“As a rural AZ resident, it is frustrating that the state’s population centers, Phoenix and Tucson, could control politics in this conservative state,” she tweeted, suggesting that the solution was finding a way around majority rule.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-virginia-republicans-confront-a-fearful-electoral-future/2019/11/09/2bbdc7aa-026b-11ea-8bab-0fc209e065a8_story.html

If an elected official is found to have broken the law or abused the powers of office, is impeachment merited or should the judgment be left to voters?

As part of our podcast, Impeachment, Explained, Vox partnered with PerryUndem and Ipsos on a poll exploring Americans’ beliefs about when presidential behavior is impeachable, when it’s simply wrong, and how partisanship is shaping those perceptions. The results were fascinating and unnerving.

Yes, Americans believe in the impeachment power; 71 percent say we need a way to remove a politician who breaks the law or abuses power from office. That includes 83 percent of Democrats, 69 percent of independents — and this is important — 61 percent of Republicans.

There’s a consensus: If the president broke the law or abused power, impeachment is merited. And that’s true even if the president’s name is Donald Trump.


Christina Animashaun/Vox

But then we drilled deeper. What counts as a “high crime or misdemeanor”? Trump lies often. Does dishonesty count? Surprisingly, majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and independents say it should.


Christina Animashaun/Vox

How about abusing the powers of your office for political gain? Here, the numbers grow even larger. Eighty percent said yes, including two-thirds of Republicans.


Christina Animashaun/Vox

How about abusing the powers of your office to enrich yourself? Eighty-eight percent said yes, including 82 percent of Republicans.


Christina Animashaun/Vox

These are huge majorities, reflecting a rare instance of national agreement. If a president abused the powers of office for personal or political gain, that’s a high crime and misdemeanor.

But anyone watching this process knows we’re not seeing a rare instance of national agreement. So then we got specific: Do you think the president of the United States pressuring another country to investigate a political rival is a high crime and misdemeanor? Is it just morally wrong? Or is it just politics as usual, something presidents do all the time?

Fifty-one percent of Americans say it’s a high crime and misdemeanor. That’s 77 percent of Democrats, 52 percent of independents, but only 22 percent of Republicans.


Christina Animashaun/Vox

Sixty-five percent say it’s morally wrong. That’s huge majorities of Democrats and independents — 89 percent and 74 percent respectively — but only 39 percent of Republicans.

Forty-four percent of the country, however, says that presidents pressure other countries to investigate their domestic political rivals all the time. That belief, at least right now, is heavily concentrated among Republicans — almost two-thirds of Republicans see Trump’s behavior as typical political maneuvering.


Christina Animashaun/Vox

This, then, is how Republicans seem to be processing Trump’s acts. Initially, the argument was that he didn’t do it. The whistleblower was lying. There was no quid pro quo. That defense collapsed quickly and totally under the White House releasing its call record and the testimonies of top officials.

So now, the argument has mutated: Yes, Trump did it, but it’s fine that he did it. Pressuring a foreign government to investigate your chief domestic political rival isn’t wrong, and even if it is wrong, everybody does it.

That’s the level of cynicism Trump is forcing his supporters to embrace. It’s not quite, as Nixon famously said, “when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.” It’s closer to: when the president does it, that means it’s normal.

The scary thing about that is it could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If the Republican Party chooses to treat what Trump has done as normal and protect him from consequences or sanction, then perhaps it will become normal. Perhaps it does just become a tactic, another power the incumbent can leverage against threats.

We don’t get the political system we deserve. We get the political system we accept.


The poll was conducted on November 5-6, 2019. Roughly 1,000 adults — 425 Republicans, 394 Democrats, and 104 independents — from the continental US, Alaska, and Hawaii were interviewed online in English.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/11/9/20955441/impeachment-trump-poll-ukraine-2020-democrats-republicans

WASHINGTON – Ahead of the first scheduled public impeachment hearings Wednesday, House Republicans requested Hunter Biden and the whistleblower whose report sparked the probe give open testimony in the ongoing probe of President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine.

Saturday was the deadline for House Republicans to submit their proposed list of witnesses to Democrats. 

In addition to “all individuals relied upon by the anonymous whistleblower in drafting his or her secondhand complaint,” Republicans asked for eight individuals: 

The whistleblower: The still-unnamed official who filed a whistleblower complaint following Trump’s July 25 call with Ukranian president Volodymyr Zelensky.

Hunter Biden: The son of former Vice President Joe Biden and former board member of Burisma Holdings, Ukraine’s largest gas company.

David Hale: The undersecretary of State for political affairs who testified behind closed doors on Nov. 6.

Tim Morrison: National Security Council aide who testified behind closed doors on Oct. 31. 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/09/trump-impeachment-inquiry-gop-asks-biden-whistleblower-testify/2543656001/

Republicans are asking that Hunter Biden, the son of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, testify as a witness in the impeachment inquiry.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Republicans are asking that Hunter Biden, the son of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, testify as a witness in the impeachment inquiry.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Republican lawmakers are asking that the impeachment inquiry into President Trump hear publicly from Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower whose allegations prompted the probe.

In a letter to Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, who is leading the inquiry, Republican Rep. Devin Nunes said that calling these witnesses would help ensure the investigation “treats the President with fairness.”

House investigators will start questioning witnesses in open sessions next week. In response to Nunes, Schiff said that “the Committee is evaluating the Minority’s witness requests and will give due consideration to witnesses within the scope of the impeachment inquiry, as voted on by the House.”

Schiff added, though, that the inquiry will not become a “vehicle to undertake the same sham investigations into the Bidens or 2016 that the President pressed Ukraine to conduct for his personal political benefit, or to facilitate the President’s effort to threaten, intimidate, and retaliate against the whistleblower who courageously raised the initial alarm.”

Democrats have wide discretion over who appears as a witness in these proceedings. As NPR’s Tim Mak notes, “the rules approved by the House for the impeachment inquiry require that Democrats approve GOP witness requests.” Therefore, “Republicans are unlikely to get most, if any, of their desired witnesses.”

House GOP members have criticized these procedures — for example, in his letter on Saturday, Nunes said the “Democrats’ resolution unfairly restricts Minority rights.”

Nunes said the anonymous whistleblower should testify “because President Trump should be afforded an opportunity to confront his accusers.”

The whistleblower accused Trump of inappropriately pressuring Ukraine to investigate the activities of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter. The demand allegedly happened in a controversial call on July 25 between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.

The whistleblower did not claim to have heard the exchange between the two leaders but instead relied on “multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call.” The Republicans are also requesting to question “all individuals relied upon by the anonymous whistleblower in drafting his or her secondhand complaint.”

Republicans also want to hear from a business associate of Hunter Biden, a former Democratic National Committee staffer, a former contractor at the private intelligence firm Fusion GPS, and several current and former U.S. officials who have already testified behind closed doors in the impeachment inquiry.

Those officials are David Hale, the No. 3 official at the State Department, the former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker and former National Security Council staffer Tim Morrison. In Morrison’s closed-door deposition, he told lawmakers that while he was concerned about the content of the July 25 call leaking, he did not think Trump had done anything illegal.

Lawmakers have questioned a number of other witnesses to the inquiry in closed sessions. In the past week, they’ve released transcripts from those sessions, including Volker’s, and most recently from National Security Council Ukraine specialist Alexander Vindman and former National Security Council Russia specialist Fiona Hill.

The transcripts — along with the White House’s log of the Ukraine call and other public statements — largely corroborate the account of the whistleblower.

Trump has called the inquiry a hoax and denies that anything was inappropriate about the call. Several senior White House officials are refusing to appear for the probe, including acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.

On Friday, Mulvaney filed a motion to join a federal lawsuit filed by Charles Kupperman, a former top White House aide. Both men had been subpoenaed by House Democrats — although they later withdrew Kupperman’s subpoena — but were told by the president not to comply. They’re asking a judge to decide whether current and former top aides to Trump are immune from being questioned by the lawmakers.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/11/09/777914177/republicans-ask-for-whistleblower-hunter-biden-to-testify-in-impeachment-inquiry

The most significant hopes and gains unlocked by the Berlin Wall’s fall, which was 30 years ago Saturday, are all at risk.

They included a historic expansion of democracies and open markets, a wave of globalization that created the greatest prosperity and largest global middle class the world has ever seen, and the enlargement the European Union, to 28 from 12 members, and NATO, to 29 from 16 – deepening ties among the world’s leading democracies.

That all brought with it the hope of what then-President George H.W. Bush called in 1989 “A Europe Whole and Free,” in which Russia could find its proper and peaceful place. Bush went even further in September 1990, after the UN Security Council had blessed the U.S.-led coalition’s war to free Kuwait from Iraqi invasion, envisioning a New World Order, “an era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony.”

The idea had been hatched a month earlier by President Bush and General Brent Scowcroft, his national security adviser, while fishing near the president’s vacation home at Kennebunkport, Maine. They came home with three bluefish and an audacious vision that the Cold War’s end and the Persian Gulf Crisis presented a unique chance to build a global system against aggression “out of the collapse of the US-Soviet antagonisms,” in the words of General Scowcroft.

Reflecting on those heady days, Scowcroft recently told me that he felt everything he had worked for in his life was now at risk. If U.S. and European leaders don’t recover the common purpose they shared at that time – and there is yet little sign they will – this weekend’s Berlin Wall anniversary is more a moment for concern than celebration.

“Look at what is happening in the world,” French President Emmanuel Macron said in a freshly published interview in the Economist. “Things that were unthinkable five years ago. To be wearing ourselves out over Brexit, to have Europe finding it so difficult to move forward, to have an American ally turning its back on us so quickly on strategic issues; nobody would have believed this possible.”

This weekend’s 30th anniversary of the Berlin Wall’s fall provides a good moment to reflect on four reasons that event – one of freedom’s greatest historic triumphs – has failed to deliver on its full potential. Understanding that, might unlock a better path forward.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/09/new-world-order-at-risk-30-years-after-berlin-wall-fell.html

A record-breaking cold front is expected to sweep across the U.S. from Sunday into Tuesday, with freezing temperatures stretching as far south as parts of the Gulf Coast.

The National Weather Service is forecasting more than 170 potential record-setting cold high temperatures Monday to Wednesday.

On Saturday, record lows were expected across the Northeast, with Baltimore, Newark and Philadelphia each bottoming out in the mid-20s. More were expected across the South and Midwest Tuesday, when parts of Texas could drop to 16 degrees. Cities in Texas and Louisiana were predicted to reach highs in the mid-40s, breaking records set decades ago.

Climate change:One of the world’s thickest mountain glaciers is melting because of global warming

Where will the Arctic blast hit?

The front will plunge down from the Arctic through the northern Plains and upper Midwest Sunday, when temperatures could be 20 to 30 degrees below normal in some areas, the Weather Channel said. The cold will sweep into the southern Plains and Ohio Valley Monday, then through most of the East Coast and Deep South by Tuesday.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/11/09/arctic-blast-map-2019-where-cold-front-hit/2530223001/

President TrumpDonald John TrumpKey impeachment witnesses to know as public hearings begin Centrist Democrats seize on state election wins to rail against Warren’s agenda Nunes demands Schiff testify behind closed doors in Trump impeachment inquiry MORE tore into the House’s impeachment investigation in an early Saturday morning tweetstorm as the inquiry is set to enter a new, public phase next week. 

He retweeted 17 messages in roughly an hour hammering Democrats over the probe, including a handful specifically going after some witnesses who have already testified behind closed doors.

“STU: ‘The #democrats know they can’t remove @realDonaldTrump from office but they’ll go ahead with the #impeachment process anyways because they detest him!’” Fox Business host Stuart Varney said in a post retweeted by Trump.

“A total and complete circus! Just petty politicians trying to undo @realDonaldTrump’s victory. Now, if only the ringleaders would let Congress get back to work on behalf of the American people,” read a post from Rep. Roger MarshallRoger W. MarshallRepublicans storm closed-door hearing to protest impeachment inquiry Conservative Republicans unveil latest ObamaCare replacement plan House conservatives attempt to access closed-door impeachment hearing MORE (R-Kan.) that the president highlighted.

The House’s impeachment inquiry was launched in September amid Democratic concerns that Trump leveraged $400 million in military aid to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to publicly open an investigation into unfounded corruption allegations against former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenCentrist Democrats seize on state election wins to rail against Warren’s agenda Nunes demands Schiff testify behind closed doors in Trump impeachment inquiry Chris Hayes and his audience troll Trump: ‘Yes, Read the Transcript!’ MORE, a top political rival, and his son.

The White House has repeatedly blasted the House investigation as a “witch hunt” and decried Democrats’ efforts as “unhinged” after they voted to formalize the inquiry late last month. 

Democrats have countered the president has abused his oath of office by seeking to involve foreign nations in U.S. domestic politics after publicizing testimony from several witnesses who said there was a quid pro quo surrounding Trump’s dealings with Ukraine

Trump has repeatedly railed against the inquiry on the campaign trail, accusing Democrats of trying to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential race. However, he went a step further Saturday, retweeting messages specifically linked to witnesses who have already testified in the probe.

“The Dems/media are desperately relying on Taylor as their star witness to show there was an impeachable offense of quid pro quo. Aside from the fact he admits he has no idea what quid pro quo even means, Taylor also admitted to me his claims aren’t based on 1st hand knowledge,” Rep. Lee ZeldinLee ZeldinWhite House doubles down on ‘no quid pro quo’ Lobbying world Five takeaways from the first Trump impeachment deposition transcripts MORE (R-N.Y.) said in a tweet about William Taylor, who serves as the chargé d’affaires for Ukraine and testified that he believed there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine, that was retweeted by Trump.

The president’s Saturday morning tweetstorm underscores the extent to which the House’s impeachment investigation has consumed his attention, leading some allies to worry that his focus should be more equally shared between the probe and his legislative priorities. 

“Then they all wonder why they don’t get gun legislation done, then they wonder why they don’t get drug prices lowered,” Trump said in September. “Because all they do is talk nonsense. No more infrastructure bills, no more anything.”

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/469722-trump-rips-impeachment-probe-witnesses-in-early-twitter-spree

The most significant hopes and gains unlocked by the Berlin Wall’s fall, which was 30 years ago Saturday, are all at risk.

They included a historic expansion of democracies and open markets, a wave of globalization that created the greatest prosperity and largest global middle class the world has ever seen, and the enlargement the European Union, to 28 from 12 members, and NATO, to 29 from 16 – deepening ties among the world’s leading democracies.

That all brought with it the hope of what then-President George H.W. Bush called in 1989 “A Europe Whole and Free,” in which Russia could find its proper and peaceful place. Bush went even further in September 1990, after the UN Security Council had blessed the U.S.-led coalition’s war to free Kuwait from Iraqi invasion, envisioning a New World Order, “an era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony.”

The idea had been hatched a month earlier by President Bush and General Brent Scowcroft, his national security adviser, while fishing near the president’s vacation home at Kennebunkport, Maine. They came home with three bluefish and an audacious vision that the Cold War’s end and the Persian Gulf Crisis presented a unique chance to build a global system against aggression “out of the collapse of the US-Soviet antagonisms,” in the words of General Scowcroft.

Reflecting on those heady days, Scowcroft recently told me that he felt everything he had worked for in his life was now at risk. If U.S. and European leaders don’t recover the common purpose they shared at that time – and there is yet little sign they will – this weekend’s Berlin Wall anniversary is more a moment for concern than celebration.

“Look at what is happening in the world,” French President Emmanuel Macron said in a freshly published interview in the Economist. “Things that were unthinkable five years ago. To be wearing ourselves out over Brexit, to have Europe finding it so difficult to move forward, to have an American ally turning its back on us so quickly on strategic issues; nobody would have believed this possible.”

This weekend’s 30th anniversary of the Berlin Wall’s fall provides a good moment to reflect on four reasons that event – one of freedom’s greatest historic triumphs – has failed to deliver on its full potential. Understanding that, might unlock a better path forward.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/09/new-world-order-at-risk-30-years-after-berlin-wall-fell.html

All of that was somewhat miraculous given the situation when Mr. Bloomberg took office.

“After the attack, people thought New York had no future,” said Mitchell Moss, a professor of urban policy and planning at N.Y.U. “There was a genuine sense that, ‘Who would want to live in New York, who would want to work in New York, who would want to visit New York?’”

In the years that followed, Mr. Bloomberg introduced an ambitious plan to preserve or build 165,000 units of affordable housing, and he oversaw the most extensive rezoning in modern city history. His administration rezoned about 40 percent of the city, paving the way for increased density and development in old industrial waterfront neighborhoods like Williamsburg and Greenpoint in Brooklyn.

“There’s this sense that the Bloomberg administration was about mega projects,” said Rafael Cestero, who led the Department of Housing Preservation and Development during part of the Bloomberg years. Mr. Cestero countered that many of those units of affordable housing were less visible but formed a more fundamental legacy. “We talk in these vagueries of units and developments and dollars and money. And the reality is that 500,000 people in our city are living more affordably because of the work that Mayor Bloomberg did over 12 years.”

As those homes were built or saved, the cost of housing in the city kept climbing. Median rents rose in New York by 19 percent, in real dollars, between 2002 and 2011, as the real median income of renter households declined slightly, according to a report by the Furman Center at N.Y.U. The number of residents in homeless shelters grew to 50,000 a night from less than 30,000.

New York’s growth and prosperity — seen at Atlantic Yards-Barclays Center; in Greenpoint; in Long Island City — appeared inseparable from the rising affordability crisis.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/09/upshot/bloomberg-new-york-prosperity-inequality.html

When the House impeachment inquiry began more than a month ago, much of the focus was on a complaint from a whistleblower that drew attention to a July 25 phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, during which Trump asked for investigations into potential political rivals.

The whistleblower accused Trump of abusing his office for political gain and laid out a road map that House Democrats have followed in their investigation.

Trump has spent weeks questioning the whistleblower’s motives and slamming the account for being inaccurate. But as this annotation shows, most of the complaint has been corroborated during closed-door depositions of administration officials, through public statements and from a rough transcript of the call itself, released by the White House.

Loading…

Designed and produced by NPR’s Thomas Wilburn and Alyson Hurt

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/11/09/776173492/the-whistleblower-complaint-has-largely-been-corroborated-heres-how

Medicare Part B premiums and deductibles for outpatient care will increase in 2020.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced the new 2020 rates Friday. For about 70% of Medicare beneficiaries, the premiums will rise nearly 7% to $144.60 a month, up from $135.50 in 2019.

The $9.10 monthly increase follows a smaller $1.50 rise this year. Upper-income retirees pay higher premiums and those rates also are going up.

The annual deductible for Part B coverage, which covers doctor visits and outpatient care, also will go up by 7% to $198 in 2020, an increase of $13 from the annual deductible of $185 in 2019.

The announcement comes a nearly a month after the Social Security Administration set a modest 1.6% cost-of-living adjustment to benefits in 2020, which works out to approximately $24 a month for the average retired worker.

Veterans Day free food:These restaurants have deals for vets, active military Monday

“People who are really counting on that Social Security (raise) will lose some of that to this Medicare increase,” said Fred Riccardi, president of the Medicare Rights Center, a group that advocates on health care issues. “For people who live with little to no savings, any increase in Medicare premiums or drug costs is going to be a struggle.”

For 2019, Social Security recipients — which include retirees, the disabled and young survivors of deceased retirees — received a 2.8% cost-of-living adjustment, or an average $40.90 extra each month, the most since 2012. The government typically deducts Medicare Part B premiums from a beneficiary’s Social Security check.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/11/09/medicare-part-b-2020-deductibles-premiums-increasing/2541901001/

Sitting inside the courtyard of his home in Ayodhya, Haji Mahboob Ahmad, a litigant who supports rebuilding the mosque, said if the court rules in favor of a Hindu temple, Muslims will accept it.

But he fears that right-wing Hindu forces will be emboldened and more mosques will be destroyed, cementing the feeling of many Muslims that they are slowly becoming second class citizens.

“Violence against Muslims will rise and it will become institutionalized,” said Mr. Ahmad, 75, who had to flee the town for a month after the mosque was demolished nearly 30 years ago.

“Those people who say there is no fear; they are lying,” he added.

For decades, Mr. Ahmad said, living steps from the destroyed mosque felt like living in an open-air prison, because of the security around the neighborhood.

“Now the issue should be solved forever and everyone should live in peace,” he said.

Ahead of Saturday’s verdict, schools were shut and 4,000 security officers were deployed to the area. Rallies have been banned, shops barred from selling kerosene and people prevented from collecting bricks or stones. Social media was alight with anticipation and citizens and community leaders appealing for calm.

Mr. Modi, on Twitter, appealed for calm in the wake of the verdict.

“Whatever verdict is delivered by the Supreme Court will not be anyone’s victory or loss,” he wrote. “I appeal to my countrymen that everyone’s priority should be that the verdict strengthens the great tradition of peace, unity and good will of India.”

If the Supreme Court rules in the Hindus’ favor on Ayodhya, it will hand Mr. Modi a major victory just six months after his party swept elections and he was granted a second term as prime minister. The ruling comes just three months after Mr. Modi’s government achieved another key B.J.P. goal, when his government stripped the Muslim-majority state of Kashmir of its autonomy in August, increasing central government control over the territory, which Pakistan also claims.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/08/world/asia/ayodhya-supreme-court-india.html

That leaves the impression that it’s someone on the White House campus, and possibly inside the West Wing.

Anonymous’s conclusion that the president is running perhaps the most inept and dysfunctional White House in history will vex and bother Mr. Trump. But what might bother him the most is the description of his lack of fitness for the role and his lack of interest in adapting to the job, or learning about the government he oversees.

Repeatedly, Anonymous describes Mr. Trump as not fully understanding the basic mechanics of governing — asking the attorney general to do jobs outside his portfolio, for instance, or asking Mr. Kushner to take over any number of roles. “He tells the secretary of defense to do things that are the responsibility of the secretary of state,” the author writes. “He tells the attorney general to do things that are the job of the director of national intelligence. Sometimes he tells his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to do all of their jobs at once, including reimagining care for America’s veterans, negotiating Middle East peace, spearheading criminal justice reform, and undertaking delicate conversations with foreign allies.”

Mr. Trump, who is sensitive to criticism that he ignores briefing books and might not be up to the task, would bristle at the portrayal of him as a version of Chance, the simple-minded, television-consuming gardener in the book and movie “Being There” who, through a series of misunderstandings, adopts the name Chauncey Gardiner and becomes top adviser to a Washington figure.

But Mr. Trump’s aides are cautioning him to ignore the book, because it will only give it more oxygen.

So far, that has worked.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/08/us/politics/warning-anonymous-book.html

This week’s cold snap is only an appetizer compared with the main Arctic blast that’s coming next week, meteorologists said. That freeze could be one for the record books.

“The National Weather Service is forecasting 170 potential daily record cold high temperatures Monday to Wednesday,” tweeted Weather Channel meteorologist Jonathan Erdman. “A little taste of January in November.”  

The temperature nosedive will be a three-day process as a cold front charges across the central and eastern U.S. from Sunday into Tuesday.

The front will plunge quickly through the northern Plains and upper Midwest Sunday, into the southern Plains and Ohio Valley Monday, then through most of the East Coast and Deep South by Tuesday, the Weather Channel said.

Melting ice:One of the world’s thickest mountain glaciers is melting because of global warming

High temperatures on Monday may be stuck in the teens and 20s in the Midwest and around the Great Lakes. It could be the coldest Veterans Day on record in cities such as Chicago and Minneapolis, according to the Weather Channel. 

By Tuesday, record cold is possible in the Northeast, Ohio Valley and portions of the South. Highs may get only into the 30s as far south as Alabama. 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/11/08/weather-arctic-blast-next-week-midwest-east-south-cold-temperatures/2518984001/

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Michael Bloomberg submitted his papers in Alabama on Friday

Billionaire former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has signalled he will join the race to secure the Democratic Party’s nomination for US president.

He has filed paperwork ahead of a deadline for the Democratic primary election in Alabama.

The move is a necessary step to join the race to be the party’s candidate to take on President Donald Trump in next year’s election.

Mr Bloomberg, 77, has not formally confirmed his candidacy.

However, spokesman Jason Schechter told US media that an announcement “could come as early as next week”.

Media caption“Little” Michael Bloomberg will hurt Biden – Trump

The businessman is said to be concerned the current Democratic contenders would not pose a strong enough challenge to Mr Trump in 2020.

He will be entering a crowded field as one of 17 candidates hoping to be chosen as the Democratic nominee.

Former Vice President Joe Biden is the frontrunner, followed by senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

The tycoon had strongly hinted that he would run, with his adviser Howard Wolfson releasing a statement on Thursday evening saying they wanted to “ensure that Trump is defeated” in the election next year.

“But Mike is increasingly concerned that the current field of [Democratic] candidates is not well positioned to do that,” he added.

Media captionBloomberg to BBC in 2018: ‘I’d like to make a difference’

His comments came after months of debate over wealth inequality in the US, with Mr Sanders and Ms Warren announcing plans for steep tax rises for billionaires. Unveiling his tax proposals in September, Mr Sanders said: “Billionaires should not exist.”

Mr Bloomberg is estimated to be worth $52bn.

On Friday, President Trump taunted Mr Bloomberg by saying there was “nobody I’d rather run against than little Michael”.

Mr Bloomberg filed his papers in Alabama later the same day.

Better late than never?

Mr Bloomberg is said to be fully aware such a belated entry to the race presents challenges in states like Iowa and New Hampshire, where other Democratic contenders have been campaigning for months.

The Bloomberg team reportedly sees a possible pathway through the so-called Super Tuesday contests in March, when 14 states – including California, Alabama and Colorado – will vote on a single day for their preferred White House nominee.

Mr Bloomberg considered running for the White House as an independent candidate in both 2008 and 2016.

In March of this year he had said he would not join the 2020 race.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Mr Bloomberg and Mr Trump, pictured here playing golf in 2007, were once friendly

What happens after Alabama?

Mr Bloomberg’s advisers are reportedly preparing the paperwork for other states with nearing deadlines. Both Arkansas and New Hampshire require candidates to file by next week.

State-by-state votes, known as primaries and caucuses, will be held from February next year to pick a Democratic White House nominee.

The eventual winner will be crowned at the party convention in Wisconsin in July. He or she is expected to face President Trump, a Republican, in the general election in November.

What’s the other reaction?

Mr Biden told media on Friday that he had “no problem” with Mr Bloomberg joining the Democratic field.

“Michael is a solid guy,” Mr Biden said. “Let’s see where it goes.”

Ms Warren welcomed Mr Bloomberg to the race on Twitter, linking to her own campaign website and suggesting the former mayor take a look for potential policy plans.

In tweet seemingly directed at Mr Bloomberg, Mr Sanders wrote: “The billionaire class is scared and they should be scared.”

Some recent opinion polls have suggested that Ms Warren and Mr Sanders – who are more politically liberal than Mr Biden – might face an uphill battle against Mr Trump.

The Republican National Committee said in a statement that the billionaire’s prospective entry “underscores the weak Democrat field”.

Image copyright
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Image caption

Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, and Elizabeth Warren are currently leading the field of Democratic candidates

Who is Bloomberg?

Mr Bloomberg was a Wall Street banker before going on to create the financial publishing empire that bears his name.

His net worth is $52bn (£40bn), according to Forbes. This is 17 times more than Mr Trump’s (estimated at $3.1bn).

He staged a successful campaign for New York mayor in 2001, remaining in office for three consecutive terms until 2013.

A philanthropist, he has donated millions of dollars to educational, medical and other causes.

Why is he running now?

Analysis – Anthony Zurcher, BBC News, Washington

Why is he contemplating a run for the highest political job in the land just a few months after announcing he would watch 2020 from the sidelines?

Here are a few theories:

  • Because he thinks he can win
  • Because he wants to shape the debate
  • Because he can afford to

The top one is the obvious response. Mr Bloomberg has plenty of pollsters and political strategists at his disposal, and is reported to be a very data-driven businessman. It doesn’t take an advanced degree in quantitative analysis, however, to realise that the Democratic field, even at this (relatively) late date, is still in flux.

There are four candidates at or near the top of early state and national primary polls – Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg. All of them have their strengths, of course, but all of them also have obvious weaknesses.

What does Bloomberg believe in?

Originally a Democrat, Mr Bloomberg became a Republican to mount his campaign for New York mayor in 2001.

Now regarded as a moderate Democrat, he rejoined the party only last year.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Michael Bloomberg has highlighted climate change and gun control as key issues

Mr Bloomberg has liberal views on issues such as climate change, gun control, immigration and abortion rights.

He was credited this week with helping Democrats win control of Virginia’s legislature, after his gun-control advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety injected $2.5m into the state’s election.

But Mr Bloomberg is more conservative on topics like the economy and policing.

As mayor, he defended the New York Police Department’s stop-and-frisk policy, which critics say disproportionately targeted African Americans and Hispanics.

At city hall, Mr Bloomberg banned supersize sodas to prevent obesity, but was overruled by the state’s Supreme Court.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50355758

Roy Thomas’s uncle Mathew Manjadiyil dies from an apparent heart attack.

Alphine Sakhariyas, the two-year-old daughter of Roy Thomas’s cousin Shaju Sakhariyas, dies, apparently from choking to death on a piece of food.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/08/asia/jolly-joseph-murder-india-intl-hnk/index.html