PG&E uses 43 helicopters for aerial inspections, along with workers on foot. In some instances, the utility sends drones to help inspect the 24,782 miles of distribution lines and 2,443 miles of transmission lines.

PG&E may be able to restore power to some areas quickly, while other places could be without electricity for days.

Without a battery attached, a home’s rooftop solar system usually does not work when the electric grid blacks out, according to Sunrun, the nation’s largest residential solar company.

Here’s why: Rooftop systems from companies like Sunrun, Tesla and Vivint generally do not provide power directly to homes. The electricity generated from the panels goes to the electric grid, controlled by the power companies and grid managers, and the customer is credited. Because the electricity flows to the closest destination that needs it, it may travel back down to the home that generated it or to a neighboring property. Otherwise, the power flows wherever the next closest demand is, just as water follows the path of least resistance.

This setup is in part a safety measure to ensure that electricity workers aren’t harmed by home solar systems tied to the grid as they work to restore power.

But lithium-ion battery systems like Tesla’s Powerwall or Sunrun’s Brightbox, which charge during the day, can keep homes powered for short outages, depending on the unit’s size. Increasingly, companies marketing solar panels also sell batteries to keep homes powered during grid outages. Lithium-ion battery technology, recognized with a Nobel Prize this week, is seen as a key to reshaping the electricity grid and home energy.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/10/business/pge-blackout-questions.html

A bipartisan Senate effort is in the works to punish Turkey for its attacks on Kurds just days after President Donald Trump withdrew US troops from northern Syria earlier this week.

Led by staunch Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), the goal is to impose a financial penalty on Turkey’s highest political leaders — including President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan — and military for invading Syria’s north. Reports show that Turkey has already killed around 16 Syrian Kurds, America’s top partner in the fight against ISIS, including at least one child.

The bill introduced on Wednesday, then, aims to compel Turkey to end its airstrikes and ground invasion. Graham’s spokesperson Kevin Bishop told me he’s unsure if there will be other similar efforts pushed in the Senate, but he “expect[s] our bill will have bipartisan, bicameral support.” A Senate Democratic aide, however, told me this was the main effort in that chamber.

Bishop also noted the legislation wasn’t written in conjunction with the White House, but it seems to have the president’s support anyway.

“I do agree on sanctions, but I actually think much tougher than sanctions if he doesn’t do it in as humane a way as possible,” the president told reporters on Wednesday when asked about Graham’s sanctions legislation. Trump doubled down on that position Thursday, tweeting “I say hit Turkey very hard financially & with sanctions if they don’t play by the rules! I am watching closely.”

It’s a confusing stance to take given that Trump’s decision to withdraw 50 US troops from northern Syria effectively paved the way for Turkey’s incursion.

In that disjointed policy, sanctioning Turkey is about the only thing the president and Congress can agree on.

Congress has passionately pushed back on his decision to move troops, arguing it’s a betrayal of one of America’s best partners in the region and endangers the broader fight against ISIS and other extremists. The president defends the move, saying he was trying to stop America’s involvement in “endless wars” — though no service members have yet come home — while adding that he would “totally destroy and obliterate the Economy of Turkey” should it harm Kurds.

The harm has happened and Turkey’s brutal campaign continues. The question now is if Congress or Trump can act quickly enough to stop it.

What the Graham-Van Hollen bill would do to Turkey

The two-page proposal, which you can find below or here, is broken up into eight sections of punishments but it really targets three main entities.

First, it goes after Turkey’s top political leaders, from the president to the minister of energy and natural resources. Basically, if you’re a key member of Erdoğan’s staff, you’re getting sanctioned.

Second, a lot of the penalties target Turkey’s military, which is a bold move considering the country is a NATO ally. Countries that sell weapons to Turkey or offer any assistance will face US sanctions, per the bill, and that could make it harder for Ankara to rearm.

Third, Turkey’s energy sector would take a hit. According to the bill outline, it would target “any foreign person or entity who supplies goods, services, technology, information, or other support that maintains or supports Turkey’s domestic petroleum production and natural gas production for the used by its armed forces.”

There’s also a section about restricting travel for Turkish leaders to the US and filing reports, as well as a part on how humanitarian aid, medical assistance, election help, and intelligence sharing would be exempted. Still, if passed and signed by the president, the legislation would be a major hit on a NATO ally.

The sanctions could come off Turkey if the US certifies that it’s not unilaterally operating in Syria, meaning it either left the area or worked in tandem with the US. The administration has to make a determination on that every 90 days and report to Congress.

Even though many say Turkey deserves a reprimand for its actions, there’s no question that the passage of this measure would sink US-Turkey relations to an even lower place than where they are now.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2019/10/10/20907934/turkey-syria-kurds-trump-sanctions-graham

President Trump speaks Wednesday at the White House. Trump has been consumed by the impeachment inquiry opened by Democrats in the House, and now support for it is on the rise.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump speaks Wednesday at the White House. Trump has been consumed by the impeachment inquiry opened by Democrats in the House, and now support for it is on the rise.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

A slim majority of Americans now approve of the Democratic House-led impeachment inquiry into President Trump, a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll finds.

Fifty-two percent say they approve of the inquiry, while 43% disapprove. That’s a slight increase in support from two weeks ago, when 49% approved and 46% disapproved. The numbers are in line with other polls that have been released this week also showing majority support or an increase in support for the inquiry.

The uptick in support in the NPR poll comes mostly from a swing with independents. In late September, more independents disapproved of the inquiry than approved, by a 50-44% margin. Now, in a reversal, more independents approve of the inquiry than disapprove, by a 54-41% margin, a net change of 19 points.

Loading…

On the questions of whether Trump should be impeached or removed from office, Americans are split — 49-47% in favor of impeachment and 48-48% on whether the Senate should vote to remove him.

While Americans’ support is growing for the impeachment inquiry, and a slim majority (51%) thinks the inquiry is a very serious matter and not “just politics,” they are unconvinced impeachment is the right way to decide the future of Trump’s presidency.

By a 58-37% margin, Americans think his future should be decided at the ballot box rather than by the impeachment process.

“There’s a danger point in this for the White House, but also some danger points for Democrats in Congress, because people are not convinced this is the way to go,” said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion, which conducts the poll.

The survey was conducted from Oct. 3 through Tuesday, Oct. 8. The previous poll from Marist dealing with impeachment was conducted Sept. 25, after the White House released its record of the phone call between President Trump and President Zelenskiy of Ukraine, but before the whistleblower complaint was made public.

Republicans firmly against, but Americans don’t approve of Trump’s behavior

Republicans are dug in against the impeachment inquiry with nearly 9 in 10 disapproving of it. Two-thirds also say they would be less likely to vote for their representative from Congress if they vote to impeach Trump.

Despite the lack of enthusiasm for impeachment, Americans clearly don’t approve of Trump’s recent behavior, don’t think he shares Americans’ moral values and are pessimistic about the direction the country is headed.

Loading…

For example, 68% say it’s not acceptable to ask a foreign country’s leader for help investigating a potential political opponent, including 40% of Republicans; 61% say Trump does not share the moral values most Americans try to live by; and just 35% say the country is headed in the right direction.

Loading…

The moral values question is similar to how Americans viewed former President Bill Clinton in the year he was impeached — 62% said Clinton did not share Americans’ moral values, according to a CBS News/New York Times poll from September 1998.

What’s more, 59% say the identity of the whistleblower who filed a complaint about Trump’s call with Zelenskiy should be protected. That includes 6 in 10 independents and about a third of Republicans.

Other answers in the survey should continue to raise red flags for the president and his reelection campaign team, including that 52% say they will definitely vote against Trump in 2020, and just 42% approve of the job the president is doing.

Those numbers have barely budged and have been consistent throughout Trump’s presidency. Part of the reason for the lack of movement, the pollsters say, is the lack of overall trust in institutions that the survey measured.

The courts were the most trusted (58%), followed by the intelligence community, including the CIA and FBI (57%), that elections are fair (51%), Democrats in the U.S. House (41%), the Trump administration (40%), Republicans in the U.S. Senate (39%), Congress (31%), and lastly, the media (29%).

Loading…

While 70% of Democrats trust the intelligence community, just 54% of Republicans and independents do. And while 60% of Democrats trust the media, just 8% of Republicans and only a quarter of independents do.

What’s more, views of Congress have changed dramatically since the impeachment of Clinton in 1998. Back then, 58% said they thought most members of Congress share the moral values most Americans try to live by, according to the CBS News/New York Times poll.

Today, it’s the opposite — just 37% say members of Congress share the moral values of most Americans, while 56% say they don’t.

Loading…

There’s some evidence that Republicans are beginning to check out of news on the controversies surrounding impeachment. In the last survey at the end of September, 80% of Republicans said they were following the news about the impeachment inquiry at least fairly closely. In this poll, that’s dropped 12 points, while Democrats and independents have essentially maintained their levels.

That helps to create a dynamic in which the GOP digs in even more.

“We’re in a period of time that the institutions that guided us through these processes are not trusted,” Barbara Carvalho, director of the Marist Poll said of impeachment during the Clinton and Nixon years. “There’s really a lack of trust among those institutions, so that makes this uncharted terrain, because people are being guided by whose side that they think they are on.”

Biden, the Ukraine controversy and who impeachment could help or hurt

Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden pauses while speaking at the SEIU Unions for All Summit in Los Angeles last week.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden pauses while speaking at the SEIU Unions for All Summit in Los Angeles last week.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

President Trump has continued to accuse former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter of wrongdoing in Ukraine, though evidence does not support those claims. Trump has pointed to the Bidens’ “corruption” amid accusations of his own wrongdoing in dealing with the country.

Most people, by a 50%-28% margin, think that effort will hurt Biden. His favorability rating has ticked down slightly from 44% in September to 41% now — within the poll’s margin of error.

The controversy has not hurt Biden with Democrats, but there’s been a slight eroding with independents and Republicans. In September, Biden had a 72%/20% positive rating from Democrats, and now, it’s a near-identical 71%/19%.

Among independents, though, it went from 43%/48% positive to 39%/46%; and among Republicans, it was 21%/72% positive in September and is 16%/74% now.

By a 45-42% margin, Americans say Biden shares their moral values. That’s higher than Trump, but clearly the jury is still out, suggesting that Biden’s response to the controversy over the next several weeks before the first voting in the Democratic nominating contest will be critical.

Overall, Americans are split 44-43% on whether impeachment will help Democrats or whether it will help Trump.

How impeachment is handled could be crucial in determining who Americans want to put in charge of Congress after 2020 as well. Democrats have just a 3-point advantage, 43-40%, on the question of which party’s candidate people would vote for in their district if the elections were held today.

That’s half of what it was in November 2018 (50-44%), just Democrats took back the U.S. House by sweeping a net of 40 seats out of Republican hands in the midterms.

Methodology: The poll of 1,123 Americans was conducted with live telephone Oct. 3 through Oct. 8, 2019. The margin of error for the overall sample is 3.4 percentage points. Party affiliation results reflect the 926 respondents who identified as registered voters, and the margin of error is 3.8 percentage points.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/10/768785510/poll-independents-move-in-favor-of-impeachment-inquiry-gop-stays-firmly-against

The best way to combat a “snake fish” is by cutting off its head.

An invasive Asian snakehead fish that can grow to 3 feet long and exist on land has surfaced in Georgia for the first time ever. State wildlife officials have formulated a foolproof animal control measure: killing it on sight.

A denizen of China’s Yangtze River basin, the northern snakehead was caught in a private pond in Gwinnett County northeast of Atlanta in early October, Georgia Department of Natural Resources officials announced Wednesday. An angler’s report allowed them to “confirm the presence,” after identifying the fish’s mottled brown coloring, a dorsal fin traversing the back and the serpentine noggin from which the fish takes its name.

“We are now taking steps to determine if they have spread from this water body and, hopefully, keep it from spreading to other Georgia waters,” said Matt Thomas, chief of fisheries for the DNR’s Wildlife Resources Division.

It would be bad news if the fishy interloper spreads. The federally regulated snakehead is a voracious hunter with no natural predators in North America and has the potential to displace local wildlife by commandeering their food resources and habitat, according to the US Department of Agriculture.

Even scarier, these serpentine swimmers can breathe air — allowing them to exist on land for days at a time.

To combat the invasion, Georgia’s Wildlife Resources Division posted a notice on their Facebook page, urging fishers to “immediately kill and freeze any suspected snakeheads, as well as snap photos of their quarry.”

Anglers should also note where it was caught — water body, GPS coordinates — and “report their find to their regional Georgia DNR Wildlife Resources Division Fisheries Office.”

The post sparked a flurry of remarks from the FB peanut gallery, most concerning the snakehead’s purported deliciousness. Said one comment section gourmand: “Just wondering if we have to cut the head off and leave them on the bank, or if we CAN take them home to eat?”

Indeed, the “ferocious fish” is a staple of hotpot restaurants throughout China.

But for US wildlife officials, the snakehead scourge is no laughing matter. The species has already been reported in 14 states.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/10/10/wildlife-officials-warn-public-to-kill-land-dwelling-fish-on-sight/

CLOSE

One Democratic Congresswoman is facing some high profile criticism from the left. They’re upset over her comments about the Syrian chemical attack. Veuer’s Nick Cardona (@nickcardona93) has the story.
Buzz60

WASHINGTON – Rep. Tulsi Gabbard announced Thursday that she is considering boycotting next week’s Democratic primary debate, claiming without proof that the Democratic National Committee and the press are trying to rig the election.

“The DNC and the corporate media are trying to hijack the entire election process, so in order to bring attention to this serious threat to our democracy, and to ensure that your voice is heard, I’m seriously considering boycotting the next debate on Oct. 15,” she said in a video statement posted to Twitter.

Gabbard said she will announce whether she will officially boycott the debate in the coming days.

In her statement, the Hawaii congresswoman said that voters in early states such as Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada expressed to her how frustrated they are that “the DNC and the corporate media are essentially trying to usurp your role as voters in choosing who our Democratic nominee will be.”

Gabbard pointed to her belief that the DNC tried to rig the 2016 election against Sen. Bernie Sanders in favor of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. Emails released in July 2016 by Wikileaks showed that some DNC officials, including Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida — who at the time was chairwoman of the committee — criticized Sanders’ campaign. 

Gabbard also claimed in her video Thursday that the “DNC and the corporate media are rigging the election again” in 2020.

“This time it’s against the American people in the early voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada,” she said. “They are attempting to replace the roles of voters in the early states using polling and other arbitrary methods which are not transparent or democratic, and they’re holding so-called debates which really are not debates at all but rather commercialized reality television, meant to entertain rather than to inform or enlighten.”

Gabbard is one of 12 candidates that made it to the debate stage for October. She also qualified for the June and July debates, with the September debate being the only one so far that she didn’t meet the requirements for.

The DNC first released the qualifications for the June and July debates in February; the qualifications for the September and October debates in May; and the qualifications for the November debate in September.

To make it to the debate stage in November, candidates must receive individual donations from at least 165,000 people, consisting of at least 600 unique donors in at least 20 states. In terms of polling, candidates must stand at 3% or higher in at least four approved national or early state polls, or they can reach 5% or higher in two early state polls.

Gabbard has hit the donor mark for the November debate, but is currently at 0.6% in polling, according to an average by Real Clear Politics. In a Quinnipiac poll released this week, Gabbard didn’t even hit 1%.

Over the past several months, Gabbard has repeatedly criticized the DNC and the primary debates.Author Marianne Williamson, who is also running for president, agreed with Gabbard’s sentiments.

“I have great respect for Tulsi for saying such inconvenient truth,” Williamson wrote in a tweet. “She is absolutely correct.”

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/10/10/tulsi-gabbard-considering-boycotting-october-debate/3928595002/

According to the indictment, Parnas, Fruman and other defendants “conspired to circumvent the federal laws against foreign influence by engaging in a scheme to funnel foreign money to candidates for federal and state office so that the defendants could buy potential influence with the candidates, campaigns, and the candidates’ governments.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates/2019/10/10/e46ddd94-eace-11e9-9c6d-436a0df4f31d_story.html

California has always prided itself on being a high-tech pioneer. One exception? Power distribution.

With Pacific Gas & Electric Co. expected to cut electricity to 800,000 customers this week, the state is confronting its reliance on a transmission network that predates climate change, solar panels and lithium-ion batteries, depending instead on electric lines strung over thousands of miles on vulnerable wooden poles.

Until that changes, experts say, utility executives are sure to cut electrical service to large sections of the state during high winds, rather than risk downed lines and transformers like those that have sparked deadly wildfires over the last two years.

PHOTOS: Northern California deals with unprecedented power outages

Utility operators historically built power grids — with massive electrical plants fired by fossil fuels and transmission lines that stretched for hundreds of miles — to provide the cheapest possible electricity. They weren’t concerned about air pollution and global warming, or the more immediate threat from wildfires, said Michael Wara, director of Stanford University’s climate and energy policy program.

“Society has been delivering electricity the same way for 130 years — exposed lines on wood poles over dry grass,” said David Rabbitt, a county supervisor in Sonoma County, one of the areas hit by the massive blackout. “I think we know more now, certainly, and it’s time to actually move on with making the investments going forward.”

Will the current outages be a pivotal moment in transforming California’s power grid? If so, the transition will likely include Californians generating power closer to their homes via solar panels and wind generators. It will also include communities building microgrids, distinct power systems that can operate independent of massive utilities like PG&E, a behemoth that serves 16 million people spread across 70,000 square miles of Central and Northern California.

In the meantime, utilities will continue to practice what is known as “de-energization,” otherwise known as blacking out customers.

The California Public Utilities Commission issued a resolution in July 2018 supporting the use of this “last resort” tactic to mitigate the risk of wildfires. PG&E last year set out its list of criteria for the so-called public safety power shutoffs. Among the potential triggers: a National Weather Service’s declaration of a red-flag fire warning, humidity levels of below 20% percent, wind forecasts of 25 miles an hour, or gusts of 45 miles an hour.

PG&E cited “gusty winds and dry conditions combined with a heightened fire risk” in cutting power in the first minutes of Wednesday morning to 513,000 customers in the Sacramento area. The shutdowns spread in all directions and as far south as Santa Clara County by Wednesday evening.

The power-downs have become necessary because the utility cannot guarantee the safety of its electric stations and lines. PG&E submitted a plan to regulators in February for pole repairs, assessment of its grid and other fixes, but by April acknowledged that it wasn’t going to meet its goals. It cited a variety of reasons, ranging from inclement winter to a lack of personnel. In some cases, only 25% of the work had been completed.

Elizaveta Malashenko, deputy executive director for safety policy at the PUC, said there is an “elevated level of concern” about PG&E because of the age and condition of much of its equipment and its inability to control trees and vegetation.

The utility recently told a federal judge it had completed only about 31% of the ambitious tree-trimming work it planned for 2019. The company said it had finished 760 miles out of the 2,455 miles of power lines that have vegetation around them. To finish the job, PG&E said it would need significantly more than the 4,500 workers it has dedicated to the work.

And that’s only for stopgap measures. In a court filing, PG&E said a clear-cutting of all trees and plants around its power lines would cost somewhere between $75 billion and $150 billion and require hiring 650,000 workers. The utility filed for bankruptcy protection because of the massive payout it anticipates because its equipment caused several fires, including the one that destroyed most of the town of Paradise and killed 85 people in November.

Public safety experts say it’s not necessary for utilities to make all-or-nothing choices.

Severin Borenstein, a professor of business administration and public policy at UC Berkeley’s Haas School of Business, said he can see a future in which utilities install concrete poles in the areas most exposed to wind. Alternately, if the state permits, they could refuse to deliver power to new developments altogether, instead requiring that they provide their own electricity.

Up until now, utilities sought to balance the cost of preventing wildfires with the need to sell power at the lowest possible rates.

“It used to be that balance was viewed as pretty reasonable,” Borenstein said. “With climate change, I think it’s not anymore.”

PG&E could have dodged some current challenges by implementing the best practices modeled by San Diego Gas & Electric following its own 2007 fire disaster, said Stanford’s Wara.

That fire tore through north San Diego, destroying more than 1,000 homes and killing two people, after sparking power lines ignited chaparral-covered hillsides. The San Diego utility responded by pumping more than $1 billion into improvements. It buried some power lines and insulated others, and broke its power network into smaller microgrids that can be shut off in smaller segments when there is a need to isolate neighborhoods with the highest risk of fire.

The Northern California utility “needs to do the things San Diego has done in the last 12 years since the Witch fire,” Wara said.

With federal and state funding, SDG&E started building a microgrid in 2012 in the desert community of Borrego Springs, several years after a wildfire took down the town’s single transmission line and cut off power for two days.

The system today uses a complex array of diesel generators, a solar farm, rooftop solar on many homes and lithium-ion batteries to allow the community to be “islanded” during systemwide outages. That means the microgrid can provide all the power the town of 3,500 needs for several hours at a time.

The system is “not trivial” and could be a model for other communities, said the PUC’s Malashenko. But the regulator noted that the Borrego Springs system took 10 years to bring fully online. The state is not ready to recreate such systems on a widespread basis, she said.

Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at UC Berkeley, said that the utilities will have to find ways to more precisely pinpoint the planned outages.

“This is going to be what we do for a while,” he said, “but it’s going to have to be refined, instead of just relying on this one very blunt instrument.”

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-10-10/pg-e-california-power-outages-grid-climate-change

An estimated 47.6 million adults in the U.S. experienced mental illness last year. That’s one in five adults in this country. “CBS This Morning” will broadcast a live town hall, “Stop the Stigma: A Conversation About Mental Health,” on Oct. 23. Dr. Sue Varma, a psychiatrist who will participate in the town hall, joins “CBS This Morning” to discuss how to break down stigmas surrounding mental health.

Watch “CBS This Morning” HERE: http://bit.ly/1T88yAR
Download the CBS News app on iOS HERE: https://apple.co/1tRNnUy
Download the CBS News app on Android HERE: https://bit.ly/1IcphuX
Like “CBS This Morning” on Facebook HERE: http://on.fb.me/1LhtdvI
Follow “CBS This Morning” on Twitter HERE: http://bit.ly/1Xj5W3p
Follow “CBS This Morning” on Instagram HERE: http://bit.ly/1Q7NGnY
Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! http://bit.ly/1OQA29B
Each weekday morning, “CBS This Morning” co-hosts Gayle King, Anthony Mason and Tony Dokoupil deliver two hours of original reporting, breaking news and top-level newsmaker interviews in an engaging and informative format that challenges the norm in network morning news programs. The broadcast has earned a prestigious Peabody Award, a Polk Award, four News & Documentary Emmys, three Daytime Emmys and the 2017 Edward R. Murrow Award for Best Newscast. The broadcast was also honored with an Alfred I. duPont-Columbia Award as part of CBS News division-wide coverage of the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Check local listings for “CBS This Morning” broadcast times.

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey56qie3Cv8

AN Extinction Rebellion protester glued himself to the top of a British Airways plane at London City Airport today.

The man, identified by Extinction Rebellion as former Paralympic cyclist James Brown, was seen clinging to the aircraft in a video streamed online by the protest group.

Former Paralympic athlete James Brown lay on top of an aircraft
The former Paralympic athlete on top of the BA aircraftCredit: London News Pictures
The protester glued himself to the top of a BA Embraer 190 jetCredit: Reuters
Brown said he was ‘s*****g’ himself as he was ‘scared of heights’
The Extinction Rebellion protester lectured fellow passengers on climate change on the Aer Lingus flightCredit: @wazzas/Twitter
The activist is led away by cops from the planeCredit: Reuters
There was a huge police presence outside London City Airport todayCredit: AFP or licensors
Extinction Rebellion protesters with bikes block a roundabout near City AirportCredit: Reuters

Brown, who is visually impaired, was arrested at Heathrow last month after a protest which saw some Extinction Rebellion activists try to fly a drone near the airport.

The 54-year-old, a former Paralympic athlete who won a bronze medal at London 2012, glued himself to the top of a BA Embraer 190 jet.

In a video he posted online he said: “Here I am on top of a f****** aeroplane at City Airport. I hate heights, I’m s******* myself, I managed to get on the roof. I am so shaky.

“This is all about the climate and ecological crisis, we’re protesting against government inaction on climate and ecological breakdown. They declare a climate emergency and then do nothing about it.

“In fact they go the opposite direction, they sanction the expansion of airports, Heathrow, Bristol and others. We can’t let this go on, we can’t have our cake and eat it.

“He later noticed security were approaching and said: Oh good security are coming. I hope they don’t take too long because this is f****** scary”.

He was eventually removed.

A spokeswoman for BA said “we are investigating what happened as a matter of urgency”.

A protester on the roof above the entrance to City Airport shouted ‘Rebellion!’Credit: AFP or licensors
The activist was cheered as he shouted down to fellow protesters: ‘Rebellion!’Credit: London News Pictures
He carefully picked his way through barbed wire to get to the top of the roofCredit: AFP or licensors
The man climbed onto the roof outside the entrance to the cheers of fellow activistsCredit: Reuters

Meanwhile another protester managed to ground a flight from London City Airport to Dublin today – to the fury of the passengers on board.

The Aer Lingus flight this morning was on the runway and about to take off when a smartly dressed man stood up and gave a lecture on climate change.

Filming himself on his phone, the man said: “I don’t wish to travel with you, but I don’t wish to get off”.

He went on: “I’m extremely sorry for the inconvenience”.

Furious passengers responded saying: “You’re not sorry at all”.

As their flight was held up, travellers pleaded with crew to remove the bespectacled man from the plane.


Do you know the protester on the Aer Lingus flight? If so please email thomas.burrows@thesun.co.uk


Continuing to address those on board, the man said: “We have two generations of human civilisation left if we carry on doing what we are doing”.

Another passenger then asked him: “Why are you filming yourself?”

The man was later seen being led away from the aircraft by police officers.

The flight, scheduled to depart at 9.40am, was delayed by ten minutes.

Passenger Warren Swalbe tweeted: “Just about to take from London City airport. Our flight was infiltrated by a climate change protester”.

Nicholas Watt, the political editor of BBC Newsnight, wrote: “My flight from London City airport to Dublin has just been grounded by a climate change protester. On runway and about to take off when smartly dressed man in late middle age stood up with iPhone to deliver lecture on climate change up and down aisle.

“Cabin crew calmly and very politely asked protester to resume his seat. Politely but persistently he declined and proceeded to deliver his lecture on climate change in aisle.

“Plane was at the end of runway. So the pilot taxied back to gate where plane was met by throng of police. They came on board and escorted the protester off the plane.

“The final irony of the climate protest on our flight. We cannot take off until we have taken on extra fuel…to replace the fuel used up during the protest, our pilot notes with humour”.

Aer Lingus said the passenger was removed “due to disruptive behaviour on board” and a full security check of the aircraft was completed before the plane departed.

Activists blocked the entrance to the airport from the DLR this morningCredit: AFP or licensors
Police arrest Extinction Rebellion activists outside the East London airport todayCredit: London News Pictures
There was a heavy police presence outside London City Airport this morningCredit: �2019 Pete Maclaine / i-Images
Police were seen dragging away protesters from the airport entranceCredit: London News Pictures
Scores of police officers were stationed outside London City Airport this morningCredit: London News Pictures

The climate change group started their three-day “Hong Kong-style” shut down of London City Airport this morning, gluing themselves to the terminal building and dancing on a roof – but ultimately failing to cancel flights.

The latest protest is against the climate impact of flying and the Government’s ongoing support of airport expansion.

Hundreds of environmentalists attempted to block the entrance to the airport from the DLR by sitting together on the ground and singing “Fly today, gone tomorrow”.

Activist Phil Kingston, 83, was among those arrested – the third time he has been arrested as part of Extinction Rebellion protests in the past week.

Protesters were seen being dragged out the airport by officers after failing to break through security into the terminal.

One was heard saying: “Please stop you’re hurting me”.

One activist climbed onto part of the roof of the terminal building where he was cheered by fellow protesters.

Standing on the roof, he bellowed down: “Shut the airport down! Rebellion!”

He then danced on the roof as a live band played clarinet music below.

The suited man told protesters to ‘shut this airport down’Credit: AFP or licensors
Negotiators try to persuade the activists to come down from the roof
Security try to grab hold of an Extinction Rebellion protester at the airportCredit: �2019 Pete Maclaine / i-Images
Police lead away a protester from the airportCredit: Alamy Live News
Extinction Rebellion are trying to shut down the airport
Police arrest an activist on day four of the protestsCredit: AFP or licensors
A man in an Extinction Rebellion tie is led away by officers

Those arriving for flights were redirected to a second terminal entrance by security workers and were not allowed to enter the building without showing their boarding cards first.

Taxi driver Jason Lempiere said that the protests had disrupted his work in and around the city.

He said: “It’s disturbing everyone’s everyday life; working, travel in and out of the airport. Yeah, have a voice, but not disrupt people’s lives like this”.

Today’s protest at City Airport is the fourth day of demonstrations by the climate change group.

Protesters have been camped on roads around Parliament Square and Whitehall since Monday calling for urgent action on climate change and wildlife.

The Metropolitan Police said 800 people have been arrested since the start of the Extinction Rebellion protests on Monday, including 91-year-old John Lynes yesterday.

They have confiscated eight ten-ton lorries worth of kit, including generators, power sources, toilets, tents and sleeping equipment.

A total of 500 cops from other forces from England and Wales have been brought in to help cope with the protests.

Disruption continued in the capital yesterday with stunts that included a mass breastfeeding near Parliament Square to “plead for the lives” of their children and a group yoga session outside Downing Street.

Police were also seen marching a giant octopus back to Trafalgar Square.

On Wednesday night, activists continued their protests in Trafalgar Square.

They were joined by Benedict Cumberbatch and Simon Amstell, while electronic music duo Disclosure and Orbital played a set.

In the wake of Prime Minister Boris Johnson calling the protesters “uncooperative crusties”, his father Stanley Johnson said the comments were made in humour and he would consider it a compliment to be called a crusty by his son.

Defending the protest group‘s tactics today Mr Johnson Snr said: “I don’t think many of them are breaking the law.

I believe that they are wedded to non-violence, to peaceful protest.”

A London City Airport spokesman said: “We can confirm that a number of protesters have arrived at London City Airport. We continue to work closely with the Metropolitan Police to ensure the safe operation of the airport, which remains fully open and operational. As of 9.15am there have been over 60 flights which have either arrived or departed.

“If you are flying from London City today, please check the status of your flight with your airline before travelling to the airport.”

The airport is the capital’s fifth-biggest, popular with business travellers, bankers and politicians for short-haul and regional routes.

Extinction Rebellion is calling on the Government declare a climate and ecological emergency, act immediately to halt wildlife loss and reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2025.

Earlier in the year, Parliament declared a climate and environment emergency and the Government has passed a law to cut emissions to net zero by 2050, far later than the activists are demanding.

The group staged 11 days of protests in London in April that disrupted public transport and roads.

On Thursday Extinction Rebellion activists used a fire engine to hose red liquid at the Treasury to draw attention to what they said was the government’s failure to avert climate disaster.

Last week the Met warned that the protests were taking officers away from other vital roles in the capital including tackling knife crime and domestic violence.

More resources have been used policing climate change protest than focusing on terror, it was said.

Extinction Rebellion have declared they will shut down London City Airport
Orbital performed for the protesters in Trafalgar Square last nightCredit: Extinction Rebellion
Actor Benedict Cumberbatch joined the activists last night
Police march a giant octopus back to Trafalgar SquareCredit: AFP or licensors
Nursing mothers with their children block Whitehall during the Extinction Rebellion mass ‘nurse-in’ road blockadeCredit: PA:Press Association
Activists protest on Whitehall, near the entrance to Downing StreetCredit: AFP or licensors
A climate change protester holds up a placard as they block Victoria Street, in LondonCredit: AP:Associated Press
John Lynes, 91, was arrested during yesterday’s protestsCredit: Alamy Live News

Source Article from https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10104063/extinction-rebellion-london-city-airport-today-shut-down/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/10/politics/mike-pence-ukraine-donald-trump/index.html

President TrumpDonald John TrumpDemocrats request testimony from Trump’s former Russia adviser Trump adviser: ‘He should stop saying things that are untrue’ US moves British ISIS suspects from Syria amid Turkish invasion MORE pressured then-Secretary of State Rex TillersonRex Wayne TillersonTrump asked Tillerson to interfere in DOJ case against Giuliani client: report Trump’s tirades, taunts and threats are damaging our democracy Donald Trump and the New Isolationism MORE to help convince the Department of Justice (DOJ) to drop a criminal investigation against an Iranian-Turkish gold trader who was also a client of Trump’s current personal lawyer, Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiTrey Gowdy joins Trump’s legal team Trump asked Tillerson to interfere in DOJ case against Giuliani client: report Barr to speak at Notre Dame law school on Friday MORE, Bloomberg reports.

Tillerson refused Trump’s 2017 request, saying it would be illegal to interfere with an ongoing investigation. He repeated his stance to then-chief of staff John KellyJohn Francis KellyMORE in a hallway conversation in the White House.

At the time, Reza Zarrab, the trader in question, was being prosecuted by a New York federal court on charges of evading U.S. sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program, according to Bloomberg. As a result, Zarrab hired Giuliani and former Attorney General Michael Mukasey.

Giuliani reportedly reached out to U.S. officials numerous in attempts to solve his client’s situation outside of the court system.

The report comes amid growing scrutiny over the president’s dealings with foreign leaders, especially in light of a recent whistleblower report that raised concerns over a phone call Trump held in which he pressed Ukraine’s president to investigate former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenDemocrats request testimony from Trump’s former Russia adviser Pence open to releasing transcripts of call with Ukraine Trey Gowdy joins Trump’s legal team MORE and his son. The scandal has also implicated Giuliani, whose own dealings in Ukraine have drawn the attention of lawmakers in recent weeks.

The report also comes shortly after Trump announced he was pulling U.S. troops out of northeastern Syria ahead of an expected Turkish offensive against Kurdish forces there. Presdient Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced on Wednesday that he had formally launched the invasion.

 

Zarrab’s release was reportedly of high priority for Erdogan until the trader decided to cooperate with New York prosecutors.

Tillerson has openly said that Trump asked him multiple times to do things that would break the law, according to the news source.

Eventually, Zarrab pleaded guilty and reportedly testified against Mehmet Hakan Atilla, who was in charge of international banking at Halkbank, a state-owned Turkish bank.

Erdogan, Zarrab asserted, knew and supported the laundering effort on behalf of Iran, according to the new outlet. The Turkish President has denied these allegations vehemently.

The White House, Kelly and Tillerson all declined to comment to Bloomberg.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/465116-trump-asked-tillerson-to-interfere-in-doj-case-against-giuliani

Members of Congress from both parties are voicing their opinions on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump at town halls in their home districts. For some Democrats in mostly Republican districts, their approach has to be measured. Politico Congressional Reporter Andrew Desiderio followed Democratic Illinois Congressman Sean Casten to six of his town halls to see how he’s handling the issue. Desiderio joined CBSN to discuss what he saw.

Subscribe to the CBS News Channel HERE: http://youtube.com/cbsnews
Watch CBSN live HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1PlLpZ7
Follow CBS News on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/cbsnews/
Like CBS News on Facebook HERE: http://facebook.com/cbsnews
Follow CBS News on Twitter HERE: http://twitter.com/cbsnews

Get the latest news and best in original reporting from CBS News delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to newsletters HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T

Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8

Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream CBSN and local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites like Star Trek Discovery anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! http://bit.ly/1OQA29B


CBSN is the first digital streaming news network that will allow Internet-connected consumers to watch live, anchored news coverage on their connected TV and other devices. At launch, the network is available 24/7 and makes all of the resources of CBS News available directly on digital platforms with live, anchored coverage 15 hours each weekday. CBSN. Always On.

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJaESeaHKsM

In the face of growing bipartisan anger, President Donald Trump defended his decision to allow a Turkish offensive in northern Syria by saying that the U.S.-allied Kurds — who led the ground campaign against the Islamic State in Syria and are under Turkish attack — did not help the U.S. during World War II.

“Now the Kurds are fighting for their land,” Trump told reporters during a press conference on Wednesday night. “They didn’t help us in the Second World War, they didn’t help us with Normandy, for example.”

Trump attributed the points to an article he said he had read, which wasn’t identified, that dismissed the importance of the Kurdish alliance. He suggested that Kurds had battled alongside U.S. forces for “their land.” “They’re there to help us with their land, and that’s a different thing.”

Many Republicans and Democrats alike would object to that last point. Some 11,000 Kurdish forces died assisting the U.S. in the counter-ISIS campaign in Syria, and high-ranking U.S. diplomats and military officials credit much of the victory over the extremist group to the Kurdish fighters.

Many have described them as the most effective fighting force on the ground, and a reliable ally of the U.S., despite the complications this alliance has caused with NATO ally Turkey. Ankara views the fighters as a security threat on its border because it sees them as indistinguishable from a separate Kurdish terrorist group that is waging a counterinsurgency inside Turkey.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., tweeted: “At request of this administration the Kurds served as the primary ground fighters against ISIS in Syria so U.S. troops wouldn’t have to.” He said the administration “then cut deal with [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan allowing him to wipe them out. Damage to our reputation & national interest will be extraordinary & long lasting.”

Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., a staunch ally of the president, tweeted on Monday: “The Kurds have fought, bled & died fighting alongside the US. They have been warriors & brothers in battle along the way. POTUS is right to want to end endless wars, but the Turks wiping out the Kurds will ABSOLUTELY NOT be an acceptable outcome after all of that.”

Erdogan has pledged to clear the area of “terrorists,” and says his aim is to allow a path for the return of Syrian refugees in Turkey to go back home. Numerous U.S. officials have cast doubt on that promise.

Turkey pushed ahead by launching airstrikes and artillery fire against the Kurdish forces on Wednesday, The Associated Press reported. The Turkish military confirmed it had “launched the land operation into the east of the Euphrates river” and said it had hit 181 “militant targets.”

Activists on the ground say at least seven civilians have been killed. Video footage showed civilians trying to flee as dark plumes of smoke rose on the horizon.

Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., introduced a bipartisan bill on Wednesday to punish Turkey with sanctions for its “invasion of Syria.” The lawmakers have lambasted Trump’s move, and expect bipartisan support with a veto-proof majority in the Senate.

In response to the Turkish strikes, Trump issued a statement saying that the U.S. “does not endorse this attack and has made it clear to Turkey that this operation is a bad idea.”

After describing the Kurds’ absence on the beaches of Normandy in 1944 and describing the Kurdish fight as one solely for their own land, Trump said, “With all of that being said, we like the Kurds.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/10/trump-defends-allowing-turkish-offensive-on-kurds-in-syria-they-didnt-help-us-in-ww2.html

October 10 at 6:57 AM

As President Trump has lobbed unsubstantiated and false claims of international corruption at former vice president Joe Biden and his son, he’s often turned to one source for ammunition: conservative author Peter Schweizer. So when the New York Times ran an op-ed on Wednesday written by Schweizer about Biden and his son Hunter, the Democratic presidential candidate’s campaign cried foul.

In a letter sent to New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet, Biden’s campaign called Schweizer a “discredited right-wing polemicist” and suggested the op-ed was part of a larger pattern of “journalistic malpractice.”

“Are you truly blind to what you got wrong in 2016, or are you deliberately continuing policies that distort reality for the sake of controversy and the clicks that accompany it?” Kate Bedingfield, Biden’s deputy campaign manager, wrote in the Wednesday letter, which was posted by CNN’s Oliver Darcy.

The Times defended its work in a statement sent to The Washington Post.

“Our coverage of the Biden campaign and Hunter Biden has been fair and accurate,” a spokesperson said, adding that the paper “will continue to cover Joe Biden with the same tough and fair standards we apply to every candidate in the race.”

Schweizer didn’t immediately respond to messages sent to his spokesperson and to Breitbart News, where he is a senior contributor.

Biden’s complaint to the Times comes amid a larger push against what his campaign argues is rampant misinformation. Earlier on Wednesday, Facebook rejected a plea from Biden to take down a 30-second Trump campaign ad that CNN refused to air because it made false claims about the former vice president. Biden made a similar request to Twitter, which has yet to respond.

Trump’s near-daily attempts to tie Biden to corrupt dealings in Ukraine and China are at the center of that battle — and both allegations have roots in Schweizer’s work. Schweizer, who is also president of the Government Accountability Institute, a nonprofit founded by former Breitbart executive chairman Stephen K. Bannon, helped push the Uranium One allegations against Hillary Clinton.

In his 2018 book, “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,” Schweizer first tied Hunter Biden’s role as a board member on a Ukrainian natural gas company to his father’s efforts to oust a prosecutor there, Bloomberg News reported. A House impeachment inquiry has now begun into Trump’s efforts to persuade Ukrainian officials to investigate Biden over that allegation.

Schweizer’s 2018 book is also the source of repeated claims by Trump that Hunter Biden made $1.5 billion in corrupt dealings with China, which The Washington Post’s Fact Checker called “false.”

The Times op-ed on Wednesday, which identifies Schweizer as “an investigative journalist,” ran under the headline “What Hunter Biden Did Was Legal — And That’s the Problem.” He argues that the vice president’s son used his father’s influence to make money in Ukraine and China, and that Washington should pass tougher financial disclosure laws for politicians’ relatives.

In his letter to the Times, Biden’s campaign complains that the piece makes “more malicious claims about the Biden family.”

“Despite voluminous work done by the independent press and fact-checkers — including some by The Times — to refute the heinous conspiracy theory that Donald Trump attempted to bully Ukraine into propping-up for him, the paper ran an op-ed by none other than Peter Schweizer, making more malicious claims about the Biden family,” Bedingfield wrote in the letter.

In the statement, the Times spokesman defended the decision to run the op-ed, which also takes aim at alleged profiteering by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) through his own ties to China.

“The op-ed makes an argument that nonpartisan government watchdogs would make, arguing in favor of a law that would prohibit self-dealing by those with government connections,” the spokesperson said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/10/10/joe-biden-peter-schweizer-new-york-times-op-ed/

A record of respondents in a Fox News Poll said they wanted President TrumpDonald John TrumpDemocrats request testimony from Trump’s former Russia adviser Trump adviser: ‘He should stop saying things that are untrue’ US moves British ISIS suspects from Syria amid Turkish invasion MORE impeached and removed from office.

The poll released Wednesday found 51 percent of respondents supported Trump’s impeachment and removal from office. Four percent of participants said the president should be impeached but not removed, and 40 percent are completely against impeachment. 

Support for impeachment and removal has risen 9 points since July, increasing 11 points among Democrats, 5 points among Republicans and 3 points among independents. 

Voters in swing counties, defined as where Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonTrey Gowdy joins Trump’s legal team Support for impeachment reaches highest level in Fox News poll Trey Gowdy out at Fox News amid talks to join Trump defense team MORE and Trump were within 10 points in the 2016 election, supported impeachment at a rate of 52 percent, 10 points above a comparable population in July.

Some demographics that typically back the president also had increased support for impeachment, with a 5 point increase among white evangelical Christians, an 8 point increase among white men without a college degree and a 10 point increase among rural whites.

Among the 40 percent against impeachment, respondents cited as reasons: 21 percent thought Trump did nothing wrong, 20 percent said the inquiry is politically motivated and 15 percent didn’t believe the allegations.

A total of 66 percent of respondents said it was not appropriate for Trump to ask foreign leaders to investigate political rivals, compared to a quarter who said it is appropriate. While 43 percent say the Ukraine call was impeachable, 27 percent say it was inappropriate but not impeachable.

The House has opened an impeachment inquiry on the president after a whistleblower report revealed Trump asked the Ukrainian president to look into former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenDemocrats request testimony from Trump’s former Russia adviser Pence open to releasing transcripts of call with Ukraine Trey Gowdy joins Trump’s legal team MORE and his son.

Polls have been showing growing support in public opinion for impeachment.

The Fox News poll surveyed 1,003 registered voters between Oct. 6 and 8 and has a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/465110-support-for-impeachment-reaches-highest-level-in-fox-news-poll

CLOSE

President Trump said “a whistleblower should be protected if the whistleblower’s legitimate.”
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – The legal team representing the whistleblower at the center of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump released a statement Wednesday saying their client had an “apolitical” career and never “worked for or advised a political candidate, campaign, or party.”

The statement came after news reports that the whistleblower is “registered Democrat” and had a “prior working relationship with a current 2020 Democratic presidential contender.” 

Lawyers Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj, whose firm Compass Rose Legal Group is representing the whistleblower, released the statement, saying that in “light of the ongoing efforts to mischaracterize whistleblower #1’s alleged ‘bias’ in order to detract from the substance of the complaint, we will attempt to clarify some facts.”

“First, our client has never worked for or advised a political candidate, campaign, or party,” the legal team begins. “Our client has spent their entire government career in apolitical, civil servant positions in the Executive Branch.”

They continue to elaborate that their client, in their respective positions, came “into contact with presidential candidates from both parties in their roles as elected officials —not as candidates.”

“The whistleblower voluntarily provided relevant career information to the IC IG in order to facilitate an assessment of the credibility of the complaint,” the lawyer’s elaborated, explaining that, “as a result, the IC IG concluded — as is well known — that the complaint was both urgent and credible.”

The lawyers are also now representing a second whistleblower who is described as “an intelligence official – has firsthand knowledge of some of the allegations outlined in the original complaint.”

“Finally, the whistleblower is not the story. To date, virtually every substantive allegation has been confirmed by other sources. For that reason the identity of the whistleblower is irrelevant,” the legal team concluded. 

Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the intelligence community, received thewhistleblower’s complaint Aug. 12, whichclaims the president was “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 election.” He spent two weeks reviewing it, finding the complaint appeared credible on Aug. 26.

According to a summary of Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky released by the White House, Trump asked Zelensky to look into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son.

However, the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, prevented Atkinson from passing along the complaint to Congress within a week, as is typically required for national-security whistleblower complaints. Maguire consulted with the White House and Justice Department in opting for the delay, he told the House intelligence panel Sept. 26, the day after a summary of the call was released and the complaint was provided to the committee.

Maguire said he thought the complaint might be protected by executive privilege. The Justice Department ruled that the complaint didn’t qualify as an “urgent concern” about “a serious or flagrant problem” requiring notification of Congress because the target – Trump – isn’t a member of the intelligence community.

Contributing: Nicholas Wu, Bart Jansen

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/09/impeachment-whistleblower-attorneys-say-client-didnt-have-political-bias/3924793002/

WAUKEE, Iowa — Vice President Mike Pence said Wednesday he is working with the White House counsel’s office to release transcripts of his own calls with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.

Pence said records of his two phone conversations would help exonerate President Donald Trump of any wrongdoing.

Pence was asked about releasing his transcripts and told reporters, “I’d have no objection to that.” He spoke after an event in Waukee, Iowa, where he addressed supporters about the president’s trade policy.

Pence said he “never discussed the issue of the Bidens” with Zelenskiy. And he again defended the president, insisting that a “plain reading” of the rough transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukranian leader shows “there was no quid pro quo.”

The Trump administration came under fire after a whistleblower complaint filed by a CIA officer suggested Trump and other administration officials worked to withhold aid from Ukraine and pushed the country’s government to investigate the son of former Vice President Joe Biden, a leading candidate in the Democratic primary for president.

Pence also said he stands by his assertion during a 2016 vice presidential debate that foreign governments shouldn’t get involved in domestic elections. He ignored shouted questions noting that Trump suggested, in front of network cameras on the White House lawn, that China should start an investigation into the Bidens.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/10/09/pence-aiming-to-release-records-of-his-own-ukraine-calls/

House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff of California speaks to the media last month. Schiff is leading the charge in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff of California speaks to the media last month. Schiff is leading the charge in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Adam Schiff has been a ubiquitous media presence criticizing President Trump. Trump, an omnivorous television news consumer, has returned the favor, tweeting disparaging comments about (Liddle’) Schiff. (and worse.)

But, beyond that, the California Democrat and chairman of the House Intelligence Committee has had something of an unlikely path to becoming the face of the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry and, in turn, the Democratic Resistance.

So here are some things to know:

1. A political career spurred on by … impeachment

His congressional district, California’s 28th, includes Hollywood. It’s heavily liberal — Hillary Clinton won 72% here in 2016. But it wasn’t always so pro-Democratic. In fact, Schiff got into Congress, ironically, by defeating a Republican, Jim Rogan, who was a staunch critic of Bill Clinton and spoke out against Clinton during his impeachment.

Schiff was able to leverage Clinton’s impeachment for his gain, as Clinton friend and entertainment mogul David Geffen promised to help raise millions to unseat Rogan. He got help from movie director Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, former chairman of Disney Studios. At the same time, Disney Chairman and CEO Michael Eisner took Rogan’s side. The result? The 2000 race became the most expensive in history, at that time, with more than $10 million raised between the two. Schiff won 53%-44%, and has since not gotten less than 63% of the vote.

2. He voted for the Iraq war authorization and the Patriot Act

Schiff had just ousted an incumbent Republican, so what did he do when he went to Congress? He joined the Blue Dog Democrats, a group for moderate and conservative Democratic members on Capitol Hill. So he didn’t always have this liberal reputation.

In fact, he supported the 2002 authorization for use of force in Iraq and voted for the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act expanded law enforcement’s ability to surveil Americans with the goal of preventing more terrorist attacks. But the privacy infringements outraged civil libertarians. Schiff grew more traditionally liberal, as his district did.

3. He prosecuted an FBI agent for taking bribes from Russians

Before running for elective office, Schiff worked in the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles in the late 1980s and early 1990s. His most famous case was the first-ever conviction of an FBI agent for espionage. The agent had been taking bribes from Russians. It took three trials over six years to secure the conviction.

“I do feel like in some ways my life has come full circle,” Schiff told the Los Angeles Daily News with a laugh last week, thinking about his work today on the Intelligence Committee.

Schiff then ran for office, but lost three times for state Assembly before eventually winning a state Senate seat and then Congress.

4. He’s an amateur screenwriter

Schiff was born in Massachusetts but represents Hollywood, so why not, right? His first screenplay was called, Remnant, which Schiff told The New Yorker “was a post-Holocaust story.” He then wrote a murder-mystery called Minotaur, and is now working on a “spy drama.”

None of his screenplays have sold.

“I had a friend who was a producer,” Schiff told The New Yorker, “and he said there were two answers in Hollywood — ‘Yes’ and ‘Here’s a check.’ I was getting lots of yeses.”

5. Schiff, who is almost 60, started doing triathlons in his 50s and is a vegan

Schiff will be 60 in eight months, and, given the workout culture in Southern California, he took up triathlons in his 50s. He said his wife, who plays tennis almost every day, has been an inspiration.

His wife, by the way, is named Eve. A friend set them up in 1990, playing doubles tennis. “I think he was just looking for the right audience for some Adam and Eve jokes,” he told Good.

Schiff is also a vegan – described by Rolling Stone as a “mild-mannered-judicious, vegan. He thanked fellow congressional vegan, Cory Booker of New Jersey for sharing vegan cupcakes.

6. He has higher political ambitions, but that path isn’t clear

Schiff has fanned the flames of running for higher office. During a speech in New Hampshire (you know, that early voting primary state), Schiff said, per the Los Angeles Times, “I’m only running for the House, but I’m honored to be asked the question.”

And: “It’s fun coming up here, and I enjoy the idea that I might cause certain heads at Fox News to explode [if I ran.]”

But his options are limited. He’s not running for president, despite the flirtation, so maybe he can hope for a Cabinet position if a Democrat wins the White House. California has a new governor in Gavin Newsom. And Schiff considered a run for the seat vacated by Barbara Boxer, but backed down when Kamala Harris got in the race.

He could run for (or be appointed to) Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s seat, when she eventually leaves office. Feinstein, who is 86, was just reelected in 2018 and has five years left in her term.

Whatever his future, a lot of it is going to ride on how Schiff handles the next few weeks and months and the impeachment inquiry into Trump.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/10/768048653/adam-schiff-the-surprising-face-of-the-impeachment-inquiry-of-president-trump

President Trump speaks at the White House Oct. 9, 2019. An NPR analysis of his tweets shows Trump using very different language and insults when sparring with white and non-white Democratic lawmakers.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump speaks at the White House Oct. 9, 2019. An NPR analysis of his tweets shows Trump using very different language and insults when sparring with white and non-white Democratic lawmakers.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump uses his Twitter feed the way past presidents used the White House briefing room. It’s the place where he announces policy and delivers his message to the American people. And it’s also the place where he, often gleefully, tries to skewer his political opponents.

As the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry continues and Trump’s own re-election efforts gather speed, an NPR analysis shows that Trump’s broadsides against Democrats in Congress have intensified since July. And his language about non-white lawmakers has also grown more heated.

NPR examined Trump’s tweets, both positive and negative, about every single current member of Congress starting from his inauguration day until last week. As of October 4, Trump has tweeted more than 700 times about sitting members of Congress.

While Trump has always spread his insults far and wide, the volume of personal insults and extreme language that he directed at the so-called “squad” of four Democratic congresswomen and African-American Congressman Elijah Cummings over the summer stood out.

He kicked off his tweet storm in mid-July with a Twitter thread that embraced racist tropes, urging members of the ‘squad’ — all women of color — to “go back” to the “totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.”

Trump would go on to tweet about the “squad” — Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan — nearly 20 times collectively in about three months.

Loading…

That’s more negative tweets than Trump has aimed at presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders in the nearly three years he’s been president.

Among other things, he’s called the squad “a very racist group of troublemakers” and claimed they hate the United States.

That language speaks to some white Trump supporters who may be worried about the country’s changing demographics, says Niambi Carter, a political science professor at Howard University.

“When he says ‘Make America Great Again’ and points to these women as the sort of embodiment of everything that America isn’t: It’s not black. It’s not a woman. It’s not Muslim. It’s not Latina … these women become perfect vehicles for all of that xenophobia and all of that anxiety that these white voters feel,” Carter said.

Omar, in particular, has been a top target for Trump on Twitter and off. Including tweets about the ‘squad’ and tweets that single her out, Trump has tweeted about her 29 times. By comparison, he tweeted about Ocasio-Cortez 22 times.

Trump is holding a rally in the heart of Omar’s district in Minneapolis on Thursday. At a campaign rally in North Carolina in July, the crowd echoed Trump’s tweets and chanted ‘send her back’ about Omar, who was born in Somalia, but is an American citizen.

These sort of attacks have a long running history, said Pearl Dowe, a political science and African-American studies professor at Emory University.

“This is an ongoing struggle for people of color to have their citizenship respected, to actually live out their full citizenship, but also their humanity as well,” Dowe said.

‘The president chooses his targets pretty carefully’

The White House did not respond to interview requests for this story, but Trump supporters generally say that the president is a counter-puncher who responds to people who attack him, no matter who they are.

The review of Trump’s tweets shows that he does go after critics, but not everyone gets the same treatment or attention.

The only lawmakers with more negative tweets than the squad and Cummings are top Democrats: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Intelligence committee chairman Adam Schiff.

Loading…

Other lawmakers who regularly criticize Trump, like former presidential candidate Eric Swalwell, barely get a mention in the president’s Twitter feed. The same is true for senators and presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Cory Booker.

“The president chooses his targets pretty carefully but he doesn’t always choose them for the same reason,” said Brian Ott, a communications professor at Texas Tech University and co-author of The Twitter Presidency.

Ott said Trump uses Twitter to discredit politicians he views as a threat and to distract from other matters.

“There’s this other motivation, which is trying to define the opposition, and it’s clear that he takes tremendous pleasure and is particularly vitriolic when it comes to characterizing women and ethnic minorities on Twitter,” he said.

On Twitter, Trump has said the face of the Democratic party is the ‘squad,’ Pelosi and Congresswoman Maxine Waters, who is African-American.

He has never extended that label, “face of the Democrat party,” to a white male lawmaker.

When Trump does set his Twitter sights on an opponent, the nature of the attacks can vary sharply depending on who the critic is.

Trump has tweeted about Schiff 41 times, with many of those mentions coming in the past three weeks as the impeachment inquiry has gotten underway. The president has accused Schiff of committing treason and being a fraud.

But Trump’s tweets about Schiff have focused on his actions as the chair of a committee probing the president. In contrast, Trump’s tweets about Cummings — who is chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform — focused on the mostly black district that he represents in and around Baltimore. Trump called the area “rat and rodent infested.”

Loading…

Trump launched similar attacks against districts represented by Pelosi and Congressman John Lewis in the past.

Paris Dennard is a prominent African-American conservative who backs Trump. He argued it’s not race or gender that motivates the president, but the prominence of the critic.

“If you are a worthy opponent, meaning you have a large social media following … meaning you can attract a lot of people to whatever it is you’re talking about … he’s going to engage with them because he thinks it’s worth the fight,” Dennard said.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/10/768646968/as-summer-heated-up-trumps-tweets-about-non-white-democrats-intensified

Former vice president Joe Biden made his most direct call for President Trump’s impeachment Wednesday, hours after Trump said the Democratic-led inquiry should be terminated “for the good of the Country,” claiming it was tainted with political bias.

“President Trump has indicted himself by obstructing justice, refusing to comply with a congressional inquiry … he’s already convicted himself,” Biden, who is running for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, said during a fiery address in New Hampshire.

Trump, meanwhile, continued to take aim at Biden and House Democrats, suggesting that he would refuse to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry unless Democrats “give us our rights.”

The developments came a day after the White House said in a scathing eight-page letter that it would not cooperate with the inquiry into the Ukraine scandal on the grounds that it lacked merit.

The letter was the latest escalation in a standoff with Congress, where Democrats are vowing to hold Trump accountable for pressing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Biden and his son at a time when U.S. military aid to Ukraine had been suspended.

● White House escalates standoff with Congress, says it will not cooperate with impeachment inquiry of Trump.

● Former national security officials fight back as Trump attacks impeachment as

“deep state” conspiracy.

● The revealing splits in GOP senators’ reactions to impeachment.

The whistleblower complaint | The rough transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky |The letter from White House counsel to House leaders

7 p.m.: Vice President Pence dodges questions about whether he was aware of Trump’s interest in foreign countries investigating Biden

In a rare back and forth with reporters in Iowa, Pence refused to answer repeated questions about whether he was aware of Trump’s desire for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.

Pence mostly regurgitated White House talking points, according to a pool report. He said he never discussed Biden on his call with President Zelensky and said he’d be open to releasing that transcript.

“What I can tell you is, all of our discussions internally, between the president and our team, and our contacts and my office with Ukraine, were entirely focused on the broader issues of the lack of European support and corruption,” Pence said.

Asked if it was okay with him that the president said he wants a foreign country to investigate his political opponent, Pence said, “I don’t believe that’s the case.”

“He said it,” a reporter pressed.

“And again, I know that’s the way Chairman Schiff characterized it in his manufactured version of the transcript, but the American people should read the transcript and they will see that the president did nothing wrong, there was no pressure, there was no quid pro quo. The president simply raised issues of importance and interest to the American people,” Pence said and then ended the gaggle.

5:30 p.m.: Whistleblower’s attorneys push back against claims of political bias

Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid, the lawyers representing the whistleblower whose complaint is at the center of the impeachment inquiry, issued a statement Wednesday evening disputing claims that their client is politically biased.

The whistleblower “has never worked for or advised a political candidate, campaign, or party” and “has spent their entire government career in apolitical, civil servant positions in the Executive Branch,” they wrote.

They added that “in these positions our client has come into contact with presidential candidates from both parties in their roles as elected officials — not as candidates.”

Bakaj and Zaid also said the whistleblower “voluntarily provided relevant career information” to the inspector general of the intelligence community “in order to facilitate an assessment of the credibility of the complaint.” The inspector general, they noted, concluded that the complaint “was both urgent and credible.”

“Finally, the whistleblower is not the story,” they said. “To date, virtually every substantive allegation has been confirmed by other sources. For that reason the identity of the whistleblower is irrelevant.”

5 p.m.: Trump repeats ‘electric chair’ claim about Biden

In an exchange with reporters after an event at the White House on Wednesday afternoon, Trump repeated an unsubstantiated claim he made last month about Biden, arguing that if a Republican behaved in a manner similar to the former vice president, that person would “be getting the electric chair.”

“Here’s a man who is on tape saying exactly what he’s going to do, in terms of corruption,” Trump said. “And he gets away with it. If that ever happened to a Republican, they’d be getting the electric chair right now. They’d be right now being walked into the electric chair. It’s a whole different standard.”

Biden’s son Hunter served for nearly five years on the board of Burisma, Ukraine’s largest private gas company, whose owner came under scrutiny by Ukrainian prosecutors for possible abuse of power and unlawful enrichment. Hunter Biden was not accused of any wrongdoing in the investigation.

As vice president, Joe Biden had pressured Ukraine to fire the top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, whom Biden and other Western officials, including Republicans, accused of not sufficiently pursuing corruption cases. At the time, the investigation into Burisma was dormant, according to former Ukrainian and U.S. officials.

On Wednesday, Trump also went after Biden’s son personally, alluding to his struggles with drug addiction.

“His son, who is at best incompetent, who was thrown out of the Navy … don’t want to say why, but it’s a subject we just discussed,” Trump said. Trump had just spoken about opioids.

4:45 p.m.: Trump predicts his refusal to cooperate with inquiry will become a Supreme Court case

In his remarks at the White House, Trump said his refusal to answer House Democrats’ requests during the impeachment inquiry “probably ends up being a big Supreme Court case.”

The remarks suggest that Trump does not plan to back down on his demands that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) hold a House vote on starting an impeachment inquiry.

At the same event, Trump appeared to open the door to cooperating with House Democrats — if they meet certain conditions.

“We would, if they give us our rights,” he said.

Trump and Republicans have criticized Democrats for not holding a vote to formally open their impeachment inquiry. They have also taken aim at Democrats for hearing witness testimony behind closed doors, even though some, such as acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire, have testified publicly.

“It’s the most unfair situation people have seen,” Trump said, contending that Democrats “have eviscerated the rules.”

4:15 p.m.: Harris, Blumenthal call on Trump Cabinet members to preserve evidence

Democratic Sens. Kamala D. Harris (Calif.) and Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) sent a letter Wednesday to Trump’s Cabinet officials urging them to preserve evidence, protect whistleblowers and inspectors general and cooperate with “all ongoing and future investigations” into potential wrongdoing by the president.

Both Harris, who is running for president, and Blumenthal are former state attorneys general.

“The president has referred to the Intelligence Community whistleblowers as partisans and traitors, which is a clear attempt to intimidate them and additional whistleblowers from coming forward,” they said in the letter. “Just as whistleblowers should not be threatened by administration officials, inspectors general should not be interfered with or intimidated.”

3:35 p.m.: Graham threatens to call Volker to testify

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) said Wednesday afternoon that he will call former special U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker to testify unless House Democrats release a full transcript of Volker’s closed-door deposition last week.

“If House D’s refuse to release full transcript of Volker testimony as requested by Congressman Jordan, it will be an abuse of power,” Graham said in a tweet. He added: “If this continues, I will call Volker before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify publicly to ensure the full story is told.”

Following Volker’s 10-hour deposition last week, Democrats said the former envoy had provided sufficient evidence of a quid pro quo by Trump in which military aid to Ukraine would be released in exchange for an investigation into the Bidens.

But House Republicans, including Rep. Jim Jordan (Ohio), have contended that nothing Volker had said damaged the president and that there was no proof Trump had sought a quid pro quo. Jordan has in recent days ramped up his calls for Democrats to release Volker’s testimony.

3:20 p.m.: Hillary Clinton presses Trump, Barr on election integrity

Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton pressed Trump and Attorney General William P. Barr on election security after the release of a Senate Intelligence Committee report that delivered a sobering assessment about the weaknesses that Russian operatives exploited in the 2016 campaign.

“I’d love to hear how @realDonaldTrump and Secretary Barr are going to take steps to protect our elections in light of this bipartisan report on the attack on our election integrity,” Clinton tweeted.

The report said in blunt language that Russians worked to damage Clinton while bolstering Trump — and made clear that fresh rounds of interference are likely ahead of the 2020 vote.

3:10 p.m.: Trump campaign releases new ad attacking Biden and son Hunter

Within minutes of Biden’s scathing remarks about the president, Trump tweeted “Sleepy Joe Biden!” and embedded his campaign’s latest attack ad against the former vice president. The ad repeats Trump’s unfounded accusation that Biden had leaned on Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor to benefit his son Hunter, who was working for a Ukrainian gas company. The company had been investigated by the prosecutor.

The ad is part of an $8 million TV commercial push by the Trump camp, which is airing this and another anti-Biden ad nationally and in local markets in early primary states.

The ad also shows a montage of Democrats — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) and Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (Mich.) — as well as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and accuses them of wanting to overturn the 2016 election.

3 p.m.: Sen. Joni Ernst refuses to say whether it’s ‘appropriate’ to ask for foreign campaign help

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) wouldn’t answer a CNN reporter who repeatedly asked whether the senator thought it was appropriate for a president to ask a foreign leader to investigate a political opponent, eventually just walking away from the interview.

At first, Ernst said they’d need to wait until they see the information gathered by the Senate Intelligence panel. The reporter asked again whether the mere act of asking for such a favor was appropriate.

“We, again, we don’t have the facts in front of us. And what we see pushed out through the media, we don’t know what is accurate at this point,” Ernst said, according to footage of the exchange.

“I didn’t ask if it was accurate — I’m asking you if it’s appropriate for a president to ask a foreign power to investigate his domestic political rival. Yes or no?” the reporter asked for a third time.

Ernst again dodged the question. The reporter asked the senator if she wasn’t answering because she feared retribution. Ernst said, “no,” and repeated her talking points about waiting to go through the information “without media interdiction.”

When the reporter tried again to get Ernst to comment on whether Trump’s request of a foreign leader was appropriate, Ernst turned and walked away.

Last week at a town hall, Ernst struggled to answer a voter who asked her, “Where is the line?”

2 p.m.: Trump responds to Biden as he speaks in New Hampshire

Trump took to Twitter to respond to Biden on Wednesday as the former vice president called for his impeachment during a campaign appearance in Rochester, N.H.

“So pathetic to see Sleepy Joe Biden, who with his son, Hunter, and to the detriment of the American Taxpayer, has ripped off at least two countries for millions of dollars, calling for my impeachment — and I did nothing wrong,” Trump tweeted. “Joe’s Failing Campaign gave him no other choice!”

Trump was referring to business dealings by Hunter Biden in Ukraine and China during Biden’s tenure as vice president.

Biden soon responded in a tweet of his own.

“Thanks for watching,” he said. “Stop stonewalling the Congress. Honor your oath. Respect the Constitution. And speaking of taxpayers, I’ve released 21 years of my tax returns. You?”

1:45 p.m.: Biden delivers forceful denunciation of Trump’s actions: ‘He should be impeached’

In a fiery campaign speech in Rochester, N.H., Biden condemned Trump’s actions and declared that the president should be impeached.

Biden had previously used caveats when discussing whether Trump’s behavior merited impeachment. In his remarks Wednesday, he argued that the president is endangering national security, violating democratic norms and abusing his power to get reelected.

“He believes he can and will get away with anything he does,” Biden said. “We all laughed when he said he could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot someone and get away with it. It’s no joke. He’s shooting holes in the Constitution, and we cannot let him get away with it.”

Biden seized on Trump’s remarks outside the White House last week, where the president publicly urged China to investigate Biden and his son, Hunter. Trump did so “in the broad light of day,” Biden said.

“It was the third foreign power that we know of that he’s asked in clear, unmistakable language … to interfere” in U.S. democratic proceedings, Biden said, adding that Trump has made overtures to Russia and Ukraine as well.

The speech marked Biden’s most combative on the topic of Trump and foreign election interference.

“We believe Americans should decide Americans, period,” Biden said. “But Donald Trump will do anything to get reelected, including violating the most basic forms of democracy. It’s stunning, and it’s dangerous. … He has seen no limits to his power, regardless what the Constitution says.”

Biden also took aim at Trump for suggesting that the people who provided information to the whistleblower should be executed. “What president has ever used such language?” he asked.

And he criticized the president for continuing to decline to release his tax returns.

“And by the way, even Nixon released his taxes,” Biden said.

1:40 p.m.: Clinton email critics do a role reversal as Trump administration draws fire for private phone use

More than four years after a squad of House Republicans led a charge against Hillary Clinton for her handling of sensitive diplomatic information, the State Department is once again under scrutiny for how diplomats use personal phones to conduct official business.

But some of those same House lawmakers are now on the opposite side of the controversy, playing defense for U.S. diplomats.

On Tuesday, lawmakers said that Trump’s top envoys for Ukraine and the European Union used personal phones and an encrypted messenger app as they conducted U.S. policy on Ukraine, a matter that was revealed during House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

Read more here.

— John Hudson and Karoun Demirjian

12:30 p.m.: Trump understates public support for impeachment

In an early afternoon tweet, Trump significantly understated the public support for his impeachment found in recent polling.

“Only 25 percent want the President Impeached, which is pretty low considering the volume of Fake News coverage, but pretty high considering the fact that I did NOTHING wrong,” Trump tweeted. “It is all just a continuation of the greatest Scam and Witch Hunt in the history of our Country!”

Support for impeaching Trump and removing him from office has ranged from 43 percent to 48 percent in independent national polls released this week.

Trump did not point to a particular poll in his tweet, and a White House spokesman did not immediately respond to a question about the source of his information.

12:15 p.m.: Pelosi, House Democrats to hold conference call Friday

Pelosi will hold a conference call with House Democrats on Friday afternoon to deliver an update on the impeachment inquiry, according to two House Democratic aides.

The call comes days before lawmakers return to Washington from their two-week recess.

— Mike DeBonis

Noon: Republicans seize on Hillary Clinton interview

Republicans seized Wednesday on a television interview with Hillary Clinton to bolster their argument that Democrats are seeking to avenge her 2016 loss by targeting Trump for impeachment.

In the interview, which aired Tuesday on “PBS NewsHour,” Clinton was asked about a Trump tweet this week in which he suggested that “crooked Hillary Clinton” should enter the 2020 presidential race and referenced the past controversy over her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.

“So maybe there does need to be a rematch,” Clinton said, adding: “Obviously, I can beat him again.”

In a tweet Wednesday that included that clip, Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel wrote: “If there were any doubt that Democrats still refuse to accept they lost in 2016, here is Hillary Clinton herself claiming she beat @realDonaldTrump. She’s completely delusional.”

While Clinton received nearly 3 million more popular votes than Trump nationwide, Trump prevailed in the electoral college.

11:20 a.m.: Trump campaign manager says Democrats ‘trying to coup’ the president

Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale tweeted Wednesday that Democrats are “trying to coup” the president.

“This isn’t the fourth impeachment attempt in American History by Democrats,” Parscale tweeted. “It is the first COUP attempt in American History by Democrats! You can call what you want, but Democrats are trying to coup the most popular Republican president in history.”

10:40 a.m.: Revealing splits in GOP senators’ reactions to impeachment

If the House impeaches President Trump, it’s up to the Senate whether to remove him from office. Senators will hold a trial, and it would take 20 Republicans along with all Democrats to reach the constitutionally mandated two-thirds majority, or 67 votes, to remove him.

That is a long shot, given that Republicans in Congress have largely defended Trump in the face of allegations that he pressured Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son.

Still, some Republican senators want to know more about the whistleblower complaint that started all this. Others have rebuked Trump for soliciting political help from foreign leaders or withheld support for the impeachment inquiry pending more facts.

We’ve collected reactions from all 53 Republican senators. Read more here about what they have had to say.

— Adrian Blanco, Amber Phillips, Kate Rabinowitz, JM Rieger and Kevin Schaul

10:15 a.m.: Jordan says Democrats ‘continue to make the rules up as they go along’

In an appearance on Fox News, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) criticized Democrats for not holding a vote to open their impeachment inquiry into Trump.

“They continue to make the rules up as they go along,” said Jordan, who has been one of Trump’s most visible surrogates as the impeachment probe ramps up.

While Democrats have not held a vote on opening an inquiry, Jordan said that it appears likely that the House will eventually vote on articles of impeachment.

“In the end, on articles, it seems like they’re headed down that road,” he said.

Earlier Wednesday, Jordan tweeted in defense of Trump, arguing that “Democrats are so busy ‘striking while the iron is hot’ that they didn’t even have a vote to start their crazy impeachment proceedings!”

9:30 a.m.: Graham says he’s gathering GOP signatures for a letter to Pelosi

Graham said Wednesday that he is seeking Republican signatures for a letter to Pelosi contending that Trump’s July call with Zelensky does not amount to an impeachable offense.

Graham made his comments during an appearance on Fox News in which he called the House impeachment inquiry “a star-chamber process.”

“I’m going to ask my colleagues in the Senate, Republicans, to sign a letter to Nancy Pelosi saying we do not believe the transcript of the phone call between the president and the Ukraine is an impeachable offense,” Graham said.

If Trump is impeached by the Democratic-led House, a trial would be held in the Republican-led Senate to determine whether to remove him from office.

Graham also elaborated on his invitation to have Trump personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani testify in front of his Senate panel.

“He’s claiming to have a lot of evidence about corruption in the Ukraine that ties back to the Democrats that’s apart from what the House is looking at,” Graham said. “I think Rudy’s got a story to tell. I want him to tell it in my committee.”

9:05 a.m.: Hoyer says Trump ‘betrayed our nation,’ urges GOP to support inquiry

Hoyer, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, said Wednesday that Trump had ‘betrayed our nation’ in the Ukraine scandal.

Hoyer’s assessment came in a statement in response to the White House announcement Tuesday that it would not cooperate with the inquiry into Trump pressing Zelensky to investigate the Bidens.

“The letter sent by the White House yesterday is the latest example of this Administration’s efforts to stonewall an investigation into the President’s abuse of power and obstruct justice,” Hoyer said. “The evidence shows that the President betrayed our nation by encouraging foreign interference in our election, undermining our democracy and national security.”

Hoyer also urged House Republicans to work with Democrats on the impeachment inquiry.

“This is not an issue of party or politics — it is about our Constitution, the rule of law, and the security of our nation,” Hoyer said. “House Democrats will continue to pursue this inquiry with the seriousness and solemnity it deserves.”

8:20 a.m.: Trump calls for end of impeachment inquiry, says whistleblower should be ‘exposed’

Trump on Wednesday called for ending the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry, claiming that it was tainted by partisanship, amid tweets in which he lashed out in multiple directions.

“For the good of the Country, this Witch Hunt should end now!” Trump wrote, calling the inquiry a “scam.”

“The Do Nothing Democrats are Con Artists, only looking to hurt the Republican Party and President,” he wrote in another tweet. “Their total focus is 2020, nothing more, and nothing less. The good news is that WE WILL WIN!!!!”

In another tweet, Trump took aim at the anonymous U.S. intelligence official whose complaint sparked the impeachment inquiry, writing that the whistleblower “should be exposed and properly questioned.”

Trump also took fresh aim at Schiff, writing that he “should be Impeached for Fraud!”

Trump has taken issue with Schiff’s statement during a hearing in which he embellished Trump’s July call with the leader of Ukraine. Schiff later said that it was meant as a parody and that Trump should have realized that.

In an earlier tweet Wednesday, Giuliani also sought to paint the impeachment inquiry as “purely partisan,” saying it should be paid for by the Democratic National Committee.

6:15 a.m.: Eric Trump supports calling impeachment inquiry an ‘attempted coup’

One of President’s Trump’s sons, Eric Trump, took to Twitter on Wednesday morning to voice support for Fox News host Sean Hannity, who on Tuesday night told viewers he would no longer refer to the impeachment inquiry by that term because “it is not.”

“This is just the latest attempted coup of a duly elected president,” Hannity said on his prime-time show.

“@seanhannity is absolutely correct — This is not an impeachment inquiry, it is an ‘attempted coup,’” Eric Trump tweeted Wednesday morning.

6 a.m.: McConnell says impeachment inquiry has ‘fallen far short’ on fairness

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), whose chamber would determine whether to remove Trump from office if he is impeached, criticized the House inquiry Tuesday night, saying it has “fallen far short” on fairness.

“Overturning the results of an American election requires the highest level of fairness and due process, as it strikes at the core of our democratic process,” McConnell tweeted. “So far, the House has fallen far short by failing to follow the same basic procedures that it has followed for every other President in our history.”

Later Tuesday night, Trump retweeted McConnell’s assessment, adding in his own words: “The Greatest Witch Hunt in the history of the USA!”

5 a.m.: Trump ally on Fox News calls whistleblowers ‘suicide bombers,’ accuses Democrats of ‘regicide’

Former U.S. attorney Joseph E. diGenova turned to European history Tuesday night to describe the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into President Trump calling their efforts “regicide,” the act of killing a king.

“What you’re seeing is regicide,” diGenova, a frequent Trump defender, told Fox News host Laura Ingraham. “This is regicide by another name, fake impeachment. The Democrats in the House want to destroy the president.”

But diGenova, a conspiracy theorist Trump wanted on his legal team during the Russia probe, wasn’t finished. In a lengthy interview on “The Ingraham Angle,” the lawyer, who was joined by Giuliani, blasted the two anonymous whistleblowers as “suicide bombers” and accused Democrats of “sedition.”

The fiery rhetoric marks the latest escalation in language used by Trump’s supporters, and even the president himself, to complain about the ongoing impeachment inquiry.

Read more here.

— Allyson Chiu

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates/2019/10/09/d1bb38e0-e9f7-11e9-9c6d-436a0df4f31d_story.html