After weeks of pushing debunked conspiracies about wrongdoing by former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter in Ukraine, President Donald Trump publicly urged China Thursday to investigate unfounded allegations that the younger Biden received a “payoff.”

The invitation to the Chinese government, denounced by Democrats and excoriated by two Republican senators, mirrored the private behavior on which the House is partially basing their formal impeachment inquiry — using the office of the presidency to press a foreign leader to investigate a political rival. Trump has defended his actions in recent days by saying he has a right, even a duty, to root out “corruption” around the world.

But much like the president’s Ukraine conspiracy theories, the serious accusations that Trump and his allies, including personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, have leveled against the Bidens with regard to China are unsupported. All the details of Hunter Biden’s business dealings aren’t known, since he has always been a private citizen, but there’s no evidence of wrongdoing on behalf of either Biden. Trump and his allies has yet to offer evidence of the claims, while the former vice president has said the president is the one who is corrupt.

“This is not about me, it’s not about my son. There’s not a shred of evidence of anything that was wrong,” Joe Biden told reporters Friday after a campaign stop in Los Angeles.

Trump’s claims, and the facts

“China should start an investigation into the Bidens, because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine,” Trump told reporters Thursday outside the White House.

Building on the baseless claims that the former vice president — now a leading contender for the Democratic nomination in 2020 — corruptly used the power of his office to boost his son’s business interests in Ukraine, Trump began making similar unfounded allegations related to China.

Hunter Biden was “getting billions of dollars. You know what they call that? They call that a payoff,” Trump said, reiterating a claim that Biden’s son somehow benefited from a 2013 trip to China with his father.

At another point last week, Trump said: “Biden’s son walks out of China with $1.5 billion in a fund, and the biggest funds in the world can’t get money out of China, and he’s there for one quick meeting and he flies in on Air Force Two, I think that’s a horrible thing. I think it’s a horrible thing.”

This allegation has also been made by conservative author Peter Schweizer, who was behind the debunked claims that foreign governments paid off the Clintons through their eponymous foundation.

The New Yorker traced the details of Hunter Biden’s business dealings in a profile this summer, from launching his own consulting firm in 2008 — which was hired by universities and an energy company, according to Open Secrets — to talks in 2012 with an Chinese private equity investor, Jonathan Li, about launching a fund backed by Chinese capital.

That venture, BHR Partners, was formed a year later, in 2013; it earned big investments from state-controlled Chinese financial institutions. The $1.5 billion number appears to refer to a fundraising goal the company set in 2014.

But throughout this period, Hunter Biden worked as an unpaid board member, a spokesman for the younger Biden previously told NBC News. After his father left office, Hunter bought a 10 percent share in the company in 2017, for $420,000.

Much of the criticism has centered around Hunter’s presence on an official trip the vice president took to China — where Trump claims Hunter got a “payoff.”

In December 2013, then-Vice President Biden went to Beijing to meet with President Xi Jinping, bringing along one of his grandchildren — this time, Hunter’s daughter Finnegan — as he often did on international trips. Hunter Biden joined them on the trip, flying on Air Force Two.

As NBC News has previously reported, Hunter and daughter Finnegan joined the vice president for ice cream, gift shopping and a traditional tea ceremony during the trip. Several former White House officials who traveled with Biden on the trip told NBC News earlier this week that they didn’t know at the time that Hunter Biden had any business interests in China and were unaware of his private schedule while in Beijing. Hunter joined the vice president for some public events, following a private itinerary, presumably with his daughter, at other times during the trip.

During the weeklong trip, Hunter met with Li, his BHR partner, in what they have both described as a social visit. The New Yorker reported he also arranged for his father to meet and shake hands with Li in the lobby of a hotel.

“How do I go to Beijing, halfway around the world, and not see them for a cup of coffee?” Hunter told the magazine earlier this year.

A Chinese business license was issued by Shanghai authorities days after the trip, officially creating the fund in late 2013. The timing has raised eyebrows, though Hunter Biden’s spokesman, George Mesires, told NBC News previously that Hunter Biden wasn’t initially an “owner” of the company and has never gotten paid for serving on the board.

Biden and his son have both said they did not discuss Hunter’s overseas business dealings while he was vice president.

“I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,” Biden said last month. On Friday, he said he stood by that statement.

“There’s been no indication of any conflict of interest. In Ukraine or anywhere else, period. I’m not going to respond to that. Focus on this man, what he’s doing, that no president has ever done. No president,” Biden told reporters Friday in Los Angeles.

“The American people know me, and they know him. They know, even the people who support him know, this man lacks character. Even people who support him know he lies constantly,” the former vice president added.

Trump’s allegations and persistent attacks on the Bidens come as his own family members have been criticized for doing business with China while he is president.

His daughter, who serves in the White House as an adviser to the president, was awarded a large batch of trademarks in October 2018 amid trade war talks between her father and the country. In 2017, she was awarded new Chinese trademarks the same day she dined with the Chinese president.

A real estate company owned by the family of Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner tried to sell a troubled Manhattan real estate investment to a Chinese firm. Kushner’s sister also touted her ties to the White House when pitching Chinese investors in Beijing to invest in New Jersey.

The president, too, has been criticized for the many ways he is profiting from the presidency.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/trump-pushing-baseless-conspiracy-about-bidens-china-here-s-what-n1062551

He warned them that believing he will agree to an extension would be “a historic misunderstanding”…

Continue reading:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/…

Top court to decide if Boris Johnson can be jailed if UK crashes out of Europe without a deal on October 31:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/…

What did Jennifer Arcuri say about Boris Johnson on Good Morning Britain?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1008060…

From Brexit breaking news to HD movie trailers, The Sun newspaper brings you the latest news videos and explainers from the UK and around the world.

Become a Sun Subscriber and hit the bell to be the first to know

Read The Sun: http://www.thesun.co.uk
Like The Sun on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thesun/
Follow The Sun on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSun
Subscribe to The Sun on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/discover/The…

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUjx_qlfbmA

The United States began withdrawing American troops from Syria’s border with Turkey early Monday, in the clearest sign yet that the Trump administration was washing its hands of an explosive situation between the Turkish military and U.S.-allied Kurdish fighters.

The withdrawal followed a late Sunday statement by the White House that the United States would not intervene in a long-threatened Turkish offensive into northern Syria. The announcement, which signaled an abrupt end to a months-long American effort to broker peace between two important allies, came after a call between President Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. 

Erdogan said in a speech Monday that the withdrawal began soon after their phone call.

A U.S. official confirmed to The Washington Post that American troops had left observation posts in the border villages of Tel Abyad and Ras al-Ayn at 6:30 a.m. local time.

The fast moving developments threatened a fresh military conflagration in a large swath of northern Syria, stretching from east of the Euphrates River to the border with Iraq. Syrian Kurds had established an autonomous zone in the area during more than eight years of Syria’s civil war.

Ankara, however, has been increasingly unnerved by the Kurdish presence, and the close ties between U.S.-allied Syrian Kurdish fighters and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, a militant group that has fought a long insurgency against the Turkish state.

For months, Erdogan has been threatening an imminent invasion, as Trump administration officials attempted to work out an accommodation that would satisfy Turkish demands for border security while providing a measure of protection for the U.S.-allied Syrian-Kurdish force.

But on Sunday, the United States appeared to throw up its hands. White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said the Turkish leader would “soon be moving forward” with dispatching troops to battle the Kurdish forces, known as the Syrian Democratic Forces, or SDF. Ankara views the group as a terrorist-linked entity, but they have fought closely with the U.S. military as a primary partner against the Islamic State. 

“The United States armed forces will not support or be involved in the operation, and United States forces, having defeated the ISIS territorial ‘caliphate,’ will no longer be in the immediate area,” Grisham said in a statement. ISIS is another name for the Islamic State, the militant group whose rise drew the U.S. military into Syria. 

The SDF said the U.S. troops had already begun pulling out and criticized them for not fulfilling their obligations.

“The United States forces have not fulfilled their obligations and withdrew their forces from the border area with Turkey,” the statement said. “This Turkish military operation in north and east Syria will have a big negative impact on our war against Daesh and will destroy all stability that was reached in the last few years.” The statement used the Arabic acronym for ISIS. 

It added that the group reserved the right to defend itself against Turkish aggression.

Erdogan, who has portrayed a Turkish incursion as necessary to protect his country’s borders, has spoken in recent weeks of resettling millions of Syrian refugees in Turkey in a “safe zone” in northern Syria, a plan that has been criticized by refugee advocates as well as local Syrian Kurds who could be displaced by such a proposal.

On Saturday, Erdogan said the invasion, dubbed Operation Peace Fountain, could begin “as soon as today or maybe tomorrow.”

U.S. officials depicted the impending offensive, and the U.S. troop withdrawal, as a dramatic turn after their prolonged attempt to hammer out an arrangement that would allay the Turks’ concerns about Syrian Kurdish forces close to their border, while also averting a battle they fear will be bloody for Kurdish fighters who the Pentagon see as a stalwart ally. 

Military officials point out that Kurdish assistance is still required to avoid a return of the Islamic State in Syria and to guard facilities where Islamic State militants and their families are being held. 

 A senior U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an evolving situation, said the U.S. government “has no idea” what the Turkish operation would look like, whether it would be a small, symbolic incursion or a major offensive intended to push 30 or 40 kilometers into Syria. 

 U.S. officials said an operation deep into Syria could further jeopardize the security of ISIS prisons. “There are many potential disastrous outcomes to this,” the official said.

The White House announcement comes only two days after the Pentagon completed its most recent joint patrol with Turkish forces, a central element of the U.S. effort to build trust in northern Syria. But a series of similar patrols and other measures overseen from a joint U.S.-Turkish military hub in southern Turkey have not reduced Ankara’s impatience to establish the buffer zone it has envisioned. 

Speaking to reporters on Friday, Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper described ongoing U.S.-Turkish cooperation in northern Syria, saying that his Turkish counterpart had agreed in a call last week “that we need to make the security mechanism work.”

In negotiations, the United States had said it would agree to a strip along the border to be cleared of Syrian Kurdish fighters and jointly patrolled by the United States and Turkey on the ground and in the air. That strip is about five miles wide, only about a quarter of what the Turks have demanded.

The joint patrols are taking place in only about a third of the border length with the idea of gradually expanding them. In addition to not liking U.S. terms for the agreement, Erdogan believes the United States is dragging its feet in implementing it.

“Mr. Trump gave the order, he ordered to pull out. But this came late,” Erdogan told reporters in Ankara on Monday. “We cannot accept the threats of terrorist organizations.”

Erdogan’s plan to send up to 3 million Syrian refugees into the 140 mile-long strip is also counter to what the United States says was part of the agreement they had reached to allow only the 700,000 to 800,000 refugees who originally fled the area to resettle there. Turkey currently hosts more than 3.6 million Syrian refugees, but the government has recently begun deporting hundreds back to Syria as public sentiment turns against the migrants.

Ibrahim Kalin, a spokesman for Erdogan, wrote on Twitter that Turkey has no interest in occupying or changing the demographics in northeastern Syria and that the “safe zone” would serve two purposes: secure Turkey’s borders and allowing refugees to return home.

After months of warning about the turmoil such a move could have, U.S. officials said they are now watching Turkey’s actions closely to inform their own decisions about how quickly they must move the hundreds of troops expected to be affected. 

 “We’re gonna get out of the way,” another U.S. official said. 

There are about 1,000 U.S. troops in northeast Syria. 

The SDF also predicted that Islamic State fighters would break out of prison camps the SDF manages in different areas of Syria.

The potential for greater risk to Islamic State prisons and camps comes after months of unsuccessful efforts by the Trump administration to convince countries in Europe and elsewhere to repatriate their citizens.

The White House statement said that “Turkey will now be responsible for all ISIS fighters” in that area. “The United States will not hold them for what could be many years and great cost to the United States taxpayer,” Grisham said. 

Erdogan said on Monday that Turkey had “an approach to this issue” of ISIS, without specifying what it was.

The United Nations is also concerned about the impact any Turkish operation would have on the protection of civilians in northeast Syria, Panos Moumtzis, U.N. regional humanitarian coordinator for Syria, said in a telephone interview.

“We wanted our message to all governments and actors on the ground to make sure that this latest development does not have an impact first of all on a new displacement of people,” he said.

The U.N. already provides services to approximately 700,000 people every month in the northeast. Moumtzis emphasized the importance of freedom of movement of civilians, and ensuring the continuation of access to humanitarian groups. He stressed that any movement of Syrians must be done voluntarily and with safety and dignity.

“We have not had any specific instructions on [the safe zone],” he said, adding that the UN has a contingency plan depending on how wide and deep the safe zone would be.

The planned offensive comes amid already heightened U.S. tensions with its NATO ally Turkey, over Ankara’s plans to operate a sophisticated Russian air defense system. 

Fahim reported from Batman, Turkey. Sarah Dadouch in Beirut and Dan Lamothe contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-to-pull-troops-from-northern-syria-as-turkey-readies-offensive/2019/10/07/a965e466-e8b3-11e9-bafb-da248f8d5734_story.html

The Supreme Court justices, pictured in November 2018, start a new term on Monday.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

The Supreme Court justices, pictured in November 2018, start a new term on Monday.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

The Supreme Court may be anxious to portray itself as an apolitical institution. But this term, political questions writ large are knocking at the high court door.

The upcoming term will almost surely be a march to the right on almost every issue that is a flash point in American society. Among them: abortion, guns, gay rights, the separation of church and state, immigration and presidential power.

Also headed to the court are cases testing the power of Congress to get information from the executive branch and elsewhere, information that is relevant to congressional oversight and potentially, to impeachment.

Clearly, President Trump had something like that in mind when he said of the current impeachment inquiry, “It shouldn’t be allowed. There should be a way of stopping it, maybe legally through the courts.”

And if that isn’t enough, pending before the court is a sleeper case testing the very structure of our presidential election system.

The Supreme Court, by tradition, has tried to stay out of big controversies in an election year. But the justices, even if reticent, don’t always have control over their docket. When the lower courts are divided on major questions, the justices cannot always escape their responsibility to be the final decider.

Here are themes to watch:

Some justices are itching to play their conservative cards

The Supreme Court is a very different place since the 2018 retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, a centrist conservative, who often cast the deciding vote in closely contested cases. With President Trump’s appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh to replace him, hard-core conservatives now have a firm majority on the court. And some of them have been itching for quite some time to reverse Roe v. Wade, to expand gun rights, religious rights, and more.

If there is a new swing justice now, it likely will be Chief Justice John Roberts. But his swings to the left have been rare indeed — upholding Obamacare in 2012, and seven years later, repudiating the citizenship question on the census.

SCOTUSblog publisher Tom Goldstein calls the chief justice “a solid conservative vote.” The disagreement among the five justices on the right of the court, he adds, has been, “How fast do you move?”

Is the right to abortion going to be struck down?

The first place that disagreement could become apparent is on abortion, in a case that asks the court to essentially reverse a 2016 decision that struck down a Texas law making it very difficult for clinics that perform abortions to exist. And now the Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments in a case that presents a nearly identical law from Louisiana.

Goldstein, who frequently argues cases before the court, expects the conservative court majority to eventually reverse Roe v. Wade outright, or to hollow it out.

“It’s coming.” he says. “But nobody knows whether it’s in one year, five years, or maybe 10.”

Guns: a major test

At a time when voters seem to approve of more gun regulation, the court seems headed in the opposite direction. Before the court is the first major test of gun regulations in the more than 10 years since the justices ruled that there is a constitutional right to own a gun for self-defense in one’s home.

Court observers have long attributed the hiatus on gun cases to a closely divided court on which neither the four conservatives, nor the four liberals, were sure how Justice Kennedy would cast his deciding vote.

But now Kennedy is retired, replaced by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who as a lower court judge was an outspoken critic of gun regulations and a strong supporter of expansive gun rights.

How separate should church and state be?

Also before the court this term are major questions involving the separation of church and state. For generations, the court sought to erect a relatively high wall of separation. But that has begun to change, and religious rights advocates are poised to pounce.

“I actually can’t recall a time in the last 20 years where there were so many cases ready for decision” in this area of the law, says Mark Rienzi, president of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.

In particular Rienzi and others have set their sights on invalidating or undermining provisions in most state constitutions that bar direct or indirect aid to religious schools.

“The mood music at the court” is that the justices “would probably say that’s just discrimination on the basis of religion, and that’s forbidden by the federal Constitution,” says former Solicitor General Paul Clement.

Can an employer fire an employee because he is gay?

On another hot-button issue, the court will hear a case that tests whether employers are free to fire gay employees because of their sexual orientation, or trans employees because of their gender identity.

The 1964 Civil Rights Act bars discrimination in employment “because of sex.” The fired employees contend that that language protects them from such discharges. The employers argue that the law was never meant to cover gay or transgender employees.

A victory for the LGBTQ community would be “huge,” says Georgetown University Law professor Paul Smith, who notes that discrimination against gay and trans individuals remains “rampant,” especially in the private sector.

The Dreamers

Then too, there are a variety of immigration cases, the biggest being the Trump administration’s attempt to roll back the Obama administration program that continues to protect from deportation some 700,000-800,000 “Dreamers,” brought to the U.S. by their parents, without legal authorization, when they were children.

Presidential power and impeachment

Multiple cases are on “rocket ships headed towards the Supreme Court,” notes SCOTUSblog’s Goldstein. That, he says, is “because the president has been so aggressive in asserting his immunity from investigations,” whether they are criminal investigations, subpoenas for his financial records, or potentially records relating to the impeachment inquiry.

The court, as Goldstein observes, is going to “hate the idea” of tackling these cases in a presidential election year, but “they may not have a way out.”

Faithless electors, the Electoral College and the 2020 election

And finally, pending before the court is a case that could involve the 2020 election. It is a test of ” faithless elector” laws. These are laws passed in many states that impose penalties on Electoral College delegates or sometimes provide for the removal of electors who refuse to vote for the presidential candidate of their designated party.

The question is: Are these laws constitutional? The Supreme Court has never before weighed in on the issue.

There have been 167 faithless electors in the history of the United States, and in no case has the outcome of an election turned on the vote of these electors. But there is no guarantee that won’t happen in 2020.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/07/765091522/the-supreme-court-march-to-the-right-fast-and-furious-or-incremental

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

The US will not be involved in the operation, the White House said

The US will play no role in an imminent Turkish operation against Kurdish-led forces in north-eastern Syria, the White House has said, in a major shift.

Turkey wants to clear Kurdish militiamen – whom it regards as terrorists – away from the border.

The Turks would become responsible for all Islamic State (IS) group prisoners in the area, the US statement said.

Kurdish YPG fighters have until now received strong support from the US, which has hundreds of troops in Syria.

In January, President Trump threatened to “devastate Turkey economically” if it attacked Kurdish forces following a planned US pullout from Syria.

However, the White House statement issued on Sunday makes no reference to the YPG, which has played a leading role in defeating IS – also known as Isis – in Syria.

The statement follows a phone call between President Donald Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

It came a day after Mr Erdogan said the Turkish incursion would soon take place.

What did the White House say?

“Turkey will soon be moving forward with its long-planned operation into Northern Syria,” the statement said.

“The United States Armed Forces will not support or be involved in the operation, and United States forces, having defeated the ISIS territorial ‘Caliphate’, will no longer be in the immediate area.”

The White House statement also said that Turkey would take over all responsibility for Islamic State (IS) group fighters captured over the past two years.

“The United States government has pressed France, Germany, and other European nations, from which many captured ISIS fighters came, to take them back but they did not want them and refused.

“The United States will not hold them for what could be many years and great cost to the United States taxpayer.”

What’s the background?

During his phone call with Mr Trump, Mr Erdogan expressed frustration at a lack of progress in establishing a “safe zone” in north-eastern Syria along the border with Turkey, which the Nato allies had agreed in August.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Kurds in north-eastern Syria have been protesting against Mr Erdogan’s plan to set up the zone

The YPG was a major part of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), the US-supported force that defeated IS in Syria.

Turkey also wants to move up to two million Syrian refugees from its territory into the zone. Turkey currently hosts 3.6 million Syrians sheltering from the conflict.

Why does Turkey regard the YPG as terrorists?

Turkey considers the YPG an extension of the banned Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) which has fought for Kurdish autonomy in Turkey for three decades.

The YPG denies any direct organisational links to the PKK.

Turkey has previously condemned the US for supporting the YPG.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49956698

President Trump represents a traitorous threat to the security of the United States and shouldn’t be reelected next November, according to longshot 2020 GOP presidential candidate Joe Walsh.

Walsh, a former congresssman, went off on the president during a Sunday interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” saying Trump was “unfit” for the White House.

“I’m running against President Trump because he’s unfit and a clear and present danger to this country,” he told host Jake Tapper.  “There’s no way in hell I would vote for him in November. The election is about Trump, period.”

Trump hasn’t responded often to his Republican primary challengers, but in a tweet back in August, he called Walsh “a one-time BAD Congressman from Illinois who lost in his second term by a landslide, then failed in radio.”

SEN. RON JOHNSON: JAMES COMEY, JOHN BRENNAN HAVE CORRUPTED FBI AND CIA

Walsh called Trump a “traitor” earlier in the segment and said he would vote to impeach the commander-in-chief if he were still in Congress, following Trump’s call for China to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden. Walsh also said he didn’t think Trump was guilty of treason.

More from Media

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“This president betrayed his country again this week,” Walsh said. “Would I vote if I were in Congress on the [impeachment] inquiry?… He stood on the White House lawn… and told two additional foreign governments to interfere in our election. That alone is impeachable. This is a strong term I’m going to use, but I’m going to say it on purpose: Donald Trump is a traitor.

“Now, I know there’s a lot of talk about treason. Right? People on both sides… have been irresponsible using that word, treason,” he continued. “I’m not accusing this president of treason. Our founders were very specific as to what treason is. But, when you look at ‘traitor’ more broadly defined, this president betrayed our country again this week, and it’s not the first time he did it.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/joe-walsh-donald-trump-traitor-national-threat

‘):””},e.getDefinedParams=function(t,e){return e.filter(function(e){return t[e]}).reduce(function(e,n){return i(e,function(t,e,n){return e in t?Object.defineProperty(t,e,{value:n,enumerable:!0,configurable:!0,writable:!0}):t[e]=n,t}({},n,t[n]))},{})},e.isValidMediaTypes=function(t){var e=[“banner”,”native”,”video”];return!!Object.keys(t).every(function(t){return Z()(e,t)})&&(!t.video||!t.video.context||Z()([“instream”,”outstream”,”adpod”],t.video.context))},e.getBidderRequest=function(t,e,n){return J()(t,function(t){return 0n[t]?-1:0}};var H=n(3),G=n(88),K=n.n(G),$=n(11),J=n.n($),Y=n(9),Z=n.n(Y),Q=n(10),X=n(89),tt=n.n(X);n.d(e,”deepAccess”,function(){return tt.a});var et=n(90);n.d(e,”deepSetValue”,function(){return et.a});var nt,rt=n(4),it=”Array”,ot=”String”,at=”Function”,st=”Number”,ut=”Object”,ct=”Boolean”,ft=Object.prototype.toString,dt=Boolean(window.console),lt=Boolean(dt&&window.console.log),pt=Boolean(dt&&window.console.info),ht=Boolean(dt&&window.console.warn),gt=Boolean(dt&&window.console.error),vt={checkCookieSupport:V,createTrackPixelIframeHtml:B,getWindowSelf:h,getWindowTop:p,getAncestorOrigins:l,getTopFrameReferrer:d,getWindowLocation:g,getTopWindowLocation:f,insertUserSyncIframe:R,insertElement:C,isFn:w,triggerPixel:D,logError:m,logWarn:y,logMessage:v,logInfo:b},bt={},yt=function(t,e){return e}.bind(null,1,bt)()===bt?Function.prototype.bind:function(t){var e=this,n=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,1);return function(){return e.apply(t,n.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)))}},mt=(nt=0,function(){return++nt}),_t=function(){if(Array.prototype.indexOf)return Array.prototype.indexOf}(),Et=function(t,e){return t.hasOwnProperty?t.hasOwnProperty(e):void 0!==t[e]&&t.constructor.prototype[e]!==t[e]},St=z(“timeToRespond”,function(t,e){return eu;)r(s,n=e[u++])&&(~o(c,n)||c.push(n));return c}},143:function(t,e,n){var r=n(19).document;t.exports=r&&r.documentElement},144:function(t,e,n){var r=n(28),i=n(44),o=n(52)(“IE_PROTO”),a=Object.prototype;t.exports=Object.getPrototypeOf||function(t){return t=i(t),r(t,o)?t[o]:”function”==typeof t.constructor&&t instanceof t.constructor?t.constructor.prototype:t instanceof Object?a:null}},145:function(t,e,n){n(146);for(var r=n(19),i=n(21),o=n(30),a=n(14)(“toStringTag”),s=”CSSRuleList,CSSStyleDeclaration,CSSValueList,ClientRectList,DOMRectList,DOMStringList,DOMTokenList,DataTransferItemList,FileList,HTMLAllCollection,HTMLCollection,HTMLFormElement,HTMLSelectElement,MediaList,MimeTypeArray,NamedNodeMap,NodeList,PaintRequestList,Plugin,PluginArray,SVGLengthList,SVGNumberList,SVGPathSegList,SVGPointList,SVGStringList,SVGTransformList,SourceBufferList,StyleSheetList,TextTrackCueList,TextTrackList,TouchList”.split(“,”),u=0;u=t.length?(this._t=void 0,i(1)):i(0,”keys”==e?n:”values”==e?t[n]:[n,t[n]])},”values”),o.Arguments=o.Array,r(“keys”),r(“values”),r(“entries”)},147:function(t,e,n){“use strict”;var r=n(148),i=n(76);t.exports=n(150)(“Set”,function(t){return function(e){return t(this,0=y.syncsPerBidder?u.logWarn(‘Number of user syncs exceeded for “‘.concat(e,'”‘)):p.canBidderRegisterSync(t,e)?(h[t].push([e,n]),void(v=function(t,e){return t[e]?t[e]+=1:t[e]=1,t}(v,e))):u.logWarn(‘Bidder “‘.concat(e,'” not permitted to register their “‘).concat(t,'” userSync pixels.’)):u.logWarn(“Bidder is required for registering sync”):u.logWarn(‘User sync type “‘.concat(t,'” not supported’))},p.syncUsers=function(){var t=0t.getTimeout()+v.b.getConfig(“timeoutBuffer”)&&t.executeCallback(!0)}function a(t,e){var n=t.getBidRequests(),r=_()(n,function(t){return t.bidderCode===e.bidderCode});!function(t,e){var n;if(t.bidderCode&&(0n&&(e=!1)),!e}),e&&t.run(),e}function c(t,e){void 0===t[e]?t[e]=1:t[e]++}var d=this;p=I,u=Date.now();var b=T.makeBidRequests(z,u,H,K,q);w.logInfo(“Bids Requested for Auction with id: “.concat(H),b),b.forEach(function(t){!function(t){V=V.concat(t)}(t)});var y={};if(b.lengthe.max?t:e},{max:0}),a=s()(e.buckets,function(e){if(t>i.max*n){var o=e.precision;void 0===o&&(o=c),r=(e.max*n).toFixed(o)}else if(t=e.min*n)return e});return a&&(r=function(t,e,n){var r=void 0!==e.precision?e.precision:c,i=e.increment*n,o=e.min*n,a=Math.pow(10,r+2),s=(t*a-o*a)/(i*a),u=Math.floor(s)*i+o;return(u=Number(u.toFixed(10))).toFixed(r)}(t,a,n)),r}function o(t){if(u.isEmpty(t)||!t.buckets||!Array.isArray(t.buckets))return!1;var e=!0;return t.buckets.forEach(function(t){void 0!==t.min&&t.max&&t.increment||(e=!1)}),e}n.d(e,”a”,function(){return r}),n.d(e,”b”,function(){return o});var a=n(11),s=n.n(a),u=n(0),c=2,f={buckets:[{min:0,max:5,increment:.5}]},d={buckets:[{min:0,max:20,increment:.1}]},l={buckets:[{min:0,max:20,increment:.01}]},p={buckets:[{min:0,max:3,increment:.01},{min:3,max:8,increment:.05},{min:8,max:20,increment:.5}]},h={buckets:[{min:0,max:5,increment:.05},{min:5,max:10,increment:.1},{min:10,max:20,increment:.5}]}},42:function(t,e){t.exports=function(t,e){return{enumerable:!(1&t),configurable:!(2&t),writable:!(4&t),value:e}}},43:function(t,e,n){var r=n(24),i=n(56),o=n(44),a=n(34),s=n(83);t.exports=function(t,e){var n=1==t,u=2==t,c=3==t,f=4==t,d=6==t,l=5==t||d,p=e||s;return function(e,s,h){for(var g,v,b=o(e),y=i(b),m=r(s,h,3),_=a(y.length),E=0,S=n?p(e,_):u?p(e,0):void 0;E”):””;return’\n \n \n prebid.org wrapper\n \n “).concat(n,”\n \n \n \n “)}(t.vastUrl,t.vastImpUrl),ttlseconds:Number(t.ttl)};return”string”==typeof t.customCacheKey&&””!==t.customCacheKey&&(e.key=t.customCacheKey),e}e.b=function(t,e){var n={puts:t.map(r)};Object(i.a)(o.b.getConfig(“cache.url”),function(t){return{success:function(e){var n;try{n=JSON.parse(e).responses}catch(e){return void t(e,[])}n?t(null,n):t(new Error(“The cache server didn’t respond with a responses property.”),[])},error:function(e,n){t(new Error(“Error storing video ad in the cache: “.concat(e,”: “).concat(JSON.stringify(n))),[])}}}(e),JSON.stringify(n),{contentType:”text/plain”,withCredentials:!0})},e.a=function(t){return””.concat(o.b.getConfig(“cache.url”),”?uuid=”).concat(t)};var i=n(5),o=n(3)},63:function(t,e,n){“use strict”;function r(t){return(r=”function”==typeof Symbol&&”symbol”==_typeof(Symbol.iterator)?function(t){return void 0===t?”undefined”:_typeof(t)}:function(t){return t&&”function”==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?”symbol”:void 0===t?”undefined”:_typeof(t)})(t)}function i(){return(i=Object.assign||function(t){for(var e=1;e (eg mediaTypes.banner.sizes).”),t.sizes=n);if(e&&e.video){var i=e.video;if(i.playerSize)if(Array.isArray(i.playerSize)&&1===i.playerSize.length&&i.playerSize.every(function(t){return Object(f.isArrayOfNums)(t,2)}))t.sizes=i.playerSize;else if(Object(f.isArrayOfNums)(i.playerSize,2)){var o=[];o.push(i.playerSize),x.logInfo(“Transforming video.playerSize from [“.concat(i.playerSize,”] to [[“).concat(o,”]] so it’s in the proper format.”)),t.sizes=i.playerSize=o}else x.logError(“Detected incorrect configuration of mediaTypes.video.playerSize. Please specify only one set of dimensions in a format like: [[640, 480]]. Removing invalid mediaTypes.video.playerSize property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.video.playerSize}if(e&&e.native){var a=e.native;a.image&&a.image.sizes&&!Array.isArray(a.image.sizes)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.image.sizes field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.image.sizes property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.image.sizes),a.image&&a.image.aspect_ratios&&!Array.isArray(a.image.aspect_ratios)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.image.aspect_ratios field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.image.aspect_ratios property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.image.aspect_ratios),a.icon&&a.icon.sizes&&!Array.isArray(a.icon.sizes)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.icon.sizes field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.icon.sizes property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.icon.sizes)}}),t},”checkAdUnitSetup”);T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr=function(t){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr”,arguments),t){var e=T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCode(t);return x.transformAdServerTargetingObj(e)}x.logMessage(“Need to call getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr with adunitCode”)},T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCode=function(t){return T.getAdserverTargeting(t)[t]},T.getAdserverTargeting=function(t){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getAdserverTargeting”,arguments),v.b.getAllTargeting(t)},T.getNoBids=function(){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getNoBids”,arguments),a(“getNoBids”)},T.getBidResponses=function(){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getBidResponses”,arguments),a(“getBidsReceived”)},T.getBidResponsesForAdUnitCode=function(t){return{bids:g.a.getBidsReceived().filter(function(e){return e.adUnitCode===t})}},T.setTargetingForGPTAsync=function(t,e){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.setTargetingForGPTAsync”,arguments),Object(f.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var n=v.b.getAllTargeting(t);v.b.resetPresetTargeting(t),v.b.setTargetingForGPT(n,e),Object.keys(n).forEach(function(t){Object.keys(n[t]).forEach(function(e){“hb_adid”===e&&g.a.setStatusForBids(n[t][e],A.BID_STATUS.BID_TARGETING_SET)})}),O.emit(k,n)}else x.logError(“window.googletag is not defined on the page”)},T.setTargetingForAst=function(t){x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.setTargetingForAn”,arguments),v.b.isApntagDefined()?(v.b.setTargetingForAst(t),O.emit(k,v.b.getAllTargeting())):x.logError(“window.apntag is not defined on the page”)},T.renderAd=function(t,e){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.renderAd”,arguments),x.logMessage(“Calling renderAd with adId :”+e),t&&e)try{var n=g.a.findBidByAdId(e);if(n){n.status=A.BID_STATUS.RENDERED,n.ad=x.replaceAuctionPrice(n.ad,n.cpm),n.adUrl=x.replaceAuctionPrice(n.adUrl,n.cpm),g.a.addWinningBid(n),O.emit(R,n);var r=n.height,i=n.width,a=n.ad,u=n.mediaType,c=n.adUrl,f=n.renderer,d=document.createComment(“Creative “.concat(n.creativeId,” served by “).concat(n.bidder,” Prebid.js Header Bidding”));if(x.insertElement(d,t,”body”),Object(S.c)(f))Object(S.b)(f,n);else if(t===document&&!x.inIframe()||”video”===u){var l=”Error trying to write ad. Ad render call ad id “.concat(e,” was prevented from writing to the main document.”);s(N,l,n)}else if(a){if(navigator.userAgent&&-1Object(b.timestamp)()},C=function(t){return t&&(t.status&&!T()([x.BID_STATUS.BID_TARGETING_SET,x.BID_STATUS.RENDERED],t.status)||!t.status)},D=(h=_.a,v={},(g={}).setLatestAuctionForAdUnit=function(t,e){v[t]=e},g.resetPresetTargeting=function(t){if(Object(b.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var e=u(t),n=h.getAdUnits().filter(function(t){return T()(e,t.code)});window.googletag.pubads().getSlots().forEach(function(t){I.forEach(function(e){n.forEach(function(n){n.code!==t.getAdUnitPath()&&n.code!==t.getSlotElementId()||t.setTargeting(e,null)})})})}},g.resetPresetTargetingAST=function(t){u(t).forEach(function(t){var e=window.apntag.getTag(t);if(e&&e.keywords){var n=Object.keys(e.keywords),r={};n.forEach(function(t){T()(I,t.toLowerCase())||(r[t]=e.keywords[t])}),window.apntag.modifyTag(t,{keywords:r})}})},g.getAllTargeting=function(t){var e=1=e.length?{value:void 0,done:!0}:(t=r(e,n),this._i+=t.length,{value:t,done:!1})})},66:function(t,e,n){function r(){}var i=n(27),o=n(140),a=n(67),s=n(52)(“IE_PROTO”),u=”prototype”,c=function(){var t,e=n(55)(“iframe”),r=a.length;for(e.style.display=”none”,n(143).appendChild(e),e.src=”javascript:”,(t=e.contentWindow.document).open(),t.write(“

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/10/video-chuck-todd-slam-republican-senator-ron-johnson-fox-news-conspiracy.html

WASHINGTON — Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., defended President Donald Trump’s recent calls for China and Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden in a combative “Meet the Press” interview Sunday morning during which he accused Democrats and the media of trying to sabotage the Trump administration.

“Let me tell you why I’m pretty sympathetic with what President Trump has gone through,” Johnson said when asked about allegations of an effort by the president and his administration to link military aid for Ukraine to promises from the government there to investigate Biden and the origins of former special counsel Bob Mueller’s investigation into foreign interference in the 2016 election.

“I’ve never in my lifetime seen a president, after being elected, not having some measure of well wishes from his opponents. I’ve never seen a president’s administration be sabotaged from the day after the election.”

Johnson has emerged as a one of the key congressional figures in the debate over whether Trump’s request of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate unproven claims against Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, amounts to an abuse of power. That issue is central to the House Democratic impeachment inquiry.

As chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Johnson was a vocal supporter of that military aid to the country.

Text messages released Friday show State Department officials discussing a link between the administration’s goal of getting Ukraine to launch investigations and scheduling the Ukrainian president for an official White House visit.

But Johnson said that when a diplomat raised the prospect of a quid pro quo to him over the summer, he reached out to the president who “vehemently, adamantly” denied any link between the ask and the aid.

Instead, Johnson argued that Trump has a right to ask foreign governments to help America investigate the origins of the allegations that ultimately became central to Mueller’s investigation.

“I’m here to report today that, unlike the narrative of the press that President Trump wants to dig up dirt on his 2020 opponent, what he wants is an accounting of what happened in 2016. Who set him up? Did things spring from Ukraine?” Johnson said.

The combative interview prompted frustration from Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., who followed Johnson’s interview.

“Ron’s a good friend, but I’m deeply scared by the positioning that Republicans have chosen to take. That interview was just a giant green light to the president of the United States to continue to solicit foreign interference in U.S. elections,” he said.

“This is wild, the lengths to which Republicans are going to try to avoid being criticized by this president.”

And he pointed to those recently released texts to accuse the Trump administration of mixing diplomacy and official business.

“The texts make it clear that there was a quid pro quo on the table, that the State Department, the White House, the president’s personal lawyers were all working to get Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election in exchange for access to the White House and likely the resumption of aid,” he added.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/gop-sen-johnson-claims-trump-has-been-sabotaged-day-one-n1062986

Anti-government protesters set fires and close a street during a demonstration in Baghdad on Sunday after nearly a week of unrest throughout Iraq.

Khalid Mohammed/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Khalid Mohammed/AP

Anti-government protesters set fires and close a street during a demonstration in Baghdad on Sunday after nearly a week of unrest throughout Iraq.

Khalid Mohammed/AP

Iraqi authorities say at least seven more people were killed in clashes between protesters and police in eastern Baghdad on Sunday, bringing the death toll from nearly a week of anti-government rallies throughout Iraq to more than 100 with thousands of others injured.

Protesters, who took to the streets on Tuesday frustrated over joblessness and corruption, have been met with live ammunition from security forces attempting to break up the mass demonstrations that have convulsed Baghdad and parts of southern Iraq for days.

So far, 104 people have been killed and 6,107 have been wounded in the unrest, according to figures released by Iraqi security officials. More than 1,200 security members are among the injured.

Demanding better basic public services like electricity and water and renouncing corruption, a small group of protesters assembled seemingly spontaneously last week before being dispersed by security forces.

Then the protesters put out a call to re-converge on social media and the response took observers and government officials aback: Thousands of mostly young adults in their 20s, outraged over inadequate services and poor job prospects in the oil-rich country, came out to push for more opportunity and an end to corruption.

The Iraqi army and police have responded by firing live rounds, tear gas and rubber bullets into crowds. As protests spread to other parts of the country, the bloody clashes continued.

The six days of street demonstrations mark the most serious challenge Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi has faced since he assumed office last October. He has committed to meeting with protesters without armed forces to have a dialogue about their demands.

“I will go and meet them without weapons and sit with them for hours to listen to their demands,” Abdul-Mahdi said on Saturday in remarks on state television.

Anti-government protesters run for cover while Iraqi security forces fire live ammunition in the air during a demonstration in Baghdad on Sunday.

Khalid Mohammed/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Khalid Mohammed/AP

Anti-government protesters run for cover while Iraqi security forces fire live ammunition in the air during a demonstration in Baghdad on Sunday.

Khalid Mohammed/AP

Abdul-Mahdi announced a plan to pay out unemployment assistance and provide government-backed housing for low-income residents in an attempt to satisfy the demonstrators who have set buildings aflame and sparred with authorities.

The United Nations envoy for Iraq, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, took to Twitter on Saturday to denounce the violence, saying: “This must stop.”

“I call on all parties to pause and reflect. Those responsible for violence should be held to account. Let the spirit of unity prevail across Iraq,” wrote Hennis-Plasschaert.

Protesters called for top government officials to step down, as authorities cut of Internet service in Baghdad and across much of the country.

Demonstrators on Sunday also called for Iran to stop meddling in Iraqi politics.

Amid growing unrest, Marta Hurtado, a spokeswoman for the United Nations high commissioner for human rights, urged the Iraqi government to allow citizens to peacefully assembly and exercise their rights to freedom of expression without fear of a violent crackdown.

“The use of force should be exceptional, and assemblies should ordinarily be managed without resort to force,” Hurtado said in a statement.

All incidents in which security forces killed or injured protesters should be promptly and transparently investigated by the government, Hurtado said.

Hurtado also said reports that three journalists covering the protests were detained and the government cutting off Internet service were alarming and should be examined.

“Blanket internet shutdowns are likely to contravene freedom of expression, unduly restricting the right to receive and impart information and may exacerbate tensions,” she said.

NPR’s Daniel Estrin contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/06/767711133/more-than-100-killed-and-thousands-injured-in-anti-government-protests-in-iraq

The fire crew arrived just after 8 p.m. Saturday at the Old World Village’s German Restaurant, where an Oktoberfest celebration was in full swing. The restaurant owner, Bernie Bischof, led two firefighters to a patio area, which he’d cordoned off from patrons a few minutes earlier after smelling a strange odor emanating from an underground vault that held three transformers.

A week earlier, he’d heard unfamiliar noises coming from the vault.

As Bischof, two of his staff members and the firefighters approached the vault, an explosion tore off its 50-pound door and knocked them to the ground, said Jeff Lopez, a battalion chief for the Huntington Beach Fire Department.

“Our firefighters had to literally pick themselves up off the ground and figure out what was going on,” Lopez said Sunday morning. The explosion had thrown a burning material — believed to be mineral oil from inside the transformers — into the air, burning the firefighters, Bischof, a server and a security guard.

They scarcely had time to get up and realize what was happening when a second explosion rocked the Bavarian-style eatery “a minute or so later,” Lopez said.

The blasts shattered the beery euphoria of Oktoberfest and left many on Sunday wondering what caused them. It was the busiest weekend of the year for Bischof’s restaurant, which at the time of the explosion was filled with 1,000 people, or two-thirds the night’s expected turnout, said Dan Escamilla, a member of the restaurant’s management team who was tapped as its spokesman after the explosions.

Josef Bischof — Bernie Bischof’s father — came to the United States from Germany in 1952 and developed the enclave of Bavarian-style restaurants, shops and bars in Huntington Beach known as the Old World Village in the late 1970s, according to the village’s website and a 1986 Times article. Its inaugural Oktoberfest celebration was held in 1978.

Of the two firefighters and three civilians who were hospitalized Saturday night, all but one civilian had been released by Sunday, Lopez said. He declined to name the hospitalized civilian, citing privacy concerns. But Escamilla said the person was Bischof, who he said was in critical condition on Sunday at UCI Medical Center, having suffered second- and third-degree burns on 38% of his body.

After the explosions, Bischof ran out of the patio and into the restaurant, where two security guards wrapped him in a tablecloth to smother the flaming oil that clung to his arms, legs, flank and head, Escamilla said. The restaurant suffered no structural damage, and the fire in the patio area was extinguished within 10 minutes, he said.

Southern California Edison has replaced the three transformers that were within the restaurant’s vault, according to Robert Villegas, a company spokesman. An Edison crew initially had to wait on Saturday night to enter the vault because police were concerned the explosions may have been caused by criminal activity, Villagas said.

Those concerns weren’t borne out, however, and Edison was able to replace the transformers overnight and restore power by 9 a.m. Sunday to some 300 customers who were left without it overnight, Villegas said. About 1,700 Edison customers in all lost power for several hours after the explosions.

Edison has cataloged the damaged equipment and is investigating the explosions’ cause, which hasn’t been determined, Villegas said.

One of the transformers beneath the restaurant exploded in June 2010, according to Escamilla; the blast occurred early in the morning and no one was injured, he said. The transformers were making “strange noises” as recently as a week ago, which Bischof had asked Edison to look into, Escamilla said.

“Edison sent someone to check and they signed off on it,” he said. “Edison dropped the ball on this, simply put.”

Villegas, the Edison spokesman, said the company is still gathering maintenance records for the transformers and had no immediate comment.

Lopez, the fire chief, said the strange odor that prompted the restaurant’s staff to call the fire department was likely mineral oil overheating inside the transformers. He credited the staff for clearing the area of patrons, which he said limited the number of injuries to a handful.

“On a Saturday night, especially an Oktoberfest night, there’s a lot of people in that restaurant,” Lopez said. “It could’ve been a lot worse.”

Three-and-a-half hours before the transformers exploded, Escamilla said, a family was celebrating a 1-year-old’s birthday at a long table “two feet from the vault.”

“I have no doubt that if Bernie hadn’t cleared the area when he noticed the smell, people would’ve lost their lives,” Escamilla said. “There would have been 30 to 40 people in that area if he had not done that.”

He described the evacuation of patrons as “fast and orderly,” in large part because there had been an active shooter threat directed on Thursday at a movie theater screening “Joker” a few blocks from the Old World Village.

“We were already on high alert,” Escamilla said.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-10-06/oktoberfest-huntington-beach-transformer-blast-injured

Image copyright
Reuters

The EU will decide at the end of the week whether a Brexit deal is going to be possible, French President Emmanuel Macron has told Boris Johnson.

He said talks should proceed swiftly in coming days to see if anything can be agreed that “respects” EU principles.

Mr Johnson, who set out his proposals last week, says the EU should not be “lured” into thinking there will be a delay to Brexit on 31 October.

However, a law requires him to request one if no deal is agreed by 19 October.

As part of a weekend talking to EU leaders, the UK prime minister told Mr Macron over the phone that he believes a deal can be achieved, but that the EU must match compromises made by the UK.

An Elysee official said: “The President told [Mr Johnson] that the negotiations should continue swiftly with Michel Barnier’s team in coming days, in order to evaluate at the end of the week whether a deal is possible that respects European Union principles.”

The comments come ahead of a crunch few days of negotiations as both parties try to find a new agreement in time for a summit of European leaders on 17 and 18 October.

On Monday, Mr Johnson’s Europe adviser, David Frost, will hold further discussions with the European Commission, while Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay will visit EU capitals.

Arrangements for preventing a hard border on the island of Ireland continue to be a sticking point, with the EU calling for “fundamental changes” to the UK’s latest proposals.

A senior Number 10 source said: “The UK has made a big, important offer but it’s time for the Commission to show a willingness to compromise too. If not the UK will leave with no deal.”

Under the Benn Act, passed last month, the prime minister must write to the EU requesting a Brexit extension if no deal is signed off by Parliament by 19 October, unless MPs agree to a no-deal Brexit.

Government papers submitted to a Scottish court said that Mr Johnson will comply, despite his assertion that there will be “no more dither or delay”.

The No 10 source called the legislation a “surrender act” and said its authors were “undermining negotiations”.

“If EU leaders are betting that it will prevent no deal, that would be a historic misunderstanding,” they said.

Analysis

By Iain Watson, political correspondent

It’s good to talk.

But was there a meeting of minds between the prime minister and the French president?

Boris Johnson’s aim was to disavow President Macron of any suspicion that parliament simply wouldn’t allow the UK to leave the EU at the end of the month without a deal.

So this really could be the ‘final opportunity’ to seal one.

The prime minister will deliver a similar message to other EU leaders.

So far, though, Mr Johnson’s proposals are yet to open the door to more intensive negotiations.

From the Elysee Palace’s account of the call, Macron’s message to the PM seemed to be: First, work through the EU negotiator, Michel Barnier – don’t work on individual leaders.

And second, if you don’t move a bit more towards the EU’s position by the end of the week, then it’s no deal.

So far, then, any talks seem to resemble the denouement of Reservoir Dogs – more stand-off than mutual understanding.

Mr Johnson has claimed his plans have gained support in Parliament.

Writing in the Sun on Sunday and the Sunday Express, he said his untested plan to use technology to eliminate customs border checks would take the UK out of EU trade rules while respecting the Northern Ireland peace process.

“I say to our European friends: grasp the opportunity our new proposal provides. Join us at the negotiating table in a spirit of compromise and co-operation,” he said.

He claimed MPs from “every wing of the Conservative Party”, Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party and from Labour have said “our proposed deal looks like one they can get behind”.

Earlier, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said he believed a deal was possible but said the current proposals could not yet “form the basis for deeper negotiations”.

Meanwhile, speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay said talks were under way with Labour and other opposition MPs aimed at securing their support for a new deal.

He said ministers were “considering” the idea of putting the PM’s proposals to a vote in Parliament to test support for them ahead of the EU summit.

What are the PM’s border plans?

Under Mr Johnson’s proposals, which he calls a “broad landing zone” for a new deal with the EU:

  • Northern Ireland would leave the EU’s customs union alongside the rest of the UK, at the start of 2021
  • But Northern Ireland would continue to apply EU legislation relating to agricultural and other products, if the Northern Ireland Assembly approves
  • This arrangement could, in theory, continue indefinitely, but the consent of Northern Ireland’s politicians would have to be sought every four years
  • Customs checks on goods traded between the UK and EU would be “decentralised”, with paperwork submitted electronically and only a “very small number” of physical checks
  • These checks should take place away from the border itself, at business premises or at “other points in the supply chain”

Also on the Andrew Marr show, Shadow Attorney General Shami Chakrabarti said the prime minister “speaks with forked tongue” on the possibility of asking for an extension, adding he “seems to think he is above the law”.

She insisted there were no loopholes in the legislation, adding that the conditions under which the PM must ask for another Brexit delay were “explicit and specific”.

Media captionConfused by Brexit jargon? Reality Check unpacks the basics.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49953914

Republican Rep. Chris StewartChristopher (Chris) Douglas StewartSunday shows preview: Republicans on defense as new reports emerge on impeachment Five notable moments from the whistleblower complaint hearing GOP lawmaker: ‘A lot’ in the whistleblower complaint is ‘concerning’ MORE (Utah), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, on Sunday dismissed the potential implications of a second whistleblower coming forward with allegations related to President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump criticizes supposed second whistleblower North Korea missile test raises fears of new capabilities Window narrows for Trump trade deals MORE‘s dealings with Ukraine. 

Asked on “Fox News Sunday” whether he was concerned about the development, the congressman replied, “Well, actually, not at all.”

“One of our concerns has always been there hasn’t been firsthand knowledge of this. The first whistleblower, virtually everything he accused was second and thirdhand knowledge,” Stewart said, before arguing that a new whistleblower would only confirm what the public already knows about Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. 

“Why should I care at all what his perspective, or is opinion or judgment, of this transcript is? You and I can read it,” Stewart added, referring to a publicly disclosed White House memorandum of the leaders’ conversation. 

Fox News host Chris WallaceChristopher (Chris) WallaceBiden campaign demands news channels stop booking Giuliani Trump allies go on the offensive against whistleblower complaint, Democrats Sunday shows — Impeachment grips Washington MORE responded by noting that the original whistleblower complaint included broad accusations about Trump’s effort to pressure Ukraine into investigating 2020 presidential candidate Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump criticizes supposed second whistleblower North Korea missile test raises fears of new capabilities Trump told House Republicans that he made Ukraine call because of Perry: Report MORE and his son, Hunter Biden, over unfounded allegations of corruption. 

“It wasn’t just this phone call. There was a whole campaign before the phone call and, even more intensely, after the phone call involving the president’s lawyer, Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiDefense chief on Ukraine: ‘My aim is to keep the department apolitical’ Trump slams ‘ass’ Romney for criticizing Ukraine dealings Trump lawyer Giuliani tells Fox his mission is ‘to disrupt the world’ MORE, to link support for the Ukrainian regime, even military aid, to an investigation of Joe Biden,” Wallace said. 

Stewart pushed back, asserting that the White House’s rough transcript showed no evidence of Trump linking an investigation of the Bidens to Ukraine’s military aid.

“He doesn’t ever offer a quid pro quo. He talks about one thing: ‘We want to investigate corruption,’ and I think that’s a reasonable thing to ask,” he said. 

The dismissive comments from Stewart came the same morning an attorney representing the original whistleblower confirmed that another unidentified intelligence official had spoken with Michael Atkinson, the head of the intelligence community’s internal watchdog office. 

Mark Zaid, who is representing the second whistleblower, told ABC News that the official had firsthand knowledge of some of the allegations included in the original complaint, which contributed to the House launching a formal impeachment inquiry into the president. 

The complaint, which was declassified last month, accuses Trump of “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign government in the 2020 U.S. election.” 

A White House memo of Trump’s call with Zelensky confirmed several key components of the complaint, including the details of the president’s July 25 phone conversation with the Ukrainian leader. During the call, Trump asked for a “favor” after Zelensky brought up U.S. military assistance. 

Trump also encouraged the Ukrainian leader to work with Giuliani and Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrHouse Democrats subpoena White House for Ukraine documents Hillicon Valley: Iranian hacking operation targeted campaign, government accounts | House panel pushes Zuckerberg to testify on Libra | Trump officials step up attacks on Facebook encryption Cornyn makes waves with tweet about Justice investigating Biden MORE to investigate the Biden family. 

Trump has repeatedly lambasted the whistleblower’s credibility, and he has gone so far as to suggest that they are a “spy.” He’s also denied accusations of wrongdoing, arguing that his phone call with Zelensky was “perfect.”

“The first so-called second hand information ‘Whistleblower’ got my phone conversation almost completely wrong, so now word is they are going to the bench and another ‘Whistleblower’ is coming in from the Deep State,” Trump tweeted on Saturday. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/464566-house-gop-intel-member-why-should-i-care-about-another-trump-whistleblower

The questionable actions of former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and former CIA director John Brennan have made it impossible for Americans to trust the country’s intelligence apparatuses and created a sense of extreme skepticism, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said during an interview that aired Sunday.

Johnson appeared on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” and got into a heated debate with host Chuck Todd over House Democrats‘ impeachment efforts and various intelligence community abuses. The GOP senator said there still were unanswered questions when asked if he thought Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

“They absolutely did,” Johnson replied. “I don’t know to what extent the Ukrainians did. I don’t know to what extent the DNC [Democratic National Committee] and the Hillary Clinton campaign were involved in… juicing up the Ukrainian involvement, as well. There are a lot of unanswered questions… Chuck, I just want the truth. The American people want the truth.”

LEWANDOWSKI SLAMS CNN’S DOUBLE STANDARD ON TRUTH: ‘THEY EMPLOY ANDY MCCABE’

“Do you not trust the FBI — you don’t trust the CIA?” Todd shot back.

“No, no, I don’t,” Johnson stated. “Absolutely not. After [former FBI Agent] Peter Strzok and [attorney] Lisa Page? After James Comey, John Brennan, no, I don’t trust any of these guys in the Obama administration.”

Todd continued to press Johnson and asked if he trusted the current operatives within the intelligence community, and Johnson rattled off a list of those he thought to be corrupt.

More from Media

“I don’t trust Andrew McCabe. I don’t trust James Comey. I don’t trust Peter Strzok. I don’t trust John Brennan,” he replied.

They both switched gears to media bias after Johnson claimed the media were twisting the facts, while Todd argued that trashing the media was simply a tactic to avoid answering tough questions.

“You started the piece with something incredibly biased that I would never be able to get the truth out,” Johnson said.

DEMOCRATS ARE ‘PANICKING’ AS ILLEGAL SPYING IS SET TO BE REVEALED, SAYS DAN BONGINO

“Senator, I don’t know why you just came on here to personally attack the press and avoid answering questions about what’s happened here,” Todd replied. “Senator, it’s pretty clear, we’re only dealing with the facts that we have, not the facts as you wish them to be.”

He added, “You’re making a choice not to believe the investigations that have taken place, multiple.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Johnson claimed the media wanted to deal only in half-truths for political reasons and weren’t interested in hearing all the facts.

“I’m trying to get to the truth. I want to look at the entire truth, Chuck,” Johnson said. “The media doesn’t.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/ron-johnson-james-comey-john-brennan-fbi-cia-trust

Four people were killed and five others injured in a shooting at a bar in Kansas City, Kan., early Sunday morning. The shooters were armed with handguns when they fled the scene, according to police.

Ed Zurga/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Ed Zurga/Getty Images

Four people were killed and five others injured in a shooting at a bar in Kansas City, Kan., early Sunday morning. The shooters were armed with handguns when they fled the scene, according to police.

Ed Zurga/Getty Images

Four people were killed and five others were injured during a shooting early Sunday morning at a bar in Kansas City, Kan.

The five people who were wounded suffered non-life-threatening injuries and were taken to local hospitals, according to a statement by the Kansas City police department.

Police spokesman Thomas Tomasic said a call came in around 1:27 a.m. about a shooting in the area around 10th Street and Central Avenue. Tomasic said that when officers arrived at the Tequila KC bar, they found four people dead inside.

Police said the shooters were armed with handguns.

Authorities say they are now looking for two male suspects. In a statement, the department said that “a preliminary investigation suggests that an earlier dispute occurred inside the bar which lead to the shooting incident.”

The four killed were all Hispanic men, ranging in age from mid-20s to late 50s, according to a CNN report.

Police said that although the investigation is still in its early stages, they do not believe the shooting was racially motivated, according to The Washington Post.

David Alvey, the mayor of Kansas City, spoke to reporters on Sunday and said his prayers were with the victims.

“It’s a sad day for all those involved,” Alvey said. “The businesses and families who live in these neighborhoods are growing our community … They deserve to feel safe in their neighborhoods and businesses and deserve to be protected.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/06/767690408/4-dead-5-wounded-in-bar-shooting-in-kansas-city-kan

“We’re sort of sitting here watching the information flow out of the White House, damning information, facts that are undisputed,” Mr. Himes said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “What’s happening is that people around the president, professionals, who are in the Oval Office, who are in the Situation Room, are watching what is happening and are finally saying, ‘my God, this cannot happen anymore,’ and they are coming forward.”

The intelligence panel is still working with the first whistle-blower and the director of national intelligence to arrange a private interview. With information evolving unusually quickly, few senior congressional Republicans or White House officials have been willing to step out publicly to defend Mr. Trump’s actions. The White House, which has been riven internally about how to handle impeachment proceedings, with no one clearly in charge, did not have any senior officials making the case to defend Mr. Trump on Sunday.

And those congressional allies who did make public comments on Sunday either focused on attacking Democrats’ handling of the case or said they would reserve judgment until they saw more facts.

Senator Roy Blunt, Republican of Missouri and a key member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he was interested to learn more about the new whistle-blower and offered no defense of Mr. Trump’s actions toward Ukraine. Instead, he said he first wanted to see the results of the Senate’s bipartisan investigation of the matter before making a judgment.

“You have to assume if it is essentially a partisan vote in the House, that that sets the stage for likely the same kind of vote in the Senate,” Mr. Blunt said on CBS. “But let’s see what the facts are.”

Others were more squarely behind the president.

Representative Chris Stewart, Republican of Utah and a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said on “Fox News Sunday” that he was “not at all” concerned by the emergence of another whistle-blower because he had already seen a transcript of Mr. Trump’s July call with Ukraine’s president that, in his view, was not problematic.

On ABC’s “This Week,” Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, one of Mr. Trump’s most steadfast defenders, said the president was merely interested in rooting out legitimate accusations of corruption and that Democrats were unfairly vilifying him for it.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/06/us/politics/second-whistleblower-trump-ukraine.html

President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump criticizes supposed second whistleblower North Korea missile test raises fears of new capabilities Window narrows for Trump trade deals MORE on Saturday took aim at a second unnamed intelligence official who is reportedly considering filing a complaint against him and testifying before Congress about Trump’s contacts with Ukraine’s president.

Trump tweeted that the official, whose identity remains a secret, is a member of the “Deep State” he has argued is working to undermine his presidency.

“The first so-called second hand information ‘Whistleblower’ got my phone conversation almost completely wrong, so now word is they are going to the bench and another ‘Whistleblower’ is coming in from the Deep State, also with second hand info. Meet with Shifty. Keep them coming!” Trump tweeted.

Trump’s mention of “Shifty” Rep. Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffTrump criticizes supposed second whistleblower Collins: Trump’s call for China to probe Biden ‘completely inappropriate’ Trump accuses Democrats of ‘interfering’ with 2020 election and ‘continuing to interfere’ with 2016 MORE (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, appeared to be a reference to Republican efforts to discredit House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry as well as the first whistleblower who raised concerns about Trump’s conversations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Republicans have argued that the first whistleblower, who met with a member of Schiff’s congressional staff before filing a complaint, is a partisan operative who did not have firsthand knowledge of Trump’s conversations.

Democrats argue that a readout of Trump’s July phone call with Zelensky, during which he repeatedly asked the Ukrainian leader to open an investigation into former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump criticizes supposed second whistleblower North Korea missile test raises fears of new capabilities Trump told House Republicans that he made Ukraine call because of Perry: Report MORE, proved the whistleblower’s concerns to be true.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/464524-trump-criticizes-supposed-second-whistleblower

Two firefighters and two civilians were injured Saturday after an electrical explosion at California’s Oktoberfest.

Attendees of the Oktoberfest celebration in Huntington Beach called the fire department after lights began flickering around 8 p.m. Saturday, the city’s fire department said in a statement.

An explosion at an Oktoberfest celebration in Huntington Beach, Calif., on Oct. 5, 2019.kylen1972 via Twitter

After firefighters arrived, they were pointed to a vault which was believed to be the source of the electrical issues. When the firefighters opened the vault, the first explosion occurred. Shortly after, there were two more explosions, shooting flames into the air, according to NBC Los Angeles.

Images from the scene show attendees in traditional German attire evacuating and flames shooting up tens of feet high.

At least two firefighters left the Oktoberfest celebration on stretchers, according to NBC Los Angeles, but the injuries suffered by both the firefighters and the civilians were minor.

Huntington Beach’s Oktoberfest fest, an American version of the famous German event, lasts for two months and is at Old World Huntington Beach, an “old world European” style dining, shopping, and entertainment complex.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/2-firefighters-2-civilians-injured-california-oktoberfest-explosion-n1063001

False accounts pedaled by members of President Trump’s inner circle threatened to poison U.S.-Ukrainian relations this year and gave Trump a cover for suspending military aid, a top advisor to Ukraine’s president said in his first interview with a U.S. news outlet.

“The fact is that some American politicians were not informed in the right degree about what is going on here,” Andriy Yermak said Saturday in an interview with the Los Angeles Times.

“This is both our problem and their problem,” said Yermak, who is a top advisor and longtime friend of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

“Clearly, over the years,” he added, “President Trump had developed a negative impression of Ukraine, which was not what we wanted.”

Yermak said he spent weeks this summer attempting to change U.S. officials’ decision to suspend a military aid package to Ukraine and was dismayed that the country had been dragged into Washington’s political fights and Trump’s possible impeachment.

Yermak chose his words carefully to avoid overt criticism of Trump advisors. But he clearly communicated a sense of betrayal and a hope that damage to Ukraine, which has depended on U.S. and European help against Russia, would be temporary.

Yermak was asked if he could trust the U.S. under Trump after all that had transpired in recent weeks, and a lengthy pause followed.

“We are pragmatic,” he said.

Ukraine’s relations with the United States have been favorable in the decades since it left the Soviet Union, turned to the West and stood up as a bulwark against Russia. The U.S. has provided military assistance that has helped Kyiv in its continued battle with Russian-backed groups that are trying to carve away parts of eastern Ukraine.

The hostile treatment by the Trump administration unnerved Zelensky’s government, which came into office five months ago and is still finding its footing.

Yermak has served as point man for connecting Zelensky with Trump through Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, whom Yermak met and spoke with several times in the months after Zelensky took office in the spring.

Yermak also helped broker the July 25 telephone call between Trump and Zelensky that now sits at the center of the impeachment inquiry.

On the call, when Zelensky asked about military aid, Trump responded, “I would like you to do us a favor though,” according to the account of the call released by the White House. He went on to press the Ukrainian leader to look at unsubstantiated allegations against former Vice President Joe Biden and his son as well as other false claims about Ukrainian involvement in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign.

Those comments reflected allegations being promoted by Giuliani and fed by a former Ukrainian general prosecutor, Yuri Lutsenko.

Lutsenko suggested to Giuliani and others that there was evidence to suggest Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 election and illicit enrichment by the Bidens. He never supplied evidence and recently recanted the claims.

Determined to reverse the tide of Kyiv becoming isolated, Yermak exchanged text messages with U.S. diplomats from July through September aimed at setting up a meeting between Trump and Zelensky.

Some of the texts with Yermak and among the U.S. diplomats were released publicly by the House Intelligence Committee late Thursday. In them, U.S. officials pressed for a public commitment from Zelensky to open investigations into Biden and others.

“I think potus really wants the deliverable,” one of the diplomats wrote, using the acronym for president of the United States.

“I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign,” wrote another of the diplomats, Bill Taylor, who was serving as the acting head of the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv.

Several days after the July 25 phone call between the two presidents, Kurt Volker, the administration’s special envoy to Ukraine, urged Yermak to draft a public statement that Zelensky could release to secure a White House meeting.

“Once we have a date” for a Trump-Zelensky meeting “we call a press briefing, announcing upcoming visit and outlining vision for the reboot of US-Ukraine relationship, including among other things Burisma and election meddling investigations,” Yermak wrote in response. Burisima is a gas company on whose board Biden’s son, Hunter, served.

“Sounds great!” Volker replied.

Volker resigned as envoy after he was named in the impeachment inquiry. He gave a deposition to the House Intelligence Committee last week in which he provided the text messages.

Pressure, meanwhile, was coming from other administration officials throughout the summer.

Zelensky and Yermak met with Trump’s former national security advisor, John Bolton, in Kyiv on Aug. 26; with Vice President Mike Pence in Warsaw on Aug. 31; and with Energy Secretary Rick Perry in mid-May. In all the meetings, the U.S. officials pressed the Ukrainians on corruption investigations, and the Ukrainians sought answers about why aid had been suspended. It is not clear whether Biden’s name specifically came up during those sessions.

In the interview, Yermak echoed Zelensky in saying Kyiv would resist outside pressure but added that much of what was being demanded of them, such as fighting corruption and reviewing past judicial cases, were things they would have done anyway.

He expressed dismay that Giuliani and other U.S. officials appeared to be woefully ignorant of Ukraine, basing their estimations on what he contended was the earlier government of Petro Poroshenko, which made advances in judicial reform but also faced corruption allegations.

“It is not a secret for us that the true information about Ukraine and U.S.-Ukraine relations left much to be desired,” he said.

After several telephone calls with Giuliani, which were arranged by Volker, Yermak met the former New York mayor in Madrid in early August. Giuliani had recently said in television appearances that the new Ukraine government led by Zelensky was full of “enemies of America.”

Ukrainian officials were stunned by that characterization. Yermak said he felt he had to speak to the lawyer personally both to dispel that notion and open a path to seeing Trump.

“I understood this was not an anybody, this was an opinion-maker,” he said of Giuliani.

Yermak says one of the government’s priority tasks now is to repair relations both with Washington and European capitals. The White House memorandum of Trump’s call with Zelensky quoted the Ukrainian as criticizing European leaders as he sought to flatter Trump.

Support from France and Germany are critical as Ukraine tries to negotiate an end to the war with the Russian-backed separatists.

After the call with Zelensky, Trump did release the nearly $400-million military aid package, and Yermak says his government has received assurances it will continue to flow.

“We made clear, however, that we want more,” he said.

As for his relationship with Giuliani, Yermak sent a note of thanks to the lawyer on social media. Giuliani responded in kind,but included Yermak’s cellphone number on the message – visible to millions of people. The calls flooded in.

Special correspondent Sergei L. Loiko contributed from Kiev.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-10-06/ukrainian-official-false-stories-threatened-us-ukraine-relations

Tunis, Tunisia – Polls have closed in Tunisia where nearly seven million people were eligible to vote in the country’s parliamentary election, a legislative race expected to end with no clear winner.

Voting began on Sunday at 8am local time (07:00 GMT) in the presence of local and international observers, including regional experts and diplomats.

This is the second such vote since the 2014 adoption of Tunisia’s constitution following the overhrow of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali three years earlier. Ben Ali, who ruled over the for 24 years before the civilian uprising in 2011 forced him to flee, died last month in Saudi Arabia.

While Tunisia is often referred to as the only success story to come out of the Arab Spring, the elections were held against a backdrop of spiralling food prices, inflation and more than 15 percent unemployment.

Preliminary results will be announced on October 10 and official results on November 17. The assembly will then be given two months to choose a prime minister and form a new government.

Test for established parties

More than 1,500 lists and 15,000 candidates were running for 217 seats, with registered political parties and independents vying for control of the single chamber.

Opinion polls have been banned but results are likely to mirror last month’s presidential election, which saw newcomers Kais Saied and Nabil Karoui advance to a run-off as Tunisians turned their backs on the country’s political elite.

Independents will “certainly perform well because of the pushback on traditional politics,” Sarah Yerkes of Carnegie, a Washington-based think-tank, told Al Jazeera.


However, Yerkes said Ennahdha – currently the biggest force in Tunisia’s parliament – and Nabil Karoui’s Qalb Tunis are also likely to do well “because of their grassroots support”.

One-third of the lists are independent, while the presidential outcome suggests that traditionally powerful parties such as Nidaa Tounes straggle behind. Never before has Tunisia’s legislative outcome been so unpredictable.

Amid the uncertainty, experts agree that no single list will win the 109 seats needed to rule parliament, resulting in a coalition of blocs. This, in turn, could make it harder for parliament to form a government – an unnecessary hurdle in a country that is dealing with a myriad of other social issues.

“No one works for the interest of the country,” lamented a 39-year-old taxi driver who asked to remain anonymous. He was still undecided over who to vote for, admitting to having been overwhelmed by the sheer amount of campaign pamphlets in circulation. “Politicians are the worst part of Tunisia,” he said, mirroring the country’s widespread sense of disillusion.

‘Good of the country’ 

In the neighbourhood of Sousse Corniche, on the Gulf of Hammamet, voting polls were still empty at 10am. 

One woman, 29-year-old waitress Amal, said she had voted for Abir Moussi’s Free Destourian party.  

“I voted for her because she is the one who will face the Ennahdha party, she will never ally with them,” she said, in reference to Moussi, a former official in Ben Ali’s dissolved Democratic Constitutional Rally (RCD) party. 

“She will also help promote women’s rights, I heard her the other day on the radio talking about how she will pass a law to prevent sons-in-law from inheriting what belongs to the mother-in-law.” 

She said she would vote for detained media magnate Nabil Karoui in the second round of the presidential election because he “was already rich” and would focus on helping the poor and spurring economic growth. 

Bechir Korbi, a 34-year-old plumber, said he voted for Ennahdha because he believed they offered the best programme. 

“I didn’t attend their meetings nor did I watch their debates but I know they have a good programme. We discuss this with my friends when we meet,” Korbi told Al Jazeera. 

“I voted for Saied in the first round and will vote for him again. I am not involved in politics, I just want the good of the country … I know Ennahdha will do what’s best for the country.”  

The economy is the top priority

In Cite Ettadhamen, where unemployment, crime and drug-use abounds, politicians wasted no time in capitalising on the people’s woes.

On one street corner, young men and women clad in the red and white of the Al Amal party promised better education and healthcare and lower unemployment.


“The most important thing is unemployment, a lot of youths with degrees but no employment,” said Yosra, who did not wish to give her full name, thrusting a campaign pamphlet into the hands of a passer-by.

But some residents remained sceptical. “People don’t have enough money to think about politics,” said Saber Werfelli, a young cafe owner. “Most people are hungry, if you give them food you keep them quiet.”

Finding a solution to unemployment, spiralling food prices and inflation will be up to the legislature and new prime minister rather than the president, whose mandate is limited to foreign affairs, defence and national security.

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/tunisia-polls-open-3rd-parliamentary-vote-2011-uprising-191006051529006.html

An attorney for the whistleblower who raised the alarm about President Trump’s communications with Ukraine said Sunday that “multiple” whistleblowers have come forward.

The news, which comes as House Democrats have launched an impeachment inquiry and are subpoenaing the White House for documents, adds to the deepening political crisis facing the president.

“IC WHISTLEBLOWER UPDATE: I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying August 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General,” the attorney, Andrew Bakaj, said in a tweet. “No further comment at this time.”

Mark Zaid, who also is a member of the original whistleblower’s legal team, confirmed to The Washington Post that the team is now representing a second whistleblower, who works in the intelligence community. The second individual has spoken to the inspector general of the intelligence community and has not filed a complaint. “Doesn’t need to,” Zaid said in a text message to The Post.

This person has “first hand knowledge that supported the first whistleblower,” Zaid said. He added that he does not know whether the individual is the same person who was mentioned in a New York Times report on Friday.

News that the original whistleblower’s team is representing a second whistleblower was first reported Sunday by ABC News.

Trump on Sunday continue to lash out at Democrats and some Republican detractors, including Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), whose impeachment the president demanded Saturday after Romney criticized him.

“The Democrats are lucky that they don’t have any Mitt Romney types,” Trump tweeted. “They may be lousy politicians, with really bad policies (Open Borders, Sanctuary Cities etc.), but they stick together!”

Trump’s Republican primary challengers also sharply criticized the president’s actions on Sunday.

Former congressman Joe Walsh (R.-Ill.) said on CNN’s “State of the Union” that he considers Trump “a traitor” who “is a threat to this country” and “deserves to be impeached.”

“Nobody from the White House and no high-level Republicans are on the show today, because there’s nothing to defend,” Walsh said, referring to host Jake Tapper’s claim that while the show had contacted the White House and Republicans in both chambers of Congress, no one had agreed to come on to address the impeachment charges. “There’s enough we know now to impeach this president.”

Former South Carolina governor and congressman Mark Sanford (R), who appeared on the show alongside Walsh, called the descriptions of Trump’s behavior “troubling” and “wrong” but stopped short of deeming it impeachable.

Asked whether he’d vote for impeachment if he were in the House now, Sanford said, “I don’t know. I suspect so.”

Rudolph W. Giuliani, Trump’s personal attorney, defended Trump in an interview on Fox News Channel’s “MediaBuzz” in which he argued that “there’s nothing wrong with” the president asking foreign countries to investigate Biden.

“I mean, the fact is — the president of the United States has every right to ask countries to help us in a criminal investigation that should be undertaken,” Giuliani said.

Asked by host Howard Kurtz about the fact that Biden is Trump’s political opponent, Giuliani responded, “Well, I can’t help that. Suppose the political opponent committed murder, what are we going to do? He’s a political opponent, so you don’t investigate him?”

Giuliani was named in the whistleblower’s complaint and in an official memorandum about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky as being a key intermediary in back-channel efforts to dig up evidence on the allegations against Biden.

Other Republicans on Sunday sought to play down Trump’s comments, including his exchange with reporters outside the White House on Thursday in which he urged China to investigate former vice president Joe Biden, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate.

In an interview on ABC News’s “This Week,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) echoed a suggestion on Friday by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) that Trump’s China statement was not “a real request.”

“George, you really think he was serious about thinking that China’s going to investigate the Biden family? … I think he’s getting the press all spun up about this,” Jordan told host George Stephanopoulos.

During the interview, Stephanopoulos repeatedly sought an answer from Jordan on whether he believes it’s appropriate for Trump to ask China and Ukraine to investigate Biden. Jordan dodged the question more than a dozen times.

“I think Senator Rubio had it exactly right,” Jordan said. “I think most Americans say this is exactly what the president was doing. You would think after, like I said, a few years of following this president, you would understand sort of how this guy communicates.”

On “Fox News Sunday,” Rep. Chris Stewart (Utah), a Republican member of the Intelligence Committee, said he was “not at all” concerned about reports of a second whistleblower and defended Trump’s July 25 phone call with Zelensky.

Referring to Trump’s request that Zelensky “look into” Biden, Stewart said: “[Trump] did that because he has knowledge of possible corruption … That’s all the president is doing here.”

Democrats, meanwhile, defended their party’s efforts to pursue an inquiry into Trump.

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.), a key member of House Democratic leadership, said on “This Week” that “the evidence of wrongdoing by Donald Trump is hiding in plain sight.”

“The president betrayed his oath of office,” Jeffries said. “He’s engaged in serious wrongdoing. The administration, without justification, withheld $391 million in military aid from a vulnerable Ukraine. The president then pressured a foreign leader to interfere in the 2020 elections and target an American citizen for political gain. That is textbook abuse of power.”

Rep. Val Demings (Fla.), a Democratic member of the Intelligence Committee, defended House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s view that no vote by the full House is necessary for an impeachment inquiry to move forward.

“There is no requirement under the Constitution that we have a full House vote,” Demings said on “Fox News Sunday.” “There is no requirement under House rules that we have a full House vote.”

She added that she believes the House “will have to take a serious look at articles of impeachment” based on the evidence that has emerged.

Abigail Hauslohner and Elise Viebeck contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/whistleblowers-attorney-says-team-now-representing-multiple-officials/2019/10/06/18b48fec-e83d-11e9-9306-47cb0324fd44_story.html

Joshua Brown, a key witness in the murder trial of a former Dallas police officer who was sentenced to 10 years in prison for killing a man inside his own home, was himself shot to death outside his apartment complex this weekend.

Brown, 28, lived across the hall from Botham Jean, a black 26-year-old accountant, and testified in the murder case against Amber Guyger, a white police officer who was off-duty when she entered Jean’s apartment and shot him to death. On Tuesday, Guyger was found guilty of murder and sentenced to 10 years in prison. The verdict was a rare conviction against a police officer in a high-profile shooting that sparked yet another national conversation about the role of race in policing and in self-defense cases. For some, Brown’s death just days later has added an unwelcome coda to the story.

Authorities say that, on Friday, Dallas police were called to Brown’s new apartment complex, about five miles from where Jean was murdered, at about 10:30 pm local time, where they found Brown lying in the parking lot with multiple gunshot wounds. He was taken to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead from his injuries.

Throughout the murder trial against Guyger, Brown testified, sometimes emotionally, about the moments when he heard gunshots ring out as he approached his apartment, and about Guyger’s behavior immediately after she killed Jean on September 6, 2018. Guyger has said she believed the apartment was her own, and that she mistook Jean for an intruder.

Brown said that he saw Guyger enter the hallway from Jean’s apartment, crying, and speaking on the phone. Attorney Lee Merritt, who represented the Jean family in the trial, wrote on Facebook that Brown’s testimony played a key role in challenging Guyger’s account of the incident and her claims that she had shouted commands at Botham before shooting him.

“She didn’t. No one heard that. No neighbors. No passerby’s. Not Joshua as he walked down the corridor. No one,” Merritt wrote.

Dallas police officials have not yet identified Brown as the victim of Friday’s shooting, but his mother confirmed his death through Merritt. Officials have also not yet identified a suspect or potential motive, and autopsy details have not yet been released. Witnesses have said that a four-door sedan was seen speeding away from the scene of the shooting.

On social media, Merritt, the attorney, called for answers.

“Brown deserves the same justice he sought to ensure the Jean family,” Merritt wrote. “The Dallas County criminal justice system must [be] mobilized to identify his killer and see that he is held accountable for this murder.

Dallas County prosecutor Jason Hermus, the lead prosecutor in the Guyger case, told the Dallas Morning News on Saturday that Brown’s testimony had been brave and essential.

”He bravely came forward to testify when others wouldn’t,” Hermus said. “If we had more people like him, we would have a better world.”

For some, this mirrors the “reality of the black experience in America”

When Guyger was found guilty of murder, Jean’s family and many activists praised what they saw as a moment of justice served. An arrest of a police officer — much less a conviction — for shooting a person is rare, and as Brittany Packnett noted for Vox, Gugyer’s conviction might not have happened but for the diverse jury pool.

Nevertheless, attorney Merritt called the court’s decision “a signal that the tide is going to change here; police officers are going to be held accountable for their actions and we believe that will change policing culture all over the world.”

With the news of Brown’s death, under circumstances not readily apparent, some of that sense of justice was diminished. Brown’s mother thinks her son was gunned down, Merritt wrote on social media.

”She suspects foul play, and it is difficult to rule it out,” Merritt wrote. “He had no known enemies. He worked for a living. He was not in the streets. We need answers. Immediately.”

On Twitter, the hashtag #Justice4JoshuaBrown began trending. Even among those who do not presume a connection between Brown’s testimony and his death, there is a sentiment that Brown’s death represented a tarnishing of what had been a victory for advocates of due process in cases of police-involved shootings.

“Just when we caught a glimpse of justice for Botham Jean, much of it feels stolen back with the murder of Joshua Brown,” wrote Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter.

The social media conversation also mirrors the questions of racial motive that were at play during the trial against Guyger. As Vox’s Sean Collins reported, many saw the case as a heightened, especially tragic example of the adage about the dangers of “driving while black” — or, in this case, as attorney Merritt said, “living while black.”

But those questions were not considered by the jury, whose decision instead hinged on whether Guyger’s claims of self-defense were credible. As Dallas police begin their investigation into the death of another young black man, so intimately tied to this case, that conversation is likely to flair back up. No matter what, Merritt wrote on social media, Brown’s death “underscores the reality of the black experience in America.”

“Brown lived in constant fear that he could be the next victim of gun violence, either state sanctioned or otherwise,” Merritt wrote. “We have more work to do deal with the constant threats to our community both from within and without.”

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/10/6/20901317/amber-guyger-botham-jean-witness-joshua-brown