As the impeachment process moves into a new and more public phase, President Trump and his allies are increasing their pressure on the media to reveal the name of the whistleblower who started it all. 

At a rally in Kentucky on Monday, Republican Senator Rand Paul urged the press to “do your job and print his name,” which prompted the audience to break into chants of “do your job!” 

Paul accompanied Mr. Trump as he campaigned for Republican Governor Matt Bevin, who is up for reelection on Tuesday. 

The whistleblower, who works as a U.S. intelligence officer, has a right to anonymity under federal law. 

The whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Zaid, denounced Paul’s comments.

 “A member of Congress who calls for the identity of any lawful whistleblower to be publicly revealed against their wishes disgraces the office they hold and betrays the interests of the Constitution and the American people,” Zaid said in a statement to CBS News.

The House passed a formal impeachment resolution last week, started releasing transcripts of witnesses’ closed-door testimonies this week, and plans to hold public hearings soon. At issue is a July 25 call in which Mr. Trump pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a Democrat running to unseat Mr. Trump, and his son, Hunter Biden. It is illegal to ask foreign entities for election assistance. 

During the rally, Paul and Mr. Trump also called on House Democrats to subpoena the whistleblower to testify before the impeachment committees. 

“The whistleblower needs to come before Congress as a material witness,” said Paul. “I say this to my fellow colleagues in Congress, to any Republican in Washington, step up and subpoena Hunter Biden and subpoena the whistleblower.”

The whistleblower’s attorney told CBS News last week that his client would be willing to answer written questions directly from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee — without having them approved by the committee’s Democratic majority. His identity would still be hidden but would be verified by the inspector general of the intelligence community. It is unclear whether this will take place.  

As concerns about the whistleblower’s safety mount, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer has asked intelligence leaders how they plan to protect him.

During the rally, Paul and Mr. Trump — once fierce opponents in the 2016 presidential race — praised one another.

Paul said, “President Trump has great courage. He faces down the fake media everyday.” The president praised Paul for being there “whenever we need a vote. He’s so incredible.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rand-paul-urges-media-to-reveal-whistleblower-name-at-trump-rally-in-kentucky-monday/

Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulRand Paul demands media print whistleblower’s name Trump: Whistleblower ‘must come forward’ Admitting North Macedonia to NATO brings more risks than benefits to the US MORE (R-Ky.) is facing a landslide of opposition from his own party over his call to publicly out the anonymous whistleblower whose concerns about President TrumpDonald John TrumpHillary Clinton urges Democrats to pick a candidate who can win the Electoral College Shimkus announces he will stick with plan to retire after reconsidering Rand Paul demands media print whistleblower’s name MORE’s interactions with Ukraine helped spark the House’s impeachment inquiry. 

Paul’s demand, made during an appearance with the president at a rally in Kentucky on Monday, marks the latest escalation by President Trump and his allies, who have called the whistleblower’s credibility into question and clamored for the person’s identity to be disclosed.

But several GOP senators, from rank-and-file members through leadership, distanced themselves from the idea on Tuesday, warning such a move could erode protections promised to the whistleblower.

“I think whistleblowers have the right to remain confidential and their privacy ought to be respected,” Sen. Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyJuan Williams: Republicans flee Trump Isolationism creeps back over America, as the president looks out for himself The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Impeachment fight enters new stage MORE (Utah), who has emerged as a vocal GOP critic of Trump’s, said on Tuesday. 

Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsJury convicts woman of mailing white powder to Sen. Susan Collins Juan Williams: Republicans flee Trump Democrats will win back the Senate majority in 2020, all thanks to President Trump MORE (R-Maine), a member of the Intelligence Committee who is up for reelection next year, said she also doesn’t believe the individual’s identity should be made public. 

“Whistleblowers are entitled to protection under the law … To try to reveal the identity of this individual is contrary to the intent of the whistleblower law,” Collins added. 

They were backed up by members of GOP leadership. 

“I don’t agree with that,” Sen. Shelley Moore CapitoShelley Wellons Moore CapitoSenate GOP shifts tone on impeachment The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Better Medicare Alliance – Dems unveil impeachment measure; Vindman splits GOP Advocates warn kids’ privacy at risk in GOP gun violence bill MORE (W.Va.), a member of GOP leadership, told The Hill. “I think the whistleblower can remain anonymous if that’s what they want.” 

Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneHillicon Valley: Zuckerberg to meet with civil rights leaders to discuss political ads | Senate bill targets ‘secret’ online algorithms | GitHub defends ICE contract | Former officials, lawmakers urge action on election security Senate bill takes aim at ‘secret’ online algorithms Republican senators open to comeback bid from Sessions MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, floated the idea of the whistleblower eventually coming forward “voluntarily” but said in the meantime “the whistleblower statute is designed to protect people.” 

Sen. Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntSenate Republicans divided over whether whistleblower should testify Booker introduces bill banning facial recognition tech in public housing Republican senators open to comeback bid from Sessions MORE (R-Mo.) said he disagreed with Paul but does want the whistleblower to speak with the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is reviewing the process behind the complaint. 

“That’s not my view,” Blunt said of Paul. “But it’s also not my view that the whistleblower should be able to answer questions in an anonymous way, and I think the whistleblower should come to the Senate Intelligence Committee.” 

Blunt and other Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee want the whistleblower to meet with the panel as part of its probe into the process followed with regards to the complaint. The whistleblower’s attorneys have offered for the whistleblower to answer questions in writing and under oath. 

The pushback against Paul comes after days of Trump, his close allies on Capitol Hill and conservative media pundits calling for the whistleblower’s identity to be publicly revealed. They argue the whistleblower’s identity is vital information because it would give Trump the ability to confront his accuser and discover any potential political biases the whistleblower may harbor.

Democrats and left-leaning commentators have countered that not only is the whistleblower’s identity legally protected, but also that it is unnecessary to reveal it because the information provided in the initial complaint has been corroborated several times over by witnesses in the impeachment inquiry.

Paul on Monday referenced unconfirmed reports in conservative media that the whistleblower worked for former Vice President Joe Biden.

“We also now know the name of the whistleblower. The whistleblower needs to come forward as a material witness because he worked for Joe BidenJoe BidenRand Paul demands media print whistleblower’s name Kentucky rally crowd behind Trump all wear ‘Read the Transcript’ shirts 2020 presidential candidates slam Trump over withdrawal from Paris climate deal MORE at the same time Hunter Biden was getting money from corrupt oligarchs,” Paul said at the rally after Trump invited him onstage.

“I say tonight to the media: Do your job and print his name,” Paul told the crowd to loud cheers.

Trump over the weekend had also urged reporters to identify the whistleblower, saying they would “be doing the public a service” if they disclosed the individual’s identity. 

“They know who it is. You know who it is. You just don’t want to report it. CNN knows who it is, but you don’t want to report it,” Trump said. “You know, you’d be doing the public a service if you did.”

Pressed on Tuesday if Trump thought it was legal to identify whistleblowers, Eric Ueland, the White House’s legislative director, sidestepped. 

“Part of ensuring that all facts are on the table, everything appropriate that needs to be known about all parties should be out on the table for public evaluation,” Ueland told reporters. 

In a statement to The Hill, Mark Zaid, one of the whistleblower’s attorneys, suggested Paul was “betray[ing] the interests of the Constitution and the American people” by calling for the whistleblower to be unmasked.

“A member of Congress who calls for the identity of any lawful whistleblower to be publicly revealed against their wishes disgraces the office they hold and betrays the interests of the Constitution and the American people,” Zaid said.

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerUS launches national security review of Chinese-owned app TikTok: report Senate Democrat: Colleague was working on fantasy football trade instead of listening to Schumer Senate Democrats to vote this week to overturn Trump ObamaCare moves MORE (D-N.Y.) lashed out at Paul from the Senate floor, saying he was “appalled” by attempts to unmask the whistleblower. 

“I cannot stress just how wrong this is. We have federal whistleblower laws designed to protect the identity and safety of patriotic Americans who come forward to stand up for the Constitution,” Schumer said during a speech on the Senate floor.

Not every Republican broke with Paul, whose libertarian-leaning views frequently put him at odds with his Senate GOP colleagues. 

“I don’t think it’s your job to do it,” Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGrassley: Up to whistleblower to reveal identity Senate Republicans divided over whether whistleblower should testify Cyber officials tout reforms with one year to Election Day MORE (R-S.C.) told reporters. “[But] I think we should allow the president to know who the accuser is. And I think the whistleblower statute is being terribly abused here.” 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump formally pulls out of landmark Paris climate agreement At-risk and unaware, consumers need CBD regulation This week: Democrats churn toward next phase of impeachment fight MORE (R-Ky.) repeatedly declined to weigh in during a weekly press conference despite multiple questions on whether whistleblowers should be protected. 

“What I’m going to do is wait until we get the case from the House — it looks like that is going to happen — and withhold judgment on the daily revelations, charges, witnesses, all the rest that you all of course, need to report on as it — as it comes out. That’s really all I have to say about that at this point,” he said.

Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioTikTok seeks to join tech fight against online terrorism Senate Republicans divided over whether whistleblower should testify Democrats to test Trump as impeachment moves to new stage MORE (R-Fla.) said they needed to follow the law but also “at some point people are also allowed to confront their accuser … so it’s a delicate situation.”

Paul, meanwhile, defended his position repeatedly on Tuesday, arguing that the whistleblower should be a “material witness” into any investigation into the Biden or his son Hunter Biden. 

“Did he bring up the conflict of interest? Was there a discussion of this? What was his involvement with the relationship between Joe Biden and the prosecutor? There are a lot of questions the whistleblower has to answer,” Paul continued.

He added during a separate gaggle with reporters there wasn’t a law preventing the media from naming the whistleblower. Pressed how he knows press reports are accurate, he told a reporter to “do some investigative reporting.” 

“Go knock on the guy’s house,” Paul said. Turning to the gaggle of reporters following him, he added: “Raise your hand if you’ve knocked on the guy’s house and asked him if he’s the whistleblower. … If you want to do your job go report it and go ask him if he’s the whistleblower.” 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/469122-pauls-demand-to-out-whistleblower-rankles-gop-colleagues

Virginia Republicans hold small majorities in both the House of Delegates and the State Senate. All 140 legislative seats are on the ballot and Democrats are aiming to take full control of state government for the first time since 1994. Democrats have a significant fund-raising advantage in Tuesday’s races, while Republicans are hoping to hold on to suburban seats that have sent its lawmakers to Richmond for decades.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/11/05/us/elections/results-virginia-general-elections.html

Voters in several states are headed to the polls on Tuesday, November 5, to cast votes in elections that could lead to major shifts in power.

In both Mississippi’s and Kentucky’s gubernatorial races, Democrats have the potential to retake the governor’s seats, and in Virginia, Democrats could flip the House and Senate.

In Kentucky, the governor’s race is being cast as a referendum on President Donald Trump; can a Democrat win in a deep-red state one year from a presidential election? And in Mississippi, Attorney General Jim Hood has a good shot at becoming the state’s first Democratic governor in 16 years — as long as a Jim Crow-era electoral system doesn’t get in his way. Virginia will test whether Republicans can hang onto power in a state that’s been trending blue for years. No Republican has won statewide office since 2009, yet they’ve clung to slim majorities in both chambers of the state assembly.

In New York City, residents will vote on whether to double the number of Americans who use a different system — ranked-choice voting — to elect officials. If passed in New York City, it would be a tremendous lift for a growing electoral reform movement that includes Maine; Sante Fe, New Mexico; Oakland, California; and Memphis, Tennessee.

The races and questions on ballots this year have the potential to serve as bellwether elections that could indicate how much momentum Democrats have managed to keep since the midterms in 2018, and offer a glimpse of what to expect from the party’s performance in 2020.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2019/11/5/20949449/november-elections-mississippi-kentucky-virginia-new-york

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, Republican member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, joins Bret Baier on ‘Special Report.’ #SpecialReport #FoxNews

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Radio, FOX News Headlines 24/7, FOXNews.com and the direct-to-consumer streaming service, FOX Nation. FOX News also produces FOX News Sunday on FOX Broadcasting Company and FOX News Edge. A top five-cable network, FNC has been the most watched news channel in the country for 17 consecutive years. According to a 2018 Research Intelligencer study by Brand Keys, FOX News ranks as the second most trusted television brand in the country. Additionally, a Suffolk University/USA Today survey states Fox News is the most trusted source for television news or commentary in the country, while a 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News is the top-cited outlet. FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape while routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.

Subscribe to Fox News! https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/

Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Special Report with Bret Baier: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
The Story with Martha Maccallum: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Tucker Carlson Tonight: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Hannity: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
The Ingraham Angle: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Fox News @ Night: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…

Follow Fox News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxnews/

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99cj1NJEQGE

The contentious gubernatorial elections in Kentucky and Mississippi have been commanding attention from political observers across the country, but these are not the only key races to watch Tuesday.

All 140 seats in the Virginia state Senate and House are up for re-election on Tuesday. Currently, Republicans hold a majority in both chambers, but Democrats’ success in flipping 15 House seats in 2017 has given the party hope that it can flip both chambers this cycle. Democrats also netted three congressional seats in 2018, indicating an increase in grassroots support for Democratic candidates in the state.

Republicans’ control of the state legislature is tenuous: they hold narrow majorities of 20 to 19 in the state Senate and 51 to 48 in the House of Delegates. Like other critical races across the country, the legislative elections have become somewhat nationalized, and a victory for Republicans could mean trouble for President Trump in 2020. A late October poll by Christopher Newport University of four competitive state Senate seats found that 59% of voters say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who supports Mr. Trump. The poll also found that the majority of voters in this district supported opening an impeachment inquiry into Mr. Trump.

With Democrat Ralph Northam as governor, if Democrats flip the chambers, they would control all three branches of government for the first time in 25 years. A trifecta would allow Democrats to determine where redistricting lines are drawn following the 2020 census.

Democrats are looking at the 2017 results as a harbinger of a potentially successful 2019. However, old photos of Northam in blackface surfaced earlier this year, ensnaring him in a weeks-long controversy that put Virginia in the spotlight for the wrong reasons. The term-limited Northam is not on the ballot Tuesday, but he would be at the helm of whatever coalition Democrats piece together. Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax was also embroiled in a scandal over allegations of sexual assault in his past that surfaced earlier this year.

Virginia was also in the national spotlight earlier this year for a state House bill that would have reduced the restrictions on conducting third-trimester abortions. Northam, who is a doctor, mangled the defense of the bill during a radio interview. Asked what would happen if a baby was born following a failed abortion, Northam said, “The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” Afterward, a spokesperson for Northam released a statement saying he was only trying to describe the “tragic or difficult circumstances” involved in a late-term abortion. 

The bill was voted down by a Virginia House subcommittee, but it sparked a conversation nationwide. 

Another issue on voters’ minds as they head to the polls is gun violence. The issue came into focus in May when a disgruntled employee shot and killed 12 people and wounded four others in Virginia Beach. Following the shooting, Northam called a special legislative session to address gun violence in June, but nothing came of it because the Republican majorities in the state legislature adjourned without taking up a single bill. 

The elections on Tuesday have drawn some big names from both parties to get out the vote. On Saturday, Vice President Mike Pence attended a rally in Virginia Beach where he reminded voters of the importance of 2021 redistricting and promised that Republicans would “always stand for the right to life.” On the Democratic side, former President Obama endorsed 17 Democratic candidates for the legislature, and former Vice President Joe Biden headlined on Sunday a canvass kickoff in Sterling with former Governor Terry McAuliffe. 

Mr. Trump has also weighed in on the elections on Twitter. On Monday, Mr. Trump tweeted his “complete and total Endorsement” to Republican Geary Higgins, who is vying for an open seat in the Virginia state Senate. He also urged Virginians to vote Republican in two tweets on Sunday.

“I hope everyone in the Great State of Virginia will get out and VOTE on Tuesday in all of the local and state elections to send a signal to D.C. that you want lower taxes, a strong Military, Border & 2nd Amendment, great healthcare, and must take care of our Vets. VOTE REPUBLICAN,” Mr. Trump wrote.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-could-flip-virginia-state-legislature-in-critical-election-2019-11-05/

A top diplomat appointed by President TrumpDonald John TrumpHillary Clinton urges Democrats to pick a candidate who can win the Electoral College Shimkus announces he will stick with plan to retire after reconsidering Rand Paul demands media print whistleblower’s name MORE revised his testimony to lawmakers in the House’s impeachment inquiry, saying in the latest version that the president’s dealings with Ukraine amounted to a clear quid pro quo.

U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland said Trump withheld U.S. military aid to Ukraine in an effort to secure investigations into the 2016 election and the president’s political adversaries, according to a transcript released Tuesday by Democrats conducting the impeachment investigation.  

His testimony and that of former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Kurt VolkerKurt VolkerRepublicans look to expand impeachment strategy amid release of transcripts First transcripts reveal deep concern over Giuliani pressure campaign Five takeaways from the first Trump impeachment deposition transcripts MORE was released Tuesday.

Sondland, a Republican mega-donor who gave $1 million to Trump’s inauguration, was interviewed by lawmakers behind closed doors on Oct. 17 but revised his testimony on Monday, after a string of subsequent witnesses appeared before the three committees leading the impeachment investigation.

In the revision, Sondland said he recalled a Sept. 1 meeting with Andriy Yermak, a top aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in which the aid was contingent on a public statement from Zelensky regarding launching probes that would benefit Trump politically. 

“After a large meeting, I now recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said that resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,” Sondland said.

DEVELOPING

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/469064-sondland-trumps-appointee-changes-testimony-and-says-there-was-clear-quid-pro

Votes have started to come in for the governor’s race in Kentucky, which has been cast as a showdown between an unpopular governor and an unpopular party. The Republican incumbent, Matt Bevin, has focused his campaign on his alignment with President Trump and his opposition to impeachment, with the president holding a rally on Monday in Lexington to reciprocate the support. The Democratic challenger, Andy Beshear, the state’s attorney general, has been buoyed by the governor’s diminished popularity — Mr. Bevin is among the least popular governors in the country.

Mr. Bevin’s approval has plummeted over cuts in government services he pushed for and his brash handling of a teacher walkout, calling protestors “selfish” and “ignorant,” and blaming them for hypothetical sexual assaults and the actual shooting of a 7-year-old girl. Still, it remains to be seen if that can build enough momentum for Mr. Beshear to overcome the influence of Mr. Trump’s popularity in Kentucky.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/11/05/us/elections/results-kentucky-governor-general-election.html

Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C. (left), and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio (right), seen here with Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, are two of the most vocal defenders of President Trump in the impeachment inquiry.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C. (left), and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio (right), seen here with Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, are two of the most vocal defenders of President Trump in the impeachment inquiry.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., is considering changing the lineup of the House Intelligence Committee to include some of President Trump’s most vocal defenders in Congress.

“If Democrats are going to turn Intel into the impeachment committee, I am going to make adjustments to that committee accordingly, for a short period of time,” McCarthy told Politico on Tuesday. A spokesman for McCarthy confirmed his comments to NPR.

At the top of the list for possible temporary appointments are Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio and Mark Meadows of North Carolina. The two lawmakers sit on the House Oversight Committee, which is taking part in the closed-door deposition phase of the investigation, but neither lawmaker sits on the House Intelligence Committee, which will lead upcoming public impeachment hearings.

A GOP aide confirmed that Jordan and Meadows are “top choices” for a temporary slot.

Long before the impeachment inquiry, Jordan and Meadows carved out reputations as two of Trump’s best allies and defenders in Congress. Most recently, they have been fixtures at the depositions, regularly attending the sessions even when the House is not in session, and aggressively defending Trump in the media. Meadows traveled to New York City with the president over the weekend to attend the Ultimate Fighting Championship at Madison Square Garden as his guest.

Allies of the two lawmakers cheered the idea on Twitter. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., praised them as the GOP’s “most effective questioners” and said they have attended more deposition testimony than Republican members of the Intelligence Committee. “Shame on us for failing” Trump if they’re not appointed, he tweeted. Gaetz also supports adding Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., to the panel.

McCarthy has almost sole discretion over which members sit on the Intelligence Committee, although any decision to change the committee lineup would need to be ratified by the House Republican Conference. Any shake-up would likely be supported by the White House, effectively minimizing opposition to the decision.

However, it is fraught with internal politics. To add new Republicans to the Intelligence Committee, other Republicans would have to step aside. It is unclear how a potential shake-up would affect the current top Republican on the committee, Rep. Devin Nunes of California. A spokesman for Nunes did not respond to NPR’s request for comment.

Committee ratios — the number of Democrats and Republicans on each House panel — are set by the majority, and Democrats are unlikely to give McCarthy a reprieve to this end. Currently, Democrats have 13 seats on the committee and Republicans have nine seats, so any new members added would require other Republicans to temporarily step aside to make room for them.

The House is in recess this week, but any changes to the Intelligence Committee could take effect as early as next week when members return.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/11/05/776487737/gop-leader-eyes-intel-shake-up-to-boost-president-trumps-defenders

The Republican National Committee funded a campaign that flooded the offices of about 36 House Democrats with more than 10,000 anti-impeachment phone calls in recent weeks.

The campaign, first reported by the New York Times, is just one part of the very diffuse defense Republicans have launched in an effort to shield President Donald Trump from a growing impeachment inquiry. Its goal, as reportedly described at a recent dinner of Republican aides, was to both tie up Democratic lawmakers’ telephone lines and attempt to influence them into opposing that inquiry.

While the strategies used by Republicans — including denying quid pro quo is wrong, attacking the whistleblower whose complaint led to the inquiry, and, despite evidence suggesting the opposite, that a White House memo of a call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is exculpatory — have been varied, they largely focus on the claims that Trump did nothing wrong and that Democrats are being unfair.

The calls seem to have focused on these talking points; the RNC said it hired a survey firm to conduct outreach and that that firm connected respondents who indicated they were not in favor of the impeachment inquiry with congressional offices. Beyond survey participants, the campaign also reportedly rallied Republicans through robocalls and automated texts that encouraged voters to call the offices, and through call sheets handed out at Trump rallies that contained a script to be read to lawmakers’ offices.

A spokesperson for the committee told the Times, “Our ‘stop the madness’ campaign has helped hundreds of thousands of voters get the information they need to reach out to their Democrat representatives and tell them to drop the phony impeachment inquiry and get back to work for the American people.”

Much of Republicans’ efforts to influence perception of the impeachment inquiry have been focused on swaying the public. Republican lawmakers and officials have held press conferences, released videos, and appeared on television to make their points about why they believe the inquiry to be unnecessary and wrong.

The telephone campaign represents a logical next step to this approach: having the public attempt to influence members of Congress. It is unclear what effect that strategy had, other than perhaps being annoying. House Democratic lawmakers voted nearly unanimously for an impeachment resolution last week, with just two of the chamber’s Democrats voting against it; 231 voted for it.

Trump’s latest strategy: have Republicans defend him on substance

The Times reports the telephone campaign began ahead of Congress’ Columbus Day break and resumed after. It came before Trump announced a change in strategy, directing Republicans to “go with Substance and close it out!”

Republican defenses against impeachment have always been evolving, and Trump has seemed to move freely among different ideas. The party has argued the whistleblower is a partisan figure; Trump has called him a spy. Trump has accused a leader of the impeachment inquiry of treason; Republican lawmakers have complained Democrats aren’t conducting the inquiry fairly.

But the call to focus on substance marked a big shift. In the weeks before it, Republicans had begun to coalesce around the argument that there was something wrong with the process itself. The call script given to rally goers told them to demand lawmakers “end this witch hunt,” and Republicans in Congress used similar language, with Sen. Lindsey Graham telling reporters at an October press conference, “I’m not here to tell you that Donald Trump has done nothing wrong. I’m not here to tell you anything other than that the way [Democrats are] going about [the inquiry] is really dangerous for the country.”

The impeachment inquiry resolution vote complicated this line of defense, however. It was not a vote for impeachment, but one on the process the inquiry would follow. The vote itself was a response to Republican complaints that no vote had been taken, and the resolution answered Republican concerns about closed hearings and the president having representation at the proceedings. Essentially, many of the process changes Republicans demanded were made.

This has left lawmakers in need of a new strategy, and Trump believes making substantive arguments is the way to go. Some lawmakers are reportedly ready to hop on board, but the wisdom of this approach is unclear, given it relies on overcoming witness testimony and a memo from the White House that would seem to make the case Trump sought to pressure Ukraine into investigating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.

And increasingly, lawmakers and officials seem to be struggling to make defenses based on the substance of the allegations.

Sunday, Republican Rep. Tom Cole said on NBC’s Meet the Press, “If there was a quid pro quo, it certainly wasn’t a very effective one.”

The Washington Post has reported a number of Republican senators began to plot messaging that argues Trump may have engaged in quid pro quo but that doing so isn’t wrong. Sen. John Neely Kennedy reportedly told lawmakers that the allegations Trump faces should be compared to the US attaching conditions to foreign aid, and Sen. Ted Cruz added quid pro quo isn’t wrong without “corrupt intent,” which he said Trump didn’t have.

Kennedy echoed that sentiment when speaking to the Post: “To me, it all turns on intent, motive. … Did the president have a culpable state of mind? … Based on the evidence that I see, that I’ve been allowed to see, the president does not have a culpable state of mind.”

The difficulty of arguing for Trump based on the merits of the scandal has led to some Trump allies arguing that there is nothing to the impeachment inquiry at all, to mixed results.

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney got himself into hot water when he told reporters at a press conference that Trump had engaged in quid pro quo but that everyone should just “get over it.”

Rep. Mark Meadows put things more plainly, arguing that because Ukraine didn’t launch any investigations when Trump asked and because military aid Trump held up eventually made it to that country, “There is zero basis for impeachment.”

The RNC has largely stayed above this sort of workshopping and has instead — like the Trump reelection campaign — worked to leverage its sizable war chest into shaping opinion through advertising. For instance, in the week of October 2-9, the RNC spent $1.3 million on anti-impeachment advertising focused on 14 Democratic House freshmen. And both the RNC and Trump campaign have a lot of money to spend; together, the two organizations have raised $300 million in 2019.

Some of that money will need to go toward supporting campaign staff and other races, such as those on the state level, but election experts have said both groups can spend what they want on fighting impeachment, including on “legal and advocacy,” the Campaign Legal Center’s Adav Noti told the Times — and the RNC has funding to spare to do so.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2019/11/5/20949491/rnc-trump-impeachment-democratic-lawmakers-phone-calls

In his closed-door interview last month, Mr. Sondland portrayed himself as a well-meaning and at times unwitting player who was trying to conduct American foreign policy with Ukraine with the full backing of the State Department while Mr. Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s lawyer, repeatedly inserted himself at the behest of the president.

But some Democrats painted him as a lackey of Mr. Trump’s who had been an agent of the shadow foreign policy on Ukraine, eager to go along with what the president wanted. Democrats contended Mr. Sondland, a wealthy hotelier from Oregon, had evaded crucial questions during his testimony, repeatedly claiming not to recall the events under scrutiny.

And other witnesses have pointed to him as a central player in the irregular channel of Ukraine policymaking being run by Mr. Trump and Mr. Giuliani, and the instigator of the quid pro quo strategy.

In the addendum, Mr. Sondland said he had “refreshed my recollection” after reading the testimony given by Mr. Taylor and Timothy Morrison, the senior director for Europe and Russia at the National Security Council.

Mr. Trump has denied there was a quid pro quo involving the aid and Ukraine’s willingness to launch investigations he was seeking into the Bidens and other Democrats. Mr. Sondland’s clarification is significant because his earlier testimony left it unclear how he viewed the issue, even as three other officials told impeachment investigators under oath that the aid and the investigations were linked. Unlike the others, Mr. Sondland was a donor to Mr. Trump’s campaign and was seen as a personal ally of the president.

Mr. Morrison, the National Security Council official, testified last week that it was Mr. Sondland who first indicated in a conversation with him and Mr. Taylor on Sept. 1 that the release of the military aid for Ukraine might be contingent on the announcement of the investigations, and that he hoped “that Ambassador Sondland’s strategy was exclusively his own.”

The new testimony appeared in part to be an attempt by Mr. Sondland to argue that the quid pro quo was not his idea, and explain why he believed the aid and the investigations were linked. He said it “would have been natural for me to have voiced what I presumed” about what was standing in the way of releasing the military assistance.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/05/us/politics/impeachment-trump.html

Here’s what you need to know to understand the impeachment inquiry into President Trump.

How we got here: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the beginning of an official impeachment inquiry against President Trump on Sept. 24, 2019. Here’s what has happened since then.

What’s happening now: Lawmakers are conducting an inquiry, which could lead to impeachment. An impeachment would mean the U.S. House thinks the president is no longer fit to serve and should be removed from office. Here’s a guide to how impeachment works.

What’s happening next: House committees conducting the investigation have scheduled hearings and subpoenaed documents from dozens of witnesses relating to the president’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Here are key dates and what’s next.

Stay informed: Read the latest reporting and analysis on the impeachment inquiry here.

Get email updates: Get a guide to the latest on the inquiry in your inbox every weekday. Sign up for the 5-Minute Fix.

Listen: Follow The Post’s coverage with daily updates from across our podcasts.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates/2019/11/05/a27d7c48-ff4e-11e9-8bab-0fc209e065a8_story.html

President Trump listens as Kentucky Republican Gov. Matt Bevin speaks during a campaign rally in Lexington, Ky., on Monday. Bevin is in a tight race for reelection.

Susan Walsh/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Susan Walsh/AP

President Trump listens as Kentucky Republican Gov. Matt Bevin speaks during a campaign rally in Lexington, Ky., on Monday. Bevin is in a tight race for reelection.

Susan Walsh/AP

Voters in four states head to the polls on Tuesday. These off-year contests may not be as high profile as the 2020 presidential and congressional elections will be a year from now, but they could offer some important hints on how voters are feeling about President Trump, impeachment, guns and more.

The main action is happening in three states: Kentucky, Mississippi and Virginia. The first two have gubernatorial races in which Democrats have a chance to pull off upsets in states that went heavily for Trump. State-level contests have been the one place where voters have been willing to split with their party — choosing someone to manage state affairs may feel different to voters than choosing a representative to send to Washington, D.C., or picking a president.

But in the hyperpartisan era of Trump, that may no longer be possible. Republicans are feeling better about both contests for governor given the congressional impeachment inquiry, which some believe may bring wayward GOP voters back into the fold — much like the Kavanaugh hearings did for Republican Senate candidates in 2018. A third governor’s race in Louisiana will go to runoffs on Nov. 16, where moderate Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards is trying to hold on.

In Virginia — a onetime swing state that is becoming more blue with every election — Democrats have a chance to flip both the House of Delegates and the state Senate.

Here’s what to watch in the key races on Tuesday night:

Kentucky governor (first polls close at 6 p.m. ET)

Republican Gov. Matt Bevin has the ignominious distinction of being named one of the most unpopular governors in America. His low approval ratings — stemming from feuds he’s picked with public school teachers, state lawmakers and others — are the biggest reason Bevin is in danger in a state that Trump carried by 30 points. He’s a brash, combative politician — Trumplike before Trump was even president — and that has alienated even many Republican voters in the red state. Some GOP strategists complain that Bevin has no one to blame but himself for his political peril.

Attorney General Andy Beshear is his Democratic challenger who’s running on returning “Kentucky values” to the commonwealth, as he says in his closing ad: “We treat everyone with respect and we look out for our neighbors. Matt Bevin doesn’t share our values.” Beshear has his own political pedigree that could help him — his father, Steve Beshear, was a popular governor who preceded Bevin. But while his dad was seen as a folksy, moderate politician, the younger Beshear has had more trouble connecting with voters and isn’t as centrist on as many issues, particularly abortion.

In order to win, Bevin has nationalized his race maybe more than any other GOP candidate on the ballot Tuesday. His ads play up his anti-abortion, anti-illegal immigration stances, his allegiance to Trump and his opposition to impeachment. A recent Mason-Dixon poll in the state, which found the two candidates tied, also showed that 65% of likely voters also oppose impeachment. That, coupled with a Trump election-eve rally, may be enough to carry Bevin over the finish line, no matter how much some voters may personally dislike him.

Mississippi governor (polls close at 8 p.m. ET)

Republican Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves is narrowly favored over state Democratic Attorney General Jim Hood in this open seat race where a swell against impeachment and a rally Trump held last Friday could help the GOP nominee secure victory.

This is a Republican state at its core. Trump carried it by 18 points, and in a Mason-Dixon poll here the president had a 54% approval rating, along with 56% of voters opposing impeachment. But if one Democrat could pull off an upset, it’s Hood. He’s a pro-gun, anti-abortion centrist Democrat whose ads feature his pickup truck and talk about hunting, fishing and going to church. He supports Medicaid expansion in the state, though, while Reeves opposes that plan.

Reeves is more of a policy wonk who had to overcome his own divisive primary and has worked to tie Hood to the national Democratic Party. All those factors could be enough to help Reeves win — along with a Jim Crow-era law that requires a candidate to win a majority of votes and a majority of state legislative districts. If a candidate doesn’t meet both those benchmarks, the race is decided by the state legislature, where Republicans have a supermajority.

There is real doubt that Hood could win a majority of the legislative districts, a mini-electoral college of sorts. But Democrats did get some good news last week as a federal judge wrote he has a “grave concern” that the antiquated law is unconstitutional and could cause “irreparable harm if eventually applied” — a signal perhaps they could intervene if Hood does finish first but falls short of the legislative threshold.

Virginia legislative elections (polls close at 7 p.m. ET)

This is likely to be Democrats’ best state of the night, but the question remains whether it will be enough to carry them to a majority in the statehouse for the first time in nearly 25 years. In the House of Delegates, Republicans have a slim 51-48 majority, and in the state Senate it’s only a 20-19 advantage. (Each chamber has a vacant seat.)

New court-ordered lines redrawn earlier this year in the House also helped Democrats. And the possibility of flipping control has drawn celebrities out to campaign, including Alec Baldwin, Kerry Washington and Jason Mraz, who has written jingles to encourage getting out the vote. 2020 hopefuls have also stumped in the state, with former Vice President Joe Biden holding a rally to help Virginia Democrats this weekend.

To underscore just how close the margins are, last time control of the House literally came down to drawing a name out of a bowl after the election was deadlocked; those two candidates are in a rematch tonight.

The shifting suburbs are again the story in the commonwealth, where Democrats flipped three congressional seats one year ago. Now, they could do the same thing in the Northern Virginia, Richmond and Virginia Beach suburbs. In one race, gun control has become a major issue, as NPR’s Melissa Block profiled, following a mass shooting there in May. A special session to try to address gun control in June was abruptly shut down by GOP legislators, and Democrats think Republicans could now feel the backlash in a state that has had several recent mass shootings.

If Democrats win control, they have the chance to make those gun reforms happen and further expand Medicaid. They could also raise the state’s minimum wage and pass the ERA — a U.S. constitutional amendment stating that “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” The ERA was first proposed in 1923 and later gained steam during the 1970s but then stalled. Illinois was the 37th state to ratify it last year, and, after failing by one vote earlier this year, a Democrat-controlled Virginia legislature would likely give it the final vote needed.

Republicans, however, hope that scandals among the three top statewide Democratic officials could give voters pause. Gov. Ralph Northam and Attorney General Mark Herring both admitted earlier this year to wearing blackface when they were younger, and two women have accused Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax of sexual assault, which he denies.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/11/05/776208910/its-election-day-2019-here-s-what-to-watch

House Republicans are looking to expand their strategy in the impeachment fight beyond criticizing the process by highlighting portions of recently released transcripts from closed-door depositions they feel help counteract attacks on President TrumpDonald John TrumpHillary Clinton urges Democrats to pick a candidate who can win the Electoral College Shimkus announces he will stick with plan to retire after reconsidering Rand Paul demands media print whistleblower’s name MORE‘s interactions with Ukraine.

GOP lawmakers have repeatedly accused Democrats of conducting a probe that lacks transparency, “cherry-picking” the information released to skew the narrative and opting to focus on impeachment over legislating. Those lines of attack are expected to continue as the investigation moves into a more public phase.

But with the release of the transcripts of depositions from former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and State Department official Michael McKinley on Monday — with more slated to be released throughout the week — Republicans are being provided with guidance on their latest line of defense, one that places more of an emphasis on substance.  

“Conference has sent out messaging guidance,” one senior GOP source told The Hill, “basically highlighting all the parts in the transcript where these people admitted no firsthand knowledge, acknowledged the president can put whoever he wants in these positions and that Trump was actually tougher on Russia with regards to Ukraine than Obama was.” 

Following the release of the two depositions, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffTrump lashes out at Pelosi during rally, tells her to ‘go back’ to home district Republicans look to expand impeachment strategy amid release of transcripts First transcripts reveal deep concern over Giuliani pressure campaign MORE (D-Calif.), acting House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Carolyn MaloneyCarolyn Bosher MaloneyRepublicans look to expand impeachment strategy amid release of transcripts White House lawyer says he will defy impeachment subpoena House Democrats launch process to replace Cummings on Oversight panel MORE (D-N.Y.), and Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot EngelEliot Lance EngelRepublicans look to expand impeachment strategy amid release of transcripts White House lawyer says he will defy impeachment subpoena This week: Democrats churn toward next phase of impeachment fight MORE (D-N.Y.) released a statement saying the content of the transcripts “demonstrates the contamination of U.S. foreign policy by an irregular back channel that sought to advance the President’s personal and political interests, and the serious concerns that this activity elicited across our government.”

But GOP lawmakers are pushing back, citing a number of exchanges from the hearings that draw into question witnesses’ firsthand knowledge of the concerns laid out in the whistleblower’s report that sparked the inquiry. 

They plan to question McKinley’s role as a key witness, recounting his comments that he “was not aware at the time of the efforts of Ambassadors Volker and Sondland to work with the President’s personal attorney, Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiKentucky rally crowd behind Trump all wear ‘Read the Transcript’ shirts Republicans look to expand impeachment strategy amid release of transcripts First transcripts reveal deep concern over Giuliani pressure campaign MORE” and “was not aware at the time of the President’s phone call with President Zelensky.” 

The arguments laid out for Republicans also look to emphasize McKinley’s comments that “every President has the right to remove an ambassador they don’t have confidence in. And this is standard, and it’s part of Department practice ever since I’ve come in. So, whatever the rationale, presidents have the right to remove ambassadors and select other envoys for the post in question.”

They note that he didn’t speak with anyone at the State Department about Giuliani and that he said “Ukraine was not among the issues I followed with Secretary Pompeo.”

The key points on Yovanovitch highlight an exchange on the ambassador’s knowledge of Trump’s “deep-rooted skepticism about Ukraine’s business environment,” point to her remarks that the Trump Administration’s policy toward Ukraine “actually got stronger over the three last three years” and cite an instance where an Intelligence Committee staffer reached out to her on her personal email in August. 

The GOP guideline also points to Yovanovitch responding, “If that’s what took place” when asked by a GOP member if “Ambassador Volker mentioned the fact that to the extent there are corrupt Ukrainians and the United States is advocating for the Ukraine to investigate themselves, that certainly would be an appropriate initiative for U.S. officials to advocate for.”

At the same time, Trump’s top defenders have also leaned into their arguments on the impeachment process, hammering Democratic chairmen for gradually releasing the transcripts and continuing to hold depositions behind closed doors this week. 

“Democrats cherry pick which transcripts they release and when. Why not release Ambassador Volker’s testimony? He was the very first witness to testify!” Rep. Jim JordanJames (Jim) Daniel JordanRepublicans look to expand impeachment strategy amid release of transcripts First transcripts reveal deep concern over Giuliani pressure campaign Five takeaways from the first Trump impeachment deposition transcripts MORE (R-Ohio) tweeted. 

Schiff told reporters Monday he expects the transcripts for Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and former special envoy to Ukraine Kurt VolkerKurt VolkerRepublicans look to expand impeachment strategy amid release of transcripts First transcripts reveal deep concern over Giuliani pressure campaign Five takeaways from the first Trump impeachment deposition transcripts MORE to be released Tuesday.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/468934-republicans-look-to-expand-impeachment-strategy-amid-release-of-transcripts

South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), the other two Democrats tested against Trump, also lead the president among registered voters, with Buttigieg up by 52 percent to 41 percent, and Harris ahead by 51 percent to 42 percent.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-trails-democratic-rivals-in-national-survey-as-independents-move-away/2019/11/04/e068afac-ff38-11e9-9518-1e76abc088b6_story.html