WASHINGTON — As Donald Trump supporters and opponents confronted each other during a hot and rainy Fourth of July, Trump himself stressed holiday themes and paid tribute to the military during a speech that largely avoided politics.

“Our nation is stronger today than it ever was before,” Trump said at one point in his speech at the Lincoln Memorial, echoing a claim he has made often on the campaign trail.

“As long as we stay true to our cause, as long as we remember our great history and as long as we never stop fighting for a better future, then there will be nothing that America cannot do,” Trump said during his “Salute to America” event.

The day featured a parade, military flyovers, a display of tanks and demonstrations. Trump supporters and protesters gathered in Washington from Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House to the expanse of National Mall. No major violence was reported, though at least one scuffle broke out at a flag burning in front of the White House.

While telling the story of George Washington and other revolutionaries who defeated the British more than two centuries ago, Trump also singled out each branch of the modern U.S. military, including his proposed “Space Force.”

He also discussed U.S. accomplishments, from Alexander Graham Bell and the telephone to the Wright Brothers and the airplane. He introduced a number of invited guests, from the flight director on the first moon landing in 1969 to gold star families who lost loved ones in battle.

The setting reflected the program’s military theme, as tanks were displayed on the grounds of the Lincoln Memorial, including one in front of the speaking platform. Air Force One flew overhead against a cloudy twilight sky as the president and first lady Melania Trump ascended the makeshift stage in front of the memorial.

At different points, sometimes amid a light rain, Trump paused in his speech to allow flyovers of various pieces of equipment, from Coast Guard choppers to a B-2 stealth bomber.

The 47-minute set of remarks ended with a military band and choir performing a rendition of “Battle Hymn of the Republic.” During the event, the band played the Army, Navy and Air Force marching songs. 

Trump, who spoke behind a shield of rain-smeared bulletproof glass, also noted he was standing near the spot where Martin Luther King, Jr., delivered his “I Have A Dream” speech in 1963.

During another discussion of American heroes, Trump mentioned Betsy Ross. He did not mention the current dispute surrounding the Betsy Ross flag, and whether white supremacist groups are using it as a symbol.

The weather may have held down the crowd, but Trump supporters packed the area in front of the stage, and on either side of the Reflecting Pool that stretches away from the Lincoln Memorial.

“That same American Spirit that emboldened our founders has kept us strong throughout our history,” Trump said. “To this day, that spirit runs through the veins of every American patriot. It lives on in each and every one of you.”

On the National Mall earlier Thursday, the liberal activist organization Code Pink inflated a Baby Trump blimp, depicting an orange-hued Trump in a diaper clutching a Twitter-ready cell phone in his right hand. It has become a fixture at major protests including recently in London and at the U.S.-Mexico border. The balloon was later deflated because of wind on the Mall. 

Trump said he was inspired to hold the Fourth of July extravaganza by a Bastille Day parade he attended in Paris two years. He has long said he wanted a similar event in Washington to honor the U.S. military, complete with flyovers and rolling military hardware.

But critics have accused him of injecting politics in a traditionally nonpartisan holiday celebration with his “Salute to America” event

A large area was fenced off around the Lincoln Memorial, preventing people without invitations from getting to the monument.

It was the first time a presidential administration has sponsored a Fourth of July event since the Richard Nixon administration backed an “Honor America Day” in 1970. Nixon was out of town, though he did deliver a speech by video.  Protesters stormed the Nixon event, also at the Lincoln Memorial, nearly shutting it down. 

On Thursday in front of the White House, protesters, some wearing T-shirts that said “Revolution – Nothing Less!” lit up an American flag on Pennsylvania Avenue, the flame rising high above the street. Counter-demonstrators wearing Trump gear rushed the protesters who surrounded the flag, leading to fisticuffs and throw-downs that had to be broken up by police. 

Activists also brought a 16-foot-tall “Dumping Trump” robot featuring the president sitting on a golden toilet wearing a MAGA-style hat saying “Make America Great Again: Impeach Me.”

Nearby Trump supporters, wearing bright red hats emblazoned by the Trump slogan, Make America Great Again, responded by chanting “I love America! I love America!”

Trump said his viewing of a Bastille Day parade two years inspired his desire to host a military-themed event in Washington; critics said the event seemed more about promoting himself.

Critics noted that tickets to Trump’s events went to supporters and Republican Party members, while the population at large was shut out.

Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg, a veteran, said the planning of the Trump event seemed designed to boost his own ego.

“Reducing our nation to tanks and shows of muscle just makes us look like the kind of loud mouth guy at the bar,” he said during a campaign stop in Iowa.

While Trump eschewed politics in his speech, many of his supporters in the crowd expressed great interest in his 2020 re-election bid.

While waiting in line for about an hour wait, Trump supporters Will Bowman, his son Peyton and June Davis talked about his important turnout is in next year’s election. The Bowmans and Davis had never met before.

“That’s the beauty of this event,” Will Bowman said. “You meet people from all walks of life.”

Davis said she was excited for the military display, despite criticism from protestors.

“That’s why we’re here today,” Davis said. “The military takes care of us.”

Will Bowman said he knows today, with the president’s speech and the fireworks, will be an unforgettable day for his children.

“(Peyton)’s never going to forget this day for the rest of his life,” he said.

Contributing: Elizabeth Lawrence, Sarah Elbeshbishi, Olivia Sanchez, Jason Lalljee, Max Cohen, Nicholas Wu and Ledyard King 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/04/independence-day-donald-trump-plans-stress-military-strength-holiday-speech/1648314001/

Officials warn of more aftershocks

Dr. Lucy Jones, a seismologist with the United States Geological Survey, said there has already been a high number of aftershocks following the quake. “I think we have already had probably an excess of 20 3.5 [magnitude aftershocks],” Jones said in a news conference.

“I would expect that there will continue to be magnitude 3s every few minutes, as there have been since this earthquake happened and that as those many 3s come through, we’re going to have several 4s,” Jones continued.

She said several minutes before the news conference, she had logged a 4.1 magnitude aftershock.

“We will be continuing to have lots of aftershocks,” she said. “There is a 1 in 20 chance that this location could have an even bigger quake in the next few days.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/live-news/earthquake-california-today-ridgecrest-strikes-near-los-angeles-2019-07-04-live-updates/

President Donald Trump is exploring using an executive order to move forward with the battle over the 2020 census question, sources familiar with the discussions told ABC News.

While the White House may be discussing the potential of an executive order, it is not yet clear how much that will factor into the rationale the Department of Justice lawyers are preparing to bring before the Maryland district judge by the Friday deadline, according to one administration official. Sources said that as of Thursday afternoon, an executive order was not part of the DOJ deliberations.

The Washington Post was first to report an executive order was under consideration.

“The Supreme Court ruled that it is legal to have a citizenship question in the census if there’s an appropriate explanation – and it should come as no surprise President Trump is looking at every option within his legal authority to add such a question.” said White House deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley

In his majority opinion issued last week, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts appeared to leave open the possibility that the administration could return and present a justification for adding the citizenship question as long as it wasn’t “contrived.”

Michelle R. Smith/AP, FILE
An envelope containing a 2018 census letter mailed to a U.S. resident as part of the nation’s only test run of the 2020 Census, March 23, 2018.

On Wednesday, the Justice Department reversed course on whether the 2020 census will be printed without a question on citizenship, after President Trump tweeted out a statement contradicting his own government’s position.

Justice Department special counsel Joshua Gardner admitted to the Maryland district court that the president’s tweet contradicted their earlier position and that they were still sorting out how to respond.

“We at the Department of Justice have been instructed to examine whether there is a path forward, consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision, that would allow us to include the citizenship question on the census,” assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s civil division, Jody Hunt, said on a Wednesday afternoon call with U.S. District Judge George J. Hazel of Maryland.

“We think there may be a legally available path under the Supreme Court’s decision. We’re examining that, looking at near-term options to see whether that’s viable and possible,” Hunt added.

Hazel ordered the government to make clear whether the citizenship question would appear on the census by Friday, or tell the court how it plans to move forward to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling.

It’s unclear what argument DOJ will ultimately make tomorrow.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-house-exploring-executive-order-deal-census-citizenship/story?id=64137382

An airstrike that hit a migrant detention center near the Libyan capital of Tripoli has left at least 40 people dead and another 200 injured, a health official in the country’s UN-recognized government told CNN.
“I expect the death toll to go up given that there are critically injured people being treated in hospital,” Malek Merset, a spokesman for the Ministry of Health, said.
Satellite images taken of the detention center in Tajoura, a coastal town east of Tripoli, showed extensive damage to several buildings in the complex. Photos taken on the ground captured piles of rubble left where structures had been, while emergency crews worked to remove both the wounded and the dead.
Libya’s Government of National Accord (GNA) condemned the “horrific crime,” blaming renegade Gen. Khalifa Haftar, leader of the Libyan National Army (LNA), whose forces have been waging an assault on the capital for the last two months.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/03/africa…

#Libya #CNN #News

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7xBdy3MnLk

I believe JCPOA was and remains the best POSSIBLE agreement on the nuclear issue. None of the participants were happy with all elements of the deal, but it addressed the major concerns of all. It was negotiated by all with open eyes about what was possible and what was not. We did not neglect anything. We accepted the reality that we could not resolve all our differences in this deal and we agreed to leave them out.

It is also important to note that, contrary to public statements by its detractors on all sides, JCPOA was not built on trust. It was indeed based on explicit recognition of mutual mistrust. That is why it is so long and detailed. Paragraph 36 of JCPOA is a clear example that we negotiated this deal with the full understanding that we could not trust the commitment of the West. We are exercising that option within the deal right now, which can indeed prevent the deal from total collapse, which will be detrimental to the interest of all, including the United States.

(Paragraph 36 provided a mechanism to resolve disputes and allows one side, under certain circumstances, to stop complying with the deal if the other side is out of compliance.)

Do you think that the nuclear deal can be salvaged? Or do you anticipate continued erosion since President Trump withdrew from the agreement?

We will remain committed to the deal as long as the remaining participants (E.U., France, Germany, U.K., Russia and China) observe the deal. Survival or collapse of the JCPOA depends on the ability and willingness of all parties to invest in this undertaking. In a nutshell, a multilateral agreement cannot be implemented unilaterally.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/04/world/middleeast/iran-zarif-interview.html

In this hyperpartisan environment, congressional leaders use every tool to compel party members to stick with the team, dangling chairmanships, committee assignments, bill sponsorships, endorsements and campaign resources. As donors recognize the growing power of party leaders, they supply these officials with ever-increasing funds, which, in turn, further tightens their grip on power.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2019/07/04/rep-justin-amash-our/

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A strong earthquake rattled a large swath of Southern California and parts of Nevada on Thursday morning, making hanging lamps sway and photo frames on walls shake. There were no immediate reports of damage or injuries but a swarm of aftershocks were reported.

The 6.4 magnitude quake struck at 10:33 a.m. in the Mojave Desert, about 150 miles (240 kilometers) northeast of Los Angeles, near the town of Ridgecrest, California. It is the strongest quake to hit the region in 20 years.



The United State Geological Survey initially said it measured at a 6.6 magnitude.

“It almost gave me a heart attack,” said Cora Burke, a waitress at Midway Cafe in Ridgecrest, a town of 28,000 people. “It’s just a rolling feeling inside the building, inside the cafe and all of a sudden everything started falling off the shelf, glasses, the refrigerator and everything in the small refrigerator fell over.”

Video posted online of a liquor store in Ridgecrest showed the aisles filled with broken wine and liquor bottles, knocked down boxes and other groceries strewn on the floor. There was at least one house on fire in Ridgecrest.

Veteran seismologist Lucy Jones said the earthquake Thursday was the strongest to hit Southern California in 20 years.

The previous large quake was a 7.1 on that struck in the area on October 16, 1999, she said.

Jones told reporters at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California, that the 6.4 quake centered in the Mojave Desert near the town of Ridgecrest was preceded by a magnitude 4.3 temblor about a half hour earlier.

She says it was vigorous aftershock sequence occurring and that she wouldn’t be surprise if a magnitude 5 quake occurred during the aftershocks.

“We should be expecting lots of aftershocks,” she said.

People from Las Vegas to the Pacific Coast reported feeling a rolling motion and took to social media to report it.

Local emergency agencies also took to social media to ask people to only call 911 for emergencies.

“We are very much aware of the significant earthquake that just occurred in Southern California. Please DO NOT call 9-1-1 unless there are injuries or other dangerous conditions. Don’t call for questions please,” the LAPD said in a statement published on Twitter.

Ashleigh Chandler, a helicopter rescue EMT at Fort Irwin, California, said the quake happened as she was getting ready for a July 4th party.

“I was just in the living room getting everything ready, we start to feel the shaking, so then I look up and then the wine bottles start rattling and I thought, ‘They’re going to fall.’

“My stepson was in the house and my dog, so we just got everyone outside and then it ended. It was like 15, 20 seconds, maybe. It was pretty good shaking, so I’m out of breath.”

“Everyone’s OK.”

Source Article from https://www.10tv.com/article/64-magnitude-earthquake-rattles-southern-california-no-injuries-reported-2019-jul

WASHINGTON – Tanks, protests and fireworks, oh my! 

Thousands will be gathering Thursday in the nation’s capital to celebrate the birth of America for its annual fireworks event, which this year will feature Army tanks, a flyover of military jets, Air Force One and fireworks. The centerpiece? A speech from President Donald Trump — the first time in decades that a president has addressed the crowd.

But protests are expected and Trump is facing criticisms over the costs of the event and has been accused of injecting politics into a traditionally nonpartisan event. This year’s celebration won’t just attract tourists, Washington, D.C., residents and families looking to observe the holiday. Both protesters and supporters of the president are descending to the heart of the nation’s capital – potentially putting the patriotic holiday on a collision course for partisan fights. 

What to expect: Washington DC 4th of July to feature Army tanks, a burning flag and Baby Trump

Trump defends plans: ‘Show of a lifetime’ or waste of taxpayer cash? Trump says 4th of July event worth it

‘This says something’

Many people donning the MAGA hats stopped one another along the National Mall when they saw others wearing the same hat or shirt, yelling “Make America Great Again” or “Go Trump!”

Jim Sutton usually attends the parade each year with his wife, Gigi. But the couple, who sported head-to-toe Trump gear, said something felt different this year.

“It’s just fantastic,” Gigi Sutton said, in her white Trump T-shirt and flag pants.

The pair said the criticism aimed at Trump’s use of military equipment in the event was unwarranted.

“We’ve been having all these problems with Iran, North Korea. This says something,” Gigi Sutton said. Her husband chimed in, “it lets the world know our nation’s defense is well at hand.”

Security was particularly tight in the city leading up to Trump’s speech later in the evening. Authorities have blocked off several blocks surrounding the Lincoln Memorial. Large tan, military vehicle blocked entryway into the memorial with Army National Guardsmen packing into the beds of pickup trucks ready for the day’s festivities.

Protests galore 

Dozens of protesters opposing Trump gathered in the sweltering humidity to spout off about the administration, its policies and the rhetoric from the commander in Chief.  With a backdrop of the Washington Monument, many posed for photos with a giant robot showing the president sitting on a golden toilet, cell phone in hand.

The liberal activist organization Code Pink inflated a Baby Trump blimp, depicting an orange-hued Trump in a diaper clutching a Twitter-ready cell phone in his right hand. It has become a fixture at major protests including recently in London and at the U.S.-Mexico border. The balloon was later deflated because of wind on the Mall. 

Activists also brought a 16-foot-tall “Dumping Trump” robot featuring the president sitting on a golden toilet wearing a MAGA-style hat saying “Make America Great Again: Impeach Me.”

Trump supporters walked by the contraption, some yelling things like “snowflakes” to the crowd while another crowd of Trump supporters chanted “I love America.” 

Others just walked by.

“I just ignore it. It’s disrespectful but nothing new,” said Eva Salcido, who traveled from Texas with her sister to see the nation’s capital for the first time.

‘Dumping Trump’: 16-foot-tall ‘Dumping Trump’ robot to join protests during president’s 4th of July speech

‘Show the world who we are’: Trump’s 4th of July military show has visitors pumped, but critics slam it as an ego trip

A look at the tanks: What we know about the tanks in Trump’s ‘Salute to America’ on the Fourth of July

Two military veterans groups are also planning to hand out T-shirts on the Mall “to honor the military service and sacrifice” of the family of John McCain, the late GOP senator with whom Trump has feuded. 

VoteVets – a liberal political action committee that almost exclusively backs Democratic candidates, according to OpenSecrets – is teaming up with Rags of Honor – a screen printing shop that employs homeless veterans – to give out the “Big Bad John” shirts depicting the USS John S. McCain.

There’s also a flag-burning protest planned, which was organized by Gregory Lee Johnson — the man at the center of the 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the burning of the U.S. flag is constitutionally protected free speech. 

“I am going to D.C. on the Fourth of July and I’m going to burn the flag in protest (of his) whole fascist agenda,” Johnson told USA TODAY before the event. “Think about all Trump has done to whip people into a frenzy.”

DC bar owners Peyton Sherwood and Frederick Uku distributed small balloon versions of the “Baby Trump” blimp to parade protesters and said that they were exercising their First Amendment rights. 

Trump starts his day golfing, tweeting

As he prepared to deliver an evening speech from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, President Donald Trump spent the afternoon playing golf and tweeting about politics.

While heading to his golf club in suburban Virginia, Trump tweeted an attack on Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., for announcing he was leaving the Republican Party because it is not responding to the nation’s problems. “A total loser,” Trump called him.

Amish, who has said the House should open an impeachment inquiry over allegations that Trump obstructed justice in the Russia investigation, announced his departure from the GOP in a Washington Post op-ed.

In a tweet, Trump called Amash’s decision “great news for the Republican Party,” and described him as “one of the dumbest & most disloyal men in Congress.”

On another political front, Trump tweeted about his efforts to still get a citizenship question onto the 2020 U.S. Census, despite an adverse decision last week by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Trump tweeted that “Department of Commerce and the Department of Justice are working very hard on this, even on the 4th of July!”

The fact is government attorneys had no choice but to work Thursday; a judge in the case gave them a Friday deadline to file arguments on how they think they think they can attach a citizenship questions consistent with the Supreme Court decision.

Trump also tweeted a pledge to deliver a non-partisan speech – “I will speak on behalf of our great Country!” he tweeted – but critics say his “Salute to America” program is more like a salute to the president’s re-election bid.

Protesting that national parks fees are being used to help finance Trump’s event, Rep. Betty McCollum, DFL-Minn., “are meant to improve our national parks” and “are clearly not to be used for a political rally.”

Trump’s speech is scheduled for 6:30 p.m.; rain is in the weather forecast.

Criticisms over price, politicizing the holiday 

Critics and lawmakers, including several candidates in the 2020 White House race, have attacked the president for the extravaganza amid questions about its expense and concerns that he is politicizing the annual celebration. 

Many have focused on a report from The Washington Post that the National Park Service was diverting nearly $2.5 million in entrance and recreation fees primarily intended to improve parks across the country to help cover the costs. An aide who was not authorized to speak publicly about the plans told USA TODAY a preliminary estimate for transporting and displaying the military tanks is about $870,000.

CLOSE

President Donald Trump is marshalling tanks, bombers and other machinery of war for a Fourth of July celebration that traditionally is light on military might, while critics accused him of using America’s military as a political prop. (July 3)
AP, AP

Politicians, donors, Pentagon officials: Who’s coming to Trump’s Fourth of July speech? What we know so far

Tanks, flag burning & a baby Trump blimp: Here’s everything we know about the July Fourth parade and Trump’s speech

2020 candidates used the event as a line of attack on the president, a sign that the celebration had become a partisan flash point.

Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado said the program was “a political spectacle – at the expense of taxpayers and our National Parks.” Marianne Williamson said that watching tanks on the streets of the nation’s capital was “heartbreaking & repugnant.” Andrew Yang said politicizing the military for Independence Day was costly and would set a “terrible precedent.”

But Trump has defended the celebration and dismissed criticisms on Twitter by saying “it will be the show of a lifetime!”

“The cost of our great Salute to America tomorrow will be very little compared to what it is worth,” Trump wrote. “We own the planes, we have the pilots, the airport is right next door (Andrews), all we need is the fuel. We own the tanks and all. Fireworks are donated by two of the greats. Nice!”

Contributing: Max Cohen, Sarah Elbeshbishi, Nicholas Wu, Ledyard King and Michael Collins 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/04/4th-july-trump-washington-tank-celebration/1639681001/

Americans are celebrating the nation’s independence this July 4th, but there will be no holiday respite for harried staffers at the Commerce and Justice Departments.

They will almost certainly be preparing for a court hearing Friday, after being summoned to explain the administration’s unanticipated, and possibly illegal, change of position on including a citizenship question on the 2020 U.S. Census.

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt the Trump administration a stunning (if narrow) defeat, rejecting patently false argument  that it wanted to add a citizenship question to the decennial national headcount so that it could better enforce the Voting Rights Act. The high court ruled that the administration would have to provide a more believable rationale.

On Tuesday, the Trump administration appeared to wave a white flag, with the Department of Justice announcing that there would be “no citizenship question on the 2020 census” after months of fighting to insert one.

The matter appeared to be settled, until it wasn’t: On Wednesday President Donald Trump backtracked, vowing on Twitter that he would move forward with the citizenship question after all.

“The News Reports about the Department of Commerce dropping its quest to put the Citizenship Question on the Census is incorrect or, to state it differently, FAKE! We are absolutely moving forward, as we must, because of the importance of the answer to this question,” he wrote, throwing the entire process of printing the forms and commencing with the count into chaos.

 

Trump redoubled his support for a citizenship question in a tweet sent Thursday morning.

“So important for our Country that the very simple and basic ‘Are you a Citizen of the United States?’ question be allowed to be asked in the 2020 Census. Department of Commerce and the Department of Justice are working very hard on this, even on the 4th of July!, he wrote.

 

Wednesday’s tweet threw the entire process into chaos and prompted the judge to order a hearing set for Friday to resolve the confusion.

Transcripts of a phone conversation that included a U.S. district court judge and lawyers from the Commerce and Justice departments show the degree of the disarray.

Despite the administration’s position just one day earlier that it had abandoned plans for a citizenship question, in a Wednesday court filing in the Southern District of Maryland, Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt said the Justice Department had been “instructed to examine whether there is a path forward, consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision, that would allow us to include the citizenship question on the census.”

The judge in the case, U.S. District Judge George Hazel wanted clarification, and asked for a phone conference with the stakeholders. The judge seemed particularly confused by what the fact that the president’s tweets in no way corresponded with what was actually happening .

“I saw a tweet that directly contradicted the position …[shared by the Justice Department] with me yesterday,” said Hazel.

Justice Department lawyer Joshua Gardner, who was also on the call, was also clearly baffled by the situation. He first reminded Hazel that he had been the DOJ for 16 years, though “multiple administrations,” and that he has always “endeavored to be as candid as possible with the Court.”

He then made it very, very clear that he had no idea why any of this was happening.

“The tweet this morning was the first I had heard of the president’s position on this issue,” said Gardner, adding that he does “not have a deeper understanding” of what the president is doing but that he would do his “absolute best to figure out what’s going on.”

The only thing the befuddled Gardner could confirm “for sure” was that “the Census Bureau is contenting with the process of printing the questionnaire without a citizenship question, and that that process has not stopped.”

Hazel has gave the Trump administration a 2 p.m.Friday deadline to come up with a justification to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census.

Reporting on that Supreme Court decision last week, ThinkProgress’s Ian Millhiser wrote that the Supreme Court opinion on the case holds that there is evidence that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross wasn’t trying to add the question for the reason he claimed he was doing so: To help the Justice Department encore the Voting Rights Act.

He came up with that rationale after the fact. “Ross’ mistake, in other words, is that he almost certainly lied about why he wanted the citizenship question,” wrote Millhiser.

There were also documents turned over by the family of GOP gerrymandering architect Thomas Hofeller, showing that he had told the Trump administration to include the citizenship question in the census as it would hurt Democrats and be “advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic Whites.”

The original deadline for printing the census forms was actually on Monday, with former census officials already sounding the alarms for the costly consequences of such delays.

Experts have warned against including the question in the census as it would in all likelihood make the count inaccurate — fearing repercussions (such as detention and deportation), undocumented migrants might either skip filling out the form or misrepresent themselves.

It would also damage representation in states with high immigrant populations.


Source Article from https://thinkprogress.org/trumps-tweet-on-citizenship-question-surprises-everyone-including-administration-lawyers-19c5122afb68/

In this hyperpartisan environment, congressional leaders use every tool to compel party members to stick with the team, dangling chairmanships, committee assignments, bill sponsorships, endorsements and campaign resources. As donors recognize the growing power of party leaders, they supply these officials with ever-increasing funds, which, in turn, further tightens their grip on power.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2019/07/04/rep-justin-amash-our/

British Royal Marines helped to seize an oil tanker after it claims that it was of breaching EU sanctions by bringing Iranian oil to Syria.

The tanker, Grace 1, was seized in British territory off Gibraltar on Thursday. According to Reuters, it had previously sailed around around Africa from the Middle East, Reuters reported.

A spokesman for the Iranian government said on Thursday that the tanker had been illegally stopped from passing through the Strait of Gibraltar by the UK. It said Iran had summoned the British ambassador to its Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Tehran.

A spokesperson for the UK Ministry of Defence told Business Insider that the Royal Marines acted at the request of local authorities in Gibraltar, which is a British territory with its own government.

Fabian Picardo, the head of Gibraltar’s government, said on Thursday that it had “detained the vessel and its cargo.”

He said “we have reason to believe that the Grace 1 was carrying its shipment of crude oil to the Banyas Refinery in Syria.” This would breach EU sanctions.

Reuters reported earlier on Thursday that it had seen data that suggested the oil was Iranian. The ship’s documents say that the oil is from Iraq, Reuters said. Al Jazeera also reported that mapping data shows the ship sailed from Iran.

British Royal Marines head towards the Grace 1 oil tanker, seized in the Mediterranean on July 4, 2019.
AP Photo/Marcos Moreno

The UK government said in a statement that it supports Gibraltar’s actions.

“We welcome this firm action by the Gibraltarian authorities, acting to enforce the EU Syria Sanctions regime,” they said.

The EU imposed sanctions against Syria’s government over its treatment of civilians under President Bashar Assad. It has banned shipments of oil to Syria since 2011.

Spain’s caretaker foreign minister said that the tanker was stopped at the request of the US, which has seen tensions increase with Iran in recent weeks.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/royal-marines-seize-iran-oil-tanker-gibraltar-2019-7

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-03/facebook-instagram-having-connectivity-issues-for-some-users

Members of the US military guide a Bradley Fighting Vehicle on July 3, 2019 as preparations are made for the “Salute to America” event at the Lincoln Memorial on the National Mall in Washington, DC. ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP/Getty Images

A small number of M1 Abrams tanks and other armored vehicles will participate in President Trump’s Fourth of July celebration in Washington, US defense officials have confirmed to CNN.

However, they will not parade down Pennsylvania Avenue due to the need to protect roads and bridges. Trump later confirmed tanks would be present during remarks in the Oval Office.

While the US continues to operate the M1 Abrams tank, the US military has not used World War II-era M4 Sherman tanks since the 1950s.

About the military display: A US defense official said that the current plan is to have a very small number of armored vehicles participate as part of a “static display” at the event on the National Mall. The vehicles will not be moving thereby reducing the chance of damaging local infrastructure. The number of vehicles will be very small with the current plan to have two M1 Abrams tanks, two Bradley fighting vehicles and an armored M88 Recovery Vehicle, along with an “appropriate” number of accompanying personnel.

Multiple US military aircraft will participate in the celebrations as well, according to two defense officials, including the B-2 stealth bomber and F-22 fighter jets.

CNN had also previously reported that the Blue Angels demonstration team, which typically flies F/A-18s, would be present along with F-35 stealth jets and that the VC-25, the aircraft that serves as Air Force One when the President is on board, also will participate.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-washington-dc-july-4-2019/index.html

Justice was served – at long last – when a jury found Navy SEAL Chief Edward “Eddie” Gallagher not guilty Tuesday of charges including murder and attempted murder in the killing of an ISIS fighter in Iraq.

The verdict proved that even the badly broken military justice can still get things right on occasion.

Gallagher, who heroically risked his life and served his country for 20 years in the Navy, should never have been charged. He spent nine months in prison awaiting his trial and was treated disgracefully by the Navy he so loyally served.

NAVY SEAL EDWARD GALLAGHER FOUND NOT GUILTY ON MURDER AND ATTEMPTED MURDER CHARGES

Gallagher was found not guilty of charges including premeditated murder, willfully discharging a firearm to endanger human life, retaliation against members of his platoon for reporting his alleged actions, obstruction of justice and the attempted murder of two noncombatants.

The SEAL was convicted of posing for a photo with a casualty – the least serious charge against him. This conviction is punishable by up to four months imprisonment. However, he has already served more time than that awaiting his trial.

The acquittal of Gallagher on all the most serious charges against him shows that not everyone in the United States military justice system has embraced overzealous and unjust prosecutions of members of our military. We should honor the brave Americans in uniform who carry out their duties despite grave danger while they face enemy fighters who want to kill as many Americans as possible.

Gallagher, who heroically risked his life and served his country for 20 years in the Navy, should never have been charged. He spent nine months in prison awaiting his trial and was treated disgracefully by the Navy he so loyally served.

Navy prosecutors and agents of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) should be ashamed of their treatment not only of Gallagher, but of his family. Who drags minor children out into the streets at gunpoint in the middle of the night, then dismisses it as “standard operating procedure?”

The NCIS, that’s who.

Unfortunately, Gallagher is not the only member of our military unjustly prosecuted for fighting enemy forces.

Another is Army Lt. Clint Lorance, on whose legal defense team I serve. He was unjustly convicted of one count of murder and two counts of attempted murder after he ordered his men to fire on two motorcycle-riding Taliban terrorists in Afghanistan. He was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment.

Yet another military member unjustly prosecuted is former Army Green Beret Maj. Matthew Golsteyn, who is facing trial on a charge of killing a Taliban bombmaker in Afghanistan who was responsible for the deaths of Americans.

All three cases are embarrassing stains on the military justice system.

The decision to charge Gallagher was inexcusable. He should never have been charged with the killing of a mortal enemy of the United States who was a member of ISIS, one of the most radical and deadly jihadist groups on the planet.

ISIS fighters have committed the most gruesome and atrocious acts imaginable – public beheadings, burning people to death in cages, slicing little boys in half, mass terror against Christians and more.

Yet prosecuting our courageous warriors is a recurring anti-American theme that infected the military justice system around 2012 and hasn’t stopped.

Fortunately, the defense team in the Gallagher case did an incredible job of uncovering prosecutorial corruption before the case reached the jury.

Gallagher’s attorneys uncovered deliberate attempts by overzealous Navy prosecutors and NCIS agents to spy on his defense team. This involved an illegal search without a warrant –violating Gallagher’s rights under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution – and also threatened his right to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment.

In addition, the Navy violated the sacrosanct privacy of the attorney-client privilege. Such misconduct cannot be defended in any way, shape or form.

Thankfully, even in the military justice system we adhere to the time-honored American principle that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

At Gallagher’s trial, a young Navy SEAL medic – Special Operator 1st Class Corey Scott – admitted he had cut a breathing tube of the ISIS fighter who Gallagher was accused of killing and said that cutting the breathing tube caused the fighter’s death.

“Did Chief Gallagher kill this terrorist?” Gallagher’s attorney asked Scott at Gallagher’s trial.

“No,” Scott answered.

Then the government’s own pathologist testified that he could find no evidence of a stab wound nor any blood on the dead fighter, nor could he conclude that anything Gallagher did killed the ISIS fighter.

The charges against Gallagher should have been dismissed then, but the trial continued. What a shame.

As an ex-Navy JAG attorney, I’m ashamed of what corrupt Navy prosecutors and NCIS agents did to war hero Gallagher and his family. But I’m proud to say that a clearheaded United States Navy jury put a stop to the insanity, at least in this case.

But without a meaningful overhaul of the military justice system, rogue military prosecutors are still likely to target prominent warfighters like Chief Eddie Gallagher. What a slap in the face to the men and women who put their lives on the line for our country.

President Trump, as commander in chief, should put a stop to this. He can do three things to right the ship. 

First, the president should vacate all charges against Army Lt. Clint Lorance and return him to active duty.

Second, President Trump should immediately end the court-martial against Army Green Beret Maj. Matt Golsteyn.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

And finally, the president should convene an advisory committee of former judge advocates with marching orders to find ways to ensure that our warriors are no longer prosecuted for killing the enemy.

Now is the time to act, Mr. President.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY DON BROWN

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/don-brown-not-guilty-verdict-for-navy-seal-gallagher-is-welcome-news-he-shouldnt-have-been-prosecuted

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

The oil tanker is suspected of carrying crude oil to Syria

Iran has summoned the British ambassador in Tehran to complain about what it says is the illegal seizure of an Iranian oil tanker.

British Royal Marines helped the authorities in Gibraltar seize the ship because of evidence it was heading to Syria in breach of EU sanctions.

Spain’s acting foreign minister said the seizure of the ship – Grace 1 – was at the US’s request.

An Iranian foreign ministry spokesman said detaining its tanker was illegal.

BBC diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus said a significant international row could be developing.

Image copyright
Ministry of Defence

Gibraltar port and law enforcement agencies detained the super tanker and its cargo on Thursday morning with the help of the marines.

The BBC has been told a team of about 30 marines, from 42 Commando, were flown from the UK to Gibraltar to help, at the request of the Gibraltar government.

A defence source described it as a “relatively benign operation” without major incident.

Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the swift action by the authorities in Gibraltar and the Royal Marines would deny valuable resources to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s “murderous regime”.

Gibraltar said there was reason to believe the ship was carrying Iranian crude oil to the Baniyas Refinery in the Syrian Mediterranean port town of Tartous.

The refinery is a subsidiary of the General Corporation for Refining and Distribution of Petroleum Products, a section of the Syrian ministry of petroleum.

The EU says the facility therefore provides financial support to the Syrian government, which is subject to sanctions because of its repression of civilians since the start of the uprising against President Assad in 2011.

The refinery has been subject to EU sanctions since 2014.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48871462

For the 243rdtime, Americans are celebrating our nation’s birthday. It’s a star-spangled party, the highlight of summer for millions of us. There will be parades and picnics and politicking. And, of course, fireworks. Lots and lots of fireworks, in fact. It’s estimated Americans shell out $1 billion every July 4 on things that go boom.

Have you ever wondered why we observe America’s birthday on that particular day? Sure, the Declaration of Independence was famously approved then. But we just as easily could have picked July 2. Or July 15. Or even August 2. They all have a claim on the honor.

Although we had been engaged in an armed conflict with British redcoats for nearly 15 months by 1776, some delegates to the Second Continental Congress still hoped to patch things up with the mother country. But by early summer they reached the conclusion that England had to go. Richard Henry Lee of Virginia proposed a resolution in June declaring us an independent nation.

It was passed in a unanimous vote on July 2.

Many of our Founding Fathers thought that would be the day we commemorated. John Adams famously wrote his wife Abigail on July 3:

The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever more.

But while Adams was penning those words, his colleague Thomas Jefferson was busy scratching out a formal Declaration of Independence. The task was assigned to the Committee of Five, but Jefferson did the heavy lifting. True, he borrowed heavily from Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws. But he had less than 48 hours to craft a document that he knew would unleash shock waves on both sides of the Atlantic. So he did what college students under a tight deadline have done with their writing for generations: He cribbed a little.

On July 4, delegates approved the final version, which is why that date appears on the famous parchment copy now preserved in the National Archives.

On July 15, New York’s delegates received permission from state authorities back home to support the Declaration, which, one might argue, finalized the earlier vote.

The July 19 entry in the Secret Journals of Congress (published in 1821) states, “Resolved That the Declaration passed on the 4th be fairly engrossed on parchment with the title and stile of “The unanimous declaration of the thirteen united states of America” & that the same when engrossed be signed by every member of Congress.”

Many modern researchers now conclude that the Declaration was formally signed on Aug. 2, which made it official.

It seems nobody actually put their name on the Declaration on July 4. Signer Thomas McKean wrote in 1796, “No person signed it on that day nor for many days after.”

Does it really matter which date marks America’s actual birthday? Not really. Which is unusual for me, because I’m usually a stickler for historical accuracy. But in this case the significance of what the Founding Fathers did far outweighs the date on which they did it. Because each man literally laid it on the line by picking up the quill and putting their name to the Declaration. They weren’t joking when they agreed to “mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor …” Had things turned out different, they might very well have wound up swinging at the end of a rope.

So happy July 2. Or 4. Or 15. Or Aug. 2. Oh well, long live the Spirit of ’76!

J. Mark Powell (@JMarkPowell) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner’s Beltway Confidential blog. He is a former broadcast journalist and government communicator. His weekly offbeat look at our forgotten past, “Holy Cow! History,” can be read at jmarkpowell.com.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-forgotten-history-of-how-we-came-to-celebrate-july-4

Social media users reported problems uploading photos and videos to Facebook and Instagram Wednesday.

“We’re aware that some people are having trouble uploading or sending images, videos and other files on our apps,” Facebook, which owns Instagram, tweeted Wednesday afternoon. “We’re sorry for the trouble and are working to get things back to normal as quickly as possible.

On Wednesday evening, both Facebook and Instagram announced the issues had been solved

“We’re back!” Instagram wrote in a tweet. “The issue has been resolved and we should be back at 100% for everyone. We’re sorry for any inconvenience.”

“Earlier today, some people and businesses experienced trouble uploading or sending images, videos and other files on our apps and platforms,” Facebook wrote in a tweet. “The issue has since been resolved and we should be back at 100% for everyone. We’re sorry for any inconvenience.”

This morning’s outages follows previous incidents in March of this year and November of 2018. However, those involved full outages, whereas problems on Wednesday morning appeared to specifically involve media content.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/bad-news-influencers-facebook-instagram-issues-uploading-images/story?id=64114454

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/04/politics/justin-amash-leaving-gop/index.html