Members of the local Jewish community gather Wednesday outside the JC Kosher Supermarket in Jersey City, the site of what is now being called a potential act of terrorism.

Rick Loomis/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Rick Loomis/Getty Images

Members of the local Jewish community gather Wednesday outside the JC Kosher Supermarket in Jersey City, the site of what is now being called a potential act of terrorism.

Rick Loomis/Getty Images

Since a pair of shooters opened fire Tuesday in Jersey City, N.J., the state’s attorney general, Gurbir Grewal, had been reluctant to label the assault on a local kosher market specifically as an anti-Semitic act. As recent as Wednesday afternoon, even after identifying the shooters, Grewal said authorities were still not in a position to definitively assign a motive.

By Thursday, though, he was ready to say it.

“At this point, the evidence points towards acts of hate,” the attorney general told reporters at a joint news conference with other law enforcement officials. “I can confirm that we’re investigating this matter as potential acts of terrorism, fueled both by anti-Semitism and anti-law enforcement beliefs.”

The announcement comes after two days of investigation into attacks that left six people dead — three civilians, one police officer and the two shooters. Grewal said authorities reached their conclusion on the motives of David N. Anderson, 47, and Francine Graham, 50, by interviewing eyewitnesses and identifying “a number of social media accounts that we believe were used by the suspects and purport to espouse certain viewpoints.”

“The cowards that took down those innocent victims engage only the folks in that store and in the law enforcement community,” said Craig Carpenito, U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, referring to closed-circuit TV footage of the attack. “You could see people walking by. They didn’t engage anyone. They were clearly targeting that store. They were clearly targeting the Jersey City Police Department. We don’t know why.”

At the moment, officials believe the shooters were working alone. Investigators say the attackers subscribed to views consistent with the Black Hebrew Israelites — a black supremacist organization that has been associated with anti-Semitism — although Grewal says investigators have not yet established any formal links between the shooters and the group.

Five firearms were recovered from the scene of the attack — four of which were found inside the market and one inside the U-Haul van that the shooters drove to the location. Grewal said one of the guns inside the store was an “AR-15-style weapon,” referring to the controversial weapons that have been used in a number of massacres in recent years, including the shootings in Las Vegas and Newtown, Conn.

Gregory Ehrie, the FBI’s special agent in charge in Newark, told reporters Wednesday that police officers had also discovered a viable pipe bomb that the shooters had left behind in their van.

“The FBI will … continue to investigate this as a domestic terrorism incident with a hate crime bias slant to it,” Ehrie said at the news conference Thursday. “We are pressing forward in collaboration with our local, state and federal partners to, again, try to understand the ‘why’ behind this.”

Orthodox Jewish men carry the casket of Jersey City victim Moshe Deutsch outside a Brooklyn synagogue following his funeral Wednesday in the Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn.

Mark Lennihan/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Lennihan/AP

Orthodox Jewish men carry the casket of Jersey City victim Moshe Deutsch outside a Brooklyn synagogue following his funeral Wednesday in the Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn.

Mark Lennihan/AP

As the investigation unfolds, members of the area Jewish community have struggled to grieve for their lost friends and loved ones.

On Wednesday night, thousands of mourners turned out in Jersey City as well as in the Williamsburg neighborhood of nearby Brooklyn for the funerals of Mindel Ferencz, who owned the market with her husband, and her cousin Moshe Deutsch — both of whom observed the Orthodox Jewish faith of Satmar Hasidim.

“Before, we felt more secured,” Moshe Blumenberg, a teacher from Union City, N.J., told Fred Mogul of member station WNYC during the Brooklyn memorial. He said the shooting has compounded rampant anxieties about recent anti-Semitic violence.

“We have police; we have everything. Now we see the only one who can protect us is God,” he added, “and it’s very terrifying.”

Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop speaks during a vigil Wednesday for the shooting victims in Jersey City, N.J. Earlier that day, Fulop, who is Jewish himself, made clear to reporters that he believed the attack on a kosher market was an anti-Semitic act: “There is no question that this is a hate crime.”

Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/AP

Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop speaks during a vigil Wednesday for the shooting victims in Jersey City, N.J. Earlier that day, Fulop, who is Jewish himself, made clear to reporters that he believed the attack on a kosher market was an anti-Semitic act: “There is no question that this is a hate crime.”

Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/AP

Residents of Jersey City have remarked on underlying frictions in the community between some longtime black residents and Jewish newcomers. The city has been coping with a recent population surge, part of which has been driven by an influx of ultra-Orthodox Jewish residents.

Plenty of city natives have complained of feeling pushed out; some Jewish residents, meanwhile, told WNYC’s Arun Venugopal that they’ve found themselves on the receiving end of anti-Semitic insults or even violence.

Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, who is Jewish and who forcefully declared Wednesday that “there is no question that this is a hate crime,” expressed relief Thursday that Grewal had joined him in using similar language.

“I’m just glad that we’re all here in the same place calling it what it is — that’s the only thing that’s important,” he tweeted after Thursday’s news conference. “We do a disservice to Judaism + ppl fighting against hate by not labeling this what it is.”

Meanwhile, as of late Thursday afternoon, authorities have raised more than $300,000 for the family of Detective Joseph Seals, the Jersey City police officer killed by the shooters at a separate location before they descended on the market

“Unfortunately, he leaves behind five children. We would anticipate the money would probably be used for education costs for these children growing up,” said Steve Lenox, spokesman for Jersey City Police Officers Benevolent Association, one of the organizations behind the fundraising effort. “You know, they lost their hero father — they should want for nothing in coming years as they continue to grow up.”

NPR’s Jeff Brady contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/12/12/787413809/acts-of-hate-officials-say-jersey-city-shooters-held-animus-toward-jews-and-cops

At George Washington University, a student’s video — which included a graphic indicating that it was filmed on the Jewish New Year’s holiday of Rosh Hashanah — convulsed the campus earlier this year. In the video, according to the Hatchet, the student newspaper, a person asks a student, “What are we going to do to Israel?” The student responds, “Bro, we’re going to f—ing bomb Israel, bro. F— out of here, Jewish pieces of s—.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2019/12/11/trumps-executive-order-anti-semitism-plunges-into-fierce-campus-conflicts-about-israel-palestine/

Image copyright
Getty Images

Climate activist Greta Thunberg has changed her Twitter bio to mock US President Donald Trump’s outrage at her winning Time Person of the Year 2019.

He said she had an “anger management problem” and should go to “a good old fashioned movie with a friend”.

“Chill Greta, Chill!” he added.

She then adapted her Twitter bio to say she was “a teenager working on her anger management problem. Currently chilling and watching a good old fashioned movie with a friend”.

The Swedish 16-year-old was named as Time magazine’s Person of the Year on Wednesday after leading a global movement against climate change.

This is not the first time she has changed her Twitter bio to reflect Mr Trump and other leaders’ criticism of her.

On Tuesday Ms Thunberg changed her bio to “pirralha” – the Portuguese word for brat – after Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro criticised her highlighting the plight of Brazil’s indigenous people.

“Greta’s been saying Indians have died because they were defending the Amazon,” Mr Bolsonaro told reporters. “It’s amazing how much space the press gives this kind of pirralha.”

In October she changed the bio to “a kind but poorly informed teenager”. This was exactly how Russian President Vladimir Putin had described her at a conference in Moscow.

In September President Trump posted a video of her speaking emotionally at the UN conference and sarcastically commented: “She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future.”

She changed her bio accordingly: “A very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future”.

Media captionThe moment Greta Thunberg saw President Donald Trump

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50762373

She was taken to Mount Sinai St. Luke’s hospital, where she died from her injuries, he said.

“We lost a very special, very talented, and very well-loved young woman,” her family said in a statement on Thursday. “Tess shone bright in this world, and our hearts will never be the same.”

The park where Ms. Majors was killed is in a Harlem precinct that has grown safer over the years, but residents have raised concerns about persistent safety issues in the park — even as the neighborhood around it improved, and playgrounds and ball fields replaced patches that were once strewn with crack vials.

Earlier this year, several people reported they were approached from behind and punched by youths in the park.

While assaults overall have fallen slightly over the last year in that precinct, police data shows, robberies have increased, with many people being targeted for personal electronics, such as Apple AirPods. As of Dec. 8, there had been 20 robberies inside Morningside Park or on its perimeter this year, compared to seven over the same period last year.

Since June, five people reported being robbed on or near the staircase at 116th Street and Morningside, near the spot where Ms. Majors was killed. Recently, the police said, several teenagers were arrested in connection with a pattern of robberies in the area, but officials did not provide additional details.

Still, the killing shocked the college and the city. “It’s terrifying to think that that can happen anywhere,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said at a news conference on Thursday. “It’s unbelievable to me that that can happen here next to one of our great college campuses.”

Barnard’s president, Sian Leah Beilock, wrote in a campuswide letter sent late Wednesday night: “Tessa was just beginning her journey at Barnard and in life. We mourn this devastating murder of an extraordinary young woman and member of our community.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/12/nyregion/tessa-majors-barnard-stabbing.html

Although dogs clearly held a solid majority Thursday, dominating social media with Santa hats and festive collars, sightings of unexpected animals also delighted many voters who had stepped out on a dismal, overcast day to cast their ballots during a time of deep political uncertainty.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/12/12/dogs-polling-stations-are-always-big-britain-this-election-also-brought-horses-reindeer/

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump attacked 16-year-old environmental activist Greta Thunberg on Thursday for being named Time magazine’s “Person of The Year.”

“So ridiculous,” Trump said on Twitter. “Greta must work on her Anger Management problem, then go to a good old fashioned movie with a friend! Chill Greta, Chill!”

Thunberg responded swiftly, changing her Twitter profile to read: “A teenager working on her anger management problem. Currently chilling and watching a good old fashioned movie with a friend.”

Trump, who was named Person of the Year after winning the 2016 presidential election, has criticized the magazine before for passing him up in the years since.

Trump mocked Thunberg back in September, when both were in New York City for meetings at the United Nations.

Citing lines from Thunberg’s address to the Climate Action Summit – the teenager said “people are dying” and “we are in the beginning of a mass extinction” – Trump issued a late-night snarky tweet.

“She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future,” Trump wrote. “‘So nice to see!”

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2019/12/12/trump-mocks-greta-thunberg-being-times-person-year/4407278002/

One of the “Black Hebrew Israelite” killers who targeted a Jewish grocery store in Jersey City left behind a handwritten note that said, “I do this because my creator makes me do this and I hate who he hates,” law enforcement sources told The Post.

The message was found inside the stolen U-Haul van that David Anderson, 47, and his girlfriend, Francine Graham, 50, on Tuesday drove to the Jersey City Kosher Supermarket, where they gunned down three people.

Sources have identified the pair as adherents of the Black Hebrew Israelites, a fringe religious movement not associated with mainstream Judaism that’s been labeled a hate group by experts who track extremists in the US.

Anderson had posted anti-Jewish and anti-police messages to social media before the attack, the sources said.

The duo’s van was linked to the killing of an Uber driver in Bayonne, officials have said.

When Jersey City Detective Joseph Seals tried to question the pair about the vehicle earlier Tuesday, they fatally shot him in the head, sources have said.

They then drove to the nearby grocery store, where they were captured on CCTV footage rolling up in their van and firing two long rifles, said Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop.

The mayor also called the attack “a hate crime against Jewish people.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/12/11/jersey-city-shooting-suspect-left-behind-a-handwritten-note-my-creator-makes-me-do-this/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/12/politics/cnn-iowa-democratic-debate/index.html

President Donald Trump is not expected to impose new tariffs on China this weekend, but he may not have much of a trade deal to show either.

That promise, however, should be enough to satisfy the stock market, which was soaring after the president tweeted that he expects a “very big” deal with China and both sides want it. The S&P 500, Dow and Nasdaq were trading at all-time highs Thursday but gave up some of their gains in late morning trading.

Trump set a Dec. 15 deadline on a new batch of tariffs on $156 billion in Chinese goods, which targeted many consumer products, such as cell phones, laptops and toys.

“This is the president helping the Santa Claus rally even more,” said Prudential Financial chief market strategist Quincy Krosby. “This is as much of a signal as we’ve wanted.”

Krosby added that while there have been plenty of headlines on trade, Trump has been relatively quiet lately and this declaration is particularly meaningful ahead of the deadline, since it is coming from him and he says both sides want a deal. It is also a big contrast to Trump’s Dec. 3 comment that he could wait until after the election for a deal, which sent the Dow skidding more than 450 points.

Trump was to meet with his advisors at the White House on Thursday, as the weekend deadline approaches.

“The devil is in the details. If you just look at his sound bites on Oct. 11, they’re identical to what he just said. The chances of more tariffs on the 15th are slim,” said Greg Valliere, chief U.S. policy strategist at AGF Investments. “I think they’ll find some way to finesse that. In terms of some big sweeping deal, it’s either a wimpy deal or no deal.”

Trump on Oct. 11 said “good things” are happening with negotiations, but that was two months ago and since then there has not been much in the way of signs of concrete progress.

Sources told CNBC that U.S. negotiators offered to cancel the new tariffs that would take effect Sunday and were also willing to cut existing tariffs by up to 50% on $360 billion of Chinese goods. A rollback on the existing tariffs was considered to be an important and potentially deal-breaking request from China.

“One thing you can be sure of is [Trump] will spin this as a great victory. To be fair, he’s had a hell of a week. He’s going to be acquitted in the Senate. He got a defense bill with family leave for federal workers and apparently the USMCA,” Valliere said, noting that the trade agreement with Canada and Mexico could take awhile to get through the Senate. “If we avoid tariffs on the 15th, it’s a plus for the markets.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/12/trade-domm-191212-ec.html

President Trump has signed an executive order that will broaden Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to apply to discrimination based on anti-Semitism. He is seen here signing the order at a Hanukkah reception at the White House.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump has signed an executive order that will broaden Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to apply to discrimination based on anti-Semitism. He is seen here signing the order at a Hanukkah reception at the White House.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Updated at 6:18 p.m. ET

President Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that will make Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act apply to anti-Semitic acts. The order is generating concern that it will stifle free speech by those who oppose Israel’s policy toward the Palestinians.

The executive order takes indirect aim at the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement that has generated intense controversy on college campuses.

Title VI bans discrimination based on race, color or national origin in programs and activities, such as colleges and universities, that receive federal funding. The executive order will extend the ban to discrimination based on anti-Semitism.

Trump signed the order at a Hanukkah celebration at the White House on Wednesday afternoon. A draft copy of the executive order was published Wednesday by Jewish Insider.

The draft order suggests that those charged with enforcing Title VI consider the definition of anti-Semitism adopted by International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which states: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

The order points in particular to the alliance’s “Contemporary Examples of Anti-Semitism.”

Among its examples is “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.”

Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt says the order won’t define Jewishness as a nationality, but rather includes Jews under the rubric of Title VI.

“That’s something we have long advocated for and does not break new ground in identifying Jews as a protected class,” he tells NPR. “But what it does say is that discrimination against Jews may give rise to a Title VI violation when that discrimination is based on the individual’s race, color or national origin.”

He says the guidance will be useful to law enforcement, campus officials and others trying to fight hate.

The left-leaning Jewish group J-Street said in a statement that the order “appears designed less to combat anti-Semitism than to have a chilling effect on free speech and to crack down on campus critics of Israel.”

J-Street adds that “we feel it is misguided and harmful for the White House to unilaterally declare a broad range of nonviolent campus criticism of Israel to be anti-Semitic, especially at a time when the prime driver of anti-Semitism in this country is the xenophobic, white nationalist far-right.”

The White House said it had been spurred by a rise in anti-Semitic incidents since 2013, and that it was looking for a way to ensure colleges take anti-Semitic acts seriously.

The Republican Jewish Coalition praised the move, calling Trump “the most Pro-Israel President in American history” and saying that he has “shown himself to be the most pro-Jewish president as well. Today’s order will have a real, positive impact in protecting Jewish college students from anti-Semitism.”

James Loeffler, a professor of Jewish history at the University of Virginia, says there has been a century-long debate among Jewish civil rights activists about the question of defining Jews differently.

“Everyone recognizes that Jews are a complicated amalgam of ethnicity and religion, and treating them as a kind of quasi-racial group can have negative consequences,” he says. “There’s a lot of fear among many Jewish leaders all throughout the past century about that.”

He says that because Jews have a different kind of identity, using the law to figure out how to protect them “is what we should be doing, as well as for other groups who may not fit exactly against the religion or race categories that we normally think about minorities in terms of.”

On its face, Loeffer says, Trump’s order is a reasonable way to address concerns about anti-Semitism and discrimination, particularly because Title VI doesn’t refer to religion.

But he says he share the concerns of those who believe it could be used to infringe on the First Amendment rights of those who would voice controversial political speech about Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “Clearly, given the administration’s political position on those issues, it’s not unrealistic to see this as coming out of that context.”

Like many statutes and administrative rules, Loeffer says, the effect of the executive order will depend on how it’s interpreted.

NPR White House correspondent Tamara Keith and religion correspondent Tom Gjelten contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787176743/trump-to-sign-order-against-anti-semitism-at-colleges-worrying-free-speech-advoc

Trump’s advice, in a morning tweet, came a day after Thunberg, who has mobilized millions of people to fight climate change and condemned leaders’ inaction, became the youngest person to be dubbed Person of the Year by Time.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-mocks-16-year-old-greta-thunberg-a-day-after-she-is-named-times-person-of-the-year/2019/12/12/fc66f406-1cda-11ea-8d58-5ac3600967a1_story.html

LONDON – Millions of people in Britain trudged toward voting booths Thursday on a cold and blustery day to decide whether to back Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s plan to “get Brexit done” or support opposition parties who want to delay Britain’s departure from the European Union or even cancel it altogether. 

The vote, Britain’s first winter general election for nearly a century and its fourth national ballot in less than five years, is not formally directly connected to Brexit. But Johnson called the vote in an attempt to gain a working majority to break a parliamentary deadlock over the nation’s EU exit.

An exit poll is due at 10 p.m. local time (5 p.m. ET). 

An overall result is expected in the early hours of Friday morning.

If Johnson’s Conservative Party retains power with a comfortable majority in Parliament it will pave the way for him to push through Brexit on Jan. 31. If Johnson loses, or no single party gains an absolute majority – a “hung Parliament” – Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn may attempt to form a minority government by partnering with other opposition groups such as the Liberal Democrats. A total of 650 parliamentary seats are up for grabs. 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/12/12/uk-election-boris-johnson-jeremy-corbyn-brexit/4407121002/

Now, rolling coverage is standard and the offerings from British broadcasters are a far cry from the radio reports in the first half of the 20th century, when “listeners simply tuned in to the radio to hear the election results read by an announcer.”

The BBC will, as always, be there to broadcast and analyze the results as they are announced. But it faces stiff competition for eyeballs from other broadcasters.

John Bercow, the former speaker of the House of Commons who burnished his reputation during endless Brexit debates, will be taking his shouts for “Order!” to Sky News for election night.

“John will bring his own authority, and no little wit to a night of high drama,” said John Ryley, the head of Sky News. The broadcaster will also try to entice younger views by partnering with BuzzFeed and streaming on platforms like Twitch and YouTube.

Channel 4 has brought on board political heavyweights like Amber Rudd, the former home secretary, and Tom Watson, the former deputy Labour leader, as well as comedians like Katherine Ryan. They will also be joined by Rylan Clark-Neal, a former contestant on the talent show “The X Factor” and on the British “Celebrity Big Brother” who will be talking through results with the studio audience. On his role, Mr. Clark-Neal said, “Who would have thought that as an ‘X-Factor’ reject I would be hosting election night?”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/12/world/europe/uk-elections-brexit.html

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz delivered scathing testimony Wednesday about the FBI’s missteps in applying for a warrant to surveil a former Trump campaign adviser. 

Horowitz was grilled for nearly six hours by lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee, with Republicans and Democrats using their time to advance competing narratives about the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia. 

Here are five takeaways from the hearing on the inspector general’s inquiry. 

 

It was a bad day for the FBI 

Horowitz’s testimony laid bare the extent of the breakdown in the FBI’s use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, a point Republicans repeatedly hammered.

“I think the activities we found don’t vindicate anybody who touched this,” Horowitz said at the outset of the hearing when asked whether his report “vindicated” former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyMisfired ‘Hurricane’: Comey’s team abused Carter Page and the FBI Trump rebukes FBI chief Wray over inspector general’s Russia inquiry The Hill’s Morning Report – Sponsored by AdvaMed – Democrats to release articles of impeachment today MORE.

The inspector general reported a total of 17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions” in the applications to monitor Page, taking particular issue with applications to renew the FISA warrant and chastising the FBI for a lack of satisfactory explanations for those mistakes.

“This has got to be fixed. At a minimum, somebody’s got to be fired,” Sen. John KennedyJohn Neely KennedyMORE (R-La.) said.

“There’s got to be a change in the culture, also,” Horowitz replied, seemingly agreeing with Kennedy’s assessment.

Committee Chairman Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamRepublicans consider skipping witnesses in Trump impeachment trial Bombshell Afghanistan report bolsters calls for end to ‘forever wars’ Hillicon Valley: Apple, Facebook defend encryption during Senate grilling | Tech legal shield makes it into trade deal | Impeachment controversy over phone records heats up | TikTok chief cancels Capitol Hill meetings MORE (R-S.C.) cautioned lawmakers and observers against interpreting the FBI’s handling of the probe as an otherwise solid investigation with “a few irregularities,” suggesting the bureau’s actions threatened to undermine the entire system.

The FBI got a reprieve from many Democratic lawmakers who expressed admiration for its work and sought to underscore Horowitz’s finding that the bureau was not influenced by political bias in launching its investigation.

But the fallout for the FBI could linger, particularly given President TrumpDonald John TrumpRepublicans consider skipping witnesses in Trump impeachment trial Bombshell Afghanistan report bolsters calls for end to ‘forever wars’ Lawmakers dismiss Chinese retaliatory threat to US tech MORE’s rocky relationship with the bureau.

 

Hearing provides fodder for Trump, allies

Horowitz’s criticism of the FBI offered plenty of talking points for Trump and his defenders, some of whom have distorted the conclusions of the report to baselessly accuse agents of a politically motivated effort to investigate the Trump campaign. 

The inspector general turned up evidence that an FBI lawyer altered a document in connection with a renewal application for the Page warrant, a detail that Trump and Republicans have seized on. 

Horowitz reiterated that he found no testimonial or documentary evidence of political bias or other improper motivation driving the FBI’s decision to open the counterintelligence investigation — dubbed “Crossfire Hurricane” — into the Trump campaign and Russia. 

Horowitz also said that it was his conclusion that the investigation was adequately predicated. Those findings and other details of the report have undercut arguments made by Trump and his allies about the impropriety of the investigation.

But at the same time, Horowitz said that the explanations his office received from officials about the errors and omissions were not “satisfactory” and was careful about making a definitive statement about a lack of bias in the attorney’s actions with respect to the warrant. 

Republicans argued that the mistakes made during the course of the investigation were deliberate and malicious. 

“It may have started lawfully. It got off the rails quick,” Graham said. “It became a criminal conspiracy to defraud the FISA court, to put Mr. Page through hell, and to continue to surveil President Trump after he got elected. And I hope somebody pays a price for that.” 

 

Rare agreement for reform of the process 

Republicans and Democrats appeared in agreement on one thing following Wednesday’s hearing: the need for changes to the FISA program to avoid the missteps Horowitz identified in his report.

“If the [FISA] court doesn’t take corrective action and do something about being manipulated and lied to, you will lose my support,” Graham said, adding that he would like to see more “checks and balances.”

A few Republicans directly apologized to Sen. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeSenate braces for brawl on Trump impeachment rules Hillicon Valley: Pelosi works to remove legal protections for tech companies from USMCA | Treasury sanctions Russian group over 0 million hack | Facebook sues Chinese individuals for ad fraud | Huawei takes legal action against FCC Senators defend bipartisan bill on facial recognition as cities crack down MORE (R-Utah), telling the national security hawk that they had not believed the FISA process could be so seriously abused and indicating an openness to changes.

Sen. Christopher CoonsChristopher (Chris) Andrew CoonsThe real US patent ‘crisis’ Senate confirms eight Trump court picks in three days Lawmakers call for investigation into program meant to help student loan borrowers with disabilities MORE (D-Del.) also asked Horowitz about potential changes to the FISA program that could prevent future breakdowns in the application process, calling it “one of the only points” with bipartisan agreement.

“I’d welcome suggestions from FBI Director [Christopher] Wray … to ensure the errors we saw here in the Page process don’t happen again,” Coons said, adding there should be considerations for civil liberties as well.

Horowitz said the inspector general’s office does not make legislative recommendations to Congress, but instead would relay its suggestions within the Justice Department about how the FISA process could be improved.

 

Horowitz resists political fight

The watchdog chose his words carefully throughout Wednesday’s appearance. 

He tiptoed around some of the more politically charged questions from members, seeking to avoid wading into debates about whether the president’s campaign was “spied” on and declining to speculate on matters beyond his report.

Horowitz declined to use the word “spying” despite its frequent use by Trump and Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrHillicon Valley: Apple, Facebook defend encryption during Senate grilling | Tech legal shield makes it into trade deal | Impeachment controversy over phone records heats up | TikTok chief cancels Capitol Hill meetings Giuliani: Trump asked me to brief Justice Department, GOP lawmakers on Ukraine trip Apple, Facebook defend encryption during Senate grilling MORE to describe FBI activities. Asked if it would be spying were the FISA warrants for Page unlawful, Horowitz hesitated before calling it “illegal” or “unlawful” surveillance. 

Under questioning from Sen. Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinHillicon Valley: Apple, Facebook defend encryption during Senate grilling | Tech legal shield makes it into trade deal | Impeachment controversy over phone records heats up | TikTok chief cancels Capitol Hill meetings Apple, Facebook defend encryption during Senate grilling Houston police chief excoriates McConnell, Cornyn and Cruz on gun violence MORE (D-Calif.), Horowitz declined to say specifically that his findings refuted allegations about a “deep state conspiracy” against Trump and his campaign, saying simply that the inquiry found “no bias” in the opening of the investigation.

Horowitz also declined to weigh in on Barr’s disagreement with his findings after the attorney general issued a statement Monday saying the investigation had been launched on the “thinnest” of suspicions.

“He’s free to have his opinion. We have our finding,” Horowitz said. 

His effort to avoid political statements did not come as a surprise; Horowitz, a former assistant U.S. attorney, has been described as an independent voice and a straight shooter who seeks to stay away from politics. 

 

Spotlight on internal Justice Department disagreements 

Horowitz’s testimony offered new details about the daylight between him and some top Justice Department officials over his finding that the investigation was adequately predicated. 

Horowitz said he was “surprised” by the decision by John DurhamJohn DurhamBarr criticizes FBI, says it’s possible agents acted in ‘bad faith’ in Trump probe Democrats rip Barr over IG statement: ‘Mouthpiece’ for Trump Barr: Horowitz report shows FBI launched Trump campaign investigation on ‘thinnest of suspicions’ MORE, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut leading a separate Russia inquiry, to issue a statement Monday disagreeing with his finding as to the opening of the FBI’s investigation.

He also said he met with Durham in November to discuss his findings, at which point Durham told Horowitz he believed the FBI would have been justified in opening a “preliminary investigation,” but not a full one.

“He said that he did not necessarily agree with our conclusion about the opening of a full counterintelligence investigation, which is what this was,” Horowitz recalled. 

“But … [Durham] said during the meeting that the information from the friendly foreign government was, in his view, sufficient to support the preliminary investigation,” he continued, referring to information received about comments made former Trump campaign adviser George PapadopoulosGeorge Demetrios PapadopoulosTrump can’t cry foul on FISA – unless he’s suddenly a civil libertarian Misfired ‘Hurricane’: Comey’s team abused Carter Page and the FBI Former FBI general counsel wants apology from Trump MORE. 

Horowitz also said he communicated with Barr, who also disagreed with the conclusion as to the predicate, before the report’s release.

“None of the discussions changed our findings here,” Horowitz said.

Barr elaborated on his opinions during an NBC News interview Tuesday, calling the FBI’s case “flimsy” and saying the steps taken were not justified by the evidence.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/474199-inspector-general-testifies-on-fbi-failures-five-takeaways

The president told his top advisers that with a win unlikely, the already unpopular plan would bring him poor reviews. Acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and acting budget director Russell Vought, along with Margaret Weichert, the White House official leading the effort, tried to persuade Trump to keep going in line with conservative principles of shrinking government, the officials said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/after-bipartisan-pushback-trump-ditches-effort-to-kill-major-federal-agency/2019/12/11/bbce1c10-16d8-11ea-a659-7d69641c6ff7_story.html

Media captionWitnesses described hearing rounds of gunfire during the incident

A Jewish supermarket in New Jersey was the target of a gun attack which left six people dead including two suspected assailants, say officials.

No motive has been confirmed, but the mayor of Jersey City tweeted that “hate and anti-Semitism” had no place in the city.

The suspects are believed to have killed a detective across town, then driven a rental van to the store.

Security video shows them firing on the market before going inside.

Investigators believe that the three people found dead inside the kosher market were killed by the attackers, who were also found dead inside the building following a four-hour standoff with police on Tuesday.

An additional victim was injured, but managed to escape, authorities said on Wednesday.

The mayor of Jersey City, Steven Fulop, told reporters that street cameras showed two people “slowly” drive towards the market, then “calmly open the door with two long rifles and begin firing from the street” into the shop.

Public safety director James Shea said video showed they parked their van “and immediately began firing on the location”. Asked how police were certain that the shop was targeted, he said the men had “bypassed” many other people walking on the street to attack the store.

The attackers have been identified as David Anderson, 47, and Francine Graham, 50.

Sources tell NBC that Anderson was a follower of the Black Hebrew Israelite movement, whose believers say they are the true descendents of ancient Israelites.

A neighbour told NBC that Graham was a former home carer in Manhattan and had met Anderson after she got hurt at work.

The New York Times and New York Post reported on Wednesday that one of the suspects had made anti-Semitic and anti-police social media posts online before the attack.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Dozens of armed officers were deployed as the suspects took shelter at the supermarket

How did the attack unfold?

The violence began at a cemetery about one mile (1.6km) away from the grocery store.

The suspects killed Detective Joseph Seals, 39, who approached them for questioning about the murder of an Uber driver over the weekend, New Jersey Attorney-General Gurbir Grewal said.

The pair fled the scene in the van and drove to the kosher supermarket at 12:20 local time (17:20 GMT) where they held off armed police and federal officials for four hours, shooting off hundreds of rounds of ammunition.

The attackers had opened fire on the shop before entering, alerting two officers on foot patrol who began firing at the suspects until they were injured by the attackers’ gunfire.

On Wednesday, the Jersey City Mayor Fulop said “had they not been there and not responded, more people would have died”.

Mr Grewal said officials were “not in the position at this time to say definitively why the suspects decided to stop in front of the supermarket and begin firing immediately”.

“This is one of the biggest gunfights I’ve seen in a while,” Willy McDonald, 67, told the New York Times. “And I’ve been in Vietnam.”

An active pipe bomb was found in the suspects’ vehicle, police say. Reports indicate that a rambling note was also left inside for police to find.

The incident ended just before 16:00 when officials used an armoured vehicle to ram through the front entrance of the shop and found the bodies of the attackers.

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

Three people in the shop were killed

The attack put approximately 30,000 students on lockdown, unable to leave their classrooms for hours after the school day had ended. Class start times were delayed on Wednesday.

Who are the victims?

The three victims inside the shop were killed soon after the gunfire broke out, but one managed to escape after being injured.

They have been identified by New Jersey officials as Mindy Ferencz, 32; Miguel Douglas, 49 and Moshe Deutch, 24.

“Mindel Ferencz, may she rest in peace, was a pioneer,” said Rabbi David Niederman, who first confirmed the death of the mother of five.

“She was a lady full of love for others,” he added. “Unfortunately, her life was cut so short.”

Ferencz’s mother told the New York Times that her husband, who owned the supermarket, had taken a break from work to go to a nearby synagogue minutes before shots rang out.

Image copyright
Facebook/ Chai Lifeline

Image caption

Moshe Deutch, 24

Deutsch’s death was also confirmed by Rabbi Niederman, who hailed him as a student who worked to organise a food drive that provided help to 2,000 families each year.

What has been the response?

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio called the attack a “hate crime” and an “act of terror” and ordered police on high alert, especially in Jewish communities. Jersey City is part of the New York metropolitan area.

“This confirms a sad truth. There is a crisis of anti-Semitism gripping this nation. There is a crisis of anti-Semitism in this city,” he said in a Wednesday news conference.

He added: “History tells us to take these warning signs seriously.”

New York Police Department commissioner Dermot Shea added that hate crimes in New York City were up 22% this year.

“You see a swastika being drawn, you see a brick being thrown through a window, you see a woman walking down the street with her kids and having her wig ripped off,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50747374

India’s Parliament has approved a controversial citizenship bill that grants citizenship to minorities facing persecution from three neighbouring countries – but excludes Muslims.

A day after clearing the lower house, the Citizenship Amendment Bill was passed on Wednesday by the upper house, with 125 members voting in its favour and 105 against it.

More:

The bill brings sweeping changes to India’s 64-year-old citizenship law by giving citizenship to “persecuted” minorities – Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians – from Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

But critics say the legislation put forward by the Hindu nationalist ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) undermines the country’s secular constitution, with opposition parties, minority groups, academics and a US federal panel calling it discriminatory against Muslims.

“Muslim citizens of this country have no reason to worry,” Amit Shah, the federal home minister, said in Parliament. “This bill is intended to give citizenship, not take away citizenship.”

Several opposition parliamentarians said the bill would be challenged in court.

“The passage of the Citizenship Amendment Bill marks the victory of narrow-minded and bigoted forces over India’s pluralism,” said Sonia Gandhi, leader of the main opposition Congress party.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said it was a “landmark day for India” and the passage of the bill would “alleviate the suffering of many who faced persecution for years”.

“Glad that the #CAB2019 has been passed in the #RajyaSabha. Gratitude to all the MPs who voted in favour of the Bill,” Modi tweeted after the vote in the Rajya Sabha, the upper house.



Al Jazeera’s Anchal Vohra, reporting from the capital New Delhi, said, “There is a palpable sense of fear in areas where Muslim Indian citizens live.”

Protests against the measure have flared in various parts of India, including the ethnically diverse northeast, where people fear that undocumented Hindu migrants from neighbouring Bangladesh could be granted citizenship.

In Assam state, thousands of people protested overnight across several towns and cities, some joining processions carrying torches. Police said they used tear gas to push back protesters in at least two cities.


“We have seen massive protests in the northeast of India today that have turned violent. Police reacted and fired tear gas at them. We have also learned that the Indian army is on standby in the state of Assam,” Vohra said.

“Some of these people are protesting, saying they don’t want any migrant to be given Indian citizenship – whether Hindus or Muslims – because they want to protect their indigenous culture,” she added.

Faizan Mustafa, an expert on constitutional law and vice chancellor at NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad, said the bill goes against the country’s constitution.

“It is arbitrary because it’s not based on reasonable classification, it doesn’t have rational objective to achieve, it does not cover all the neighbours, it doesn’t cover all the persecuted minorities,” Mustafa told Al Jazeera.

“It is constitutionally suspect and legally untenable but let’s see what the Supreme Court does in this case,” Mustafa added.

‘Second-class citizens’

Modi’s government – re-elected in May and under pressure over a slowing economy – said Muslims from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan are excluded from the legislation because they do not face discrimination in those countries.

Also left out are other minorities fleeing political or religious persecution elsewhere in the region such as Tamils from Sri Lanka, Rohingya from Myanmar and Tibetans from China.

Many Muslims in India say they have been made to feel like second-class citizens since Modi came to power in 2014.

Several cities perceived to have Islamic-sounding names have been renamed, while some school textbooks have been altered to downplay Muslims’ contributions to India.

In August, Modi’s administration rescinded the partial autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir, India’s only Muslim-majority state, and split it into two union territories.

A citizens’ register in Assam finalised earlier this year left 1.9 million people, many of them Muslims, facing possible statelessness, detention camps and even deportation.

Modi’s government has said it intends to replicate the register nationwide with the aim of removing all “infiltrators” by 2024.

Bilal Kuchay contributed to this report from New Delhi


Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/india-parliament-approves-contentious-citizenship-law-191211152439609.html