WASHINGTON — The House on Friday voted for a measure that would block President Donald Trump from initiating military action against Iran without congressional approval.

Lawmakers adopted the amendment from Reps. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., in a 251-170 vote with more than two dozen Republicans in support. The measure was wrapped into the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act that the House passed Friday afternoon.

The House and the Senate will still have to reconcile their separate versions of the defense bill, and are likely to exclude the Iran amendment from the final package. Last month, a similar measure that would have restricted the president’s ability to unilaterally launch military action on Iran failed in the Senate. The legislation received 50 votes in favor and 40 against, falling short of the 60-vote hurdle to advance to a final vote.

The amendment’s adoption by the House follows Trump’s statement in June that the United States had been “cocked and loaded” to strike Iranian targets in retaliation for Iran shooting down an unmanned drone.

During a White House meeting a day before Trump almost greenlighted the military strike, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told the president that he would need Congress to approve any sort of military action against Iran, she later told reporters. Trump himself said that he had backed down because the Pentagon said that the loss of life would be a disproportionate response to the shooting down of the drone.

Trump said at the time, amid heightening tensions with Iran, that he had executive power to strike Iran unilaterally without congressional approval. Former President Barack Obama relied on an authorization for the use of military force from 2001 in justifying his unilateral power to launch strikes against the Islamic State militant group in Iraq and Syria.

On Friday, the House also repealed the AUMF that Congress passed in 2002 and adopted another amendment that expressed that the 2001 AUMF has served as a “blank check for any president to wage war at any time and any place.” The measure said that any new AUMF must include a sunset clause with a clear set of “objectives, targets, and geographic scope, and reporting requirements.”

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-votes-require-congressional-approval-military-strike-against-iran-n1029311

Special counsel Robert Mueller spoke at the Department of Justice on May 29 about the Russia investigation.

Carolyn Kaster/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Carolyn Kaster/AP

Special counsel Robert Mueller spoke at the Department of Justice on May 29 about the Russia investigation.

Carolyn Kaster/AP

Updated at 11:33 a.m. ET

Congress is delaying testimony by former special counsel Robert Mueller, Democratic congressional sources said Friday.

Mueller had been scheduled to appear on the morning of July 17 before the House Judiciary Committee and then that afternoon before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

That now appears to be on hold, according to congressional sources familiar with the discussions. It isn’t clear when new hearings might take place.

Neither Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., nor intelligence committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had addressed the timing directly as of Friday morning.

But some lawmakers were unhappy with the rules that appeared to be in the works for those sessions. The committees appeared on track to restrict the amount of time that members could speak or which members in attendance might be able to question Mueller.

Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., complained on Wednesday that the panel had been divided into “haves and have-nots.”

“This committee got rolled,” he said.

So one reason for a delay could be to permit more time for negotiations within Congress over the ground rules for the hearings.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/07/12/741098605/congress-delays-robert-mueller-hearings-amid-dispute-over-time-for-questions

July 12 at 2:30 PM

The House voted Friday to prevent President Trump from launching into war with Iran without getting Congress’ approval first, after more than two dozen Republicans joined Democrats to include the provision in the House’s annual defense authorization bill.

The move sets up a likely showdown with the Senate over whether the Iran restriction, which includes an exception for cases of self-defense, will be included in the final bill negotiated between the two chambers. The House voted 220 to 197 Friday to pass its version of the annual defense bill, despite Trump’s threat to veto the legislation.

Republican leaders in the House and Senate have argued that the Iran language members included in the bill by a vote of 251 to 170 would send a bad message to Tehran that the United States is divided, complicating the president’s ability to manage escalating tensions. Supporters of the provision in the Senate failed to come up with enough votes last month to include a similar Iran measure in its defense bill.

The debate comes amid increased friction between Iran and the United States and its allies. President Trump says he authorized, then called off an air strike last month in response to Iran’s downing of a U.S. surveillance drone. On Friday, Iran demanded that Britain release an Iranian supertanker seized off the coast of Gibraltar last week.

The Iran amendment is just one of several high-profile measures that lawmakers voted this week to include in the first defense authorization bill Democrats have steered through the House since taking over the majority earlier this year.

Those measures, which range from ending U.S. participation in Saudi Arabia’s military campaign in Yemen to undoing President Trump’s ban on transgender troops, helped secure the support of liberal Democrats from the congressional Progressive Caucus, who had previously warned that they might vote against the defense bill.

But those measures lost Democrats what little Republican support existed for the House’s defense bill. Two Republican members of the Armed Services panel voted in favor of the bill in committee last month; no Republicans endorsed the House’s defense bill Friday morning.

That stands in sharp contrast to the traditionally bipartisan turnout for defense bills, even when the parties spar over provisions along the way. Instead, Republican leaders accused Democrats of using the must-pass measure to play politics in a way that is “shameful,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Friday morning.

“Our national security is not a game. But that is exactly how Democrats are treating it,” McCarthy said of the bill.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), visibly riled at the charge, retorted that Republicans “can oppose [the bill], that’s fine, but to say we don’t care about national security . . . is a baldfaced lie.”

“In fact, our bill isn’t just good, it’s better than the ones that the Republican Party has put together, because we believe the Pentagon should be accountable,” Smith continued.

At the heart of the dispute between Republicans and Democrats is a disagreement over how much money Congress should allocate to the Pentagon and military this year. Republicans and the Trump administration want a $750 billion bill, which is the overall size of the defense authorization bill that the Senate passed last month. But the House’s bill clocks in at $733 billion — a figure that Smith argued military leaders endorsed previously.

For liberal Democrats, $733 billion was too steep a jump over the current fiscal year’s $717 billion authorization. In an effort to level out spending, they proposed a $16.8 billion reduction to the war funding authorized under the bill, but the effort failed to pass the House Friday morning, after Republicans and many Democrats opposed it.

The House also voted Friday against measures from Reps. Sylvia Garcia (D-Tex.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to prevent defense money and facilities from being used to house migrant children and undocumented immigrants. But members endorsed a measure from House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) to block defense dollars from being used to house foreign nationals detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Members also endorsed a repeal of the 2002 authorization for use of military force that was passed to approve the Iraq invasion, and stated that they believe the 2001 AUMF, adopted after the Sept. 11 attack to greenlight hostilities against al-Qaeda and the Taliban, ought to be retired and replaced with a time-limited authorization.

They also voted in favor of an amendment to suspend for one year the sale of air-to-ground munitions to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, one of several efforts in the bill to limit U.S. support for the Saudi-led military coalition’s operations in Yemen’s civil war, and prevent the kingdom from acquiring U.S.-made weapons of war.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/house-votes-to-restrain-trump-on-war-with-iran-setting-up-showdown-with-the-senate/2019/07/12/1305584e-a4bb-11e9-bd56-eac6bb02d01d_story.html

Sen. John Kennedy said the Mueller report is “as dead as fried chicken” amid reports that the former special counsel’s testimony to two House committees could be delayed by a week.

Sources told Fox News Friday morning that the hearings, set for July 17, will be pushed back to July 24. Yet the Democratic majority on the House Judiciary Committee maintained that the date has not been changed.

A senior source said there was a “breakdown in negotiations” to have Robert Mueller appear. Reacting on “America’s Newsroom,” the Louisiana Republican said House Democrats want to pull Mueller into a political fight and don’t want the Trump-Russia story to ever end.

“It’s done as far as I’m concerned. The issue is as dead as fried chicken,” said Kennedy, adding Mueller was supposed to “call it like he saw it” and now Democrats want to put him in the middle

PASTORS STAND GROUND ON CONDITIONS OF BORDER FACILITY AFTER AOC CLAPS BACK

“I thought he was foolish to agree to testify,” said Kennedy, pointing out that after a two-year investigation, Mueller did not make a determination on whether President Trump committed obstruction of justice and did not find evidence of collusion.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Kennedy said Mueller may be “exercising more wisdom than zeal” and trying to avoid the “political trap.”

He said if he were Mueller, he would refuse to testify and tell House Democrats, “The short answer is no and the long answer is, hell no.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sen-john-kennedy-mueller-testimony-possible-delay

U.S. exports to China dropped sharply last month as the Trump administration and Beijing appear no closer to reaching a deal to end a months-long trade war that has affected billions of dollars’ worth of goods.

The Associated Press reported Friday that Chinese imports from the U.S. were down 31.4 percent from the same time last year, while the country’s surplus from trade with the U.S. grew by 3 percent. U.S. imports from China dropped by a far lower rate — down just 7.8 percent over last year.

Experts remain pessimistic, according to the news service, convinced that Trump’s talks with China could break down again, extending the trade conflict for months.

“Our base case remains that trade talks will break down again before long,” economist Julian Evans-Pritchard said, according to the AP.

In a tweet Thursday, the president slammed China’s lack of imports from the U.S., accusing Beijing of going back on promises to cut down on China’s trade surplus with the U.S. by buying more American goods.

“Mexico is doing great at the Border, but China is letting us down in that they have not been buying the agricultural products from our great Farmers that they said they would. Hopefully they will start soon!” he tweeted.

China’s government has worked to halt U.S. exports recently, in particular areas designed to hurt the president’s relationship with his base such as in the Midwest. China stopped importing U.S. soy in May and in April clamped down on imports of U.S. grains such as sorghum.

Trump denied that the U.S. was in a trade war with China in April, even as the administration has moved subsequently to increase tariffs on Chinese imports while Beijing responded in a similar manner.

“We are not in a trade war with China, that war was lost many years ago by the foolish, or incompetent, people who represented the U.S. Now we have a Trade Deficit of $500 Billion a year, with Intellectual Property Theft of another $300 Billion. We cannot let this continue!” Trump tweeted in early April.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/finance/452767-us-imports-to-china-plunge-amid-trade-war


Most Republicans opposed an amendment lawmakers approved that they said would handcuff President Donald Trump in dealing with Iran’s destabilizing actions in the Middle East. | Alex Brandon/AP Photo

Defense

The House Friday voted to block President Donald Trump from waging war against Iran without congressional authorization.

Lawmakers approved 251 to 170 an amendment to the fiscal 2020 National Defense Authorization Act by Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) that would bar funding to use military force against Iran unless Congress authorizes it.

Story Continued Below

It also would clarify that the broadly worded 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which underpins numerous U.S. military operations, doesn’t apply to Iran. And it would preserve the president’s authority to use military force under the War Powers Resolution.

Khanna called the legislation “the most important foreign policy vote in the United States Congress.”

“If my war hungry colleagues — some of whom have already suggested that we invade Venezuela, North Korea and probably a few other countries before lunchtime tomorrow — if they’re so certain of their case against Iran, let them bring their authorization to use military force against Iran to this very floor,” said Gaetz, a Trump ally.

Most Republicans, however, opposed the measure, arguing it would handcuff the president in dealing with Iran’s destabilizing actions in the Middle East.

“It takes legitimate options off the table, shows America divided in the face of mounting Iranian threats and makes our nation less safe,” said Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas, the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/12/house-vote-limit-trump-iran-war-powers-1414943

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tore into what she called the Trump administration’s “policy of dehumanization” and stood by claims that detained migrants were told to drink out of toilet bowls at a fiery and emotional hearing about the migrant crisis at the border that featured the New York lawmaker and her freshman allies.

The House Oversight Committee hearing Friday on child separation included a host of high-profile witnesses. Among them were the freshman Democratic lawmakers — known informally as the “Squad” — who recounted their recent visit to the border, which itself became a flashpoint in the already raging debate over the migrant surge, poor conditions at detention centers and who’s to blame.

HOUSE DEMS USE OBAMA-ERA PHOTOS TO PROMOTE ‘KIDS IN CAGES’ HEARING

At the hearing, Ocasio-Cortez maintained: “This is a manufactured crisis because the cruelty is manufactured.”

The lawmaker — who demanded to be sworn in before her testimony despite Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., noting this was not normally done — said that blame was not to be placed on border agents, but on the Trump administration. She took aim at senior adviser Stephen Miller.

“It is a policy of dehumanization implemented by this executive administration made at the feet of Stephen Miller that creates a tinderbox of violence and dehumanization where hurt people hurt people,” she said.

Testifying next, Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich, broke into tears as she recalled what she saw at the border, and also scolded President Trump and others for using the phrase illegal immigrants.

“No one is illegal. That term is derogatory because it dehumanizes people. You can say any other forms of coming in without regulations or so forth but the use of illegal is disrespectful and I ask my colleagues to try in so many ways not to dehumanize our immigrant neighbors who are trying to come in for a safe haven,” she said.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., also testified.

Republicans on the panel slammed Democrats for allegedly downplaying the crisis at the border for years, and noted the sizeable Democratic opposition to a bill granting funding for humanitarian aid at the border. That bill passed last month, but Ocasio-Cortez and her allies opposed it.

Rep. Debbie Lasko, R-Ariz., noted that the U.S. was projected to apprehend a million migrants at the border this year, and that that was equivalent to a congressional district a year.

HOMELAND SECURITY WATCHDOG REPORTS OVERCROWDING AND MIGRANTS PLEADING FOR HELP DURING DETENTION-FACILITY TOUR

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said “this body has failed to secure the border and created the very magnet that is causing these migrants to come through and be abused by cartels while this body sits cowardly in the corner doing nothing about it.”

Republicans also brushed off claims by Ocasio-Cortez that migrants were being made to drink from toilets, arguing that the stations have sinks with drinking water that are part of a toilet unit.

But Ocasio-Cortez stood by her claim.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“When these women tell me they were put into a cell and their sink was not working and we tested the sink ourselves and the sink was not working and they were told to drink out of a toilet bowl, I believe them,” she said.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-tears-into-trump-hearing-migrant

Former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III is offering to postpone his congressional testimony by one week to give lawmakers more time to question him about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible obstruction of justice by President Trump. 

Mueller is scheduled to testify before the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees on Wednesday in a much-anticipated public appearance since he gave a short statement following the conclusion of his nearly two-year investigation. Mueller is perhaps the one person lawmakers and the nation have been wanting to hear from the most.

His offer to appear instead on July 24 is being considered by the congressional panels, according to multiple officials familiar with the discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity Friday to discuss sensitive talks. 

The possible delay came as House Democrats on the Judiciary panel pressed their leaders for more time to question the special counsel. Under the current agreement, Mueller would appear for two hours each before the Judiciary and Intelligence committees. But due to five-minute questioning rules, only the most senior dozen or so Democrats and Republicans on the Judiciary Committee would get to ask questions, upsetting more junior members.

Those members asked the committee this week to try to get Mueller to commit to more time.

The Mueller report said investigators found insufficient evidence to show a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to influence the election and reached no conclusion about whether Trump obstructed justice — despite laying out episodes of the president apparently seeking to stymie the investigation. Mueller’s team wrote that it was bound by Justice Department policy that forbids the indictment of a sitting president from deciding or alleging — even privately — that Trump had committed a crime. 

Mueller spoke to the public briefly in May, saying that he could neither clear nor accuse Trump of obstructing justice, leaving room for Congress to make that call and fueling impeachment demands among some Democrats. The remarks were his first public comments on the case since he concluded his investigation. Mueller said that if his office “had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” and he noted that the Constitution “requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.”

Many members of the Judiciary Committee are concerned that two hours is insufficient time to discuss even half of the 10 areas of potential obstruction of justice by Trump identified in the Mueller report. 

Democrats want to highlight each of those 10 episodes in their hearing, well aware that most of the public has not read the report. The time crunch, however, has made their job difficult, forcing Democrats to prioritize which episodes they would like to focus on. 

Trump, speaking to reporters outside the White House Friday, disparaged Congress’s push to get Mueller to testify. There’s nothing Mueller “can say,” Trump said. “He’s written a report. It said no collusion, and it said, effectively, no obstruction. They want to go it again and again and again because they want to hurt the president before the election.”

Over the nearly two-year investigation, the special counsel charged 34 people, including 26 Russian nationals, and secured guilty pleas from seven, including several high-level Trump campaign and administration officials. The investigation concluded in March, and the following month the Justice Department released the office’s report documenting its work.

Mueller’s long-awaited testimony will come as more than 80 House Democrats have called for opening impeachment proceedings against Trump, arguing that he has ignored the Constitution that he took an oath to defend while repeatedly refusing to cooperate with congressional investigations.

Impeachment proponents hope Mueller’s testimony will increase public support for ousting the president. At the very least, his testimony is certain to provide the headline-grabbing, made-for-cable-television testimony that Democrats have been seeking since the 448-page redacted report was released April 18.

The negotiations come as a closed-door session with Mueller and his deputies was suddenly canceled. Under the original plan, after the open hearing with Mueller, House Democrats had proposed to question Mueller and his top lieutenants in private for an hour. But on Wednesday, lawmakers were told that the session was off.

Republicans have argued that the closed-door questioning was never agreed to. Democrats said they believed it was agreed to and that Mueller’s team may have backed out under pressure from the Justice Department not to participate. 

Colby Itkowitz contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mueller-offers-to-delay-testimony-one-week-to-give-lawmakers-more-time-for-questions/2019/07/12/21849ffe-a4ae-11e9-b732-41a79c2551bf_story.html

Chinese demand for American goods has tanked — evidence that economic damage from the trade war isn’t just hurting China, but the United States, as well.

On a year-over-year basis, Chinese imports of American goods dropped by 31 percent in June. Economists say this indicates that the Chinese economy, which was already decelerating, is continuing to slow its rate of growth.

“A country’s imports are indicative of its economy. A strong economy always imports more. This weak import number is an indication of the weaker economic growth in China,” said Zhiwei Ren, managing director and portfolio manager at Penn Mutual Asset Management.

“It’s more reflective of China’s weak domestic demand,” said Jeff Ng, chief economist, Asia, at Continuum Economics, said the data reflected weaker domestic demand and slowing growth. “We expect GDP growth to stabilize at a low level in the coming quarters,” he said. “I expect growth at 6 percent in 2020. Only in the 2020s do I expect it below.

China’s first-quarter GDP growth rate was 6.4 percent, but economists polled by Reuters expect that to fall to 6.2 percent for the second quarter when the Chinese government reports it on Monday.

The sharp drop in U.S. imports also is reflective of how tit-for-tat tariffs are prompting China to shift its purchases of goods to other countries at the expense of export-dependent sectors of the American economy.

“The motivation is twofold,” said Monica de Bolle, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. “On one hand, yes, it’s retaliatory. A second part of the reason might be that tariffs make goods more expensive,” she said. “Buying from other countries is more attractive.”

In addition to the contraction of imports, Chinese exports to the U.S. fell by nearly 8 percent, while China’s trade surplus grew by 3 percent to roughly $39 billion.

This does not bode well for the future of U.S.-China trade negotiations, experts say.

“Sooner or later, President Donald Trump will realize he’s not getting any of the things he asked for from China,” said Mark Williams, chief Asia economist at Capital Economics.

The president has already been pressing for that on Twitter, saying on Thursday, “China is letting us down in that they have not been buying the agricultural products from our great Farmers that they said they would.” On Friday, he defended his protectionist stance in a series of tweets, saying, “Tariffs are a great negotiating tool, a great revenue producer,” and accusing China of devaluing its currency.

In addition to the plummeting Chinese demand for American goods overall, Williams said Trump seemed to have given more than he got in return during his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping during the G-20 economic summit last month, particularly with regard to relaxing restrictions on American technology access. “Mr. Trump has given ground, easing the sanctions on Huawei. It’s hard to see the current truce in the trade war lasting,” Williams said.

The longer the two sides remain at loggerheads, the more it costs the global economy. “If you look at the global import-export data, it’s coming down across the board. That’s basically an indicator that global GDP growth is going down,” Ren said.

This is a situation Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and other Fed officials are watching closely. In his prepared testimony to Congress this week, Powell expressed concern about the damage trade tensions were inflicting on economic growth both at home and abroad, saying, “Crosscurrents, such as trade tensions and concerns about global growth, have been weighing on economic activity and the outlook.”

“This confirms a lot of other economic indicators that already show a slower U.S. economy, so this is another reason we’re going to see a rate cut in July,” Ren predicted.

“It certainly underscores the point that he made that eventually the trade war is going to appear on broad macroeconomic variables the Fed has to monitor,” de Bolle said. “That requires the Fed to be not only attentive to these things but also preemptive, if necessary.”

Whether or not the central bank will be able to move quickly enough when the inflection point is reached is an open question, de Bolle added. “It may take some time for the effects to appear, but they do show up.”

“Powell’s concern is that eventually when these things do show up, they might show up very abruptly,” said de Bolle.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/drop-chinese-imports-u-s-goods-shows-trade-war-damage-n1029276

“The administration’s measured response to Iran shoot-down of our U.S. military asset in international airspace shows the president is not looking for a war with Iran,” Mr. McCaul said, referring to the downing of an American drone.

Still, the amendment brought together the oddest of coalitions in Washington, with Concerned Veterans of America, a conservative advocacy group backed by Charles G. and David H. Koch, and VoteVets, the liberal political action committee, joining forces to support the measure. Other lobbying groups, normally foes — including FreedomWorks, the Tea Party advocacy group and Indivisible, a liberal anti-Trump group — jumped into the fray to urge members to support the bill.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers led by Senator Tom Udall, Democrat of New Mexico, attempted to attach a similar measure to the Senate’s version of the defense policy bill last month, but the amendment failed 50 to 40.

If the larger defense bill clears the House on Friday, it must still be reconciled with a Senate version that is considerably less confrontational with the Trump administration. And it is likely Senate negotiators will try to strip out many of the House’s liberal-leaning provisions, including the Iran amendment and another measure passed by the House on Thursday that would cut off American support for Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen.

The defense policy bill has traditionally been a bipartisan exercise, but House Republicans have come out strongly against this year’s version, declaring it a partisan document, a charge Democrats on the Armed Services Committee have contested. The House version of the bill allocates $733 billion in military spending while the Senate version allocates $750 billion, meeting the figure the White House requested.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/us/politics/trump-iran-vote.html

As of late Thursday, no structures had been destroyed, though county officials noted that some farm equipment had burned. No injuries had been reported, either.

Source Article from https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2019/07/11/maui-brush-fire-closes-down-kuihelani-highway-humane-society-evacuates/

Flooding concerns are not just limited to Louisiana and have expanded around the Gulf region.

Mississippi, Alabama and the western Florida Panhandle are also at risk for extreme rain, CNN meteorologist Haley Brink said Thursday.

The National Weather Service tweeted early Friday morning that Mobile, Alabama, can expect heavy rain that may lead to flash flooding as well as a high risk of rip currents and a surf up to 8 feet.

The Florida Panhandle has seen double red flags go up in some areas, closing beaches, the National Weather Service said.

In addition to potential heavy rains in Louisiana, the Mississippi Delta Region is also at risk for tornadoes beginning Friday evening.

These are the areas that are currently under storm surge watches and warnings:

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/tropical-storm-barry-2019/index.html

Labor Secretary Alex Acosta’s resignation comes amid renewed fury over his handling of a plea deal with millionaire Jeffrey Epstein.

Here’s what you need to know about the deal: In November, the Miami Herald reported that when Acosta was a US attorney in Florida, he gave Epstein the “deal of a lifetime.” In a sweeping review of the politically connected billionaire’s case, the Herald explained how Acosta had made an agreement with Epstein to avoid major repercussions for the hedge fund manager, even though a federal investigation had identified 36 underage victims.

The report said Acosta had brokered a deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys, where he pleaded in 2008 to two state prostitution charges, ultimately serving only 13 months and avoiding a federal trial. He also registered as a sex offender and paid restitution to the victims identified by the FBI.

The agreement, the Herald said, “essentially shut down an ongoing FBI probe” and further granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators” in the case.

Why is this coming up now? Epstein has been indicted earlier this week on new charges related to alleged sex crimes involving minors

Initially Acosta defended the deal: On Wednesday, Acosta maintained he secured the best deal he could when he helped prosecute financier Jeffrey Epstein for sex crimes a decade ago, but acknowledged the terms look lenient with the passage of time.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/labor-secretary-acosta-out/index.html

If your day doesn’t start until you’ve gotten up to speed on the latest headlines, then let us introduce you to your new favorite morning fix. Sign up here for the ‘5 Things’ newsletter.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/12/us/five-things-july-12-trnd/index.html

Poor Nancy Pelosi. The Democratic House speaker worked harder than anyone to win Team Blue its majority in Congress. But she played by an old set of rules, and her party’s unruly young leaders have decided she goes on the ash heap with Joe Biden and all the other Klansmen — er, sorry, Klanspeople.

Of course, it’s absurd even to think of Pelosi as some kind of racist or sexist. But a decade of Democratic progress finally caught up with her on Wednesday. San Francisco’s liberal feminist leader finally fell victim to her party’s much-atrophied capacity for discussion and critical thinking in the twenty-first century.

It all began when Pelosi attempted to enforce some party discipline. Certain House Democrats, particularly Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, were airing the party’s dirty laundry over social media. She demanded some discretion and grown-up behavior. Ocasio-Cortez responded … by calling her a racist and a sexist, of course.

“When these comments first started, I kind of thought that she was keeping the progressive flank at more of an arm’s distance in order to protect more moderate members, which I understood,” the New York Democrat said. “But … it got to a point where it was just outright disrespectful … the explicit singling out of newly elected women of color.”

Later, Ocasio-Cortez restated and amplified this criticism. “It’s really just pointing out the pattern,” she said. “We’re not talking about just progressives, it’s singling out four individuals,” namely, herself, Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, and Aryanna Pressley of Massachusetts; all nonwhite women recently elected to Congress. (And it has to be that they’re “women of color,” it can’t possibly be their failure to work together as a party or their lack of political judgment.)

So how has it come to this, that any bright-eyed, young Rep. Janie-Come-Lately can lob ludicrous accusations of racism and sexism at a battle-hardened liberal feminist leader like Pelosi? For the liberal Left of 2019, this is what comes naturally. The snake has finally gotten around to eating its own tail.

This is what the future of the Democratic Party looks like.

It didn’t happen overnight, of course. During the Obama era, top Democratic influencers discovered a shortcut to political debate with Republicans. You don’t need to make arguments or propound new ideas. Just indiscriminately call them racists. Even if you’re not discussing an explicitly racial issue, then you could at least say they’re racists for disparaging the first black president and his agenda.

You criticized Obama for playing too much golf? Nice try, racist! You want lower taxes or less government? You own a gun? You’re pro-life? Surely, there is some convoluted argument that your position or your lifestyle is based in racism (the details don’t matter too much). And there is no shortage of intellectually vapid left-wingers ready to make the case.

Redistricting, which was great before Democrats lost control of it, is also racist. In fact, elections are racist, at least every time Democrats lose them.

Eventually, the wolf-cry of racism became a shortcut for dealing with almost any disagreement, political or otherwise. Completely nonpolitical people became thought-criminals without realizing it. Milk, the “OK” hand gesture, and the original U.S. 13-star flag have now become racist symbols, too.

That longstanding Democratic icons like Biden and now Pelosi should be devoured by this same irrational beast is just part of the natural order of things.

We’ve learned in the last ten years that name-calling “racist” doesn’t usually settle issues or win elections. It certainly doesn’t make a sound case for ideas or rational arguments. But it does create ample ill will and division in American politics. And most importantly, it always throws opponents off their game, particularly if they are decent people who in truth abhor racial prejudice.

So you really have to admire Ocasio-Cortez’s ruthlessness in mau-mauing Nancy Pelosi. She has been in Congress less than a year, and the freshman has already found a way to wield the Democratic Party’s weapons of mass destruction against its own leaders.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/future-of-the-democratic-party-how-aoc-turned-the-guns-of-racism-against-nancy-pelosi

WASHINGTON – Two events today more than 1,700 miles apart will put on display the deep divisions over the worsening migrant crisis at the southern U.S. border. 

Battling to shape public perceptions of the worsening migrant crisis at the southern U.S. border, Vice President Mike Pence and a group of Republican senators will head to the border to tour a migrant detention center while Democrats host a high-profile hearing about the centers featuring testimony from government watchdog officials and some of their most outspoken members, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. 

The dueling events will put all eyes — and TV cameras – on conditions at the facilities, which have drawn intense scrutiny due to reports chronicling severe overcrowding and inadequate care for migrant families. All of this comes against the backdrop of the deaths of at least six migrant children who have died in federal custody and nationwide raids expected this weekend by Immigration and Customs Enforcement that would leave even more undocumented migrants in federal custody.  

Pence says TV welcome: VP defends conditions at border centers, says he’ll bring cameras on tour

‘They tore out a piece of my heart’: Migrant mother describes toddler’s illness, death

Pence, senators tour detention center

Democrats have expressed outrage over what they say is inhumane treatment of migrant families. 

But Pence and Republican senators want to push back on those criticisms. They contend that the border facilities have become overwhelmed because Democrats have refused to work with them on policies that would stem the flow of migrants across the border. Pence has criticized lawmakers such as Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who have compared the detention facilities to concentration camps.

“It is really contemptible that some in Congress have referred to U.S. detention facilities as concentration camps,” Pence told reporters Wednesday during a trip to California. “That’s an outrage. The Nazis killed people. Our Customs and Border Protection personnel save lives every day.”

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Tex., said he visited a detention facility in McAllen, Texas — the same Pence will tour with a handful of senators today, and said that the crisis along the border “was worse than I’ve ever seen it,” noting that the packed cells he saw were built for 300 people but housing about 1,100. 

“The crisis has gotten materially worse in significant part because congressional Democrats keep galloping to the left on immigration so that as a policy matter, they essentially support open borders,” Cruz said. “Until we close the loopholes, a lot more children will be victimized.” 

While Cruz highlighted the worsening conditions in such centers, Pence vowed to bring along TV cameras as he toured the facility in McAllen, Texas and said Thursday the aim of the visit with Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee was to show people a facility and level of care that would “make the American people proud.” 

“What people are going to see is not the situation many Democrats have described but actually a situation where our CBP agents are providing humanitarian care, health care, shelter, food, sustenance in a way that would make the American people proud,” Pence said Thursday. 

More: Mike Pence visiting border to counter ‘absurd’ claims about treatment of migrants, aide says

Pence noted Wednesday that the detention centers are “overwhelmed” because “our system was simply never designed to deal with this” and said, “we’re going to lean into this crisis.” 

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., agreed and criticized planned House testimony from Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, a freshmen Democrat from New York who has become a progressive star on social media. 

“Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez’s opinion counts, just not to me. She can’t be objective on this issue,” he said. “I think her mind is made up and I don’t think any amount of testimony would change her mind. I don’t think she understands the problem and I question her judgment. I think she’s more famous than wise.”

Democrats highlight Ocasio-Cortez in hearing about migrant centers

While Republicans are touring, Democrats on the House Oversight and Reform Committee will put the spotlight on the Trump administration and discuss the treatment of migrants in a 10 a.m. EST hearing.

Despite Republican attacks on Ocasio-Cortez, House Democrats will make her one of the stars of Friday’s hearing on the conditions of the centers.

She, along with Reps. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., and Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, will testify before the committee about their visit to the border earlier this month, where they toured a detention facility in Clint, Texas and met with families who said they had been separated. The congresswomen bashed the facility after the tour, telling a large swath of reporters that the conditions of the center were horrid. 

More: AOC criticizes CBP after report of secret Facebook group as agency opens investigation

CLOSE

A young girl described her treatment while locked in a Texas border station where hundreds of other migrant children have been detained this year. (July 1)
AP, AP

Ocasio-Cortez called it “unconscionable,” saying, “no woman should ever be locked up in a pen when they have done no harm to another human being.”

Detained women who spoke with the lawmakers during the visit “all began sobbing,” Ocasio-Cortez said on Twitter, “out of fear of being punished, out of sickness, out of desperation, lack of sleep, trauma, despair.”

The Border Patrol facility in Clint made headlines after a group of lawyers who had spent time there went public with their findings, detailing children sleeping on floors and being held without access to medical care, clean water or toothbrushes. It has become the epicenter of the migrant crisis in large part because assessing conditions border facilities is difficult due to limited access to sites.

The congressional committee will hear from activists and the Department of Homeland Security’s acting Inspector General, Jennifer Costello, who issued the scathing watchdog reports chronicling unsafe conditions inside detention facilities. 

“The American people are deeply concerned about the inhumane detention centers at the border and the number of children separated from their families,” said Rep. Elijah Cummings, the chairman of the committee. “We look forward to hearing about the steps necessary to correct this crisis manufactured by the Trump Administration.”

Later this month, the committee will hear testimony from Acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan about the centers and the separation of families. 

Opinion: Trump plan to incarcerate migrant children at Fort Sill again shows worst of America

Friday’s hearing follows an inspector general’s report released by Costello this month that described the conditions at detention facilities in the Rio Grande Valley as “a ticking time bomb.” The report included photos showing migrants crowded behind chain-link fences, huddling under blankets on the floor and some holding up their hands and signs.

Contributing: Maureen Groppe and Alan Gomez

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/12/mike-pence-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-star-events-migrant-crisis/1704086001/

The attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, the alleged child sex trafficker and global jet-setter of unknown wealth, told the court Thursday that they wanted to keep Epstein’s mysterious finances under seal, and the Justice Department declined to take a position on Epstein’s request.

Epstein has been in jail since he was arrested by authorities at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey on his way home from Paris this weekend. His indictment, unsealed Monday, alleges that he “sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls at his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida, among other locations” between 2002 and 2005, according to a 14-page federal indictment. Epstein, a registered sex offender, pleaded not guilty to the new charges Monday.

During a lengthy court filing Thursday arguing that Epstein should be allowed to be kept essentially under house arrest at his Manhattan mansion instead of being held behind bars, Epstein’s attorneys requested that the court allow Epstein’s finances be provided as “sealed supplemental disclosure” and be kept secret from the public. Epstein’s attorneys also said that they would provide a “sealed list of his philanthropic donations.”

The DOJ’s attorneys responded that “the government takes no position on the defendant’s application” to keep his finances sealed, but they did complain that they had not yet received financial information from Epstein themselves, despite deadlines for him to do so. The DOJ told the judge that they “still have not yet received any financial disclosure or information from the defense in connection with the defendant’s application for bail” and claimed that “there is no reason that the defendant need have waited until this evening to submit his sealing motion.”

And the DOJ asked for an extra 24 hours to respond to Epstein’s financial information when the defense submits it.

The lawyers for Epstein claimed that “Epstein has, to this point, not provided a complete financial disclosure on advice of counsel, motivated by a desire to ensure the accuracy of the information provided to the Court.”

Epstein’s attorneys provided scant details about his financial dealings and about how much money he has, saying that “through his business and the five residences he maintains in the United States, Mr. Epstein employs people, many of whom have been with him for more than a decade, and feels personally responsible for their livelihoods.” The lawyers said that Epstein is “admittedly wealthy” and claimed that “all of his financial resources (other than his Paris residence)” were held inside the U.S., including the U.S. Virgin Islands.

But Epstein’s lawyers wanted the specific details about Epstein’s wealth kept sealed, and that request was without objection from the DOJ.

It remains to be seen how Judge Richard Berman will rule on that request.

The sources of Epstein’s wealth and how much money he is actually worth have long been shrouded in mystery, although he is worth enough to own a $77 million Manhattan mansion, a Palm Beach estate, a ranch in New Mexico, an apartment in Paris, and a private island in the Caribbean, often dubbed the “Island of Sin” or “Pedophile Island.”

And Epstein is wealthy enough to afford a private jet, nicknamed the “Lolita Express,” and to travel all over the world on a regular basis with a variety of politicos, celebrities, and tycoons.

Former President Bill Clinton, who has praised Epstein in the past, released a statement on Monday evening claiming that he had taken four total trips on Epstein’s jet, but a review of flight records indicates Clinton actually took at least 27 flights totaling at least six trips.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-tells-judge-he-wants-mysterious-finances-kept-secret