David Correia leaves the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan after his appearance on Wednesday.

Kevin Hagen/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Kevin Hagen/AP

David Correia leaves the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan after his appearance on Wednesday.

Kevin Hagen/AP

A fourth defendant who allegedly conspired with associates of President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, to illegally funnel foreign money into Republican campaigns, has turned himself in to authorities.

David Correia, 44, a Florida resident, surrendered at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport after returning from the Middle East. He appeared briefly in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on Wednesday and was released on $250,000 bond.

In this courtroom artist’s sketch, defense attorney William Harrington, left, defendant David Correia, center, and defense attorney Jeff Marcus appear in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Wednesday.

Elizabeth Williams/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Elizabeth Williams/AP

In this courtroom artist’s sketch, defense attorney William Harrington, left, defendant David Correia, center, and defense attorney Jeff Marcus appear in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Wednesday.

Elizabeth Williams/AP

Correia’s arrest comes a week after Igor Fruman and Lev Parnas, who allegedly helped Giuliani in his efforts to dig up dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, in Ukraine, were arrested at Dulles International Airport outside Washington as they tried to board a plane to Frankfurt, Germany, on one-way tickets.

Another man, Andrey Kukushkin, a Ukrainian-born California businessman, was arrested last week in San Francisco. Parnas was also born in Ukraine and Fruman in Belarus.

The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that Giuliani is a focus of the investigation.

In the grand jury indictment issued last week by Geoffrey Berman, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the two associates of Giuliani are accused of setting up a shell company, Global Energy Producers LLC, to hide the foreign sourcing of a $325,000 donation to America First Action, a pro-Trump super PAC. The alleged illegal transfer appears to have first been noticed last year by the non-profit watchdog Campaign Legal Center.

The indictment alleges the men “conspired to circumvent the federal laws against foreign influence by engaging in a scheme to funnel foreign money to candidates for federal and state office so that the defendants could buy potential influence with candidates, campaigns, and the candidates’ governments.”

Prosecutors say Correia, Parnas, Fruman and Kukushkin also made illegal contributions to local and federal politicians in New York, Nevada and other states to get support for a new recreational marijuana business.

Earlier this week, a grand jury issued a subpoena for former Texas Republican Rep. Pete Sessions, who is thought to be the “congressman-1” listed in the indictment. According to the indictment, Fruman and Parnas met with “congressman-1” during the 2018 campaign and pledged to raise $20,000 for him, possibly in exchange for “assistance” in removing then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.

A spokesman for Sessions has said that the former congressman is cooperating with the investigation.

Yovanovitch, who was recalled from her post in May ahead of schedule, testified last week to House impeachment investigators as part of the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry of the president.

She reportedly told lawmakers that her departure came after Giuliani’s repeated criticisms of her. Giuliani has said, without evidence, that Yovanovitch as ambassador badmouthed Trump and sought to protect the Bidens, whom Trump and Giuliani, again without evidence, have accused of corruption over Hunter’s seat on the board of a Ukrainian energy company.

Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, has said he is unaware of any illegal campaign contributions by Parnas and Fruman and that he has not reviewed the evidence presented in their case.

In an undated photograph posted last July on the Facebook page of Ukraine’s chief rabbi, two men who appear to be Correia and Fruman pose flanking Trump at an America First Action event, all three smiling and giving the thumbs up.

Parnas and Correia are business partners in a firm called Fraud Guarantee, which advertises itself as helping investors “reduce the risk of fraud as well as [to] mitigate the damage caused by fraudulent acts,” according to its website. Parnas and Correia are listed as co-founders of the firm.

A brief biography on Fraud Guarantee’s website says Correia played professional golf for more than six years, worked in the commercial mortgage and lending industry and has “owned, operated and successfully sold nationally acclaimed restaurants” after which he “became intimately engaged in the Philadelphia residential real estate market as an investor.”

The Miami Herald, citing Florida corporate records, says Correia was listed as the secretary of a company called Parnas Holdings in 2012.

In an interview with the Herald, Dianne and Michael Pues, a New Jersey couple who say they are owed $500,000 after they invested in a failed movie venture by Parnas, allege that Correia once called them, issuing a veiled threat on behalf of his partner.

“He said we no longer knew who we were dealing with and that the Ukrainians had ties all the way up to the State Department and the White House and they were partners with Rudy Giuliani,” Dianne Pues said.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/17/770837095/4th-defendant-arrested-in-alleged-campaign-contribution-scheme-linked-to-giulian

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/16/asia/hong-kong-jimmy-sham-attack-intl-hnk/index.html

Dear Mr. President,

Let’s work out a good deal! You don’t want to be responsible for slaughtering thousands of people, and I don’t want to be responsible for destroying the Turkish economy—and I will. I’ve already given you a little sample with respect to Pastor Brunson.

I have worked hard to solve some of your problems. Don’t let the world down. You can make a great deal. General Mazloum is willing to negotiate with you, and he is willing to make concessions that they would never have made in the past. I am confidentially enclosing a copy of his letter to me, just received.

History will look upon you favorably if you get this done the right and humane way. It will look upon you forever as the devil if good things don’t happen. Don’t be a tough guy. Don’t be a fool!

I will call you later.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump

Source Article from https://www.salon.com/2019/10/16/read-trump-bizarre-letter-to-erdogan/

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Democratic lawmakers leading an impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump have heard days of testimony from a parade of senior government officials. But they have yet to hear from the whistleblower who sparked the probe – and may never do.

In the end, it may not matter, some Democratic lawmakers said, because the other officials who have testified, Trump’s own statements, a trove of texts between top U.S. diplomats, and other White House documents have largely substantiated the whistleblower’s complaint that Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate political rival Joe Biden.

Talks between lawyers for the whistleblower and representatives of the House of Representatives and Senate committees that want to question the intelligence official have all but deadlocked, three sources familiar with the negotiations told Reuters.

Lawyers for the official have voiced concern about the person’s safety and that testifying in person to congressional aides could expose the person’s identity. They have attributed some of that concern to statements by Trump, who calls the inquiry a sham and has suggested the whistleblower committed treason.

U.S. officials told Reuters last week that the government was providing security for the whistleblower.

At first, the negotiations focused on proposals that would allow the whistleblower to testify but away from Capitol Hill and with face and voice obscured, two of the sources said. But the whistleblower’s lawyers remained concerned that those precautions might not be enough to protect their client’s anonymity.

A proposal was made for the whistleblower to answer questions in writing, the two sources said, and House aides accepted it in principle.

Republican and Democratic sources both say, however, that members of the Senate Intelligence Committee are insistent that they be allowed to interview the whistleblower, ideally face to face, although possibly under conditions that would still shield the person’s identity.

There are no immediate signs that the standoff will be resolved anytime soon, said one of the sources, a congressional official with direct knowledge of the discussions. Democrats are under pressure to move quickly with their investigation amid Trump allegations that his political opponents are using it to oust him from office or derail his re-election effort in 2020.

DIFFERENT VANTAGE POINTS

Democrats began the impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 following the disclosure that the whistleblower had lodged a complaint about a July 25 phone call in which Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Biden, a leading contender for the Democratic nomination in 2020, and his son Hunter, who had business interests in Ukraine.

In the complaint since made public, the whistleblower said the information about the call came from White House officials.

After the whistleblower’s complaint emerged, the person quickly became seen as a crucial figure in the drama.

But the whistleblower has faded into the background as more details confirming the person’s account have emerged. The impeachment inquiry now has the White House’s rough transcript of the phone call, texts between Trump’s former envoy to Ukraine, his ambassador to the European Union and his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and the accounts of other witnesses.

“Not each of the witnesses have had the same vantage point. But in their own ways, every story we’ve heard is consistent with that basic narrative,” Democratic Representative Tom Malinowski told Reuters on Wednesday.

Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, says the impeachment inquiry already has the evidence it needs to show that Trump abused his power by conditioning a White House meeting with Zelenskiy on his Ukrainian counterpart’s readiness to investigate the Bidens.

Schiff has also said that because Trump released the rough transcript of his call with Zelenskiy, congressional investigators do not need to speak to the whistleblower.

That transcript has been bolstered by the testimony of a series of witnesses over the past two weeks. So far, lawmakers and staff from three congressional committees have interviewed at least five witnesses and gathered nearly 50 hours of testimony. Additional interviews are planned in the coming days.

The witnesses have provided detailed accounts of events in the weeks before and after the July 25 call between Trump and Zelenskiy.

The inquiry has focused on Giuliani’s role in digging up dirt on Biden, the firing in May of then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, and the outsized role in dealings with Ukraine of officials with close ties to Trump.

Reporting by Mark Hosenball, Patricia Zengerle and Jonathan Landay; Writing by Ross Colvin; Editing by Peter Cooney

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-testimony/one-person-is-missing-in-the-democrats-impeachment-inquiry-the-whistleblower-idUSKBN1WV2PQ

Parnas and Fruman, who had been helping Giuliani investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, were arrested a week ago at Dulles International Airport, outside of Washington, where they had one-way tickets on a flight out of the country, officials said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/fourth-defendant-in-giuliani-associates-case-arrested-at-new-york-airport/2019/10/16/2c3ea19e-f024-11e9-89eb-ec56cd414732_story.html

Teacher in Chicago have announced that they will go on strike.

John Gress/Corbis via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

John Gress/Corbis via Getty Images

Teacher in Chicago have announced that they will go on strike.

John Gress/Corbis via Getty Images

For the second time in seven years, Chicago Public Schools teachers will be on strike starting Thursday, walking out of class, they say, in the name of better schools.

Gathered on the stage of the union hall on Wednesday, the Chicago Teachers Union said its delegates were in full support of moving forward with a strike. Delegates had already authorized the walkout and set a date so it would have taken a reversal to cancel the strike.

“We have not achieved what we need to bring justice and high quality schools to the children and teachers of Chicago,” said CTU President Jesse Sharkey. “We need to have the tools we need to do the job at our schools. We need pay and benefits that will give us dignity and respect. We are on strike until we can do better.”

Altogether, more than 30,000 workers will be on the picket lines. This includes 7,500 teacher aides, custodians and security guards who members of SEIU Local 73. SEIU said Wednesday evening it had rejected CPS’ contract offer and planned to strike on Thursday along with CTU.

Officials say schools will be open, with principals and other administrators supervising any children that need a place to go. They also are telling parents they can bring their children to libraries and some community organizations.

Some 300,000 students who attend district-run schools will be impacted. Another 62,000 students who attend charter and contract schools run by private organizations will not be affected.

The two sides say they will be back at the negotiating table on Thursday, and will work toward reaching a deal.

Lightfoot announced Wednesday morning that she was cancelling school Thursday in anticipation of the strike. She said she expected the strike, painting it as a strike of choice. She said there has been some progress at the bargaining table, saying “At every turn, we bent over backwards to meet the unions’ needs.”

“I was disappointed by the CTU’s decision to begin a work stoppage and force the cancellation of classes because I feel like we rolled up our sleeves and negotiated in good faith over a long period of time,” she added Wednesday evening. “We offered a historic package on CTU’s core issues of compensation, staffing and class size.”

The union has yet to accept the school district’s salary and benefits offer, but the bargaining team has not been voicing major objections to the mayor’s proposal for teachers, which would provide 16% raises over five years and only minimally increase health care contributions.

When it comes to salary, it has focused on getting more money for veteran teachers and for office clerks and teacher aides, known as PSRPs.

However, the union’s most contentious asks have to do with creating better working environments for teachers and learning conditions for students.

The union sees this as a moment to win battles it has been fighting for years.

Since the current leadership took over the CTU in 2009, it has been pushing a focus on social justice issues, moving far beyond the traditional union bread and butter concerns. The idea of using teacher contracts to push for so-called “common good” issues has taken hold around the country.

In 2012, the union published a manifesto called the Schools Students Deserve that detailed the need for lower class sizes and more staff, such as librarians, social workers and counselors.

In the last two contract fights, the union brought up these issues, but they also had to concentrate on protecting their members whose jobs were being threatened by school closings and the opening of charter schools. The school district also had a budget deficit that made it difficult to argue for more resources.

This year, they saw an opening to try to win big on these social justice issues. The school district has more money after a change in the state’s funding formula and Lightfoot has said she believes schools need additional resources. The union also feels compelled to push these demands after years of budget cuts that led to staff losses in schools .

Many teachers say conditions in schools are unacceptable.

Lightfoot and her team have maintained they are committed to adding 250 more nurses, 200 social workers and more special education case managers to schools. But they say putting these promises in the contract would limit their flexibility.

For months, Lightfoot resisted putting enforceable class size caps, lowering class size limits and putting promises for more staff in the contract. She also has pointed out state law prohibits teachers from striking on issues outside of pay and benefits.

Then, in recent days, the union offered up a compromise. They said lower class size and increased staffing could apply to the neediest schools first.

And just Monday, Lightfoot changed her position and signaled she was willing to write into the contract some commitments on class size and staffing.

Speaking at a press conference Wednesday, Chicago Board of Education President Miguel del Valle argued that the union had essentially gotten what it wanted. “They were concerned about the staffing issues, they were concerned about class size,” he asked. “The mayor responded … what’s left?”

But the union maintains that, even this week, the offers being made by the school district don’t do enough to address their demands. They say they still want a nurse, librarian and a social worker in every school. They also want to lower counselor caseloads.

The union and school district say some tentative agreements have been reached, but many outstanding issues remain.

The union handed the school district 83 pages of demands on January 15. But talks did not begin in earnest until after Lightfoot took office in May.

The union’s contract expired on June 30.

Sarah Karp covers education for WBEZ. Follow her on Twitter at @WBEZeducation and @sskedreporter.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/16/770809022/chicago-teachers-will-go-on-strike-capping-years-of-social-justice-activism

The House of Representatives in the United States on Tuesday passed legislation to show support for pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong, drawing swift condemnation from China, which said its relationship with the US would be damaged if the bills were to become law. 

The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, which protesters had urged legislators to pass, would end the Chinese city’s special trading status with the US unless the State Department certified annually that the authorities were respecting human rights and the rule of law.

A second measure, the Protect Hong Kong Act, would bar commercial exports of military and crowd-control items such as teargas.

The third is a non-binding resolution recognising Hong Kong’s relationship to the US, condemning Beijing’s “interference” in its affairs, and supporting the right of the city’s residents to protest.

China’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement it was “resolutely opposed” to the bills and urged US legislators to stop interfering in Hong Kong. It has accused “external forces” of heightening months of unrest in the semi-autonomous city.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the bills important reminders of US support for human rights in the face of significant commercial interests in China.

“If America does not speak out for human rights in China because of commercial interests, then we lose all moral authority to speak out on behalf of human rights any place in the world,” she said.

Pelosi said the bravery of young protesters in Hong Kong stood in contrast to “the cowardly government that refuses to respect the rule of law” and the “one country, two systems” policy that was supposed to ensure a smooth political transition after Britain returned the former colony to China in 1997.


China warning

All three bills had cross-party support and were approved in separate voice votes.

The Senate has not yet scheduled votes on the legislation, which would send the measures to the White House for US President Donald Trump to sign into law – or veto.

A Foreign Relations Committee aide said votes on Hong Kong-related measures were expected in the chamber in the coming weeks.

China’s foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said China’s relationship with the US would be damaged if the measures were to become law.  

Hong Kong’s government said, “foreign legislatures should not interfere in any form.”

Christopher Smith, a Republican and one of the lead sponsors of one of the Hong Kong bills, said they were necessary to hold China to account.

Under President Xi Jinping, human rights abuses in China had significantly worsened, Smith said.

China “excels in crushing bodies, shattering bones, torturing dissidents and filling concentration camps -massive crimes against humanity for which there has been little or no accountability or sanction,” Smith said, echoing comments made by Xi while on a visit to Nepal over the weekend.

“Today we’re simply urging the Chinese president and the Hong Kong Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, to faithfully honour the government’s promises.”

Protesters in Hong Kong first took to the streets in June, calling on the government to withdraw a bill that would have allowed people to be sent to mainland China for trial.


Increasing violence

Last month, Lam finally agreed to shelve the bill – it will be formally withdrawn at the Legislative Council this week – but the demonstrations have continued with the protesters’ demands expanding to include the right to elect their leaders and an investigation into alleged police brutality.

Violence has broken out in districts across Hong Kong with small groups of protesters throwing bricks and petrol bombs, and police using tear gas, water cannon, rubber-coated bullets and, more recently, live rounds.

An 18-year-old was shot in the chest earlier this month, and a 14-year-old in the thigh last week. Police say they have arrested more than 2,300 people as a result of the protests.

Beijing rejects claims that it is meddling in Hong Kong and accuses Western countries, such as the US and Britain of stirring up trouble.

The House also passed a measure commending Canada’s government in a dispute over the extradition of Huawei Technologies’ chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou.

Meng is charged in the US over Huawei’s business in Iran, which is under US sanctions. Meng has said she is innocent and is out on bail, living at her home in Vancouver.

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/house-approves-hong-kong-bills-boost-protesters-191016005623109.html

Mr. Mattis was “the world’s most overrated general,” Mr. Trump told the group. “You know why? He wasn’t tough enough. I captured ISIS. Mattis said it would take two years. I captured them in one month.”

The conversation, several Democratic officials said, only devolved from there, and reached a fever pitch after Ms. Pelosi told the president that Russia, which has quickly stepped in to fill the void left by American troops in Syria, “has always wanted a foothold in the Middle East.” It was at this point that she told Mr. Trump that all roads with him led to Mr. Putin.

At another point, Mr. Trump told Ms. Pelosi that he cared more about defeating terrorism than she did.

“I hate ISIS more than you do,” the president declared.

“You don’t know that,” the speaker replied.

What happened next is now a matter of ammunition by both the Democrats and the White House.

“You’re just a politician,” Mr. Trump said to Ms. Pelosi.

“Sometimes I wish you were,” Ms. Pelosi shot back.

Mr. Schumer interjected, telling Mr. Trump that name-calling was not necessary.

“Is that a bad name, Chuck?” Mr. Trump asked, then turned to Ms. Pelosi. “You’re not a politician, you’re a third-grade politician.” (Or “third-rate,” depending on which politician was doing the retelling.)

Ms. Pelosi stood up to leave, but then sat back down. At this point Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the House majority leader — who later said he was “deeply offended” by the president’s treatment of the speaker — said it was time to go.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/16/us/politics/trump-pelosi-white-house.html

On Wednesday, Syrian government troops entered the border town of Kobane, Syria’s state news agency reported. It was an advance freighted with symbolism: Four years ago, the Islamic State militant group was handed its first major battlefield defeat in Kobane, by Kurdish fighters backed by U.S. air power and supplied with American weapons. 

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/erdogan-rejects-us-offer-to-mediate-cease-fire-with-kurds-in-syria/2019/10/16/1bf95fd8-ef87-11e9-bb7e-d2026ee0c199_story.html

[The stream is scheduled to start at 12 p.m. ET. Please refresh the page if you do not see a player above at that time.]

President Donald Trump was slated to hold a press conference at the White House on Wednesday with Italian President Sergio Mattarella.

The White House said the two leaders will “celebrate the strong and enduring historical ties between the United States and Italy, which underpin our bilateral relationship.”

But the Trump administration’s recent tariffs on European imports have raised tensions between the U.S. and EU member states.

The U.S. announced earlier this month that it plans to impose duties on the EU following a victory at the World Trade Organization.

Trump, meanwhile, is likely to be asked by reporters about House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, which he has repeatedly decried as a “hoax.”

Italy’s president has typically taken on a more ceremonial role than the country’s prime minister, Giuseppe Conte.

— Reuters contributed to this report.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/16/watch-trump-holds-press-conference-with-italian-president.html

US president Donald Trump and Italian president Sergio Mattarella hold a news conference at the White House.

Subscribe to Guardian News on YouTube ► http://bit.ly/guardianwiressub

Support the Guardian ► https://support.theguardian.com/contr…

Today in Focus podcast ► https://www.theguardian.com/news/seri…

The Guardian YouTube network:

The Guardian ► http://www.youtube.com/theguardian
Owen Jones talks ► http://bit.ly/subsowenjones
Guardian Football ► http://is.gd/guardianfootball
Guardian Sport ► http://bit.ly/GDNsport
Guardian Culture ► http://is.gd/guardianculture

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P90ut3sccR8

George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of state responsible for Ukraine, told House investigators he was instructed to “lay low,” focus on the five other countries in his portfolio and defer to Volker, Sondland and Perry — who called themselves the “three amigos” — on matters related to Ukraine, Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.) told reporters Tuesday. Kent took that as a sign, Connolly added, that having been critical of the plan he was being pushed aside “because what he was saying was not welcome” at high levels of the government.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/top-state-department-official-expected-to-face-questions-about-ukraine-and-giuliani/2019/10/14/8ba23d18-eeca-11e9-b2da-606ba1ef30e3_story.html

  • The past month has been the worst stretch of time in Donald Trump’s entire presidency.
  • In foreign policy, Trump has sparked bipartisan outrage by pulling US troops out of northeastern Syria, effectively abandoning US-allied Kurdish forces there.
  • On the domestic front, the president is besieged by a rapidly expanding congressional impeachment inquiry.
  • Trump officials are defying orders to stay silent, offering testimony in the impeachment inquiry.
  • Their revelations give a damning impression of a concerted effort to leverage US foreign policy in exchange for material that would personally benefit the president.
  • More whistleblowers are also coming out of the shadows, potentially bringing more trouble for the president.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

The past month has been the worst stretch of time in Donald Trump’s entire presidency.

A little over a week ago, Trump abruptly decided to withdraw US forces from northeastern Syria. The move prompted bipartisan criticism in Washington, including rare blowback from congressional Republicans, who accused the president of effectively abandoning US-allied Kurdish forces to a Turkish military invasion.

The Kurds bore the brunt of the US-led campaign against the terrorist group ISIS, losing roughly 11,000 fighters, and Trump was promptly accused of betraying US allies. Meanwhile, Trump was warned by US lawmakers and former officials that his decision could catalyze the resurgence of ISIS and create a power vacuum that Russia would be happy to fill.

Turkey invaded Syria last Wednesday, and within a week the situation has spiraled into a humanitarian catastrophe that ISIS and Moscow have already exploited.

Read more: FBI officials were ‘rattled’ and ‘blindsided’ by Trump’s call for Ukraine to manufacture dirt on Joe Biden

Beyond the criticism of Trump’s Syria retreat in Congress, leaders in Europe have said the president has significantly undermined the US’s credibility by leaving the Kurds to fend off the Turkish assault.

Trump officials come out of the woodwork, defying his orders to stonewall Congress

All this comes as the president is besieged on the domestic front by an escalating congressional impeachment inquiry examining whether Trump used his public office for private gain.

At the heart of the investigation is an unprecedented whistleblower complaint filed by a US intelligence official.

The controversy exploded in mid-September, when House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff revealed the existence of the complaint to the public.

Specifically, the intelligence official alleged that Trump repeatedly pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a July 25 phone call to investigate corruption allegations against former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Trump also asked Zelensky to help discredit the FBI’s finding that Russia secretly worked to help elect Trump.

Beyond asking a foreign power for dirt against a political rival ahead of an election, Trump is battling allegations that he held up a nearly $400 million military-aid package to Ukraine days before the phone call to maintain leverage over Zelensky.

Read more: The floodgates are opening as Trump officials publicly defy his orders and more whistleblowers come out of the shadows

In the weeks since, Trump officials have come out of the woodwork — defying his and other top officials’ orders to stay silent — to offer testimony in the impeachment inquiry.

Taken together, their revelations paint a damaging portrait of a concerted effort from the highest levels of the Trump administration to leverage US foreign policy in exchange for material that would personally benefit the president.

They also show how far Trump went to involve his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani. Here are the highlights:

  • Kurt Volker, the former special representative for Ukraine, turned over explosive text messages to Congress that revealed how intricately senior US diplomats were involved in Giuliani’s efforts to dig up dirt on the Bidens.
  • The texts showed that Volker and another diplomat conveyed to Ukraine that a good relationship was predicated on the Ukrainian government’s ability to pursue “investigations” and “get to the bottom” of what happened in 2016.
  • The second diplomat, Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, is expected to testify to Congress this week that the content of a text message he wrote denying there was a quid pro quo exchange with Ukraine was relayed to him directly by Trump.
  • Sondland is reportedly expected to go even further and tell lawmakers he doesn’t even know if Trump was being honest when he denied the quid pro quo.
  • Marie Yovanovitch, a former US ambassador to Ukraine who refused to go along with Trump’s and Giuliani’s efforts against Biden, testified that she was abruptly recalled in May based on “unfounded and false claims by people with clearly questionable motives.”
  • Yovanovitch said she was removed despite the State Department’s belief that she had “done nothing wrong.” She also said there had been “a concerted campaign” against her and that the department “had been under pressure from the president to remove me since the summer of 2018.”
  • Fiona Hill, the White House’s former top Russia analyst, testified that John Bolton, the former national security adviser, was so angry with the pressure campaign on Ukraine that he instructed her to tell White House lawyers about it.
  • Hill also said Bolton described Giuliani as a “hand grenade” who would “blow everybody up.” She added that she witnessed “wrongdoing” while serving in the Trump administration.

Read more: These are the key players you need to know to make sense of the Trump impeachment inquiry

More whistleblowers come forward as Giuliani faces a federal criminal probe

Meanwhile, the president could face even more whistleblowers as other government officials consider stepping forward.

The attorneys representing the first Ukraine whistleblower have said they’re representing a second US intelligence official who has more information about Trump’s call with Zelensky.

And the House Ways and Means Committee is trying to learn more about a third whistleblower, who works in the IRS and whose complaint alleges “inappropriate efforts to influence” the agency’s audit of Trump’s tax returns, a court filing from the committee said.

According to The Washington Post, the person accused of trying to interfere with the audit is a political appointee at the Treasury Department.

Citing two congressional sources, The Daily Beast reported last week that new potential whistleblowers were coming forward in the wake of the House’s impeachment inquiry.

Amid the firestorm, Trump has resisted calls to beef up his legal team and White House war room.

But the president may well have to look elsewhere soon, given that Giuliani is at the center of a broadening federal criminal investigation into whether he broke foreign lobbying laws while working to oust Yovanovitch.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-presidency-disintegrates-syria-ukraine-whistleblower-impeachment-2019-10

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy leaves the deposition of George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs, on Tuesday, Oct. 15. Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images

At the weekly House GOP press conference, House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy argued “there’s nothing that the president did wrong” when it comes to his phone call with the Ukrainian President where he pushed for an investigation into the Bidens, saying, “There’s nothing that the President did within that call that’s impeachable.”

Later he reiterated, “So no, the President didn’t do anything wrong.”

Asked if Rudy Giuliani should still be the President’s personal attorney McCarthy initially deflected, saying, “that’s a question for the President,” but then took a subtle jab at Giuliani, he added, “I think there would be other people I’d have represent myself.” 

McCarthy defended Giuliani’s role in the Ukraine matter, saying, “Rudy Giuliani has a right to try to get to the bottom of it, especially when you just put America through this for more than two years. I think all of America wants to have the answer to that question, it would be appalling to me that we would not.”

McCarthy slammed the impeachment inquiry, saying that “When it comes to the President, the Democrats believe you’re guilty, until you prove your innocence.”

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/impeachment-inquiry-10-16-2019/index.html

Democrats need to talk about Hunter Biden. Sorry, but they do.

The fourth Democratic presidential primary debate opened by asking all 12 participants about impeachment. Once the round-robin was finished, CNN’s Anderson Cooper turned to Joe Biden and asked this carefully phrased question:

The impeachment inquiry is centered on President Trump’s attempts to get political dirt on Vice President Biden and his son. President Trump has falsely accused your son of doing something wrong while serving on a company board in Ukraine. I want to point out there’s no evidence of wrongdoing by either one of you.

Having said that, on Sunday, you announced if you are president, no one in your family will be involved in any foreign businesses. My question is, if it’s not okay for a president’s family to be involved in foreign businesses, why was it okay for your son when you were vice president?

“My son did nothing wrong,” Biden replied. “I did nothing wrong. I carried out the policy of the United States in rooting out corruption in Ukraine. That’s what we should be focusing on.”

Chastened, the moderators moved on to ask Elizabeth Warren about whether she’d raise taxes to pay for Medicare-for-all. But even that, apparently, had been too much. A few minutes later, asked his views on a federal job guarantee, Sen. Cory Booker denounced the moderators for subjecting Biden to such humiliating scrutiny. “I saw this play in 2016’s election,” he said. “We are … elevating a lie and attacking a statesman. That was so offensive. The only person sitting at home that was enjoying that was Donald Trump.”

A few things are true about the Hunter Biden story. One is that there’s no evidence Joe Biden did what Donald Trump has accused him of doing: pressuring Ukraine to fire a prosecutor to protect his son from investigation.

But another is that Hunter Biden poses real problems for Joe Biden’s campaign, and if Democrats pretend otherwise, they’re making a mistake.

Many Democrats consider raising the Hunter Biden question unfair to Joe Biden. Why should he have to answer for the legal actions of his adult son? But no one said politics was fair. And if Democrats avoid the issue, they can be certain Trump will not. Biden’s vulnerability here needs to be tested in the primary, when Democrats have other choices, rather than in the general, when they won’t.

The problems Hunter Biden creates for Joe Biden

Hunter Biden isn’t a natural gas expert, and he’s not a Ukraine expert. But he was son of the then vice president of the United States. And that’s why he was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to sit on Burisma’s board — among others. The New Yorker’s investigation, which predates the revelation of Trump’s call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, put it well:

Several former officials in the Obama Administration and at the State Department insisted that Hunter’s role at Burisma had no effect on his father’s policies in Ukraine, but said that, nevertheless, Hunter should not have taken the board seat. As the former senior White House aide put it, there was a perception that “Hunter was on the loose, potentially undermining his father’s message.” The same aide said that Hunter should have recognized that at least some of his foreign business partners were motivated to work with him because they wanted “to be able to say that they are affiliated with Biden.” A former business associate said, “The appearance of a conflict of interest is good enough, at this level of politics, to keep you from doing things like that.”

It wasn’t illegal for Hunter Biden to take that job. But Hunter Biden himself has admitted it was “poor judgment.” It’s reminiscent of nothing so much as the $675,000 Hillary Clinton took for giving speeches to Goldman Sachs: not illegal, but a kind of soft corruption that voters find loathsome.

Clinton and Biden both make the same argument: The money — in Clinton’s case direct, in Biden’s case to his son — didn’t affect their decisions. I believe Biden on this. But these are huge sums and represent a kind of DC back-scratching and influence-trading that voters dislike. Getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for doing basically no work is a rare gift, and the cost of accepting that gift or of letting a family member accept it is it can be used against you in a future election.

None of this is news to Biden. As the Intercept’s Ryan Grim documented, Biden has faced attacks for decades over not just Hunter’s work, but his brother James’s efforts to cash in on his name, so he knew this was a vulnerability long before Burisma. Biden’s answer here seems to have been to create a personal firewall about the topics he’d discuss with Hunter. “I never discussed a single thing with my son about anything having do with Ukraine,” he said. “No one has indicated I have. We kept everything separate.”

What’s unusual about this case is Hunter Biden appears to have inadvertently done his country a great service: He lured Donald Trump into openly extorting a foreign country to investigate the son of a domestic political rival. It’s an important revelation that has launched an impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump and may help Democrats win back the White House. But is Joe Biden going to be the strongest Democratic contender in this conversation? Or will his ability to make the case be compromised, as every time he attacks Trump for soliciting foreign assistance, Trump will counter with allegations about why exactly Hunter Biden was being paid so much money by a Ukrainian natural gas giant?

Hunter Biden’s exploits also make it hard for Biden to launch what should be a broader, and damning, attack on Trump: that he’s compromised and corrupted the government through nepotism and self-dealing. Twitter is full of liberals mocking the hypocrisy of the Trump children for attacking Biden, but the money Hunter Biden made trading on the Biden name weakens Joe Biden’s ability to make the case against Trump’s nepotism and corruption, even though it’s clearly one of Trump’s core vulnerabilities.

Hunter Biden and Hillary’s emails

Booker, like other Democrats I’ve heard, analogized talking about Hunter Biden’s job in Ukraine to talking about Hillary Clinton’s emails — an unfair smear that is legitimized when raised by the media or other candidates. “I am having deja vu all over again,” he said.

Me too, but for a different reason.

In 2016, Bernie Sanders famously refused to attack Clinton’s emails in the debates. “The American people are sick and tired about hearing about your damn emails,” he said to applause. The result was that rather than Democrats realizing how damaging that story was — and how ineffective Clinton was at putting it to rest — during the primary, they found that out in the general election. And yes, the media deserves the blame for the coverage decisions, but Democrats can’t simply assume the media won’t make the same mistakes in 2020. The lesson of Clinton’s emails is that unfair smears can help Donald Trump get elected.

I’m not arguing that any of this disqualifies Joe Biden. He may yet prove the strongest Democratic candidate. But it would be unwise for Democrats to refuse to scrutinize him out of some misplaced sense that admitting the vulnerability is playing into Trump’s hands or is unfair to Biden. What would be playing into Trump’s hands is ignoring an obvious vulnerability so that he can exploit it later.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020-presidential-election/2019/10/16/20916760/joe-biden-hunter-biden-democratic-debate-trump-2020

American officials say the United States attacked Iran in a cyber operation after Tehran allegedly hit two Saudi oil facilities in a September strike.

The officials said Wednesday that the U.S. attack happened in September and looked to hurt Iran’s ability to disseminate “propaganda,” according to Reuters.

Iran responded by saying the attack never happened.

“They must have dreamt it,” Mohammad-Javad Azari Jahromi, an Iranian government spokesperson, said.

The Sept. 14 strikes on Saudi oil plants threatened to disrupt oil markets, and the U.S., which has since blamed Iran, was forced to move additional troops and missiles to Saudi Arabia in response to the attack.

Iran warned last month that any attack in response would lead to “all-out war.”

The Pentagon would not comment on the cyberattack, saying that “as a matter of policy” they “do not discuss cyberspace operations, intelligence, or planning.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/us-retaliated-against-iran-with-secret-cyberattack-after-saudi-oil-strike

“We’re assuming that the House of Delegates will vote today to move forward with a strike, and as a result all classes and after school activities will be cancelled tomorrow,” CPS CEO Janice Jackson said. “This includes team practices and competitions, tutoring, field trips, internships, Parent University activities and all other community activities.”

Source Article from https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-cps-strike-school-canceled-chicago-public-schools-20191016-hgm4s6o6cvcffhtn5iatp2ilei-story.html

The debate also underscored the deep policy divisions that persist among Democrats on issues including health care, abortion, taxes, education, inequality, technology, foreign policy and trade. Health care was perhaps the most contentious issue, as it has been in previous debates. 

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/warren-faces-first-sustained-attack-in-debate-that-begins-with-unified-condemnation-of-trump/2019/10/16/a029a39c-ef6b-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html