WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said Thursday he would have no qualms voting for a gay presidential candidate – even though he’s unlikely to support the gay Democrat running to take his job this year, Pete Buttigieg.

“It doesn’t seem to be hurting Pete Buttigieg,” Trump told Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera during a radio interview in response to a question about whether U.S. voters would support a gay candidate for president.

“I think there would be some that wouldn’t – and I wouldn’t be among that group to be honest with you,” Trump said. 

Senate action:Senate poised to pass bill curbing Trump’s war powers with Iran 

Trump v. Kelly:Ex-Trump Chief of Staff John Kelly defends Alexander Vindman

Trump touched on a wide range of topics during the roughly 45-minute interview, including the 2020 election. He slammed former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is facing criticism for embracing a “stop-and-frisk” policies that disproportionately affected the city’s black residents.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/02/13/trump-could-support-gay-president-but-probably-not-buttigieg/4748705002/

‘):””},t.getDefinedParams=function(e,t){return t.filter(function(t){return e[t]}).reduce(function(t,n){return i(t,function(e,t,n){return t in e?Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:n,enumerable:!0,configurable:!0,writable:!0}):e[t]=n,e}({},n,e[n]))},{})},t.isValidMediaTypes=function(e){var t=[“banner”,”native”,”video”];return!!Object.keys(e).every(function(e){return J()(t,e)})&&(!e.video||!e.video.context||J()([“instream”,”outstream”,”adpod”],e.video.context))},t.getBidderRequest=function(e,t,n){return H()(e,function(e){return 0n[e]?-1:0}};var L=n(3),F=n(115),G=n.n(F),V=n(12),H=n.n(V),K=n(10),J=n.n(K),$=n(116);n.d(t,”deepAccess”,function(){return $.a});var Y=n(117);n.d(t,”deepSetValue”,function(){return Y.a});var Z,X=n(5),Q=”Array”,ee=”String”,te=”Function”,ne=”Number”,re=”Object”,ie=”Boolean”,oe=Object.prototype.toString,ae=Boolean(window.console),ue=Boolean(ae&&window.console.log),ce=Boolean(ae&&window.console.info),se=Boolean(ae&&window.console.warn),de=Boolean(ae&&window.console.error),fe={checkCookieSupport:M,createTrackPixelIframeHtml:k,getWindowSelf:f,getWindowTop:d,getWindowLocation:l,insertUserSyncIframe:O,insertElement:T,isFn:_,triggerPixel:C,logError:v,logWarn:h,logMessage:p,logInfo:g},le={},pe=function(e,t){return t}.bind(null,1,le)()===le?Function.prototype.bind:function(e){var t=this,n=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,1);return function(){return t.apply(e,n.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)))}},ge=(Z=0,function(){return++Z}),he=function(){if(Array.prototype.indexOf)return Array.prototype.indexOf}(),ve=N(“timeToRespond”,function(e,t){return t=e.length?(this._t=void 0,i(1)):i(0,”keys”==t?n:”values”==t?e[n]:[n,e[n]])},”values”),o.Arguments=o.Array,r(“keys”),r(“values”),r(“entries”)},101:function(e,t,n){“use strict”;var r=n(102),i=n(72);e.exports=n(104)(“Set”,function(e){return function(t){return e(this,0>>0,o=0;if(t)n=t;else{for(;o=y.syncsPerBidder?s.logWarn(‘Number of user syncs exceeded for “‘.concat(t,'”‘)):g.canBidderRegisterSync(e,t)?(h[e].push([t,n]),(r=b)[i=t]?r[i]+=1:r[i]=1,void(b=r)):s.logWarn(‘Bidder “‘.concat(t,'” not permitted to register their “‘).concat(e,'” userSync pixels.’)):s.logWarn(“Bidder is required for registering sync”):s.logWarn(‘User sync type “‘.concat(e,'” not supported’));var r,i},g.syncUsers=function(){var e=0Object(y.timestamp)()},R=function(e){return e&&(e.status&&!I()([T.BID_STATUS.RENDERED],e.status)||!e.status)},D=(v=A.a,m={},(b={}).setLatestAuctionForAdUnit=function(e,t){m[e]=t},b.resetPresetTargeting=function(e){if(Object(y.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var t=s(e),n=v.getAdUnits().filter(function(e){return I()(t,e.code)});window.googletag.pubads().getSlots().forEach(function(e){C.forEach(function(t){n.forEach(function(n){n.code!==e.getAdUnitPath()&&n.code!==e.getSlotElementId()||e.setTargeting(t,null)})})})}},b.resetPresetTargetingAST=function(e){s(e).forEach(function(e){var t=window.apntag.getTag(e);if(t&&t.keywords){var n=Object.keys(t.keywords),r={};n.forEach(function(e){I()(C,e.toLowerCase())||(r[e]=t.keywords[e])}),window.apntag.modifyTag(e,{keywords:r})}})},b.getAllTargeting=function(e){var t,n,p,v,m,A,w,x,E,j=1e.getTimeout()+b.b.getConfig(“timeoutBuffer”)&&e.executeCallback(!0)}function a(e,t){var n=e.getBidRequests(),r=S()(n,function(e){return e.bidderCode===t.bidderCode});!function(e,t){var n;if(e.bidderCode&&(0n&&(t=!1)),!t}),t&&e.run(),t}function d(e,t){void 0===e[t]?e[t]=1:e[t]++}var l=this;g=C,s=Date.now();var m=I.makeBidRequests(W,s,K,$,L);E.logInfo(“Bids Requested for Auction with id: “.concat(K),m),m.forEach(function(e){var t;t=e,G=G.concat(t)});var y={};if(m.lengtht.max?e:t},{max:0}),b=0,m=u()(t.buckets,function(t){if(e>v.max*n){var i=t.precision;void 0===i&&(i=s),r=(t.max*n).toFixed(i)}else{if(e=t.length?{value:void 0,done:!0}:(e=r(t,n),this._i+=e.length,{value:e,done:!1})})},62:function(e,t,n){function r(){}var i=n(28),o=n(94),a=n(63),u=n(50)(“IE_PROTO”),c=”prototype”,s=function(){var e,t=n(55)(“iframe”),r=a.length;for(t.style.display=”none”,n(97).appendChild(t),t.src=”javascript:”,(e=t.contentWindow.document).open(),e.write(“

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/02/the-way-to-make-mike-bloomberg-disappear-is-to-elect-him.html

The US attorney general, William Barr, publicly rebuked Donald Trump on Thursday, saying that the president’s tweets about the case of Roger Stone “make it impossible for me to do my job” and that he would not be “bullied or influenced” over justice department decisions.

In an interview with ABC News, the attorney general acknowledged his comments could leave him open to backlash from the president, who is notoriously intolerant of criticism from his aides. But Barr said he was determined to lead the justice department without being influence by outside forces, including the president.

“I think it’s time to stop the tweeting about Department of Justice criminal cases,” Barr told ABC.

The attorney general emphasized Trump “has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case”, but he acknowledged the president’s comments undercut his authority.

Despite Barr insisting he will not be “bullied” by Trump on justice department matters, some commentators were skeptical that Barr was actually trying to distance himself from the president.

An Obama-era justice department official, Matthew Miller, wrote on Twitter: “Don’t be fooled by this one, people. Barr is telling the president that his impulsiveness is making it politically harder for him to deliver the results he wants. If Trump would just shut up, Barr could take care of him much more effectively.”

“The best indicator of future performance is past performance,” wrote the US congresswoman Val Demings, of Florida. “Attorney General Barr’s past performance was to mislead the American people (about the Mueller Report) in order to cover up wrongdoing by the president. Why shouldn’t we believe that’s exactly what he’s doing now?”

ABC News Politics
(@ABCPolitics)

EXCLUSIVE: Attorney General Bill Barr: If the president “were to say ‘go investigate somebody’…and you sense it’s because they’re a political opponent, then an attorney general shouldn’t carry that out, wouldn’t carry that out.” https://t.co/lBtFOWpLkC pic.twitter.com/YcJ0GruGeB


February 13, 2020

In his interview with ABC, Barr added that public statements and tweets about the department and its pending cases “make it impossible for me to do my job and to assure the courts and the prosecutors in the department that we’re doing our work with integrity”.

He added: “I’m not going to be bullied or influenced by anybody … whether it’s Congress, a newspaper editorial board, or the president. I’m gonna do what I think is right. And you know … I cannot do my job here at the department with a constant background commentary that undercuts me.”

The White House press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, responded by saying the president “wasn’t bothered” by Barr’s comments: “[Barr] has the right, just like any American citizen, to publicly offer his opinions. President Trump uses social media very effectively to fight for the American people against injustices in our country.”

ABC News Politics
(@ABCPolitics)

NEW: White House press sec. Stephanie Grisham says President Trump “wasn’t bothered” by Attorney General Bill Barr’s comments to @ABC News. https://t.co/crNbWi6YpG pic.twitter.com/eK4dd9BdZ0


February 13, 2020

The attorney general’s remarkable rebuke comes amid an intensifying fallout over the Stone case, after the justice department overruled its own prosecutors who had recommended that Stone, a longtime Trump ally and confidant, be sentenced to seven to nine years in prison. The four prosecutors on the case subsequently resigned in protest.

The department has insisted the decision to undo the sentencing recommendation was made on Monday night before Trump’s tweet calling the recommended sentence “very horrible and unfair”.

Barr, a Trump loyalist, is also under fire for the reversal, which has drawn fierce condemnation from former justice department figures and leading Democrats who have warned of an “abuse of power”.

The Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, speaking on Fox News, said the president should heed Barr’s advice. “I think the president should listen,” McConnell told the host Bret Baier. “If the attorney general says it’s getting in the way of doing his job, the president should listen to the attorney general.”

Barr is not the only high-profile figure to have criticized Trump this week. On Wednesday, the former White House chief of staff John Kelly spoke out against the treatment of the fired impeachment inquiry witness Alexander Vindman.

Stone was convicted in November of tampering with a witness and obstructing the House investigation into whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Russia during the 2016 election. He is scheduled to be sentenced next week.

Agencies contributed reporting

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/13/william-barr-trump-twitter-justice-department

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said Thursday he would have no qualms voting for a gay presidential candidate – even though he’s unlikely to support the gay Democrat running to take his job this year, Pete Buttigieg.

“It doesn’t seem to be hurting Pete Buttigieg,” Trump told Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera during a radio interview in response to a question about whether U.S. voters would support a gay candidate for president.

“I think there would be some that wouldn’t – and I wouldn’t be among that group to be honest with you,” Trump said. 

Senate action:Senate poised to pass bill curbing Trump’s war powers with Iran 

Trump v. Kelly:Ex-Trump Chief of Staff John Kelly defends Alexander Vindman

Trump touched on a wide range of topics during the roughly 45-minute interview, including the 2020 election. He slammed former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is facing criticism for embracing a “stop-and-frisk” policies that disproportionately affected the city’s black residents.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/02/13/trump-could-support-gay-president-but-probably-not-buttigieg/4748705002/

Christina Kerby was corralled aboard a massive luxury cruise ship, charting a meandering course somewhere in the South China Sea, when she began thinking about the apocalypse.

Luckily, the WiFi on Holland America’s MS Westerdam was plentiful. She tapped out a tweet.

“Here’s a science fiction plot line for ya,” she wrote. “Amidst a global epidemic that wipes out the earth’s population, it’s up to the people aboard one cruise ship — the only safe place on earth — to repopulate the planet. **Passengers onboard the #Westerdam begin eyeing each other nervously**”

It was an idea befitting her new dystopian reality — but instead of a sci-fi thriller, she was going for lighthearted comedy. The way she saw it, there wasn’t much else she could do, as her long-planned vacation was ensnared in a global frenzy over a fast-spreading disease and the story of her cruise ship had spiraled into international news.

Kerby boarded the ship in Hong Kong on Feb. 1, but hundreds of other passengers had been cruising since Jan. 21, riding a route that was supposed to ferry them north, from Cambodia to Japan. Soon after Kerby got on, plans began to change.

Four times the Westerdam tried to dock at ports across East and Southeast Asia, and four times it was turned away, rebuffed by governments frantically trying to protect their countries from the spread of coronavirus, now known as covid-19. Authorities are wary of cruise ships after infections rose aboard the Diamond Princess, which is quarantined at a port in Yokohama, Japan. Strict new measures have also banned from cruise ships anyone who has recently traveled in China.

Even after the cruise line decided to cancel the rest of the trip, it struggled to find a country nearby that would allow its legions of passengers and crew to disembark and catch flights home.

Holland America tried to reassure officials in Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines and Thailand: The ship is virus-free, the company said again and again, with no known or suspected cases on board. On Monday, the crew told passengers they’d be able to get off in Bangkok, the cruise aborted but fully refunded.

But by the next day, they’d been told once more they were unwelcome. They’d have to keep floating, with no end in sight.

That’s about when Kerby, a 41-year-old who works in health-care communications, decided to start tweeting.

“I felt like it was really important to dispel some of the fears and misconceptions about what was going on in the ships,” Kerby told The Washington Post in an interview from the ship. “I was reading a lot of really scary and negative media reports, and I thought, this is not giving an accurate picture of what’s going on, so I wanted to bring some truths and some positivity to the mix.”

Because life aboard the ship bore little resemblance to the dire plot Kerby outlined in one of her tweets — at least for the passengers who paid a premium to ride the stately Westerdam, recently remodeled with a new bar and something called the Music Walk, which includes a “Lincoln Center Stage” and a “B.B. King’s Blues Club.”

Kerby was traveling with her 75-year-old mom, a mother-daughter trip she had eagerly anticipated, and when coronavirus fears scuttled their plan, she endeavored to make the best of a bad situation.

Her Twitter account became a live, public diary of the unexpectedly adventurous cruise. She has posted two dozen times, sharing photos and videos, opening a window into the strange pattern of life on board.

The ship was stranded, on the verge of a geopolitical crisis, but the revelry did not stop.

Counting passengers and crew, there were roughly 2,200 people aboard, making the Westerdam’s population about the same as a midsize New Hampshire city. Even with all the idle minds, bodies and time, Kerby said, the entertainment was constant and meticulously planned. She praised the cruise employees, who had to cancel trips to see family when the ship couldn’t dock and who have worked grueling hours for weeks in a row.

In cruise ship parlance, days traveling between ports are known as “sea days,” when the crew must arrange full days of events to amuse the boatload of people.

“They’ve somehow turned four sea days into, I don’t know, 10 or 12 sea days,” Kerby said.

There was the illusionist who performed magic tricks, the dueling pianos that played the hits, the nacho bar that came back every day. Then, the pièce de résistance: the chocolate surprise, when a parade of waiters appeared carrying trays piled high with chocolates.

In between performances, Kerby sat by the pool, attended spin classes and practiced folding pool towels into animals, a pastime that, aboard cruise ships, has been elevated to an art form. She said her new skill would “really raise the bar for home decorating” once she got home.

She went to a hair salon and attended a watch party for the Academy Awards, which aired Monday morning ship time — all without setting foot on land, like a floating summer camp.

Her Twitter missives have kept family and friends informed and have buoyed the spirits of passengers and crew, one of whom left a handwritten note at her cabin door, thanking her for the posts, the “witty sense of humor” and the “positive attitude.”

Her mother has enjoyed the ride, and Kerby remains relentlessly optimistic. But she did concede that the stress and uncertainty have been difficult at times. Nearly 8,000 miles away, in California’s Bay Area, Kerby’s husband and two young children have tracked her journey.

“I was starting to get concerned as the days went on,” her husband, Tony Martin-Vegue, said in an interview.

He wasn’t worried she was in danger from the disease, he said, but was concerned that a government would overreact.

“I thought, ‘Uh oh, at this point, anything can happen,’ ” Martin-Vegue said. “She could be stuck on the cruise line for a month or in quarantine on some military base because of innuendo, not necessarily facts.”

“I have a new understanding of cruises and how they work and how truly out of control you are,” he added. “If she were in a hotel in Hong Kong, she’d have more options, but she’s completely at the mercy of the cruise liner and local governments.”

But when Martin-Vegue saw her first few tweets, he knew Kerby would be all right.

“This is just her magic power,” he said. “She turns any situation into something positive.”

Kerby said she has drawn on her work with an organization called the Medical Clown Project, which sends trained clowns to hospitals to help families cope with illness. Aboard the ship, she saw passengers anxious and annoyed. She decided to channel her inner clown.

“I thought, well, this is an opportunity to give that a try in a stressful situation and see if I can lighten the mood,” she said. “I’ve always been the type of person to lead with humor.”

On Wednesday, for the second time in three days, Kerby tweeted, “Homeward bound!” But this time, she was hopeful it was for real. The Cambodian government had agreed to allow the Westerdam to dock at a port on the country’s southwestern coast. “All approvals have been received and we are extremely grateful to the Cambodian authorities for their support,” Holland America said in a statement.

The U.S. ambassador to Cambodia also tweeted his thanks. Kerby posted a video of passengers bopping to a cover of Bill Haley’s “Rock Around the Clock” in celebration. When she woke up Thursday, local time, Kerby could see land. The ship was anchored near Sihanoukville, and the crew said they’d be off soon, after a health check.

As the ship made its way into port on Thursday, Kerby diligently live-tweeted its progress. She wondered whether her husband would agree to buying a waterbed once she returned home, writing, “Not sure I’ll be able to sleep on dry land.”

She reported that the passengers remained upbeat — even though the muesli had run out at the buffet. Around dinner time on the ship, she noted that she was feeling rebellious and had decided to wear sneakers in the dining room.

The captain had said the clearance process was going smoothly, she wrote, but taking longer than expected. Not that she minded.

“People seem relieved to have time for more swimming and ice cream onboard,” she wrote.

And then, early Friday, Kerby signed on to share another series of updates: The Westerdam had been given the all clear.

The cruise to nowhere had arrived, and its passengers were finally coming ashore.

Read more:

How cruise ships are handling mass onboard quarantines as the new coronavirus spreads

Ten passengers infected with coronavirus on quarantined cruise ship with thousands aboard

Cruise lines ban anyone who has recently been to China as coronavirus fears spread

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2020/02/12/coronavirus-cruise-live-tweet/

Trump continued:His incredible wife, Karen, who I have a lot of respect for, once pulled me aside & said strongly that ‘John respects you greatly. When we are no longer here, he will only speak well of you.’ Wrong!”

According to The Atlantic, during a 75-minute speech and question and answer session at Drew University in New Jersey, Kelly defended Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who Trump removed from the White House last week following Vindman’s cooperation with impeachment investigators. He also touched on North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump’s rhetoric on immigration.

Kelly was Trump’s longest-serving chief of staff, holding the job for 18 months until leaving as Trump’s top aide in December 2018. Prior to that, he’d served as Trump’s first Homeland Security secretary, and ran U.S. Southern Command, which oversees military operations in Central and South America as well as the Caribbean. His scolding Wednesday is the sharpest criticism of Trump since he left the White House, though he has previously not hesitated to break with Trump since leaving government.

Two weeks ago, he said, “I believe John Bolton,” the former national security adviser who claimed in excerpts of a forthcoming memoir that Trump pursued a quid pro quo with Ukraine, according to news accounts of the book.

Before that, Kelly told The Washington Examiner he’d warned Trump not to replace him with a chief of staff who would be a “yes man,” predicting that doing so would result in his impeachment — an assertion Trump reportedly denied.

He also countered Trump during last year’s historically long partial government shutdown, picking a fight with the president over his proposed border wall with Mexico.

Kelly is far from the only former White House official who’s crossed the president after leaving the administration. Trump has also lambasted Bolton, former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and former aides Omarosa Manigault and Anthony Scaramucci after they each either implicitly or explicitly criticized Trump.

Bolton had Kelly‘s back, speaking up later Thursday to defend his former colleague, whom he called “an honorable man,“ against Trump‘s attacks while urging Republicans not to fall in line with Trump‘s broadsides.

“John and I have disagreed at times, as is commonplace at senior government levels, but he has always served his country faithfully,“ Bolton tweeted. “Conservatives especially have a responsibility to reject baseless attacks upon him.“

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/13/donald-trump-john-kelly-114861

Shipments of chicken from the U.S. to China are being diverted to ports in Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam due to the virus outbreak, according to Reuters, citing a U.S. poultry export trade group.

This is due to the outbreak keeping people from coming back to work in China, leading to a slowdown in the unloading of products at Chinese ports, which have run out of space for refrigerated containers. Such containers must be plugged into power once offloaded, to keep frozen meat cold, the USA Poultry & Egg Export Council told Reuters.

An estimated 300 to 400 refrigerated containers with poultry are being diverted, the council said, according to the report.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/14/coronavirus-latest-updates-chinas-hubei.html

Attorney General William Barr said Thursday that President Donald Trump should stop tweeting about the Department of Justice, complaining that the president’s comments “make it impossible for me to do my job.”

Barr’s unusual critique of his boss came in an ABC News interview.

The remarks followed days of sharp criticism of Barr, Trump and the DOJ by congressional Democrats over the department’s decision to reverse a harsh sentencing recommendation for Trump’s friend, Republican political consultant Roger Stone.

“I think it’s time to stop the tweeting about Department of Justice criminal cases,” Barr told ABC News Chief Justice Correspondent Pierre Thomas.

“I will make those decisions based on what I think is the right thing to do, and I’m not going to be bullied or influenced by anybody … whether it’s Congress, a newspaper editorial board, or the president,” Barr said.

“I’m going to do what I think is right,” Barr said. “I cannot do my job here at the department with a constant background commentary that undercuts me.”

Trump’s tweets, “make it impossible for me to do my job and to assure the courts and the prosecutors in the department that we’re doing our work with integrity,” he said.

White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham responded to Barr’s comments with the following statement:

“The President wasn’t bothered by the comments at all and he has the right, just like any American citizen, to publicly offer his opinions. President Trump uses social media very effectively to fight for the American people against injustices in our country, including the fake news. The President has full faith and confidence in Attorney General Barr to do his job and uphold the law.”

A White House official told NBC News that “the media is completely ignoring [the fact that] both Attorney General Barr and President Trump agree that the President is the victim of an egregious political injustice, and the Department of Justice is investigating these matters because it is the right thing to do.”

The four prosecutors who handled Stone’s trial on Monday night told a judge in a court filing that Stone should serve between seven to nine years in prison, the same span called for under federal sentencing guidelines as determined by U.S. probation officials.

Within hours of that filing, Trump blasted the sentencing recommendation as a “disgrace.”

And hours after that, the Justice Department said it would filed a new sentencing suggestion for Stone, calling for a markedly lower prison term.

All four prosecutors quit the case in apparent protest on Tuesday — and one resigned from the Justice Department altogether.

Trump praised Barr on social media after the Justice Department pushed the prosecutors in Stone’s case to weaken their proposal.

In his ABC interview, Barr, for the first time publicly, detailed his account of the decision to reduce Stone’s sentencing recommendation.

Barr said that Timothy Shea, his former counselor who recently became the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on Monday “came by to briefly chat with me and say that the team [of trial prosecutors] very much wanted to recommend the 7-9 year to the judge, but he thought that there was a way of satisfying everybody and providing more flexibility.”

“And there was a brief discussion of that. I was under the impression that what was going to happen was very much what I had suggested, which was deferring to the judge,” Barr told ABC.

“Monday night, when I first saw the news reports [about the sentencing proposal], I said “gee, the news is spinning this. This is not what we were going to do.’ “

“I was very surprised. And once I confirmed that that’s actually what we filed, I said that night to my staff that we had to get ready cause we had to do something in the morning to amend that and clarify what our position was,” the attorney general said.

“I had made a decision that I thought was fair and reasonable in this particular case. And once the tweet [by Trump condemning the sentencing proposal] occurred, the question was, well, now what do I do? Do you go forward with what you think is the right decision? Or do you pull back because of the tweet?”

“And that just sort of illustrates how disruptive these tweets can be,” Barr said.

Barr added that while “I have a problem with some of the tweets, I’m happy to say that in fact, the President has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case.

Asked if he had ever spoken with Trump about the sentencing recommendations for Stone, Barr said, “Never.”

Barr also denied that anyone from the White House had called him to try to influence him about Stone: “No. I have not discussed the Roger Stone case at the White House.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/13/ag-barr-says-trumps-tweets-make-it-impossible-for-me-to-do-my-job.html

North Korea has said it was also taking measures against the virus but has not released any official figures.

Reporting and research was contributed by Gillian Wong, Chris Buckley, Sui-Lee Wee, Steven Lee Myers, Keith Bradsher, Austin Ramzy, Choe Sang-Hun, Amber Wang, Zoe Mou, Albee Zhang, Yiwei Wang, Claire Fu, Amy Qin, Elaine Yu, Makiko Inoue, Hisako Ueno, Eimi Yamamitsu, Motoko Rich, Megan Specia, Stanley Reed, Elizabeth A. Harris, Tariro Mzezewa, Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs, Paul Mozur, Niraj Chokshi, Raymond Zhong and Tariro Mzezewai.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/13/world/asia/china-coronavirus.html

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., (center), Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, have been pushing a bipartisan resolution to limit the president’s war powers regarding Iran.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., (center), Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, have been pushing a bipartisan resolution to limit the president’s war powers regarding Iran.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Updated at 3:18 p.m. ET

The Senate approved a bipartisan resolution to curb the president’s war powers when it comes to Iran — a rare rebuke and effort to reassert Congress’ authority,

The vote was 55-45 — with eight Republicans joining all Democrats to pass the measure. The tally fell far short of the two-thirds needed to override a presidential veto.

Virginia Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine led the charge on the resolution, which would ban the president from ordering any new offensive strikes against Iran. It would still allow the president to order strikes in cases of self-defense against an imminent attack.

Early on, the legislation garnered three Republican co-sponsors: Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Mike Lee of Utah. And at least one other GOP member, Todd Young of Indiana, said he would support the measure, with other Republicans signaling they would vote yes as well.

“The resolution just says no war with Iran, unless you come and make that case to Congress. And if you make the case to Congress, in front of the American people, and we all have the discussion, ask the tough questions and conclude, sadly, it’s in the national interest, that’s one thing,” Kaine told NPR. “But if we’re not even willing to have that discussion, we shouldn’t be forcing people to risk their lives.”

The move comes more than a week after the Senate acquitted President Trump in a highly partisan impeachment trial. The war powers resolution was filed before the trial began, in the wake of escalating tensions with Iran.

The Democratic-led measure needed at least four Republicans to sign on for the measure to reach the simple majority of the Senate needed for passage — 51 votes.

Lee said the measure focuses on an imbalance of power that has given way to the presidency and it’s time for Congress to reclaim its authority.

“We need congressional authorization. We’ve been lied to by the Pentagon for years regarding a war that has gone on two decades. That’s long enough. … We don’t want any more wars without the people’s elected representatives being able to debate,” Lee said.

Collins said Congress can’t be sidelined in these “important decisions.”

“It is long overdue,” the Maine Republican said. “It reasserts Congress’ constitutional role and recognizes that the Framers did not vest in the presidency the authority to declare war unilaterally.”

Tensions remain for U.S. and Iran

On Jan. 3, Trump greenlighted a U.S. drone strike that killed a top Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani, which led to increased tensions with Tehran. Iran responded days later by launching more than a dozen ballistic missiles at two military bases in Iraq, which left more than 100 service members with brain injuries.

Soon after, the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives approved a resolution mostly along a party-line vote directing Trump to seek consent from Congress before taking new military action against Iran. However, that resolution was nonbinding.

Supporters say this new Senate version will force the president to make a statement on their concerns. Some maintain that the issue forces debate about what they call “perpetual wars” that need to come to an end.

“I think we’ve been at war too long in too many places, and it’s time to talk about bringing the troops home,” said Paul, one of the Republican co-sponsors of the legislation. “It’s not so much about rebuking the president — it’s rebuking all of us for not giving permission for being at war so long.”

The House has signaled that it could pass the Senate version of the war powers resolution. However, Trump has also said he would veto the measure and has lobbied against it.

Still, Kaine holds out some hope for a change of mind in the president since it’s an election year, and he says the measure is consistent with Trump’s argument that he would end these kinds of foreign entanglements.

“I mean, he might look at it and say, actually, this is kind of what I promised to people,” Kaine said. “And he could confound expectations and say the bill gives me the ability to defend us against imminent attack, which I need to have as commander in chief.”

Kaine and other supporters have said that even with a veto, the measure sends a strong message to the president to seek lawmakers’ approval on such actions and could potentially influence future decisions.

They point to Trump’s veto last year of a resolution to end military support of Saudi-led forces in Yemen. However, a few months later, the president ended the refueling of jets aiding the coalition fighting in Yemen.

“So when something like this gets on his desk and represents the majority will of both bodies, he may not care about Congress, but he cares deeply about what the American public thinks about the prospect of another war,” Kaine said.

Still, several Senate Republicans spoke against the plan, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who voted against it. He suggested supporters should wait until they garner a two-thirds majority of the Senate, or the 67 votes needed to override a veto.

“This war powers resolution cuts short that interplay between the branches. It short-circuits the thoughtful deliberation and debate,” he said. “It’s a dangerously overbroad resolution that should not pass Congress and is certain to be vetoed if it does.”

Gaining bipartisan support for the measure

Kaine introduced the first version of his war powers resolution within hours of the Soleimani attack on Jan. 3. He revised it with help from a group of Republicans to gain their support and filed an updated resolution days later. The new version, for example, removed direct references to Trump

Young, who is a Marine Corps veteran, says his military background played a role in his decision to support the measure. “It’s really important that Congress fulfill our constitutional responsibilities, which is to declare war, to authorize the use of military force and to engage in these debates on a consistent basis as long as we have men and women overseas ready to put their life on the line for all of us.”

The war powers concern is tied to a long-running debate on whether the president should be relying on authorizations issued in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Congress approved the wide-ranging Authorization for Use of Military Force efforts in 2001 and 2002. And Trump administration officials have maintained that the president already has the authority to take action against Iran under the 2002 authorization.

Kaine said that at minimum, service members deserve a debate on whether the U.S. should enter into new wars. And this isn’t the first time GOP lawmakers have split from the White House to pass a war powers resolution.

Last June, Collins, Lee, Paul and Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas backed an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act to require congressional approval for action against Iran. However, the effort ultimately failed at that time by a 50-40 vote.

This time Kaine strove to increase support for the plan by working one-on-one with Republicans to tweak the legislation in their favor.

Lee publicly signed on to the measure after a contentious closed-door January briefing on Iran with Trump administration officials. Lee said he found the briefing, which included Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, “insulting and demeaning” and an attempt to quash any dissent on the Iran attack that killed Soleimani.

It reaffirmed for him that he should support the war powers measure, he said.

“This is one that is neither liberal nor conservative. It’s neither Democratic nor Republican. … This is neither hawkish nor dovish,” Lee argued this week. “This is something that simply focuses not on whether war is ever appropriate, not on whether some action against or involving Iran might at some point become necessary or warranted. It focuses instead on the fact that moving forward, any action that we take involving Iran … needs to be authorized by Congress.”

But Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., agreed with other detractors that the measure sends a problematic message that Congress and the administration aren’t on the same page.

“It sends a message to adversaries that the president somehow doesn’t have support or the power to act defensively if we come under attack,” Rubio told NPR. “They are not going to read the language. They are just going to view it as a rejection of the president acting forcefully to either prevent an attack against Americans or respond to one.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/02/13/805594383/senate-approves-legislation-to-limit-presidents-war-powers-against-iran

Trump’s invocation of “lawsuits & harrassment” was a reference to the state’s numerous lawsuits against his administration and also against Trump’s business, which is based in New York.

That prompted Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.), one of the House managers who prosecuted Trump’s impeachment in the Senate, to accuse the president of “expanding his abuse of power to blackmailing U.S. states (threatening millions of people he supposedly works for). In this case, he’s holding New York state hostage to try to stop investigations into his prior tax fraud.”

State attorney general Letitia James has subpoenaed for Trump’s financial records, and the state is pursuing multiple inquiries about the Trump Organization’s business practices. James also just secured a $2 million settlement from Trump’s now-defunct charitable foundation, which was accused of numerous violations of misuse of funds.

The settlement prompted a sharp rebuke from Trump, who tweeted on Nov. 7 that James’ suit against the foundation was for “political purposes.”

“When you stop violating the rights and liberties of all New Yorkers, we will stand down,” James said Thursday, responding to Trump’s tweet. “Until then, we have a duty and responsibility to defend the Constitution and the rule of law. BTW, I file the lawsuits, not the Governor.”

Trump’s linkage of the investigations and lawsuits to his national security-related decisions involving New York immediately called back to House Democrats’ warning that Trump — if acquitted in last week’s impeachment trial — could leverage federal resources to coerce states to take actions that benefit him personally or politically.

“An acquittal would also provide license to President Trump and his successors to use taxpayer dollars for personal political ends … Presidents could also hold hostage federal funds earmarked for States — such as money for natural disasters, highways, and healthcare — unless and until State officials perform personal political favors,” the House wrote in its impeachment trial brief. “Any Congressional appropriation would be an opportunity for a President to solicit a favor for his personal political purposes — or for others to seek to curry favor with him. Such an outcome would be entirely incompatible with our constitutional system of self-government.”

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler drew a link between Trump’s tweet about New York and the “quid pro quo” that got him impeached: withholding millions of dollars in military aid from Ukraine while demanding that the country investigate his Democratic rivals.

“Dear @SenateGOP, This is what another quid pro quo by the President of the United States looks like,” Nadler tweeted, pointing to Trump’s comment.

Some Capitol Hill Democrats compared Trump’s tweet to his July 25 conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky when, after Zelensky referenced the U.S. provision of Javelin missiles to Ukraine, Trump pivoted to a request for the country to investigate Democrats, including former vice president Joe Biden, a political rival who had announced a 2020 challenge against him.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/13/trump-new-york-investigations-114991

The Chinese technology firm Huawei is facing a raft of U.S. federal charges, including racketeering conspiracy.

Mark Schiefelbein/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Schiefelbein/AP

The Chinese technology firm Huawei is facing a raft of U.S. federal charges, including racketeering conspiracy.

Mark Schiefelbein/AP

Federal prosecutors have added new charges against Chinese telecom giant Huawei, its U.S. subsidiaries, and its chief financial officer, including accusing it of racketeering and conspiracy to steal trade secrets from U.S.-based companies.

The company already faced a long list of criminal accusations in the case, which was first filed in August 2018, including bank fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to defraud the United States. Prosecutors filed the expanded indictment in federal court in Brooklyn on Thursday.

Huawei’s lawyers did not immediately respond to NPR’s request for comment. It has previously pleaded not guilty to all counts.

“The Trump administration has repeatedly made clear it has national security concerns about Huawei, including economic espionage,” NPR’s Ryan Lucas reported. Recently, Trump tried to convince the U.K. not to contract with Huawei to provide equipment to build a 5G network, but British leaders did so anyway.

Sens. Richard Burr, R-N.C., and Mark Warner, D-Va., said in a joint statement that the indictment “paints a damning portrait of an illegitimate organization that lacks any regard for the law.”

Huawei is also accused of doing business in countries subject to U.S. sanctions such as North Korea and Iran. Prosecutors accuse Huawei of helping Iran’s government “by installing surveillance equipment, including surveillance equipment used to monitor, identify and detain protesters during the anti-government demonstrations of 2009 in Tehran, Iran.”

They say that for decades, Huawei has worked to “misappropriate intellectual property, including from six U.S. technology companies, in an effort to grow and operate Huawei’s business.”

Huawei allegedly pushed its employees to bring in confidential information from competitors, even offering bonuses for the “most valuable stolen information,” according to the indictment.

The 56-page indictment is rife with examples of Huawei scheming to obtain trade secrets from U.S. companies. They also allegedly attempted to recruit employees from rival companies or would use proxies such as professors working at research institutions to access intellectual property.

For example, starting in 2000 the defendants allegedly took source code and user manuals for Internet routers from an unnamed northern California-based tech company, and incorporated it into its own routers. They then allegedly marketed those routers as a lower-cost version of the tech company’s devices. During a 2003 lawsuit, Huawei allegedly claimed that it had removed the source code from the routers and recalled them, but also erased the memories of the recalled devices and sent them to China so they could not be used as evidence.

In an incident that drew headlines last year, a Huawei employee in 2012 and 2013 allegedly repeatedly tried to steal technical information about a robot from an unnamed wireless network operator, eventually going as far as making off with the robot’s arm. The details match those in a separate federal lawsuit in Seattle where the company is accused of targeting T-Mobile.

A subsidiary of the firm also allegedly entered into a partnership in 2009 with a New York and California-based company working to improve cellular telephone reception. Despite a nondisclosure agreement, Huawei employees allegedly stole technology. The subsidiary eventually filed a patent that allegedly relied on the other company’s intellectual property.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/02/13/805821661/u-s-prosecutors-hit-huawei-with-new-federal-charges

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/13/politics/nevada-caucuses-changes/index.html

Attorney General William Barr said Thursday that President Donald Trump should stop tweeting about the Department of Justice, complaining that the president’s comments “make it impossible for me to do my job.”

Barr’s unusual critique of his boss came in an ABC News interview.

The remarks followed days of sharp criticism of Barr, Trump and the DOJ by congressional Democrats over the department’s decision to reverse a harsh sentencing recommendation for Trump’s friend, Republican political consultant Roger Stone.

“I think it’s time to stop the tweeting about Department of Justice criminal cases,” Barr told ABC News Chief Justice Correspondent Pierre Thomas.

“I will make those decisions based on what I think is the right thing to do, and I’m not going to be bullied or influenced by anybody … whether it’s Congress, a newspaper editorial board, or the president,” Barr said.

“I’m going to do what I think is right,” Barr said. “I cannot do my job here at the department with a constant background commentary that undercuts me.”

Trump’s tweets, “make it impossible for me to do my job and to assure the courts and the prosecutors in the department that we’re doing our work with integrity,” he said.

The White House declined CNBC’s request for comment on Barr’s remarks.

The four prosecutors who handled Stone’s trial on Monday night told a judge in a court filing that Stone should serve between seven to nine years in prison, the same span called for under federal sentencing guidelines as determined by U.S. probation officials.

Within hours of that filing, Trump blasted the sentencing recommendation as a “disgrace.”

And hours after that, the Justice Department said it would filed a new sentencing suggestion for Stone, calling for a markedly lower prison term.

All four prosecutors quit the case in apparent protest on Tuesday — and one resigned from the Justice Department altogether.

Trump praised Barr on social media after the Justice Department pushed the prosecutors in Stone’s case to weaken their proposal.

In his ABC interview, Barr, for the first time publicly, detailed his account of the decision to reduce Stone’s sentencing recommendation.

Barr said that Timothy Shea, his former counselor who recently became the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on Monday “came by to briefly chat with me and say that the team [of trial prosecutors] very much wanted to recommend the 7-9 year to the judge, but he thought that there was a way of satisfying everybody and providing more flexibility.”

“And there was a brief discussion of that. I was under the impression that what was going to happen was very much what I had suggested, which was deferring to the judge,” Barr told ABC.

“Monday night, when I first saw the news reports [about the sentencing proposal], I said “gee, the news is spinning this. This is not what we were going to do.’ “

“I was very surprised. And once I confirmed that that’s actually what we filed, I said that night to my staff that we had to get ready cause we had to do something in the morning to amend that and clarify what our position was,” the attorney general said.

“I had made a decision that I thought was fair and reasonable in this particular case. And once the tweet [by Trump condemning the sentencing proposal] occurred, the question was, well, now what do I do? Do you go forward with what you think is the right decision? Or do you pull back because of the tweet?”

“And that just sort of illustrates how disruptive these tweets can be,” Barr said.

Barr added that while “I have a problem with some of the tweets, I’m happy to say that in fact, the President has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case.

Asked if he had ever spoken with Trump about the sentencing recommendations for Stone, Barr said, “Never.”

Barr also denied that anyone from the White House had called him to try to influence him about Stone: “No. I have not discussed the Roger Stone case at the White House.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/13/ag-barr-says-trumps-tweets-make-it-impossible-for-me-to-do-my-job.html

“They were in the process of telling us that we need to be good little boys and girls and not debate this in public,” Mr. Lee said then, emerging red-faced from the briefing. “I find that absolutely insane. It’s un-American, it’s unconstitutional and it’s wrong.”

They were joined on Thursday by six other Republicans in supporting the effort to curtail Mr. Trump’s war powers: Senators Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, Susan Collins of Maine, Jerry Moran of Kansas, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Todd Young of Indiana.

The vote was the latest in a series of bids by Congress over the past year to rein in Mr. Trump’s war powers. Last year, Congress cleared a bipartisan measure invoking the War Powers Act that would have cut off American military support for the Saudi-led campaign in Yemen’s civil war, and a separate measure seeking to curtail the president’s war-making powers in Iran ping-ponged between the two chambers, passing the House but not the Senate.

Despite a recognition in both parties that much of the American public is weary of perpetual military conflict, the measures drew only modest support from Republicans, each time falling well short of the two-thirds majority vote necessary to override a veto.

Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, said that he had voted multiple times to send troops to war — first as a member of the House and then later in the Senate. He described them as “the toughest votes” he ever had to cast, “knowing that in the best of circumstances, that Americans will die.”

“Before you make that decision, you have to think long and hard, and many members of Congress would like to race away from that,” he said. He described the rationale adopted by many lawmakers as: “I’d just rather blame the president if it turns out bad.”

Supporters of the resolution approved Thursday saw a glimmer of hope in the final vote tally. In July, the Senate rejected a similar measure to curtail the president’s war powers related to Iran, with only four Republican senators defecting to support it. Twice as many supported the resolution on Thursday.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/13/us/politics/iran-war-powers-trump.html

Confirmed coronavirus cases boomed this week as China altered its method for counting amid concerns over its handling of the crisis. 

Thursday, U.S. health officials confirmed a 15th U.S. case.

The death toll from the coronavirus that surfaced in China late last year rose to 1,370 on Thursday. All but three of the deaths have been in mainland China.

China previously counted cases only when a person tested positive for the virus. Chest imaging and other medical diagnoses are now included.

“While this may be a sensitive technique to look for an infection with the new coronavirus, it may also identify patients with other, similar viral illnesses, including the flu, artificially inflating the actual number of cases,” said Robert Glatter, an emergency physician at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York.

Glatter said the coronavirus, dubbed COVID-19, is proving difficult to contain.

“The lack of reliable information combined with a highly transmissible virus is problematic, to say the very least,” Glatter said. “Relying on health care providers to report cases – using clinical suspicion along with CT scans with certain patterns of lung inflammation – as ‘positive’ is not an ideal approach.”

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/02/13/coronavirus-boom-concern-but-death-rate-far-below-sars-so-far/4747205002/

Chuck ToddCharles (Chuck) David ToddButtigieg leans into mayoral record as rivals go on the attack Buttigieg: ‘I didn’t set out to be the gay president’ Sanders: We released ‘substantive’ part of all medical records MORE said Wednesday that he doesn’t “understand how Bernie SandersBernie SandersBiden assures supporters the primary is still ‘wide open’ in lengthy phone call: report Limbaugh on Buttigieg: ‘America’s still not ready to elect a gay guy kissing his husband on the debate stage’ CNN announces Democratic town halls in Nevada MORE is considered a front-runner” in the 2020 Democratic presidential race after the Independent Vermont senator’s performance in the New Hampshire primary.

“I don’t understand how Bernie is considered a front-runner,” an animated Todd said on “Meet the Press Daily” on MSNBC. “This is a guy that, more people showed up to the polls, highest turnout ever, and his percentage went down, not up. His total number went down, not up.”

New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation primary ended with Sanders winning by 1.3 percentage points over former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul ButtigiegBiden assures supporters the primary is still ‘wide open’ in lengthy phone call: report Limbaugh on Buttigieg: ‘America’s still not ready to elect a gay guy kissing his husband on the debate stage’ CNN announces Democratic town halls in Nevada MORE and 5.9 points over Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharBiden assures supporters the primary is still ‘wide open’ in lengthy phone call: report Limbaugh on Buttigieg: ‘America’s still not ready to elect a gay guy kissing his husband on the debate stage’ CNN announces Democratic town halls in Nevada MORE (D-Minn.), who finished a strong third in a boost her campaign.

Sanders won by 22 percentage points in New Hampshire against former Secretary of State Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonCNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting Trump says he’ll debate eventual Democratic nominee Bull meets china shop: Roger Stone controversy follows a familiar pattern MORE in 2016, but he was facing nine more opponents in the Granite State on Tuesday.

“I feel like the only people who are going out on a limb and calling Bernie Sanders the front-runner, they have other reasons to call him front-runner,” Todd, who moderates “Meet the Press” and serves as political director for NBC News, argued. “One person leads delegates, one person has a lock on a chunk of the party, but we don’t know where this goes.”

Buttigieg has 22 delegates to Sanders’s 21.

Supporters of Sanders have accused MSNBC of being biased against their candidate, including one woman who told network host Ari Melber on Tuesday that she voted for the self-described democratic socialist because of the network’s “cynical” coverage of the candidate.

“I want to say that the reason I went for Bernie is because of MSNBC,” the woman said during the network’s live coverage of the primary.

“Go on,” interviewer Melber joked, looking at the camera.

“I think it is completely cynical to say that [Sanders] lost 50 percent of his vote from [2016], when there were two candidates. Now there are multiple, wonderful candidates who are great candidates who would be great presidents we can all get behind,” she continued.

“The kind of ‘stop Bernie cynicism’ that I heard from a number of people — I watch MSNBC constantly, that I heard from a number of commentators … made me angry, and I said, ‘OK, Bernie’s got my vote,'” she added.

Todd was a the center of a firestorm on Tuesday after quoting a Bulwark story that referred to Sanders supporters as the “digital brownshirt brigade,” which resulted in the hashtag #FireChuckTodd.

“I want to bring up something Jonathan Last put in the Bulwark today,” Todd said Tuesday afternoon in a conversation with Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus.

“It is about how, Ruth, we have all been on the receiving end of the Bernie online brigade. And here’s what he says: ‘No other candidate has anything like this digital brownshirt brigade. I mean, except for Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpBiden assures supporters the primary is still ‘wide open’ in lengthy phone call: report Warren: We are watching a descent into authoritarianism Collins: Trump ‘angered by impeachment’ MORE. The question no one is asking is this: What if you can’t win the presidency without an online mob? What if we live in a world where having a bullying, agro social online army running around popping anyone who sticks their head up is either an important ingredient for, or a critical marker of, success?’”

Sanders aide David Sirota posted the video on his twitter feed, drawing nearly 900,000 views and 10,000 likes.

The Democratic field is now turning its attention to the Nevada caucuses, which will be held on Feb. 22.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/media/482888-chuck-todd-i-dont-understand-how-bernie-is-considered-a-frontrunner-after-new