Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

A number of people are being evacuated from Great Abaco to the capital, Nassau

Head of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) has compared the damage from Hurricane Dorian in the Bahamas to that of a nuclear bomb.

Mark Green said he had taken a flight to observe the damage caused by the storm on Grand Bahama and the Abacos islands.

Dorian ripped through the Bahamas last Sunday with category five winds with some gusts reaching 300km/h (200mph).

So far 43 people are confirmed dead however the number is expected to rise.

Prime Minister Hubert Minnis called the loss of life “catastrophic and devastating”.

Mr Green told Reuters news agency: “I was struck by the focused nature of the devastation.

“There are parts of Abaco and the Bahamas that don’t show a great deal of damage, and then there are clusters and communities that were devastated, almost as though nuclear bombs were dropped on them.”

USAID says it is working with the government of the Bahamas to provide emergency shelter, medical care, food and water.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Hurricane Dorian ripped through the Bahamas last Sunday

Thousands of evacuees are fleeing Abaco for Nassau. A number of passenger planes, cruise liners and government boats and ships have arrived to transport evacuees to Nassau, the Bahamas’ capital, and Florida.

About 3,500 people have been evacuated to Nassau so far. On Saturday, a cruise liner carrying 1,400 people docked in Riviera Beach, Florida.

Officials have acknowledged that Nassau will struggle to house all of the people requiring shelter.

According to the United Nations’ World Food Programme, some 70,000 people are in need of food and shelter. The islands have a population of about 400,000.

In Marsh Harbour in the Abacos, 90% of infrastructure is damaged or destroyed.

Media captionOn board a UK ship offering aid and rescue to the Bahamas

The prime minister said supplies of food and water were adequate.

However there is anger among some people in Abaco against their government for failing to provide enough help.

“We’ve had to funnel gasoline out of destroyed cars to get injured people back and forth. There’s no food, no medicine and no water,” said one resident of Marsh Harbour, Tepeto Davis,

The US Coast Guard and Navy are shipping in relief supplies.

Hurricane Dorian has diminished into a post-tropical cyclone. On Saturday, it smashed into the Canadian province of Nova Scotia, toppling trees and cutting power to more than 450,000 homes.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-49629850

Job growth falls short of expectations as August payrolls rise…

The increase fell short of Wall Street estimates for 150,000, while the unemployment rate stayed at 3.7%, as expected.

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/09/hong-kong-police-fire-tear-gas-as-protesters-vandalize-the-city-after-thousands-appeal-to-trump.html

“The president’s counsel may respond in writing to information and testimony presented to the committee in open session,” the resolution says, adding that Mr. Trump’s lawyers may also be invited to review and respond to information kept secret if the chairman chooses.

One of the aides involved in drafting the resolution said that the president’s lawyers could yet play a larger, in-person role, as well, if they requested it.

There may be other benefits to taking a procedural vote, too. Though the resolution does not mention matters of decorum, Democrats believe the vote to adopt it will allow lawmakers to get around normal House rules that limit their ability to accuse the president of crime, the aide said.

The Judiciary Committee plans to finalize the resolution on Monday, the aides said, and could vote as soon as Wednesday to adopt it. Details of the procedures were first reported on Friday by Politico after Judiciary Committee aides briefed lawmakers on the planned vote, but the draft text has not previously been reported.

Lawmakers from the president’s party have oscillated between criticizing the mechanics of Democrats’ investigation and dismissing their’ impeachment efforts as a pathetic and futile hunt for nonexistent evidence to oust Mr. Trump. But without the votes to overpower the Democrats, they have little recourse but to vocally object.

“If they really want to do this, they have to bring impeachment to the floor,” the top Republican on the committee, Representative Doug Collins of Georgia, said on Fox News on Sunday. “This is simply a show. It is a travesty. And, frankly, they should be ashamed.”

The Judiciary Committee has been edging toward a full-scale impeachment inquiry since the spring, when Democrats began calling witnesses and demanding evidence related to a range of potential presidential misconduct.

But only in July, after testimony from Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, did the committee formally declare to a judge that what had begun as a regular congressional oversight investigation was now primarily focused on whether to recommend articles of impeachment.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/08/us/politics/democrats-judiciary-procedures-impeachment-trump.html

CLOSE

The top U.S. military officer says it’s too early to talk about a full American troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, as peace talks with the Taliban appear to be near a final agreement. (Aug. 28)
AP, AP

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump is facing backlash after announcing he planned to hold a secret meeting with the Taliban at Camp David this weekend but canceled it over attacks overseas that left 12 dead, including one American. 

Republican and Democratic leaders sharply criticized the president over two main concerns: bringing members of the Taliban to the U.S.—specifically to Camp David, a presidential retreat for presidents used for administrations, and the timing of the meeting — just days before the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. 

The Trump administration and leaders of the Taliban, an extremist Islamic organization that controls about half of Afghanistan, have been in peace talks for months and closing in on a possible deal that would remove about 5,000 American troops from five bases over the next five months if the Taliban fulfills promises to reduce violence and prevent Afghanistan from becoming a haven for terrorists. 

More: Donald Trump’s secretary of state says Afghanistan talks are dead ‘for now’

More: Trump suspends Afghanistan peace talks after attack, cancels secret Camp David meeting

The president revealed plans to host Taliban leaders on Twitter Saturday evening, explaining that it was canceled and all peace talks were off after the group claimed responsibility for a car bomb this week that killed an American and 11 others. 

But the news that a meeting was planned drew criticism as skeptics have said the Taliban, itself a militant Islamic group that harbored Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda —which carried out the 9/11 attacks — cannot be trusted. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle vented their frustrations. 

More: ‘Agreement in principle’ reached with Taliban to withdraw 5,000 US troops within five months

More: 15 years after Sept. 11, the questions that still remain in our minds

Rep. Liz Cheney, one of most powerful House Republicans whose father was vice president during the 9/11 attacks, said “no member of the Taliban should set foot” at Camp David. 

“Camp David is where America’s leaders met to plan our response after al Qaeda, supported by the Taliban, killed 3000 Americans on 9/11,” said Cheney, R-Wyoming, on Sunday. “No member of the Taliban should set foot there. Ever. The Taliban still harbors al Qaeda.”

Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger, an Air Force veteran who flew missions throughout the Middle East — including Afghanistan, said members of the group should “NEVER” be allowed in the U.S.  

“Never should leaders of a terrorist organization that hasn’t renounced 9/11 and continues in evil be allowed in our great country,” tweeted Kinzinger, R-Ill. “NEVER. Full stop.” 

Democrats also piled on. After Trump’s announcement, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D- Calif., wrote on Twitter: “You brought the Taliban to the United States the week of September 11?” 

Rep. Justin Amash, who recently switched from the Republican party to become an independent, also blasted the move.

“How about we end the war without inviting the Taliban to dinner on the week of 9/11?” he wrote on Twitter. 

Others pointed to posts the president made while his predecessor, Barack Obama, was in the White House and working to negotiate a peace deal in Afghanistan. 

“While @BarackObama is slashing the military, he is also negotiating with our sworn enemy the Taliban–who facilitated 9/11,” Trump wrote in 2012. 

But the controversial meeting and its cancelation have boosted uncertainty over Trump’s hopes to fulfill a campaign promise in ending America’s longest war and bringing U.S. troops home from Afghanistan. 

On Sunday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the peace talks were dead “for now” and defended Trump’s now aborted meeting. 

“The Taliban tried to gain negotiating advantage by conducting terror attacks inside of the country,” Pompeo said on CNN’s ‘State of the Union,’ one in a string of television interviews he conducted Sunday. “It made no sense for the Taliban to be rewarded for that kind of bad behavior.”

After the 9/11 attacks, U.S.-led forces invaded Afghanistan, toppled the Taliban and tried to foster democracy in the war-torn country. But remnants of the extremist group have been fighting the government ever since, and the Taliban now controls about half the country again.

CLOSE

President Donald Trump told Cabinet members the Islamic State and Taliban should fight each other instead of having the U.S. involved.
USA TODAY

More than 2,400 American soldiers have been killed in the war, according to the most recent figures from the Pentagon. There are currently about 22,000 coalition troops in Afghanistan now, 14,000 of them Americans.

Trump’s hope for a speedy withdrawal of U.S. forces has drawn opposition from within his own administration, including military leaders who want a more phased approach. Critics fear a premature withdrawal would encourage the Taliban to re-take control of the country.

Contributing: David Jackson, Deirdre Shesgreen and John Fritze

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/08/president-trump-criticized-taliban-camp-david/2255653001/

All 100 of these generators were purchased in Florida and are being shipped to the Bahamas.

A man walked into a Costco in Florida and left with 100 generators, all of which are heading to the Bahamas.

His receipt read $49,285.70 and most of that came from paying $450 a pop for 100 generators. Peas, beans, coffee, salt, pepper and other essentials made up the rest of his mega purchase from a Costco in Jacksonville, Florida, on Wednesday.

All of it is going to those in need on the hard-hit islands of Grand Bahama and Abaco, he said.

The man wishes not to be named. He said he doesn’t want the attention and would rather that people focus on helping those affected by Hurricane Dorian in the Bahamas.

A photo of the anonymous donor was snapped by Alec Sprague, who was shopping at Costco at the time.

“I had to go up there to him and say, ‘Thank you for doing this,'” Sprague said. “I am so glad to see someone doing this.”

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/hurricane-dorian-bahamas-live-updates/index.html

Following President Trump‘s claim that Alabama could have been affected by Hurricane Dorian, The Federalist editor Mollie Hemingway said on “Media Buzz” Sunday that the media’s nonstop coverage of the event was uncalled for — and she specifically called out CNN.

“As people die, CNN and other media outlets are focusing on what, exactly?” she asked. “You almost get the feeling that the media decided at the beginning of the week, they were going to make Trump’s handling of the hurricane a major story.”

She continued, “You shouldn’t have just an oppositional stance as your approach, but you need to have better news judgment than they showed.”

Trump faced media backlash after he was said to have taken a marker and drawn a possible path of the storm that would have affected Alabama. Members of the media proceeded to mock Trump and claimed he was making false statements to the American public.

PERFECT STORY: MEDIA POUND TRUMP OVER ‘SHARPIE-GATE’ HURRICAN MAP

Trump responded on Twitter and kept the issue alive by claiming he had been correct, before blaming the uproar on media bias.

“[Dorian] turned North and went up the coast, where it continues now. In the one model through Florida, the Great State of Alabama would have been hit or grazed. In the path it took, no. Read my FULL FEMA statement. What I said was accurate! All Fake News in order to demean!” Trump tweeted on Thursday.

“Just as I said, Alabama was originally projected to be hit. The Fake News denies it!”

TRUMP DOUBLES DOWN ON CLAIM DORIAN THREATENED ALABAMA, SLAMS MEDIA MOCKERY

Hemingway said the media had no moral high ground when it came to letting things go, and accused them of devoting hours and hours to a story that wasn’t worthy of coverage in the first place.

“It was unbelievable to watch this week, so much coverage devoted to ‘Sharpie-gate,'” she said earlier in the interview. “They say that the president can’t let things go, and that’s absolutely true, but the media are in no position to say that, given how they handle this.”

More from Media

She continued, “This is such a minor point that even if you put the worst construction on it, it does not deserve seven days of coverage, 24 hours, hundreds of stories, front-page news.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

CNN host Brian Stelter tweeted about the story on Sunday and claimed President Trump was purposely being untruthful when he made his remarks.

“The words we use and the frames we choose matter a lot. Here, I argue that the media’s framing of Trump’s Alabama errors actually let the president off easy. This wasn’t ‘Sharpie-gate,’ it was ‘lying about a hurricane-gate,'” he wrote.

CNN did not immediately respond to Fox News’ requests for comment.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-sharpie-gate-alabama-media-bias

September 8 at 11:49 AM

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Sunday defended President Trump’s now-scuttled plan to host members of the Taliban leadership and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani at Camp David, amid a backlash from members of both parties.

In interviews on all five major Sunday morning news shows, Pompeo argued that Trump was willing to take a political risk to strike a deal on reducing the American troop presence in Afghanistan. But he conceded that the talks are dead “for the time being” and said the United States has recalled Zalmay Khalilzad, the chief U.S. negotiator in the process.

“If you’re going to negotiate peace, you often have to deal with some pretty bad actors,” Pompeo said on ABC News’s “This Week.” “I know the history, too, at Camp David, and indeed President Trump reflected on that. Some pretty bad actors have traveled through that place throughout recorded history.”

The canceled summit would have taken place just ahead of the 18th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which led to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.

Rep. Liz Cheney (Wyo.), the No. 3 Republican in the House, was among those who had sharply criticized Trump over the move to invite the Taliban.

“Camp David is where America’s leaders met to plan our response after al Qaeda, supported by the Taliban, killed 3000 Americans on 9/11,” Cheney said Sunday morning on Twitter. “No member of the Taliban should set foot there. Ever.”

For months, Khalilzad had been shuttling between the capitals of Afghanistan and Qatar to meet with Taliban leaders and Afghan officials in an effort to forge a peace deal. Last week, he announced that a deal had been reached “in principle” under which the United States would partially withdraw its troops from Afghanistan in exchange for the Taliban renouncing al-Qaeda, which had orchestrated the 2001 attacks.

U.S. officials expected the tentative agreement to advance a comprehensive cease-fire and talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government. But after a spate of attacks and bombings by the Taliban, including one that killed a U.S. soldier, further talks over ending the 18-year conflict began to waver.

In what appeared to be a last-minute scramble to save the negotiations, Khalilzad traveled to Qatar on Thursday for meetings with Taliban officials after U.S. officials had said negotiations with the militant group had ended.

In his tweets on Saturday, Trump said he “called off peace negotiations” after the Taliban took responsibility for an attack in Kabul “that killed one of our great soldiers, and 11 other people.”

“What kind of people would kill so many in order to seemingly strengthen their bargaining position?” Trump tweeted. “They didn’t, they only made it worse!”

The president, who was spending his second day in a row at his golf club in Sterling, Va., had not tweeted again on the topic as of late Sunday morning.

Pompeo said Sunday on ABC News that U.S. officials had made “enormous progress over the last month” in negotiations with the Taliban.

“We finally reached a point where we were close. We’d made real progress. And then the Taliban failed to live up to a series of commitments that they had made. And when that happened, President Trump said, ‘I’m not going to take that deal,’ ” Pompeo said.

The Taliban said in a statement that Trump’s cancellation of the talks would harm the United States and “increase its financial and human losses.” In his ABC interview, Pompeo responded that the United States will continue its effort to “protect our nation from a terror attack ever emanating from that place again.”

John Hudson and Seung Min Kim contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pompeo-defends-trumps-decision-to-invite-taliban-to-talks-at-camp-david/2019/09/08/c88eb6e2-d247-11e9-9610-fb56c5522e1c_story.html

September 8 at 11:49 AM

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Sunday defended President Trump’s now-scuttled plan to host members of the Taliban leadership and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani at Camp David, amid a backlash from members of both parties.

In interviews on all five major Sunday morning news shows, Pompeo argued that Trump was willing to take a political risk to strike a deal on reducing the American troop presence in Afghanistan. But he conceded that the talks are dead “for the time being” and said the United States has recalled Zalmay Khalilzad, the chief U.S. negotiator in the process.

“If you’re going to negotiate peace, you often have to deal with some pretty bad actors,” Pompeo said on ABC News’s “This Week.” “I know the history, too, at Camp David, and indeed President Trump reflected on that. Some pretty bad actors have traveled through that place throughout recorded history.”

The canceled summit would have taken place just ahead of the 18th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which led to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.

Rep. Liz Cheney (Wyo.), the No. 3 Republican in the House, was among those who had sharply criticized Trump over the move to invite the Taliban.

“Camp David is where America’s leaders met to plan our response after al Qaeda, supported by the Taliban, killed 3000 Americans on 9/11,” Cheney said Sunday morning on Twitter. “No member of the Taliban should set foot there. Ever.”

For months, Khalilzad had been shuttling between the capitals of Afghanistan and Qatar to meet with Taliban leaders and Afghan officials in an effort to forge a peace deal. Last week, he announced that a deal had been reached “in principle” under which the United States would partially withdraw its troops from Afghanistan in exchange for the Taliban renouncing al-Qaeda, which had orchestrated the 2001 attacks.

U.S. officials expected the tentative agreement to advance a comprehensive cease-fire and talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government. But after a spate of attacks and bombings by the Taliban, including one that killed a U.S. soldier, further talks over ending the 18-year conflict began to waver.

In what appeared to be a last-minute scramble to save the negotiations, Khalilzad traveled to Qatar on Thursday for meetings with Taliban officials after U.S. officials had said negotiations with the militant group had ended.

In his tweets on Saturday, Trump said he “called off peace negotiations” after the Taliban took responsibility for an attack in Kabul “that killed one of our great soldiers, and 11 other people.”

“What kind of people would kill so many in order to seemingly strengthen their bargaining position?” Trump tweeted. “They didn’t, they only made it worse!”

The president, who was spending his second day in a row at his golf club in Sterling, Va., had not tweeted again on the topic as of late Sunday morning.

Pompeo said Sunday on ABC News that U.S. officials had made “enormous progress over the last month” in negotiations with the Taliban.

“We finally reached a point where we were close. We’d made real progress. And then the Taliban failed to live up to a series of commitments that they had made. And when that happened, President Trump said, ‘I’m not going to take that deal,’ ” Pompeo said.

The Taliban said in a statement that Trump’s cancellation of the talks would harm the United States and “increase its financial and human losses.” In his ABC interview, Pompeo responded that the United States will continue its effort to “protect our nation from a terror attack ever emanating from that place again.”

John Hudson and Seung Min Kim contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pompeo-defends-trumps-decision-to-invite-taliban-to-talks-at-camp-david/2019/09/08/c88eb6e2-d247-11e9-9610-fb56c5522e1c_story.html

CLOSE

The U.S. has unsealed a warrant to seize an Iranian oil tanker detained in Gibraltar.
Buzz60

WASHINGTON – The Trump administration has used diplomatic pressure, legal action, economic sanctions – and even cold, hard cash – to try to get its hands on a hulking Iranian oil tanker that has been spinning its way around Africa and the Middle East for months.

The extraordinary effort to seize the vessel has come to naught – so far. Even a curious State Department offer to make the ship’s captain a multi-millionaire fell flat.

But the cat-and-mouse game between Iran and the Trump administration over the vessel – called the Adrian Darya 1 and laden with 2.1 million barrels of oil – is emblematic of an increasingly confrontational relationship. And like the fate of the supertanker and its crew, the outcome of the U.S.-Iran tensions remains unclear.

The Trump administration’s efforts to capture the Adrian Darya is a small part of its “maximum pressure” campaign – aimed at reducing Iran’s oil exports to zero, strangling its economy, and forcing its leaders into negotiations with President Donald Trump. Trump withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and other world powers, saying it did not do enough to curb the Islamic Republic’s ballistic missile program and support for terrorism. 

Experts say Iran’s ability to keep the Darya out of the U.S. government’s long reach illustrates the shortfalls of the U.S. strategy. And it comes as Iran leaders once again rejected negotiations with Washington, saying Trump must lift U.S. sanctions first.

On Saturday, Iran further reduced its compliance with the nuclear deal, saying it has begun injecting uranium gas into advanced centrifuges and that the country will no longer abide by the deal’s limits on its nuclear research and development.

“The Iranians are not capitulating,” said Barbara Slavin, director of the Future of Iran Initiative at the Atlantic Council, a foreign policy think tank in Washington. “They’re not saying … ‘Please, Mr. Trump, can we have a meeting with you?’”

Closing window: Iran warns ‘not much time left’ to save nuclear accord

Instead, Iran has launched its own aggressive strategy, downing an American drone, allegedly sabotaging other ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, and using circuitous shipping routes and cloaked transponders to move its own oil.

The Adrian Darya – previously named Grace 1– began its current journey in mid-April, starting in Iran’s main export terminal where it apparently was loaded up with light crude oil, said Samir Madani, co-founder of TankerTrackers.com, a company that uses satellite imagery and other tools to track crude oil shipments. The ship’s transponder was “cloaked” at the time, he said, and his firm couldn’t get any images of it because of bad weather. 

“She resurfaced then, heading back out of the Iran area but waited around in the Persian Gulf until around May,” he said. “Then she left, sailing all the way around Africa” and apparently heading to the Mediterranean. 

The two nations’ competing playbooks collided in July near Gibraltar, when the British Royal Navy seized the Adrian Darya, previously called the Grace 1. British and American officials suspected the ship was headed to Syria, in violation of European sanctions on oil sales to the brutal Assad regime in that war-torn country.

The Trump administration tried to seize the vessel from Gibraltar, saying the ship and its oil were subject to U.S. forfeiture based on alleged violations of bank fraud and money laundering statutes, and other crimes.

But officials in Gibraltar defied the U.S. legal move and released the oil tanker on Aug. 16. The ship’s captain, a 43-year-old Indian man named Akhilesh Kumar, steered the supertanker slowly away from Gibraltar and into international waters, according to Madani.

About a week later, as the Adrian Darya meandered toward the east Mediterranean, Kumar received a remarkable email.

“This is Brian Hook … I work for secretary of state Mike Pompeo and serve as the US Representative for Iran,” the Aug. 26 missive read. “I am writing with good news.” Hook confirmed to USA TODAY that he sent the email, which was first reported by the Financial Times.

Hook proceeded to offer the ship’s captain several million dollars, if he agreed to steer the vessel to a port where the U.S. could seize it.

“With this money you can have any life you wish and be well-off in old age,” Hook wrote in a second email. “If you choose not to take this easy path, life will be much harder for you.”

The captain apparently did not respond to Hook’s email. And on Aug. 30, the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned the ship and Kumar. USA TODAY was unable to contact Kumar for comment or to confirm that he read the emails. 

Iran’s semi-official news agency labeled the move an attempted “bribe” and the country’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, derided it as desperate.

“Having failed at piracy, the US resorts to outright blackmail—deliver us Iran’s oil and receive several million dollars or be sanctioned yourself,” Zarif tweeted on Wednesday.

Hook’s offer of U.S. taxpayer funds is allowed under a State Department program called Rewards for Justice, which provides money to individuals who help the U.S. prevent terrorist attacks or catch perpetrators. Hook publicly announced this week that the State Department would award up to $15 million to anyone who helped the U.S. disrupt the financial operations of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps, an elite military unit that the Trump administration has designated as a terrorist group.

“It’s the first time that the United States has offered a reward for information that disrupts a government entity’s financial operations,” Hook told reporters. “We have taken this step because the IRGC operates more like a terrorist organization than it does a government.”

Slavin said Hook’s email to Kumar was “amateurish” and unprecedented.

“I have never seen anything like that in my life,” she said.

“It really did read like a Nigerian come-on: Send me your bank account information and you will become a millionaire tomorrow,” Slavin added, referring to the notorious foreign email scams. “Whose idea it was, I can’t even imagine.”

As of Sept. 4, the Adrian Darya was approximately 60 miles off the Syrian coast, according to TankerTrackers.com. Satellite imagery tweeted out Friday by Trump’s National Security Advisor John Bolton appeared to show the ship just a few miles off the coast of Syria. It was not clear if its oil cargo had been unloaded. 

Iran on Saturday said that it seized a separate tugboat near the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway for oil transportation. It said 12 Filipinos were aboard the boat. It was not immediately clear what national flag the boat was sailing under.

Madani, the company’s co-founder, said the crew may be planning to offload some or all of its oil, either via a Syrian port or a ship-to-ship transfer, and then head through the Suez Canal and back to Iran. He said he’s not sure why the Trump administration seems so focused on this particular ship, but its pressure has not stopped Iran from sending oil to Syria via other ships and other routes.

The U.S. is unlikely to be in a position to impound the vessel any time soon, said Andrew Serdy, an expert on maritime law at the University of Southampton in southern England.

“The boat can’t be seized in a foreign nation’s territorial sea,” he said. The only place that the U.S. could realistically seize the Iran-flagged Adrian Darya1 would be in its own territorial waters several thousand miles away: the U.S. East Coast.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/09/08/trump-official-offered-millions-dollars-captain-iranian-ship/2234522001/

CLOSE

The U.S. has unsealed a warrant to seize an Iranian oil tanker detained in Gibraltar.
Buzz60

WASHINGTON – The Trump administration has used diplomatic pressure, legal action, economic sanctions – and even cold, hard cash – to try to get its hands on a hulking Iranian oil tanker that has been spinning its way around Africa and the Middle East for months.

The extraordinary effort to seize the vessel has come to naught – so far. Even a curious State Department offer to make the ship’s captain a multi-millionaire fell flat.

But the cat-and-mouse game between Iran and the Trump administration over the vessel – called the Adrian Darya 1 and laden with 2.1 million barrels of oil – is emblematic of an increasingly confrontational relationship. And like the fate of the supertanker and its crew, the outcome of the U.S.-Iran tensions remains unclear.

The Trump administration’s efforts to capture the Adrian Darya is a small part of its “maximum pressure” campaign – aimed at reducing Iran’s oil exports to zero, strangling its economy, and forcing its leaders into negotiations with President Donald Trump. Trump withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and other world powers, saying it did not do enough to curb the Islamic Republic’s ballistic missile program and support for terrorism. 

Experts say Iran’s ability to keep the Darya out of the U.S. government’s long reach illustrates the shortfalls of the U.S. strategy. And it comes as Iran leaders once again rejected negotiations with Washington, saying Trump must lift U.S. sanctions first.

On Saturday, Iran further reduced its compliance with the nuclear deal, saying it has begun injecting uranium gas into advanced centrifuges and that the country will no longer abide by the deal’s limits on its nuclear research and development.

“The Iranians are not capitulating,” said Barbara Slavin, director of the Future of Iran Initiative at the Atlantic Council, a foreign policy think tank in Washington. “They’re not saying … ‘Please, Mr. Trump, can we have a meeting with you?’”

Closing window: Iran warns ‘not much time left’ to save nuclear accord

Instead, Iran has launched its own aggressive strategy, downing an American drone, allegedly sabotaging other ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, and using circuitous shipping routes and cloaked transponders to move its own oil.

The Adrian Darya – previously named Grace 1– began its current journey in mid-April, starting in Iran’s main export terminal where it apparently was loaded up with light crude oil, said Samir Madani, co-founder of TankerTrackers.com, a company that uses satellite imagery and other tools to track crude oil shipments. The ship’s transponder was “cloaked” at the time, he said, and his firm couldn’t get any images of it because of bad weather. 

“She resurfaced then, heading back out of the Iran area but waited around in the Persian Gulf until around May,” he said. “Then she left, sailing all the way around Africa” and apparently heading to the Mediterranean. 

The two nations’ competing playbooks collided in July near Gibraltar, when the British Royal Navy seized the Adrian Darya, previously called the Grace 1. British and American officials suspected the ship was headed to Syria, in violation of European sanctions on oil sales to the brutal Assad regime in that war-torn country.

The Trump administration tried to seize the vessel from Gibraltar, saying the ship and its oil were subject to U.S. forfeiture based on alleged violations of bank fraud and money laundering statutes, and other crimes.

But officials in Gibraltar defied the U.S. legal move and released the oil tanker on Aug. 16. The ship’s captain, a 43-year-old Indian man named Akhilesh Kumar, steered the supertanker slowly away from Gibraltar and into international waters, according to Madani.

About a week later, as the Adrian Darya meandered toward the east Mediterranean, Kumar received a remarkable email.

“This is Brian Hook … I work for secretary of state Mike Pompeo and serve as the US Representative for Iran,” the Aug. 26 missive read. “I am writing with good news.” Hook confirmed to USA TODAY that he sent the email, which was first reported by the Financial Times.

Hook proceeded to offer the ship’s captain several million dollars, if he agreed to steer the vessel to a port where the U.S. could seize it.

“With this money you can have any life you wish and be well-off in old age,” Hook wrote in a second email. “If you choose not to take this easy path, life will be much harder for you.”

The captain apparently did not respond to Hook’s email. And on Aug. 30, the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned the ship and Kumar. USA TODAY was unable to contact Kumar for comment or to confirm that he read the emails. 

Iran’s semi-official news agency labeled the move an attempted “bribe” and the country’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, derided it as desperate.

“Having failed at piracy, the US resorts to outright blackmail—deliver us Iran’s oil and receive several million dollars or be sanctioned yourself,” Zarif tweeted on Wednesday.

Hook’s offer of U.S. taxpayer funds is allowed under a State Department program called Rewards for Justice, which provides money to individuals who help the U.S. prevent terrorist attacks or catch perpetrators. Hook publicly announced this week that the State Department would award up to $15 million to anyone who helped the U.S. disrupt the financial operations of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps, an elite military unit that the Trump administration has designated as a terrorist group.

“It’s the first time that the United States has offered a reward for information that disrupts a government entity’s financial operations,” Hook told reporters. “We have taken this step because the IRGC operates more like a terrorist organization than it does a government.”

Slavin said Hook’s email to Kumar was “amateurish” and unprecedented.

“I have never seen anything like that in my life,” she said.

“It really did read like a Nigerian come-on: Send me your bank account information and you will become a millionaire tomorrow,” Slavin added, referring to the notorious foreign email scams. “Whose idea it was, I can’t even imagine.”

As of Sept. 4, the Adrian Darya was approximately 60 miles off the Syrian coast, according to TankerTrackers.com. Satellite imagery tweeted out Friday by Trump’s National Security Advisor John Bolton appeared to show the ship just a few miles off the coast of Syria. It was not clear if its oil cargo had been unloaded. 

Iran on Saturday said that it seized a separate tugboat near the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway for oil transportation. It said 12 Filipinos were aboard the boat. It was not immediately clear what national flag the boat was sailing under.

Madani, the company’s co-founder, said the crew may be planning to offload some or all of its oil, either via a Syrian port or a ship-to-ship transfer, and then head through the Suez Canal and back to Iran. He said he’s not sure why the Trump administration seems so focused on this particular ship, but its pressure has not stopped Iran from sending oil to Syria via other ships and other routes.

The U.S. is unlikely to be in a position to impound the vessel any time soon, said Andrew Serdy, an expert on maritime law at the University of Southampton in southern England.

“The boat can’t be seized in a foreign nation’s territorial sea,” he said. The only place that the U.S. could realistically seize the Iran-flagged Adrian Darya1 would be in its own territorial waters several thousand miles away: the U.S. East Coast.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/09/08/trump-official-offered-millions-dollars-captain-iranian-ship/2234522001/

In the cause of figuring out whether, in November 2020, Trump will be rewarded with a second term, many numbers and dynamics get tossed around: the unemployment figures, the Dow Jones, the trade war, the advantages of incumbency, the peculiarities of the Electoral College and Trump’s approval ratings, consistently low but not entirely static.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2019/09/07/frank-bruni-republicans/

China’s exports unexpectedly fell in August as shipments to the United States slowed sharply, pointing to further weakness in the world’s second-largest economy and underlining a pressing need for more stimulus as the Sino-U.S. trade war escalates.

Beijing is widely expected to announce more support measures in coming weeks to avert the risk of a sharper economic slowdown as the United States ratchets up trade pressure, including the first cuts in some key lending rates in four years.

On Friday, the central bank cut banks’ reserve requirements for a seventh time since early 2018 to free up more funds for lending, days after a cabinet meeting signalled that more policy loosening may be imminent.

August exports fell 1% from a year earlier, the biggest fall since June, when it fell 1.3%, customs data showed on Sunday. Analysts had expected a 2.0% rise in a Reuters poll after July’s 3.3% gain.

That’s despite analyst expectations that a falling yuan would offset some cost pressure and looming tariffs may have prompted some Chinese exporters to bring forward or “front-load” U.S.-bound shipments into August, a trend seen earlier in the trade dispute.

China let its currency slide past the key 7 per dollar level in August for the first time since the global financial crisis, and Washington labelled it a currency manipulator.

“Exports are still weak even in the face of substantial yuan currency depreciation, indicating that sluggish external demand is the most important factor affecting exports this year,” said Zhang Yi, economist at Zhong Hai Sheng Rong Capital Management.

Among its major trade partners, China’s August exports to the United States fell 16% year-on-year, slowing sharply from a decline of 6.5% in July. Imports from America slumped 22.4%.

Many analysts expect export growth to slow further in coming months, as evidenced by worsening export orders in both official and private factory surveys. More U.S. tariff measures will take effect on Oct. 1 and Dec. 15.

“China-U.S. trade friction has led to a sharp decline in China’s exports to the United States,” said Steven Zhang, chief economist and head of research at Morgan Stanley Huaxin Securities.

Exports to Europe, South Korea, Australia, and Southeast Asia also worsened on an annual basis, compared with July, while shipments to Japan and Taiwan posted slightly better growth than the previous month.

Sunday’s data also showed China’s imports shrank for the fourth consecutive month since April. Imports dropped 5.6% on-year in August, slightly less than an expected 6.0% fall and unchanged from July’s 5.6% decline.

Sluggish domestic demand was likely the main factor in the decline, along with softening global commodity prices. China’s domestic consumption and investment have remained weak despite more than a year of growth boosting measures.

China reported a trade surplus of $34.84 billion last month, compared with a $45.06 billion surplus in July. Analysts had forecast a surplus of $43 billion for August.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/08/chinas-exports-to-us-fell-16percent-in-august-as-trump-escalates-trade-war.html

In fighting the US-China trade war, China’s political elite makes a big mistake: it assumes that China has achieved “power parity” with the US.

That’s according to a recent article published in the September issue of Current History. It argues that the growing economic interdependence between the world’s two largest economies has given China the “false impression” that it has reached power parity with the US; and that gives Chinese officials the confidence that they can reach a “win-win” deal with Washington.

“Anchoring to that relationship, in a typical Chinese analysis, is the robust economic bond that has manifested itself in two-way trade and investment worth hundreds of billions of dollars every year,” writes Professor  Xiangfeng Yang in  “The Lose-Lose Trade War.” “It supposedly bound the two countries of disparate cultures and political systems together in a manner that rendered divorce impossible for this “bickering couple,” another analogy numerous Chinese officials were prone to using.”

Koyfin

That’s a big mistake. “Interdependence” between an emerging economy, which is still relying on commodity exports and technology imports for its growth, and a mature developed country, it has long way to go before it turns into power parity.

A “divorce” between the two countries will have some consequences for the US, but it will be devastated for China at this point.

Still, the “interdependence” premise has led these officials to believe that China has, indeed, reached  “power parity” with the US—a premise that gave them confidence they can reach a “win-win” deal with Washington. “This economic interdependence gave many of them the false impression that China had achieved parity in power with the United States, which boosted their confidence,” he says. “The belief that a unilateral disruption of this “win-win relationship” would amount to mutual destruction in economic terms gave Beijing excessive assurance that the vagaries of Washington’s China policy won’t swing too far.”

Turn into a trade war, that is. “It is doubtful that many Chinese officials and analysts ever seriously contemplated the outbreak of a trade war, let alone prepared for it,” he adds. And that the trade war would turn into a technology and currency war, we should add. This means, that unless Beijing recognizes that it isn’t in power parity with the US, it will be hard for the two sides to reach a trade deal anytime soon.

Still, Yang believes that the trade war is a “lose-lose” situation, as it has already damaged relations between the two countries. “The feud not only has precipitated an economic decoupling of the United States and China, but also has pushed the overall bilateral relationship to its lowest point in half century,” he says.

And that makes him pessimistic about the future relations between Washington and Beijing, even if a trade deal is reached.  “Any deal will be just a temporary cease-fire in a long-lasting economic war,” he adds.

 

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2019/09/07/a-big-mistake-chinas-political-elite-makes-in-fighting-the-trade-war/

Image copyright
Getty Images

The government will “test to the limit” a new law designed to force it to seek an extension to the Brexit deadline if a deal is not reached by 19 October.

Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said the government would abide by the law but would “look very carefully” at its “interpretation” of the legislation.

He said Britain remained committed to getting a deal with the EU.

The law, which should gain royal assent on Monday, aims to stop the UK exiting the EU with no deal on 31 October.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been warned he could face legal action if he chooses to flout it.

Mr Raab called the legislation “lousy” and said it “weakened” the government’s negotiating position in Brussels.

“That legislation is lousy, it envisages multiple delays, it would effectively force us to accept conditions from the EU however vindictive, punitive and harsh they may be,” he told Sky News’ Sophy Ridge on Sunday programme.

He added: “We will adhere to the law but we will also – because this is such a bad piece of legislation – want to test to the limit what it actually lawfully requires.”

He insisted testing the law’s limits is “the responsible thing to do” and accused Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn of dragging the country “into the quicksand”.

Chancellor Sajid Javid said the government “absolutely will not” ask the EU to extend the date of Brexit, adding: “We will leave on 31 October.”

Asked how this would work, he told the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme: “You will have to wait and see what happens because there is a lot of days between now and 19 October.”

Media captionSajid Javid: “Our policy is unchanged… we will be leaving on 31 October”

MPs, including Tories expelled from the party, are preparing legal action in case the PM refuses to seek a delay to Brexit.

It is thought that Mr Johnson believes he could legally disregard some or all of the bill’s requirements.

This could lead to an emergency judicial review by the Supreme Court next month.

Justice Secretary Robert Buckland said he had spoken to the prime minister about the importance of the rule of law.

In a tweet, Mr Buckland said he supported Mr Johnson, saying speculation that he might resign from cabinet was “wide of the mark”.

Earlier, shadow chancellor John McDonnell said the country was in “an extremely serious constitutional position” and that “no-one can trust” what might happen with Mr Johnson as PM.

“We’ve got to prevent Boris Johnson from forcing through a no-deal because of the damage it could do for our country,” he told Andrew Marr.

Mr McDonnell said he believed the prime minister might wait until no-deal was the only option but warned calling an election would not solve the problem.

“We don’t believe that we can pin him down and I don’t trust him an inch. I don’t think anyone does.”

Media captionShadow chancellor John McDonnell: “We don’t trust the PM an inch”

Shadow attorney general and Labour peer Baroness Chakrabarti called the government’s position “irresponsible and elitist”.

“The idea there’s one law for Boris Johnson and his mates and another law for everyone else, it’s appalling,” she told Sky News.

She added: “Every tin-pot dictator on the planet throughout history has used the excuse of having the people on their side to break the law, to shut down Parliament and all the rest of it.”

She said the legislation was “crystal clear” and Boris Johnson was “personally” duty-bound to comply with it.

Amber Rudd, the latest high-profile figure to resign from the government said the government “must obey the law”.

What is the new law?

The bill, which is set to receive royal assent on Monday, was presented by the Labour MP Hilary Benn and backed by opposition parties and the recently expelled Tory MPs.

It gives Mr Johnson until 19 October to either pass a deal in Parliament or get MPs to approve a no-deal Brexit.

After this deadline, he would have to write to the EU asking for an extension to the UK’s departure date from 31 October to 31 January 2020.

The bill outlines the wording of the letter that the prime minister would have to write to the president of the European Council..

If the EU proposes a different date, the PM must accept it within two days.

But during this two-day period, MPs – not the government – would be able to reject the EU’s date.

Ministers will also be compelled to give the House of Commons Brexit progress updates over the following months.

Election moves continue

The battle over who will control the timing of the next general election continued on Sunday ahead of another vote on an autumn general election.

The government is again going to ask MPs to back its call for a snap election when they return to the Commons on Monday. A similar move on Wednesday failed to secure the necessary two-thirds majority required.

Writing in the Mail on Sunday and Sunday Express newspapers, Mr Johnson said “this government will simply carry on” should Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn refuse to agree to an early election.

Opposition parties have agreed not to back his demand for a general election before the EU summit in mid-October, and say they will vote against the government’s latest proposal.

Politicians from all parties are attempting to clarify their positions, ahead of a likely general election.

  • Sajid Javid has insisted the Conservatives have “no need” for a pact with the Brexit Party. He told the Andrew Marr Show: “We don’t need an electoral alliance with anyone. We can stand on our own two feet.”
  • Sam Gyimah – one of the 21 Tories expelled from the parliamentary Conservative party this week – says he intends to stand in East Surrey as an independent candidate and will ask Remain parties not to field candidates against him.
  • John McDonnell wants an election “as soon as we possibly can” – once the threat of a no-deal Brexit has been removed – but ruled out making any deals with the SNP: “If we are in a minority, we will be a minority government, we won’t do coalitions.”
  • The Conservative Party intends to stand a candidate against Speaker John Bercow at the next election, in retaliation for his role in allowing MPs to take control of the Commons agenda. Business secretary Andrea Leadsom accused the MP for Buckingham of “flagrant abuse” of his impartial role as Speaker.
  • Former Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt warned in a tweet that “divided parties don’t win elections” as he urged “a cold shower of generosity and magnanimity from all”.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49625431

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is taking part in a ceremony to mark the return of the remains of an American soldier, hours after President Trump announced he canceled a secret meeting he was to hold with Taliban leaders because the terrorist group killed a dozen people in a car bombing in Kabul, Afghanistan.

The dignified transfer of remains for Army Sgt. 1st Class Elis Angel Barreto Ortiz, 34, is scheduled to take place Saturday at 10:10 p.m. at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware, Lt. Col. Mike Burns, public affairs officer at the 82nd Airborne Division, told the Washington Examiner.

Pompeo’s schedule shows him participating “in a dignified transfer at Dover Air Force Base” at 10 p.m. Such ceremonies don’t usually include the participation of the secretary of state.

Trump announced on Twitter Saturday evening that he had called off a Maryland meeting with the Taliban because of the attack. The car bomb set off at a checkpoint near the United States embassy killed 12 people, including a Romanian soldier supporting the NATO mission, and injured more than 40.

“Unbeknownst to almost everyone, the major Taliban leaders and, separately, the President of Afghanistan, were going to secretly meet with me at Camp David on Sunday. They were coming to the United States tonight,” he wrote. “Unfortunately, in order to build false leverage, they admitted to an attack in Kabul that killed one of our great great soldiers, and 11 other people. I immediately cancelled the meeting and called off peace negotiations. What kind of people would kill so many in order to seemingly strengthen their bargaining position?”

American envoy Zalmay Khalilzad declared Monday his team and the Taliban had reached an agreement “in principle” to end the United States’ longest war, soon to mark its 18th anniversary. But a day after the deadly car bombing, Khalilzad returned to Qatar for unscheduled talks with the terrorist group.

Barreto’s death, the fourth of an American service member in Afghanistan in the last couple weeks, brought the number of American combat deaths there this year to 16. The Taliban promised after the bombing to continue its attacks.

Barreto, a paratrooper from Morovis, Puerto Rico, was assigned to Company H, 82nd Brigade Support Battalion, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division. He “was killed by a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device” while conducting operations in the Afghan capital Thursday, the Army said. It was his second deployment to the country.

“Personally, I will tell you that the ‘Paratrooper’ is the lifeblood of our Division and every time we have a casualty it is felt deeply across our formation. At the same time, it strengthens our resolve,” Burns told the Washington Examiner. “Sgt. 1st Class Barreto will forever be a hero in our Division. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family, friends, and fellow Paratroopers.”

Barreto joined the Army in August 2010 and served his first deployment to Afghanistan in 2013. He graduated from Airborne School at Fort Benning, Georgia, in 2017 and was assigned to the 82nd, an airborne infantry division, the next year.

The paratrooper has a long list of decorations, including the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters, the Army Achievement Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters, the Army Good Conduct Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters, the Combat Action Badge, the Basic Parachutist Badge, and the Army Driver and Mechanic Badge.

He is survived by his wife and children, who reside in Cameron, North Carolina.

“With honor and courage, Sgt. 1st Class Barreto answered our nation’s call to deploy and serve in Afghanistan,” said Col. Arthur Sellers, commander of the 3rd Brigade Combat Team. “In this most difficult time, his loved ones are now surrounded by a community of love and caring by members of our Paratrooper Family Readiness Group.”

“Today is a hard day for the Panther Team,” Sellers and Command Sgt. Maj. Reese Teakell wrote in a Facebook post. “After choosing to enlist, and re-enlist, during a time of war, SFC Barreto answered our Nation’s call to deploy and serve in Afghanistan. His expertise and professionalism made him a vital component of every Team he was assigned to.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/pompeo-participating-in-dover-ceremony-to-mark-return-of-body-of-fallen-soldier-hours-after-trump-cancels-taliban-talks

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/08/politics/mark-sanford-presidential-campaign/index.html

Image copyright
Getty Images

China’s exports unexpectedly fell in August as shipments to the US slowed sharply, adding to worries about the effects of the two nations’ trade war.

China is expected to announce more support measures soon, to avert the risk of a sharp economic slowdown.

These could include the first cuts in four years to some key lending rates.

August exports from the world’s second largest economy fell 1% from a year earlier, the biggest fall since June, when they fell 1.3%,

Analysts had expected to see a rise in exports.

‘Sluggish demand’

China’s August exports to the US fell 16% year-on-year, slowing sharply from a decline of 6.5% in July. Meanwhile, imports from the US slumped 22.4%.

There were escalations in August in the year-long trade row, with Washington announcing 15% tariffs on a wide range of Chinese goods from September.

China hit back with levies of its own, and let its yuan currency fall to offset some of the tariff pressures.

On Friday, China’s central bank cut banks’ reserve requirements for a seventh time since early 2018 to free up more funds for lending.

Analyst expectations had been that a falling yuan would offset some cost pressures.

China let its currency slide past the key 7-per-dollar level in August for the first time since the global financial crisis.

That led Washington to dub Beijing “a currency manipulator”.

“Exports are still weak even in the face of substantial yuan currency depreciation, indicating that sluggish external demand is the most important factor affecting exports this year,” said Zhang Yi, economist at Zhong Hai Sheng Rong Capital Management.

Fresh talks

Many analysts expect export growth to slow further in coming months, with more US tariff measures due to take effect on 1 October and 15 December.

Chinese exports to Europe, South Korea, Australia, and South East Asia also worsened on an annual basis, compared with July.

But exports to Japan and Taiwan were slightly better than the previous month.

On Thursday, China and the US agreed to renew trade talks in October in Washington, the first since a failed US-China trade meeting in July.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49625843

 Tens of thousands of demonstrators took to Hong Kong streets on Sunday and marched to the U.S. Consulate, urging American lawmakers to pass legislation in support of the territory’s democratic aspirations.

The police-sanctioned rally and march through the city center had some of the trappings of a 4th of July parade, as protesters waved American flags and played the Star Spangled Banner. Demonstrators carried red, white and blue signs calling for President Trump to “Liberate Hong Kong” and chanted: “Free Hong Kong, pass the act!” 

As has happened in the past with the generally peaceful demonstrations, violence broke out at the end of the day. By early evening, groups of protesters had vandalized a main subway station in central Hong Kong that was closed by police earlier in the day and set a fire around one of its entrances. Demonstrators wearing face masks and helmets smashed station windows leaving glass piled on the sidewalk. They tossed street signs and emptied trash cans down the subway stairwells and began building barricades in the streets. 

Later in the night, police fired repeatedly tear gas to disperse protesters in the popular shopping district of Causeway Bay.

The pockets of violence continued two consecutive nights of clashes, despite Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam’s decision to withdraw the widely unpopular extradition bill that had originally sparked the months-long political crisis — a clear sign that her concession has been roundly rejected by the majority of pro-democracy protesters. 

As dissent in Hong Kong — and the accompanying police crackdown — continues, Lam and her government will have to face the possibility of growing international criticism particularly from the United States where lawmakers have now returned from their summer recess. 

Authorities have even targeted prominent activists who have not been at the forefront of the recent protests. Former student leader Joshua Wong, who is due to visit the United States soon to testify at a congressional hearing in support of the Hong Kong bill, was arrested at the city’s airport while returning from a trip in Taiwan, he said through a legal representative on Sunday evening.

Wong was detained for “breaching bail conditions” following his arrest last month, but said this was due to mistakes on his bail certificate. He said he expected to be released Monday but called his overnight detention “utterly unreasonable.”

Organizers handed a petition to a consulate official calling for the swift passage in Congress of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, a bill that has bipartisan backing. This latest protest will likely draw the ire of Beijing, which has already accused the United States of meddling in the months-long political crisis and warned that Hong Kong is an internal Chinese matter. 

Members of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China reintroduced the bill in June, days after a million people marched calling for the extradition legislation to be scrapped. 

The bill would require an annual review of the special treatment afforded by Washington to Hong Kong under the U.S. Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992. This would include the trade and business privileges Hong Kong enjoys, separate from China. The legislation also calls for asset freezes and denial of entry into the United States for people found to be “suppressing basic freedoms” in Hong Kong. 

“The Chinese government is breaking their promises to give freedom and human rights to Hong Kong. We want to use the U.S. to push China to do what they promised over 20 years ago,” said a 24-year-old protester who declined to be named. He wore a red “Make America Great Again” hat. “The U.S. government can make China think; do they really want to lose Hong Kong?” 

Lam, Hong Kong’s chief executive, suspended the extradition bill in mid-June, but did not fully withdraw it until Wednesday. In the weeks between those actions, the protests expanded in intensity and scope to more broadly focus on Beijing’s erosion of the “one country, two systems,” framework under which Hong Kong has existed since it was handed back to China in 1997. 

In an indication of the growing anti-China flavor of protests, demonstrators on Sunday carried posters and stickers depicting the Chinese flag with its yellow stars rearranged into a swastika.

Swastikas with the term “Chinazi” were also spray painted in the Central district.

Lam’s concessions, which also included beefing up the independent police oversight committee, were met with hostility among protesters, who want her to meet the four other demands they have laid out.

Her move to fully withdraw the bill “was a public relations exercise vis-a-vis Beijing and Washington,” said Andreas Fulda, the author of a book on efforts at democratization in China and a senior fellow at the University of Nottingham’s Asia Research Institute. “Carrie Lam has every reason to be worried about a strong U.S. response” when Congress sits again, he said. 

The growing distrust and public animosity toward police was again evident on Sunday after dozens of police stopped and searched protesters on a glitzy stretch of road in the Central district lined with luxury shops. Bystanders jeered at the police, yelling “shame” and cheered when a group of tactical officers left the area.

“They think that this is perhaps a tactical retreat and a way to pacify the movement, but it is so evident that it doesn’t address the elephant in the room, which is the militarization of the Hong Kong Police Force,” he added. 

Earlier Saturday, a second “stress test” was scheduled by demonstrators to disrupt transportation to Hong Kong International Airport but it was thwarted by police. Last weekend protesters caused massive traffic jams and rail delays on lines heading toward the airport. Police stymied Saturday’s effort with officers in riot gear stationed at subway stops and ferry terminals as well as boarding buses to check for demonstrators. 

“We are in a very urgent situation. We need all the support we can get,” said Cody a 30-year-old IT worker attending the march. 

Those who are pushing for a stronger U.S. government response on the situation in Hong Kong say Washington has several options, including tweaking language in the Hong Kong Policy Act in a way that would effectively limit government to government interaction and alter the U.S. economic relationship with Hong Kong. 

Conversations have been ongoing between lawmakers and members of foreign relations committees over the summer, as Congress has been in recess, and lawmakers have been watching further developments before deciding on how actively to push the bill when back in session. 

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat said earlier this week that lawmakers should move to quickly advance the bill. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican, said in an interview Tuesday that he would support legislation to “enhance” the Hong Kong Policy Act he helped to pass in 1992.

The push to pass the law has frustrated pro-establishment lawmakers in Hong Kong.

“Traditionally, these bills targeting specific countries, they are developing countries, with dictators in those countries,” said Felix Chung, a pro-Beijing lawmaker who traveled as part of a delegation of Hong Kong lawmakers last month to Montana to meet with congressmen and senators. 

“But Hong Kong has been so close to the U.S., economically and socially, it has never been a target of the U.S. government, so why should they use such a particular bill to punish Hong Kong?” he added. 

While leaders from both parties have been vocal in their support of Hong Kong’s protesters, Trump has taken a largely hands-off response to the upheaval. Last month, he said Chinese President Xi Jinping could “quickly and humanely solve the Hong Kong problem.” Previously, he described protesters as “riots,” a term used by Hong Kong authorities and a characterization protesters are fighting to have withdrawn as one of their demands. 

Kurt Tong, who served as U.S. Consul General in Hong Kong until this summer, said during a speech in Washington in late July that Hong Kong was treated as a “second-tier” issue by the administration, which put more focus on Iran, North Korea and the trade war with China. 

Shibani Mahtani contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/hong-kong-protesters-call-on-trump-to-liberate-hong-kong/2019/09/08/4123008c-d215-11e9-9610-fb56c5522e1c_story.html

Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisDemocrats ignore Asian American and Pacific Islander voters at their peril Harris unveils plan to offer health care, housing assistance to over 500K veterans Hill editor-in-chief: Sanders has to ease fears among seniors on ‘Medicare for All’ MORE‘s (D-Calif.) apologized Saturday after a questioner in New Hampshire described President TrumpDonald John TrumpWashington Post editor fires back after Trump attack on reporters Democrats ignore Asian American and Pacific Islander voters at their peril Gorsuch: Americans should remember political opponents ‘love this country as much as we do’ MORE’s actions as “mentally retarded” when she laughed and responded with “well said.”

In a clip of the Friday event, the questioner, wondering why congressional Democrats have declined to move forward on impeachment proceedings, asked Harris what she was “going to do in the next one year to diminish the mentally retarded actions” by Trump.

“Well said,” Harris responded as the crowd applauded before adding, “I plan to win this election. I’ll tell you that.”

The Harris campaign referred The Hill to an interview Harris did with CBS’s Caitlin Huey-Burns on Saturday, in which Harris said the man’s use of the phrase was “not something that I really heard or processed.”

Harris also tweeted a video of her conversation with Huey-Burns and said she had not heard the person saying person saying the word but apologized.

“When my staff played the video from my town hall yesterday, it was upsetting.” Harris tweeted. “I didn’t hear the words the man used in that moment, but if I had I would’ve stopped and corrected him. I’m sorry. That word and others like it aren’t acceptable. Ever.”

While “mentally retarded” was once the clinical term for intellectual disabilities, it is now considered a slur, particularly when used as an insult.

Harris acknowledged this history in the interview, telling Burns, “It’s offensive, and you would think that in the year 2019, people would have a much better understanding how hurtful a term like that can be but also the history behind it, which is the history of really ignoring the needs and the realities and the capacity of our disabilities community.”

Disability rights activists criticized Harris for laughing in response to the questioner.

“Fighting against the R-word is disability rights 101. We have been working against that word in particular for decades,” journalist and historian David M. Perry told The Hill.

“As the father of a boy with Down syndrome, I expect my leaders to at least get this basic stuff right so we can work on much harder questions of justice and equity,” he added.

“We are not the butt of jokes, we are people first. Why should voters with [intellectual disabilities] vote for her now that she made fun of them?” Ivanova Smith, a faculty member at the University of Washington’s leadership education in neurodevelopment and related disabilities program, told The Hill.

“We have a say in politics too, and our voice matters, and I am saying this as a self-advocate leader myself,” she added.

Several incidents in recent years involving both Republicans and Democrats have aroused the ire of disability rights activists who perceived those figures as mocking disabled people or using them as shorthand for an insult.

In 2010, then-White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel apologized for describing progressive activists as “retards.” The year before, then-President Obama apologized for describing his bowling abilities as “Special Olympics” in an interview with Jay Leno.

President Trump, meanwhile, was condemned for making hand gestures that appeared to mock New York Times reporter Serge Kovaleski, who has arthrogryposis.

Trump has denied the gesture was intended as a mockery of Kovaleski’s disability and has denied ever meeting him face-to-face. Kovaleski previously reported on Trump for the New York Daily News, where he says the two met dozens of times.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/460385-harris-says-she-didnt-hear-questioner-call-trump-policies-mentally-retarded