CHICAGO (AP) — Murder charges have been filed against a woman and her daughter in the death of a pregnant Chicago woman whose baby was cut from her womb.

Police say 46-year-old Clarisa Figueroa and her daughter, 24-year-old Desiree Figueroa were charged Thursday with first-degree murder in the death of 19-year-old Marlen Ochoa-Lopez. The older woman’s boyfriend, 40-year-old Piotr Bobak, is charged with concealment of a homicide.

Police say the break in the case came after detectives learned more than a week after Ochoa-Lopez’s April 23 disappearance that she had responded to a Facebook offer of free clothes and arranged to pick them up.

Source Article from https://www.wbrz.com/news/three-people-charged-in-slaying-of-pregnant-woman-in-chicago

Still, other women said they were alarmed by the limits emerging from the Legislature and the governor’s office, which opponents have vowed to challenge in court.

“It’s insulting as an educated woman — in consultation with my highly educated doctor — that I can’t come to a decision that’s best for me and for my health,” said Erin Arnold, who lives in Birmingham and teaches biology. “A woman should have agency over her body.”

She added: “I sometimes wonder if Alabama is the state to raise my children. I waver. When laws like this pass, it’s frustrating.”

A culture of silence about women’s health is pervasive in many of the state’s 67 counties.

“Girls and women do not talk about their health issues here,” said Emily Capilouto, 31, who also lives in Birmingham. “You turn to those close to you when these issues arise, but now we are talking about it on a state level and nationally because of what’s happening, but I don’t know that there are larger conversations going on in the community.”

Beyond highly limited abortion access, critics of the bill contend that the restrictions distract from Alabama’s endemic problems and further threaten a deeply troubled health care network that offers the state’s roughly two million women few options for specialized care, especially in rural areas.

Across the state, there are fewer than 500 obstetricians and gynecologists, and in almost half of Alabama’s counties, there are no doctors who specialize in the health of women. In crucial barometers of health care quality, including infant mortality and deaths of women during childbirth, Alabama has some of the nation’s worst figures.

“If you argue the point that this is a matter of life for children, there is no evidence from birth to death that Alabama is in any way concerned about the lives of children,” said Wayne Flynt, one of the state’s leading historians. “There is a profound difference between being pro-fetus, in which I think Alabama’s credentials are pretty solid, and pro-life.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/16/us/abortion-law-women.html

President Trump speaks to service members of the U.S. Coast Guard during an invitation to play golf at Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach, Fla. The Trump resort at Mar-a-Lago brought in nearly $23 million last year.

Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images

President Trump speaks to service members of the U.S. Coast Guard during an invitation to play golf at Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach, Fla. The Trump resort at Mar-a-Lago brought in nearly $23 million last year.

Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images

At a time when House Democrats are battling the president for his tax returns, new disclosures provide some basic information about his finances. For instance: His income was at least in the hundreds of millions last year.

The data come from the president’s latest annual financial disclosure form covering the year 2018. It shows where that income came from. For example, Trump Doral in South Florida, one of his highest-income properties according to the report, provided a nearly 2% bump in income last year, up $1.2 million to $76 million.

Meanwhile, income from Mar-a-Lago, the Palm Beach, Fla., resort Trump frequents on winter weekends away from the White House, fell by nearly 10% from 2017, to $22.7 million last year.

The Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., held steady, at $40.8 million in income for Trump — up slightly from 2017, according to prior disclosures.

These year-to-year shifts indicate that at least some Trump properties have stabilized since sharp drops in revenue between 2016 and 2017. The $22.7 million that Mar-a-Lago took in last year is nearly 40 percent lower than its 2016 income.

And the Trump Doral golf club’s $76 million in income last year is still far below its $115.9 million income Trump reported from 2016.

The disclosures provide a window into the president’s finances, but it’s not a detailed view. Disclosure forms filed with the Office of Government Ethics allow officials to cite many figures in ranges, rather than exact numbers — Trump’s income from a piece of real estate on Wall Street and several others, for example, was “over $5,000,000.”

All told, then, Trump reported income of well over $400 million, but it could have been much higher than that. It’s impossible to accurately compare the president’s overall income from year to year using these forms.

The financial disclosures show the president’s ongoing income from controversial arrangements. When Trump took office, critics raised concerns that Trump properties would provide an avenue for people to essentially buy the president’s favor by frequenting his properties.

The Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., has continued to raise ethics red flags. Earlier this year, a government watchdog said that government lawyers ignored the U.S. Constitution’s Emoluments Clause in allowing the Trump Organization to continue leasing the Old Post Office building on Pennsylvania Avenue, blocks from the White House.

Presidential financial disclosures do provide some clarity about the president’s assets and income, but they leave many questions about the president’s finances unanswered. House Democrats recently subpoenaed six years of Trump’s tax returns, arguing that this is part of their oversight duties and that they want to know the full extent of his involvement in his businesses.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/05/16/724115959/trump-financial-disclosures-show-drop-in-mar-a-lago-income

There’s no reason for anyone to get excited about the White House’s “new” immigration proposal. If he treats it anything like he treated the nearly identical bill introduced two years ago by Sens. David Perdue, R-Ga., and Tom Cotton, R-Ark., President Trump will forget about it 10 days after it’s introduced.

White House officials have been dripping out details on the plan for two weeks, and so far it’s set to look more or less the same as the Perdue-Cotton plan. The main difference is that while that one sharply reduced legal immigration numbers, the White House one, hatched by senior adviser Jared Kushner, maintains the current level.

Otherwise, like the Perdue-Cotton bill, the crux of the “new” one is to put a priority on admitting foreigners who know English and have work skills. It will reportedly put more restrictions on who qualifies for asylum, which is very important, but it will also require that new immigrants pass some kind of dumb “patriotic assimilation” test.

Citing an unnamed “administration official,” the Washington Post reported Wednesday that green card applicants “would be required to pass an exam based on a reading of George Washington’s farewell address or Thomas Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptist Association.”

Literally anybody can memorize a speech or a letter. That is not what makes an American American. A more accurate assessment on a potential immigrant’s capacity and enthusiasm for assimilation would be to ask about their favorite (or least favorite) musicians or bands, favorite books, and favorite movies and actors. Do they watch “Big Brother” or “The Bachelor”? Have they seen “The Godfather”? Are they familiar with Oprah? How many strikes and you’re out? What’s their favorite NFL team?

And if they say they prefer soccer, they’re disqualified.

That’s a joke (sort of). But they should at least have a demonstrable knowledge and enjoyment of mainstream American culture.

Trump is the embodiment of an ideal 20th century secular American: Rich, famous, and influential. But I really don’t want to ask him to recite a George Washington speech from memory. Most Americans wouldn’t be able to do it.

The “new” White House proposal would use a type of scorecard to evaluate a candidate’s ability to contribute to society, such as their education level, their career field, and whether they have a job offer in the U.S. — preferably one with a high-paying salary.

That’s nice, but if the purpose is only to send a signal to Trump’s supporters ahead of 2020, and it is, this is a waste of time. Even Trump’s good friend Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Wednesday that the proposal is “not designed to become law.”

Trump is in the White House in large part because voters liked where he stood on immigration. He gave the issue a half-hearted effort during the first two years of his office, and if this “new” proposal is more of that, we can all ignore it.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/trumps-immigration-proposal-sounds-nice-but-hell-probably-let-his-supporters-down-again

The president’s professed hopes for a dialogue with Iran seem unlikely to produce a breakthrough any time soon. In Tokyo, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif of Iran said there was “no possibility” of discussions with the administration to ease the tensions, Agence France-Presse reported.

“The escalation by the United States is unacceptable,” Mr. Zarif told reporters, according to AFP.

Mr. Pompeo has outlined 12 steps that Iran must take to satisfy the United States — measures that some in the Pentagon view as unrealistic and could back Iranian leaders into a corner. He recently described American policy as being calculated to produce domestic political unrest in Iran.

Mr. Bolton, as a private citizen, long called for regime change in Tehran. He has resisted compromises that would open the door to negotiations with Tehran, has stocked the N.S.C. with Iran hard-liners and has masterminded recent policy changes to tighten the economic and political vise on the country’s leaders.

Mr. Trump is less frustrated with Mr. Bolton over his handling of Iran — he favors the tougher measures as a warning to Tehran — than over the evolving narrative that his national security adviser is leading the administration’s policy in the Middle East, according to three officials.

The president, they said, is well-versed and comfortable with the administration’s recent steps, which have included imposing increasingly onerous sanctions on Iran and designating the military wing of the government, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, as a foreign terrorist organization.

Still, the gravity of the Iranian threat has become the subject of a fierce debate among administration officials. Some officials have argued that it did not warrant a dramatic American response, like deploying thousands of troops to the Middle East, or the partial evacuation of the United States Embassy in Baghdad.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/16/world/middleeast/iran-war-donald-trump.html


House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy declined to say whether he wants to see the Supreme Court strike down the Alabama law. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

congress

The top Republican in the House said Thursday that he believes Alabama’s new restrictive abortion law — the strictest in the nation — goes too far.

“It goes further than I believe, yes,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy told reporters during a news conference.

Story Continued Below

While the California Republican reiterated his anti-abortion stance, McCarthy took issue with Alabama’s ban for not including exceptions for cases of rape and incest.

“I defend my pro-life position for my whole political career,” he said. “But in my whole political career, I also believed in rape, incest or life of the mother. There was exceptions.”

“That’s exactly what Republicans have voted on in this House, that’s what our platform says,” McCarthy added.

Alabama Republican Gov. Kay Ivey signed the law on Wednesday to outlaw nearly all abortions in the state, setting up a court fight that Republicans hope will end with the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

The bill, which was easily approved by the Republican-dominated Alabama House last month, does make an exception if the pregnancy poses a health risk to the mother. Under the measure, doctors could face up to 99 years in prison for performing an abortion.

McCarthy declined to say whether he wants to see the Supreme Court strike down the Alabama law, but he did note that the bill’s author was hoping to spark a court challenge.

“[The author’s] point was to try to get it to the court,” McCarthy said. “The individual tried to make it to an extreme position to try to make a debate inside the court.”

The law, along with a number of other anti-abortion bills that have been recently passed in red states around the country, have generated a groundswell of opposition among abortion rights advocates who worry that the ideological makeup of the current Supreme Court puts the precedent set by Roe in jeopardy.

“When I was growing up, people got abortions,” tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) “Desperate women turned to back alley butchers or even tried the procedure on their own. Some were lucky, but others weren’t. They all went through hell. Access to safe, legal abortion is a constitutional RIGHT. Full stop.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/16/abortion-bill-kevin-mccarthy-1328692

President Trump is not backing down in his trade war. After initially raising tariffs from 10% to 25% on $200 billion worth of goods coming from China, the Trump administration also hiked tariffs on an additional $300 billion worth of goods.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Trump said: “We’re having a little squabble with China because we’ve been treated very unfairly for many, many decades or actually a long time, and it should’ve been handled a long time ago, and it wasn’t, and we’ll handle it now. I think it’s going to turn out extremely well. We’re in a very strong position.”

The additional tariffs come after China announced it will raise tariffs on $60 billion worth of goods coming from the United States. Trump is excited about this escalating trade war. Others in Washington are not.

Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, both Republicans, have expressed concern and pessimism over Trump’s trade policy, especially when it comes to agriculture. The state they both represent, Iowa, ranks second in the nation in terms of agricultural exports between corn, soybeans, pork, and eggs. It’s also the nation’s leader in producing and exporting corn and ethanol, a biofuel additive for gasoline.

Meanwhile, the 2020 Democratic candidates are pinning all the blame on Trump.

Following the news of the initial tariffs being raised, Joe Biden told reporters in New Hampshire this week, “The president has done nothing but increase the tariffs, the debt, and the trade deficit. The way we have to proceed is we have to have our allies with us. It’s not just us. We have to keep the world together.” Earlier in May, Biden said that China are not bad folks and are not competition for the U.S.

The problem here is that many Democrats, like Biden, are pretending there’s a moral equivalence between China and the U.S.

China is an authoritarian state run by the Communist Party. The Chinese people simply don’t have the same freedoms as Americans. Political dissent is punished. Freedom of religion is a farce.

Consider the Uighur Muslims, a religious and ethnic minority in the western province of Xinjiang, who have been persecuted by the Chinese government for practicing Islam. In addition to being subject to increased surveillance in daily life that includes owning books about Uighurs, growing a beard, having a prayer rug, or even quitting smoking or drinking, over a million Uighur Muslims are imprisoned in “re-education camps,” which can be argued as modern-day concentration camps.

Looking at the bigger picture, Trump’s trade war could be the extent of how far he’s willing to go with China. Yes, U.S. farmers and consumers will arguably be hurt by the tariffs. But China is a bad actor that has no interest in making the lives of Americans better. All they care about is expanding and cementing their power on the world stage. American politicians on both sides of the aisle should be quick to remember that.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/amid-us-china-trade-war-americans-need-to-know-who-theyre-dealing-with

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-financial-disclosure-reveals-revenue-dips-mar-lago-mixed-results-n1006561


HOUSTON – Severe weather is possible in the Houston area this weekend as a front attempts to slide through the region.

Thursday and Friday will feature lots of sunshine and warm temperatures, with afternoon highs in the upper 80s. There’s a slim chance of an isolated shower or thunderstorm each afternoon.

Rain chances jump to 60% by Saturday as a cold front moves into Southeast Texas. The bulk of the rain will happen during the evening hours and linger into Sunday morning. 

There is a slight risk of severe weather for the Houston area on Saturday, with hail and gusty winds the primary threat with any strong storms that develop.

KPRC

Skies begin to clear by Sunday afternoon before summerlike heat and humidity arrive Monday.

High temperatures are expected to be in the 90s for a majority of next week.

Copyright 2019 by KPRC Click2Houston – All rights reserved.

Source Article from https://www.click2houston.com/weather/severe-storms-possible-this-weekend-in-houston

CLOSE

The College Board is rolling out a new system that assigns test-takers a score based on the environment they grew up in.
USA TODAY

The College Board is rolling out a new system that assigns SAT test-takers a score based on the environment they grew up in.

Dubbed the Environmental Context Dashboard, the score will give prospective colleges another point of information that takes into account the students’ socio-economic background as well as factors like the rigor of their high school. 

The move drew criticism and praise for its attempt to add more context to an exam that has long been seen as catering to students with the time and resources to prepare for it.

Many have described the information shown on the dashboard as an “adversity score,” but David Coleman, the chief executive officer of the College Board, pushed back on that characterization.

Coleman said the aim of the new metric is to see how well students do in challenging environments.

“We’re trying to shine a light on resourcefulness on students who do more with less,” Coleman said. “What is scarce is resourcefulness. It’s not just that you grew up with adversity but that you did so much with it.”

The College Board says the move aims to even the playing field so that striving students from low-income backgrounds get full consideration by college admissions officers, even if their overall scores aren’t as high as those of wealthier peers.

Better to be rich than smart: 7 out of 10 wealthy kindergarten students with low test scores were affluent by age 25, study finds

The program has been in development since 2015, and it’s currently being used at 50 colleges, as first reported by The Wall Street Journal. It’s set to expand to 150 in the fall and then expand from there. 

The College Board will withhold the scores from the students themselves, and will allow only the universities considering applications to the adversity index.

Jeff Thomas, the executive director of admissions programs at Kaplan Test Prep, said the new measure has potential, but much about how the score works remains unknown. 

“To that end, it remains to be seen how admissions officers will evaluate an adversity score relative to the more traditional admissions factors,” Thomas said in a statement. “Suffice it to say, it won’t trump the importance of factors like GPA and SAT scores, though it may offer additional context.” 

Connie Betterton, vice president of higher ed access and strategy, said the universities currently using the dashboard are a mix of private and public institutions. She added they tend to be more on selective side, as these are the types of universities who conduct a more holistic review of applicants.

The dashboard is separate from the students’ academic score on the test. And it’s calculated through factors such as the poverty level or crime rate in students’ neighborhoods.

The dashboard also includes institutional factors such as the average number of AP tests taken at students’ high schools or the percentage of the population on free or reduced lunches. (Note: The College Board also administers AP exams.) It also shows how the students fared on the test compared to their peers.

It does not factor in students’ race. Coleman said the purpose to measure what students have done in their academic life outside of their race.

“I think that the reason race isn’t a factor here is what we’re measuring is resourcefulness,” Coleman said. “And what it allows you to do is see that that is a widespread issue throughout the American population and within every racial community.”

College administrators can also plug in ACT scores into the dashboard, although the score from the rival test will be converted to the equivalent SAT score.

The ACT is developing its own approach to better judge the merit of students from under-served backgrounds, wrote Ed Colby, a spokesman for the company. He said, however, the company was not developing a tool similar to the SAT’s dashboard.

Andy Borst, the director of undergraduate admissions at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, wrote in an email that his university hadn’t started using the scale, but it will in a limited scale starting next year.

Application reviewers will only have access to students’ individual disadvantage scores, but will able to see the score of the high school. And he wrote the tool may be helpful in determining who succeeds in college and how their background plays into that. The challenge will be, he wrote, oversimplifying the way the data is used.

“I certainly agree with being skeptical of any new measure until we understand what the new information tells us,” he wrote. “But if our end goal is getting students to graduation, then there can be value to be found if the adversity scale information is used to better understand the college student experience.”

Akil Bello,  a founder and former CEO of the test prep company Bell Curves, said the idea sounds good in theory, but it remains to see how effective it will be in practice. And he said the exclusion of race is actually a good thing. It gives universities the chance to “address inequities without addressing race.”

But Bello said he was unsure what the College Board was trying to do in assigning a number to students’ disadvantage. There’s a reductiveness to numbers, he said.

“As a testing agency, I guess all they want is a score at all times,” Bello said. “But this seems like a big missed opportunity to me to move the conversation away from scores, and the problems that scores create.”

Both the ACT and SAT have been under public pressure in recent months following the biggest-ever college admissions scandal in which Rick Singer helped students cheat on these exams to game their way into elite universities. The extent of the cheating included faking disabilities for extra time to take the test to having stand-ins take the test for the students.  

The move is also sure to draw criticism from those critical of considering race-related factors in college admissions. There have been several lawsuits in recent years challenging affirmative action, the most high profile of which is a case between Students for Fair Admissions and Harvard University. The former alleges the university’s use of race is unfair to Asian Americans. Harvard has argued it doesn’t discriminate against anyone.

More generally, many universities have started to reconsider requiring the use of these exams, the most prominent among them is the University of Chicago.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2019/05/16/college-admissions-college-board-add-adversity-score-sat/3692471002/

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Thursday that he opposes a new Alabama law that outlaws virtually all abortions, even in cases of rape and incest, arguing that it “goes further than I believe.”

“I believe in exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother, and that’s what I’ve voted on,” McCarthy said at his weekly news conference.

The new antiabortion law in Alabama, the strictest in the country, has divided Republicans and put them on the defensive on the issue. Until this week, Republicans had been playing offense by casting Democrats as extreme due to a recent New York law expanding access to late-term abortion.

In addition to not including exceptions for rape or incest, the law also allows a penalty of up to 99 years in prison for doctors who perform abortions.

Republicans are wary of a reprise of 2012, when they lost two key Senate races in Indiana and Missouri after the party’s nominees in those states made comments about pregnancies resulting from rape. The debate over the Alabama law also comes at a time when Republicans are looking to make inroads with suburban women, a voting bloc that they lost when Democrats recaptured the House in 2018.

Among those criticizing the Alabama bill this week was longtime televangelist Pat Robertson, who decried it as “extreme.”

Trump and the White House have been noticeably silent on the law, and Republican senators such as Martha McSally (Ariz.) and Thom Tillis (N.C.) facing tough reelection races next year have been hesitant to weigh in on it.

At his Thursday news conference, McCarthy said exceptions for rape and incest are “exactly what Republicans have voted on in this House. That’s what our platform says.”

President Trump said in 2016 that he would support changing the platform to include exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother. But the platform does not in fact include those exceptions. A spokesman for McCarthy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

McCarthy also declined to offer an opinion on whether the Alabama law should be struck down.

“Look I’m not an attorney. I’m not on the Supreme Court,” McCarthy said, adding that it was up to the justices on the top court to decide.

A spokesman for the other top Republican in Congress, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.), did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Alabama law.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/top-house-republican-mccarthy-says-he-opposes-alabama-abortion-law/2019/05/16/22fae790-77f3-11e9-b3f5-5673edf2d127_story.html

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump has become irritated at an emerging impression his hawkish national security advisers are marching him closer to war with Iran despite his isolationist tendencies, according to people familiar with the matter.

    ‘);$vidEndSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–active’);}};CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;var configObj = {thumb: ‘none’,video: ‘politics/2019/05/15/iran-tensions-white-house-skepticism-starr-dnt-lead-vpx.cnn’,width: ‘100%’,height: ‘100%’,section: ‘domestic’,profile: ‘expansion’,network: ‘cnn’,markupId: ‘body-text_29’,theoplayer: {allowNativeFullscreen: true},adsection: ‘const-article-inpage’,frameWidth: ‘100%’,frameHeight: ‘100%’,posterImageOverride: {“mini”:{“width”:220,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181106151425-us-iran-flag-split-small-169.jpg”,”height”:124},”xsmall”:{“width”:307,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181106151425-us-iran-flag-split-medium-plus-169.jpg”,”height”:173},”small”:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”http://www.noticiasdodia.onlinenewsbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/181106151425-us-iran-flag-split-large-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”medium”:{“width”:780,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181106151425-us-iran-flag-split-exlarge-169.jpg”,”height”:438},”large”:{“width”:1100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181106151425-us-iran-flag-split-super-169.jpg”,”height”:619},”full16x9″:{“width”:1600,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181106151425-us-iran-flag-split-full-169.jpg”,”height”:900},”mini1x1″:{“width”:120,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181106151425-us-iran-flag-split-small-11.jpg”,”height”:120}}},autoStartVideo = false,isVideoReplayClicked = false,callbackObj,containerEl,currentVideoCollection = [],currentVideoCollectionId = ”,isLivePlayer = false,mediaMetadataCallbacks,mobilePinnedView = null,moveToNextTimeout,mutePlayerEnabled = false,nextVideoId = ”,nextVideoUrl = ”,turnOnFlashMessaging = false,videoPinner,videoEndSlateImpl;if (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === false) {autoStartVideo = false;if (autoStartVideo === true) {if (turnOnFlashMessaging === true) {autoStartVideo = false;containerEl = jQuery(document.getElementById(configObj.markupId));CNN.VideoPlayer.showFlashSlate(containerEl);} else {CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = true;}}}configObj.autostart = CNN.Features.enableAutoplayBlock ? false : autoStartVideo;CNN.VideoPlayer.setPlayerProperties(configObj.markupId, autoStartVideo, isLivePlayer, isVideoReplayClicked, mutePlayerEnabled);CNN.VideoPlayer.setFirstVideoInCollection(currentVideoCollection, configObj.markupId);videoEndSlateImpl = new CNN.VideoEndSlate(‘body-text_29’);function findNextVideo(currentVideoId) {var i,vidObj;if (currentVideoId && jQuery.isArray(currentVideoCollection) && currentVideoCollection.length > 0) {for (i = 0; i 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.showEndSlateForContainer();if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.disable();}}}}callbackObj = {onPlayerReady: function (containerId) {var playerInstance,containerClassId = ‘#’ + containerId;CNN.VideoPlayer.handleInitialExpandableVideoState(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, CNN.pageVis.isDocumentVisible());if (CNN.Features.enableMobileWebFloatingPlayer &&Modernizr &&(Modernizr.phone || Modernizr.mobile || Modernizr.tablet) &&CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibraryName(containerId) === ‘fave’ &&jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length > 0 &&CNN.contentModel.pageType === ‘article’) {playerInstance = FAVE.player.getInstance(containerId);mobilePinnedView = new CNN.MobilePinnedView({element: jQuery(containerClassId),enabled: false,transition: CNN.MobileWebFloatingPlayer.transition,onPin: function () {playerInstance.hideUI();},onUnpin: function () {playerInstance.showUI();},onPlayerClick: function () {if (mobilePinnedView) {playerInstance.enterFullscreen();playerInstance.showUI();}},onDismiss: function() {CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer.disable();playerInstance.pause();}});/* Storing pinned view on CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer So that all players can see the single pinned player */CNN.Videx = CNN.Videx || {};CNN.Videx.mobile = CNN.Videx.mobile || {};CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer = mobilePinnedView;}if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length) {videoPinner = new CNN.VideoPinner(containerClassId);videoPinner.init();} else {CNN.VideoPlayer.hideThumbnail(containerId);}}},onContentEntryLoad: function(containerId, playerId, contentid, isQueue) {CNN.VideoPlayer.showSpinner(containerId);},onContentPause: function (containerId, playerId, videoId, paused) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, paused);}},onContentMetadata: function (containerId, playerId, metadata, contentId, duration, width, height) {var endSlateLen = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0).length;CNN.VideoSourceUtils.updateSource(containerId, metadata);if (endSlateLen > 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.fetchAndShowRecommendedVideos(metadata);}},onAdPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType) {/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays an Ad */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onAdPause: function (containerId, playerId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType, instance, isAdPause) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, isAdPause);}},onTrackingFullscreen: function (containerId, PlayerId, dataObj) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleFullscreenChange(containerId, dataObj);if (mobilePinnedView &&typeof dataObj === ‘object’ &&FAVE.Utils.os === ‘iOS’ && !dataObj.fullscreen) {jQuery(document).scrollTop(mobilePinnedView.getScrollPosition());playerInstance.hideUI();}},onContentPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, event) {var playerInstance,prevVideoId;if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreEpicAds’);}clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onContentReplayRequest: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);var $endSlate = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0);if ($endSlate.length > 0) {$endSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–active’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’);}}}},onContentBegin: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.enable();}/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays a video. */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.mutePlayer(containerId);if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘removeEpicAds’);}CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoSourceUtils.clearSource(containerId);jQuery(document).triggerVideoContentStarted();},onContentComplete: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreFreewheel’);}navigateToNextVideo(contentId, containerId);},onContentEnd: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(false);}}},onCVPVisibilityChange: function (containerId, cvpId, visible) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, visible);}};if (typeof configObj.context !== ‘string’ || configObj.context.length 0) {configObj.adsection = window.ssid;}CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibrary(configObj, callbackObj, isLivePlayer);});CNN.INJECTOR.scriptComplete(‘videodemanddust’);

    Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/16/politics/donald-trump-iran-john-bolton-mike-pompeo/index.html

    President Trump is not backing down in his trade war. After initially raising tariffs from 10% to 25% on $200 billion worth of goods coming from China, the Trump administration also hiked tariffs on an additional $300 billion worth of goods.

    Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Trump said: “We’re having a little squabble with China because we’ve been treated very unfairly for many, many decades or actually a long time, and it should’ve been handled a long time ago, and it wasn’t, and we’ll handle it now. I think it’s going to turn out extremely well. We’re in a very strong position.”

    The additional tariffs come after China announced it will raise tariffs on $60 billion worth of goods coming from the United States. Trump is excited about this escalating trade war. Others in Washington are not.

    Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, both Republicans, have expressed concern and pessimism over Trump’s trade policy, especially when it comes to agriculture. The state they both represent, Iowa, ranks second in the nation in terms of agricultural exports between corn, soybeans, pork, and eggs. It’s also the nation’s leader in producing and exporting corn and ethanol, a biofuel additive for gasoline.

    Meanwhile, the 2020 Democratic candidates are pinning all the blame on Trump.

    Following the news of the initial tariffs being raised, Joe Biden told reporters in New Hampshire this week, “The president has done nothing but increase the tariffs, the debt, and the trade deficit. The way we have to proceed is we have to have our allies with us. It’s not just us. We have to keep the world together.” Earlier in May, Biden said that China are not bad folks and are not competition for the U.S.

    The problem here is that many Democrats, like Biden, are pretending there’s a moral equivalence between China and the U.S.

    China is an authoritarian state run by the Communist Party. The Chinese people simply don’t have the same freedoms as Americans. Political dissent is punished. Freedom of religion is a farce.

    Consider the Uighur Muslims, a religious and ethnic minority in the western province of Xinjiang, who have been persecuted by the Chinese government for practicing Islam. In addition to being subject to increased surveillance in daily life that includes owning books about Uighurs, growing a beard, having a prayer rug, or even quitting smoking or drinking, over a million Uighur Muslims are imprisoned in “re-education camps,” which can be argued as modern-day concentration camps.

    Looking at the bigger picture, Trump’s trade war could be the extent of how far he’s willing to go with China. Yes, U.S. farmers and consumers will arguably be hurt by the tariffs. But China is a bad actor that has no interest in making the lives of Americans better. All they care about is expanding and cementing their power on the world stage. American politicians on both sides of the aisle should be quick to remember that.

    Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/amid-us-china-trade-war-americans-need-to-know-who-theyre-dealing-with

    New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is joining the two dozen other Democratic candidates running for president and many of us can only ask, why? Why would another (usually white, often male) politician look at the field of highly qualified Democratic presidential candidates and think: You know what this race needs? One more.

    Though each of these candidates surely thinks he or she has something unique to offer, the truth is that with this many people in the race, it’s hard to see what possible way there is to break out of a very crowded race. The recent additions to the packed Democratic field could be better described as ”a bay of milquetoast men running for president,” Lee Banville, a political analyst at the University of Montana, recently told Vox’s Ella Nilsen.

    Sure, there are real reasons candidates like Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet, or even Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan have entered a campaign that Joe Biden appears to be dominating — and that Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg, and Kamala Harris are duking it out for double-digit polling numbers. After all, Biden’s support could always collapse. Paradoxically, the more candidates in the race, the more enticing it becomes to join because the number of delegates are awarded proportionally, dramatically lowering the bar for the potential to win.

    There certainly is a strong degree of personal vanity too; some of these guys just look in the mirror and say “I’m just born to be in it.”

    But maybe the most important reason the field is so damn crowded is that the Democratic Party is still sorting through an identity crisis in the aftermath of 2016. A host of candidates look at recent history and think: The Democratic Party doesn’t really know what it’s looking for, and in this time of chaos, maybe the answer is me.

    The plainly political reasons so many people are running for president

    We asked Kyle Kondik, who helps run the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, why a politician would decide to jump into the 2020 campaign when there are already 20 other candidates. He named three factors.

    1) There isn’t exactly a big favorite.

    “There’s not really a big favorite for the nomination. Biden may become that, but he’ll need to prove it,” Kondik says. “A dominant frontrunner is a barrier to entry for candidates, and this field has lacked that and arguably still does.”

    Yes, Biden is substantially leading the polls — though he still doesn’t yet have a majority of primary voters — but it wouldn’t be a shock if he became the Democratic nominee. Plenty of other early frontrunners like Mitt Romney in 2012 and Hillary Clinton in 2016 have more or less sailed to the nomination. But just as many others have faltered. Take Rudy Giuliani in 2008, for example, or Jeb Bush in 2016 (even though he admittedly never polled that well).

    But Biden’s certainly got some liabilities, and his presidential campaigns have flamed out before. If that happens, the race really does look wide open — which might make it attractive for a Bullock (a white man with a populist but center-left sensibility) to dip his toes in the water.

    2. With so many candidates already in, why not take the chance?

    “It may be that the sheer number of candidates has the effect of enticing even more candidates to enter. With every additional entry, hypothetically that means that the share of the vote needed to win Iowa or New Hampshire goes down,” Kondik says. “It’s not hard for any of them to imagine winning a quarter of the vote in an early state, which may be all it requires to win.”

    Remember, the Democratic Party awards delegates in every state proportionally. You have to hit a certain threshold — 15 percent — to win delegates, but, as Kondik notes, politicians who have won statewide elections or who became the mayor of America’s biggest city on a long-shot comeback can certainly talk themselves into believing their talents can get them to 15 percent. At worst, they could win some delegates and become a power player at an unlikely but conceivable brokered convention.

    3. Democrats really think they can beat Donald Trump.

    “Democrats likely feel that the nomination is worth having — namely, that Trump is beatable in a general election,” Kondik told us. “If the incumbent president was more popular, my guess is that fewer people would be running.”

    The payoff here is huge. Sure, Trump might have some built-in advantages as the incumbent, but he’s an incumbent who is historically unpopular considering the state of the economy. He sure seems vulnerable.

    Dave Hamrick, who ran former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley’s presidential campaign in 2016, also noted the attention a candidate could generate as a White House contender. Nobody might care what an everyday Congress member about thinks about any given subject but a presidential candidate? That can get you on CNN or MSNBC.

    You also have issues candidates, Hamrick said. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, relentlessly focused on climate change, is a good example. Bennet, a proud pragmatist, is another candidate with some clear ideological rationale for his long-shot run. And with the rise of out-of-nowhere candidates like South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, many think, why not take the chance?

    “Nobody knows who’s going to win this primary. It’s completely open,” Hamrick said. “There are a lot of Democrats here that can all look at themselves and say, ‘It could be me. I’m qualified. I have as good a story as anyone. It could happen.’”

    Why there are (still) so many white men running for president

    After the 2018 midterm elections — dubbed the year of the Democratic woman — delivered the most diverse map of elected officials in US history, it’s worth noting that of the 22 Democrats running for president, only six are people of color and only six are women. One is both.

    It’s the most diverse field of presidential candidates ever, but Reps. Seth Moulton, Tim Ryan, and Eric Swalwell, Sen. Bennet, and Gov. Bullock all got in anyway.

    There is some research on gender and politics that helps explain this dynamic. For one, the stereotypical expectation of the role is intrinsically tied to men and masculinity; after all only men have served as president of the United States (and only one ever was nonwhite).

    Second, women are much less likely than men to even begin to consider running for office, and when they do, they consider many more factors than men. “Men of all types felt more freedom to launch a candidacy,” according to a Washington University study by political scientists Richard Fox, Jennifer Lawless, and Courtney Feeley. This disparity starts at an early age; in a 2013 study, young men were twice as likely as women to have thought about running for office “many times.”

    Men see officeholders who look like them, and they’ve likely thought about running for president before, regardless of whether someone urged them to, and they’re more likely to have considered fewer other factors — like potential risks — before jumping in.

    Interestingly, in the runup to 2020, when the focus was on the slate of diverse candidates gearing up to compete, conventional wisdom indicated Democrats would need a new approach to beating Trump.

    “There is a willingness to say the best contrast to [Trump] is a woman, and maybe a woman of color,” Kelly Dittmar, a political scientist with Rutgers University, told Vox earlier in the year. That no longer appears to be the case.

    Democrats are going through an identity crisis

    The 2016 primary was so dramatic because it boiled down to a binary choice between the mainstream liberal Hillary Clinton and the socialist populist Bernie Sanders. When Clinton beat Sanders only to lose to Trump, Democrats felt they had to seriously recalculate.

    Sanders — a very unorthodox heir to the “candidate who finished second last time gets the nomination this time” trope — is trying to claim victory on the ideas front; in many ways, he’s right. The field now largely backs a $15 minimum wage, major changes to the American health care and higher education systems, and abandoning trade agreements the party’s last president negotiated. Democrats have a lot of candidates who now back a decidedly progressive platform, including Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, and Kirsten Gillibrand. Others, like Biden, Bennet, and Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, have shored up the more traditional moderate flank.

    While these left-wing ideas have dominated the conversation around Democratic politics for the greater part of the past four years, they still represent a radical shift in a party that only three years ago selected a nominee that didn’t back a $15 minimum wage or single-payer health care.

    Joe Biden is saying Obama-style politics were good. Amy Klobuchar wants to tell you that she can work across the aisle. The party has different ideologues, like Bennet and Inslee, even de Blasio. (You also have the pragmatists, like Bullock). California Rep. Eric Swalwell is sounding a very particular kind of national security message.

    We don’t know what exact alchemy Democratic primary voters will come up with if they decide they don’t want to stick with Biden. Republicans endured some version of this in 2016, having gone with the consensus choice in 2012 and then lost an election they really thought they were going to win. It was a genuine identity crisis — remember the autopsy in 2013?

    Under Trump, Democrats haven’t had to build meaningful consensus around policies — only rally around vague slogans. The Democratic Party doesn’t know what the consensus is. The candidates know this.

    “They fill a lane where they think the party is going,“ Hamrick says. “Nobody can handicap this one. Nobody can predict it.”

    Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/5/16/18623083/democratic-presidential-candidates-2020-election-bill-de-blasio


    DETROIT – We need to watch the skies very closely later today as the Storm Prediction Center has placed SE Lower Michigan in a Marginal to Slight Risk for Severe Weather later today. It all depends on the timing of a cold front moving west to east over the area later today.

    All signs point to showers and storms after 7 or 8 p.m. which may limit the severity of these potential storms due to fading sunlight and more stable conditions. So, we will keep an eye to the skies and if the front advances faster, we may see some storms blossom in the late afternoon capable of damaging winds and large hail.

    Stay tuned.

    Meanwhile, partly sunny and low to mid 70s on tap for today with gusty winds picking up in the afternoon SSW 7-17 mph gusting to 25 mph. That will help warm us up, but may also deliver the heat and moisture needed for those storms later today. For now, plan on a stormy evening and early night ahead.

    Friday forecast

    Rain will likely linger over Metro Detroit Friday morning drying up during the morning drive. So, most of your Friday is a dry day with only partly sunny to mostly cloudy skies and highs just shy of 70 degrees staying in the 60s all day.

    Saturday forecast

    More rain and potentially heavy rain moves in overnight into early Saturday with some morning soakers before again drying up for most of the day. Due to morning showers and lingering clouds, we may not get out of the 60s again on Saturday.

    Sunday forecast

    Sunday will be another day for ‘eyes to the skies’ with a dry first half of the day and temps possible warming to 80 degrees.

    A little sun early filling with clouds and a cool front approaching bringing rain and thunderstorms through Sunday afternoon and evening.

    Wet weather should clear out for Monday and Tuesday the only partly sunny skies and upper 60s early next week as cooler breezes keep us barely on the cooler side of average or normal (70°F). Showers and storms are likely late, late Tuesday and/or Wednesday of next week.  

    You can get your 7-Day Forecast and track our next storm chances with our Local4Casters app.

    • Download for iPhone
    • Download for Android

    Copyright 2019 by WDIV ClickOnDetroit – All rights reserved.

    Source Article from https://www.clickondetroit.com/weather/metro-detroit-weather-tracking-severe-storm-chances-tonight

    The College Board, which oversees the SAT exam used by most U.S. colleges during the admissions process, plans to introduce an “adversity score” which takes into consideration the social and economic background of every student.

    The move is likely to reignite the debate over race and class in college admissions.

    The new adversity score is being calculated using 15 factors, including the crime rate and poverty level from the student’s high school and neighborhood, The Wall Street Journal first reported.

    Students won’t be privy to their scores but colleges and universities will see them when reviewing applications.

    HARVARD WON’T RENEW WEINSTEIN LAWYER AS STUDENT HOUSE DEAN

    So far, 50 colleges have used it in making a decision about a prospective student’s chances. The College Board plans to expand that to 150 higher learning institutions in the fall. The goal is to use it broadly by 2021.

    Yale University is one of the schools that has used adversity scores. The Connecticut-based Ivy has pushed to increase socioeconomic diversity in recent years and has almost doubled the number of low-income students. 
    (istock)

    “There are a number of amazing students who may have scored less (on the SAT) but have accomplished more,” David Coleman, chief executive of the College Board, said. “We can’t sit on our hands and ignore the disparities of wealth reflected in the SAT.”

    Yale University is one of the schools that has used adversity scores. The Connecticut-based Ivy has pushed to increase socioeconomic diversity in recent years and has almost doubled the number of low-income students.

    “This (adversity score) is literally affecting every application we look at,” Jeremiah Quinlan, dean of undergraduate admissions at Yale, told WSJ. “It has been a part of the success story to help diversity our freshman class.”

    Still, it’s unlikely the adversity score will be a hit with advocates who have long argued that merit alone should dictate whether a student is allowed admission.

    HAVARD DISCRIMINATION TRIAL REVEALS IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL’S DIFFERENT SAT STANDARDS FOR ASIAN-AMERICANS 

    Many universities like Harvard say a diverse student body is part of the college experience and should be the educational mission of a school. However, there have been several lawsuits filed in recent years that accuse universities of unfair admission practices.

    In October, Harvard University’s dean of admissions testified the Ivy League school applies different SAT score standards to prospective students based on factors such as race, but insisted the practice is not discriminatory.

    Students for Fair Admissions, a group headed by legal strategist Edward Blum, sued the Cambridge, Mass., school in 2014 claiming Asian-Americans, who have the highest academic records, unfairly receive the lowest admission rate at the elite university.

    CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

    Similar lawsuits have also been filed against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of California system.

    According to a February Pew Research Center survey, 73% of Americans say colleges should not consider race or ethnicity when making admission decisions. Only 7% said race should be a major factor.

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/sat-to-use-adversity-score-for-students-applying-to-college

    Julie Goodridge (left) and Hillary Goodridge were the face of the movement to legalize same-sex marriage in Massachusetts. They got married on May 17, 2004, just hours after that state became the first in America to allow same-sex marriage.

    Winslow Townson/AP


    hide caption

    toggle caption

    Winslow Townson/AP

    Julie Goodridge (left) and Hillary Goodridge were the face of the movement to legalize same-sex marriage in Massachusetts. They got married on May 17, 2004, just hours after that state became the first in America to allow same-sex marriage.

    Winslow Townson/AP

    Fifteen years ago Friday, Hillary and Julie Goodridge married amid great fanfare and great protests.

    In pastel suits, with broad smiles and colorful streamers, they exchanged vows and rings just hours after Massachusetts became the first state in America to allow same-sex marriage.

    The Goodridges were the face of the movement. The lawsuit that made gay and lesbian marriages a reality bears their name: Goodridge v. Department of Public Health. Historians often divide the equal-marriage movement into “before Goodridge” and “after Goodridge.”

    But less than five years later, they were getting divorced. In winning the right to marry, they lost their own marriage.

    Now, Hillary, Julie and their daughter, Annie Goodridge, are speaking more candidly about the entirety of their experience.

    “If you look at any interview that we’ve done, we’ve never talked about the trauma,” says Julie Goodridge. “But I think that it’s important to tell the full story.”

    The making of a family

    Many years into their relationship but long before Hillary and Julie were involved in any court case, they were dreaming about having a child.

    Because they were a lesbian couple, marriage was forbidden. But they wanted to do something to mark that they were a family. So, they say, they dug through their family trees and picked a common last name: Goodridge.

    Julie remembers thinking, “Oh that sounds positive; let’s pick that!”

    Hillary and Julie Goodridge with their daughter, Annie (center). “It was a lot of stress for all of us, all the time,” says Annie, now 23, of her parents’ involvement in the lawsuit that made same-sex marriages legal. “When you have to be on all the time, it’s hard to turn yourself off.”

    Meredith Nierman/WGBH


    hide caption

    toggle caption

    Meredith Nierman/WGBH

    Hillary and Julie Goodridge with their daughter, Annie (center). “It was a lot of stress for all of us, all the time,” says Annie, now 23, of her parents’ involvement in the lawsuit that made same-sex marriages legal. “When you have to be on all the time, it’s hard to turn yourself off.”

    Meredith Nierman/WGBH

    A few years later, their daughter made a dramatic appearance. She was rushed to the newborn intensive care unit, and Julie, her biological mother, was also in critical condition receiving intensive care. But Hillary was stuck in the hospital’s waiting room. With no legal relationship to either of them, she was unable to visit or help make medical decisions.

    “It’s not like that happened and we thought, ‘We have to sue for marriage equality,’ ” remembers Hillary. But later, that was one of the memories that motivated them to find a way to formalize their relationship, she says.

    As the story goes, the immediate impetus was a simple question from 3-year-old Annie: “If you love each other, then why aren’t you married?” By the time Annie was 5, they were the named plaintiffs in the lawsuit that would spur a decade of intense national debate.

    The trauma of perfection

    As the lawsuit gained momentum and the questions of same-sex marriage consumed the country, Hillary and Julie Goodridge say, the pressure mounted and the resistance grew. Now, with 15 years of distance, they say the trauma they experienced during that time took a few different forms.

    Initially, Hillary says, they felt the pressure to be perfect.

    It was “the stress of feeling like I have the entire community resting on our being likeable,” she says. Every TV outlet wanted shots of Hillary flipping pancakes, Julie ironing, and Annie eating breakfast.

    “We had to look like the girls who could be next door,” says Hillary. “Not too threatening.” No leather. No piercings. Just two moms and their curly-haired daughter.

    “It was a lot of stress for all of us, all the time,” says Annie, now 23. “When you have to be on all the time, it’s hard to turn yourself off.”

    The trauma of being a target

    The Goodridge lawsuit became a call to arms for opponents of same-sex marriage, including then-President George W. Bush. In his 2004 State of the Union address, just a few months after the decision came down, he declared to thunderous applause: “Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.”

    “I remember watching that and thinking, ‘Oh my gosh. He’s talking about us,’ ” Hillary says. “It really got crazy very quickly.”

    Across the country there were efforts to ban same-sex marriage. Forty-one states ultimately limited marriage to heterosexual couples.

    In the middle of it all, Hillary got a voicemail from her mother that went something like this: “Hi, darling. Well, I see today you’ve managed to piss off the pope and the president. But when you get done with that, please give your mother a call.”

    The pope and the president were pissed off, and soon Annie’s playmates were, too. Elementary school classmates refused to come to her house; she was called homophobic slurs; and opponents sent around a flyer.

    “It went into our sex life and how we were harming our daughter,” recalls Julie. “It was a mass mailing.” And Annie remembers, “it was sent to the house of every family that was at my school.”

    Julie says walking into Annie’s school, “we felt a little bit like animals being looked at that were in cages in a zoo.”

    Losing each other

    After spending all day in the public eye, often discussing their relationship, the last thing they wanted to do when they got home was discuss their relationship.

    “We kind of went our separate ways in the house,” says Julie.

    Annie echoes that sentiment: “When you have to be so public about every tiny detail of your lives, it really exacerbates any minute divide between how you deal with stress and what you need to do at the end of the day.”

    Hillary and Julie says seeking couples counseling wasn’t an option. “We couldn’t do that. It felt like too much of a risk. It felt like the word would get out,” remembers Julie.

    Less than two years after getting married, Hillary and Julie had separated. A few years later, they were divorced. When news of their split was leaked to the media, it sent shock waves through the gay community.

    Julie remembers receiving “an incredibly nasty email about how we were going to be destroying the gay community. It went on for several pages. And I just felt like saying, ‘This is not what I chose. I’m doing the best I can.’ “

    “I felt like our family let everyone down,” says Annie, who was 10 when her parents separated.

    Two smiling brides

    The Supreme Court has now guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide. Public opinion has shifted dramatically in support of gay and lesbian marriages. And the Goodridges have been able to step out of the limelight.

    The three of them still spend Christmas together. They exchange Mother’s Day gifts. When their dog was alive — affectionately named “Mary Bonauto” after their lawyer in the case — they all helped care for her.

    And, in some fundamental ways, they still think of themselves a family. “Would I ever consider changing my name? The answer is no,” says Julie.

    In Julie’s office, there’s a picture from a gay-pride march. Somebody is holding a sign that said ‘Brown Roe and Goodridge.'” Their state lawsuit was printed alongside monumental Supreme Court decisions. “I just kind of love that,” Julie says.

    When asked if it was worth it, they are quick to say it was heart-wrenching personally but, they think, good for the country and the world. It was worth it, they decide, but they’re not sure they would do it all again.

    Then, they tell a story: A few weeks ago, a waitress at a nearby restaurant showed them pictures of her wedding. Looking at the shots, they saw two smiling brides staring back.

    “I remember thinking, ‘She has absolutely no idea who we are.’ And that’s what was kind of great,” says Julie. “She was just showing us because she could and she felt comfortable to bring her pictures to her place of work.”

    “Every single time that I scrolled through them, I would cry a little bit because you would see they’re so happy and you feel like you had a part in that,” says Annie.

    After all, the Goodridges say, it is nice to have their family name stamped on something that made so many gay couples happy.

    Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/05/16/723647834/how-making-history-unmade-a-family

    Sen. Josh Hawley said many states are adopting more restrictive abortion policies in response to the “extremism” of pro-choice pushes in states like New York and Virginia.

    The Missouri Senate passed a bill early Thursday to ban abortion at eight weeks of pregnancy. The Republican-led Senate approved the legislation 24-10. It needs at least another vote of approval in the House of Representatives, which is also led by Republicans, before it can head to Republican Gov. Mike Parson’s desk.

    AOC BLAMES TWITTER, READERS AFTER CALLED OUT FOR TWEETS ABOUT ALABAMA PRO-LIFE LAW

    The advancing of the bill comes just hours after Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, a Republican, signed into law a controversial bill that will make performing an abortion at any stage of pregnancy a felony punishable by 10 to 99 years or life in prison.

    Kentucky, Mississippi, Ohio and Georgia have approved bans on abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected, which can happen in the sixth week of pregnancy.

    “It’s a direct response … to the extremism we’ve seen in places like New York and Virginia,” Hawley, R-Mo., said on “Fox & Friends” Thursday. “It’s just incredible the extremism that we’re seeing. And I think you’re seeing these states responding.”

    He said he has long believed Roe v. Wade is “wrongly decided,” and the pro-life versus pro-choice debate should be up to voters in individual states to decide.

    CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Democrat politicians are actually advocating abortion in the final weeks of pregnancy,” Hawley said. “These are policies … that only a few countries in the world — like Iran, like China — allow. We’ve got to stop this kind of extremism.”

    The Associated Press and Fox News’ Nicole Darrah contributed to this report.

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/josh-hawley-abortion-bills-response-extremism-democrats

    The mayor who came closest to the presidency was from New York City: DeWitt Clinton, who won his party’s endorsement but lost to James Madison in 1812. The last sitting mayor of New York who tried to run for president was John V. Lindsay in 1972; Rudolph W. Giuliani, who left City Hall in 2002, unsuccessfully sought the Republican nomination in 2008.

    In fact, it has been nearly a century since any New York City mayor went on to be elected to any office; the last was Ardolph Loges Kline, who was acting mayor in 1913, and served a term in the House of Representatives from 1921 to 1923.

    Nonetheless, being mayor of America’s largest city does offer built-in visibility and stature, and Mr. de Blasio has used his platform to try to push the Democratic Party toward embracing his vision as it looks to dislodge President Trump from the White House in 2020.

    But along the way, Mr. de Blasio has made missteps. He has faced investigations and criticism for his fund-raising tactics. State and federal prosecutors investigated his practices but declined to bring charges, although federal investigators found a pattern in which Mr. de Blasio or his associates solicited contributions from donors seeking favors from the city, and then contacted city agencies on their behalf.

    In April, the mayor held a fund-raiser in Boston hosted by Suffolk Construction, a company that is aggressively trying to extend its footprint in the city.

    He also angered some national Democratic Party leaders by withholding his endorsement of Mrs. Clinton for months, even though he had been her campaign manager during her successful first run for the United States Senate in New York in 2000.

    He began to make clear indications of his own ambition earlier this year, appearing at the United States Conference of Mayors in Washington in January, embracing the underdog narrative that he rode to victory in 2013 when he became mayor.

    Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/16/nyregion/bill-de-blasio-president.html

    Samsung may have a fix for its folding phone that kept breaking

    Samsung has reportedly fixed issues with its folding phone, the Galaxy Fold, and is planning to release it next month.

    read more

    Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/16/frances-macron-on-huawei-over-protectionism-not-the-answer.html