Vox writers are making the best case for the leading Democratic candidates — defined as those polling above 10 percent in national averages. This article is the third in the series. Our case for Bernie Sanders is here; our case for Elizabeth Warren is here. Vox does not endorse individual candidates.

For a Democrat to beat President Donald Trump in 2020 and to have a shot at retaking the Senate, they’ll have to win in places Hillary Clinton lost. Democrats who’ve done it before want former Vice President Joe Biden to be the nominee.

Rep. Conor Lamb, 35, won a special election in the suburbs of Pittsburgh 18 months after Trump carried the district by 20 points. His campaign made time for only one national surrogate: Biden.

“He reminds me of my son Beau,” Biden said at a rally at the Carpenter’s Training Center in Collier, Pennsylvania, a week before the March 2018 election, referring to his son who died of brain cancer in 2015.

Biden’s endorsement was not the only reason for Lamb’s victory, but the campaign did think the visit from the former vice president offered Lamb a chance to build credibility with union workers.

Lamb is now endorsing Biden to be the Democratic nominee, and he’s in good company. Biden has far more endorsements from elected officials than any other candidate. The FiveThirtyEight endorsement tracker, which keeps track of high-profile endorsements and weights them by influence, has Biden scoring 237 points — nearly triple the second-place candidate, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who scores an 81. Sen. Bernie Sanders trails Warren at 55. Sen. Amy Klobuchar is next with 50.

Other candidates have picked up pockets of support in important states — in Michigan, five state lawmakers are backing Warren and the Young Democrats have come out for Sanders. But Biden has way outpaced his competitors in numbers, and he’s earned endorsements from Democrats who’ve won tough races in places that will be tough again in 2020.

In Pennsylvania, four sitting Democratic members of Congress have come out for Biden. In Arizona, where Democrats have a slim chance of picking up a Republican-held Senate seat, Biden has been endorsed by former Gov. Janet Napolitano (a rare Democrat to have won statewide in recent history). Sen. Doug Jones — the first Democrat to win a Senate seat in Alabama in decades — has endorsed him, too.

Former Vice President Joe Biden speaks at a rally in support of Democratic congressional candidate Conor Lamb in Pittsburgh on March 6, 2018.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

Jones, up for reelection in 2020, won a special election in 2017 against a man accused of sexually assaulting two teenagers and other predatory behavior. Even so, the campaign knew it would be a feat for a Democrat to win in Alabama. They only wanted surrogates with cross-party appeal, like former NBA star Charles Barkley — and Biden.

“We were not anxious to bring in a lot of national partisan officeholders,” said Democratic strategist Joe Trippi, who worked on the Jones campaign. “Biden’s never had the persona of a hard-charging partisan. He was somebody we wanted to campaign. He is among the least polarizing figures in the party.”

The Democrats in swing states who have endorsed Biden did so, of course, because they support his policy positions. But in a year when Democrats are laser-focused on beating Trump, their endorsements also represent a vote of confidence in Biden’s ability to win in their states and to help down-ballot Democrats win, too.

Biden seems to have an edge in battleground states, but the top Democratic candidates all tend to outperform Trump in head-to-head polling. The case for Biden is about his potential to do one more thing: take back the Republican-controlled Senate.

“How the hell are any of them going to get anything through Congress with Mitch McConnell sitting in the Senate?” Trippi said.

Biden’s coalition offers the Democrats their best shot at winning up and down the ballot. He’s led the pack nationally among Democrats, including core base voters like African Americans. He’s consistently polled further ahead of Trump in key Midwestern states, despite relentless attacks from Trump. And the Democrats who know what it takes to defeat Republicans in hostile territory want him to take on not just Trump but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, too.

How Democrats won in 2018

Two important storylines about the Democratic Party emerged from the 2018 election.

The first is the rise of the far left, best symbolized by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s upset victory against longtime Democrat Joe Crowley in New York. Ocasio-Cortez instantly became a leading voice in the new progressive wing of the party.

The second storyline to emerge has gotten far less attention but explains how Democrats actually won. While Ocasio-Cortez represents an important new force in the party, her win over a fellow Democrat didn’t change the party makeup of the House. That bragging right goes to a crop of moderate Democrats who ran careful, pragmatic campaigns. They won on tangible policy ideas, like preserving the Affordable Care Act’s provision on preexisting conditions. They weren’t calling for a revolution, so much as a return to stability.

An analysis by Alan I. Abramowitz at the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia found that candidates in the 2018 midterms who supported Medicare-for-all performed worse than those who did not.

Biden speaking at Iowa Central Community College in Fort Dodge, Iowa, on January 21, 2020.
Al Drago/Getty Images

It’s true that the progressive left helped inspire enthusiasm, including a surge of new voters and young voters. Latinx voters made up a larger vote share in 2018 than in previous elections.

But as Yair Ghitza of the Democratic data firm Catalist estimates, about 89 percent of the party’s improved vote margin is attributable to swing voting not higher turnout by committed Democrats. “A big piece of Democratic victory was due to 2016 Trump voters turning around and voting for Democrats in 2018.”

Ghitza also found that even though many of the Democratic wins were in suburban districts, “rural areas largely moved in a Democratic direction, often by even larger margins than the suburbs.”

To carry these districts and win the Electoral College, the Democratic nominee must appeal to a broad swath of voters — including Trump voters. Biden stumped in these districts in 2018 and candidates welcomed his help, a sign that he’s the strongest choice to do it in 2020.

Biden has the best shot at carrying the Senate

Any Democrat who could beat Trump would only have a shot at a transformative presidency if he or she also took the Senate. Right now, it looks bleak for Democrats.

McConnell controls the Senate by three votes (plus the vice president’s tie-breaker). And in 2020, there is no Republican running in a state that Clinton carried by 5 points or more. So while Democrats defend seats in 12 states where they’re up for reelection, a few of them tough races, they’ll also have to flip seats in at least three competitive races to take back control of Congress.

Most Democrats believe their best bets for flips are in Colorado, Arizona, Georgia, and Maine. Biden has earned about a dozen endorsements across these states, including from Napolitano, the only Democrat to be elected governor in the state since 1982.

Vulnerable Democrats defending seats include Sen. Gary Peters in Michigan, a state where Biden has consistently polled above Trump by a higher margin than any other candidate. He’s earned some half a dozen endorsements from sitting lawmakers there, too.

Similarly, he’s picked up strong support in Alabama.

“Even if you look at an example like the state of Alabama where there’s a clear dichotomy between urban-exurban and rural, he’s uniquely positioned not to move just urban voters,” said Democratic Birmingham Mayor Randall Woodfin, who has endorsed Biden. “When you think about all parts of the state, he’s actually able to excite and motivate those same Alabamians who may be white or rural.”

Hanging on to the House is not a given, either. Democrats surged in 2018, delivering a wave election even bigger than the Tea Party’s in 2010. But this time around, Trump will be back at the top of the ticket and could make it harder for Democrats who won on his turf.

Biden’s campaign is headquartered in Pennsylvania, a state that Barack Obama won in 2008 and 2012 but Clinton lost in 2016 and that Democrats will need to win back in 2020 to realistically defeat Trump. He’s racked up endorsements from six sitting and former Pennsylvania lawmakers.

“I think some in the media and the sort of commentary around this race have been a little bit focused on the size and novelty of policy proposals,” Lamb said in a recent interview before heading to Iowa to stump for Biden. “I think Joe Biden is advancing ideas that can actually be passed into law and actually help the lives of people who I care about.”

Liberals shouldn’t be so worried about Biden

A fear among liberal skeptics of Biden is that his pragmatism represents a retreat from the party’s leftward momentum. That’s true in one sense. He doesn’t pass progressive purity tests on issues like Medicare-for-all. On paper, his plans are less ambitious.

But he’d still be the most progressive Democratic nominee in history if he won.

His plans line up closer with the center of gravity in the party, but in recent years the center has moved much further left than even during the Barack Obama years. For example, Biden isn’t willing to replace the Affordable Care Act with a new, single-payer system like Warren or Sanders’s Medicare-for-all. But he does want to improve on it with a major new addition, an expansive public option. He’d also cap premiums at 8.5 percent of a patient’s income.

These might seem small relative to the scope of Medicare-for-all, but Medicare-for-all has pretty much no chance of becoming law, and it’s likely to spark a damaging intraparty fight among congressional Democrats that harms the chances of passing any health care bill.

Lamb pointed out that there probably aren’t enough votes in the Democratic-controlled House to pass it, never mind a Republican-controlled Senate (or even a narrowly Democratic-controlled Senate post-2020). And the key Senate Democrats who will drive health care policy if Democrats retake the gavel have already said Medicare-for-all is a nonstarter.

Ultimately, the question of which health care policy passes Congress comes down to how many votes Democrats have in Congress. If Biden is best for down-ballot Democrats, as many Democrats who’ve won in those states believe, then he’s likelier to get health care reform passed than his competitors with more ambitious plans, but narrower political appeal.

National Nurses United union members protest during a rally in front of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America in Washington on April 29, 2019.
Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via Getty Images

“It takes a lot of integrity not to necessarily back the flashiest thing in the moment but the thing that I can actually do for you and your life,” Lamb said.

Woodfin agreed, echoing Lamb’s point that most Americans don’t favor Medicare-for-all; even among Democrats, the enthusiasm has declined.

“At a certain point, being a leader, wanting to be a leader — the president, the leader of the free world— pragmatism is required,” Woodfin said. “It’s not just this whole world of what I want to do.

“As it relates to his policies, they are pragmatic. They are workable.”

Biden has also outlined a suite of policies that, taken on their own terms, would be the most ambitious governing agenda of any modern Democrat:

  • On climate change, Biden’s plan is similar to those of the other leading contenders. He’s also been fighting climate change well before the rest of his party. He introduced the first climate bill ever in the Senate in 1986.
  • On criminal justice reform, he’s put forth a sweeping proposal, which my colleague German Lopez, often critical of Biden’s policies, describes as “one of the most comprehensive among the presidential campaigns, taking on various parts of the criminal justice system at once.”
  • On gun control, he’s one of just a handful of original candidates to get into his plans in detail.
  • On paying for college, Biden was an early supporter of the idea of free college, though he speaks about it less now. He did, however, unveil a well-received plan to make community college free. (He also put forward a comprehensive plan for primary education, which includes boosting spending in poorer districts and raising teacher pay.)

Still, there is one significant policy criticism that Biden can’t overcome easily: his stance on the Iraq War. He voted in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to support the intervention. He’s recently portrayed the vote as a decision he quickly regretted. But as Alex Ward and Tara Golshan reported for Vox, the story of Biden and Iraq is long, complicated, and arguably checkered.

During a recent debate, Biden reiterated that he regrets the vote and that he has proven he’s trustworthy on the issue.

“It was a mistake and I acknowledged that, but the man who argued against the war, Barack Obama, picked me to be vice president.”

While liberals recall how the Iraq War shaped the 2008 primary and general election, a deadly folly that loomed in voters’ minds, polling amid Trump’s Iran confrontation showed 32 percent of potential Democratic primary voters trusted Biden most on foreign policy. Sanders came in second, trailing him by 12 points.

Matters of war and foreign policy are certainly big enough questions for any individual voter to consider in deciding whom to pick for president. For Biden, he’s overwhelmingly the favorite among Democrats on these matters.

There are some obvious problems with Biden

In an ideal world, the Democrats would likely want a nominee younger than Biden, who is 77.

It’s also true that for a party coming off the historic election of the first African American president and that came within a razor’s edge of electing the first female president, there’s something symbolically disappointing about retreating to another white man.

Joe Biden arrives at Zion Baptist Church before the King Day at the Dome march and rally in Columbia, South Carolina, on January 20, 2020.
Sean Rayford/Getty Images

This is made worse by the fact that when he was pressed to address his problematic personal treatment of women near the launch of his campaign, Biden was perfunctory and dismissive.

Representation matters, and with Biden we’re not getting a real advance. But we don’t live in an ideal world, and there isn’t a younger and slightly more self-reflective version of Biden out there for Democrats to vote for.

There’s way too much that’s both tangibly and symbolically at stake with Trump’s presence in the White House for Democrats to ignore the overwhelming evidence that the politicians with something on the line in tough races think Biden is the best chance to beat him.

Trump has been running — and losing — against Biden for months

Ultimately, the 2020 primary issue Democrats care about most is who can stand up to Trump and beat him. Biden is in a unique position. He’s faced almost a year of attacks by Trump — and it hasn’t hurt him.

In the fall, the American public learned that Trump had enlisted his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani to gin up dirt on Biden’s son Hunter Biden by leaning on the government of Ukraine. While these revelations ultimately ended in the president’s impeachment, they also led to months and months of Trump attacking Joe Biden.

In October, Trump really lit into him with personal insults (he “was only a good vice president because he understood how to kiss Barack Obama’s ass”). Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump and his former press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders went on to make fun of Biden’s slight stutter.

Amid all this, Biden’s fundraising skyrocketed, and he paid no penalty in the polls. Biden remains up over Trump in head-to-head polling in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. (As noted earlier, most Democratic candidates beat Trump in head-to-head polling, but Biden consistently holds the highest margin in swing states.)

Biden’s campaign made an ad about Trump’s attacks, which Biden tweeted with a joke, “Why are you so obsessed with me?” Sometimes a joke is funny because it gets at the truth.

Biden isn’t the flashiest candidate or the most ambitious in his proposals. But he’s the candidate who is in the best position to beat Trump and take back the Senate. He’s stayed strong in the polls nationally and up against Trump in key states, despite months of attacks. He’s got strong support from different types of Democrats. And most of all, the Democrats who know what it takes to win in Trump country believe he’s the best candidate for the job.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2020/1/29/21078640/joe-biden-beat-trump-win-2020-election-primaries

Media captionPalestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says the “conspiracy deal won’t pass”

Palestinians have dismissed US President Donald Trump’s new Middle East peace plan as a “conspiracy”.

The plan envisages a Palestinian state and the recognition of Israeli sovereignty over West Bank settlements.

Mr Trump said Jerusalem would remain Israel’s “undivided” capital, but the Palestinian capital would “include areas of East Jerusalem”.

Reacting to Tuesday’s announcement, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said Jerusalem was “not for sale”.

“All our rights are not for sale and are not for bargain,” he added.

Media captionWhy the ancient city of Jerusalem is so important

Thousands of Palestinian protesters held a “day of rage” in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday, while the Israeli military deployed reinforcements in the occupied West Bank.

The blueprint, which aims to solve one of the world’s longest-running conflicts, was drafted under the stewardship of President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Standing alongside Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Tuesday, Mr Trump said his proposals “could be the last opportunity” for Palestinians.

Media captionPresident Trump: “No Palestinians or Israelis will be uprooted from their homes”

Reports said Mr Netanyahu was planning to press ahead with annexing 30% of the occupied West Bank, with a cabinet vote due on Sunday.

Israel has settled about 400,000 Jews in West Bank settlements, with another 200,000 living in East Jerusalem. The settlements are considered illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this.

What did Mr Abbas say?

Speaking on Tuesday, he said it was “impossible for any Palestinian, Arab, Muslim or Christian child to accept” a Palestinian state without Jerusalem as its capital.

“We say a thousand times, no, no, no,” he said. “We rejected this deal from the start and our stance was correct.”

The militant Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, also rejected the deal which it said aimed “to liquidate the Palestinian national project”.

The UN said it remained committed to a two-state solution based on the boundaries in place before the 1967 war, when Israel seized the West Bank and Gaza.

And Mr Netanyahu?

The Israeli prime minister described Mr Trump’s plan as the “deal of the century”.

Media captionNetanyahu: Trump’s peace plan is “the deal of the century”

Israel “will not miss this opportunity”, Mr Netanyahu said.

“May God bless us all with security, prosperity and peace!” he added.

How about international reactions?

A spokesman for UN Secretary General António Guterres called for a peace deal on the basis of UN resolutions, international law and bilateral agreements.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Palestinian protesters carried pictures of Mahmoud Abbas through the streets of Ramallah on Tuesday

The Arab League said it would hold an urgent meeting on Saturday.

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab urged the Palestinians to give the plans “genuine and fair consideration and explore whether they might prove a first step on the road back to negotiations”.

What are Trump’s key proposals?

  • The US will recognise Israeli sovereignty over swathes of the West Bank, including Jewish settlements and much of the Jordan river valley
  • The move will “more than double the Palestinian territory and provide a Palestinian capital in eastern Jerusalem”, where Mr Trump says the US will open an embassy. The Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) said the plan would give Palestinians control over 15% of what it called “historic Palestine”
  • Jerusalem “will remain Israel’s undivided capital”. The Palestinians insist East Jerusalem be the capital of their future state
  • “No Palestinians or Israelis will be uprooted from their homes” – suggesting that existing Jewish settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank will remain
  • Israel will work with Jordan to ensure the status quo governing the key holy site in Jerusalem known to Jews as the Temple Mount and al-Haram al-Sharif to Muslims is preserved. Jordan runs the religious trust that administers the site
  • Territory allocated to Palestinians in Mr Trump’s map “will remain open and undeveloped for a period of four years”. During that time, Palestinians can study the deal, negotiate with Israel, and “achieve the criteria for statehood”

Mr Trump also indicated that the West Bank would not be cut in half under the plan.

“We will also work to create a contiguous territory within the future Palestinian state, for when the conditions for statehood are met, including the firm rejection of terrorism,” he said.

A plan that overturns Palestinian aspirations

Until now all of the most difficult aspects of an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal – the so-called final status issues – like borders; the future of Israeli settlements in the West Bank; the long-term status of Jerusalem; and the fate of Palestinian refugees, were to be left for face-to-face talks between the Israelis and Palestinians themselves.

Not any longer. The deal proposed by President Trump and enthusiastically endorsed by Prime Minister Netanyahu essentially frames all of these issues in Israel’s favour.

The Palestinians were not just absent from this meeting – they have boycotted the Trump administration ever since it unilaterally moved its embassy to Jerusalem. But they have essentially been presented with an ultimatum – accept the Trump parameters or else, and they have been given some four years to come around.

While President Trump is offering the Palestinians a state it would be a much truncated one. No Jewish settlers will be uprooted and Israeli sovereignty will apparently be extended to the settlement blocs and the Jordan Valley. The Palestinians might have a capital in the East Jerusalem suburbs. This “take it or leave it offer” will appal many long-standing students of the region. The question now is not so much what benefit this deal might bring but how much damage it may do by over-turning Palestinian aspirations.

What’s the background?

Media captionIs Palestinian-Israel peace plan out of reach?

The Palestinians broke off contacts with the Trump administration in December 2017, after Mr Trump recognised Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and move the US embassy to the city from Tel Aviv.

Since then, the US has ended both bilateral aid for Palestinians and contributions for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA).

In November, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the US had abandoned its four-decades-old position that Jewish settlements in the West Bank were inconsistent with international law.

What are the issues at stake?

Of all the conflicts in the Middle East, that between Israel and the Palestinians has been the most intractable. Although the two sides signed a peace accord in 1993, more than a quarter of a century on they are arguably as far apart as ever.

Jerusalem: Both Israel and the Palestinians hold competing claims to the city. Israel, which occupied the formerly Jordanian-held eastern part in 1967, regards the whole of Jerusalem as its capital. The Palestinians insist on East Jerusalem – home to about 350,000 of their community – as their future capital

Palestinian statehood: The Palestinians want an independent state of their own, comprising the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. Israeli prime ministers have publicly accepted the notion of a Palestinian state alongside Israel – but not what form it should take. Benjamin Netanyahu has said any Palestinian state should be demilitarised with the powers to govern itself but not to threaten Israel.

Recognition: Israel insists that any peace deal must include Palestinian recognition of it as the “nation-state of the Jewish people”, arguing that without this Palestinians will continue to press their own national claims to the land, causing the conflict to endure. The Palestinians say what Israel calls itself is its own business, but to recognise it as the Jewish state will discriminate against Israel’s Arab population of Palestinian origin, who are Muslims, Christians and Druze.

Borders: Both sides have fundamentally different ideas as to where the boundaries of a potential Palestinian state should be. The Palestinians insist on borders based on ceasefire lines which separated Israel and East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza between 1949 and 1967. Israel says those lines are militarily indefensible and were never intended to be permanent. It has not said where borders should be, other than making clear its own eastern border should be along the Jordan River.

Settlements: Since 1967, Israel has built about 140 settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, as well as 121 outposts – settlements built without the government’s authorisation. Settlements are considered illegal by most of the international community, though Israel disputes this. Palestinians say all settlements must be removed for a Palestinian state to be viable. Mr Netanyahu has vowed not only to never to uproot any settlements but to bring them under Israeli sovereignty.

Refugees: The UN says its agencies support about 5.5 million Palestinian refugees in the Middle East (the Palestinian Authority says there are up to 6 million), including the descendants of people who fled or were expelled by Jewish forces from what became Israel in the 1948-49 war. Palestinians insist on their right to return to their former homes, but Israel says they are not entitled to, noting that such a move would overwhelm it demographically and lead to its end as a Jewish state.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-51292865

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/28/politics/house-gop-2020/index.html

» Subscribe to NBC News: http://nbcnews.to/SubscribeToNBC
» Watch more NBC video: http://bit.ly/MoreNBCNews

NBC News is a leading source of global news and information. Here you will find clips from NBC Nightly News, Meet The Press, and original digital videos. Subscribe to our channel for news stories, technology, politics, health, entertainment, science, business, and exclusive NBC investigations.

Connect with NBC News Online!
Visit NBCNews.Com: http://nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
Find NBC News on Facebook: http://nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
Follow NBC News on Twitter: http://nbcnews.to/FollowNBC
Follow NBC News on Instagram: http://nbcnews.to/InstaNBC

World Health Organization Provides Update On Coronavirus | NBC News (Live Stream)

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mx6FzezCPXM

LONDON (Reuters) – The United Kingdom leaves the European Union an hour before midnight on Friday, casting off into an uncertain Brexit future that also challenges Europe’s post-World War Two project of forging unity from the ruins of conflict.

After the twists and turns of the Brexit crisis, the country’s most significant geopolitical move since the loss of empire could be an anticlimax of sorts: a transition period preserves membership in all but name until the end of 2020.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has given little clue to what the future holds, promising only to restore confidence for people and businesses.

“We’ll be out of the EU, free to chart our own course as a sovereign nation,” said Johnson, the New York-born face of the campaign to leave the EU.

But the June 2016 Brexit referendum showed a nation divided about more than Europe and triggered soul-searching about everything from secession and immigration to capitalism, empire and modern Britishness.

Strains exacerbated by Brexit could even lead to the break-up of the United Kingdom: England and Wales voted to leave the bloc but Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay.

The EU, meanwhile, must bid farewell to 15% of its economy, its biggest military spender and the City of London, the world’s international financial capital.

Some will celebrate Brexit, some will weep — but many Britons will do neither.

At home, government advertisements proclaim the Jan. 31 exit date while a newly minted 50-pence coin celebrates the end of 47 years of membership by imploring “peace, prosperity and friendship with all nations”.

Brexiteers wanted bells to toll across the land but Big Ben will stand silent after a campaign to get it to ‘bong for Brexit’ failed; it was too expensive given repair work.

The protracted Brexit meltdown — some say breakdown — has left allies and investors puzzled by a country that was for decades touted as a confident pillar of Western economic and political stability.

BREXIT FOREVER?

Leaving the EU was once far-fetched: the UK joined in 1973 as “the sick man of Europe” and less than two decades ago British leaders were arguing about whether to join the euro.

But the turmoil of the euro zone crisis, fears about mass immigration and a series of miscalculations by former Prime Minister David Cameron prompted the 52 to 48 percent vote to go.

For proponents, Brexit is a dream “independence day” for a United Kingdom escaping what they cast as a doomed German-dominated project that is failing its 500 million population.

“A very major country is leaving and maybe people should start to think about why that is,” said Nigel Farage, who along with Johnson was one of the main leaders of the 2016 Brexit campaign. “This European project wants to become an empire.”

U.S. President Donald Trump has praised Brexit as a “great thing” and a smart move.

Some European leaders have suggested the United Kingdom might one day change its mind.

After the repeated failure of “Remainers” to unite, organize or win elections, the main hope of europhiles is that the economic impact of leaving will convince a new generation to plot a way back into the fold.

‘A BETTER ENGLAND’

In east London’s Dagenham, overwhelmingly pro-Brexit in 2016, Tommy Smith, 63, will celebrate with a dram of whisky on Brexit night.

“It is about time. I am hoping for a better England,” the former delivery driver said.

“Hopefully it will reduce immigration and stop people coming here robbing the country and going home millionaires. There are too many immigrants,” said Smith, who said he hoped the government would spend more to help people like him.

The future, though, is unclear.

“Brexit is a reconceptualisation of our country, of our politics and of our place in the world,” said Anand Menon, director of The UK in a Changing Europe think-tank.

“It is the most significant thing certainly to have happened in our history since the Second World War.”

Opponents see leaving as a step back from the world that imperils both the United Kingdom and the European project that united a continent of democracies after millennia of conflict.

A diminished United Kingdom, they say, will still have to juggle the 21st Century rivalry between the United States and China — but as a $2.7 trillion economy rather than as a leading member of the $18.3 trillion EU.

Trade talks with every major power — including the EU — loom while there is little clarity on what the United Kingdom’s pitch to global investors will be.

For many, Brexit fatigue has set in already.

“Well I am not ready at all because I did not vote for it and I did not want it to happen, but now I just want it over,” said Judith Miller, a resident of London.

“I am tired, I have had enough, I am sick of it on the news and we are just going to have to deal with it.”

Writing by Guy Faulconbridge; Additional reporting by Parniyan Zemaryalai and Elizabeth Howcroft; Editing by Catherine Evans

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-preview/into-the-brexit-unknown-a-dis-united-kingdom-exits-the-european-union-idUSKBN1ZS20L

House Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., second from left, walks on Capitol Hall after a news conference with the House Democratic impeachment managers on Tuesday.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

House Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., second from left, walks on Capitol Hall after a news conference with the House Democratic impeachment managers on Tuesday.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

With Trump’s legal team resting its defense of the president, the impeachment trial now moves to its next phase: asking written questions.

Over 16 hours, senators of both parties will submit questions to House managers prosecuting the case and Trump’s defense lawyers, with Chief Justice John Roberts, who is presiding over the trial, reading the questions aloud on the floor of the chamber.

During the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton in 1999, senators asked more than 150 questions across two days.

Republicans and Democrats reached a deal in which the parties will alternate turns asking questions for up to eight hours on Wednesday. The same rules and duration of question time has been allotted for Thursday.

That sets the stage for a Friday vote on witnesses.

According to Democrats, multiple possible witnesses have first-hand accounts of what they say as a quid-pro-quo scheme with Ukraine that forms the basis of the two impeachment charges Trump is facing.

Democrats say bringing witnesses into the impeachment trial is essential to conducting a fair trial, while conservatives fear the entry of witnesses can inject uncertainty into the proceeding and prolong the process.

Among the sought-after witnesses is former National Security Adviser John Bolton, who captured Washington’s attention following the release of revelations in his forthcoming book that Trump allegedly told Bolton that the military assistance was only to be released after Ukraine opened investigations into his Democratic rivals. Those purported book details, first reported by The New York Times, placed pressure on senators to vote to allow witnesses into the trial.

Trump’s defense team, in response, argued that a manuscript of Bolton’s book would be “inadmissible” in the trial. Defense lawyer Jay Sekulow saying impeachment “is not a game of leaks and unsourced manuscripts.” And anything Bolton would have to offer in person about his conversations with Trump, argued Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz, would not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.

Whether Republicans can defeat the Democrats’ push for witnesses, including Bolton, remains an open question.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told Republicans in a closed-door meeting late Tuesday that the party does not yet have the votes to block new witnesses, but that does not mean Democrats will be able to subpoena Bolton, or any other witness. That decision will come down to moderate Republicans including Mitt Romney, R-Utah, Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska and Susan Collins, R-Maine who have indicated they may be open to hearing from witnesses, but their final decision is still unknown.

Trump’s defense team argued earlier this week that the case against the president presented by Democrats does not constitute any impeachable offenses.

Lawyers for Trump have also accused Democrats of trying to invalidate the result of the 2016 election. They also argued that Trump has not committed any crime and therefore cannot be removed from office, even though many legal scholars say breaking a law is not required in order to secure an impeachment conviction that would remove a president from office.

Democrats have impeached Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for what the prosecution team says was a campaign to pressure Ukraine into opening investigations into Trump’s political rivals and held-up $391 million in congressionally approved security assistance in order to apply leverage on Ukrainian authorities. House Democrats say the White House’s refusal to cooperate with the impeachment investigation is proof of a cover-up and amounts to obstruction.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/29/799371386/impeachment-trial-moves-to-question-phase-while-witness-vote-looms

Hong Kong has halted transport links to mainland China and extended school closures after declaring a virus emergency for the city over the weekend.

Chinese authorities have restricted travel for at least 17 cities in its central Hubei province, where Wuhan is located. It is an area encompassing more than 50 million people. The virus is believed to have first appeared in a Wuhan seafood market also selling wildlife including snakes and marmots. Hubei on Sunday shut down inter-city and inter-province buses in an effort to curb the outbreak.

The World Health Organization is sending a delegation of researchers and other health experts to China to help combat the coronavirus outbreak. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing earlier Tuesday.

While the majority of confirmed coronavirus cases and deaths are in mainland China, the virus has also been identified in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, Nepal, France, Germany, Australia, the UAE and the U.S.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/29/first-middle-east-cases-of-coronavirus-confirmed-in-the-uae.html

MSNBC was in impeachment hyperdrive on Tuesday and gave little mention to the Middle East peace plan President Trump announced from the White House alongside Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu.

Trump called for a two-state solution to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as he unveiled the details of his administration’s much-awaited plan to bring peace in the Middle East.

“My vision presents a win-win situation for both sides,” Trump said. “Today Israel has taken a giant step toward peace.”

He later tweeted a map of the proposed State of Palestine.

While Trump and Netanyahu praised the plan as a way toward ending the decadeslong conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, odds of the peace plan taking shape are long given that the Palestinians have preemptively rejected the plan.

“This is a great deal,” Trump said. “And the Palestinians may not have this opportunity ever again.”

CNN’S VIRAL VIDEO MOCKING SUPPORTERS RACKS UP MILLIONS MORE VIEWERS THAN ORIGINAL AIRING

MSNBC, however, didn’t air Trump’s major foreign policy remarks, despite the White House event occurring before Tuesday’s impeachment trial continued.

The cable news network made a brief mention of the announced Middle East plan during its marathon impeachment coverage.

“Just to let our viewers in on what’s going on across town at the White House, the president is hosting the indicted prime minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu,” MSNBC anchor Brian Williams said as the network briefly showed live footage from the White House. “It’s an East Room event. President is reading remarks on a teleprompter. Netanyahu is up there on stage with him as you can see. This is apparently the day they unveil the latest crack at a Mideast peace plan at the White House prior to the president traveling to Wildwood, New Jersey, to put the ‘wild’ in Wildwood, New Jersey, tonight for a rally.”

“As soon as this ends, Netanyahu is flying to Moscow, putting Moscow back in the middle of these conversations,” impeachment coverage co-anchor Nicolle Wallace added, ending the network’s coverage of the unveiled Israel-Palestinian plan shortly after.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

CNN aired roughly six minutes of the beginning portion of Trump’s remarks and later interviewed White House adviser and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who was heavily involved in the peace talks.

Fox News aired roughly 33 minutes of Trump’s remarks until the impeachment trial was underway in the Senate.

Fox News’ Andrew O’Reilly and John Roberts contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-trump-netanyahu-middle-east-peace-plan-israel

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/28/politics/democrats-usmca-not-invited/

NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly dismissed the idea that journalists interview top government officials to score “political points,” pushing back on Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoNPR reporter after Pompeo clash: Journalists don’t interview government officials to score ‘political points’ NPR sends letter to State Dept. demanding answers for reporter’s removal from trip Trump allies throw jabs at Bolton over book’s claims MORE‘s remarks following a clash between the pair after an interview last week.

Kelly, co-host of NPR’s “All Things Considered,” wrote in a New York Times op-ed on Tuesday night that being able to hold powerful people accountable is “both a privilege and a responsibility.”

“There is a reason that freedom of the press is enshrined in the Constitution. There is a reason it matters that people in positions of power — people charged with steering the foreign policy of entire nations — be held to account. The stakes are too high for their impulses and decisions not to be examined in as thoughtful and rigorous an interview as is possible,” she wrote.

“Journalists don’t sit down with senior government officials in the service of scoring political points. We do it in the service of asking tough questions, on behalf of our fellow citizens. And then sharing the answers — or lack thereof — with the world.”

Kelly’s op-ed came days after a run-in with Pompeo following an interview, in which the reporter said the secretary of State swore at her, questioned whether Americans care about Ukraine and quizzed her on whether she could point to Ukraine on a map.

Pompeo lashed out on Saturday, accusing her of lying about the terms of the interview and violating an agreement to keep part of their discussion off the record while asserting that the incident was “another example of how unhinged the media has become in its quest to hurt President TrumpDonald John TrumpCNN’s Don Lemon explains handling of segment after Trump criticism NPR reporter after Pompeo clash: Journalists don’t interview government officials to score ‘political points’ Lawyer says Parnas can’t attend Senate trial due to ankle bracelet MORE and this Administration.”

He also seemingly suggested that she couldn’t find Ukraine on a map.

The feud escalated when the State Department reportedly told another NPR reporter that they were being removed from the secretary’s upcoming overseas trip, sparking backlash and calls from journalist advocacy groups to reverse the decision.

Kelly noted in her op-ed that in January she interviewed not only Pompeo, but also Javad Zarif, Iran’s foreign minister. That interview with Zarif in Tehran came just “four days after an American drone strike had killed Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani,” she wrote, outlining how she pressed the Iranian diplomat in that interview.

“I write about all this now to refocus attention on the substance of the interviews, which has been overshadowed by Mr. Pompeo’s subsequently swearing at me, calling me a liar and challenging me to find Ukraine on an unmarked map,” Kelly explained.

She wrote that “[f]or the record, I did” find Ukraine on an unmarked map.

“That’s not the point. The point is that recently the risk of miscalculation — of two old adversaries misreading each other and accidentally escalating into armed confrontation — has felt very real,” she continued.

“It occurs to me that swapping insults through interviews with journalists such as me might, terrifyingly, be as close as the top diplomats of the United States and Iran came to communicating this month.”

 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/media/480425-npr-reporter-after-pompeo-clash-journalists-dont-interview-top-government

Waves splash in a pool during an earthquake, seen in a still frame from social media video, in George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.

Social Media/Realvision.com via Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Social Media/Realvision.com via Reuters

Waves splash in a pool during an earthquake, seen in a still frame from social media video, in George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.

Social Media/Realvision.com via Reuters

Updated at 9:45 p.m. ET

A powerful 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of Jamaica, Cuba and the Caymans on Tuesday, startling people as far away as Miami and prompting official tsunami alerts for a large area of the Caribbean that were later withdrawn.

The quake, initially reported as 7.3-magnitude before being upgraded, was centered 86 miles northwest of Montego Bay, Jamaica, and 87 miles west-southwest of Niquero, Cuba, at a depth of just 6 miles, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. It struck at 2:10 p.m. ET.

There were no immediate reports of major damage or injuries, but social media was flooded with posts of photos and video from people documenting the event. In the Cayman Islands, video showed damaged streets and sinkholes opened up by the violent shaking.

A tsunami alert was issued for a wide swath of the Caribbean. However, it was later cancelled.

Knolly Moses, an ad executive in Jamaica told NPR that the quake was long and strong, with the walls of his office rippling.

“This one was serious. It put the fear of God into many people today,” he said.

In the Cayman Islands, where there was a strong 6.1-magnitude aftershock, videos on social media show sinkholes and damage to streets. Skyscrapers in downtown Miami were evacuated.

The Associated Press reports that the quake was felt strongly in the Cuban city of Santiago.

“We were all sitting and we felt the chairs move,” Belkis Guerrero, who works in a Catholic cultural center in the center of Santiago, told the AP. “We heard the noise of everything moving around.”

She said there was no apparent damage in the city. “It felt very strong but it doesn’t look like anything happened,” she told the news agency.

The quake was also felt in Mexico’s Quintana Roo state, where Cancun is located, Gov. Carlos Joaquín González told the AP.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/28/800547848/powerful-earthquake-strikes-caribbean-but-no-reports-of-injuries-or-damage

Chinese President Xi Jinping is facing a major political crisis from the ongoing coronavirus outbreak, experts said.

By the end of Tuesday, there were 5,974 confirmed cases of the new coronavirus in mainland China, according to the country’s National Health Commission. The death toll was 132.

To contain the spread of the virus, Beijing is taking measures like locking down cities housing millions, restricting travel and extending the Lunar New Year holiday. Economists expect the economic fallout to hit tourism and consumption in and outside China.

The rapid escalation of the viral outbreak since it was first identified in late December likely made Xi realize that it was “not just a public health crisis,” said Allison Sherlock, China researcher at the Eurasia Group, a risk consultancy.

“This is the probably the greatest political challenge that he’s faced since taking office in 2012,” Sherlock told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “At the central level, President Xi and his right-hand man, Premier Li Keqiang, I think they understand that the stakes are very high here.”

“The mishandling of the virus didn’t just lead to the rapid spread of the outbreak, it also eroded trust in the government. And they’re going to try to do everything in their power to ensure that people start believing in their local officials again,” she added.

Volker Stanzel, a former German ambassador to China, said the coronavirus outbreak is the biggest, foreseeable test for the Chinese Communist Party leadership this year.

A constant factor in the last 70 years of Communist China is that of the party holding onto power “ruthlessly, relentlessly and not giving in,” said Stanzel, who is now a senior distinguished fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP.

Xi in particular has managed to consolidate power at the very top of the political ladder.

“As soon as you have stress factors not fully managed in the way the Communist Party claims it will do it, then the authority of the Communist Party, and first of all, the person at the top of the Communist Party will be put into question and you see the first symptoms of that not after (the social unrest in) Hong Kong, not after (the elections in) Taiwan, but as is reported in our media, you see it with the coronavirus,” Stanzel said at a discussion on Tuesday to discuss China’s outlook for 2020 hosted by Mercator Institute for China Studies in Berlin.

China’s tightly controlled official media is reporting all-out government efforts to control the virus, but social media anger at how the outbreak has been handled has prevailed, often in coded terms to evade censors.

“Here, suddenly, obviously, it is not even possible anymore for the internet censors to control the cynical questions in the internet of the population whether the leadership is really managing this crisis in the right way,” Stanzel said, according to a live stream of the discussion.

“So here, we have the first time … obviously and openly, for all to see who go on the internet, the authority of Xi Jinping is put into question,” Stanzel said.

On Tuesday, Reuters reported that Xi told the head of the WHO on Tuesday that the new coronavirus is a “devil” and that China is confident of winning the battle against it.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/29/coronavirus-chinas-xi-is-facing-his-greatest-political-challenge.html

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Several offices were evacuated in Miami, Florida after the earthquake struck

A powerful 7.7-magnitude earthquake has struck in the Caribbean, prompting brief tsunami warnings and office evacuations as far away as Florida.

The quake hit between Jamaica, the Cayman Islands and Cuba at a depth of 10 km (6.2 miles), the US Geological Survey (USGS) said on Tuesday.

Buildings shook and tremors were felt across the Caribbean, but there were no immediate reports of casualties.

Some offices were temporarily evacuated in Miami and parts of Jamaica.

Warnings by the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) were later withdrawn.

The PTWC initially said “hazardous tsunami waves” were possible for coasts located within 300km (186 miles) of the earthquake’s epicentre.

This included parts of Belize, Cuba, Honduras, Mexico, the Cayman Islands and Jamaica, it said. But in an update at around 20:45 GMT, the PTWC said the “tsunami threat had now largely passed”.

Seismologist Dr Lucy Jones tweeted: “The M7.7 Jamaican quake produced sideways motion on the fault, so the tsunami risk is low.”

The epicentre of the quake, initially reported as magnitude-7.3 before being upgraded, was 125 km north-west of Lucea, Jamaica.

Shaking was reported in the Cuban capital, Havana, in Kingston, Jamaica and Miami – some some 708 km from the epicentre.

Image caption

The quake hit between Jamaica, the Cayman Islands and Cuba

Pictures from Miami showed office workers gathered in car parks and thronging the streets after the quake struck at around 14:10 Miami time (19:10 GMT). There were no injuries or road closures, Miami police said.

USGS geologist Ryan Gold told the Miami Herald it was “completely reasonable” for a quake of that magnitude to be felt in Florida.

“It’s a very large earthquake which can produce a lot of seismic energy,” he said.

“I felt the house trembling and realised that it was a quake,” Kingston resident Jawara Rawjers told AFP news agency.

Machel Emanuel, a doctor in the same city, added: “I was on the second floor of a building and there was a sustained shaking of the building. I felt dizzy. The door was slamming consistently for a while.”

In the Cayman Islands, a warning to “move away from coastal areas” was issued by the government but stood down a few hours later.

On Twitter, Cayman authorities said there were “only a few reports of structural damage to buildings” and shelters were being opened as a precaution.

Mikhail Campbell, a police media relations officer in the Cayman Islands, told Reuters news agency he was not immediately aware of any reports of serious damage.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-51287493

MSNBC was in impeachment hyperdrive on Tuesday and gave little mention to the Middle East peace plan President Trump announced from the White House alongside Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu.

Trump called for a two-state solution to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as he unveiled the details of his administration’s much-awaited plan to bring peace in the Middle East.

“My vision presents a win-win situation for both sides,” Trump said. “Today Israel has taken a giant step toward peace.”

He later tweeted a map of the proposed State of Palestine.

While Trump and Netanyahu praised the plan as a way toward ending the decadeslong conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, odds of the peace plan taking shape are long given that the Palestinians have preemptively rejected the plan.

“This is a great deal,” Trump said. “And the Palestinians may not have this opportunity ever again.”

CNN’S VIRAL VIDEO MOCKING SUPPORTERS RACKS UP MILLIONS MORE VIEWERS THAN ORIGINAL AIRING

MSNBC, however, didn’t air Trump’s major foreign policy remarks, despite the White House event occurring before Tuesday’s impeachment trial continued.

The cable news network made a brief mention of the announced Middle East plan during its marathon impeachment coverage.

“Just to let our viewers in on what’s going on across town at the White House, the president is hosting the indicted prime minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu,” MSNBC anchor Brian Williams said as the network briefly showed live footage from the White House. “It’s an East Room event. President is reading remarks on a teleprompter. Netanyahu is up there on stage with him as you can see. This is apparently the day they unveil the latest crack at a Mideast peace plan at the White House prior to the president traveling to Wildwood, New Jersey, to put the ‘wild’ in Wildwood, New Jersey, tonight for a rally.”

“As soon as this ends, Netanyahu is flying to Moscow, putting Moscow back in the middle of these conversations,” impeachment coverage co-anchor Nicolle Wallace added, ending the network’s coverage of the unveiled Israel-Palestinian plan shortly after.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

CNN aired roughly six minutes of the beginning portion of Trump’s remarks and later interviewed White House adviser and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who was heavily involved in the peace talks.

Fox News aired roughly 33 minutes of Trump’s remarks until the impeachment trial was underway in the Senate.

Fox News’ Andrew O’Reilly and John Roberts contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-trump-netanyahu-middle-east-peace-plan-israel

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul says he’s offended and shocked that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer would accuse President Trump and his children of making money illegally off of politics.

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Radio, FOX News Headlines 24/7, FOXNews.com and the direct-to-consumer streaming service, FOX Nation. FOX News also produces FOX News Sunday on FOX Broadcasting Company and FOX News Edge. A top five-cable network, FNC has been the most watched news channel in the country for 17 consecutive years. According to a 2018 Research Intelligencer study by Brand Keys, FOX News ranks as the second most trusted television brand in the country. Additionally, a Suffolk University/USA Today survey states Fox News is the most trusted source for television news or commentary in the country, while a 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News is the top-cited outlet. FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape while routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.

Subscribe to Fox News! https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/

Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon
Special Report with Bret Baier: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon
The Story with Martha Maccallum: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon
Tucker Carlson Tonight: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon
Hannity: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon
The Ingraham Angle: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon
Fox News @ Night: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon

Follow Fox News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxnews/

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYucu5C0m_c

Here’s what you need to know to understand the impeachment trial of President Trump.

What’s happening now: Trump’s legal team and House impeachment managers have presented their cases under ground rules adopted by the Senate last week.

What happens next: The trial will resume Wednesday afternoon with the question period for senators. Questions will alternate between the majority and minority for up to eight hours on Wednesday and again for up to eight hours on Thursday. They are submitted to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who reads them. Here’s more on what happens next.

How we got here: A whistleblower complaint led House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to announce the beginning of an official impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24. Closed-door hearings and subpoenaed documents related to the president’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky followed. After two weeks of public hearings in November, the House Intelligence Committee wrote a report that was sent to the House Judiciary Committee, which held its own hearings. Pelosi and House Democrats announced the articles of impeachment against Trump on Dec. 10. The Judiciary Committee approved two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. When the full House of Representatives adopted both articles of impeachment against him on Dec. 18, Trump became the third U.S. president to be impeached.

Stay informed: Read the latest reporting and analysis on impeachment here.

Listen: Follow The Washington Post’s coverage with daily updates from across our podcasts.

Want to understand impeachment better? Sign up for the 5-Minute Fix to get a guide in your inbox every weekday. Have questions? Submit them here, and they may be answered in the newsletter.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mcconnell-tells-senators-he-doesnt-have-votes-to-block-witnesses-in-trump-impeachment-trial/2020/01/28/52caa426-41e0-11ea-b5fc-eefa848cde99_story.html

Concerns about Iran had become “much more existential than the Palestinian issue,” Mr. Kuttab said. “They are worried about their physical presence being threatened from Iran, much more than Israel,” he said.

Still, for all the changes, Arab leaders refrained from publicly backing Mr. Trump’s plan.

In his address at the White House on Tuesday, Mr. Trump thanked Oman, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates “for the incredible work they’ve done in helping us with so much,” and noted that their ambassadors were in attendance. But even those countries did not formally endorse the plan.

Some other countries took a notedly measured stance.

The foreign ministry of Egypt, the first Arab country to reach a peace treaty with Israel, praised Mr. Trump’s efforts to reach an agreement, but the language of its statement remained inside the boundaries of Egypt’s longstanding policy on the conflict.

Egypt “appreciates the continuous efforts” of the Trump administration to end the conflict, the statement said. It encouraged both sides to resume talks that might eventually restore to Palestinians their “full legitimate rights through the establishment of a sovereign independent state.”

The carefully worded statement was a clear expression of support for the American president, if not for the plan itself, from Egypt’s authoritarian ruler, President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, whom Mr. Trump once called “my favorite dictator.”

The Trump administration is currently mediating a dispute involving Egypt by hosting negotiations with officials from Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan over a contentious $4 billion dam that Ethiopia is building.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/world/middleeast/arabs-reaction-trump-mideast-peace-plan.html