CLOSE
CLOSE

An ex-girlfriend and former classmates have spoken out about Connor Betts, the 24-year-old who killed nine people and wounded others in Dayton, Ohio.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – Hours after visiting with victims and first responders from the mass shooting in Dayton, Ohio, the White House said President Donald Trump was treated like a “rock star” and criticized several Ohio lawmakers for “mischaracterizing” the visit.

Dan Scavino, White House director of social media and assistant to the president, in several posts on Twitter criticized what he says were mischaracterizations” of Trump’s visit to Miami Valley Hospital in Dayton. Reporters were held in a holding room during Trump’s visit.

“Very SAD to see Ohio Senator Brown, & Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley – LYING & completely mischaracterizing what took place w/ the President’s visit to Miami Valley Hospital today,” Scavino wrote in a tweet. “They are disgraceful politicians, doing nothing but politicizing a mass shooting, at every turn they can.”

“The President was treated like a Rock Star inside the hospital, which was all caught on video,” he continued. “They all loved seeing their great President!”

Dayton mayor on Trump: ‘I think he heard me, but I don’t know if he’ll take action.’

Trump in his own tweet also criticized Brown and Whaley, saying that they are “misrepresenting what took place inside of the hospital.”

“Just left Dayton, Ohio, where I met with the Victims & families, Law Enforcement, Medical Staff & First Responders. It was a warm & wonderful visit. Tremendous enthusiasm & even Love,” Trump wrote on Twitter.

“Their news conference after I left for El Paso was a fraud,” Trump continued on the two lawmakers. “It bore no resemblance to what took place with those incredible people that I was so lucky to meet and spend time with. They were all amazing!”

The Cincinnati Enquirer, a member of the USA TODAY Network, was with Whaley when she found out about the tweets from an aide as she sat in a booth in a local restaurant talking to reporters, with a cup of coffee and soda in front of her to give her an energy boost.

“Where is it, I don’t see it,” Whaley said looking at her phone. “I’m confused. We said he was treated very well. I don’t know what he’s talking about misrepresenting.”

“Oh well. He lives in his world of Twitter,” she added.

CLOSE

Dayton mayor reacts to Trump’s tweet about her, Sen. Brown calling their news conference “a fraud.”
Meg Vogel, Cincinnati

In a follow-up Tweet, Scavino tweeted photos from the president’s visit, adding: “Some extremely powerful moments throughout the entire visit, with so much enthusiasm and love, contrary to what the Trump Hating Dems would ever share or say.”

However, the White House’s characterization seems to be at odds with what Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Whaley said of Trump’s visit. Both politicians accompanied Trump on his visit.

During a press conference after Trump’s visit to the hospital, the two officials said that they believe the victims and first responders appreciated the president’s visit.

“He was received well by the patients as you’d expect,” Brown said. “They’re hurting. He was comforting and he did the right things. Melania did the right things. It’s his job in part to comfort people.”

“I’m glad he did it in those hospital rooms,” Brown continued.

More: Protests, no-shows, and the Baby Trump balloon greet the president in two grief-stricken cities

“I think the victims and the first responders were grateful that the President of the United States came to Dayton,” Whaley said.

Brown also discussed his own meeting with Trump, saying that he called on Trump to ask Republicans to open a special session in the Senate so the chamber could vote on a gun background check bill that the House of Representatives passed earlier this year.

“He only said ‘we will get things done,'” Brown said. He added that he also called on Trump to not repeal the Affordable Care Act if the president cares about mental health. Throughout his tenure, Trump has tried to repeal the ACA.

Brown also said that during Trump’s visit with first responders, the president offered to give the police officers awards. Police responded to the shooter in less than 30 seconds. Nine people were killed and several others were injured.

However, Brown said he responded with: ‘Mr. President, respectfully … the most important thing you can do for these police officers is take assault weapons off the street so they don’t have to go up against those assault weapons.”

Whaley said that during a “pretty brief” meeting with Trump, she told him that “the people of Dayton are waiting for action from Washington, D.C.”

She also noted that she was grateful that the president did not go to the Oregon District of Dayton, where the shooting took place. Whaley ahead of Trump’s visit said that the president’s “rhetoric has been painful for many in our community.”

“A lot of the time his talk can be very divisive, and that’s the last thing we need in Dayton,” Whaley said Wednesday afternoon following the hospital visit.

Contributing: Scott Wartman, Cincinnati Enquirer 

Like what you’re reading?: Download the USA TODAY app for more

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/07/trumps-ohio-visit-dayton-mayor-nan-whaley-confused-president-tweets/1946291001/

Investigators have found two bodies in the search for teen fugitives suspected of killing three people in Canada, including a young American tourist.

NBC News reports that authorities believe the bodies are those of Cam McLeod, 19, and Bryer Schmegelsky, 18. The Manitoba division of the Royal Canadian Mountain Police announced the discovery Wednesday on Twitter, saying that the bodies were found near the shore of the Nelson River, less than five miles from a burned vehicle that launched a missing persons search that turned into a manhunt.

The pair is believed to be responsible for the July shooting deaths of North Carolina native Chynna Deese, 24; her Australian boyfriend, Lucas Fowler, 23; and university professor Leonard Dyck, 64. Last week, after a number of possible sightings that did not lead to the suspects’ capture, Canadian authorities reduced the scale of the manhunt.

But late last week, the RCMP found a damaged aluminum boat on the shore of the Nelson River, along with additional items connected to the suspect. RCMP then deployed a dive team to search the water.

Authorities have not yet released a possible motive for the killings. There is no known relationship between the suspects and the three victims.

For the latest true crime and justice news, subscribe to the ‘Crime Stories with Nancy Grace’ podcast.

Source Article from https://www.crimeonline.com/2019/08/07/breaking-teen-suspects-in-canada-killing-spree-believed-dead-after-bodies-found-near-shoreline/

WASHINGTON — It was intended to be a day for President Donald Trump to pay his respects to the victims of two deadly mass shootings, thank first responders and serve as consoler-in-chief.

But before he even left the White House on Wednesday for El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, the president used his bully pulpit to settle political scores and lash out against slights.

From his private residence Tuesday night, Trump mocked Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke, an El Paso native, for saying that the president’s “racism” was responsible for the mass shooting in Texas.

Then, after telling reporters on the South Lawn of the White House on Wednesday morning that he was trying to stay out of the political fray, he sought to link the Dayton shooter to Democratic presidential candidates Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts because of a tweet the shooter had posted that mentioned them, though it was unclear whether he supported them.

And while flying on Air Force One between meeting with victims in Dayton and El Paso, he accused Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley and Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, of misrepresenting his visit with victims at a Dayton hospital. “Their news conference after I left for El Paso was a fraud,” he tweeted. “It bore no resemblance to what took place with those incredible people that I was so lucky to meet and spend time with.”

Speaking to reporters after the president’s hospital visit, Brown said that the president had done “the right things” during his time there, adding that some had told him privately that they were not admirers of the president, but that they had “showed respect for the office.”

“He was received well by the patients, as you’d expect. They were hurting, he was comforting,” said the senator. Both he and Whaley said they had suggested to Trump that he press for gun control legislation.

White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham told the Daily Mail that Brown and Whaley were “playing up what little conversation they had [with the president], saying they made comments or demands and that’s just not true. The president allowed them to be part of the entire visit, which was very gracious of him. Their little press conference was clearly premeditated and not in the best interest of anyone but themselves. It’s a disservice to this country, and I have a real problem with that.”

She later told CNN it was “disgusting” that Brown and Whaley had not noted that those at the hospital were “so happy” to have the president and first lady visit.

Brown brushed off the criticism. “I’ve said before Donald Trump is a bully and bullies are cowards,” he said in a statement. “I don’t care what he says about me. But the people of Dayton deserve a president more focused on protecting them from gun violence than protecting his own ego.”

Grisham told reporters traveling with the president that they could not accompany him inside the hospital because the visit was “never intended to be a photo op.” Shortly after Trump left, however, he and White House social media director Dan Scavino both tweeted out an edited video and photos of Trump being greeted by hospital staff and visiting survivors of the shooting.

Trump also tweeted aboard Air Force One that a speech Wednesday by former Vice President Joe Biden in Iowa accusing the president of trying to destroy the foundations of America was “sooo boring!,” and criticized Fox News anchor Shepard Smith for his ratings.

Earlier in the day, Trump denied that his rhetoric was divisive, saying that he had toned down some of his words, but that he believed his language “brings people together.”

“Our country is doing incredibly well,” he added.

Shortly before Trump left the White House for El Paso and Dayton, he tweeted that O’Rourke used a “phony name to indicate Hispanic heritage” and told him to “be quiet!”

O’Rourke, whose full name is Robert Francis O’Rourke and has long been called by his childhood nickname “Beto,” responded in a tweet: “22 people in my hometown are dead after an act of terror inspired by your racism.”

The president’s visits drew criticism from elected officials in Texas and Ohio over his lack of action on gun regulations and his divisive stance toward immigrants. Protests took place in both cities.

Outside the Dayton hospital, protestors inflated a large balloon of Trump as a baby, with signs reading “you are why” and “words have consequences.” Another group of protestors gathered near the site of the shooting, chanting, “Do something.”

Before leaving the White House, Trump said criticism of him after the two shootings was politically motivated, and he placed the blame for the scourge of mass shootings that have marked his presidency on mental illness and a culture of violence.

“These are people who are looking for political gain, and as much as possible I try to stay out of that,” Trump told reporters.

Trump said that he supported stronger background checks and limits on allowing people with mental illness to have access to guns. He said that he believed Congress would be able to reach a deal on gun control legislation, but that he did not expect it to include limits on assault-style weapons.

“I have had many talks over the last few days, and I think we are going to come up with something that’s gong to be really, really good,” Trump said.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-slams-el-paso-native-o-rourke-ahead-visit-grieving-n1039876

Puerto Rico has had three governors in less than a week.

On Wednesday, Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court booted out the man who had declared himself governor on Friday, leaving the US territory temporary leaderless. But by the end of the day Wednesday, Justice Secretary Wanda Vázquez had been sworn in as the new governor.

The dizzying turn of events started Wednesday afternoon, when the court’s seven justices invalidated Friday’s swearing-in of Pedro Pierluisi, a lawyer and former politician whom former Gov. Ricardo Rosselló had nominated to replace him. Rosselló resigned after 12 days of anti-government protests in San Juan in response to corruption and social media scandals.

Rosselló had handed over the governor’s mansion to Pierluisi before leaving office at 5 pm Friday, even though the Senate had yet to vote on his confirmation. That set up a battle with Senate Majority Leader Thomas Rivera Schatz, who is also a member of the pro-statehood party and was reportedly jockeying for the position of governor. He filed a lawsuit Saturday, claiming that Pierluisi’s appointment as governor was unconstitutional without Senate confirmation.

The Supreme Court agreed.

“The Hon. Pedro R Pierluisi Urritia cannot continue in the role of governor from the moment this opinion and ruling goes into effect,” the court wrote.

Puerto Rico’s constitution lays out a line of succession for the governorship, which placed Justice Secretary Wanda Vázquez next in line. She previously said she doesn’t want the position, and protesters have threatened to kick her out too. On Wednesday, Vázquez said she would take the position, though it’s unclear how long she might last. Sources told El Nuevo Día newspaper that she plans to resign after nominating Jennifer González-Colón to replace her as governor. González-Colón is Puerto Rico’s non-voting delegate to the US House of Representatives, and may be able to get enough confirmation votes to succeed Vázquez.

The turn of events adds more chaos to an unprecedented moment in Puerto Rican history. Hundreds of thousands of protesters had taken to the streets in recent weeks, demanding a complete change in direction for Puerto Rico’s government, which has been plagued with corruption scandals for decades. They succeeded in kicking out the sitting governor, but now it’s still unclear who will be in charge next week.

Puerto Ricans want real change

Whoever does end up in the governor’s mansion has a lot of work ahead.

Puerto Ricans have been patient through decades of government incompetence and corruption, and they’ve had enough. They’re bearing the burden of Puerto Rico’s bankruptcy, the lingering economic recession, and the botched response to Hurricane Maria. But two recent scandals sent them over the edge.

In July, the FBI arrested two former cabinet officials in Rosselló’s government as part of a corruption probe over their handling of $15.5 million in post-hurricane contracts. The officials, former Education Secretary Julia Keleher and Ángela Ávila-Marrero (former chief of Puerto Rico’s Health Insurance Administration), are accused of funneling the government contracts to businesses they had personal ties to.

Then, three days later, investigative reporters on the island published leaked Telegram app messages that showed Rosselló and his inner circle joking about casualties from Hurricane Maria and ridiculing political rivals with violent, homophobic, and sexist language. Two government officials who were part of the chat — the secretary of state and a government representative on the bankruptcy oversight board — have since resigned, leaving two key positions unfilled.

The incidents triggered the largest government protests in modern Puerto Rican history, surfacing decades of pent-up public anger at the island’s two main political parties. Rosselló’s pro-statehood New Progressive Party and its rival, the anti-statehood Popular Democratic Party, both bear much blame for driving the US territory’s economy into the ground while doing little to ease widespread poverty.

All the corruption allegations are taking a toll on the public, too. Elected officials in Puerto Rico have been involved in so many corruption scandals that they’re hard to keep track of. Countless government leaders have pleaded guilty to charges accusing them of accepting bribes and giving government contracts to businesses they favor. For example, the last time the anti-statehood party was in power, in 2008, the FBI arrested a dozen government officials on charges of money laundering and campaign finance violations. The governor at the time, Aníbal Acevedo-Vilá, was arrested, too (though he was acquitted during trial).

Frustrated voters kicked the party out of office in 2009, but the pro-statehood party now has its own corruption problems. And unlike last time, voters weren’t willing to wait until the next election to show their frustration.

After 12 days of massive anti-government protests calling for Rosselló to step down, the governor agreed to leave by 5 pm on Friday. Then another crisis unfolded.

Puerto Rico’s constitutional crisis, explained

When Friday came around, Puerto Ricans still didn’t know who would replace Rosselló when he left the governor’s mansion.

The Puerto Rican Senate leader said he could not get enough votes Thursday to approve Rosselló’s pick for the position: Pedro Pierluisi, a 60-year-old Puerto Rican lawyer and Washington insider.

Rosselló had just chosen Pierluisi to fill the secretary of state position in his administration, which was left vacant in July after the chat message scandal forced his predecessor to resign. If the legislature could confirm Pierluisi for the secretary of state position, that would place him first in the line of succession to the governorship by the time Rosselló left office Friday at 5 pm ET.

The local House of Representatives confirmed Pierluisi, but not the Senate.

Many senators from Rosselló’s party were uneasy about Pierluisi. He’s spent the past few years working for a Washington, DC, law firm that provides legal counsel to the federal oversight board monitoring Puerto Rico’s bankruptcy. Many Puerto Ricans hate the oversight board, which has inflicted severe austerity measures on the island. Pierluisi has stepped down from that job, but Puerto Ricans suspected that he would have supported the board’s demands to cut pensions and pay for teachers and other public-sector workers as governor.

With Pierluisi’s Senate confirmation invalidated by the Supreme Court, the job of governor fell to the person second in the line of succession: Vázquez, as the Puerto Rican constitution dictates. But as was previously mentioned, she said she doesn’t want the job either, and protestors have threatened to kick her out, too.

In short, although Vázquez is now the territory’s governor, she may not remain in the post until Puerto Rico’s 2020 gubernatorial election; however, there aren’t currently a lot of good options for people who could replace her.

All the people fighting for the governor’s seat have a lot of political baggage

On the surface, Pierluisi seemed like the perfect person for Puerto Rico’s governorship. He has tons of political experience and deep connections to US members of Congress. He served as Puerto Rico’s attorney general and was elected in 2008 as Puerto Rico’s non-voting delegate to the US House of Representatives. His relationship with Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other House leaders is considered an asset as Puerto Rico fights for Congress to release more hurricane relief aide to the island.

But, like every other person whose name was floated to replace Rosselló, he has political baggage. In 2016, when he represented Puerto Rico in the US House of Representatives, the New York Times reported that he was pushing legislation that would benefit his wife’s clients on Wall Street. He was never charged with corruption, but the story raised questions about his ethics.

Another person jockeying for the governor’s seat is Thomas Rivera Schatz, the Puerto Rican Senate majority leader. But Rosselló discarded that idea after news surfaced that Rivera Schatz had reportedly steered government contracts to his relatives’ businesses. The editorial board of El Nuevo Día, the largest newspaper in Puerto Rico, has accused Schatz of holding up the vote to confirm Pierluisi because he wants the job himself.

Then there’s Vázquez. She has baggage, too. Vázquez angered the public for reportedly refusing to investigate the reason why tons of hurricane supplies were abandoned in fields and never distributed to survivors. She also ignored public demands to investigate a recent spike in violence against women. So protesters have threatened to drive her out of office the same way they drove out Rosselló.

It still seems likely that Vázquez may resign with or without public pressure. But now she has the power to nominate someone to succeed her. Hopefully, that someone will have enough support from both chambers of Congress and from the public to govern effectively. Whether there is a public official in Puerto Rico who meets both those criteria, however, remains to be seen.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/7/20758998/puerto-rico-governor-supreme-court-pierluisi-vazquez

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerTrump’s Nixon-to-China moment on guns Schumer, GOP Rep. King urge McConnell to give background check bill a vote Pelosi says House recess could be cut short if Senate passes background checks bill MORE (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday poured cold water on “red flag” legislation that is gaining traction among some Senate Republicans in the wake of a pair of mass shootings over the weekend, calling the measure an “ineffective cop out.”

“The notion that passing a tepid version of an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) bill—alone—is even close to getting the job done in addressing rampant gun violence in the U.S. is wrong and would be an ineffective cop out,” Schumer said in a statement.

He added that Democrats “are not going to settle for half-measures so Republicans can feel better and try to push the issue of gun violence off to the side.”

Schumer’s comments come as several Republican senators have floated passing legislation to provide incentives for states to pass red flag laws in response to last weekend’s mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio, and El Paso, Texas.

Red flag laws, as discussed by Republicans, would let family members petition for court orders to prevent dangerous individuals from being able to buy a gun. It would also let family members petition for court orders to have law enforcement temporarily remove a firearm.

Republican senators, including Sens. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioEmpower the VA with the tools to help our veterans The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump, Democrats at odds over shootings’ causes, cures Social media bots pose threat ahead of 2020 MORE (Fla.), Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanMcConnell faces pressure to bring Senate back for gun legislation Shaken Portman urges support for ‘red flag’ laws after Ohio shooting CNN slams GOP for not appearing on network after mass shootings, conservatives fire back MORE (Ohio) and Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamThe Hill’s Morning Report – How will Trump be received in Dayton and El Paso? McConnell faces pressure to bring Senate back for gun legislation Trump to hold Hamptons fundraisers; top ticket is 0K: report MORE (S.C.), have talked about the idea of passing legislation that would provide grants to states to enact the laws.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpMSNBC’s Geist presses Castro on sharing Trump donors names: These people ‘are already being harassed’ Marianne Williamson: Message of love ‘absolutely’ extends to Trump Hickenlooper says Democrats are falling for ‘Trump’s execrable politics of distraction’ MORE also name-checked the idea during his White House speech on Monday, while Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneLawmakers jump start talks on privacy bill Trump border fight throws curveball into shutdown prospects Senate leaves for five-week August recess MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, told the Argus Leader that he was “confident Congress will be able to find common ground on the so-called ‘red flag’ issue.”

But Democrats have homed in on trying to pressure Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSherrod Brown now says he’ll join Trump during Dayton trip Trump ‘all in favor’ of background checks but doubts will of Congress Advocates ramp up pressure on criminal justice measure MORE (R-Ky.) into passing a House bill that would implement universal background checks in the wake of the two mass shootings.

“Even the strongest [extreme risk protection order] legislation won’t be fully effective without strong universal background checks. As long as the gun show and online sales loopholes exist, someone prohibited from possessing a gun under an ERPO law could still purchase a firearm far too easily,” Schumer said in a statement.

The House passed its background check bill earlier this year with only eight Republicans voting for it. The Senate companion bill has 42 backers, none of whom are Republicans, leaving it well short of the 60 votes needed to pass the chamber and head to Trump’s desk. The White House has threatened to veto the bill.

But Schumer added that Democrats would try to force a vote on the House bill if Republicans bring red flag legislation to the Senate floor.

“Democrats in the Senate will seek to require that any ERPO bill that comes to the floor is accompanied by a vote on the House-passed universal background checks legislation,” he said.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/456545-schumer-blasts-red-flag-legislation-as-ineffective-cop-out

Cyntoia Brown, a woman serving a life sentence for killing a man when she was 16, appeared during her clemency hearing in May 2018. Brown and her supporters for years have maintained that the 2004 killing was an act of self-defense.

Lacy Atkins/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Lacy Atkins/AP

Cyntoia Brown, a woman serving a life sentence for killing a man when she was 16, appeared during her clemency hearing in May 2018. Brown and her supporters for years have maintained that the 2004 killing was an act of self-defense.

Lacy Atkins/AP

Cyntoia Brown, who served 15 years of a life sentence for killing a man when she was 16, has been released from a Nashville prison, Tennessee officials announced early Wednesday.

Earlier this year, then-Gov. Bill Haslam took the unusual step of granting Brown clemency for what he called a “tragic and complex case,” a major victory for Brown and her supporters, who for years have maintained that the 2004 killing was an act of self-defense.

Over the years, the fight for Brown’s release has brought prominent lawyers to her defense, a PBS documentary and backing from celebrities including Kim Kardashian West and Rihanna. Her case also inspired the introduction of state legislation aimed at protecting minors who are victims of sex trafficking.

In 2006, Brown was convicted of aggravated robbery and first-degree murder for killing 43-year-old real estate agent Johnny Allen, whom she went home with after he picked her up for sex at a Sonic Drive-In in Nashville.

She told police that she pulled a pistol out of her purse and fatally shot Allen because she thought he was reaching for a gun.

She then fled with Allen’s guns and money. She drove away in his pickup truck.

Prosecutors claimed that Brown shot Allen as part of a plan to rob him, but Brown told police she was acting to protect herself. She was convicted and sentenced to life in prison over the killing.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that mandatory life sentences without parole for juvenile offenders are not constitutional, but Tennessee prosecutors successfully argued that Brown would technically become eligible for parole after 51 years, in 2055.

Brown, now 31, was among more than 180 inmates serving life sentences in the state for crimes they committed as teenagers.

She never testified during her trial, but during her appeals process, Brown, who had been a teenage runaway, took the stand and described how at the time of the killing, she was ensnared in an abusive relationship with a drug dealer known as Cut Throat who forced her into prostitution.

Her case gained new scrutiny with the rise of the #MeToo movement, as her supporters drew attention to the case using the hashtag #FreeCyntoiaBrown. Criminal justice reform advocates portrayed Brown’s case as an example of the unreasonable incarceration of a teenager who was a victim of sex trafficking.

“Did we somehow change the definition of #JUSTICE along the way??” Rihanna asked in a 2017 Instagram post about Brown that received nearly 2 million likes. “The system has failed,” Kardashian West tweeted.

While incarcerated, Brown earned her GED, finished a bachelor’s degree and mentored at-risk youth.

“Transformation should be accompanied by hope,” Haslam said when commuting her sentence to parole in January.

On Tuesday, the National Women’s Law Center celebrated the long legal battle that led to Brown’s release, but with a cautionary note.

“We’re glad Cyntoia has finally been freed — but we must not forget that she never should have been in prison in the first place. We must continue to seek justice for survivors like her,” the group said on Twitter.

Her publisher announced that Brown will release a memoir in October that will describe her traumatic childhood, how she transformed her life from behind bars and the events that led to her murder conviction and eventual release.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/08/07/749025458/cyntoia-brown-released-after-15-years-in-prison-for-murder

President TrumpDonald John TrumpMSNBC’s Geist presses Castro on sharing Trump donors names: These people ‘are already being harassed’ Marianne Williamson: Message of love ‘absolutely’ extends to Trump Hickenlooper says Democrats are falling for ‘Trump’s execrable politics of distraction’ MORE should do more to tackle gun violence, because it is the right thing to do, and because it would drive Democrats crazy. First up: let’s set the record straight.

Fact: President Trump is no more responsible for the heinous shootings in El Paso and Dayton than President Obama was responsible for the slaughter in Orlando (2016, 49 dead) or Newtown (2012, 27 killed), which were among the worst incidents in our nation’s history.

And the frequency of these terrible events has not increased under President Trump. According to the non-profit group Gun Violence Archive, there were 269 mass shootings in 2014 (the earliest year collected), 335 in 2015, 382 in 2016, 346 in 2017 and 340 last year. There have been 253 so far this year.

That hasn’t prevented Democrats and their handmaidens in the liberal media from blaming the president for the tragedies in Dayton and El Paso. The bodies had not been identified before the politicization of the murders began, along with ominous alarms that white nationalists across the land are mainlining the president’s rhetoric because he, as 2020 hopeful Beto O’Rourke declared, “stokes racism in this country” and is like “something out of the Third Reich.”

Maybe that bold assertion will boost Beto’s sagging candidacy, but I doubt it. Piling on Trump is as commonplace as ketchup.

Fact: President Trump’s tough line on illegal immigration echoes similar past stances by Democrats. President Clinton won a standing ovation from both sides of the aisle in his 1995 State of the Union when he promised to crack down on people entering the country illegally, noting that “All Americans….are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country.”

President Obama promised in his 2013 State of the Union Address to put “more boots on the Southern border than at any time in our history and [reduce] illegal crossings to their lowest levels in 40 years.”

Chuck SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerTrump’s Nixon-to-China moment on guns Schumer, GOP Rep. King urge McConnell to give background check bill a vote Pelosi says House recess could be cut short if Senate passes background checks bill MORE, a constant scold of the president’s immigration stance, is inconveniently on record saying in 2009, “First, illegal immigration is wrong and a primary goal of comprehensive immigration reform must be to dramatically curtail future illegal immigration.”

The country has not changed its view on this issue; Democrats have. According to Gallup polling from earlier this year, some 77 percent of the country thinks “large numbers of undocumented immigrants entering the United States” constitute either a “critical” or “important” threat to the nation.  

Several Democratic 2020 candidates have taken their party sharply off course, recently pledging free health care to those crossing our border improperly and, moreover, looking to decriminalize illegal entry.

If President Trump’s rhetoric has upped the temperature of the debate, so have these candidates. And, so has the absurd stonewalling of Democrats in Congress, who for months refused to admit that tens of thousands of migrants streaming unchecked across our border might constitute a security problem.   

Fact: Liberals are distorting the facts behind these terrible events to demonize Trump and to scare Americans, hoping that fear will override voters’ rising optimism about their financial prospects.

The New York Times ran a piece in the wake of the Dayton and El Paso murders entitled “White Terrorism Shows ‘Stunning’ Parallels to Rise of Islamic State”; that is called fear-mongering. There is no caliphate, no leadership, there is no similarity between the sporadic outbursts from a handful of crazed and angry young men in our country and the widespread Islamic terror group that wants to take over the world.

While media outlets have widely broadcast the El Paso shooter’s screed against immigrants, there has been scant mention that the Dayton killer Tweeted his admiration for socialism and Elizabeth Warren. Surely that’s newsworthy, too?

Fact: President Trump is amenable to changes in our gun laws. His White House has banned bump stocks, a device which allowed the Las Vegas shooter to convert a semi-automatic gun into an even more deadly weapon, and passed the Fix Nics law, which strengthened background checks.

Trump recently called for expanded background checks and backed so-called “red flag” laws, which would give law enforcement authorities an opportunity to respond when an individual exhibits dangerous tendencies. These are popular measures.

He should go further. Fully automatic guns are illegal, but the ban on semi-automatics (of the kind used in the Orlando shootings) and related ammunition expired in 2004. That restriction should be revived; nobody needs what many call an assault rifle to hunt game or shoot clay pigeons. At the least, the size of the magazines should be limited, which could lessen the carnage of mass shootings.

Unhappily, as with immigration, Democrats will not want to work with the Trump administration to enact sensible laws that might staunch the bloodshed. It is much more attractive politically to use gun violence as a cudgel. In fairness, many Republicans will not go there either. The National Rifle Association does indeed have a large checkbook, and wields it to stave off tougher gun laws.

But that creates an opportunity for Trump, who more than once has opposed GOP orthodoxy. These shootings are horrific events that have become an unwelcome thread in our country’s ragged social tapestry. Not only are the killings becoming routine, so is our response.

Politicians on the left decry the guns used in the shootings, blame the NRA for our pro-gun culture, and point fingers at anyone callous enough to block legislation restricting gun ownership. Politicians on the right cede sufficient ground to avoid being heckled at their next town hall, talk about untreated mental illness and point out (rightly) that most of the guns used in these shootings were purchased legally, some in the states that claim the toughest gun laws.

Ultimately, nothing happens, and Congress’ approval ratings sink one notch lower.

We can, and should, do better. As with trade and health care, Trump could be the disruptor here. Just as it took a Republican like Nixon to open up China, President Trump could make history by advancing sensible gun legislation. It is time.

Liz Peek is a former partner of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim & Company. For 15 years, she has been a columnist for The Fiscal Times, Fox News, the New York Sun and numerous other organizations. Follow her on Twitter: @lizpeek.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/456439-trump-could-obliterate-democrats-by-leading-on-gun-violence

McLEAN, Va. (AP) — An unconfirmed report of an armed person at the Northern Virginia office building that houses USA Today prompted an evacuation and massive police response Wednesday that found no immediate signs of violence.

Fairfax County Police Chief Edwin Roessler said at a news conference that his department got a 911 call around noon from the building saying an armed “former employee” had been seen there.



Roessler said it was not clear yet whether that report was true. A floor-by-floor search of the 11-story building was underway Wednesday afternoon and expected to last for hours, but Roessler said so far there had been no evidence of violence.

“I pray they are not in the building, and that this will end safely,” he said.

USA Today reported that alarms sounded and police squad cars converged on the scene in McLean, Virginia, as employees waited outside. Law enforcement officers with rifles and body armor patrolled the area and a helicopter hovered overhead.

Taylor Rosa, an accountant for USA Today’s owner, Gannett, said he was in his office when co-workers told him there were police with body armor on the campus. But he and others went back to work. He said his initial guess was that some sort of VIP was visiting the headquarters and had police protection. About five minutes later, they were told to evacuate.

“There were some people that definitely had panic in their faces” as they evacuated, Rosa said.

“Mostly we were just a little confused,” he said.

Rosa said he had gotten notice from his human resources department that it may be two to four hours before employees could re-enter the building, a glass structure tucked in Tysons Corner in a row of other corporate campuses.

Photos showed flags there flying at half-staff. The incident came as the nation reels from its latest mass shootings — at a Walmart store in El Paso, Texas, and an entertainment district in Dayton, Ohio. A combined 31 people were killed and dozens wounded in less than 24 hours in those two weekend attacks.

Roessler said he couldn’t say for sure whether the person reported to be in the building was a Gannett employee. The building also houses other tenants.

Police were searching for the “person of interest,” he said.

The incident came just two days after GateHouse Media, a fast-growing chain backed by an investment firm, announced it was buying Gannett in a $1.4 billion merger of two of the largest U.S. newspaper companies.

The companies said they were committed to journalistic excellence while also cutting costs by $300 million annually. The combined company would have more than 260 daily papers in the U.S. along with more than 300 weeklies.

Source Article from https://www.10tv.com/article/usa-today-hq-evacuated-police-search-man-weapon-2019-aug

President Trump made the following comments about this weekend’s mass shootings in Dayton and El Paso Wednesday morning as he departed the White House to visit with the victims:

[Question regarding a potential ban on large capacity magazines]



PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: No. You have to have a political appetite within Congress. So far, I have not seen that. I can only do what I can do. I think there is a great appetite to do something with regard to making sure that mentally unstable, seriously ill people are not carrying guns. I have never seen the appetite as strong as it is now. I have not seen it with regards to certain types of weapons.


QUESTION: How concerned are you about the rise in white supremacy?


TRUMP: I am concerned about the rise of any group of hate. I do not like it. Any group of hate, I am. Whether it is white supremacy, whether it is any kind of supremacy, whether it is Antifa, whether it is any group of hate, I am very concerned about it and I will do something about it.


QUESTION: [indiscernible]


TRUMP: I do not think my rhetoric has at all. I think my rhetoric — it brings people together. Our country is doing incredibly well. China is not doing well if you look at the trade situation.


Watch Trump’s full comments Wednesday morning:

Source Article from https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/08/07/trump_i_am_concerned_about_any_group_of_hate_my_rhetoric_brings_people_together.html

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerTrump’s Nixon-to-China moment on guns Schumer, GOP Rep. King urge McConnell to give background check bill a vote Pelosi says House recess could be cut short if Senate passes background checks bill MORE (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday poured cold water on “red flag” legislation that is gaining traction among some Senate Republicans in the wake of a pair of mass shootings over the weekend, calling the measure an “ineffective cop out.”

“The notion that passing a tepid version of an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) bill—alone—is even close to getting the job done in addressing rampant gun violence in the U.S. is wrong and would be an ineffective cop out,” Schumer said in a statement.

He added that Democrats “are not going to settle for half-measures so Republicans can feel better and try to push the issue of gun violence off to the side.”

Schumer’s comments come as several Republican senators have floated passing legislation to provide incentives for states to pass red flag laws in response to last weekend’s mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio, and El Paso, Texas.

Red flag laws, as discussed by Republicans, would let family members petition for court orders to prevent dangerous individuals from being able to buy a gun. It would also let family members petition for court orders to have law enforcement temporarily remove a firearm.

Republican senators, including Sens. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioEmpower the VA with the tools to help our veterans The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump, Democrats at odds over shootings’ causes, cures Social media bots pose threat ahead of 2020 MORE (Fla.), Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanMcConnell faces pressure to bring Senate back for gun legislation Shaken Portman urges support for ‘red flag’ laws after Ohio shooting CNN slams GOP for not appearing on network after mass shootings, conservatives fire back MORE (Ohio) and Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamThe Hill’s Morning Report – How will Trump be received in Dayton and El Paso? McConnell faces pressure to bring Senate back for gun legislation Trump to hold Hamptons fundraisers; top ticket is 0K: report MORE (S.C.), have talked about the idea of passing legislation that would provide grants to states to enact the laws.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpMSNBC’s Geist presses Castro on sharing Trump donors names: These people ‘are already being harassed’ Marianne Williamson: Message of love ‘absolutely’ extends to Trump Hickenlooper says Democrats are falling for ‘Trump’s execrable politics of distraction’ MORE also name-checked the idea during his White House speech on Monday, while Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneLawmakers jump start talks on privacy bill Trump border fight throws curveball into shutdown prospects Senate leaves for five-week August recess MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, told the Argus Leader that he was “confident Congress will be able to find common ground on the so-called ‘red flag’ issue.”

But Democrats have homed in on trying to pressure Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSherrod Brown now says he’ll join Trump during Dayton trip Trump ‘all in favor’ of background checks but doubts will of Congress Advocates ramp up pressure on criminal justice measure MORE (R-Ky.) into passing a House bill that would implement universal background checks in the wake of the two mass shootings.

“Even the strongest [extreme risk protection order] legislation won’t be fully effective without strong universal background checks. As long as the gun show and online sales loopholes exist, someone prohibited from possessing a gun under an ERPO law could still purchase a firearm far too easily,” Schumer said in a statement.

The House passed its background check bill earlier this year with only eight Republicans voting for it. The Senate companion bill has 42 backers, none of whom are Republicans, leaving it well short of the 60 votes needed to pass the chamber and head to Trump’s desk. The White House has threatened to veto the bill.

But Schumer added that Democrats would try to force a vote on the House bill if Republicans bring red flag legislation to the Senate floor.

“Democrats in the Senate will seek to require that any ERPO bill that comes to the floor is accompanied by a vote on the House-passed universal background checks legislation,” he said.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/456545-schumer-blasts-red-flag-legislation-as-ineffective-cop-out

The ex-girlfriend of the Dayton shooter says she’s “not shocked he did something horrific.” Connor Betts opened fire early Sunday morning in a popular nightlife area of Dayton, killing nine people before police shot and killed him.

Adelia Johnson says she and Betts dated from March to May. Betts was studying psychology in college and that’s why, at first, she didn’t think much of his fascination with violence. 

“I didn’t think he would go shoot strangers. Especially his sister,” Johnson said. “He was interested in what makes terrible people do terrible things.”

But looking back, there were red flags. On their first date, he showed her a video of a mass shooting. She broke up with him in the spring.

“I’m not shocked he did something horrific,” she said. “I am shocked that he did it to this level.”

The FBI has opened an investigation into Betts as evidence emerges he previously expressed a desire to commit a mass shooting and had a history of violent ideologies. The FBI says it’s looking at three main things: what ideology influenced the attacker, who if anyone helped him or knew about his plan, and why he committed this specific act of violence.

Adelia Johnson  

CBS News


Late Tuesday, police delivered a statement on behalf of Betts’ parents, which included an expression of horror and grief over the loss of both of their children. During his 30-second rampage in Dayton’s Oregon District, Betts killed nine people including his own sister.

We are also learning more about the victims. Nicholas Cumer was a graduate student studying cancer care. Beatrice Nicole Warren-Curtis worked in health insurance, and friends say she was “always supportive.” Thomas McNichols was the father of four children, all ages 8 and under.

Dion Green says he was enjoying a night out with his father, 57-year-old Derrick Fudge, when the shooter opened fire.  His dad died in his arms.

“He saved my life, ’cause there’s no way that I shouldn’t have been the one that got hit,” Green said. “He’s just staring at me, just staring at me, and I’m just like, ‘c’mon,’ and he just stops breathing on me, and I just lose it, I just grab him. I hold him, just tell him I love him, just hold him.”

The FBI said the shooter was not on its radar prior to this incident. It would not give specifics on what exactly his violent ideologies were, but did say it found no evidence he was racially motivated or influenced by the El Paso shooting.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dayton-shooter-ex-girlfriend-says-shes-not-shocked-he-did-something-horrific/


President Donald Trump speaks at the White House Monday about the mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio. | Evan Vucci/AP Photo

White House

The president said he has taken tough action on guns. His administration has mostly focused on expanding gun access through little-noticed regulatory moves.

President Donald Trump this week said his administration has done “much more than most” to curb mass shootings in the United States.

While Trump boasts of action on firearms, his administration has eased gun restrictions over the past 2½ years.

Story Continued Below

Federal agencies have implemented more than half a dozen policy changes — primarily through little-noticed regulatory moves — that expand access to guns by lifting firearms bans in certain locations and limiting the names in the national database designed to keep firearms away from dangerous people. The administration asked the Supreme Court to overturn New York City restrictions on transporting handguns outside homes. And it pushed to allow U.S. gunmakers to more easily sell firearms overseas, including the types used in mass shootings.

“This president has in a very intentional, sweeping way made it easier for people to access firearms, not more difficult,” said Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), a vice chairman of the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force. “He’s systematically gone and undone all the protections that were put in place to try to limit the ability of dangerous people to access firearms.”

Trump’s critics say they aren’t surprised by his actions after he received an early and strong endorsement from the National Rifle Association, which spent $30 million to help his 2016 campaign and to blast his Democratic opponent in TV ads. After he was sworn into office, Trump vowed repeatedly to repay gun owners for their support.

This week, after two mass shootings 13 hours apart killed at least 31 people in Texas and Ohio, Trump took credit for changes he said are helping cut down on gun violence — while he proposed vague changes to policies involving social media, video games and mental health.

Last year, Trump backed Congress in increasing penalties on agencies that do not report information to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System and giving millions to schools to combat violence. This year, his Justice Department banned bump stocks — a device that allows a semiautomatic rifle to fire continuously with one pull of a trigger. It was used in a Las Vegas shooting that left 58 people dead and 422 more wounded by gunfire in 2017.

“We have done much more than most administrations,” Trump said in his first public remarks on the shootings Sunday. “It’s … really not talked about very much, but we’ve done, actually, a lot. But perhaps more has to be done.”

But those changes were narrow, lengthy and, in the case of the bump stock ban, could be reversed by the next president because it is not written into law.

William Vizzard, who spent nearly three decades at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, described the restrictions as modest. “On a scale of 1 to 100, they’re about a 2,” he said.

The White House and the NRA didn’t return requests for comment. In an earlier statement, the NRA said it “welcomes the president’s call to address the root causes of the horrific acts of violence that have occurred in our country.“

Before he ran for president, Trump supported several Democratic-backed proposals, including a ban on assault weapons and waiting period for firearm purchases. But after his inauguration, he made policy changes backed by the NRA. Most of them bypassed Congress, where firearms changes are difficult to pass.

“The response has largely parroted the talking points of the NRA,” said Chelsea Parsons, vice president of gun violence prevention at the left-leaning Center for American Progress.

Perhaps the most significant change is the revocation of a regulation that made it harder for people with mental illnesses to buy guns. It had been enacted by Trump’s Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama, after the 2012 elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn., that killed 26.

The Obama regulation had required the government to add those eligible for Social Security Administration mental disability payments to the national database and block them from buying guns. The Obama administration estimated it would have added 75,000 names to the database.

In addition, the Trump Justice Department narrowed the definition of “fugitive,” excluding people from being added to the national database and barred from buying a gun.

The FBI had considered a fugitive to be a person who left the city or county where a warrant had been issued for his or her arrest. But the DOJ adopted ATF’s narrower definition, describing a fugitive as a person who either crossed state lines to avoid prosecution or giving testimony.

The changes, according to a senior DOJ official, came after the department’s Office of Legal Counsel determined in 2016 that the existence of a warrant — without anything further — would not meet “that statutory threshold based on the language passed by Congress.”

The Interior Department also has made a series of changes, expanding the areas where hunting is permissible, including on federal lands in Alaska, and rescinding a ban on hunting with lead ammunition in national parks and wildlife refuges.

“Hunting and fishing are more than just traditional pastimes as they are also vital to the conservation of our lands and waters, our outdoor recreation economy, and our American way of life,” Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said in June when announcing the expansion of hunting at 74 national wildlife refuges.

The ATF delayed a rule proposed during the Obama administration that would have made gun-safety devices more easily available where firearms are sold.

The administration is working on a change to the small-arms export policy that critics say would make it easier for gunmakers to sell weapons to foreign buyers. The proposal would transfer supervision from the State Department to the Commerce Department, which provides less oversight on sales. It would also make 3D printed weapons, which are largely undetectable, more easily available. Some lawmakers are trying to stop the change.

“Loosening this regulation, as the Trump administration is proposing to do, will have broad national security and human rights implications outside the U.S.,” said Adzi Vokhiwa, federal affairs manager at Giffords, which was founded by former Rep. Gabby Giffords after she was shot and gravely wounded. “But even here in the U.S., it would make it much easier for a domestic terrorist or someone who is under the age of 18 or someone who is prohibited from purchasing or possessing a firearm to just go online to one of these websites, download the blueprint and print their own gun.”

In May, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to overturn New York City’s restrictions on transporting handguns outside the home, arguing the rule violated the Second Amendment and put illegal restrictions on interstate commerce.

Before the high court could act, New York City changed the law to allow residents to take their guns to seven shooting ranges in the city. Gun owners still can’t take their guns to other homes and shooting ranges even with safety measures in place.

In another pending court case, the federal government indicated it is considering rescinding the Army Corps of Engineers’ ban on carrying loaded firearms and ammunition on federal lands. The Corps has had a decade-old ban on carrying loaded firearms and ammunition on its 12 million acres of land. Courts have differed on whether the ban is legal.

The ban remains in place but the Corps said Tuesday it may make the change. “The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is reconsidering the regulation that governs the possession and transportation of firearms and other weapons at Army Corps of Engineers water resources development projects,” Corps spokesman Doug Garman said.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/07/trump-gun-access-restrictions-1449663

WASHINGTON – As he left for a daylong trip to Texas and Ohio on Wednesday to meet with the victims of back-to-back shootings, President Donald Trump dismissed criticism that his own campaign trail rhetoric has contributed to the violence.

“My critics are political people,” Trump told reporters at the White House. 

His critics, he said, are seeking “political gain.”

The shootings in El Paso and Dayton, in which at least 31 people were killed, have once again thrust Trump into the increasingly familiar role of consoling communities reeling from the brutality of the killings while navigating the tricky politics of gun control.

This time, however, at least some residents of the affected communities may not welcome Trump so warmly. Some critics argue that Trump’s rhetorical broadsides on migrants in particular created an atmosphere of hate that presaged the attacks. 

Air Force One touched down in Dayton shortly before 11 a.m. ET. 

The president said lawmakers are working toward a deal on legislation to increase background checks for gun purchases. Some lawmakers are discussing the possibility of red-flag provisions. Background checks would be a higher hurdle. 

Red flag laws allow law enforcement, family members and others to petition a judge to confiscate guns from individuals who may cause harm to themselves or others. 

“I’m looking to do background checks,” Trump said, adding that there is a “great appetite” for background checks. 

When the president lands in El Paso in the afternoon, after visiting Dayton in the morning, he will be confronted by a front-page editorial in the El Paso Times lauding the city’s response and questioning the way his administration characterizes the community.

“Mr. President, in your February State of the Union address, you claimed that El Paso was ‘one of our nation’s most dangerous cities’ before a border wall was built,” editor Tim Archuleta wrote. “Mr. President, that is not El Paso.”

The El Paso Times is part of the USA TODAY Network. 

CLOSE

President Donald Trump said our nation must condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy following two mass shootings in Dayton and El Paso.
USA TODAY

The El Paso gunman wrote a “manifesto” expressing concern about an “invasion” by Hispanics, echoing language often used by Trump to describe migrants

Trump expressed grievances in pre-trip tweets, criticizing Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke around midnight on Tuesday after the former congressman said the president should stay away from El Paso.

USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll: Who’s to blame for mass shootings?

Trump also urged the news media to focus on reports that the shooter in Dayton allegedly used a Twitter account to express support for Democrats like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. While it’s true that other mass shooters have supported Democrats, Trump did not address the fact that his own rhetoric is unusual among national politicians in the intensity he brings to his attacks on immigrants.   

Several El Paso officials urged Trump not to visit the area.   

“Don’t come here President Trump, you are not welcome,” wrote Cassandra Hernandez, a city council member representing the neighborhood where the shooting occurred.

Mass shootings in the US: After El Paso and Dayton, 112 killed in mass shootings over 216 days

Mayor Dee Margo, the Republican mayor of El Paso, said he will meet with Trump.

In Ohio, Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, told SiriusXM on Tuesday said he would not join Trump on the Dayton visit. “I don’t have any interest because of what he’s done on this – total unwillingness to address the issue of guns, his racist rhetoric.”

Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley said she planned to tell him that his proposals on gun control as outlined in remarks Monday are inadequate.

“His comments weren’t very helpful to the issue around guns,” Whaley told reporters. 

Trump has at times struggled to fulfill the role of consoler-in-chief increasingly demanded of modern presidents. The president was greeted by hundreds of protesters singing softly in Hebrew or holding signs as he visited the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh last year, days after a gunman killed 11 worshipers. 

Months earlier, after the president spent an hour meeting with people who lost family members and the survivors of a shooting at a Texas high school, one of the mothers who lost a child described Trump’s presence in the private gathering as polarizing.

“It was like talking to a toddler,” she said.

Trump remained mostly out of sight Tuesday, even on Twitter. White House aides said the president spent the day meeting with staff and preparing for Wednesday’s travel.  

“This is a very, very serious moment in our country’s history,” Trump spokesman Hogan Gidley told reporters. “This president recognizes the gravity of this moment.” 

Americans overwhelmingly blame the mental health system, racism and white nationalism and loose gun laws for a series of mass shootings that have shaken communities across the country, according to a USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll this week.

Nearly three of four Democrats said some of the responsibility should be held by the president, who has been criticized for racist tweets and provocative rhetoric aimed at Latinos, Muslims, blacks and others. That compared with just 23% of Republicans.

White House officials declined to say where within El Paso and Dayton the president is traveling, citing security concerns. The president is expected to visit Dayton first. 

Critics questioned Trump’s sincerity in dealing with mass shootings, noting he backed away from an initial tweet calling for “strong” background checks for gun purchases. During subsequent remarks at the White House on Monday, Trump called on the nation to condemn “racism, bigotry and white supremacy.”

What’s next: Trump vows action but offers few specifics after shootings 

Democrats, including those who are making gun control an issue in the 2020 election, said Trump’s words after the shooting don’t erase his previous statement.   

“This president, who helped create the hatred that made Saturday’s tragedy possible, should not come to El Paso,” tweeted O’Rourke, who once represented the city in Congress.

“We do not need more division,” he said. “We need to heal. He has no place here.”

 Contributing: The Arizona Republic

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/07/trump-visits-dayton-el-paso-grief-mass-shootings/1920474001/

This isn’t about the Second Amendment. The time is long past for Americans, particularly our elected leaders, to check their partisan leanings on guns and develop workable solutions to a problem that is only getting worse. It’s about finding a constitutionally acceptable method for keeping guns away from those who would use them to murder their fellow citizens. That requires leadership. We’ve elected our leaders; we need to see real action.

Advertisement



Understanding mass shootings

Broadly defined, a mass shooting consists of at least four fatalities (excluding the offender or offenders) resulting from use of a firearm. While the individual shooters, targets, and motivations for the attacks vary, the weapon is the same. Addressing the motivating factors behind mass violence is critical, but it is not enough. From research to real-world experience, we understand more today about the characteristics of people who commit mass violence than ever before — and yet we are suffering on average more than one mass shooting per day.

Advertisement



We will not find our way out of this cycle of death unless we address the means of violence, as well as the motivation. Here are proposals that could be introduced with bipartisan political will. None of them removes or compromises Second Amendment provisions:

Extreme Risk Laws

Fifteen states and Washington, D.C., have enacted “Extreme Risk” laws, which allow family members and law enforcement to intervene when there are warning signs of violence. The laws permit a court petition for an order to temporarily remove firearms from dangerous situations, often known as an Extreme Risk Protection Order. If the court finds a person is at risk of harming him or herself or others with a firearm, that person is prohibited from purchasing or possessing guns while the order is in effect. In 51 percent of mass shootings, from 2009 to 2017, the attackers exhibited warning signs suggesting that they posed a risk to themselves or others, according to Everytown for Gun Safety.

Mandatory Firearms Safety Training

When I served in the FBI and other police departments, firearms training was a regular activity. It is perplexing that we as a nation have decided to require education, training, licensing, and regular renewals to drive a motor vehicle, but we have virtually no requirements for people to own and use a a gun. Gun owners should be required to take mandatory firearms safety training.

Advertisement



Mandatory training serves several functions. It requires the gun owner to express a minimum level of respect and proficiency in handling the weapon. This moves the weapon from the realm of violent fantasy into the very real world of routine and safety. It also gives trained instructors the opportunity to observe a gun owner with the weapon and note any troubling actions or words.

Ban Assault Rifles

Military grade weapons have no place in civilian life. We actually had a ban in the 1990s, when support was at 50 percent. The most recent effort was defeated in 2013, after mass shooting at Sandy Hook School in Newtown, Conn. I would return to the notion that Americans also want to keep law enforcement safe. A 2007 report by the International Association of Chiefs of Police recommended that Congress enact an effective ban on military-style assault weapons in order to curb the ability of individuals to “outgun” law enforcement officers.

Universal Background Checks

We need to close the loophole that allows unlicensed firearms sellers to sell a weapon without performing a background check. Whenever this recommendation is raised, it is typically followed by arguments that background checks would not have prevented mass shootings. Perhaps, but when every firearm sale is governed by the same standard, it contributes to a higher culture of respect and concern for weapons, which in turn moves toward national gun safety. The president has called for ubiquitous background checks, members of the House and Senate have been advocating for these checks for years, and more than 90 percent of the public supports it. What exactly is it going to take to make this a reality?

Advertisement



Our “thoughts and prayers” mantra is not a solution, and it does nothing to soothe the grief of families whose loved ones have been murdered in mass shootings. No other nation has this problem to this degree. We have the capacity to address it, if we really want to.

On this sad day, that remains to be seen.


Erroll G. Southers, a former FBI special agent, is professor in the practice in national and homeland security at the University of Southern California, where he directs the university’s Safe Communities Institute and its Homegrown Violent Extremism Studies.

Source Article from https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2019/08/07/after-mass-shootings-guns-are-still-problem/U37TZn311s8iHtBywBhYhO/story.html

President Trump is visiting two grief-stricken communities on Wednesday in the wake of two mass shootings that took place over the weekend. His visit, however, has drawn ire from some residents and local lawmakers, who have urged the commander-in-chief to stay in Washington as their community grapples with the loss of life. 

As he prepared to leave the White House South Lawn Wednesday, the president insisted that his critics are just trying to make political points, and that Democrats and Republicans are close to completing a background check bill. 

“My critics are political people that are trying to make points … some of them in particular are very low in the polls,” the president told reporters. 

Mr. Trump and the first lady are slated to visit Dayton, Ohio and El Paso, Texas to meet with first responders, survivors and families of victims killed in the weekend shootings. His visit, however, is not being well received by some local officials. Democratic Rep. Veronica Escobar of El Paso tweeted Tuesday that she declined to meet with Mr. Trump when he comes to the area.

Escobar wrote she refuses to “join without a dialogue about the pain his racist and hateful words and actions have caused our community and country.”

Escobar’s predecessor in the congressional seat, 2020 hopeful Beto O’Rourke, has also publicly asked Mr. Trump not to come to El Paso. O’Rourke and the president have since been embroiled in a war of words over legislative inaction and violent extremism. 

Meanwhile in Ohio, Dayon Mayor Nan Whaley told reporters that she would welcome the president in the official capacity as mayor, but did not shy away from criticizing him for his inflammatory rhetoric and inaction on gun control. 

“He probably will hear it from you all, better than he hears it from me,” she told reporters. “I mean, yesterday, his comments weren’t very helpful to the issue around guns.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-el-paso-visit-president-heads-to-mass-shooting-communities-as-lawmakers-protest-visit-live-stream-today-2019-08/

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

The Wagah border crossing is a symbol of the often tense relationship between India and Pakistan

The row between India and Pakistan over the disputed territory of Kashmir has deepened with Pakistan’s announcement that it was expelling India’s top diplomat and suspending trade.

Indian-administered Kashmir has been on lockdown since the Indian government decided on Monday to strip the region of its special constitutional status.

Phone networks and the internet have been cut off since Sunday evening.

Tens of thousands of troops have been patrolling the streets.

Instances of protest and stone-throwing have been reported, despite the communications blackout and a curfew.

Kashmiris in other parts of the country said that they were unable to get through to their families. Local leaders have also been detained.

Why is Kashmir so contentious?

The Himalayan region of Kashmir is claimed in its entirety by both India and Pakistan, but they each control only parts of it.

There is a long-running separatist insurgency on the Indian side, which has led to thousands of deaths over three decades. India accuses Pakistan of supporting insurgents but its neighbour denies this, saying it only gives moral and diplomatic support to Kashmiris who want self-determination.

Media captionProtesters throw stones at Indian armed forces

Under Article 370 of the Indian constitution, the state of Jammu and Kashmir had special dispensation to make its own laws – the basis for its complex relationship with India for some 70 years.

However, the Indian government is now revoking most of Article 370.

What is Pakistan doing?

Pakistan is suspending all trade between the two countries.

It also recalling its high commissioner (the equivalent of an ambassador) from the Indian capital Delhi and expelling his Indian counterpart from Islamabad.

Prime Minister Imran Khan has “directed that all diplomatic channels be activated to expose brutal Indian racist regime, design and human rights violations”, a Pakistani government statement said.

He also directed the armed forces to remain vigilant.

In addition, Pakistan is asking the UN Security Council to consider the dispute.

Neighbouring China has also voiced opposition to the Indian move, describing it as “unacceptable”.

How serious is this?

India and Pakistan – who both possess nuclear weapons – have fought two wars over Kashmir since independence from British colonial rule in 1947.

Many people in Indian-administered Kashmir do not want it to be governed by India, preferring instead either independence or union with Pakistan.

The population of the Indian-administered state of Jammu and Kashmir is more than 60% Muslim, making it the only state within India where Muslims are in the majority.

While the current insurgency began in 1989, violence surged again in 2016, with the death of a young militant leader, Burhan Wani. Last year, more than 500 people were killed – including civilians, security forces and militants – the highest such toll in a decade.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party have for a long time wanted to scrap Article 370 – a promise included in their manifesto for elections earlier this year.

They argued that Kashmir needed to be put on the same footing as the rest of India.

Once returned to power with an increased majority in May, the government lost no time in acting on its pledge.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49267912

CLOSE
CLOSE

President Donald Trump said our nation must condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy following two mass shootings in Dayton and El Paso.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said Wednesday he is talking with congressional leaders and considering tougher background checks for gun buyers as lawmakers coalesce around the idea of so-called “red flag” laws following mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio.

“I’m looking to do background checks,” Trump told reporters at the White House as he was departing for Dayton, where he will meet with shooting survivors and first responders. “I think background checks are important.”

Trump, who will also visit El Paso later Wednesday, said he senses there is “a very strong appetite” for background checks, though many lawmakers have so far mostly focused publicly on so-called “red flag” laws to keep guns out of the hands of people who are an imminent danger to themselves or others.

Trump indicated there wasn’t a “political appetite” for limiting gun magazines.

“There is a great appetite, and I mean a very strong appetite, for background checks,” he said. “I think we can bring up background checks.”

Last weekend’s shootings, which killed 31 people, appear to have opened the door – if only for a crack – to the possibility that Congress could pass the first significant gun-control legislation in more than two decades.

Congressional Republicans, who have staunchly resisted past measures to tighten restrictions on guns, appear closer to embracing the idea of a “red flag” law.

“There are some laws that I think bridge this issue of the guns and the mental health issue, and I think red flag laws is one,” Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, told reporters.

Congress has consistently rejected other attempts to tighten gun control regulations in the aftermath of other mass shootings.

Then-President Barack Obama angrily wiped away tears and urged Americans to demand that Congress “stand up to the gun lobby’s lies” and protect citizens from gun violence after 20 first-graders and six adults were killed in a mass shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn.

Congress did nothing.

Cries for tougher gun-control measures were met with congressional inaction after mass shootings at a South Carolina church, a Pittsburgh synagogue, an Orlando gay nightclub, a Maryland community newspaper, a Florida high school, a country music festival in Las Vegas and a Navy yard in Washington, D.C.

The last significant gun control measure to win congressional approval was an assault weapons ban enacted in 1994. The ban expired a decade later and lawmakers did not renew it.

Trump, however, said that in light of last weekend’s shootings, he intends to persuade Congress “to do things they don’t want to do.”

“You have a lot of people on one side and a lot of people on the other,” he said. “I have a lot of influence with a lot of people; I want to convince them to do the right thing.”

Trump said he has talked with congressional leaders over the past few days and would be meeting with other members of Congress.

On Capitol Hill, there are signs of movement as pressure has increased on Congress to do something to stop the carnage.

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., issued a statement saying that addressing gun violence is “a worthy conversation for lawmakers to have” and said he’s confident that Congress can find “common ground” on the red flag proposals.

Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., who has been pushing Congress for years to pass tougher background checks for gun buyers, said he talked to both Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., about the need for tougher gun laws following last weekend’s shootings.

“The truth is there is no law that we can pass that guarantees that there will never be another such mass shooting,” Toomey told reporters. “However, there are things that we can do to make our communities safer than they are today, and it’s past time for Congress to act.”

The investigation: FBI launches probe into Dayton shooter’s motive, ‘violent ideologies’

McConnell, who has faced a torrent of criticism for blocking gun-control legislation that already has passed the House by wide margins, said he has asked the chairman of three Senate committees to begin a bipartisan discussion about how to protect communities from gun violence “without infringing on Americans’ constitutional rights.”

McConnell gave no indication that he’s willing to move ahead on the background check legislation that was approved in February by the Democratic-controlled House.

For now, the idea that appears to have the best chance of winning the bipartisan support to move through Congress appears to be a measure to get guns out of the hands of people who are a danger to themselves or others.

Two senators – Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democrat Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut – said they have struck an agreement on the framework for “red flag” legislation that would provide grants and incentives to enable law enforcement and courts to remove guns when there’s a risk of danger to a gun owner or others.

The lawmakers will be finalizing details of the bill and reaching out to their colleagues for support in the coming days and weeks, Blumenthal said in a statement.

Presidential response: Donald Trump condemns white supremacy and vows action after mass shootings but offers few specifics

In the House, meanwhile, Rep. Mike Turner, whose daughter was in a bar across the street when the shooting started in Dayton on Saturday night, issued a statement Tuesday announcing his support for preventing military style weapon sales to civilians, magazine limits and red flag legislation.

“I strongly support the Second Amendment, but we must prevent mentally unstable people from terrorizing our communities with military style weapons,” said Turner, R-Ohio. “… The carnage these military-style weapons are able to produce when available to the wrong people is intolerable.”

Congress, he said, also must pass red flag legislation to quickly identify people who are dangerous and remove their ability to harm others.

“Too often after mass shootings, we hear there were early warning signs that were ignored,” he said.

For their part, Democrats insist that McConnell also permit the Senate to vote on the background check legislation that already has passed the House.

“We’ve discussed this long enough,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Tuesday at a joint news conference with Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. “Discussions are fine, but let’s pass this bill now.”

“Red flag” legislation “is OK, but it doesn’t substitute for doing this,” Schumer said. “It’s not enough.”

Carnage: After El Paso and Dayton, 112 killed in mass shootings over 216 days

Scott Jennings, a Republican political strategist and a former McConnell aide, said he believes McConnell is serious about finding common ground, although it’s not yet clear what form that policy might take.

Red flag laws appear to have the most momentum, Jennings said, but McConnell is right to want to make sure that whatever proposals emerge have bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate.

After last weekend’s shootings, “I think the nation wants something,” Jennings said, “even as most people understand that you can’t legislate all the crazy and evil out of the world.”

Yet even as Republicans step forward and embrace proposals like red flag laws, it will still be tough getting them through Congress, said Matt Glassman of the Government Affairs Institute at Georgetown University.

“Red flag laws tend to be the kind of thing that don’t get the pro-gun groups too worried,” he said. But, “I think you’re going to see a divisive battle about this among Republicans.”’

Contributing: Lisa Kaczke of the Sioux Falls Argus Leader

Bipartisan blame: Poll: Who’s to blame for mass shootings? On that, some bipartisan agreement

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/07/el-paso-and-dayton-shootings-gop-lawmakers-embrace-red-flag-gun-law/1927852001/

The grief and sorrow in Dayton, Ohio, and El Paso have begun to give way to anger and frustration in advance of President Trump’s planned visits Wednesday, with local leaders and residents increasingly vocal in their assertions that presidential condolences, thoughts and prayers will not be enough.

People are signing petitions, planning protests and, in Dayton, organizing a demonstration featuring an inflated “Baby Trump” to express their discontent with a president whose anti-immigrant rhetoric was echoed by a gunman who killed 22 people in El Paso. And while the motive of the man who killed nine people in Dayton remains unclear, Trump’s silence on the issue of guns has been criticized by local officials who want action to prevent future massacres.

“He’s made this bed and he’s got to lie in it. His rhetoric has been painful for many in our community,” Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley (D) told reporters Tuesday, adding that she supported the planned protests against Trump. “Watching the president for the past few years over the issue of guns, I don’t think he knows what he believes, frankly.”

The open repudiation of a visiting president in the aftermath of a mass tragedy was striking Tuesday as a growing chorus of critics made clear that Trump would not be universally welcome during a pair of condolence visits that will take Air Force One from the Rust Belt to the southern border.

“Dayton has been through enough, and we don’t want him here or his hateful rhetoric,” said Megan Baxter, a stay-at-home mother and local activist organizing a protest in the city for Wednesday. “I’m just tired of all the killing.”

At a makeshift memorial behind the El Paso Walmart where 22 were fatally shot Saturday, people gathered Tuesday to pray, to cry and to try to heal. Many said Trump’s planned visit was an unnecessary intrusion on the community’s efforts to process the tragedy and mourn the losses.

“Now’s not the time,” said David Nevarez, who describes himself as a veterans’ advocate. “We do not need anybody fanning the flames of hate, anger and racism. There’s enough in this world already.”

Maxine Morales, who was born and raised in El Paso, brought her two children to the memorial. She said the president’s rhetoric about immigration and the border have caused deep wounds in the city.

“At this moment, I’m just filled with anger and frustration and sadness,” Morales said, her voice breaking. “My parents were immigrants. And they came here to better their lives and to make sure that we all had better lives. So that really hits home, and it hurts.”

Authorities think the suspect in the El Paso attack — a 21-year-old who has been charged in the case — is the author of an online statement that denigrated immigrants and warned of a “Hispanic invasion” in Texas.

In a statement Monday, Trump denounced “racism, bigotry and white supremacy,” without acknowledging his own rhetoric — which has at times included warnings of “an invasion” across the southern border. Trump’s language has been embraced by far-right extremists.

The president has offered several proposals for reducing gun violence but has given few specifics and has largely steered clear of anything that would restrict broader access to firearms. Instead, he pointed to “gruesome and grisly video games” and online radicalization as drivers of the kind of violence that left at least 31 people dead in back-to-back mass shootings in the span of about 13 hours last weekend.

In Dayton, residents struggled with a mix of emotions Tuesday including sorrow, confusion and rage as they sought to make sense of how a gunman was able to kill nine people and injure dozens in less than a minute.

Dwayne Cargle stood outside the makeshift memorial where wilting flowers and the wax of melted candles cover the sidewalk, shaking his head.

Two of his friends were in the hospital after being trampled inside a bar as a man used an AR-15-type weapon with 100-round magazines to fire on revelers in Dayton’s Oregon District early Sunday.

“It don’t make no sense,” Cargle, 57, said. “They try to blame it on everything else. They say it’s video games and all this other mess. It’s hate. Plain and simple.”

Jeffrey Fudge, whose brother Derrick was killed in the early-morning rampage, called for limits on the military-style weapon he said was used to gun down his brother as he enjoyed a night out with his son.

“My nephew watched his father die in his arms,” he said. “I’m angry. I’m confused. I don’t think the nation will ever heal if this is the path we are going to take.”

While comforting grief-stricken communities in the wake of tragedy has been a time-honored tradition of politicians, there are growing signs that those affected by mass shootings want more from leaders than standard condolences.

Frustrated chants of “Do something!” drowned out Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine’s remarks at a Sunday vigil in Dayton. On Tuesday, DeWine (R) announced proposals aimed at curbing gun violence.

Trump could face a similar outpouring of frustration as he visits Dayton and El Paso. The White House declined to provide details of the president’s schedule.

“The President and First Lady are visiting these communities to speak with those affected, and thank the first responders and medical staff for their heroic actions,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement.

The visits could echo the president’s October trip to Pittsburgh, where hundreds of demonstrators gathered to protest Trump in the wake of a mass shooting at Tree of Life synagogue that left 11 people dead. Police said the alleged attacker had targeted Jewish people on a social media account using anti-refugee language that complained of refu­gee “invaders” around the same time Trump was railing against caravans of Central American asylum seekers.

Local leaders in El Paso and Dayton have said they would like the chance to address Trump directly to channel the frustration of their constituents.

“There’s a lot of anger out there,” said El Paso City representative Cissy Lizarraga, one of six Latinos on the eight-member city council, wearing black mourning clothes. “What we’re trying to do is to have a unified voice and to try to bring peace and calm in a situation, because that’s what’s going to help to heal our community.”

She said she has been deluged with phone calls and emails about the president’s visit, which many oppose.

“I am in mourning, mourning for my community, and unfortunately a lot of people think that the president somehow is responsible for this,” she said, adding that she did not blame him. But she said she would welcome the opportunity to “look at the president in the face so that he could see the pain that our community is suffering.”

Whaley, the Dayton mayor, said she planned to meet with Trump on Wednesday and would “absolutely” tell him “how unhelpful he’s been.”

She has called for the president to pursue gun-control measures, including a ban on the kind of military-style weapons and high-capacity magazines used in last weekend’s attacks.

DeWine stopped short of embracing bans on certain kinds of weaponry in Ohio, saying Tuesday that such issues would have to be dealt with at the federal level. Instead, he called Tuesday for the legislature to pass increased background checks and a law to get guns out of the hands of people deemed dangerous. He also backed more focus on ­mental-health initiatives and stricter penalties for those who purchase firearms illegally.

Some Republicans are showing an openness to new gun restrictions. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has so far refused to allow a vote on a universal background check bill passed by the House in February, said Monday that he was willing to work with the White House and Democratic lawmakers on legislation to address mass killings.

In Lexington, Ky., dozens of people upset with McConnell’s inaction on gun control and other legislation held a protest late into the night outside of his house. They banged pots and drums — at times even scraping a shovel across a sidewalk.

It was one of several demonstrations calling for stricter gun laws that erupted in cities across the country this week.

Some of the protests, including one Monday in front of NRA headquarters in Northern Virginia, were organized by gun-control organizations hoping to capitalize on public anger. Others seemed more spontaneous, including the Philadelphia Union soccer player who grabbed a microphone during a match Sunday.

“Congress, do something now! End gun violence,” Alejandro Bedoya yelled after scoring a goal.

Democrats running for president have been most forceful in linking Trump’s rhetoric to the attack in El Paso, and pushing for new restrictions on some firearms.

Former congressman Beto O’Rourke, who lives in El Paso, accused Trump of espousing the same white-supremacist views embraced by the suspected attacker. Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., called Trump a white nationalist and unveiled a proposal Tuesday to boost federal funding to combat hateful ideology and increase federal research into gun violence.

In Dayton, residents’ unease with Trump was heightened after he misspoke during his nationally televised address on Monday and referred to the city as “Toledo,” said Carin Al-Hamdani, who has organized a protest during the president’s visit.

She and Baxter, the stay-at-home mother, started a GoFundMe account to pay for a 20-foot high “Baby Trump” balloon to be shipped from Chicago, quickly raising more than $2,000. Hamdani, a lawyer, said someone volunteered to drive the balloon to Dayton, and that the money raised would be donated to victims of the shooting.

The Baby Trump balloon — which will be filled with air rather than helium — will be carrying a sign that says, “Welcome to Toledo Dayton! Don’t be a baby — Stand up to the NRA.” On the sign, the word “Toledo” will be crossed out.

Hernández reported from Dayton. Maria Sacchetti and Bob Moore in El Paso, Kevin Williams in Dayton and Hannah Knowles and Nick Miroff in Washington contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/we-dont-want-him-here-trump-to-face-protests-and-skepticism-as-he-visits-el-paso-and-dayton-after-mass-shootings/2019/08/06/55c9b306-b879-11e9-a091-6a96e67d9cce_story.html