USC President Carol L. Folt confirmed Wednesday that police investigators are looking into drug overdoses as a potential cause of death among some of the nine students who have died this semester.
While Folt would not elaborate on the scope of the inquiries or circumstances of the individual deaths, citing federal student privacy laws, she said USC is working with the Los Angles Police Department on the cases and “doubling down” on education and outreach over drug abuse.
Three of the nine deaths have been ruled suicides, but the cause or causes in the remaining cases have not been officially determined.
Investigators are trying to determine whether any student deaths are connected with tainted drugs, said sources who spoke to The Times on the condition on anonymity because they were not authorized to comment. The sources stressed that no links to tainted drugs have yet been confirmed. Autopsies and toxicology tests are still pending in a number of the deaths.
“We’re doubling down on educating [students] about the harm and serious risks associated with all types of drug abuse and substance abuse,” Folt said Wednesday. “And in particular, we’ve been also talking about the real risks of mixing opioids and prescription drugs and alcohol because we are concerned about that.”
In a letter sent to staff and students just after 10 p.m. Tuesday, top USC officials warned against the dangers of drug use — specifically opioids — and the sometimes lethal mixture of drugs and alcohol. The statement further warns about the increase of contaminated drugs.
“We all know that people that get drugs on the street have no idea what is in those drugs,” Fold said.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, deaths from drug overdoses have increased dramatically across all age groups over the last decade, with opioids and synthetic opioids — such as fentanyl — the main cause.
Fentanyl is a painkiller often prescribed as a skin patch for cancer patients and is considered 50 times stronger than heroin. Illicit fentanyl, manufactured as a white powder, has infiltrated the drug supply and can be lethal even in small amounts.
Last year, 2,311 people in California died of an opioid overdose, according to the state Department of Public Health. Young people are more likely to die from heroin and fentanyl overdoses than older drug users, who more commonly overdose on prescription opioids, state data show.
In 2017, 4,094 people nationwide ages 15-24 died of an opioid overdose, according to the CDC. That same year, the age group with the highest opioid overdose deaths was 25- to 34-year-olds.
USC Police Chief John Thomas said the university decided to relay the new information to students for their safety. Officials wanted to warn them about the dangers of narcotics and improperly used prescription medications in light of the deaths.
“You [students] may feel invincible, but you are not,” Thomas said. “Please look out for yourself and your fellow students.”
The threat and danger of tainted drugs on college campuses is widespread, according to Dr. Caleb Alexander, co-director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness.
Counterfeit pills often contain fentanyl, which is added to the drugs to give them a stronger high.
In recent years, public health officials have become concerned about what they see as the latest phase of the opioid epidemic: non-opioids, such as cocaine or ecstasy, that contain deadly fentanyl.
While the West Coast has been somewhat spared from the worst of the opioid epidemic, many worry that fentanyl-laced drugs could become a major problem in California because the state’s drug market is dominated by stimulants that could increasingly contain fentanyl.
“The presence of fentanyl in cocaine and other non-opoid drugs represents an extremely difficult and serious problem for public health authorities and for drug users alike,” Alexander said.
Putting fentanyl in a drug like cocaine greatly increases the risk of death, experts say. Last year, three men in Los Angeles died after snorting cocaine that contained fentanyl. And in September 2018, rapper Mac Miller died of an alcohol and drug overdose of cocaine and oxycodone pills laced with fentanyl.
“There are a tremendous number of unanswered questions regarding why and how this is taking place,” Alexander said. “The prospect for fentanyl to further penetrate the non-opioid drug supply is incredibly serious.”
Though little is known about the specific deaths, risk factors for suicides and overdose deaths can be similar, with both often driven by an ambivalence about life, said Dr. Paul Nestadt, a Johns Hopkins psychiatry professor. And suicides and overdoses have been increasing among young people in recent years, he said.
“They’re both kind of going up at the same time, almost twin epidemics,” he said.
Between 2006 and 2016, the rate of drug overdose deaths among people ages 15 to 24 increased more than 50%, according to CDC data. Still, the rate of drug overdose deaths for this age group was lower than all others, except those under 15 and over 65.
And drug use can be further exacerbated by alcohol abuse. Alcohol and opioids are both sedatives, and mixing them can be a dangerous combination, said Alexander. Both substances depress the body’s central nervous system, which can halt breathing and be fatal, he said.
It’s not uncommon to find alcohol in the bloodstream of someone who has died of an opioid overdose, Alexander said.
“The deaths are very alarming. There’s no corner of the U.S. that’s been spared from the opioid epidemic, and college students are clearly vulnerable.”
Among the USC student deaths, all are men. Rates of drug overdose — as well as suicides — are higher among men than women, although experts are not sure why.
USC administrators have been engaged in a delicate balancing act as they notify students about the deaths without overburdening them with information in an attempt to quell rumors, offer mental health resources and also try to avoid triggering anyone who may be in the midst of a mental health crisis.
In the letter sent Tuesday night to USC students, Vice President for Student Affairs Winston Crisp and Chief Health Officer for Student Health Sarah Van Orman addressed the ongoing need for mental health services and noted the university’s plans to increase resources on campus with the addition Monday of a Department of Psychiatry practice at the student health center.
“We will continue to ensure that services are in place for your safety and well-being.”
Brittney Weissman, executive director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness Los Angeles County Council, said that emphasizing social connectedness will be essential for the USC community.
In general, support systems are vital because college is a transitional period and people may feel a lot of pressure to succeed, she said. And now, as students are dealing with the trauma of the recent deaths, those bonds are more important than ever.
“I cannot imagine losing nine friends or classmates in the span of months,” she said. “It’s devastating.”
Weissman said that students should pay attention to their anxiety levels and use self-care strategies and that officials should ensure mental health resources are available to students, with no barriers.
Folt said USC has increased the number of mental health professionals by nearly 50% since she arrived on campus in July.
“No death is something we want to live with and no unhappy student that cannot get their work done is what we want,” she said. “So constant, constant attention is needed. “
Officials said additional resources from faculty and counselors at Keck Medicine School and other schools across the university are offering assistance, as the community continues to grapple with the deaths.
Weissman said students who are struggling may become withdrawn or engage in risky behaviors. People may stop their daily routines, such as going to class, showing up to sports practices or brushing their teeth.
Half of a person’s mental health challenges show up by their 14th birthday, Weissman noted, and 75% by age 24. So college can be the perfect time to start seeking help, she said.
“Early intervention is key to a more positive trajectory for your life,” she said. “The earlier, the better.”
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot accused Uber of “paying off” local ministers in an effort to stop her plan to raise taxes on ride hail programs.
Lightfoot made the remarks to the press following a city council meeting Wednesday after being asked about Uber’s proposed alternatives to her plan.
“Is this the one where they’re paying off black ministers with $54 million?” Lighftoot said. “That one or is this a new one?”
In an effort to generate $40 million for the city of Chicago, Lightfoot’s plan would implement a $3 flat fee on ride hails in downtown between 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., according to NBC Chicago.
The first-term mayor told the press that an alternative plan from Uber fails to address congestion and that the company has thrown “lots of Hail Marys because what they don’t want is to actually be regulated by the city of Chicago.”
“They offered up black ministers $54 million, a one time offer, if they would convince the mayor to do away with any other kind of regulation,” Lightfoot said. “And as we walked these ministers through the realities of what’s actually at stake here, they realized that frankly they’d been hoodwinked.”
Josh Goldman, who works for Uber’s public affairs department, vehemently denied the accusation as “categorically false” on Twitter. Goldman said Lightfoot was getting the $54 million figure from a plan the company had proposed that would have prospectively raised money her budget.
“We worked on that idea over the course of months of mtgs w/city – it’s more progressive and would raise more funding for city,” Goldman wrote.
Uber has urged Chicago residents to resist Lightfoot’s proposed flat fee, according to NBC Chicago. The company emailed customers asking that they “Lobby Or Tweet” city hall in opposition to the tax hikes that would raise fares.
In a statement to NBC Chicago, Uber again denied the mayor’s claims.
“After months of conversations with the Mayor’s office, we are making public our plan to raise the money the City needs in a way that is more equitable and doesn’t increase fees on South and West side residents by nearly 80%,” the company said.
Lightfoot said Wednesday that the company’s plan failed to address congestion and that she doesn’t believe the number promised by Uber “holds any water.”
“There’s no question whatsoever, when you look at the explosion of new cars that are in the downtown area that’s driven in large part, if not exclusively, by ride share,” Lightfoot said.
Israeli airstrikes hit Islamic Jihad targets in Gaza on Wednesday as militants continued to retaliate with rockets — bringing the total number to about 360 — during a two-day escalation of violence since the targeted killing of a top commander of the Iran-backed terror group, the Israeli military said.
The Israel Defense Forces’ Iron Dome missile defense system has been deployed against the rockets, with a success rate of over 90 percent, a military spokesman told The Post.
At least 23 Palestinians have been killed, including a 7-year-old boy and two other minors, since Tuesday in the heaviest round of fighting in months. Nearly all of those killed were members of Islamic Jihad, officials said.
The hostilities erupted after Israel targeted the group’s top commander, Baha Abu Al-Atta, who was killed along with his wife inside their home in the Gaza Strip.
According to Israel, Abu Al-Atta was responsible for rocket fire at Israel as well as other attacks and was planning more violence, with the military calling him a “ticking bomb.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel was prepared to keep pounding the militants in Gaza as long as rocket fire continues. Two Israelis have been wounded by shrapnel from the rocket fire.
“Either stop these attacks or absorb more and more blows,” he said Wednesday at the start of a special cabinet meeting, emphasizing that Israel would act “without mercy.”
“The terrorists know we can put a target on them and we will put a target on anyone who tries to harm us. They know we can get to them in their hiding places with surgical precision,” Netanyahu said in a statement, according to the Times of Israel.
Defense Minister Naftali Bennett, who took office Tuesday, said Israel was sending a clear message to its enemies.
“Whoever plans to harm us during the day, will never be safe to make it through the night,” he said.
The latest fighting brought life in much of southern Israel to a standstill. Schools were closed in communities near the Gaza border, restrictions on public gatherings continued as rockets rained down and air raid sirens continued to wail.
In Gaza, schools and public institutions also were shuttered for a second day and there were few vehicles on the road, with people mostly hunkering down indoors.
The bodies of six people were brought to a Gaza hospital in taxis and ambulances Wednesday, as relatives wept and screamed. Medics and witnesses said they were civilians who lived in densely populated neighborhoods of the enclave.
In the north of Gaza City, family members said Rafat Ayyad and two of his sons, Islam, 25, and Ameer, 9, were killed by Israeli fire while rushing to the hospital to visit another son who had earlier been injured in another attack.
“I got wounded and I called my father. He was coming to see me in hospital and two of my brothers were with him on the motorcycle when they were hit by Israel,” Loay Ayyad, 18, told Reuters during the funeral.
The Israel Defense Forces said it had struck at least five rocket squads early Wednesday.
Other targets included a rocket warhead manufacturing facility, an Islamic Jihad headquarters and a weapons storage site. Islamic Jihad confirmed that two of its militants were killed in separate strikes.
In a joint statement, the Al-Quds Brigades, Islamic Jihad’s military wing, and three other armed groups in Gaza took credit for firing dozens of rockets at Sderot and Ashkelon.
“We announce that we are responsible for this heroic mission,” the joint statement reads, according to the Times of Israel.
Islamic Jihad spokesman Musab al-Barayem said the group was not interested in mediation for now as it responded to the killing of one of its commanders.
A statement by the Joint Command of Palestinian armed factions said: “We will not allow the enemy to return to the policy of cowardly assassination under any circumstances.”
The Joint Command includes Hamas, the much larger Islamist group that controls Gaza.
While Hamas appeared to be giving the green light for Islamic Jihad to continue, the larger group did not appear to be launching rockets itself.
Hamas and Israel have managed to defuse prior confrontations and avoid a full-scale conflict for the past five years, following three wars from 2008 to 2014.
In the past, Israel has held Hamas responsible for rockets fired by any group in Gaza, but this time the IDF appeared to be avoiding Hamas targets.
Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, an IDF spokesman, said the army was trying to limit its activities to Islamic Jihad military targets in hopes of keeping Hamas on the sidelines and preventing a serious escalation.
“However, it’s very clear that if there will be Israeli casualties, the situation would change drastically and we would be forced to respond in a different manner,” he said.
UN Middle East peace envoy Nickolay Mladenov said he was “very concerned about the ongoing and serious escalation” between the Islamic Jihad and Israel.
“The indiscriminate launching of rockets and mortars against population centers is absolutely unacceptable and must stop immediately,” he said, according to Reuters.
Two American diplomats shared key details of President Donald Trump’s pressure campaign on Ukraine during the first day of public testimony in the impeachment inquiry and stuck to their story that Trump used his office to go after a political rival.
Democrats used Wednesday’s open hearing to bolster their case for Trump’s impeachment while Republicans tried to scuttle the process by dismissing Democrats’ claims Trump engaged in a “quid pro quo” with Ukraine.
Over nearly six hours, House Intelligence Committee members peppered Ambassador Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, and George Kent, deputy assistant secretary at the State Department, with questions about Trump’s motivations in Ukraine.
Taylor testified a Trump official said the president “cares more” about investigating former Vice President Joe Biden, a 2020 presidential candidate, and his son Hunter than he did Ukraine policy. And Kent suggested a Ukraine company at the center of the controversy should be investigated. But mostly, the two withstood fiery questioning from both sides, often expanding on what they’d offered in closed-door testimony.
Trump, meanwhile, claimed not to pay any mind, although he continually tweeted throughout the hearing.
The inquiry is based on a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky where Trump discussed military assistance for Ukraine in exchange for a “favor” to investigate his political rivals.
Taylor told the committee about a phone call between Trump and Gordon Sondland, the U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, in which the president seemed to indicate he was more interested in having the Bidens investigated than he was in overall U.S. policy toward Ukraine.
The details of the July 26 call, relayed to Taylor by an aide who overheard it, was a new revelation that had not come out of the closed-door hearings held in previous weeks.
In the conversation, Trump asked Sondland about “the investigations,” Taylor told the panel Wednesday.
The president was apparently referring to his request to Zelensky to open probes into Joe Biden’s son Hunter, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian gas company that was previously under investigation, as well as alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 presidential election. U.S. intelligence has found no evidence of Ukrainian meddling in 2016.
Taylor told lawmakers his staffer asked Sondland what the president thought about Ukraine after the phone call, which came a day after Trump’s conversation with Zelensky that sparked the impeachment inquiry.
Sondland said that “President Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden, which Giuliani was pressing for” than the U.S. policies on Ukraine, according to Taylor.
Trump told reporters the phone call never happened.
The witnesses held up despite the GOP grilling
Taylor and Kent methodically laid out not only their concerns about the president’s call and the resulting push by his allies to investigate the Bidens, but also the danger of using Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Guiliani, to pressure a strategic ally for political gain.
The taunts came early from Republicans. In his opening statement, California Rep. Devin Nunes, the top GOP lawmaker on the Intelligence Committee, mockingly congratulated them “for passing the Democrats’ Star Chamber auditions held for the last six weeks in the basement of the Capitol.”
Later, Ohio GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, a staunch Trump defender known for his aggressive questioning, challenged Taylor about his “clear understanding” that both U.S. military aid and a meeting With Trump were contingent on Zelensky publicly announcing the investigations.
Jordan said he couldn’t understand how Taylor could come to that conclusion when he never heard it firsthand from either Trump or Zelensky, whom he met three times since his appointment as ambassador in mid-June.
“Three meetings with the president of Ukraine and no linkage,” Jordan said. “Your clear understanding was wrong because it didn’t happen. (And) this is what I can’t believe and you’re their star witness,”
“I don’t consider myself a star witness for anything,” Taylor responded.
“Yeah, you do,” Jordan continued.
“I’m not here to take one side or the other or to advocate any particular outcome,” the ambassador said. “My understanding is only coming from the people that I talk to.”
At one point, both Kent and Taylor were asked whether they were “Never Trumpers.” Both responded no.
Kent’s Burisma concerns
In response to Republican questioning, State Department aide George Kent said the Ukrainian oligarch owner of gas company Burisma should be investigated for paying a bribe to kill a probe into the company.
The Ukrainian firm is at the center of the impeachment controversy. Hunter Biden, an attorney, joined the company’s board in 2014 until leaving the firm earlier this year.
“To summarize, we thought that Mykola Zlochevsky had stolen money,” Kent said of the head of Burisma. “We thought a prosecutor had taken a bribe to shut the case, those were our main concerns.”
“Are you in favor of that matter being fully investigated and prosecuted?” asked Steve Castor, House Intelligence Committee Counsel for the minority.
“I think since U.S. taxpayer dollars were wasted, I would love to see the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office find out who the corrupt prosecutor was and who took the bribe, and how much was paid, and that’s what I told the deputy prosecutor general in February 2015,” Kent replied.
Republicans have claimed investigations into Zlochevsky were ended to benefit Hunter Biden.
GOP downplays July 25 Trump call
Republicans questioned why Hunter Biden was getting a cozy appointment to a Ukrainian energy company that paid him as much as $50,000 per month. They brought up a debunked claim that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election. And they accused Democrats of orchestrating an unfair process aimed at impeaching the president regardless of fact.
What they didn’t talk about much was the actual contents of the July 25 call that triggered the impeachment inquiry and that critics have called an abuse of power.
When they did, it was to to say that nothing came of the president’s alleged pressure.
“For the million of Americans viewing today, the two most important facts are the following,” said Republican Elise Stefanik of New York. “Number one, Ukraine received the aid. Number two, there was in fact no investigation of the Bidens.”
Jordan, the Ohio Republican, complained the panel wouldn’t hear testimony from the anonymous whistleblower who reported Trump’s July 25 call to the inspector general, which sparked the House investigation into Ukraine policy.
Jordan said lawmakers and the American public will never get the chance to gauge the whistleblower’s credibility, motivation and bias.
“We will never get the chance to see the whistleblower raise his right hand, swear to tell the truth and nothing but the truth,” he said. “More importantly, the American people won’t get that chance … They understand the facts support the president. They understand this process is unfair.”
But Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said the committee would welcome testimony from the person who prompted the investigation.
“President Trump is welcome to come in and take a seat,” Welch said to laughter in the hearing room.
Trump tweeted despite claims he wouldn’t watch
Trump said he wouldn’t be watching Wednesday’s hearing but that didn’t stop him from tweeting his criticism of the proceedings to his millions of followers.
The president’s strongest weapon against impeachment has been his ability to keep Republican lawmakers in line. And they remain loyal in no small part due to the GOP base’s devotion to Trump.
Trump was making sure his base had his version of the impeachment process with a string of tweets and retweets beginning Tuesday night that continued up to and during Wednesday’s hearing.
Before the hearing, Trump called it a “phony showtrial,” a “circus,” a “fraudulent hoax conspiracy theory,” and “another Witch Hunt.” He retweeted conservative allies who have called the inquiry “a partisan sham” and said Democrats have “stacked the deck” against him.
At various times during the nearly six-hour hearing went on, the president retweeted his allies, some of whom mocked the “star witness” term Jordan had conferred on Taylor.
Trump also tweeted out an 83-second video halfway through the hearing that came with the following message: “DEMOCRATS ARE PUTTING POLITICS BEFORE COUNTRY!”
Contributing: Bart Jansen, Nicholas Wu, Courtney Subramanian
Senior aides have reportedly advised that firing Mulvaney at such a pivotal moment during the House’s impeachment inquiry could be risky, particularly given Mulvaney’s role in the decision to temporarily freeze the aid and the chaos that would ensue in trying to find a replacement for him.
“I don’t think you’ll see him going anywhere until after December,” one Trump adviser told the Post. “But the president was very unhappy with that press conference. That was a very bad day for the president.”
Mulvaney was in direct communication with Trump about the president’s desire to hold $400 million in military aid to Ukraine as the White House was pressuring Kyiv to launch investigations that would be politically beneficial to the president.
“Trump is back asking everyone what they think about Mulvaney,” said one senior U.S. official. “He clearly is upset with him. He’s being advised that the last thing he needs is another major personnel move.”
Mulvaney’s standing in the White House has been under renewed scrutiny since he reversed plans to file a lawsuit asking a federal court to rule on if he should comply with a House subpoena for his testimony, saying instead he would follow the White House’s order to not cooperate with the impeachment probe.
WASHINGTON — Roger Stone obstructed a congressional investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election — and he did so in order to help and protect his longtime ally, President Donald Trump, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Kravis told jurors Wednesday.
“The evidence showed that Stone not only tried, but succeeded in impeding the committee’s investigation,” Kravis said during closing arguments of Stone’s criminal trial on allegations he lied to Congress. “A person who is acting in good faith would not say and do the things that Roger Stone said and did … It shows you exactly what was in his head all along: to obstruct the committee’s investigation.”
Stone’s defense attorney, Bruce Rogow, countered by saying the longtime operative had no reason to lie to Congress to protect Trump and the campaign. Doing so was a “nonissue,” Rogow said. When Stone testified before Congress, the campaign was long over and Trump was already president.
“Why would Stone lie, why would he make stuff up?” Rogow said, adding that Stone volunteered to testify publicly. “There is no purpose, there is no reason, there is no motive.”
Stone, a fixture in GOP politics known for his flamboyance and combativeness, is accused of lying to the House Intelligence Committee in 2017 about his back-channel efforts to push for the release of damaging emails about the Democratic National Committee during the 2016 presidential campaign. He’s also accused of falsely denying he talked to the Trump campaign about his efforts and of forcing a witness to also lie to Congress.
The committee, at that time, was investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and possible ties to the Trump campaign.
The 67-year-old longtime operative is among the most prominent Trump allies to be charged as part of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the last election. The trial nears its conclusion as an impeachment inquiry fueled by allegations that Trump sought to have another country interfere in the next election gains steam.
The charges against Stone present the first clear picture from prosecutors about how the Trump campaign sought to learn about WikiLeaks’ plans to publish emails that would hurt Democratic rival Hillary Clinton in 2016. Testimonies from government witnesses over the past week portrays the Trump campaign as an eager beneficiary of WikiLeaks’ emails dumps, and Stone as the conduit who had boasted about his connections to WikiLeaks.
Stone, who has maintained his innocence, faces seven charges: one count of obstruction of an official proceeding, five counts of false statements and one count of witness tampering. Wearing a dark gray suit, Stone appeared at his trial accompanied by his wife and daughter.
The high waters, known as “acqua alta,” flooded 85 percent of the city, according to city hall. Venice authorities said the water level peaked at 1.87 meters, or just over six feet, second only to a record flood in 1966.
If your only sources of news the past two months have been CNN and MSNBC, you probably think President Trump has committed some heinous act that is deserving of being drawn, quartered and carted out of the White House.
That’s a false narrative built on selectively leaked testimony from Rep. Adam Schiff’s closed-door Intelligence Committee hearings. The manner in which he and Speaker Nancy Pelosi are conducting this impeachment investigation is unprecedented, constitutionally questionable, and an affront to American fair play….
Ahead of the first public impeachment hearings, Republican House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy sounds off on ‘Fox & Friends’ on what he says is a lack of due process for President Trump.
As House Democrats ramp up their impeachment push with public hearings starting on Wednesday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy argued that it’s merely their effort to avoid facing President Trump in the 2020 election.
“We’ve never had an impeachment in the first term. They are so afraid of facing the president in the election, they’re trying to frame him,” McCarthy, R-Calif., told “Fox & Friends.”
“They’ve [House Democrats] already accused him of being guilty and they keep changing the term because they’re trying to find a crime.”
With the bang of a gavel, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., will open the impeachment hearings Wednesday into Trump’s alleged pressure on Ukraine to investigate the 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden’s dealings in the country.
The former vice president has boasted about pressuring Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor, as his son Hunter Biden held a lucrative role board of a Ukrainian natural gas company despite having little relevant expertise.
Schiff, in a memo and open letter to colleagues on the eve of Wednesday’s proceedings, outlined some of the rules — including that members not assigned to the Intelligence Committee were not permitted to make statements or question witnesses, but were allowed to sit in the audience.
McCarthy said there has never been “something so partisan” and that the impeachment inquiry is a “pure” setup by Schiff.
“There’s no due process, the president’s attorney is not in the room, cannot cross-examine, we can not have our witnesses, we can’t have a whistleblower who this all started from, an individual who was not even on the phone call,” McCarthy said.
A whistleblower’s complaint about Trump’s July 25 telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky ignited the impeachment investigation. During the hearing Wednesday, a key exchange during that 30-minute call, which has been outlined in a Sept. 24 transcript released by the White House, could take center stage. Zelensky has said he felt no pressure during the call.
Fox News’ Gregg Re, Chad Pergram contributed to this report.
One of Italy’s most popular travel destinations is under water after it was hit by the highest tide in 50 years.
Flooding in Venice hit the second-highest levels ever recorded in history, and the historic canal city braces for yet another wave on Wednesday.
Venice’s Mayor Luigi Brugnaro blamed climate change for the “dramatic situation” and called for a speedy completion of a long-delayed project to construct off-shore barriers.
“Now the government must listen,” he said on Twitter. “These are the effects of climate change… the costs will be high.”
According to the Sun,exceptionally high tides that produce major flooding occur every four years. However, the city usually experiences minor flooding about four times a year.
Brugnaro also tweeted various photos that showed historic tourist attractions under water such as St. Mark’s Square, which was one of the worst hit areas. Photos surfaced of shopkeepers struggling to minimize the damage as water poured into their stores.
Brugnaro also noted that St. Mark’s Basilica had suffered major damage from the high levels of water, raising new concerns for the mosaics and other artworks. According to the BBC, this is the sixth time the basilica flooded in 1,200 years with four of those times occurring within the past 20 years.
Photos on social media showed a city ferry, taxi boats and gondolas grounded on walkways flanking canals.
The high-water mark hit 74 inches late Tuesday, meaning more than 85 percent of the city was flooded. The highest level ever recorded was 76 inches during infamous flooding in 1966.
Officials projected a second wave as high as 63 inches at midmorning Wednesday.
One person, a man in his 70s, died on the barrier island of Pellestrina, apparently of electrocution, said Danny Carrella, an official on the island with 3,500 inhabitants.Media outletsreport that a second man was found dead in his home. He said the situation there remained dramatic, with about three feet of water still present due to broken pumps.
The long-delayed off-shore barriers, called “Moses,” were meant to limit flooding of the city, caused by southerly winds that push the tide into Venice. But the controversial project opposed by environmentalists concerned about damaging the delicate lagoon eco-system has been delayed by cost-overruns and corruption scandals, with no completion date in site.
Luca Zaia, governor of the Veneto region, told the Italian news channel SkyTG24 that the barriers were almost complete, but it wasn’t clear if they would work against such flooding.
“Despite 5 billion euros under water, St. Mark’s Square certainly wouldn’t be secure,” Zaia said, referring to one of Venice’s lowest points that floods when there is an inundation of 31.5 inches.
Brugnaro said that the flood levels represent “a wound that will leave indelible signs.”
Contributing: Associated Press. Follow Adrianna Rodriguez on Twitter: @AdriannaUSAT.
The op-ed, which comes a day before the House holds its first public hearings in the inquiry, claims Trump’s interactions with Ukraine were “innocent” and that House Democrats are unfairly targeting his client.
“In an ideal America, politicians would be held to the same standard regardless of party, and this inquiry would be over. But the left’s inability to accept the results of the 2016 election and fear of Mr. Trump’s policy agenda have driven the Democrats into a frenzy,” he added.
“The conversation my client, President Donald J. Trump, had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on July 25 was innocent. During a congratulatory call, the newly elected Mr. Zelensky brought up the need to ‘drain the swamp’ in his country. Rooting out corruption was one of Mr. Zelensky’s campaign pledges, and Mr. Trump asked him to investigate allegations of corruption at the highest levels of both governments. It was a matter of serious mutual concern,” he wrote.
“Moreover, Mr. Trump requested that Ukraine root out corruption; he didn’t demand it. His words were cordial, agreeable and free of any element of threat or coercion. Mr. Trump offered nothing in return to Ukraine for cleaning up corruption,” Giuliani continued.
The op-ed comes a day before the House begins hearing public testimony in its inquiry into Trump. William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, and George Kent, a top State Department official, are set to testify Wednesday, while former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch is expected to testify Friday.
House Democrats launched their impeachment probe in September over concerns that Trump leveraged $400 million in military aid to Ukraine to pressure Kyiv to publicly launch an inquiry into Biden and 2016 election meddling. Several witnesses have testified privately that they were uncomfortable with Trump’s request and that they believed there was a quid pro quo surrounding the president’s dealings with Ukraine.
DACA plaintiffs clasp hands on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday after justices heard oral arguments in the consolidation of three cases before the court regarding the Trump administration’s bid to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
hide caption
toggle caption
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
DACA plaintiffs clasp hands on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday after justices heard oral arguments in the consolidation of three cases before the court regarding the Trump administration’s bid to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
The U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority signaled Tuesday that it may let the Trump administration shut down the Obama-era program that granted temporary protection from deportation to roughly 700,000 young people, commonly known as DREAMers.
Brought to the U.S. illegally as children, the DREAMers were allowed to legally work and go to school if they met certain requirements and passed a background check. The program, begun in 2012, is known as DACA — Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.
The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on the DACA program, which covers 700,000 young people.
Susan Walsh/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Susan Walsh/AP
The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on the DACA program, which covers 700,000 young people.
Susan Walsh/AP
Until Tuesday the administration had consistently maintained that it had no choice but to pull the plug on the program because, as President Trump’s attorney general put it in September 2017, the DACA program was “illegal” and “unconstitutional” from the time it was first put in place in 2012.
Three federal appeals courts disagreed and ruled that when an administration revokes a policy like this, on which so many people, businesses and even the U.S. economy have relied, the administration must provide a fully supported rationale that weighs the pros and cons of the program, the costs and the benefits. Faced with those lower court decisions, the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court, which seemed Tuesday to be on the verge of a contrary decision.
Hundreds of people gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court to rally in support of DACA.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Hundreds of people gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court to rally in support of DACA.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Can the Supreme Court even decide this case?
Solicitor General Noel Francisco opened the argument, telling the justices that they have no authority to review the policy change because DACA is a discretionary program under which the Obama administration used its prosecutorial discretion to defer deportations for certain qualified individuals.
The court’s liberals pushed back. “There’s a strange element to your argument,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told the solicitor general. She pointed out that he was arguing that “this is a discretionary matter” and therefore “not reviewable because it’s committed to agency discretion. But on the other hand, you say the agency had no discretion because this program was illegal…. So how can it be committed to your discretion when you’re saying ‘we have no discretion’?”
Ginsburg said that even a second memo, written after the litigation began, was “infected” with the idea that DACA was illegal.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed to Trump’s conflicting remarks about DACA recipients, noting that the president told the DREAMers that they were “safe under him” and then abruptly ended the program.
“We own this”
But when the lawyers representing the DACA plaintiffs rose to argue, they got a fusillade of doubt from the conservative wing of the court.
Chief Justice John Roberts sought to minimize the number of immigrants covered by previous programs similar to DACA, dating to the 1950s. Other members of the conservative majority fired different rounds.
The case tests the legality of DACA, a federal immigration policy that has given protection from deportation to 700,000 people brought illegally to the U.S. when they were children.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Justice Samuel Alito posed this hypothetical: Let’s say an administration decides not to prosecute drug cases involving less than 5 kilos of cocaine, and the next administration decides to change the amount to 3 kilos. Would that be reviewable by the courts?
Lawyer Theodore Olson, who represented the plaintiffs, replied that DACA is different because of the huge number of people and industries and businesses that have relied on the assurances in the existing program. If the government wants to change such a program, he said, it has to lay out its policy reasons, and not just by fiat say that the DACA policy was illegal from the get-go.
“What more would you have the government say?” interjected Justice Neil Gorsuch. “What good would another five years of litigation over the adequacy of the explanation serve?”
Replied Olson: “We don’t know what the administration would do.” The Trump administration “did not want to own this decision.” It was not an independent decision reached by the acting secretary of homeland security because DHS was bound by the attorney general’s one-sentence decision saying DACA was illegal, Olson said.
In rebuttal,Francisco, the Trump administration lawyer, batted that down, saying the administration has decided that even if DACA was and is legal, Trump has decided to shut it down.
The first death occurred in late August, two days before classes began, when an incoming freshman was struck by a car while walking on a freeway near the University of Southern California. In the more than 2 months since, eight other USC students have died – at least three by suicide, others by unknown means.
The string of fatalities has left students and faculty at the prestigious university shaken and struggling for answers. CBS Los Angeles reported that the latest fatality – a 27-year-old student found dead Monday in an off-campus apartment – came days after administrators sent letters to students and parents about the series of deaths.
“There is a great deal of speculation about the causes of these deaths and most are being attributed to suicide. This is not correct,” the station quoted one of the letters as saying.
“These tragic losses have resulted from a number of different causes. In some cases the cause of death is still undetermined, and in others loved ones do not want details disclosed,” the university’s president, Carol Folt, said in the letter.
While officials say three of the deaths are confirmed suicides, the causes of the others are not known or haven’t been released. The latest case is still under investigation.
Administrators said they decided to reach out about the deaths to be as transparent as possible and to let students who are going through emotional turmoil know there are campus resources available.
“We know that our students are looking for answers,” said Sarah Van Orman, chief health officer for USC Student Health. “It’s important that if we hear misinformation, we share what we do know.”
Students acknowledged that word of the deaths has shaken the campus.
“It’s definitely been a really tough semester for us,” student body president Trenton Stone said, adding that he and every member of his executive board knew at least one of the students. “There’s a lot going on, and everyone’s asking the same question: ‘What can we be doing?'”
USC senior Nicole Ricken told CBS Los Angeles the recent deaths have really hit close to home. “I’ve been acquaintances with at least four of the students who passed away,” she said. “One of them was one of my closest friends.”
Student government leaders are planning a community event to bring the campus together with health professionals, Stone said.
During a typical school year, USC student deaths have ranged from four to 15, Van Orman said. Six were reported last year at the school with 47,500 students.
“Students are pleading for answers from the university,” said Natalie Bettendorf, managing editor of The Daily Trojan student newspaper. “There’s a sense of desperation from within the student body. There have been too many deaths and not enough answers.”
Former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley on Nov. 12 gave her first live interview since her resignation to discuss major topics covered in her new book. Read more: https://wapo.st/33SQwMA. Subscribe to The Washington Post on YouTube: https://wapo.st/2QOdcqK
Senate Intel Committee chair recalls “outrageous things” from Trump’s past that didn’t convince people he wasn’t qualified to be president
11:55 a.m. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, a Republican, said that although there have been “outrageous things” released about President Trump — in particular, “I can remember his conversation with Billy Bush” — they didn’t meet “the threshold that people thought he was unqualified to be president.”
“I would only say to you the test we’re going to have,” Burr said at an event with Senator Mark Warner at Wake Forest University, in North Carolina, “and I think we’ll be presented with it — does it reach the level of removal from office?”
Burr also thinks the Senate impeachment process could take six to eight weeks. If that’s the case, Mr. Trump’s impeachment trial would be longer than the five-week Senate trial for President Bill Clinton.
Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, is unhappy that this early on in the process, some of his colleagues have already made up their minds.
“What upsets me is, again, men and women I work with on either team who are jumping to conclusions, either saying, ‘I’ve already made my decision that he’s guilty or not,'” Warner said.
He added, “Let’s let this play out, but we should be doing it with a sense of sobriety and seriousness that it warrants.” — Alan He
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump will welcome Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to the White House on Wednesday just weeks after the authoritarian leader invaded Syria and attacked U.S.-allied Kurdish forces, unleashing fresh violence and chaos in the Middle East.
The Trump-Erdogan meeting could prove to be a political hornet’s nest, provoking fresh bipartisan anger over Trump’s decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria in what many lawmakers saw as a betrayal of the Kurdish-led forces that helped American troops fight the Islamic State. Trump invited Erdogan to Washington during an Oct. 6 phone call, in which critics say Trump also gave Erdogan a green light to invade Syria.
The White House tete-a-tete – along with an ensuing joint news conference – will unfold as the House opens public impeachment hearings showcasing Trump’s relationship with another foreign leader, the president of Ukraine, even as lawmakers in both parties question Trump’s seemingly warm ties with Erdogan.
More than a dozen members of Congress recently called on Trump to rescind his invitation to Erdogan, saying the Turkish leader’s actions should not be rewarded with a high-profile White House visit.
“President Erdogan’s decision to invade northern Syria on October 9 has had disastrous consequences for U.S. national security, has led to deep divisions in the NATO alliance, and caused a humanitarian crisis on the ground,” House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., wrote Friday in a letter that was signed by 16 other lawmakers, including two Republicans.
“Now is a particularly inappropriate time for President Erdogan to visit the United States,” they wrote.
Trump will have to perform a “high wire act” on Wednesday, trying to calm outraged lawmakers in Congress over his dealings with Erdogan, while also trying not to alienate the Turkish leader and NATO ally, said Bulent Aliriza, director of the Turkey Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington foreign policy institute.
Trump is “in danger of offending both sides, or at the very least pleasing neither,” he said.
Regardless, a senior administration official said Trump is convinced that “a full and frank engagement” is essential to addressing the challenges facing the two countries.
“This is nearly a 70-year alliance,” the official said. “It has helped both of our countries through very, very dark times. We are not going to throw it away lightly if there is a way forward.”
Meanwhile, U.S. reporters will almost certainly use Wednesday’s news conference to ask Trump about the impeachment proceedings, “underlining his weakness in foreign affairs,” Aliriza said. He noted that Trump’s foreign policy toward Ukraine sparked the impeachment probe, and now “here he is meeting in a controversial manner with Turkey’s president.”
Erdogan’s visit comes amid reports of ongoing clashes in Syria – and questions about whether Turkish-backed forces have engaged in ethnic cleansing and other atrocities. Turkey’s assault, along with the U.S. withdrawal from northeastern Syria, has already prompted more than 180,000 civilians to flee the border areas, according to the United Nations.
Although the U.S. brokered a cease-fire between Turkey and the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces, it’s not clear how well that is holding. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, fighting has continued this week between the SDF and forces loyal to Turkey. Russian and Syrian government troops have also moved in to fill the power vacuum left by the U.S. withdrawal.
“The combination of the U.S. withdrawal from northeast Syria, Turkey’s military offensive and the Syrian government all combined has created the worst-case scenario for that region,” Margaret Huang, executive director of Amnesty International USA, told reporters earlier this week.
She and others urged Trump to use Edrogan’s visit to press him on alleged human-rights abuses and the perilous situation in Syria. But Trump has shown little interest in taking a hardline with Erdogan on Syria.
Instead, Trump will likely focus on trade negotiations and Turkey’s purchase of a Russian-made missile system, the S-400. Turkey received delivery of the Russian weapons system earlier this year, despite stern U.S. warnings against such a move.
The White House responded by canceling Turkey’s participation in the Pentagon’s elite Joint Strike Fighter program, saying the S-400 system could be used to collect sensitive data on the F-35 jet fighter program, making Turkey’s continued participation “impossible.”
Trump is now under pressure to impose stiff sanctions on Turkey for the S-400 purchase, as well as for its Syria attack. The House approved a biting sanctions bill last month aimed at crippling Turkey’s economy and punishing Erdogan personally by requiring an assessment of his net worth.
In a recent letter to Erdogan leaked to Turkish media, Trump warned the Turkish president that he will have to impose sanctions on Turkey over the S-400 purchase soon – unless Turkey agrees not to activate the missile system and allows U.S. verification that it remains inoperative. According to a report in the Middle East Eye, Trump said if Erdogan accepted that proposal, the U.S. would allow Turkey back into the F-35 program and ink a bilateral trade deal worth $100 billion.
Erdogan, however, has said he is not interested in mothballing the S-400. And he will present his own set of demands, including pressing Trump to cut U.S. ties with Kurdish forces in Syria who Erdogan views as a terrorist group, and seeking the extradition of a Turkish cleric, Fethullah Gulen, who Erdogan blames for inciting a failed coup attempt against him.
Aliriza and other Turkey experts said the two men will likely use the news conference to showcase their personal connection, but they are unlikely to accomplish anything that would improve U.S-Turkey relations.
“Erdogan has already got most of what Trump can give — protection from sanctions and carte blanche in Syria,” said Max Hoffman, associate director for national security and international policy at the Center for the American Progress, a liberal think tank.
“That augurs a headline-grabbing press conference to distract from impeachment, but with little follow-through,” Hoffman said.
Lawmakers may be more interested in what Trump and Erdogan discuss privately than anything they say at the joint news conference.
“By not rescinding his invitation, President Trump is once again coddling an authoritarian leader and sending a terrible message,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “Since this meeting is moving forward, I urge congressional leadership to seek a full accounting of discussions.”
This is a widget area - If you go to "Appearance" in your WP-Admin you can change the content of this box in "Widgets", or you can remove this box completely under "Theme Options"