Sen. Kamala Harris said she wants an investigation into Rudy Giuliani and that the New York Bar Association should “probably” disbar President Trump’s personal attorney.

“The New York Bar Association needs to investigate Giuliani and probably disbar him,” the California Democrat said Thursday on MSNBC. Harris, 54, also demanded that the inspector general investigate connections between Giuliani and State Department officials who could have been working with him.

“To help ensure that the foreign relations of the United States are carried out in good faith, I request that you investigate these and other circumstances described in the complaint and preserve all relevant records,” Harris said. “I am particularly concerned that Department officials might have been aware of or aided Mr. Giuliani in violation of law or regulations against engaging in partisan political activities.”

Harris has described the president’s handling of the whistleblower and his call with the Ukrainian president as a “cover-up” and urged his impeachment.

Giuliani has denied any wrongdoing and said he only talked to Ukrainian officials at the request of the State Department.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kamala-harris-new-york-bar-association-should-probably-disbar-giuliani

‘):””},e.getDefinedParams=function(t,e){return e.filter(function(e){return t[e]}).reduce(function(e,n){return i(e,function(t,e,n){return e in t?Object.defineProperty(t,e,{value:n,enumerable:!0,configurable:!0,writable:!0}):t[e]=n,t}({},n,t[n]))},{})},e.isValidMediaTypes=function(t){var e=[“banner”,”native”,”video”];return!!Object.keys(t).every(function(t){return Z()(e,t)})&&(!t.video||!t.video.context||Z()([“instream”,”outstream”,”adpod”],t.video.context))},e.getBidderRequest=function(t,e,n){return J()(t,function(t){return 0n[t]?-1:0}};var H=n(3),G=n(88),K=n.n(G),$=n(11),J=n.n($),Y=n(9),Z=n.n(Y),Q=n(10),X=n(89),tt=n.n(X);n.d(e,”deepAccess”,function(){return tt.a});var et=n(90);n.d(e,”deepSetValue”,function(){return et.a});var nt,rt=n(4),it=”Array”,ot=”String”,at=”Function”,st=”Number”,ut=”Object”,ct=”Boolean”,ft=Object.prototype.toString,dt=Boolean(window.console),lt=Boolean(dt&&window.console.log),pt=Boolean(dt&&window.console.info),ht=Boolean(dt&&window.console.warn),gt=Boolean(dt&&window.console.error),vt={checkCookieSupport:V,createTrackPixelIframeHtml:B,getWindowSelf:h,getWindowTop:p,getAncestorOrigins:l,getTopFrameReferrer:d,getWindowLocation:g,getTopWindowLocation:f,insertUserSyncIframe:R,insertElement:C,isFn:w,triggerPixel:D,logError:m,logWarn:y,logMessage:v,logInfo:b},bt={},yt=function(t,e){return e}.bind(null,1,bt)()===bt?Function.prototype.bind:function(t){var e=this,n=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,1);return function(){return e.apply(t,n.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)))}},mt=(nt=0,function(){return++nt}),_t=function(){if(Array.prototype.indexOf)return Array.prototype.indexOf}(),Et=function(t,e){return t.hasOwnProperty?t.hasOwnProperty(e):void 0!==t[e]&&t.constructor.prototype[e]!==t[e]},St=z(“timeToRespond”,function(t,e){return eu;)r(s,n=e[u++])&&(~o(c,n)||c.push(n));return c}},143:function(t,e,n){var r=n(19).document;t.exports=r&&r.documentElement},144:function(t,e,n){var r=n(28),i=n(44),o=n(52)(“IE_PROTO”),a=Object.prototype;t.exports=Object.getPrototypeOf||function(t){return t=i(t),r(t,o)?t[o]:”function”==typeof t.constructor&&t instanceof t.constructor?t.constructor.prototype:t instanceof Object?a:null}},145:function(t,e,n){n(146);for(var r=n(19),i=n(21),o=n(30),a=n(14)(“toStringTag”),s=”CSSRuleList,CSSStyleDeclaration,CSSValueList,ClientRectList,DOMRectList,DOMStringList,DOMTokenList,DataTransferItemList,FileList,HTMLAllCollection,HTMLCollection,HTMLFormElement,HTMLSelectElement,MediaList,MimeTypeArray,NamedNodeMap,NodeList,PaintRequestList,Plugin,PluginArray,SVGLengthList,SVGNumberList,SVGPathSegList,SVGPointList,SVGStringList,SVGTransformList,SourceBufferList,StyleSheetList,TextTrackCueList,TextTrackList,TouchList”.split(“,”),u=0;u=t.length?(this._t=void 0,i(1)):i(0,”keys”==e?n:”values”==e?t[n]:[n,t[n]])},”values”),o.Arguments=o.Array,r(“keys”),r(“values”),r(“entries”)},147:function(t,e,n){“use strict”;var r=n(148),i=n(76);t.exports=n(150)(“Set”,function(t){return function(e){return t(this,0=y.syncsPerBidder?u.logWarn(‘Number of user syncs exceeded for “‘.concat(e,'”‘)):p.canBidderRegisterSync(t,e)?(h[t].push([e,n]),void(v=function(t,e){return t[e]?t[e]+=1:t[e]=1,t}(v,e))):u.logWarn(‘Bidder “‘.concat(e,'” not permitted to register their “‘).concat(t,'” userSync pixels.’)):u.logWarn(“Bidder is required for registering sync”):u.logWarn(‘User sync type “‘.concat(t,'” not supported’))},p.syncUsers=function(){var t=0t.getTimeout()+v.b.getConfig(“timeoutBuffer”)&&t.executeCallback(!0)}function a(t,e){var n=t.getBidRequests(),r=_()(n,function(t){return t.bidderCode===e.bidderCode});!function(t,e){var n;if(t.bidderCode&&(0n&&(e=!1)),!e}),e&&t.run(),e}function c(t,e){void 0===t[e]?t[e]=1:t[e]++}var d=this;p=I,u=Date.now();var b=T.makeBidRequests(z,u,H,K,q);w.logInfo(“Bids Requested for Auction with id: “.concat(H),b),b.forEach(function(t){!function(t){V=V.concat(t)}(t)});var y={};if(b.lengthe.max?t:e},{max:0}),a=s()(e.buckets,function(e){if(t>i.max*n){var o=e.precision;void 0===o&&(o=c),r=(e.max*n).toFixed(o)}else if(t=e.min*n)return e});return a&&(r=function(t,e,n){var r=void 0!==e.precision?e.precision:c,i=e.increment*n,o=e.min*n,a=Math.pow(10,r+2),s=(t*a-o*a)/(i*a),u=Math.floor(s)*i+o;return(u=Number(u.toFixed(10))).toFixed(r)}(t,a,n)),r}function o(t){if(u.isEmpty(t)||!t.buckets||!Array.isArray(t.buckets))return!1;var e=!0;return t.buckets.forEach(function(t){void 0!==t.min&&t.max&&t.increment||(e=!1)}),e}n.d(e,”a”,function(){return r}),n.d(e,”b”,function(){return o});var a=n(11),s=n.n(a),u=n(0),c=2,f={buckets:[{min:0,max:5,increment:.5}]},d={buckets:[{min:0,max:20,increment:.1}]},l={buckets:[{min:0,max:20,increment:.01}]},p={buckets:[{min:0,max:3,increment:.01},{min:3,max:8,increment:.05},{min:8,max:20,increment:.5}]},h={buckets:[{min:0,max:5,increment:.05},{min:5,max:10,increment:.1},{min:10,max:20,increment:.5}]}},42:function(t,e){t.exports=function(t,e){return{enumerable:!(1&t),configurable:!(2&t),writable:!(4&t),value:e}}},43:function(t,e,n){var r=n(24),i=n(56),o=n(44),a=n(34),s=n(83);t.exports=function(t,e){var n=1==t,u=2==t,c=3==t,f=4==t,d=6==t,l=5==t||d,p=e||s;return function(e,s,h){for(var g,v,b=o(e),y=i(b),m=r(s,h,3),_=a(y.length),E=0,S=n?p(e,_):u?p(e,0):void 0;E”):””;return’\n \n \n prebid.org wrapper\n \n “).concat(n,”\n \n \n \n “)}(t.vastUrl,t.vastImpUrl),ttlseconds:Number(t.ttl)};return”string”==typeof t.customCacheKey&&””!==t.customCacheKey&&(e.key=t.customCacheKey),e}e.b=function(t,e){var n={puts:t.map(r)};Object(i.a)(o.b.getConfig(“cache.url”),function(t){return{success:function(e){var n;try{n=JSON.parse(e).responses}catch(e){return void t(e,[])}n?t(null,n):t(new Error(“The cache server didn’t respond with a responses property.”),[])},error:function(e,n){t(new Error(“Error storing video ad in the cache: “.concat(e,”: “).concat(JSON.stringify(n))),[])}}}(e),JSON.stringify(n),{contentType:”text/plain”,withCredentials:!0})},e.a=function(t){return””.concat(o.b.getConfig(“cache.url”),”?uuid=”).concat(t)};var i=n(5),o=n(3)},63:function(t,e,n){“use strict”;function r(t){return(r=”function”==typeof Symbol&&”symbol”==_typeof(Symbol.iterator)?function(t){return void 0===t?”undefined”:_typeof(t)}:function(t){return t&&”function”==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?”symbol”:void 0===t?”undefined”:_typeof(t)})(t)}function i(){return(i=Object.assign||function(t){for(var e=1;e (eg mediaTypes.banner.sizes).”),t.sizes=n);if(e&&e.video){var i=e.video;if(i.playerSize)if(Array.isArray(i.playerSize)&&1===i.playerSize.length&&i.playerSize.every(function(t){return Object(f.isArrayOfNums)(t,2)}))t.sizes=i.playerSize;else if(Object(f.isArrayOfNums)(i.playerSize,2)){var o=[];o.push(i.playerSize),x.logInfo(“Transforming video.playerSize from [“.concat(i.playerSize,”] to [[“).concat(o,”]] so it’s in the proper format.”)),t.sizes=i.playerSize=o}else x.logError(“Detected incorrect configuration of mediaTypes.video.playerSize. Please specify only one set of dimensions in a format like: [[640, 480]]. Removing invalid mediaTypes.video.playerSize property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.video.playerSize}if(e&&e.native){var a=e.native;a.image&&a.image.sizes&&!Array.isArray(a.image.sizes)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.image.sizes field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.image.sizes property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.image.sizes),a.image&&a.image.aspect_ratios&&!Array.isArray(a.image.aspect_ratios)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.image.aspect_ratios field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.image.aspect_ratios property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.image.aspect_ratios),a.icon&&a.icon.sizes&&!Array.isArray(a.icon.sizes)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.icon.sizes field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.icon.sizes property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.icon.sizes)}}),t},”checkAdUnitSetup”);T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr=function(t){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr”,arguments),t){var e=T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCode(t);return x.transformAdServerTargetingObj(e)}x.logMessage(“Need to call getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr with adunitCode”)},T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCode=function(t){return T.getAdserverTargeting(t)[t]},T.getAdserverTargeting=function(t){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getAdserverTargeting”,arguments),v.b.getAllTargeting(t)},T.getNoBids=function(){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getNoBids”,arguments),a(“getNoBids”)},T.getBidResponses=function(){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getBidResponses”,arguments),a(“getBidsReceived”)},T.getBidResponsesForAdUnitCode=function(t){return{bids:g.a.getBidsReceived().filter(function(e){return e.adUnitCode===t})}},T.setTargetingForGPTAsync=function(t,e){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.setTargetingForGPTAsync”,arguments),Object(f.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var n=v.b.getAllTargeting(t);v.b.resetPresetTargeting(t),v.b.setTargetingForGPT(n,e),Object.keys(n).forEach(function(t){Object.keys(n[t]).forEach(function(e){“hb_adid”===e&&g.a.setStatusForBids(n[t][e],A.BID_STATUS.BID_TARGETING_SET)})}),O.emit(k,n)}else x.logError(“window.googletag is not defined on the page”)},T.setTargetingForAst=function(t){x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.setTargetingForAn”,arguments),v.b.isApntagDefined()?(v.b.setTargetingForAst(t),O.emit(k,v.b.getAllTargeting())):x.logError(“window.apntag is not defined on the page”)},T.renderAd=function(t,e){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.renderAd”,arguments),x.logMessage(“Calling renderAd with adId :”+e),t&&e)try{var n=g.a.findBidByAdId(e);if(n){n.status=A.BID_STATUS.RENDERED,n.ad=x.replaceAuctionPrice(n.ad,n.cpm),n.adUrl=x.replaceAuctionPrice(n.adUrl,n.cpm),g.a.addWinningBid(n),O.emit(R,n);var r=n.height,i=n.width,a=n.ad,u=n.mediaType,c=n.adUrl,f=n.renderer,d=document.createComment(“Creative “.concat(n.creativeId,” served by “).concat(n.bidder,” Prebid.js Header Bidding”));if(x.insertElement(d,t,”body”),Object(S.c)(f))Object(S.b)(f,n);else if(t===document&&!x.inIframe()||”video”===u){var l=”Error trying to write ad. Ad render call ad id “.concat(e,” was prevented from writing to the main document.”);s(N,l,n)}else if(a){if(navigator.userAgent&&-1Object(b.timestamp)()},C=function(t){return t&&(t.status&&!T()([x.BID_STATUS.BID_TARGETING_SET,x.BID_STATUS.RENDERED],t.status)||!t.status)},D=(h=_.a,v={},(g={}).setLatestAuctionForAdUnit=function(t,e){v[t]=e},g.resetPresetTargeting=function(t){if(Object(b.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var e=u(t),n=h.getAdUnits().filter(function(t){return T()(e,t.code)});window.googletag.pubads().getSlots().forEach(function(t){I.forEach(function(e){n.forEach(function(n){n.code!==t.getAdUnitPath()&&n.code!==t.getSlotElementId()||t.setTargeting(e,null)})})})}},g.resetPresetTargetingAST=function(t){u(t).forEach(function(t){var e=window.apntag.getTag(t);if(e&&e.keywords){var n=Object.keys(e.keywords),r={};n.forEach(function(t){T()(I,t.toLowerCase())||(r[t]=e.keywords[t])}),window.apntag.modifyTag(t,{keywords:r})}})},g.getAllTargeting=function(t){var e=1=e.length?{value:void 0,done:!0}:(t=r(e,n),this._i+=t.length,{value:t,done:!1})})},66:function(t,e,n){function r(){}var i=n(27),o=n(140),a=n(67),s=n(52)(“IE_PROTO”),u=”prototype”,c=function(){var t,e=n(55)(“iframe”),r=a.length;for(e.style.display=”none”,n(143).appendChild(e),e.src=”javascript:”,(t=e.contentWindow.document).open(),t.write(“

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/09/how-many-people-knew-what-ukraine-call-whistleblower.html

Two quickly conducted polls released Thursday found Americans are split over whether to launch an impeachment inquiry into President Trump, indicating the latest news has not immediately moved people beyond their previously entrenched positions.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) accused the White House of a “coverup,” hours after the public release of a whistleblower’s report that claimed officials tried to limit access to the written record of Trump’s phone call with the leader of Ukraine.

Trump lashed out at Democrats minutes after the explosive whistleblower report was made public, and he urged Republicans to “STICK TOGETHER” as another dramatic day in Washington unfolded.

Joseph Maguire, acting director of national intelligence, spent more than three hours Thursday morning before the House Intelligence Committee, where lawmakers questioned him about the complaint, which revealed that Trump had pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his son. A redacted version of the complaint was made public Thursday morning.

● Whistleblower claimed Trump abused his office and that White House officials tried to cover it up

● Intelligence chief Maguire testifies before Congress about whistleblower complaint

● Biden says the rough transcript suggests that Trump most likely committed “an impeachable offense

Official readout: Trump’s July 25 phone call with Zelensky | The whistleblower report |Opening statement by Maguire

7:00 p.m. Top Democrats accuse Trump of trying to intimidate whistleblower to obstruct justice

Democratic Reps. Eliot L. Engel, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Adam Schiff, chairman of the Intelligence Committee, and Elijah E. Cummings, chairman of the Oversight Committee, issued a joint statement condemning Trump’s comments that seem to threaten the whistleblower’s life.

At a private event, Trump called whistleblower a spy.

“You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart? Right? With spies and treason, right? We used to handle them a little differently than we do now,” Trump said.

The Democratic leaders said the president’s remarks were akin to obstructing the House impeachment inquiry by seeking to intimidate the whistleblower from cooperating.

“We condemn the President’s attacks, and we invite our Republican counterparts to do the same because Congress must do all it can to protect this whistleblower, and all whistleblowers,” they said. “Threats of violence from the leader of our country have a chilling effect on the entire whistleblower process, with grave consequences for our democracy and national security.”

6:30 p.m.: New polls find nation divided over impeachment inquiry

Two flash polls found mixed reactions to the House of Representatives’ opening of an impeachment inquiry and the seriousness of the whistleblower’s claims.

An NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll conducted on Wednesday found 49 percent of Americans supported opening the impeachment inquiry while 46 percent were opposed, though independents tilted in disapproval, 50 percent to 44 percent.

A separate Huffington Post/YouGov poll conducted Tuesday-Thursday found 47 percent saying “Trump should be impeached and removed from office,” slightly higher than 43 percent in the same poll earlier this month. But that increase was driven more by increased support among Democrats than independents.

The NPR/PBS/Marist poll found 50 percent saying the impeachment inquiry is “a serious matter” compared with 48 percent who called it “just politics.” But a slightly larger 55 percent said the official notes about President Trump’s call with president of Ukraine is a serious matter.

More than 7 in 10 said the whistleblower should testify before Congress.

Scott Clement

6:15 p.m.: Ocasio-Cortez suggests Republicans who can’t find the time to read whistleblower complaint should quit

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) offered a blunt assessment of the congressional Republicans who have dodged reporters’ questions about the whistleblower complaint by saying they didn’t read it.

“There is almost no excuse for a member of Congress to have not read the whistleblower report by now. It’s a few pages. This is literally our jobs,” she tweeted. “If you don’t have the commitment to be here and do the work, cut your fancy fundraisers & make the time, or quit.”

Ocasio-Cortez was responding directly to a list posted by CNN of Republican senators’ reactions to the complaint that shows many of them offering some variation of: “I didn’t read it yet.”

5:50 p.m.: Schiff says he’s ‘deeply concerned’ about whistleblower’s safety

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) said he is concerned about the safety of the whistleblower who raised the alarm about Trump’s call with Zelensky, citing “repugnant threats” made by the president earlier Thursday.

“I’m deeply concerned about it,” Schiff told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer when asked about the whistleblower’s safety. “And obviously, we’re going to do everything we can … to protect the whistleblower’s identity. But given those real, repugnant threats coming from the president, I have a real concern about this.”

Hours earlier, in a meeting with U.S. diplomats in New York, Trump had likened the whistleblower to a spy and suggested that the person should be punished for his or her actions.

Schiff also dismissed criticism from Republicans who have seized on his opening statement at Thursday’s hearing, in which he offered what he has described as a “parody” of Trump’s call with Zelensky.

“Oh, I don’t think it’s making light of the situation,” Schiff said on CNN. “And I certainly wouldn’t want to suggest that there’s anything comical about this.”

He added that it was accurate to say, as he did in the hearing, that Trump was “speaking like an organized crime boss.”

5:30 p.m.: Former Ukraine prosecutor says Hunter Biden ‘did not violate anything’

A former top Ukrainian prosecutor, whose allegations were at the heart of the dirt-digging effort by Rudolph W. Giuliani, said Thursday he believed that Hunter Biden did not run afoul of any laws in Ukraine.

“From the perspective of Ukrainian legislation, he did not violate anything,” former Ukrainian prosecutor general Yuri Lutsenko told The Washington Post in his first interview since the disclosure of a whistleblower complaint alleging pressure by Trump on Zelensky.

Lutsenko’s comments about Hunter Biden — which echo what he told Bloomberg News in May — were significant, because Trump and his personal attorney Giuliani have sought to stir up suspicions about both Hunter and Joe Biden’s conduct in Ukraine in recent weeks.

Read more here.

— Michael Birnbaum, David L. Stern and Natalie Gryvnyak

4:30 p.m.: American Academy of Diplomacy says Trump’s statements about Yovanovich are cause for ‘great concern’

The American Academy of Diplomacy, a nonprofit that supports the work of U.S. diplomats, put out a strongly worded statement condemning the disparaging comments Trump made about Marie Yovanovitch, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, during his call with the Ukrainian president.

According to the rough transcript of the call between Trump and Zelensky provided by the White House, Trump said, “The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that.”

Then Trump added, “She’s going to go through some things.”

The nonprofit’s chairman, Thomas Pickering, and its president, Ronald Neumann, said Trump’s comments causes them “great concern.”

Pickering worked in the State Department and as an ambassador under every president from Richard M. Nixon to Bill Clinton, while Neumann served as ambassador to Afghanistan and Bahrain under President George W. Bush and Algeria under Clinton.

“The threatening tone of this statement is deeply troubling,” they said in a joint statement. “It suggests actions outside of and contrary to the procedures and standards of a professional service whose officers, like their military counterparts, take an oath to uphold the Constitution. Whatever views the Administration has of Ambassador Yovanovitch’s performance, we call on the Administration to make clear that retaliation for political reasons will not be tolerated.

Yovanovitch was called back from her post in Ukraine in May, a move that Democrats have called a “political hit job.”

4:10 p.m.: Pompeo declines to say whether State Department told Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declined to say Thursday whether the State Department directed Giuliani to contact Zelensky and his aides.

Giuliani said in a Fox News Channel interview earlier this week that he was “operating at the request of the State Department” when he reached out to Ukrainian officials about investigating Biden.

But in a news conference in New York, Pompeo dodged a question on Giuliani’s claim. He said he had yet to read the whistleblower’s complaint, telling reporters that he “read the first couple of paragraphs and then got busy today.” And he maintained that “to the best of my knowledge,” the behavior of State Department officials was “entirely appropriate.”

“We have tried to use this opportunity to create a better relationship between the United States and Ukraine, to build on the opportunities, to tighten our relationship, to help end corruption in Ukraine,” Pompeo said. “This was what President Zelensky ran on. We’re hopeful that we can help him execute and achieve that.”

4 p.m.: Clinton says Trump’s efforts to undercut Biden mirror his attacks against her in 2016

In an interview taped before Pelosi officially announced her support for an impeachment inquiry into Trump, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton described the latest developments regarding Trump’s alleged actions as “incredibly troubling.” She said Trump’s attempts to damage Biden’s 2020 chances are similar to his efforts to undercut her in 2016.

“The most outrageously false things were said about me,” Clinton said in an interview with CBS’s “Sunday Morning.” “And unfortunately, enough people believed them. So this is an effort to sow these falsehoods against Biden. And I don’t care if you’re for the [Democrats] or you’re a Republican, when the president of the United States — who has taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution — uses his position to, in effect, extort a foreign government for his political purposes, I think that is very much what the founders worried about in high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Later in the interview, Clinton called Trump “a clear and present danger.”

The interview will air in its entirety on Sunday.

3:50 p.m.: Biden campaign says Trump’s actions extend from ‘fear’ that the former vice president will beat him in 2020

The Biden campaign responded to the latest revelations in Trump’s alleged efforts to seek incriminating information from Ukraine about the former vice president, claiming that Trump’s alleged actions are “all borne from his deep, fully substantiated fear that Joe Biden will beat him in November 2020.”

“An intelligence community whistleblower said, ‘I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election,’” Kate Bedingfield, Biden’s deputy campaign manager, said in a statement.

“An hour after the report was made public, the Acting Director of National Intelligence called this report ‘urgent and important’ and ‘totally unprecedented.’ And now we know that President Trump’s response to all of this was to privately issue a thinly veiled threat this morning to execute the national security professionals who followed their oath to uphold the Constitution by bringing this to light.”

Bedingfield added that Trump’s “abuse of power makes him one of the most divisive, unfit individuals to occupy the Oval Office in our nation’s history.”

3:30 p.m.: Trump compares whistleblower to a ‘spy’

In remarks at a meeting with staffers for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations on Thursday, Trump likened the whistleblower to a spy and suggested that the person should be punished for his or her actions.

He told staffers that “basically, that person never saw the report, never saw the call, he never saw the call — heard something and decided that he or she, or whoever the hell they saw — they’re almost a spy.”

“I want to know who’s the person, who’s the person who gave the whistleblower the information? Because that’s close to a spy,” Trump said, according to audio of his remarks posted by the Los Angeles Times and confirmed to The Washington Post by a person in the room. “You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart? Right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”

At a separate event with campaign donors at New York City’s Cipriani restaurant on Thursday, Trump waved a copy of the rough transcript of his call with Zelensky and boasted that it was good news for the GOP because it had prompted a flood of donations.

“This is the greatest thing that has ever happened to the Republican Party,” Trump said, according to an attendee.

When the crowd chanted “four more years,” the president responded by joking that they shouldn’t stop there.

“If you really want their heads to explode, you should chant eight more years,” Trump said.

— Josh Dawsey

2:30 p.m.: Timeline: The alarming pattern of actions by Trump included in whistleblower allegations

Six weeks after it was submitted, a complaint from an intelligence community whistleblower has been declassified and released publicly. Part of the complaint centers on the July 25 call between Trump and Zelensky. The whistleblower complaint, filed more than a month earlier, accurately captures the content of that call, lending validity to the rest of the assertions in the complaint.

With that in mind, we’ve pulled out the significant dates mentioned in the whistleblower complaint to give a sense of how the effort by Trump and Giuliani to elicit an investigation in Ukraine unfolded.

Read more here.

— Philip Bump

1:30 p.m.: Number of House members supportive of impeachment inquiry stands at 220

The number of House members who support an impeachment inquiry into Trump has grown slightly to 220, according to a Washington Post tally.

The figure includes 219 Democrats and one independent member.

Of those, 27 have gone a step further and said they support impeaching the president.

The ranks of Democrats calling for an impeachment inquiry swelled in the past week, culminating Tuesday when Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced a formal inquiry.

Read more here.

— JM Rieger

1 p.m.: Trump arrives back in Washington

President Trump landed in Washington Thursday afternoon — and immediately lashed out at Democrats over their continued scrutiny of his phone call with Zelensky.

It was an “absolutely perfect phone call,” Trump told reporters shortly after getting off the plane.

He argued that Pelosi has been “hijacked by the radical left,” renewing his attacks on the speaker of the House after she announced her support for an impeachment inquiry.

1 p.m.: Schiff says Democrats are ‘determined to get to the bottom of this’

Schiff said his committee would work through an upcoming two-week recess as it continues to probe Trump’s interactions with Zelensky.

“We are determined to get to the bottom of this,” Schiff said, suggesting the committee would interview multiple witnesses, including the whistleblower.

The committee also wants to learn more about the roles of Attorney General William P. Barr and Giuliani among others, Schiff said.

Schiff spoke to reporters shortly after his panel adjourned after hearing from Maguire for more than three hours.

12:50 p.m.: Trump lashes out at Schiff after hearing wraps up

Trump took to Twitter shortly after the House Intelligence Committee hearing wrapped up, taking aim at its chairman and dismissing the whistleblower report as “second hand information.”

“Adam Schiff has zero credibility. Another fantasy to hurt the Republican Party!” Trump tweeted.

The tweet came as Schiff (D-Calif.) was fielding questions following the hearing from reporters, one of whom asked about Trump’s tweet.

“I’m always flattered when I’m attacked by someone of the president’s character,” Schiff responded.

In a separate tweet, Trump sought to play down the seriousness of the allegations of the whistleblower, who acknowledged no firsthand knowledge of Trump’s actions but said the complaint was informed by “more than half a dozen U.S. officials.”

“A whistleblower with second hand information? Another Fake News Story! See what was said on the very nice, no pressure, call. Another Witch Hunt!” Trump wrote.

Later, Trump targeted Schiff again on Twitter, writing: “Liddle’ Adam Schiff, who has worked unsuccessfully for 3 years to hurt the Republican Party and President, has just said that the Whistleblower, even though he or she only had second hand information, “is credible.” How can that be with zero info and a known bias. Democrat Scam!”

12:40 p.m.: Vermont Gov. Phil Scott, a Republican, voices support for impeachment inquiry

Phil Scott on Thursday became the nation’s first Republican governor to voice support for the House’s impeachment inquiry against Trump.

“I believe we need to figure out what exactly did happen, establish the facts, and let the facts drive us from there to where we go,” Scott, who has been a frequent Trump critic, said at a news conference in Vermont.

12:30 p.m.: Lewandowski denies having conversations with White House about leading impeachment team

Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s former campaign manager, denied a CNN report that he has had discussions with the White House about potentially leading the president’s impeachment team.

“For the last five years, I have done my best to help this president in any capacity that he has asked me,” Lewandowski said in a phone interview with The Washington Post. “But I have had no conversation with anyone at the White House regarding this.”

Lewandowski signaled, however, that he is open to helping Trump fight back against impeachment in whatever way the president requests.

“If the president asks me to push back on the fake impeachment narrative, I will do that in any way I can,” Lewandowski said.

CNN reported earlier Thursday that Lewandowski, who is mulling a U.S. Senate bid, representing his home state of New Hampshire, has had recent conversations with White House officials about taking an administration position as the impeachment battle ramps up.

Robert Costa

12:20 p.m.: Maguire hearing wraps up

The House Intelligence Committee hearing concluded Thursday afternoon after more than three hours of heated questioning of Maguire by lawmakers.

Maguire is expected to go behind closed doors later Thursday to address the Senate Intelligence Committee.

12:10 p.m.: Republicans plan another House vote on impeachment authorization

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said he will force another House vote on authorizing an impeachment investigation, in a move designed to put pressure on Democrats on the issue.

“Every member owes it to their constituents — their constituents are the ones who lend their voice to the members for two years,” McCarthy said at his weekly news conference. “And they should be very clear on where they stand.”

On Thursday morning, the number of House members backing an impeachment inquiry had passed the halfway mark, with 218 House Democrats and one independent member supporting at least opening an inquiry into whether Trump committed “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

But some Democrats are still holding out, including several in Republican-leaning districts.

— Mike DeBonis

12 p.m.: Senate panel debates withholding State Department funds

The Senate Appropriations Committee spent some time Thursday morning debating an amendment that would have withheld some State Department funds until $448 million in security assistance is released for Ukraine.

Ultimately, the committee didn’t vote on the amendment after its author — Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) — withdrew it. Murphy said he didn’t want to set a bad precedent and wanted to retain bipartisan agreement on the committee. He also said he trusted a commitment from Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) to ensure funding for Ukraine. Graham chairs the Appropriations subcommittee on state and foreign operations.

“I accept Senator Graham’s commitment to continue to work on this,” Murphy said. “I would rather have us stay together united, Republicans and Democrats, speaking for the importance of continuing to fund aid to Ukraine, and I agree with him that even without this language, when we spend money, when we appropriate it, the president is legally obligated to spend it.”

Underlying the discussion was Trump’s decision to hold up security assistance for Ukraine until recently, as revelations emerged about his phone call with the president of Ukraine in which Trump suggested that Biden should be investigated by authorities in that country.

Graham insisted that Trump was withholding funds as a means to get other countries to pay more. Murphy raised questions about that explanation.

Several Democrats said that under the circumstances, there was a need for statutory language requiring money appropriated for Ukraine to be spent.

“The plot has thickened dramatically,” said Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.).

But the discussion ended without specific resolution.

“I just want to find a way to tell the Ukraine we’re with them and not screw up everything else,” Graham said.

— Erica Werner

11:45 a.m.: Trump’s other Ukraine problem: New concern about his business

Buried in the controversy over Trump’s phone call with Zelensky was an effort by the Ukrainian leader at currying favor with Trump through his business.

“Actually, last time I traveled to the United States, I stayed in New York near Central Park, and I stayed at the Trump Tower,” Zelensky told Trump, according to a rough transcript of the July 25 call released Wednesday.

Zelensky’s comments mark the first known example of the kind of interaction Democrats and government ethics experts had warned about when Trump took office: that foreign leaders would try to influence Trump by spending money at his properties and telling him about it.

Other Ukrainian officials have also patronized Trump properties. A top Zelensky aide met at Trump’s D.C. hotel in July with Trump attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani, a frequent patron of the hotel himself, according to the New York Times. A lobbyist who registered as an agent of Zelensky’s with the U.S. government hosted a $1,900 event at the D.C. hotel in April, according to a federal filing.

Read more here.

— Jonathan O’Connell and David A. Fahrenthold

11:40 a.m.: Lawmakers urge Congress not to go on recess

The House is scheduled to leave town on Friday for a two-week recess. But several Democrats are arguing that lawmakers should remain in Washington amid the intensifying focus on Trump’s conduct and the whistleblower complaint.

“Trump clearly sees the Oval Office as his campaign office,” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said in a tweet. “We cannot let the occupant make a mockery of our Constitution any longer. Congress must cancel the upcoming recess so we can finally impeach this president.”

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) also said that “Congress must not leave for recess tomorrow.”

“If we are committed to holding Trump accountable and passing something on gun violence, we have to keep working here in DC,” he said in a tweet. “The stakes are too high.”

The liberal group Indivisible said in a statement earlier this week that Pelosi should cancel recess “and get to a vote on articles of impeachment as soon as humanly possible.”

11:15 a.m.: Pelosi accuses the White House of a “coverup”

Pointing to the whistleblower’s report during remarks to reporters late Thursday morning, Pelosi repeatedly accused the White House of having engaged in a “coverup.”

She was responding to claims by the whistleblower from the U.S. intelligence community that not only did Trump misuse his office for personal gain and endanger national security, but that unidentified White House officials had tried to hide that conduct.

According to the complaint, White House officials were so alarmed by Trump’s call with Zelensky that they sought to limit access to its written record.

“Their actions are a coverup,” Pelosi said at her weekly press briefing. “It’s not only happened that one time. My understanding is it may have happened before.”

Pelosi also said that there was no timeline on the impeachment inquiry announced earlier this week and that Trump would have an opportunity to present exculpatory information.

“There is no rush to judgment,” Pelosi said.

She said the episode involving Ukraine would take precedence in the impeachment inquiry.

“We are at a different level of lawlessness that is self-evident to the American people,” Pelosi said.

11 a.m.: Schumer says Senate will serve as ‘solemn jurors of our democracy’ if House impeaches Trump

In remarks as the Senate opened Thursday morning, Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) called for lawmakers to place the best interests of the country, not their political parties, front and center as they weigh their next steps following the release of the whistleblower’s complaint.

“We have a responsibility to consider the facts that emerge squarely and with the best interest of our country — not our party — in our hearts,” Schumer said. “We have a responsibility not to rush to final judgment or overstate the case — not to let ourselves be ruled by passion, but by reason.”

He added that “if the House at the end of its inquiry sees fit to accuse the president of impeachable offenses, we in the Senate will act as jury.”

“And our role as the solemn jurors of democracy demands that we place fidelity to the country and fidelity to the Constitution above all else,” he said.

10:30 a.m.: Trump campaign says Democrats are the ones interfering in the 2020 election

A spokesman for Trump’s reelection campaign said Thursday morning that it wasn’t Trump who sought to interfere in the 2020 elections — but Democrats.

“All of this amounts to Democrats interfering in the 2020 election by attempting to block @realDonaldTrump from running for re-election,” Tim Murtaugh, the communications director for Trump’s campaign, wrote on Twitter. “They want to deny Americans the opportunity to vote to re-elect the President. They know they can’t beat him, so they have to try to impeach.”

10:15 a.m.: House Republicans highlight 20-year-old clips of Democrats opposing President Bill Clinton’s impeachment

As House Democrats sought to build a case for impeachment against Trump, House Republicans were using their Twitter account to share two-decade-old video clips of Democrats taking issue with the impeachment of President Bill Clinton.

The House Republican conference account shared clips of more than a half-dozen lawmakers speaking out against Clinton’s impeachment in 1998, with some of them complaining about a partisan process seeking to undo the will of voters.

One video depicted Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), currently the chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee, speaking on the House floor.

“I am greatly disappointed in the raw, unmasked, unbridled hatred and meanness that drives this impeachment coup d’etat. The unapologetic disregard for the voice of the people,” she said.

Others Democrats highlighted in the clips included Pelosi, now-House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (Md.), now-Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Rep. Jim McGovern (Mass.), Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (Tex.) and Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro (Conn.).

9:45 a.m.: Democratic White House hopefuls start weighing in on whistleblower complaint

Democratic White House contenders have started weighing in on the whistleblower complaint, with one — former congressman Beto O’Rourke (Tex.) — calling on the House to cancel its upcoming two-week recess.

“The House should cancel its break and start impeachment proceedings now,” O’Rourke said in a tweet. “As the whistleblower made clear: Every day Trump is in office, our democracy is less safe. We can’t wait to act.”

Rep. Tim Ryan (Ohio) shared on Twitter that he had read the report.

“It’s as straightforward as can be,” Ryan said, alleging it detailed “third-rate, banana republic behavior.”

“I can’t believe my Republican colleagues are going to ignore this,” Ryan said in another tweet. “Would they if our President was an Democrat?”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) also weighed in, writing on Twitter: “Donald Trump solicited foreign interference in our elections from the Oval Office. He attempted to cover up his actions. And his appointees intervened, against the law, to attempt to suppress this whistleblower complaint.”

Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), meanwhile, highlighted a paragraph in the report and offered her assessment: “This is a coverup.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) later asserted in a statement that the whistleblower complaint was “only the tip of an iceberg of corrupt, illegal and immoral behavior by this president.”

“What the House must do is thoroughly investigate Trump’s cover-up of this call and his other attempts to use government resources to help his re-election campaign,” he said.

9:20 a.m.: White House dismisses whistleblower complaint as ‘third-hand accounts’

Shortly after the whistleblower complaint was made public, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham issued a statement.

“Nothing has changed with the release of this complaint, which is nothing more than a collection of third-hand accounts of events and cobbled-together press clippings — all of which shows nothing improper,” she said.

9:15 a.m.: Whistleblower claimed Trump abused his office and that White House officials tried to cover it up

The House Intelligence Committee has released the whistleblower complaint at the heart of the burgeoning controversy over Trump’s July phone call with the Ukrainian president — an explosive document that claims not only that Trump misused his office for personal gain, but that unidentified White House officials tried to hide that fact.

“In the course of my official duties, I have received information from multiple U.S. government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election,” the whistleblower wrote in the complaint dated Aug. 12. “This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals. The President’s personal lawyer, Mr. Rudolph W. Giuliani, is a central figure in this effort. Attorney General (William P.) Barr appears to be involved as well.”

Read more here.

— Devlin Barrett

8:45 a.m.: Trump lashes out at Democrats as whistleblower complaint is released

Minutes after a whistleblower complaint was made public, Trump lashed out at Democrats in a tweet written in all capital letters in which he accused them of trying to destroy the Republican Party “AND ALL THAT IT STANDS FOR.”

“STICK TOGETHER, PLAY THEIR GAME, AND FIGHT HARD REPUBLICANS. OUR COUNTRY IS AT STAKE!” he counseled members of his party.

The tweet was in response to a whistleblower from the U.S. intelligence community who alleged that Trump had improperly pressed Zelensky to investigate Biden and his son.

8:10 a.m.: Sarah Sanders argues impeachment drive helps Trump politically

Former White House press secretary Sarah Sanders argued Thursday that House Democrats have given Trump a political boost by launching a formal impeachment inquiry.

“I think that it’s one of the dumbest and most ridiculous political moves that we’ve seen in history, how they have forced impeachment over this issue,” Sanders said during an appearance on Fox News, where she is now a contributor.

“All this is doing is helping fuel his campaign,” Sanders said of the Democrats’ move. “They’re raising more money, they’re rallying his base, and they’re unifying the Republican Party in a way that only they can by attacking this president the way they do time and time again.”

7:30 a.m.: Trump unleashes spate of morning tweets

The president asserted Thursday that the stock market would crash if Democrats followed through with impeaching him, a warning sent in the midst of a morning spate of tweets and retweets about the inquiry announced this week by Pelosi.

In one tweet, Trump highlighted a Fox Business Network report with the headline: “Stocks hit session lows after Pelosi calls for impeachment inquiry.”

“If they actually did this the markets would crash,” Trump wrote in response. “Do you think it was luck that got us to the best Stock Market and Economy in our history. It wasn’t!”

Trump also highlighted a tweet by his daughter Ivanka, a White House adviser, in which she thanked him for his work and included a photo of her father pumping his fist.

“So cute! Her father is under siege, for no reason, since his first day in office!” Trump wrote.

In another, he wrote: “THE GREATEST SCAM IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN POLITICS!”

6:30 a.m.: Biden suggests a motive for Trump reaching out to Ukraine

Speaking at a fundraiser Wednesday night in Los Angeles, Biden said there was no proof of Trump’s allegation that he and his son Hunter Biden had conflicts of interest while he served as vice president.

“This is not about me, and it really isn’t because not a single publication said anything he has ever said about me or my son is true,” Biden said. “Everyone has gone and researched it and said it’s not true.”

Biden suggested that Trump asked Zelensky to investigate him and his son because “70-something polls show that I’ll kick his … toes.” The audience burst into laughter.

6:15 a.m.: Some House Democrats fret as Pelosi forges ahead with impeachment

As his fellow House Democrats moved en masse toward impeaching Trump after months of hesitation, Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey could only watch in bewilderment.

“I don’t get surprised often,” the freshman moderate said Wednesday, less than 24 hours after Pelosi dropped her own qualms and launched the House’s official impeachment inquiry targeting Trump. “But really, truly, I just was like, ‘Wow.’ It happened so quickly.”

As other Democrats proclaimed unity and resolve after Pelosi described the “dishonorable fact of the president’s betrayal of his oath of office,” pledging to move quickly toward impeachment articles, Van Drew stood with a group of Democrats who say they continue to have reservations and fear a rash impeachment could obliterate the rest of the party’s governing agenda, improve Trump’s chances of reelection and imperil their own.

Read more here.

— Mike DeBonis

6 a.m.: Biden edges closer to calling for impeachment on ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’

Biden edged closer to calling for impeachment on Wednesday night, pointing to a rough transcript of a conversation between Trump and Ukraine’s president as evidence that Trump is likely to have committed “an impeachable offense.”

Biden, who had stopped short of calling for the president to be ousted earlier this week, adjusted his stance after the White House shared the details of a 30-minute phone call Trump made to Zelensky in July. According to the 2,000-word rough transcript, Trump repeatedly suggested that Zelensky investigate Biden, offering help from the Justice Department and raising the possibility of inviting the foreign leader to the White House.

“Based on the material that they acknowledged today, it seems to me it’s awful hard to avoid the conclusion that it is an impeachable offense and a violation of constitutional responsibility,” Biden said during an appearance on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”

Red more here.

— Allyson Chiu

5 a.m.: 218 House Democrats support impeachment inquiry

As of Wednesday evening, there were now 217 House Democrats and Independent Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.) who support launching an impeachment inquiry, giving 218 votes to impeach Trump — the threshold number of votes needed to pass anything in the House.

In the past two days, 78 Democrats said they wanted the House to go through with an impeachment process. Before the whistleblower complaint news broke last week, there were 95 members total who supported doing so.

“Today, for the world to see, we learned in his own words that the President of the United States used the full weight of the most sacred office in the land to coerce a foreign leader in a way that undermines our democracy and threatens our national security,” said Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), who came out for an impeachment inquiry Wednesday night.

But just because 218 lawmakers want the House to go through with the impeachment process, there’s no guarantee that they would vote to impeach Trump at the end of it. Of the 218, only 25 have said they’d vote to impeach the president right now.

Read more here.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-ukraine-impeachment/2019/09/26/a68c32f8-dfef-11e9-b199-f638bf2c340f_story.html

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler and President Trump attend an event about the environment at the White House in July.

Alex Brandon/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Alex Brandon/AP

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler and President Trump attend an event about the environment at the White House in July.

Alex Brandon/AP

The Trump administration is following up on President Trump’s threat to go after California for pollution that he blames on the state’s large homeless population. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler sent a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom Thursday expressing concern that he is failing to enforce the Clean Water Act.

Trump said after a visit to California last week that San Francisco is violating pollution laws by allowing needles and other waste from homeless encampments to drain into the ocean.

San Francisco Mayor London Breed responded to the letter, rejecting Trump’s claims.

“I’m sick of this president taking swipes at our city for no reason other than politics,” Breed said. “As I’ve said before, there are no needles washing out to the Bay or ocean from our sewer system, and there is no relationship between homelessness and water quality in San Francisco.”

The EPA letter expands Trump’s complaints, saying that the state is not acting with enough urgency to address environmental problems related to homelessness.

“California is responsible for implementing appropriate municipal storm water management and waste treatment requirements as part of its assumed federal program,” Wheeler wrote. “The state is failing to properly implement these programs.”

The letter said the alleged violations put nearly 800,000 residents at risk.

Wheeler asked Newsom to respond in 30 days about what the state plans to do about it.

A spokesman for the governor also responded to the letter.

“The president is abusing the powers of the presidency and weaponizing government to attack his political opponents. This is not about clean air, clean water or helping our state with homelessness,” said Nathan Click, spokesman for Newsom. “This is political retribution against California, plain and simple.”

The Trump administration and California are in an escalating fight over a range of issues, including homelessness, the environment and immigration.

During a fundraising trip to California last week, the president portrayed the homeless as harmful to the state: “If these Democrat liberal politicians don’t straighten it out, the federal government will have to come in. We’re not going to lose cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco and others that are great cities. We’re not going to allow that to happen to our cities.”

Trump also said homeless people scare away foreigners who want to live in those cities.

Trump’s statements have provoked the ire of homeless advocates in California. David Lewis, the executive director of environmental group Save The Bay, said Trump’s sudden interest in the homeless crisis is purely political.

“The way to reduce the impacts from homeless encampments is to reduce homelessness,” said Lewis.

Earlier this week, Wheeler sent a letter to the California Air Resources Board, accusing the state of having the worst air quality in the United States. He threatened to withdraw billions of dollars in federal highway money if the situation does not improve.

Paolo Zialcita is an intern on NPR’s News Desk.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/09/26/764759005/trump-administration-blames-homeless-for-californias-water-pollution

Following 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg’s rise to global fame, adult climate change deniers—led by President Donald Trump—have unleashed a torrent of criticism and sarcastic remarks on the teenager and her mission to save the planet. Now, they finally have a place to go to be heard.

Comedian Mark Humphries shared a satirical video on Thursday about a “Greta Thunberg Helpline.” Created with Humphries’ co-writer Evan Williams, the video jokes that climate deniers angry about Thunberg’s speech this week at the United Nations General Assembly may need some support.

The video begins with a testimonial from a middle-aged man with “an embarrassing problem.” “I get irrationally angry at a Swedish girl who wants to save the planet,” he says.

“If you’re a grown adult who needs to yell at a child for some reason, the Greta Thunberg Helpline is here to tolerate you,” the video jokes.

Trump was one of the first to target Thunberg on Monday night with a sarcastic tweet. “She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future. So nice to see!” Trump wrote, sharing a video of her visibly upset.

Thunberg responded by changing her Twitter bio to read: “A very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future.”

The teenage activist was also ridiculed by conservative pundit Michael Knowles, who called her “mentally ill.”

“None of that matters because the climate hysteria movement is not about science,” he said on Fox News’ The Story With Martha MacCallum. “If it were about science, it would be led by scientists rather than by politicians and a mentally ill Swedish child who is being exploited by her parents and by the international left.”

Fox News later apologized to Thunberg for the pundit’s comment.

Climate denier Steve Milloy joined in the chorus of critics claiming Thunberg was not acting of her own volition. “She’s ignorant, maniacal and is being mercilessly manipulated by adult climate bedwetters funded by Putin,” he tweeted.

Thunberg has taken to Twitter herself to address her “haters.” “Here we go again,” she wrote. “As you may have noticed, the haters are as active as ever—going after me, my looks, my clothes, my behaviour and my differences. They come up with every thinkable lie and conspiracy theory.”

The activist also shared the satirical video. “Hang in there! Help is available,” she wrote.

Thunberg received her first taste of global recognition when she created a school climate strike movement under the name “Fridays for Future” in 2018. The next climate strike will happen on this Friday. “Last Friday 4 million people striked for climate. This Friday we do it again!” said Greta in a recent tweet.

Additional details of Greta’s climate strike can be found at her website, FridaysForFuture.org.

p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
content: none
}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/greta-thunbergs-adult-critics-now-have-satirical-helpline-call-are-you-grown-adult-who-1461591

“New Pres of Ukraine still silent on investigation of Ukrainian interference in 2016 election and alleged Biden bribery of Pres Poroshenko,” Giuliani tweeted on June 21, without evidence of the allegations, referring to the former president, Petro Poroshenko, whom Zelensky defeated. “Time for leadership and investigate both if you want to purge how Ukraine was abused by Hillary and Obama people.”

The frustration helps explain why Trump, ahead of a July 25 phone call that is now the subject of a whistleblower complaint and a congressional impeachment inquiry, turned up the heat.

Facing doubt about Zelensky’s willingness to work with Giuliani, Trump suspended military aid to Ukraine on July 18. Days later, Zelensky’s party swept Ukraine’s parliamentary elections, ushering in political newcomers and upping the uncertainty about whether Giuliani’s efforts would come undone.

In the meantime, Trump was withholding a date for a coveted bilateral summit with Zelensky. A congratulatory call with the comedian landed on the books — a chance for Trump to make his wishes clear.

“I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it,” Trump said after Zelensky raised the matter of military aid, according to a rough transcript of the call released by the White House.

Trump told the Ukrainian leader that he should coordinate with Giuliani and Attorney General William P. Barr in investigating the Democratic National Committee’s email server, which Trump suggested was in Ukraine, and probe the activities of Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who served on the board of a Ukrainian gas company while his father was vice president.

The sequence of events is at the heart of an extraordinary whistleblower complaint from an unnamed U.S. intelligence official released Thursday, which warns that Trump was using the power of his office to solicit interference in the 2020 election from Ukraine. Giuliani’s in-person meetings and secretive sessions form a key component of what the whistleblower saw as “a serious or flagrant problem, abuse or violation of law or Executive Order.”

Giuliani decried any scrutiny of his conduct in a long interview Thursday, saying that more attention was finally being paid to the Biden family.

“These crooks can go after me all they want,” he said. “They’re not going to find anything.”

A bevy of prosecutors

In interviews with The Washington Post, Giuliani said that, in his capacity as Trump’s personal lawyer, he had met with five current and former Ukrainian prosecutors since last year. During those meetings, he said, he obtained information about Hunter Biden and what the former New York mayor has alleged was collusion between Democrats and Ukraine in the 2016 election.

Giuliani and a Ukrainian American businessman who was working with him, Lev Parnas, said those meetings included a Skype phone call last year with former Ukrainian prosecutor general Viktor Shokin, whom Joe Biden had urged be fired. Giuliani then met with then-Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuri Lutsenko in New York in January and again in Warsaw in February. 

By May, Giuliani planned to visit Kiev to meet with the newly elected Zelensky. After the New York Times revealed his plan, the former mayor canceled his trip but said he met in Paris with more prosecutors, including Nazar Kholodnytsky, head of Ukraine’s Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office. So many Ukrainian prosecutors had to be consulted because they often disagreed with one another, Giuliani said, adding that some of them are “inept.” 

“It’s hard for me to separate all the different ones,” he said.

Some of the Ukrainians Giuliani and his associates interacted with were banned from entering the United States. Giuliani blamed the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine for blocking the officials from coming to the United States to give him more information.

 Parnas described an atmosphere in which Ukrainian prosecutors were rushing to Giuliani with information, often also pursuing their own personal and political agendas. He described the officials as “hitting on every door to try and get their information here.”

A former Ukrainian prosecutor said he believed the officials were angling to provide Giuliani with compromising information at least partly to advance their own careers — and win U.S. backing for their position within the often rough-and-tumble world of Ukrainian politics.

“They needed direct access to the U.S. president to convince him that they are the right group to represent Ukraine,” the former prosecutor said, speaking on the condition on anonymity to discuss his private impressions of the group’s motivations. “They understood the best method to come closer to Trump is to bring something that contains information that is a real interest to U.S. politics.”

Who contacted whom in each case, and how, is not entirely clear. 

Giuliani and Parnas suggested that the prosecutors came to them. Lutsenko, however, in an interview with The Post on Thursday, said Giuliani contacted him via another prosecutor, whom the Ukrainian politician declined to name.

In an interview in his heavily guarded office in Kiev, Kholodnytsky said that his conversation with Giuliani in Paris was like that between two prosecutors. The Ukrainian official voiced his suspicions about investigations into Burisma, the energy company on whose board Hunter Biden sat for five years, and about the summer 2016 appearance in Ukraine of a black ledger tallying payments to Paul Manafort, Trump’s campaign chairman, that forced him out of his post.

“The conversation was generally about corruption in Ukraine,” Kholodnytsky said. “I had a personal conversation. I told him that something wasn’t right there.” 

Giuliani “didn’t react,” Kholodnytsky said. “He didn’t jump with balloons.”

Changing stories

Among the bevy of prosecutors, perhaps none was more important than Yuri Lutsenko, who served as Ukraine’s top prosecutor under Poroshenko from May 2016 until Aug. 29 of this year. 

Lutsenko was always an unconventional pick for the post. Although he served twice as interior minister after the 2004 Orange Revolution, he was not a lawyer, a typical qualification for a job comparable to attorney general in the United States.

When he took office in 2016, diplomats and pro-Western activists were hopeful that he could sweep through the corruption-plagued prosecutor general’s office and shake up the system. Biden had just helped to push out his predecessor, Viktor Shokin, amid a widespread perception in Ukraine and among its Western backers that he was perpetuating old, corruption-prone habits. 

But hopes placed in Lutsenko were quickly dashed. He clashed with a more independent anti-corruption bureau set up in the aftermath of a 2014 pro-Europe uprising. He also ended up in a vicious battle with U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, who pushed him to stop pressuring the bureau. She called for Kholodnytsky’s ouster after the bureau allegedly caught him on tape advising suspects in corruption cases on how to avoid prosecution — a bold intervention on her part.

By the time he met Giuliani, Lutsenko was fed up with Yovanovitch, a career diplomat who was appointed in the final year of the Obama administration. He was nervous about his future as Ukrainian presidential elections drew closer. And he saw a chance to deliver a blow to the rival anti-corruption bureau that he viewed as a dangerous actor with loyalties more to the United States than to Ukraine.

Initially, Lutsenko appeared to help in Giuliani’s pursuit. 

He stirred up perceptions that Joe Biden had intervened into Ukraine’s justice system to quash an investigation into the gas company where Hunter Biden served on the board, meeting repeatedly with Giuliani and telling a conservative columnist at the Hill newspaper that he “would be happy” to talk to Barr about the issue. 

But when Poroshenko, his boss and political ally, lost in the spring election, the top prosecutor dialed back certain comments.

First, in May, he said in an interview with Bloomberg News that “at least as of now,” he didn’t believe that the Bidens had broken any Ukrainian laws.

Then on Thursday, he declared to The Post that “on the territory of Ukraine, Hunter Biden did not violate Ukrainian legislation.”

Giuliani was livid. “He flipped because he was trying to protect Poroshenko,” he said in an interview Thursday.

‘Bad news’

Giuliani wanted to go through every point that could potentially boost Trump’s reelection effort, the former top prosecutor recalled.

“He had a lot of files and documents on the table. I was not the first person he had met with about the case,” Lutsenko said.

One of Giuliani’s main allegations is that Joe Biden pushed for Shokin’s dismissal because the prosecutor was investigating the owner of the gas company where Hunter Biden was on the board. The U.S. ambassador at the time, however, had publicly pressured Shokin to pursue the owner, singling out the prosecutor’s apparent shelving of the case as an example of his failures.

For Lutsenko, discussions with Giuliani were a chance to take aim at Yovanovitch, who had a brass-knuckled approach to tackling the institutions and individuals she saw as keeping Ukraine stuck in a mire of corruption.

Giuliani also wanted her fired. “Her embassy was keeping five different people from giving us information,” he said.

Her blunt style led to clashes. But other Western diplomats in Kiev said her approach was fairly common for U.S. envoys in any country that depends heavily on U.S. aid.

Lutsenko said he confided his worries about the ambassador to Giuliani. In an article in the Hill, Lutsenko claimed the ambassador gave him a “do not prosecute” list — an allegation that the State Department denied. The story got play on Fox News and was mentioned by both Trump and his eldest son in tweets, building pressure that led to the State Department ending Yovanovitch’s tour early. Lutsenko, in an April interview with the Ukrainian publication the Babel, admitted she did not give him a list. Speaking to The Post, he maintained she wanted certain people to be untouchable.

Yovanovitch declined to comment.

In his call with Zelensky, Trump called her “bad news.” Zelensky said he agreed “100 percent.”

Trump added: “Well, she’s going to go through some things.”

Birnbaum reported from Kiev. Tom Hamburger in Washington and David L. Stern and Natalie Gryvnyak in Kiev contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-gambit-for-trump-giuliani-engaged-parade-of-ukrainian-prosecutors/2019/09/26/4d3dc72e-e072-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, said it should be “impossible” for the Ukraine whistleblower to be considered the “hero” when he is the one acting in the government’s interests.

“It is impossible that the whistleblower is a hero and I’m not. And I will be the hero! These morons—when this is over, I will be the hero,” Giuliani told The Atlantic‘s Elaina Plott on Thursday morning. Plott described Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City, as “very angry” about the situation.

“I’m not acting as a lawyer. I’m acting as someone who has devoted most of his life to straightening out government,” Giuliani added. “Anything I did should be praised.”

Giuliani has been one of Trump’s biggest supporters throughout the Ukraine affair. When the House Intelligence Committee released a redacted version of the whistleblower’s complaint on Thursday morning, the attorney dismissed the damning allegations as “crap,” CNN reported.

The document detailed concerns that Trump was “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election.” The primary issue was the president’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which the two leaders discussed investigating former Vice President Joe Biden.

The whistleblower complaint also directly implicated Giuliani and Attorney General William Barr, claiming both men were aware of the conversation and Trump’s push for Ukraine to probe the Biden family. The document specifically described Giuliani as a “central figure” in the situation and that multiple White House officials were “deeply concerned” about his attempt to insert himself into U.S.-Ukraine relations.

Asked about these accusations, Giuliani told The Atlantic that he believes the whistleblower is “totally out of the loop or just a liar.”

Giuliani told Fox News on Tuesday night that he contacted Ukrainian officials only at the request of the State Department. He claimed that he reported “every conversation” he had with the foreign officials back to the federal agency.

In the interview, Giuliani also repeatedly alleged that Biden and his son Hunter had committed crimes in Ukraine. He did not provide any evidence for his allegations.

Amid the Ukraine scandal, the House of Representatives officially launched a formal impeachment inquiry against Trump earlier this week. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters that Trump “must be held accountable” and that “no one is above the law.”

Trump has dismissed the inquiry as another Democratic “witch hunt” and said it “shouldn’t be allowed.”

“There should be a way of stopping it, maybe legally through the courts,” Trump told reporters on Thursday upon his return to Washington, D.C., from the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
content: none
}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/rudy-giuliani-ukraine-whistleblower-hero-1461646

Speaker Nancy Pelosi renewed her criticism of President Trump’s call with the Ukrainian president, saying in her weekly press conference Thursday that efforts by the White House to “lock down” information about the phone call showed that there had been a “cover up.”

Pelosi also criticized Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, who was simultaneously testifying before the House Intelligence Committee, saying that he “broke the law” by not passing along a whistleblower complaint regarding the call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Congress immediately after receiving it.

“I think what the DNI did was broke the law. The law is very clear. The DNI shall convey the complaint to the Intelligence Committee,” Pelosi said.

In his opening statement before the Intelligence Committee, Maguire said that he did not immediately send the whistleblower’s complaint to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees because it contained information pertaining to a conversation by the president, which may have been subject to executive privilege. He acknowledged that he had contacted the White House Counsel after receiving the complaint to obtain its legal opinion on whether he could share it.

Maguire also said that his office had consulted with the Department of Justice, and included the inspector general in those discussions, to determine whether the complaint was an “urgent concern.” The Office of Legal Counsel for the Justice Department found the complaint did not amount to an urgent concern, because “the president is not a member of the intelligence community.” This meant, Maguire said, he was not legally obligated to pass on the complaint to the congressional intelligence committees.

The complaint was released to the public shortly before the beginning of the hearing. It raises concerns about White House efforts to restrict access to the records of the call. According to the complaint, “senior White House officials had intervened to ‘lock down’ all records of the phone call,” and White House officials were “directed” to remove the electronic transcript from the computer system.

The complaint reported an “urgent concern” about Mr. Trump’s request for Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, as well as how records of the call were handled and the role of Mr. Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, in the U.S. relationship with Ukraine.

In the complaint, the whistleblower wrote, “I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals.” 

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pelosi-says-white-house-effort-to-lock-down-ukraine-call-was-a-cover-up/

Nixon, of course, had nothing like the pro-Trump media to defend him. Talk radio in its current format, with its heavy tilt toward conservative provocateurs, did not develop until the 1990s. In Nixon’s day, cable news was still a few years away and the most popular hosts on the radio talked about subjects like extraterrestrial activity.

Mr. Trump’s allies repeatedly invoke the special counsel investigation into his campaign’s dealings with Russia during the 2016 election, which failed to produce the smoking gun-type revelations that many on the left had predicted. The president’s critics, they say, are once again engaging in a smear campaign to declare him guilty before all the evidence is out.

As Mr. Savage said on Wednesday, “He is already in the hay wagon on the way to the guillotine because of the fascist vermin in the media.”

They also appear to have learned an important lesson about how Mr. Trump and his attorney general, William P. Barr, managed the narrative of the release of the special counsel report: They are moving fast to tell the story on their terms. And that is a story in which Mr. Biden and his son Hunter Biden — not Mr. Trump — have covered up wrongdoing involving their Ukrainian interests.

Mr. Hannity, whose radio show each day begins with an announcer declaring that he is “Fighting the Trump-hating liberal media one day at a time,” called the Biden angle “the real story.”

Mr. Limbaugh told listeners, “Joe Biden may be the most corrupt politician in Washington bar none.” Then he offered a novel theory of the origins of the Ukraine-Trump investigations. “This effort going on here is actually a twofer,’’ he said. “It is designed by the Democrats to take out both Trump and Biden and clear the way for anybody else, probably Elizabeth Warren.”

Mr. Trump has also characterized the investigations as a Democratic conspiracy to weaken his standing, which he said is formidable. “Democrats feel they’re going to lose,” he said on Wednesday, pointing to Rasmussen numbers that had his approval rating at 53 percent, which he insisted was too low. “They say you could add ten to it. A lot of people say you can add more than ten to it,” Mr. Trump said.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/impeachment-conservatives-republicans.html

President Trump referred to reporters as “scum” and “animals” during a private event at the Intercontinental Hotel in New York on Thursday, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Trump reportedly spoke at the event amid growing tension over the intelligence community whistleblower complaint alleging he pressured his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate the Biden family. The complaint, which Trump has dubbed a “hoax,” has led to a formal impeachment inquiry, announced Tuesday by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

The Times reported that an attendee recorded Trump’s remarks, which focused on the whistleblower, and the recording was obtained by the paper.

CNN HAS BAD WEEK AMID APRIL RYAN, CHRIS CUOMO AND DON LEMON NEWS: ‘IT WAS QUITE EMBARRASSING’

“You know, these animals in the press… they’re animals, some of the worst human beings you’ll ever meet,” Trump reportedly said. When someone in the room shouted “fake news,” Trump responded: “They’re scum. Many of them are scum, and then you have some good reporters, but not many of them, I’ll be honest with you.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The event reportedly took place as Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, blasted the media during a hearing with the acting director of national intelligence that discussed the whistleblower complaint.

MEDIA ‘MOVE THE GOALPOSTS’ AFTER RELEASE OF TRUMP-UKRAINE CALL TRANSCRIPT

“This operation began with media reports — from the prime instigators of the Russian collusion hoax — that a whistleblower is claiming President Trump made a nefarious ‘promise’ to a foreign leader,” Nunes said. “The released transcript of the call has already debunked that central assertion, but that didn’t matter. The Democrats simply moved the goalposts and began claiming that there doesn’t need to be a quid pro quo for this conversation to serve as the basis for impeaching the president.”

Nunes added that the mainstream media used the same playbook to repeatedly push allegations that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“We’re supposed to forget about all those stories but believe this one,” he said.

Trump has attacked the mainstream media on a regular basis since entering the world of politics, often calling CNN “fake news” and referring to The New York Times as “failing.” He has also mocked NBC News, saying the organization is “worse” than the ratings-challenged CNN.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-media-scum-animals-report


Sen. Richard Shelby. | Mark Wilson/Getty Images

congress

09/26/2019 01:29 PM EDT

Updated 09/26/2019 04:57 PM EDT


The Senate today passed stopgap spending legislation that would ward off a looming government shutdown and keep federal funding on autopilot through Nov. 21.

The upper chamber easily cleared the bill, H.R. 4378 (116), in an 81-16 vote. President Donald Trump is expected to sign it. Current federal funding runs out Monday.

Story Continued Below

The measure buys more time for bicameral negotiations on a dozen fiscal 2020 spending bills that would provide updated funding levels for 15 federal departments and dozens of smaller federal agencies.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) warned earlier in the day, however, that bipartisan agreement on those bills could elude lawmakers if Congress and the White House aren’t able to reach an agreement on border security, including Trump’s wall.

“If these conditions are not met, I fear we are moving headlong toward a full-year continuing resolution,” Shelby said during a full committee markup of the Senate’s Interior-Environment, State-Foreign Operations, Commerce-Justice-Science, Homeland Security and Legislative Branch spending bills.

Shelby is set to meet with Trump on Friday morning to have a “candid“ discussion about the “realities” of the appropriations process and how to avoid additional continuing resolutions over the next year.

Sixteen Senate Republicans voted against the stopgap bill, including Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Ted Cruz of Texas, Steve Daines of Montana, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Josh Hawley of Missouri, Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, Mike Lee of Utah, Rand Paul of Kentucky, David Perdue of Georgia, Jim Risch of Idaho, Mike Rounds of South Dakota, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Rick Scott of Florida, Tim Scott of South Carolina and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania.

Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.), who initially voted in favor of the bill, later requested to change his vote to a “no.”

The House passed the continuing resolution last week. The measure includes a number of extensions and exceptions, providing another year to spend military assistance to Ukraine following the Trump administration’s temporary freeze on the funds.

The bill also allows the president’s trade relief to continue flowing to farmers as long as USDA is transparent about who’s getting the money.

Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories would receive a much-needed extension of their Medicaid funding.

And the National Flood Insurance Program’s authority and the Export-Import Bank’s charter would be extended through Nov. 21.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/26/senate-clears-stopgap-spending-bill-averts-shutdown-1514600

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler and President Trump attend an event about the environment at the White House in July.

Alex Brandon/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Alex Brandon/AP

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler and President Trump attend an event about the environment at the White House in July.

Alex Brandon/AP

The Trump administration is following up on President Trump’s threat to go after California for pollution that he blames on the state’s large homeless population. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler sent a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom Thursday expressing concern that he is failing to enforce the Clean Water Act.

Trump said after a visit to California last week that San Francisco is violating pollution laws by allowing needles and other waste from homeless encampments to drain into the ocean.

San Francisco Mayor London Breed responded to the letter, rejecting Trump’s claims.

“I’m sick of this president taking swipes at our city for no reason other than politics,” Breed said. “As I’ve said before, there are no needles washing out to the Bay or ocean from our sewer system, and there is no relationship between homelessness and water quality in San Francisco.”

The EPA letter expands Trump’s complaints, saying that the state is not acting with enough urgency to address environmental problems related to homelessness.

“California is responsible for implementing appropriate municipal storm water management and waste treatment requirements as part of its assumed federal program,” Wheeler wrote. “The state is failing to properly implement these programs.”

The letter said the alleged violations put nearly 800,000 residents at risk.

Wheeler asked Newsom to respond in 30 days about what the state plans to do about it.

A spokesman for the governor also responded to the letter.

“The president is abusing the powers of the presidency and weaponizing government to attack his political opponents. This is not about clean air, clean water or helping our state with homelessness,” said Nathan Click, spokesman for Newsom. “This is political retribution against California, plain and simple.”

The Trump administration and California are in an escalating fight over a range of issues, including homelessness, the environment and immigration.

During a fundraising trip to California last week, the president portrayed the homeless as harmful to the state: “If these Democrat liberal politicians don’t straighten it out, the federal government will have to come in. We’re not going to lose cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco and others that are great cities. We’re not going to allow that to happen to our cities.”

Trump also said homeless people scare away foreigners who want to live in those cities.

Trump’s statements have provoked the ire of homeless advocates in California. David Lewis, the executive director of environmental group Save The Bay, said Trump’s sudden interest in the homeless crisis is purely political.

“The way to reduce the impacts from homeless encampments is to reduce homelessness,” said Lewis.

Earlier this week, Wheeler sent a letter to the California Air Resources Board, accusing the state of having the worst air quality in the United States. He threatened to withdraw billions of dollars in federal highway money if the situation does not improve.

Paolo Zialcita is an intern on NPR’s News Desk.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/09/26/764759005/trump-administration-blames-homeless-for-californias-water-pollution

CLOSE

The whistleblower’s complaint that sparked an impeachment inquiry into President Trump has been released.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — After a whistleblower’s complaint about President Donald Trump was declassified and made public on Thursday, Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, was angry, according to a report.

“It is impossible that the whistleblower is a hero and I’m not. And I will be the hero! These morons—when this is over, I will be the hero,” Giuliani said while “nearly shouting” at an Atlantic journalist.

“Anything I did should be praised,” Giuliani said in the interview.

The anonymous whistleblower complaint that sparked an impeachment inquiry alleges that Trump pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate political rival Joe Biden — and the White House sought to cover up the phone conversation between the two world leaders.

More: Read the full declassified text of the Trump whistleblower complaint

The complaint says Giuliani was a “central figure in this effort,” and in a summary of a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky released by the White House on Wednesday, Giuliani is mentioned by both leaders.

More: ‘I would like you to do us a favor.’ What Trump and Zelensky said in their July 25 phone call

“Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you,” Trump said on the call, according to the summary. “I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy.”

On the call, Trump also asked Zelensky to look into Biden, who Trump has claimed with no proof was involved in a corruption scandal in Ukraine.

More: Read the summary of President Trump’s call with Ukraine president about Biden

The whistleblower’s complaint said that White House officials were “deeply concerned by what they viewed as Mr. Giuliani’s circumvention of national security decisionmaking processes to engage with Ukrainian officials and relay messages back and forth between Kyiv and the President.”

“If this guy is a whistleblower, then I’m a whistleblower too,” Giuliani said in the Atlantic interview. “You should be happy for your country that I uncovered this.”

In one of multiple interviews with CNN on Thursday, Giuliani also said, “I should be as sympathetic as a whistleblower. I did my job and now all these people are torturing me.”

More: Why the Trump-Zelensky call isn’t just about Joe Biden

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/26/rudy-giuliani-after-whistleblower-complaint-public-hero/3780146002/

Fox News correspondent Griff Jenkins followed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers in Los Angeles, a sanctuary city, as they pursued criminal aliens and detailed the difficulties of making such apprehensions.

“If you had a criminal warrant from a judge on a specific person, you could go forcibly in, but ICE cannot. They’re abiding by the law,” Jenkins explained Thursday on “Fox & Friends.”

At one stop, ICE agents could see the suspect inside, but could not forcibly enter, having to wait for the owner of the property to allow them inside.

“[It] speaks to the difficulty that ICE has in trying to make these apprehensions,” Jenkins said.

AMERICAN ARRESTED IN TEXAS AFTER 53 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FOUND INSIDE SWELTERING TRACTOR-TRAILER, OFFICIALS SAY

ICE: TEXAS DETENTION CENTER TO HOUSE MIGRANT FAMILIES AGAIN

An ICE agent told Jenkins that the criminal alien had been convicted of multiple crimes and had a detainer placed on him on August 9, though it was not honored by local law enforcement and he was released.

“It’s been extremely disappointing to us in federal law enforcement,” the ICE agent said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“He’s definitely a danger to the community. Had that local law enforcement agency just honored our detainer, we would’ve come to pick them up and we wouldn’t be here now,” the ICE agent told Jenkins.

Jenkins said out of 11 total targets, ICE was only able to make one apprehension.

“That is why they are very frustrated when lawmakers particularly help these illegal criminal aliens to evade being taken into custody when it could be done without all of what you just watched and done very peacefully and calmly in the facilities once they’re released.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/ice-agents-sanctuary-city-fox-friends-griff-jenkins

Lawyers for the whistle-blower refused to confirm that he worked for the C.I.A. and said that publishing information about him was dangerous.

“Any decision to report any perceived identifying information of the whistle-blower is deeply concerning and reckless, as it can place the individual in harm’s way,” said Andrew Bakaj, his lead counsel. “The whistle-blower has a right to anonymity.

The C.I.A. referred questions to the inspector general for the intelligence agencies. A spokeswoman for the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, said that protecting the whistle-blower was his office’s highest priority. “We must protect those who demonstrate the courage to report alleged wrongdoing, whether on the battlefield or in the workplace,” Mr. Maguire said at a hearing on Thursday, adding that he did not know the whistle-blower’s identity.

Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The New York Times, said The Times was right to publish information about the whistle-blower. “The role of the whistle-blower, including his credibility and his place in the government, is essential to understanding one of the most important issues facing the country — whether the president of the United States abused power and whether the White House covered it up.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html

A protester holds up a sign in favor of impeachment outside the U.S. Capitol building on Thursday.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images

A protester holds up a sign in favor of impeachment outside the U.S. Capitol building on Thursday.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images

Americans are split, 49%-46%, on whether they approve of Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into President Trump, and independents at this point are not on board, a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll finds.

But the pollsters warn that the new developments could change public opinion quickly, especially with 7 in 10 saying they are paying attention to the news.

“Democrats in the House have work to do to convince people of the usefulness of their case,” said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion, which conducted the survey of 864 Americans. The poll was conducted Wednesday night with live phone interviewers. That was one day after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the impeachment inquiry, but before a whistleblower complaint about the president’s call with the Ukrainian leader was released to the public.

Miringoff added that while “independents still need to be convinced,” the next few days are going to be crucial for both Democrats and Republicans, who will be making their cases about the validity of the inquiry.

“It’s very important,” Miringoff said, “because this is sort of like we are in the middle of a potential storm here.”

Americans are also split on whether the impeachment inquiry is a serious matter (50%) or just politics (48%) and whether it’s worth going through with if the Senate doesn’t convict and Trump gets to stay in office. By a 2-point margin, 49%-47%, they say it’s not worth it.

Important for Democrats, half of independents disapprove (50%) of the impeachment inquiry and don’t think it’s worth it if the Senate doesn’t convict (52%). People who live in the suburbs, whom Democrats relied on for support in the 2018 midterms to take back the House, are largely split on each of those questions.

On the impeachment inquiry, 48% of those living in the suburbs approve, while 49% disapprove. And on whether it’s worth it, they divide evenly, 49%-49%.

Familiar fissures also emerge by party, gender, education and place. Democrats; women, especially college-educated women; and people who live in big cities are in favor of the impeachment inquiry. Republicans, people who live in rural areas, and men largely are not.

Loading…

Don’t see the graphic above? Click here

Overall, 71% say they have been paying very close or fairly close attention to the news about the House impeachment inquiry into Trump. More Republicans (80%) said they’ve at least followed the news on this fairly closely than Democrats (70%) or independents (64%).

But overwhelmingly, people want to hear more, with three-quarters of Americans, including a majority of Republicans, saying the whistleblower should testify before Congress.

A majority also think there needs to be investigation into the Ukraine call and the president asking about the Bidens, with 54% of voters calling it a very serious matter.

This is going to be a long fight between the two parties, waging a messaging war to try to win over persuadable voters. And right now, independents are saying they don’t approve of the job Trump is doing (52%), but they disapprove of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi more (62%).

What’s more, the president’s base is more behind him than Pelosi’s is behind her — 90% of Republicans approve of Trump’s job, as opposed to 74% of Democrats saying the same about Pelosi.

Trump’s overall approval rating is about where it’s been — 44%, but Pelosi comes off worse at 39%.

Viewed worst of all of the leaders in Washington, however, is Mitch McConnell. Just 32% approve of the job he is doing.

So it’s pretty clear whose party the GOP is.

Methodology: The poll of 864 Americans was conducted with live telephone callers the night of Sept. 25. The margin of error for the overall sample is 4.6 percentage points. Party affiliation results reflect the 745 respondents who identified as registered voters, and the margin of error is 5 percentage points

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/09/26/764724904/npr-pbs-newshour-marist-poll-americans-split-on-house-impeachment-inquiry

Media captionLabour MP Karl Turner confronts PM’s adviser Dominic Cummingss

Boris Johnson’s been criticised for language he used in the Commons in a heated debate on Wednesday. So is the atmosphere at Westminster as poisonous and angry as it seems?

You’ve probably heard the phrase “demob happy”.

It expresses a sentiment of rules and conventions being cast aside because what we’ve been long used to is coming to an end.

Well, this feels like a demob-angry parliament. A place that knows the time for procrastination – for now at least – is running short.

And a reckoning is coming very, very soon: on Brexit, and at a general election.

The day after the night before, the place is fizzing.

“I’ve just shopped him to security. I’ve done it three times already today.”

So said an old-timer, referring to Dominic Cummings – the de facto chief of staff to Boris Johnson – standing 20 yards away from us.

He was wandering around chatting to people, but not wearing his security badge.

A man technically in the shadows, but unafraid to be very visible around here. A man whose name is spat out by his political opponents, and revered by some Brexiteers. A man seen as the architect of the government’s strategy since Mr Johnson became prime minister.

Image copyright
Getty Images

After a word from security, his pass hung from his neck.

As shadow chancellor John McDonnell walked past, he merrily shouted: “Hello, comrade.”

Mr Cummings had already had a run-in with another Labour MP, Karl Turner, who had challenged him about what happened in the Commons last night. Mr Cummings had replied that he didn’t know who Mr Turner was.

All of this happened on the floor of Portcullis House, the glass-roofed space full of fig trees and coffee tables. A place where MPs, their staff and journalists mingle and gossip.

One floor up, reporters had already done one of the things we do rather a lot of: loitering.

Because behind two wooden doors, in the Boothroyd Room, Conservative MPs were meeting the prime minister.

‘Reaching out’

Mr Johnson arrived to cheers from some colleagues.

We’re told the European Research Group of MPs – made up primarily of Brexiteers – formed something of a protective ring around the prime minister.

They were the ones making the most noise as Mr Johnson arrived.

Behind them, though, were lots of Tory MPs who didn’t cheer.

The former minister Tobias Ellwood spoke out, saying he was uncomfortable with what had happened on Wednesday night.

Another MP, who is a parliamentary private secretary, the lowest rung of the government ladder, asked the prime minister how he was “reaching out” to MPs, given that in three weeks he might need lots of Labour MPs to vote for a Brexit deal.

Image caption

Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered in 2016

One MP whispered that a colleague had told him he would be resigning the whip – no longer sitting as a Conservative MP – because of Wednesday’s rows in the Commons.

The thinking in Downing Street goes like this: they will not shift away from describing the law designed to prevent a no-deal Brexit next month as a “surrender bill”.

The view in No 10 is that the word is an accurate description, as it undermines the ongoing negotiation with Brussels.

Officials also maintain that the best way to improve the atmosphere in Parliament is to deliver Brexit.

And some Conservative sources point out politicians on all sides have been guilty of using the kind of explosive language many would like to see expunged from political debate – such as “tyranny,” “liars” “traitors” and “betrayal”.

But something of a distinction appears to be being drawn between that, and those specific exchanges last night referring to the murdered Labour MP Jo Cox.

Even the most bullish of aides are holding back on that.

The former minister Tim Loughton told Politics Live on BBC Two that during his address to Conservative MPs, Mr Johnson “realised he might’ve not used the best language” on this.

But listen to the language as far as their broader argument is concerned.

“This building taking a wrecking ball to democratic politics is very big potatoes. A lot of people in here don’t want to face the fundamentals of their environment. The last government encouraged people to avoid facing reality, but in the end reality cannot be fooled,” a senior government source said.

“We are trying to get the country out of a hole after the last government drove us into a cul de sac,” the source added, mixing his metaphors but not the message.

The government’s strategy remains as clear as it has been since day one.

The anger in here – on all sides – is very clear too. And it’s not going away.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49845165

Joseph Maguire, acting director of national intelligence, spent more than three hours Thursday morning before the House Intelligence Committee, where lawmakers questioned him about the complaint, which revealed that Trump had pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his son. A redacted version of the complaint was made public Thursday morning.

● Whistleblower claimed Trump abused his office and that White House officials tried to cover it up

● Intelligence chief Maguire testifies before Congress about whistleblower complaint

● Biden says the rough transcript suggests that Trump most likely committed “an impeachable offense

Official readout: Trump’s July 25 phone call with Zelensky | The whistleblower report |Opening statement by Maguire

5:50 p.m.: Schiff says he’s ‘deeply concerned’ about whistleblower’s safety

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) said he is concerned about the safety of the whistleblower who raised the alarm about Trump’s call with Zelensky, citing “repugnant threats” made by the president earlier Thursday.

“I’m deeply concerned about it,” Schiff told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer when asked about the whistleblower’s safety. “And obviously, we’re going to do everything we can … to protect the whistleblower’s identity. But given those real, repugnant threats coming from the president, I have a real concern about this.”

Hours earlier, in a meeting with U.S. diplomats in New York, Trump had likened the whistleblower to a spy and suggested that the person should be punished for his or her actions.

Schiff also dismissed criticism from Republicans who have seized on his opening statement at Thursday’s hearing, in which he offered what he has described as a “parody” of Trump’s call with Zelensky.

“Oh, I don’t think it’s making light of the situation,” Schiff said on CNN. “And I certainly wouldn’t want to suggest that there’s anything comical about this.”

He added that it was accurate to say, as he did in the hearing, that Trump was “speaking like an organized crime boss.”

5:30 p.m.: Former Ukraine prosecutor says Hunter Biden ‘did not violate anything’

A former top Ukrainian prosecutor, whose allegations were at the heart of the dirt-digging effort by Rudolph W. Giuliani, said Thursday he believed that Hunter Biden did not run afoul of any laws in Ukraine.

“From the perspective of Ukrainian legislation, he did not violate anything,” former Ukrainian prosecutor general Yuri Lutsenko told The Washington Post in his first interview since the disclosure of a whistleblower complaint alleging pressure by Trump on Zelensky.

Lutsenko’s comments about Hunter Biden — which echo what he told Bloomberg News in May — were significant, because Trump and his personal attorney Giuliani have sought to stir up suspicions about both Hunter and Joe Biden’s conduct in Ukraine in recent weeks.

Read more here.

— Michael Birnbaum, David L. Stern and Natalie Gryvnyak

4:30 p.m.: American Academy of Diplomacy says Trump’s statements about Yovanovich are cause for ‘great concern’

The American Academy of Diplomacy, a nonprofit that supports the work of U.S. diplomats, put out a strongly worded statement condemning the disparaging comments Trump made about Marie Yovanovitch, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, during his call with the Ukrainian president.

According to the rough transcript of the call between Trump and Zelensky provided by the White House, Trump said, “The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that.”

Then Trump added, “She’s going to go through some things.”

The nonprofit’s chairman, Thomas Pickering, and its president, Ronald Neumann, said Trump’s comments causes them “great concern.”

Pickering worked in the State Department and as an ambassador under every president from Richard M. Nixon to Bill Clinton, while Neumann served as ambassador to Afghanistan and Bahrain under President George W. Bush and Algeria under Clinton.

“The threatening tone of this statement is deeply troubling,” they said in a joint statement. “It suggests actions outside of and contrary to the procedures and standards of a professional service whose officers, like their military counterparts, take an oath to uphold the Constitution. Whatever views the Administration has of Ambassador Yovanovitch’s performance, we call on the Administration to make clear that retaliation for political reasons will not be tolerated.

Yovanovitch was called back from her post in Ukraine in May, a move that Democrats have called a “political hit job.”

4:10 p.m.: Pompeo declines to say whether State Department told Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declined to say Thursday whether the State Department directed Giuliani to contact Zelensky and his aides.

Giuliani said in a Fox News Channel interview earlier this week that he was “operating at the request of the State Department” when he reached out to Ukrainian officials about investigating Biden.

But in a news conference in New York, Pompeo dodged a question on Giuliani’s claim. He said he had yet to read the whistleblower’s complaint, telling reporters that he “read the first couple of paragraphs and then got busy today.” And he maintained that “to the best of my knowledge,” the behavior of State Department officials was “entirely appropriate.”

“We have tried to use this opportunity to create a better relationship between the United States and Ukraine, to build on the opportunities, to tighten our relationship, to help end corruption in Ukraine,” Pompeo said. “This was what President Zelensky ran on. We’re hopeful that we can help him execute and achieve that.”

4 p.m.: Clinton says Trump’s efforts to undercut Biden mirror his attacks against her in 2016

In an interview taped before Pelosi officially announced her support for an impeachment inquiry into Trump, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton described the latest developments regarding Trump’s alleged actions as “incredibly troubling.” She said Trump’s attempts to damage Biden’s 2020 chances are similar to his efforts to undercut her in 2016.

“The most outrageously false things were said about me,” Clinton said in an interview with CBS’s “Sunday Morning.” “And unfortunately, enough people believed them. So this is an effort to sow these falsehoods against Biden. And I don’t care if you’re for the [Democrats] or you’re a Republican, when the president of the United States — who has taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution — uses his position to, in effect, extort a foreign government for his political purposes, I think that is very much what the founders worried about in high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Later in the interview, Clinton called Trump “a clear and present danger.”

The interview will air in its entirety on Sunday.

3:50 p.m.: Biden campaign says Trump’s actions extend from ‘fear’ that the former vice president will beat him in 2020

The Biden campaign responded to the latest revelations in Trump’s alleged efforts to seek incriminating information from Ukraine about the former vice president, claiming that Trump’s alleged actions are “all borne from his deep, fully substantiated fear that Joe Biden will beat him in November 2020.”

“An intelligence community whistleblower said, ‘I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election,’” Kate Bedingfield, Biden’s deputy campaign manager, said in a statement.

“An hour after the report was made public, the Acting Director of National Intelligence called this report ‘urgent and important’ and ‘totally unprecedented.’ And now we know that President Trump’s response to all of this was to privately issue a thinly veiled threat this morning to execute the national security professionals who followed their oath to uphold the Constitution by bringing this to light.”

Bedingfield added that Trump’s “abuse of power makes him one of the most divisive, unfit individuals to occupy the Oval Office in our nation’s history.”

3:30 p.m.: Trump compares whistleblower to a ‘spy’

In remarks at a meeting with staffers for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations on Thursday, Trump likened the whistleblower to a spy and suggested that the person should be punished for his or her actions.

He told staffers that “basically, that person never saw the report, never saw the call, he never saw the call — heard something and decided that he or she, or whoever the hell they saw — they’re almost a spy.”

“I want to know who’s the person, who’s the person who gave the whistleblower the information? Because that’s close to a spy,” Trump said, according to audio of his remarks posted by the Los Angeles Times and confirmed to The Washington Post by a person in the room. “You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart? Right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”

At a separate event with campaign donors at New York City’s Cipriani restaurant on Thursday, Trump waved a copy of the rough transcript of his call with Zelensky and boasted that it was good news for the GOP because it had prompted a flood of donations.

“This is the greatest thing that has ever happened to the Republican Party,” Trump said, according to an attendee.

When the crowd chanted “four more years,” the president responded by joking that they shouldn’t stop there.

“If you really want their heads to explode, you should chant eight more years,” Trump said.

— Josh Dawsey

2:30 p.m.: Timeline: The alarming pattern of actions by Trump included in whistleblower allegations

Six weeks after it was submitted, a complaint from an intelligence community whistleblower has been declassified and released publicly. Part of the complaint centers on the July 25 call between Trump and Zelensky. The whistleblower complaint, filed more than a month earlier, accurately captures the content of that call, lending validity to the rest of the assertions in the complaint.

With that in mind, we’ve pulled out the significant dates mentioned in the whistleblower complaint to give a sense of how the effort by Trump and Giuliani to elicit an investigation in Ukraine unfolded.

Read more here.

— Philip Bump

1:30 p.m.: Number of House members supportive of impeachment inquiry stands at 220

The number of House members who support an impeachment inquiry into Trump has grown slightly to 220, according to a Washington Post tally.

The figure includes 219 Democrats and one independent member.

Of those, 27 have gone a step further and said they support impeaching the president.

The ranks of Democrats calling for an impeachment inquiry swelled in the past week, culminating Tuesday when Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced a formal inquiry.

Read more here.

— JM Rieger

1 p.m.: Trump arrives back in Washington

President Trump landed in Washington Thursday afternoon — and immediately lashed out at Democrats over their continued scrutiny of his phone call with Zelensky.

It was an “absolutely perfect phone call,” Trump told reporters shortly after getting off the plane.

He argued that Pelosi has been “hijacked by the radical left,” renewing his attacks on the speaker of the House after she announced her support for an impeachment inquiry.

1 p.m.: Schiff says Democrats are ‘determined to get to the bottom of this’

Schiff said his committee would work through an upcoming two-week recess as it continues to probe Trump’s interactions with Zelensky.

“We are determined to get to the bottom of this,” Schiff said, suggesting the committee would interview multiple witnesses, including the whistleblower.

The committee also wants to learn more about the roles of Attorney General William P. Barr and Giuliani among others, Schiff said.

Schiff spoke to reporters shortly after his panel adjourned after hearing from Maguire for more than three hours.

12:50 p.m.: Trump lashes out at Schiff after hearing wraps up

Trump took to Twitter shortly after the House Intelligence Committee hearing wrapped up, taking aim at its chairman and dismissing the whistleblower report as “second hand information.”

“Adam Schiff has zero credibility. Another fantasy to hurt the Republican Party!” Trump tweeted.

The tweet came as Schiff (D-Calif.) was fielding questions following the hearing from reporters, one of whom asked about Trump’s tweet.

“I’m always flattered when I’m attacked by someone of the president’s character,” Schiff responded.

In a separate tweet, Trump sought to play down the seriousness of the allegations of the whistleblower, who acknowledged no firsthand knowledge of Trump’s actions but said the complaint was informed by “more than half a dozen U.S. officials.”

“A whistleblower with second hand information? Another Fake News Story! See what was said on the very nice, no pressure, call. Another Witch Hunt!” Trump wrote.

Later, Trump targeted Schiff again on Twitter, writing: “Liddle’ Adam Schiff, who has worked unsuccessfully for 3 years to hurt the Republican Party and President, has just said that the Whistleblower, even though he or she only had second hand information, “is credible.” How can that be with zero info and a known bias. Democrat Scam!”

12:40 p.m.: Vermont Gov. Phil Scott, a Republican, voices support for impeachment inquiry

Phil Scott on Thursday became the nation’s first Republican governor to voice support for the House’s impeachment inquiry against Trump.

“I believe we need to figure out what exactly did happen, establish the facts, and let the facts drive us from there to where we go,” Scott, who has been a frequent Trump critic, said at a news conference in Vermont.

12:30 p.m.: Lewandowski denies having conversations with White House about leading impeachment team

Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s former campaign manager, denied a CNN report that he has had discussions with the White House about potentially leading the president’s impeachment team.

“For the last five years, I have done my best to help this president in any capacity that he has asked me,” Lewandowski said in a phone interview with The Washington Post. “But I have had no conversation with anyone at the White House regarding this.”

Lewandowski signaled, however, that he is open to helping Trump fight back against impeachment in whatever way the president requests.

“If the president asks me to push back on the fake impeachment narrative, I will do that in any way I can,” Lewandowski said.

CNN reported earlier Thursday that Lewandowski, who is mulling a U.S. Senate bid, representing his home state of New Hampshire, has had recent conversations with White House officials about taking an administration position as the impeachment battle ramps up.

Robert Costa

12:20 p.m.: Maguire hearing wraps up

The House Intelligence Committee hearing concluded Thursday afternoon after more than three hours of heated questioning of Maguire by lawmakers.

Maguire is expected to go behind closed doors later Thursday to address the Senate Intelligence Committee.

12:10 p.m.: Republicans plan another House vote on impeachment authorization

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said he will force another House vote on authorizing an impeachment investigation, in a move designed to put pressure on Democrats on the issue.

“Every member owes it to their constituents — their constituents are the ones who lend their voice to the members for two years,” McCarthy said at his weekly news conference. “And they should be very clear on where they stand.”

On Thursday morning, the number of House members backing an impeachment inquiry had passed the halfway mark, with 218 House Democrats and one independent member supporting at least opening an inquiry into whether Trump committed “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

But some Democrats are still holding out, including several in Republican-leaning districts.

— Mike DeBonis

12 p.m.: Senate panel debates withholding State Department funds

The Senate Appropriations Committee spent some time Thursday morning debating an amendment that would have withheld some State Department funds until $448 million in security assistance is released for Ukraine.

Ultimately, the committee didn’t vote on the amendment after its author — Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) — withdrew it. Murphy said he didn’t want to set a bad precedent and wanted to retain bipartisan agreement on the committee. He also said he trusted a commitment from Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) to ensure funding for Ukraine. Graham chairs the Appropriations subcommittee on state and foreign operations.

“I accept Senator Graham’s commitment to continue to work on this,” Murphy said. “I would rather have us stay together united, Republicans and Democrats, speaking for the importance of continuing to fund aid to Ukraine, and I agree with him that even without this language, when we spend money, when we appropriate it, the president is legally obligated to spend it.”

Underlying the discussion was Trump’s decision to hold up security assistance for Ukraine until recently, as revelations emerged about his phone call with the president of Ukraine in which Trump suggested that Biden should be investigated by authorities in that country.

Graham insisted that Trump was withholding funds as a means to get other countries to pay more. Murphy raised questions about that explanation.

Several Democrats said that under the circumstances, there was a need for statutory language requiring money appropriated for Ukraine to be spent.

“The plot has thickened dramatically,” said Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.).

But the discussion ended without specific resolution.

“I just want to find a way to tell the Ukraine we’re with them and not screw up everything else,” Graham said.

— Erica Werner

11:45 a.m.: Trump’s other Ukraine problem: New concern about his business

Buried in the controversy over Trump’s phone call with Zelensky was an effort by the Ukrainian leader at currying favor with Trump through his business.

“Actually, last time I traveled to the United States, I stayed in New York near Central Park, and I stayed at the Trump Tower,” Zelensky told Trump, according to a rough transcript of the July 25 call released Wednesday.

Zelensky’s comments mark the first known example of the kind of interaction Democrats and government ethics experts had warned about when Trump took office: that foreign leaders would try to influence Trump by spending money at his properties and telling him about it.

Other Ukrainian officials have also patronized Trump properties. A top Zelensky aide met at Trump’s D.C. hotel in July with Trump attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani, a frequent patron of the hotel himself, according to the New York Times. A lobbyist who registered as an agent of Zelensky’s with the U.S. government hosted a $1,900 event at the D.C. hotel in April, according to a federal filing.

Read more here.

— Jonathan O’Connell and David A. Fahrenthold

11:40 a.m.: Lawmakers urge Congress not to go on recess

The House is scheduled to leave town on Friday for a two-week recess. But several Democrats are arguing that lawmakers should remain in Washington amid the intensifying focus on Trump’s conduct and the whistleblower complaint.

“Trump clearly sees the Oval Office as his campaign office,” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said in a tweet. “We cannot let the occupant make a mockery of our Constitution any longer. Congress must cancel the upcoming recess so we can finally impeach this president.”

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) also said that “Congress must not leave for recess tomorrow.”

“If we are committed to holding Trump accountable and passing something on gun violence, we have to keep working here in DC,” he said in a tweet. “The stakes are too high.”

The liberal group Indivisible said in a statement earlier this week that Pelosi should cancel recess “and get to a vote on articles of impeachment as soon as humanly possible.”

11:15 a.m.: Pelosi accuses the White House of a “coverup”

Pointing to the whistleblower’s report during remarks to reporters late Thursday morning, Pelosi repeatedly accused the White House of having engaged in a “coverup.”

She was responding to claims by the whistleblower from the U.S. intelligence community that not only did Trump misuse his office for personal gain and endanger national security, but that unidentified White House officials had tried to hide that conduct.

According to the complaint, White House officials were so alarmed by Trump’s call with Zelensky that they sought to limit access to its written record.

“Their actions are a coverup,” Pelosi said at her weekly press briefing. “It’s not only happened that one time. My understanding is it may have happened before.”

Pelosi also said that there was no timeline on the impeachment inquiry announced earlier this week and that Trump would have an opportunity to present exculpatory information.

“There is no rush to judgment,” Pelosi said.

She said the episode involving Ukraine would take precedence in the impeachment inquiry.

“We are at a different level of lawlessness that is self-evident to the American people,” Pelosi said.

11 a.m.: Schumer says Senate will serve as ‘solemn jurors of our democracy’ if House impeaches Trump

In remarks as the Senate opened Thursday morning, Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) called for lawmakers to place the best interests of the country, not their political parties, front and center as they weigh their next steps following the release of the whistleblower’s complaint.

“We have a responsibility to consider the facts that emerge squarely and with the best interest of our country — not our party — in our hearts,” Schumer said. “We have a responsibility not to rush to final judgment or overstate the case — not to let ourselves be ruled by passion, but by reason.”

He added that “if the House at the end of its inquiry sees fit to accuse the president of impeachable offenses, we in the Senate will act as jury.”

“And our role as the solemn jurors of democracy demands that we place fidelity to the country and fidelity to the Constitution above all else,” he said.

10:30 a.m.: Trump campaign says Democrats are the ones interfering in the 2020 election

A spokesman for Trump’s reelection campaign said Thursday morning that it wasn’t Trump who sought to interfere in the 2020 elections — but Democrats.

“All of this amounts to Democrats interfering in the 2020 election by attempting to block @realDonaldTrump from running for re-election,” Tim Murtaugh, the communications director for Trump’s campaign, wrote on Twitter. “They want to deny Americans the opportunity to vote to re-elect the President. They know they can’t beat him, so they have to try to impeach.”

10:15 a.m.: House Republicans highlight 20-year-old clips of Democrats opposing President Bill Clinton’s impeachment

As House Democrats sought to build a case for impeachment against Trump, House Republicans were using their Twitter account to share two-decade-old video clips of Democrats taking issue with the impeachment of President Bill Clinton.

The House Republican conference account shared clips of more than a half-dozen lawmakers speaking out against Clinton’s impeachment in 1998, with some of them complaining about a partisan process seeking to undo the will of voters.

One video depicted Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), currently the chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee, speaking on the House floor.

“I am greatly disappointed in the raw, unmasked, unbridled hatred and meanness that drives this impeachment coup d’etat. The unapologetic disregard for the voice of the people,” she said.

Others Democrats highlighted in the clips included Pelosi, now-House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (Md.), now-Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Rep. Jim McGovern (Mass.), Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (Tex.) and Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro (Conn.).

9:45 a.m.: Democratic White House hopefuls start weighing in on whistleblower complaint

Democratic White House contenders have started weighing in on the whistleblower complaint, with one — former congressman Beto O’Rourke (Tex.) — calling on the House to cancel its upcoming two-week recess.

“The House should cancel its break and start impeachment proceedings now,” O’Rourke said in a tweet. “As the whistleblower made clear: Every day Trump is in office, our democracy is less safe. We can’t wait to act.”

Rep. Tim Ryan (Ohio) shared on Twitter that he had read the report.

“It’s as straightforward as can be,” Ryan said, alleging it detailed “third-rate, banana republic behavior.”

“I can’t believe my Republican colleagues are going to ignore this,” Ryan said in another tweet. “Would they if our President was an Democrat?”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) also weighed in, writing on Twitter: “Donald Trump solicited foreign interference in our elections from the Oval Office. He attempted to cover up his actions. And his appointees intervened, against the law, to attempt to suppress this whistleblower complaint.”

Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), meanwhile, highlighted a paragraph in the report and offered her assessment: “This is a coverup.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) later asserted in a statement that the whistleblower complaint was “only the tip of an iceberg of corrupt, illegal and immoral behavior by this president.”

“What the House must do is thoroughly investigate Trump’s cover-up of this call and his other attempts to use government resources to help his re-election campaign,” he said.

9:20 a.m.: White House dismisses whistleblower complaint as ‘third-hand accounts’

Shortly after the whistleblower complaint was made public, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham issued a statement.

“Nothing has changed with the release of this complaint, which is nothing more than a collection of third-hand accounts of events and cobbled-together press clippings — all of which shows nothing improper,” she said.

9:15 a.m.: Whistleblower claimed Trump abused his office and that White House officials tried to cover it up

The House Intelligence Committee has released the whistleblower complaint at the heart of the burgeoning controversy over Trump’s July phone call with the Ukrainian president — an explosive document that claims not only that Trump misused his office for personal gain, but that unidentified White House officials tried to hide that fact.

“In the course of my official duties, I have received information from multiple U.S. government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election,” the whistleblower wrote in the complaint dated Aug. 12. “This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals. The President’s personal lawyer, Mr. Rudolph W. Giuliani, is a central figure in this effort. Attorney General (William P.) Barr appears to be involved as well.”

Read more here.

— Devlin Barrett

8:45 a.m.: Trump lashes out at Democrats as whistleblower complaint is released

Minutes after a whistleblower complaint was made public, Trump lashed out at Democrats in a tweet written in all capital letters in which he accused them of trying to destroy the Republican Party “AND ALL THAT IT STANDS FOR.”

“STICK TOGETHER, PLAY THEIR GAME, AND FIGHT HARD REPUBLICANS. OUR COUNTRY IS AT STAKE!” he counseled members of his party.

The tweet was in response to a whistleblower from the U.S. intelligence community who alleged that Trump had improperly pressed Zelensky to investigate Biden and his son.

8:10 a.m.: Sarah Sanders argues impeachment drive helps Trump politically

Former White House press secretary Sarah Sanders argued Thursday that House Democrats have given Trump a political boost by launching a formal impeachment inquiry.

“I think that it’s one of the dumbest and most ridiculous political moves that we’ve seen in history, how they have forced impeachment over this issue,” Sanders said during an appearance on Fox News, where she is now a contributor.

“All this is doing is helping fuel his campaign,” Sanders said of the Democrats’ move. “They’re raising more money, they’re rallying his base, and they’re unifying the Republican Party in a way that only they can by attacking this president the way they do time and time again.”

7:30 a.m.: Trump unleashes spate of morning tweets

The president asserted Thursday that the stock market would crash if Democrats followed through with impeaching him, a warning sent in the midst of a morning spate of tweets and retweets about the inquiry announced this week by Pelosi.

In one tweet, Trump highlighted a Fox Business Network report with the headline: “Stocks hit session lows after Pelosi calls for impeachment inquiry.”

“If they actually did this the markets would crash,” Trump wrote in response. “Do you think it was luck that got us to the best Stock Market and Economy in our history. It wasn’t!”

Trump also highlighted a tweet by his daughter Ivanka, a White House adviser, in which she thanked him for his work and included a photo of her father pumping his fist.

“So cute! Her father is under siege, for no reason, since his first day in office!” Trump wrote.

In another, he wrote: “THE GREATEST SCAM IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN POLITICS!”

6:30 a.m.: Biden suggests a motive for Trump reaching out to Ukraine

Speaking at a fundraiser Wednesday night in Los Angeles, Biden said there was no proof of Trump’s allegation that he and his son Hunter Biden had conflicts of interest while he served as vice president.

“This is not about me, and it really isn’t because not a single publication said anything he has ever said about me or my son is true,” Biden said. “Everyone has gone and researched it and said it’s not true.”

Biden suggested that Trump asked Zelensky to investigate him and his son because “70-something polls show that I’ll kick his … toes.” The audience burst into laughter.

6:15 a.m.: Some House Democrats fret as Pelosi forges ahead with impeachment

As his fellow House Democrats moved en masse toward impeaching Trump after months of hesitation, Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey could only watch in bewilderment.

“I don’t get surprised often,” the freshman moderate said Wednesday, less than 24 hours after Pelosi dropped her own qualms and launched the House’s official impeachment inquiry targeting Trump. “But really, truly, I just was like, ‘Wow.’ It happened so quickly.”

As other Democrats proclaimed unity and resolve after Pelosi described the “dishonorable fact of the president’s betrayal of his oath of office,” pledging to move quickly toward impeachment articles, Van Drew stood with a group of Democrats who say they continue to have reservations and fear a rash impeachment could obliterate the rest of the party’s governing agenda, improve Trump’s chances of reelection and imperil their own.

Read more here.

— Mike DeBonis

6 a.m.: Biden edges closer to calling for impeachment on ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’

Biden edged closer to calling for impeachment on Wednesday night, pointing to a rough transcript of a conversation between Trump and Ukraine’s president as evidence that Trump is likely to have committed “an impeachable offense.”

Biden, who had stopped short of calling for the president to be ousted earlier this week, adjusted his stance after the White House shared the details of a 30-minute phone call Trump made to Zelensky in July. According to the 2,000-word rough transcript, Trump repeatedly suggested that Zelensky investigate Biden, offering help from the Justice Department and raising the possibility of inviting the foreign leader to the White House.

Watch the video: Biden suggests rough transcript shows Trump committed ‘an impeachable offense’

“Based on the material that they acknowledged today, it seems to me it’s awful hard to avoid the conclusion that it is an impeachable offense and a violation of constitutional responsibility,” Biden said during an appearance on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”

Red more here.

— Allyson Chiu

5 a.m.: 218 House Democrats support impeachment inquiry

As of Wednesday evening, there were now 217 House Democrats and Independent Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.) who support launching an impeachment inquiry, giving 218 votes to impeach Trump — the threshold number of votes needed to pass anything in the House.

In the past two days, 78 Democrats said they wanted the House to go through with an impeachment process. Before the whistleblower complaint news broke last week, there were 95 members total who supported doing so.

“Today, for the world to see, we learned in his own words that the President of the United States used the full weight of the most sacred office in the land to coerce a foreign leader in a way that undermines our democracy and threatens our national security,” said Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), who came out for an impeachment inquiry Wednesday night.

But just because 218 lawmakers want the House to go through with the impeachment process, there’s no guarantee that they would vote to impeach Trump at the end of it. Of the 218, only 25 have said they’d vote to impeach the president right now.

Read more here.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-ukraine-impeachment/2019/09/26/a68c32f8-dfef-11e9-b199-f638bf2c340f_story.html

An intelligence whistle-blower law protects intelligence officials from reprisal — like losing their security clearance or being demoted or fired — as long as they follow a certain process for bringing allegations of wrongdoing to the attention of oversight authorities.

The whistle-blower followed that process — filing a complaint with the inspector general for the intelligence community. The Trump Justice Department later proclaimed that the information the whistle-blower put forward did not qualify under the intelligence whistle-blower law, raising the question of whether the official was still protected from reprisal. The acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, has said he would not permit the official to suffer retaliation, but the inspector general has pointed out that this personal assurance is not a legal shield.

Moreover, whistle-blower laws are aimed at channeling complaints to certain officials with oversight responsibilities — Congress, supervisors or inspectors general — and do not protect officials who provide information to other people without authorization. For that reason, these laws almost certainly do not protect the officials who told the whistle-blower about the call in the first place.

Mr. Trump spoke as the director of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was testifying before Congress that the president had never asked for the identity of the whistle-blower, whose complaint was initially withheld from Congress by the Trump administration.

At a fund-raiser at Cipriani 42nd Street in Manhattan immediately after the United Nations event, Mr. Trump walked out before the crowd of several hundred donors clutching paper in one of his hands and said, “This is the call.” He then said it was “the greatest thing” to happen to the Republican Party because they had raised so much money off the controversy.

In a Twitter post later in the day, Mr. Trump referred again to the whistle-blower having “second hand information” and called the inquiry “Another Witch Hunt!”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/trump-whistle-blower-spy.html