Sara Fitzgerald and Michael Martin, both with the group One Virginia, protest gerrymandering in front of the Supreme Court in March 2018.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Sara Fitzgerald and Michael Martin, both with the group One Virginia, protest gerrymandering in front of the Supreme Court in March 2018.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

The way Thomas Hofeller talked about redistricting — the drawing of political boundaries and the sifting of voters into buckets — you could be forgiven if you assumed he was speaking about a loved one or a favorite holiday.

“Redistricting is like an election in reverse! It’s a great event,” he said with a smile at a National Conference of State Legislatures event in 2000. “Usually the voters get to pick the politicians. In redistricting, the politicians get to pick the voters!”

A mapmaker and Republican strategist, he saw holes in the democratic system that could be exploited by technology and guile. Hofeller, who died in August 2018, saw a way to turn small vote margins into supermajorities for GOP legislators.

Now a trove of his data has been uncovered that could undo some of the work he spent decades perfecting.

The strategy

In North Carolina, after Republican successes in the 2010 election, Hofeller helped draw new maps that netted the party 10 of the state’s 13 congressional seats, despite the popular vote in that state being nearly even.

Hofeller also knew the key to success in this niche field was protecting against lawsuits. He spent 10 PowerPoint slides in a presentation he gave about redistricting in 2011 just on legal issues and privacy.

“Treat every statement and document as if it was going to appear on the FRONT PAGE of your local newspaper,” he implored on one slide. “Emails are the tool of the devil.”

He knew the practice was unseemly, and if politicians were going to partake, Hofeller warned, they needed good lawyers. And a way to keep secrets.

“Loose lips sink ships,” he said, at the same NCSL event in 2000. “Remember, a journey to legal hell starts with but a single misstatement.”

All the more surprising, then, that his own files have prompted legal action.

After Hofeller’s death, his daughter found hard drives and thumb drives holding close to 100,000 files, according to The New York Times. She turned them over to Common Cause, a voting-rights nonprofit.

The first hint at what they could contain came in a court filing last week.

Census case offers a sliver

An unpublished 2015 report, authored by Hofeller, concluded that adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census would produce data that would help redraw political maps “advantageous to Republican and Non-Hispanic Whites.”

Plaintiffs in one of the New York-based lawsuits over the question also say that Hofeller later ghostwrote an early draft of the Trump administration’s request for the question. A Justice Department spokesperson called that accusation “false.”

The Trump administration has said it wants to add the question to help minority representation, even though Census Bureau research disputes that.

Ohio State law professor Daniel Tokaji says the Hofeller discovery is just another example of how the administration’s justification doesn’t hold up.

“It was not really, as they claimed, to get better enforcement of the Voting Rights Act so that Latinos could be fairly represented,” said Tokaji. “In fact, there was a deliberate plan, and that plan includes the dilution of Latino votes and the enhancement of Republican voting strength.”

The question now is, what else is in the newly uncovered files?

The data, as some have theorized, could potentially be useful in other partisan gerrymandering lawsuits that are floating around the country.

Attorneys for Common Cause said in court filings made public Thursday the Hofeller files reveal that Republicans in North Carolina made false statements to a federal court to avoid special elections in 2017.

Legislators repeatedly said districts that had been ruled unconstitutional couldn’t be quickly thrown out because work on new ones had not yet begun. The newfound files, however, show that Hofeller had almost completely finished new maps at the time those statements were made.

Kathay Feng, the national redistricting director for Common Cause, wouldn’t discuss what else is in the files because of ongoing litigation, but she spoke generally about the dangers of politicians drawing district lines that favor their own party.

“This is an American democracy, and we don’t want a situation where, perhaps the best analogy is like Russia, where you have fake choices on the ballot,” Feng said. “Where there is no such thing as true democracy, where your vote doesn’t matter.”

The public’s view on “vote-stealing”

Public opinion about partisan gerrymandering is consistently negative. Last fall, voters in four states voted to reduce the role of elected officials in the redistricting process.

A Campaign Legal Center poll from earlier this year found that about two-thirds of likely 2020 voters view gerrymandering unfavorably.

Tokaji says the public getting a closer look at the unsavory details of Hofeller’s work will only fuel those feelings.

“I think it’s a little bit like the Wizard of Oz,” he said. “It allows those of us who have not been in the backroom to see behind the curtain, and see the real partisan agenda behind some of these decisions.”

The more the public knows and understands about the practice, the less brazen politicians may be when lines are redrawn in 2021.

For much of Hofeller’s career, redistricting was considered a wonky practice that operated in the shadows of the political process.

“Redistricting is a very complex field, but I think it’s a field which affects Americans a lot more than they understand,” Hofeller said in 1991. “I define redistricting as the only legalized form of vote-stealing left in the United States today.”

What remains an open question is exactly how much of his work will be undone by the data that have now come to light.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/06/06/730260511/redistricting-gurus-hard-drives-could-mean-legal-political-woes-for-gop

A total of 20 cadets were injured in this morning’s West Point accident that also killed one, the academy announced on Twitter.

Two soldiers were also wounded in the Light Medium Tactical Vehicle accident, according to the West Point Military Academy.

Here’s what the academy said on Twitter:

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/west-point-accident-june-2019/index.html

President Donald Trump traveled to Normandy on Thursday to commemorate the 75th anniversary of D-Day and pay tribute to American and allied forces who led the invasion of Nazi-occupied France that was the turning point in World War II.

“You are among the very greatest Americans who will ever live. You are the pride of our nation. You are the glory of our republic. And we thank you from the bottom of our hearts,” the president said, addressing the over 60 veterans in attendance who fought in the consequential battle.

Sean Gallup/Getty Images
President Donald Trump speaks at the main ceremony to mark the 75th anniversary of the World War II Allied D-Day invasion of Normandy at Normandy American Cemetery on June 06, 2019, near Colleville-Sur-Mer, France.

During his remarks, the president singled out and recognized the contributions of some of the veterans in attendance, retelling their stories and joining the audience in applause for their service.

Alex Brandon/AP
President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron, talk to a World War II veteran during a ceremony to commemorate the 75th anniversary of D-Day on June 6, 2019, in Colleville-sur-Mer, Normandy, France.

The president and first lady Melania Trump were joined at the commemoration by French President Emanuel Macron and his wife at the American Cemetery in Normandy, where 9,380 American service members lay in final rest. Marcon offered his country’s heartfelt thanks for the sacrifices of allied partners in liberating France, telling the audience, “France has not forgotten those fighters to whom we owe the right to live in freedom.”

Philippe Wojazer/AP
British Prime Minister Theresa May and French President Emmanuel Macron attend a Franco-British ceremony to mark the 75th anniversary of D-Day landings.

“On behalf of France, I bow down before their bravery, I bow down before their immense sacrifice of those killed and those missing, who died as heroes in Normandy between June and August 1944 and who for many were to rest there for eternity,” said Macron, turning to the remaining veterans and adding: “On behalf of my country, I just want to say, thank you.”

Alain Jocard/AFP/Getty Images
President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron hug in front of U.S. WWII veterans during a ceremony at the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial in Colleville-sur-Mer, Normandy, northwestern France, on June 6, 2019.

When Macron concluded his remarks, Trump embraced the French president on stage with an extended handshake and hug.

Macron then awarded France’s highest award for military merit, the Legion of Honour, to several American veterans onstage.

Trump also extended appreciation on behalf of the American people for the French people’s role as caretakers of the American cemetery, with each grave having been adopted by a French family.

“They come from all over France to look over our boys,” Trump said. “Today, America embraces the French people and thanks you for honoring our beloved dead. Thank you.”

Ian Langston/POOL/EPA via Shutterstock
President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron react during the commemoration marking the 75th anniversary of the Allied landings on D-Day in France, June 06, 2019.

Following the ceremony, there was a 21-gun salute from the beach as the two couples walked down to an overlook of Omaha Beach. They observed a moment of silence looking out over the water before the taps was played, and then a show of French and American military jets flew overhead — with the final set of jets leaving red, white and blue streaks in the sky.

After the ceremony, President Trump and his wife visited the graves at the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial.

Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images
President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump visit graves after a French-U.S. ceremony in Normandy, northwestern France, on June 6, 2019, as part of D-Day commemorations.

Trump is just the latest in a long string of U.S. presidents to commemorate the anniversary of the battle Normandy — a tradition that began with Ronald Reagan on the 40th anniversary.

“These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. These are the men who took the cliffs. These are the champions who helped free a continent. These are the heroes who helped end a war,” Reagan said in 1984.

President Jimmy Carter visited before Reagan, in 1978, but his visit did not coincide with the anniversary. President Bill Clinton traveled to Normandy for the 50th anniversary, President George W. Bush on the 60th, and President Barack Obama on the 70th.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-visits-normandy-75-years-day/story?id=63523054

Auto loans hit record high, sending borrowers to the used market

People buying a new vehicle continue pushing the envelope, borrowing more and, on average, paying more each month for their auto loan.

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/06/former-commerce-secretary-expects-mexican-tariffs-to-go-into-place.html

  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reportedly told top Democrats that she wants to see President Donald Trump “in prison.”
  • Pelosi’s comments, first reported by Politico, came during a meeting among senior Democrats to debate impeachment.
  • “I don’t want to see him impeached, I want to see him in prison,” the House Speaker said, according to Politico.
  • Pelosi’s reasoning stems from her desire to see Trump defeated in the 2020 election so that he can potentially face criminal prosecution for any alleged wrongdoing.
  • Visit BusinessInsider.com for more stories.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told senior Democratic lawmakers that she wants to see President Donald Trump “in prison” at a recent meeting at which they debated over impeachment, Politico reported.

Sources told the outlet Pelosi made the comment — which represents some of her strongest language yet against Trump — after butting heads with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler about starting an impeachment inquiry into the president.

Nadler has pushed Pelosi to allow his committee to formally launch an impeachment inquiry once before, and he pressed the issue again at the meeting, but Pelosi is said to have shot him down.

“I don’t want to see him impeached, I want to see him in prison,” the House Speaker said, according to Politico. Pelosi’s reasoning stems from her desire to see Trump defeated in the 2020 election so that he can potentially face criminal prosecution for any alleged wrongdoing.

UNITED STATES – JULY 23: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from California, right, and Nuri al-Maliki, Iraq’s prime minister, shakes hands while addressing the media before a meeting at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, July 23, 2009. Maliki pledged to mend sectarian divisions and fight corruption as he urged the international community to continue providing support to his nation. (Photo by Brendan Hoffman/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

U.S. Vice President-elect Mike Pence, right, shakes hands with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from California, following a meeting in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Nov. 17, 2016. During their closed-door meeting, Pelosi expressed strong concerns about Trump’s decision to name former Breitbart News chief Steve Bannon to be his chief White House strategist, and asked him to reconsider the appointment. Photographer: Chip Somodevilla/Pool via Bloomberg




Read more:Congress is using the Watergate playbook to take on Trump and drum up support for his impeachment

It’s not the first time she’s alluded to the possibility. During an appearance on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” last week, Pelosi said she wanted the Democratic-led House of Representatives to investigate Trump to the fullest extent so they could have an airtight case against the president.

The “silver lining” of impeachment for Trump, Pelosi said, is that “he believes that he would be exonerated by the United States Senate. And there is a school of thought that says, if the Senate acquits you, why bring charges against him in the private sector when he’s no longer president?”

“So when we go out there with our case, it’s got to be ironclad,” Pelosi added.

Sources told Politico that the House Speaker understands Democrats who want to impeach Trump, but she doesn’t believe it’s time to take that step yet.

A key determinant of Pelosi’s and other top Democrats’ reluctance to launch impeachment proceedings right now is that the idea doesn’t have broad public support and bipartisan backing.

Read more:Majority of Americans in new poll agree with GOP Rep. Justin Amash that Trump ‘committed impeachable offenses’

At the same time, Congress is better positioned now than it was at the start of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

A higher percentage of people support impeaching Trump now than the percentage of adults who supported impeaching Nixon at the beginning of the Watergate hearings in 1973.

By June of that year, as the televised hearings had just kicked off, public support for Nixon’s impeachment was at just 19%, according to Gallup polling data obtained by The Washington Post.

Comparatively, in a CNN poll conducted last week, 41% of respondents said they support impeaching Trump.

House Democrats have been grappling with talk of impeachment since the former special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report in the Russia investigation was released in April with light redactions.

Mueller did not charge Trump or anyone on his campaign for conspiring with the Russian government in the 2016 election. In his obstruction-of-justice case against Trump, Mueller did not make a “traditional prosecutorial judgment,” citing Justice Department guidelines that say a sitting president cannot be indicted.

But the former special counsel laid out an extensive roadmap of evidence against Trump and emphasized that even though he didn’t bring charges in the obstruction case, the report “does not exonerate” the president. Prosecutors also noted that if they had confidence that he did not commit a crime, they would have said so.

Mueller also highlighted two points that legal experts say indicate his belief that the president engaged in potentially criminal conduct. First, Mueller said the constitutional remedy for accusing a sitting president of wrongdoing lies with Congress, not the criminal justice system. Second, he said a president is not immune from criminal prosecution once he leaves office.

NOW WATCH: Fox News pundits are using white supremacist language tied to ‘The Great Replacement’ conspiracy theory

See Also:

SEE ALSO: Congress is using the Watergate playbook to take on Trump and drum up support for his impeachment

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/06/06/pelosi-is-reportedly-pushing-back-on-impeachment-wants-to-see-trump-in-prison-instead/23742936/

With the Mueller fiasco, the damage to the idea of a special counsel is complete, and that is a good thing. Long ago I served as law clerk to the panel of circuit court judges that selected “independent counsels” because the judge I clerked for, Roger Robb, was its senior member. As a special assistant to Attorneys General William Smith and Ed Meese, and a member of the White House Counsel’s Office under the estimable Fred Fielding, I saw firsthand how difficult it was for the Justice Department and the White House to deal with the bizarre idea of a prosecutor independent of everyone, an idea deeply at odds with the framers’ design for the executive branch. I’ve taught constitutional law for 25 years and always teach that the Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the independent counsel statute that replaced the ad hoc special counsel arrangements of the Nixon era. But I also point out that, crucially, Congress decided not to renew that statute because of its malignant consequences.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2019/06/05/hugh-hewitt-mueller/

President Trump arrived at his golf course in Doonbeg, Ireland, on Wednesday for a two-night stay — pausing between official events in Europe to visit a business that has cost him $41 million and never reported turning a profit.

Trump, coming off an official state visit to Britain, landed at Shannon Airport in the west of Ireland and met briefly with Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar before flying to Doonbeg, about 40 miles away.

The Irish Times reported that Trump originally wanted to meet with Varadkar at his golf club, but Varadkar wanted to meet at another nearby hotel. The two leaders settled on an awkward compromise: the VIP lounge at the airport.

Trump will leave Doonbeg on Thursday, visiting France for D-Day commemorations. He will return to Doonbeg on Thursday night, before flying home Friday.

Despite the odd geography of that schedule — which requires flying hundreds of miles west to Ireland, then hundreds more miles back east to France — Trump said he stayed at Doonbeg for convenience.

“We’re going to be staying at Doonbeg in Ireland because it’s convenient and it’s a great place. But it’s convenient,” Trump said before he left Washington.

The visit marks the third time Trump has paused during an overseas trip to visit one of his businesses, which he has maintained ownership of as president. He made a brief stop at his Waikiki hotel in Hawaii on the way to Asia in 2017 and spent two nights at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland last summer.

This visit has brought a large contingent of U.S. and Irish officials, as well as police and security forces, to a village of about 750 people. It was not clear how many of them, besides Trump, were staying at the Doonbeg course’s 120-room hotel.

But if they wanted to stay in Doonbeg, they didn’t have many other choices. TripAdvisor lists three hotels, total. Trump’s hotel is rated No. 1. The No. 3 is not a typical hotel but a group of “camping pods” that resemble cozy wooden sheds.

The visit is also bringing worldwide publicity to a course that Trump bought in 2014, after its former owners had struggled to turn a profit.

Trump paid $11.9 million, according to Irish corporate records. After that, Trump put in an additional $30 million into renovating and operating the property, without taking a mortgage loan.

Doonbeg was one of 14 properties that Trump bought without loans between 2006 and 2014, an all-cash spending binge that topped $400 million — defying his history as the heavy-borrowing “King of Debt.” The Trump Organization has explained this unusual spending — which defies the usual practices of the debt-loving real estate industry — by saying its other businesses produced enough cash to make it easy.

“I took a chance, I bought it and — no options, no nothing, just bought it for cash, no mortgage, no debt, no nothing,” Trump told The Washington Post in 2016. “I don’t have debt on any of them. I don’t have debt on very much, period.”

Since then, Doonbeg has never reported turning a profit, losing more than $1 million every year from 2014 to 2017, according to Irish corporate records.

In 2018, the course’s revenue rose slightly — up about 2 percent from $14.2 million to $14.5 million, according to Trump’s latest U.S. financial disclosures. But those disclosures do not show whether the course turned a profit, and the Irish records that would show profit or loss are not yet available.

The course is now waiting on two decisions from Irish planning authorities that the Trump Organization says are crucial to the club’s future.

One is on a proposed sea wall to stop the Atlantic Ocean from eroding away part of the golf course.

The Trump Organization cited climate change in its application for the permit, according to a Politico report from 2016, saying that sea-level rise and more-powerful storms had worsened the threat of erosion. Trump the politician, of course, has questioned idea that climate change is a threat at all — defying the overwhelming scientific consensus and his own golf course’s assessment of its future.

The application for that sea wall is now before Ireland’s national planning authority.

In 2018, the Trump Organization also applied to local authorities to expand the hotel by adding more than 50 new rental cottages and a large ballroom for events. It is awaiting approval from local officials.

At Doonbeg, Trump is likely to find something that escaped him in London: a warm welcome. Trump’s club employs more than 200 people, making it one of the largest employers in a rural area of County Clare. Reporters visiting the area in advance of his visit found that locals — even those who disagreed with his politics — thanked him for bringing customers and money to Doonbeg.

“People divorce Donald Trump the owner of the golf course from his politics,” said James Griffin, a member of the Trump club interviewed by the Irish Times. “People have their own ideas about his policies. The big thing here are the jobs he supports.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/trump-to-stay-at-doonbeg-his-money-losing-golf-course-threatened-by-climate-change/2019/06/05/417832fe-87a2-11e9-9d73-e2ba6bbf1b9b_story.html

Members of the Guadalajara-based faith, if they were willing to talk at all on Wednesday, said they believe their 50-year-old leader is the target of a smear campaign. It is designed, they said, to tear Garcia down, along with the church his father led before him, the one his grandfather founded 93 years ago.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-la-luz-del-mundo-molestation-rape-religion-20190606-story.html

WASHINGTON — American and Mexican negotiators failed to reach a deal Wednesday to prevent punitive U.S. tariffs from going into effect over border security, Trump administration officials told NBC News.

Vice President Mike Pence hosted Mexican Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard, as well as other top U.S. and Mexican officials, at the White House for a meeting on Wednesday that lasted roughly an hour and a half. According to a senior administration official who attended the meeting, the Mexican delegation offered what the White House viewed as a “good faith,” if “minimalist,” approach to solving the “crisis” at the border.

According to another senior administration official, in order for a deal to be made, the White House is asking Mexico to hold Central American asylum seekers in a “safe third country” designation, rather than letting them cross the US border. Additionally, the White House is also asking Mexico to accept the “Migration Protection Protocols,” which require migrants to remain in Mexico until their cases are processed. The administration official was skeptical that a deal could be struck before the Monday deadline, noting that it was likely tariffs would go into effect.

Trump sparked the last-minute meeting between the two countries after announcing on Twitter that he would impose a 5 percent tariff on all Mexican imports beginning this Monday “until Mexico substantially stops the illegal inflow of aliens coming through its territory.” The president warned that the tariffs could increase monthly if the Mexican government failed to adequately address illegal immigration, with the penalties potentially climbing as high as 25 percent.

Ebrard told reporters after the Wednesday meeting that he remained optimistic about reaching a deal before the tariffs deadline, pointing out that such tariffs would hurt people in both the U.S. and Mexico.

Trump, who was traveling abroad Wednesday, tweeted that “[p]rogress is being made, but not nearly enough!” He added that negotiations would continue on Thursday “with the understanding that, if no agreement is reached, Tariffs at the 5% level will begin on Monday, with monthly increases as per schedule.”

“The higher the Tariffs go, the higher the number of companies that will move back to the USA!,” he added.

Trump’s plan to hit Mexico with tariffs in order to compel them to sign on to his immigration policies has been met with significant bipartisan blowback.

After meeting with Senate Republicans on Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., asked White House officials to urge Trump to delay the tariffs until the president is back in the country and able to meet with party members to hear out their concerns.

McConnell also told the administration officials that because the policy is so vast they need to hear from the president himself. The senators also wanted to hear from Trump because the officials in the lunch on Tuesday couldn’t answer many of their questions, a separate source familiar with the conversation told NBC News.

Citing negative economic effects, other Republicans warned the White House that Trump would not have the political backing necessary to follow through with his plan. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., went as far to warn the White House that the Senate would be prepared to vote to disapprove of the president’s action, or even override a potential veto by the president if necessary.

Democrats, for their part, have accused the president of using the unexpected tariff announcement as a mechanism to distract from special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings and ongoing inquiries into potential wrongdoing by the president.

“I don’t even think it rises to the level of policy,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said of Trump’s tariff announcement to reporters on Wednesday. “It’s a distraction from the Mueller report. And it’s served its purpose, right? Here we are.”

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/u-s-mexico-fail-reach-immigration-deal-days-trump-tariffs-n1014351

Donald Trump greets veterans before starting his speech.  MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images

US President Donald Trump singled out another veteran, Private Pickett, describing his ordeal on the beaches at Normandy.

“And today, believe it or not, he has returned to these shores to be with his comrades. Private Pickett, you honor us all with you presence,” Trump said.

Private Pickett then rose to a huge round of applause, before Trump walked over to hug him. “Tough guy,” Trump said, after returning to the podium.

“Today, America embraces the French people, and thanks you for honoring our beloved dead,” Trump went on. “To all of our friends and partners, our cherished alliance was forged in the heat of battle, tested in the trials of war, and proven in the blessings of peace. Our bond is unbreakable.”

He turned back to US troops who took part in the Normandy landings. “They were fathers who would never meet their infant sons and daughters, because they had a job to do — and with God as their witness, they were going to get it done.”

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/d-day-trump-commemorations-gbr-intl/index.html

Donald Trump joked “he can handle it” as a 93-year-old D-Day veteran flirted with US First Lady Melania today.

Thomas Cuthbert laughed, “if I was 20 years younger” as he shook 49-year-old Melania’s hand – right in front of President Trump, 72.

Trump added: “It’s my honor, believe me, thank you very much.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM THE SUN

Speaking after the meet-and-greet, Mr. Cuthbert, from Elmstead Market, Essex, said that Trump “came across very well”.

He added: “He surprised me, when you see someone on the TV but he seemed different, he seemed one of the boys.

Melania Trump and US President Donald Trump meet veteran Thomas Cuthbert during commemorations for the 75th Anniversary of the D-Day landings at Southsea Common, Portsmouth.
(PA via Getty)

WORLD LEADERS INCLUDING PRESIDENT TRUMP GATHER TO COMMEMORATE 75TH ANNIVERSARY OF D-DAY LANDINGS

“His wife was very pleasant as well.”

The joke came at the end of an hour-long D-Day ceremony to remember the historic moment hundreds of thousands of troops stormed the beaches in World War Two.

D-DAY VETERAN, 97, PARACHUTES INTO NORMANDY 75 YEARS LATER: ‘I’D GO UP AND DO IT ALL AGAIN’

President Trump performed a reading at the ceremony, which also featured a series of poems, dramatizations, songs and speeches.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

This article originally appeared in The Sun. For more from The Sun, click here.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/world/d-day-veteran-93-flirts-melania-trump-20-years-younger

In his conduct of the office of president of the United States, Richard M. NixonDonald J. Trump, contrary to his oath faithfully to execute the office of president of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has failed without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives on April 11, 1974, May 15, 1974, May 30, 1974, and June 24, 1974April 19, 2019, April 22, 2019, and May 21, 2019; the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives on April 15, 2019; the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives on April 15, 2019; the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives on April 15, 2019, and May 8, 2019; and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives on May 10, 2019, and willfully disobeyed such subpoenas. The subpoenaed papers and things were deemed necessary by the committee in order to resolve by direct evidence fundamental, factual questions relating to presidential direction, knowledge or approval of actions demonstrated by other evidence to be substantial grounds for impeachment of the president. In refusing to produce these papers and things Richard M. NixonDonald J. Trump, substituting his judgment as to what materials were necessary for the inquiry, interposed the powers of the presidency against the lawful subpoenas of the House of Representatives, thereby assuming to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the sole power of impeachment vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/05/opinion/impeachment-trump-democrats-nixon-clinton.html

Greater China markets struggle for gains as investors expect Fed…

In China, the Shanghai composite fell 1.17% to 2,827.80 and the Shenzhen composite was down 2.08% at 1,463.70. Taiwan’s Taiex fell 0.5% to 10,409.20 while Hong Kong’s Hang…

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/06/trump-says-tariffs-on-china-could-be-raised-by-another-300-billion.html

Operation Overlord — or D-Day as it came to be known — was the highest risk venture of World War II. Researching my upcoming book, “Three Days at the Brink: FDR’s Daring Gamble to Win World War II,” I was struck by the drama involved in the decision to launch an invasion across the English Channel on Western Europe.

At a critical conference in Tehran in November 1943, the “Big Three” – President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Soviet leader Josef Stalin –fiercely debated the wisdom and timing of such a launch. They all knew it was a high-stakes gamble and that failure could lead to a catastrophic bloodbath that would turn the war in German leader Adolf Hitler’s favor. And yet, they decided it must be done.

Supreme Commander Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower was aware that, despite the peril, Overlord was a necessity.

ROBERT CHARLES: I TALKED WITH A D-DAY VET — HERE’S WHY YOU NEED TO DO SO, TOO

“Every obstacle must be overcome, every inconvenience suffered and every risk run to ensure that our blow is decisive,” Eisenhower wrote to his commanders. “We cannot afford to fail.”

He had devised an elaborate plan, choreographed to the last detail, but he knew that some circumstances were out of his control.

On June 4, 1944, hearing discouraging weather reports and already having delayed the invasion a day because of storms, Eisenhower faced an agonizing moment of decision: to go on June 6 or wait for better weather.

When President Trump delivers his D-Day remarks Thursday at the U.S. Cemetery in Normandy, he has the rare opportunity to pay tribute with emotion, personal stories, and soaring words to the service and the sacrifice of those who died on those beaches and saved the world.

At Southwick House, the invasion headquarters in the southern English town of Portsmouth, Eisenhower sat bowed, head in hands, and contemplated a seemingly impossible choice. He wasn’t all-knowing; he could only judge circumstances as they were set before him.         

Further delay might mean scrapping the mission altogether; the tides allowed only the narrowest window for invasion, and the troops were already poised. “How can you keep this invasion on the end of a limb and let it hang there?” he asked.

On the other hand, if Allied forces invaded as a storm rolled across the Channel, landing craft would be overwhelmed, air support would be impossible, and thousands could perish to no avail.

Indeed, unbeknownst to Eisenhower, German Gen. Erwin Rommel had already decided the Allies would never risk the invasion and had left the theater to meet with Hitler in Germany.

Eisenhower finally rose from his seat, unwilling to decide just yet. He suggested to his team that they try to get a few hours sleep and reconvene later.

At 3:30 a.m. on June 5, Eisenhower brought his team back together and polled them for their opinions, pacing the room as they spoke. He was heartened by an improved weather forecast.

After everyone had finished speaking, he paused, and then said, “OK, we’ll go.”

The invasion was on for the following day.

FILE — June 6, 1944: U.S. Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, left, gives the order of the day to paratroopers in England prior to boarding their planes to participate in the first assault of the Normandy invasion. (U.S. Army Signal Corps via AP)

Back in his quarters, Eisenhower privately agonized over the decision. He wrote a note in longhand, which he folded into his wallet, accepting responsibility in the event of Overlord’s failure.

The note said: “Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based upon the best information available. The troops, the air, and the navy did all that Bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt it is mine alone.”

That night Eisenhower drove to Newbury, where the 101st Airborne Division was preparing to fly out. He walked among the paratroopers, with their blackened faces, and spoke to as many of them as he could. Then he waited until the last of them were in the air before returning to headquarters around midnight, his mind filled with thoughts of the brave men who would risk their lives at dawn.

On Thursday, as we commemorate the 75th Anniversary of D-Day, we know the story of what happened on the Normandy coast. The scenes of courage, of horror, of loss and ultimately triumph are stamped on our minds.

It was the beginning of the end for Hitler, and although VE Day would not occur until May 8, 1945, we know we have the brave forces who fought on D-Day to thank for our victory.         

On the evening of June 6, as the early positive reports from the invasion reached his desk in the Oval Office, President Roosevelt, who had accepted the risk of the invasion back in Tehran, was filled with a mixture of relief and also heartache over the sacrifices suffered that day. He chose to broadcast to the nation — not a speech, but a prayer.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

President Roosevelt said this prayer to radio listeners: “Almighty God: Our sons, pride of our nation, this day have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity … they will need Thy blessings. Their road will be long and hard. For the enemy is strong. He may hurl back our forces. Success may not come with rushing speed, but we shall return again and again; and we know that by Thy grace, and by the righteousness of our cause, our sons will triumph … Some will never return. Embrace these, Father, and receive them, Thy heroic servants, into Thy kingdom.”

When President Trump delivers his D-Day remarks Thursday at the U.S. cemetery in Normandy, he has the rare opportunity to pay tribute with emotion, personal stories, and soaring words to the service and the sacrifice of those who died on those beaches and saved the world.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM BRET BAIER

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/bret-baier-d-day-roosevelt-prayer-eisenhower-overlord-trump-normandy

CLOSE

Veterans recall D-Day horror and triumph
AP

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump will take part in a tradition for modern presidents that dates back four decades when he stands at the edge of Omaha Beach in Normandy on Thursday to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the D-Day invasion.

But while the ceremony will honor the sacrifices made on June 6, 1944, some fear Trump’s “America First” presidency and the international drama he has carried with him as he begins his third trip to France will complicate the hallowed observance. 

Like his predecessors, Trump will pay homage to the 160,000 American and Allied troops who landed on D-Day, altering the course of World War II. But in a break with past U.S. presidents, he is unlikely to use his remarks in France to embrace institutions such as NATO that rose out of the ashes of the fighting.

The American president has accused those institutions of “ripping off” the United States. 

“It’s going to be a tough challenge for him,” said Nicholas Burns, a professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and a former U.S. ambassador to NATO who served presidents of both parties. “What we learned from D-Day and the Second World War is that we need allies.”

As on past international trips, Trump has also drawn considerable attention to his Twitter feed and overseas media interviews. He attacked singer-songwriter Bette Midler, blasted 2020 Democratic candidate Joe Biden and continued to drive news coverage by referring to Meghan Markle’s  comments about him as “nasty.” 

Trump, who was feted with a formal state visit by Queen Elizabeth II earlier in the week, gathered with British officials Wednesday on Britain’s south coast, where thousands of ships involved in Operation Overlord assembled before crossing the English Channel. Trump read a prayer that President Franklin Roosevelt delivered in a radio address on June 6, 1944.

“Almighty God, our sons, pride of our nation, this day, have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our republic, our religion and our civilization and to set free a suffering humanity,” Trump read. 

On Thursday, the president will deliver remarks at an international ceremony at the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial, where some 9,388 American military dead are buried.

The president is not expected to attend D-Day events taking place on Thursday evening, according to a senior administration official who was not authorized to speak publicly about the president’s schedule. Instead, Trump will meet with French President Emmanuel Macron, with whom he has had a testy relationship.

“The whole event is structured around the American Cemetery,” the official said. 

‘Boys of Pointe du Hoc’

Presidents have long used D-Day remarks to link the sacrifices made by the soldiers who landed in France to their own times and to apply lessons from the war to their own foreign policies. President Ronald Reagan’s 1984 address is often cited for his vivid retelling of the Army Ranger effort to scale the Omaha Beach cliffs – the “boys of Point du Hoc” – but he also notably laid out a vision for U.S. engagement in Europe. 

Speaking during a time of heightened tension between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, Reagan used the 40th Anniversary of D-Day to condemn Moscow for occupying Eastern Bloc countries – “uninvited, unwanted,” he said – and vowed that the United States would remain a global force in defending democracy.  

“We in America have learned bitter lessons from two World Wars: It is better to be here ready to protect peace than to take shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost,” Reagan said. “We’ve learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments.” 

President Barack Obama’sD-Day remarks in 2014 came just months after Russia’s invasion of Crimea shocked Europe, ultimately prompting sanctions from the U.S. and other countries. Obama and Russian leader Vladimir Putin held their first face-to-face meeting about the Ukrainian crisis during a lunch break amid the D-Day ceremonies.

Obama did not mention Russia’s action directly, though he used his second address on the shores of Normandy – his first was in 2009 – to defend U.S. efforts to build Europe’s economy after the war. Speaking at the 70th anniversary of Operation Overlord, Obama noted the U.S. “stood with the people of this continent” through the Cold War, and hinted at the wave of isolationism taking hold at the end of his term.   

“In a time when it has never been more tempting to pursue narrow self-interest, to slough off common endeavor, this generation of Americans, a new generation – our men and women of war – have chosen to do their part as well,” Obama said.  

Trump split with allies 

Trump ran for office in 2016 vowing to shake up much of the global order that emerged following World War II to prevent another global conflict and keep the Soviet Union – and communism – at bay. He has criticized NATO members for treating the United States like a “piggy bank,” engaged in high-profile Twitter spats with allies, including leaders in France, and has imposed stiff tariffs on the European Union, Canada and others.

Most recently, Trump’s administration has threatened 5% tariffs on all Mexican imports unless that country does more to stop the flow migrants to the U.S.  

The president has faced pushback at home from some veterans groups. The White House remains embroiled in a controversy over an apparent order to block from view the USS John S. McCain during Trump’s recent trip to Japan. Others have blasted Trump for pardoning – or considering pardons for – those accused of war crimes

“He’s probably the worst president in our history to commemorate this moment,” said Jon Soltz, chairman of VoteVets, a left-leaning veterans group. “He’s undermined the alliances which gave us peace in Europe for over 70 years.”

Dan Caldwell, executive director of Concerned Veterans for America, countered that Trump has pursued the same foreign policy he campaigned on in 2016. Many of those arguments, including Trump’s remarks on NATO, generated news coverage at the time, so his positions should not have been a surprise to voters. 

“He should talk about how the world has changed since the end of World War II, and why he is pursuing a foreign policy that is much different than his predecessors,” said Caldwell, whose group leans conservative.

“I think he can do that in a positive way,” he said, “explaining the world is changed and that it requires us to look at problems differently than we did 25 years or 75 years ago.” 

Focus on veterans 

Trump’s address will mark one of the last times an American president speaks to a group of D-Day veterans on the beaches of Normandy. The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that just under 500,000 U.S. World War II veterans were still living in late 2018.

A U.S. president delivering remarks at the memorial is a relatively recent phenomena. An American president didn’t visit Normandy until Jimmy Carter made the trip in January 1978. Carter pledged to defend Western Europe during the Cold War.

“We are determined, with our noble allies here, that Europe’s freedom will never again be endangered,” he said.   

President Dwight Eisenhower, who organized the D-Day invasion eight years before his election to the White House, issued a short statement on its 10th anniversary. 

Craig Symonds, a maritime history professor at the U.S. Naval War College who wrote a book on the invasion, said Eisenhower “knew viscerally and instinctively that it’s important for us to listen to the legacy” of what happened on that day. 

“It’s important for a president to have a sense of history,” he said. 

Like what you’re reading? Download the USA TODAY app for more

Contributing: David Jackson 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/05/d-day-75th-anniversary-donald-trump-normandy-speech/1301411001/

Assume for a second that Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is speaker of the House and that she’s agreed to go forward with the Democrats who want to immediately begin the impeachment process for President Trump. What is the specific crime or action they would cite to justify the proceeding?

Has anyone heard the exact crime or action that Trump engaged in that would justify impeachment? Democrats talk generally about “obstruction of justice,” or Trump’s “conduct,” but the specifics are curiously light, considering the gravity of what they propose.

Republicans complained about former President Bill Clinton’s “conduct” in office, but they at least had some specific charge — Clinton’s under-oath lie to a grand jury about his sexual affair with a White House intern and his efforts to conceal evidence from investigators.

Sometimes, Democrats talk about the “10 instances” or “10 episodes” in the special counsel report related to obstruction, but which one is an impeachable offense? Most often cited is Trump’s June 2017 phone call to his lawyer, Don McGahn, wherein, according to the report, Trump “directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed.” But McGahn refused the request, and Mueller wasn’t removed. The special counsel remained in place for another two years and completed his investigation. He found no conspiracy between the Trump 2016 campaign and Russia.

That has been the final result ever since the special counsel report was released in April. Yes, Trump fired FBI Director James Comey (which the report says was within his authority as president); he asked former Attorney General Jeff Sessions to reassert some control over the special counsel (that didn’t happen); and he publicly criticized associates once they were in legal jeopardy and might offer damaging information to prosecutors as part of a plea deal. (Importantly, this is not a crime.)

Impeaching Trump for any one of these, or all of them, would have been like impeaching Clinton for even just thinking about having an affair or for asking his lawyer whether he should lie to the grand jury.

I know that House Democrats are angry and don’t like Trump, but there’s a reason that the standard for impeachment is “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors,” and not just “I really, really hate the orange man!” The process isn’t supposed to be a political plaything.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/democrats-cant-name-the-specific-action-trump-should-be-impeached-for

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WBNS) – A grand jury has indicted Dr. William Husel on charges stemming from the deaths of 25 patients in an overdose scandal that has rocked the Mount Carmel Health System and the families of nearly three dozen patients.

Both the Franklin County Prosecutor’s Office and the Columbus Division of Police have been investigating since early December – when the hospital fired Husel after concerns were raised about his patient care. Husel pleaded not guilty on all counts during his arraignment Wednesday afternoon. His bond was set at $1 million.

To date, 35 patients have been identified as having received excessive doses of pain medication – 29 of the patients, the hospital says, received potentially lethal doses of pain medications.



Prosecutors and police updated reporters on the status of its investigation Wednesday morning – focusing on the deaths of 25 of the 35 patients who died under Husel’s care.

COMPLETE COVERAGE: Mount Carmel patient deaths investigation

In most cases, the highly powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl was administered to intensive care patients as they were being removed from ventilators.

In interviews with 10 Investigates, several family members acknowledged that their loved ones were in bad shape – and may have died anyway – but claim they were not consulted about the large doses of pain medications that were about to be administered to their loved ones. Many of them died after receiving doses of fentanyl while others were given fentanyl along with other drugs like dilaudid, versed and paralytics like vecuronium.

Attorneys representing these patients have claimed that the combination of drugs like fentanyl and versed or dilaudid accelerated these patients’ deaths or that the use of paralytics gave an inaccurate picture of the patients’ true conditions – making it appear as though they were brain dead.

10 Investigates first broke the news of the patient overdose scandal on January 14 – the same day the first of 28 wrongful death lawsuits were filed. That same day, Mount Carmel Health System President and CEO Ed Lamb issued a taped video apology, saying that the actions of the doctor were unacceptable and not in line with the hospital’s standards of care.

The hospital has said that its internal processes were not sufficient to stop these actions from happening. The hospital has since adopted a series of changes – including now requiring that nurses and doctors receive pharmacy approval before administering drugs when a patient is being removed from a ventilator.

Ed Lamb, president & CEO, Mount Carmel Health System sent 10TV the following after the indictment was announced Wednesday:

We appreciate the County Prosecutor’s leadership and his ongoing commitment to justice in this case. Following the discovery of the actions of Dr. Husel, we notified appropriate authorities, including law enforcement. We have shared information with them and will continue to fully cooperate throughout their investigation.

Mount Carmel has made and will continue to implement meaningful changes throughout our system to ensure events like these never happen again.

There is nothing more important to Mount Carmel than the safety of our patients and their trust in us. Providing compassionate care to patients and their families is one of our most sacred responsibilities. Our thoughts and prayers continue to be with the families of patients affected by this tragedy.

At the request of the County Prosecutor, and because this is now an ongoing criminal proceeding, Mount Carmel will not comment further on the specific facts or circumstances surrounding the care provided by Dr. Husel. For more information about Mount Carmel’s previous statements and actions relating to Dr. Husel, visit the fact page on MountCarmelHealth.com.

10 Investigates has assembled the most comprehensive timeline of the Mount Carmel patient overdose scandal:

June 2013 – Dr. William Husel applies to work at Mount Carmel Health System.

September 2013 – Dr. William Husel is granted credentials to work as a critical care intensivist. Sources have raised questions about if Husel met the hospital’s own criteria to work as in the intensive care unit as an intensivist. They point to the hospital’s own documents that show you must be an MD or DO; have a residency in internal medicine; a fellowship in critical care; and be eligible to take the board exam in internal medicine. Husel met just two of the four requirements because he had a residency in anesthesiology. The hospital has disputed this claim, saying Husel met the qualifications for appointment as a critical care specialist and that its bylaws trump any conflict that may have existed with his application for clinical privileges. The sources allege the hospital was negligent in its credentialing process.

September 2014 – Patient suspected of receiving excessive dose of fentanyl dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital. The attorneys representing this person have confirmed the date but have not released the person’s identity.

March 1, 2015 – Patient Jan Thomas dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital. Her medical records show she received 800 micrograms of fentanyl. Her family’s attorney, David Shroyer, and son Chris Thomas, told reporters that Jan Thomas had a previous hospital stay prior to being taken to Mount Carmel West on February 28, 2015. She died on March 1, 2015. Shroyer says she was given a lethal dose of fentanyl as she was being removed from a ventilator.

May 10, 2015 – Joanne Bellisari, 71, an auxiliary nun was given 1,000 microgram push of fentanyl through her IV, her medical records show. Her attorneys allege in their wrongful death lawsuit that Bellisari was given a “grossly inappropriate dose.” The attorneys allege, as they have in other patient lawsuits, that Mount Carmel’s electronic medical records failed to flag or alert Joanne Bellisari’s medical providers that such an order appeared to be in error. Alternatively, the complaint read, “this excessive dose of fentanyl was flagged and/or alerted by the system as inappropriate, but Defendants ignored the alerts because the order was intended to hasten the termination of Joanne Bellisari’s life.”

October 9, 2017 – Six patients are alleged to have died between Oct. 9, 2017 and Dec. 11, 2017, including two separate sets of patients who died during the same shifts, attorneys allege.

Timothy Fitzpatrick and Beverlee Schirtzinger were the two patients identified by their attorneys who both died on October 9, 2017.

December 10, 2017 – Patient Larry Brigner dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital. A lawsuit filed says he received 500 micrograms of fentanyl.

December 11, 2017 – Janet Kavanaugh dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital after her attorneys allege that she was given 1,000 micrograms of fentanyl through her IV. The attorneys allege that both Kavanaugh and Brigner died on the same overnight shift.

April 1, 2018 – Jeremia “Sue” Hodge died at Mount Carmel West Hospital. Her attorneys allege in a wrongful death lawsuit that she went from the cath lab to the ICU. Her sons had a conversation with Dr. Husel about her health and the family made a decision to withdraw life support. She was given a dose of fentanyl believed to be in excess of 500 micrograms.

May 28, 2018 – Jim Allen received 1,000 micrograms of fentanyl, according to his medical records. He died the same day.

July 15, 2018 – 44-year old Troy Allison dies after his attorneys alleged that he was given 1,000 micrograms of fentanyl.

September 30, 2018 – Bonnie Austin dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital after her attorneys allege she was given 600 micrograms of fentanyl less than an hour before midnight. Her medical records show the order was not reviewed by another physician, nurse or pharmacist.

October 24, 2018 – James Nickolas Timmons, 39, dies after receiving 1,000 micrograms of fentanyl.

October 25, 2018 – Mount Carmel West says it received a “formal report” concerning an allegation about Dr. Husel’s patient care.

October 25, 2018 to Nov. 21, 2018 – Three more patients die

November 21, 2018 – Dr. Husel is removed from patient care.

November 26, 2018 – Dr. Husel was inexplicably re-credentialed and re-appointed to the active medical roster at the hospital.

December 4, 2018 – Memo goes out to Mount Carmel staffers expressing concerns that some employees didn’t live up to the hospital’s standards of care.

December 5, 2018 – Dr. William Husel is fired.

December 7, 2018 – Mount Carmel West President Sean McKibben and his wife call Dublin Police and the Delaware County Sheriff’s Office requesting escorts to their home, saying Husel was upset after being fired from the hospital. Husel made no threats following his termination, according to police records.

December 13, 2018 – Additional memo goes out to Mount Carmel staff

December 27, 2018 – Mount Carmel begins notifying patient families

January 14, 2019 – WBNS-TV’s 10 Investigates breaks story of patient deaths. First wrongful death lawsuit is filed. Hospital’s CEO and President Ed Lamb releases first of two video statements. Reached by phone, Dr. William Husel declines to comment and refers questions to his attorneys.

January 15, 2019 – Centers for Medicare and Medicaid begins process to start site survey through the Ohio Department of Health.

January 18, 2019 – CMS receives a report of substantial allegation survey conducted by the Ohio Department of Health at Mount Carmel West. CMS determines that Mount Carmel West was not in compliance with Medicare standards involving pharmaceutical services. “We have determined that the deficiencies are so serious that they constitute an immediate threat to patient health and safety.”

January 24, 2019 – CMS receives a report of substantial allegation survey conducted by the Ohio Department of Health at Mount Carmel St. Ann’s. CMS determines that Mount Carmel West was not in compliance with Medicare standards involving pharmaceutical services. “We have determined that the deficiencies are so serious that they constitute an immediate threat to patient health and safety.”

January 24, 2019 – Mount Carmel releases updated statement announcing that the number of patients believed to have received potentially fatal doses of fentanyl has increased from 27 to 34.

The hospital also released this: “We received a formal report on October 25, 2018, that related to Dr. Husel’s care. Based on what we learned about that report, we should have begun a more expedited process to investigate and consider immediate removal of Dr. Husel from patient care at that time. Dr. Husel was removed from patient care on November 21, 2018. We are aware of three patients who died between October 25 and November 21 after receiving excessive and potentially fatal doses of medication ordered by Dr. Husel. We are sorry for this tragedy, and we will continue to investigate how we responded to this report and whether there is any other information that should have led us to investigate sooner into Dr. Husel’s practices.

“We are investigating whether Dr. Husel ordered excessive doses of medication when there was still opportunity to explore if there were reversible causes of patients’ immediate conditions.”

January 25, 2019 – State medical board announces that it is suspending the medical license of Dr. William Husel. The Ohio Department of Medicaid suspends the provider agreement with Dr. William Husel, accusing him of fraud for billing Medicaid for “medically unnecessary procedures involving grossly inappropriate doses of fentanyl.”

January 30, 2019 – CMS sends letter to Mount Carmel West notifying the hospital that its Medicare and Medicaid funding will be terminated unless they submit an acceptable plan of correction.

February 1, 2019 – CMS sends letter to Mount Carmel St. Ann’s notifying the hospital that its Medicare and Medicaid funding will be terminated unless they submit an acceptable plan of correction.

February 4, 2019 – Mount Carmel employee speaks out regarding the scandal to 10 Investigates. He alleges that Dr. Husel is responsible for ordering the high doses, but that the hospital’s lack of training of staff and lax internal controls led to a “systemic failure.”

February 5, 2019 – Correspondence between Dr. Husel and state medical board show that he apologized for his 1996 misdemeanor conviction for improperly storing a destructive device or pipe bomb while attending college in West Virginia. He also admits in a 2013 addendum to his medical license application that he got caught up in the wrong crowd, broke into cars and that his arrest more than 20 years ago is not reflective of the person he is today. Husel wrote: “my passion is taking care of sick patients in the ICU. Please give me the opportunity to practice what I love doing.”

February 5, 2019 – Mount Carmel acknowledges it has sent its plan of correction to CMS. Its federal funding hangs in the balance on whether CMS will accept its plan. Pharmacy manager Janet Whittey tells the state pharmacy board that she is no longer employed at Mount Carmel. The hospital has not said if she was fired or quit.

February 6, 2019 – Law firm identifies Melissa Penix as the patient who died on Nov. 20, 2018. The law firm of Leeseberg & Valentine alleges that Penix’s death may have triggered the hospital’s internal investigation. Three patients died between Oct. 25, 2018 – when the hospital said it received a formal report with concerns about Husel’s patient care and Nov. 21, 2018 – when the hospital removed Husel from patient care.

*(A total of 28 wrongful death lawsuits are filed against Mount Carmel and Dr. Husel).

February 12, 2019 – The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services accepts plans of correction for Mount Carmel to fix its deficiencies. State health inspectors noted that Mount Carmel “failed to ensure that a system was in place to monitor and prevent large doses of medications” from being accessed via overrides from the hospital’s automated medication dispensing machines. Inspectors noted that inn 24 of the 27 patient cases it reviewed, Husel used an override to access the pain medications. The hospital announced it is changing policies – including capping doses of fentanyl and requiring that physicians and nurses get pharmacy approval before using medications during ventilator removals. Staffers were also being re-educated on what to look for and ask questions if they have concerns about dosing.

March 29, 2019 – Mount Carmel Health System President and CEO Ed Lamb defends the hospital in an impromptu interview with 10 Investigates. 10 Investigates reporter Bennett Haeberle was covering another news story in downtown Columbus when he encountered Lamb and asked him to address criticism that Mount Carmel could have addressed the patient overdosing scandal sooner.

Ed Lamb: “I think we’ve been very transparent. We want to make sure that we are doing everything we can to let the public know what’s going on.”

10 Investigates: “Was the hospital aware before October?”

Ed Lamb: “We’ve been discovering things all along as we’ve been learning through the investigation.”

10 Investigates: “Was there any chance to remove (Husel) before October.

Ed Lamb: “Not before October, no.”

April 22, 2019 – Three wrongful death lawsuits filed by the families of the patients are settled.

May 7, 2019 – Two more wrongful death lawsuits are settled.

June 4, 2019 – Another wrongful death lawsuit is settled.

Source Article from https://www.10tv.com/article/officials-update-mount-carmel-deaths-dr-husel-investigation-11-am-presser-conference-2019

As he seeks a second term in the 2020 election, President Trump should be able to lean on his advantage in the Electoral College — in 2016, as you might remember, he lost the national popular vote but won enough states (and the right states) to secure 270 electors and take the presidency.

But new polling of his state-by-state approval ratings suggests the president is unpopular in some of the most important battleground states for 2020, an ill omen if the trends hold until Election Day 2020.

Trump has been unpopular since his first day in office. The question now is whether he’s so unpopular that it overrides his advantage as an incumbent and a pretty strong US economy. The new state polls from Morning Consult don’t bode well for him.

Here are the raw numbers for Trump in the states that are expected to be competitive in the 2020 election:

  • New Hampshire: 39 percent approval, 58 percent disapproval
  • Wisconsin: 42 percent approval, 55 percent disapproval
  • Michigan: 42 percent approval, 54 percent disapproval
  • Iowa: 42 percent approval, 54 percent disapproval
  • Arizona: 45 percent approval, 51 percent disapproval
  • Pennsylvania 45 percent approval, 52 percent disapproval
  • Ohio: 46 percent approval, 50 percent disapproval
  • North Carolina: 46 percent approval, 50 percent disapproval
  • Florida: 48 percent approval, 48 percent disapproval
  • Indiana: 49 percent approval, 46 percent disapproval

It’s a grim picture. Wisconsin and Michigan were critical Midwestern pieces of Trump’s Electoral College puzzle and he is now deeply unpopular in both states. Pennsylvania was maybe his most surprising win in 2016, and now he is seven points underwater. Perhaps Trump can take solace in his even job approval rating in Florida, but that is the only swing state where the president looks as strong as he did on Election Day 2016. Everywhere else, his support has deteriorated.

Maybe the most striking finding is in Iowa, where Trump beat Hillary Clinton by nearly 10 points. Iowans disapprove of his job performance by a 12-point margin now, in a farming state that’s been hit hard by Trump’s trade war. That would suggest the president’s cult of personality will not totally inoculate him from the unpopular parts of his policy agenda.

We still have a year and a half to go before the 2020 election. These approval numbers aren’t the same as a head-to-head match-up with a specific Democratic candidate (though those have not been very encouraging for Trump either). But they do indicate the unusual weakness of the president heading into his reelection campaign.

Trump’s presidential approval rating has been stubbornly low

Head-to-head polling between Trump and any prospective Democratic nominee seems nearly useless at this point. Aside from Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, many Americans haven’t yet formed their opinions on the various Democrats seeking their party’s nomination.

But presidential approval ratings have always been strongly linked to voting behavior, and everybody knows Trump. Here is the RealClearPolitics average of the president’s approval rating, from the start of his presidency to now:


Real Clear Politics

Trump has been consistently unpopular throughout his first two years. At his best, so far, he was seven points more unpopular than popular. A recent uptick has swiftly eroded. And as Vox’s Ezra Klein wrote last summer, this has been in defiance of a relatively solid economy:

“Trump’s poll numbers are probably 20 points below where a president would typically be with consumer sentiment as high as it is now,” says John Sides, a political scientist at George Washington University who has done work benchmarking presidential approval to economic indicators.

So here, then, is what we can say: Judged on the economy, which is the traditional driver of presidential approval, Donald Trump’s poll numbers should be much, much higher than they are now. Far from finding a winning strategy, he seems to have found a losing one despite holding a winning hand.

Trump’s approval rating is the metric to watch as we endure all the unpredictable twists and turns that will precede the 2020 election. The new numbers from Morning Consult show it isn’t just the Democratic states that are down on Trump; the states he would need to win reelection aren’t very happy with the president, either.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/6/5/18653800/trump-approval-rating-by-state-2020-election-odds