“Two sides can play the blame game.” Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron didn’t use these words as they smiled their way through their first meetings with Boris Johnson since he became prime minister. But the words reflect what the German and French leaders were really up to.

They judged that Johnson’s visits to Berlin and Paris were aimed at paving the way for him to blame the EU for a no-deal Brexit on 31 October. “This trip was all about his excuse: he tried for a deal but the unreasonable EU rejected it,” one European diplomat told me. The EU is right to smell a rat.

Yet I think Boris is still pursuing a twin-track approach: aim for a deal, but go hard for no deal if that doesn’t work. He will delay switching the points until the last possible moment.

My hunch is that he is more likely to take the line marked no deal. But the chances of a last-minute diversion to a deal increased slightly this week. Merkel’s remarks on Wednesday about finding a solution within 30 days were ridiculously over-hyped by pro-Brexit newspapers. She clarified them on Thursday.

To be fair, Johnson’s aides did not overspin Merkel’s words. They know that conciliatory language from the German chancellor does not necessarily translate into action, as David Cameron and Theresa May found to their cost. Similarly, Macron’s bonhomie was accompanied by a warning that the Irish backstop is “indispensable”. Crucially, there was no change of policy by either leader. Shrewdly, they put the ball back in Boris’s court, giving themselves a counter-attack if he blames them for no deal. If he cannot show that his vague plans to replace the backstop with “alternative arrangements” and additional “commitments” are workable, they will blame him.

In Brussels, there is huge scepticism about technological alternatives to the backstop, which officials have dismissed as “magical thinking”. Even UK politicians involved in the Alternative Arrangements Commission trumpeted by Boris admit their proposals might take three years to develop. However, it’s just possible that the bridge to such a solution could be found in a longer than planned transitional period, an idea being quietly considered in both London and Brussels.

Boris’s first foray into EU territory went better than some of his allies had expected. He will reap one benefit. The prospect of a deal, however slim, will make Conservative MPs who oppose no deal less likely to back a vote of no confidence in the government when the Commons returns on 3 September. Tory whips will have a new card to play: warning potential rebels they risk scuppering an agreement, and ending up with the very no-deal Brexit they want to prevent.

Jeremy Corbyn, under pressure from other opposition parties, will be tempted to table a no-confidence vote when parliament resumes. Merkel’s 30-day target means he should wait. As one senior MP involved in cross-party talks to stop no deal put it: “There’s no chance of a no-confidence motion passing in September now. We should wait until October. It will work only if we are close to the cliff edge.”

However, MPs should not be thrown off the scent by overexcited talk of a deal. They should still try to pass legislation ordering the PM to seek an extension to the UK’s EU membership beyond 31 October. There’s no time to waste; such a law will probably still be needed to avoid the chaos of crashing out. If there is a deal, the EU could simply refuse the UK’s request.

As Johnson heads to Biarritz for this weekend’s G7 summit, an EU deal – not his inevitable love-in at his first meeting as PM with Donald Trump – should be uppermost in his mind. He should view his first talks with another president – the European Council’s Donald Tusk – as equally important. Avoiding no deal, and securing a long-term trade pact with the EU, will matter much more to the UK economy than a US trade agreement.

Boris’s chances of clinching an EU deal will be reduced if Trump pulls him away from the European position on issues like Iran. The US president will certainly try to do that and persuade the UK not to allow the Chinese giant Huawei a role in providing its 5G mobile network. UK officials are nervous that Trump’s transactional approach will drag such matters into the trade talks. The UK turning its back on an Iran nuclear deal it was instrumental in forging would make a nonsense of Johnson’s pledge to maintain close security links with “our European friends and partners”.

The test for Boris in Biarritz is not whether he kickstarts a UK-US trade agreement, but whether he improves the prospects of a more immediate and important deal much closer to home.

Source Article from https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/boris-johnson-g7-donald-trump-tusk-no-deal-brexit-a9076831.html

Cancer patients receive chemotherapy treatment at Roshana Cancer Center, a private clinic in western Tehran.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Cancer patients receive chemotherapy treatment at Roshana Cancer Center, a private clinic in western Tehran.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

At a cancer treatment center in Iran’s capital of Tehran, a doctor’s fight to treat her cancer patients has become harder. As U.S. sanctions sink in, the flow of medicine and medical supplies in Iran appears to have slowed — and the reasons are difficult to pin down.

Dr. Mastaneh Sanei, an oncologist at the Roshana Cancer Center, says she’s treating patients without the benefits of consistently functioning equipment and a reliable supply of drugs.

With the right treatment, she says, “you may not cure these patients, but they have the chance to prolong survival.”

The shortages affecting Iran’s hospitals and clinics are a particularly perilous example of an economic crisis that has worsened since the Trump administration reimposed economic sanctions on the country. The 2015 nuclear deal offered Iran economic relief in exchange for limiting its nuclear program, but the U.S. withdrew from the agreement last year and penalize doing business with Iran’s oil, banking and other sectors and individuals.

U.S. officials insist that the sanctions explicitly do not apply to medicine or medical devices. But trade experts say heavy restrictions can have an impact on business decisions in sectors that may not have been targeted. Meanwhile, each nation’s government blames the other for the squeeze on medicine.

After new U.S. sanctions against Iran were put in place, the flow of medicine and medical supplies has slowed to facilities like the Roshana Cancer Center. The reasons are difficult to pin down.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

After new U.S. sanctions against Iran were put in place, the flow of medicine and medical supplies has slowed to facilities like the Roshana Cancer Center. The reasons are difficult to pin down.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif has accused the U.S. of “economic terrorism” and of cutting off access to cancer drugs. The allegation is so explosive that Brian Hook, the U.S. special representative for Iran, addressed Iranians directly in a video, calling it a “myth.”

In an interview with NPR, Hook blamed Iran’s government, saying that “one of the challenges that medical supply firms have had is that when medical devices are imported, the devices that were supposed to help the Iranian people, the regime ends up selling them at a much higher price for profit.”

Flowery wallpaper adorns a treatment room at the Roshana Cancer Center. The center is also decorated with statues of angels — because “they save you,” one doctor says.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Flowery wallpaper adorns a treatment room at the Roshana Cancer Center. The center is also decorated with statues of angels — because “they save you,” one doctor says.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

In July, Iran’s presidential chief of staff said that money for essential goods, including medicine, had disappeared, something U.S. officials cite as an example of how corruption has prevented drugs and medical supplies from reaching hospitals. Hook told NPR that in that case, more than 1 billion euros intended for medical supplies had disappeared.

Praying the radiation machine doesn’t break

The Roshana Cancer Center is decorated with statues of angels — because “they save you,” Sanei says.

Many specialists in Iran are worried about their ability to save patients.

Neda Sendani is a technician working in the radiotherapy section of Roshana Cancer Center. In ideal circumstances, medical staff at a cancer center would be constantly learning how to provide the latest treatments.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Neda Sendani is a technician working in the radiotherapy section of Roshana Cancer Center. In ideal circumstances, medical staff at a cancer center would be constantly learning how to provide the latest treatments.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Sanei says she likes her work. “Every day, new things happen. Every day, new discoveries,” she says. But she is slowly being cut off from access to discoveries in the field.

She has been unable to access international research websites and medical journals. “Scientific sites have blocked us,” she says, so she has trouble accessing “lots of research and union guidelines for cancer treatments in the world.” And her colleagues desperately hope their technology doesn’t break in ways they can no longer fix.

Through a door with a radiation sign, there’s a huge radiation therapy machine from the U.S.-based company Varian Medical Systems.

On this day, it’s working. But the doctors say it’s hard to maintain the machines and obtain replacement parts when something breaks. “You don’t have access to the main company, and you are not able to buy the spare parts we need,” says Sanei.

Doctors at Tehran’s Roshana Cancer Clinic say it’s hard to maintain radiation therapy machines and obtain replacement parts when something breaks.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Doctors at Tehran’s Roshana Cancer Clinic say it’s hard to maintain radiation therapy machines and obtain replacement parts when something breaks.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Varian tells NPR that it does sell cancer care systems to Iran. It’s an example of a disconnect between what U.S. companies and the government say they are doing and what medical care providers in Iran are experiencing.

A long-term problem

While the problem has intensified recently, Iran has experienced medicine shortages before.

In a 2012 report, then-United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon wrote that the “sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic of Iran have had significant effects on the general population,” among them “a shortage of necessary items, including medicine.”

Part of the reason, he wrote, was concern about whether certain banking transactions would be allowed under the sanctions.

“Many foreign banks have stopped doing business with the Islamic Republic of Iran altogether, which has made it considerably difficult for Iranians to transfer funds and for private businesses to obtain lines of credit,” the report said.

The shortages affecting Iran’s hospitals and clinics are a particularly perilous example of an economic crisis that has worsened since the Trump administration reimposed economic sanctions on the country. Each nation’s government blames the other for the squeeze on medicine.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

The shortages affecting Iran’s hospitals and clinics are a particularly perilous example of an economic crisis that has worsened since the Trump administration reimposed economic sanctions on the country. Each nation’s government blames the other for the squeeze on medicine.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

The unwillingness of companies and financial institutions to engage in business with Iran, even to sell goods such as medicine that are exempt from U.S. sanctions, is likely contributing to the current shortage.

“There are so many sanctions and they are so complex and they cover so many entities in Iran, especially in the financial sector, it’s very difficult to find legal, viable, credible, efficient business counterparts in Iran for international businesses to do business with,” says Elizabeth Rosenberg, a former Treasury Department sanctions official.

Even if Western companies do find Iranian business and banking counterparts, Rosenberg says, there’s no telling what can happen along the supply chain. “Now most of the big [Iranian] banks are designated [for sanctions], and as you can imagine, any smaller bank doesn’t have as much capital on hand, they may have less capacity to handle cross-border financial transactions, and they may also not have in place some of the appropriate controls for safety and soundness or anti-money-laundering controls.”

A nurse prepares chemotherapy medications for patients at the Roshana Cancer Center. An oncologist there says the limitation goes beyond goods and supplies.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

A nurse prepares chemotherapy medications for patients at the Roshana Cancer Center. An oncologist there says the limitation goes beyond goods and supplies.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Alan Enslen, an international trade lawyer at Baker Donelson in Washington, D.C., says it isn’t just financial institutions that are reluctant to do business with Iran; it is also shipping and other companies along the chain. “Everybody feels like they’re putting themselves at risk and so it has to be worth it,” Enslen says. “I know it sounds like economics prevails over humanitarian concerns, but sometimes that’s just the reality of how it plays out.”

An article published in March by the Washington, D.C.-based think tank Atlantic Council said the Treasury has previously “prosecuted medical companies for selling small amounts of medical supplies to Iran, which in turn, has had a deterring effect on other companies doing business with Tehran.”

People shop in Tehran’s Tajrish market. Iran faces high inflation. Food prices went up by more than 70% between July 2018 and July 2019, one economy expert says.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

People shop in Tehran’s Tajrish market. Iran faces high inflation. Food prices went up by more than 70% between July 2018 and July 2019, one economy expert says.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

The U.S. exported $12.5 million in pharmaceutical preparations to Iran last year, down by more than 80% from the annual total in 2009, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Europe has also reportedly reduced medical exports to the country. The European Union — which remains in the Iran deal and pressed the U.S. not to withdraw — set up a special office to finance food and medicine for Iran, but its work has begun slowly.

“People are poorer than they were before”

The economic toll of the sanctions isn’t immediately visible in Tehran. Streets are bustling. Restaurants and cafes in many parts of the city are lively. In the more affluent areas, construction cranes dot the skyline.

Yet many Iranians are struggling. Amid high inflation, food prices went up by more than 70% between July 2018 and July 2019, according to Djavad Salehi-Isfahani, an Iran economy expert at the Brookings Institution, citing the country’s official statistics. “The short of it is that people are poorer than they were before,” he says.

Residents of Tehran recently interviewed by NPR were willing to fault Iran’s ruling establishment for the economic troubles, a departure from normal practice in the country.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Residents of Tehran recently interviewed by NPR were willing to fault Iran’s ruling establishment for the economic troubles, a departure from normal practice in the country.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

Iranians have endured decades of sanctions, but this round is in some ways inflicting more pain.

“What’s different is that the U.S. has reimposed the sanctions it lifted pursuant to the nuclear deal and it has layered on many more, including doing things like designating some Iranian financial institutions not previously designated and that were previously used to facilitate food, medicine and medical imports,” says Rosenberg, who is now a senior fellow at the think tank Center for a New American Security.

“That’s a particular affront to people who disagree with Trump’s policy, and it certainly gives another talking point to those people who are laying the blame at the feet of sanctions. The reality around who is responsible may be somewhere in between the arguments offered on both sides.”

People hang out in the evening outside Tehran’s City Theater performing arts center. The economic toll of the sanctions isn’t immediately visible in the city.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

People hang out in the evening outside Tehran’s City Theater performing arts center. The economic toll of the sanctions isn’t immediately visible in the city.

Marjan Yazdi for NPR

“We are not guilty”

The economic troubles have triggered debate among Iranians about who’s to blame.

In a country where people have long been hesitant to openly criticize the government, residents of Tehran recently interviewed by NPR were willing to fault Iran’s ruling establishment.

That includes 32-year-old Mahsa Hadipour, who regularly visits the Roshana Cancer Center with her father, who has prostate cancer. She has struggled with rheumatoid arthritis for much of her life and can’t find the prosthetic joints she needs in Iran. She can’t afford treatment abroad, and she blames Iran’s government for the strain on her family.

“It must be my own government,” she says. “The government should be supporting us. Instead we’re the ones who sacrifice at the hands of these political games.”

Sanei, the oncologist, says she doesn’t like Trump’s politics but doesn’t entirely blame the Trump administration, either. “They are right about the things they say about our country,” she says. “But we are not guilty — people are not.”

This story was reported in Iran and the U.S.
NPR’s Bo Hamby produced the broadcast reports.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/08/24/753446099/iran-under-sanctions-a-scramble-for-cancer-care-and-blame-to-go-around

A 12-year-old boy has been wounded in a shooting at an elementary school in Georgia and another child is in custody.

Rockdale County sheriff’s deputies say deputies responded to Peek’s Chapel Elementary School in Conyers at about 6:35 p.m. Friday and found the boy with a gunshot wound. He was taken to an area hospital. His condition was not known Saturday afternoon.

It’s unclear how many other students were on campus at that hour.

Deputies say a boy was taken into custody and has been charged in connection with the shooting. The exact charges and details about the shooting have not been released.

Neither child’s name has been released because of their age.

According to sheriff’s office, the incident remains under investigation.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/12-year-boy-shot-georgia-elementary-school-65171116

Trade wars are rarely good and never easy to win, but they’re a lot costlier and harder to win when we’re going against a country like China.

The People’s Republic of China is an undemocratic state with a centrally planned economy run by the Communist Party. Most importantly, the Chinese regime doesn’t care much about the welfare of its people.

Trump should not go head-to-head against such a regime in a trade war.

Trump loves tariffs. Tariffs, though, are taxes. So Trump’s conservative allies have defended his tariffs as means, not ends. If we slap enough tariffs on China’s exports, they’ll cave to our demands.

When China retaliates, the thinking goes, we escalate. Ultimately, we can escalate more than they can because our economy is bigger and more robust.

To put this trade war in terms of actual war: Trump’s strategy is a blend of Cold War-era Mutually Assured Destruction, and a Czar-era war of attrition. The big problem is that Mutually Assured Destruction works only, to borrow from Sting, if the other guys “love their children too.” And a war of attrition against a ruthless rival amounts to mass sacrifice of your own people.

China on Friday announced new tariffs, hitting $75 billion worth of U.S. goods. For instance, the U.S. sells billions of dollars worth of cell phones to China. Those phones will now face a Chinese tariff, and so the sales are likely to fall. Plenty of other U.S. exporters of electronics will also suffer from other Chinese tariffs.

Of course, China’s government is hurting its own people by taxing the goods Chinese consumers want to buy. And yes, our tariffs hurt Chinese exporters. In turn, our tariffs hurt our consumers.

That’s why it’s such a shame that Trump on Friday announced a massive escalation in his tariff war in retaliation to China’s new tariffs. On Oct. 1, the U.S. will raise the tariff on $250 billion of goods coming from China from 25% to 30%, and the remaining $300 billion of Chinese goods will be taxed at 15% on Sept. 1 instead of 10%.

Since our economy is larger and less precarious than China’s, it’s conceivable that we could outlast China in this war of attrition, and force them to take down their protectionist tariffs, cut off their export subsidies, and stop their theft of intellectual property.

But a government willing to spy on its own people, bar them from social media, detain its religious minorities, and jail its dissidents will also have high tolerance for harming its manufacturers and consumers through an ever-escalating trade war.

China has been doing this for years. Long before this particular trade war, China has been subsidizing its exporters to the detriment of the broader Chinese economy. One economic study concluded “that by stopping this type of trade policy, China stands to experience a 3% gain in real income.”

So why does China do these things? The subsidized exporters tend to be owned and run by the family members of Communist officials, or by the state itself. In short, China’s economic policies that impoverish the Chinese people empower China’s ruling class, and the rulers are the ones who make the rules.

Similarly, economists have concluded that China is harming its middle class through its aggressive efforts to build infrastructure in the developing world. Yet these efforts expand the government’s power.

In general, taxes, subsidies, and regulations reduce economic efficiency, but increase the political class’s power—and ultimately the wealth of the powerful.

Trump shouldn’t play China’s game. In that game, the losers are always the people.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/trump-needs-to-stop-playing-chinas-tariff-game

At their impromptu lunch on Saturday, Mr. Macron called Mr. Trump “a very special guest for us” and pledged cooperation. But for those around the American president, their meeting was just the first of what promised to be a series of fraught interactions as he presses his case with his counterparts.

And amid preparations for those top-level encounters, down the road in Bayonne, 13,000 police officers were arrayed, firing tear gas and water cannons on Saturday to disperse protests by demonstrators opposed to globalization and other tenets the Group of 7 represents.

For Mr. Trump’s first one-on-one meeting on Sunday morning, he has chosen to meet with Boris Johnson, the new British prime minister, who has been engaged in his own extended verbal spat with the Continent’s leaders over the terms of Britain’s exit from the European Union. Mr. Trump has publicly expressed support for Brexit, a position that has further irritated his already tense relationships on the world stage.

The president will meet with Shinzo Abe, the Japanese prime minister, later on Sunday amid reports that negotiators for the two countries have reached a deal in principle on tariffs. The men could formally sign a deal next month, a victory that is likely to please Mr. Trump, who has repeatedly praised his relationship with Mr. Abe.

His discussion with Mr. Trudeau on Sunday is likely to be far frostier, although by the time the seven world leaders had met Saturday for a working dinner at the base of a lighthouse built in the 1830s, Mr. Trump had so far resisted the temptation to criticize the Canadian prime minister.

Mr. Trump has shown less restraint when it comes to Angela Merkel, the departing chancellor of Germany, whom he will meet with on Monday. In a tweet on Wednesday, in a week of complaints about Federal Reserve policy, he lamented that Germany was paying “zero interest” on debt while the United States is “paying interest.”

That followed tweets in June, when Mr. Trump alleged that crime in Germany was “way up” and insisted that “people in Germany are turning against their leadership” because of decisions to let migrants into the country.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/24/us/politics/trump-g7-economy.html

NASA astronaut has been accused of committing the first crime in outer space after her estranged wife alleged she stole her identity and accessed her bank account without permission during a six-month mission aboard the International Space Station.

Former Air Force intelligence officer Summer Worden, from Kansas, has been involved in a bitter divorce with astronaut Anne McClain since 2018 but the battle heated up after Worden filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission and NASA’s Office of Inspector General accusing her wife of assuming her identity and gaining improper access to her private financial records while orbiting the earth, the New York Times reported.

LARRY KING FILES FOR DIVORCE FROM WIFE SHAWN KING AFTER 22 YEARS OF MARRIAGE 

Worden told the Times that she was tipped off when McClain somehow had knowledge about her private spending while on a mission with no way to know otherwise.

Former Air Force intelligence officer Summer Worden has been involved in a bitter divorce with McClain (pictutred) since 2018 but the battle heated up after Worden filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission and NASA’s Office of Inspector General accusing her wife of assuming her identity and gaining improper access to her private financial records while orbiting the earth
(NASA)

She contacted her bank and was informed that her sign-in credentials had been used on a computer registered to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

“I was pretty appalled that she would go that far. I knew it was not O.K.,” Worden said.

McClain has denied these allegations, telling the inspector general’s office in an interview last week that she was acting in routine by checking the family’s finances to make sure they had sufficient funds to pay bills for their son.

EX-NASA WINGSUIT SCIENTIST DIES DURING BASE JUMP IN SAUDI ARABIA 

McClain (pictured) took Worden to court in 2018 to get shared parenting rights after accusing the boy’s mother of having a temper and making poor financial decisions but Worden filed for divorce after now-pictures of her son and McClain were posted to her Twitter. 
(NASA)

The child has also been a point of contention during the divorce.

According to the Times report, Worden had a son about a year before she met McClain. After the couple wed in 2014, she refused McClain’s request to adopt the child.

McClain took Worden to court in 2018 to get shared parenting rights after accusing the boy’s mother of having a temper and making poor financial decisions but Worden filed for divorce after now-deleted pictures of her son and McClain were posted to her Twitter.

Expedition 58 Flight Engineer Anne McClain of NASA speaks with friends and family after having her Russian Sokol suit pressure checked in preparation for her launch aboard the Soyuz MS-11 spacecraft on Monday, Dec. 3, 2018, at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. (NASA/Aubrey Gemignani)

A short time later, McClain went on mission.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

The International Space Station was launched in the late nineties and is operated by five agencies from the U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada and 22 collective European nations.

NASA officials told the Times that they were unaware of any previous crimes committed on the space station.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/nasa-astronaut-identity-theft-bank-account-divorce-wife

Topline: As news of the fires in the Amazon rain forest spread, sparking international outrage and condemnation, so too did a uncited statistic: The Amazon produces 20% of the world’s oxygen. French President Emmanuel Macron tweeted it. Actor Leonardo Dicaprio posted it on Instagram. CNN included it in its coverage.

The only problem? No one knows where the number came from, and it doesn’t appear to be true.

  • Mathematically, it’s impossible for the Amazon to produce that much oxygen, said Jonathan Foley, the former executive director of the California Academy of Sciences and founder of Project Drawdown, a research group focusing on climate change. 
  • Foley thinks the number could have originated from the fact that all tropical forests (including those in Africa and Indonesia) produce 20% of the oxygen from land-based sources.
  • Combining land and ocean, which also produces oxygen, tropical forests only account for 10% of the world’s oxygen. Narrowing that down, Foley estimates it’s only possible for the Amazon itself to produce 6%.

Still, even without worrying about oxygen, the Amazon is important for the environment, Foley said. It stores carbon that, once released into the atmosphere through the act of burning, produces dangerous carbon dioxide emissions that warm the atmosphere and contribute to climate change. In fact, the Amazon stores 25% of the world’s carbon, according to a 2015 paper published in Nature

“The more carbon that can be taken out of the atmosphere and put into forms that are more stable is a good thing, and forest vegetation is one of those good ways to store carbon,” said Robin Chazdon, a professor at the University of Connecticut. 

The Amazon is also a hotspot for biodiversity, or the thousands of species—including insects, wildlife and plants—that live in the rain forest. As the Amazon continues to burn, those species are in danger, Chazdon added.

Ultimately, oxygen from the Amazon doesn’t matter all that much, scientists say. There’s plenty of oxygen in the atmosphere that has been built up over thousands of years. Even if the Amazon was completely destroyed, the supply of oxygen in the atmosphere wouldn’t be in jeopardy, Foley said. Oxygen levels are primarily regulated by long-term geological forces, such as plate tectonics, not oxygen from photosynthesis, he added.

“The Amazon is so precious and deforestation is a huge problem, for climate change, biodiversity and indigenous people living there,” Foley said. “But we can scratch one thing off the doomsday list here, we don’t have to worry about the world’s oxygen levels.”

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2019/08/23/as-the-amazon-fires-spread-so-did-this-unfounded-statistic/

Media captionDonald Tusk: I hope Boris Johnson will not want to go down in history as Mr No Deal

European Council President Donald Tusk and Prime Minister Boris Johnson have clashed over who would be to blame in the case of a no-deal Brexit.

Mr Tusk said Mr Johnson risked being remembered as “Mr No Deal” – but the PM responded by saying it was Mr Tusk who would become “Mr No-Deal Brexit”.

The pair are due to meet for talks at the G7 summit in France on Sunday.

Mr Tusk added the EU was “willing to listen” to the PM’s ideas for Brexit – as long as they are “realistic”.

But speaking at his press conference in Biarritz, Mr Tusk said he would “not co-operate on [a] no-deal”.

Since becoming PM, Mr Johnson has said the UK will leave the EU on 31 October.

Mr Johnson has repeatedly stated he would prefer to leave the EU with a deal, but insists the backstop – the insurance policy designed to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland – must be removed from the withdrawal agreement.

“I’ve made it absolutely clear I don’t want no deal and that we’ve got to get rid of the backstop from the treaty and if Mr Tusk doesn’t want to go down as Mr No-Deal Brexit I hope that point will be borne in mind too,” he said.

Earlier in the day, Mr Tusk had used the same moniker when talking about Mr Johnson.

“I still hope Prime Minister Johnson will not like to go down in history as Mr No Deal,” he said.

“The EU has always been open to co-operation. One thing I will not co-operate on is a no deal.

“We are willing to listen to ideas that are operational, realistic and acceptable to all EU member states.”

‘All signs point to a no-deal Brexit’

Analysis by BBC diplomatic correspondent James Landale

When Boris Johnson met President Emmanuel Macron and Chancellor Angela Merkel this week, he got a relatively positive response.

Both leaders indicated they were willing to listen to any ideas the prime minister may have to avoid a no-deal Brexit.

But Mr Johnson’s meeting with Donald Tusk at the G7 summit on Sunday may now prove more problematic.

The spat between both men – both of them warning they could go down in history as Mr No Deal – shows that both sides are engaged in a blame game.

Neither side wishes to be seen as the intransigent partner in a negotiation that leads to no deal.

Mr Macron and Ms Merkel were implicit in this, while Mr Tusk was explicit, prompting an equally blunt response from Mr Johnson.

It is, of course, still possible that some political space may be carved out to allow for a compromise at the last minute. But all the signs still point towards a no-deal Brexit at the end of October.

The G7 summit – a get-together of most of the leaders of the world’s largest economies – comes with just over two months until the UK is scheduled to leave the EU at the end of October.

Mr Johnson wants to renegotiate the Irish backstop – a key Brexit sticking point – but the EU has consistently ruled this out.

Speaking on Saturday, Mr Johnson said: “We’ve made it very clear we won’t be instituting any kind of checks or controls at the Northern Irish border. We don’t think such controls are necessary.

“There are a large range of alternative arrangements – these we will be discussing in the coming weeks.”

If implemented, the backstop – a last resort should the UK and the EU not agree a trade deal after Brexit – would see Northern Ireland staying aligned to some rules of the EU single market.

It would also see the UK stay in a single customs territory with the EU, and align with current and future EU rules on competition and state aid.

At a news conference on Wednesday with Mr Johnson, German Chancellor Merkel suggested an alternative to the backstop might be achievable, adding that the onus was on the UK.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Boris Johnson met with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Presidential Palace this week

But the next day French President Macron said the backstop was “indispensable” to preserving political stability and the single market.

After visiting his counterparts in Paris and Berlin this week, Mr Johnson said there was “new mood music”, but reaching a new deal would not be “a cinch”.

He has insisted the UK will leave the EU on 31 October, whether or not a new deal is reached.

Mr Johnson will also meet with US President Donald Trump, who arrived in France around Saturday lunchtime.

Asked if he would be telling Mr Trump not to escalate the US-China trade war, Mr Johnson said: “You bet.”

He added one of his priorities for the summit was “the state of global trade”.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49458293


Evan Vucci/AP Photo

foreign policy

President Donald Trump offered Friday to help Brazil contain forest fires raging in the Amazon rain forest, putting him at odds with a key ally going into the weekend’s G7 meeting.

“Just spoke with President @JairBolsonaro of Brazil. Our future Trade prospects are very exciting and our relationship is strong, perhaps stronger than ever before. I told him if the United States can help with the Amazon Rainforest fires, we stand by ready to assist!” Trump tweeted Friday evening. Bolsonaro retweeted Trump on Friday.

Story Continued Below

The goodwill message comes after reports of French President Emmanuel Macron’s plans to oppose a long-anticipated trade deal involving Brazil as a result of President Jair Bolsonaro’s role in deforestation in his country.

Bolsonaro — a right-wing populist who has repeatedly moved to undermine his country’s environmental protections — has advocated reclaiming the Amazon to exploit its natural resources. He has blamed without evidence advocacy groups of starting the fires to soil his name.

Macron said on Twitter that he wanted to discuss the fires during this weekend’s G7 summit in France. Brazil is not a member of the exclusive group, and Bolsonaro said on Twitter that the idea of the G7 discussing his country’s domestic affairs was “colonialist.”

Trump and Bolsonaro have bonded over their similar styles of populism, and both have advocating using previously protected natural areas for their resources.

Bolsonaro announced Friday that he would send the military to combat the fires. The military will work with emergency services and environmental agencies.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/23/trump-brazil-amazon-fire-1474310

August 24 at 6:00 AM

The Rev. Alyn E. Waller, a senior pastor at Enon Tabernacle Baptist Church in Philadelphia, believes African American voters in his city hold the key to the White House.

After backing a Democrat for president since 1988, Pennsylvania swung behind Donald Trump in 2016, helping to propel him to the presidency with a dramatic turnout of supportive white voters while the turnout of black Democratic voters in urban areas fell.

Hillary Clinton easily won the vote in Philadelphia, but the drop-off from prior elections left her unable to offset white Republican votes coming from more rural and conservative parts of the state.

It was a moment not lost on Trump. During a rally in Pennsylvania in December 2018, he praised black Americans for staying at home. “They didn’t come out to vote for Hillary,” he said. “They didn’t come out. And that was a big — so thank you to the African American community.” He also has often lauded his rural supporters for their high turnout.

Overall, turnout of black voters fell from nearly 67 percent in 2012 — during the reelection of the nation’s first African American president — to less than 60 percent in 2016 while the white percentage rose incrementally, according to a Pew Research study.

In Pennsylvania, exit polls showed, the percentage of the vote cast by African Americans, who overwhelmingly sided with Clinton, dropped from 13 percent in 2012 to 10 percent in 2016. White voters, who went dramatically for Trump, rose from 78 percent to 81 percent of the electorate.

Interviews with black and white voters in the state show that a different dynamic may already by in play — on both sides.

Arresting the slide in black turnout and cutting into Republican advantages among white and rural voters is seen by Democrats as key to flipping Pennsylvania back into their electoral column. The same is true in Wisconsin and Michigan, two other historically Democratic states that went for Trump in 2016.

“I think people in Philadelphia understand that we can determine the presidential election in many ways because we can determine how Pennsylvania goes,” Waller said in an interview with The Washington Post. Trump’s margin of victory in the state was narrow: Just 44,000 of the 6.2 million voters turned the state from blue to red.

“We are trying to impress upon our community how important both the vote and the census is in this new year,” Waller said.

He argues that Joe Biden, the former vice president, is the candidate most likely to get black voters to the ballot box.

“What we fundamentally need is someone who can energize our community to come out. I don’t think any of the candidates will help us with a Barack Obama-style turnout, but I think Biden is like getting back into old comfortable shoes that will allow us to get our footing back.”

That sentiment reflects Biden’s primary campaign strategy, more so than any Democrat seeking the nomination in 2020: He is keen to demonstrate that he’s popular among black voters, while also appealing to the exurban and rural white voters who aided Trump.

Yet he has faced a series of potential setbacks in maintaining his support among black voters over the last few months: Rivals have attacked his opposition to federally mandated busing in his home state of Delaware in the 1970s and also comments in which he championed his work with well-known segregationist senators.

Earlier this month, he told a group of mostly minority voters in Iowa that “poor kids” are just as bright as “white kids” before quickly correcting himself. But the controversy doesn’t appear to have trickled down to black voters in Philadelphia.

“Where do these comments come from?” questioned Tasha Ann, a 46 year-old dental assistant in Philadelphia. “It’s worrying, but we all say things we shouldn’t say.”

“You can’t judge him on that,” she added. “He proved himself time and time again with Obama. We all have a past. I would say Biden is more likely to get African Americans out voting.”

Waller was also unconcerned. “We have had 30 years to see his heart,” he said. “Do I believe that Joe Biden in his heart is a racist, or do I believe that he does not have the African American community in his heart? I don’t believe he’s a racist and I don’t believe he wouldn’t give the best that he could for our community.”

More than a dozen African Americans who said they usually vote Democratic — but didn’t vote at all in 2016 — blamed unease with Clinton’s candidacy. They also expressed support for Biden, frequently citing his past as Obama’s vice president as a major positive, and occasionally others.

Carl Garner, a 53-year-old IT specialist, said he was partial to Sen. Kamala D. Harris of California.

“Anything’s better than what we have right now.” he said, adding: “I’ve always liked Kamala D. Harris and I think she’s a very strong candidate. . . . I wouldn’t mind putting my vote behind her, but right now I think we just want to beat Trump, to be honest with you.”

Biden, he said, is best suited to win: “I still feel that the middle of the country trusts Joe Biden more than the other candidates. Even though I’m not part of that middle, I don’t think we can win without them.”

Jason Saffore, 43, an African American Democrat working in Philadelphia’s Reading Terminal Market, said he couldn’t bring himself to vote for Clinton in 2016 and so didn’t vote at all. Next year, he said, will be different.

“The guy we have in office now is not serving our country and it’s time for a change,” he said, as he arranged a stack of onions in a crate. “We need a president who is for all Americans. Last time I didn’t really care for the Democratic field at all, so I stayed out of the mix. I think a lot of people did.”

“I’m actually for Joe Biden at this point,” he added.

At a bus stop nearby, Shanta Tillar, a 36-year-old African American from Philadelphia, said that in 2016 “I really didn’t think my vote would count” so she chose not to cast a ballot.

“Yes, I regret not voting last time,” she said. That will change in 2020 “because America need a different president,” she insisted. “I think Joe Biden would be a good president as he worked with Obama, but really anyone is better than who we have now.”

Where Biden has an advantage at this early stage of the campaign is his ability to meld support from black voters with a measure of backing from more conservative white voters who will entertain a vote for him but are less open to other Democrats in the race.

David Kenderdine, a white 55-year-old retired police officer from Montgomery County, said he had been a “straight Republican” his entire life and voted for Trump. But if Biden wins the nomination, that could change.

“He’s the Democrat who would appeal to the working man,” Kenderdine said, speaking outside a local coffee shop in Doylestown, 4o miles north of Philadelphia. “I like him, I always have.”

“Mr. Biden is a gaffe machine, but at the end of the day he is a statesman and I believe that he has the best interest of our country in mind. If it was anyone else, I’d say no. But, I probably won’t make my decision until I pull the lever.”

Kenderdine is forgiving of the various controversies that have surfaced around Biden’s campaign, suggesting they make him a more appealing candidate to take on Trump.

“I like Mr. Biden,’ he said. “It’s mainly because the guy doesn’t care what he says and he speaks his mind. So many of these politicians speak with a guarded tongue. He doesn’t. He still has my nod for the Dems.”

Chris Cozzone, a 56-year-old garage owner and Trump voter in Little Britain, a rural area near Lancaster, 70 miles west of Philadelphia, also believes Biden is the most palatable Democrat in the race. “Out of all the Democrats, he would probably be my favorite because he’s not so far left,” he said.

“He’s a little more on the conservative side. Medicare-for-all and free college for everybody” — programs favored by other candidates that Biden has dismissed — “that would be awesome, but it’s just not reality.”

But he describes himself as a “die-hard Republican who is unlikely to turn against Trump next year.

“I think he is turning the economy around and doing a really good job. Things are still getting done, despite the opposition.”

Bill Neff, 65, who owns a local security company in Lancaster, is one of a few voters in the area who admits he deeply regrets voting for Trump in 2016. “He’s not for the common person, he’s for the elites and the very wealthy and therefore he’s bleeding money from working people,” he said.

He is undecided on which candidate he backs in the crowded Democratic field. “But I will not vote for Donald Trump again,” he said. “No way.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/some-pennsylvania-democrats-regret-not-voting-in-2016-they-say-theyll-be-sure-to-cast-a-ballot-in-2020/2019/08/23/e2d4f4c0-a1b0-11e9-b732-41a79c2551bf_story.html

“Our great American companies are hereby ordered to immediately start looking for an alternative to China, including bringing our companies HOME and making your products in the USA,” Mr. Trump tweeted, adding, “We don’t need China and, frankly, would be far better off without them.”

Mr. Trump’s threat to invoke the 1977 act to force companies to leave China would be his most recent unorthodox use of standby authorities that Congress delegated to the presidency for exigent circumstances. The president previously threatened to use those emergency powers to impose tariffs on Mexican goods, unless the Mexican government did more to stop migrants from illegally entering the United States.

The president’s tweet could further unsettle American companies that conduct an enormous amount of business with China, one of the United States’ largest trading partners. Stock markets fell sharply on Friday after Mr. Trump first raised the prospect of cutting off trade altogether.

His effort to use the emergency powers could also be challenged in court, given the restrictions surrounding when it can be invoked. The International Emergency Economic Powers Act says that if the president decides that circumstances abroad have created “any unusual and extraordinary threat” to “the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” the president can declare a “national emergency.” This triggers special authority for the leader to regulate “any transactions in foreign exchange” by Americans.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/24/world/europe/trump-g7-summit.html

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/24/politics/g7-trump-global-slump/index.html

President Trump extended an offer of aid to Brazil’s president on Friday should the government of the South American nation need help containing massive forest fires sweeping across the Amazon rainforest.

Trump tweeted that he spoke with President Jair Bolsonaro and touted “very exciting” trade prospects between the U.S. and Brazil, adding that the relationship between the two nations was “perhaps stronger than ever.”

“I told him if the United States can help with the Amazon Rainforest fires, we stand by ready to assist!” Trump said on Twitter Friday evening. Bolsonaro retweeted Trump’s message.

AMAZON FIRES TURN POLITICAL AS BRAZIL’S PRESIDENT CALLS OUT FRANCE’S MACRON

Nearly 40,000 fires are incinerating Brazil’s Amazon rainforest, the latest outbreak in an overactive fire season that has charred 1,330 square miles of the rainforest this year. Brazil’s National Institute for Space Research noted an 84 percent increase compared to this same period last year. Sao Paulo was in the dark for about one hour Monday afternoon as a result of the fires about 1,600 miles away.

On Friday, Bolsonaro announced that the Brazilian armed forces will step in to help public security agencies and public environmental agencies battle the fires. He also warned foreign powers against meddling in what he viewed as a domestic issue.

“The Brazilian Amazon is a heritage of our people, who will protect it from the threats of those who harm the forest with illegal actions and will react to those who intend to violate our sovereignty,” Bolsonaro’s announcement said.

Trump is traveling to Biarritz, France, next week to participate in the G7 summit, where leaders from seven of the world’s economies will discuss global economic issues. Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States are members. Climate change is on a topic on the agenda.

On Thursday, French President Emmanuel Macron, the host and leader of this year’s summit, called on G7 members to discuss Amazon fires this week. Brazil is not a member of G7 and will not be present.

“Our house is burning. Literally. The Amazon rain forest — the lungs which produce 20 percent of our planet’s oxygen — is on fire,” Macron said. “It is an international crisis. Members of the G7 Summit, let’s discuss this emergency first order in two days!”

FRANCE THREATENS BRAZIL ON TRADE DEAL, ESCALATING TENSIONS OVER AMAZON FIRES

Bolsonaro slammed Macron for his “misplaced colonialist mindset” for suggesting that fires in the Amazon be discussed at G7 without representation from Brazil.

Their feud carried over into Friday when Macron issued a statement, saying Bolsonaro had blatantly lied to Macron at the Osaka Summit in June over his commitment to tackling climate change, pollution and environmental destruction. Macron threatened to withdraw French support from a trade deal with South American nations and the European Union over the dispute.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Bolsonaro, who has advocated against environmental conservation policies, admitted his country may not have the resources to police an area of land greater than the size of Europe. He suggested advocacy groups were starting criminal fires in the Amazon to tarnish his name, Politico reported.

Reuters reported that farmers in Brazil — if not outright — had “tacit” encouragement from Bolsonaro who has maintained that the Amazon should be utilized for Brazil’s economy. The news agency reported that a so-called “Fire Day” was designated to show the president that farmers were eager to work.

Fox News’ Edmund DeMarche, Lucia I. Suarez Sang, Robert Gearty and the Associated Press contributed to this report

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-brazil-amazon-fire-climate-change-jair-bolsonaro-trade-g7-summit-foreign-aid-colonialism

In a case that brought national attention to Florida’s  “Stand Your Ground” gun law, a jury on Friday night convicted a licensed gun owner on manslaughter charges after deliberating for six hours following a weeklong trial.

The defendant, Michael Drejka, was accused of killing Markeis McGlockton in the parking lot of a convenience store in Clearwater on July 19, 2018, after arguing with McGlockton’s girlfriend over a handicapped parking space. Drejka claimed he fatally shot McGlockton in self-defense.

In surveillance video played for the jury, McGlockton is seen emerging from the store and shoving Drejka to the ground. Seconds later, Drejka pulls out Glock .40-caliber handgun and shoots McGlockton, 28, as he turned away.

FATAL SHOOTING REIGNITES ‘STAND YOUR GROUND’ LAW DEBATE IN FLORIDA

“He did what he thought he had to do, in the moment, in the split-second time, given that he was attacked,” Drejka’s attorney, John Trevena, said during his closing argument, according to the Tampa Bay Times. “You may not agree with the law. But you took an oath as a juror to uphold the law.”

“He did what he thought he had to do, in the moment, in the split-second time, given that he was attacked.”

— John Trevena, attorney for gun owner Michael Drejka

Aside from being a test of the “Stand Your Ground” law, the case also took on racial dimensions because Drejka is white and McGlockton was black.

Defendant Michael Drejka was convicted of manslaughter in a 2018 fatal shooting despite invoking Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law as his defense. (Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office)

Force against threats

Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” gun legislation, which became law in 2005, established the right for gun owners to apply lethal force to defend themselves against threats regardless of whether it was possible to retreat first. In 2017, state legislators revised the law to put the burden of proof on prosecutors to disprove a Stand Your Ground claim instead of on defense attorneys to prove one.

The lengthy statute generally says a shooting is justified if a reasonable person under those circumstances would believe they are in danger of death or great bodily harm. But it also says the shooter could not have instigated the altercation.

Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri initially did not arrest Drejka, saying the controversial law precluded him from doing so. Three weeks would pass before Pinellas-Pasco State Attorney Bernie McCabe announced his office was formally arresting and charging Drejka with manslaughter.

Some suggested politics or race played a role in the sheriff’s initial decision not to arrest, but Gualtieri was quick to deny those accusations.

“He told deputies that he had to shoot to defend himself. Those are the facts and that’s the law,” Gualtieri told Fox News at the time. “No matter how you slice it or dice it that was a violent push to the ground.”

Culture of racism

But civil rights activists said the shooting, and the sheriff’s delay in arresting Drejka, spoke to a culture of racism within the state of Florida. The National Rifle Association, as well as Republican legislators who helped write the law, disputed the sheriff’s interpretation of it and all five Democratic candidates for governor stood alongside the Rev. Al Sharpton at an Aug. 5, 2018 “Justice for Markeis” rally to call for a repeal of the law.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

McGlockton’s family was pleased with the verdict.

“This conviction doesn’t bring our son back, but it does give us some sense of justice because far too often the criminal justice system fails us by allowing people who take the lives of unarmed Black people to walk free as though their lives meant nothing,” McGlockton’s mother, Monica Robinson, said in a statement. “We are hopeful that this conviction will be a brick in the road to changing the culture of racism here in Florida.”

Drejka will be sentenced in October and could get up to 30 years behind bars.

Fox News’ Allie Raffa and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/florida-michael-drejka-second-amendment-guilty-manslaughter-mcglockton

Joe Biden’s presidential campaign is accusing President Trump’s campaign of poaching online donors. In a fundraising email sent to supporters Thursday, the Biden campaign pointed out that if someone types “donate Joe Biden” into a Google search, the first link to appear is one that directs them to donate to Donald J. Trump for President.

Here’s what the search turned up Friday morning:

Elsa / Getty Images


“Trump’s campaign is paying money to run ads online so that their donation link is the first thing you see when you search ‘donate Joe Biden,'” the email read. “But, listen, here’s the thing: We can’t stop them because we’re out of money to run online ads for the rest of the month.”

While the Biden campaign is calling out President Trump’s reelection campaign, it’s not immediately clear who exactly is behind the ad making the Trump campaign page appear above Biden’s in the search. The Trump campaign has not yet confirmed that it purchased the Google ad, which was purchased on Google’s pay-per-click keyword advertising platform.

The Trump campaign ad appears after a search of the specific words, “donate Joe Biden,” in that order. It doesn’t come up if users type “Joe Biden donate” or “donate Biden” in the search field. It’s also unclear whether these efforts have affected the attempts by Biden supporters to donate to the former vice president’s campaign.

Because there is a host of requirements for advertisers running Google ads that mention political candidates, it seems likely that the Trump campaign is responsible for the digital ad, according to Bully Pulpit Interactive, a digital marketing and strategy firm.

“The interesting part of the Trump ad strategy to me is that, even though the ads click through to a Trump campaign donation page, they are probably not driving many donations. People searching ‘donate to Biden’ are Democrats who have already made up their mind on who they are supporting and how,” J.D. Bryant, Bully Pulpit’s director of buying, told CBS News.

He went on to say, “They are really unlikely to suddenly change their minds and switch not only the candidate but also the party to which they are giving money. That means the people behind this ad aren’t doing it because it’s a smart digital tactic. They’re doing it because they’ll do anything to keep the attention on Trump.”

In the second quarter of the year, Biden raked in more than $22 million putting him just behind Pete Buttigieg in fundraising in that period. However, his fundraising efforts are not the same type of grassroots operations as those deployed by Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, who have both sworn off big-dollar fundraising events. The president and his campaign committees raised $54 million in the second quarter.

A Google search of other top polling Democratic presidential candidates in the race, including Sanders, Kamala Harris, Warren and Buttigieg, found no other candidate faced the same type of targeting when searched online.

This is not the first time the former vice president and current Democratic presidential frontrunner has been an online target. An search of “Joe Biden” lists a parody account just below his official website on Google. The website includes references to “Uncle Joe,” old videos and images of Biden awkwardly touching women, and a series of policy positions far outside the norms for progressive Democrats. The New York Times previously reported the website had been created by a Trump consultant.

Dan Patterson contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-campaign-accuses-trump-campaign-of-poaching-donors/

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

European Council President Donald Tusk spoke at the G7 summit in France

European Council President Donald Tusk has said the EU is “willing to listen” to Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s ideas for Brexit if they are “realistic”.

Speaking at a press conference at the G7 summit in Biarritz, France, Mr Tusk said he would “not cooperate on no deal”.

Mr Tusk and Mr Johnson are due to meet on Sunday to discuss Brexit.

Since becoming prime minister, Mr Johnson has insisted the UK will leave the EU on 31 October.

Mr Tusk said Mr Johnson is the third British prime minister he will have met since the UK voted to leave the EU in June 2016.

He said: “The EU has always been open to cooperation. One thing I will not cooperate on is a no deal.

“We are willing to listen to ideas that are operational, realistic and acceptable to all EU member states.

“I still hope Prime Minister Johnson will not like to go down in history as Mr No Deal.”

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Boris Johnson met with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Presidential Palace this week

The G7 summit – a get-together of most of the leaders of the world’s largest economies – comes with just over two months until the UK is scheduled to leave the EU at the end of October.

Mr Johnson wants to renegotiate the Irish backstop – a key Brexit sticking point which is part of the withdrawal agreement and aims to prevent a hard border on the island of Ireland after Brexit.

The EU has consistently ruled this out.

If implemented, the backstop – a last resort should the UK and the EU not agree a trade deal after Brexit – would see Northern Ireland staying aligned to some rules of the EU single market.

It would also see the UK stay in a single customs territory with the EU, and align with current and future EU rules on competition and state aid.

At a news conference on Wednesday with Mr Johnson, German Chancellor Angela Merkel suggested an alternative to the backstop might be achievable, adding that the onus was on the UK to find a workable plan.

But the next day French president Emmanuel Macron said the backstop was “indispensable” to preserving political stability and the single market.

After visiting his counterparts in Paris and Berlin this week, Mr Johnson said there was “new mood music”, but reaching a new deal would not be “a cinch”.

He has insisted the UK will leave the EU on 31 October, whether or not a new deal is reached.

Mr Johnson will also meet with US President Donald Trump, who arrived in France around Saturday lunchtime.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49458293

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/24/economy/arun-jaitley-india-economy/index.html

President Trump announced on Twitter Friday that his administration will retaliate against China by raising tariffs on imports from the Asian nation amid a bitter trade war between the two countries.

“For many years China (and many other countries) has been taking advantage of the United States on Trade, Intellectual Property Theft, and much more. Our Country has been losing HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS a year to China, with no end in sight,” Trump tweeted. “Sadly, past Administrations have allowed China to get so far ahead of Fair and Balanced Trade that it has become a great burden to the American Taxpayer. As President, I can no longer allow this to happen!”

The move came hours after Beijing said it would hike tariffs on $75 billion in U.S. imports, escalating a conflict over trade and technology that threatens to tip a fragile global economy into a recession.

TRADE WAR EXPLODES AS TRUMP CLASHES WITH US FIRMS OVER ‘ORDER’ TO ABANDON TIES, BLOCK FENTANYL SHIPMENTS

Trump called those tariffs “politically motivated.”

“Starting on October 1st, the 250 BILLION DOLLARS of goods and products from China, currently being taxed at 25 percent, will be taxed at 30 percent,” Trump continued. “Additionally, the remaining 300 BILLION DOLLARS of goods and products from China, that was being taxed from September 1st at 10 percent, will now be taxed at 15 percent. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

Economic groups were aghast at the new tariffs, which were announced an hour after the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down more than 623 points following an earlier presidential broadside against the Chinese.

“It’s impossible for businesses to plan for the future in this type of environment,” National Retail Federation Senior Vice President of Government Relations David French said in a statement. “The administration’s approach clearly isn’t working, and the answer isn’t more taxes on American businesses and consumers. Where does this end?”

Earlier in the day, Trump tweeted that the U.S. has “stupidly” lost trillions of dollars to China and accused Beijing of stealing “our Intellectual Property at a rate of Hundreds of Billions of Dollars a year, & they want to continue.

“I won’t let that happen!” wrote Trump, who also said he “hereby ordered” American companies to seek alternatives to doing business in China.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The president also raged against Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell for his continued refusal to cut interest rates, at one point saying: “My only question is, who is our bigger enemy, Jay Powel (sic) or [China’s] Chairman Xi [Jinping]?”

That outburst came after Powell, speaking to central bankers in Jackson Hole, Wyo., gave vague assurances that the Fed “will act as appropriate” to sustain the nation’s economic expansion. While the phrasing was widely seen as meaning interest rate cuts, he offered no hint of whether or how many reductions might be coming the rest of the year.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-announces-raised-tariffs-on-china-to-take-effect-in-september-october

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/23/politics/trump-trade-war-china-week-in-review/index.html

The yearly rainfall ranges from 80 to 400 inches (200 to 1,000cm).

Most of this rain, which can get very heavy, runs through the Amazon’s rainy season roughly from mid-December to mid-May.

But the Amazon is a massive forest, meaning its climate varies depending on what area.

It rains far less in central Amazonia than in the Peruvian Amazon or at the eastern Amazon of Brazil.

READ MORE

Amazon rainforest fire: Rainfall in the Amazon? Latest rainfall maps – FORECAST

Amazon fires latest: Just 40 firefighters tackling raging blaze – INSIGHT

Amazon fires latest news: Thick smoke pours over Peru as fires rage on – PICTURES

Source Article from https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1169284/amazon-rainforest-fire-weather-is-it-raining-amazon-rainforest-brazil-rain-radar



A white Florida man on trial for manslaughter insisted he fired in self-defense when 28-year-old Markeis McGlockton shoved him outside a Clearwater convenience store, then took several steps toward him.

However, surveillance video of the July 2018 incident blows a hole in defendant Michael Drejka‘s claims and shows McGlockton retreating moments before Drejka, 49, fires the fatal shot.

In this Thursday, July 19, 2018 image taken from surveillance video released by the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office, Markeis McGlockton, far left, is shot by Michael Drejka during an altercation in the parking lot of a convenience store in Clearwater, Florida. (Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office via AP)

“What happens if I told you that I looked at the video and at no time and point does he come running up toward you,” an officer tells the suspect in an interview the day of the shooting last year, adding, “He actually takes a step back.”

“I would disagree,” Drejka replied. 

Clips of that police interview, along with Drejka’s reenactment of the fatal incident, were played in court by the prosecution Thursday as part of his trial, CNN reported. Like Drejka, the defense argued the suspect was only protecting himself after McGlockton knocked him to the ground.

The confrontation between the two men unfolded July 19, 2018, when an irate Drejka confronted McGlockton’s girlfriend, Britany Jacobs, after she parked in a handicap-accessible space but didn’t have the proper permit. McGlockton and the couple’s 5-year-old son were inside the convenience store as Jacobs and Drejka argued outside.

In court Wednesday, Jacobs testified that she “just wanted this man to leave … me and my babies alone,” recalling how Drejka scolded her for parking in that particular spot.

The young father eventually exits the store to find Drejka arguing with his girlfriend. He then approaches the enraged man and forcibly pushes him to the ground. That’s when Drejka, struggling to get up, draws his weapon and fires at McGlockton, killing him, according to surveillance footage.

After the shooting Drejka, 47, told deputies that he feared for his life and shot in self-defense.

“I shoot to save my own ass, and that’s that,” he said in a police interview.

The Florida man also cited the state’s controversial “stand your ground law,” which allows people to respond to threats with lethal force without fear of prosecution. In the interview, he told deputies “I did exactly what I thought I was supposed to be doing at that time considering, what was happening to myself,” adding that he feared McGlockton would continue attacking him.

Pinellas County authorities agreed and initially declined to charge Drejka in the incident, arguing that the shooting “fell within the bookends” of the controversial statute. A month later, the state attorney’s office would charge him with manslaughter.

Drejka’s lawyers have decided against using the “stand you ground” defense, which, if successful, would make him immune to prosecution, and have instead chosen to stick with arguing self-defense. His attorney is expected to call a self-defense expert witness to testify, among other witnesses, local station WFLA reported. 

Witness testimony in the case continued Friday.

Drejka’s trial is expected to last two weeks, and if convicted he faces up to 30 years behind bars.

Watch more in the video below.


Source Article from https://atlantablackstar.com/2019/08/23/stand-your-ground-trial-shooter-michael-drejka-claims-he-fired-in-self-defense-when-victim-charged-at-him-but-video-shows-victim-was-retreating/