The archives that Ms. Manning provided to WikiLeaks in 2010, when she was an Army intelligence analyst posted in Iraq, helped vault the antisecrecy organization and Mr. Assange to global fame. The events took place years before their image and actions evolved with the publication of Democratic emails stolen by Russian hackers during the 2016 election.

Ms. Manning admitted sending the files to WikiLeaks in a court-martial trial. She also confessed to interacting online with someone who was probably Mr. Assange, but she said she had acted on principle and was not working for WikiLeaks.

Testimony showed that she had been deteriorating, mentally and emotionally, during the period when she downloaded the documents and sent them to WikiLeaks. Then known as Pfc. Bradley Manning, she was struggling with gender dysphoria under conditions of extraordinary stress and isolation while deployed to the Iraq war zone.

She was sentenced to 35 years in prison — the longest sentence by far in an American leak case. After her conviction, she changed her name to Chelsea and announced that she wanted to undergo gender transition, but was housed in a male military prison and twice tried to commit suicide in 2016.

In January 2017, President Barack Obama commuted most of the remainder of her sentence shortly before he left office. But she was swept back up into legal trouble last year when prosecutors investigating Mr. Assange subpoenaed her to testify before a grand jury about their interactions.

Although prosecutors granted immunity for her testimony, Ms. Manning had vowed not to cooperate in the investigation, saying she had ethical objections, and she was placed in civil detention for contempt of court.

Separately last year, the Justice Department unsealed criminal charges against Mr. Assange, who was living in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. Prosecutors initially charged him with a narrow hacking conspiracy offense, accusing him of agreeing to try to help Ms. Manning crack a password that would have let her log onto a military computer system under a different user account, covering her tracks.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/us/politics/chelsea-manning-released-jail.html

The situation appears to be without precedent and doubtless will cause much fiscal pain, especially for the most vulnerable companies. Chicago’s famous storefront theaters, traditionally about 100 seats, are free to make their own decision, the league said, but they, too, will be under pressure to cancel. The decision also kills off the major touring productions in the Loop, likely producing a knock-on effect of economic hurt.

Source Article from https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavirus/ct-coronavirus-illinois-state-briefing-thursday-20200312-pq3wcmlc6zetxmptk7l4iwsqey-story.html

The NCAA announced Thursday it was canceling its men’s and women’s basketball tournaments.

Mitchell Layton/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mitchell Layton/Getty Images

The NCAA announced Thursday it was canceling its men’s and women’s basketball tournaments.

Mitchell Layton/Getty Images

Updated at 5:24 p.m. ET

The NCAA has announced that it is canceling its Division I men’s and women’s college basketball tournaments. This year, there will be no March Madness.

“This decision is based on the evolving COVID-19 public health threat, our ability to ensure the events do not contribute to spread of the pandemic, and the impracticality of hosting such events at any time during this academic year given ongoing decisions by other entities,” the NCAA said in a statement Thursday.

The decision followed earlier declarations by Duke and Kansas that they were suspending all athletic competitions indefinitely.

The NCAA had previously announced that the basketball tournaments would take place only in front of essential staff and limited family members — no crowds.

Announcements from across the American sports landscape fell on sports fans on Thursday: Most everything is canceled or at least postponed.

Major League Baseball halted spring training and delayed the start of the regular season for two weeks. The National Hockey League put its season on ice for 30 days. Major League Soccer won’t play for the next month.

And the NBA announced Wednesday night that it has called off the entire rest of its season, after Utah Jazz player Rudy Gobert tested positive for COVID-19. The game was called off moments before tip-off as word came in about Gobert’s test result. The entire team, as well as some staff members and beat reporters were then tested for the virus — a second Jazz player, Donovan Mitchell, tested positive.

Four teams that recently played the Jazz — the Detroit Pistons, Boston Celtics, Washington Wizards and Toronto Raptors — said that they have some players and staff in quarantine.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/03/12/815115557/no-march-madness-ncaa-cancels-mens-and-women-s-basketball-tournaments

As a result of the growing Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Disneyland Resort, including Disneyland and Disney California Adventure is closing to guests the morning of March 14, effective immediately.

All Disneyland Resort hotels will remain open through March 16 to give guests the ability to make necessary travel arrangements. The closure is expected to take place through the end of the month. During this time, Downtown Disney is expected to remain open, however Disneyland expects to monitor the ongoing situation and adjust hours as necessary. Disney will also continue to pay Cast Members during this time.

Historically, this is only the fourth time in the park’s history that all operations have been fully suspended. Prior closures include the national day of mourning for JFK in 1963, the Northridge earthquake in 1994, and the September 11th attacks in 2001.

The news comes after the City of Anaheim issued guidelines calling for the modification of postponement of non-essential gatherings of 250 or more people through March 31st, which the resort is complying with.

This is the fourth Disney resort worldwide, and the first American resort, to close temporarily as a result of the pandemic. Shanghai Disney Resort was the first to close, but has recently opened up areas of the resort not including Shanghai Disneyland. Currently, Hong Kong Disneyland Resort and Tokyo Disney Resort remain closed. Disneyland Paris has suspended all outdoor shows and parades, as well as severely restricted capacity for attractions, shops, and restaurants, to comply with the French ban on gatherings of more than 1,000 people, but the resort remains open for the time being.

Guests with packages booked through the Walt Disney Travel Company may currently reschedule for a “future date in 2020” without having to pay the $50.00 change fee.

Keep reading WDWNT and Disneyland News Today for continuing coverage of this ongoing story.

Source Article from https://wdwnt.com/2020/03/breaking-disneyland-resort-temporarily-closing-on-march-14-due-to-coronavirus-covid-19-outbreak/

The United Kingdom, which is home to Trump Turnberry and Trump International Golf Links, and Ireland, which is home to another Trump-branded hotel and golf course at Doonbeg, do not participate in the Schengen Area. Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania are also not part of the Schengen Area. All three of the resorts are struggling financially.

Ireland’s prime minister, Leo Varadkar, is scheduled to meet Trump at the White House on Thursday in one of the few events related to St. Patrick’s Day that has not been canceled due to coronavirus concerns.

The administration’s European travel proclamation notes that “the Schengen Area has exported 201 COVID-19 cases to 53 countries. Moreover, the free flow of people between the Schengen Area countries makes the task of managing the spread of the virus difficult.”

Trump’s European travel ban comes with several other loopholes.

There are now 460 confirmed coronavirus cases in the U.K., including Nadine Dorries, the British government’s own health minister in charge of patient safety. Wednesday saw the biggest rise in U.K. cases in a single day, and the country’s highest-level crisis committee — known as Cobra — will meet Thursday to consider additional moves to reduce the impact of the virus.

Though they are subject to border checks on arrival, residents of the 26 Schengen Area countries are also free to live and work in the United Kingdom, meaning they could fly to the United States from a British airport as long as they hadn’t spent time within the Schengen countries in the last 14 days.

EU leaders condemned Trump’s move on Thursday, and disputed the president’s criticism of Europe’s handling of the crisis.

“The Coronavirus is a global crisis, not limited to any continent and it requires cooperation rather than unilateral action,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Charles Michel said in a joint statement.

“The European Union disapproves of the fact that the U.S. decision to impose a travel ban was taken unilaterally and without consultation,” they said, adding that the bloc was “taking strong action to limit the spread of the virus.”

Anita Kumar and Hans Joachim von der Burchard contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/12/trump-coronavirus-travel-europe-resorts-126808

The full payroll tax suspension “would not only increase workers’ take-home pay but would ease cash flow constraints for employers who are likely to face a rough patch in the incoming months,” said Karl Smith, the vice president of federal tax and economic policy at the Tax Foundation, which traditionally supports cutting taxes to spur economic growth. Mr. Smith said he supported the Trump proposal, though the Tax Foundation had not taken an official position.

“The payroll tax would be great,” Mr. Trump said on Wednesday. “Dems are not in favor of it. I’m trying to figure out why.”

Democrats are opposed for several reasons. Many economists, including liberals and conservatives who have called for stimulus measures, say there are much more effective ways to stoke demand and support growth during a viral outbreak. They note that cutting payroll taxes only helps Americans who are still working — and not those who are furloughed by quarantines or laid off amid floundering sales. The benefits would arrive gradually across paychecks instead of in one stimulative burst.

“A payroll tax cut like the president wants wouldn’t help the elderly, non-employed, who are at the most risk from the virus,” Michael R. Strain, an economist at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, wrote Wednesday on Twitter. “It would provide a larger benefit to the well off. And it isn’t targeted on those who need it.”

Claudia Sahm, an economist at the liberal Washington Center for Equitable Growth, said Thursday that lawmakers could still ward off a recession with stimulus, but “a payroll tax won’t do it.” She and Mr. Strain both favor giving cash assistance to Americans.

Cutting payroll taxes “will be too slow, and its effects too small,” Ms. Sahm said. “So small most won’t even notice it. Those who don’t have or will lose their jobs won’t get it at all.”

The political calculations around payroll tax cuts are fraught. The tax feeds the Social Security Trust Fund; while administration officials said they would most likely divert other money to avoid robbing the fund, cutting payroll taxes would further balloon the rising budget deficit.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/business/trump-tax-cut-coronavirus.html

House Republicans made clear Thursday that they won’t support the new emergency coronavirus aid bill unveiled by Democrats — at least not in its current form.

Lawmakers in both parties are scrambling to take action to combat the deadly coronavirus pandemic.

But Republicans have hang-ups with the specifics of the Democrats’ bill, CNBC’s Ylan Mui reported Thursday, because it omits several of the measures President Donald Trump had called on Congress to enact. 

Politico reported Thursday morning that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy R-Calif., opposed the bill.

McCarthy was expected to explain his problems with the bill in public remarks at 10 a.m. ET. In a tweet earlier Thursday, he called the plan “unworkable” and complained that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., had introduced the “completely partisan” bill late at night Wednesday.

Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill responded on Twitter that McCarthy’s claim was “not true.”

“Minority staffs of committees of jurisdiction were given language yesterday afternoon” and had already requested changes, Hammill said.

Pelosi continued negotiations with Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin that had begun earlier in the week.

Trump, in an Oval Office address Wednesday night, had asked lawmakers to consider implementing payroll tax relief amid the U.S. response to the virus. That measure, which even some Republicans have been reluctant to endorse, is not included in the Democrats’ bill.

Payroll taxes fund entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

The bill also ignores Trump’s call for increased authority for Small Business Administration loans.

A spokesman for Pelosi told CNBC that the payroll tax and SBA measures did not come up during the speaker’s call with Mnuchin.

Lawmakers are set to return to their districts for the next week, compounding the sense of urgency to push something through the chamber while members are still there to cast votes.

There has been talk that negotiations could extend through the weekend if a deal can’t be reached before the scheduled recess begins. 

During a meeting Thursday morning, the House Rules Committee’s ranking Republican, Tom Cole of Oklahoma, griped about the lack of bipartisan cooperation on the bill.

“I set a pretty hopeful tone last night because I thought that was the appropriate thing to do, and I would’ve liked to have had the opportunity to continue that today. But frankly, while work may have been continued through the night, there wasn’t very much bipartisan work through the night as I understand it,” Cole said.

“On top of that, this legislation hasn’t had a single hearing, hasn’t had a single witness, has had zero Republican input of any substance. So at this point, we’re certainly not prepared to support either the rule or the underlying legislation.”

While the politicians pressed their positions, the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms announced Thursday that access to the U.S. Capitol by the general public will be banned for the rest of the month. The White House also announced it has temporarily canceled tours.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-house-republicans-come-out-against-bill-ahead-of-vote.html

Pressed for comment on the reports, Trump added: “Let’s put it this way, I’m not concerned.”

Wajngarten is Bolsonaro’s press secretary.

The White House did not immediately provide comment on the reports.

Later Thursday, Florida Sen. Rick Scott announced that he would self-quarantine “in an abundance of caution” after learning that Wajngarten “was in the same room as me” when Scott met with Trump in Miami on Monday.

“I have been told that my risk is low, and [that] I don’t need to take a test or quarantine,” Scott, a Republican, said in a statement. “However, the health and safety of the American people is my focus and I have made the decision to self-quarantine in an abundance of caution.”

Scott added that he feels healthy and is not currently experiencing any symptoms of the coronavirus.

It is unclear if Trump has previously been in direct contact with anyone who has tested positive for the coronavirus. But he has recently interacted with multiple U.S. lawmakers who went into self-quarantine after learning that they had been in contact with an individual who was since diagnosed with the disease.

Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., shook hands with Trump last Friday when the president traveled to Atlanta to visit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where officials there briefed him on their response to coronavirus.

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., flew on Air Force One with Trump on Monday on a flight from Orlando, Florida, to Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. Gaetz reportedly learned on that flight that he had been in contact with a person who was diagnosed with the coronavirus. He said he would self-quarantine about an hour after he got off the plane with Trump.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-brazilian-official-who-met-trump-tests-positive.html

Passengers hoping to change their flights to the U.S. wait in long lines at the Schiphol Airport in the Netherlands, after President Trump announced new restrictions on travel from Europe.

Niels Wenstedt/Barcroft Media via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Niels Wenstedt/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

Passengers hoping to change their flights to the U.S. wait in long lines at the Schiphol Airport in the Netherlands, after President Trump announced new restrictions on travel from Europe.

Niels Wenstedt/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

“The EU disapproves of the fact that the U.S. decision to impose a travel ban was taken unilaterally and without consultation,” the heads of the European Union said Thursday, expressing their displeasure with President Trump’s plan to block visitors from 26 European countries from entering the U.S.

“The Coronavirus is a global crisis and requires cooperation,” the EU leaders said.

European Council President Charles Michel and European Commission Ursula von der Leyen spoke out the morning after Trump abruptly announced his 30-day ban – rattling an already-shaken travel industry and creating new uncertainty among travelers in both the U.S. and Europe. The United Kingdom is exempt from the ban.

Complicating matters further, Trump left many people scrambling to learn the extent of the ban, which takes effect at midnight Friday. The White House later said the ban applies only to foreign nationals who have been in Europe’s open-border Schengen Area.

Trump referred to “exemptions for Americans who have undergone appropriate screenings.” Explaining that idea, the White House said U.S. citizens “will be directed to a limited number of airports where screening can take place.”

The president’s speech set off chaos at airports in Europe and created doubt for Americans who were bound to depart the U.S. — many of whom faced worries that they might not be able to return home, either under the travel ban or a new policy that might be enacted while they’re abroad.

The U.S. move came hours after the World Health Organization classified COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

Confusion about Trump’s plan was reflected in tweets from two journalists who were on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean when he announced the ban.

“Sitting at Atlanta airport after abandoning my flight to France late last night,” tweeted reporter Jennifer Berry Hawes of Charleston, S.C.’s The Post and Courier.

After being blindsided by news of the travel ban, Hawes and a colleague had only an hour to decide whether to fly to Europe as planned. The White House guidance on U.S. exemptions came out nearly two hours after Trump began his speech. Hawes and her coworker opted to stay put rather than risk being stranded in Europe.

The scene was even more frantic at European airports.

“Bedlam at U.S.-bound airlines at [Charles De Gaulle airport] in Paris early this a.m., as Americans pay as much as $20,000 for last-minute flights,” reporter Mike McIntire of The New York Times said via Twitter.

McIntire added that he did not pay that large sum — but he said he got an urgent call from a relative in the U.S. after Trump announced the ban, and bought an expensive ticket online as a result.

Trump also said the ban will proscribe “trade and cargo” from Europe, causing more confusion. The White House later clarified that the immigration law invoked by the president’s ban “only applies to the movement of human beings, not goods or cargo.”

In his address to the nation, the president said:

“To keep new cases from entering our shores, we will be suspending all travel from Europe to the United States for the next 30 days.  The new rules will go into effect Friday at midnight.  These restrictions will be adjusted subject to conditions on the ground.

“There will be exemptions for Americans who have undergone appropriate screenings, and these prohibitions will not only apply to the tremendous amount of trade and cargo, but various other things as we get approval.  Anything coming from Europe to the United States is what we are discussing.”  

Vice President Mike Pence, who is leading the Trump administration’s COVID-19 effort, defended Trump’s handling of the primetime address, saying “I don’t think there was confusion” created by the president’s remarks.

In an appearance on CNN Thursday morning, Pence also mentioned that Americans flying home from Europe “will be funneled through 13 different airports” where they will be screened and then asked to self-quarantine. Pence did not name those airports.

The confusion played out as a broader debate continues over the ability of travel bans to contain deadly diseases and protect vulnerable populations from an outbreak.

The morning after Trump spoke, Lawrence Gostin, a public health law expert at Georgetown University, called the president’s travel ban “incoherent” and said it would have no impact on the coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. Gostin added that the policy goes against recommendations from the WHO and other international agencies.

“Travel from highly functioning health systems like Switzerland [are] banned, but not weak systems like Russia or Africa,” Gostin said. “People are no safer in U.S. than many places banned.”

Trump’s new policy follows weeks of criticisms of his administration’s approach to the coronavirus – particularly its inability to get plentiful supplies of reliable testing kits into the hands of health professionals around the country. In the absence of enough testing, experts say, the U.S. has been unable to monitor or contain the virus.

In his speech, Trump also sought to blame the EU’s member countries for failing to contain the virus, saying “a large number of new clusters in the United States were seeded by travelers from Europe.”

Before Trump’s announcement, his administration had barred visitors from entering the U.S. if they had been in China or Iran in the past 14 days. Those policies, which took effect in February, don’t apply to U.S. citizens or people who live in the U.S.

Roughly 105 countries currently have some type of travel restrictions in place because of the coronavirus, according to the IATA international travel site, which tracks such policies. Most of those limits are aimed at reducing ties to hotspots in China and Italy. And while some countries block passengers from France, Germany and Spain – all of which now have more than 2,000 coronavirus patients — the U.S. seems to be the first to prohibit visitors from virtually all of Europe.

“The president of the United States of America has announced an entry ban for most European countries,” Royal Dutch Airlines (KLM) says on its web page dedicated to the COVID-19 outbreak. Reflecting the uncertainty over Trump’s policy, the airlines adds, “The impact of this measure is still unclear but is being investigated as we speak.”

For now, the airline is one of many that are telling would-be passengers to be sure their contact information is up to date, so they can receive news of any changes.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/12/814876173/coronavirus-trump-speech-creates-chaos-eu-says-it-wasnt-warned-of-travel-ban

[Can you be forced into quarantine? What you need to know.]

The day before issuing the proclamation, Mr. Newsom released a stockpile containing millions of N95 masks for use by health workers.

Ahead of the statewide declaration, some local governments, like San Francisco, Santa Clara and San Diego Counties, declared their own local health emergencies.

In California, the provisions outlined in the state’s emergency declaration remain in effect until officials deem that they are no longer warranted. When that will be, however, remains to be seen.


Coronavirus cases in the U.S. have surpassed 1,000, and the World Health Organization officially declared it to be a pandemic. In California, as of late Wednesday night, 201 cases of the virus had been reported, and four people died.

California has become the latest state to impose new measures aimed at containing the virus, telling residents to postpone or cancel gatherings of more than 250 people, including sports events, conferences and concerts, through the end of March.

The new guidelines also advised against gatherings in smaller venues, such as auditoriums, that don’t allow for six feet of distance between people. Groups of high-risk people, such as those in retirement or assisted-living facilities, should be limited to no more than 10 people, officials said.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/us/california-state-of-emergency.html

If you’ve ever gotten a paycheck, you’ve probably looked with scorn at the amount of taxes that get withheld from your pay. Not only do you have to have money taken out of your check for your income taxes, but the federal government also takes extra money to cover payroll taxes.

Now, in response to economic concerns about the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak, President Trump is looking at ways to provide financial stimulus in an effort to forestall a recession. One proposal that the White House is reportedly pitching is to eliminate payroll taxes for the rest of 2020. Doing so would put more money in the pockets of millions of Americans. Below, we’ll take a look at the proposal and what it would mean for the typical worker.

Image source: Getty Images.

What you’re paying now in payroll taxes

Payroll taxes are imposed on workers to provide revenue for Social Security and Medicare. The current total rate of payroll taxes is 7.65%. That’s composed of a 6.2% withholding tax for Social Security and a 1.45% withholding tax for Medicare.

However, there’s a limit on the wages that get considered to determine the amount of Social Security withholding tax. That number changes each year, and for 2020 the limit is $137,700. If your earnings for the year are more than $137,700, you’ll stop having to pay the 6.2% Social Security payroll tax once your year-to-date pay rises above that level. The 1.45% Medicare portion of the payroll tax has no such limit, so you’ll keep paying that amount throughout the year regardless of what you earn.

Employers also have to pay payroll taxes. If you’re an employee, your employer pays an equal 7.65% of your wages to the federal government to cover its portion of payroll taxes. Those who are self-employed end up covering both halves of the payroll tax liability, with a combined rate of 15.3%.

What the White House wants

President Trump reportedly wants to suspend the payroll tax through the end of the year. An outright elimination of the tax would make paychecks bigger, putting more money in the hands of American consumers and presumably helping to boost spending and economic activity. Those making $52,000 a year would see their take-home pay rise by $76.50 a week. That’d add up to nearly $3,000 for 2020 if the cuts take effect starting April 1.

The proposal leaves some questions unanswered, though. So far no one’s said anything specific about payroll taxes on pay earned so far in 2020, with the assumption being that the federal government would keep any taxes already collected. That’s fine for employees, but for gig workers and others who typically make quarterly estimated tax payments, there’s uncertainty about how they’d figure out how much of their earnings came before or after a payroll tax suspension took effect.

Similarly, it’s not clear whether high-income earners would benefit from a slashing of the payroll tax. Those with annual incomes of $500,000 and up are likely to go above the $137,700 wage base limit on Social Security payroll taxes before the measure could get through Congress and get signed into law. If they’ve already paid their maximum tax for the year, then the suspension of taxes won’t save them any money. Helping the wealthy might not be a priority for President Trump, but the answer to that question could have an impact on the cost of the proposal.

Will a payroll tax cut really happen?

Discussions between the White House and Republican congressional leaders about potential economic stimuli are taking place, and the payroll tax proposal will inevitably be part of their agenda. With control of Congress divided between Republicans and Democrats, any measure would need bipartisan support. Many see that as being unlikely in an election year, but for those hoping for some financial relief if the economy starts to sputter toward recession, the prospect of a modest but significant boost in pay looks good right now.

Source Article from https://www.fool.com/taxes/2020/03/11/trump-wants-to-slash-payroll-taxes-what-it-means-f.aspx

House Republicans made clear Thursday that they won’t support the new emergency coronavirus aid bill unveiled by Democrats — at least not in its current form.

Lawmakers in both parties are scrambling to take action to combat the deadly coronavirus pandemic.

But Republicans have hang-ups with the specifics of the Democrats’ bill, CNBC’s Ylan Mui reported Thursday, because it omits several of the measures President Donald Trump had called on Congress to enact. 

Politico reported Thursday morning that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy R-Calif., opposed the bill.

McCarthy was expected to explain his problems with the bill in public remarks at 10 a.m. ET. In a tweet earlier Thursday, he called the plan “unworkable” and complained that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., had introduced the “completely partisan” bill late at night Wednesday.

Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill responded on Twitter that McCarthy’s claim was “not true.”

“Minority staffs of committees of jurisdiction were given language yesterday afternoon” and had already requested changes, Hammill said.

Pelosi continued negotiations with Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin that had begun earlier in the week.

Trump, in an Oval Office address Wednesday night, had asked lawmakers to consider implementing payroll tax relief amid the U.S. response to the virus. That measure, which even some Republicans have been reluctant to endorse, is not included in the Democrats’ bill.

Payroll taxes fund entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

The bill also ignores Trump’s call for increased authority for Small Business Administration loans.

A spokesman for Pelosi told CNBC that the payroll tax and SBA measures did not come up during the speaker’s call with Mnuchin.

Lawmakers are set to return to their districts for the next week, compounding the sense of urgency to push something through the chamber while members are still there to cast votes.

There has been talk that negotiations could extend through the weekend if a deal can’t be reached before the scheduled recess begins. 

During a meeting Thursday morning, the House Rules Committee’s ranking Republican, Tom Cole of Oklahoma, griped about the lack of bipartisan cooperation on the bill.

“I set a pretty hopeful tone last night because I thought that was the appropriate thing to do, and I would’ve liked to have had the opportunity to continue that today. But frankly, while work may have been continued through the night, there wasn’t very much bipartisan work through the night as I understand it,” Cole said.

“On top of that, this legislation hasn’t had a single hearing, hasn’t had a single witness, has had zero Republican input of any substance. So at this point, we’re certainly not prepared to support either the rule or the underlying legislation.”

While the politicians pressed their positions, the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms announced Thursday that access to the U.S. Capitol by the general public will be banned for the rest of the month. The White House also announced it has temporarily canceled tours.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-house-republicans-come-out-against-bill-ahead-of-vote.html

Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley said the attack, which also killed a coalition member and wounded 14 others, was carried out by “Shia militia groups.” He did not name the group responsible but said “we have pretty good confidence we know who did this.”

Earlier on Thursday, Central Command chief Gen. Frank McKenzie told senators that Iran-backed Kataib Hezbollah is the only Shia militia group known to have conducted “an indirect fire attack on this scale against U.S. coalition forces in Iraq.” The group attacked a military base in Kirkuk, Iraq, in December that killed a U.S. contractor and set off a series of responses that brought the U.S. and Iran to the brink of war.

Wednesday’s attack came from an improvised truck launcher that fired off 30 Katyusha rockets, 18 of which landed on Camp Taji, a base just north of Baghdad that houses U.S. and coalition forces. None of the incoming rockets was shot down by any air defense system, a U.S. official said.

Milley said the U.S. was able to capture the truck with Iraqi security forces and has “good indications” who fired the rockets based on forensic evidence.”

“The groups that were responsible will be held accountable,” he said.

When asked why the U.S. didn’t intercept the incoming rockets, Milley responded that the base has no defenses for those types of weapons.

“On that base with these type of rockets, no they were not intercepted. It’s not a function of failure. There’s not a system there to defend against those types of rockets,” he said.

The U.S. is moving air and ballistic missile defense systems into Iraq to protect against a potential Iranian attack following the escalation in January, McKenzie told the House Armed Services Committee on Tuesday.

Following the attack, reports emerged of airstrikes on Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps positions on Abu Kamal near the border between Iraq and Syria. However, the U.S. official said those strikes were not conducted by the United States. It is possible the Israeli military carried out the strikes.

One former Trump administration official said it is likely Wednesday’s attack was conducted with the “knowledge and support of the IRGC.”

“Although some stated they believed the killing of [Iranian Gen. Qassem] Solemani would prevent further attacks, many more believed it would not and that this is the start of their response,” the former official said.

The Pentagon is likely preparing options to present to the president for a response, ranging from direct attacks against the militia group that carried out the rocket strike, targeting IRGC operatives in Iraq or Syria, and perhaps even direct attacks on Iranian military in Iran. The military may also be considering “covert actions,” which could help reduce the chances of escalation.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/12/attack-that-killed-2-us-troops-was-likely-iran-backed-militia-group-top-general-says-127011

Citing California public health officials, Governor Gavin Newsom Wednesday night said that gatherings of more than 250 people should be postponed or canceled across the state until at least the end of March. That effectively would ground any Hollywood film and TV premieres, festivals, larger screenings and Emmy campaign events and would temporarily halt the use of live audiences in show tapings, including primetime sitcoms.

All New York-based late-night shows on Wednesday announced that they were not going to employ studio audience starting Monday, citing similar guidance on public gatherings from New York City officials. The major Los Angeles-based late-night shows, Jimmy Kimmel Live, Late Late Show with James CordenA Little Late with Lilly Singh and Real Time with Bill Maher, have not moved in to remove audiences. (Most of the top LA-based daytime shows, led by Ellen and Dr. Phil, already are going temporarily audience-free.)

The recommendation also will impact reality series like America’s Got Talent, which currently filming auditions at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium, and American Ninja Warrior, which is filming in Los Angeles this weekend. Also likely affected would be the NCAA basketball tournament’s West Regional scheduled for March 26-28 at Staples Center, as well as big theater productions, including Hamilton at the Pantages Theater, and concerts.

“Each of us has extraordinary power to slow the spread of this disease,” Newsom said. “”Not holding that concert or community event can have cascading effects — saving dozens of lives and preserving critical healthcare resources that your family may need a month from now. The people in our lives who are most at risk — seniors and those with underlying health conditions — are depending on all of us to make the right choice.”

Smaller events must be limited to no more than 250 people and can only take place if organizers can implement social distancing of six feet. Gatherings of people who are at higher health risk should be limited to no more than 10 people and also follow the social-distancing guidelines, the statement said.

Source Article from https://deadline.com/2020/03/california-gov-gavin-newsom-moratorium-large-gatherings-slow-coronavirus-outbreak-hollywood-impact-1202880622/


Joe Biden. | AP Photo/Matt Rourke

TALLAHASSEE — Joe Biden is in line to deliver a knockout punch to Bernie Sanders in Florida in Tuesday‘s Democratic primary, according to a new poll that gives the former vice president a staggering 44-point lead over his opponent.

Biden is lapping Sanders in voter support, with support from 66 percent of likely Democratic primary voters to 22 percent for Sanders, according to a University of North Florida poll taken March 5-10.

Advertisement

The findings land just after Sanders, a U.S. senator from Vermont, on Wednesday vowed to stay in the presidential race despite taking a multi-state beatdown in the past two weeks. Biden has 864 delegates to Sanders’ 710, and Florida has 219 grabs. Voters there go to the polls March 17.

“This is down to a two-man race and Biden is looking toward a blowout in Florida,” said Michael Binder, the director of UNF’s Public Opinion Research Lab. Sanders, he said, “is facing a do-or-die debate on Sunday if he hopes to swing the momentum.”

The poll of 1,339 Democratic likely voters “paints a bleak picture for the Sanders campaign.”

The survey’s margin of error is plus or minus 2.5 percent.

Three other states also will vote on March 17: Illinois, Ohio and Arizona. In Florida, more than 728,000 Democrats already have cast ballots.

Biden hopes to sweep all four states, but Florida is more than a big delegate prize. A Biden blowout in the battleground state would send a warning to President Donald Trump in his newly adopted home state, which Trump needs to carry to win a second term.

Winning Florida, a state with a moderate and older electorate, was always an uphill climb for Sanders. The Vermont senator lost to Hillary Clinton in the state by roughly 30 points four years ago.

And Sanders, a self-proclaimed Democratic socialist who has praised Fidel Castro, has alarmed establishment Democrats in Florida who fear the state would be a lost cause for the party if Sanders captures the nomination.

The UNF poll shows Sanders with a commanding lead among voters aged 18 to 24, but Biden is the overwhelming choice for older voters and blacks.

The poll also has Biden ahead with Hispanics — 65 percent to 28 percent — breaking a run of success Sanders has had with Hispanics in other states.

“Sanders does have a lot of support among young people, however there are just not enough voters in that demographic to propel him to a victory in Florida,” Binder said.

Since Super Tuesday on March 3, Biden also has picked up a wave of endorsements from high-profile Democrats in the state, culminating with the support of Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried on Wednesday.

Fried, Florida’s only statewide elected Democrat, had remained on the sidelines when there were multiple candidates in the Democratic contest.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2020/03/12/new-poll-shows-biden-with-a-staggering-44-point-lead-over-sanders-1266598

Mayor Bill de Blasio said the city is preparing unprecedented measures to contain the coronavirus by limiting public gatherings — including possibly closing Broadway — as nine new cases bumped the Big Apple’s tally to 62, he said Thursday.

“We’re going to have to introduce more and more restrictions, which we’re certainly going to be doing in New York City today and tomorrow,” he said on CNN. There are nine new coronavirus cases in the city since Wednesday.

De Blasio did not get into specifics but said the changes would “somehow balance the need to keep as much normalcy in society as possible while reducing the gatherings that are causing concern, giving people more space.”

He said the city would launch “new models that we’ve never used before.”

But Hizzoner hedged on completely shuttering Broadway.

“I don’t want to see Broadway go dark if we can avoid it. I want to see if we strike some kind of balance,” he said. “If we cannot strike the balance, of course we can go to closure, that’s the decision we will make right away.”

So far, there is no plan to shut down schools or mass transit.

“We’re not going to shut down a subway system,” de Blasio said.

“If you shut down a subway system, then you’re shutting down an economy and you’re shutting down work and livelihood,” he said.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-in-ny-city-prepares-historic-measures-as-cases-jump-to-62/