The now 20-year-old Brooke (Skylar) Richardson, who gave birth in 2017, was facing a potential life term, charged with aggravated murder, involuntary manslaughter, child endangerment, tampering with evidence and gross abuse of a corpse, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported. Earlier this week a judge had dismissed the tampering charge, the Enquirer said.

Source Article from https://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/ny-ohio-cheerleader-richardson-buried-baby-backyard-20190912-gzpcjrb4tvashnwfmbpft3hafa-story.html

Within a day of a no-deal Brexit, truck traffic across the English Channel could be reduced by 40 percent to 60 percent, according to the document, because of new mandatory controls in France.

Trucks crossing the English Channel from Dover to France could face waits of up to two-and-a-half days, and it could take three months to work out new procedures to ease the delays.

The delays would not just inconvenience those attempting to cross the border, they could have a trickle-down impact across the southeast of England. Regional traffic disruptions caused by border delays could impair fuel distribution, with the potential to “disrupt fuel supply in London and the South-East.”

Because so many of Britain’s medicines and medical products are imported from the Continent, and many medicines have a limited shelf life, shortages of certain items are a real possibility.

The adult social care market is also at risk, the report says, because of an expected burst of inflation that could stretch the finances of the providers of elder care.

The document raises concerns of civil unrest. “Protests and counter-protests will take place across the U.K. and may absorb significant amounts of police resource,” it states. “There may also be a rise in public disorder and community tensions.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/12/world/europe/no-deal-brexit-impact.html

Julián Castro embarked on a fierce line of attack against Joe Biden over healthcare during Thursday night’s Democratic debate, culminating in him accusing the former vice president of forgetting what he said during the debate.

“I want every single American family to have a strong Medicare plan available,” Castro, 44, said before adding that he does believe people should be able to “choose to hold on to strong, solid private health insurance.”

“But the difference between what I support and what you support, Vice President Biden, is that you require them to opt-in,” Castro said, noting that under his plan, people would be automatically enrolled. “Barack Obama’s vision was not to leave 10 million people uncovered; he wanted every single person in this country covered. My plan would do that, your plan would not.”

“They do not have to buy in,” Biden, 76, responded.

“You just said that two minutes ago,” Castro shot back as Biden shook his head and said, “You do not have to buy in if you can’t afford it.”

As the two men talked over each other, Castro broke in and retorted to mixed applause and jeering from the crowd, “Are you forgetting what you said two minutes ago?”

“Are you forgetting already what you said just two minutes ago? I mean, I can’t believe that you said two minutes ago that they had to buy in, and now you’re saying they don’t have to buy — you’re forgetting that,” he said.

“I’m fulfilling the legacy of Barack Obama, and you’re not,” Castro added.

[ Related: Biden relies on notes during opening Democratic debate statement]

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/are-you-forgetting-what-you-said-two-minutes-ago-castro-accuses-biden-of-memory-loss

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/12/politics/who-won-the-debate/index.html

“Campaign donors give their hard-earned money to fund campaign activities, and the law makes clear that paying personal expenses is not a campaign activity,” said Adav Noti, former associate general counsel at the F.E.C. “When donors give, they have a reasonable expectation that their money will be used on a campaign and not on somebody’s car payment.”

Mr. Yang’s advisers said Thursday it was their understanding that the personal use statute applies only to a candidate and his campaign.

The $1,000 payments would begin sometime in the fall and would continue once a month for a year, regardless of whether Mr. Yang remained in the race for president, his campaign said. Advisers said they would ask people to apply for the dividends on the campaign website and would select the recipients based on their applications.

Mr. Yang’s campaign has framed the planned payments as an original idea never previously undertaken by a presidential candidate. One expert in campaign finance law said he could not recall a time when the F.E.C. had been forced to consider the legality of a stipend like the one Mr. Yang is proposing.

“Andrew Yang’s use of campaign funds to give ‘freedom dividends’ to supporters would push the boundaries of, and perhaps break, campaign finance law,” said Paul Seamus Ryan, a vice president at Common Cause, a nonpartisan organization that promotes government accountability. “This unprecedented use of campaign funds would give rise to a bunch of novel legal questions.”

Mr. Yang’s advisers raised a similar point Thursday, noting that the unusual nature of the giveaway means that federal agencies have not yet issued a definitive ruling on its legality. However, they asserted that those agencies would find their arguments convincing.

[We fact-checked what the candidates said at the Democratic debate.]

Experts noted that every person who gets paid by a campaign in exchange for goods and services, or both — like caterers at a campaign event — eventually cashes their paycheck and uses the money for personal expenses, exercising a sort of “conversion” that the F.E.C. does not prohibit. They suggested that to bolster his legal argument, Mr. Yang’s campaign could potentially ask the dividend recipients to perform tasks as a condition of getting the money and then argue that the payments are permissible because they represent compensation at market value. (Mr. Yang, however, has repeatedly said that the dividends he is proposing would be given out with no strings attached.)

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/12/us/politics/andrew-yang-debate-payments.html

Thursday’s Democratic presidential debate in Houston confirmed what we already knew: Beto O’Rourke needs to sit down, face reality, and drop out.

From the beginning of his presidential campaign, O’Rourke has come across as smug rather than substantive. A mediocre man and example of “white privilege” if there ever was one, the sheer audacity of his campaign launch was astounding: Imagine losing a Senate race, but thinking you somehow then deserve to become president. And in the now-famous Vanity Fair cover story in light of his campaign launch, O’Rourke said he “was born to be in it.”

Too bad he wasn’t born with any qualifications or talent. O’Rourke’s inadequacies have never been more clear than after the most recent ABC debate.

Within 10 seconds of opening his mouth for the first time, O’Rourke invoked the recent El Paso, Texas, mass shooting to exploit the tragedy to stump on gun control and reinvigorate his campaign, blaming it on President Trump, to boot. That’s right: His first order of business was to attempt to cash in on a massacre to score political points. Party affiliation aside, all sensible Americans know that such a shameless man ought not be president.

Now add in O’Rourke’s reiterated disdain for gun owners and Second Amendment rights. On the debate stage, he said, “Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47,” and continued to push his fake narrative of a “mandatory gun buyback,” aka forcible gun seizure.

When an ABC moderator asked O’Rourke, “Why are you the most qualified candidate to address the [political] divide?” he immediately pivoted back to the El Paso shooting and said that President Trump “poses a mortal threat to people of color all across this country.”

Yes, that’s right: O’Rourke’s answering to healing the divide is that Trump, and by implication, his supporters, are racist, evil, and a deadly threat to minorities. Then he basically called America a racist country, saying that the true start of the country was August 20, 1619, when the first slave was brought here. O’Rourke promised to sign a reparations bill to address this, because there’s nothing less divisive than “reparations” supported by less than a third of the country.

We get it. As a straight white dude in the Democratic Party of 2019, a certain amount of pandering is required. O’Rourke’s hands are basically tied. But this guy is obviously not capable of being a unifying president in any way, shape, or form, and it’s time for him to give it a rest.

Remember: In the lead-up to the debate, O’Rourke was averaging less than 3% in the polls. Voters just aren’t drawn to a mediocre white dude who thinks standing on a table is a personality, especially when it’s paired with radical policy, divisive rhetoric, and obnoxious grandstanding.

It doesn’t look like any of this is getting better. O’Rourke once again resorted to speaking his broken Spanish on the debate stage in a gross attempt to pander to Hispanic voters who he offensively assumes can’t understand English.

It’s never been more clear than after tonight: This man should never become president. Let’s just hope O’Rourke finally puts this joke to bed and stops subjecting us all to his midlife crisis of a campaign.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/abcs-houston-democratic-presidential-debate-showed-beto-orourke-should-face-reality-and-drop-out

Sen. Kamala Harris of California made a claim about why President Trump was not indicted that has been debunked by Attorney General William Barr and special counsel Robert Mueller during her opening statement at the Democratic presidential debate Thursday evening.

“The only reason you [Trump] have not been indicted is because there was a memo in the Department of Justice that says a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime,” Harris told the crowd at Texas Southern University.

But both Barr and Mueller have repeatedly contradicted the claim made by Harris and others that Trump would have been charged with a crime if not for the existence of an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion which says a president can’t be indicted while in office.

Mueller, who was appointed special counsel by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in May 2017, concluded in March 2019 that the Russian government had interfered in the 2016 presidential election, but he did not establish any criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians. Mueller laid out ten possible instances of obstruction of justice but did not reach a conclusion on whether or not obstruction had occurred. Barr and Rosenstein then determined that Trump had not obstructed justice.

Barr said in April that he and Rosenstein met with Mueller in early March and that they “specifically asked him about the OLC opinion and whether or not he was taking a position that he would have found a crime but for the existence of the OLC opinion.”

“And he made it very clear several times that that was not his position,” Barr continued in April. “He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.”

During his May press conference, Mueller said that “the special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy, and charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.” After Mueller’s roughly nine-minute statement, some politicians, pundits, and journalists were confused about whether that meant he would’ve charged Trump with a crime if the OLC opinion didn’t exist, so Barr and Mueller put forward a united front following the presser to clarify.

“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination — one way or the other — about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements,” a joint statement from DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and Mueller spokesman Peter Carr said in May.

A similar situation arose during Mueller’s testimony in front of the House of Representatives in July.

In his morning appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, Mueller caused confusion when he appeared to contradict Barr and himself when he declined to stand by his previous statement.

Rep. Ted Lieu of California questioned him, “I’d like to ask you the reason, again, you did not indict Donald Trump is because of OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”

“That is correct,” Mueller said in reply.

But Mueller walked that back during his opening remarks in front of the House Intelligence Committee that afternoon.

“Now, before we go to questions, I want to add a correction to my testimony this morning,” Mueller said. “I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu who said, and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.’”

“That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller said. “As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”

The day of Mueller’s testimony, Harris shared a post on Instagram promoting Lieu’s exchange with Mueller before deleting it.

Nevertheless, just a couple days after Mueller’s testimony, just like Harris on Thursday evening, Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler tried to use the exchange with Lieu as evidence that Trump would’ve been charged if not for the OLC opinion, despite the fact that Mueller walked that back and repeated that that wasn’t his position.

“He told us in a remarkable exchange with Mr. Lieu that, but for the Department of Justice policy prohibiting him from doing so, he would’ve indicted President Trump,” Nadler claimed in July. “Indeed, it is clear that any other citizen of this country who has behaved as this president has would have been charged with multiple crimes.”

Nadler opened an “impeachment inquiry” into Trump on Thursday morning.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kamala-harris-makes-claim-debunked-by-barr-and-mueller-on-why-trump-wasnt-indicted

Gregory Cheadle – a black man who Donald Trump referred to as “my African American” during a rally – has announced he is leaving the Republican party, citing the president’s “white superiority complex”.

The real estate broker and one-time Republican candidate for Congress, who attracted national attention in 2016 after Trump’s comments at a rally in Redding, California, now plans to run as an independent in the House of Representatives next year.

Cheadle, 62, told a radio program the tipping point came when Republicans came to Trump’s defence after he tweeted that four Democratic congresswoman of colour should leave the US and when he attacked Elijah Cummings’ home town of Baltimore.

Although Cheadle refused to describe the president as racist, he said Trump has a “white superiority complex”.

Cheadle told PBS NewsHour on Thursday: “When you look at his appointments for the bench: white, white, white, white, white, white, white. That to me is really damning to everybody else, because no one else gets a chance because he’s thinking that the whites are superior. Period.”

He added: “President Trump is a rich guy who is mired in white privilege to the extreme. Republicans are too sheepish to call him out on anything and they are afraid of losing their positions and losing any power themselves.”

He accused the Republican party of following a “pro-white” agenda and using black people as “political pawns”.

Recalling to PBS the moment Trump pointed at him at the rally in Redding, and said, “Look at my African American over here! Look at him! Are you the greatest?!” Cheadle said he saw it as a joke at the time, but now he sees it differently.

“I’m more critical of it today than I was back then because today I wonder to what extent he said that for political gain or for attention.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/12/trump-gregory-cheadle-republican-white-superiority-complex

CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin defended fellow network contributor and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe after the Department of Justice rejected his appeal to avoid criminal charges for lying to federal agents.

“The Department rejected your appeal of the United States Attorney’s Office’s decision in this matter. Any further inquiries should be directed to the United States Attorney’s Office,” said an email sent to McCabe’s attorneys, a source close to McCabe’s legal team told the Washington Examiner.

While reporting on the topic, Toobin wanted to let viewers know McCabe is a respected coworker at the network.

“Let me just emphasize the point you started with. Andy McCabe is a CNN contributor, he is a colleague and a friend to many of us who work here. He’s here recently, but people need to factor that in to what they’re hearing,” Toobin said Thursday.

“This is an extremely unusual prosecution. Andy McCabe had the right to speak to reporters. That is beyond dispute as deputy director of the FBI, he had the right to speak to reporters. He also has an impeccable record one of the most honored and successful FBI agents of his generation,” he added.

Toobin also pointed out President Trump has been a heavy critic of McCabe.

“The president of the United States has been on a crusade to disparage and insult Andrew McCabe for literally his entire presidency. He has been saying that McCabe was corrupt. McCabe’s wife ran for the state Senate in Virginia as a Democrat before all of this happened, he’s claimed, the president has claimed some sort of bias,” he said.

Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired McCabe in 2018, less than two days before he was set to retire. His firing was prompted by a Justice Department inspector general report found he misled former FBI Director James Comey and investigators about leaks to the media regarding the Hillary Clinton emails investigation and an inquiry into the Clinton Foundation.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cnn-analyst-defends-colleague-and-friend-andrew-mccabe-after-doj-rejects-appeal

The problem for the low-polling candidates is that Ms. Warren has now established herself as the candidate of ideas — ideas Democrats like. Along the way she has become very popular herself, a figure they may have allowed to become too imposing to take down.

Biden: After a shaky performance in the first debate, Mr. Biden was somewhat steadier in his second appearance, including when he reached for a classic Bidenism to respond to talk from his opponents about “Medicare for all” and the failings of the current health care system. “This idea is a bunch of malarkey,” he said, before warning about what a Medicare-for-all system would cost.

Harris: Ms. Harris’s attack on Mr. Biden over race and busing gave a jolt of energy to her campaign, attracting a surge in donations and a bump in the polls. By invoking her personal story, Ms. Harris also contrasted herself as a young, fresh face in the Democratic Party, as opposed to Mr. Biden’s elder statesman status.

Sanders: Mr. Sanders has put a big focus on his signature policy proposal, creating a Medicare-for-all system in the United States. “I wrote the damn bill!” he declared during the second debate. He has not let voters forget it: He has used the line many times on the campaign trail since then.

Warren: Ms. Warren found a convenient foil in John Delaney, the former Maryland congressman, who argued in the second debate that the progressive policies she advocates were unrealistic. Ms. Warren’s candidacy revolves around the idea of fighting for sweeping change, and her comeback to Mr. Delaney — expressing bafflement about why someone would run for president with a message of discouraging big ideas — packed a punch.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/12/us/politics/september-democratic-debate-live.html

[Want climate news in your inbox? Sign up here for Climate Fwd:, our email newsletter.]

The Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers, which worked together to write the original Obama water rule, are expected to issue a new, looser replacement regulation by the end of this year. It is expected that the new measure, still being developed, will retain federal protections for larger bodies of water, the rivers that drain into them and wetlands that are directly adjacent to those bodies of water.

But it will quite likely strip away protections for streams that run only during or after rainfalls, and for wetlands that are not adjacent to major bodies of water or connected to them by a surface channel. Those changes would represent a victory for farmers and rural landowners who aggressively lobbied the Trump administration.

Lawyers said the interim period between the repeal of the Obama rule and the implementation of the new Trump rule this year could lead to regulatory confusion for farmers and landowners.

“The Obama clean water rule had very clear lines defining which waters are protected by the Clean Water Act, versus which waters are not, while repealing the rule means replacing those lines with case-by-case calls,” said Blan Holman, an expert on water regulations with the Southern Environmental Law Center.

Mr. Holman said the administration was replacing “clear, bright-line rules” with a case-by-case system. “This will be very unpredictable,” he said.

Legal experts also predicted a barrage of lawsuits across the country.

Under the provisions of the Clean Water Act, legal challenges must be heard in Federal District Court, which is based at the state level, rather than federal appeals court. Richard J. Lazarus, a professor of environmental law at Harvard Law School, said that meant that opponents of the Trump administration would focus their challenges in states they perceived as friendly.

“It’s going to be chaos,” Mr. Lazarus said. “We’re going to see suits brought all over the country.”

For more news on climate and the environment, follow @NYTClimate on Twitter.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/12/climate/trump-administration-rolls-back-clean-water-protections.html

This video was originally published on February 08, 2017. Warren punctured the political noise when Senate Republicans silenced her reading of Coretta Scott King’s criticisms of Trump’s attorney general pick

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCCV75OQN_s

Aurora Cannabis exec says he is “very worried” about vaping…

“In Canada, it’s very different, and we’re heavily regulated by Health Canada, which is a good thing,” Executive Chairman Michael Singer says.

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/12/trump-says-he-would-consider-an-interim-trade-deal-with-china.html

A tropical disturbance near the Bahamas is getting more organized and has a strong chance of growing into a tropical depression or a tropical storm during the next two days as it sets its sights on Florida, forecasters from the National Hurricane Center said on Thursday.

If the system becomes a tropical storm, it would be named Humberto. As for its future track, no one knows for certain, but forecasters say lots of possibilities are on the table — including a path along the eastern coast of Florida towards the Carolinas, similar to the track of the recent monster storm, Hurricane Dorian.

As is common when storm systems are disorganized and barely in their formation stage, computer guidance models spit out a wide array of potential storm tracks.

Many models continue to favor a track across southern Florida and into the Gulf of Mexico. However, an overnight run of the European guidance model suggested the storm system could hug the eastern coast of Florida and move up the southeastern U.S. coast. And the National Hurricane Center’s official forecast map made a noticeable eastward shift in the projected track during the past 24 hours.

Not surprisingly, that sparked a big buzz on social media. Forecasters, however, say it’s far too early to determine where this tropical storm will go — if it even develops into a tropical storm.

Future storm track is ‘very uncertain’

The European model simulations “look rather interesting next week, though given the highly variable solutions run to run, it is best to take these individual simulations with a grain of salt,” the National Weather Service’s regional office in New Jersey said in its forecast discussion on Thursday.

The main American forecast model, known as the GFS, has a “totally different” projection on where the storm system may move, the weather service office notes. “The bottom line is that the large-scale pattern is of very low predictability next week, with model solutions unlikely to converge/stabilize for several more days.”

“It’s very uncertain what it’s long-term track is going to be,” said Jonathan O’Brien, a meteorologist at the weather service office in Mount Holly, which oversees forecasts for the Jersey Shore, Delaware and eastern Maryland.

“It’s way, way too early to know,” he added, not only the storm’s path but its intensity and how it would be influenced by other weather systems circulating in the Atlantic.

Weather experts at the Washington Post agree, calling it “a very challenging system to forecast,” noting that “its ragged, sloppy structure right now makes it difficult for computer models to project its future path.”

O’Brien says his office will be closely monitoring the progress of the storm system and the public should monitor trustworthy weather sources, like the National Hurricane Center and the National Weather Service.

Status of tropical disturbance

As of Thursday afternoon, the National Hurricane Center says there’s a 70 percent chance the tropical disturbance will form into a tropical depression or a named tropical storm within 48 hours, and an 80 percent chance that will occur in the next five days.

If the system keeps moving northwest through the northwestern Bahamas and toward the Florida Peninsula, the agency might issue “Potential Tropical Cyclone advisories” later today.

National Hurricane Center

This is the forecast track for a tropical disturbance that has a high probability of becoming a tropical storm by this weekend.

UPDATE (5:20 p.m. Thursday): The National Hurricane Center has begun to issue public advisories on this system, which is now being called Potential Tropical Cyclone Nine, and a tropical storm warning has been issued for the northwestern Bahamas. Forecasters expect this system to strengthen into a tropical depression by Friday and a tropical storm by early Saturday morning as it moves close to the southeastern region of Florida. The storm could make landfall Saturday afternoon in east-central Florida or move just off the coast, according to the official forecast map issued by the hurricane center. (see map above)

“This disturbance will bring heavy rainfall and gusty winds across portions of the Bahamas through Friday, especially in portions of the northwestern Bahamas affected by Hurricane Dorian,” the agency said.

The Atlantic hurricane season is at its historical peak this week, and weather experts say there are multiple signs there will be an uptick in tropical storm activity during the next few weeks and into October.

Len Melisurgo | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

A tropical cyclone is a low-pressure system that develops over tropical or sub-tropical waters, with a closed wind circulation around a well-defined center. The types of cyclones vary by strength.

Len Melisurgo may be reached at LMelisurgo@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @LensReality or like him on Facebook. Find NJ.com on Facebook.

Source Article from https://www.nj.com/news/2019/09/new-tropical-storm-could-be-brewing-near-florida-but-track-remains-uncertain.html

When John Bolton was ousted as national security adviser, I noted that it was great news for fans of Barack Obama’s Iran policy. Some thought I was exaggerating, but then on Wednesday we got this Bloomberg report that with Bolton gone, Trump was looking to give money to Iran to induce a leader of the terrorist regime, Hassan Rouhani, to meet with him:

“President Donald Trump discussed easing sanctions on Iran to help secure a meeting with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani later this month, prompting then-National Security Advisor John Bolton to argue forcefully against such a step, according to three people familiar with the matter.

After an Oval Office meeting on Monday when the idea came up, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin voiced his support for the move as a way to restart negotiations with Iran, some of the people said. Later in the day, Trump decided to oust Bolton, whose departure was announced Tuesday.”

This development is not surprising to those who have been following the administration’s erratic Iran policy. For all the headlines that were generated about Trump pulling out of Obama’s Iran deal and ratcheting up sanctions, thanks to intense lobbying by Mnunchin, Trump has stopped well short of following through on his promise of “maximum pressure” by waiving some key sanctions. Most worrisome, Trump has repeatedly granted waivers for “civilian” nuclear cooperation. This has helped keep Obama’s nuclear deal warm for a potential Democratic successor to revive it.

Now, Trump desperately wants to meet with Rouhani, and is willing to ease up on the economic pressure campaign that has been put on Iran. We’ve gone from the possibility of a meeting under certain conditions, to a willingness to meet without preconditions, to a situation in which it seems increasingly likely that Trump is going to capitulate to Iran and meet the regime’s conditions for a meeting.

At least in Obama’s case, it could be argued that the administration was consistent. They believed a policy of appeasing Iran would strengthen moderates, and reorient the Middle East, and they were hostile toward traditional U.S. allies in the region — the Arab states and Israel.

In Trump’s case, however, his Iran policy is all over the place. He decided to pull out of the Iran deal, but then short arm the “maximum pressure” campaign, and now wants to offer concessions in exchange for a meeting that would be a diplomatic coup for Iran without doing anything to advance U.S. interests. It’s unclear why Trump wanted to pull out of the deal in the first place if this is how he followed through.

There are multiple possible explanations for this vacillation. One is that Trump has competing impulses on foreign policy — wanting to seem tough, wanting to avoid conflict. The other is that he has advisers pulling him in different directions — hawks, non-interventionists who portray any toughness with Iran as a prelude to war, and those like Mnuchin who are sympathetic to Obama’s policies.

At the same time, Trump’s showman nature makes him crave spectacle. He loved the idea of ripping up Obama’s Iran deal, and now he loves the idea of a historic handshake with a leader of one of the chief enemies of the U.S. This policy incoherence is dangerous. Let’s hope there is somebody left in the administration can talk him out of his turn toward Obama 2.0.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/trumps-erratic-iran-policy-careens-toward-becoming-obama-2-0

    ‘);$vidEndSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–active’);}};CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;var configObj = {thumb: ‘none’,video: ‘politics/2019/08/13/kth-donald-trump-racist-comments-sot-vpx-ac360.cnn’,width: ‘100%’,height: ‘100%’,section: ‘domestic’,profile: ‘expansion’,network: ‘cnn’,markupId: ‘body-text_9’,theoplayer: {allowNativeFullscreen: true},adsection: ‘const-article-inpage’,frameWidth: ‘100%’,frameHeight: ‘100%’,posterImageOverride: {“mini”:{“width”:220,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190812202345-kth-donald-trump-racist-comments-sot-vpx-ac360-00000000-small-169.jpg”,”height”:124},”xsmall”:{“width”:307,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190812202345-kth-donald-trump-racist-comments-sot-vpx-ac360-00000000-medium-plus-169.jpg”,”height”:173},”small”:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”http://www.noticiasdodia.onlinenewsbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/190812202345-kth-donald-trump-racist-comments-sot-vpx-ac360-00000000-large-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”medium”:{“width”:780,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190812202345-kth-donald-trump-racist-comments-sot-vpx-ac360-00000000-exlarge-169.jpg”,”height”:438},”large”:{“width”:1100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190812202345-kth-donald-trump-racist-comments-sot-vpx-ac360-00000000-super-169.jpg”,”height”:619},”full16x9″:{“width”:1600,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190812202345-kth-donald-trump-racist-comments-sot-vpx-ac360-00000000-full-169.jpg”,”height”:900},”mini1x1″:{“width”:120,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190812202345-kth-donald-trump-racist-comments-sot-vpx-ac360-00000000-small-11.jpg”,”height”:120}}},autoStartVideo = false,isVideoReplayClicked = false,callbackObj,containerEl,currentVideoCollection = [],currentVideoCollectionId = ”,isLivePlayer = false,mediaMetadataCallbacks,mobilePinnedView = null,moveToNextTimeout,mutePlayerEnabled = false,nextVideoId = ”,nextVideoUrl = ”,turnOnFlashMessaging = false,videoPinner,videoEndSlateImpl;if (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === false) {autoStartVideo = false;if (autoStartVideo === true) {if (turnOnFlashMessaging === true) {autoStartVideo = false;containerEl = jQuery(document.getElementById(configObj.markupId));CNN.VideoPlayer.showFlashSlate(containerEl);} else {CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = true;}}}configObj.autostart = CNN.Features.enableAutoplayBlock ? false : autoStartVideo;CNN.VideoPlayer.setPlayerProperties(configObj.markupId, autoStartVideo, isLivePlayer, isVideoReplayClicked, mutePlayerEnabled);CNN.VideoPlayer.setFirstVideoInCollection(currentVideoCollection, configObj.markupId);videoEndSlateImpl = new CNN.VideoEndSlate(‘body-text_9’);function findNextVideo(currentVideoId) {var i,vidObj;if (currentVideoId && jQuery.isArray(currentVideoCollection) && currentVideoCollection.length > 0) {for (i = 0; i 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.showEndSlateForContainer();if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.disable();}}}}callbackObj = {onPlayerReady: function (containerId) {var playerInstance,containerClassId = ‘#’ + containerId;CNN.VideoPlayer.handleInitialExpandableVideoState(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, CNN.pageVis.isDocumentVisible());if (CNN.Features.enableMobileWebFloatingPlayer &&Modernizr &&(Modernizr.phone || Modernizr.mobile || Modernizr.tablet) &&CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibraryName(containerId) === ‘fave’ &&jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length > 0 &&CNN.contentModel.pageType === ‘article’) {playerInstance = FAVE.player.getInstance(containerId);mobilePinnedView = new CNN.MobilePinnedView({element: jQuery(containerClassId),enabled: false,transition: CNN.MobileWebFloatingPlayer.transition,onPin: function () {playerInstance.hideUI();},onUnpin: function () {playerInstance.showUI();},onPlayerClick: function () {if (mobilePinnedView) {playerInstance.enterFullscreen();playerInstance.showUI();}},onDismiss: function() {CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer.disable();playerInstance.pause();}});/* Storing pinned view on CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer So that all players can see the single pinned player */CNN.Videx = CNN.Videx || {};CNN.Videx.mobile = CNN.Videx.mobile || {};CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer = mobilePinnedView;}if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length) {videoPinner = new CNN.VideoPinner(containerClassId);videoPinner.init();} else {CNN.VideoPlayer.hideThumbnail(containerId);}}},onContentEntryLoad: function(containerId, playerId, contentid, isQueue) {CNN.VideoPlayer.showSpinner(containerId);},onContentPause: function (containerId, playerId, videoId, paused) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, paused);}},onContentMetadata: function (containerId, playerId, metadata, contentId, duration, width, height) {var endSlateLen = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0).length;CNN.VideoSourceUtils.updateSource(containerId, metadata);if (endSlateLen > 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.fetchAndShowRecommendedVideos(metadata);}},onAdPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType) {/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays an Ad */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onAdPause: function (containerId, playerId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType, instance, isAdPause) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, isAdPause);}},onTrackingFullscreen: function (containerId, PlayerId, dataObj) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleFullscreenChange(containerId, dataObj);if (mobilePinnedView &&typeof dataObj === ‘object’ &&FAVE.Utils.os === ‘iOS’ && !dataObj.fullscreen) {jQuery(document).scrollTop(mobilePinnedView.getScrollPosition());playerInstance.hideUI();}},onContentPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, event) {var playerInstance,prevVideoId;if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreEpicAds’);}clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onContentReplayRequest: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);var $endSlate = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0);if ($endSlate.length > 0) {$endSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–active’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’);}}}},onContentBegin: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.enable();}/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays a video. */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.mutePlayer(containerId);if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘removeEpicAds’);}CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoSourceUtils.clearSource(containerId);jQuery(document).triggerVideoContentStarted();},onContentComplete: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreFreewheel’);}navigateToNextVideo(contentId, containerId);},onContentEnd: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(false);}}},onCVPVisibilityChange: function (containerId, cvpId, visible) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, visible);}};if (typeof configObj.context !== ‘string’ || configObj.context.length 0) {configObj.adsection = window.ssid;}CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibrary(configObj, callbackObj, isLivePlayer);});CNN.INJECTOR.scriptComplete(‘videodemanddust’);

    Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/12/politics/trump-my-african-american-leaving-gop/index.html

    On Thursday night, the third Democratic debate will be the first to put all the major Democratic candidates on one stage together. But among the 10 candidates, only three have been consistently registering frontrunner status in the polls: Former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

    And that’s been pretty consistent for several months now.

    Between the two rounds — and four nights — of debates, there have been a lot of break out moments for those three and some of the other seven candidates who will be on stage Thursday (Sen. Kamala Harris, South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, entrepreneur Andrew Yang, Sen. Cory Booker, former Rep. Beto O’Rourke, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, and former US housing secretary Julián Castro).

    There was the time Harris took Biden to task over his comments about working with southern Democratic segregationists in the Senate. Booker tried to have a repeat viral moment over Biden’s criminal justice record in the second debate. O’Rourke surprised everyone by whipping out some broken Spanish. Sanders found a catch phrase when pushed back on criticism on his signature proposal, the Medicare for All Act, by declaring he wrote the “damn” bill. Or Warren asked why moderate John Delaney even bothered to run for president.

    But these moments haven’t really changed the fundamental polling outcomes going into Thursday:

    1. Joe Biden is still leading nationally.
    2. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are basically tied for second, and nipping closely at Biden’s heels in a few early states.
    3. Everyone else needs a break-through moment that will stick.

    There have been ongoing trends that are worth keeping a close eye on. Warren’s upward trajectory in polling continues. Sanders, meanwhile has remained pretty stable, while showing some good showings in early state polls. And there are a lot of undecided voters among key demographics that could make or break these candidates chances.

    This is looking increasingly like a three-way race

    Recent polls all seem to paint a similar picture.

    Biden is winning overall. Going into this week, an ABC/Washington Post from September 2-5, found Biden with 27 percent of the vote, Sanders with 19 percent and Warren with 17 percent. None of the other candidates registered double digits. Biden was overwhelmingly seen as the most electable candidate against Trump in that poll. A CNN poll during the same time found similar results: Biden at 24 percent, and Warren and Sanders at 18 and 17 percent respectively.

    That’s consistent with the polling averages overall, that puts Biden at roughly 28 percent of national support — roughly 10 points ahead of the rest of the field. Compared to the very beginning of his campaign, when he was polling in the low 40s, Biden’s clout in the field has dropped substantially, but he’s remained a stable lead throughout the summer. The exception is in South Carolina, where Biden has 43 percent of the support — a full 25 points ahead of second-place Sanders, according to the most recent late August, early September YouGov poll.

    Biden has been put on the defensive throughout the primary cycle as candidates across the ideological spectrum have attacked his record and past comments. Some of these moments have affected Biden’s poll numbers — he took a dip after Harris publicly called him out for his position on school busing in the 1970s — but he’s always bounced back. And despite talking himself into a seemingly never ending “gaffe” news cycle, Biden remains in the lead.

    That said, Biden’s frontrunner status isn’t going unchallenged. Sanders and Warren are also registering double digits in the polls and they’ve increasingly seen their strength come in state polls in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada. The Real Clear Politics polling average puts the two in a dead heat, as did an early September YouGov poll which saw Warren and Biden in a tie at 24 percent and Sanders behind at 17 percent.

    A Franklin Pierce-Boston Herald New Hampshire poll this week, in fact, put Sanders up 7 points ahead of the rest of the field, with 29 percent of the vote. Biden came in second with 21 percent, followed by Warren (17 percent). Another YouGov New Hampshire poll from late August into early September put Warren ahead of the three, with 27 percent, with Sanders and Biden essentially tied for second and third. Sanders led the latest YouGov poll out of Nevada, another early state, by two points, with Biden and Warren trailing closely behind.

    Sanders and Warren support similar policies and have occupied the most progressive flank of the Democratic party, but as Vox’s Andrew Prokop noted, they have had different trajectories in the race. Sanders, who had high name recognition going into this election from his 2016 run, has remained relatively stagnant in second place. Meanwhile, Warren has seen a steady rise.

    There are a lot of undecided voters

    About a quarter of the Democratic electorate is still undecided — a share of voters that hasn’t substantially shrunk since April, when Biden first jumped in.

    Poll after poll has shown that Democratic voters are more willing to pick a candidate that they think will win against Donald Trump than a candidate they are more ideologically aligned to. In other words, electability matters to Democrats this election cycle, a lot.

    The good news for the candidates in the Democratic field is that in hypothetical match-ups, Trump loses to almost all of them. As Vox’s Sean Collins pointed out, a September 10 New Hampshire Emerson poll even found Yang — who hasn’t substantially topped 2 percent of support — defeating Trump comfortably. The ABC-Washington Post poll found Biden, Warren, Sanders, and Harris beating Trump by double-digit margins. But that doesn’t always match up with voters’ perceptions.

    The number of undecided voters could have interesting implications for some of the top candidates, particularly in demographics that represent a core part of the Democratic base. For example, an Essence poll of black women found while older generations primarily supported Biden, and younger black women supported Sanders, 26 percent were still undecided. In states like South Carolina, where black voters make up 60 percent of the Democratic base, that could make or break some candidate’s chances. Candidates like Warren who has struggled to shore up support among black voters so far.

    There’s still a big field of candidates who haven’t had breakthroughs

    Meanwhile, the rest of the field needs a break out moment that will actually stick.

    Harris had some momentum after the first debate when she took on Biden. State polls in Iowa and South Carolina offered a little more light for Harris in July. She outpaced Warren and Sanders in a mid-July Monmouth poll of South Carolina voters and essentially tied with Warren in a YouGov poll of Iowa in July. But in national polls, that was a fleeting moment of electoral success, and in the past two months she’s slipped back solidly into fourth place.

    Similarly, Buttigieg, who enjoyed a major media frenzy early on, hasn’t been able to substantially make a dent in the crowded field. And not far behind Harris and Buttigieg sit a tier of candidates, from O’Rourke, to Booker and Yang stuck at around 2 to 3 percent of the vote.

    The debates, as always, give these candidates a chance to break out. But they’ll need to have a moment that actually sticks.

    Correction: This article incorrectly identified the Franklin Pierce-Boston Herald New Hampshire poll as a poll with The Boston Globe.

    Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/9/12/20856894/democratic-primary-polls-biden-warren-sanders-2020-debate

    The fire that killed 34 people on a commercial dive boat off California started while all crew members were asleep, federal investigators said Thursday, confirming the lack of a “night watchman” whose job it is to look after the vessel overnight.

    The 75-foot commercial dive boat, the Conception, burst into flames off Santa Cruz Island early on Sept. 2, but by the time five crew members above deck noticed, the fire was so intense that no one below could be saved.

    Officials say initial examinations indicate the 33 passengers and a member of the crew died of smoke inhalation before being burned. Only the five crew members above deck were able to escape the flames.

    The last body was recovered by divers on Wednesday.

    According to its preliminary report, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined that five crew members were asleep in upper-deck berths at the time of the fire, as was the crew member who died in the bunkroom.

    Investigators are still working to determine the cause of the fire, and it could be more than a year before the NTSB releases its final report.

    Source Article from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonwells/dive-boat-fire-preliminary-report-ntsb

    R.E.M.’s Mike Mills (left) and Michael Stipe performing in 2004.

    Tim Mosenfelder/Getty Images


    hide caption

    toggle caption

    Tim Mosenfelder/Getty Images

    R.E.M.’s Mike Mills (left) and Michael Stipe performing in 2004.

    Tim Mosenfelder/Getty Images

    There’s a new, unreleased song from R.E.M. out today, with all proceeds going to Mercy Corps, an organization helping those in the Bahamas impacted by Hurricane Dorian.

    “Fascinating” was originally recorded for the 2001 album Reveal, but “it made the record too long… and something had to go,” Mike Mills says. This 2004 version — an ornate ballad with twinkly electronics, an oboe and flute arrangement and a psychedelic climax — was made at Compass Point Studios in Nassau, Bahamas.

    “We first became aware of Mercy Corps around the time of Hurricane Katrina, and we supported their efforts to help in that situation,” Mills tells Bandcamp Daily. “I spend a lot of time every year in the Abaco Islands, which was literally ground zero for this disaster. I know a lot of people who lost everything — their homes, their businesses, literally everything they own is gone.”

    “I have been fortunate to spend many weeks working and playing in the Bahamas, making friends and lots of music there,” Mills continues. “It breaks my heart to see the damage wrought by Hurricane Dorian. Please help us and Mercy Corps do what we can to alleviate the suffering caused by this catastrophe.”

    Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/09/12/760122210/r-e-m-releases-a-single-from-the-vaults-to-benefit-hurricane-dorian-victims