MONTREAL/SYDNEY/WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Airlines are scrambling to book time in 737 MAX training facilities as far afield as Fiji, Iceland and Panama, operators said, after Boeing Co recommended pilots be trained in one of the few simulators replicating the latest model.

That means thousands of pilots from more than 54 airlines need to squeeze into about three dozen 737 MAX simulators around the world before they can fly the plane.

“Boeing is recommending that all 737 MAX pilots undergo training in a 737 MAX simulator prior to flying the aircraft in commercial service,” the company told Reuters on Tuesday evening, the first confirmation of its new policy.

On Jan. 7, the company had recommended using a simulator but did not specify what type.

The 737 MAX has been grounded since March 2019 after two fatal crashes and cannot return to service until regulators approve software changes and training plans.

The estimated 34 737 MAX simulators in service, produced separately by CAE Inc and Textron Inc’s simulator and training division TRU, are less than a quarter of the number of older 737 NG simulators certified by U.S. and European regulators.

“I think that what a shortage of simulators will mean is the fleet of MAXes will start flying more slowly than what the airlines would like,” said Gudmundur Orn Gunnarsson, managing director of TRU Flight Training Iceland, a joint venture between Icelandair and Textron’s simulator and training division.

“In the beginning it was said that simulator training would not be needed,” he said. “This changes it totally.”

SIMULATORS SCARCE

Gunnarsson said TRU Flight Training Iceland had more inquiries than usual from potential airline customers about the use of its 737 MAX simulator since Boeing’s Jan. 7 announcement.

Boeing said on Tuesday it did not expect to win approval for returning the 737 MAX to service until mid-year, longer than previous estimates, in part because regulators are working on new pilot training requirements.

Many airlines did not order 737 MAX simulators, assuming they could rely on the older 737 NG simulators because the types were so similar.

Simulators can cost C$10 million ($7.64 million) to C$20 million each, with the 737 MAX at the upper end, CAE said. Hourly rates for simulator training can cost $500 to $1,000, it said.

High demand for 737 MAX simulators has led the Montreal-company and its rival TRU to produce simulators for customers they have yet to line up.

“Customers are making increasing inquiries from all over the globe,” a TRU spokeswoman said.

South Korean low-cost carrier Eastar Jet, which does not have a 737 MAX simulator, said it had already contacted Boeing, other airlines and training centers.

“With limited MAX simulators available, we expect carriers will likely face challenges to book slots for MAX simulators,” said an Eastar official, who was not authorized to publicly discuss the matter and spoke on condition of anonymity.

SELLING TIME

Fiji Airways spent more than $10 million to buy a 737 MAX simulator to help save on the costs and lost productivity of sending pilots to Singapore, Australia and the United States for training, said its chief operating officer, Paul Doherty.

The carrier uses its simulator 35% to 42% of the available hours to train its 70 737 pilots and had plans to sell the additional time. Now it is getting calls from airlines thousands of miles away.

“We have got interest … particularly from Asia,” Doherty said. “We are expecting some from the U.S. Our focus is to really develop our own pilots and to provide the best for Fiji Airways, but we are also very happy to help other airlines that need some time. That could be a real choke point, I think, for a lot of airlines.”

Panamanian carrier Copa Holdings SA, the only Latin American airline with a 737 MAX simulator, said it was seeing a lot of demand, although it was not authorized to disclose the interested carriers. Copa said it its top priority was to train its own 245 pilots.

U.S. airlines have more simulators than many of their counterparts abroad, but they also have more 737 pilots to train, which could be done in stages.

Slideshow (5 Images)

Before Boeing’s recommendations for simulator training, Southwest Airlines Co, the world’s largest 737 operator, had estimated it would take about 30 days to train all of its roughly 10,000 737 pilots on the MAX.

On Tuesday, the Dallas-based carrier said it would be premature to make cost and timing estimates before regulators approved a training package.

The airline said it has three simulators in various stages of FAA certification and expects to receive an additional three in late 2020.

Reporting by Allison Lampert in Montreal, Jamie Freed in Sydney and David Shepardson in Washington; additional reporting by Tracy Rucinski in Chicago, Heekyong Yang in Seoul and Marcelo Rochabrun in Sao Paulo. Editing by Gerry Doyle

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-737max-training/airlines-scour-the-world-for-scarce-737-max-simulators-idUSKBN1ZL0EH

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/21/world/lebanon-prime-minister-govt-intl/index.html

PHOENIX (3TV/CBS 5) – It’s an unimaginable act: a mother killing her children. But Phoenix police say 22-year-old Rachel Henry admitted to harming her three kids Monday and was booked into Fourth Avenue Jail on suspicion of first-degree murder.

[WATCH: Psychologist weighs in on Phoenix mother who admitted to killing her 3 kids]

“It’s mind-blowing, it’s shocking. It’s one of those things where you start asking yourself, why didn’t she reach out for help?” said psychologist Dr. John Delatorre.

[RELATED: Police ID mom who admitted killing her three children under age 4 at Phoenix home]

And while it’s horrified the state, Delatorre says the kind of crime Henry is accused of is more common than many might think.

“The most recent statistics that I’ve been able to find has this occurring about 3% of all homicides are filicides, which is the parents murdering their child,” Delatorre said.

Delatorre says parents often kill their children because they feel they have no other option. Tuesday, Delatorre offered up different areas investigators might look into.

[WATCH: Mom booked on suspicion of first-degree murder]

“Could it be mental illness? Absolutely it could be mental illness. Could it be that the person saw no way out? That here they have to take care of so many children and they don’t have enough resources to care for them.”

And in this case, Phoenix police say investigators will be looking into whether postpartum depression might have been a factor. The 22-year-old mother had three children, all under four-years-old.

[PHOTOS: See the Phoenix house where mom admitted to killing 3 children]

“Having an increase of hormones when she’s pregnant, then a depletion after birth, and then so quickly another one, and then so quickly another one for someone who’s so young could play such a havoc on the person’s emotional experience because of the depletion of hormones,” Delatorre said.

Delatorre added it would also be useful to know why Henry recently moved to Arizona from Oklahoma, and what her family life was like. He says with so little information, it’s tough to tell why this happened.

“Why did it go this far? I think that’s my initial reaction just as a human being,” Delatorre said.



Source Article from https://www.azfamily.com/news/phoenix-psychologist-breaks-down-why-parents-kill-their-children/article_e988e7e6-3caf-11ea-9143-874cd5d96a1c.html

The National Weather Service warned Florida residents to be alert for falling iguanas as temperatures plunge in the South.

“This isn’t something we usually forecast, but don’t be surprised if you see Iguanas falling from the trees tonight as lows drop into the 30s and 40s. Brrrr!” the National Weather Service in Miami said Tuesday.

Iguanas, which are an invasive species in South Florida, sometimes sleep in trees, and when temperatures drop into the 40s, their bodies go dormant, which can result in the falling reptiles. The iguanas can grow up to five feet in length and pose a hazard to those walking under trees in the cool weather.

The weather doesn’t immediately kill the iguanas, but if the temperature stays in the 40s for more than eight hours, they will start to die. Ron Magill with Zoo Miami told CNN that the size of iguanas is a factor if it begins to get too cold.

“The temperature threshold for when iguanas begin to go into a dormant state depends greatly on the size of the iguana,” Magill said. “Generally speaking, the larger the iguana, the more cold it can tolerate for longer periods.”

Magill said that some iguanas in Florida have adapted to the cold by going into deep burrows to stay warm. For some residents, the iguana slowdown is a welcome opportunity to purge their yards of the growing population of reptiles.

“I do know that there are several iguana hunters that are looking forward to this upcoming cold front as it will certainly facilitate them removing these invasive reptiles from the South Florida environment, as they will not be able to run away,” Magill said.

The current forecast for Miami has temperatures dropping to a low of 43 degrees. A windchill advisory was issued for the area until 9 a.m. on Wednesday.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/national-weather-service-warns-floridians-about-falling-iguanas

‘):””},t.getDefinedParams=function(e,t){return t.filter(function(t){return e[t]}).reduce(function(t,n){return i(t,function(e,t,n){return t in e?Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:n,enumerable:!0,configurable:!0,writable:!0}):e[t]=n,e}({},n,e[n]))},{})},t.isValidMediaTypes=function(e){var t=[“banner”,”native”,”video”];return!!Object.keys(e).every(function(e){return J()(t,e)})&&(!e.video||!e.video.context||J()([“instream”,”outstream”,”adpod”],e.video.context))},t.getBidderRequest=function(e,t,n){return H()(e,function(e){return 0n[e]?-1:0}};var L=n(3),F=n(115),G=n.n(F),V=n(12),H=n.n(V),K=n(10),J=n.n(K),$=n(116);n.d(t,”deepAccess”,function(){return $.a});var Y=n(117);n.d(t,”deepSetValue”,function(){return Y.a});var Z,X=n(5),Q=”Array”,ee=”String”,te=”Function”,ne=”Number”,re=”Object”,ie=”Boolean”,oe=Object.prototype.toString,ae=Boolean(window.console),ue=Boolean(ae&&window.console.log),ce=Boolean(ae&&window.console.info),se=Boolean(ae&&window.console.warn),de=Boolean(ae&&window.console.error),fe={checkCookieSupport:M,createTrackPixelIframeHtml:k,getWindowSelf:f,getWindowTop:d,getWindowLocation:l,insertUserSyncIframe:O,insertElement:T,isFn:_,triggerPixel:C,logError:v,logWarn:h,logMessage:p,logInfo:g},le={},pe=function(e,t){return t}.bind(null,1,le)()===le?Function.prototype.bind:function(e){var t=this,n=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,1);return function(){return t.apply(e,n.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)))}},ge=(Z=0,function(){return++Z}),he=function(){if(Array.prototype.indexOf)return Array.prototype.indexOf}(),ve=N(“timeToRespond”,function(e,t){return t=e.length?(this._t=void 0,i(1)):i(0,”keys”==t?n:”values”==t?e[n]:[n,e[n]])},”values”),o.Arguments=o.Array,r(“keys”),r(“values”),r(“entries”)},101:function(e,t,n){“use strict”;var r=n(102),i=n(72);e.exports=n(104)(“Set”,function(e){return function(t){return e(this,0>>0,o=0;if(t)n=t;else{for(;o=y.syncsPerBidder?s.logWarn(‘Number of user syncs exceeded for “‘.concat(t,'”‘)):g.canBidderRegisterSync(e,t)?(h[e].push([t,n]),(r=b)[i=t]?r[i]+=1:r[i]=1,void(b=r)):s.logWarn(‘Bidder “‘.concat(t,'” not permitted to register their “‘).concat(e,'” userSync pixels.’)):s.logWarn(“Bidder is required for registering sync”):s.logWarn(‘User sync type “‘.concat(e,'” not supported’));var r,i},g.syncUsers=function(){var e=0Object(y.timestamp)()},R=function(e){return e&&(e.status&&!I()([T.BID_STATUS.RENDERED],e.status)||!e.status)},D=(v=A.a,m={},(b={}).setLatestAuctionForAdUnit=function(e,t){m[e]=t},b.resetPresetTargeting=function(e){if(Object(y.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var t=s(e),n=v.getAdUnits().filter(function(e){return I()(t,e.code)});window.googletag.pubads().getSlots().forEach(function(e){C.forEach(function(t){n.forEach(function(n){n.code!==e.getAdUnitPath()&&n.code!==e.getSlotElementId()||e.setTargeting(t,null)})})})}},b.resetPresetTargetingAST=function(e){s(e).forEach(function(e){var t=window.apntag.getTag(e);if(t&&t.keywords){var n=Object.keys(t.keywords),r={};n.forEach(function(e){I()(C,e.toLowerCase())||(r[e]=t.keywords[e])}),window.apntag.modifyTag(e,{keywords:r})}})},b.getAllTargeting=function(e){var t,n,p,v,m,A,w,x,E,j=1e.getTimeout()+b.b.getConfig(“timeoutBuffer”)&&e.executeCallback(!0)}function a(e,t){var n=e.getBidRequests(),r=S()(n,function(e){return e.bidderCode===t.bidderCode});!function(e,t){var n;if(e.bidderCode&&(0n&&(t=!1)),!t}),t&&e.run(),t}function d(e,t){void 0===e[t]?e[t]=1:e[t]++}var l=this;g=C,s=Date.now();var m=I.makeBidRequests(W,s,K,$,L);E.logInfo(“Bids Requested for Auction with id: “.concat(K),m),m.forEach(function(e){var t;t=e,G=G.concat(t)});var y={};if(m.lengtht.max?e:t},{max:0}),b=0,m=u()(t.buckets,function(t){if(e>v.max*n){var i=t.precision;void 0===i&&(i=s),r=(t.max*n).toFixed(i)}else{if(e=t.length?{value:void 0,done:!0}:(e=r(t,n),this._i+=e.length,{value:e,done:!1})})},62:function(e,t,n){function r(){}var i=n(28),o=n(94),a=n(63),u=n(50)(“IE_PROTO”),c=”prototype”,s=function(){var e,t=n(55)(“iframe”),r=a.length;for(t.style.display=”none”,n(97).appendChild(t),t.src=”javascript:”,(e=t.contentWindow.document).open(),e.write(“

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/richmond-to-impeachment-senate-minority-rule-rules.html

Some of the grounded Boeing 737 MAX airplanes are seen parked in Moses Lake, Wash., in October 2019.

David Ryder/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

David Ryder/Getty Images

Some of the grounded Boeing 737 MAX airplanes are seen parked in Moses Lake, Wash., in October 2019.

David Ryder/Getty Images

Boeing’s troubled 737 Max airplane will now remain grounded from passenger service until at least June or July, which is months later than the company had previously suggested.

And that means airlines will likely cancel Max flights through the busy summer travel season.

The three U.S. airlines that fly the 737 Max, American, Southwest, and United, had already removed the planes from their flight schedules into early June.

In a statement, Boeing confirms that it has told its customer airlines and its manufacturing suppliers that “we are currently estimating that the ungrounding of the 737 MAX will begin during mid-2020.” Industry sources tell NPR that means June or July at the earliest and ultimately, the FAA and other aviation regulators around the world will determine when the 737 Max is safe to fly passengers again, which could be months later.

The 737 Max has been grounded by regulators since last March, after the second of two crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia killed 346 people. Investigators primarily blame a faulty automated flight control system on the Max for the crashes. The company has been working on software fixes for that and other problems ever since.

Until recently, Boeing had often suggested the fixes were almost ready to be submitted to regulators and approval was imminent. But in December, FAA Administrator Stephen Dickson pushed back against Boeing’s then-CEO Dennis Muilenburg for suggesting repeatedly that the Max would be recertified before the end of the year, saying the regulatory agency would not be pressured into granting quick approval.

Dickson summoned Muilenburg to Washington for a hastily called meeting, in which the FAA chief told the company’s chief executive that “Boeing continues to pursue a return-to-service schedule that is not realistic.” In a statement, the FAA said Dickson was also concerned with “the perception that some of Boeing’s public statements have been designed to force FAA into taking quicker action.”

During the meeting, Dickson “made clear that FAA’s certification requirements must be 100% complete before return to service.” And “he reminded Mr. Muilenburg that FAA controls the review process” and will take all the time it needs to get the 737 Max review right.

Shortly after the FAA’s rebuke, Muilenburg was forced out and replaced by Boeing board member and former General Electric executive David Calhoun as CEO.

In a statement today, the FAA says “the agency is following a thorough, deliberate process to verify that all proposed modifications to the Boeing 737 MAX meet the highest certification standards. We continue to work with other safety regulators to review Boeing’s work as the company conducts the required safety assessments and addresses all issues that arise during testing. We have set no timeframe for when the work will be completed.”

Boeing’s efforts to fix the MCAS flight control system on the MAX have been plagued by setback after setback.

In pushing back the anticipated date of the plane’s return to service, new CEO Calhoun appears to be trying to set a new tone. The new estimate “is informed by our experience to date with the certification process,” Boeing says in its statement.

The new estimate of when the plane may finally be approved to return to service “is informed by our experience to date with the certification process,” Boeing says in its statement. “It is subject to our ongoing attempts to address known schedule risks and further developments that may arise in connection with the certification process. It also accounts for the rigorous scrutiny that regulatory authorities are rightly applying at every step of their review of the 737 MAX’s flight control system,” including pilot training requirements.

“Returning the MAX safely to service is our number one priority, and we are confident that will happen,” Boeing’s statement continues. “We acknowledge and regret the continued difficulties that the grounding of the 737 MAX has presented to our customers, our regulators, our suppliers, and the flying public.”

The 737 Max crashes and subsequent crisis at the airplane manufacturer has been taken a toll on morale among Boeing employees and retirees in the Seattle area, where most of the company’s planes are built.

CEO Calhoun is in Seattle this week, meeting with Boeing employees and for the first time, he plans to take questions from reporters in a conference call Wednesday.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/21/798312515/boeing-737-max-may-stay-grounded-into-summer

Drinking fountains are marked “Do Not Drink Until Further Notice” at Flint Northwestern High School in Flint, Mich., in May 2016. After 18 months of insisting that water drawn from the Flint River was safe to drink, officials admitted it was not.

Carolyn Kaster/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Carolyn Kaster/AP

Drinking fountains are marked “Do Not Drink Until Further Notice” at Flint Northwestern High School in Flint, Mich., in May 2016. After 18 months of insisting that water drawn from the Flint River was safe to drink, officials admitted it was not.

Carolyn Kaster/AP

The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for water crisis victims to sue state and local government officials in Flint, Mich.

For years, Flint city officials and state regulators have argued that they are protected by “qualified immunity” from being sued for their role in the water contamination crisis. But lower courts have ruled to the contrary.

In refusing to take up a pair of cases involving the lead-tainted water, the Supreme Court has upheld those lower court rulings.

Attorney Michael Pitt, co-lead counsel on the class action lawsuit, which includes thousands of Flint residents suing for damages from the 2014 incident, welcomed the decision as a major victory.

He said, “It’s time for the people of Flint to start feeling like they are going to get their day in court,” Michigan Radio reporter Steve Carmody reported. “This just moves the entire process closer to that day.”

Pitt added that his clients have thus far “been denied justice.”

The initial lawsuit turned away by the high court was filed in 2016. It argues that officials, including then-Gov. Rick Snyder, acted indifferently to the risk of bodily harm that residents faced when they were exposed to high levels of lead and other contaminants after the city’s drinking water source was switched to draw from the Flint River in 2014. The move was made without properly treating pipes for corrosion, letting lead and bacteria into the water supply.

In an April 2019 ruling, U.S. District Judge Judith Levy ruled that Snyder “was indifferent because instead of mitigating the risk of harm caused by the contaminated water, he covered it up. In private, he worried about the need to return Flint to [Detroit’s water system] and the political implications of the crisis. But in public, he denied all knowledge, despite being aware of the developing crisis. As a result, plaintiffs were lured into a false sense of security.”

More than a year later, the city switched to using water from Lake Huron. But that came too late to prevent a dozen fatalities.

During the period that Flint’s tap water came from the Flint River, a Legionnaires disease outbreak occurred, killing at least 12 people. Dozens of others were hospitalized.

Although government officials initially claimed the water was safe to drink, 18 months later they admitted it was not.

It wasn’t until late 2016 that the city’s water supply finally met federal safety standards, though some residents remain skeptical of those findings.

Defense attorney Pitt says it could be another year before an actual trial begins.

The events in Flint have triggered scores of Midwest cities to remove aging lead water pipes.

As Tom Neltner at the Environmental Defense Fund told WBEZ’s Monica Eng, “Our country has an estimated 6 million lead service lines. … And it’s like drinking water through a lead straw. So where people have them, it’s one of the most significant sources of lead in drinking water.”

About 180 cities and towns across the country are taking action to remove harmful pipes.

In Flint, crews have been working to replace old lead and galvanized service lines with copper pipes.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/21/798331185/supreme-court-allows-flint-water-lawsuits-to-move-forward-officials-not-immune

The 2020 census officially starts in Toksook Bay, an Alaskan fishing village along the Bering Sea.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

Near the iced-over Bering Sea, parka-clad workers for the U.S. Census Bureau are gathering in a remote fishing village along the southwestern rim of Alaska to resume a U.S. tradition seen only once a decade — a count of every person living in the country.

After years of largely under-the-radar planning by the federal government and months of turmoil arising from the Trump administration’s failed push to add a citizenship question, the 2020 census officially begins Tuesday in Toksook Bay, Alaska — population 590, according to the 2010 head count.

The bureau’s director, Steven Dillingham, is expected to arrive by plane to attend a ceremony at the gymnasium of Nelson Island School, where community members are marking the day with traditional Yup’ik dancing and drumming.

A RavnAir pilot guides a flight to Toksook Bay, Alaska, which can be seen out the window.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

A RavnAir pilot guides a flight to Toksook Bay, Alaska, which can be seen out the window.

Claire Harbage/NPR

Census workers and their production crew arrive in Toksook Bay. The Census Bureau’s workers rely on bush planes, snow machines, or snowmobiles, and dog sleds to get to Alaskan villages to ask people their name, sex, age, race and other demographic information.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

Census workers and their production crew arrive in Toksook Bay. The Census Bureau’s workers rely on bush planes, snow machines, or snowmobiles, and dog sleds to get to Alaskan villages to ask people their name, sex, age, race and other demographic information.

Claire Harbage/NPR

For most households in the country — including those in the Lower 48, Hawaii and the U.S. territories, as well as Alaska’s major cities — the count is not set to roll out until March.

But since Alaska became a state in 1959, the Census Bureau has started tallying Alaska’s most remote residents in January, when the frozen ground makes it easier for the federal government’s door knockers to reach far-flung communities. To get around the country’s largest state by land area, the bureau’s workers rely on bush planes, snow machines, or snowmobiles, and dog sleds to get to villages to ask people their name, sex, age, race and other demographic information.

Since the 2000 census, the bureau has selected one village to be the site of the first counting, beginning with Unalakleet along the state’s central coast and then Noorvik in northern Alaska. This year, census workers are starting in the state’s southwest corner, in Toksook Bay, home to members of the Nunakauyarmiut Tribe. It was first thrust into the national spotlight after the Census Bureau announced it had selected the village in 2018.

Alexie Jimmie, 76, says his family was one of the first to settle in Toksook Bay in 1964.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

Alexie Jimmie, 76, says his family was one of the first to settle in Toksook Bay in 1964.

Claire Harbage/NPR

“We’re all excited about it,” says Alexie Jimmie, 76, whose family was one of the first to settle in the village in 1964, when it was just a fishing camp. “I hope that people counting for the census will go to every house, every home so that everybody can be counted. That’s very important.”

The future of Toksook Bay, along with every other community in the U.S., will be shaped by the results of the census, which the federal government is expected to start releasing by the end of this year. The numbers are used to distribute congressional seats and Electoral College votes among the states, as well as an estimated $1.5 trillion a year in federal funding for public services.

Joanna Woods, 12, (left) and her cousin Mick Chakuchin, 10, go ice fishing in Toksook Bay.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

Joanna Woods, 12, (left) and her cousin Mick Chakuchin, 10, go ice fishing in Toksook Bay.

Claire Harbage/NPR

Washington, D.C., politics, however, have often diverted the public’s attention away from the constitutionally mandated count. As the census officially launches in Alaska, lawmakers are regrouping Tuesday on Capitol Hill to resume the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump. Last year, days before printers were scheduled to start producing census mailers, Trump announced he was looking into delaying the count for the first time in U.S. history after the Supreme Court ruled to keep the citizenship question he wanted off census forms.

Last week, the bureau confirmed that more than 120 million paper census questionnaires have been printed for the count.

Lizzie Chimiugak Nenguryarr’s family gathers to celebrate her 90th birthday at her home in Toksook Bay. She is expected to be the first person counted for the 2020 census.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

Lizzie Chimiugak Nenguryarr’s family gathers to celebrate her 90th birthday at her home in Toksook Bay. She is expected to be the first person counted for the 2020 census.

Claire Harbage/NPR

In Toksook Bay and some other rural parts of the country, however, they won’t be arriving in the mail. Instead, census workers are collecting people’s responses through in-person visits, beginning with the home of Lizzie Chimiugak Nenguryarr, an elder of Toksook Bay. Dillingham, the bureau’s director, is himself expected to interview Nenguryarr for the first enumeration of the 2020 census.

“It’s overwhelming for people to come in and say this is such a big honor,” Nenguryarr says in Yup’ik through interpretation by one of her daughters, Katie Schwartz Nuiyaaq. “This is just one in every day that comes rolling in.”

Fish dry outside a home in Toksook Bay.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

Fish dry outside a home in Toksook Bay.

Claire Harbage/NPR

On Sunday night, people gather and practice singing hymns for George Paul Miisaq’s funeral. Miisaq was living in Anchorage and his body was flown back to Toksook Bay to be buried.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

On Sunday night, people gather and practice singing hymns for George Paul Miisaq’s funeral. Miisaq was living in Anchorage and his body was flown back to Toksook Bay to be buried.

Claire Harbage/NPR

Toksook Bay has seen a flurry of activity these past few days. The day before the count, classes ended early at Nelson Island School to allow mourners to pay their respects to a former resident, George Paul Miisaq, whose body was returned home to be buried in the village cemetery.

A day earlier, Nenguryarr, who is a locally renowned member of an Yup’ik dancing group, held an early celebration for what she considered to be at least her 90th birthday, based on a baptismal record.

“I want everybody to show love and compassion towards all human beings, young and old,” Nenguryarr said.

St. Peter the Fisherman Catholic Church in Toksook Bay is seen after sunset. Census numbers are used to guide the distribution of an estimated $1.5 trillion a year in federal funding for public services.

Claire Harbage/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Claire Harbage/NPR

St. Peter the Fisherman Catholic Church in Toksook Bay is seen after sunset. Census numbers are used to guide the distribution of an estimated $1.5 trillion a year in federal funding for public services.

Claire Harbage/NPR

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/21/796703843/along-the-rim-of-alaska-the-once-a-decade-u-s-census-begins-in-toksook-bay

  • In response to Hillary Clinton’s suggestion that “nobody likes him,” Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday said, “On a good day, my wife likes me.”
  • Clinton criticized Sanders in a documentary set to premiere at the Sundance Film Festival this week, saying: “Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician.”
  • When asked about Clinton’s criticism and why she seemed set on rehashing their battle in the 2016 Democratic primary, Sanders said: “That’s a good question. You should ask her.”
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday did not seem fazed by the latest round of criticism directed at him by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“On a good day, my wife likes me, so let’s clear the air on that one,” Sanders told the NBC reporter Geoff Bennett when asked about Clinton’s assertion that “nobody likes him.”

In a new documentary set to premiere at the Sundance Film Festival this week, Clinton suggested that the Vermont senator is virtually friendless in Washington.

“He was in Congress for years. He had one senator support him,” Clinton said in the four-part documentary, according to The Hollywood Reporter. “Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician. It’s all just baloney, and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it.”

In an interview with the publication, Clinton also did not commit to supporting Sanders if he were to become the Democratic nominee for president. “I’m not going to go there yet,” she said. “We’re still in a very vigorous primary season.”

This is not the first time Clinton has been critical of Sanders, her top challenger for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.

After Clinton became the nominee, Sanders campaigned for the former secretary of state across the US. But supporters of Clinton have blamed Sanders and his supporters, in part, for her ultimate defeat in the general election against Donald Trump. They said that Sanders should’ve dropped out of the race earlier and that his refusal to do so contributed to divisions in the Democratic Party that boosted Trump’s campaign.

Clinton touched on these sentiments in an interview last month with Howard Stern, who asked her if she was “upset” over how long it took Sanders to endorse her in 2016.

“No, disappointed,” Clinton said. “And I hope he doesn’t do it again to whoever gets the nomination.”

“Once is enough. We have to join forces,” Clinton added. “He hurt me. There’s no doubt about it. He hurt me.”

Along the 2020 campaign trail, Sanders has repeatedly said that while he would campaign for the ultimate Democratic presidential nominee, he hopes it’s him.

When asked by Bennett on Tuesday why he thought Clinton was still discussing 2016, Sanders said: “That’s a good question. You should ask her.”

In an earlier statement on Clinton’s remarks, Sanders signaled that his priority is Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

“My focus today is on a monumental moment in American history: the impeachment trial of Donald Trump,” Sanders said. “Together, we are going to go forward and defeat the most dangerous president in American history.”

Recent polling from Morning Consult on voters’ opinions of their state’s senators found that Sanders was the most popular US senator.

Sanders has placed second in several national polls for the 2020 Democratic primary, behind former Vice President Joe Biden. But Sanders has been dominating the field in terms of fundraising and surging in polls in early-voting states in recent weeks.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-nobody-likes-my-wife-likes-me-2020-1

Here’s what you need to know to understand the impeachment trial of President Trump.

What’s happening now: The impeachment trial of President Trump gets underway in earnest as the Senate prepares to take up a resolution proposed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) that seeks a swift trial. House impeachment managers urged the Senate to reject McConnell’s rules and Democrats have panned the proposal. In a legal brief filed Monday, the White House called for Trump’s acquittal.

What happens next: Under McConnell’s proposal, opening arguments would begin at 1 p.m. on Wednesday afternoon, with each side given 24 hours to present their case over a three-day period. Here’s more on what happens next.

How we got here: A whistleblower complaint led House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to announce the beginning of an official impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24. Closed-door hearings and subpoenaed documents related to the president’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky followed. After two weeks of public hearings in November, the House Intelligence Committee wrote a report that was sent to the House Judiciary Committee, which held its own hearings. Pelosi and House Democrats announced the articles of impeachment against Trump on Dec. 10. The Judiciary Committee approved two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. When the full House of Representatives adopted both articles of impeachment against him on Dec. 18, Trump became the third U.S. president to be impeached.

Stay informed: Read the latest reporting and analysis on impeachment here.

Listen: Follow The Washington Post’s coverage with daily updates from across our podcasts.

Want to understand impeachment better? Sign up for the 5-Minute Fix to get a guide in your inbox every weekday. Have questions? Submit them here, and they may be answered in the newsletter.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-democrats-privately-mull-biden-for-bolton-trade-in-impeachment-trial/2020/01/21/e73b971a-3c71-11ea-baca-eb7ace0a3455_story.html

It’s somehow Hillary Clinton versus Bernie Sanders in the Democratic presidential primary again, even though she isn’t even on the ballot.

The former secretary of state stirred up controversy on Monday with remarks reinforcing that there is no love lost between her and her 2016 Democratic primary challenger. The Hollywood Reporter published new details of a forthcoming documentary about Clinton in which she says “nobody likes [Sanders], nobody wants to work with him” and declares him a “career politician.” In a subsequent interview with the publication, Clinton stood by her words and declined to say whether she would endorse and campaign for Sanders if he were to win the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination in 2020. “I’m not going to go there yet,” Clinton told THR. “We’re still in a very vigorous primary season.” Later in the day on Tuesday, Clinton clarified that she would support whoever the Democratic Party nominates.

Clinton’s remarks, both in the documentary and in the interview, predictably kicked up tensions that have, at this point, been simmering for years. The Sanders camp views themselves as slighted in 2016 by a Democratic establishment that stacked the deck for Clinton, tilting everything from the debate schedule to delegate structures against them. The Clinton camp views Sanders and those around him as sore losers who did not wholeheartedly back her in 2016 and who can’t play well with others on the left.

According to a Clinton spokesperson, the interviews in the documentary go as far back as mid-2018 and stretched into the spring of 2019, but it’s not clear exactly when in that time frame she made the Sanders-specific comments. Regardless, the THR interview in which she stood by her assessment and elaborated on it took place in January.

Who would have thought that with the Iowa caucuses two weeks away, we would still be talking about Hillary versus Bernie? But here we are. The 2016 election appears to be the one that won’t die, and the pair seems destined to clash again and again and again, revealing that emotions over the last White House race remain very raw.

What Hillary said about Bernie this time

On March 6, Hulu will release Hillary, a new documentary about the former first lady, senator, and secretary of state and 2016 presidential nominee. And in it, she has some less-than-flattering things to say about Sanders. Namely, according to the Hollywood Reporter, this:

He was in Congress for years. He had one senator support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician. It’s all just baloney and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it.

In a follow-up interview in January, Clinton told THR she stands by her assessment and, when asked, declined to say definitively that she would endorse him if he became the nominee. She went on to explain some of her issues with Sanders and his backers:

I will say, however, that it’s not only him, it’s the culture around him. It’s his leadership team. It’s his prominent supporters. It’s his online Bernie Bros and their relentless attacks on lots of his competitors, particularly the women. And I really hope people are paying attention to that because it should be worrisome that he has permitted this culture — not only permitted, [he] seems to really be very much supporting it. And I don’t think we want to go down that road again where you campaign by insult and attack and maybe you try to get some distance from it, but you either don’t know what your campaign and supporters are doing or you’re just giving them a wink and you want them to go after Kamala [Harris] or after Elizabeth [Warren]. I think that that’s a pattern that people should take into account when they make their decisions.

In the Hollywood Reporter interview, Clinton pointed to recent clashes after a report that Sanders told Warren in a 2018 private dinner that he didn’t believe a woman could win the White House in 2020. Warren has confirmed the report, while Sanders has denied it, and supporters of both have dug in. Some of his backers filled Warren’s Twitter mentions with snake emojis, and the hashtags #NeverWarren and #WarrenIsASnake started to trend. Clinton described the incident as a “very personal attack” on Warren and “part of a pattern” from Sanders.

It appears Sanders is not taking the bait. “My focus today is on a monumental moment in American history: the impeachment trial of Donald Trump. Together, we are going to go forward and defeat the most dangerous president in American history,” he said in a statement. Trump’s impeachment trial kicked off on Tuesday in the Senate.

On Tuesday evening, Clinton said in a tweet that she would do “whatever I can to support our nominee” — while also adding in a bit of snark with regard to those who throughout her career have criticized her for seeming inauthentic. “I thought everyone wanted my authentic, unvarnished views!” she wrote.

While Sanders and Clinton, beyond what they’ve already said, may be determined to let this one lie, more or less, the internet has made no such determination. Hillary Clinton, #NobodyLikesHim, and #ILikeBernie trended on Twitter on Tuesday, and plenty of people weighed in.

What Hillary has to say about Bernie does and doesn’t matter

There are two sides to the Hillary-Clinton-said-a-controversial-thing coin: On the one hand, she will likely never run for office or hold a major political position again; on the other hand, she has deep ties to the Democratic establishment, and she’s been a prominent figure in the party for years.

Clinton, at this point, has nothing to lose — she’s been vilified basically forever — and so in criticizing Sanders, she may be saying something in public that others in the establishment are saying in private. Establishment fears of Sanders have become a trope in political journalism. Just two weeks ago, the Associated Press published a story along those lines. How the establishment feels about a particular candidate doesn’t matter as much as it used to, but it still makes a difference.

Clinton is still an important figure among Democrats, and while she’s not the most beloved, she’s also not as hated as the coverage of her would have you think. A September 2018 poll from Gallup shows 77 percent of Democrats had a favorable opinion of Clinton — that’s higher than Sanders, Warren, and Joe Biden, in a Gallup poll last summer looking at favorability of 2020 presidential candidates. Her assessment that nobody likes Sanders, however, is off base, among voters: According to a Morning Consult tracking poll, he’s the most popular senator in the country.

And while Clinton may be largely out of the game, many of her allies are not. Last year, her former aides attempted to undercut Sanders’s current campaign, including pushing the media to look into his record on gun control and same-sex marriage and highlighting his use of a private jet while campaigning for Clinton in 2016.

It’s also worth noting that Clinton appears determined to poke the bear every few months or so. In October, for example, she sparred with Tulsi Gabbard after saying in an interview that the Hawaii Congress member was “the favorite of the Russians” as a potential third-party spoiler for Democrats in 2020.

It’s not always easy to say whether Clinton intentionally causes a media firestorm. She has been held up by conservatives as a boogeywoman for 30 years, and she’s taken on a similar aura for some on the left post-2016 as well. But she must have known her Sanders remarks would kick up dust. And with the primaries about to begin and tensions among Democrats already on the rise, her timing is maybe not great. That being said, her endorsement probably wouldn’t help Sanders anyway — if anything, this latest tiff will fire up his supporters even more.

2016 is the election that will never die

There’s plenty of arguing to be done about what happened in 2016 between Clinton and Sanders, as evidenced by Twitter on Tuesday.

Both sides have important points to make. As Vox’s Ezra Klein wrote in 2017, Democratic leaders did really shape the race in a way that was favorable to Clinton in 2016. Some of that was negative for Sanders — few and oddly scheduled debates, early pledged superdelegates — but some of it was also positive, as Klein notes, because the sense that the DNC was behind Clinton also kept other politicians out of the race.

And while the Bernie Bro trope of white, young, very online males isn’t exactly accurate — Sanders has a diverse coalition behind him — Clinton isn’t wrong in her assessment that his supporters’ attacks can be harsh and disproportionate, especially on the internet. Dare to breathe a bad word about Sanders and you risk an onslaught of attacks.

Whatever the details of the back-and-forth, or the arguments on either side, what’s clear is that we’re not yet over 2016. Even the recent dustup between Warren and Sanders felt eerily similar to the last race. Democratic politicians, aides, operatives, and voters want desperately to defeat Trump in 2020, and the persistent what ifs of 2016 heighten anxieties around that. There’s also a lot of concern about party unity whoever the eventual nominee is — and Clinton’s comments don’t help that.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/21/21075555/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-hollywood-reporter-interview-hulu-documentary

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/21/business/boeing-737-max-delay/index.html

Drinking fountains are marked “Do Not Drink Until Further Notice” at Flint Northwestern High School in Flint, Mich., in May 2016. After 18 months of insisting water drawn from the Flint River was safe to drink, officials admitted it was not.

Carolyn Kaster/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Carolyn Kaster/AP

Drinking fountains are marked “Do Not Drink Until Further Notice” at Flint Northwestern High School in Flint, Mich., in May 2016. After 18 months of insisting water drawn from the Flint River was safe to drink, officials admitted it was not.

Carolyn Kaster/AP

The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for water crisis victims to sue state and local government officials in Flint, Mich.

For years, Flint city officials and state regulators have argued they are protected by “qualified immunity” from being sued for their role in the water contamination crisis. But lower courts have ruled to the contrary.

In refusing to take up a pair of cases involving the lead-tainted water, the Supreme Court has upheld those lower court rulings.

Attorney Michael Pitt, co-lead counsel on the class action lawsuit which includes thousands of Flint residents suing for damages from the 2014 incident, welcomed the decision as a major victory.

He said, “It’s time for the people of Flint to start feeling like they are going to get their day in court,” Michigan Public Radio reporter Steve Carmody reported. “This just moves the entire process closer to that day.”

Pitt added that his clients have thus far “been denied justice.”

The initial lawsuit turned away by the high court was filed in 2016. It argues officials, including then-Gov. Rick Snyder, acted indifferently to the risk of bodily harm residents faced when they were exposed to high levels of lead and other contaminants after the city’s drinking water source was switched to draw from the Flint River in 2014. The move was made without properly treating pipes for corrosion, letting lead and bacteria into the water supply.

In an April 2019 ruling, U.S. District Judge Judith Levy ruled Gov. Snyder “was indifferent because instead of mitigating the risk of harm caused by the contaminated water, he covered it up.

“In private he worried about the need to return Flint to [Detroit’s water system] and the political implications of the crisis. But in public, he denied all knowledge, despite being aware of the developing crisis. As a result, plaintiffs were lured into a false sense of security,” Levy wrote.

More than a year later the city switched to using water from Lake Huron. But that came too late to prevent a dozen fatalities.

During the period Flint’s tap water came from the Flint River, a Legionnaires Disease outbreak occurred, killing at least 12 people. Dozens of others were hospitalized.

Although government officials initially claimed the water was safe to drink, 18 months later they admitted it was not.

It wasn’t until late 2016 that the city’s water supply finally met federal safety standards, though some residents remain skeptical of those findings.

Defense attorney Pitt says it could be another year before an actual trial begins.

The events in Flint have triggered scores of Midwest cities to remove aging lead water pipes.

As Tom Neltner at the Environmental Defense Fund told WBEZ’s Monica Eng, “Our country has an estimated 6 million lead service lines. … And it’s like drinking water through a lead straw. So where people have them, it’s one of the most significant sources of lead in drinking water.”

About 180 cities and towns across the country are taking action to remove harmful pipes.

In Flint, crews have been working to replace old lead and galvanized service lines with copper pipes.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/21/798331185/supreme-court-allows-flint-water-lawsuits-to-move-forward-officials-not-immune

West Virginia lawmakers are scrambling to let rural Virginia counties join the Mountain State amid conservative voter anger with the new Democratic majority in Richmond and its push for gun control and other liberal initiatives.

In a building fight that echoes the Civil War-era split of the Old Dominion that created West Virginia in 1863, 40 of 100 West Virginia House delegates have signed on to legislation that would accept revolting Virginia counties and towns.

The effort began after the November elections when urban and suburban voters put the Virginia General Assembly into Democratic hands. Many of those Democrats ran on a platform of restricting and banning guns.

“We’re starting to get some phone calls from friends on the border who say these folks want to leave,” said West Virginia Del. Gary Howell.

Howell, a Republican, told Secrets that what started off as a long-shot effort “has turned into a real thing.”

He said that Virginia lawmakers and officials along the West Virginia border have cited the Democratic drive for gun control and desire to shift spending to the urban areas near Washington as reasons to leave for West Virginia.

In his bill, HCR 8, Howell and his team wrote about the urban-rural battle. “These tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the government at Richmond for the differences in certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth.”

He also cited gun control, a huge fight on display in Richmond Monday when some 22,000 gun owners protested restrictions sweeping through the state Senate. There is no new push for gun control in West Virginia.

“In the latest, and most evident, in this string of grievances, the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth,” said the Howell legislation, now before the rules committee. Howell is on the rules committee and is also the chairman of Government Organization Committee.

The bottom line in the legislation: “In a spirit of conciliation, the legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the state of West Virginia.”

One county that could lead the way with or without the legislation is Frederick, some 70 miles from Washington. It still has an open invitation from the 1800s to join West Virginia, and some members of the county board of supervisors have expressed support for a vote to leave.

In the West Virginia Senate, Sen. Charles Trump has offered a resolution urging Frederick County to join West Virginia.

Closer to D.C., Loudoun County was recently home to a short-lived effort to split, with some in the more rural and conservative western half — which borders West Virginia — bidding to create their own county called Catoctin for the mountains that provide a border.

Howell said that he has a team working on how any merger would work. He said that since West Virginia operates much like Virginia, it would be easy to merge police and infrastructure.

He also said that border shifts do not need federal approval.

“We’ve been looking way down the road. Once we realized that this was getting very real, we figured that we have to have answers for this, we have to have a plan in place, that’s what we’ve been discussing,” he told Secrets.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/civil-war-ii-gun-control-could-push-virginia-counties-to-join-west-virginia

  • Trump extolled a newly confident America with a series of bold statements about the country’s economic performance throughout his presidency in his big speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday.
  • Many of those statements didn’t match economic reality or were wildly misleading.
  • Here are the facts related to five of Trump’s boldest claims.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

President Trump touted a newly resurgent America in his big speech at the World Economic Forun in Davos, Switzerland, making a series of bold claims in an address that echoed some of his talking points on the 2020 campaign trail.

Many of those assertions, though, didn’t match economic reality or were wildly misleading.

Trump said that the American economy was in “a dismal state” when he inherited it in 2017 and that US wealth inequality was tossed into the dustbin of history. He also asserted that he “saved” historically black colleges and universities and the US economy now is “the greatest” in US history.

Finally, he contended that the two trade deals he signed were “the biggest ever made.”

Here are the facts about five of Trump’s boldest claims made in Davos.

Source Article from https://www.insider.com/five-bold-claims-trumps-big-speech-davos-facts-us-economy-2020-1

The U.S. move is the latest taken under Executive Order 13884, signed by President Donald Trump in August, authorizing a block on property and interests of the Venezuelan government.

Under the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, U.S. citizens are prohibited from using assets that have been blocked or sanctioned.

“This action furthers U.S. efforts to use targeted sanctions and steady diplomacy to end Maduro’s attempts to usurp power, and to support a Venezuelan transition to democracy, including free and fair presidential elections,” wrote Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in a statement.

The new development adds to what has become a nearly two-decade saga of crumbling relations between Washington and Caracas.

Tensions between Venezuela and the U.S. can be traced back to when Hugo Chavez, Maduro’s predecessor, became president of Venezuela in 1999. During his campaign for president, Chavez vilified the U.S. and other countries he felt were taking advantage of Venezuela.

Chavez also accused the U.S. of aiding in an attempted coup against his government in 2002. While the Bush administration tried to distance itself from the coup attempt, documents found in 2004 showed the CIA knew of an attempted coup back then.

Read more: Tensions between Venezuela and the US keep rising. Here’s how they got to this point

The U.S. condemned Venezuela for imprisoning political opponents as well as the Chavez regime’s consolidation of power. Chavez seized control of the country’s supreme court in 2004. He also increased his control over the local media, passing laws that penalized outlets for running content that “offends” public officials.

Once Chavez died in 2013 and Maduro took over, tensions began to increase once again. Maduro, who is not the charismatic leader Chavez was, consolidated his power in 2017 by stripping the country’s opposition-led legislature of power. By then, a massive humanitarian and economic crisis had already begun.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/21/trump-administration-increases-pressure-on-maduro-regime-with-new-sanctions.html

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/21/politics/white-house-impeachment-defense-fact-check/

NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.

Connect with NBC News Online!
NBC News App: https://apps.nbcnews.com/mobile
Breaking News Alerts: https://link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/bre…
Visit NBCNews.Com: http://nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
Find NBC News on Facebook: http://nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
Follow NBC News on Twitter: http://nbcnews.to/FollowNBC
Follow NBC News on Instagram: http://nbcnews.to/InstaNBC

Senate Impeachment Trial Of President Trump | Day 1 | NBC News (Live Stream)

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFEc3zdo0ws

Politicians have long deflected criticism onto the news media, blaming it for not covering them the way they want. But the frequency and tenor of the Sanders campaign’s critique is unusual, a can’t-miss leitmotif alongside “Medicare for all,” the Green New Deal, the millionaires and the billionaires.

“I am not a candidate of the corporate media,” Mr. Sanders has said.

A particularly visible contributor to this effort is Mr. Sirota, who even while working as a journalist seemed to delight in trolling the media from inside the house. Accepting the 2015 Izzy Award for special achievement in independent media (it is named for the radical muckraker I.F. Stone), Mr. Sirota spoke of doing hard-hitting investigations “at an outlet that allows you to do it, which tend not to be legacy media outlets.”

But assailing the mainstream media could prove tricky for the campaign. A recent Pew study found that 76 percent of Democrats believe journalists act in the public interest; many support what they see as the ferreting out of executive office malfeasance. Mr. Trump, highly unpopular among voters who will choose the Democratic nominee, routinely demonizes the press, labeling it “the enemy of the people” and attacking individual outlets in strikingly personal terms.

“I think it’s politically naïve,” Todd Gitlin, a professor at the Columbia Journalism School and a prominent liberal writer, said of Mr. Sanders’s press criticism, “but also analytically misguided, and overlooking the significance of the investigations that the news media have delivered in the last three years.”

The publisher of the progressive magazine The Nation, Katrina vanden Heuvel, who has endorsed Mr. Sanders’s broader media critique, sees the challenge in the senator’s approach. “I do think it’s tricky just to attack media,” she said. It works best, she added, when “he does it with a humane criticism that millions of Americans are being shorted in terms of the coverage of their own lives and communities.”

Those associated with the campaign would insist that the Trump critique and the Sanders critique are substantively different.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/us/politics/david-sirota-bernie-sanders.html