Four elderly passengers on board Holland America’s MS Zaandam have died on the cruise ship that is stuck in limbo during the coronavirus pandemic

The ship is currently carrying 138 people who have complained of flu-like symptoms, which are similar to coronavirus symptoms. Two people have tested positive for coronavirus.

“Our thoughts and prayers are with their families and we are doing everything we can to support them during this difficult time,” Holland America Line said of the four who had died of undisclosed causes in a statement shared by spokesperson Erik Elvejord.

Elvejord added that Holland America Line couldn’t share whether those passengers had reported coronavirus symptoms due to privacy regulations.

Those on the ship who are sick include 53 passengers and 85 crew members. There are 1,243 passengers and 586 crew members on the ship, including 305 Americans.

The ship did not have coronavirus tests available on board until Thursday evening when it rendezvoused with Holland America’s MS Rotterdam for additional supplies and medical personnel. On board the Zaandam there are four doctors and four nurses, and the Rotterdam is carrying two doctors and four nurses, the cruise line said.

The two ships received permission to anchor off the coast of Panama to meet and transfer supplies and passengers. However, the plan for disembarkation is not yet finalized. 

“While the onward plan for both ships is still being finalized, we continue to work with the Panamanian authorities on approval to transit the Panama Canal for sailing to Fort Lauderdale, Florida,” the line said in the statement.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/cruises/2020/03/27/coronavirus-4-dead-138-sick-holland-america-cruise-limbo/2927031001/

Two hours after the Trump’s initial post, Massie confirmed that he would do just that, tweeting: “I swore an oath to uphold the constitution, and I take that oath seriously. In a few moments I will request a vote on the CARES Act which means members of Congress will vote on it by pushing ‘yes’ or ‘no’ or ‘present.'”

Massie’s threat has forced dozens, if not hundreds, of lawmakers to return to Washington from their home districts, navigating across interstates and through airports at a time when public health officials have urged Americans to avoid nonessential travel and gathering in large groups.

“He just wants the publicity. He can’t stop it, only delay, which is both dangerous … & costly,” Trump tweeted of Massie. “Workers & small businesses need money now in order to survive. Virus wasn’t their fault. It is ‘HELL’ dealing with the Dems, had to give up some stupid things in order to get the ‘big picture’ done. 90% GREAT! WIN BACK HOUSE, but throw Massie out of Republican Party!”

In another tweet, the president sought to target Massie’s status as chairman of the conservative House Second Amendment Caucus, writing: “By empowering the Radical Left Democrats, do nothing Kentucky politician @RepThomasMassie is making their War on the 2nd Amendment more and more difficult to win (But don’t worry, we will win anyway!). He is a disaster for America, and for the Great State of Kentucky!”

Massie reached out to Trump, but it is not clear whether they connected, according to two sources.

POLITICO previously reported that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) had been in contact with Massie, and that the White House was aware of the potential obstacle he posed to the package’s final passage.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced on Thursday that the House would vote Friday on the legislation, sending lawmakers scrambling back to the Capitol after they were previously told they would have at least 24 hours’ notice if they needed to return.

Any single member could complicate the proceedings on Friday by objecting on the grounds that there is not a quorum — in this case, 216 lawmakers — in the chamber, or by demanding a roll-call vote, an option opposed by Democratic and Republican congressional leadership. But even if Massie forces a recorded vote, the package is expected to pass with broad bipartisan support.

Massie, who drove from Kentucky to be in Washington for the vote, on Thursday tweeted ominously an image of the Constitution’s clause having to do with quorums in chambers of Congress. He also described the package as “not a good deal” and suggested it was the result of dubious legislative maneuvering.

“They’re trying to convince us it should be a voice vote, it shouldn’t be recorded. And I’m struggling with this,” Massie told a Cincinnati radio station. As of late Thursday night, senior aides in both parties said they were unsure what he would do.

By Friday, however, the answer had become apparent, as Massie issued a multi-message screed on social media outlining his qualms with the package.

“It’s pretty clear now, with enough members here to pass the bill, that Pelosi and McCarthy are still working together to block a recorded vote just to insulate members of Congress from ACCOUNTABILITY,” he tweeted. “Biggest spending bill in the history of mankind, and no recorded vote? #SWAMP.”

Massie also wrote that he had been told House leaders “don’t even have 1 minute available for me to speak against this bill during the 4 hour debate. The fix is in. If this bill is so great for America, why not allow a vote on it? Why not have a real debate?”

Although Massie has broken with Trump on other high-profile votes in Congress, the libertarian congressman’s new feud with the president marks a major fracture in his campaign to win Trump’s support amid a competitive Republican primary for his House seat in June.

When Trump visited his Mar-a-Lago resort for Super Bowl weekend last month, Massie purchased TV advertising time in South Florida on Fox News to air an attack ad branding his GOP challenger as a “Trump hater.”

Jake Sherman contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/27/trump-congressman-thomas-massie-coronavirus-vote-151523

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has tested positive for the novel coronavirus.

Johnson will self-isolate at his residence at 10 Downing Street, and continue to lead the government response to the coronavirus pandemic, a spokesperson said.

In a video posted Friday, Johnson said that he had developed mild symptoms of Covid-19 — a fever and “persistent cough.” He took a test, and it came out positive.

“So I am working from home, I’m self-isolating and that’s entirely the right thing to do,” Johnson said. “But, be in no doubt, that I can continue, thanks to the wizardry of modern technology, to communicate with all my top team to lead the national fight back against coronavirus.”

Johnson also credited the staff of the National Health Service and public service workers and volunteers for their participation in a “national effort” against the coronavirus.

“We will get through it and the way we’re going to get through it is of course by applying the measures that you’ll have heard so much about,” he said. “And the more effectively we all comply with those measures, the faster our country will come through this epidemic, and the faster we’ll bounce back.”

Johnson and 10 Downing Street have said the prime minister will continue to coordinate the government’s coronavirus response remotely, though earlier this week foreign minister Dominic Raab was named the “designated survivor” in case Johnson became ill and needed someone to assume his responsibilities.

The UK Parliament went into recess March 26 until at least April 21, after approving emergency coronavirus legislation this week.

Johnson’s diagnosis comes after the prime minister implemented strict stay-at-home measures Monday that shuttered businesses and limited gatherings to two or more people. The mandate is in place for at least three weeks.

The United Kingdom has confirmed 11,800 cases of coronavirus, and recorded nearly 580 deaths. The country hasn’t been hit as hard as others in Europe, but the UK government lagged behind in adopting those strict social distancing measures.

The UK’s early coronavirus response also faced widespread criticism, after the government balked on banning mass gatherings and closing schools, and even exposing a large portion of the British population to the virus to help establish “herd immunity.”

Johnson and the UK government has drastically reversed course since, suspending gatherings, orders restaurants, bars, and pubs to shut, and advised people to stay indoors.

Other prominent politicians have been diagnosed with the coronavirus, including the leader of Italy’s democratic party and Spain’s deputy prime minister. Earlier this week, Prince Charles also tested positive for coronavirus.

Still, Johnson is might be one of the most prominent elected world leaders to confirm a positive diagnosis, though others, including Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (whose wife tested positive for the coronavirus) and German Chancellor Angela Merkel (whose doctor tested positive for coronavirus) are also running their respective countries from quarantine over concerns they were exposed to the virus.

President Donald Trump has also been tested for the coronavirus, which he and his doctor have said came out negative. Earlier in March, Trump met with Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro at Mar-a-Lago, after which a top aide to Bolsonaro tested positive for coronavirus. After some confusion, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro also said he tested negative. Neither of those leaders — who have both dismissed the severity of the coronavirus pandemic at points — put themselves under self-quarantine.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2020/3/27/21196747/boris-johnson-coronavirus-uk-prime-minister-positive

People in Wuhan, China, line up at a facility that tests discharged COVID-19 patients as well as individuals who had been held in isolation.

Feature China/Barcroft Media via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Feature China/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

People in Wuhan, China, line up at a facility that tests discharged COVID-19 patients as well as individuals who had been held in isolation.

Feature China/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

A spate of mysterious second-time infections is calling into question the accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tools even as China prepares to lift quarantine measures to allow residents to leave the epicenter of its outbreak next month. It’s also raising concerns of a possible second wave of cases.

From March 18-22, the Chinese city of Wuhan reported no new cases of the virus through domestic transmission — that is, infection passed on from one person to another. The achievement was seen as a turning point in efforts to contain the virus, which has infected more than 80,000 people in China. Wuhan was particularly hard-hit, with more than half of all confirmed cases in the country.

But some Wuhan residents who had tested positive earlier and then recovered from the disease are testing positive for the virus a second time. Based on data from several quarantine facilities in the city, which house patients for further observation after their discharge from hospitals, about 5%-10% of patients pronounced “recovered” have tested positive again.

Some of those who retested positive appear to be asymptomatic carriers — those who carry the virus and are possibly infectious but do not exhibit any of the illness’s associated symptoms — suggesting that the outbreak in Wuhan is not close to being over.

NPR has spoken by phone or exchanged text messages with four individuals in Wuhan who are part of this group of individuals testing positive a second time in March. All four said they had been sickened with the virus and tested positive, then were released from medical care in recent weeks after their condition improved and they tested negative.

Two of them are front-line doctors who were sickened after treating patients in their Wuhan hospitals. The other two are Wuhan residents. They all requested anonymity when speaking with NPR because those who have challenged the government’s handling of the outbreak have been detained.

One of the Wuhan residents who spoke to NPR exhibited severe symptoms during their first round of illness and was eventually hospitalized. The second resident displayed only mild symptoms at first and was quarantined in one of more than a dozen makeshift treatment centers erected in Wuhan during the peak of the outbreak.

But when both were tested a second time for the coronavirus on Sunday, March 22, as a precondition for seeking medical care for unrelated health issues, they tested positive for the coronavirus even though they exhibited none of the typical symptoms, such as a fever or dry cough. The time from their recovery and release to the retest ranged from a few days to a few weeks.

Could that second positive test mean a second round of infection? Virologists think it is unlikely that a COVID-19 patient could be re-infected so quickly after recovery but caution that it is too soon to know.

Under its newest COVID-19 prevention guidelines, China does not include in its overall daily count for total and for new cases those who retest positive after being released from medical care. China also does not include asymptomatic cases in case counts.

“I have no idea why the authorities choose not to count [asymptomatic] cases in the official case count. I am baffled,” said one of the Wuhan doctors who had a second positive test after recovering.

These four people are now being isolated under medical observation. It is unclear whether they are infectious and why they tested positive after their earlier negative test.

It is possible they were first given a false negative test result, which can happen if the swab used to collect samples of the virus misses bits of the virus. Dr. Li Wenliang, a whistleblowing doctor who later died of the virus himself in February, tested negative for the coronavirus several times before being accurately diagnosed.

In February, Wang Chen, a director at the state-run Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, estimated that the nucleic acid tests used in China were accurate at identifying positive cases of the coronavirus only 30%-50% of the time.

Another theory is that, because the test amplifies tiny bits of DNA, residual virus from the initial infection could have falsely resulted in that second positive reading.

“There are false positives with these types of tests,” Dr. Jeffrey Shaman, a professor of environmental health sciences at Columbia University, told NPR by email. Shaman recently co-authored a modeling study showing that transmission by individuals who did not exhibit any symptoms was a driver of the Wuhan outbreak.

How real is China’s recovery?

On Tuesday, Hubei province, where Wuhan is the capital, said it would relax lockdown measures that have now been in place for more than two months and begin letting residents leave cities the following day. Wuhan said it would begin lifting its quarantine measures and letting residents leave two weeks later, on April 8.

To leave Wuhan, residents must first test negative for the coronavirus, according to municipal authorities. Such screenings will identify some remaining asymptomatic virus carriers. But the high rate of false negatives that Chinese doctors have cited means many with the virus could pass undetected.

Last Thursday, Wuhan reported for the first time since the outbreak began that it had no new cases of the virus from the day before — a milestone in China’s virus containment efforts. The city reported a zero rise in new cases for the following four days.

Assessing asymptomatic carriers

But Caixin, an independent Chinese news outlet, reported earlier this week that Wuhan hospitals were continuing to see new cases of asymptomatic virus carriers, citing a health official who said he had seen up to a dozen such cases a day.

Responding to inquiries about how the city was counting asymptomatic cases, Wuhan’s health commission said Monday that it is quarantining new asymptomatic patients in specialized wards for 14 days. Such patients would be included in new daily case counts if they develop symptoms during that time, authorities said.

“Based on available World Health Organization data, new infections are mainly transmitted by patients who have developed symptoms. Hence [asymptomatic cases] may not be the main source of transmission,” the commission said.

A researcher at China’s health commission told reporters Tuesday that asymptomatic carriers “would not cause the spread” of the virus. Zunyou Wu, the researcher, explained this was because the authorities were isolating people who had close contact with confirmed patients. Wu did not explain how they would identify asymptomatic carriers who had no close contact with confirmed patients.

Addressing growing public concern of asymptomatic patients, China’s Premier Li Keqiang urged during Thursday’s senior-level government meeting that “relevant departments must … truthfully, timely, and openly” answer questions, such as whether these patients are infectious and how the course of the outbreak may change.

Research suggests that the spread can be caused by asymptomatic carriers. Studies of patients from Wuhan and other Chinese cities who were diagnosed early in the outbreak suggest that asymptomatic carriers of the virus can infect those they have close contact with, such as family members.

“In terms of those who retested positive, the official party line is that they have not been proven to be infectious. That is not the same as saying they are not infectious,” one of the Wuhan doctors who tested positive twice told NPR. He is now isolated and under medical observation. “If they really are not infectious,” the doctor said, “then there would be no need to take them back to the hospitals again.”

Geoff Brumfiel contributed reporting from Washington, D.C.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/27/822407626/mystery-in-wuhan-recovered-coronavirus-patients-test-negative-then-positive

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/27/uk/uk-boris-johnson-coronavirus-gbr-intl/index.html

America’s state governors have found themselves under an intense national spotlight in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

The additional scrutiny has also highlighted an evolving dynamic between these chief executives who operate the country’s states and a White House run by a mercurial president whose public statements and policy turns are often impossible to predict.

As the virus crisis has grown stronger governors’ daily press conferences and media calls on the coronavirus have become primetime events for a worried and often fearful populace. Governors, the typically aloof top state officials, are currently some of the most reliable sources of information on confirmed coronavirus cases and updates on medical supplies in response to the virus.

“The governors are acting in a way governors traditionally act, it just so happens that governors have more of an audience for it now,” said the former Delaware governor Jack Markell, a Democrat.

Responses to the pandemic have varied from state to state. Partially because not every governor has the same amount of authority. Some governors can activate the national guard or order schools closed essentially on their own. Others have had to take legislative routes or make other bureaucratic moves.

There have been some markings of a deeper ideological divide to responding to the virus. Some Republican governors, such as Arizona’s Doug Ducey, have loudly touted new partnerships with private business to fight the pandemic while some Democrats have leaned more on executive orders to slow the outbreak down.

Governors have also received more attention from Donald Trump than they otherwise would.

New York’s governor, Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, has received both praise and criticism from the president. Cuomo has regularly been in touch with Trump but at times criticized the federal government’s help to his state. Illinois’ governor, JB Pritzker, and Michigan’s governor, Gretchen Whitmer, , have gotten into public spats with Trump on Twitter.

At the same time, Republican and Democratic governors are learning how to shape their public comments under the intense scrutiny of a TV-obsessed president eager to return praise and respond to criticism with more criticism. It is a tough tightrope to walk and in the face of dealing with a pandemic comes with life-or-death high stakes.

California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, usually an eager critic of the president, has repeatedly praised the Trump administration for how it has responded to the crisis. Newsom has praised Trump for the president’s “focus on treatments”.



California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, speaks in Rancho Cordova, California, on 23 March. Photograph: Rich Pedroncelli/AP

Conversely, Pritzker found himself in a Twitter feud with the president where, at one point, the top Illinois Democrat called Trump a carnival barker. Trump has also fumed at Washington’s governor, Jay Inslee, calling him a “snake”.

“It’s a two-way street,” Trump said of dealing with governors during a Fox News town hall. “They have to treat us well.”

There’s been an increased level of coordination and note trading between governors as well. Usually, each governor is mostly siloed off from even their closest neighbors. But conference calls with the White House or one-on-one calls and joint statements between governors have become more regular.

“There is a lot of chatter amongst governors,” said Kansas’ governor, Laura Kelly, a Democrat, in an interview with the Guardian. “We’ve just started texting and calling each other as we look to [ask] ‘Why did you do this? What was the thought process behind this?’ as we’re trying to make decisions for our own states.”

The National Governors Association, the nonpartisan umbrella organization, has helped to facilitate conference calls between the governors and a White House. The Democratic Governors Association and the Republican Governors Association have been sharing information about what governors have been doing on the pandemic with their members.

A call between Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, and Georgia’s governor, Brian Kemp, on Covid-19 was listed on DeSantis’s public schedule in mid-March. Whitmer, a Democrat, and Ohio’s Republican governor, Mike DeWine issued a joint statement urging Trump to take extra steps to protect the auto industry from financial ruin during the pandemic and resulting economic collapse.

The White House has been interacting with governors regularly. South Dakota’s governor, Kristi Noem, talked extensively with Larry Kudlow, the director of Trump’s National Economic Council, on Wednesday. On Thursday the Trump administration released a letter sent to every governor detailing how it planned to release new guidelines for classifying counties as “high-risk”, “medium-risk” or “low-risk” on the coronavirus. The Trump administration has regularly held conference calls with governors.

According to a Republican aide to one of the governors on those calls, oftentimes the calls start out with “Vice-President Mike Pence giving an update on what the latest is that’s going on on a federal level”. Then Dr Deborah Birx, the response coordinator for the Trump administration’s coronavirus taskforce, will give a medical update on the virus. Then governors are free to ask questions. The calls have been cordial and fairly non combative. There was another one on Thursday and one planned for next week.

“It really, probably more than anything, continues to be a discussion about supply chains and quantities,” Kelly said. “I think every governor is experiencing a problem with that. A problem with getting tests done and getting test results back.”

As governors have enjoyed additional national and local attention, New York’s Cuomo has received an outsized amount. That’s partially because New York has been one of the most hardest hit locations of the virus. He has seen more press than any other governor, even ones being mentioned as possible presidential candidates in 2024.

“Quite honestly, he has done a wonderful job of communicating and keeping people informed,” Kelly said. She pointed out that New York has really been a “hotbed” for the virus and that “it’s such a huge driver of all things American – it’s our financial sector, it’s all sorts of things”.

Elsewhere there has been an unusual level of agreement among governors. In the community of governors there’s a growing, bipartisan level of skepticism about that the US could reopen by Easter, as Trump is hoping for. Asked if that’s feasible, Kelly said: “No, and I think it’s very unhelpful to even say those things.”

Similarly, during a press conference on Thursday, Noem, when pressed, doubted that her state would be back to normal soon.

“I do not think South Dakota will be back to normal for many months – many months,” Noem said.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/27/us-governors-coronavirus-trump

Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox. Sign up here.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is being disingenuous about her role in crafting the $2 trillion coronavirus aid package, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Thursday night.

“I know it is her birthday, but it does not give her the right to lie,” McCarthy, a California Republican, said on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle” on the day that Pelosi, a San Francisco Democrat, turned 80 years old.

“Ninety-nine percent of this bill was already decided on Sunday — she held the bill up,” McCarthy added.

MCCONNELL ADMONISHES PELOSI OVER CORONAVIRUS AID BILL: ‘I WISH SHE’D TURN OFF THOSE POLITICAL TALKING POINTS’

Pelosi claimed in earlier remarks that she and other House Democrats had “performed jiu-jitsu on” the bill, preventing Republicans from making it a piece of “corporate first” legislation.

She claimed Democrats succeeded in shifting the bill’s direction toward a “democratic, workers-first legislation.”

McCarthy added that nearly 3.3 million Americans filed jobless claims this week, while Democrats “held up” the bill, which was being crafted to provide relief.

He also slammed Pelosi for trying to insert provisions enacting parts of the Green New Deal, giving millions to Planned Parenthood, transforming election law, granting money to sanctuary cities, and giving a handout to the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington.

CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE

“That is what she was requesting — that is what we kept out,” he said, adding that during bipartisan negotiations, the provision giving $24 million to the Kennedy Center remained in the bill.

“[The Kennedy Center funding] is her ‘jiu-jitsu’,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/pelosi-jiu-jitsu-claim-on-coronavirus-relief-all-wrong-mccarthy-says-she-held-the-bill-up

In the call with Trump, Xi said that U.S.-China relations are at a critical juncture, and hoped the U.S. would make substantial action in improving the relationship, according to a Chinese-language state media report translated by CNBC.

“Under the current circumstances, China and the U.S. should unite to fight the epidemic,” the report of Xi’s comments said, noting both countries’ health departments and disease control experts have maintained communication. 

“The Chinese side is willing to continue to provide information and experience with the U.S. without reservation,” the report added, noting some provinces, cities and businesses in China are providing the U.S. with medical supplies. 

“The Chinese side understands the current difficulties of the U.S., and is willing to provide support within (China’s) ability.”

It was not immediately clear from the report whether China would give away supplies, or that it just hopes to sell more. China has donated some supplies externally since the crisis began, as well as accept assistance from outside.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/27/donald-trump-speaks-to-chinas-xi-jinping-on-coronavirus.html

Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox. Sign up here.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. responded Thursday to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo‘s criticism of the $2 trillion coronavirus response package, telling “Bill Hemmer Reports” the money is not meant to plug the holes blown in state budgets by the pandemic.

Gillibrand told host Bill Hemmer that the bill was intended as “emergency relief to the most in need [and] at risk [people].”

“There will be another bill and probably another after that and another after that,” said Gillibrand. “This is not a short-term crisis this is a long-term crisis. Every state is going to see more and more cases.”

Cuomo has complained that while New York is receiving about $3 billion in aid, the contagion has blown a hole in the state budget more than three times that size.

Gillibrand pointed out that the bill, which the Senate approved 96-0 late Wednesday, allocated $150 billion to the hospital industry.The House is expected to approve the bill on Friday and send it to President Trump to sign.

The senator also praised Cuomo for doing what she called “an excellent job,” dealing with the pandemic.

“He is meeting the needs of his constituents,” she said. “We have drive-thru testing in a lot of places that have cases.” She also noted that Cuomo has worked successfully to turn the Jacob Javits Convention Center in Hell’s Kitchen into a makeshift overflow hospital.

With states like New York, Pennsylvania and Callifornia essentially closed for business, the state governments are unable to reap sales taxes and business taxes during this time.

CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/kirsten-gillibrand-andrew-cuomo-coronavirus-relief

President Trump on Thursday downplayed the number of ventilators he thinks New York will need in the battle against the coronavirus.

“I have a feeling that a lot of the numbers that are being said in some areas are just bigger than they’re going to be,” Trump said in a call to Fox News’ “Hannity.”

“I don’t believe you need 40,000 or 30,000 ventilators,” Trump continued. “You know you go into major hospitals sometimes they’ll have two ventilators and now, all of a sudden, they’re saying, ‘Can we order 30,000 ventilators?’”

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has requested 30,000 of the machines. On Tuesday, the governor blasted the federal government for only sending a sliver of what he anticipates the Empire State will need to deal with the crisis.

“You want a pat on the back for sending 400 ventilators?” a furious Cuomo said, during a press conference, adding that tens of thousands of New Yorkers were “going to die” unless Trump and the feds up the ante on the ventilators they promised.

Speaking to Sean Hannity, Trump said that purchasing a ventilator was like buying a car, calling it “very expensive” and “very intricate.”

“And you know they’d say, like Gov. Cuomo and others, they’d say we want 30,000 of them. Thirty thousand?” Trump said. “Think of this, you know you go to hospitals that have one in a hospital and now all of a sudden everyone’s asking for these vast numbers.”

“Look it’s a very bad situation,” he added. “We haven’t seen anything like it but the end result is we gotta get back to work, and I think we can start by opening up some parts of the country.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2020/03/26/trump-questions-if-new-york-will-actually-need-30k-ventilators/

A motorist gets a drive-through coronavirus test Thursday in Daly City, Calif. The U.S. has surpassed China to have the world’s largest number of coronavirus cases.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

A motorist gets a drive-through coronavirus test Thursday in Daly City, Calif. The U.S. has surpassed China to have the world’s largest number of coronavirus cases.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Updated 9:31 p.m. ET Thursday

The U.S. now has more coronavirus cases than any other country in the world, surpassing China’s total and highlighting how rapidly the virus can move through a population.

The U.S. logged more than 83,000 cases as of 8 p.m. ET Thursday, while China reported more than 81,00 infections, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

America now leading the world in coronavirus cases is striking since the U.S. population of some 330 million is just a fraction of China’s 1.4 billion people.

In China, where the epidemic started in December, almost 3,300 people have died, while in the U.S., the toll stands at around 1,200. In Italy, there have been about 8,200 deaths.

As coronavirus cases surge, business nationwide has nearly ground to a halt and the economy has soured, with major swaths of America shut down and officials urging residents to stay indoors and practice social distancing to curb the rate of infection.

Bracing for the number of new coronavirus cases to keep rising, hospitals are scrambling to acquire bed capacity and crucial medical equipment like ventilators, gloves, gowns and protective masks. Many state officials have said in the absence of additional supply, the crush of infected people who need care will far exceed resources.

Officials with the White House’s coronavirus task force have expected a sharp rise in new cases, the result of testing becoming more available throughout the country.

Yet the U.S. testing rate still falls far short of other countries grappling with the virus. For instance, South Korea’s testing rate for coronavirus is more than six times that of America’s, despite Trump’s repeated claim that the U.S. is the world leader in testing.

Testing in many parts of the U.S. has been far from smooth, as people nationwide report long waits for a test and stringent criteria for qualifying for a test.

New York has emerged as the epicenter of the pandemic. The state reported more than 37,000 infections, equaling more than half of America’s cases. The accelerating rate in New York has spilled over into neighboring New Jersey, which now has the second-highest state total in the U.S.

Deborah Birx, who is on the White House’s coronavirus task force, said on Thursday that new hot spots are forming in the counties that include Detroit and Chicago.

Millions of Americans are teleworking if they can. Many others are out of work altogether. Nearly 3.3 million have filed unemployment claims last week. Market volatility has been rocking investors for weeks. And dozens of leading economic forecasters say the virus is lurching the global economy into a recession.

Trump, meanwhile, has indicated that he would like to see the country open to business by Easter, a timeline that is much sooner than what public health experts are advising.

White House officials say updated guidelines on possibly loosening social distancing recommendations could arrive as soon as next week.

A historic $2 trillion relief package was passed by the Senate on Wednesday night with hopes to providing a jolt to a limping economy. Among the provisions of the more than 800-page bill: sending $1,200 direct payments to most American adults.

The House on Friday is poised to take up the measure and is expected to pass it. Trump has said he is ready to sign the bill into law.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/03/26/822248693/u-s-surpasses-china-in-cases-of-coronavirus

President Donald Trump told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday evening that he believes that the coronavirus battle will not require the number of medical equipment pieces that have been requested by some states.

Trump has been the subject of criticism over the distribution of medical equipment from federal stockpiles, with some state governors saying they do not have enough ventilators available to properly care for patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

“FEMA says, ‘we’re sending 400 ventilators,” New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said at a Wednesday news conference. “Really? What am I going to do with 40 ventilators when I need 30,000?”

Newsweek reached out to Governor Cuomo’s office for comment but did not receive a response in time for publication.

“I have a feeling that a lot of the numbers that are being said for some areas are just bigger than they’re going to be,” Trump said. “I don’t believe you need 40,000 or 30,000 ventilators. You know, at a major hospital sometimes they’ll have two ventilators. All of a sudden they’re saying, ‘Can we order 30,000 ventilators?'”

“Look, it’s a very bad situation,” the president continued. “We haven’t seen anything like it. But the end result is we gotta get back to work and I think we can start by opening up certain parts of the country.”

While many lawmakers have asked Trump to use the powers of the Defense Production Act (DPA) in order to impel American manufacturers to create more medical equipment, the president said companies have “stepped up” and volunteered to make them on their own.

“I haven’t had to use [the DPA],” Trump said. “We had Ford step up, General Motors step up, 3M step up, so many companies stepped up and they’re making vast amounts of things but when you talk about ventilators, that’s sort of like buying a car. It’s very expensive, it’s a very intricate piece of equipment, heavily computerized and the good ones are very very expensive.”

“They say, like Governor Cuomo and others, we want 30,000 of them. 30,000!” Trump exclaimed. “You go to hospitals, they’ll have one in a hospital and now all of a sudden everybody’s asking for these vast numbers.”

However, Trump said his relationship with Cuomo had improved and that New York would be receiving an adequate amount of help, if not everything the governor had asked for.

“I don’t think that certain things will materialize,” Trump said, “a lot of equipment is being asked for that I don’t think they’ll need, but we’re building four hospitals, four medical centers and many other things.”

Trump announced Thursday during a coronavirus task force news briefing that the USNS Comfort, a hospital ship, was expected to dock in New York Harbor to assist health care workers with coronavirus patients. Not originally planned to complete retrofitting for coronavirus care for another three weeks, Trump said the ship was expected to arrive Saturday.

“This is tremendous,” Trump told Hannity. “These are warships. These are ships that take care of the soldiers in battles and they are big and powerful.”

p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
content: none
}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/trump-claims-us-states-dont-need-amount-ventilators-theyre-asking-i-dont-believe-you-need-1494599

ALBANY — With revenues torpedoed by the coronavirus pandemic, Gov. Andrew Cuomo will seize control of the state budget for quarterly tweaks through an obscure clause quietly created last year.

“We know the revenues are down, [but] we don’t know how much, we don’t know when the economy comes back, we don’t know the rate at which the economy comes back and we don’t know what Washington may do to address this situation in the future, if anything,” Cuomo told reporters during a press conference at the state Capitol on Thursday.

“So, you don’t know, you don’t know, you don’t know and you don’t know,” he summarized. “But you have to do a budget with all those unknowns.”

The move comes as Cuomo’s office forecasts the coronavirus may cost the Empire State as much as $15 billion in revenues during its next budget, dramatically exacerbating the state’s precarious finances.

Cuomo is able to take the reins via the state Division of the Budget thanks to a clause baked into the Fiscal Year 2020 budget, allowing the DOB to take over in the event of dire financial straits.

“We’re going to adjust the budget through the years to reflect the actual revenue,” he said. “We’ll say on day one, ‘OK, we intended to give you $100. We don’t have $100, so we’re going to give you $95. But I can only give you $95 if I get $95. And I’ll let you know quarterly.’

“And that’s, frankly, the only way you can do this budget when you have so many unknowns.”

Cuomo said that the quarterly adjustments would be made based on pure numbers and without the hand of the state legislature, in order to save lawmakers a trip to Albany with the contagion still raging.

“What we’re thinking about is quarterly — or something like that — adjustments that are almost mathematical reflections of what the revenues are,” he said. “You know what the revenue projection is, and you know how much money you’ve made for that quarter. Whatever that deviation is would be automatic.

“It would be done by the Division of the Budget,” he continued. “I don’t believe the legislature is going to want to come up here every quarter and go through numbers. At this rate, with the spread of the virus, I don’t even know that it would be responsible to ask for a convening of the legislature.”

The Empire State has now been hit with 385 deaths from the disease, among 37,258 cases, with the worst still weeks away, officials project.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2020/03/26/cuomo-seizing-control-of-ny-state-budget-amid-coronavirus-economic-crunch/

After days of back-and-forth heated debate on partisan lines, the Senate passed its version of the coronavirus stimulus bill. Included in that bill is a relief check for qualifying individuals of up to $1,200 for individuals and $2,400 for couples.

The bill still needs to go back to the House of Representatives and then be signed into law by President Donald Trump before the checks can be sent out, but the Senate represented one of the largest hurdles in the process.

So how do you know how much you may be getting?

It’s based on your adjusted gross income in your 2019 tax filings — or 2018 filings if you haven’t filed yet. Individuals who make $75,000 a year or less, and heads of households who make $112,500 or less, all qualify for the full amount of $1,200.

Married couples who file their taxes jointly who make $150,000 or less qualify for all of the $2,400.

But what if your income is higher than those amounts?

Once you hit those limits, your check would be reduced by 5% of the total amount you earn above those limits. (The stimulus checks phase out entirely for single filers with incomes of $99,000 or higher and $198,000 or higher for married couples filing jointly).

If you really want to do the math, here’s an equation for figuring out how much you might be getting: Take the total amount you earn over $75,000 (or $150,000 for married couples filing jointly) and multiply it by 0.05. Then subtract that amount from 1,200.

Here’s a quick rundown on what stimulus checks will look like with a variety of incomes .

For single earners:

  • If you make $75,000 a year or less, your check will be $1,200
  • If you make $80,000 a year, your check will be about $950
  • If you make $85,000 a year, your check will be about $700
  • If you make $90,000 a year, your check will be about $450
  • If you make $95,000 a year, your check will be about $200

For the heads of households

  • If you make $112,500 a year or less, your check will be $1,200
  • If you make $117,500 a year your check will be $950
  • If you make $122,500 a year your check will be $700
  • If you make $127,500 a year your check will be $450
  • If you make $132,500 a year your check will be $200

For married couples who file taxes jointly:

  • If your household makes $150,000 a year or less, your check will be $2,400
  • If your household makes $160,000 a year, your check will be about $1,900
  • If your household makes $170,000 a year, your check will be about $1,400
  • If your household makes $180,000 a year, your check will be about $900
  • If your household makes $190,000 a year, your check will be about $400

The bill also provides an extra $500 for every child under 17 claimed by each filer, regardless of how much they are making. If you have children, use the previous equation and then add $500 for each child you claim on your taxes to get the amount you will receive in your stimulus check.


More Coronavirus News


Like WTOP on Facebook and follow @WTOP on Twitter to engage in conversation about this article and others.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2020 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Source Article from https://wtop.com/business-finance/2020/03/how-much-to-expect-in-your-coronavirus-stimulus-check/

[[getSimpleString(data.title)]]

[[getSimpleString(data.text)]]

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kv3NHO89C8k

The public health system, limping along on local tax receipts, kills mosquitoes and traces the contacts of people with sexually transmitted diseases. It has been outmatched by the pandemic.

There was no Pentagon ready to fight the war on this pandemic, no wartime draft law. There was eventually a White House Coronavirus Task Force, but it has been led by politicians, not medical experts.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is one of the great disease-detective agencies in the world, and its doctors have contributed mightily in skirmishes against Ebola, Zika and any number of other health threats.

But the agency retreated into silence, its director, Dr. Robert Redfield, almost invisible — humbled by a fiasco in the failure to produce basic diagnostic testing.

Now at least 160 million Americans have been ordered to stay home in states from California to New York. Schools are closed, often along with bars, restaurants and many other businesses. Hospitals are coping with soaring numbers of patients in New York City, even as supplies of essential protective gear and equipment dwindle.

Other hospitals, other communities fear what may be coming.

“We are the new global epicenter of the disease,” said Dr. Sara Keller, an infectious disease specialist at Johns Hopkins Medicine.

“Now, all we can do is to slow the transmission as much as possible by hunkering down in our houses while, as a country, we ramp up production of personal protective equipment, materials needed for testing, and ventilators.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/health/usa-coronavirus-cases.html

You might have some extra money coming from the U.S. government this spring. 

The U.S. Senate approved a sweeping $2 trillion stimulus package that aims to help people affected by the coronavirus pandemic. People who are still working, those who are unemployed, those who are self-employed and contractors would all benefit. Businesses also stand to get financial assistance to avoid closing down or laying off employees because of the economic effect of the pandemic. 

The legislation still needs approval in the U.S. House. 

For individuals, the amount of money you receive is based on your household income and how many children you claim as dependents on your taxes. 

Use the calculator below to determine how much you would receive. 

Calculate your stimulus check

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/03/26/stimulus-checks-how-much-money-get-government/2921123001/

“We have to get people off their selfishness,” Pelosi added, speaking about GOP threats to demand a roll call vote instead of letting the House clear the package via a simple voice vote.

Pelosi’s comments come as House leaders on both sides worry that one or more of their members will try to cause a scene on Friday, demanding a quorum call or a roll call vote which would require more lawmakers to return to the Capitol. House leaders are hoping to pass the bill via a voice vote, which wouldn’t necessitate a majority of members traveling to Washington, something they are desperate to avoid.

In an effort to ensure the vote goes smoothly, Pelosi has been in touch with Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said he called Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), the incoming White House chief of staff.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has been making the pitch to his members — in pressers, conference calls and individual conversations — to not object to the voice vote on Friday. His argument: that the process will still allow for a debate and a chance to express opposition, without having to drag everyone back to Washington and slow down the bill’s passage.

House Republican leadership is particularly concerned about the intentions of GOP Rep. Tom Massie. Massie drove from Kentucky to be in Washington for the vote, and has signaled to the leadership that he may call for a recorded tally. The White House is aware of the issue, sources said.

Both McCarthy and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) have been in contact Massie, according to a Republican leadership aide — but no one is quite sure where he will land.

Earlier Thursday, Massie signaled he was still wrestling with his decision. “They’re trying to convince us it should be a voice vote, it shouldn’t be recorded. And I’m struggling with this,” he said. “I’m having a real hard time with this.”

When asked Thursday whether any lawmakers would block the bill’s speedy passage in the House, Trump responded: “Let’s see whether or not we have a grandstander.”

In addition to potential GOP disruptions, Pelosi said there was one Democratic member who might demand a roll call vote on the massive package but she did not name the lawmaker.

For some Democrats, the main point of contention involves the massive $150 billion rescue fund for state and local governments as they attempt to combat the crisis on the ground. That money can only be awarded to localities of more than 500,000 people — a major concern for lawmakers whose districts may not qualify for aid. The National League of Cities has lobbied lawmakers to allow the cash to flow to any locality with 50,000 or more people.

The $2 trillion-plus package, which has already been approved by the Senate, will provide immediate relief to workers, small businesses and major industries crippled by the crisis.

Later in the call, Pelosi strongly urged Democrats not to demand a roll call vote, telling her caucus it would be “selfish” to require their colleagues to fly and drive in from across the country, potentially putting everyone’s health at risk.

House leaders are hoping to quickly pass the relief package via a voice vote — allowing members who chose to come to the chamber to debate and verbalize their objections without requesting a roll call vote.

But a single member could object on the grounds that there isn’t a quorum — in this case 216 lawmakers — in the chamber. A lawmaker could also demand a roll call vote, something leaders in both parties are urging against.

Some rank-and-file Democrats — Reps. Dan Kildee of Michigan and Gerry Connolly of Virginia — also tried during Thursday’s caucus call to plead with their colleagues not to request a recorded vote during the time of national crisis. Instead, they urged, any lawmakers upset with the legislation should voice their objection through the congressional record.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/26/nancy-pelosi-coronavirus-package-150815