WASHINGTON — Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, is expected to step down in the coming days after spending his tenure at odds with President Trump over issues including Russia and Mr. Trump’s own attacks on the intelligence community, people familiar with the decision said on Sunday.

To replace him, the people said, the president was likely to tap Representative John Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican and staunch defender of Mr. Trump. As a member of the House Judiciary Committee, he sharply questioned Robert S. Mueller III, the former special counsel, at last week’s hearing.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/28/us/politics/dan-coats-intelligence-chief-out.html

HONG KONG — Police fired tear gas at pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong on Sunday amid growing anger over escalating violence against demonstrators.

Anti-riot forces marched toward crowds gathered near the Chinese government’s representative office, known as the Central Government Liaison Office, firing rounds of gas. Multiple protesters were forced to the ground by security forces after clashes erupted and protesters threw bricks at police.

“Police no longer fear using excessive force,” protester Jason Lo, 34, told NBC News. “This is unacceptable. As long as I can come out, I will continue.”

Organizers called Sunday’s rally to protest the police use of tear gas and rubber bullets to break up a demonstration one week ago.

The movement that began seven weeks ago in response to a controversial extradition bill has become increasingly violent.At least two dozen people were injured and 11 arrested on Saturday in an outlying district near the border with mainland China where protesters assembled despite a police ban.

Eight people injured in Saturday’s clashes remained hospitalized the following morning. Two people were reported to be in serious condition.

The severity of the previous day’s events didn’t stop Lo and countless others from gathering on Sunday at Chater Garden, an urban park in the financial district. As with on Saturday, police had denied a request for protesters to march about 1.4 miles west to Sun Yat-sen Memorial Park. But many protesters once again defied the ban, simply marching in the opposite direction.

Protesters built barricades across major roadways in the city of 7 million, targeting areas popular among tourists. Many carried placards that said, “Stop the violence” while others chanted “shame on you” at police.

“If we did not come out these two days, we are basically submitting to the abuse of power by police force,” Lo said, adding that the demonstrations were an act of protecting freedom of expression.

Demonstrators clash with police during a protest against police violence, near China’s Liaison Office in Hong Kong, on Sunday.EDGAR SU / Reuters

Police have fired tear gas and rubber bullets at demonstrators in previous rounds of protest. Demonstrators believe the use of force has been excessive and are calling for an investigation.

The human rights group Amnesty International has also called the police response heavy-handed and unacceptable.

Police have said they had to use “appropriate force” because of the bricks and other objects thrown at them, including glass bottles with a suspected corrosive fluid inside. They also claim protesters charged at officers with metal poles and have vandalized police vehicles.

While protesters maintain their initial demand for a complete withdrawal of the proposed extradition bill, the movement has morphed to also include calls for the resignation of the city’s chief executive Carrie Lam and a broader push for democracy in the semi-autonomous Chinese territory.

The former British colony became a special administrative region of China in 1997. Unlike those living in mainland China, the territory’s seven million residents can freely surf the internet and participate in public protests.

But there is widespread fear that their rights are being eroded under Beijing’s rule, prompting as many as 2 million people to march the streets of Hong Kong.

Matt Bradley and Veta Chan reported from Hong Kong, and Linda Givetash reported from London.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/hong-kong-protesters-defy-police-resume-rallies-despite-violence-n1035431

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney reacted to the aftermath of Robert Mueller’s testimony and a new push for investigating President Trump by claiming it is simply House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., trying to keep his job.

Nadler is facing a primary challenge from Lindsey Boylan, a progressive candidate looking to do to him what Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., did to House veteran Joe Crowley. Boylan has called for Trump’s impeachment, and Mulvaney thinks Nadler is now doing the same in an effort to stave off the threat from the left.

MARK PENN: MUELLER’S TESTIMONY AND INVESTIGATION ARE OVER — THIS IS THE SERIOUS THREAT WE NOW FACE

“He is falling over himself to become more and more progressive, in order to try and keep his job and not lose to the next AOC” Mulvaney said.

Nadler said after Mueller’s testimony that “there appears to be compelling evidence of the president’s misconduct outside of the four corners of the redacted version of Mueller report, and we will work to uncover that evidence as well.” Mulvaney said that Nadler also told people he has initiated an impeachment inquiry.

“This is not over in their minds, which is just bizarre given what happened this week,” Mulvaney said, referring to Mueller’s hearing. Trump and fellow Republicans touted the hearing as a victory due to Mueller’s lackluster performance in the face of scrutiny from GOP questioning, and a lack of new information to support Democrats.

Mulvaney also criticized Mueller’s comments regarding obstruction of justice, and how the report said he did not “exonerate” Trump.

“You don’t get exonerated, you are innocent until proven guilty,” Mulvaney said. “This is over.”

Mulvaney also came to President Trump’s defense in the wake of recent accusations of racism from Democrats. Trump criticized Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., for not doing enough to help his Baltimore district, saying conditions there are worse than those at the southern border. Trump’s language drew criticism from Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

Mulvaney claimed that Trump’s criticism of Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., had nothing to do with race, and was simply a response to unjustified remarks from the House Oversight Committee chairman.

“The president is attacking Mr. Cummings for saying things that are not true about the border,” Mulvaney told host Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday,” saying that the president’s remarks have “absolutely zero to do with race.”

Mulvaney pointed to a House Oversight hearing where Cummings cited conditions at the border, claiming that children were sitting in their own feces.

“That’s just not right. It’s not accurate,” Mulvaney said, stating that Cummings does not have any first-hand knowledge about border conditions.

“Mr. Cummings has not been to the border in recent memory, certainly not during this administration,” Mulvaney said.

TRUMP THROWS SQUAD FEUD BACK AT PELOSI AFTER ‘RACIST’ ACCUSATION: ‘DEMOCRATS ALWAYS PLAY THE RACE CARD’

This week, the Senate is set to vote on a budget bill which raises spending by $324 billion over spending caps. When asked if Trump wants it to pass, Mulvaney said yes, and that Trump will sign it, despite the excessive spending. He justified it by touting money that will be going toward defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

“Did we spend more money than we wanted to? Yes. Did we get a lot in return? Yes.”

Mulvaney also celebrated the recent Supreme Court decision that allowed the Trump administration to use $2.5 billion in Defense Department money on construction of a wall along the southern border.

“That’s the right decision,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mulvaney-impeachment-push-is-result-of-nadler-falling-over-himself-to-look-more-progressive

Alexei Navalny, one of Russia’s most prominent opposition figures, in a courtroom in Moscow on July 24, 2019.

Pavel Golovkin/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Pavel Golovkin/AP

Alexei Navalny, one of Russia’s most prominent opposition figures, in a courtroom in Moscow on July 24, 2019.

Pavel Golovkin/AP

Four days after being arrested by Russian authorities, Alexei Navalny, a longtime critic of President Vladimir Putin, has been hospitalized with what his spokeswoman has described as an “allergic reaction.”

Navalny, one of the most prominent leaders of Russia’s opposition movement, was arrested after calling for protests on Saturday against the exclusion of opposition candidates from city council elections in Moscow. He was sentenced to 30 days in prison.

The demonstration drew thousands of supporters. Russian police detained more than 1,300 people according to the OVD-Info group, an independent monitor that tracks police departments in Russia.

On the day of his arrest, Navalny posted an Instagram video, saying that police arrested him as he left his apartment to go for a jog and buy flowers for his wife’s birthday.

Kira Yarmysh, Navalny’s spokeswoman, wrote in a Twitter post that he had been hospitalized on Sunday morning with “severe swelling of the face and skin redness.”

She said the cause of Navalny’s allergic reaction was unknown, and “he had never suffered from such reactions in the past.” The Associated Press reported that according to Yarmysh, as of Sunday afternoon in Moscow Navalny was in “satisfactory condition.”

Election authorities barred opposition candidates from upcoming elections for Moscow’s city council because they said they didn’t have enough valid signatures on nominating petitions. Candidates are required to collect about 5,000 signatures to run for election. The opposition candidates say they’ve been kept from the ballot for political reasons.

Early Saturday, Moscow police rounded up and detained several high-profile opposition politicians, including Ilya Yashin, Dmitry Gudkov and Ivan Zhdanov.

The 45-seat Moscow City Duma is controlled by the pro-Kremlin United Russia party. Those seats have a five-year term, and the entire council is up for re-election on Sept. 8.

NPR’s Moscow correspondent Lucian Kim wrote in a tweet, “Reason for crackdown: Allowing even a few opposition politicians into Moscow city council would grant them legitimacy and exposure. And that could be a slippery slope to further erosion of Kremlin power.”

Earlier this week, Kim reported Putin’s approval rating has dropped in recent years. He noted, “The party has become so unpopular nationally that Putin ran for reelection as an independent last year. In upcoming Moscow city council elections, United Russia members have abandoned the party ticket and registered as independents.”

The decision to bar some candidates from the city council elections has triggered multiple protests across Russia this month.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/07/28/746031480/russian-opposition-leader-alexei-navalny-hospitalized-with-severe-allergic-react

The Federal Aviation Administration was poorly positioned to oversee the safety of the automated flight system that was to blame for the two deadly crashes of Boeing’s 737 Max plane over the last year, The New York Times reported Saturday.

The agency engineers in charge of keeping a watch on the airplane’s flight control systems through the latter part of its development had little experience with such software, according to The Times report. And Boeing largely kept them in the dark about the importance of the flight-control system on the 737 Max and a crucial change they made to the software soon before releasing the plane commercially, The Times reported.

The Times did not name the engineers in its report.

In a statement emailed to Business Insider, Boeing spokesman Peter Pedraza said the company actually had informed the FAA about changes it made to the flight-control system, dubbed MCAS, during the 737 Max’s development.

“The 737 MAX met the FAA’s stringent standards and requirements as it was certified through the FAA’s processes,” Pedraza said in the statement. “The FAA,” he continued, “considered the final configuration and operating parameters for MCAS and concluded it met all certification and regulatory requirements.”

FAA spokesman Lynn Lunsford declined to comment on The Times’ report. The agency’s certification process for the 737 Max is the subject of multiple investigations and reviews, he said in an emailed statement.

“While the agency’s certification processes are well-established and have consistently produced safe aircraft designs, we welcome the scrutiny from these experts and look forward to their findings,” he said in the statement.

The 737 Max’s flight control system, dubbed MCAS, has been at the center of the investigation into the safety of the plane. In certain circumstances, that system can take control of the plane and tilt its nose sharply downward.

The software is believed to have played a role in both of fatal crashes, which together killed 346 people. The FAA grounded the plane after the second crash in March.

Read more: Boeing says it could suspend 737 Max production if grounding continues, putting tens of thousands of jobs at risk

An aerial photo shows Boeing airplanes, many of which are grounded 737 MAX aircraft, at Boeing Field in Seattle, Washington.
REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson

According to The Times report, FAA had two highly experienced engineers overseeing the safety of the Boeing’s flight control systems in the agency’s Seattle office. But both engineers left the FAA midway through the development of the 737 Max, The Times reported. One of the engineers the FAA named in their place had little flight control experience. The other was a newly hired engineer who graduated from graduate school just three years earlier.

The two “seemed ill-equipped” to be in charge of the safety of the MCAS software, The Times reported, citing unnamed people who had worked with them.

Boeing largely kept the FAA in the dark about the MCAS software

Even if the engineers had been more experienced, they might not have caught the problems with the system, The Times suggested.

Early reviews of the plane’s development provided by Boeing to the engineers played down the system’s importance and the safety risks it might entail, according to the report. An FAA manager later delegated a safety review of the system to Boeing itself — an increasingly common, albeit controversial, practice by the agency, The Times reported.

A Saudi man whose brother died in the crash of an Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max in March, stands near some of the wreckage of the plane.
REUTERS/Baz Ratner

As the plane got closer to production, Boeing made a big change to the MCAS system, allowing it to turn on at low speeds and to move the tail stabilizer by as much as 2.5 degrees each time it turned on, according to the report. Previously, the system could only activate at high speeds and could only move the stabilizer by 0.6 degrees a time.

Boeing didn’t provide the FAA with an updated safety assessment of the flight-control system after making the changes and the two new agency engineers were unaware that the software could move the tail by 2.5 degrees, according to the report.

After the first crash of the 737 Max last October, FAA officials found they didn’t understand and had little documentation about the workings of the MCAS system, The Times reported.

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at twolverton@businessinsider.com, message him on Twitter @troywolv, or send him a secure message through Signal at 415.515.5594. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/boeing-737-max-flight-system-faa-oversight-2019-7

​President Trump doubled down ​Sunday ​on his ​blitz ​against ​a ​Democratic ​lawmaker and his Maryland congressional district while expanding the scope of his twitter attacks to include House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“Someone please explain to Nancy Pelosi, who was recently called racist by those in her own party, that there is nothing wrong with bringing out the very obvious fact that Congressman Elijah Cummings has done a very poor job for his district and the City of Baltimore,” the president wrote in a posting.

“Just take a look, the facts speak far louder than words! The Democrats always play the Race Card, when in fact they have done so little for our Nation’s great African American people. Now, lowest unemployment in U.S. history, and only getting better. Elijah Cummings has failed badly!” Trump continued.

Pelosi, a California Democrat, came to Cummings’ defense on Saturday when Trump initially took aim at him.

“@RepCummings is a champion in the Congress and the country for civil rights and economic justice, a beloved leader in Baltimore, and deeply valued colleague. We all reject racist attacks against him and support his steadfast leadership,” she wrote.

Trump, on Sunday, turned his ire to Pelosi.

​”​Speaking of failing badly, has anyone seen what is happening to Nancy Pelosi’s district in San Francisco. It is not even recognizeable (sic) lately. Something must be done before it is too late​,” he said, adding that Democrats should “stop wasting time on the Witch Hunt Hoax.”

Trump ripped Cummings after the Maryland Democrat earlier this month tore into acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan for the conditions at the southern border and the administration’s policy to separate children from their families.

Cummings, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, also authorized subpoenas last week for private email accounts of top White House advisers, including First Daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Pelosi had been feuding with four minority members of the Democratic caucus known as “the Squad” – Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley and Ilhan Omar – as they pursued their progressive agenda.

Ocasio-Cortez blamed Pelosi for her “singling out of newly elected women of color.”

But she came to their defense after the president tweeted the foursome should “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they ca​me.”​

Pelosi and Ocasio-Cortez met last Friday to “clear the air.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/07/28/trump-rips-rep-cummings-again-also-targets-pelosi-in-latest-tweetstorm/

MOSCOW—Russia’s elites think of themselves as heirs to the Soviet Union’s imperial glory. Problem is, they only possess the resources of a second-tier power.

This fundamental conflict between aspirations and means—and between how Russia views itself and how it’s perceived by others—shapes President Vladimir Putin’s high-risk strategy in international affairs, from the Ukraine invasion to the Syria intervention to election interference in the U.S. to more recent forays in Venezuela and Africa.

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/gap-between-russias-dreams-and-means-feeds-adventurism-abroad-11564308000

LONDON (Reuters) – The British government is working on the assumption that the European Union will not renegotiate its Brexit deal and is ramping up preparations to leave the bloc on Oct. 31 without an agreement, senior ministers said on Sunday.

Boris Johnson, who took over as British prime minister on Wednesday with a promise to deliver Brexit by the end of October “no ifs or buts”, plans to seek a new exit deal with the EU. The EU has said repeatedly that the deal cannot be reopened.

Leading Brexit supporter Michael Gove, who Johnson has put in charge of ‘no deal’ preparations, wrote in the Sunday Times newspaper that the government would undertake “intensive efforts” to secure a better deal from the EU.

“We still hope they will change their minds, but we must operate on the assumption that they will not … No deal is now a very real prospect and we must make sure that we are ready,” Gove wrote.

“Planning for no deal is now this government’s no. 1 priority,” he said, adding “every penny needed” for no deal preparations would be made available.

Gove said the government would be launching “one of the biggest peacetime public information campaigns this country has seen” to get people and businesses ready for a ‘no deal’ exit.

The Sunday Times reported that Dominic Cummings, the mastermind behind the 2016 referendum campaign to leave the EU and now a senior aide to Johnson, told a meeting of the prime minister’s advisers that he had been tasked with delivering Brexit “by any means necessary”.

Johnson has set up a “war cabinet” of six senior ministers to make decisions on Brexit and is preparing for a no-deal emergency budget in the week of Oct. 7, the newspaper added.

Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, new finance minister Sajid Javid said: “In my first day in office … I tasked officials to urgently identify where more money needs to be invested to get Britain fully ready to leave on October 31 – deal or no deal. And next week I will be announcing significant extra funding to do just that.”

Javid, a former interior minister, said this would include funding for 500 new Border Force officers.

Asked by Sky News where the money would be coming from, junior Treasury minister Rishi Sunak said it was “not a blank cheque” for spending but that Britain could afford to borrow more.

REHEAT THE DISH

Johnson has said the Irish backstop, an insurance policy designed to prevent the return of a hard border between EU-member Ireland and the British province of Northern Ireland by provisionally keeping Britain in a customs union with the EU, must be removed from any Brexit deal.

It was one of the most hotly contested elements of the divorce agreement his predecessor Theresa May reached with the EU, and opposition to it was a key driver behind the deal being rejected three times by parliament.

“You can’t just reheat the dish that’s been sent back and expect that will make it more palatable,” Gove wrote. “We need a new approach and a different relationship. Critically, we need to abolish the backstop.”

Lawmakers from opposition parties and the governing Conservative Party have threatened to try and block Johnson taking Britain out of the EU without a divorce deal.

The Observer newspaper reported that former finance minister Philip Hammond, who quit last week before Johnson took office, held talks with the opposition Labour Party about how to stop a no-deal Brexit.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said on Sunday his party would do everything it could to prevent the country leaving the EU without a deal.

Although Johnson has been adamant he will not hold an election before Brexit, his Conservative Party does not have a majority in parliament, is divided over Brexit and under threat of a no-confidence vote when parliament returns in September.

Speculation of an early election to break the deadlock is likely to be fuel led by a YouGov opinion poll in the Sunday Times, which showed the Conservatives had opened up a 10-point lead over Labour since Johnson took over.

“That is not what we want, that is not what the prime minister wants,” Sunak said when asked about the possibility of an election.

Editing by Janet Lawrence

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu/assuming-eu-will-not-budge-britain-ramps-up-preparations-for-no-deal-brexit-idUSKCN1UN08Q

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Gunfire at a large, outdoor event in Brooklyn killed one man and injured at least 11 others late Saturday night, police said.

Mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted early Sunday that the shooting in east Brooklyn’s Brownsville neighborhood “shattered a peaceful neighborhood event.” Twelve people were shot, including a 38-year-old man who was dead on arrival at a local hospital, a New York City police spokesman said around 3:30 a.m. Sunday.

The police spokesman said he did not know the identity of the man, who was shot once in the head.

No arrests have been made, and police did not offer details about a possible suspect or whether there was more than one gunman at the park where the event took place. As of 6:30 a.m., police said they did not have details about the conditions of the other 11 people wounded and that the investigation as ongoing.

RELATED: New York Police Department

NEW YORK, NY – DECEMBER 27: Maritza Ramos, wife of the victim, holds the colors as she is joined by her sons Justin, left, and Jaden, right, during the funeral of slain New York Police Department (NYPD) officer Rafael Ramos at the Christ Tabernacle Church on December 27, 2014 in the Glenwood section of the Queens borough of New York City. Ramos was shot, along with Police Officer Wenjian Liu while sitting in their patrol car in an ambush attack in Brooklyn on December 20. Thousands of fellow officers, family, friends and Vice President Joseph Biden arrived at the church for the funeral. (Photo by Kevin Hagen/Getty Images)




At least six people had been transported to local hospitals by just after midnight, with some in serious condition, a New York City fire department spokesman said earlier. He described the scene at the time as “fluid.”

De Blasio’s tweet didn’t include details about the community event referenced, but a notice on the NYC Parks website said other programming at the Brownsville Recreation Center by the playground was canceled over the weekend because of the annual Old Timers Event.

A 2010 newsletter from the parks department described it as a celebration of “former members of the center who went on to success and fame in sports and other endeavors” that’s grown to include concerts and other events. A flyer for the dayslong celebration said Saturday’s event was to begin at 6 p.m. on Hegeman Avenue, in the vicinity of the site of the shooting.

Calls and emails to the offices of council members organizing the celebration were not immediately returned, but Council Member Alicka Amprey-Samuel shared de Blasio’s tweet and added comments of her own.

“One of the worst experiences of my life,” the council member for the 41st District tweeted. “How does such a beautiful and peaceful event become overshadowed by tragedy in seconds?”

A man who answered a phone number listed online for one of Saturday’s scheduled performers, The Legendary Intruders, identified himself as band member Khalil Shabazz. He told The Associated Press that his band had already performed and departed the venue by the time of the shooting.

Videos posted on social media showed police clearing large groups of people out of the area around the recreation center following the shooting. Photos from local news outlets showed several people taken from the scene on stretchers, including some with what appeared to be minor wounds.

Brownsville is a neighborhood that’s continued to struggle with gun violence, even as New York streets become safer than they have been in decades.

“We will do everything in our power to keep this community safe and get guns off our streets,” de Blasio tweeted.

State Sen. Roxanne J. Persaud echoed de Blasio, adding the hashtags “#StopTheViolence” and “#PutDownTheGuns” to her tweets expressing frustration with the shooting, which she called “unacceptable” and “cowardly.”

“Our community mourns again. We should be able to have fun in open spaces without fear of violence,” tweeted Persaud, whose district includes Brownsville. “Respect your community. We are better than the violence.”

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/07/28/1-dead-11-others-shot-at-community-event-in-brooklyn-park/23780754/

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg sits for a portrait in the Lawyer’s Lounge at the Supreme Court of the United States.

Shuran Huang/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Shuran Huang/NPR

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg sits for a portrait in the Lawyer’s Lounge at the Supreme Court of the United States.

Shuran Huang/NPR

Does Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the 86-year-old feminist icon, have any regrets about her professional life?

Hardly.

“I do think that I was born under a very bright star,” Ginsburg said, recounting her life and the obstacles that faced her.

Ginsburg added: “I’ll tell you what Justice [Sandra Day] O’Connor once said to me. She said, ‘Suppose we had come of age at a time when women lawyers were welcome at the bar. You know what? Today, we would be retired partners from some large law firm, but because that route was not open to us, we had to find another way, and we both end up in the United States Supreme Court.’ “

Don’t see the video? Click here.

Ginsburg graduated from Columbia Law School at the top of her class in 1959, but she was well aware of the barriers to women. She “didn’t think there was much to be done about it.” She clerked for a U.S. District Court judge, but “no law firm in the city of New York” would “hire me,” she said.

She worked on a project on civil procedure that took her to Sweden before she eventually took a job at Rutgers Law School in New Jersey in 1963.

“Then the women’s movement came alive at the end of the ’60s,” and “there I was, a law school professor with time that I could devote to moving along this change.”

That is an understatement.

For more than a decade prior to her first judicial appointment in 1980, Ginsburg led the legal fight for gender equality. And, in our interview last week, she singled out that work, not any of her Supreme Court opinions, as perhaps her greatest accomplishment.

“In the ’70s, there were many things that came together that led the court for the first time” in its history “to strike down gender classifications as unconstitutional, as a denial of equal protection of the laws,” Ginsburg said. “That was an exhilarating 10 years in my life. In doing that, and then this job, well, it really is the best job in the world for a judge.”

The highlights of her crusade in the 1960s and ’70s are recounted in two recent movies — RBG, a documentary, and On The Basis Of Sex, a biopic.

Ginsburg’s first Supreme Court victory came in 1971 when she filed the lead brief in Reed v. Reed, a case testing whether a state could automatically prefer men over women as executors of estates. The answer was, “No.”

It was the first time the Supreme Court had ever struck down a state law because it discriminated based on gender. And that was just the beginning.

Ginsburg founded the Women’s Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union and would go on to become the first tenured female professor at Columbia Law School.

As the chief architect of the battle for women’s legal rights, she devised a strategy that was characteristically cautious, precise and single-mindedly aimed at one goal: winning.

Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court William Rehnquist administers the oath of office to newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with President Bill Clinton on Aug. 10, 1993.

Kort Duce/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Kort Duce/AFP/Getty Images

Because she often had to persuade establishment-oriented male judges, she frequently picked male plaintiffs. In Weinberger v. Weisenfeld, for instance, she represented Stephen Weisenfeld, whose schoolteacher wife, the family’s principal breadwinner, died in childbirth.

Ginsburg convinced the Supreme Court that it was unconstitutional gender discrimination for the Social Security Administration to deny widower Weisenfeld the same benefits that would have been given to a widow for child care.

In another case, she took on the U.S. military, representing Sharron Frontiero, a lieutenant in the Air Force who was denied a dependent’s allowance for her husband that would have been automatically granted for the wife of any military member. The Supreme Court agreed with Ginsburg that the law unconstitutionally discriminated based on gender.

Over the course of a decade, Ginsburg would win landmark victories in five of the cases she argued before the high court.

In a prior NPR interview, she explained the legal theory she sold to the Supreme Court this way:

“The words of the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection clause — ‘Nor shall any state deny to any person the equal protection of the laws’ — well, that word, ‘any person,’ covers women as well as men. And the Supreme Court woke up to that reality really in 1971.”

Going forward, even with a majority-conservative court, Ginsburg said she believes the country has come too far to go back.

“I don’t think there’s going to be any turning back to old ways,” she said, adding, “When you think about — the world has changed really in what women are doing. I went to law school when women were less than 3% of lawyers in the country; today, they are 50%. I never had a woman teacher in college or in law school. The changes have been enormous. And they’ve just — they’ve gone much too far [to be] going back.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/07/28/745304221/does-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-have-any-regrets-hardly

Following more than six hours of questioning of former special counsel Robert Mueller before two different congressional committees, Democrats and Republicans remain largely splintered on impeaching President Donald Trump, even as nearly half of Americans show little movement on their support or opposition to the move, according to a new ABC News/Ipsos poll.

The poll, conducted using Ipsos’ Knowledge Panel, asked Americans about the former FBI director’s testimony Wednesday in consecutive hearings before the House Judiciary and House Intelligence committees.

ABC News Photo Illustration, ABC News Poll, Ipsos, Getty Images/Caroline Brehman/CQ Roll Call
Ipsos Poll Mueller Testimony

Among those who read, saw or heard about Mueller’s testimony, 47% said it made no difference in their views about impeaching the president. The public hearings had opposing impacts based on partisanship: among Democrats, 48% said they are more likely to support the process of impeachment that could ultimately lead to Trump’s removal from office, 8% said they are less likely to support impeachment and 44% said they feel the same as they did prior to Mueller’s testimony.

Whereas for Republicans, only 3% said they were more likely to support impeachment, 42% said they were less likely, and 54% were unchanged. Independents were split, with 26% saying they are more likely to support impeachment and 29% saying less likely. 45% of Independents said they feel the same as they did prior to Mueller’s testimony.

An overwhelming majority of Americans — 71% — said that they had either read, seen or heard about Mueller’s testimony this week, the first time he publicly answered questions about his 22 months-long investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and possible obstruction of justice by the president, which culminated in a 448-page report.

But a majority of Americans expressed little confidence in the country’s ability to stave off potential foreign attacks on U.S. democratic institutions in 2020, after Mueller testified that Russia’s effort to interfere in 2016 “wasn’t a single attempt … they expect to do it during the next campaign.”

ABC News Photo Illustration, ABC News Poll, Ipsos, Getty Images/TomWilliams/CQ Roll Call
Mueller Testimony Poll

Also, 54% of Americans said that they are not confident in the capability of the U.S. to effectively defend itself from potential foreign government interference in the 2020 presidential election.

Only 17% said they were very confident and 27% were somewhat confident.

There were also large partisan differences on this question — with 25% of Democrats saying they are very or somewhat confident, compared to 77% of Republicans. Independents fell in between, at 40%.

ABC News Photo Illustration, ABC News Poll, Ipsos
Mueller Testimony Poll

Those who read, saw or heard about the testimony were asked in a follow up question to offer a response in only a few words about what comes to mind when thinking about Mueller’s testimony. One independent voter said, “Republicans for the president, Democrats against the president,” mirroring the public response to the testimony, with enormous variance in what partisans said came to mind.

In the open-ended question, most Republicans described the testimony as a waste of time and taxpayer dollars or questioned the competence and fairness of Mueller. Fewer than 2% of Republicans said the testimony was valuable or in some way made the case against Trump.

Among Democrats, although some expressed disappointment in Mueller’s demeanor and the nature of the testimony, an overwhelming majority said the testimony demonstrated that Trump had colluded with the Russians, obstructed justice or deserved to be impeached. Only 4% said that the testimony was a waste of time or taxpayer money.

In their open-ended responses, Independents were much more likely to echo the comments made by Republicans than those made by Democrats. A majority of self-described Independents — 60% — described the testimony as a waste of time and taxpayer money or questioned Mueller’s fitness. About one in five — 19% — of Independents mentioned that the testimony proved or confirmed Trump’s guilt. The remaining 20% of Independents had more mixed assessments.

This ABC News/Ipsos poll was conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs‘ KnowledgePanel® July 25-July 26, 2019, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 577 adults. Results have a margin of sampling error of 4.5 points, including the design effect. See the poll’s topline results and details on the methodology here.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/partisan-differences-impeachment-remain-mueller-testimony-half-americans/story?id=64587293

CNN anchor Victor Blackwell struggled to keep his composure Saturday while reporting on President Trump’s Twitter tirade against Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and his congressional district in Baltimore.

Blackwell, 38, told viewers he’s a Baltimore native and took personal offense to the president’s comments about the city, including Trump’s remark that “No human being would want to live there.”

“You know who did, Mr. President? I did,” Blackwell responded on the air Saturday. “From the day I was brought home from the hospital to the day I left for college, and a lot of people I care about still do.”

TRUMP SLAMS ‘BRUTAL BULLY’ ELIJAH CUMMINGS, CLAIMS BALTIMOREDISTRICT IS ‘MORE DANGEROUS’ THAN BORDER

“There are challenges no doubt, but people are proud of their community,” Blackwell continued, according to the Daily Beast. “I don’t want to sound self-righteous, but people get up and go to work there. They care for their families there. They love their children who pledge allegiance to the flag just like people who live in districts of congressmen who support you, sir. They are Americans, too!”

Blackwell also referred to the president’s use of the word “infested” during his critique of Baltimore. The CNN anchor accused the president of taking a word normally associated with rodents and insects and using in attacks against lawmakers who are members of minority groups.

“He’s insulted thousands of people, many different types of people,” Blackwell said, according to the Washington Post. “But when he tweets about infestation, it’s about black and brown people.”

Antagonistic relationship

Trump and CNN have long had an antagonistic relationship, with the president often accusing the network of reporting “fake news” and referring to it as “the enemy of the people.”

Just days ago, CNN’s Jake Tapper ripped the president for tweeting, “TRUTH IS A FORCE OF NATURE!” after former Special Counsel Robert Mueller testified on Capitol Hill.

“It’s interesting for the president to be saying in all caps that truth is a force of nature,” Tapper remarked, “because what we’ve been hearing about to a large degree all day is how many lies President Trump and the team have told.”

CNN and President Trump have long had an antagonistic relationship. (Reuters)

Earlier this month, CNN’s Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon took Trump to task for spelling errors in his social media messages.

“If you are the president of the United States and people hang on your every word,” Lemon said, “then you should check and recheck and double-check and triple-check and make sure that your spelling is correct.”

“If you are the president of the United States and people hang on your every word, then you should check and recheck and double-check and triple-check and make sure that your spelling is correct.”

— CNN’s Don Lemon

Also this month, CNN’s Anderson Cooper accused the president’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, of misrepresenting a situation that occurred in North Carolina, where a crowd a one of President Trump’s rallies chanted “Send her back!” in reference to far-left U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., an immigrant from Somalia.

“She’s just friggin’ lying,” Cooper said at one point.

“She’s just friggin’ lying.”

— CNN’s Anderson Cooper

Contentious moment

Perhaps the most contentious moment between the president and the network came last November, when the White House suspended the press pass of Jim Acosta, CNN’s White House correspondent.

The move was prompted by what the White House viewed as inappropriate questions from Acosta, plus an incident where the reporter appeared to have placed his hands on a White House intern in what appeared to be an attempt to prevent her from taking a microphone back from him during a news conference.

The suspension against Acosta was ultimately lifted. Last month he put out a book about his time covering the White House, with the title, “The Enemy of the People.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-anchor-victor-blackwell-a-baltimore-native-gets-emotional-after-trumps-tweets

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Michael Gove, the newly appointed chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, is in charge of preparing for a no-deal Brexit

The government is now “working on the assumption” of a no-deal Brexit, Michael Gove has said.

Mr Gove said his team still aimed to come to an agreement with Brussels but, writing in the Sunday Times, he added: “No deal is now a very real prospect.”

Mr Johnson has made Mr Gove responsible for planning a no-deal Brexit.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has told Mr Gove to chair meetings seven days a week until Brexit is delivered, according to the paper.

Mr Gove said tweaks to Theresa May’s withdrawal agreement – which was approved by the EU but resoundingly rejected by Parliament – would not be enough.

“You can’t just reheat the dish that’s been sent back and expect that will make it more palatable,” he wrote.

He added he hoped EU leaders might yet open up to the idea of striking a new deal, “but we must operate on the assumption that they will not”.

“While we are optimistic about the future, we are realistic about the need to plan for every eventuality.”

Mr Gove highlighted a major flaw of Mrs May’s deal as the Irish backstop plan – a measure designed to prevent the introduction of a hard border on the island of Ireland.

So far the backstop has proved a sticking point in the Brexit negotiations.

A no-deal Brexit would mean the UK leaving the EU and cutting ties immediately, with no agreement in place.

The UK would follow World Trade Organization rules if it wanted to trade with the EU and other countries, while also trying to negotiate free-trade deals.

But with Britain outside the EU, there could be physical checkpoints to monitor people and goods crossing in and out of the UK – something ruled out by the Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland.

No-confidence vote

Speaking to Sky’s Sophy Ridge, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said he would do everything to prevent a no-deal Brexit.

He reiterated his call for a new referendum – insisting he would still hold one if Labour were in power – and said, in the event of a no-deal Brexit, Labour would campaign to remain in the EU.

Mr Corbyn also said he would look at whether to call a no-confidence vote in the government after Parliament returns in September.

Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson told Sky that, in the event of a general election, her party’s message would be: “Stop Brexit, stop Boris and start renewing our country.”

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Jo Swinson was elected Lib Dem leader earlier this week

Mr Gove is one of several new ministers pressing on with Brexit preparations since joining Mr Johnson’s cabinet earlier this week.

Newly appointed Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Rishi Sunak, told Sky: “We’re turbo-charging preparations for no-deal, that is now the government’s number one priority.”

He said if the EU would not reopen discussions about the Irish backstop plan then “it’s right that we prepare properly, with conviction, and importantly with the financial resources that the Treasury will now supply properly”.

Chancellor Sajid Javid has pledged extra funding to help prepare for a no-deal scenario.

Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, Mr Javid said there would be “significant extra funding” for 500 new Border Force officers and “possible” improved infrastructure at British ports.

Mr Javid is expected to pledge more money for projects next week.

Boris Johnson’s government

Who is in charge of what?

Meanwhile, there have been reports of more dissatisfaction within the Conservative Party, as MPs opposed to a no-deal Brexit continue to consider ways to avoid it.

The Observer alleges former chancellor Philip Hammond held private talks with Labour’s Brexit spokesman Sir Keir Starmer before Mr Johnson became prime minister.

The pair met shortly after Mr Hammond resigned from the government, the paper said.

Mr Starmer told the paper that work to build “a strong cross-party alliance” to prevent a no-deal Brexit would “intensify over the summer”.

But despite several Tory MPs voicing their opposition to Mr Johnson in his first week in Downing Street, an opinion poll has suggested a recent boost in support for the party.

Since Mr Johnson took office on Wednesday the Conservatives have gained 10 points to stand at 30%, a survey for the Mail on Sunday showed.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49141375

President Trump drew a torrent of criticism from Democrats on Saturday over a series of Twitter messages aimed at U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and the Baltimore district that Cummings represents in Congress.

But just a few years ago, Sen. Bernie Sanders — a candidate seeking the Democratic Party’s 2020 presidential nomination — took his own shots at Baltimore, a struggling Northeast city grappling with high rates of violent crime, drug abuse, poverty and political corruption.

“Anyone who took the walk that we took around this neighborhood would not think you’re in a wealthy nation,” Sanders said during a visit to the city’s West Baltimore section in December 2015, the Baltimore Sun reported. “You would think that you were in a Third World country.”

TRUMP DOUBLES DOWN ON CUMMINGS CRITICISM AS DEMS, BALTIMORE OFFICIALS DEFEND ‘HERO’ REP

The independent U.S. senator from Vermont also referred to Baltimore as “a community in which half of the people don’t have jobs.”

“We’re talking about a community in which there are hundreds of buildings that are uninhabitable,” he added, according to the Sun.

“We’re talking about a community in which there are hundreds of buildings that are uninhabitable.”

— U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks at George Washington University in Washington, July 17, 2019. (Associated Press)

Sanders was visiting the section of Baltimore where a 25-year-old black man named Freddie Gray was arrested earlier that year for allegedly possessing an illegal knife. Gray fell into a coma while in police custody and died a few days later, sparking a national outcry against members of the city’s police department.

But all six police officers who were suspended in connection with the death either had all charges against them dropped, or were acquitted.

ARRESTS ANNOUNCED IN GUNPOINT ROBBERY OF BALTIMORE DEPUTY POLICE COMMISSIONER, WIFE

In 2016, Sanders posted a Twitter message about Baltimore.

“Residents of Baltimore’s poorest boroughs have lifespans shorter than people living under dictatorship in North Korea,” Sanders wrote. “That is a disgrace.”

The bleak portrait Sanders painted back then seems little different from the one Trump presented Saturday, in which the president said the city had become a monument to governmental failures.

In one message, Trump described Cummings’ district as “a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess.”

“If he spent more time in Baltimore,” the president added, “maybe he could help clean up this very dangerous & filthy place.”

“Where is all this money going?” Trump asked later, referring to federal dollars sent to Baltimore over the years. “How much is stolen? Investigate this corrupt mess immediately!”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Prominent Democrats – including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, who was born in Baltimore and whose father was a Baltimore mayor, and presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren – were quick to defend Cummings and fire back at Trump.

Also on Saturday, Sanders appeared to abandon his past critiques of Baltimore and focus instead on defending Cummings and bashing the president.

“Here’s what’s really going on,” Sanders wrote. “@RepCummings has been busy revealing the failures of the Trump administration and exposing the greed of Trump’s friends in the pharmaceutical industry, and our racist president doesn’t like it.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bernie-sanders-blasted-baltimore-as-third-world-country-and-disgrace-in-past-comments

LINCOLN HEIGHTS, LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Friends, family and co-workers held a vigil for a 24-year-old Los Angeles Police Department officer who was killed while off duty Saturday morning in a Lincoln Heights shooting.

“What we mainly want is for all of you guys to remember Juan for the goofball he was, the personality he was, always made someone smile,” said Juan Diaz’s sister, Anahi, at the vigil held in front of LAPD’s downtown headquarters.

Diaz had been with the department for two years, fulfilling his childhood dream of becoming a police officer, added people close to Diaz.

“He grew up in a bad neighborhood, infested with gangs, yet he led a good life,” added and Sgt. Manuel Hernandez who was his Police Academy Training Officer.

A police source confirmed to ABC7 details of the incident that were first reported by the Los Angeles Times.

Diaz, his girlfriend and her two brothers were eating at a taco stand when the off-duty officer saw several young men writing graffiti nearby and told them to stop, according to the source. One of the taggers then brandished a handgun as they approached Diaz and made threats.

The policeman and his companions attempted to avoid a confrontation by getting into their vehicle and leaving, but the gunman opened fire, said the source, who identified the surviving victim as the girlfriend’s brother.

The shooter allegedly claimed allegiance to a gang whose territory included the area where the encounter occurred.

An LAPD motorcycle officer was flagged down shortly before 1 a.m. after reports of gunfire in the area of Avenue 26 and Humboldt Street, and discovered that one of the two men suffering from gunshot wounds was a fellow officer, according to officials.

Assistant Police Chief Beatrice Girmala confirmed the death at a 6 a.m. news conference. In a later statement, Mayor Eric Garcetti identified the slain policeman who was assigned to the department’s Professional Standards Bureau.

“The senseless murder of Officer Juan Diaz is a shocking reminder of the dangers that LAPD officers face every moment they wear the badge, and the absolute courage and selflessness with which they uphold the oath each day,” the mayor said, expressing condolences to Diaz’s family and friends.

WATCH: Acting LAPD chief confirms death of officer shot in Lincoln Heights

“My promise is that we will hold them close, stand with them every step of the way – and never tire until we find and prosecute the vicious criminals responsible for this horrific tragedy,” the statement said.

The other victim in the shooting was hospitalized and is expected to survive.

“We mourn the tragic loss of a young officer killed in an act of senseless violence and ask for our community’s support in finding his killer,” LAPD Chief Michel Moore, who was out of the country at the time, said on Twitter.

No suspect was in custody. A description of the gunman was not available.

Source Article from https://abc7.com/vigil-held-for-24-year-old-lapd-officer-killed-while-off-duty/5423395/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/28/us/nyc-brownsville-brooklyn-shooting/index.html

The Federal Aviation Administration was poorly positioned to oversee the safety of the automated flight system that was to blame for the two deadly crashes of Boeing’s 737 Max plane over the last year, The New York Times reported Saturday.

The agency engineers in charge of keeping a watch on the airplane’s flight control systems through the latter part of its development had little experience with such software, according to The Times report. And Boeing largely kept them in the dark about the importance of the flight-control system on the 737 Max and a crucial change they made to the software soon before releasing the plane commercially, The Times reported.

The Times did not name the engineers in its report.

In a statement emailed to Business Insider, Boeing spokesman Peter Pedraza said the company actually had informed the FAA about changes it made to the flight-control system, dubbed MCAS, during the 737 Max’s development.

“The 737 MAX met the FAA’s stringent standards and requirements as it was certified through the FAA’s processes,” Pedraza said in the statement. “The FAA,” he continued, “considered the final configuration and operating parameters for MCAS and concluded it met all certification and regulatory requirements.”

FAA spokesman Lynn Lunsford declined to comment on The Times’ report. The agency’s certification process for the 737 Max is the subject of multiple investigations and reviews, he said in an emailed statement.

“While the agency’s certification processes are well-established and have consistently produced safe aircraft designs, we welcome the scrutiny from these experts and look forward to their findings,” he said in the statement.

The 737 Max’s flight control system, dubbed MCAS, has been at the center of the investigation into the safety of the plane. In certain circumstances, that system can take control of the plane and tilt its nose sharply downward.

The software is believed to have played a role in both of fatal crashes, which together killed 346 people. The FAA grounded the plane after the second crash in March.

Read more: Boeing says it could suspend 737 Max production if grounding continues, putting tens of thousands of jobs at risk

An aerial photo shows Boeing airplanes, many of which are grounded 737 MAX aircraft, at Boeing Field in Seattle, Washington.
REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson

According to The Times report, FAA had two highly experienced engineers overseeing the safety of the Boeing’s flight control systems in the agency’s Seattle office. But both engineers left the FAA midway through the development of the 737 Max, The Times reported. One of the engineers the FAA named in their place had little flight control experience. The other was a newly hired engineer who graduated from graduate school just three years earlier.

The two “seemed ill-equipped” to be in charge of the safety of the MCAS software, The Times reported, citing unnamed people who had worked with them.

Boeing largely kept the FAA in the dark about the MCAS software

Even if the engineers had been more experienced, they might not have caught the problems with the system, The Times suggested.

Early reviews of the plane’s development provided by Boeing to the engineers played down the system’s importance and the safety risks it might entail, according to the report. An FAA manager later delegated a safety review of the system to Boeing itself — an increasingly common, albeit controversial, practice by the agency, The Times reported.

A Saudi man whose brother died in the crash of an Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max in March, stands near some of the wreckage of the plane.
REUTERS/Baz Ratner

As the plane got closer to production, Boeing made a big change to the MCAS system, allowing it to turn on at low speeds and to move the tail stabilizer by as much as 2.5 degrees each time it turned on, according to the report. Previously, the system could only activate at high speeds and could only move the stabilizer by 0.6 degrees a time.

Boeing didn’t provide the FAA with an updated safety assessment of the flight-control system after making the changes and the two new agency engineers were unaware that the software could move the tail by 2.5 degrees, according to the report.

After the first crash of the 737 Max last October, FAA officials found they didn’t understand and had little documentation about the workings of the MCAS system, The Times reported.

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at twolverton@businessinsider.com, message him on Twitter @troywolv, or send him a secure message through Signal at 415.515.5594. You can also contact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/boeing-737-max-flight-system-faa-oversight-2019-7