CLOSE

Ambulances arrived in waves Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2019, bringing injured paratroopers to Forrest General Hospital in Hattiesburg from Camp Shelby.
Lici Beveridge, Hattiesburg American

HATTIESBURG, Miss. – A massive, monthlong parachuting exercise was continuing at Camp Shelby on Thursday despite a mishap that injured at least 22 soldiers late Wednesday.

Lt. Col. Deidre Smith, with the Mississippi National Guard, said the troops had jumped from a C-130 in high winds and were blown from their intended drop zone into a group of pine trees.

Seven soldiers were hospitalized, the rest were treated at the scene, she said. None of the injuries were considered life-threatening, Smith said. She added that first responders and a local hospital had been notified of the training in advance, just in case there were injuries.

About 650 soldiers with the 4th Brigade Combat Team 25th Infantry Division out of Anchorage, Alaska, were participating in the 10-day training program. Smith said the exercises were continuing Thursday.

“We have a lot of extremely professional soldiers who are ready to rock and roll,” Smith told USA TODAY.

Approximately 180 were in the zone at the time of the incident, and 89 paratroopers made it out of the planes, said Sgt. Alex Skripnichuk, with the 4th Brigade’s public affairs office.

Each plane carries up to 60 people. Emergency responders took some of the injured to local hospitals, where teams of doctors and nurses could be seen walking quickly toward the emergency room.

“Airborne Operations all bear an inherent risk. We strive to mitigate this risk as much as possible,” the combat team said in a Facebook post. “Our goal is ultimately to continue training. Despite the challenges that we currently face, soldiers always place the mission first.”

The jumps took place on the first day of Exercise Arctic Anvil. Plans called for heavy equipment drops and jumps by more than 900 paratroopers. To make the training more realistic, local soldiers are playing the role of the opposing force.

“This is the largest exercise that Camp Shelby has hosted in conjunction with an active duty brigade combat team,” Ginn said before the accident. He said the training would enhance the brigade’s “lethality.”

In June 2016, two soldiers were injured when the Humvee they were traveling in hit a median on U.S. 98 just west of the camp’s East Gate and overturned. The driver and passenger were taken to Forrest General Hospital with moderate injuries.

Camp Shelby, in operation for more than 100 years, serves as a training site for Army reserve soldiers as well as active duty members of all the Armed Forces. It’s the biggest reserve training facility in the country, hosting 100,000 personnel a year, according to MilitaryBases.US.

The site consists of a more than 130,000 acres of state, Department of Defense and U.S. Forest Service lands in the DeSoto National Forest.

Bacon reported from McLean, Va. Contributing: Ellen Ciurczak, Hattiesburg American

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/03/22-paratroopers-injured-training-camp-shelby-mississippi/3849889002/

President Trump launched a broadside against Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) at a joint news conference Wednesday afternoon with the president of Finland, after the House Intelligence Committee chairman warned the White House that “we’re not fooling around” on the impeachment inquiry.

The president’s attacks on Schiff came after Democrats announced that they would subpoena documents related to Trump’s July phone call with the leader of Ukraine.

House and Senate committee staff met with the State Department inspector general who gave them a packet of documents containing conspiracy theories about Biden’s son as well as the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. But it’s unclear where they originated.

Earlier Wednesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo acknowledged during a news conference in Rome that he listened in on the call, on which Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his son.

Current and former U.S. officials also told The Washington Post that Trump involved Vice President Pence in efforts to pressure Zelensky at a time when the president was using other channels to solicit information that he hoped would be damaging to Biden.

The former vice president, meanwhile, told reporters at a forum on guns that the president’s actions were “beyond anything I frankly thought he would do.” And House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a television interview that she believes Trump is “scared” of the inquiry.

●Impeachment inquiry erupts into battle between executive, legislative branches

●Key federal agencies increasingly compelled to benefit Trump

●Impeachment inquiry puts new focus on Giuliani’s work for prominent figures in Ukraine

Read the whistleblower complaint | The rough transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky | Related coverage and analysis of the Trump impeachment inquiry

8:50 p.m.: CNN: Giuliani says some of the inspector general documents were from him

Giuliani told CNN that at least some of the conspiracy theory-filled documents that the inspector general showed Congress were his.

He said he sent Pompeo in March information outlining allegations against Biden and the then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Masha Yovanovitch based off interviews he’d done with Ukrainian officials.

Giuliani claims that Pompeo told him the agency would investigate.

7:00 p.m.: Democratic chairmen say State inspector general’s ‘urgent’ documents were a packet of debunked conspiracy theories

The State Department inspector general, who met privately with House and Senate committees, handed over documents that include disinformation about former vice president Joe Biden’s son and former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Masha Yovanovitch, but it’s unclear where the documents originated.

House committee chairmen Eliot Engel of Foreign Affairs, Adam Schiff of Intelligence and Elijah E. Cummings of Oversight, released a joint statement about their committee staffs’ briefing with Inspector General Steve Linick.

“The documents provided by the Inspector General included a package of disinformation, debunked conspiracy theories, and baseless allegations in an envelope marked ‘White House’ and containing folders labeled ‘Trump Hotel.’ These documents also reinforce concern that the President and his allies sought to use the machinery of the State Department to further the President’s personal political interests,” they wrote.

Sen. Robert Menendez, ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also released a statement about the pages received from the intelligence community’s top watchdog.

“We are just beginning to examine the documents provided by the State Department Inspector General, but they appear to contain long-debunked theories and false statements about the former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine and one of President Trump’s political opponents,” Menendez said. “These documents provide further evidence of a concerted, external effort to conduct a disinformation campaign against a career U.S ambassador, who has been the subject of baseless attacks, including by the President himself.”

Some were let down by the inspector general’s big reveal, which came about because he requested an urgent meeting to discuss the documents, because there was no information about where the packet came from or for whom it was intended.

6:50 p.m.: GOP Rep. Upton supports an inquiry, but not one with impeachment in front of its name.

Michigan Rep. Fred Upton, a moderate Republican who has been critical of President Trump in the past, said Wednesday that he supports an inquiry into the president’s actions pertaining to Trump’s controversial July call with the Ukrainian president, but not an impeachment inquiry.

“Let’s really look at all the details, ask lots of questions and see where it takes us,” Upton told NPR’s Michigan station.

“So you’re supportive of the idea that there needs to be this inquiry. You’re not questioning that,” a reporter clarified.

“Yeah, I want the answers to the questions that need to be raised,” Upton said.

But when pressed later on whether that meant he was supportive of House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry of Trump, Upton’s spokesman said, “he does not” and pointed to other comments made by the congressman that parse his desire for information about what Trump did with a formal impeachment inquiry.

Read more here.

6:15 p.m.: Trump on Schiff: ‘They should look at him for treason’

Trump on Wednesday renewed his attacks on Schiff by arguing that the California Democrat should be tried for treason — which is defined as aiding an enemy with which the United States is at war.

“It should be criminal,” Trump said in the Oval Office on Wednesday afternoon, referring to Schiff’s characterization of his phone call with Zelensky at a hearing last week. “It should be treasonous. … He should resign from office in disgrace, and frankly, they should look at him for treason.”

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on Trump’s assertion that Schiff committed treason. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on whether Trump has directed his administration to pursue legal action against Schiff.

The U.S. Constitution defines treason as the act of someone who, “owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere.”

While the common usage of the term can be very broad, the legal definition of treason is limited to Americans who act on behalf of a country with which the United States is at war. There are fewer than three dozen treason convictions in U.S. history, including during World War II and the Whiskey Rebellion.

— Devlin Barrett

6 p.m.: Trump involved Pence in efforts to press Ukraine’s leader, though aides say vice president was unaware of pursuit for dirt on Bidens

Trump repeatedly involved Pence in efforts to exert pressure on the leader of Ukraine at a time when the president was using other channels to solicit information that he hoped would be damaging to a Democratic rival, current and former U.S. officials said.

Trump instructed Pence not to attend the inauguration of Zelensky in May — an event White House officials had pushed to put on the vice president’s calendar — at a time when Ukraine’s new leader was seeking recognition and support from Washington, the officials said.

Months later, the president used Pence to tell Zelensky that U.S. aid was still being withheld while demanding more aggressive action on corruption, officials said. At that time — after Trump’s July 25 phone call with Zelenksy — the Ukrainians probably understood action on corruption to include the investigation of former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden.

Read more here.

— Greg Miller, Greg Jaffe and Ashley Parker

4:45 p.m.: Biden: ‘It’s way beyond anything I frankly thought he would do.’

Biden told reporters that he was surprised that Trump asked a foreign leader for help getting information that could damage his presidential campaign, saying, “It’s way beyond anything I frankly thought he would do.”

Biden, who spoke to reporters at a forum on gun violence in Las Vegas, was told that the president that afternoon had referred to Biden and his son Hunter as “stone cold crooked.” Asked whether he has spoken to his son about any of the controversy, Biden said they’d “communicated a couple times.”

“Look, the issue is — this president of the United States engaged in something apparently that is close to, well, engaged in activity which, at minimum, gives a lot of running room for the Russians and Ukraine, and I think we should just focus on — he’s the issue,” Biden said. “Nobody has ever asserted that I did anything wrong except he and what’s that fellow’s name? Rudy? … Giuliani?”

— Chelsea Janes

4:15 p.m.: Buttigieg and Castro dodge questions about whether they’d allow their vice president’s child to serve on a foreign board

Pete Buttigieg and Julián Castro, both 2020 candidates, were asked whether they’d allow the son or daughter of their vice president to serve on a foreign board as former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter did in Ukraine.

Both candidates dismissed the question as doing Trump’s bidding.

“So one thing that is really important right now is to deny this president to change the subject, and the subject is that the president confessed on national television to an abuse of power. Let’s deal with that and not get caught in the shiny objects he’s going to throw out,” Buttigieg, mayor of South Bend, Ind., said.

Castro, who was housing and urban development secretary in the Obama administration, said the question allows Trump to “use the same playbook against Joe Biden as he used against Hillary Clinton.”

“He’s trying to besmirch the reputation of an honorable public servant who has given a lot of honest years of public service so that he can try and win a narrow electoral college victory,” Castro said.

Buttigieg and Castro each spoke to reporters after speaking at a forum on gun violence. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.) were asked about impeachment and their role as jurors if the Senate holds trial, but not the specific question related to Hunter Biden.

— Chelsea Janes

3:30 p.m.: White House will preserve records of Trump’s communications, Justice Department says

Justice Department attorneys promised a federal judge Wednesday that the White House will not destroy records of the president’s calls and meetings with foreign leaders while the court weighs a lawsuit brought by historians and watchdog groups.

In a two-page filing, Justice Department lawyer Kathryn L. Wyer told a federal judge in Washington that the Trump administration and executive office of the president “voluntarily agree … to preserve the material at issue pending” litigation.

The filing came after U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of Washington, D.C., on Tuesday set a 3 p.m. deadline for the government after the suing groups requested a temporary restraining order in a lawsuit filed in May to compel the administration to comply with the federal Presidential Records Act.

Three organizations — government watchdog groups Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, and National Security Archive, and the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations — alleged that the White House was failing to create and save records as required of Trump’s meetings and communications with foreign leaders.

The lawsuit preceded the current storm surrounding a Democratic House impeachment inquiry into the White House. However, the plaintiffs on Tuesday asked Jackson for an emergency order, saying the whistleblower’s complaint and the White House’s subsequent’s admissions exposed record keeping practices “specifically designed to conceal the president’s abuse of his power,” CREW said in a statement.

The Justice Department has moved to dismiss the lawsuit, saying appeals courts have precluded courts from weighing in on presidents’ compliance with the archiving law, “not to mention the President’s broad authority to negotiate with foreign leaders.”

— Spencer Hsu

3:15 p.m.: Trump doesn’t answer when asked what he wanted from Ukraine on Bidens

During Wednesday’s joint news conference, Trump refused to answer what exactly he wanted from the Ukrainian president regarding Joe and Hunter Biden.

Instead, Trump ignored the question and focused his answer on why he held back military aid to Ukraine, citing, as he has in the past, corruption in Ukraine and the unsubstantiated claim that the United States is the “only one who gives the big money to Ukraine.”

When Reuters’s Jeff Mason tried again and again to ask the Biden-specific question, Trump became angry and demanded that Mason “not be rude” and instead ask a question of the Finnish president. When Mason pressed him, Trump responded that “Biden and his son are stone cold crooked,” then leveled his oft-made attack against the “fake news” media.

3 p.m.: With no evidence, Trump accuses Schiff of having helped write whistleblower complaint

At a fiery joint news conference late Wednesday afternoon with Finnish President Sauli Niinistö, Trump continued to lash out at Schiff, accusing him, with no evidence, of having helped write the whistleblower’s complaint.

Trump made the comment in response to a question about a New York Times report stating that Schiff had learned the outlines of the whistleblower’s concerns days before the individual filed a formal complaint.

“Well, I think it’s a scandal that he knew before,” Trump said of Schiff. “I’d go a step further. I think he probably helped write it, okay? That’s what the word is. … He knew long before, and he helped write it, too. It’s a scam. It’s a scam.”

Schiff said in a statement ahead of the news conference that “at no point did the Committee review or receive the complaint in advance,” and that his panel did not receive the complaint until the night before acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire testified last Thursday.

The whistleblower first contacted the Intelligence Committee “for guidance on how to report possible wrongdoing within the jurisdiction of the Intelligence Community,” Schiff said.

“This is a regular occurrence, given the Committee’s unique oversight role and responsibilities,” he said, adding that “consistent with the Committee’s long-standing procedures, Committee staff appropriately advised the whistleblower to contact an Inspector General and to seek legal counsel.”

2:10 p.m.: Pelosi said Trump ‘scared’ of impeachment inquiry

Pelosi said during a television interview Wednesday that she believes Trump is “scared” of the impeachment inquiry being led by House Democrats.

“I think the president knows the argument that can be made against him, and he’s scared,” Pelosi said in an interview with ABC News, excerpts of which were released Wednesday afternoon. “And so he’s trying to divert attention from that to where [he’s] standing in the way of legislation.”

ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos asked Pelosi whether Trump had fear in his voice when the two spoke last week before her announcement of a formal impeachment inquiry in response to the whistleblower’s complaint about Trump’s call with Zelensky.

“I saw the surprise in his voice that he didn’t understand that I thought what he did was wrong,” Pelosi said. “That he was undermining our national security, that he was undermining our Constitution by his actions, and he was undermining the integrity of our elections. He just didn’t see it.”

1:30 p.m.: California’s governor offers a rejoinder to Trump

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) took to Twitter to respond to Trump’s comments about him during a 13-minute stretch of Trump’s Oval Office meeting with Niinistö in which they fielded questions from reporters.

In the midst of insults directed at Pelosi and Schiff, Trump also derided Newsom as “a do-nothing” as he complained about a California law that would keep him off the primary ballot in the state next year if he doesn’t publicly release his taxes.

“Hello @realDonaldTrump…heard you just gave me a shout out in the Oval Office,” Newsom tweeted. “Actually watched your press conference — mainly just feel bad for the poor President of Finland who had to endure that. Today, we are all Sauli Niinistö.”

12:50 p.m.: Trump says identity of the whistleblower’s sources should be public

Trump, during an event in the Oval Office, called for the identity of those who provided information to the whistleblower to be publicly disclosed.

“This country has to find out who that person was, because that person’s a spy, in my opinion,” Trump told reporters while visiting Finnish President Sauli Niinistö looked on.

The whistleblower said his complaint was based on conversations with more than a half dozen U.S. officials.

In his remarks Wednesday, Trump acknowledged that there is value in protecting the identity of whistleblowers in some cases.

“I think a whistleblower should be protected if the whistleblower’s legitimate,” he said.

Trump also expanded on grievances aired earlier Wednesday on Twitter and took repeated shots at Schiff and Pelosi.

The president called Schiff “a low life” and a “shifty dishonest guy” and again called for him to resign.

Among other things, Trump took issue with Schiff having criticized Pompeo, saying “that guy couldn’t carry his blank strap.” Trump said he was trying to sanitize a common phrase about carrying a jock strap.

Trump suggested Pelosi should focus on her San Francisco-area congressional district, where he said there are people living in tents and “people dying in squalor.”

12:15 p.m.: State Department employees feel caught in the middle, diplomat says

Many State Department employees feel that they are caught in the middle of a political battle between the agency and House committees, said a U.S. diplomat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to comment frankly about the adverse impact on morale.

Career Foreign Service officers are expected to follow the direction of State Department leadership and respond to congressional requests. It may not be possible to do both now.

“People are not politicized, and they’re very anxious not to be,” the diplomat said, referring to a number of clashes, including the impeachment inquiry, the pressure on Ukraine that led to the removal of the U.S. ambassador to Kiev and a reopened investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails. “They want to do their jobs, serve their country and not be pulled into this.”

The diplomat has not spoken to anyone who feels bullied and intimidated, as Pompeo characterized the reaction to congressional outreach.

But the diplomat said employees expect Pompeo to defend them more vociferously than he has so far. The gold standard, still recalled with admiration in Foggy Bottom, the diplomat said, was set by George Shultz when he was secretary of state. In 1985, he threatened to resign over a Reagan administration proposal to require lie detector tests for all employees with access to highly classified information.

“The idea is that the secretary of state should stand up for them,” the diplomat said. Of Pompeo, he added: “There have been some generic comments, but nothing specific. The expectation is he should say more, and do more.”

— Carol Morello

11:50 a.m.: Trump insults Pelosi and Schiff, uses profanity to describe inquiry

Trump continued to hurl insults at Pelosi and Schiff as they conducted their news conference, and he later referred to the impeachment inquiry as “BULLSHIT.”

Writing on Twitter, Trump dismissed comments by Pelosi that House Democrats continue to want to work with the White House on trade and lowering prescription drug prices.

“She is incapable of working on either,” Trump said of Pelosi. “It is just camouflage for trying to win an election through impeachment. The Do Nothing Democrats are stuck in mud!”

Trump also sought to make the case that Schiff compares unfavorably to Pompeo.

“Adam B. Schiff should only be so lucky to have the brains, honor and strength of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo,” Trump tweeted. “For a lowlife like Schiff, who completely fabricated my words and read them to Congress as though they were said by me, to demean a First in Class at West Point, is SAD!”

At a hearing last week, Schiff presented an embellished version of Trump’s phone call with Zelensky. He later said it was meant as a parody and said that should have been apparent to Trump.

Shortly after the new conference wrapped up, Trump returned to Twitter.

“The Do Nothing Democrats should be focused on building up our Country, not wasting everyone’s time and energy on BULLSHIT, which is what they have been doing ever since I got overwhelmingly elected in 2016, 223-306,” he wrote, referring to the electoral college results in the election. “Get a better candidate this time, you’ll need it!”

Trump’s tweet did not accurately convey the final electoral college results. Because of “faithless electors” who ended up voting for other people, Clinton’s final electoral college tally was 227, reduced from 232, and Trump’s went from 306 to 304.

11:30 a.m.: Schiff says, ‘We’re not fooling around here’

Schiff warned the White House on Wednesday that stonewalling could lead to an additional article of impeachment on obstruction of justice.

“We’re not fooling around here,” Schiff said as he appeared with Pelosi at a news conference on Capitol Hill shortly after House Democrats announced that they would subpoena the White House for documents. The subpoena will go out this week or next, Schiff said.

Democrats, he added, “are deeply concerned about Secretary Pompeo’s effort now to potentially interfere with witnesses whose testimony is needed before our committee.”

Pelosi said Democrats “place ourselves in a time of urgency” and observed that the country’s founders never thought they would have a president “kick those guardrails” of checks and balances provided by the Constitution.

She noted that “we have to give the president the chance to exonerate himself,” but so far, he’s described his actions as “perfect.”

11:20 a.m.: Trump accuses Democrats of trying to hurt the country

Trump asserted Wednesday that the stock market was going down because of the impeachment inquiry and accused House Democrats of trying to deliberately hurt the county.

He latest tweet came as Pelosi and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) held a news conference on Capitol Hill.

“All of this impeachment nonsense, which is going nowhere, is driving the Stock Market, and your 401K’s, down,” Trump tweeted. “But that is exactly what the Democrats want to do. They are willing to hurt the Country, with only the 2020 Election in mind!”

10:35 a.m.: Trump attacks Democrats ahead of Pelosi news conference

Trump went on Twitter to attack House Democrats shortly before Pelosi was scheduled to hold a news conference on Capitol Hill with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.).

In a pair of tweets, Trump renewed his call for Schiff to resign and attacked Democrats more broadly as “Do Nothing Democrats.”

At a hearing last week, Schiff presented an embellished version of Trump’s phone call with Zelensky. He later said it was meant as a parody and said that should have been apparent to Trump.

“Congressman Adam Schiff should resign for the Crime of, after reading a transcript of my conversation with the President of Ukraine (it was perfect), fraudulently fabricating a statement of the President of the United States and reading it to Congress, as though mine! He is sick!” Trump tweeted.

He also shared a quote from Jeanne Zaino, a political science professor at Iona College in New York state, who had appeared as a guest on Fox News.

“Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats haven’t met the standards of impeachment. They have to be very careful here,” read the quote.

10:30 a.m.: House Democrats to subpoena White House for documents in its impeachment inquiry focused on Ukraine

In a memo issued Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.) said that the White House’s “flagrant disregard of multiple voluntary requests for documents — combined with stark and urgent warnings from the Inspector General about the gravity of these allegations — have left us with no choice but to issue this subpoena.”

The subpoena will be issued Friday, according to Cummings’s memo.

The memo said the subpoena will seek documents that the committee first requested on Sept. 9.

9:30 a.m.: Eric Trump cites Republican fundraising as he taunts Democrats

The president’s son Eric Trump went on Twitter on Wednesday morning to taunt Democrats for their impeachment inquiry.

In a tweet, he attached an Associated Press news story about Trump’s reelection campaign and the Republican National Committee having raised a record $125 million in the third quarter of the year.

“This is what happens when you manufacture nonsense… the American people see right through it. Keep it up @SpeakerPelosi,” Eric Trump wrote.

9:15 a.m.: State Department’s inspector general headed to Capitol Hill for afternoon meeting

Steve Linick, the State Department’s inspector general, plans to meet with staffers of key House and Senate committees Wednesday at 3 p.m. at his request.

The committees were notified Tuesday that Linick wants “to discuss and provide staff with copies of documents related to the State Department and Ukraine,” according to a letter obtained by The Washington Post.

The offer by Linick’s office, which operates mostly independently from the State Department and is responsible for investigating abuse and mismanagement, comes amid a standoff between Pompeo and House Democrats, who are demanding documents and testimony on Ukraine-related matters for their impeachment inquiry.

Linick’s office “obtained the documents from the acting legal adviser of the Department of State,” the letter said. The inspector general doesn’t have to seek Pompeo’s approval to approach Congress with information, especially if it is not classified.

It is unclear exactly what Linick will provide the committees, which include the panels in charge of foreign relations, intelligence, appropriations and oversight in the House and Senate. But the demand for any credible information related to Ukraine and the State Department is at a fever pitch as Democrats seek to build the case for Trump’s ouster based on his dealings with Ukraine’s leadership.

— Karoun Demirjian and John Hudson

9 a.m.: Trump focuses on other issues in first tweets of the day

Unlike previous days, impeachment did not dominate Trump’s early activity on Twitter on Wednesday.

He instead turned to other topics, including his promised border wall and a federal judge’s order to block a California law that would require Trump to release his tax returns for access to the state’s primary election ballot.

“I won the right to be a presidential candidate in California, in a major Court decision handed down yesterday,” Trump wrote. “It was filed against me by the Radical Left Governor of that State to tremendous Media hoopla. The VICTORY, however, was barely covered by the Fake News. No surprise!”

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said the state would appeal the ruling.

In early tweets, Trump also urged Louisiana voters to pick a Republican candidate in the state’s gubernatorial primary on Oct. 12. Candidates from both parties compete in the state’s “jungle primary.”

8:15 a.m.: Former staff members say it’s unusual for a secretary of state to listen in on a call with leader of small nation

Former staff members who worked on foreign leader calls said it is very unusual for a secretary of state to listen in on calls with leaders from a country as small as Ukraine.

Partly it is because the secretary of state’s schedule is very busy and rarely aligns with the president’s schedule of routine calls to heads of state, so they arrange only to be on major foreign leader conversations.

When Rex Tillerson was secretary of state, for example, he would coordinate plans to listen in on Trump’s calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

The former staffers on the National Security Council said Pompeo’s presence on this call suggests the subject or the purpose of the call had high importance to the president, and thus to him. The former staffers spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak more candidly.

— Carol D. Leonnig

7:15 a.m.: Pompeo confirms he was on Trump’s July call with Zelensky

Pompeo acknowledged publicly for the first time Wednesday that he was on the July call between Trump and the leader of Ukraine.

Asked about the episode during a news conference in Rome, Pompeo said, “I was on the phone call.”

In response to a multipart question, he did not say whether he was comfortable with Trump’s pressing of Zelensky to investigate Biden and his son, Hunter.

Pompeo said the call focused on issues such as the threat that Russia poses to Ukraine and the need for Ukraine to root out corruption.

He said the United States would consider to pursue those issues “even while all this noise is going on.”

During a Sept. 22 appearance on ABC News’s “This Week,” Pompeo was asked what he knew about Trump’s conversation with Zelensky following an initial Wall Street Journal report that the call was part of a whistleblower complaint.

Pompeo responded by saying he hadn’t seen the whistleblower report. He later said he had seen a statement from the Ukrainian foreign minister that there was no pressure applied on Zelensky. Pompeo made no mention of being on the call.

During his news conference Wednesday, Pompeo also repeated his claims from a letter on Tuesday that House Democratic staffers have been seeking to intimidate State Department officials in their efforts to learn more about Trump’s call with Zelensky.

“We won’t tolerate folks on Capitol Hill bullying, intimidating State Department employees. That’s unacceptable, and it’s not something that I’m going to permit to happen.” Pompeo said.

6:30 a.m.: Country to hear directly from Trump, Pelosi on Wednesday

The country will hear directly from the two leading figures in the impeachment drama — Trump and Pelosi — at separately scheduled news conferences on Wednesday.

Pelosi plans to hold a news conference on Capitol Hill at 10:45 a.m. She will be accompanied by Schiff, who has become the public face for Democrats in the impeachment inquiry.

Trump, meanwhile, has a 2 p.m. joint news conference scheduled with Finnish President Sauli Niinistö, who is visiting the White House on Wednesday. Trump is certain to get questions from U.S. journalists about the impeachment drive.

6:15 a.m.: Critics blast Trump for calling his impeachment inquiry a ‘COUP’

Trump claimed he was a victim of a coup d’etat on Tuesday night, continuing his dramatic rhetoric that has drawn fierce pushback from legal scholars and Democrats since the House impeachment inquiry began last week.

“As I learn more and more each day,” he wrote on Twitter, “I am coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of the United States of America!”

Critics disputed the president’s tweet by pointing to basic definitions of a coup d’etat, a violent illegal overthrow of the government by an opposing group, and impeachment, a legal process laid out in the Constitution. Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), a presidential hopeful, even suggested Trump should not be allowed to make such a remark on Twitter, sharing his “COUP” tweet with CEO Jack Dorsey.

Read more here.

— Meagan Flynn

6 a.m.: Giuliani suggests suing Democrats over Ukraine probe

On Tuesday night, Rudolph W. Giuliani proposed an unusual legal strategy in response to the ongoing investigation into President Trump’s dealings in Ukraine: suing Democratic members of Congress.

Speaking on the Fox News show “The Ingraham Angle,” Trump’s personal attorney said that he “had a couple of talks” with attorneys amid the accelerating impeachment probe and a House subpoena for his own personal records concerning Ukraine. Their recommendation, Giuliani said, was “that we should bring a lawsuit on behalf of the president and several people in the administration, maybe even myself as a lawyer, against the members of Congress individually for violating constitutional rights, violating civil rights.”

Host Laura Ingraham noted that Giuliani’s suggestion was “novel,” and that congressional immunity prevents House members from being sued for anything they say on the floor. But outside those parameters, Giuliani argued, they could be held liable for forming a “conspiracy” to deprive the president of his constitutional rights.

Read more here.

— Antonia Noori Farzan

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-whistleblower/2019/10/02/80df829a-e494-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html

Storm clouds rolled over Capitol Hill earlier this week.

Tom Brenner/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Tom Brenner/Getty Images

Storm clouds rolled over Capitol Hill earlier this week.

Tom Brenner/Getty Images

House Democrats are set to launch a new phase of their impeachment inquiry on Thursday when former Ambassador Kurt Volker, until recently a top State Department representative to Ukraine, is scheduled to meet with investigators.

Then, on Friday, the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, is due on the Hill.

More witnesses are expected next week, all for depositions behind closed doors with members of Congress and their staff.

Democrats say that itinerary and their other actions, including the prospect of a subpoena for the White House itself, show they mean business about the Ukraine affair.

“This is a very serious — a very serious — challenge that the president has put there,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. “It’s very sad. I don’t see impeachment as a unifying thing for our country. I weighed those equities hard and long until I had the president’s admission that he did what he did.”

Pelosi and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., told reporters on Wednesday that they’re “not fooling around,” as Schiff put it, and they may be on course to vote on articles of impeachment that could trigger a trial for Trump in the Senate over whether he keeps his office.

Loading…

Trump appeared to take the Democrats at their word — and said they were trying to short-circuit the will of voters.

“They’re a disaster,” Trump said Wednesday at the White House. “They’re the do-nothing Democrats. They don’t do any work. All they want to do is try and win the election in 2020, so they come up with this impeachment nonsense.”

The president excoriated what he called Schiff’s “treason” and dishonesty and called for him to resign from Congress.

More broadly, Trump said, Democrats have harried him since his election by “wasting everyone’s time and energy” with what he called nonsense — although Trump used an expletive in his post about it on Twitter.

At a press conference Wednesday, the president responded to a question about Democrats’ subpoena threats by saying, “Well, I always cooperate.” He then repeated his criticism of Pelosi and Schiff and suggested he was done disclosing accounts of his conversations with foreign leaders.

Trump had earlier said he’d be open to releasing an account of a previous call he had with Ukraine’s president and one involving Vice President Mike Pence.

But on Wednesday Trump said of releasing transcripts: “I hope I don’t have to do it again. I don’t want to do it again.”

The Ukraine affair

Pelosi’s casus belli is Trump’s July 25 conversation with the president of Ukraine in which Trump asked him to investigate the family of former Vice President Joe Biden.

Democrats call that an abuse of power and want to know more about what took place beforehand.

An anonymous whistleblower wrote in a complaint via Atkinson’s office that someone in Trump’s camp had primed people close to President Volodymyr Zelenskiy about the need to “play ball” with Trump.

Investigators want to know whether such a message truly was delivered and if so, what it was and by whom. That’s why they’ve called Volker and other State Department officials, including a former ambassador to Kyiv who is scheduled to appear with other witnesses next week.

If Democrats could confirm that someone in Trump world told the Ukrainians that military assistance was being cut off unless Zelenskiy cooperated with a Biden investigation, that may make the case — to them — for impeaching Trump.

The White House halted military assistance authorized by Congress before the Zelenskiy call with no explanation given to agencies in Washington or some leaders in Congress; the support was restored by early September.

The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that Pence played a central part in the Trump world dealings with Ukraine — but people in Pence’s camp also told the newspaper that the vice president didn’t know about the Biden angle.

An end, a middle, but no beginning

Other parts of the story remain unclear.

According to some news reports, for example, Ukrainian officials said they never heard from anyone on the American side that military assistance was being cut off until it didn’t arrive, and even then they didn’t get a full explanation.

If that’s so, does that mean no one from the U.S. actually threatened anyone in Zelenskiy’s camp before the phone call? With no such threat, was there, as Democrats have alleged there might be, a quid-pro-quo with Trump?

The president repeated on Wednesday that his conversation with Zelenskiy was innocent but he did not respond to questions about what, precisely, he wanted the Ukrainian leader to do in connection with the Biden family.

Also unresolved is how much of a role State Department officials played, up to and including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and how much of the Ukraine account was held by those formally outside the administration, especially Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Trump and Pompeo acknowledged on Wednesday that Pompeo was on the call with Zelenskiy but didn’t detail how much else he knew or whether the secretary of state found anything objectionable.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff during a weekly news conference held by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday.

Tom Brenner/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Tom Brenner/Getty Images

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff during a weekly news conference held by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday.

Tom Brenner/Getty Images

Pompeo and Giuliani both have received requests for information from Congress; Pelosi and Schiff said on Wednesday that they’d cast a wary eye on what they called any attempts by the administration to intimidate witnesses or obstruct their investigation.

Pompeo had said he wouldn’t go along with any attempts to “intimidate and bully” his workers and asked for more time before a former ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, met with House investigators.

Yovanovitch, who remains in the State Department, was to have gone first on Wednesday; after Pompeo’s objections, her appointment was moved to Oct. 11.

Trump’s allies in the House Republican minority echoed Pompeo’s warnings about what they called misguided haste and overreach by Democrats.

“We have serious concerns about Democrats’ abusive targeting of our career foreign service professionals, which would put our nation’s diplomatic interests at risk,” said Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the Oversight Committee.

Continued Jordan: “The Democrats are choosing confrontation over cooperation and exploiting their power solely to attack this president and undo the results of the 2016 election.”

Volker and Giuliani

All the same, Volker’s deposition is expected to go ahead with lawmakers and staff members on Thursday.

He’s a longtime diplomat who helped broker a meeting between a Ukrainian official and Giuliani that took place earlier this year in Spain.

People in Zelenskiy’s camp who knew Volker from his service in the east asked him to arrange contact in order to advertise the progress that backers said was being made in Ukraine on fighting corruption.

Giuliani, meanwhile, had been working for some time on what he’s said was his job to investigate evidence on behalf of Trump about the Bidens.

If Giuliani took the Ukrainians’ message on board in Spain, he also may have had one for his counterpart — one about the alleged “corruption” involving the Biden family and a now-debunked claim about pressure by the then-vice president in service of protecting his son, Hunter, who was being paid by a Ukrainian company.

The whistleblower complaint describes White House aides saying that Zelenskiy had been briefed before his call with Trump, although the whistleblower writes that he or she doesn’t know how, or by whom.

The official White House account of the call describes the Ukrainian leader mentioning to Trump how eager he is to buy more American weapons for use against Russian or Russian-backed forces in the east. That’s when Trump asks him for a “favor,” leading to his request about the Bidens.

Administration equanimous

Giuliani and Trump say they haven’t done anything wrong, that the “corruption” allegations about the Bidens merit more inquiry, and that they’ve been acting in concert with the official diplomacy of the State Department.

In view of the deepening complexity of the story and the prospects that it could occupy Washington for several more weeks or months, Giuliani has hired a lawyer, former Watergate prosecutor Jon Sale, to represent him in the Ukraine matter.

Giuliani hasn’t gone quiet, though.

He wrote on Twitter that he was preparing to “seek legal redress” against members of Congress and he has continued to air what he calls the case against Biden in appearances on TV.

All the same, Giuliani not only must decide how he’ll respond to the subpoena from the House for his records in the case, but how to respond if lawmakers eventually ask him to testify.

Trump, meanwhile, has turned up the volume on counterattacks against Democrats, including in his remarks to reporters and with posts on Twitter. Pelosi and the majority, he says, are attempting no less than a “coup” designed to take away the power of the electorate.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/03/766154470/political-storm-clouds-glower-as-dems-open-new-phase-in-impeachment-case

“Don’t you dare lay a finger on those girls!” yelled Mei Wong, a 60-year-old resident. “You won’t have a good afterlife if you do.”

In a sign of the strain on officers, one police group has called for the Hong Kong government to impose curfews or adopt other emergency measures that it said would help the police get a better grip on the situation. Hong Kong government officials have been discussing whether the city’s leader, Carrie Lam, should invoke emergency powers to impose a ban on face masks, said Ronny Tong, a member of Mrs. Lam’s executive council, her top advisory body.

“We are only a law enforcement agency with limited power under the law,” Lam Chi-wai, the chairman of the Junior Police Officers’ Association, said in a statement on Wednesday. “If we do not have appropriate and strong measures from the top to coordinate and assist, then it will be hard for us to achieve anything on our own.”

The police force has said that one of its officers shot Tsang Chi-kin, an 18-year-old student, in self-defense this week, and has described its officers as being under siege. On Wednesday night, protesters outraged by the shooting poured into the streets, vandalizing shops, blocking roads and throwing firebombs into a police station. Many of them put their hands on their chests to express solidarity with Mr. Tsang.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/world/asia/hong-kong-protests-police.html

It’s Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2019. Let’s start here.

1. Pelosi: Trump ‘scared’ of impeachment

President Donald Trump spent most of Wednesday lashing out against the ongoing impeachment inquiry against him, accusing Democrats of not focusing on the issues.

“The Do Nothing Democrats should be focused on building up our Country, not wasting everyone’s time and energy on [B***S***], which is what they have been doing ever since I got overwhelmingly elected in 2016, 223-306,” Trump tweeted, referring to the electoral vote. “Get a better candidate this time, you’ll need it!”

Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Trump is “scared” of the inquiry.

“I think the president knows the argument that can be made against him, and he’s scared,” Pelosi, D-Calif., told ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos in an interview to be broadcast Thursday morning on “Good Morning America.”

ABC News’ John Santucci and ABC News’ Trish Turner explain the strategies for both sides as the inquiry continues.

2. Bernie Sanders hospitalized

Sen. Bernie Sanders was hospitalized Tuesday night in Las Vegas to treat a blockage in an artery, his campaign announced.

The 78-year-old had two stents inserted following medical tests.

“Sen. Sanders is conversing and in good spirits. He will be resting up over the next few days,” Sanders’ senior adviser Jeff Weaver said on Wednesday. “We are canceling his events and appearances until further notice, and we will continue to provide appropriate updates.”

ABC News Deputy Political Director MaryAlice Parks explains why the Sanders campaign has no easy options for how to deal with the health scare.

Cheryl Senter/AP
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders pauses while speaking at a campaign event, Sept. 29, 2019, in Hanover, N.H.

3. Car sales hit roadblock

U.S. auto sales took a dive in September, led by big losses for Toyota and Honda which were worse than analysts expected.

Stocks were down broadly on Tuesday for the second day in a row, sparking further recession fears. The Dow dropped 494 points.

ABC News Chief Business and Economics correspondent Rebecca Jarvis tells “Start Here” what is fueling the lack of demand for cars.

“Start Here,” ABC News’ flagship podcast, offers a straightforward look at the day’s top stories in 20 minutes. Listen for free every weekday on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, iHeartRadio, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn or the ABC News app. Follow @StartHereABC on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram for exclusive content and show updates.

Elsewhere:

‘I could feel everything just split apart’: Authorities in California are searching for a suspect who punched a 73-year-old man in the face during a road rage incident. The man told sheriff’s deputies that he was driving on Highway 88 when he became involved in a dispute with a driver in a Honda sedan.

‘Covert on-demand delivery service’: Six alleged members of a drug delivery service known as “Mike’s Candyshop” were arrested on Wednesday by police and federal agents and charged with distributing heroin and cocaine, including a dose that killed Colin Kroll, the co-founder of the HQ Trivia app.

‘I love you like anyone else’: Former Dallas police officer Amber Guyger was sentenced on Wednesday to serve 10 years in prison for the fatal 2018 killing of an innocent man she shot when she mistakenly entered his apartment believing it was her own but in a remarkable act of kindness, the brother of the victim took the witness stand and spoke directly to Guyger, saying, “I love you like anyone else,” and later hugged her in the courtroom before she was led off to prison.

‘Deeply troubling, and as presented, inaccurate’: Opera star Placido Domingo resigned as general director of LA Opera in California shortly after stepping away from the Metropolitan Opera in New York.

From our friends at FiveThirtyEight:

‘Preliminary impeachment polling tracker’: Now that House Democrats are holding an official inquiry into allegations that President Trump pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, FiveThirtyEight is following how public opinion responds.

Doff your cap:

“He looked like a little baby kangaroo!”

That’s was the first thought Melody Rezzonico of Wyoming had upon seeing her two-legged rescue dog, Gus, for the first time.

When she saw his photo, she immediately texted her mom, “I think this is gonna be my next dog!”

Play
Two-legged dog looks just like a baby kangaroo

Gus was abandoned in South Dakota when he was 4 months old and Rezzonico got connected to him through a local shelter. Read more about his amazing story HERE.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/start-here-trump-lashes-impeachment-bernie-sanders-hospitalized/story?id=66004786

At least three protesters and one policeman have been killed in Iraq‘s southern city of Nasiriya, according to a monitoring group, after nationwide anti-government protests devolved into violence that saw security forces fire live rounds and tear gas for a second straight day. 

The deaths on Wednesday came a day after at least two protesters – one in the capital, Baghdad, and one in Nasiriya – were killed and hundreds of people were wounded in clashes between police and protesters angry at  unemployment, corruption and poor public services.

The nationwide rallies are the largest display of public anger against Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi’s year-old government. 

Mustafa Saadoon, director of the Iraqi Observatory for Human Rights, told Al Jazeera three protesters and one policeman were killed in Nasiriya during clashes on Wednesday. At least 78 people were also wounded, he said.


News agencies quoted medical and security sources as saying that the death toll over the past two days stood at nine. The figure could not be independently verified.

Later on Wednesday, authorities deployed counterterrorism troops in Nasiriya after police “lost control” when gun battles erupted between protesters and security forces, police sources told Reuters news agency. Curfews were later imposed in Nasiriya and two other southern cities, Amara and Hilla, they added.

Meanwhile, internet blockage observatory NetBlocks said online coverage had been cut off across much of the country, including Baghdad, with connectivity falling below 70 percent.


In the capital, Tahrir Square was sealed off on Wednesday by heavily armed soldiers and dozens of riot policemen, with some demonstrators gathering around the edges. Hundreds of protesters, including university graduates, had rallied there on Tuesday. 

Protesters on Wednesday also took to the streets in al-Shaab in north Baghdad and Zafaraniya in the south, with riot police attempting to disperse them with tear gas and live rounds fired in the air.

“I came out today in support of my brothers in Tahrir Square,” Abdallah Walid told AFP news agency in Zafaraniya, where protesters were burning tyres on streets lined with riot police vehicles.


“We want jobs and better public services. We’ve been demanding them for years and the government has never responded,” the 27-year-old said.

AFP, citing medical sources, said some 60 people were wounded across the capital, including nine from bullets.

“All through the evening, we’ve been hearing the sound of gun fire and sirens,” said Al Jazeera’s Imran Khan, reporting from Baghdad. The demonstrations have spread to several cities across the country, with demonstrators in Najaf reportedly setting fire to government buildings, he said. 

The Iraqi government has been taken by surprise over the size of the rallies, which were mostly organised on social media, he said, adding: “The government appears to be very concerned about these protests spreading. They are restricting live broadcasts from the protest scene, as well as social media platforms, like Facebook and Twitter.” 


Meanwhile, protesters tried to break into the municipality building in the eastern city of Kut, while hundreds took to the streets of Hilla and Diwaniya, according to Reuters.

Thousands gathered in the oil-rich southern city of Basra in front of the provincial administration building but so far protests there were peaceful.

Peaceful protests were also reported in Samawa, while small rallies were held in the northern cities of Kirkuk and Tikrit, as well as in the eastern province of Diyala, Reuters reported.


Abdul Mahdi on Wednesday chaired an emergency meeting of the national security council, which later issued a statement regretting deaths and injuries on both sides during Tuesday’s protests and affirming the right to protest and freedom of expression. It made no mention of Wednesday’s protests.

“The council affirms the right to protest, freedom of expression, and the protesters’ legitimate demands, but at the same time condemns the acts of vandalism that accompanied the protests,” it said.

Appropriate measures to protect citizens, as well as public and private property would be taken, it added.

All military units were placed on high alert, the defence ministry said.

In a statement on Tuesday, the prime minister had promised jobs for unemployed graduates and instructed the oil ministry and other government bodies to start including a 50 percent quota for local workers in subsequent contracts with foreign companies.

According to the World Bank, youth unemployment in Iraq is more than 20 percent.


Ali al-Nashmi, a professor of international relations at the Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, described the latest protests as the “most serious we have seen yet”. 

“The protesters are raising many slogans – they want jobs, they want to fight against corruption, they want electricity. They don’t have one slogan or one leader. They are looking for everything. And they are not followers of a specific religious or political party. Therefore it will be difficult to control or negotiate with them.” 

Late on Wednesday, Moqtada al-Sadr, a powerful Shia leader who has led previous demonstrations, called for “peaceful protests and a general strike” after calling for an investigation into the violence.

Yusuf Alabarda, an analyst based in Turkey’s Ankara, called the situation in Iraq “very fragile”.

“This is a war-torn country, very close to being a failed state. And there are rivalries among United States, Iran and Turkey. And for these reasons, the situation inside Iraq is very fragile,” he told Al Jazeera. 

However, “in the short term, this government will not be able to alter the economic situation,” he said. “But changing governments will not help fight against economic issues, corruption, terrorism or the security threats.” 

The United Nations expressed concern over the violence and urged calm, with the special representative of the UN secretary-general for Iraq, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, reaffirming in a statement the right to protest.

Iraq’s President Barham Salih, in a post on Twitter late on Tuesday, also reminded security forces that “peaceful protest is a constitutional right”. He added: “Our young Iraqi children are looking for reform and jobs, and our duty is to meet these legitimate demands.”

Parliament, too, has ordered an investigation into the violence and its human rights committee criticised security forces for their “suppression” of the demonstrations.

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/iraqi-police-open-fire-day-protests-hit-baghdad-191002120630933.html

Then came another unlikely embrace — from the judge in the case that sparked renewed protests Wednesday as Guyger received a 10-year-sentence that some called a “slap in the face.” With the emotional trial wrapped up, Judge Tammy Kemp walked over in her black robes to give Guyger a Bible. Then, she wrapped her arms around Guyger and murmured to her. Together, they prayed.

The two extraordinary moments would polarize, just like the case that led up to them, raising fresh questions about race in a white officer’s fatal shooting of a black man.

For some, the hugs and words of understanding were testament to the power of radical compassion, often rooted in religious convictions — “a spirit of forgiveness, faith and trust,” as the Dallas Police Department put it in a Wednesday evening tweet.

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) praised Brandt Jean for a demonstration of “Christian love,” while District Attorney John Creuzot called the teen’s address to Guyger an “amazing act of healing.”

“I would hope that the greater community, not just Dallas, not just Texas, but the greater United States, could gain a message from that,” Creuzot said.

Nikki Haley, the former U.N. ambassador, called the teen’s hug an “amazing example of faith, love, and forgiveness.”

But others were confused, troubled and outraged. They saw the latest feel-good episode in a long history of black people extending quick absolution to white people in the face of horrific wrongs.

“Black people, when they experience injustice, there’s almost an expectation that we will immediately forgive and therefore can sort of move on,” Jemar Tisby, an African American historian and writer, told The Washington Post. “So I think a lot of people are reacting — that we have a right to be angry, a right to grieve, and a right to want justice.”

The conversation that played out on social media as clips of both Brandt Jean’s and Kemp’s moments with Guyger went viral continued a debate familiar to those who watched or read about a similarly startling scene of mercy four years ago, when loved one after loved one of the victims of white supremacist Dylann Roof — all black parishioners at a church in Charleston, S.C. — offered prayers and forgiveness just days after Roof’s deadly rampage.

On Wednesday, the congregation at the Dallas West Church of Christ, where the Jean family went to worship after the sentencing, met a video of Brandt Jean’s words to Guyger with applause and tears, the Associated Press reported.

The responses of victims’ relatives in both Dallas and Charleston were part of a long tradition in the black Christian community, Tisby said, one he thinks is rooted in everything African Americans have endured since slavery. It’s an attitude he sees in Fannie Lou Hamer, the black civil rights activist who once said, “Ain’t no such a thing as I can hate anybody and hope to see God’s face” — and an attitude he witnessed this past weekend at commemorations of a 1919 massacre of black Americans, where he said people spoke of justice but not revenge.

“There has been such a long history of injustice perpetrated against black people in the United States that if we didn’t forgive, we run the risk of being consumed by bitterness,” Tisby said.

Back in 2015, others found the attitudes of the Charleston shooting victims’ families hard to comprehend. In a New York Times article titled “Why I Can’t Forgive Dylann Roof,” writer Roxane Gay expressed wonder at the reactions and slammed a society she called overeager for the mourners’ compassion.

“White people embrace narratives about forgiveness so they can pretend the world is a fairer place than it actually is, and that racism is merely a vestige of a painful past instead of this indelible part of our present,” she wrote.

Similar misgivings were on display Wednesday as the Guyger case came to an end. The judge’s hug for Guyger — highly unusual, many commented — provoked particular controversy as some pointed to other convicts who received no such shows of kindness.

“Did Crystal Mason get a hug when she was sent to jail for voting?” one critic asked on Twitter, referencing a black mother in the same state of Texas who was infamously sentenced to five years in prison for casting a ballot illegally.

Tisby thought of epithets like “thug” thrown at black people and dehumanizing discussions of Michael Brown, the teen fatally shot by police in 2014. African Americans stereotyped as threatening or prone to crime are often denied the sort of empathy Guyger got during her sentencing, he said; others online echoed his sadness at uneven distribution of the kind of compassion Brandt Jean showed.

“I think black people are legitimately upset when we extend grace in the face of clear and blatant injustices, but we’re never extended that same grace in the public mind,” Tisby said.

Guyger has said her actions toward Botham Jean had nothing to do with race, testifying tearfully to her remorse and saying the shooting was “about being scared” rather than “about hate.” But a lawyer for the Jean family framed Guyger’s conviction as a “victory for black people in America” and an affirmation that their lives matter.

Guyger has also come under fire for offensive texts made public before her sentencing: Messages show the former officer joking about the death of Martin Luther King Jr., disparaging black colleagues and responding to a friend’s warning that a dog “may be racist” with the words, “It’s okay. I’m the same.”

‘Not racist but …’: White police officer who killed innocent black man in his home sent offensive texts

Those texts were on the minds of some people dismayed at Judge Kemp’s gestures to Guyger.

“How Botham Jean’s brother chooses to grieve is his business. He’s entitled to that. But this judge choosing to hug this woman is unacceptable,” tweeted Atlantic writer Jemele Hill, telling people to remember that “this convicted murderer is the same one who laughed about Martin Luther King Jr’s assassination.”

Legal experts had questions for Kemp, too. Kenneth Williams, a professor at the South Texas College of Law in Houston, said he’d never seen anything like Wednesday’s interaction with Guyger in his 30 years of legal practice. It was not only rare but inappropriate, he said, since Kemp might have to weigh in on further case developments if Guyger appeals.

“She has indicated an affinity or sympathy for the defendant,” he said, suggesting the case might have to go to another judge.

Kemp did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. The Post was unable to reach Brandt Jean, and an inquiry to the Jean family’s lawyer was not immediately returned.

Andra Gillespie saw grace in the Jean family’s response to 26-year-old Botham Jean’s killer: It was “their way of trying to fulfill their Christian obligation to forgive her in spite of everything that happened,” she said. But the political science professor at Emory University and devout evangelical also cautioned — as she did after the Charleston church shooting — against letting forgiveness dull the urgency of injustice. Admiration for Brandt Jean’s speech shouldn’t distract people from deeper, troubling questions raised by Botham Jean’s death, she said — questions like, “Why do people kill black people before they ask questions they might ask of other people?”

“My problem is when outsiders look at that situation and they get touched by the forgiveness and then they get lulled into thinking we don’t have to do anything else for that situation. … We don’t take the lessons from it that we should,” Gillespie said.

Read more:

As plantations talk more honestly about slavery, some visitors are pushing back

Iowa reporter who found a viral star’s racist tweets slammed when critics find his own offensive posts

The brand label that stokes Trump’s fury: ‘Racist, racist, racist’

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/10/03/judge-botham-jeans-brother-hugged-amber-guyger-igniting-debate-about-forgiveness-race/

BORIS Johnson has laid out his Brexit deal to the Commons and warned Remainers it’s his deal or no deal.

The PM told MPs to get behind the government’s new plan but said “we’re ready” to leave without a Withdrawal Agreement on October 31.

Continue reading – Boris lays out his Brexit plan and warns MPs ‘it’s this deal or no deal’:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politic…

Boris Johnson reveals Brexit ‘final offer’ to EU with ten days to go to crack deal. Continue reading:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/…

So who’s at the Conservative Party Conference, what should we expect, and what are the key events to look out for?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1003290…

Boris Johnson could tell EU to REFUSE Brexit delay as part of exit agreement to give MPs straight choice between his deal or no deal:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/…

Boris Johnson’s final masterplan for Brexit deal to be unveiled to Brussels as he urges leaders to veto extension beyond Oct 31:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/…

Tory conference: Key events, speeches and what to expect from Manchester:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1003290…

From Brexit breaking news to HD movie trailers, The Sun newspaper brings you the latest news videos and explainers from the UK and around the world.

Become a Sun Subscriber and hit the bell to be the first to know

Read The Sun: http://www.thesun.co.uk
Like The Sun on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thesun/
Follow The Sun on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSun
Subscribe to The Sun on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/discover/The…

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOfoTFDmuzM

Source Article from https://www.tmz.com/2019/10/02/ex-dallas-police-officer-amber-guyger-sentenced-10-years-prison-murder/

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-03/-you-re-not-going-to-destroy-me-biden-warns-trump

  • President Donald Trump told Vice President Mike Pence to convey to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that the US would withhold military aid to Ukraine while demanding they aggressively investigate corruption, the Washington Post reported.
  • The Ukrainians likely understood that Trump’s demand to investigate “corruption” was linked to his desire for them to look into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son.
  • The revelation is the latest indication that the US president may have dangled taxpayer dollars in order to get a foreign government to investigate a political rival for personal gain. It also ropes the vice president further into the brewing controversy.
  • Trump’s direction to Pence came shortly after he spoke to Zelensky in a July 25 phone call in which he repeatedly pressured his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate the Bidens for corruption and help discredit the Russia investigation.
  • Pence met with Zelensky during a diplomatic trip on September 1. Afterward, Pence told a reporter the US has “great concerns” about corruption, and that the president wanted to be sure US military aid to Ukraine was going toward “the kind of investments that will contribute to security and stability in Ukraine.”
  • Katie Waldman, press secretary for the vice president, released a statement in response to The Post’s reporting.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

President Donald Trump used Vice President Mike Pence to convey to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that the US would withhold military aid to the country while demanding that they aggressively investigate corruption, the Washington Post reported.

The Ukrainians likely understood that Trump’s demand to investigate “corruption” was connected to his desire for them to look into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son ahead of the 2020 election, The Post said.

The revelation is the latest indication that the US president may have dangled taxpayer dollars in order to get a foreign government to investigate a rival for political gain.

Trump’s direction to Pence came shortly after he spoke to Zelensky in a July 25 phone call that’s now the subject of an explosive whistleblower complaint a US intelligence official filed against the president in August.

The complaint alleged Trump used the power of his office to “solicit interference from a foreign country” in the 2020 US election. His personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani is described as a “central figure in this effort,” and it said Attorney General William Barr “appears to be involved as well.”

Trump had ordered his administration to withhold the nearly $400 million military-aid package to Ukraine days before the phone call with Zelensky.

While the White House’s notes on the call showed that Trump did not directly mention offering aid in exchange for Zelensky’s assistance in investigating Biden, they confirmed that Trump brought up how the US does “a lot for Ukraine” right before asking Zelensky to do him a “favor” by investigating Biden and discrediting the former special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe.

Read more: Mike Pompeo made at least 4 significantly misleading statements about his role in the Trump-Ukraine phone call

Pence, meanwhile, addressed the issue of corruption in Ukraine during a diplomatic trip to Poland earlier this month. The trip occurred before the public learned of the whistleblower’s complaint and after it was reported that the US was withholding aid from Ukraine. Pence held a news conference during the trip, which took place one day after he met with Zelensky.

“Did you discuss Joe Biden at all during that meeting yesterday with the Ukrainian president?” a reporter asked Pence. “And number two, can you assure Ukraine that the hold-up of that money has absolutely nothing to do with efforts, including by Rudy Giuliani, to try to dig up dirt on the Biden family?”

Pence replied, “Well, on the first question, the answer is no. But we … discussed America’s support for Ukraine and the upcoming decision the President will make on the latest tranche of financial support in great detail.”

Pence added that Trump had asked him to meet with Zelensky and convey that the US has “great concerns about issues of corruption.”

Zelensky, he said, in turn assured him that his government has taken steps to address “the issue of public corruption.”

Pence continued: “I mean, to invest additional taxpayer money in Ukraine, the president wants to be assured that those resources are truly making their way to the kind of investments that will contribute to security and stability in Ukraine, and that’s an expectation the American people have and the president has expressed very clearly.”

Read more: The Trump whistleblower told the House Intelligence Committee about their concerns before filing an official complaint

It’s unclear what Pence knew about the July 25 call or the whistleblower complaint ahead of the meeting.

Officials close to the vice president told The Post he had no knowledge of Trump’s efforts to pressure Zelensky to investigate Biden and his son over their dealings in Ukraine.

Following the release of The Post’s report, Katie Waldman, press secretary for the vice president, released the following statement:

 

Other officials, however, told The Post that one of Pence’s top deputies was a participant in Trump’s July phone call with Zelensky and that the vice president should have had access to a transcript of the conversation. The whistleblower’s complaint detailed how senior White House officials took steps to “lock down” records of the call immediately after over concerns that it could prove damaging to the president.

To that effect, they took the unusual step of moving the official transcript of the call from the computer system such documents are typically stored in to a top-secret codeword-level system in the National Security Council that houses information pertaining to US national security.

The Wall Street Journal also reported that Pence advised Trump against releasing the summary of his call with Zelensky last week. The vice president is said to have raised concerns about the precedent that releasing the summary could set but eventually sided with other White House officials calling for Trump to release it.

A separate Tuesday report from the Associated Press, which cited a source familiar with the issue, alleges that Trump asked Pence not to take a trip to Ukraine for Zelensky’s inauguration this past May, which is a claim the whistleblower made in the complaint. Pence aids, however, said that the scrapped trip was due to logistics.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-pence-ukraine-us-withhold-aid-corruption-probe-2019-10

Top House Intelligence Committee Republicans accused Chairman Adam Schiff of withholding information from the panel about a whistleblower complaint concerning President Trump before it became public.

Responding to a report that revealed Schiff had earlier knowledge of the complaint from a CIA officer than previously known, California Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking member, called the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry a politically motivated attack on the president.

“We learn from the press today that Chm Schiff had prior knowledge and involvement in the WB complaint. He withheld this info from the American people and even from the Intel Cmte. In light of this news, it’s hard to view impeachment as anything aside from an orchestrated farce,” Nunes tweeted.

Asked if Schiff concealed information about the whisteblower from GOP members of the panel, Rep. John Ratcliffe, a Republican from Texas who was briefly Trump’s pick to be his director of national intelligence, told the Washington Examiner that he too was not made aware of this official’s overtures to the committee.

“I was never made aware that Chairman Schiff was aware of this whistleblower’s concerns before a complaint was ever filed, much less that own his Intel staff advised the whistleblower on how to proceed,” Ratcliffe said. “For Chairman Schiff to then feign outrage and allege a White House ‘cover-up’ to keep Congress from knowing about the whistleblower complaint that he helped to initiate is beyond dishonest.”

New York Rep. Elise Stefanik, another GOP member of the committee, called on Schiff to immediately step down as chairman.

According to the report on Wednesday, a colleague of the whistleblower first went to the agency’s top lawyer to convey accusations that Trump abused his power by pressuring Ukraine’s president to investigate Joe Biden, a political rival.

Concerned his allegations would be ignored, the whistleblower then approached a House Intelligence Committee aide with vague details of what would appear in the complaint. The aide then shared some of what the whistleblower said to Schiff but did not divulge the identity of the CIA officer, the report said.

Asked to react to the story during a press conference, Trump called it a “scam” and accused Schiff of helping the whistleblower write his or her complaint.

A lawyer for the whistleblower strongly rejected Trump’s allegation. “There was no contact between the legal team and Congress until nearly a month after the whistleblower complaint was submitted to the Intelligence Community’s Inspector General,” Mark Zaid said. “I can unequivocally state that neither any member of the legal team nor the whistleblower has ever met or spoken with Congressman Schiff about this matter.”

Schiff’s team insisted both the intelligence panel and the whistleblower followed proper procedure and that the whistleblower was advised to find a lawyer and file an official complaint. “Like other whistleblowers have done before and since under Republican- and Democratic-controlled committees, the whistleblower contacted the committee for guidance on how to report possible wrongdoing within the jurisdiction of the intelligence community,” Schiff’s spokesman Patrick Boland said. “At no point did the committee review or receive the complaint in advance.”

Spokespeople for Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr and Vice Chairman Mark Warner also stressed that it would be standard procedure for an intelligence committee to advise a potential whistleblower to hire a legal representation and file a complaint with an agency or intelligence community inspector general.

Bradley Moss, who is a partner at Zaid’s firm, told the Washington Examiner in a brief message that “sure” it would have been appropriate for Schiff to advise Nunes on what he had learned but added it was “not legally required.”

What exactly Schiff knew and when he knew it remains an open question. Schiff’s spokesman did not return the Washington Examiner‘s request for comment in response to the Republican claims that he hid information from them. Yet as the fight for access to the complaint between Congress and the Trump administration unfolded, Schiff repeatedly indicated his office had no contact with the whistleblower.

“We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to. But I’m sure the whistleblower has concerns that he has not been advised, as the law requires, by the inspector general or the director of national intelligence just as to how he is to communicate with Congress,” he told MSNBC days after the complaint’s existence went public.

Members of the House Intelligence Committee were reportedly briefed on the whistleblower’s allegations after the complaint was filed. These lawmakers got the “notion” he knew about the complaint itself and the identity of the whistleblower before the complaint was made public, they told Fox News.

Schiff publicly announced the existence of the complaint on Sept. 13, when he subpoenaed acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire for access to it. The California Democrat argued Maguire defied statute by not delivering the complaint, deemed “credible” and “urgent” by the Intelligence Committee inspector general, to the intelligence committees in Congress.

Maguire, who received guidance from the Justice Department and White House, countered that the statute did not apply because the complaint focused on an official that was outside of the intelligence community.

As reports came out revealing details about the complaint and Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Democrats escalated their criticism of Trump with allegations that he sought a foreign country’s help in the 2020 election by leveraging millions of dollars in security aid that was withheld until September.

On Sept. 19, Schiff strongly suggested that he only became aware of the complaint because Inspector General Michael Atkinson reached out after Maguire withheld it. “No complaint was provided and the inspector general felt it necessary to inform the Congress that that complaint was being withheld. In the absence of the actions, and I want to thank the inspector general, in the absence of his actions and coming to our committee, we might not have even known there was a whistleblower complaint alleging an urgent concern,” he said.

When Trump admitted he brought up Biden in the phone call, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi initiated an impeachment inquiry. Trump and his allies argue that notes on the phone call, released soon after, show there was no explicit “quid pro quo,” but the release of the complaint raised new concerns about an effort to conceal details of that call and others using a highly secure computer system.

During a Fox News interview on Tuesday, Nunes warned of there being a “Russia hoax 2.0” because the House intelligence Committee is taking the lead in impeachment proceedings, and he suggested there will be selective leaks leading to new “bombshells” with anonymous sources in the media.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/an-orchestrated-farce-house-intel-republicans-accuse-schiff-of-concealing-info-about-whistleblower

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Democrats accused the Trump administration on Wednesday of using “propaganda and disinformation” to attack the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and demanded that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo explain how the material circulated at top levels of his department.

The Democrats, who are pursuing an impeachment probe of President Donald Trump, leveled the charge after State Department Inspector General Steve Linick delivered a package of documents to a hastily called hour-long briefing with staff for eight congressional committees.

“We are now in possession of this packet of propaganda and disinformation,” said Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin, the only lawmaker who joined committee staff members at the meeting. “The real question is where did it come from and how did it end up in our lap?”

Photographs of some of the documents, seen by Reuters, promoted unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about Marie Yovanovitch, the former U.S. envoy to Ukraine, who was removed from her post in May, months before she was due to leave, after Trump allies accused her of disloyalty.

Multiple meeting participants, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the materials arrived at the State Department this spring and that Linick passed them on to the FBI.

The materials were inside an envelope marked “White House” that contained folders labeled “Trump Hotel,” said a statement issued by the Democratic chairmen of the House of Representatives intelligence, oversight and foreign relations committees.

The documents “reinforce concern that the president and his allies sought to use the machinery of the State Department to further the president’s personal political interests,” they said.

The meeting with Linick came as the Democratic-led U.S. House looks at whether Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate a Democratic political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter, who was a director of a Ukrainian energy firm.

Following a whistleblower complaint released last week, Democrats launched the impeachment inquiry focusing on a July 25 call in which Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Biden, a Trump rival in the president’s race for re-election in 2020, and his son.

Pompeo said on Wednesday during a visit to Rome that he had listened in on Trump’s call with Zelenskiy.

Photographs of documents delivered by Linick to Congress included what appeared to be a cover sheet addressed to Pompeo on White House stationery.

One document, whose source was not disclosed, described a discredited theory promoted by Trump allies that Yovanovitch was installed in her post by billionaire George Soros, a Democratic donor frequently attacked by far-right activists.

“Until she is removed Soros has as much, or more, power over Yovanovitch as the President and the Secretary of State,” said the document.

Also in the packet was an email from John Solomon, a pro-Trump columnist for The Hill newspaper, to pro-Trump lawyers Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGenova, and Lev Parnas, a Soviet-born businessman who has been aiding Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

The email contained a report by Solomon that the U.S. Embassy in Kiev pressed Ukrainian authorities to end an investigation into an anti-corruption group supported by Soros during the 2016 U.S. election.

The report also quoted a former Ukrainian prosecutor as saying Yovanovitch had given him a list of people, including Soros allies, who should not be prosecuted. The State Department has vehemently denied such a list existed.

Giuliani, who has called Parnas one of his clients, has been a leading promoter of the unsubstantiated allegation that Biden, while vice president, pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor investigating the company in which his son was a director.

The prosecutor has said the probe pre-dated Hunter Biden’s role in the company.

Giuliani told CNN he was the source of some of the information that the inspector general turned over to Congress, the network reported. Giuliani said he sent the documents to Pompeo, who told Giuliani he would refer it for investigation, according to CNN.

Giuliani, the White House, State Department, Solomon, Toensing and DiGenova did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Slideshow (2 Images)

Bob Menendez, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the materials provided by Linick appeared “to contain long-debunked theories and false statements about the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and one of President Trump’s political opponents.”

He demanded an explanation of Pompeo’s role.

Before the meeting, congressional sources had told Reuters the session with Linick would focus on potential political retaliation against career State Department diplomats by the department’s leadership.

Reporting By Jonathan Landay, Patricia Zengerle and Mark Hosenball; additional reporting by Lisa Lambert; Editing by Bill Berkrot, David Gregorio, Tom Brown and Cynthia Osterman

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-state/democrats-say-trump-administration-used-misinformation-to-attack-us-diplomat-idUSKBN1WH1WA

Sean Hannity ripped House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff on Wednesday, accusing the California Democrat of lying after a New York Times report confirmed that Schiff’s office spoke with the unidentified “whistleblower” in the Trump-Ukraine controversy before filing a complaint.

“Now it’s no secret the cowardly Schiff is dishonest, deceptive, is a proven liar, nothing but a political hack, an operative,” Hannity said on his television program. “He’s been proven to lie over and over and over again.”

“Now it’s no secret the cowardly Schiff is dishonest, deceptive, is a proven liar, nothing but a political hack, an operative. He’s been proven to lie over and over and over again.”

— Sean Hannity

PRANK CALLER TRICKS SCHIFF INTO THINKING HE HAS DIRT ON TRUMP

A spokesman for Schiff acknowledged for the first time Wednesday that the whistleblower alleging misconduct in the White House had reached out to the intelligence panel before filing a complaint — prompting President Trump to accuse Schiff directly of helping write the document.

Schiff had previously claimed in a televised interview that “we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.”

But Hannity wasn’t buying Schiff’s story.

“His fingerprints all over this,” Hannity said of Schiff. The host called the congressman a “sleazebag” who was “behind this ‘nonpartisan, totally legitimate whistleblower complaint’ from the very beginning.”

Hannity pointed out that the revelation about Schiff is the very reason America dislikes Washington politics.

“Keep in mind, that guy the same con artist who’s now leading the Democrats’ idiotic impeachment inquiry, which is totally based on the whistleblower complaint that the shifty Schiff himself had a hand in creating. Clearly. And offering advice to,” Hannity said. “This is why Americans hate the swamp known as Washington, D.C.

CLICK HERE FOR THE ALL-NEW FOXBUSINESS.COM

“And sadly what we are seeing here is nothing new,” Hannity added. “It’s the same Schiff, different day.”

Fox News’ Gregg Re and Catherine Herridge contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/hannity-rips-adam-schiff-over-new-whistleblower-revelation-this-is-why-americans-hate-the-swamp

After three demonstrators were killed on Tuesday by riot police officers who resorted to live fire, Mr. Mehdi ordered the security forces to refrain from the use of bullets. By nightfall on Wednesday, however, it seemed that some police officers may have ignored his instructions as more people were reported shot.

Officials in the prime minister’s office said the government had cut off the internet to hinder the use of social media by protesters, but the extent of such a shutdown was unclear.

The protests have veered from furious attacks on government property to peaceful, even ecumenical, pleas for the government to respond to citizens’ needs. At dusk in Baghdad, some Sunni and Shia Muslims joined together in prayer.

Some demonstrators carried banners that seemed in keeping with Mr. Mehdi’s statement that both the police and the demonstrators were sons of Iraq. But some banners also appeared aimed at rallying the police to the side of the protesters.

One banner read: “Oh you soldier, do not open fire. I am your brother. Your mother and my mother cry the same tears. You fight for me and I demonstrate for you.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/world/middleeast/iraq-corruption-protests.html

CLOSE

It was a moving moment when Brandt Jean asked the judge if he could hug Amber Guyger, the former Dallas cop who shot and killed his brother.
USA TODAY

It’s a moment very rare in the annals of crime history: A man hugging the killer of his own brother in the courtroom where she was convicted, wishing her the best.

That’s the scene that played out in a Dallas courtroom Wednesday. In the moments following the sentencing of Amber Guyger, the former Dallas police officer who shot and killed a black neighbor after she accidentally walked into his apartment, the victim’s brother had forgiveness in his heart. 

Botham Jean was killed while eating ice cream in his own apartment, after Guyger mistakenly opened the door to his apartment and mistook him for an intruder. But his younger brother, Brandt Jean, didn’t wish Guyger any ill will on Wednesday.

In fact, he wished Guyger nothing but the best and, holding back tears, he asked the presiding judge if he could hug the woman convicted of murder in the killing of his brother. Guyger, 31, was sentenced to 10 years in prison

“I don’t know if this is possible,” the 18-year-old said in a video of the moment posted by WFAA-TV’s Mike Leslie, “but can I give her a hug, please? Please?”

After a pause, Judge Tammy Kemp said yes. 

Guyger and Brandt Jean embraced in the courtroom for nearly a minute. Kemp also hugged Guyger before she was led from the courtroom.

“If you truly are sorry, I know… I can speak for myself, I forgive you,” he said before the hug. “And I know if you go to God and ask him, he will forgive you. 

“Again, I’m speaking for myself, not even on behalf of my family, but I love you, just like anyone else. I’m not going to say I hope you rot and die just like my brother did, but I, personally, want the best for you.

Sobs were audible throughout the courtroom as the two hugged and Kemp could be seen wiping tears away. 

“I wasn’t going to ever say this in front of my family or anyone, but I don’t even want you to go to jail. I want the best for you, because I know that’s exactly what Botham would want you to do. And the best would be, give your life to Christ. I’m going to say anything else.

“I think giving your life to Christ would be the best thing that Botham would want you to do.”

Contributing: John Bacon, USA TODAY; The Associated Press.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/02/amber-guyger-sentencing-botham-jeans-brother-embraces-guyger/3847967002/

Kurt Volker, the State Department special envoy to Ukraine who resigned last week amid Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into President TrumpDonald John TrumpFederal judge halts California law targeting Trump tax returns Trump agriculture chief: No guarantee small farms can survive Harris presses Twitter to ‘do something’ over Trump’s ‘coup’ tweet MORE, reportedly met last year with officials from Burisma, the Ukrainian company denounced by the Trump administration as corrupt.

The Associated Press reported Wednesday that Volker met with officials from Burisma at a conference in September 2018 hosted by the Atlantic Council. A photo of Volker and an adviser to Burisma later appeared on the company’s website.

According to multiple attendees, Volker met briefly with Vadym Pozharskyi at the conference, though it was not known if their discussions included Trump’s efforts to spur an investigation into former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHarris presses Twitter to ‘do something’ over Trump’s ‘coup’ tweet Poll: 40 percent of Republicans say Trump ‘probably’ mentioned Biden on Ukraine call Pompeo, House chairmen clash in impeachment fight MORE and his son Hunter Biden, who previously served on Burisma’s board.

The administration has in recent days accused the company of corrupt business dealings through its connection to Hunter Biden, who Trump says benefited from efforts by his father to dismiss a Ukrainian prosecutor who at one point in time investigated Burisma.

No wrongdoing by either Biden has been suggested by Ukrainian officials, and the prosecutor who Trump argued was targeted said recently that Hunter Biden was not found to have committed a crime.

“From the perspective of Ukrainian legislation, he did not violate anything,” said Yuri Lutsenko, Ukraine’s former top prosecutor. “Hunter Biden cannot be responsible for violations of the management of Burisma that took place two years before his arrival.”

Trump’s efforts to persuade Ukraine’s president to launch an investigation into Joe Biden, currently the top-polling candidate in the 2020 Democratic primary, has become the center of House Democrats’ impeachment investigation.

Volker is set to appear before House lawmakers on Thursday to give a deposition as part of that inquiry.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/international/464120-volker-met-with-adviser-for-ukranian-firm-at-center-of-impeachment

President Trump put a spotlight on a 2014 photograph featuring former Vice President Joe Biden and son Hunter Biden posing on a golf course with a Ukrainian gas company board member by sharing a video making use of the image.

A photo obtained by Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” shows the Bidens golfing in the Hamptons with Devon Archer, who served on the board of Burisma Holdings with Hunter.

A source close to Archer told Fox News the photo was taken in August 2014. Based on contemporaneous news reports, the then-vice president was in the Hamptons at the time. Hunter Biden and Archer joined the Burisma Holdings board in April 2014.

On Wednesday afternoon, the president put the photograph center stage, sharing it as part of a video that also featured the 2005 song “Photograph” from the band Nickelback.

TRUMP SAYS SCHIFF ‘HELPED WRITE’ WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINT, AFTER HOUSE PANEL ADMITS ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE

PRANK CALLER TRICKS SCHIFF INTO THINKING HE HAS DIRT ON TRUMP

“LOOK AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH!” Trump tweeted.

The clip also features a tense exchange between the 2020 frontrunner and Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy, who pressed him last month about his knowledge of his son’s financial ties to Ukraine.

“Have you ever spoken to your son about his overseas business dealings?” Doocy asked.

“I’ve never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,” Biden responded.

INTELLIGENCE WATCHDOG NOW CLAIMS WHISTLEBLOWER HAD FIRSTHAND INFORMATION, IN DEPARTURE FROM PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO CONGRESS — INCLUDING THE COMPLAINT ITSELF

The video goes on to label the Bidens and the “Ukraine gas exec” and hearts appearing around their faces.

Trump had been on the offensive all day after The New York Times reported earlier Wednesday that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., “learned about the outlines” of the whistleblower’s complaint “days before” it was filed. The complaint has fueled a House impeachment inquiry.

Speaking to Fox News, Schiff’s office denied that the intelligence committee had reviewed or received the complaint in advance, but largely confirmed The Times’ reporting.

A Schiff spokesperson seemingly narrowed that claim late Wednesday, telling Fox News that Schiff himself “does not know the identity of the whistleblower, and has not met with or spoken with the whistleblower or their counsel” for any reason.

CLICK HERE FOR THE ALL-NEW FOXBUSINESS.COM

“It shows that Schiff is a fraud. … I think it’s a scandal that he knew before,” Trump said, as the president of Finland stood at an adjacent podium. “I’d go a step further. I’d say he probably helped write it. … That’s a big story. He knew long before, and he helped write it too. It’s a scam.”

Referring to Schiff  — a Trump antagonist who has long claimed to have surefire evidence that Trump illegally conspired with Russians — as “Shifty Schiff,” Trump characterized Democrats’ impeachment inquiry as a “fraudulent crime on the American people.” (Earlier in the day, Trump described the inquiry as “BULLS—,” and mocked Schiff as a partisan “lowlife.”)

Fox News’ Gregg Re and Catherine Herridge contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-spotlights-bidens-golf-outing-with-ukraine-exec-with-nickelback-video-look-at-this-photograph

WASHINGTON — The intelligence community employee who has accused President Donald Trump of abusing his office filed his whistleblower complaint after first consulting with an aide to the Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, a committee spokesman acknowledged Wednesday, touching off a firestorm of criticism from Republicans.

But while President Trump and others accused House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., of orchestrating the complaint, Democratic committee aides told NBC News that what happened was rather routine, and no different from the two to three times a month an intelligence agency employee comes to them with concerns.

They said they did what they usually do in that situation: They instructed the future whistleblower to file a formal document with the inspector general, as called for in the law.

“Like other whistleblowers have done before and since under Republican and Democratic-controlled committees, the whistleblower contacted the committee for guidance on how to report possible wrongdoing within the jurisdiction of the Intelligence Community,” committee spokesman Patrick Boland told NBC News. “This is a regular occurrence, given the committee’s unique oversight role and responsibilities. Consistent with the committee’s longstanding procedures, committee staff appropriately advised the whistleblower to contact an Inspector General and to seek legal counsel.”

The sequence of events was first reported by the New York Times. The future whistleblower, a CIA officer, came to the committee after he had already filed a complaint with the CIA general counsel, and was concerned that the complaint was not being properly handled, Democratic committee aides said.

“At no point did the Committee review or receive the complaint in advance,” Boland said.

Trump, at a news conference, seized on the revelation and made an unsupported allegation that Schiff had helped prepare the complaint.

“He knew long before and helped write it, too. It’s a scam,” the president said.

The House Republican leader, Kevin McCarthy, claimed on Twitter that Schiff “just got caught orchestrating with the whistleblower before the complaint was ever filed. Democrats have rigged this process from the start.”

Boland and a lawyer for the whistleblower denied that Schiff played any role in writing the complaint.

However, Republicans focused on the veracity of a statement Schiff made on MSNBC’s Morning Joe a few days after he publicized the existence of the complaint.

“We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower,” Schiff said. “We would like to, but I’m sure the whistleblower has concerns that he has not been advised, as the law requires, by the inspector general or the Director of National Intelligence, just as to how he is to communicate with Congress.”

A committee aide said Schiff was referring to the committee writ large “officially interviewing the whistleblower,” as distinct from the brief conversation with a staffer. But Sam Stein, the Daily Beast journalist who asked the question, tweeted, “Schiff did appear to lie here in previously saying that his office had not spoken directly with the whistleblower.”

He added, “But if you care more about this stuff than the actual substance of the whistleblower complaint then you’re being a hack.”

Boland noted that the committee did not receive a copy of the complaint from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence until the night before the acting director of national intelligence’s testimony, more than three weeks after the legal deadline by which the committee should have received the complaint.

“The whistleblower should be commended for acting appropriately and lawfully throughout every step of the process,” he added. “The committee expects that they will be fully protected, despite the President’s threats. Only through their courage did these facts about the President’s abuse of power come to light. The committee encourages all whistleblowers to come forward and seek advice on how to make disclosures of serious or flagrant wrongdoing. The committee — and the nation — rely on brave members of the Intelligence Community to raise the alarm and avail themselves of established channels.”

Schiff does not know the identity of the complainant, the committee aides said, adding that the whistleblower passed on only a vague account of his or her concerns. They would not comment on whether Schiff knew they involved a Trump phone call with the Ukrainian president.

But one result of the heads up was that Schiff, alone among members of Congress, knew there was something important when the inspector general of the Intelligence Community notified the House and Senate intelligence committees that an “urgent concern” complaint was being withheld from them on legal grounds. On September 13, a Friday night, Schiff announced without warning that he was issuing a subpoena for the complaint, and suggested the complaint was being withheld to protect the president. Other Democrats did not appear to know what he knew.

The committee aides added that the bulk of the whistleblower’s complaint was marked unclassified, and that he therefore did not violate the whistleblower law that prohibits intelligence employees from conveying classified information to Congress without going through procedures, including filing a complaint with an inspector general.

A source close to the whistleblower’s legal team said there was no violation, and did not dispute the sequence of events as reported in the New York Times and confirmed by committee aides.

When the whistleblower first had a colleague convey his or her concerns in very general terms to the CIA’s general counsel, the CIA’s counsel briefed the White House Counsel’s Office about the complaint, a person familiar with the matter said. When the whistleblower learned about that, he became concerned the complaint was being swept aside, the New York Times reported.

“The intelligence community whistleblower followed the advice of legal counsel from the beginning,” Andrew Bakaj, lead counsel for the whistleblower, said. “The laws and processes have been followed.”

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/trump-republicans-accuse-top-dem-orchestrating-whistleblower-complaint-n1061681

Mr. Pompeo has often said that the Trump administration has not been tested by a true foreign crisis and that sooner or later one was coming. Now he is caught in the middle of a domestic one. He will be pressed to explain what he knew — after acknowledging that he listened in on a July 25 phone call between Mr. Trump and the newly elected president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky — and how he reacted when he heard his boss seek political help.

“I was on the phone call,” he said Wednesday, but ignored a question about what he thought about Mr. Trump’s requests.

That admission was a marked change. In interviews in recent weeks, Mr. Pompeo repeatedly evaded questions about the content of the call between the two presidents, and never volunteered that he had listened in.

In an interview on Sept. 22, days before the White House released a transcript of the call, Mr. Pompeo suggested that he was unaware of the details, telling Martha Raddatz of ABC that he had not seen the whistle-blower report and then describing American policy toward Ukraine in traditional terms, without reference to the favors Mr. Trump sought.

The Benghazi hearings that first brought national attention to Mr. Pompeo, then a conservative congressman from Kansas, investigated systematic security failings after four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, were killed in an attack on a diplomatic outpost and a nearby C.I.A. annex in 2012. The two-year congressional inquiry — one of the most bitterly partisan in history — concluded that the State Department and the C.I.A. did not appreciate the high security risk in Benghazi, but found no evidence that Mrs. Clinton was directly to blame.

Like the Benghazi hearings, the impeachment proceedings, opened last week by House Democrats, are as immersed in diplomacy as they are in political intrigue. In recent days Mr. Pompeo’s role in the Ukraine chain of events has become increasingly clearer — and ever closer to the center of the controversy.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/us/politics/pompeo-ukraine-impeachment.html

Government contractors erect a section of a Pentagon-funded border wall along the Colorado River in Yuma, Ariz., on Sept. 10.

Matt York/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Matt York/AP

Government contractors erect a section of a Pentagon-funded border wall along the Colorado River in Yuma, Ariz., on Sept. 10.

Matt York/AP

President Trump made building a border wall between the U.S. and Mexico a cornerstone of his 2016 presidential campaign. But when, after the election, efforts to build the wall stalled, he turned to other possible options — including constructing a trench filled with snakes and alligators — according to a forthcoming book.

“He would raise this idea of a trench — and [that] maybe we could have a water-filled trench,” New York Times journalist Julie Hirschfeld Davis told Fresh Air on Wednesday. “And he raised [the idea] so many times that actually his aides finally went and got a cost estimate for what a trench would cost.” Davis notes that thoughts of a border trench were cast aside after it was estimated that it would cost three times as much as a wall.

Davis and her Times colleague Michael Shear have covered the Trump administration from its earliest days. They chronicle the president’s attempts to upend the nation’s immigration system in their new book, Border Wars: Inside Trump’s Assault on Immigration, publishing on Oct. 8.

According to Davis and Shear, Trump sees a border wall as something more than a physical barrier. “The wall, in his view, should not just be a structure that would stop people on the other side, but that anybody who tried to climb it would be hurt severely,” Shear says.

To that end, they say, the president has proposed electrifying the wall or topping it with spikes and sharp concertina wire that would cut anyone who tried to climb it. He once suggested to now former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen that the wall be painted a “flat black” that would heat up in the sun and burn anyone who touched it.

“At one point, he actually publicly said that when migrants would throw rocks at the military or the border guards, that the military should just respond with rifles, implying that they should just kill them in response,” Shear told Fresh Air.

Shear notes that when aides told Trump that they could not respond to rock throwing with lethal force, the president backed down — but only slightly.

“He suggested, ‘Well, why don’t we just shoot them in the leg? That’ll slow them down,’ ” Shear says. “The aides sort of sat there kind of slack jawed and finally said to him, ‘No, sir, you can’t do that either.’ “

Terry Gross’ full interview with Julie Hirschfeld Davis and Michael Shear will air on Fresh Air on Thursday. The New York Times published an excerpt of Border Wars on Oct. 1.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/03/766423762/from-snakes-to-spikes-border-wars-reveals-the-extremes-of-trump-s-immigration-pr