Georgia Republican Rep. Doug Collins reacts to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi withholding impeachment articles from Senate.
House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins weighed in Sunday on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi continuing to withhold articles of impeachment against President Trump from the Senate, saying he thought “she had a bad Christmas carol, if you want to use the analogy of the last couple weeks.”
The Georgia Republican told “Sunday Morning Futures” that Pelosi “had a ghost of Christmas past, where she trashed all the rules to try and impeach this president and rush it before the end of the year.”
Collins continued, “She has a president sitting here now with a bad case, bad articles of impeachment that have no basis in reality to impeach the president and she’s looking at a future in which she has no legislative agenda.”
He went on, “There’s nothing in the House for her to do because [Democrats] have wasted so much time and taxpayer dollars on impeaching this president that we’re sitting here literally waiting on her to send articles over to try and influence the Senate decision in which she has no control over.”
“That’s how sad we’ve become and how sad this speaker’s legacy is so far.”
Pelosi surprised many in Washington last month with her decision to withhold articles — which accused Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress over his dealings with Ukraine — as she sought to pressure the Senate to agree to certain terms for a trial. In an unusual news conference, Pelosi, D-Calif., defended her decision while calling Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., a “rogue leader.”
McConnell last month said Pelosi’s delay in sending articles of impeachment was an “absurd” position to take, saying the speaker “apparently believes she can tell us how to run the trial.”
“Let the American people understand something,” Collins told host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday. “The speaker got up there and gave this grand show of being solemn and it’s our duty and it’s our conscious vote, but yet the minute after she forced them into this impeachment vote on the weakest case in history, she went out and then basically turned it into a political document.”
He continued, “She took a sham vote for them to actually say impeachment was needed and then went out and said, ‘Well no, I’m going to hold this.’”
Pelosi said last month she hoped the Senate would find a bipartisan agreement on how to conduct the trial. “We would hope that they can come to some conclusion like that, but in any event, we’re ready when we see what they have.”
Collins continued Sunday, “She pulled the curtain back, showed everybody that this is simply a political statement against this president to affect the 2020 election because they have nobody that can beat the president. The economy, everything is working.”
Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo contributed to this report.
Nine-year-old Jaremy Vazquez of Brooklyn and Eileen Zelis Aria, 35, of the Bronx were passengers in a bus driven by Shuang Quing Feng, 58, of Flushing, N.Y. that ended in their death, according to the Westmoreland County Coroner’s office.
Georgia Republican Rep. Doug Collins reacts to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi withholding impeachment articles from Senate.
House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins weighed in Sunday on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi continuing to withhold articles of impeachment against President Trump from the Senate, saying he thought “she had a bad Christmas carol, if you want to use the analogy of the last couple weeks.”
The Georgia Republican told “Sunday Morning Futures” that Pelosi “had a ghost of Christmas past, where she trashed all the rules to try and impeach this president and rush it before the end of the year.”
Collins continued, “She has a president sitting here now with a bad case, bad articles of impeachment that have no basis in reality to impeach the president and she’s looking at a future in which she has no legislative agenda.”
He went on, “There’s nothing in the House for her to do because [Democrats] have wasted so much time and taxpayer dollars on impeaching this president that we’re sitting here literally waiting on her to send articles over to try and influence the Senate decision in which she has no control over.”
“That’s how sad we’ve become and how sad this speaker’s legacy is so far.”
Pelosi surprised many in Washington last month with her decision to withhold articles — which accused Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress over his dealings with Ukraine — as she sought to pressure the Senate to agree to certain terms for a trial. In an unusual news conference, Pelosi, D-Calif., defended her decision while calling Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., a “rogue leader.”
McConnell last month said Pelosi’s delay in sending articles of impeachment was an “absurd” position to take, saying the speaker “apparently believes she can tell us how to run the trial.”
“Let the American people understand something,” Collins told host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday. “The speaker got up there and gave this grand show of being solemn and it’s our duty and it’s our conscious vote, but yet the minute after she forced them into this impeachment vote on the weakest case in history, she went out and then basically turned it into a political document.”
He continued, “She took a sham vote for them to actually say impeachment was needed and then went out and said, ‘Well no, I’m going to hold this.’”
Pelosi said last month she hoped the Senate would find a bipartisan agreement on how to conduct the trial. “We would hope that they can come to some conclusion like that, but in any event, we’re ready when we see what they have.”
Collins continued Sunday, “She pulled the curtain back, showed everybody that this is simply a political statement against this president to affect the 2020 election because they have nobody that can beat the president. The economy, everything is working.”
Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo contributed to this report.
Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani is killed in a US airstrike. Trump and Rudy Giuliani weigh in; Stabbings inside a rabbi’s home on the seventh day of Hanukkah marked the latest in a string of incidents that have targeted the Jewish community in New York; NASA plans to launch a rover to Mars this July to hunt for signs of ancient Red Planet life.
» Subscribe to USA TODAY: http://bit.ly/1xa3XAh » Watch more on this and other topics from USA TODAY: https://bit.ly/2IMPbAh » USA TODAY delivers current local and national news, sports, entertainment, finance, technology, and more through award-winning journalism, photos, videos and VR.
In the wake of increased tensions between the United States and Iran after the killing of top Iranian military leader Qasem Suleimani, Democratic lawmakers introduced legislation on Friday that would block funding for any military action “in or against Iran” without congressional authorization.
The two sponsors, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., represent some of the most progressive wings of the Senate and House of Representatives.
“Today, we are seeing a dangerous escalation that brings us closer to another disastrous war in the Middle East,” the two lawmakers said in a statement. “A war with Iran could cost countless lives and trillions more dollars and lead to even more deaths, more conflict, more displacement in that already highly volatile region of the world.”
Framing their bill in terms of socioeconomic inequality, Sanders and Khanna urged their fellow lawmakers to pass their legislation because “We know that it will ultimately be the children of working-class families who will have to fight and die in a new Middle East conflict—not the children of the billionaire class.”
Democrats have urged caution about further escalation with Iran. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said late Thursday the world “cannot afford to have tensions escalate to the point of no return.”
Also on Friday, Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., introduced a resolution to attempt to force a debate and vote in Congress on the use of military force against Iran.
“We’re now at a boiling point, and Congress must step in before Trump puts even more of our troops in harm’s way. We owe it to our servicemembers to have a debate and vote about whether or not it’s in our national interest to engage in another unnecessary war in the Middle East,” Kaine said in a statement.
But the strike on the Iranian general was preoccupying many lawmakers. Some Democrats, calling the action unauthorized and illegal, made clear over the weekend that they intended to try to curtail Mr. Trump’s ability to strike Iran in the future. After the White House on Saturday sent Congress an unusual, completely classified notification of the drone strike, Ms. Pelosi said it raised “serious and urgent questions” about the decision.
“Congress and I will do everything I can to assert our authority,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, said Sunday on ABC. “We do not need this president either bumbling or impulsively getting us into a major war.”
But in a clear signal that he has no interest in consulting with Congress on his military moves or strategy, Mr. Trump suggested on Sunday that lawmakers should monitor social media to discern how he plans to proceed.
“These Media Posts will serve as notification to the United States Congress that should Iran strike any U.S. person or target, the United States will quickly & fully strike back, & perhaps in a disproportionate manner,” the president tweeted. “Such legal notice is not required, but is given nevertheless!”
Senators are expected to receive a full briefing from administration officials in the coming week on the strike. An all-members briefing in the House has yet to be scheduled, according to a senior Democratic aide.
“As members of Congress, our first responsibility is to keep the American people safe,” Ms. Pelosi said in a letter announcing the war-powers vote. “For this reason, we are concerned that the administration took this action without the consultation of Congress and without respect for Congress’s war powers granted to it by the Constitution.”
Senators could be forced to vote on a similar resolution as soon as mid-January.
That timing could collide directly with an impeachment trial, an all-consuming proceeding that brings other Senate work to a halt.
Darian Vaziri, 21, said he and his family arrived at the border around 8 p.m. Saturday and were also placed under further scrutiny. He said his parents were born in Tehran, and the agents asked them about where they went to school, their family members, any military background and when they were last in Iran.
Mr. Vaziri said his parents, who live in Los Angeles, had been in the United States for four decades. They had come up to Seattle to visit family and had taken a day trip to Vancouver.
“My parents have been here for 40 years, legally, and they are still not being treated normally like everyone else,” Mr. Vaziri said.
Mr. Vaziri shared a photo of a young child who was sleeping on a bench late at night as families waited. He said one group of travelers with two young children arrived for extra scrutiny after midnight, just before he and his family were allowed to leave.
Matt Adams, the legal director for the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, a nonprofit legal services group in Seattle involved in efforts to help people at the port of entry on Sunday, said United States citizens and permanent residents who were born in Iran or were traveling with people born in Iran were still being singled out for questioning on Sunday, but were being processed much more quickly than the night before.
Mr. Adams said that, beyond the detainment, he worried that the government might use these interrogations as tools to second-guess the immigration status of people who were lawfully in the country.
“It’s a fishing expedition,” he said. “They are going after anyone with Iranian heritage.”
Zolan Kanno-Youngs reported from Washington, Mike Baker from Seattle and Mariel Padilla from New York. Danielle Ivory contributed reporting from New York.
“A very corrupt person leaves the presidency of the National Assembly today, as a millionaire, a billionaire,” said Maduro, referring to Guaidó. He added, “to justify their defeat, they say that a security operation was launched” to stop them.
At least three explosions were reported Sunday inside the heavily-fortified Green Zone — which houses the U.S. Embassy, Balad Air Base and Iraqi government buildings — in the second attack of its kind after the U.S.-led airstrike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani.
A total of six Katyusha rockets — three inside the Green Zone and three in the nearby Jadriya area — hit Baghdad, according to a statement by Iraq’s military, as Reuters reported.
No injuries were reported immediately but alert sirens waited on the west bank of the Tigris river.
One blast allegedly blocked the road leading to the American diplomatic mission in the Iraqi capital. Five people were also injured as mortar shells ricocheted into the neighboring Jadriya region, where Baghdad University is located.
Tensions in the Middle East escalated after the U.S. launched three rockets Thursday that killed Soleimani, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force as well as Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of Iran-backed militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces, and five other people.
Mourners at a funeral ceremony for Gen. Qassem Soleimani in the southwestern city of Ahvaz, Iran, on Sunday. (Morteza Jaberian/Mehr News Agency via AP)
Throngs of mourners carried the flag-draped casket of Soleimani off a plane in Ahvaz in southwestern Iran earlier Sunday as his body was returned to his country.
Iran has declared three days of public mourning and throngs of revelers, including acting Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi, marched in a procession to honor the two Shiite militia leaders.
The ‘Office’ creator also took shots at Felicity Huffman and Jeffrey Epstein.
Once again, Golden Globes host Ricky Gervais did not shy away from hot-button topics in his monologue, even as he told the stars attending on Sunday not to elongate their acceptance speeches by referring to contentious current events.
At the top of the annual ceremony at the Beverly Hilton, Gervais ended his monologue by telling the stars at the ceremony: “So if you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything, you know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg. So, if you win, come up, accept your little award, thank your agent and your God and fuck off. OK?”
Gervais’ swear word was bleeped out on NBC. He was also bleeped for his use of profanity in two other separate jokes: one where he called Cats‘ James Corden a “fat pussy” and another where he discussed the same film’s Judi Dench “licking her ass.”
The comedian, however, also peppered the monologue with references to #MeToo and contemporary issues. He started off by noting that it was his fifth time hosting, and therefore he didn’t care what flak he would take. Then he punched in with a nod to last year’s college admissions scandal: “I came here in a limo tonight and the license plate was made by Felicity Huffman,” he said, referring to the actress’ prison sentence.
Gervais noted that top film executives present at the ceremony may have come from different companies, “but they all have one thing in common: They’re all terrified of Ronan Farrow. He’s coming for you, he’s coming for you.”
At another point, the host noted that the Golden Globes was an old-fashioned awards show, and asserted the ceremony should just thank Netflix and get on with it. Gervais pointed out he has a show on Netflix, Afterlife, about a man considering committing suicide after his wife dies. “Spoiler alert, there’s a season two, so in the end, he didn’t kill himself. Just like Jeffrey Epstein. Sorry, I know he’s your friend,” Gervais joked to the A-list audience.
Epstein came up again when Gervais took aim at Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood: “Leonardo DiCaprio attended the premiere and by the end, his date was nearly too old for him. Even Prince Andrew was like, ‘C’mon, mate… .'” (Gervais was referring to allegations that Epstein’s former friend Prince Andrew sexually assaulted a girl trafficked by Epstein.)
While discussing the addition of Apple TV+ to the room, Gervais noted the irony of a #MeToo-themed show like The Morning Show being “made by a company who runs sweatshops in China. You say you’re ‘woke’… .”
Gervais has developed a reputation for unpredictability while prodding Hollywood’s elite on the Beverly Hilton stage. The comedian and British Office creator infamously made a dig about a car accident involving Caitlyn Jenner at the 2016 ceremony and Angelina Jolie’s humanitarian work and international adoptions in 2010. But in an interview withThe Hollywood Reporter prior to this year’s ceremony, he insisted that he wants to make his jokes “bulletproof” this time around.
“Kevin Hart [lost] his job [as Oscars host] for 10-year-old tweets that he said he was sorry about and deleted at the time,” Gervais said. “So there’s more pressure on making [the jokes bulletproof]. It’s the world [watching]. This isn’t me in a comedy club.”
The 77th annual Golden Globes aired live coast-to-coast on NBC.
Dick Clark Productions, which produces the Golden Globes, shares a parent company with The Hollywood Reporter.
Georgia Republican Rep. Doug Collins reacts to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi withholding impeachment articles from Senate.
House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins weighed in Sunday on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi continuing to withhold articles of impeachment against President Trump from the Senate, saying he thought “she had a bad Christmas carol, if you want to use the analogy of the last couple weeks.”
The Georgia Republican told “Sunday Morning Futures” that Pelosi “had a ghost of Christmas past, where she trashed all the rules to try and impeach this president and rush it before the end of the year.”
Collins continued, “She has a president sitting here now with a bad case, bad articles of impeachment that have no basis in reality to impeach the president and she’s looking at a future in which she has no legislative agenda.”
He went on, “There’s nothing in the House for her to do because [Democrats] have wasted so much time and taxpayer dollars on impeaching this president that we’re sitting here literally waiting on her to send articles over to try and influence the Senate decision in which she has no control over.”
“That’s how sad we’ve become and how sad this speaker’s legacy is so far.”
Pelosi surprised many in Washington last month with her decision to withhold articles — which accused Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress over his dealings with Ukraine — as she sought to pressure the Senate to agree to certain terms for a trial. In an unusual news conference, Pelosi, D-Calif., defended her decision while calling Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., a “rogue leader.”
McConnell last month said Pelosi’s delay in sending articles of impeachment was an “absurd” position to take, saying the speaker “apparently believes she can tell us how to run the trial.”
“Let the American people understand something,” Collins told host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday. “The speaker got up there and gave this grand show of being solemn and it’s our duty and it’s our conscious vote, but yet the minute after she forced them into this impeachment vote on the weakest case in history, she went out and then basically turned it into a political document.”
He continued, “She took a sham vote for them to actually say impeachment was needed and then went out and said, ‘Well no, I’m going to hold this.’”
Pelosi said last month she hoped the Senate would find a bipartisan agreement on how to conduct the trial. “We would hope that they can come to some conclusion like that, but in any event, we’re ready when we see what they have.”
Collins continued Sunday, “She pulled the curtain back, showed everybody that this is simply a political statement against this president to affect the 2020 election because they have nobody that can beat the president. The economy, everything is working.”
Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo contributed to this report.
The killing of Gen. Qassen Soleimani stoked fears Sunday that people of Iranian descent in the United States would come under heightened surveillance and led to reports that Iranian Americans were being detained at the U.S.-Canada border, which Customs and Border Protection denied.
The Washington state chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, claimed that dozens of Iranians and Iranian Americans had been detained and questioned about their political views and allegiances as they returned to the United States from a pop concert in Canada on Saturday night.
But a spokesman for Customs and Border Protection, or CBP, called the report “false.”
“Based on the current threat environment, CBP is operating with an enhanced posture” at its border crossings to “safeguard our national security and protect the America[n] people while simultaneously protecting the civil rights and liberties of everyone,” the agency said in a statement.
CBP said wait times at the border crossing in Blaine, Washington, where the concertgoers were alleged to have been detained, increased to four hours for some people because of reduced staffing and increased traffic.
Nevertheless, responses to Soleimani’s killing from President Donald Trump and the Los Angeles Police Department have triggered fear and anxiety about what could come next, said Niaz Kasravi, founder and director of the Avalan Institute, an advocacy group based in Los Angeles.
“We seem to always be at the brink of conflict between our two countries in one way or another,” said Kasravi, who was born in Tehran and moved to the United States in 1984, when she was 9. “For a lot of us, it is the most serious we’ve seen it.”
Deeply disturbed by reports that Iranian Americans, including U.S. citizens, are being detained at the Canadian border with WA State.
My office has been working on this all morning. Please contact us with information on directly affected people at WA07PJ_casework@mail.house.gov.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said Sunday that she was “deeply disturbed” by CAIR’s report and that her office was working on the issue. Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., offered her office’s phone number for people to report cases of detention.
Azadeh Shahshahani, legal and advocacy director of Project South, a human rights group based in Atlanta, tweeted Saturday that surveillance of Iranian Americans and others was sure to escalate “in light of US aggression against Iran.”
She said in an interview that since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, she has seen the FBI question people who migrated from other countries when the United States was involved in conflicts with those countries. Project South handled cases of people of Afghan and Pakistani descent who had been questioned by the agency shortly before the 2016 election, she said.
“Especially now in the current atmosphere … it’s really important for Iranian Americans and Muslim Americans to be aware that they have rights if targeted by the FBI,” she said. “One of them is the right to counsel.”
Shahshahani said she was not aware of anyone being contacted by the FBI since the Iran tensions ratcheted up. An FBI spokeswoman declined to comment on Sunday night.
In Los Angeles, which has more residents of Iranian ancestry that any other U.S. city, an Assembly member of Iranian descent, Adrin Nazarian, said people were unlikely to take to the streets even if they were “happy there’s one less brutal individual in the world.”
Nazarian said many Los Angeles transplants fled Iran during the 1979 revolution because they were members of minority religious groups and likely faced persecution under the new regime. But they still have relatives in Iran, he added.
“A lot of times, you’ll see some folks not wanting to be too vocal outside Iran out of fear for consequences for their loved ones,” Nazarian said.
The weekend saw some of the worst days of the crisis so far, with hundreds more properties destroyed. Rural towns and major cities saw red skies, falling ash and smoke that clogged the air.
But by Monday, there were no emergency warnings in fire-ravaged states, following the weather change. Victoria state had 25 “watch and act” alerts and South Australia had one “watch and act” alert.
In NSW, all fires were back at the “advice” level, the lowest alert level, Rural Fire Service Commissioner Shane Fitzsimmons said.
However, Victoria Emergency Management Commissioner Andrew Crisp warned “it will warm up” and the fires “will take off again”.
On Monday morning, there were only around 10km between a blaze in Victoria’s Corryong and two burning at Kosciuszko National Park in NSW.
“This will be a changing, dynamic situation,” he said, warning it was “inevitable” the fires would join across the border.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said more than A$100,000 (£53,000, $69,000) would be released for disaster relief – while A$2bn would be committed to recovery over the next two years.
Turning from orange to grey
Simon Atkinson, BBC News in Eden, NSW
With its drizzle and grey horizon, the wharf at Eden could almost be an English coastal town.
It’s hard to fathom that on Saturday night – as fire threatened and skies turned orange – this was where hundreds of people fled for the feeling of safety that came with being near water.
Most have now left. Some to their homes as the fire threat eased. Others to evacuation centres in bigger towns after authorities warned the wharf really wasn’t a safe option.
The rain is a welcome surprise, and has given some respite from the smoke-filled air.
But with hot dry conditions predicted later in the week, Eden’s people – like many in this corner if the country – are in limbo.
And the navy ship lurking off the coast – poised to help in rescue mission – is another reminder this is far from over.
Australia is fighting one of its worst bushfire seasons, fuelled by record-breaking temperatures and months of drought.
The country has always experienced bushfires but this year they are a lot worse than normal.
At the weekend, Mr Morrison warned the crisis might go on for months.
At least 24 people have died since the fires began in September. Air quality in the capital Canberra was recently rated the worst in the world.
Mr Morrison announced the creation of a recovery agency to help those who have lost homes and businesses in the fires.
He has faced fierce criticism for his response to the fires – including for taking a holiday to Hawaii during the crisis.
Former Foreign Minister Julie Bishop – and Mr Morrison’s Liberal Party colleague – said she thought the PM was “doing the best he can”, but said Canberra should show leadership on global climate change.
“We don’t have a national energy policy in this country and a national approach to climate change,” she said.
“If a country like Australia fails to show leadership, we can hardly blame other nations for not likewise showing leadership in this area.”
The New Year opens with Bernie Sanders in his best standing yet against the field in Iowa and New Hampshire. He’s in a first-place tie with Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg in Iowa. All three are at 23%, and each would get a similar number of delegates out of the caucuses if they were to take place today, according to the CBS News Battleground Tracker. Sanders also now has a narrow edge in New Hampshire, with a two-point lead over Biden.
Meanwhile, Elizabeth Warren has slipped in New Hampshire since November, as liberal voters have moved toward Sanders instead. However, she’s still in position to get delegates there.
There’s at least one thing keeping this race in flux: If Democrats’ New Year’s resolution is to beat President Trump, none of the candidates has yet convinced a majority he or she can do it.
Apart from recent gains in New Hampshire, Sanders’ support is still best characterized by its steadiness and strength compared to other candidates who have seen more volatility. Nearly half (47%) of his New Hampshire voters say they’ve definitely made up their minds. By comparison, just 15% of Biden’s backers in the state describe their choice that way.
In New Hampshire, 65% of Sanders’ backers call themselves “enthusiastic” about supporting him ahead of all other candidates.
Sanders also leads the field on these two measures in Iowa. Forty-three percent have definitely made up their minds, and 67% feel enthusiastic in a state where enthusiasm can be an important motivator for voters to go out and caucus. Sanders does appear more reliant on first-time caucus goers than the other leading candidates in Iowa, with 36% of his backers saying this would be their first caucus, versus Buttigieg’s 25% and Biden’s 24%.
But neither Biden’s nor Buttigieg’s backers are as committed to their first choice as are Sanders’ supporters. And past caucus participation is by no means a perfect predictor of future participation from one election cycle to the next.
Underpinning Biden’s support is that more than half of voters in these states describe him as a “safe” choice — even if few see him as an exciting one — while half see Sanders’ policies as “too progressive” to win over swing voters this November. Weeks of other campaigns’ critiques against Warren may have taken their toll on her in this regard, too. In New Hampshire, 71% of those backing Biden think Warren’s policies are too progressive.
And in a sign of how much attention the campaigns attract in these small early states, two-thirds of voters told CBS News they had been following politics as much as usual over the holiday season specifically. Almost nine in 10 say they are paying at least some attention.
Back in November, when Warren enjoyed the lead in New Hampshire, she was described by 53% of voters there as “exciting.” Today that number has dropped to 37%, lower than before, though still a bit higher than Buttigieg and far higher than Biden. Two months ago, Warren led Sanders among liberal voters, and now she trails him. As he did in November, Biden continues to lead among moderates.
Among those considering Warren — though not necessarily picking her as first choice — fewer today think she could probably defeat Mr. Trump than thought so last fall. For context, none of these candidates has convinced a majority of Iowa and New Hampshire voters he or she is probably going to win.
After nearly a year of parsing policies and details, in the closing weeks, a candidate’s approach and style can matter just as much. Voters in both states split when given the choice of someone who makes their points in a “nice and polite” way versus one whose style is to fight and argue their points.
The ideologically liberal are more apt to prefer the fighting rhetorical style — in particular, the very liberal in New Hampshire — and Warren and Sanders both do relatively better with them. The moderates tend to prefer the nice approach. Biden — and particularly Buttigieg — do relatively better with those who do.
Amy Klobuchar has inched up to 7% support in both Iowa and New Hampshire. As is the case with Biden and Buttigieg, most Democrats say Klobuchar’s policies are about right for winning over swing voters.
Buttigieg is being widely considered by half of Iowa voters and four in 10 New Hampshire voters, but he does not do as well as Biden or Sanders in New Hampshire at converting those considering him into first-choice votes.
One presidential candidate these voters aren’t seeing in person is Mike Bloomberg, who is skipping these contests in favor of the Super Tuesday states. Asked separately if they’d consider him were he campaigning in Iowa, 31% there say they would, which in context would have ranked above many other candidates but not at the level of the top four. In New Hampshire, 27% of likely voters say they would have considered Bloomberg.
Here’s how current support in Iowa and New Hampshire would translate into delegates. These are translations of current levels, not forecasts, but if these patterns did emerge next month, these two early contests would not settle much in the delegate counts that ultimately matter.
These CBS News surveys were conducted by YouGov between December 27, 2019 and January 3, 2020. A representative sample of 2,000 registered voters in Iowa was selected, including 953 self-identified Democrats and Democratic-leaning Independents. A representative sample of 1,100 registered voters in New Hampshire was selected, including 519 self-identified Democrats and Democratic-leaning Independents. The samples were weighted according to gender, age, race, and education based upon voter registration lists and the U.S. Census Current Population Survey, as well as 2016 presidential vote. Respondents were selected to be representative of registered voters within Iowa and New Hampshire, respectively. The margin of error +/- 3.8 points in Iowa and +/- 5.3 points in New Hampshire.
This is a widget area - If you go to "Appearance" in your WP-Admin you can change the content of this box in "Widgets", or you can remove this box completely under "Theme Options"