Two of President Trump’s senior economic advisers took to the airwaves Sunday to downplay the risk of a recession after a tumultuous week in the markets suggested the economy is heading onto shaky ground.

Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, and White House trade director Peter Navarro between them appeared on all five Sunday morning shows to defend the president’s economic record and argue that his trade offensive against China isn’t harming American producers or consumers.

Their push came days after bond market investors sent a powerful signal that they see a potential downturn looming, and economists from Wall Street and beyond further whittled growth forecasts for a record-length economic expansion that appears to be slowing.

“I don’t see a recession at all,” Kudlow said on “Fox News Sunday.” On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” he urged Americans, “Let’s not be afraid of optimism.”

“Consumers are working at higher wages,” Kudlow said. “They are spending at a rapid pace. They’re actually saving also while they’re spending. That’s an ideal situation. So I think actually the second half, the economy’s going to be very good in 2019.”

On ABC News’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” Navarro maintained that a recession could be staved off if the Federal Reserve stops raising interest rates and banks in Europe and in China make similar moves.

“The Federal Reserve’s precipitous interest rate hikes actually cost us a full point of growth,” Navarro told host Martha Raddatz. “All we need, Martha, is to reverse that, have Europe do what they need to do, China do their fiscal stimulus, and the global economy will — will have a bullish cycle going through 2020 and beyond.”

Appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Navarro dismissed research indicating American businesses and consumers are shouldering the bulk of the tariff burden Trump has imposed on Chinese imports.

“That dog won’t hunt,” Navarro said of findings by economists at Harvard University, the University of Chicago, the International Monetary Fund and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston that the tariffs are effectively tax hikes on Americans. “They’re not hurting anybody here. … They’re hurting China. They’re slashing their prices.”

The White House announced Tuesday that it is delaying until December new tariffs on a number of popular consumer goods, including cellphones, laptops and strollers, that were set to take effect next month. Trump framed the decision as a gift to American shoppers heading into the Christmas season.

But Navarro rejected the suggestion that the move amounts to an acknowledgment by the administration that the import duties are raising prices for American consumers. Instead, he said it was “a goodwill gesture that the president made to the Chinese. It was a wise decision to delay the tariffs to December 15th, and in the meantime half of those tariffs are actually going on September 1st. The tariffs are working.”

Democratic presidential hopefuls on Sunday painted a bleaker picture of the economic outlook and blamed Trump’s trade policies.

“There’s a big debate going on right now about whether we’re on the cusp of a recession. I think we probably are,” South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg said on CNN. “But the more important thing is, even during an expansion, most Americans haven’t been able to get ahead. … And the president has made it abundantly clear that he doesn’t care. When it comes to rural America, I think to him it’s just the scenery that he sees out the helicopter window on the way to his golf course. And when it comes to American consumers, he is completely out of touch on the impact it’s going to have on the prices we pay for our goods as the result of a trade war in which both sides will lose.”

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), appearing on ABC, said she worries that the pending trade agreement to replace NAFTA will end up exacerbating economic woes.

“I’m concerned because I think NAFTA 2.0 is a disaster,” Gillibrand said. “I think it was a giveaway to drug companies in Mexico. It’s going to harm our jobs. President Trump said no bad trade deals. Not only has he entered into them, but he’s started a trade war with China.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/08/18/top-trump-officials-downplay-recession-risks/

Jeffrey Epstein’s former gal pal Ghislaine Maxwell gave a talk to kids at a Massachusetts school — which had no idea she had been accused of being a madam for the multimillionaire pedophile.

Maxwell, 57, gave a presentation to a classroom at Rockport Elementary School last January about her environmental mission to help protect the world’s oceans, according to the Boston Globe.

Rockport is just one town over from Manchester-by-the-Sea, where the British socialite was rumored to have been laying low with a new beau, tech CEO Scott Borgerson, in his $3 million oceanfront home.

Rockport Schools Superintendent Rob Liebow confirmed Maxwell’s presentation — but told the Globe they “had no knowledge” of her ties to Epstein.

He told the paper she was invited as the founder of New York-based environmental nonprofit, TerraMar Project, as a one-time event at the request of a teacher studying oceans.

Maxwell has long been tied to Epstein’s activities and is believed to be one of the key targets of ongoing investigations now the pedophile is dead. Recent court papers claimed that “multiple witnesses” had testified that Maxwell was responsible for “recruiting, maintaining, harboring and trafficking girls for Epstein.”

Borgerson, meanwhile, insisted that he was not dating the socialite — who was instead found by The Post at an In-N-Out Burger in Los Angeles.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/08/18/elementary-school-invited-ghislaine-maxwell-to-speak-to-kids/

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Pro-Beijing demonstrators are separated from supporters of the Hong Kong protestors in London

Protests over the Hong Kong democracy movement have spread across the globe, with rallies taking place in the UK, France, US, Canada and Australia.

In Vancouver, Toronto and London, demonstrators were confronted by pro-Beijing rallies.

Hundreds also protested in Sydney’s Belmore Park on Sunday.

Some wore facemasks due to fears of alleged Chinese state surveillance of citizens who support Hong Kong from abroad.

On Sunday hundreds of thousands of people took part in pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong despite increasingly severe warnings from the Chinese central government.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Supporters of the Hong Kong protests demonstrated in central London on Saturday

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Pro-Beijing demonstrators confronted them

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

There were also rival demonstrations in Sydney – here, pro-Beijing activists march through the city

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

Some clashed with a pro-democracy demonstrator holding a Taiwanese flag

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Supporters of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protesters called for solidarity in the face of “tyranny”

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

In Paris there were heated exchanges between those supporting the Hong Kong protests and those supporting the Beijing government

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

New York’s Chinatown area also saw rival demonstrations

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

In Vancouver, a pro-Hong Kong democracy supporter wore a patch on one eye and a drawing depicting salt poured on the wound – a reference to a demonstrator in Hong Kong who was allegedly wounded in one eye by police firing a projectile

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Pro-Chinese government supporters were also out

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Some demonstrators dressed like protesters in Hong Kong

All photos subject to copyright.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-49388822

Reps. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., continue to speak out against President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following the decision to bar them from visiting Israel last week, but now recent social media posts from the freshman congresswomen – part of the “Squad” that includes Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ayanna Pressley — include a political cartoon from an artist celebrated for his anti-Semitic imagery.

Tlaib and Omar posted to their Instagram stories a cartoon which depicts Netanyahu silencing Tlaib by covering her mouth, and Trump doing the same to Omar, The Jewish Daily Forward’s Batya Ungar-Sargon noticed.

TLAIB HITS BACK AT BILL MAHER FOR COMMENTS ON BDS, COMPARES ISRAEL TO APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA

“The more they try to silence us, our voices rise. The more they try to weaken us, the stronger we become. The more they try to discredit us, the truth prevails,” was the statement included in Tlaib’s post.

Ungar-Sargon pointed out that the artist who drew the cartoon, Carlos Latuff, has a history of cartoons that compare Israel to Nazis, including an entry in the 2006 Iran Holocaust Cartoon Contest that won him second place.

Latuff himself shared the cartoon on his Twitter page, and early Sunday morning he posted a link to an interview he did with the Forward where he discussed his controversial artwork. He defended his use of the Holocaust to criticize Israel’s treatment of Palestinians, even while acknowledging that the two are not exactly the same.

“Of course Israel isn’t building gas chambers in the West Bank, but surely we can find some similarities between the treatment given to Palestinians by the [Israel Defense Forces] and the Jews under Nazi rule,” Latuff said.

Earlier this month, the U.S. State Department updated its definition of “anti-Semitism” to include “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.” This was after Omar introduced a resolution that endorsed the use of boycotts, specifically referring to their past use against Nazi Germany.

When confronted with criticism of his use of “traditional anti-Semitic motifs,” Latuff insisted, “My cartoons have no focus on the Jews or on Judaism. My focus is Israel as a political entity[.]” He did not explain why it was necessary to use anti-Jewish tropes to criticize Israel, other than to say, “It happens to be Israeli Jews that are the oppressors of Palestinians.”

Still, when pressed on the issue, he did say, “No doubt about real anti-Semitism. Of course you’ll have people hijacking the Palestinian struggle as a chance for bashing the Jews, like European neo-Nazis who demonstrate against the occupation of Palestinian territories or the Iraq War. It’s important for the left to keep them apart from the legitimate struggle for the rights of the Palestinians.”

He denied, however, that being anti-Zionist is anti-Semitic.

It is unclear whether Tlaib or Omar were aware of Latuff’s history when they shared the recent cartoon. Fox News reached out to both lawmakers, but they did not immediately respond.

ILHAN OMAR’S GOP CHALLENGER DEFENDS ISRAEL’S DECISION TO REJECT ENTRY, SAYS SHE BASICALLY MADE HERSELF AN ‘ENEMY’

The congresswomen were originally scheduled to visit Israel over the weekend. The Israeli government initially said they would be welcome, despite an Israeli law that bars visitation from those who support boycotts of the Jewish state, which Omar and Tlaib have publicly endorsed.

On Thursday, the day before they were set to embark on their trip, Israeli Interior Minister Arye Deri decided to block them from coming after all, with Netanyahu supporting the decision. The prime minister explained the decision in a statement, which described how the government had recently received a copy of Omar and Tlaib’s itinerary, which was labeled as a trip to “Palestine” and not Israel, and which Netanyahu said “reveals that the sole purpose of their visit is to harm Israel and increase incitement against it.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Tlaib, who has family residing in Palestinian territory in the West Bank, was told that she could enter Israel if she submitted a humanitarian request and promised not to promote boycotts of Israel during her visit. She made a formal request that noted that this could be her last chance to see her elderly grandmother. Israel then granted her permission to come, only for her to then say she would not come after all, claiming, “Visiting my grandmother under these oppressive conditions meant to humiliate me would break my grandmother’s heart.”

When talk show host Bill Maher criticized the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement that Tlaib and Omar support, Tlaib suggested that viewers boycott his HBO show.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tlaib-omar-share-image-by-artist-who-once-entered-irans-holocaust-cartoon-contest

Kabul, Afghanistan — The death toll from a late-night suicide bombing at a crowded wedding party in the Afghan capital rose to at least 63 on Sunday, including women and children, officials said. The local Islamic State (IS) group’s affiliate claimed responsibility for what was the deadliest attack in Kabul this year.

Another 182 people were wounded in the Saturday night explosion, government spokesman Feroz Bashari said. Interior Ministry spokesman Nusrat Rahimi confirmed the casualty toll as families began to bury the dead. Some helped to dig graves with their bare hands.

Kabul residents were outraged as there appears to be no end to violence even as the U.S. and the Taliban say they are nearing a deal to end their 18-year conflict, America’s longest war.

The Taliban condemned the attack as “forbidden and unjustifiable” and denied any involvement. Both the Taliban and IS have carried large-scale attacks in the Afghan capital in the past.

The blast occurred in a western Kabul neighborhood that is home to many of the country’s minority Shiite Hazara community. IS has claimed responsibility for many attacks targeting Shiites in the past. A statement by the militant group posted on an IS-linked website on Sunday said a Pakistani IS fighter seeking martyrdom targeted a large Shiite gathering in Kabul.

The statement also claimed that after the suicide bombing, a car bomb was detonated in the attack but Afghan officials have not confirmed this.

An Afghan man inspects a damaged wedding hall after a blast in Kabul, Afghanistan August 18, 2019.

MOHAMMAD ISMAIL / REUTERS


The bomber detonated his explosives near the stage where musicians were playing and “all the youths, children and all the people who were there were killed,” said eyewitness Gul Mohammad.

Ahmad Omid, a survivor, said about 1,200 guests had been invited to the wedding of his father’s cousin.

“I was with the groom in the other room when we heard the blast and then I couldn’t find anyone,” he said. “Everyone was lying all around the hall.”

Amid the carnage were blood-covered chairs, crushed music speakers and a pile of abandoned shoes.

The blast at the hall, known as Dubai City wedding hall, shattered a period of relative calm in Kabul. On August 7, a Taliban car bomb aimed at Afghan security forces detonated his explosives on the same road, killing 14 people and wounding 145 — most of them women, children and other civilians.

Kabul’s huge, brightly lit wedding halls are centers of community life in a city weary of decades of war, with thousands of dollars spent on a single evening.

“Devastated by the news of a suicide attack inside a wedding hall in Kabul. A heinous crime against our people; how is it possible to train a human and ask him to go and blow himself (up) inside a wedding?!!” presidential spokesman Sediq Seddiqi said on Twitter.

Messages of shock poured in on Sunday. “Such acts are beyond condemnation,” the European Union mission to Afghanistan said. “An act of extreme depravity,” U.S. Ambassador John Bass said.

The wedding halls also serve as meeting places, and in November, at least 55 people were killed when a suicide bomber sneaked into a Kabul wedding hall where hundreds of Muslim religious scholars and clerics had gathered to mark the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad. The Taliban denied involvement in that attack, and IS did not claim responsibility.

The shoes of victims are seen outside a damaged wedding hall after a blast in Kabul, Afghanistan August 18, 2019.

MOHAMMAD ISMAIL / REUTERS


Saturday night’s explosion came a few days after the end of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, with Kabul residents visiting family and friends, and just ahead of Afghanistan’s 100th Independence Day on Monday. The city, long familiar with checkpoints and razor wire, has been under heavier security ahead of the event.

The blast also comes at a greatly uncertain time in Afghanistan as the U.S. and the Taliban appear close to a deal on ending the war. The Afghan government has been sidelined from those discussions, and presidential spokesman Seddiqi on Saturday said his government was waiting to hear results of President Trump’s meeting Friday with his national security team about the negotiations.

Top issues include a U.S. troop withdrawal and Taliban guarantees they would not allow Afghanistan to become a launching pad for global terror attacks.

But many Afghans fear that terror attacks inside the country will continue, and their pleas for peace — and for details on the talks — have increased in recent days.

“Taliban cannot absolve themselves of blame, for they provide platform for terrorists,” President Ashraf Ghani said Sunday on Twitter, declaring a day of mourning and calling the attack “inhumane.′

Frustration at the authorities has also grown.

“We want the government to stop arguing about power and act like a human being to bring peace to this country,” a worker at the wedding hall, Hajji Reza, said Sunday.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/afghanistan-bombing-islamic-state-claims-responsibility-for-bombing-at-kabul-wedding-that-killed-63/

The reaction to President Trump’s sudden interest in buying Greenland from Denmark has been mostly one of derision. And Denmark, which owns the territory, appears to oppose any sale.

But don’t laugh — an American purchase of Greenland could represent an extraordinary deal in terms of America’s national security, economic interests, and environmental protection.

As much as it might seem out of the blue, U.S. acquisition of Greenland is not at all a strange or irrational idea. Following Denmark’s fall to Nazi Germany in 1940, American forces defended Greenland. The roots of American-Greenland comradeship are thus old and formal. In 1946, one Harry S. Truman even attempted to purchase Greenland for $100 million. Was Truman crazy? On the contrary, he was the president who ended a global war and set America on its ultimate course to defeat the Soviet Union.

As for the contemporary utility of purchasing Greenland, it has extraordinary strategic value. Through the U.S. Air Force base already present at Thule, Greenland offers critical intelligence capabilities to conduct satellite operations and to detect possible over-the-North-Pole nuclear missile launches from China or Russia. Thule better allows the U.S. to warn its citizens of an imminent attack.

And it does more than that. Thanks to Thule’s deep water port and long runway, the base provides a logistics hub for operations in the Arctic. And it gives the U.S. military the means to deter and defeat prospective aggression. Russia, in particular, has been working to secure territorial control over resource-rich areas of the Arctic. America’s presence in Greenland is increasingly relevant for that reason.

The purchase of Greenland would further strengthen these existing national security benefits. Unbound from political sensitivities in Denmark, for example, the U.S. could station missile forces in Greenland, including intermediate range missile forces. Russia’s Arctic ambitions would have to be put on ice.

Greenland also abounds with resources. An already energy independent U.S. would have unfettered access to a land rich not only in hydrocarbons but also in rare earth metals that are currently only available from an adversary, China. Greenland also controls flourishing fishing waters.

But this isn’t just about American interests. Greenland’s small population also has everything to gain from a massive influx of American investment. The surge in tourism alone would surely offer a vast untapped potential.

And Greenland offers many grand opportunities for environmental protection. Its waters are home to numerous species of Whale, its lands to numerous species of flower and animals, and its skies to numerous species of birds. Greenland offers the potential for vast new designated wildlife reserves, and it would give American scientists the chance to study the Arctic environment from a unique vantage point.

As odd as it might sound at first blush — and America’s purchase of Alaska also seemed very odd at the time — Americans of all political stripes would benefit from Greenland and its 56,000 inhabitants joining our national family.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/buying-greenland-isnt-a-good-idea-its-a-great-idea

Gibraltar has refused a request by the United States to seize an Iranian oil tanker at the centre of a diplomatic standoff between Tehran and Europe. 

British Royal Marines had seized the vessel in Gibraltar in July on suspicion that it was carrying oil to Syria, a close ally of Iran, in violation of European Union sanctions.

That detention ended last week, but on Friday a US court issued a warrant for the seizure of the tanker, on the grounds that it had links to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which Washington has designated a “terrorist” organisation.

Gibraltar’s government said on Sunday it could not comply with the US request because of European law.

“The Central Authority’s inability to seek the Orders requested is a result of the operation of  European Union law and the differences in the sanctions regimes applicable to Iran in the EU and the US,” the government said in a statement.

“The EU sanctions regime against Iran – which is applicable in Gibraltar – is much narrower than that applicable in the US.”

Iran has denied the tanker was ever headed to Syria

Al Jazeera’s Andrew Simmons, reporting from Gibraltar, said the authorities in the overseas British territory had determined that US sanctions on Iran were not applicable in the EU. 

“The US action is based on US sanctions, while the action taken by Gibraltar and the UK was enforced under EU sanctions, and as far as that issue goes there is compliance now. There was an assurance [from Iran] that this cargo on board, 2.1 million barrels of light crude oil, is not destined for Syria,” he said.

Tehran said on Sunday it was ready to dispatch its naval fleet to escort the tanker – now renamed the Adrian Darya-1 – if required.


“The era of hit and run is over … if top authorities ask the navy, we are ready to escort out tanker Adrian,” Iran’s navy commander, Rear Admiral Hossein Khanzadi was quoted as saying by Mehr news agency.

On Sunday, video footage and photographs showed the tanker flying the red, green and white flag of Iran and bearing its new name, painted in white, on the hull.

Its previous name, Grace 1, had been painted over. The vessel’s anchor was still down.

Hamid Baeidinejad, Iran’s ambassador to Britain, said the vessel was expected to leave Gibraltar on Sunday night.

Gibraltar’s Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the release of the vessel after 43 days in detention.  

The decision came after Gibraltar’s government said it had received written assurances from Iran that the ship would not be headed for countries “subject to European Union sanctions”.

The seizure triggered a sharp deterioration in relations between Iran and the United Kingdom. Tehran subsequently detained the British-flagged tanker in what was seen as a tit-for-tat move. 

That tanker, the Stena Impero, is still in custody. 

Al Jazeera’s Simmons said the British authorities “hope there is a reciprocal action from Iran at some point”.

The release of the British tanker would ease tensions in the Gulf, he said, but much depended on the US’s next move.

“Will the US seize this ship in international waters? That would be extreme and elevate tensions to a very high extent,” he said. 

US-Iran frictions have been mounting since Washington reimposed fresh sanctions on Tehran after exiting an international accord curbing its nuclear programme last year.

The pact’s remaining signatories – UK, France, Germany, Russia and China – oppose the US move and have pledged to protect Tehran from the sanctions imposed by Washington. 

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/08/gibraltar-refuses-request-seize-iranian-tanker-190818123157328.html

The author’s grandfather, Vicente Guerra, is pictured in a mug shot from San Quentin State Prison. He was sentenced to five years to life for the 1931 murder of Joseph Retotar.

California State Archives


hide caption

toggle caption

California State Archives

On rare occasions, Dad and I would get together for lunch. It was 2014, and I had just started a job at NPR. Dad was retired and lived 60 miles away.

From what I remember, we ate dim sum, which meant driving through the heart of downtown Los Angeles, the massive skyscrapers glistening in the afternoon sun.

It was quiet in the car. I was thinking about how Mom and Dad used to make this commute to LA every day for work. Two hours in the morning, two hours at night.

Dad interrupted my thoughts, pointing to a building on the side of the freeway.

“Did you know that my dad killed somebody in that place?”

“Wait, what?” I responded, almost missing the moment.

I never met my grandfather, Lolo Vicente, but I’d heard stories about him. On our living room wall, there’s a picture of him. He was handsome. Dad said he was strict, but he never talked about him coming to America, much less that he killed someone. When I asked Dad why it had taken him so long to tell me, he said it’s because I never asked.

A million thoughts raced through my head. Lolo was in America? Why was Lolo in America? Who did he kill? Did he go to prison?

But the main question tugging at me was what this all meant for the story of my family’s history in America.

The author’s father, Manolo Guerra, stands for a portrait at his home in Moreno Valley, Calif., on Aug. 7.

Kat Kaye for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Kat Kaye for NPR

The author’s father, Manolo Guerra, stands for a portrait at his home in Moreno Valley, Calif., on Aug. 7.

Kat Kaye for NPR

The murder had suddenly shattered my view of the quintessential immigrant narrative — the story my parents embodied. They both came to the United States from the Philippines in the 1980s looking for a better life. Dad became a citizen; Mom, a green card holder. They worked hard, bought a house in the suburbs and raised three children.

My grandfather had taken a darker path. The fact that this violence was a part of my American story scared me. I hated how it might feed into the false narrative that immigrants drive up crime rates. The story also enticed me. I needed to find answers to my questions.

This is the story of my Lolo — which means “grandfather” in Tagalog, a language native to the Philippines. The reason I’m here is because of him.

America’s “little brown brothers”

Trophies and ribbons won by the Guerra sisters are on display in the garage of their father, Manolo Guerra.

Kat Kaye for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Kat Kaye for NPR

Trophies and ribbons won by the Guerra sisters are on display in the garage of their father, Manolo Guerra.

Kat Kaye for NPR

When I first found Lolo’s mug shot, I thought he looked handsome. He was only 24, with soft features and slick black hair.

He had come to America six years earlier, in 1926. He grew up poor in a small province in the Philippines and was part of a mass migration that, by one estimate, brought 150,000 Filipinos to America between 1907 and 1930. These were mostly single young men who boarded steamships to travel thousands of miles from the Philippines to the United States.

At the time, it was relatively easy to immigrate to the U.S. from the Philippines, which in the 1930s was still a U.S. territory. The agricultural sector needed cheap labor, and Filipinos, who were considered noncitizen nationals, fulfilled that role.

Manolo Guerra points himself out in an old family portrait. He’s standing in the photo with his father, Vicente Guerra, his mother, Isabel Guerra, and his older brother Greg.

Kat Kaye for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Kat Kaye for NPR

Manolo Guerra points himself out in an old family portrait. He’s standing in the photo with his father, Vicente Guerra, his mother, Isabel Guerra, and his older brother Greg.

Kat Kaye for NPR

A family photo at the home of Manolo Guerra. The author, Denise Guerra, appears on the far left alongside her sister, mother, father, sister and brother-in-law. Her two nieces appear seated in the front row.

Kat Kaye for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Kat Kaye for NPR

A family photo at the home of Manolo Guerra. The author, Denise Guerra, appears on the far left alongside her sister, mother, father, sister and brother-in-law. Her two nieces appear seated in the front row.

Kat Kaye for NPR

While most of these Filipinos worked in farming, men like my grandfather ended up in cities as low-wage domestic workers. In Los Angeles, he became a “houseboy.” Family lore said he cleaned house for actor George Raft, who appeared in the original Scarface.

For newly arrived immigrants like Lolo, life in America was hard, and the reception was not always warm. Filipino men were known as America’s “little brown brothers,” a phrase coined by William Howard Taft, who before winning the White House in the 1908 election, served as the first American governor-general of the Philippines.

White America’s view could be summed up in a 1929 Los Angeles Times op-ed titled “The Filipino Invasion.” The author describes Filipinos as “good boys, most of them trained on battleships or as houseboys to neatness, cleanliness and quiet courtesy.”

I can only imagine how emasculating this must have felt for Lolo and other young Filipino men. But you wouldn’t be able to tell by looking at photographs of them from the time. Outside of work they wore fedoras, pressed zoot suits and shiny wingtip shoes.

Anthony Ocampo, a sociologist at California State Polytechnic University and author of the book The Latinos of Asia: How Filipino Americans Break the Rules of Race, said dressing like that offered a form of mental self-preservation.

“I think part of the reason they did that is because having traveled 7,000 miles across the Pacific Ocean, being able to present themselves in that way gave them some sort of dignity,” Ocampo said. “That the journey was worth it.”

Guerra sits at his home. In the 1980s, Guerra immigrated to the U.S. from the Philippines in search of a better life.

Kat Kaye for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Kat Kaye for NPR

Guerra sits at his home. In the 1980s, Guerra immigrated to the U.S. from the Philippines in search of a better life.

Kat Kaye for NPR

Of course, it wasn’t strictly about self-preservation, said Ocampo. They also did it to attract women, especially at the local taxi-dance halls, where men could hire women to dance with them. The dance halls gave immigrants an outlet to socialize with one another and spend some of their hard-earned money — typically 10 cents per dance — in hopes of finding some companionship.

The women were usually white, and given racist attitudes and miscegenation laws, that dynamic would eventually spark violence against the Filipino community by white men enraged over the influx of migrant laborers in the area.

The most notorious incident happened in Watsonville, an agricultural community in Northern California. In 1930, a mob of about 500 white men and youth opened fire at a dance hall popular with the local Filipino community where white women were being employed. Over five days, roaming mobs assaulted Filipinos with pistols, clubs and whips. They dragged Filipinos from their homes and beat them. Filipinos were thrown off bridges. One man, Fermin Tobera, 22, was shot to death.

“I was out to run the Filipinos out of the country,” one participant told the Oakland Tribune. “We’re going to get rid of them, that’s what.”

The murder

The next year, a woman would again be at the center of violence involving Filipinos. This time, it involved my Lolo.

To this day, no one in my family can say for certain what drove my grandfather to murder. But according to an Associated Press report dated Sept. 23, 1931, it all had to do with “an American girl.” The headline of the story read, “Oriental Killed, One Shot in Love Feud.”

According to my dad, Lolo was in a restaurant bathroom when two men cornered him and slit his neck, leaving Lolo bleeding and facedown on a toilet. Someone found Lolo and was able to get help.

Dad doesn’t know what prompted the attack, but he remembers the scar that it left on the back of Lolo’s neck.

After his recovery, Lolo went looking for his attackers, and one day, while cruising the streets of a busy downtown corridor, Lolo spotted two men leaving a theater. He told a friend to get the car ready. Lolo had a gun and was set on revenge.

The shooting took place close to a popular dance hall where Filipinos hung out, near city hall. His victims were John Lopez, shot in the leg, and Joseph Retotar, a Filipino, who died.

Records for the two men are hard to come by. Based on what I could find, Retotar was about the same age as Lolo. And that love feud? While the article suggests it was over an American, no one in the family can say for sure.

For years I agonized. If only I had her name or the details of the others involved, then just maybe I could figure out what really happened. It had to be in the case file. I went to the Los Angeles County Hall of Records to look for it, but when the archivist took the decades-old microfilm out of its box, it fell apart. This mystery woman was now a ghost on decrepit microfilm.

Guerra and wife’s house in the suburban community of Moreno Valley. The couple bought the home after immigrating to the U.S. and raised three children there.

Kat Kaye for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Kat Kaye for NPR

Guerra and wife’s house in the suburban community of Moreno Valley. The couple bought the home after immigrating to the U.S. and raised three children there.

Kat Kaye for NPR

Return to the Philippines

Lolo was caught, tried by a jury and found guilty of second-degree murder. He was sentenced to five years to life at San Quentin State Prison.

He was out in seven years. Dad said Lolo talked about marking his cell with chalk every year he spent there. When he was released, he took his hand, swiped the chalk marks off the wall and cried aloud, “Goodbye!”

It’s unclear why Lolo was released from prison so early, but a handwritten note in his prison records offers a clue. It appears to read, “repat Paroled 5/5/39.”

“Repat” is a likely reference to the government’s efforts to repatriate Filipinos under a 1935 law signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to anger among white workers about Filipino men taking U.S. jobs. The measure came a year after the Tydings-McDuffie Act — a law that set the Philippines on the path to independence but that also reclassified Filipinos already in the U.S. as “aliens.” Taken together, the two laws were blamed for separating Filipino families, given that Tydings-McDuffie capped Filipino immigration at 50 people per year, making it near impossible for anyone who was repatriated to return.

As Lolo was heading back to the Philippines in 1939, World War II was raging in Europe. In the Pacific, Japanese forces had taken over several Chinese cities. The U.S. was on guard — its interests in the Philippines could be next.

Lolo’s niece, my Tita Letty Francisco, remembers that the war may be the reason for Lolo’s parole. Back then, it was common for prisoners to be recruited to fight the Japanese.

In 1941, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Within hours, it invaded the Philippines. Lolo became a second lieutenant in the guerrilla army fighting the Japanese alongside U.S. forces. He even got a new nickname. Instead of Vicente Guerra, they called him Vicente Bakal.

Vicente Guerra is pictured during his time as a second lieutenant in the guerilla force fighting the Japanese in World War II.

Courtesy of Denise Guerra


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of Denise Guerra

Vicente Guerra is pictured during his time as a second lieutenant in the guerilla force fighting the Japanese in World War II.

Courtesy of Denise Guerra

“Bakal is iron,” said Tita Letty. She said he could be loving toward his family, but when it came to war, Lolo showed no remorse for killing the Japanese. She remembers Lolo’s fury after the Japanese bombed the home he shared with the woman he ended up marrying in the Philippines, Lola Isabel. He’d even brag about how many lives he took, she said.

But according to Dad, there was at least one death that troubled Lolo.

It was the time he was tasked with killing a Filipina who had been accused of working as an informant for the Japanese. She was labeled a “Makapili,” the name Filipinos gave those who aided the Japanese.

During the war, the Japanese would take informants, place bags over their heads, cut two holes for their eyes and ask them to identify Filipinos. Once identified, the Japanese would shoot.

Lolo’s secret mission to kill this woman meant he couldn’t use a gun, because it would make noise, so he and others used a piece of wood.

” ‘ They keep hitting her and hitting her, and she won’t die,’ ” Dad remembered Lolo telling him.

“So what they did, they just digged a hole. But when they put her there, she’s still alive. So they keep hitting her,” Dad said, his tone solemn like I imagine Lolo’s must have been when recounting the story.

After that, Lolo asked his boss to transfer him to another assignment. He couldn’t take it anymore.

When I think back on this story, it makes me angry. How could he have killed someone so brutally? Even if it was in the service of his country.

Dad takes me back to reality.

“This is war,” he said. “What did you expect?”

The enforcer

It was about five years after our car ride that Dad and I went to where the murder took place in downtown LA. The street corner looks like a restored loft with some shops. It’s loud, bustling. Traffic and construction noise fills the air. In one direction, I see homeless men. In another, a man on a dockless scooter riding by.

It’s here, almost a century ago, that Lolo’s life in America took a turn.

Dad’s silent, taking it all in. My thoughts are elsewhere, and I wonder how Lolo’s environment shaped his actions. Did life in America encourage the worst in him? Turn him more angry? More violent? What if he had never come to the U.S.? Would he have avoided all the bloodshed? Or was it all inevitable?

I think about another influence in Lolo’s life, Ted Lewin. He was an American who built one of the biggest gaming operations in Manila. In a 1959 profile, Time magazine described Lewin, saying he had “a taste for dark shirts, penthouses, air-conditioned Cadillacs and shadowy wheelings and dealings. In and out of Manila, in the past two decades, he has turned many a fast peso.”

Lolo worked for Lewin as an enforcer.

“When they see something or they found out something in the casino that you are cheating, they would beat the hell out of them,” said Dad.

Dad said Lolo would tell him stories about taking a hammer and smashing each finger of a cheater’s hand.

Lolo became a top boss for Lewin. He was feared and respected. When Lewin was forced out of the trade by the Philippine government, Lolo took his experience and used it to establish his own businesses.

He had a fleet of taxis and operated distilleries. Ever the hustler, he at one point took a job at customs, where he accepted bribes for letting folks smuggle goods into the islands.

This allowed him to give his kids the opportunity to attend college in the Philippines, drive nice cars and establish political and business connections.

Dad used that to build his own business selling electronics in the Philippines. It did well at first but then fell into bankruptcy. He looked at America and saw a second chance. And thanks in part to Lolo’s war service, Dad was eventually able to gain citizenship.

He’s retired now, after 40 years in manufacturing. He and my mom worked all the time, and because of that, my family enjoyed full bellies and college educations. The quintessential American Dream.

My family, my country

I asked Dad why his life in America was so different from Lolo’s. He said it’s because each generation will be better off than the one before it.

“Remember during [his] time, they are all illiterate. They didn’t go to high school,” Dad said.

“You go to another country, especially an industrialized country like America, most of them turned out to be drivers, busboys or work as a maid because they don’t have schooling.”

Dad never went back to the Philippines, even for Lolo’s funeral.

“Even when I die, I already bought our family plot, because most people when they die, they go home, but this is my home, so I will just stay here,” Dad said.

“My parents are already dead. My only brother is dead. So there’s no more thing for me to go to the Philippines.”

Guerra says a prayer in the chapel he constructed in his garage. He has never returned to the Philippines since coming to America in the 1980s. “My parents are already dead. My only brother is dead. So there’s no more thing for me to go to the Philippines,” he said.

Kat Kaye for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Kat Kaye for NPR

Guerra says a prayer in the chapel he constructed in his garage. He has never returned to the Philippines since coming to America in the 1980s. “My parents are already dead. My only brother is dead. So there’s no more thing for me to go to the Philippines,” he said.

Kat Kaye for NPR

When I think about Lolo’s history in America — the murder, the war, his thuggery — my biggest question is still whether he was a monster. Or would he have made different choices if America had been kinder? If you exist in a land where you’re constantly seen as a villain, do you inevitably become one?

Despite Lolo’s violence, Dad believes he was a good father, a good friend. Tita Letty remembers him as kind.

I’m not so sure. But the blood he shed is part of my family’s story. It’s part of America’s.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/08/18/749810572/my-grandfather-a-killer

Media captionMichael Gove was questioned about what had actually changed since the document was produced

A leaked cross-government study warning of the impact of a no-deal Brexit outlines a “worst-case scenario”, cabinet minister Michael Gove has said.

Details from the dossier warn of food and medicine shortages if the UK leaves the EU without a deal.

Mr Gove, who is responsible for no-deal preparation, said the document was old and Brexit planning had accelerated since Boris Johnson became PM.

But he acknowledged no deal would bring disruption, or “bumps in the road”.

The leak comes as Mr Johnson is to meet European leaders later this week.

The prime minister will insist there must be a new Brexit deal when he holds talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron.

According to Operation Yellowhammer, the dossier leaked to the Sunday Times, the UK could face months of disruption at its ports after a no-deal Brexit.

And plans to avoid a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic are unlikely to prove sustainable, it adds.

The dossier says leaving the EU without a deal could lead to:

  • Fresh food becoming less available and prices rising
  • A hard Irish border after plans to avoid checks fail, sparking protests
  • Fuel becoming less available and 2,000 jobs being lost if the government sets petrol import tariffs to 0%, potentially causing two oil refineries to close
  • UK patients having to wait longer for medicines, including insulin and flu vaccines
  • A rise in public disorder and community tensions resulting from a shortage of food and drugs
  • Passengers being delayed at EU airports, Eurotunnel and Dover
  • Freight disruption at ports lasting up to three months, caused by customs checks, before traffic flow improves to 50-70% of the current rate

Image copyright
AFP/Getty Images

Image caption

The dossier warns of disruption at ports, along with food, fuel and medicine shortages

A No 10 source told the BBC the dossier had been leaked by a former minister in an attempt to influence discussions with EU leaders.

They added that the document “is from when ministers were blocking what needed to be done to get ready to leave and the funds were not available”.

Responding to the leak, Mr Gove said some of the concerns about a no-deal Brexit had been “exaggerated”.

He said: “It’s certainly the case that there will be bumps in the road, some element of disruption in the event of no-deal.

“But the document that has appeared in the Sunday Times was an attempt, in the past, to work out what the very, very worst situation would be so that we could take steps to mitigate that.

“And we have taken steps.”

Mr Gove also claimed some MPs were “frustrating” the government’s chances of securing a new deal with the EU.

He said: “Sadly, there are some in the House of Commons who think they can try to prevent us leaving on October 31st. And as long as they continue to try to make that argument, then that actually gives some heart to some in the European Union that we won’t leave on October 31st.

“The sooner that everyone recognises that we will leave on that day, the quicker we can move towards a good deal in everyone’s interests.”

Business minister Kwasi Kwarteng told Sky News’ Sophy Ridge on Sunday: “I think there’s a lot of scaremongering around and a lot of people are playing into project fear.”

‘Completely insane’

But a former head of the civil service, Lord Kerslake – who described the document as “credible” – said the dossier “lays bare the scale of the risks we are facing with a no-deal Brexit in almost every area”.

“These risks are completely insane for this country to be taking and we have to explore every avenue to avoid them,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Broadcasting House.

Irish Deputy Prime Minister Simon Coveney said, in a tweet, that Dublin had “always been clear” a hard border in Ireland “must be avoided”.

The Irish backstop – the provision in former prime minister Theresa May’s withdrawal agreement that could see Northern Ireland continue to follow some of the same trade rules as the Republic of Ireland and the rest of the EU, thus preventing a hard border – was an “insurance policy” designed to protect the peace process, he said.

Michelle O’Neill, Sinn Fein’s deputy leader, accused Mr Johnson of treating the Northern Ireland peace process as a “commodity” in Brexit negotiations.

She said Ireland as a whole had been voicing concerns about a no-deal Brexit for months.

The SNP’s Stephen Gethins said the documents lay bare the “sheer havoc Scotland and the UK are hurtling towards”.

Liberal Democrat MP Tom Brake said they showed the effects of a no-deal Brexit should be taken more seriously.

“The government has simply, I think, pretended that this wasn’t an issue,” he said

Ministers were in “a real pickle” since the “the US has said that if that border is jeopardised, we’re not going to get a trade deal with them”, he added.

Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi said on Wednesday that a US-UK trade deal would not get through Congress if Brexit undermined the Good Friday Agreement.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Boris Johnson will this week visit EU leaders

The leak comes as the prime minister prepares to travel to Berlin to meet German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Wednesday, before going to Paris to see French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday.

Mr Johnson is expected to say Parliament cannot and will not change the outcome of the 2016 EU referendum and will insist there must be a new deal to replace Mrs May’s withdrawal agreement – defeated three times by MPs – if the UK is to leave the EU with a deal.

However, it is thought their discussions will chiefly focus on issues such as foreign policy, security, trade and the environment, ahead of the G7 summit next weekend.

Meanwhile, a cross-party group of more than 100 MPs has urged the prime minister to recall Parliament and let it sit permanently until the UK leaves the EU.

In a letter, MPs say the country is “on the brink of an economic crisis”.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn also reiterated his call for MPs to work together to stop a no-deal Brexit.

Elsewhere, anti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller said the government had “unequivocally” accepted it could not shut down Parliament to clear the way for a no-deal Brexit.

She told Sky’s Sophy Ridge On Sunday: “What they have said is, unequivocally, they accept that to close down Parliament, to bypass them in terms of Brexit – stopping a no-deal Brexit, in particular – is illegal.”

Ms Miller said she would continue to seek further reassurances that MPs would be able to pass legislation to stop a no-deal Brexit.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Anti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller said the government had accepted it could not shut down Parliament to clear the way for a no-deal Brexit

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49388402

The mayor of Portland, Ore., said Saturday night that his city had avoided the “worst-case scenario” after members of far-right groups and far-left members of Antifa held dueling demonstrations in the center of the city that lasted for hours on end.

“Given the continuing movement and the number of people involved, I am grateful that this was a largely peaceful event,” Mayor Ted Wheeler told reporters. “Police did an exemplary job of de-escalating the situation, keeping the extremists on both sides separate for the most part, and of limiting interactions between individuals.”

TRUMP THREATENS TO DESIGNATE ANTIFA A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION AHEAD OF EXPECTED PORTLAND CLASHES

At least 13 people were arrested. Police Chief Danielle Outlaw said at a press conference that possible charges against those arrested include disorderly conduct, interfering with police, resisting arrest, possession of a weapon in a park and unlawful use of a weapon.

Earlier in the day, police tweeted images of weapons it had seized from multiple groups, including bear spray, shields and metal and wooden poles.

“At this time, we know of six force-events involving officers,” Outlaw said. “There was one instance where an officer deployed pepper balls. The other instances involved take-downs or control against resistance.”

Six people suffered minor injuries and one of them was taken to a local hospital. Another individual was treated for a medical condition unrelated to the demonstrations, police spokeswoman Lt. Tina Jones said.

Flag-waving members of the Proud Boys and Three Percenters militia group began gathering late in the morning, some wearing body armor and helmets. Meanwhile, black-clad, helmet and mask-wearing Antifa members were also among the several hundred people on the streets. The groups gathered on both sides of the Willamette River, which runs through the city.

Authorities used sound trucks and loudspeakers to remind demonstrators of both sides to stay out of the streets or they would be arrested. They also set up concrete barriers and closed streets and bridges in an effort to contain and separate the rival groups.

Roughly 700 law enforcement officials from local, state and federal agencies, including the FBI, were in the city for the right-wing rally, which was expected to draw people from across the country. Portland Police said all of the city’s 1,000 officers would be on duty for the gathering that was hyped on social media and elsewhere for weeks.

Not all who gathered Saturday were with right-wing groups or Antifa. Also on hand were people dressed in colorful outfits and those who attended a nearby prayer service, holding signs that had slogans such as “No Trump, No NRA.”

Police formed a physical barricade beneath the Morrison Bridge in Tom McCall Waterfront Park to separate the rival groups from sparring. The Proud Boys and their supporters were on the south side of the divide while the counter-protesters remained on the north side, according to reports by The Oregonian.

TRUMP THREATENS TO DESIGNATE ANTIFA A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION AHEAD OF EXPECTED PORTLAND CLASHES

FOX 12 Oregon and The Oregonian newspaper reported that some of the demonstrators began to leave in the early afternoon, with authorities briefly re-opening the Hawthorne Bridge to allow them to pass. Police used officers on bikes and in riot gear to prevent members of Antifa from following them. The Oregonian reported that a group of left-wing demonstrators attacked a bus carrying a group of Proud Boys out of downtown Portland, breaking some windows.

“The Proud Boys contacted us or contacted the units on the ground saying that they wanted to leave and so we facilitated for them to leave the area,” Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office Sgt. Brandon White told the newspaper. “It wasn’t planned. It wasn’t orchestrated. We had a request that they would like to leave the area and so we facilitated.”

But hundreds of people remained downtown and on nearby streets, and there were skirmishes throughout the day. At around 4:15 p.m., police declared a gathering of mostly left-wing protesters near Pioneer Courthouse Square a “civil disturbance” and told people to leave.

Later in the afternoon, The Oregonian also reported that a group of left-wing counter-demonstrators had surrounded two people wearing American flag-themed clothing and were “taunting, threatening, and chasing them.”

Among those attending the demonstration was Patriot Prayer’s Joey Gibson, who organized similar rallies in 2017 and 2018 that erupted in clashes. Gibson surrendered Friday on an arrest warrant for felony rioting but was released on bail hours later.

“I’m just here for the ride,” Gibson told The Oregonian.

Organizer Joe Biggs told the paper that the demonstrators “wanted national attention and we got it.”

“Go look at President Trump’s Twitter,” Biggs said. “He talked about Portland, said he’s watching Antifa. That’s all we wanted … Mission success.”

President Trump tweeted Saturday morning that he is considering designating Antifa a domestic terror group.

“Major consideration is being given to naming ANTIFA an ‘ORGANIZATION OF TERROR,’” Trump said. “Portland is being watched very closely. Hopefully the Mayor will be able to properly do his job!”

Late Saturday, the Proud Boys issued a statement vowing to return to Portland every month until Wheeler “takes charge and removes the scourge of violent domestic terrorists from his city,” referring to Antifa.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Wheeler responded Saturday night by imploring Biggs to think about the millions of dollars in taxpayer money used to police and provide security for demonstrations. The mayor also said that Biggs’ rhetoric was stoking an “environment of fear nationally.”

“We do not want him here in my city. Period,” Wheeler said.

Wheeler’s message was similar to his warning to protesters on both sides prior to the demonstrations.

“We don’t want your hatred, we don’t want your violence, but if you come here, we’re going to be prepared,” he said in an interview on Fox News’ “Outnumbered Overtime” on Friday.

“Again, when it comes to enforcement of our community standards, we support people’s rights to demonstrate, but we don’t care about who you are or your politics are,” he said. “If you engage in violence in this city, you will be held accountable.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-protests-civil-disturbance-antifa-proud-boys-demonstrations-trump

A New York Times board member has issued a public apology for his ties to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

“I take full responsibility for my error in judgment. I am deeply sorry to the survivors, to the Media Lab, and to the MIT community for bringing such a person into our network,” Joi Ito said in a statement posted to the Media Lab website and titled “My apology regarding Jeffrey Epstein.”

Ito, who is the director of MIT’s prestigious Media Lab, invited Epstein there and visited several of his homes after meeting “through a trusted business friend” at a 2013 conference, Ito said.

“In all of my interactions with Epstein, I was never involved in, never heard him talk about, and never saw any evidence of the horrific acts that he was accused of,” wrote, who has been a New York Times board member since 2012.

Ito’s connections to Epstein surfaced in early July on the online personal calendar of renowned Harvard genealogist George Church showing Ito and Epstein dined with two others in Cambridge on Nov. 30.

In 2012, the “Epstein Interests” foundation donated $50,000 to MIT, campus newspaper The Tech reported.

Ito admitted having knowledge of the MIT gifts and said Epstein invested in his tech startups.

In the apology letter, posted Thursday, Ito said he would raise money equivalent to Epstein’s Media Lab donations for trafficking survivors. He also pledged to return Epstein’s tech investments.

Church also apologized earlier this month for “poor awareness and judgment” regarding Epstein, he told health news site STAT.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/08/17/new-york-times-board-member-apologizes-for-jeffrey-epstein-ties/

BRITAIN will face fuel, food and medicine shortages if it leaves the EU without a Brexit transition deal, leaked documents claim.

The worrying forecasts – compiled by the Cabinet Office –  reportedly set out the most likely aftershocks of a no-deal Brexit rather than the worst case scenarios.

The leaked papers warn of chaos at customs terminalsCredit: PA:Press Association

They said up to 85 per cent of lorries using the main channel crossings “may not be ready” for French customs, meaning disruption at ports would potentially last up to three months.

The government also believes a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic will be likely as current plans to avoid widespread checks will prove unsustainable, the Sunday Times said.

“Compiled this month by the Cabinet Office under the codename Operation Yellowhammer, the dossier offers a rare glimpse into the covert planning being carried out by the government to avert a catastrophic collapse in the nation’s infrastructure,” the paper exclusively reported.

“The file, marked ‘official-sensitive’ requiring security clearance on a ‘need to know’ basis is remarkable because it gives the most comprehensive assessment of the UKs readiness for a no-deal Brexit.”

Boris Johnson has repeatedly vowed to leave the bloc on Oct. 31 without a deal if neededCredit: AFP or licensors

The UK is heading towards a showdown with the EU as Boris Johnson has repeatedly vowed to leave the bloc on Oct. 31 without a deal unless it agrees to renegotiate the Brexit divorce.

After more than three years of Brexit dominating EU affairs, the bloc has repeatedly refused to reopen the Withdrawal Agreement which includes an Irish border insurance policy that Johnson’s predecessor, Theresa May, agreed in November.

Johnson will this week tell French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel that parliament cannot stop Brexit and a new deal must be agreed if Britain is to avoid leaving the EU without one.

The PM is coming under pressure from politicians across the political spectrum to prevent a disorderly departure, with opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn vowing this week to bring down Johnson’s government in early September to delay Brexit.

It is, however, unclear if lawmakers have the unity or power to use the British parliament to prevent a no-deal departure – likely to be the United Kingdom’s most significant move since WWII.

Opponents of no deal say it would be a disaster for what was once one of the West’s most stable democracies.

A disorderly divorce, they say, would hurt global growth, send shockwaves through financial markets and weaken London’s claim to be the worlds top financial centre.

Brexit supporters say there may be short-term disruption from a no-deal exit but that the economy will thrive if cut free from what they cast as a doomed experiment in integration.

Source Article from https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9745142/cabinets-leaked-no-deal-brexit-plan/

CLOSE

KABUL, Afghanistan – A suicide-bomb blast ripped through a wedding party on a busy Saturday night in Afghanistan’s capital and dozens of people were killed or wounded, a government official said. More than 1,000 people had been invited, one witness said, as fears grew that it could be the deadliest attack in Kabul this year.

Interior Ministry spokesman Nusrat Rahimi told The Associated Press the attacker set off explosives among the wedding participants. Both the Taliban and a local affiliate of the Islamic State group carry out bloody attacks in the capital.

The blast occurred near the stage where musicians were and “all the youths, children and all the people who were there were killed,” witness Gul Mohammad said. One of the wounded, Mohammad Toofan, said that “a lot of guests were martyred.”

Officials were not expected to release a toll until daytime Sunday.

“There are so many dead and wounded,” said Ahmad Omid, a survivor who said about 1,200 guests had been invited to the wedding for his father’s cousin. “I was with the groom in the other room when we heard the blast and then I couldn’t find anyone. Everyone was lying all around the hall.”

Outside a local hospital, families wailed. Others were covered in blood.

The blast at the Dubai City wedding hall in western Kabul, a part of the city that many in the minority Shiite Hazara community call home, shattered a period of relative calm. On Aug. 7, a Taliban car bomb aimed at Afghan security forces detonated on the same road, killing 14 people and wounding 145 – most of them women, children and other civilians.

Kabul’s huge, brightly lit wedding halls are centers of community life in a city weary of decades of war, with thousands of dollars spent on a single evening.

“Devastated by the news of a suicide attack inside a wedding hall in Kabul. A heinous crime against our people; how is it possible to train a human and ask him to go and blow himself (up) inside a wedding?!!” Sediq Seddiqi, spokesman for President Ashraf Ghani, said in a Twitter post.

The wedding halls also serve as meeting places, and in November at least 55 people were killed when a suicide bomber sneaked into a Kabul wedding hall where hundreds of Muslim religious scholars and clerics had gathered to mark the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad. The Taliban denied involvement in an attack that bore the hallmarks of the Islamic State affiliate.

Saturday night’s explosion came a few days after the end of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, with Kabul residents visiting family and friends, and just before Afghanistan marks its 100th independence day on Monday under heavier security in a city long familiar with checkpoints and razor wire.

The blast comes at a greatly uncertain time in Afghanistan as the United States and the Taliban near a deal to end a nearly 18-year war, America’s longest conflict.

The Afghan government has been sidelined from those discussions, and presidential spokesman Seddiqi said earlier Saturday that his government was waiting to hear results of President Donald Trump’s meeting Friday with his national security team about the negotiations. Top issues include a U.S. troop withdrawal and Taliban guarantees not to let Afghanistan become a launching pad for global terror attacks.

While the Taliban earlier this year pledged to do more to protect civilians, it continues to stage deadly attacks against Afghan security forces and others in what is seen by many as an attempt to strengthen its position at the negotiating table.

The conflict continues to take a horrific toll on civilians. Last year more than 3,800, including more than 900 children, were killed in Afghanistan by the Taliban, U.S. and allied forces, the Islamic State affiliate and other actors, the United Nations said.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/08/17/afghanistan-explosion-wedding-hall/2043696001/

It’s taken for granted that whatever trite thing Beto O’Rourke says will be described by the Washington Post as “emotional.” But with that aside, it’s time he reckon with the fact that Democratic voters are just not that into him.

He can think of it like a breakup, but rather than with a romantic partner, it’s with his hopes for the party’s presidential nomination.

The failed U.S. Senate candidate and former Texas representative on Thursday attempted to once again reset his bid for the White House by shutting down pleas for him to instead run for a different public office and by insisting that he will now run a different kind of campaign.

Now he’ll do what no Democrat has done before: He’ll criticize President Trump!

The Washington Post’s Jenna Johnson, naturally, called O’Rourke’s reset an “emotional 30-minute speech” wherein the candidate said he would go “where Donald Trump has been terrorizing and terrifying and demeaning our fellow Americans.”

So he’ll continue his lackluster campaign that stands for nothing other than its opposition to Trump. Maybe someone should tell O’Rourke that there’s already a movement in place for that. It’s called “the resistance” and it started long before the national press started comparing him to a Kennedy (incidentally, not the drunk-driving one) and convincing him that he was special.

Here’s one of those memorable and “emotional” lines from O’Rourke’s reset speech: While putting to rest rumors he might abandon his current campaign to instead run for Senate, he said, “that would not be good enough for this community, that would not be good enough for El Paso, that would not be good enough for this country.”

Because what El Paso and the country apparently need is O’Rourke running for president, sitting at less than 3% in national polls.

The whole production really is like when a woman hasn’t quite figured out that she’s been a girlfriend of convenience. Her friends on the outside watch as she makes an endless series of excuses for why she truly believes she can make the relationship work, even as everyone else knows that it’s just not going to happen because the other party involved isn’t interested.

It’s time for O’Rourke to give it up. Democratic voters just aren’t that into him.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beto-orourke-should-face-it-dem-voters-are-just-not-that-into-him

President Trump issued a stark warning to antifa, the collective of militant anti-fascist leftist groups, ahead of a rally on Saturday in Portland, Oregon, where antifa activists were widely expected to confront far-right activists.

“Major consideration is being given to naming ANTIFA an ‘ORGANIZATION OF TERROR,’” Trump tweeted. “Portland is being watched very closely. Hopefully the Mayor will be able to properly do his job!”

Notably, the president did not warn or criticize the controversial right-wing group organizing the rally that antifa was planning to protest against. Organizers Joe Biggs and Enrique Tarrio, who did not receive a permit for the rally, are members of the Proud Boys, a group of self-proclaimed “Western chauvinists” with links to the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville in 2017 and a history of violence against left-wing activists. The Southern Poverty Law Center has designated them as a hate group.

Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler told The Oregonian he believed members of the alt-right like Biggs and Tarrio come to Portland hoping to foment violence, well aware that it is home to a large antifa contingent, Rose City Antifa. “I think they come to Portland because it gives them a platform,” Wheeler said. “They know that if they come here conflict is almost guaranteed.”

Of Trump’s tweet, Wheeler said, “Frankly, it is not helpful.”

Trump’s disinterest in criticizing the Proud Boys is part of a longer trend in which he’s remained completely silent or, at most, has been mildly critical of the threat posed by white nationalist and white supremacist organizations, many of whom view his presidency as a boon for their cause and whose language echoes that of the president.

Trump often undercuts his criticism of hate with statements that run counter to the point he seems to be making, and with political talking points. As Vox’s Aaron Rupar writes, following a mass shooting that killed 11 people at a Pittsburgh synagogue, “Trump responded by reading a speech in which he denounced the ‘evil anti-Semitic attack.’ But during unscripted comments later that same day, he lamented that there wasn’t an armed guard inside the synagogue.”

And following the recent shooting in El Paso — in which the shooter left writings that made it clear he hoped to target members of the Latinx community — Trump said “one voice, our nation must condemn racism, bigotry, and white supremacy,” but also blamed mental illness and video games for the violence.

The president also, infamously, responded to the death of Heather Heyer amid the violence in Charlottesville by saying there were “very fine people on both sides” of a protest that included neo-Nazis and members of the Ku Klux Klan.

Trump has been repeatedly critical of antifa, however, and has threatened to label the association a terrorist organization in the past. GOP lawmakers have already made symbolic gestures to the same effect: In July, Republican Sens. Ted Cruz (TX) and Bill Cassidy (LA) introduced a nonbinding resolution that would label antifa activists as terrorists.

“Antifa are terrorists, violent masked bullies who ‘fight fascism’ with actual fascism, protected by Liberal privilege,” Cassidy said in a statement. “Bullies get their way until someone says no. Elected officials must have courage, not cowardice, to prevent terror.”

Part of what would make Cassidy and Cruz’s effort difficult (beyond the fact that antifa has not yet committed any terror acts) is that antifa is not a centrally organized organization. Its members mostly participate in actions anonymously, making it difficult to pin down a clearly stated ideology or code of ethics toward violence.

“The group of typically black-clad activists are radicals who believe the best way to deal with the rise of white supremacy and hate groups in the Trump era is by confronting them on the street,” Vox’s Zack Beauchamp has explained. “Sometimes, this means organizing demonstrations against them; other times, it means brawling in the streets.”

Portland has seen a striking number of brawls between antifa and far-right groups in recent years. The Proud Boys themselves have a known record of violence against their political adversaries. Two members of Proud Boys are currently on trial in New York, and are charged with, among other things, attempted gang assault.

In anticipation of a stand off between antifa and the members of the alt-right who gathered in the city Saturday, Mayor Wheeler and Portland Police Chief Danielle Outlaw ordered that no police officers would have the day off, and more than two dozen other agencies, including the FBI, were involved in preparation. Fortunately, despite some altercations, the protests remained largely peaceful; and the bulk of the alt-right demonstrators were escorted out of the area police had cordoned off for them following a brief event.

Both antifa and alt-right representatives called the event a success; Trump, however, did not tweet what he took away from his close watch of the situation.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/17/20810221/portland-rally-donald-trump-alt-right-proud-boys-antifa-terror-organization

The reaction to President Trump’s sudden interest in buying Greenland from Denmark has been mostly one of derision. And Denmark, which owns the territory, appears to oppose any sale.

But don’t laugh — an American purchase of Greenland could represent an extraordinary deal in terms of America’s national security, economic interests, and environmental protection.

As much as it might seem out of the blue, U.S. acquisition of Greenland is not at all a strange or irrational idea. Following Denmark’s fall to Nazi Germany in 1940, American forces defended Greenland. The roots of American-Greenland comradeship are thus old and formal. In 1946, one Harry S. Truman even attempted to purchase Greenland for $100 million. Was Truman crazy? On the contrary, he was the president who ended a global war and set America on its ultimate course to defeat the Soviet Union.

As for the contemporary utility of purchasing Greenland, it has extraordinary strategic value. Through the U.S. Air Force base already present at Thule, Greenland offers critical intelligence capabilities to conduct satellite operations and to detect possible over-the-North-Pole nuclear missile launches from China or Russia. Thule better allows the U.S. to warn its citizens of an imminent attack.

And it does more than that. Thanks to Thule’s deep water port and long runway, the base provides a logistics hub for operations in the Arctic. And it gives the U.S. military the means to deter and defeat prospective aggression. Russia, in particular, has been working to secure territorial control over resource-rich areas of the Arctic. America’s presence in Greenland is increasingly relevant for that reason.

The purchase of Greenland would further strengthen these existing national security benefits. Unbound from political sensitivities in Denmark, for example, the U.S. could station missile forces in Greenland, including intermediate range missile forces. Russia’s Arctic ambitions would have to be put on ice.

Greenland also abounds with resources. An already energy independent U.S. would have unfettered access to a land rich not only in hydrocarbons but also in rare earth metals that are currently only available from an adversary, China. Greenland also controls flourishing fishing waters.

But this isn’t just about American interests. Greenland’s small population also has everything to gain from a massive influx of American investment. The surge in tourism alone would surely offer a vast untapped potential.

And Greenland offers many grand opportunities for environmental protection. Its waters are home to numerous species of Whale, its lands to numerous species of flower and animals, and its skies to numerous species of birds. Greenland offers the potential for vast new designated wildlife reserves, and it would give American scientists the chance to study the Arctic environment from a unique vantage point.

As odd as it might sound at first blush — and America’s purchase of Alaska also seemed very odd at the time — Americans of all political stripes would benefit from Greenland and its 56,000 inhabitants joining our national family.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/buying-greenland-isnt-a-good-idea-its-a-great-idea

Ray Fisher, a spokesman for Shell, said in an email to The Times that workers who didn’t show up for the speech would still have gotten paid for their workweek, but not as much as those who scanned in and stayed on site all day.

The day “was treated as a training (work) day with a guest speaker who happened to be the president,” Mr. Fisher said in the email.

“We do these several times a year with various speakers,” he said, adding that there was a morning session before the speech that started at 7 a.m. and lasted for three hours. It “included safety training and other work-related activities,” Mr. Fisher said.

“It was understood some would choose not to attend the Presidential visit and were given the option to take paid time off” instead, he wrote. “As with any workweek, if someone chooses to take PTO,” he said, referring to paid time off, “they are not eligible to receive the maximum overtime available.”

According to The Post-Gazette, workers were told that “anything viewed as resistance” to Mr. Trump would not be tolerated at the event, which, the workers were told, was intended to foster “good will” with the building trade unions.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/17/us/politics/trump-shell-workers.html

A tourist gives her luggage to security guards as she tries to enter the departures gate during another demonstration by pro-democracy protesters at Hong Kong International Airport on Tuesday.

Philip Fong/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Philip Fong/AFP/Getty Images

A tourist gives her luggage to security guards as she tries to enter the departures gate during another demonstration by pro-democracy protesters at Hong Kong International Airport on Tuesday.

Philip Fong/AFP/Getty Images

It may be strange for tourists to land in Hong Kong to find throngs of impassioned protesters. They might wonder: What do they expect me to do about the Chinese government?

Tourists come from all over the world to see the elegantly industrious city-state.

“It is like a cauldron,” Jan Morris wrote in her book Hong Kong, “seething, hissing, hooting, arguing, enmeshed in a labyrinth of tunnels and overpasses, with those skyscrapers erupting everywhere into view, with those ferries churning and hovercraft splashing and great jets flying in.”

But there are also visitors coming to Hong Kong from China’s mainland. They are citizens of a country in which they have no political freedom and little uncensored information, and live under threat of imprisonment if they dissent.

They come from the country the Hong Kong protesters don’t want to be their future; even as they know each day brings them closer to 2047, when Hong Kong is to be absorbed into the whole of China.

President Trump is vocal when he decries China’s trade policies. “China was killing us with unfair trade deals,” he said again this month.

But he has not raised his voice against China’s human rights crimes, including the mass detention of Chinese Uighurs in reeducation camps or the widespread imprisonment of political dissidents.

To be sure, even those U.S. and world leaders who criticize China about human rights have been reluctant to risk losing any of the lucrative trade with the country. Their moral indignation has mostly stayed rhetorical.

But when Trump was asked about the protests in Hong Kong this week, he once more praised Chinese President Xi Jinping as “a very great leader” and called for a “happy and enlightened ending to the Hong Kong problem” — which seems to say protesters are “the problem” — not China’s increasingly steely rule of a place to which it had promised autonomy for 50 years.

I think a reason protesters descended on Hong Kong’s vast international airport was to appeal personally to people from all over the world. Their protest might have inconvenienced tourists. But it might also pierce their conscience and make them consider if China’s vast wealth can buy the silence of the world.

The protesters have made a song from Les Misérables, a Western musical, their anthem as they sing, “Who will be strong and stand with me?”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/08/17/751902944/opinion-hong-kong-protesters-might-bother-tourists-or-pierce-their-conscience

American consumers are increasingly propping up the global economy, an enduring source of strength that is helping keep the United States out of recession and drawing a sharp contrast with the rest of the world.

But as a number of signs point to a possible downturn in the United States, economists are growing more skeptical that consumers will continue to open up their wallets as freely. A failure to do so could hasten the arrival of the first U.S. recession in a decade.

Low unemployment, rising wages and easy credit have given consumers the confidence and ability to spend in recent months. That has proved crucial as spending by U.S. businesses has declined, U.S. manufacturing has fallen into a funk, and the economies of many other large countries, including Germany, have begun to shrink.

The strength of the consumer has convinced many business leaders that the U.S. economy won’t go into recession anytime soon, and it is the basis for optimism at the White House that it will remain strong into the 2020 election.

“Probably above all else, the consumer is doing in­cred­ibly,” President Trump said Thursday.

Yet a number of developments could shift this view.

The U.S. stock market, which saw its largest one-day decline of the year Wednesday, has proved highly volatile as Trump’s trade war with China has escalated. Bond markets, which have a strong track record of predicting recessions, are flashing warning signs. And the trade war itself, which for the most part hasn’t hit consumers directly, will begin to do so more forcefully in the fall as tariffs rise on consumer staples including some food and clothing products.

“The consumer is playing Atlas, shouldering the economy,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist at the accounting firm Grant Thornton. “But there’s an underlying fragility here. Businesses have already been scared into pulling back, and now consumers are also walking on eggshells.”

No single bit of negative news is likely to dramatically change the outlook of consumers, whose spending drives about 70 percent of the U.S. economy. But collectively — and combined with other financial anxieties — they could prompt a cycle of fear that leads consumers to pull back. That’s especially true for the tens of millions of Americans who have painful memories of the Great Recession, which lasted from December 2007 through June 2009.

One of the most reliable warning signs arrived Friday, when the University of Michigan’s consumer confidence index fell to a ­seven-month low, and the index measuring Americans’ outlook for the future dropped even further.

It was “the first indication that the U.S. consumer might not save the world economy after all,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist for Capital Economics, wrote in a note to clients.

Trump last week delayed a new 10 percent tariff on a large chunk of $300 billion worth of Chinese exports that had been scheduled to go into effect in September. Trump said he didn’t want to undermine the holiday shopping period, so he pushed about half the tariffs back to mid-December.

But economists warn that the tariffs that remain will have an outsize impact on consumers. Previous rounds of tariffs mainly affected industrial products and raw materials such as steel.

“The tariffs that are going into effect next month are not insignificant,” Swonk said. “We’re talking about a lot of basics that people buy at the grocery store — garlic, pine nuts, meats, dairy — that all come from China.”

Other challenges are also on the horizon. Historically, consumers have been spooked by a falling stock market and a decline in hiring. The job market has been red hot, but there are signs of a hiring slowdown. And growth in paychecks, which had been quite robust last year and early this year, is slowing as well.

Also, the boost from Trump’s tax cuts may be fading. The tax cut law passed at the end of 2017 added hundreds of dollars to many middle-class families’ take-home pay last year, according to the Tax Policy Center. But economists say the effects of the tax cut were strongest then, and the stimulus diminishes as Americans adjust to the new norm.

“The bottom line is the effects of the tax cut are fading,” said Torsten Slok, chief economist at Deutsche Bank Securities. “We’re getting more worried about the U.S. outlook.”

Consumer spending could also prove fragile since so much of it is reliant on debt. American households have again taken on large debt loads to fuel consumption, with consumer debt hitting $13.9 trillion in the spring, more than a trillion dollars above the prior peak, reached just before the 2008 financial crisis.

The cloud of uncertainty has some consumers questioning when they should start making changes, and to what degree. The possibility of another downturn has some shoppers starting to trim pricier items from their grocery lists or doubting future job prospects.

By most measures, Andrea Maxand says she feels financially secure. She has a good job, has paid off her credit card debt, and is making more money than she did a year ago.

But over the past few weeks, she has started pulling back in small ways. She has brought down her weekly grocery bill from $160 to $110, and is cutting down on “the frivolous things”: takeout, delivery, weekend trips to see her favorite bands.

“My situation right now is good,” said Maxand, who works as a paralegal in Seattle while studying for a graduate degree in history. “But I’m anxious. I’ve been watching the rumblings of the trade war. This week, when the stock market tumbled, I said, yup, it’s time to start budgeting.”

A growing sense of anxiety around a recession is enough to unsettle consumers, said Mark Cohen, director of retail studies at Columbia Business School.

People may grow concerned that they’ll lose their jobs, or that they won’t get the raises they expected. Businesses affected by the trade war will be “faced with a series of really suboptimal decisions,” Cohen said, that could include passing the cost of the tariffs on to consumers.

And if shoppers are hit with an uptick in prices — say $10 more at the grocery store checkout — people will start to scale back, particularly those who are struggling paycheck to paycheck, or nearly so.

“If it’s abrupt or somewhat precipitous, people will freak out in the consumer space, which happens to be everyone with a heartbeat,” Cohen said. “And what does that do? It dampens demand.”

Margaret Williford has one year left toward her master’s degree in public policy and will soon be on the job hunt. She plans to scout for openings at nonprofit organizations advocating for women who have been victims of violence, and has been thinking primarily about going to a large city that may come with pricier rent.

But Williford, like many of her fellow graduate students, is starting to wonder if she’ll be entering the workforce at the start of a recession. She worries that as others consider tightening their wallets, she’ll be entering a field dependent on charitable giving.

“Women don’t stop being abused just because there’s a recession,” Williford, 23, said. “If there’s a recession, there’s no giving, and nonprofits are not going to have money to do their work, let alone to hire new people.”

When she thinks about that word — “recession” — Williford says she thinks back to the Great Recession. She was in middle school then and watched as her mother, a teacher, lost her job because of budget cuts at her school, even though she ended up landing on her feet.

Williford considered taking out loans this year to “have some more wiggle room.” Instead she’s thinking about where to start saving.

“So many of my friends are graduating with debt and are going to be trying to find a job,” Williford said. “It’s just one thing on top of the other.”

Joshua Leve, founder and chief executive of the Association of Fitness Studios, said he’s not worried but staying alert to how the economy and the trade war could affect fitness studios and others, such as equipment manufacturers, who may be affected by tariffs.

“Right now everybody is just kind of keeping their ears perked to keep an understanding of how is this going to impact me?” Leve said.

How Americans feel about the economy is driven partly by their feelings about Trump. Republicans routinely say this is the best economy since the 1990s boom, but Democrats do not, a split that could become more pronounced as the trade war escalates.

Nearly 80 percent of Republicans rated the economy as “excellent” or “good,” according to a Pew survey conducted in mid-
July, before the latest stock market drop and trade flare-up, but only 33 percent of Democrats said the same.

But even among the president’s party, lower-income Americans do not view the situation as favorably.

“Only about half of Republicans with incomes of less than $30,000 rate economic conditions positively,” Pew said.

Andrew Van Dam contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/american-consumers-are-holding-up-the-global-economy-but-for-how-long/2019/08/17/9eb20740-c066-11e9-a5c6-1e74f7ec4a93_story.html