BEIJING — When Turkey’s leader, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, visited Beijing this summer, he hailed a new Silk Road bridging Asia and Europe. He welcomed big Chinese investments for his beleaguered economy. He gushed about China’s sovereignty.

But Mr. Erdogan, who has stridently promoted Islamic values in his overwhelmingly Muslim country, was largely silent on the incarceration of more than one million Turkic Muslims in China’s western region of Xinjiang, and the forced assimilation of millions more. It was an about-face from a decade ago, when he said the Uighurs there suffered from, “simply put, genocide” at the hands of the Chinese government.

Like Mr. Erdogan, the world has been noticeably quiet about Xinjiang, where China has built a vast network of detention camps and systematic surveillance over the past two years in a state-led operation to convert Uighurs into loyal, secular supporters of the Communist Party. Even when diplomats have witnessed the problems firsthand and privately condemned them, they have been reluctant to go public, unable to garner broad support or unwilling to risk financial ties with China.

Backed by its diplomatic and economic might, China has largely succeeded in quashing criticism. Chinese officials have convinced countries to support Beijing publicly on the issue, most notably Muslim ones in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. They have played to the discord within the West over China. And they have waged an aggressive campaign to prevent discussion of Xinjiang at the United Nations.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/world/asia/china-xinjiang-muslim-camps.html

MILPITAS (CBS SF) — A 68-year-old Missouri man has been arrested in connection with a series of arsons in the Milpitas foothills last week.

The Santa Clara County District Attorney charged Freddie Graham of Lonejack, Missouri with 15 counts of arson, including two counts of arson during a declared state of emergency.

The fires burned 128 acres in rugged terrain in the hills east of Milpitas.
Graham allegedly boarded a plane in his home state of Missouri on September 19 and flew cross country, landing in San Jose and setting fires the next day.

“He flew into town on Thursday in San Jose. Set the fires on Friday and Saturday, and then had plans to return back to Missouri,” said Bud Porter, Supervising Deputy District Attorney for Santa Clara County.

Frederick Graham, 68, of Missouri (Photo: Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office)

Graham allegedly drove a rental car along the narrow, windy roads between Ed Levin Park and the Calaveras Reservoir, starting fires as he went.

“The fires were set with a lighter, setting pieces of paper on fire and then throwing it out the window of the car,” explained Porter.

A witness who became suspicious after spotting Graham’s car near the fires turned the license plate over to investigators.

Cal Fire officers arrested Graham when he tried to return the car at Mineta San Jose International Airport.

“We are just appreciative that the public was able to provide us with information that was instrumental in our officers making the arrest,” said Cal Fire Division Chief Mike Marcucci.

Graham’s bail was set at $2 million. He was scheduled to enter a plea at a court appearance scheduled for Sept. 30.

Last March, Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency in California for the duration
of fire season, which could factor in if Graham is convicted.

“Because the fires came during a state of emergency, he’s charged with that count, which carries additional prison time,” Porter said.

No structures were burned and no one was injured in the fires.

If convicted on all counts, Graham could face up to 22 years in prison.

Source Article from https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2019/09/25/arsonist-calaveras-reservoir-fire-police-missouri-freddie-graham/

Sen. Ben SasseBenjamin (Ben) Eric SasseManufacturing group leads coalition to urge Congress to reauthorize Ex-Im Bank The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump ousts Bolton; GOP exhales after win in NC Trump endorses Sasse in 2020 race MORE (R-Neb.) said Wednesday that a whistleblower complaint concerning a call between President TrumpDonald John TrumpAmash responds to Trump: ‘It’s not about the transcript of a call’  Warren announces expansion of presidential campaign Colbert on Ukraine controversy: ‘It might be the thing’ that gets Trump MORE and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky contained “lots that’s very troubling,” warning his GOP colleagues not to dismiss it.

“Republicans ought not to be rushing to circle the wagons to say there’s no there there when there’s obviously lots that’s very troubling there,” Sasse said after reviewing the complaint, according to an NBC News reporter. “The administration ought not be attacking the whistleblower as some talking points suggest they plan to do.”

However, Sasse also castigated the media and House Democrats, who have announced an impeachment inquiry based on the whistleblower complaint, saying, “Democrats ought not to be using the word impeach before they have the whistleblower complaint or before they read any of the transcript.”

“The media humbly should not pretend that this story is about something that’s going to be resolved in the next two hours,” he added. “Done right with lots of deliberation, this is going to take a lot of time, but there’s obviously some really troubling things here.”

Sasse, who is up for reelection in 2020, was a frequent critic of Trump earlier in his administration but has scaled back his criticism in recent months. Trump, who has frequently declined to endorse Republican incumbents he perceives as antagonizing him or endorsed their opponents, tweeted that Sasse had his endorsement in early September.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/463100-gop-senator-on-whistleblower-complaint-theres-obviously-lots-thats-very

CLOSE

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry over President Donald Trump’s efforts to get Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON— As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump’s contact with the Ukrainian president, multiple 2020 Democratic presidential candidates switched their view on where they stand with impeachment or reiterated their belief that impeachment is the right path.

Here are where the 2020 Democratic candidates currently stand on impeaching the president:

Michael Bennet

The senator from Colorado has called for more investigation into the president’s conduct and said Tuesday night that the “House is right to launch an impeachment inquiry … This administration cannot hide the truth.” 

Joe Biden

The former vice president has been trading words with Trump over the controversy, and on Tuesday called on Congress to begin impeachment proceedings if Trump does not comply with all of Congress’ request for information about the July call Trump had with Ukraine’s president. 

“It’s time for this administration to stop stonewalling and provide the Congress with all the facts it needs,” Biden said. “It’s time for the Congress to fully investigate the conduct of this president. The president should stop stonewalling this investigation and all the other investigations into his alleged wrongdoing. Using its full Constitutional authority, Congress in my view should demand the information it has a legal right to receive.”

Cory Booker

The senator from New Jersey said Pelosi’s move forward is “our one remaining path to ensuring justice is served,” and has been a long time supporter of impeachment.

Steve Bullock

The Montana governor called on Congress to demand the whistleblower’s complaint that has in part led to the impeachment inquiry, saying in a statement if “they don’t get it, I see no other option than starting impeachment proceedings.” 

Pete Buttigieg 

The South Bend, Indiana, mayor continued his previously stated support of impeachment, using the news Tuesday to encourage his supporters to register to vote on National Registration Day via twitter.

Julián Castro

The former Housing and Urban Development secretary has long supported impeachment, and retweeted singer Lizzo cleverly tweeting “IM[peach emoji]MENT” with: Truth hurts, a nod to Lizzo’s smash hit single.

John Delaney

The former congressman had previously supported Pelosi waiting on an official impeachment inquiry and again followed the Speaker Tuesday, saying in a statement he believes Pelosi has “exercised extremely good judgment” and he agrees with her, reiterating that “she deserves our support.” 

Tulsi Gabbard

Representative Tulsi Gabbard went against the tide of her fellow 2020 contenders on impeachment, saying she doesn’t support it because it would be “terribly divisive”  for an “already very divided” country.”  

Kamala Harris

The California senator tweeted out a petition before Pelosi had announced formal proceedings, asking supporters to sign if they want to see movement towards impeachment. 

“As a 2016 candidate, Donald Trump openly encouraged a foreign adversary to hack a political opponent and attack our elections. As President, he’s doing it again in broad daylight. We cannot stand for this abuse of power,” the petition reads.

Amy Klobuchar

The Minnesota senator tweeted that “the House did the right thing,” maintaining her previously stated support for an impeachment inquiry.

Wayne Messam

The Miramar, Florida, mayor tweeted Tuesday that “Many folks continue to demand impeachment proceedings for @POTUS, I’m on record as well.” 

Beto O’Rourke

The former congressman from Texas on Twitter called on his former colleagues to simply “finish the job and impeach him.”

Tim Ryan

The congressman from Ohio took to twitter to say: “Donald Trump showed us again that his true colors are more like a mob boss than a president. It’s time to impeach.”

Bernie Sanders

The Vermont senator tweeted Tuesday he believes Trump “is the most corrupt president in the modern history of this country. Enough is enough.”  

He also said Tuesday he fears that if impeachment fails in the Senate, “I know and you know what [Trump] will do: ‘I am vindicated! … I am vindicated!’ And I think that is a fact that has to be taken into consideration.”

Joe Sestak

The former congressman and Naval officer said that if the allegations against Trump are true, “the constitutional duty of Congress is to investigate the outreach of America’s leader.” 

Tom Steyer

The billionaire reiterated his support for the impeachment movement. Steyer began calling for impeachment two years ago to “hold this lawless, criminal president accountable. We are finally at a watershed moment.” 

Elizabeth Warren

The Massachusetts Senator reiterated her longtime belief in impeaching the president, tweeting a video of her speaking on the floor of the Senate in May where she said “Congress must fulfill its Constitutional duty & begin impeachment proceedings against the President.” She also said “when it comes to the Senate, I will do what the Constitution requires.”

Marianne Williamson: Williamson said Tuesday that she had previously been unsure of an impeachment inquiry because of the GOP stronghold on the Senate, as well as Trump possibly using the inquiry “make himself look like a victim.”

However, “when a president has no qualms withholding aid from another country unless its government agrees to help him get dirt on his political opponents, America has a serious problem,” the author said in a statement. “Our president has apparently no respect for the demands, responsibilities, or the limits to his power.”

“It is with no pleasure that I support an impeachment inquiry into the president. It is, however, with a deep belief that it is the right thing to do,” she added.

Andrew Yang: Yang came forward on Tuesday via Twitter to say he now believes “impeachment is the right path forward. Asking foreign leaders for political help in return for aid and then suppressing your own agency’s inquiry is egregious,” but clarified that if impeachment doesn’t work in the Republican Senate, he plans to “beat Donald Trump at the ballot box in 2020.”

“Sometimes you do the right thing independent of politics,” he continued.

President Trump, for his part, has called the latest push for impeachment a “positive for me in the election.” 

Trump’s campaign manager Brad Parscale called the Democrats impeachment strategy “misguided.”

“Democrats can’t beat President Trump on his policies or his stellar record of accomplishment, so they’re trying to turn a Joe Biden scandal into a Trump problem,” Parscale said in a statement.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/09/24/election-2020-where-do-2020-democrats-stand-trump-impeachment/2435355001/

Three other GOP senators complained privately in discussions with The Washington Post that the White House erred by releasing the transcript, arguing that it sets a precedent for future presidents about disclosure of calls with foreign leaders and could be seen as a concession to Democrats.

Publicly, two senators expressed serious concerns about the revelation, as cracks have begun to emerge with GOP lawmakers privately discussing Trump’s conduct and their party’s political standing.

“Republicans ought not to be rushing to circle the wagons and say there’s no ‘there’ there when there’s obviously a lot that’s very troubling there,” Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) told reporters after reviewing the whistleblower’s complaint. “. . . Democrats ought not be using words like ‘impeach’ before they knew anything about the actual substance.”

Sasse, who opposed Trump’s 2016 candidacy, recently has spoken more favorably about Trump and earned the president’s endorsement in his reelection bid.

“It remains troubling in the extreme. It’s deeply troubling,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) told reporters Wednesday when asked about the transcript.

As Republican senators left a closed-door luncheon Wednesday, they were mostly supportive of the president and dismissive of the transcript, even as some lawmakers and their aides groused behind the scenes about the White House’s response.

There were scattered statements about whether Trump handled the call appropriately, but any sense of alarm was muted.

“As a general rule, transcripts of phone conversations between heads of state should not be released. In this case, an exception had to be made,” said Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), pointing out that some Senate Republicans had asked the president to release the document. He added that he was not troubled by its content.

“It’s a decision for the White House,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said when asked about the release, quickly calling out Democrats for “hating” Trump.

“It’s unprecedented that he’s released it and there are some ramifications for the office, but people were clamoring for all the information, and he’s giving it,” said Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), who attended a White House meeting Wednesday morning to review the rough transcript.

While many Republicans continue to dismiss Democrats’ impeachment efforts, the initial fault lines could foreshadow how Senate Republicans ultimately handle a trial, should the House impeach the president, according to several lawmakers and aides.

In the rough transcript of the July 25 call, Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to work with U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr to investigate the conduct of Biden and offered to meet with the foreign leader at the White House after he promised to conduct such an inquiry.

Those statements and others in the phone call between Trump and Zelensky were so concerning that the intelligence community inspector general thought them a possible violation of campaign finance law.

In late August, intelligence officials referred the matter to the Justice Department as a possible crime, but prosecutors concluded last week that the conduct was not criminal, according to senior Justice Department officials.

Trump has acknowledged publicly that he asked Zelensky to investigate Biden’s son, who served on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company that came under scrutiny by authorities there.

Trump has denied doing anything improper, but lawmakers have raised concerns about his directive to freeze nearly $400 million in military assistance for Ukraine in the days leading up the phone call with Zelensky.

Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) echoed other Republicans in arguing there was “no quid pro quo,” adding, “while the conversation reported in the memorandum relating to alleged Ukrainian corruption and Vice President Biden’s son was inappropriate, it does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.”

Rough transcript of Trump’s call with Ukrainian president shows him offering U.S. assistance for Biden investigation

Three Senate GOP aides said Wednesday that their bosses were unhappy with the White House’s decision and the sense that Republican lawmakers were being forced into the difficult position of defending Trump while contending with what many Democrats see as a problematic transcript.

But other Senate Republicans, allied with Trump, were dismissive. “Wow. Impeachment over this?” Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) tweeted. “What a nothing (non-quid pro quo) burger.”

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who like Graham faces reelection next year, said, “I’ve looked at the transcript; I don’t see anything there.”

Live updates: Number of House members supporting impeachment inquiry swells to 200

One early divide among Senate Republicans is between the “Burr camp” and the “Johnson camp,” according to two senior GOP aides who were not authorized to speak publicly, referring to Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee.

Burr’s faction of the Senate GOP has a darker, frustrated view of Trump’s handling of Ukraine, while Johnson has linked the Ukraine issue to his committee’s work into reviewing the launch of the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails while serving as secretary of state.

During a closed-door Senate Republican lunch Tuesday, both Burr and Johnson underscored their own position in conversation with colleagues, who asked them whether their respective committees would launch investigations of Biden.

Burr said Wednesday said he had no interest in investigating the Biden-Ukraine angle.

“That’s not my lane, but I’m only focused on gathering the facts on this piece,” he said, referencing Russian interference in the 2016 election. Johnson said his committee has been conducting “information gathering and oversight” related to the 2016 campaign probe, which might now involve Hunter Biden.

“It just kind of morphs into that same cast of characters, what they were doing,” he said.

Others who have expressed concern about the whistleblower complaint and pushed for more disclosure include Romney, the 2012 GOP presidential nominee who carries stature nationally in the party, even though he is still building relationships within the Senate, which he joined earlier this year.

Romney’s willingness to pressure the White House has irritated Trump advisers, who cheered the president’s tweet this week about Romney’s 2012 defeat.

“I’d forgotten I’d lost, so I appreciate the reminder,” Romney joked to reporters.

But Romney’s willingness to speak out has “given cover” to Senate Republicans who also want to speak out, even if more mutedly, one Senate GOP aide said, because Romney is taking the lead in asking pointed questions about Trump and the administration.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said, “Biden is the one who threatened Ukraine’s aid, not Trump, and that has to be investigated.”

The tensions between Senate Republicans who view the whistleblower complaint strictly as an intelligence matter and those who see it as part of a political “witch hunt” of Trump by Democrats are almost certain to continue, lawmakers and aides said, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) having to navigate those dynamics and hold his members together amid the tumult.

McConnell faces reelection next year and is focused on keeping his Senate majority as the GOP defends 23 seats to the Democrats’ 12.

McConnell’s member-driven approach was evident early Tuesday, when several Senate Republicans said they were unsure if McConnell would oppose the call by Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) to have the whistleblower complaint sent to the intelligence committees.

“I really thought Mitch would knock it down, because Chuck was putting it up. He hates everything Chuck does,” one veteran Republican senator said, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly. “But he didn’t. He let Chuck’s resolution get through with unanimous consent.”

When the senator inquired about McConnell’s decision, he was told McConnell was following the requests from his members to receive more information.

Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry, says Trump’s courting of foreign political help is a ‘betrayal of national security’

McConnell also saw up close at Tuesday’s lunch how many Senate Republicans, while publicly rallying around the president, are asking the White House to share more information. Even Trump allies asked White House legislative affairs director Eric Ueland, who attended the Tuesday lunch, to give more documents to Congress, according to aides and lawmakers present.

McConnell’s public message has been sharply partisan and far more predictable, calling House Democrats’ impeachment moves an “impeachment parade in search of a rationale” and driven by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s “far-left conference.”

But McConnell is not yet preparing for a Senate trial, with some of his longtime allies holding out hope that impeachment fades in the House. McConnell’s associates said this week that he has not begun internal planning for an impeachment trial, logistically or politically.

“Zero. None. No discussions of a trial. You prepare for the probable, not the improbable. I just can’t imagine a universe in which they end up doing that,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) said. “Nancy Pelosi is simply too shrewd to let things get out of control.”

Added Sen. John Neely Kennedy (R-La.): “I don’t know how they’d handle it. I’m labor, not management.”

Democrats are looking ahead but remain unsure of whether Senate Republican support for Trump would ever crumble.

“An impeachment trial would be challenging, but the Senate is more than capable of rising to the occasion, and I hope my Republican colleagues would be capable of breaking their silence and stepping forward,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said. “This is truly a time of reckoning.”

Seung Min Kim in New York and Paul Kane contributed to this report.

Read more at PowerPost

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/senate-republicans-split-over-trump-urging-ukrainian-leader-to-investigate-biden/2019/09/25/48ec0e64-dfa6-11e9-be96-6adb81821e90_story.html

A longtime GOP political consultant made a stunning claim on Wednesday that “30” Republican senators would vote to impeach President Trump if there was a secret ballot.

Mike Murphy, a former advisor to John McCain and Mitt Romney, appeared on MSNBC and began by claiming that Trump’s alleged misconduct was “much clearer” in the transcript of the president’s conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky than the Mueller report and that a direct “quid pro quo” wasn’t necessary, calling it a “classic shakedown.”

“I’m telling you — these Senate Republicans, should the Democrats vote impeachment… are going to be pinned down to a yes-no answer,” Murphy told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell. “And if they provide cover for Donald Trump for this, a clear violation of his role as president, we’re going to lose Colorado with Cory Gardner. We’re going to lose Maine with Susan Collins. We’re going to lose Arizona with Martha McSally. And the Democrats will put the Senate very much in play.”

CNN ANCHOR ATTACKS TRUMP, DEFENDS BIDEN FROM ‘100 PERCENT WRONG’ AND ‘BASELESS’ ACCUSATIONS

Murphy predicted that the politics will become “worse and worse” for Trump, which will push GOP lawmakers towards impeachment. He then claimed that dozens of Republicans are secretly on board with impeachment.

“I can tell you this… one Republican senator told me if it was a secret vote, 30 Republican senators would vote to impeach Trump,” Murphy claimed.

On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., announced a formal impeachment inquiry, saying “the president must be held accountable” for his “betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security, and the betrayal of the integrity of our elections.”

Invoking the “darkest days of the American Revolution,” Pelosi called on lawmakers to honor their constitutional oath to protect the country “from all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“This week, the president has admitted to asking the president of Ukraine to take actions which would benefit him politically,” Pelosi said. “Therefore, today, I’m announcing the House of Representatives is moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry. I’m directing our six committees to proceed with their investigations under that umbrella.

“The president must be held accountable,” she continued. “No one is above the law.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-mccain-romney-adviser-tells-msnbc-30-gop-senators-would-impeach-trump-in-secret-ballot

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has authorized six House committees to gather evidence and hold hearings related to President Trump’s impeachable offenses.
LEARN MORE: https://abcn.ws/2mZ8VqA

#ABCNews #Trump #ImpeachmentInquiry #Impeachment #Pelosi

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1iNLaQiSy4

Amazon just released a bunch of new products — here’s a look at…

By throwing many ideas into the market and seeing what sticks, Amazon hopes to spread key homegrown technologies, such as Alexa and Sidewalk, a newly announced wireless…

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/boeing-settles-lion-air-lawsuits-for-at-least-1point2-million-apiece.html


“A vote for the president today is a vote in favor of cutting money for our military and slashing support for critical military projects in red states as well as blue,” Sen. Chuck Schumer said. | Win McNamee/Getty Images

Congress

The Senate voted Wednesday for a second time to block President Donald Trump’s emergency declaration, rebuking the president over his attempt to fund a border wall without congressional approval.

In a 54-41 vote, the Senate approved a resolution to disapprove of Trump’s emergency declaration, including 11 Republicans. The vote comes after the Trump administration announced it would divert $3.6 billion in military construction funding from several states to build his border wall.

Story Continued Below

The president will surely veto the resolution, as he did in March. Under federal law, Democrats may bring up the emergency vote every six months.

Prior to the vote, Senate Democrats accused Republicans of prioritizing Trump over military families.

“A vote for the president today is a vote in favor of cutting money for our military and slashing support for critical military projects in red states as well as blue,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. “My Republican colleagues should vote to terminate the emergency declaration today on constitutional grounds.”

Among the states hit by the diversion of military funds are Colorado, Arizona, North Carolina, Texas and South Carolina – all of which have Republican senators up for re-election in 2020.

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) decried the vote as a “show vote” during his remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday morning.

“Still unwilling to work with the president and Republicans on a long-term bipartisan solution for border security, Senate Democrats are making us repeat the same show vote again,” McConnell said. “I would urge my colleagues to vote for border security.”

The actual raiding of military funds did not affect Republican votes. The breakdown was similar to the Senate’s first vote against the emergency declaration.

The eleven Republican senators joining Democrats to disapprove of the emergency declaration were Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Mike Lee of Utah, Jerry Moran of Kansas, Rob Portman of Ohio, Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Roy Blunt of Missouri and Roger Wicker of Mississippi. Marco Rubio of Florida, who previously voted to disapprove of the emergency declaration did not vote.

Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) — all 2020 candidates — also did not vote.

Trump declared a national emergency in February to access the funds, after spending negotiations with Congress led to the longest government shutdown in history.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/senate-vote-national-emergency-border-wall-1510795

A college football fan who raised more than $1 million with a joke sign begging for beer money was exposed for writing old racist tweets — forcing his beloved Busch Light to dump him.

Carson King, 24, who became a viral sensation with his sign held up on TV saying “Busch Light Supply Needs Replenished” on Sept. 14 — then promised the money that rolled in to a local kids’ hospital — was revealed have made the offensive posts as a 16-year-old high school sophomore in 2012.

They included one comparing black mothers to gorillas, according to a report by the Des Moines Register.

But on Wednesday, critics of the exposé unearthed offensive tweets published by the Register reporter in 2010 and 2013 — making light of abusing women and mocking same-sex marriage legislation, the Washington Post reported.

Critics of Aaron Calvin’s report asked why the outlet dug so far into the past of an ordinary person who “selflessly” raised money for sick kids.

King quickly apologized, saying he was “embarrassed and stunned” by his “offensive and hurtful” attempts at humor as a teen.

But he was still dropped by Busch Beer, the company that had called him “Carson King, Iowa Legend” on personalized beer cans with pictures of his face as it promised him a year’s supply of brews.

“Carson King had multiple social media posts that do not align with our values as a brand or as a company and we will have no further association with him,” Anheuser-Busch told MarketWatch on Tuesday.

However, Busch stressed that it was still matching donations until the end of the month — with its involvement key in helping King raise more than $1.14 million for the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital.

“We are honoring our commitment by donating more than $350,000 to the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics,” the firm told the publication.

Venmo, which also matched King’s fundraising, did not respond to MarketWatch’s requests for comment.

In his online mea culpa, King noted the irony in social media bringing him viral fame — then causing it to crash down.

“It has the power to bring people together for the common good. It can also make your life very public,” he said, highlighting anti-racism posts he made in the years after his offensive ones.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/09/25/1-million-viral-beer-money-guy-dropped-by-busch-over-racist-tweets/

On the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, President Trump on Wednesday dismissed Democrats’ move to open an impeachment inquiry against him, denied that he pressured Ukraine’s leader to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and suggested that the White House should release even more records of his communications.

The July 25 call has been the subject of intense scrutiny since The Washington Post reported last week that a whistleblower had come forward with concerns about the matter.

Trump has acknowledged publicly that he asked Zelensky to investigate Biden’s son, who served on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company that came under scrutiny by authorities there.

A roundup of the day’s events:

● The White House released a rough transcript of the July call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Democrats say confirms the need for an impeachment inquiry.

● The document showed Trump offering the help of the U.S. attorney general to investigate Biden and promising Zelensky a White House meeting after he said he would conduct such an inquiry.

● House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a statement that the rough transcript proves Trump “has tried to make lawlessness a virtue in America and now is exporting it abroad.”

● Zelensky told reporters in New York that Trump did not push him to investigate Biden. “I think you read everything,” he said. “I think you read [the] text. I’m sorry, but I don’t want to be involved to democratic, open elections, elections of U.S.A. … Nobody pushed me.”

● Trump denied that he urged Zelensky to investigate Biden. “In other words, no pressure,” he said.

● Trump later said the White House should make public the transcript of his first conversation with Zelensky in April, after the Ukranian president was elected.

5:10 p.m.: Trump suggests White House should release transcript of his first call with Zelensky

At his news conference late Wednesday afternoon, Trump suggested that the White House should make public the transcript of his first conversation with Zelensky, which was in April, after the Ukranian president was elected.

“I think you should ask for the first conversation also. … It was beautiful,” Trump said.

The president also said that Vice President Pence has had “one or two” conversations related to the matter and that information about those calls should be released, too.

“They were perfect,” Trump said. “They were all perfect.”

The president dismissed the notion that his actions amount to an impeachable offense.

“Impeachment for that?” Trump said. “When you have a wonderful meeting or a wonderful phone conversation? It was beautiful. It was a perfect conversation. I think you should ask for Vice President Pence’s conversation. Nothing was mentioned of anything of import.”

4:30 p.m.: Trump says he wants ‘transparency’ from Biden

In tweets shortly before he was scheduled to address reporters in New York, Trump said he had informed House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and all House Republicans that he “fully” supports “transparency on so-called whistleblower information.” But he added that also wants “transparency from Joe Biden and his son Hunter, on the millions of dollars that have been quickly and easily taken out of Ukraine and China.”

“Additionally, I demand transparency from Democrats that went to Ukraine and attempted to force the new President to do things that they wanted under the form of political threat,” Trump said. It was not immediately clear which Democrats Trump was referencing, or what he meant by “political threat.”

Trump has acknowledged publicly that he asked Zelensky to investigate Biden’s son, who served on the board of a Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company that came under scrutiny by authorities there.

Hunter Biden was not accused of any wrongdoing in the investigation. As vice president, Joe Biden pressured Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor, who Biden and other Western officials said was not sufficiently pursuing corruption cases. At the time, the Ukrainians’ investigation was dormant, according to former Ukrainian and U.S. officials.

4:05 p.m.: Castro defends Biden as ‘an honorable man’

One of Biden’s 2020 Democratic presidential rivals, Julián Castro, offered words of support for the former vice president at an event in Oakland, Calif., on Wednesday afternoon.

“He and his family do not deserve these kind of baseless accusations from Donald Trump,” said Castro, who was the housing secretary in the Obama administration. “Donald Trump is trying to do to Joe Biden what he did to Hillary Clinton; to turn somebody who has given a lifetime of service, and done it honorably, into the victim of false accusations.”

At a Democratic debate this month, Castro had gone on the attack against Biden, accusing him of forgetting the details of his own health-care plan. But on Wednesday, he struck a different note.

“Joe Biden is an honorable man,” Castro said. “I think he’s an honest man and his family is honest. I have disagreements with Vice President Biden that I’ve made clear — on health care, on immigration, on other issues — but I don’t want to see this election decided by Donald Trump’s usual tearing down of other people with false accusations.”

— David Weigel

3:35 p.m.: On Wall Street, the fear is Trump’s trade policies, not impeachment

The market reaction to Pelosi’s announcement of an impeachment inquiry into Trump was a giant shrug. This is a political moment for the country, not an economic one, many analysts say.

Stocks fell a bit Tuesday as news of Pelosi’s decision broke, but the market rebounded Wednesday. On Wall Street, few think the process will lead to Trump’s removal from office. Pelosi appears to be inching closer to the votes for an impeachment in the House, but it looks highly unlikely at this point that two-thirds of the GOP-controlled Senate will go along with it.

“Markets have seen this impeachment movie before. So what if the House impeaches if the Senate will never remove the President from office? Markets are way more interested in a trade deal with China,” said Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group in Richmond.

Read more here.

— Heather Long

3:25 p.m.: Congress will receive whistleblower complaint today, lawmaker says

Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, who until now had blocked Congress from seeing the whistleblower complaint that first brought the phone call between Trump and Zelensky to light, will provide that complaint to Congress today by 4 p.m., according to Rep. Devin Nunes (Calif.), the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee.

Lawmakers have demanded the whistleblower’s complaint be made available to them, both before and after seeing the White House’s readout of the call.

Nunes made the announcement while speaking on the House floor in defense of Trump.

“The media coverage and the Democrats’ hysterical and politicized response is reminiscent of countless episodes during the course of the Russia collusion hoax,” Nunes said. “That’s why Republicans look forward to actually reading the material on which the Democrats, from a position of ignorance, are basing their unrestrained accusations.”

3:10 p.m.: Congress ‘must pursue the facts,’ Biden says

Biden reacted to the White House release of a readout of the call between Trump and Zelensky, referring to it as an “abridged version that the White House was willing to issue to the public” and reiterating his call for the full whistleblower complaint about Trump’s conduct on the call be made available to Congress.

As the Biden statement came out, Trump was attacking Biden during a media availability at the United Nations with Zelensky, who seemed to be doing his best to stay out of the middle of this U.S. political scandal.

Biden, who has called for impeachment if the White House doesn’t cooperate with the House’s investigations, said that Congress “must pursue the facts and quickly take prompt action to hold Donald Trump accountable.”

“In the meantime, I will continue to focus my campaign not on how Donald Trump abused his power to come after my family, but on how he has turned his back on America’s families,” Biden said.

2:50 p.m.: ‘No pressure’ on Zelensky, Trump says, despite rough transcript of call

Trump told reporters on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly that he did not pressure Zelensky on the July call. The president also strenuously defended the actions of his personal attorney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, who he said is “looking to find out where the phony witch hunt started.”

“Rudy Giuliani is a great lawyer,” Trump said. “He’s a great mayor. He’s highly respected. I’ve watched the passion that he’s had on television over the last few days.”

Trump began his highly-anticipated face-to-face meeting with Zelensky with a joke, noting that “he’s made me more famous, and I’ve made him more famous.”

Zelensky, a comedian before he was elected in April, also tried to keep the mood light by noting that “it’s better to be on TV than by phone.”

— Anne Gearan

2:20 p.m.: Cruz says Democrats are trying to ‘undo’ 2016 election

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) joined other Republicans in accusing Democrats of seeking to “undo” the results of the 2016 election through impeachment.

But if Trump were removed from office, it would not result in a Democrat taking his place. Instead, Vice President Pence would be in line to become president.

“Since the day President Trump was elected, congressional Democrats have been working to find any reason under the sun to impeach the president and undo the results of the last election,” Cruz said. “First, it was Mueller, then the Mueller report found no collusion. Now it’s Ukraine. Next month, it will be something else.”

2 p.m.: Pelosi privately urges narrow Trump impeachment probe focused on Ukraine

Pelosi urged fellow Democratic leaders in a private meeting to keep the impeachment investigation narrowly focused on Trump and his dealings with the president of Ukraine, according to five Democrats familiar with the conversation.

The closed-door meeting took place hours after the White House released a rough transcript of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky in which Trump pressed Zelensky to work with Attorney General William P. Barr and Giuliani to investigate Biden.

Inside the room, Democrats said, Pelosi told colleagues that keeping the inquiry narrowly focused on the Ukraine allegations could help keep the investigation out of the courts, where a slew of investigative matters have been bogged down for months — though she did not rule out ultimately including other episodes in a potential impeachment package.

Read more here.

— Mike DeBonis and Rachael Bade

1:20 p.m.: White House mistakenly sends Trump-Ukraine talking points to Democrats

In the hours after the release Wednesday of the rough transcript of Trump’s July phone call with Zelensky, the White House circulated an email with proposed talking points for Trump’s defenders.

Unfortunately for the White House, the email was mistakenly sent to not only Republicans but also Democratic lawmakers and their staff.

The message, titled, “What You Need To Know: President Trump’s Call with President Zelensky,” was quickly recalled — but not before Democrats took to Twitter to ridicule the White House over the error.

Read more here.

1:15 p.m.: Trump calls House impeachment inquiry a “manufactured crisis”

Trump called the House impeachment inquiry a “manufactured crisis” Wednesday afternoon and said it undermines the ability of Democrats to make progress on trade deals and gun legislation.

“I don’t think they can do any deals. All they’re talking about is nonsense,” Trump said at a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly in New York.

“She’s wasting her time on … a manufactured crisis,” Trump said of Pelosi.

1 p.m.: Democratic chairmen says no “quid pro quo” is required for wrongdoing

A joint statement issued Wednesday afternoon by four Democratic committee chairmen sought to push back on Trump’s argument that he had done nothing wrong because his request for Zelensky to investigate the Bidens was not linked to U.S. military aid to Ukraine.

“Let’s be clear: no quid pro quo is required to betray our country,” the statement said. “Trump asked a foreign government to interfere in our elections — that is betrayal enough. The corruption exists whether or not Trump threatened — explicitly or implicitly — that a lack of cooperation could result in withholding military aid.”

The statement was issued by Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Oversight Chairman Elijah E. Cummings (Md.) and Foreign Relations Chairman Eliot L. Engel (N.Y.).

12:45 p.m.: Impeachment inquiry threatens to overtake Capitol, upend trade and spending talks

House Democrats’ new impeachment inquiry threatens to overtake Capitol Hill and chill legislating on other fronts, deepening partisan divisions and mistrust between lawmakers and administration officials who’ve already struggled to secure deals on spending and trade.

Trump’s top agenda item, a rewrite of the 1994 trade deal between Mexico, Canada and the United States, could be the first victim.

The formal impeachment inquiry, announced Tuesday, will test whether congressional Democrats and the White House can attempt to continue governing on other matters. Numerous Republicans have said the impeachment inquiry changes everything.

Democrats are trying to forge ahead, multitasking on trade and budget talks while also preparing for impeachment.

Read more here.

— Erica Werner and David J. Lynch

12:30 p.m.: Some Senate Republicans question White House’s judgment

Several Senate Republicans were stunned Wednesday and questioned the White House’s judgment after it released a rough transcript of Trump’s call with Ukraine’s president.

One Senate Republican, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly, said the transcript’s release was a “huge mistake” that the GOP now has to confront, even as Republicans argue that House Democrats are overreaching with their impeachment effort.

A top Senate GOP aide said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is expecting Wednesday’s closed-door lunch to be eventful and possibly tense as Republicans react to the transcript and debate their next step.

“It remains troubling in the extreme. It’s deeply troubling,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) told reporters Wednesday, when asked about the transcript.

Read more here.

Robert Costa

12:15 p.m.: Schiff says rough transcript reveals “mafia-like shakedown”

At a news conference Wednesday afternoon, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) said the rough transcript reveals “a classic mafia-like shakedown of a foreign leader.”

Schiff said Zelensky’s statements in the rough transcript “reflect a Ukrainian president who was desperate for U.S. support.” Trump, he said, was eager to leverage that situation.

“This is how a mafia boss talks. … ‘I have a favor I want to ask you,’ ” Schiff said. And the favor, “of course, is to investigate his political rival,” he added.

He also took aim at Trump’s mentions of Barr in the call.

The fact that Trump would invoke the attorney general, Schiff said, sends a message to the Ukrainian president that “this is the United States government asking, and we plan to effectuate that through the Department of Justice.”

12:05 p.m.: Pelosi says rough transcript confirms need for impeachment inquiry, questions whether Trump cares about ethics

Pelosi said in a statement that the rough transcript confirms the need for an impeachment inquiry of a president who, she said, “has tried to make lawlessness a virtue in America and now is exporting it abroad.”

“The release of the notes of the call by the White House confirms that the President engaged in behavior that undermines the integrity of our elections, the dignity of the office he holds and our national security,” Pelosi said.

The California Democrat said that she respects Trump’s responsibility to engage with foreign leaders.

But, she said, “It is not part of his job to use taxpayer money to shake down other countries for the benefit of his campaign. Either the President does not know the weight of his words or he does not care about ethics or his constitutional responsibilities.”

Pelosi also accused the Justice Department of “acting in a rogue fashion” and being “complicit in the President’s lawlessness.”

12 p.m.: Trump-Zelensky call shows lengths to which foreign leaders go to flatter Trump

The rough transcript of Trump’s phone call with Zelensky provides evidence of Trump asking the Ukrainian president to investigate the conduct of Biden and his son Hunter.

But it also reveals the lengths to which foreign leaders will go in their private conversations with Trump to flatter the president to win his favor.

Zelensky, who was elected in April, lavishes praise on Trump in four distinct ways in the July phone call.

Most significantly, Zelensky mentioned that he stayed at one of Trump’s properties.

“Actually, last time I traveled to the United States, I stayed in New York near Central Park, and I stayed at the Trump Tower,” Zelensky told Trump, according to the rough transcript.

Read more here.

11:30 a.m.: Hoyer says House focus will be on Ukraine matter

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) called the rough transcript “pretty damning” and told reporters Wednesday morning that Democrats would focus on it.

“We are going to focus on this particular matter,” Hoyer said, adding that it’s “not hard to understand.”

As they move forward with an impeachment inquiry, House Democrats have been in talks about how narrowly to focus on the Ukraine matter vs. material from an array of other investigations.

Holding up a copy of the rough transcript, Hoyer said, “Even that which is in this document is pretty damning. … These are very serious national security issues.”

Hoyer added that there are no plans to cancel an upcoming two-week recess because it is important for members to have time to explain to constituents what happened in the Ukraine matter.

Earlier Wednesday, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said the rough transcript confirmed “several things.”

“The President, Donald Trump, clearly pressured the Ukrainian president to commence an investigation of the Biden family to dig up political dirt in order to bolster the president’s electoral prospects in 2020,” Jeffries said. “That is textbook abuse of power, and the transcripts have become Exhibit A in that regard.”

— Rachael Bade and Mike DeBonis

11:20 a.m.: Nadler says Barr should recuse himself from Ukraine matter

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) demanded Wednesday that Attorney General William P. Barr recuse himself from further involvement in the Ukraine matter, citing his mention in the rough transcript.

The document shows that Trump urged Ukraine’s leader to contact Barr about opening an inquiry tied to Biden.

“The President dragged the Attorney General into this mess. At a minimum, AG Barr must recuse himself until we get to the bottom of this matter,” Nadler tweeted.

— Mike DeBonis

11:15 a.m.: Democratic presidential candidates pounce on release of rough transcript

Several Democratic presidential candidates pounced on the release of the rough transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky, saying it bolstered the case for the president’s impeachment.

“This ‘transcript’ itself is a smoking gun,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said on Twitter. “If this is the version of events the president’s team thinks is most favorable, he is in very deep jeopardy. We need to see the full whistleblower complaint and the administration needs to follow the law. Now.”

Former Obama Cabinet secretary Julián Castro also called the rough transcript a “smoking gun.”

“Donald Trump pressured a foreign government to work with his Justice Department to investigate a political opponent. Congress should cancel recess and begin impeachment proceedings immediately,” Castro said on Twitter.

Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), meanwhile, said the document amounted to an admission on the part of Trump.

“Trump pressured the Ukrainian president to work with the U.S. Attorney General to investigate a political opponent. He must be impeached,” she tweeted.

Billionaire activist Tom Steyer said the rough transcript showed Trump is “a traitor,” while former congressman Beto O’Rourke (D-Tex.) said it showed Trump is “unfit for office and needs to be impeached.”

10:40 a.m.: Schumer says he strongly supports House impeachment inquiry

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that he strongly supports Pelosi’s decision to move forward with a formal impeachment inquiry.

“The president’s conduct made an impeachment inquiry unavoidable,” Schumer said during remarks on the Senate floor. “The events of recent days have brought sharply into focus the question of whether President Trump abused the powers of his office and betrayed the public trust for personal and political gain.”

10:40 a.m.: Trump calls on Democrats to apologize

Shortly after the rough transcript was publicly released, Trump went on Twitter to call on Democrats to apologize.

“Will the Democrats apologize after seeing what was said on the call with the Ukrainian President?” he wrote. “They should, a perfect call — got them by surprise!”

Trump also tweeted a clip of a younger Pelosi speaking on the House floor about how unfairly Republicans were treating then-President Bill Clinton during his impeachment.

Shortly afterward, speaking to reporters in New York, he continued to insist he is the victim of “the single greatest witch hunt in American history.”

“It’s a disgraceful thing,” Trump said. “The letter was a great letter, meaning the letter revealing the call.”

He claimed the rough transcript showed he put “no pressure” on Zelensky.

While Democrats had suggested he had a “call from hell,” Trump said, it instead “turned out to be a nothing call.”

10:30 a.m.: “Is it out?” House Republican leaders were unaware rough transcript was released

House Republican leaders were apparently caught unawares that the White House released the rough transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky.

At their weekly news conference, which began at 10 a.m., House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) and others stuck largely to talking points that were the same as those they used on Tuesday — keeping the focus on Biden and Pelosi.

“No one has read this transcript,” McCarthy said at one point, chastising a reporter.

At another point, McCarthy said, “When this transcript comes out …”

After reporters and others in the room clarified that the rough transcript had already been released, McCarthy responded, “Is it out?”

Shortly afterward, House Republican leaders wrapped up the news conference.

10:15 a.m.: Hillary Clinton says Trump has “betrayed our country”

Shortly after the rough transcript was released, Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee defeated by Trump in 2016, took to Twitter to offer her support for impeachment.

“The president of the United States has betrayed our country,” she wrote. “That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act. He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”

10:15 a.m.: McConnell accuses House Democrats of rushing to judgment

In remarks shortly after the rough transcript was released, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) accused House Democrats of having an “impeachment addiction.”

“While our friends across the Capitol rush to judgment and dive deeper into their nearly three-year-old impeachment addiction, we’ll stay focused on the American people’s business,” McConnell said during remarks of the Senate floor.

10 a.m.: Rough transcript shows Trump offering U.S. assistance to Zelensky for Biden investigation

Trump told Zelensky to work with the U.S. attorney general to investigate Biden’s conduct and offered to meet with the leader of Ukraine at the White House after he promised to conduct such an inquiry, according to a newly released rough transcript of the call.

Those statements and others in a July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky were so concerning that the intelligence community inspector general thought them a possible violation of campaign finance law. In late August, intelligence officials referred the matter to the Justice Department as a possible crime, but prosecutors concluded last week that the conduct was not criminal, according to senior Justice Department officials.

The administration’s disclosures underscore how the president’s phone call has consumed the federal government in recent days, and how the White House is scrambling to defuse the situation by offering more details of what the president said.

On Wednesday, the administration released a White House rough transcript of the call and detailed behind-the-scenes discussions about how to handle the accusations.

Read more here.

Devlin Barrett, Matt Zapotosky, Carol D. Leonnig and Josh Dawsey

9:30 a.m.: Number of House members supporting impeachment inquiry swells to 200

The number of House members who say they support at least opening an impeachment inquiry into Trump has swelled to 200, a figure that includes 199 Democrats and Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.), a former Republican who recently left the party, according to an updated Washington Post tally.

In just the past two days, the number has grown by 60, with many members tying their decisions to Trump’s call with Zelensky.

Twenty-two of the 24 Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over the impeachment inquiry, have expressed public support for the move.

Read more here.

— JM Reiger

9:15 a.m.: House to vote Wednesday afternoon to condemn administration for withholding whistleblower complaint

The House plans to vote Wednesday afternoon on a resolution condemning the administration’s efforts to block the release of the whistleblower complaint alleging that Trump’s promise to a foreign leader constituted an “urgent concern” to national security.

Acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire has refused to share the complaint from a U.S. intelligence official in what Democrats say is a clear violation of the law.

Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the intelligence community, reviewed the complaint and determined that it was credible and troubling enough to be considered a matter of “urgent concern,” a legal threshold that requires notification of congressional oversight committees.

“We hope that all Members of the House — Democrats and Republicans alike — will join in upholding the rule of law and oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution as Representatives of the American people,” Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said in a joint statement.

In a rare, albeit subtle protest from the GOP-led Senate, lawmakers adopted a resolution on Tuesday calling for the White House to turn over the complaint to the intelligence committees, as is required under law.

8:30 a.m.: Giuliani says the rough transcript was read to him

Giuliani said Wednesday morning that the rough transcript had been read to him, an acknowledgment that prompted protests from Democratic members of Congress who had yet to review the document.

During an appearance on Fox News’s “Fox & Friends” in which he defended Trump and attacked Biden, Giuliani was asked if he had seen the rough transcript.

“Let’s say it was read to me,” he replied.

“The whole thing?” asked co-host Brian Kilmeade.

“I hope,” Giuliani replied.

Democrats, including House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), argued that Giuliani, who doesn’t hold a government position, should not have had an opportunity to review the rough transcript before they did.

7:25 a.m.: Trump complains again about Democrats “frozen with hatred and fear”

Trump went on Twitter early Wednesday to complain about continued Democratic scrutiny of his actions.

“There has been no President in the history of our Country who has been treated so badly as I have,” he wrote. “The Democrats are frozen with hatred and fear. They get nothing done. This should never be allowed to happen to another President. Witch Hunt!”

Trump’s salvo followed several tweets on Tuesday night in which he shared video clips of friendly commentators arguing that he is being treated unfairly.

6:40 a.m.: New poll shows limited support for impeachment

Amid a groundswell of support for impeachment proceedings among House Democrats, a new poll finds a majority of Americans do not favor ousting Trump from office.

Thirty-seven percent of voters say that Trump should be impeached and removed from office, while 57 percent say he should not be impeached, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday morning.

The poll was conducted from Thursday through Monday, as details were emerging about Trump’s call with Zelensky.

The poll shows a stark partisan divide on the question of impeachment. Among Democrats, 73 percent support impeachment, while 21 percent are opposed. Among Republicans, only 4 percent support impeachment, while 95 percent are opposed.

Read more here.

5 a.m.: Giuliani pursued shadow Ukraine agenda as key foreign policy officials were sidelined

Trump’s attempt to pressure the leader of Ukraine followed a months-long fight inside the administration that sidelined national security officials and empowered political loyalists — including the president’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani — to exploit the U.S. relationship with Kiev, current and former U.S. officials said.

The sequence, which began early this year, involved the abrupt removal of the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, the circumvention of senior officials on the National Security Council, and the suspension of hundreds of millions of dollars of aid administered by the Defense and State departments — all as key officials from these agencies struggled to piece together Giuliani’s activities from news reports.

Several officials described tense meetings on Ukraine among national security officials at the White House leading up to the president’s phone call on July 25, sessions that led some participants to fear that Trump and those close to him appeared prepared to use U.S. leverage with the new leader of Ukraine for Trump’s political gain.

Read more here.

— Greg Miller, Josh Dawsey, Paul Sonne and Ellen Nakashima

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-ukraine-controversy/2019/09/25/9390e9b8-df82-11e9-b199-f638bf2c340f_story.html

It was Mr. Trump who took the conversation into political territory, once again ripping into Mr. Biden and his son, Hunter, accusing them of corruption, and then veering into familiar territory to excoriate his 2016 rival, Hillary Clinton, for deleting emails.

In a statement on Wednesday, Mr. Biden called Mr. Trump’s suggestion that Mr. Zelensky should be in touch with Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, an attempt “to manufacture a smear” against him, “using a malicious conspiracy theory.”

“We also learned that he planned to involve the United States Department of Justice in this scheme — a direct attack on the core independence of that department, an independence essential to the rule of law,” he said.

But he tried deftly to make it not about him — as he made it about him.

“Congress must pursue the facts and quickly take prompt action to hold Donald Trump accountable. In the meantime, I will continue to focus my campaign not on how Donald Trump abused his power to come after my family, but on how he has turned his back on America’s families.”

Other Democratic presidential candidates condemned Trump again, saying the call is a “smoking gun” for impeachment, with at least two candidates using the phrase: Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and the former housing secretary Julián Castro.

Ms. Pelosi did not hold back in condemning Mr. Trump’s behavior as she indicated in a statement that the release of the phone call reconstruction would only fuel the impeachment inquiry:

“The release of the notes of the call by the White House confirms that the President engaged in behavior that undermines the integrity of our elections, the dignity of the office he holds and our national security. The President has tried to make lawlessness a virtue in America and now is exporting it abroad.

“I respect the responsibility of the President to engage with foreign leaders as part of his job. It is not part of his job to use taxpayer money to shake down other countries for the benefit of his campaign. Either the President does not know the weight of his words or he does not care about ethics or his constitutional responsibilities.”

She also made it clear that Mr. Barr would now be part of the multipronged House investigation that could yield articles of impeachment. “The transcript and the Justice Department’s acting in a rogue fashion in being complicit in the President’s lawlessness confirm the need for an impeachment inquiry,” she wrote. “Clearly, the Congress must act.”

Shortly after her remarks, the chairmen of the House Judiciary, Intelligence, Oversight and Foreign Affairs committees issued a joint statement:

“The record of the call released by the White House confirms our worst fears: that the President abused his office by directly and repeatedly asking a foreign country to investigate his political rival and open investigations meant to help the President politically. Not once, not twice, but more than half a dozen times during one telephone call. This was a shakedown. The President of the United States asked for a ‘favor’ after the Ukrainian President expressed his country’s need for weapons to defend against Russian aggression.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html

It hasn’t received as much attention as his efforts to get the Ukrainian government to investigate Joe Biden and his son, but the “transcript” of President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also indicates that just a day after special counsel Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress, Trump was seeking help in trying to undermine the foundations of the Russia investigation.

According to the White House’s account of Trump’s July call with Zelensky, the Ukrainian president obliquely brought up military aide that the Trump administration had mysteriously put on hold just days earlier by referring to specific pieces of equipment he intended to buy once the money came through.


Trump responded by telling Zelensky, “I would like you to do us a favor though.” He went on to ask him for a confusing favor related to a cybersecurity firm, a billionaire, and a computer server — but its subtext seems to be that Trump wanted help uncovering evidence that he believes would indicate that Russia was framed for hacking the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in 2016.

“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike … I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it,” Trump said, according to the White House. (The ellipses are in the “transcript,” which could be benign pauses or could suggest the White House may have withheld some information, a la Attorney General William Barr’s misleading letter to Congress about the Mueller report ahead of its public release.)


CrowdStrike, for those who may not remember, was the cybersecurity firm that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) used to investigate hacks against it back in 2016. It concluded that Russia was responsible, a finding later backed up by the US intelligence communities and special counsel Robert Mueller. But Trump apparently still believes that his own intelligence agencies have it wrong.

CrowdStrike cooperated with the FBI’s investigation of the hacks but Trump has nonetheless repeatedly pushed baseless conspiracy theories suggesting that information was somehow withheld from the bureau because CrowdStrike didn’t turn over a physical server to the FBI, and was therefore involved in a cover-up that resulted in the Russia investigation. (This isn’t how the relevant technology works, but more on that later.)

For a sense of how grounded in reality this “inside job” conspiracy theory about the DNC hack is, it’s worth pointing out (as Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo did) that, broadly speaking, it’s the same one that holds that DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered by a DNC-affiliated hit squad for leaking the emails to WikiLeaks.

During a bilateral media availability with Zelensky at the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday, Trump alluded to the “Crowdstrike” conspiracy theory and said that his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, is “looking to also find out where the phony witch hunt started, how it started.”

Once Trump asked Zelensky for some help trying to discredit the origins of the Russia probe during their phone call, he apparently turned to more forward-looking concerns.

According to the White House’s summary of the call, after Zelensky promised to help Trump out with email-related stuff, Trump then brought up “[t]he other thing.” He went on to ask Zelensky to work with Attorney General William Barr on an investigation of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.


Trump’s ask regarding the Bidens has received more attention — and understandably so, since it amounts to the president asking a foreign government to essentially serve as the opposition research arm of his political campaign. But Trump’s reference to “Crowdstrike” is also significant, illustrating as it does the president’s continued fixation on the Russia investigation, not to mention the fact that he continues to disbelieve the consensus conclusion of his own intelligence agencies.

Trump really doesn’t get how servers work

Based on the White House’s “transcript,” Trump seems to think that Ukraine was in possession of an email server containing Clinton’s emails. There’s just one problem: It doesn’t really work like that.

As Lonrenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai explained for Vice, the ask Trump made to Zelensky regarding “Crowdstrike” rests on a fundamental confusion that he can’t seem to shake: that “a very rich Ukrainian” is somehow in physical possession of the DNC server:

In reality, there’s no missing server, and both CrowdStrike and the US government concluded that Russian government hackers broke into the DNC.

In a 2017 interview with the Associated Press, Trump said CrowdStrike is “Ukraine-based” (fact check: it’s based in Sunnyvale, California, and has a big office in Arlington, Virginia).

“That’s what I heard. I heard it’s owned by a very rich Ukrainian, that’s what I heard,” Trump said.

So, to recap, it seems that Trump is saying that CrowdStrike, an American company, is actually Ukrainian. That’s why he’s asking the new President of Ukraine, a former comedian by the way, to help him find a missing server that actually does not exist.

In short, Trump doesn’t really know what he’s talking about and hence made a nonsense ask of Zelensky. But Zelensky, likely in his desire to appease Trump and receive the held-up US aid, indulged him anyway.

Though the White House’s “transcript” provides strong evidence that Trump linked releasing the military aid to Zelensky’s willingness to help him dig up dirt on Biden, Trump has this week alternately claimed the hold-up was over concerns about “corruption” and European countries not spending their share on foreign aid. Perhaps even he realized that the truth about him continuing to solicit foreign help to discredit his political rivals — and in this case seemingly using foreign aid as leverage — would be publicly untenable.


The news moves fast. To stay updated, follow Aaron Rupar on Twitter, and read more of Vox’s policy and politics coverage.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2019/9/25/20883373/trump-crowdstrike-ukraine-call-explained

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announces new Iran sanctions during a speech on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly. Read more on this here: https://fxn.ws/2lIKj5h #FoxNews

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Radio, FOX News Headlines 24/7, FOXNews.com and the direct-to-consumer streaming service, FOX Nation. FOX News also produces FOX News Sunday on FOX Broadcasting Company and FOX News Edge. A top five-cable network, FNC has been the most watched news channel in the country for 17 consecutive years. According to a 2018 Research Intelligencer study by Brand Keys, FOX News ranks as the second most trusted television brand in the country. Additionally, a Suffolk University/USA Today survey states Fox News is the most trusted source for television news or commentary in the country, while a 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News is the top-cited outlet. FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape while routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.

Subscribe to Fox News! https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/

Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Special Report with Bret Baier: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
The Story with Martha Maccallum: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Tucker Carlson Tonight: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Hannity: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
The Ingraham Angle: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Fox News @ Night: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…

Follow Fox News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxnews/om/

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTk-ELyL-Rs

Amazon just released a bunch of new products — here’s a look at…

By throwing many ideas into the market and seeing what sticks, Amazon hopes to spread key homegrown technologies, such as Alexa and Sidewalk, a newly announced wireless…

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/boeing-adds-safety-committee-considers-changes-to-plane-development.html

CLOSE

President Donald Trump is denying that he told the president of Ukraine that his country would only get U.S. aid if they investigated the son of Democratic rival Joe Biden. Trump said emphatically: “I didn’t do it.” (Sept. 23)
AP, AP

WASHINGTON – Vice President Mike Pence on Monday defended his own and the president’s conversations with the Ukrainian president, telling Fox News’ Sean Hannity that there was no quid pro quo when Trump brought up former Vice President Joe Biden during Trump’s congratulatory call to the newly-elected president in July.

“He mentioned Vice President Biden and his son in the context of us wanting to see honest government,” Pence said on Hannity’s show. “That’s exactly what the American taxpayer would expect.”

Trump himself denied Tuesday using military aid as a pressure tactic to get Ukraine to investigate Biden.

“I didn’t do it,” Trump said in brief remarks with reporters before delivering a speech at the United Nations. Trump said he held up the funds because the U.S. was paying too much while other countries were not paying enough.

Pence had his own conversation with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky during a trip to Poland this month. He told reporters after the meeting that he had not discussed Biden with Zelensky. He did not directly respond when asked if he could assure Ukraine that the holdup of military assistance was not related to an effort to dig up dirt on the Biden family.

More: GOP group slams Mike Pence for ‘who cares?’ comment in response to Trump business conflicts

Pence told Hannity Monday that all of his discussions with Zelensky, and all of the administration’s contacts, “were all based upon proper considerations of how we support Ukraine, how we support their effort to end an era of corruption in their government and advance the interest of their sovereignty.”

Asked whether he would recommend that a transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky be released, Pence said that’s a decision for the president to make.

Trump, on Tuesday, said reporters would realize the charges against him are “nonsense” when they “see the call.”

But he then referred to a “read out” of the call, which is a summary, and not a transcript.

Like Trump has, Pence said that the only wrongdoing was on the part of Biden.

“He had a quid pro quo,” Pence said of his predecessor. “He said to Ukrainian officials that you will not get over a billion dollars in American aid unless you fire a prosecutor who just happened to be investigating a company that Vice President Biden’s son was on the very board of.”

More: Pence goes after Biden for saying ‘I’m the vice president’ at the Democratic debate

Biden, while vice president in the Barack Obama administration, pressured Ukraine’s government to dismiss a chief prosecutor. He did so with the support of the Obama administration and other western governments who regarded the chief prosecutor as corrupt.

Trump and allies maintain that the prosecutor was investigating a gas company in which Biden’s son Hunter was a board member. There is no evidence that any kind of investigation touched directly on Hunter Biden, though he was criticized for work in a developing country in which his father had influence.

Biden’s presidential campaign team on Monday accused President Trump and his allies of peddling “roundly debunked conspiracy theory.”

The back-and-forth comes as scrutiny of Trump’s actions during the call is mounting amid renewed calls among House Democrats to impeach Trump.

Contributing: John Fritze and Aamer Madhani.

More: ‘What are we going to do, Mike?’ Trump’s victory posed problems for Pence and his wife, new book says

More: What’s going on with Trump and Ukraine? And how does it involve Biden and a whistleblower complaint?

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/24/pence-defends-his-and-trumps-talks-ukraine-scrutiny-continues/2428201001/

This is the text from the official summary of the phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on July 25. The conversation — particularly Mr. Trump’s remarks about Joe Biden — is at the center of a whistleblower complaint against the president, which is central to the impeachment inquiry launched by House Democrats. 

The White House acknowledged that this is not a full, verbatim transcript of the controversial call. Rather, it is notes taken from the conversation in the White House Situation Room. 


President Trump: Congratulations on a great victory. We all watched from the United States and you did a terrific job. The way you came from behind, somebody who wasn’t given much of a chance, and you ended up winning easily. It’s a fantastic achievement. Congratulations.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky: You are absolutely right Mr. President. We did win big and we worked hard for this. We worked a lot but I would like to confess to you that I had an opportunity to learn from you. We used quite a few of your skills and knowledge and were able to use it as an example for our elections and yes it is true that these were unique elections. We were in a unique situation that we were able to achieve a unique success. I’m able to tell you the following: the first time, you called me to congratulate me when I won my presidential election, and the second time you are now calling me when my party won the parliamentary election. I think I should run more often so you can call me more often and we can talk over the phone more often.

Trump: [laughter] That’s a very good idea. I think your country is very happy about that.

Zelensky: Well yes, to tell you the truth, we are trying to work hard because we wanted to drain the swamp here in our country. We brought in many, many new people. Not the old politicians, not the typical politicians, because we want to have a new format and a new type of government. You are a great teacher for us and in that.

Trump: Well it is very nice of you to say that. I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. When I was speaking to Angela Merkel she talks Ukraine, but she doesn’t do anything. A lot of the European countries are the same way so I think it’s something you want to look at but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.

Zelensky: Yes you are absolutely right. Not only 100%, but actually 1000% and I can tell you the following; I did talk to Angela Merkel and I did meet with her I also met and talked with Macron and I told them that they are not doing quite as much as they need to be doing on the issues with the sanctions. They are not enforcing the sanctions. They are not working as much as they should work for Ukraine. It turns out that even though logically, the European Union should be our biggest partner but technically the United States is a much bigger partner than the European Union and I’m very grateful to you for that because the United States is doing quite a lot for Ukraine. Much more than the European Union especially when we are talking about sanctions against the Russian Federation. I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike … I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you said yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible. 

Zelensky: Yes it is very important for me and everything that you just mentioned earlier. For me as a President, it is very important and we are open for any future cooperation. We are ready to open a new page on cooperation in relations between the United States and Ukraine. For that purpose, I just recalled our ambassador from United States and he will be replaced by a very competent and very experienced ambassador who will work hard on making sure that our two nations are getting closer. I would also like and hope to see him having your trust and your confidence and have personal relations with you so we can cooperate even more. I will personally tell you that one of my assistants spoke with Mr. Giuliani just recently and we are hoping very much that Mr. Giuliani will be able to travel to Ukraine and we will meet once he comes to Ukraine. I just wanted to assure you once again that you have nobody but friends around us. I will make sure that I surround myself with the best and most experienced people. I also wanted to tell you that we are friends. We are great friends and you Mr. President have friends in our country so we can continue our strategic partnership. I also plan to surround myself with great people and in addition to that investigation, I guarantee as the President of Ukraine that all the investigations will be done openly and candidly. That I can assure you.

Trump: Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that’s really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it…It sounds horrible to me.

Zelensky: I wanted to tell you about the prosecutor. First of all I understand arid I’m knowledgeable about the situation. Since we have won the absolute majority in our Parliament; the next prosecutor general will be 100% my person, my candidate, who will be approved, by the parliament and will start as a new prosecutor in September. He or she will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue. The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case. On top of that, I would kindly ask you if you have any additional information that you can provide to us it would be very helpful for the investigation to make sure that we justice in our country with regard to the Ambassador to the United States from Ukraine as far as I recall her name was Ivanovicli. It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%. Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous President and she was on his side. She would not accept me as a new President well enough.

Trump: Well, she’s going to go through some things. I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I’m sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything. Your economy is going to get better and better I predict. You have a lot of assets. It’s a great country. I have many Ukrainian friends, they’re incredible people.

Zelensky: I would like to tell you that I also have quite a few Ukrainian friends that live in the United States. Actually last time I traveled to the United States, I stated in New York near Central Park and I stayed at the Trump Tower. I will talk to them and I hope to see them again in the future. I also wanted to thank you for your invitation to visit the United States, specifically Washington DC. On the other hand, I also wanted to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation. As to the economy, there is much potential for our two countries and one of the issues that is very important for Ukraine is energy independence. I believe we can be very successful and cooperating on energy independence with United States. We are already working on cooperation. We are buying American oil but I am very hopeful for a future meeting. We will have more time and more opportunities to discuss these opportunities and get to know each other better. I would like to thank you very much for your support.

Trump: Good. Well., thank you very much and I appreciate that. I will tell Rudy and Attorney General Barr to call. Thank you. Whenever you would like to come to the White House, feel free to call. Give us a date and we’ll work that out. I look forward to seeing you. 

Zelensky: Thank you very much. I would be very happy to come and would be happy to meet with you personally and get to know you better. I am looking forward to our meeting and I would also like to invite you to visit Ukraine and come to the city of Kiev which is a beautiful city. We have a beautiful country which would welcome you. On the other hand, I believe that on September 1 we will be in Poland and we can meet in Poland hopefully. After that it might be a very good idea for you to travel to Ukraine. We can either take my plane and go to Ukraine or we can take your plane, which is probably much better than mine.

Trump: Okay, we can work that out. I look forward to seeing you in Washington and maybe in Poland because I think we are going to be there at that time.

Zelensky: Thank you very much Mr. President.

Trump: Congratulations on a fantastic job you’ve done. The whole world was watching. I’m not sure it was so much of an upset but congratulations.

Zelensky: Thank you Mr. President bye-bye. 

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/read-the-transcript-summary-president-trump-call-with-ukrainian-president-volodomyr-zelensky/

September 25 at 1:27 PM

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement Wednesday that the rough transcript released of President Trump’s July call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky confirms the need for an impeachment inquiry of a president who, she said, “has tried to make lawlessness a virtue in America and now is exporting it abroad.”

The California Democrat’s statement followed the release of a document that showed Trump offering the help of the U.S. attorney general to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and promising Zelensky a White House meeting after he promised to conduct such an inquiry.

The latest developments in the burgeoning controversy over the July call came on a day in which Trump was also scheduled to meet with Zelensky on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in the afternoon.

The July 25 call has been the subject of intense scrutiny since The Washington Post reported last week that a whistleblower had come forward with concerns about the matter.

Trump has acknowledged publicly that he asked Zelensky to investigate Biden’s son, who served on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company that came under scrutiny by authorities there.

1:20 p.m.: White House mistakenly sends Trump-Ukraine talking points to Democrats

In the hours after the release Wednesday of the rough transcript of Trump’s July phone call with Zelensky, the White House circulated an email with proposed talking points for Trump’s defenders.

Unfortunately for the White House, the email was mistakenly sent to not only Republicans but also Democratic lawmakers and their staff.

The message, titled, “What You Need To Know: President Trump’s Call with President Zelensky,” was quickly recalled — but not before Democrats took to Twitter to ridicule the White House over the error.

Read more here.

1:15 p.m.: Trump calls House impeachment inquiry a ‘manufactured crisis’

Trump called the House impeachment inquiry a “manufactured crisis” Wednesday afternoon and said it undermines the ability of Democrats to make progress on trade deals and gun legislation.

“I don’t think they can do any deals. All they’re talking about is nonsense,” Trump said at a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly in New York.

“She’s wasting her time on … a manufactured crisis,” Trump said of Pelosi.

1 p.m.: Democratic chairmen says no “quid pro quo” is required for wrongdoing

A joint statement issued Wednesday afternoon by four Democratic committee chairmen sought to push back on Trump’s argument that he had done nothing wrong because his request for Zelensky to investigate the Bidens was not linked to U.S. military aid to Ukraine.

“Let’s be clear: no quid pro quo is required to betray our country,” the statement said. “Trump asked a foreign government to interfere in our elections — that is betrayal enough. The corruption exists whether or not Trump threatened — explicitly or implicitly — that a lack of cooperation could result in withholding military aid.”

The statement was issued by Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Oversight Chairman Elijah E. Cummings (Md.) and Foreign Relations Chairman Eliot L. Engel (N.Y.).

12:45 p.m.: Impeachment inquiry threatens to overtake Capitol, upend trade and spending talks

House Democrats’ new impeachment inquiry threatens to overtake Capitol Hill and chill legislating on other fronts, deepening partisan divisions and mistrust between lawmakers and administration officials who’ve already struggled to secure deals on spending and trade.

Trump’s top agenda item, a rewrite of the 1994 trade deal between Mexico, Canada and the United States, could be the first victim.

The formal impeachment inquiry, announced Tuesday, will test whether congressional Democrats and the White House can attempt to continue governing on other matters. Numerous Republicans have said the impeachment inquiry changes everything.

Democrats are trying to forge ahead, multitasking on trade and budget talks while also preparing for impeachment.

Read more here.

— Erica Werner and David J. Lynch

12:30 p.m.: Some Senate Republicans question White House’s judgment

Several Senate Republicans were stunned Wednesday and questioned the White House’s judgment after it released a rough transcript of Trump’s call with Ukraine’s president.

One Senate Republican, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly, said the transcript’s release was a “huge mistake” that the GOP now has to confront, even as Republicans argue that House Democrats are overreaching with their impeachment effort.

A top Senate GOP aide said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is expecting Wednesday’s closed-door lunch to be eventful and possibly tense as Republicans react to the transcript and debate their next step.

“It remains troubling in the extreme. It’s deeply troubling,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) told reporters Wednesday, when asked about the transcript.

Read more here.

Robert Costa

12:15 p.m.: Schiff says rough transcript reveals “mafia-like shakedown”

At a news conference Wednesday afternoon, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) said the rough transcript reveals “a classic mafia-like shakedown of a foreign leader.”

Schiff said Zelensky’s statements in the rough transcript “reflect a Ukrainian president who was desperate for U.S. support.” Trump, he said, was eager to leverage that situation.

“This is how a mafia boss talks. … ‘I have a favor I want to ask you,’ ” Schiff said. And the favor, “of course, is to investigate his political rival,” he added.

He also took aim at Trump’s mentions of Attorney General William P. Barr in the call.

The fact that Trump would invoke the attorney general, Schiff said, sends a message to the Ukrainian president that “this is the United States government asking, and we plan to effectuate that through the Department of Justice.”

12:05 p.m.: Pelosi says rough transcript confirms need for impeachment inquiry, questions whether Trump cares about ethics

Pelosi said in a statement that the rough transcript confirms the need for an impeachment inquiry of a president who, she said, “has tried to make lawlessness a virtue in America and now is exporting it abroad.”

“The release of the notes of the call by the White House confirms that the President engaged in behavior that undermines the integrity of our elections, the dignity of the office he holds and our national security,” Pelosi said.

The California Democrat said that she respects Trump’s responsibility to engage with foreign leaders.

But, she said, “It is not part of his job to use taxpayer money to shake down other countries for the benefit of his campaign. Either the President does not know the weight of his words or he does not care about ethics or his constitutional responsibilities.”

Pelosi also accused the Justice Department of “acting in a rogue fashion” and being “complicit in the President’s lawlessness.”

12 p.m.: Trump-Zelensky call shows lengths to which foreign leaders go to flatter Trump

The rough transcript of Trump’s phone call with Zelensky provides evidence of Trump asking the Ukrainian president to investigate the conduct of Biden and his son Hunter.

But it also reveals the lengths to which foreign leaders will go in their private conversations with Trump to flatter the president to win his favor.

Zelensky, who was elected in April, lavishes praise on Trump in four distinct ways in the July phone call.

Most significantly, Zelensky mentioned that he stayed at one of Trump’s properties.

“Actually, last time I traveled to the United States, I stayed in New York near Central Park, and I stayed at the Trump Tower,” Zelensky told Trump, according to the rough transcript.

Read more here.

11:30 a.m.: Hoyer says House focus will be on Ukraine matter

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) called the rough transcript “pretty damning” and told reporters Wednesday morning that Democrats would focus on it.

“We are going to focus on this particular matter,” Hoyer said, adding that it’s “not hard to understand.”

As they move forward with an impeachment inquiry, House Democrats have been in talks about how narrowly to focus on the Ukraine matter vs. material from an array of other investigations.

Holding up a copy of the rough transcript, Hoyer said, “Even that which is in this document is pretty damning. … These are very serious national security issues.”

Hoyer added that there are no plans to cancel an upcoming two-week recess because it is important for members to have time to explain to constituents what happened in the Ukraine matter.

Earlier Wednesday, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said the rough transcript confirmed “several things.”

“The President, Donald Trump, clearly pressured the Ukrainian president to commence an investigation of the Biden family to dig up political dirt in order to bolster the president’s electoral prospects in 2020,” Jeffries said. “That is textbook abuse of power, and the transcripts have become Exhibit A in that regard.”

— Rachael Bade and Mike DeBonis

11:20 a.m.: Nadler says Barr should recuse himself from Ukraine matter

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) demanded Wednesday that Attorney General William P. Barr recuse himself from further involvement in the Ukraine matter, citing his mention in the rough transcript.

The document shows that Trump urged Ukraine’s leader to contact Barr about opening an inquiry tied to Biden.

“The President dragged the Attorney General into this mess. At a minimum, AG Barr must recuse himself until we get to the bottom of this matter,” Nadler tweeted.

— Mike DeBonis

11:15 a.m.: Democratic presidential candidates pounce on release of rough transcript

Several Democratic presidential candidates pounced on the release of the rough transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky, saying it bolstered the case for the president’s impeachment.

“This ‘transcript’ itself is a smoking gun,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said on Twitter. “If this is the version of events the president’s team thinks is most favorable, he is in very deep jeopardy. We need to see the full whistleblower complaint and the administration needs to follow the law. Now.”

Former Obama Cabinet secretary Julián Castro also called the rough transcript a “smoking gun.”

“Donald Trump pressured a foreign government to work with his Justice Department to investigate a political opponent. Congress should cancel recess and begin impeachment proceedings immediately,” Castro said on Twitter.

Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), meanwhile, said the document amounted to an admission on the part of Trump.

“Trump pressured the Ukrainian president to work with the U.S. Attorney General to investigate a political opponent. He must be impeached,” she tweeted.

Billionaire activist Tom Steyer said the rough transcript showed Trump is “a traitor,” while former congressman Beto O’Rourke (D-Tex.) said it showed Trump is “unfit for office and needs to be impeached.”

10:40 a.m.: Schumer says he strongly supports House impeachment inquiry

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that he strongly supports Pelosi’s decision to move forward with a formal impeachment inquiry.

“The president’s conduct made an impeachment inquiry unavoidable,” Schumer said during remarks on the Senate floor. “The events of recent days have brought sharply into focus the question of whether President Trump abused the powers of his office and betrayed the public trust for personal and political gain.”

10:40 a.m.: Trump calls on Democrats to apologize

Shortly after the rough transcript was publicly released, Trump went on Twitter to call on Democrats to apologize.

“Will the Democrats apologize after seeing what was said on the call with the Ukrainian President?” he wrote. “They should, a perfect call — got them by surprise!”

Trump also tweeted a clip of a younger Pelosi speaking on the House floor about how unfairly Republicans were treating then-President Bill Clinton during his impeachment.

Shortly afterward, speaking to reporters in New York, he continued to insist he is the victim of “the single greatest witch hunt in American history.”

“It’s a disgraceful thing,” Trump said. “The letter was a great letter, meaning the letter revealing the call.”

He claimed the rough transcript showed he put “no pressure” on Zelensky.

While Democrats had suggested he had a “call from hell,” Trump said, it instead “turned out to be a nothing call.”

10:30 a.m.: “Is it out?” House Republican leaders were unaware rough transcript was released

House Republican leaders were apparently caught unawares that the White House released the rough transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky.

At their weekly news conference, which began at 10 a.m., House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) and others stuck largely to talking points that were the same as those they used on Tuesday — keeping the focus on Biden and Pelosi.

“No one has read this transcript,” McCarthy said at one point, chastising a reporter.

At another point, McCarthy said, “When this transcript comes out …”

After reporters and others in the room clarified that the rough transcript had already been released, McCarthy responded, “Is it out?”

Shortly afterward, House Republican leaders wrapped up the news conference.

10:15 a.m.: Hillary Clinton says Trump has “betrayed our country”

Shortly after the rough transcript was released, Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee defeated by Trump in 2016, took to Twitter to offer her support for impeachment.

“The president of the United States has betrayed our country,” she wrote. “That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act. He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”

10:15 a.m.: McConnell accuses House Democrats of rushing to judgment

In remarks shortly after the rough transcript was released, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) accused House Democrats of having an “impeachment addiction.”

“While our friends across the Capitol rush to judgment and dive deeper into their nearly three-year-old impeachment addiction, we’ll stay focused on the American people’s business,” McConnell said during remarks of the Senate floor.

10 a.m.: Rough transcript shows Trump offering U.S. assistance to Zelensky for Biden investigation

Trump told Zelensky to work with the U.S. attorney general to investigate Biden’s conduct and offered to meet with the leader of Ukraine at the White House after he promised to conduct such an inquiry, according to a newly released rough transcript of the call.

Those statements and others in a July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky were so concerning that the intelligence community inspector general thought them a possible violation of campaign finance law. In late August, intelligence officials referred the matter to the Justice Department as a possible crime, but prosecutors concluded last week that the conduct was not criminal, according to senior Justice Department officials.

The administration’s disclosures underscore how the president’s phone call has consumed the federal government in recent days, and how the White House is scrambling to defuse the situation by offering more details of what the president said.

On Wednesday, the administration released a White House rough transcript of the call and detailed behind-the-scenes discussions about how to handle the accusations.

Read more here.

Devlin Barrett, Matt Zapotosky, Carol D. Leonnig and Josh Dawsey

9:30 a.m.: Number of House members supporting impeachment inquiry swells to 200

The number of House members who say they support at least opening an impeachment inquiry into Trump has swelled to 200, a figure that includes 199 Democrats and Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.), a former Republican who recently left the party, according to an updated Washington Post tally.

In just the past two days, the number has grown by 60, with many members tying their decisions to Trump’s call with Zelensky.

Twenty-two of the 24 Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over the impeachment inquiry, have expressed public support for the move.

Read more here.

— JM Reiger

9:15 a.m.: House to vote Wednesday afternoon to condemn administration for withholding whistleblower complaint

The House plans to vote Wednesday afternoon on a resolution condemning the administration’s efforts to block the release of the whistleblower complaint alleging that Trump’s promise to a foreign leader constituted an “urgent concern” to national security.

Acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire has refused to share the complaint from a U.S. intelligence official in what Democrats say is a clear violation of the law.

Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the intelligence community, reviewed the complaint and determined that it was credible and troubling enough to be considered a matter of “urgent concern,” a legal threshold that requires notification of congressional oversight committees.

“We hope that all Members of the House — Democrats and Republicans alike — will join in upholding the rule of law and oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution as Representatives of the American people,” Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said in a joint statement.

In a rare, albeit subtle protest from the GOP-led Senate, lawmakers adopted a resolution on Tuesday calling for the White House to turn over the complaint to the intelligence committees, as is required under law.

8:30 a.m.: Giuliani says the rough transcript was read to him

Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, said Wednesday morning that the rough transcript had been read to him, an acknowledgment that prompted protests from Democratic members of Congress who had yet to review the document.

During an appearance on Fox News’s “Fox & Friends” in which he defended Trump and attacked Biden, Giuliani was asked if he had seen the rough transcript.

“Let’s say it was read to me,” he replied.

“The whole thing?” asked co-host Brian Kilmeade.

“I hope,” Giuliani replied.

Democrats, including House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), argued that Giuliani, who doesn’t hold a government position, should not have had an opportunity to review the rough transcript before they did.

8:15 a.m.: Schiff raises concerns about the validity of what will be released

Ahead of the expected release of a rough transcript, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) raised concerns about whether it would provide a full picture of what transpired between Trump and Zelensky.

“We won’t know whether what we get from the White House is the complete story in terms of that conversation,” Schiff said during an interview on CNN. “We certainly know we can’t rely on the White House to be forthcoming.”

Schiff said Democrats are concerned that “whatever they release today may not be the full content of that conversation.”

“If there’s anything we know from the Mueller investigation, it’s that this president will go to extraordinary lengths to obstruct an investigation into his misconduct,” he added, referring to the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.

Asked to elaborate on his concerns, Schiff said it is unclear that “if it is in fact a transcript, that is someone taking word-by-word notes of what was said, like a stenographer, or whether there was a recording of the conversation that can be transcribed or whether instead this is one of the president’s staff or someone else from the [National Security Council] or someone else from the State Department sitting in on the call and writing only that which would not thoroughly embarrass the president.”

He said House Democrats investigating Trump’s conduct want to talk to the note-taker.

7:25 a.m.: Trump complains again about Democrats “frozen with hatred and fear”

Trump went on Twitter early Wednesday to complain about continued Democratic scrutiny of his actions.

“There has been no President in the history of our Country who has been treated so badly as I have,” he wrote. “The Democrats are frozen with hatred and fear. They get nothing done. This should never be allowed to happen to another President. Witch Hunt!”

Trump’s salvo followed several tweets on Tuesday night in which he shared video clips of friendly commentators arguing that he is being treated unfairly.

6:40 a.m.: New poll shows limited support for impeachment

Amid a groundswell of support for impeachment proceedings among House Democrats, a new poll finds a majority of Americans do not favor ousting Trump from office.

Thirty-seven percent of voters say that Trump should be impeached and removed from office, while 57 percent say he should not be impeached, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday morning.

The poll was conducted from Thursday through Monday, as details were emerging about Trump’s call with Zelensky.

The poll shows a stark partisan divide on the question of impeachment. Among Democrats, 73 percent support impeachment, while 21 percent are opposed. Among Republicans, only 4 percent support impeachment, while 95 percent are opposed.

Read more here.

5 a.m.: Trump’s meeting with Zelensky is a high-wire act for both leaders

Trump meets with Zelensky on Wednesday afternoon as he seeks to dispel concerns about his decision to temporarily hold nearly $400 million of military aid from the embattled country.

The meeting, scheduled at 2:15 p.m., is a high-wire act for both leaders as Zelensky tries to avoid angering the U.S. president or his Democratic opponents while Trump tries to disarm allegations that have generated a formal impeachment inquiry by the Democrat-controlled House.

At issue is the July phone call between Trump and Zelensky in which Trump is said to have brought up investigating former vice president Biden, a potential 2020 presidential opponent, and his son. Days before the phone call, Trump ordered a hold on the aid for Ukraine, which has been fending off Russian-backed separatists in the country’s east.

Read more here.

— John Hudson

5 a.m.: Giuliani pursued shadow Ukraine agenda as key foreign policy officials were sidelined

Trump’s attempt to pressure the leader of Ukraine followed a months-long fight inside the administration that sidelined national security officials and empowered political loyalists — including the president’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani — to exploit the U.S. relationship with Kiev, current and former U.S. officials said.

The sequence, which began early this year, involved the abrupt removal of the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, the circumvention of senior officials on the National Security Council, and the suspension of hundreds of millions of dollars of aid administered by the Defense and State departments — all as key officials from these agencies struggled to piece together Giuliani’s activities from news reports.

Several officials described tense meetings on Ukraine among national security officials at the White House leading up to the president’s phone call on July 25, sessions that led some participants to fear that Trump and those close to him appeared prepared to use U.S. leverage with the new leader of Ukraine for Trump’s political gain.

Read more here.

— Greg Miller, Josh Dawsey, Paul Sonne and Ellen Nakashima

Felicia.Sonmez@washpost.com

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-ukraine-controversy/2019/09/25/9390e9b8-df82-11e9-b199-f638bf2c340f_story.html

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-24/biden-to-back-impeachment-if-trump-ignores-document-requests

Over the next several days, the president offered a series of shifting and at times contradictory explanations and justifications for his conversation with Mr. Zelensky and his decision this summer to freeze the $391 million in aid to Ukraine. It was unblocked after officials at the Office of Management and Budget raised concerns that the money would be impounded, making it harder to spend in the future, and after two Republican senators — Rob Portman of Ohio and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — raised concerns to the White House.

Mr. Trump made no direct or indirect mentions of aid to Ukraine during the July 25 call, according to the White House memorandum. But Mr. Trump does repeatedly mention Mr. Biden, saying at one point that the former vice president had bragged about stopping a prosecution involving the company that his son worked for — a charge for which there is no public evidence.

According to the reconstructed call, Mr. Zelensky responded that Ukraine has a good prosecutor now.

In New York for the annual United Nations General Assembly, which opened Monday, Mr. Trump at one point repeated his assertion that the conversation with Mr. Zelensky was about corruption. But he later said he had frozen the aid because European countries were not committing their fair share toward defending Ukraine against Russian aggression.

Mr. Trump and his allies inside the White House initially refused to allow details about the call to be released to lawmakers or disclosed publicly. They argued that doing so would set a dangerous precedent and would discourage frank conversations between presidents and foreign leaders.

Faced with mounting demands for disclosure, including by Senate Republicans, Mr. Trump relented on Tuesday.

But Mr. Trump’s advisers, even as the president gave in, said they believed that Democrats had gone too far and that the record of the phone call — and the substance of the whistle-blower’s complaint — would prove not to be damaging to Mr. Trump.

Meanwhile, the president made it clear on Twitter that he planned to aggressively fight Democratic efforts to impeach him. He lashed out at the allegations of impropriety regarding the call, saying they were nothing more than “more breaking news Witch Hunt garbage.” And he denounced what he called “crazy” partisanship by his opponents.

“PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT,” he tweeted Tuesday evening.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/politics/ukraine-transcript-trump.html