving forward and how he performs in the Democratic debates.

Gorman said that Biden is “much more guarded” from the press than Trump, who would often call in to TV shows for live interviews.

“I think that, in the long run, is going to hurt him,” Gorman said. “What’s going to be crucial for him is the first debate … That’s when people are going to start taking shots at everybody else, especially Biden.”

The question, according to Noyes, is “will Biden choose to be just as controversial, as a way to steal the headlines away from his challengers — and, if he does, will it work?”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/joe-biden-channels-trump-2016-as-he-dominates-media-coverage

The pastor was thundering from the pulpit of our small evangelical church.  Red-faced, dress shirt soaked with sweat, fist slamming against the lectern as he paced back and forth. For the last half hour he had been shouting about Sodom and Gomorrah and he landed on his conclusion that gay people were going to burn forever in the lake of fire.

What most troubled me in the moment is that all of these people around me, whom I knew to love me so well, were nodding in agreement.  They were shouting out amens and raising their hands in praise. Some of them even stood to applaud. I realized that if they knew what I was hiding about myself, they would stop loving me immediately.

I got up and walked out of the church.  I was 16 years old.

Even then I knew the constant homophobia was backed up by just about every preacher in our community, as well as the ones who were always on television:  Billy Graham, so often at the elbow of every president, telling LGBTQ people they’d be “judged by God’s holy standard.” Jimmy Swaggart, a hero to practically everyone I knew, who once said he’d kill any man who looked at him “like that.” Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell both blamed the terrorist attacks of 9/11 on “the gays”.

Although my entire community, and the larger culture, was telling me that God didn’t want my kind in his churches, belief burned in me, and no one ever could put it out. Being a believer was nearly as innate to me as being gay.  It’s just who I was, and no matter the slurs and constant reminder that I couldn’t be a Christian and a gay person, I never did lose my faith.

Nearly 30 years after walking out, I found solace in the Episcopal church, where I was delighted to see people of all kinds kneeling to take the Eucharist, and witnessing the rector and the congregation openly embracing LGBTQ people during the service and in everyday life.

Although there has been progress, all these years later, those with the biggest platforms are still attacking LGBTQ Christians and saying we are not worthy of God.  Presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg, who is an openly gay married man and an Episcopalian, is at the center of this conversation. Over the last couple of weeks his faith has been called into question repeatedly because he is gay. Vice President Mike Pence was among the first. “My family and I have a view of marriage that’s informed by our faith,” Pence said about Buttigieg, in essence declaring that Buttigieg’s faith doesn’t matter, or perhaps even that Buttigieg isn’t a Christian.

Evangelist Franklin Graham offered that Buttigieg would be punished by “eternal damnation.” Everett Piper, president of Oklahoma Wesleyan University weighed in by saying “you don’t get to make up your own Christianity.” Talking head Erick Erickson attacked not only Buttigieg but also the Episcopal church. Michael Brown, a leader of the Charismatic movement, put forth that “As an out-and-proud gay man, Buttigieg must discard the entire testimony of Scripture.”

This is not only suggesting that Buttigieg is not worthy of his own faith — it is also homophobia. These men have done exactly what they set out to do: get other homophobes riled up. Recently, Buttigieg was interrupted by hecklers at an Iowa rally who chanted “Sodom and Gomorrah!” and “You betray your holy baptism!” Social media is filled with endless discussion of Buttigieg’s “depravity,” “perversion,” and so on. At another event Operation Rescue founder Randall Terry showed up dressed as Buttigieg and whipped a man dressed as Christ while someone in a Satan costume shouted “Yes, more blood, Peter!” among other taunts. Terry told the Associated Press he was doing it because Buttigieg “glorifies and normalizes a sinful behavior.” Protesters yelled “Repent!” and “Marriage is between a man and a woman!” while the candidate tried to address a packed audience in Dallas last Friday.

The thing that none of them realize is that every time they allow their judgement to rear its head, support for Buttigieg grows even stronger among many potential voters. And every time his sincerity as a gay Christian is questioned I feel as if my own faith is strengthened. Whenever they attack the Episcopal church I’m prouder to be a member. Each time his marriage is held up as an act of depravity I cherish my own marriage even more.

There is a point where bullying and judgement backfire.  That’s what happened when I walked out of that church at 16 years old, devastated to lose the only community and culture I had ever known so intimately, but emboldened by the realization that I was standing up for what I believed in.

Studies show that while homophobia and hate crimes against LGBTQ people still abound, the tide has changed over the last couple of decades when it comes to the way Americans think about these issues.  A recent poll conducted by Quinnipiac University found nearly 70% of Americans claiming they are open to electing a gay president. However, only 36% think the country is ready for it.

I’d like to think that most Americans, like LGBTQ people, are tired of the bullying and name-calling and are ready to stand up for what they believe in, too. Polls, however, show one thing, and electoral votes have revealed another with the majority voting in a transphobic president and a vice-president who is perhaps best known for his anti-LGBTQ initiatives.

For now, Buttigieg is among the most popular of the wide field Democratic presidential candidates.  He and his husband have graced the cover of Time magazine and dozens of other publications. Analysis of campaign finance reports show that so far, Buttigieg and Kamala Harris are doing a better job of poaching donors from their opponents than other candidates in the 2020 primary race.

The boy I used to be could have never imagined the day that a gay man is being seriously considered as a candidate for president. He would have been amazed to know Buttigieg is also standing up for the fire of belief that burns in us both. Sometimes I wonder how we kept going, how we survived it all. Then I wonder if the very people who set out to break us aren’t the ones who ended up making us that much stronger.

Source Article from https://www.salon.com/2019/05/17/as-a-gay-christian-pete-buttigiegs-faith-and-visibility-give-me-strength/

China is powering ahead of the US in the race for mega start-ups

The surge of growth is a testament to a unique business environment, as well as a population more than three times larger than the U.S. At the same time, it bears all the…

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/18/us-may-scale-back-huawei-trade-restrictions-to-help-existing-customers.html

Despite a development boom in neighboring Chino, Corona, Norco and Eastvale, the 2,150 acres of wetlands behind the dam comprise a labyrinth of channels, ponds and forests that are havens for threatened and federally endangered species including red-sided garter snakes and least Bell’s vireos.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-prado-dam-flood-risk-failure-20190516-story.html

When Mr. Barr first used the word “spying” in congressional testimony last month, he later backpedaled somewhat during the hearing, saying that he just wanted to know whether surveillance done as part of the investigation had a proper basis and that he “was not suggesting” that rules were violated.

In the same way, after raising the possibility to Fox News in the interview that aired Friday that law enforcement and intelligence officials may have been trying to sabotage Mr. Trump for political reasons, Mr. Barr added that he was just asking questions.

“If we’re worried about foreign influence, for the very same reason we should be worried about whether government officials abuse their power and put their thumb on the scale,” he said. “And so I’m not saying that happened, but it’s something we have to look at.”

His caveat did not prevent alarming headlines across the conservative news media.

Mr. Barr may not have intended to be as inflammatory as those conclusions, said James A. Baker, a former F.B.I. general counsel who helped oversee the early stages of the Russia investigation, and who previously worked for Mr. Barr at Verizon.

“He is a very careful lawyer and he words things very precisely,” he said. “If you read those precise words, they are less alarming than people have assessed them to be. He is, however, saying things that can be easily misconstrued and apparently are being misconstrued, and any attorney general needs to be mindful of the fact that he or she need to maintain credibility with, and the trust of, all Americans.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/17/us/politics/barr-russia-investigation-spying.html

With the surge of asylum seekers, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol are now flying migrants from the Rio Grande Valley in southern Texas to cities across the country.

In San Diego on Friday, 100 migrants arrived for processing. It came one day after two south Florida counties were upset with a plan that would bring thousands of migrants there.

“We cannot accommodate in Florida just dumping unlawful migrants into our state,” said Gov. Ron DeSantis. “I think it’ll tax our resources, the schools, healthcare, law enforcement, state agencies.”

CBS News reached out to the Department of Homeland Security and the White House, but neither has responded.

Florida officials have been told to expect two plane loads of migrants each week, up to 1,000 people a month, split between Palm Beach and Broward counties. Both are Democratic strongholds. The migrants do not face criminal charges but would likely be released into the community awaiting immigration hearings.

CBS News reporting found that 80% of the beds at the nation’s largest detention center for immigrant families in Dilley, Texas were empty last month. But Brian Hastings, chief of law enforcement operations for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said they’re overwhelmed.

“The crisis at hand is causing us to look at multiple different locations where we have capacity to process, to fly these individuals to, simply so we can process them into the system,” Hastings said.

Florida has no designated shelters or government funding for food and security. Officials there have been told to expect migrants in about two weeks.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/homeland-security-flying-migrants-out-of-texas-to-locations-throughout-u-s-florida-san-diego/

As Iran girds for possible war with the United States, President Trump may turn out to be the best friend it has.

Despite the saber-rattling of senior aides and Trump’s own tweets, when push has come to shove over the past two years, the president has repeatedly backed away from the threatened use of military force.

Whether the target has been North Korea, with which warnings of “fire and fury” have become little more than an exchange of “beautiful” letters between Trump and Kim Jong Un, or Venezuela, where the threat of “all options” has failed to upset the status quo, the president has blinked. With Iran, the dispatch of a U.S. aircraft carrier and a bomber task force, as well as reported plans to deploy 120,000 troops, were quickly followed by Trump’s insistence that he only wants to talk to Iranian leaders.

Trump has said that there is no inconsistency in his administration’s messaging but that the image of incoherence can be useful. “At least Iran doesn’t know what to think, which at this point may very well be a good thing!” he tweeted Friday.

But as he moves more deeply into the second half of his term with major foreign policy issues unresolved, Trump’s credibility has suffered, and his options have narrowed.

“If you make threats and then people decide you aren’t going to follow through, if you’re looking for the reaction and you stop getting the reaction, the options are either to make larger threats or to stop going down that road at all,” said Jon B. Alterman, Middle East Program director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“Credibility is a hard thing for a president to maintain,” Alterman said.

Iran, which has said that it doesn’t want war but is ready for it, has responded with its own taunts and bellicose rhetoric.

“With the B Team doing one thing & @realDonaldTrump saying another thing, it is apparently the U.S. that ‘doesn’t know what to think,’ ” Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif tweeted Friday in response to Trump. Zarif frequently refers to White House national security adviser John Bolton as the head of the “B team,” or simply, “the Moustache.”

“We in Iran have actually known what to think for millennia — and about the U.S., since 1953. At this point, that is certainly ‘a good thing!’ ” Zarif wrote. In 1953, the CIA orchestrated the overthrow of an elected leftist government in Tehran, bolstering the U.S.-backed monarchy that itself was ousted in 1979 by Iran’s current clerical rulers.

The administration sees Iran as now in the grip of devastating sanctions, its oil income effectively cut off, and close to economic and political collapse. But Iran is fortified by the success of its recent efforts to expand its power across Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. If its own messaging is to be believed, it perceives declining American influence across the Middle East, as Trump seeks to withdraw and regional powers seek closer relations with other world powers, notably Russia and China.

“The Americans are unwilling and unable to carry out military action against us . . . and their unwillingness stems from their inability,” Brig. Gen. Hossein Dehghan, a military aide to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said last week, according to the Iranian Fars News Agency.

Trump has clearly made good on his campaign promises to cancel international agreements, wreak havoc on what he has called “unfair” trade agreements, and repair tattered U.S. relations with Israel and Saudi Arabia. But his desire to pull back from costly wars and avoid new ones has often seemed at odds with the bombastic rhetoric that comes from him and his aides — principally Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo — and has forced both allies and adversaries to divine which of Trump’s instincts will prevail.

That has been particularly problematic in the case of Iran. The administration last week sent an aircraft carrier and bombers to the Persian Gulf in response to what it has said is intelligence indicating that Iran and its proxies in the region are preparing attacks on U.S. forces and their allies.

Few in the region doubt that Iran was behind the sabotage that blew holes in the hulls of two Saudi tankers and a Norwegian ship in the Persian Gulf on Sunday. But “it was very well designed not to justify a violent reaction,” said Sami Nader, director of the Levant Institute for Strategic Affairs in Beirut. “The objective was to test American resolve to use power.”

“They calculate [Trump] will not risk a protracted or full-scale war,” Nader said. “We will see more incidents, and they could spin out of control.”

European allies, who agree with the administration’s assessment of Iran’s expansionist aims but are still smarting from Trump’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal last year, have been skeptical of the intelligence and worry about the possibility of miscalculation. “I personally believe the American president doesn’t want to go to war. But that’s not the problem,” said a senior European diplomat whose government was briefed by Pompeo this week. “The problem is that the situation may at some point become so volatile and so unstable that it’s inevitable.”

Republican lawmakers have complained that the administration has not briefed them on its justification for the deployment, while Democrats have suggested the intelligence may have been exaggerated to justify an attack on Iran long advocated by Bolton.

“As we try to make sense of the raised tensions in the Persian Gulf, we should not forget that sixteen years ago, the United States went to war in Iraq on the basis of distorted and misrepresented intelligence,” Rep. Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.) said in a statement Wednesday. “That must never be allowed to happen again.”

In a briefing Thursday for a small group of journalists, senior administration officials offered a convoluted explanation, saying that their goal was not to start a war but to deter Iran from taking action in response to the intensifying pressure of U.S. sanctions.

Trump has expressed frustration with Bolton, joking to him and other aides that “we’d be in war everywhere if it was up to this guy,” according to a senior administration official who has heard the comments. Trump has often told advisers that he doesn’t want to send a single additional troop anywhere.

He has allowed Bolton, who issued the initial White House statement announcing warships were on their way, to take the lead in threatening Tehran. Just days later, Trump told reporters that Iran had “great potential.” Like North Korea, he said, Iran’s leaders should be “calling me up, sitting down,” so that “we can make a deal.”

Asked Thursday if the two countries were headed toward war, Trump said: “I hope not.”

As concern over escalating tensions with Iran has risen this month, the president has sharply denied any daylight between him and Bolton. Media accounts of “infighting with respect to my strong policy in the Middle East” are “Fake News,” he tweeted this week. “Different opinions are expressed and I make a decisive and final decision — it is a very simple process.”

Privately, Trump is dismissive of turmoil in the Middle East, telling White House officials and informal advisers that nothing good comes from being involved.

As he has repeatedly described it, his goal is to have a “tough” and “strong” military that doesn’t have to do anything — and to use rhetoric that scares people. In a 70-minute meeting Wednesday with surrogates who often appear on television to back him, Trump concentrated on China and immigration. He never mentioned Iran.

Rep. Peter T. King, a New York Republican and Trump ally, said there was a plan behind the seeming confusion. “His strategy is to shake things up with Iran and also say he doesn’t want to go to war,” King said. Trump, King said Friday, is “a good cop and a bad cop. We’ll see if it works. I don’t think we’ll end up going to war.”

The president, he added, “is verbally aggressive and loves sanctions. . . . It could cause them to be more conciliatory. It might not work, but I think people shouldn’t prejudge it. We’ll see in a year.”

Sly reported from Beirut.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-risks-credibility-with-policy-that-veers-between-threats-and-inaction/2019/05/17/e6585d56-77fa-11e9-bd25-c989555e7766_story.html

Good news: On Friday, the U.S. has reached a deal with Canada and Mexico to end tariffs on metal imports.

As first reported by Politico, “The agreement completely lifts the 25 percent tariff on steel and 10 percent tariff on aluminum. In a development that will bring relief to pro-traders, it does not involve quotas.” As the Washington Examiner’s Colin Wilhelm notes, this should expedite congressional passage of the president’s renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

Still, the most basic reason why this agreement is good news is the nature of free trade.

Free trade, where supported by fair enforcement mechanisms, is an inherently good thing. It fosters competition that reduces prices for consumers and companies, and incentivizes economic dynamism. We can have confidence that this agreement will have mutual benefit.

Of course, China stands apart here. Beijing views trade as a zero-sum game in which only China can ultimately triumph. Hence, Xi Jinping’s feudal mercantilism trade policy and his voracious thievery of intellectual property. We must resolutely oppose China’s malevolent activities. But as with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, we should build closer trade links with nations that stand with American interests. Canada has proven itself a critical U.S. ally in resisting pressure from China over the detention of a Huawei executive on a U.S. warrant. Friday’s agreement will help consolidate Canada’s belief that being America’s friend is better than being a Chinese puppet.

As I say, this is a win for America and our friends.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/free-trade-is-good-and-so-is-the-new-north-american-tariff-deal

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/17/politics/florida-mayors-migrants/index.html