President Clinton in the Rose Garden of the White House on Dec. 11, 1998, before delivering a statement on the impeachment inquiry.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

President Clinton in the Rose Garden of the White House on Dec. 11, 1998, before delivering a statement on the impeachment inquiry.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

The impeachment process now under way against President Trump comes 21 years to the month after the last presidential impeachment, when the House approved two articles against then-President Bill Clinton.

And there are many parallels in the two procedures.

Some are on the surface; others deeper. There are 55 lawmakers in the House now who voted on the Clinton impeachment in 1998. Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who has since moved on to the Senate, is one of President Trump’s most vocal defenders. He was one of the House managers who argued for convicting Clinton in his Senate trial, saying that “high crimes doesn’t even have to be a crime. It’s just when you start using your office and you’re acting in a way that hurts people.”

And the current House Judiciary Committee chairman, Democrat Jerry Nadler of New York, who favors impeaching Trump, argued against impeaching Clinton. He said then, “We’re lowering the standard of impeachment. What the president has done is not a great and dangerous offense to the safety of the republic in the words of George Mason. It is not an impeachable offense under the meaning of the Constitution.”

The politics

The day Clinton was impeached, Dec. 19, was a dramatic one. Not only did the House vote to impeach Clinton, but the Republican who was expected to become the next House speaker, Rep. Bob Livingston of Louisiana, surprised everyone by announcing he was stepping down, after conceding he too had had extramarital affairs.

Rep. Ray LaHood on Capitol Hill on Dec. 18, 1998, during the House’s impeachment debate.

Joe Marquette/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Joe Marquette/AP

Rep. Ray LaHood on Capitol Hill on Dec. 18, 1998, during the House’s impeachment debate.

Joe Marquette/AP

Ray LaHood, a Republican congressman from Illinois who presided over the House during the Clinton impeachment votes, was as shocked as everyone else when Livingston made his announcement. “The air came out of the House,” LaHood told NPR.

He said he was immediately approached on the House floor by then-Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., who asked LaHood to consider becoming speaker himself.

“And I said, ‘Mel, that’s simply not going to happen politically,'” LaHood recalls. “That would never happen during this period.”

LaHood calls impeachment “probably the most acrimonious political activity that the House can engage in.” He says then-Speaker Newt Gingrich had decided early on after the 1994 election to impeach Clinton, and he thinks current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made a similar call.

Gingrich “was intent on impeaching President Clinton,” LaHood says. “And I believe that the decision to impeach, and to have articles of impeachment against President Trump is a political decision made by Speaker Pelosi.”

LaHood says it’s “a political dynamic and a political decision made by two different speakers for two different presidents.”

Pelosi, in the current impeachment inquiry, has insisted that Democrats are following facts, not politics. She held back from pursuing impeachment for months, but formally launched the inquiry after a whistleblower complaint about Trump’s July 25 call with Ukraine.

Presidential conduct

While clearly two different presidents, there are some similarities in their conduct says Russell Riley, co-chair of the Presidential Oral History Program at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center.

Riley says both Clinton and Trump survived earlier incidents of questionable conduct only to repeat that behavior. In Clinton’s case there were accusations of infidelity that arose during his 1992 campaign. “And notwithstanding that,” Riley says, “in a moment of weakness, he engages in inappropriate behavior with a White House employee.”

For Trump, it was foreign influence, and allegations of contact between his 2016 campaign and Russia, and then the consequential phone call with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.

“Having weathered lots and lots of of criticism in investigations about foreign influence,” Riley says, “when that seems to be clear, [Trump] finds himself on the evidence of this telephone call doing exactly that which he’d been accused of earlier.”

The evidence

Riley finds another similarity between the two cases.

There was physical evidence connecting Clinton with Monica Lewinsky, the infamous blue dress Lewinsky kept that had Clinton’s DNA on it. Riley says the summary transcript of Trump’s call to Zelenskiy is “the modern day equivalent of the blue dress.” But, he says, “None of us can agree on what exactly it means, in my judgment.”

The counternarrative

Trump has also adopted a Clinton tactic for dealing with impeachment, keeping before the public and in claiming not to be distracted by impeachment.

“Clinton wanted the American people to see that he was tending to their business,” Riley says.

“He felt that the best defense against everything was going on behind the scenes with the Kenneth Starr investigation of what was going on Capitol Hill was that the American people would stand by him if they saw that he was tending to their business.”

Trump too has kept before the public eye, this week attending NATO meetings in London, and holding public bill signing sessions.

But Riley says is skeptical that Trump can sustain this over time. “President Trump seems to be so easily distracted by his critics that it’s not clear to me that he’s going to have the discipline to stick with this over the long haul.”

The ending

After two days of debate in December, the House approved two articles of impeachment against President Clinton, for perjury and obstruction of justice. The next month the Senate trial began.

Former Democratic Sen. Dale Bumpers of Arkansas delivered the final argument in defense of Clinton, in language that sounds familiar to another who has been following the Trump proceedings.

“We’re here because of a five year, relentless, unending investigation, of the president,” Bumpers said. “Hundreds of FBI agents fanning across the nation, examining in detail the microscopic lives of people. Maybe the most intense investigation not only of a president but anybody, ever.”

The Senate failed to convict Clinton on either article of impeachment, and no members of the president’s party voted against him. That may well turn out to be another parallel between then and now.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/12/06/784721754/president-clinton-was-impeached-21-years-ago-some-parallels-run-deep

The episode began shortly after 4 p.m., when the two carjackers burst into Regent Jewelers, a shop on “Miracle Mile,” an upscale shopping destination in Coral Gables, in Miami-Dade County, Chief Edward J. Hudak Jr. of the Coral Gables Police Department said at a news conference. Police officers responded to reports of the robbery within a minute and a half, but by that time the robbers and the shopkeeper had opened fire on each other and the robbers had fled.

The chief said that at least two employees, a man and a woman, were in the store at the time of the robbery, and that the woman was injured. He said it was not clear if the suspects had succeeded in stealing anything from the store before they fled.

The melee continued as the robbers fled the store, with gunfire striking a window at City Hall, which is across the street from the jewelry store, according to Chief Hudak. The suspects left the area in a truck but soon abandoned it and hijacked the UPS truck at gunpoint, kidnapping its driver as well, he said.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/06/us/fbi-florida-shootout-ups.html

Former Vice President Joe Biden, who has been on the campaign trail in Iowa this week, sat down with CNBC’s John Harwood on Thursday to discuss a range of topics, including trade, health care, taxes and President Donald Trump’s standing among world leaders.

Biden has lagged behind Democratic presidential rivals Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders in recent polls of voters in Iowa, which will hold the first-in-the-nation nominating contest in February. Yet he has consistently led the field in national polling averages.

Here is a transcript of Biden and Harwood’s interview.

John Harwood: Mr. Vice President, thanks for joining us.

Joe Biden: Thanks for being out here.

John Harwood: How’s that bus tour? Had a wild exchange this morning.

Joe Biden: Well, that was actually a little bit of fun. The fact is that we have a great bus tour. We have about 660 miles. We’re going in day six. We’ve had a couple thousand people show up. They’re enthusiastic. It was interesting the response of the crowd when that fellow spoke up.

John Harwood: Let me ask you a little bit about how you get your program passed. You’ve made the argument that Trump’s an aberration. If you beat him, you can then bring things back to normal, implement your middle-class economic agenda in the way that we’ve become used to. We’re now in a situation where Republican senators are repeating what is known to be Russian propaganda, including propaganda about you. How do you bring that back to normal?

Joe Biden: Well, I don’t hold grudges, for real. You’ve watched me a long time. I think a lot of Republicans in the Senate are really under enormous pressure. When you have a Republican Party and that old joke, this ain’t your father’s Republican Party, saying that a poll showing they think he’s better than Abraham Lincoln, you know something’s wrong. And so I think there’s going to be a lot of people who are going to be prepared to deal with things that they know we should be talking about.

John Harwood: But to the point about not your father’s Republican Party, some of the things on your tax and spending agenda are things that Republicans blocked when you were the vice president, before Trump.

Joe Biden: Yes, I agree. But now we’ve had Trump. There’s two ways people get inspired, John. They get inspired by inspirational people like John Kennedy and they get inspired by very bad people, bad presidents like Donald Trump.

And what people have now seen is that his tax policy has been a disaster for the middle-class, disaster for them, and that there is plenty of room to be able to do things that make a lot of sense. I have always been at the view that the tax policy is not about punishing people. It’s about giving everybody a shot, giving everybody an equal prospect. And so when I call for – for example, there’s overwhelming evidence now that the idea that the capital gains tax is promoting growth is just not the case. We should charge people the same tax for their capital gains as their tax rate is. And I think we should raise the tax rate back to, for example, I take it back to where it was before it was reduced.

It could go higher, but at 39.5%, 40% basically if you have that as the capital gains, that raises, I brought along, I’m not going to bore you with it, but you’ve seen it, I brought along a graph is how much money each of these things raise.

John Harwood: I have seen that graph.

Joe Biden: But I think they’re all realistic now. I think that the possibility of saying to people, “Look, we ought to start rewarding work as much as we do well.” And you have a significant number of Republicans who aren’t multimillionaires thinking that makes a lot of sense.

John Harwood: Let me go back, though, to the divisions. A few years ago after the Affordable Care Act passed, I interviewed President Obama and asked him if he was concerned that we’re getting divided, not just by party and ideology, but also by race.

He said, “No, people are going to say that the Affordable Care Act benefits white and black alike and that is a way that’s going to bridge that divide.” It didn’t happen. Do you think it will be easier for you to do that than it was for him because you’re a white man?

Joe Biden: No. John, I think it did happen. Look at the 2018 election. I went into 24 States with over 65 candidates on health care. The thing about Barack was, I used to always say to him, “We ought to take a victory lap on what happened in Obamacare.”

He said, “We don’t have time.” Everything but locusts landed on his desk. It wasn’t until Republicans started taking it away that all of a sudden people said, “Whoa, I didn’t know that that’s where I got that from.”

And look what we did. We won back 41 seats, Republican seats in purple and red areas. You didn’t hear any Republicans out there saying, “I’m going to take away your preexisting condition coverage.” Because they figured it out. The one thing that Trump has done, he pulled the band-aid off and said, “This is who I am. This is what we’ve done.”

Whether it’s, for example, the idea that we’re in a position where there is no minimum tax on corporations that don’t pay anything, make billions and billions of dollars. Where I come from in Delaware, a lot of Republicans do, they think, Whoa, that doesn’t work. That’s not fair. Other corporations don’t think it is fair. So there’s a lot of things that have been exposed now.

John Harwood: Let me ask you about another aspect of the divide. What we’ve seen is a geographic divide economically. And more diverse, better educated, more digitally focused cities are doing better, higher incomes. Places like Chickasaw County here in Iowa are falling behind, lesser levels of education and more and more levels of cultural resentment, which has been to the benefit of the Republican Party. What do you do about that?

Joe Biden: Well, that’s also shifted too. The president has said, Trump said he’s going to take care of the forgotten man. He got elected and forgot them. Look what Chickasaw County out here now. Basically, a conservative area in the past, but now all of a sudden they’re realizing his foreign policy is killing them, killing them. His failure to invest in any education is killing them. Being able to bring teachers, the attitude toward rural hospitals is killing them.

John Harwood: But we’ve seen farmers say, “I’m sticking with the president. He’s on my side. He’s giving us aid to compensate.”

Joe Biden: There are going to be people sticking with them. Remember, we lost by about 172,000 votes. Okay? So you don’t have to win back, you don’t have to fundamentally change anything. But you’ve got to let people know that all the meetings I’ve had, I’ve talked about the incredible opportunity of rural America leading American through the 21st century, for real.

We’re the only country in the world that has been able to take grave crises and turn them into real opportunities. Global warming – agriculture is going to be the epicenter of the first, and I predict to you, the first area of zero net, zero carbon because of the way in which the technology’s changing, where farmers can make a lot of money not just growing and selling their crop, but with crop cover, with dealing with absorbing carbon. with setting up.

I know is not going to sound good on television, but you know there’s an awful lot of chicken manure in Delaware because it was a big area. There’s an awful lot of hog manure and cattle. Well guess what? We’ve learned now how to pelletize that. Take out the methane, use it for energy and be able to sell this pure stuff that is not damaging the environment abroad. We’re going to see little factories springing up all over this area. Or for example, ethanol. Ethanol, the salaries ethanol plants are not 15 bucks an hour, $45 an hour. They’ve generated significant economic income.

John Harwood: Let me ask you about one specific farm issue.

Joe Biden: Sure.

John Harwood: Farm exports have been hurt by the trade war. He’s had subsidies to compensate. If you become president, do those tariffs come off on day one?

Joe Biden: Those tariffs come off in terms of farmers, but other tariffs may go on in terms of the violation of the stealing of intellectual property, violating WTO.

John Harwood: So for all the people saying that the tariffs are creating uncertainty and harming the economy, you think some of them are justified?

Joe Biden: Well, for example, on steel dumping it’s justified. It’s justified. The excess of steel, they dump it at a lower cost. It is in fact designed to drive down our steel market and our steel production. But the idea of us making the farmer pay for what they’ve worked like hell to do, provide and have a market in China, makes no sense. It’s not about the (trade) deficit. What it’s about is what they’re doing unfairly to change world trade rules.

Look, we make up 25% of the world’s economy. When we were prepared to bring our allies with us, China has to listen. But this time, we have to have labor and environmentalist at the table, at the table. And then what happens is we can begin to once again set the rules of fair trade internationally.

John Harwood: On the divide we’re talking about, Sanders and Warren have made a case for closing the divide with large universal programs that everybody benefits from. Given how popular Medicare and Social Security as universal programs are, why are they wrong?

Joe Biden: Well because they’re not being honest about how much it will cost. If you take a look at where the Democratic Party is and where the American people are, they’re not supporting Medicare for All. First of all, it’s going to take their own admission four to 10 years for it to happen, number one. It’s going to cost between $30 trillion and $40 trillion over 10 years. It’s not realistic, going to raise taxes on middle-class people. It’s the exact opposite of the thing we have to do.

I have a really bold plan. I’m taking what Obamacare, adding a public option to it, meaning Medicare for people who want to buy into that, or if they’re already eligible for Medicaid, they automatically get enrolled. I’m further subsidizing the plans that exist under Obamacare, so the largest deduction you’d have to pay for a copay would be $1,000 in a gold plan and you’re allowed to keep your insurance if you like it.

John Harwood: Nancy Pelosi says Medicare for All is not an idea that she’s in favor of. You’re saying it’s not a good idea even if you could pass it?

Joe Biden: Well, I think it’s not a necessary idea. Theoretically, it makes sense on the merits. But the fact is there’s no way to get it done. Our entire budget for one year, every single thing doesn’t add up to what it would cost for Medicare for one year. It’s about whether or not we can do something big that can get done and benefit people. The one thing I don’t like about the Medicare for All, there’s about 160 million people who’ve negotiated and taking pay cuts to get better insurance coverage with their companies, and they like it.

John Harwood: Do you think it is a problem – economically, politically, even morally – for Democrats to be in a position of offering lots of free stuff?

Joe Biden: I think there are important things we have to offer for free for people who need basic health care, basic education, basic needs that relate to how they can live their lives. I think for many people that has to be free. Look, he’s just cut back on food stamps, for God’s sake, going into Christmas.

John Harwood: Right. But you’ve seen the objection. People say, “Oh those Democrats, they’re just promising this and that.”

Joe Biden: You have to right the market a little bit here. If you have all of the tax breaks, essentially all the tax breaks, all of the benefits flowing through the top one 10th of 1% – there’s never been as great a concentration of wealth, including going back to the Great Depression, ever.

One of the things that worries me most about that, John, is the middle class is getting killed. The middle class right now is in a position where more than half of them don’t think the children will ever have the same standard of living they have.

John Harwood: But this is where the Sanders and Warren wealth tax comes in. It polls pretty well. Critics, Republicans, also some prominent Democrats say two things about it, two objections. One, it’s not workable. And two, it’s punitive. Do you agree with both of those objections?

Joe Biden: Parts of the plan, those objections apply. But here’s the deal: my view is you have to reform the entire tax code, not just have a single tax on a single group of people. For example, if in fact we’re able to – and I think we can get it passed – make you pay on capital gains, clipping coupons, your money making money, the same rates you pay in your regular taxes. If, in fact, you eliminate a thing called stepped up basis, which is not an inheritance tax.

John Harwood: That’s one of the things that you guys tried and couldn’t do under Obama.

Joe Biden: No, but we can now. Once the carny show comes through – with the guy with the pea in the shell, three shells and there’s no pea under any shell – the second time it comes around, they figure it out.

They know that there are a number of things that don’t make any sense in the tax code, punish the working class, the middle-class and benefit unduly people who, in fact, don’t need those tax cuts.

And here’s the point, John. It is a political dynamic that allows the demagogues to go out and spread and split the country in two. It’s not just we need a middle class. It’s not just being fair. It’s taking away the argument he’s used so well. “The reason why you’re not having your job is not paying as much because of all those immigrants. The reason why is …” and so on. And we’ve got to end it. And there’s a way to do it. It’s within our wheelhouse to be able to do it.

John Harwood: Treasury Secretary Mnuchin today said that he opposed a financial transaction tax, which some in the race of supported, because it would destroy financial markets. Is that why you’ve rejected that idea?

Joe Biden: No. I still think we should do that. I think we should have a financial transaction tax. But I focused on what I think I could get done, get done quickly and pay for everything I’m talking about, Because look, the president has increased with his profligate tax cut to the very wealthy the deficit by $1 trillion, $900 billion. It can’t be sustained. It can’t be sustained.

And the argument I use when he passed it though, when I was against it, I was asked to go to the House and speak in the steps of the Capitol and what I pointed out was it’s all designed to be able to justify doing away with the entire safety net. “The reason why we have to cut the safety net now is we have this terrible deficit.” When they controlled the Congress before ’18, what was the first thing the budget committee do? They move to increase taxes on Medicare by over $500 billion.

John Harwood: But now, here’s what some Democrats are saying. They’re saying that we’ve seen that politically deficits don’t matter all that much. Economically, it’s actually helped Trump’s economy in the short-term. Given all that, would it be okay with you to increase spending more than the amount you could raise taxes to pay for it?

Joe Biden: It depends on the circumstance we find ourselves when we get elected. Look what we had to do. We, in order to be able to get out of the financial recession, which was the greatest recession, sort of a depression in American history, the president asked me to chair the recovery act, which had $900 billion in it, and we did it. Most even conservative economists acknowledged it probably saved us from a depression. But what we did at the same time was we were able to invest it in things that in fact grew the economy at the same time.

That’s the exact opposite of what Trump has done. What he has done hasn’t grown the economy. It hasn’t grown the economy. There are circumstances where you have to spend in order to generate economic growth, but there has to be a way that you can catch up to that. Otherwise, you end up in a situation where you have to make terrible, terrible choices.

John Harwood: Do you still favor the balanced budget amendment that you voted for in 1995?

Joe Biden: No, because we’re in a different place now. I hope it’s not true, but we’re likely to inherit a recession, at least a significant economic slowdown. That doesn’t make sense.

John Harwood: Do you think that vote was a mistake?

Joe Biden: No, not then. Everything’s context. One of the reasons I like giving an interview with you is you know the context. I’m not being a wise guy. 1995 was a very different place than we find ourselves today.

This is about how do we grow the economy. For example, it makes a lot of sense that we say that okay, why is it if you give a charitable contribution, I won’t say you, I mean you editorially, someone in the 20% tax bracket gets to take a 20% break for that. Well, somebody who is in the 40% tax bracket, they in fact get to deduct 40% of it. Well, why is that? What does that do? I limit, for example, no tax break that you get. No deduction can you take that’s more than what 28%.

John Harwood: Another thing Obama tried to do, couldn’t get done.

Joe Biden: But we’ll get it done. Because things have changed.

John Harwood: Right. A couple of economic points quickly, cause I know our time is short. Sen. Warren came out today with a new proposal on limiting mega mergers. Looking back on your time in the Obama administration, do you think you guys were too slack on antitrust enforcement, and that concentration among big corporations is a big economic problem?

Joe Biden: It is a big economic problem. And one of the things that I’ve said I would do as president is set up within the Justice Department an entire new entity to go back and look at the mega mergers that have occurred and those who that are being proposed to occur. There’s a lot of concentration of power. And make a judgment whether or not it made sense for that to happen.

One of the things that always happens from one administration to the next, even within the same party is you go back and you look at the consequences and what was done. There’s too much concentration of power. And I don’t disagree with Elizabeth’s point – how we go about making that judgment remains to be seen. I don’t think you go about and making judgment by picking a particular company. I think you talk about what happened when we concentrated the power.

John Harwood: Do you think you guys should have done more in the Obama administration?

Joe Biden: Look, remember, everything landed on the presidents plate but locusts. We finally got to the place where we got not only the car out of the ditch and kept from going over the cliff, we put new tires on it. We began to tune the engine. It was running 40 miles an hour. We were ready to make it run faster. We lost. The Democrats lost the election.

And so we’re faced with a different problem now. How do we go back and regain the momentum that we’d gotten going. There’s a lot of things you can go back in every administration and say, “Well, maybe would have done something differently.” But at the moment, there wasn’t much else that could be done at that time.

John Harwood: President Trump has been very strong in ripping Fed Chair Powell. Do you think Powell is doing a good job, and is he the kind of person you would keep or put on the Fed?

Joe Biden: I’m not going to get into the personalities, but I do say this: the president should not be trying to pressure the Fed. We did not do that. That’s supposed to be an independent entity out here. It’s just like how he pressures the military and intervenes in the chain of command. It’s his way of abusing power across the board. It’s a big mistake. A big mistake, and I would not do that.

John Harwood: You’ve got an ad out today that says the world’s laughing at President Trump. Very strong ad on the wake of this recent NATO meeting. And the President Trump responded not directly to the ad, but he said, “All we found over there was deep respect for the United States.” In the meeting. Do you think he actually believes that, or do you think that privately, he fears that he’s being mocked, ridiculed, that he’s not respected?

Joe Biden: How could he not know that? How could he not know that? He turned around and he called the prime minister of Canada two faced. He turned around … the idea he doesn’t know that. I mean, look, this president thinks if he says the lie long enough and often enough and repeats it enough, somehow people will believe it. Look, the reason why is just I’m not happy that the president of the United States got mocked. But what it says is we lack the respect of the rest of the world that we had in spades before.

John Harwood: Well, here’s the related question that if he does know, and the question is does he care?

I ask for this reason. First of all, you may remember John Kerry who endorsed you today, got mocked in 2004 as being too French. A couple of the people in those videos where Emmanuel Macron and Justin Trudeau. Do you think as an elite, non-elite matter, he doesn’t care?

Joe Biden: I don’t think it’s about being elite. I think it’s about being smart or not so smart. I think it’s about being mean spirited or not mean spirited. It’s about coddling Russia is trying to break up Europe and NATO or sticking with our friends.

John Harwood: That’s the point I was getting to. Those people in that video were leaders of NATO. Vladimir Putin wants NATO weakened and divided. Nancy Pelosi today when she was announcing the drafting of articles of impeachment said that in essence, the Russia of 2016 scandal and the Ukraine scandal are different pieces of the same story, that all roads lead to Putin. Do you see it that way yourself?

Joe Biden: I do, in Europe. Absolutely, positively. I know Putin. I’ve had private time with Putin. I’ve looked in his eyes, as they say. This is a guy who had one overarching desire: to break up NATO and to have America pull away from Europe, the Euro Atlantic Alliance. Because that’s the one thing he cannot penetrate if it’s strong.

But if you have 28 nations all going their own way, he becomes significantly more powerful. And what happens when you live next door to the bear and you don’t have anybody protecting you and doesn’t have that shotgun out to make sure the bear doesn’t get you? Then, in fact, you begin to make accommodations.

John Harwood: And why do you think President Trump wants to help him?

Joe Biden: I don’t think the president of the United States today has any notion of geopolitical concerns. I remember he said, seriously, a couple of months into his administration, “You know this job’s harder than running a real estate empire.” He knows nothing about foreign policy. He knows nothing about nuclear deterrent. He knows nothing. I actually, privately, encouraged a number of generals, senior state department people, foreign policy experts to stay in the administration. Don’t leave. Look what’s happened.

John Harwood: But is your judgment, then, that it’s ignorance, that he doesn’t understand geopolitics, as opposed to he is purposely helping Russia and Putin because he’s compromised in some way?

Joe Biden: All I know is the results are the same. I can’t read his mind. He has done things that seem to me to be completely contrary to reality. When he stands before in the whole world at a G 20 meeting and says that I believe Vladimir Putin did not interfere in our elections and these 18 intelligence agencies that work for us, in fact, do. They think he did, but I think they’re wrong. What is that about?

John Harwood: That’s the question.

Joe Biden: I don’t know. But the result is the same. It has drastically weakened our standing around the world. Poll came out not long ago, Gallup and Pew showing that we ranked just below China in respect and just above Russia. What’s going on? Look, when we are not leading, we’ve led the world by the example, not just of our power, but the power of our example.

There’s three things I’ve learned. I’ve learned Vladimir Putin doesn’t want me to be president. That’s why he’s spending a lot of money on these bots trying to tell any lies about me. I’ve learned that Kim Jong Un thinks I am a rabid dog, should be beaten to death with a stick, and he gets a love letter from Trump. And I learned that Donald Trump doesn’t want me to be the nominee.

This president is the most unusual politician I’ve ever worked with. And he doesn’t seem to have any sense of who we are. He’s ripping the soul out of this country. He really is. I sometimes sit back and wonder, “Whoa, I don’t know whether …” – well, I shouldn’t speculate because I don’t know, to be honest.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/06/biden-trump-is-ripping-the-soul-out-of-america-and-recession-is-likely.html

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezOcasio-Cortez on food assistance cuts: ‘If this happened then, we might’ve just starved’ Youth climate activists grade top 2020 Democrats on Green New Deal commitment Sanders to join youth climate strikers in Iowa MORE (D-N.Y.) slammed the Trump administration’s decision to implement cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), referencing her family’s past reliance on food stamps.

“My family relied on food stamps (EBT) when my dad died at 48. I was a student. If this happened then, we might’ve just starved,” she tweeted Thursday. “Now many people will.”

She continued, criticizing Republican lawmakers who she views as stewards of the wealthy. 

“It’s shameful how the GOP works overtime to create freebies for the rich while dissolving lifelines of those who need it most.”

The rebuke comes in response to a plan that would result in deep cuts to those who qualify to receive food stamps.

The Trump administration proposal, which was announced Wednesday, will stiffen the rules for states seeking waivers for a requirement that food stamp recipients be employed or enrolled in vocational training programs. Government estimates say the proposal could cut benefits for about 750,000 people.

The work or vocational training requirement applies to recipients who are “able-bodied” or are not caring for a child under 6 years old. Current guidelines say that states can grant a waiver for work requirements for those receiving benefits from SNAP, also known as food stamps, if their unemployment rates are at least 20 percent above the national rate.  

The proposal would limit benefits for an estimated 3.7 million people and 2.1 million households.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/473313-ocasio-cortez-on-food-stamp-cuts-if-this-happened-then-we-mightve-just-starved

Pelosi blew up at a reporter today when she was confronted on whether she hates Trump. Reaction and analysis on ‘The Five.’ #TheFive #FoxNews

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Radio, FOX News Headlines 24/7, FOXNews.com and the direct-to-consumer streaming service, FOX Nation. FOX News also produces FOX News Sunday on FOX Broadcasting Company and FOX News Edge. A top five-cable network, FNC has been the most watched news channel in the country for 17 consecutive years. According to a 2018 Research Intelligencer study by Brand Keys, FOX News ranks as the second most trusted television brand in the country. Additionally, a Suffolk University/USA Today survey states Fox News is the most trusted source for television news or commentary in the country, while a 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News is the top-cited outlet. FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape while routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.

Subscribe to Fox News! https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/

Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Special Report with Bret Baier: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
The Story with Martha Maccallum: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Tucker Carlson Tonight: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Hannity: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
The Ingraham Angle: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Fox News @ Night: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…

Follow Fox News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxnews/

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yia1YR72QQo

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-06/china-to-waive-trade-war-tariffs-for-some-u-s-soy-pork

Beyond Mr. Buttigieg’s agreement with McKinsey, this is something of an awkward moment to be associated with the consultancy, especially if you happen to be a Democratic politician in an election year shadowed by questions of corporate power and growing wealth inequality. The firm has long advocated business strategies like raising executive compensation, moving labor offshore and laying off workers to cut costs. And over the last couple of years, reporting in The New York Times and other publications has revealed episodes tarnishing McKinsey’s once-sterling reputation: its work advising Purdue Pharma on how to “turbocharge” opioid sales, its consulting for authoritarian governments in places like China and Saudi Arabia, and its role in a wide-ranging corruption scandal in South Africa. (All of these came after Mr. Buttigieg left the firm.)

Just this week, ProPublica, copublishing with The Times, revealed that McKinsey consultants had recommended in 2017 that Immigration and Customs Enforcement cut its spending on food for migrants and medical care for detainees.

After a campaign event on Wednesday in Birmingham, Ala., Mr. Buttigieg remarked on the latest revelations. “The decision to do what was reported yesterday in The Times is disgusting,” he said. “And as somebody who left the firm a decade ago, seeing what certain people in that firm have decided to do is extremely frustrating and extremely disappointing.”

The Buttigieg campaign says he has asked to be let out of his nondisclosure agreement so he can be more forthcoming about that formative time in his life. A McKinsey spokesman said Mr. Buttigieg “worked with several different clients” during his time with the firm, but “beyond that, we have no comment on specific client work.”

But interviews with six people who were involved in projects that Mr. Buttigieg worked on at McKinsey, along with gleanings from his autobiography, fill in some of the blanks.

Mr. Buttigieg was recruited by McKinsey at Oxford. The company seeks out Rhodes scholars like him, banking that their intellects will make up for their lack of M.B.A.s from traditional recruiting grounds like Harvard Business School.

Yet even during the recruitment process, Mr. Helbling recalled, Mr. Buttigieg made it known that, like many applicants, he saw the business experience on offer at McKinsey as a good job “in the near term,” in his case an asset on the way to a career in public service.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/05/us/politics/pete-buttigieg-mckinsey.html

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/12/05/michael-bloomberg-president-donald-trump-should-impeached/2626229001/

The two robbers, a UPS driver and a person in a nearby car were killed in the shooting in Miramar, George Piro, a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent, told reporters. Police said no officers were killed.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/12/05/armed-robbers-hijacked-ups-truck-led-police-chase-that-ended-shootout/

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

The usually busy Gare du Nord railway station in Paris seen empty on Thursday

A strike over planned pension reforms that paralysed France on Thursday has entered its second day.

Several unions, including rail and metro workers, voted to extend the strike action, meaning another day of major disruptions to key services.

It comes after more than 800,000 people protested on Thursday, with violent clashes reported in a number of cities.

Workers are angry about planned pension reforms that would see them retiring later or facing reduced payouts.

France currently has 42 different pension schemes across its private and public sectors, with variations in retirement age and benefits. President Emmanuel Macron says his plans for a universal points-based system would be fairer, but many disagree.

Rail workers voted to extend their strike through Friday, while unions at the Parisian bus and metro operator said their walkout would continue until at least Monday.

Numerous rush-hour trains into Paris were cancelled on Friday and 10 out of 16 metro lines were closed, while others ran limited services, Reuters news agency reports.

Traffic jams of more than 350km (217 miles) were reported on major roads in and around the capital.

A number of flights have also been disrupted, while many schools are expected to remain shuttered and hospitals understaffed.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Protesters sang songs against President Macron

Mr Macron’s government has reportedly made plans to deal with the strike action at the weekend.

Some trade union leaders have vowed to strike until Mr Macron abandons his campaign promise to overhaul the retirement system.

“We’re going to protest for a week at least, and at the end of that week it’s the government that’s going to back down,” 50-year-old Paris transport employee Patrick Dos Santos told Reuters.

What happened on Thursday?

French police gave the figure of 800,000 people taking to the streets across the country, including 65,000 in Paris.

Union leaders put the numbers higher, with the CGT union saying 1.5m people turned out across France.

The disruption meant popular tourist sites in Paris, including the Eiffel Tower, were closed for the day and usually busy transport hubs like the Gare du Nord were unusually quiet.

Media captionSome of the Thursday’s protests turned violent

In the capital there were reports of vandalism in places and police used tear gas to disperse protesters. In total, 71 arrests were made across the city, police said.

Clashes were also reported in a number of other cities including Nantes, Bordeaux and Rennes.

What is the impact on transport?

Rail operator SNCF says 90% of regional trains were cancelled by the disruption on Thursday.

Hundreds of flights were also cancelled, with airlines warning of further disruption to come.

Image copyright
Reuters

Eurostar has said it will operate a reduced timetable until 10 December, with 29 services planned for Friday already cancelled.

Who is striking and why?

Teachers, transport workers, police, lawyers, hospital and airport staff were among those who took part in Thursday’s general walkout.

Many other workers reportedly pre-empted the disruption by taking Thursday and Friday off, but it is unclear how long the “unlimited strike” action could last.

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

Large crowds were seen across the capital

The Macron administration will hope to avoid a repeat of the country’s general strike over pension reforms in 1995, which crippled the transport system for three weeks and drew massive popular support, forcing a government climbdown.

Mr Macron’s unified system would reward employees for each day worked, awarding points that would later be transferred into future pension benefits.

The official retirement age has been raised in the last decade from 60 to 62, but remains one of the lowest among the OECD group of rich nations – in the UK, for example, the retirement age for state pensions is 66 and is due to rise to at least 67.

The move would remove the most advantageous pensions for a number of jobs and unions fear the new system will mean some will have to work longer for a lower pension.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50682071

ST. CLOUD, Minn. – A Minnesota National Guard UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter carrying three crew members crashed south of St. Cloud after it lost contact with the base Thursday afternoon, killing everyone on board.

According to emergency scanner traffic, the helicopter was found by a Minnesota State Patrol trooper . The status and identities of the crew members is unknown.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz confirmed Thursday night that all three crew members had died.

Stearns County Chief Deputy Dan Miller addressed local media and confirmed the helicopter crashed at approximately 2:15 p.m., Central. 

According to emergency scanner traffic, the helicopter took off from St. Cloud at about 1:55 p.m. and called mayday about nine minutes after takeoff. St. Cloud Mayor Dave Kleis said the helicopter took off from the St. Cloud Regional Airport.

“We do not have contact with the helicopter but we do not quite yet know what the situation is,” Minnesota National Guard Master Sgt. Blair Heusdens said after the base lost contact with the aircraft. “We’re working to figure it out.” 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/12/05/black-hawk-helicopter-crashes-minnesota-killing-three/2624653001/

CORAL GABLES, FLA. (WSVN) – Four people, including a UPS driver, have died after a police chase ended with gunfire in Miramar after officers pursued alleged armed robbery subjects from Coral Gables, according to the FBI.

Coral Gables Police responded to a shooting outside of a jewelry store along the 300 block of Miracle Mile at around 4:15 p.m., Thursday.

7SkyForce HD flew over the scene were police tape was wrapped around Regent Jewelers and markers were placed along the alleyway behind the store, Thursday afternoon.

According to police, two subjects allegedly robbed Regent Jewelers in the area of Le Jeune Road.

Coral Gables Police Chief Ed Hudak said the subjects fled north in a U-Haul to the area of 1261 Mariana Ave. where they abandoned the vehicle and abducted a UPS truck and its driver. The driver was making a delivery at the time of the carjacking, police said.

Shortly after the call went out, police found the alleged armed robbery subjects driving along the northbound lanes of the Florida Turnpike in a UPS delivery truck and gave chase.

The high-speed chase ended on Miramar Parkway just east of Flamingo Road in Miramar.

7Skyforce HD flew over the scene where the alleged subjects could be seen exchanging gunfire with officers.

FBI Special Agent in Charge George Piro said in a news conference that the two subjects and two innocent civilians have died.

UPS has released a statement upon learning of the death of one of their employees.

“We are deeply saddened to learn a UPS service provider was a victim of this senseless act of violence. We extend our condolences to the family and friends of our employee and the other innocent victims involved in this incident. We appreciate law enforcement’s service and will cooperate with the authorities as they continue the investigation.”

Two other people suffered minor injuries from a motor vehicle crash, were not shot and refused transport, according to fire rescue.

Hudak held a press conference outside of the jewelry store after the chase ended. He said the subjects exchanged gunfire with the store’s owner.

According to Hudak, a female employee in the store was injured during the robbery. She was transported to a local hospital with injuries that are not considered to be life-threatening. Police said they cannot confirm if the woman was shot.

Hudak said at least one bullet hit Coral Gables City Hall, which is located across the street from the jewelry store. The building was placed on lockdown, and no injuries were reported at city hall.

Miami-Dade Police, the FBI, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Miramar Police, Pembroke Pines Police and Coral Gables Police are investigating the case.

Police are asking drivers to avoid the area due to a large police presence on the scene.

Miramar Police said no law enforcement officers were injured.

The FBI has since taken the lead on the investigation.

Please check back on WSVN.com and 7News for more details on this developing story.

Copyright 2019 Sunbeam Television Corp. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source Article from https://wsvn.com/news/local/fbi-4-dead-including-ups-driver-after-police-chase-ends-in-gunfire-after-coral-gables-armed-robbery/

‘):””},e.getDefinedParams=function(t,e){return e.filter(function(e){return t[e]}).reduce(function(e,n){return i(e,function(t,e,n){return e in t?Object.defineProperty(t,e,{value:n,enumerable:!0,configurable:!0,writable:!0}):t[e]=n,t}({},n,t[n]))},{})},e.isValidMediaTypes=function(t){var e=[“banner”,”native”,”video”];return!!Object.keys(t).every(function(t){return Q()(e,t)})&&(!t.video||!t.video.context||Q()([“instream”,”outstream”,”adpod”],t.video.context))},e.getBidderRequest=function(t,e,n){return Y()(t,function(t){return 0n[t]?-1:0}};var G=n(3),K=n(118),$=n.n(K),J=n(12),Y=n.n(J),Z=n(11),Q=n.n(Z),X=n(9),tt=n(119);n.d(e,”deepAccess”,function(){return tt.a});var et=n(120);n.d(e,”deepSetValue”,function(){return et.a});var nt,rt=n(4),it=”Array”,ot=”String”,at=”Function”,st=”Number”,ut=”Object”,ct=”Boolean”,dt=Object.prototype.toString,ft=Boolean(window.console),lt=Boolean(ft&&window.console.log),pt=Boolean(ft&&window.console.info),ht=Boolean(ft&&window.console.warn),gt=Boolean(ft&&window.console.error),vt={checkCookieSupport:F,createTrackPixelIframeHtml:P,getWindowSelf:h,getWindowTop:p,getAncestorOrigins:l,getTopFrameReferrer:f,getWindowLocation:g,getTopWindowLocation:d,insertUserSyncIframe:B,insertElement:D,isFn:w,triggerPixel:R,logError:y,logWarn:m,logMessage:v,logInfo:b},bt={},mt=function(t,e){return e}.bind(null,1,bt)()===bt?Function.prototype.bind:function(t){var e=this,n=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,1);return function(){return e.apply(t,n.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)))}},yt=(nt=0,function(){return++nt}),_t=function(){if(Array.prototype.indexOf)return Array.prototype.indexOf}(),Et=L(“timeToRespond”,function(t,e){return e=t.length?(this._t=void 0,i(1)):i(0,”keys”==e?n:”values”==e?t[n]:[n,t[n]])},”values”),o.Arguments=o.Array,r(“keys”),r(“values”),r(“entries”)},104:function(t,e,n){“use strict”;var r=n(105),i=n(77);t.exports=n(107)(“Set”,function(t){return function(e){return t(this,0>>0,o=0;if(e)n=e;else{for(;o=m.syncsPerBidder?u.logWarn(‘Number of user syncs exceeded for “‘.concat(e,'”‘)):p.canBidderRegisterSync(t,e)?(h[t].push([e,n]),void(v=function(t,e){return t[e]?t[e]+=1:t[e]=1,t}(v,e))):u.logWarn(‘Bidder “‘.concat(e,'” not permitted to register their “‘).concat(t,'” userSync pixels.’)):u.logWarn(“Bidder is required for registering sync”):u.logWarn(‘User sync type “‘.concat(t,'” not supported’))},p.syncUsers=function(){var t=0Object(y.timestamp)()},R=function(t){return t&&(t.status&&!x()([O.BID_STATUS.BID_TARGETING_SET,O.BID_STATUS.RENDERED],t.status)||!t.status)},B=(v=S.a,m={},(b={}).setLatestAuctionForAdUnit=function(t,e){m[t]=e},b.resetPresetTargeting=function(t){if(Object(y.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var e=c(t),n=v.getAdUnits().filter(function(t){return x()(e,t.code)});window.googletag.pubads().getSlots().forEach(function(t){j.forEach(function(e){n.forEach(function(n){n.code!==t.getAdUnitPath()&&n.code!==t.getSlotElementId()||t.setTargeting(e,null)})})})}},b.resetPresetTargetingAST=function(t){c(t).forEach(function(t){var e=window.apntag.getTag(t);if(e&&e.keywords){var n=Object.keys(e.keywords),r={};n.forEach(function(t){x()(j,t.toLowerCase())||(r[t]=e.keywords[t])}),window.apntag.modifyTag(t,{keywords:r})}})},b.getAllTargeting=function(t){var e=1t.getTimeout()+v.b.getConfig(“timeoutBuffer”)&&t.executeCallback(!0)}function a(t,e){var n=t.getBidRequests(),r=_()(n,function(t){return t.bidderCode===e.bidderCode});!function(t,e){var n;if(t.bidderCode&&(0n&&(e=!1)),!e}),e&&t.run(),e}function c(t,e){void 0===t[e]?t[e]=1:t[e]++}var f=this;p=I,u=Date.now();var b=T.makeBidRequests(L,u,G,$,q);w.logInfo(“Bids Requested for Auction with id: “.concat(G),b),b.forEach(function(t){!function(t){F=F.concat(t)}(t)});var m={};if(b.lengthe.max?t:e},{max:0}),a=s()(e.buckets,function(e){if(t>i.max*n){var o=e.precision;void 0===o&&(o=c),r=(e.max*n).toFixed(o)}else if(t=e.min*n)return e});return a&&(r=function(t,e,n){var r=void 0!==e.precision?e.precision:c,i=e.increment*n,o=e.min*n,a=Math.pow(10,r+2),s=(t*a-o*a)/(i*a),u=Math.floor(s)*i+o;return(u=Number(u.toFixed(10))).toFixed(r)}(t,a,n)),r}function o(t){if(u.isEmpty(t)||!t.buckets||!Array.isArray(t.buckets))return!1;var e=!0;return t.buckets.forEach(function(t){void 0!==t.min&&t.max&&t.increment||(e=!1)}),e}n.d(e,”a”,function(){return r}),n.d(e,”b”,function(){return o});var a=n(12),s=n.n(a),u=n(0),c=2,d={buckets:[{min:0,max:5,increment:.5}]},f={buckets:[{min:0,max:20,increment:.1}]},l={buckets:[{min:0,max:20,increment:.01}]},p={buckets:[{min:0,max:3,increment:.01},{min:3,max:8,increment:.05},{min:8,max:20,increment:.5}]},h={buckets:[{min:0,max:5,increment:.05},{min:5,max:10,increment:.1},{min:10,max:20,increment:.5}]}},45:function(t,e){t.exports=function(t,e){return{enumerable:!(1&t),configurable:!(2&t),writable:!(4&t),value:e}}},46:function(t,e,n){var r=n(26),i=n(61),o=n(47),a=n(39),s=n(88);t.exports=function(t,e){var n=1==t,u=2==t,c=3==t,d=4==t,f=6==t,l=5==t||f,p=e||s;return function(e,s,h){for(var g,v,b=o(e),m=i(b),y=r(s,h,3),_=a(m.length),E=0,S=n?p(e,_):u?p(e,0):void 0;E=e.length?{value:void 0,done:!0}:(t=r(e,n),this._i+=t.length,{value:t,done:!1})})},67:function(t,e,n){function r(){}var i=n(28),o=n(97),a=n(68),s=n(52)(“IE_PROTO”),u=”prototype”,c=function(){var t,e=n(60)(“iframe”),r=a.length;for(e.style.display=”none”,n(100).appendChild(e),e.src=”javascript:”,(t=e.contentWindow.document).open(),t.write(“

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/12/michael-bloomberg-2020-campaign-political-donations-history-winning.html

Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden said Thursday he believed that new tax policies were needed to “right the market” during a historic period of economic inequality.

“There are certain things that you have to right the market a little bit. And the market is that if you have all of the tax breaks, essentially all the tax breaks, all of the benefits flowing to the top one tenth of one percent, there’s never been as great a concentration of wealth, including going back to the Great Depression, ever,” Biden said.

The comments came during an interview with CNBC’s John Harwood in Iowa, where the former vice president has embarked on an eight-day bus tour.

He also appeared to support a new financial transactions tax, which has been embraced by rival candidates Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., but which Biden did not include in his economic plan released this week.

Asked why he had rejected the plan, which aides were reportedly considering, Biden suggested it would not raise much revenue, but embraced it otherwise.

“No, I still think we should do that. That doesn’t raise the kind of money — I think we should have a financial transactions tax,” Biden said.

Biden has managed to hold onto his strong polling lead in the Democratic presidential primary, though he has recently fallen to fourth in polling averages in Iowa, which hosts the party’s first nominating contest.

On Wednesday, Biden released the details of a new economic plan that his campaign says will raise $3.2 trillion over the next 10 years.

The plan calls for an increase of the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21% and a minimum tax of 15% on the nation’s most profitable companies, directed at corporate giants like Amazon that have reaped vast sums while paying little or nothing to the government.

Biden has said that the funds will go to paying for his policy proposals related to education, climate and health care.

The interview came shortly after Biden engaged in a testy exchange at a campaign event with a voter who accused Biden, without evidence, of securing his son a job on the board of a Ukrainian energy company while Biden was vice president.

Biden called the man a “damn liar” and “fat,” though a spokesperson later said in a post on Twitter that Biden was not referring to the man’s appearance.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/05/biden-says-to-right-the-market-us-has-to-address-tax-inequality.html