WASHINGTON — Ahead of the first public testimony of the impeachment inquiry next week, the White House and key Hill Republicans are discussing a defense of President Donald Trump that is heavy on offense, with a focus on dismissing and discrediting witnesses whose testimony may be damaging to the president.

“If folks question the motivations and credibility of the president as we go through this, it’s possible that the same standard could apply to them,” said an administration official involved in the process granted anonymity to speak candidly about strategy, who said the approach had been used during past impeachment defenses.

The president’s congressional backers are likely to question the standing of witnesses expected to provide the toughest assessments of his conduct in requesting the government of Ukraine investigate Hunter Biden, son of 2020 rival Joe Biden, the former vice president.

Some key Hill GOP allies of the president are looking to the combative Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings as a model for what they view as a successful effort to chip away at the credibility of a potentially damaging witness, according to a person familiar with the White House’s thinking.

The strategy for limiting the damage to the president from the upcoming hearings, developed by White House aides in concert with Republican allies in Congress, also includes an effort to emphasize distance between the witnesses — who include three career diplomats — and the president, according to people familiar with the discussions.

The questioners are expected to emphasize that none of the witnesses providing public testimony had a direct conversation with Trump about a link between Ukraine funding and an investigation into the Bidens, said an administration official. Instead, the White House is hoping the hearings will suggest witness allegations of an explicit quid pro quo predicating security assistance for Ukraine on the public announcement of an investigation of the Bidens were based on conversations among themselves.

The White House has asserted executive privilege to block witnesses from discussing their conversations with the president, preventing anyone who would have had a direct conversation with Trump from testifying. A majority of the current and former White House officials who may have direct knowledge of the conversation and whose testimony was requested or subpoenaed by House lawmakers this week have declined to appear.

While Democrats are anticipating the testimony starting Wednesday will boost their public case for impeachment, White House officials say they are optimistic the event, like other high-profile hearings they have weathered, won’t be as damaging as anticipated.

The first open hearings as part of the House impeachment inquiry, to be held Nov. 13, are scheduled to feature testimony from career diplomat William Taylor and State Department official George Kent. The second hearing, scheduled for Nov. 15, is expected to include testimony from former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.

In transcripts of closed door testimony released this week, the three painted a picture of a shadow foreign policy run by Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani ,who was mounting a pressure campaign on Ukraine to investigate business dealings in Ukraine by Joe Biden’s son, and conspiracy theories on that nation’s possible role in 2016 election interference.

Taylor said he was told Trump had ordered a hold on military assistance to Ukraine and that it was his “clear understanding” the money wouldn’t be released until the Ukrainian president publicly committed to investigate the Bidens. Kent testified that he witnessed an effort to push politically motivated investigations “injurious to the rule of law,” according to the transcript.

Trump floated the argument that none of the witnesses had firsthand knowledge of his thinking on Ukraine on Friday as he took questions from reporters before departing the White House.

“For the most part, I’ve never even heard of these people, I have no idea who they are,” Trump said. “…It seems that nobody has any firsthand knowledge, there is no firsthand knowledge.”

He said of European Union ambassador and Trump donor Gordon Sondland, “I hardly know the gentleman.” Sondland first testified that Trump told him there was no quid pro quo, though later amended his testimony to say that he had “presumed” there was one and told the Ukrainians they likely wouldn’t get funding until they made a statement about the investigations.

Meanwhile, Trump has been working to ensure his support from Senate Republicans remains solid. In a reminder to Republicans of why they should support him, he held an event Wednesday touting the number of conservative judges he has appointed where he heaped praise on key Senate Republicans such as Iowa’s Chuck Grassley and South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham — senators whose support he will need if he faces an impeachment vote in the Senate.

White House advisers say they feel confident Trump can weather the public phase of the impeachment process, since Republican voter support for the president remains strong — an indication, said a White House official, that GOP senators up for re-election in 2020 will need to stick by Trump, or risk facing a primary challenger.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/weather-impeachment-hearings-white-house-looks-put-witnesses-trial-n1079041

WASHINGTON – A New York judge’s ruling that President Donald Trump must pay $2 million to charity appears to be the final chapter in the saga of Trump’s troubled charitable foundation.

State Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla of Manhattan ruled on Thursday that Trump pay $2 million in damages to various nonprofit groups to settle allegations that he and his family used the Trump Foundation to further his political and business interests.

Though Trump admitted the misconduct in court documents, he issued a defiant statement in which he accused New York’s attorney general of mischaracterizing the settlement process for political purposes. Trump claimed he had been attacked by “political hacks in New York State.”

Here’s a closer look at the ruling and the foundation’s legal troubles:

What was the lawsuit about?

The lawsuit, filed last year by then-New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, outlined a wide array of mismanagement by Trump and his three eldest children.

Chief among them: allowing Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign to orchestrate a televised fundraiser in Des Moines, Iowa, for the foundation, which then distributed $2.8 million to veterans’ charities that were also chosen by the campaign. 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/08/trump-foundation-saga-troubled-charity-ends-2-million-judgment/2532798001/

House Democrats complained that Mr. Bolton was stiff-arming them, but said they would not subpoena him because they did not want to get dragged into lengthy court proceedings. Instead, Democrats have suggested that they may cite the refusal to testify as evidence of obstruction of Congress by the president, which could form its own article of impeachment.

In his letter, Mr. Bolton’s lawyer argued that his client would be willing to talk to investigators, but only if a court rules that he should ignore White House objections.

Mr. Bolton’s former deputy, Charles M. Kupperman, represented by the same lawyer, filed a lawsuit seeking guidance from the federal courts on competing demands by the executive branch, which has ordered them not to testify, and the legislative branch, which has issued subpoenas directing them to. Late Friday, Mr. Mulvaney filed to join Mr. Kupperman’s lawsuit to have a court settle whether the men are obligated to comply with testimony requests.

But Democrats have said they will not pursue time-consuming litigation on the matter, arguing that it is a stalling tactic.

Mr. Mulvaney defied a House subpoena on Friday morning, citing instructions that he was absolutely immune from testifying.

Investigators were already eager to question Mr. Mulvaney after his admission in the White House briefing room last month of a quid pro quo linking the military aid for Ukraine to that country’s announcement of investigations that Mr. Trump wanted. Hours later, Mr. Mulvaney said he was misunderstood and retracted the statement.

At the White House, Mr. Trump derided the coming public hearings as a “hoax,” even as he sought to project confidence that he would not be brought down by a recent stream of damning testimony from officials in his own administration who have cooperated with the impeachment inquiry.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/08/us/politics/john-bolton-mick-mulvaney-trump.html

The Washington Post’s Karoun Demirjian dissects the Republicans latest push to unmask and subpoena the whistleblower. Read more: https://wapo.st/36MRTi3. Subscribe to The Washington Post on YouTube: https://wapo.st/2QOdcqK

Follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/washingtonpost
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/washingtonp…
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/washingtonpost/

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcAOCR6zTTY

Washington — Former White House senior counselor Steve Bannon began his roughly 30 minutes of testimony in the trial of Roger Stone, a former Trump campaign adviser, by saying, “I’ve been compelled to testify” and “would not come voluntarily.” 

The government tried in its questioning of Bannon to establish that the Trump campaign communicated with Stone about impending WikiLeaks dumps of Democrats’ emails during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Prosecutor Michael Marando asked Bannon whether Stone had bragged about his relationship with WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange. Bannon replied that while Stone mentioned it “a lot in the media,” this was not something he would bring up “all the time.” He added, “We didn’t talk that often — only every couple of weeks.”

Marando read the transcript of Bannon’s grand jury testimony, noting that Bannon had said, “I think it was generally believed that the [Trump campaign’s] access point [to Assange] would be Roger Stone.”

Under cross examination by Stone’s attorney, Robert Buschel, Bannon stated that the Trump campaign had no official “access point,” per se. But he also said Stone would be considered a source of information on WikiLeaks because Stone had implied he had a connection. Buschel tried to downplay the emails Stone had sent to Bannon about the WikiLeak dumps of Democrats’ emails, by suggesting that everyone from the “kid in the mailroom to the guy on the street” had an idea about how to fix the Trump campaign. 

However, when Bannon was asked why he emailed Stone on Oct 4, 2016 — the date WikiLeaks announced the dump of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails — Bannon replied, “Because Roger was the guy who knew about WikiLeaks and knew Julian Assange.” 

Bannon could not name another person affiliated with the Trump campaign who claimed to be in contact with WikiLeaks besides Stone.

Prosecutors are presenting evidence that Stone tried to get information to and from Assange and use the hacked emails and information from Assange to influence the 2016 election.  

Stone is fighting charges that he lied to Congress and engaged in witness tampering involving radio personality Randy Credico. He told the House Intelligence Committee that Credico was his only backchannel to Assange. However, prosecutors allege that Stone was in fact relying on another associate, too, named Jerome Corsi, to try to contact Assange, and he never mentioned Corsi to Congress. Credico testified that Stone had bragged to him about having his own backchannel and even did so publicly before Credico made his own contact with Assange. 

Stone also allegedly pressured Credico to plead the 5th and not cooperate with Congress and the Mueller investigation. He allegedly threatened him and his dog with harm if he did. The jurors were shown texts from Stone telling Credico to, “Do your Frank Pentangeli” in front of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. If you’re familiar with the “Godfather” movies, you may recall Frank Pentangeli lies to Congress, pretending not to know anything incriminating about the Corleone family. 

Prosecutors told the court earlier this week that Stone spoke to Mr. Trump six times over the course of several weeks in June and July 2016, including on the day the Democratic National Committee announced it had been hacked. The U.S. intelligence community determined the hack was the work of a sophisticated campaign by Russian intelligence operatives to boost Mr. Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton.

The indictment claims that Stone spoke to senior Trump campaign officials about information that could damage Clinton’s campaign. The indictment also alleges that Stone was contacted by senior Trump campaign officials to inquire about future releases that WikiLeaks, identified as “Organization 1” in the indictment, might have.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/roger-stone-trial-day-4-steve-bannon-testifies-against-former-trump-campaign-adviser-2019-11-08/

If the House of Representatives impeaches President Trump, the Senate would hold a trial on the charges – complicating campaign plans for Democratic senators who are running for president. CBS News special correspondent Alex Wagner interviewed California Senator Kamala Harris about the possible trial for Showtime’s “The Circus,” and Wagner joined CBSN to discuss the impeachment inquiry.

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlulwAAHi_4

UPDATE (WKOW) — A woman now living in Florida has been arrested in connection with a brutal 1999 homicide.

Racine County Sheriff Christopher Schmaling today identified Peggy Lynn Johnson, who was 23 at the time, as the victim found dead in Racine County on July 21, 1999.

Linda LaRoche, a registered nurse in McHenry, Illinois, at the time, was arrested Tuesday in Cape Coral, Florida, by Racine County Sheriff’s Office detectives.

Over the years, Johnson’s DNA was submitted for genealogical DNA testing and her body was exhumed for chemical isotope testing conducted by the Smithsonian Institution, Schmaling said at a Friday morning news conference.

It was only recently that investigators developed information that led to Johnson’s identification.

Since then, investigators have learned that Johnson, 18 at the time and cognitively impaired, was on her own after her mother died.

She sought help at a medical clinic in McHenry, Illinois. where she met LaRoche, a registered nurse.

Police say LaRoche recognized Johnson’s disability and took Johnson into her home, where she spent the last five years of her life.

It was there that Johnson suffered horrific abuse at the hands of LaRoche until, police say, she was killed in 1999.

LaRoche has waived extradition and is on her way back in Racine County.

Source Article from https://wkow.com/news/crime/2019/11/08/breaking-authorities-make-arrest-in-brutal-1999-cold-case-homicide/

A board member of the new Black Voices for Trump Coalition appeared on “Fox & Friends” Friday, taking issue with the media’s effort to downplay President Trump’s contributions to the black community.

“What the president has done and is doing for our country, for the black community, is so underrated. It gets downplayed at every turn by the liberal media,” David Harris Jr. said, touting the new initiative of the Trump 2020 campaign.

“They don’t want to focus on any of his successes.”

Trump departed the White House on Friday to launch a new re-election campaign initiative in Atlanta that will focus on African-American voters. Harris Jr. said that he was “excited” to be a part of the coalition.

TRUMP CAMPAIGN TO LAUNCH ‘VETERANS FOR TRUMP’ COALITION

Harris Jr. said he recently had a conversation with his driver, a black man, while en route to the event and he asked about Trump’s contributions to the black community. The driver responded that he “had no idea” about the subject.

TRUMP LOCKED IN TIGHT CONTEST IN 2020 BATTLEGROUNDS, DESPITE TRAILING IN NATIONAL POLLS

Harris Jr. spoke of Trump’s signing into law a $360 million funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities and the record-low black unemployment figures.

Harris Jr. also noted that the campaign initiative will consist of law enforcement officers, health care professionals, business owners, and activists that have been successful in “improving their communities.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Most black Americans don’t know because the liberal media doesn’t want them to hear and we are dedicated to bringing the truth to the people in a very strategic way with digital media and social media. Something that’s never been done before,” Harris Jr. said.

“It’s truly unprecedented, what’s taking place today.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/black-voices-trump-campaign-liberal-media

This week’s cold snap is only an appetizer compared with the main Arctic blast that’s coming next week, meteorologists said. That freeze could be one for the record books.

“The National Weather Service is forecasting 170 potential daily record cold high temperatures Monday to Wednesday,” tweeted Weather Channel meteorologist Jonathan Erdman. “A little taste of January in November.”  

The temperature nosedive will be a three-day process as a cold front charges across the central and eastern U.S. from Sunday into Tuesday.

The front will plunge quickly through the northern Plains and upper Midwest Sunday, into the southern Plains and Ohio Valley Monday, then through most of the East Coast and Deep South by Tuesday, the Weather Channel said.

Melting ice:One of the world’s thickest mountain glaciers is melting because of global warming

High temperatures on Monday may be stuck in the teens and 20s in the Midwest and around the Great Lakes. It could be the coldest Veterans Day on record in cities such as Chicago and Minneapolis, according to the Weather Channel. 

By Tuesday, record cold is possible in the Northeast, Ohio Valley and portions of the South. Highs may get only into the 30s as far south as Alabama. 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/11/08/weather-arctic-blast-next-week-midwest-east-south-cold-temperatures/2518984001/

President Trump travels to Atlanta Friday where he’ll appeal to African American voters.

RELATED: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPXLV…

The event one year out from the election will launch the “Black Voices for Trump” coalition. His campaign describes it as a “national effort to mobilize and empower black Americans” to help spread the president’s message of “Promises Made, Promises Kept.” Only 8% of African Americans cast their ballot for Trump in 2016 while his approval rating among black voters sits at just 10%, according to a recent survey by Quinnipiac University.

» Subscribe to USA TODAY: http://bit.ly/1xa3XAh
» Watch more on this and other topics from USA TODAY: https://bit.ly/2Vq6Nnq
» USA TODAY delivers current local and national news, sports, entertainment, finance, technology, and more through award-winning journalism, photos, videos and VR.

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLPM4wBG-vE

Fox Business Network anchor Stuart Varney predicted that former New York City Michael Bloomberg’s potential entry into the 2020 presidential race is bad news for all the Democratic candidates in the running.

“He’s a grenade chucked right into the Democrat race,” said Varney on Fox Nation’s “My Take” on Friday.

“He was mayor of New York, considered a centrist, 77 years old, and wait for it — he’s worth $52 billion,” Varney continued. “In politics, a man with all that money is a game-changer.”

First, Varney argued that Bloomberg’s background sets him on a collision course with Senators Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

“Think this through, please. Front-running Democrats Warren and Sanders have no time at all for billionaires. They based their campaigns on confiscating their wealth. They rail against the rich. But now they have one of the richest people in the world running against them from inside their own party. Can you say division, split, ideological schism?”

Second, Varney said that he believes Bloomberg’s entry into the 2020 field would be devastating for former Vice President Joe Biden.

“Bloomberg is considered a moderate. So is Joe Biden. Well, a $50 billion moderate goes up against a fading, stumbling moderate. Who do you think is going to win? Bloomberg is a huge problem for Biden.”

As far as policy goes, Varney suggested that Bloomberg may have a positive effort on the Democratic party.

WHAT THE LATEST NYT ARTICLE SLAMMING BIDEN REALLY MEANS: VARNEY

“He’s a capitalist. He wants a well-run, efficient capitalist economy. Surely he’s got no time for the socialists who’ve taken over the party. That means forget a wealth tax. Forget Medicare-for-all. Forget the Green New Deal. Forget massive crippling tax increases. At this point, Bloomberg’s the guy who pulls the Democrats away from the edge of the socialist cliff.

“If anything, Bloomberg will put some sanity back into the Democrat Party,” Varney concluded. “A party which bases its appeal on hating the rich now has to contend with a powerful Democrat candidate who is extremely rich. It’s going to be fun.”

To see Stuart Varney’s full remarks on  “My Take”, and for more episodes of his daily commentary, visit Fox Nation and join today.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR A FOX NATION FREE TRIAL

Fox Nation programs are viewable on-demand and from your mobile device app, but only for Fox Nation subscribers. Go to Fox Nation to start a free trial and watch the extensive library from Tomi Lahren, Pete Hegseth, Abby Hornacek, Laura Ingraham, Ainsley Earhardt, Greg Gutfeld, Judge Andrew Napolitano and many more of your favorite Fox News personalities.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/michael-bloomberg-biden-warren-2020

An accidental mix of cleaners — acid and bleach — generated toxic fumes that killed the manager of a Buffalo Wild Wings in Massachusetts, authorities said Friday.

Thirteen others were taken to the hospital, according to the Fire Department in Burlington, Massachusetts, a Boston suburb.

The accident occurred shortly after 5:30 p.m. Thursday when a worker began cleaning the kitchen floor just before the dinner rush, Burlington Fire Chief Michael Patterson told NBC News on Friday.

But that employee did not know that an acid-based cleaner, Scale Kleen, had been spilled on the floor earlier, Patterson said. So when the worker used chlorine- and bleached-based Super 8 on the floor, the mixture turned green and started to bubble, Patterson added.

After that worker fled the kitchen with burning eyes and breathing issues, the manager grabbed a squeegee and tried to push the bubbling green concoction out of the restaurant and into an outdoor drain before he was unable to continue, according to the chief.

“He was quickly overcome … and the squeegeeing led him to a severe medical condition,” Patterson said.

Both the Scale Kleen and Super 8 cleaners had clear labels warning not to mix them with other products, according to fire officials.

“I believe this is just an accident,” Patterson said. The victim, who died at Lahey Hospital & Medical Center in Burlington, was not immediately identified.

Memphis-based Auto-Chlor System appears to be the maker of both Scale Kleen and Super 8. But in a company statement, it only referred to Super 8.

“We understand the concerns, fears and questions you may have following the Buffalo Wild Wings chemical incident which may have involved Auto-Chlor’s product SUPER 8,” according to the statement.

“First and foremost, our condolences are with the individual and their family as well as those affected yesterday during the incident. The safety and well-being of our customers are our first priority, always.”

The statement continued, “At this time, working with OSHA, local authorities, and emergency teams on site, we are doing everything we can to determine all details behind this incident.”

A responding state hazardous materials team spread neutralizer on the floor and into the outside air, making the restaurant safe to enter hours later, officials said.

City officials closed the restaurant and it will need to get formal clearance from the Burlington Board of Health before it can reopen.

Investigators with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration were responding to the scene on Friday, an agency spokesman said.

“Bleach by itself shouldn’t be deadly,” said Rick Sachleben, a retired organic chemist and member of the American Chemical Society. “However when it’s a mixed with incompatible chemicals, it can generate toxic gasses and that’s probably what happened here.”

He said millions of homes and businesses across America use these cleaning agents that are perfectly safe when properly used — and potentially harmful if combined.

“You can put all the labels you want, but there are lots of things we use on a regular basis that are potential dangerous,” said Sachleben, who lives in Burlington.

“I mean, think about gasoline and how flammable and dangerous that is. But no one thinks twice about pulling up to a station and filling up with gas.”

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/deadly-accidental-mix-acid-bleach-blamed-buffalo-wild-wings-manager-n1078866

“If the two parties reach the first-phase agreement, they should, in accordance with the contents of the agreement, simultaneously and proportionally cancel the tariffs that were already raised,” Gao Feng, a ministry spokesman, said. “This is an important condition for reaching an agreement … China’s position has been consistent and clear: The trade war was started by raising tariffs, and so it should be ended by canceling them.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/in-latest-china-pivot-trump-says-partial-trade-deal-might-not-be-completed-this-year/2019/11/08/b3d65bd4-024d-11ea-9518-1e76abc088b6_story.html

The 2020 presidential campaign is starting to feel a lot like 2016. This is a good thing for Donald Trump and his Republican Party. It is a bad thing for the Democrats.

During the 2016 campaign, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton seemed almost predestined to defeat Donald Trump. Clinton was a former secretary of state, a former first lady, a person who had devoted much of her life to public service, is highly intelligent and an expert on public policy. She was also buoyed among Democratic voters and many others by the fact that she would be America’s first woman president. Trump, meanwhile, was viewed by the news media and most serious political observers as a buffoon, the gimp at a political freak show. Voting models and public opinion polls showed Hillary Clinton easily winning the White House.

But Clinton’s destiny would be derailed.

Because they found him to be an “entertaining” TV character, the American news media gave Donald Trump approximately $5 billion in free airtime. Trump also benefited from how the media covered the 2016 election, focusing more on negativity and scandal than on substantive policy issues.

FBI Director James Comey would impact the outcome of the 2016  election by announcing a last-minute investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails (which involved no crimes) while never making the public aware of investigations into Trump’s campaign and inner circle (where crimes actually did occur).

Clinton’s campaign made fatal errors in resource allocation in swing states such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and Michigan. Disaffected Bernie Sanders voters and third-party candidates such as Jill Stein siphoned votes away from Clinton.

In the end Hillary Clinton would defeat Donald Trump by close to 3 million votes, but would lose the Electoral College and therefore the presidency.

Trump’s won because of several key reasons. His skill at developing and manipulating a cult-like following, his authoritarian and fascist appeal to racist, nativist and sexist voters, his deft use of social media including Facebook and Twitter, the Fox News right-wing propaganda machine, and illegal Russian interference on his behalf gifted him the White House.

As the 2020 presidential election approaches, with the third year of Trump’s reign coming to an end, all signs again seem to point toward a Democratic victory.

Trump is remarkably unpopular. More Americans want Trump impeached than wanted Richard Nixon impeached in 1974. Public opinion polls show a general level of discontent and disgust with Trump, both as a person and as president. Public opinion polls generally show the Democratic presidential nominee — whoever that may be — defeating Trump easily.

The Democrats have finally decided to impeach Donald Trump for his many crimes and other misdeeds, including obstruction of justice, abuse of power including bribery and extortion (as seen in the Ukraine scandal), his rampant corruption and violations of the emoluments clause of the Constitution, and his general betrayal of the presidential oath of office.

Trump’s overt embrace of white supremacy and racism, his disregard for the rule of law and the Constitution, and his threats of violence against the American news media, leading Democrats and various private citizens are also impeachable offenses.

On a near-daily basis, Trump’s many political scandals are multiplying like bacteria in a petri dish. He will almost certainly become the first president to run for re-election after having been impeached.

For these and many other reasons, Donald Trump should be doomed. But Donald Trump is not a normal political candidate. He is a political version of James Cameron’s “Terminator” or a zombie ghoul from George Romero’s “Night of the Living Dead.” Donald Trump is almost unstoppable. Despite all of the evidence suggesting otherwise, Trump will likely win in 2020.

While public opinion polls and other research show that the American people are turning against Donald Trump at an increasing rate, his support among Republicans and right-leaning independents remains remarkably high. A new poll from Monmouth University reports that 62 percent of people who approve of Trump say they will continue supporting him no matter what he does.

Donald Trump also has the highest level of baseline support for an American president in the history of modern public opinion polls.

An analysis by the research company Moody’s Analytics shows Donald Trump winning the 2020 presidential election by a comfortable margin. Other polling models echo Moody’s prediction: For many voters the strength of the American economy outweighs Trump’s perfidy and authoritarianism.

As in 2016, the Democrats will be reminded that the United States is not a direct democracy. The president is decided by the Electoral College. There, Donald Trump has plausibly maintained or expanded his lead in key battleground states which he won in 2016. A recent New York Times article explained:

In national polls, Mr. Trump’s political standing has appeared to be in grave jeopardy. His approval ratings have long been in the low 40s, and he trails Mr. Biden by almost nine points in a national polling average. But as the 2016 race showed, the story in the battleground states can be quite different. Mr. Trump won the election by sweeping Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, Arizona and North Carolina — even while losing the national vote by two points.

Democrats would probably need to win three of the six states to win the White House, assuming other states voted as they did in 2016 — an outcome that is not at all assured.

The Times/Siena results and other data suggest that the president’s advantage in the Electoral College relative to the nation as a whole remains intact or has even grown since 2016, raising the possibility that the Republicans could — for the third time in the past six elections — win the presidency while losing the popular vote.

Donald Trump leads a political cult. His members will not abandon him for any reason, because they are enmeshed together in a state of collective narcissism and other mental pathologies. Right-wing Christian evangelicals are among Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters. According to a recent Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) report, 99 percent of white Christian Evangelicals report that they will never defect from Donald Trump’s cult.

CBS News offers this context:

This is an even greater percentage than overall Republicans, 94% of which oppose the impeachment and removal of Mr. Trump. (Ninety-nine percent of Republicans who watch Fox News, a subsection that likely overlaps with white evangelical Protestants, also oppose impeachment and removal.)

The new PRRI report also shows that Republicans have sealed themselves into a right-wing echo chamber of lies and disinformationBuzzFeed explains:

Fox News viewers are remarkably, and unrelentingly, loyal to Trump. Fifty-five percent of Republicans who get their news from the network said there was nothing Trump could do to lose their approval, a recent study found. This was in contrast to just 30% of Republicans who don’t get their news from the network. In a new Suffolk poll, only 9% of people who trust Fox News the most said they believed Trump’s call with Ukraine’s president is an impeachable offense, compared to 72% of people who trust CNN the most. And 78% of Fox watchers said they agreed with Trump’s assessment that the impeachment proceedings constitute a “political lynching.”

Interviews with Trump’s supporters reveal a public so unflinchingly loyal that any efforts to impeach Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors makes his cultists love him even more.

Donald Trump is also very popular among “blue-collar” working-class white women, the largest single voting bloc in America. They are Trump’s human shields in the impeachment fight. Washington Monthly reports:

Democrats face two key questions: who are Trump’s most stalwart defenders, and can they be persuaded to abandon him?

New research suggests an answer to the first of these queries. It’s a group that Democrats should — and could — be winning over: blue-collar white women. While Democrats made crucial gains among these voters in the 2018 election, these women may now be rallying to Trump’s defense… .

As of October 21, Trendency found that a solid majority (54 percent) of non-college-educated white women either outright oppose or lean against impeachment, while just 37 percent strongly support it. In fact, blue-collar white women are the strongest opponents of impeachment among all white voters (see chart below). This opposition is in stark contrast to college-educated white women, among whom only 26 percent indicated “no support” for impeachment as of October 21.

Why does this group of white women support Donald Trump? White women, like white men, have both historically been deeply invested in white supremacy. Non-college-educated white women’s support for Trump is also a function of internalized hostile sexism where his misogyny, dozens of alleged sexual assaults, and efforts to take away women’s reproductive rights and freedoms are not viewed as disqualifying and may in fact be understood as reasons to vote for him.

What if Donald Trump is in fact defeated in 2020? He, his supporters and their captive news media will claim that he is a victim of a coup. This will make governance all but impossible for the new Democratic president. With Trump and his allies already engaging in stochastic terrorism and talk of “civil war,” right-wing political violence on an escalating scale will then be more likely than not.

As Tom Nichols observed in a recent column in USA Today, the modern Republican Party has decided to destroy itself as proof of its loyalty to Donald Trump and American fascism. Like its leader, the present-day Republican Party represents an existential threat to American democracy.

Nichols writes, “The House Republicans have clearly decided to throw themselves on the pyre of Donald Trump’s burning presidency. The last act of this tragedy — and impeachment, no matter how it turns out, is a national tragedy — will be when Senate Republicans meekly submit to the will of Donald Trump and acquit him, like terrified jurors under the glaring eye of a Mafia boss who knows their names.”

Nichols then sounds this alarm:

There isn’t much more ground to cover between the historic Halloween vote and the final immolation of the Republican Party. The GOP will fail this test of character. What is more important is whether the American nation passes it and demands the impeachment and removal of the greatest threat to the United States Constitution ever to come from the Oval Office.

Former high-ranking and other distinguished members of the United States military and the intelligence community have also warned the American people and the world that Donald Trump is a threat to democracy. Speaking to that point, retired Adm. William H. McRaven, former commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command, even wrote an op-ed in the New York Times to suggest where that Donald Trump is “destroying” the United States.

As should be obvious to everyone, the 2020 presidential election is not politics as usual.

The re-election of Donald Trump will mean that basic human and civil rights, the rule of law, the Constitution and other central aspects of American democracy — such as freedom of the press, free and fair elections and the right to vote — will be imperiled.

Trump and his allies will take a 2020 victory as an endorsement of the “unitary executive” theory, which holds that the president — as long as he or she is a Republican — is more like a king or an emperor than a democratic leader accountable to the Constitution and the rule of law. Such an outcome is a betrayal of the best core democratic values of the United States established at the founding and enshrined in the Constitution, values for which millions of Americans, both at home and abroad, have struggled, fought and died.

Ultimately, the 2020 presidential election will be one of the most important moments in American history. Like the Civil War and the civil rights movement, it is a referendum on the country’s democracy and its centuries-long journey to become a “more perfect union.” In its national myth America is a shining city on the hill. A vote for Donald Trump in 2020 is a decision to transform that shining city on the hill into a stinking outhouse and an embarrassment before the world. This is the choice that the American people will make in 2020.

Defeating Donald Trump requires full knowledge of the facts. They must not be ignored in favor of overly optimistic predictions meant to buoy the spirits of the “resistance.” Vanquishing President Trump and his movement is urgent and necessary. It will not be easy, and victory is by no means certain.

Source Article from https://www.salon.com/2019/11/07/dont-get-complacent-trump-is-likely-to-win-again-unless-we-fight-for-democracy/

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump is pitching his record to African-American voters on Friday in Atlanta, Georgia, where he will join Vice President Mike Pence to kick off the launch of the “Black Voices for Trump” coalition a year out from the 2020 election. 

The president will speak at the World Congress Center in Atlanta to build support with a group of voters with whom he is deeply unpopular. Only 8% of African Americans cast their ballot for Trump in 2016 while his approval rating among black voters sits at just 10%, according to a recent survey by Quinnipiac University

Not all African Americans are dismissing Trump. The Atlanta event drew a few hundred African American supporters, many wearing red and Make America Great Again hats, with the line stretching through the lobby of the World Congress Center. Some cheered with excitement and some brought their children to witness the announcement.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/08/trump-pence-atlanta-african-american-voters-2020/2507539001/

President Donald Trump will get another vocal defender in the ongoing impeachment probe as it enters the public stage.

Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, who has been a fervent ally of Trump, has been assigned to the House Intelligence Committee to fight for “fairness and truth” as the impeachment proceedings enter the public phase, according to a statement from House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

Jordan joins the ranks of the president’s most ardent defenders already on the panel, including Reps. Devin Nunes of California and John Ratcliffe of Texas.

The assignment comes soon after another man said Jordan, when he was a wrestling coach at Ohio State University in the early 1990s, ignored his claim that he had been the subject of sexual abuse by Dr. Richard Strauss. Independent investigators have ruled that Strauss, who died in 2005, sexually abused 177 male students over about 20 years.

A Jordan spokesman did not return CNBC’s request for comment on the latest Strauss-related accusation.

In the impeachment hearings, Jordan will likely be at odds with Intel committee chairman Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who is leading the public inquiry and has drawn the ire of conservatives pundits and politicians, including Trump.

Jordan was part of a failed effort to censure Schiff in October over Schiff’s recounting of Trump’s controversial July 25th call with Ukrainian President Vlodomyr Zelensky during a September 27 hearing. A partial transcript of that call was made public after a whisteblower complaint exposed it.

On the call, Trump appears to ask Zelensky to dig up dirt on his political rivals in exchange for the release of military aid that the administration had held up. The question of whether there was a quid pro quo is at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.

Jordan currently serves as the top Republican on the House Oversight and Reform Committee, but will be temporarily placed on the Intel committee as well while the panel conducts public hearings.

The Oversight committee is also involved in the impeachment process, but the Intel Committee is the only body with the ability to conduct public hearings on impeachment.

Rep. Matt Gaetz, a Florida Republican who has been a staunch advocate of Trump, tweeted on Nov. 5th that if Jordan was not added to the panel, House Republicans would be “failing” President Trump.

Jordan has also pushed for the public disclosure of the whistleblower’s identity, whose complaint to the inspector general sparked the impeachment inquiry into President Trump.

Jordan’s appointment comes at the expense of Arkansas Rep. Rick Crawford, who stated his hope that the Intel Committee would “hear the full truth” during the course of the impeachment hearings.

CNBC’s Yelena Dzhanova contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/08/rep-jim-jordan-gets-a-seat-on-house-intel-committee-for-impeachment-hearings.html