Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said Sunday he has not seen any spikes in new coronavirus cases in states that recently reopened “non-essential” businesses.

The HHS chief expressed optimism that state governments have the tools to avoid new outbreaks of COVID-19, as several places including Wisconsin, South Carolina, Georgia and Colorado enter new phases of reopening local businesses. Several states have recorded record highs in the number of new daily coronavirus cases, but those numbers are in direct correlation to an increasing amount of tests being made available to residents. Newly reported deaths tied to the virus have leveled off or decreased.

During a CNN interview, host Jake Tapper said to Azar that it’s “intriguing” that some states that reopened “despite warnings of dire consequences from health experts” have — so far — not seen any dramatic spikes in new cases. “Is it still too early to tell?” he asked Azar Sunday morning.

“We are seeing that in areas that are opening, we’re not seeing the spike in cases,” Azar said. “We still see spikes in some areas that are, in fact, closed, very localized situations. And so this is going to be very important for us to watch the circumstances on the ground.”

A representative for the Wisconsin Department of Health Services told Newsweek Sunday that the state’s steady increase in new positive coronavirus cases, 502 between Friday and Saturday and 410 the day before, are on par with their expansion of testing. Last week, many “nonessential” businesses including bars and restaurants reopened after the Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down a statewide “safer at home” order which had kept them closed them for weeks.

Wisconsin saw a drop in new positive cases between Saturday and Sunday and its 7-day average has remained steady. But state health officials noted there can be a lag time of around 14 days between infection and potential hospitalization among those who experience symptoms of coronavirus.

Azar said in the interview that the key to the reopening of state economies and businesses is the surveillance of asymptomatic individuals as well as those in congregate living situations like prisons or nursing home facilities.

He said the Trump administration has set a goal for 300 million doses of a coronavirus vaccine to be available to Americans by the end of 2020, although he noted this is “not a pledge.” Azar added that reopening “does not depend on a vaccine” getting developed, but that the Trump administration is “committed to delivering a vaccine” using the full power of the federal government and private sector.

Many states that began reopening on May 1, including South Carolina and Wisconsin, have seen their highest daily numbers in new coronavirus cases, but this comes as the federal and state governments have worked together to expand testing.

On Saturday, South Carolina’s health department did not announce any new deaths from COVID-19 over the previous 24-hour period, which remained at 380 from Friday. However, the state did report a new daily high of 276 new cases on Saturday — up from 218 on Friday. Governor Henry McMaster lifted the home or work order in South Carolina on May 1.

“More testing has led to an increase in positive test results and we encourage everyone who needs to get a test to get a test,” Wisconsin Department of Health Services communications representative Jennifer Miller told Newsweek via email Sunday.

“We likely won’t know for another 14 days or more what impact the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling will have on case counts, though we are preparing for an increase of cases if people do not practice physical distancing or continue healthy hygiene practices,” she added.

Texas is another state that posted its highest-yet amount of new cases in one day on Saturday. But health officials there echoed the sentiment of other states which have reopened by saying an increase in testing has boosted that number. Texas, however, has failed numerous times to reach its testing goals.

p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
content: none
}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/states-that-reopened-havent-seen-any-spike-new-coronavirus-cases-hhs-secretary-azar-says-1504652

Steve Linick, the quasi-independent watchdog whose job it was to expose waste and malfeasance within the agency, investigated a number of issues at the State Department that agitated senior Trump administration officials, but it remains unclear what specifically triggered his ouster Friday night.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-department-inspector-general-steve-linick-mike-pompeo/2020/05/17/daf5170a-98a7-11ea-b60c-3be060a4f8e1_story.html

Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar spoke in optimistic terms about quickly reopening the US economy on CNN Sunday. And he did so while downplaying the severity of the coronavirus fatality rate nationally, seeming to suggest that demographics — rather than policy choices — are behind confirmed US coronavirus-related deaths approaching 90,000.

But his positive gloss on the administration’s coronavirus response appears to be at odds with recent polling indicating that an overwhelming majority of Americans — including those who have lost their jobs or taken pay cuts due to stay-at-home measures — are concerned that states will lift social distancing restrictions too quickly.

In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Azar said, “Thanks to the president’s historic response efforts here …. we are in a position to be able to reopen now.”

“We have got to get this economy and our people out and about, working, going to school again, because there are serious health consequences to what we’ve been going through,” he said.

However, his confidence about a swift return to normalcy — and the ability of state and local leaders to oversee that process competently — is not shared by most of the American public. A Pew Research Center poll taken from April 25 to May 5 (with a 1.4 percentage point margin of error) shows that 68 percent of all adults are concerned state governments will lift stay-at-home restrictions too quickly.

Strikingly, even among people who have been laid off or have taken a pay cut, the percentage of people with that concern is identical — 68 percent — which indicates concerns about the virus are serious even among those facing direct economic consequences from the coronavirus-spurred recession. (Among those who had not been laid off or taken a pay cut, the percentage concerned was one point higher: 69 percent.)

These results also suggest it’s not just government shutdowns of businesses that are keeping people home and away from businesses, but fear of the virus itself.

Azar also answered questions from Tapper about the fatality rate in an eyebrow-raising manner, suggesting that communities of color are a key reason that the US has the highest number of reported casualties from coronavirus in the world.

When Tapper initially asked Azar to explain why the virus is “worse for us than it is for anyone else,” referring to the number of Americans who are dead, Azar first responded by pointing out that the US’s mortality rate as a percentage of reported cases was not exceptionally high.

But when Tapper pressed him further, and emphasized that the overall number of deaths in the US is the highest in the world, Azar said this could be explained by ethnic demographics.

“Unfortunately the American population is a very diverse, and, it is, it is a population with significant unhealthy comorbidities that do make many individuals in our communities, in particular African American, minority communities, particularly at risk here, because of significant underlying disease, health disparities, and disease comorbidities,” Azar said.

“That is an unfortunate legacy in our health care system that we certainly do need to address,” Azar added.

Azar is right that public health inequities are contributing to disproportionate casualties among communities of color. But pointing to that as the primary reason the US has surpassed every other country in the world in terms of coronavirus-related deaths is a troubling dodge: it seems to imply that racial minorities are to blame for their deaths rather than the federal government.

The more immediate and larger explanation for the US’s exceptional number of deaths is the disorganized and anti-scientific response by the federal government to the pandemic.

But even setting that aside, the fact that many communities of color do have worse health outcomes is a function of longstanding socioeconomic marginalization and uneven access to nutrition, health care, and a healthy environment. In other words, Azar’s formulation could be flipped: it’s not people of color driving up America’s casualties, but America that is driving up people of color’s casualties.


Support Vox’s explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/covid-19-coronavirus-us-response-trump/2020/5/17/21261708/alex-azar-coronavirus-trump-economy-african-american

A Butte County pastor who defied public health officials and held an in-person Mother’s Day service that potentially exposed 180 congregants to the coronavirus has spoken out about his decision on social media.

In a Facebook post on Friday, pastor Mike Jacobsen of Palermo Bible Family Church said that an asymptomatic congregant who attended the May 11 service woke up the next morning “needing medical attention” and was tested for the coronavirus that day. The congregant received positive test results for COVID-19 two days later.

Jacobsen, who with his wife has led the pentecostal church since 2008, said in the post that he would “never with knowledge put anyone in harms [sic] way.”

“For 7 weeks we have been kept out of our church and away from our church family,” Jacobsen wrote in the post, which has since been deleted. “I am fully aware that some people may not understand that for our church it is essential to be together in fellowship.”

Reached by phone Sunday night, Jacobsen confirmed that his church was the site of possible contagion, but declined to immediately comment on the situation, saying he needed some time to think about it before making a statement.

Without naming the church, Butte County health officials on Friday issued a warning to residents, asking them to not speed through the reopening process. The officials said it had come to their attention that nearly 200 people could have been exposed to the coronavirus through the Mother’s Day service.

“At this time, organizations that hold in-person services or gatherings are putting the health and safety of their congregations, the general public and our local ability to open up at great risk,” Danette York, county public health director, said in a statement that urged residents to follow stay-at-home orders.

Local health officials are attempting to notify every person who attended the service and instruct them to self-quarantine. They are also are working with healthcare partners to obtain testing for all attendees, the news release said.

Butte County is one of 22 counties that has certified to the state that it meets the conditions for additional businesses to reopen. But gatherings of any size remain prohibited, even in counties that are reopening more quickly than the rest of California.

“Moving too quickly through the reopening process can cause a major setback and could require us to revert back to more restrictive measures,” York said.

On Wednesday, Jacobsen spoke of his decision to open the church on Mother’s Day during a Facebook Live Bible study.

Jacobsen said it’s important for Palermo Bible’s many young, new believers to be supported in their fledgling faith — and part of that is being able to attend church in person. He compared the act of depriving these congregants of in-person worship to taking “an infant out of the arms of its mother.”

“We’ve really tried to raise the bar and do a good job with what we’ve been given,” Jacobsen said of virtual services, “but it’s not the same as being together in fellowship with one another.”

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-05-17/butte-county-pastor-who-led-mothers-day-service-discloses-church-exposure-to-covid-19

The Senate will pass another stimulus package; what will be included in it?

The House passed The Heroes Act Friday. This bill provides, among many other things, a second round of $1,200 stimulus checks and hazard pay for essential frontline workers. Will the Senate agree to include these two provisions in the bill it eventually passes? I say “eventually” because all signs lean toward the conclusion that Republicans will end up negotiating with Democrats to pass yet another stimulus package.

Congress has already passed three different stimulus packages in response to this pandemic and, at the end of the day, the Senate will sign on and work with the House to pass a fourth one. The Republican Senate will do this for the same reason the Democratic House just passed The Heroes Act—the economy. But regardless of the reasons—and despite all the bluster—all signs lean toward another stimulus relief package getting through Congress. For now, both parties will gripe and complain, but then they will negotiate and compromise in order to work out a deal and inject more stimulus money into this declining—or at best stalled—economy.

What will the Senate include in its stimulus package?

The question isn’t will there be another stimulus deal, the question is what will be included in the deal when it’s done?

Huge majorities of Americans want more stimulus checks. Essential workers, the ones we now call American heroes, are still waiting for—and should get—hazard pay. State and local governments are telling anyone who will listen of their dire financial predicament and critical need for stimulus money to deliver basic and essential services. Far too many businesses are still shut down or only partially open. Real unemployment has reached depression-error levels, and corporate bankruptcies have begun. So the real conversation Senators are having right now is really more about what they will do rather than will they do anything more at all.

That bill may be dead on arrival, but another will get worked out.

The economy is bad—dire even—and everyone paying attention knows it, including Senate Leader McConnell and other Republicans. In response, the House put forward and passed The Heroes Act which provides a second round of $1,200 stimulus checks and $200 billion in hazard pay for essential workers. Senate Majority Leader McConnell slammed it as “dead on arrival.” But not so fast. If all you were hearing is that he said the House’s bill was dead on arrival, you might be inclined to believe that the Senate has no plans of moving forward with another stimulus relief package. You’d be wrong.

Despite all the bluster, Leader McConnell knows—just like Speaker Pelosi did—that another stimulus package is necessary, and McConnell said so Thursday on Fox News, “We all believe that another bill probably is going to be necessary.” He went on to say that he wasn’t yet prepared to commit to any precise timeline on when the Senate would take any action, but he acknowledged they will indeed need to take more action.

Americans want more stimulus checks.

Republicans in the Senate can work from a blank slate as they start their process, but they will be presented with The Heroes Act that the House passed Friday. The Senate has to decide whether it agrees to do what the House has already done and approve the following provisions, present a modified version on stimulus checks, or refuse additional stimulus checks altogether. This is what the House passed.

  • Another one-time $1,200 stimulus check.
  • Individuals will receive $1,200, married joint filers get $2,400, and children (up to three) get $1,200 with a maximum amount of $6,000.
  • Income limits are in place just as with the first stimulus checks Congress passed. Individuals must earn $75,000 or less per year to receive the full $1,200 stimulus check, and married joint filers must earn $150,000 or less per year to receive the full $2,400. The $1,200 amount decreases and phases out for those earning above these limits. Individuals earning more than $99,000 aren’t eligible for any stimulus amount, and couples earning more than $198,000 aren’t eligible for any amount.

In addition to the House including stimulus checks in its bill, there is also the White House which has indicated that it’s likely to support more stimulus checks as well. Surely, the Senate will consider the economy and all of this when determining how to move forward.

Essential workers want hazard pay.

Again, Republicans in the Senate can choose to work from a blank slate, but they will be presented with The Heroes Act that already provides hazard pay for essential workers. The Senate has to decide whether it agrees to add to, drop or just go with what the House has passed in this regard.

  • $200 billion for hazard pay to essential workers.
  • The hazard pay money is called the Heroes Fund.
  • This fact sheet describes that $200 billion will be used to “ensure that essential workers who have risked their lives working during the pandemic receive hazard pay.”

Despite all the praise being heaped on essential workers, before Friday’s passage of The Heroes Act, not a single one of the previously passed stimulus packages set aside money specifically for essential workers. Essential workers are employees, and they have been grossly overlooked up to now. The House has now passed something that considers the needs of essential workers. Will the Senate do the same?

Whatever stimulus package the Senate puts forward, it must include hazard pay for essential workers, and the House should refuse to agree to any stimulus package that removes the hazard pay provision for essential workers. If Americans indeed want to send the message that we really do value and appreciate essential workers—those we now call heroes—we have to pay them as well as thank them.

It will come down to the economy, as always.

The old adage—it’s the economy, stupid—still holds true today.

Ignore all the other hype; ignore the partisan outrage, ignore the bluster. Congress will act because it’s in the best of interest of the economy (and hence themselves) to do so. Republican Senators will consider the impact to the economy, just like Democrats did, before making any decisions about including another stimulus check or hazard pay into a new relief package.

The best guide you have to assess whether the Senate will take any action is to pay attention to the economy. Pay attention to unemployment. Pay attention to job losses and notice whether or not jobs are expected to come back. Listen closely to what employers are saying. Hone in on corporate bankruptcies and assess the impact on hiring. These factors and others will give you more insight into what Congress might do than anything any members say.

So, will the bill the Senate eventually puts forward include the two aspects most Americans want—republicans and democrats? Will it include another stimulus check? Will it include hazard pay for essential workers? Americans and our essential workers are paying attention and waiting to see what deal both chamber of Congress ultimately pass.

Recommended reading:

This Is The Most Important Question Leaders Ask During A Crisis

3 Warning Signs That You Lack The Mental Strength To Lead

The Heroes Act.

The Bill Passed For Second Stimulus Check And Hazard Pay For Essential Workers

House Votes Today: Another $1,200 Stimulus Check, $200 Billion For Hazard Pay, Extended Unemployment

Hazard pay for essential workers.

These Two Groups Of Employees Need New Stimulus Checks More Than Most

$200 Billion In Hazard Pay: These Essential Workers Must Get Their Fair Share

Unemployment and the economy.

Depression Is On The Rise With High Unemployment And Career Instability

3 Bitter Truths About Coronavirus Job Losses And The Economy

16% Unemployment This Summer: CBO’s Prediction And How To Prepare For It

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/terinaallen/2020/05/17/will-the-senate-include-stimulus-checks-and-hazard-pay-in-next-relief-package/

Some of the online posts, which include racist language, memes and graphics, claim that Arbery was carrying a hammer and wearing boots when he was killed, as the groups try to create false narratives about his death, analysts said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/far-right-groups-are-spreading-racist-false-claims-about-shooting-victim-ahmaud-arbery-analysts-say/2020/05/17/31cde428-962b-11ea-82b4-c8db161ff6e5_story.html

State Department Inspector General Steve Linick is pictured here in October 2019 leaving a meeting at the Capitol.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

State Department Inspector General Steve Linick is pictured here in October 2019 leaving a meeting at the Capitol.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Congressional Democrats announced Saturday they’re requesting all records and documents regarding President Trump’s decision to fire State Department Inspector General Steve Linick, the fourth government watchdog Trump has fired or sought to remove in the last six weeks.

“We unalterably oppose the politically-motivated firing of inspectors general and the President’s gutting of these critical positions,” New York Rep. Eliot Engel, chair of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, and New Jersey Sen. Robert Menedez, the top Democrat on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, wrote in a letter to the deputy secretary of state.

The Trump administration announced Friday evening that Linick will be replaced by Ambassador Stephen Akard, who currently directs the department’s Office of Foreign Missions. Linick’s removal is effective in 30 days.

A White House official told NPR on background Saturday that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recommended the move, “and President Trump agreed.”

Engel said he’d learned that Linick had opened an investigation into Pompeo. A Democratic aide on Capitol Hill told NPR that the inspector general was investigating Pompeo’s alleged misuse of a State Department political appointee who was performing personal tasks for the secretary and his wife.

“Such an action, transparently designed to protect Secretary Pompeo from personal accountability, would undermine the foundation of our democratic institutions and may be an illegal act of retaliation,” the Engel and Menendez letter states.

The letter requests that administration officials preserve all records related to the firing and turn that information over to the Democrats’ committees by Friday.

Asked about the removal on CBS’ Face The Nation Sunday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., conceded that “the president has the right to fire any federal employee,” but said the decision was “typical of the White House, announcing something that is very unsavory” late on a Friday.

Some Republicans criticized the move too.

Maine Sen. Susan Collins voiced concern on Twitter, saying, “The President has not provided the kind of justification for the removal of IG Linick required by [a 2008] law.”

Utah Sen. Mitt Romney said in a tweet that the firings of multiple inspectors general were “unprecedented,” and “doing so without good cause chills the independence essential to their purpose.”

Romney was the lone Republican to vote for Trump’s impeachment in his Senate trial.

Bill Richardson, a Democrat and former ambassador to the United Nations, was asked about the role of inspectors general on NPR’s Weekend Edition Sunday.

“You have to respect their independence,” he said. “They don’t work for you; they work for the public, for the Congress, for openness. And this is being violated massively in this administration.”

In early April, Trump fired the intelligence community’s inspector general. He then removed the head of the group charged with overseeing a $2 trillion coronavirus relief package. And early this month, he moved to replace a watchdog at the Department of Health and Human Services who reported on hospital shortages of medical supplies.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/05/17/857589529/democrats-launch-probe-of-trumps-firing-of-state-department-inspector-general

Donald Trump has hit back at Barack Obama’s criticism of his administration’s handling of the coronavirus crisis, accusing the former US president of being “grossly incompetent” during his time in office.

It is rare for a former president to rebuke a successor, but Obama did so during an online speech to graduating university and high school students yesterday, although he did not name Trump in his comments.

“More than anything, this pandemic has fully, finally torn back the curtain that so many of the folks in charge know what they’re doing. A lot of them aren’t even pretending to be in charge,” Obama said during an online commencement address to graduates of historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) on Saturday.

On Sunday, Trump said he had not seen Obama’s comments, but added: “Look, he was an incompetent president, that’s all I can say. Grossly incompetent.”

Trump has faced widespread criticism for his administration’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic, which has killed almost 90,000 people in the US, far higher than any other country in the world. Trump has insisted the US is making great progress against the virus, and has encouraged states to reopen their economies despite warnings from public health experts that such a move will lead to more deaths.


Trump accuses Obama of ‘gross incompetence’ – video

“So I think we had a great weekend. We did a lot of terrific meetings. Tremendous progress is being made on many fronts, including coming up with a cure for this horrible plague that has beset our country,” said Trump on Sunday. “It was a working weekend, it was a good weekend. A lot of very good things have happened.”

Although Obama has largely avoided criticizing Trump’s performance in office, in a call leaked last week the former president described the US government’s coronavirus response as, “an absolute chaotic disaster”, and questioned whether the justice department’s recent decision to drop charges against former national security advisor Michael Flynn could endanger the “rule of law” in the United States. The remarks prompted the US Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, a Republican, to tell the former president to “keep his mouth shut”.

Trump has recently sought to distract from the pandemic, including by pushing “#Obamagate” a conspiracy theory that accuses Obama of attempting to frame Trump for colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election. One former CIA analyst described as “a hashtag in search of a scandal”.

It is not the first time Trump has sought to promote conspiracy theories about the former president.

“Doing what feels good, what’s convenient, what’s easy – that’s how little kids think,” Obama said in a second virtual speech on Saturday evening for graduating US high school students. “Unfortunately, a lot of so-called grown-ups, including some with fancy titles and important jobs, still think that way – which is why things are so screwed up.”

The former president’s comments came amid dual crises – one a pandemic disproportionately sickening people of color in the US, and another born by the economic impacts of attempts to contain the virus through lockdowns. So far, there have been 1.4m confirmed cases of Covid-19 in the US, and millions of people are out of work.

“Let’s be honest, a disease like this just spotlights the underlying inequalities and extra burdens that black communities have historically had to deal with in this country,” said Obama in the HBCU speech earlier on Saturday. “We see it in the disproportionate impact of Covid-19 on our communities.”

Those crises, as well as the high-profile killings of black people by police, loomed large in the virtual event, itself necessitated by the shutdown of large gatherings to stem the spread of the disease.

“These aren’t normal times. You’re being asked to find your way in a world in the middle of a devastating pandemic and a terrible recession,” said Obama.

He added that the injustices faced by African Americans are not new, and described the recent high-profile killing of Ahmaud Arbery, an unarmed black jogger who was shot and killed after being pursued in broad daylight by a white former police officer and his son through a neighborhood in Georgia.

“We see it when a black man goes for a jog and some folks feel like they can stop and question and shoot him, if he doesn’t submit to their questioning,” said Obama.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/17/donald-trump-barack-obama-coronavirus-criticism

Two weeks after Texas Governor Greg Abbott began reopening the economy, the southern state on Saturday reported 1,801 new confirmed coronavirus infections marking its single-highest rise in cases since the beginning of the pandemic.

Of the new cases, 734 are from Potter and Randall counties. “These counties’ new cases are largely from targeted testing of employees at meat plants in the area. More test results from plants are expected,” tweeted the Texas Department of Health.

As of May 17, Texas has a total of 45,198 COVID-19 cases, with 1,272 deaths and 25,454 recoveries. Before the weekend, Texas had never reported over 1,500 cases in one day. The state has been averaging roughly 1,220 cases per day over the past week, as non-essential businesses continue to open as part of Governor Greg Abbott’s phased reopening plan.

The surge in cases can partly be attributed to an outbreak among the meatpacking industry in Amarillo. Following the spike announcement, Abbott released a statement saying that coronavirus response teams that were sent to Armarillo earlier this month have been increasing testing in the area and other measures to contain the outbreak.

“That is exactly why I established Surge Response Teams,” the governor said. “By immediately deploying resources and supplies to these high-risk areas, we will identify the positive cases, isolate the individuals and ensure any outbreak is quickly contained, which is the strategy being deployed in Amarillo.”

The surge comes as Texas continues to push ahead with reopening its economy and both non-essential and essential businesses. Abbott allowed malls, movie theaters, restaurants and retails stores to reopen at quarter capacity with social distancing on May 1, becoming the most populous state to do so at the time.

Texas’ phased reopening plan saw hair salons and barbershops across the state open their doors on May 8. Next, gyms and other such businesses will be allowed to resume on Monday with capacity limits.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told Congress earlier this week that states that prematurely reopen will experience “little spikes that might turn into outbreaks.”

Despite the increase in cases, Abbott has maintained that Texas is still far from hitting hospital and ventilator capacity. About 1,790 individuals are currently hospitalized in the state, and more than 17,000 beds are still available to be used.

Newsweek reached out to Texas Governor Greg Abbott for further comment. This story will be updated with any response.

p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
content: none
}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/texas-reports-highest-single-day-rise-coronavirus-cases-state-continues-push-ahead-reopening-1504659

For now, however, the political atmosphere seems to be one of demand for more aggressive action: One Democratic group, Navigator Research, that has been conducting daily polling on the pandemic, found large majorities of voters concerned that the government would do too little to help people and eager for the government to do more, even if it cost a lot of money.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/17/us/politics/joe-biden-economy-democrats.html

Rahm Emanuel, former mayor of Chicago and the White House Chief of Staff to President Barack Obama, has famously stated, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste.” He has described a “serious crisis” as an “an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.” It seems that Speak of the House Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat majority in the House have heeded Emanuel’s advice by passing the $3 trillion Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions (HEROES) Act on Friday. If passed by the Senate, the HEROES Act can significantly appease the burden of student loans until September 2021 as well as provide financial relief in the form of another round of stimulus checks.

The Senate and the Executive branch have been vocal about their opposition to the HEROES Act. According to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, he believes the Act is “not designed to deal with reality, but designed to deal with aspirations.” Similarly, a statement of administration policy issued by the executive office of the president stated that if the HEROES Act was presented to the president, “his advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.” 

However, in the event that the HEROES Act does pass in the Senate, it would offer $10,000 in student loan forgiveness to federal, Perkins, and commercially-held FFEl-program loan holders. Only those who are considered “economically distressed borrowers” would qualify for the $10,000 forgiveness, mandating that borrowers currently:

  • Pay $0 a month on student loans OR 
  • Be in default, serious delinquency, forbearance or deferment.

The HEROES act also addresses previously faulty PSLF timeline limitations, and would allow payments made towards the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program to qualify even if borrowers choose to consolidate their commercially-held FFEL-program federal student loans and Perkins loans, which, unless consolidated via the federal Direct consolidation program, do not qualify for forgiveness. Without the HEROES Act, any payments made prior to consolidation does not count in the 10 years of repayment.

The HEROES Act would also extend the CARES Act loan payment suspensions by another 12 months. This means that students would now have until September of 2021 to begin paying back their loans. This allows those experiencing financial hardship more time to get back on their feet before having to worry about paying off student loans.

The current situation with COVID-19 has significantly impacted the livelihoods of millions of Americans, and is projected to continue impacting college students as they enter the job market. Colleges and universities around the country have all responded differently, but providing relief by pausing student loan repayment until 2021 and receiving another round of stimulus checks can significantly impact students’ future prospects in the years to come. Whether or not the HEROES Act will pass in the Senate, or if any other economic aid package will be addressed by the Senate, will come after the Memorial Day recess on May 25. Until then, the economic fate of college students around the country will be put on hold.

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherrim/2020/05/17/student-loan-forgiveness-and-another-round-of-stimulus-checksheres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-heroes-act/

California Gov. Gavin NewsomGavin Christopher NewsomOver 180 church goers told to self-quarantine after attendee at Mother’s Day service tests positive for COVID-19 Sunday shows preview: Congress spars over next round of coronavirus relief; GOP seeks offensive after news of Flynn ‘unmasking’ Coronavirus Report: The Hill’s Steve Clemons interviews Jane Harman MORE (D) on Sunday said approving coronavirus relief funding for state and local governments is “not charity” and that his state is facing budgetary concerns as a “direct result” of the crisis. 

“It’s a social responsibility at a time when states large and small [ are] facing unprecedented budgetary stress. It is incumbent upon the federal government to support the states through this difficult time,” he said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” 

Newsom said lawmakers have a “moral and ethical obligation” to help Americans across the country. 

The issue of funding for state and local governments has been one of the main points of contention as lawmakers turn their attention to a possible next round of coronavirus relief, with some Senate Republicans and President TrumpDonald John TrumpChina’s top medical adviser warns country is vulnerable to second wave of COVID-19 infections Romney denounces multiple IG firings as ‘threat to accountable democracy’ MLB predicts billions in losses upon return to baseball season: AP MORE claiming it would amount to a bailout for Democrat-led states.

The House last week passed a $3 trillion coronavirus relief package proposed by Democrats that includes funding for state and local governments. 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellFed chair issues dire warnings on economy Red-state cities get cool reception from GOP on relief aid Sunday shows preview: Congress spars over next round of coronavirus relief; GOP seeks offensive after news of Flynn ‘unmasking’ MORE (R-Ky.) and Senate Republicans, however, said the bill is “dead on arrival.” 

Newsom, along with governors across the country, have said they need the federal aid to help fund many of the frontline workers amid the coronavirus pandemic including healthcare workers and police. 

“I hope they’ll consider this next time they want to salute and celebrate our first responders … consider the fact that they will be the first ones laid off by cities and counties,” Newsom said. 

“This is not a red issue or a blue issue. This is impacting every state in America,” Newsom added. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/498184-newsom-says-federal-government-has-ethical-obligation-to-send-states

State Department Inspector General Steve Linick is pictured here in October 2019 leaving a meeting at the Capitol.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

State Department Inspector General Steve Linick is pictured here in October 2019 leaving a meeting at the Capitol.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Congressional Democrats announced Saturday they’re requesting all records and documents regarding President Trump’s decision to fire State Department Inspector General Steve Linick, the fourth government watchdog Trump has fired or sought to remove in the last six weeks.

“We unalterably oppose the politically-motivated firing of inspectors general and the President’s gutting of these critical positions,” New York Rep. Eliot Engel, chair of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, and New Jersey Sen. Robert Menedez, the top Democrat on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, wrote in a letter to the deputy secretary of state.

The Trump administration announced Friday evening that Linick will be replaced by Ambassador Stephen Akard, who currently directs the department’s Office of Foreign Missions. Linick’s removal is effective in 30 days.

A White House official told NPR on background Saturday that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recommended the move, “and President Trump agreed.”

Engel said he’d learned that Linick had opened an investigation into Pompeo. A Democratic aide on Capitol Hill told NPR that the inspector general was investigating Pompeo’s alleged misuse of a State Department political appointee who was performing personal tasks for the secretary and his wife.

“Such an action, transparently designed to protect Secretary Pompeo from personal accountability, would undermine the foundation of our democratic institutions and may be an illegal act of retaliation,” the Engel and Menendez letter states.

The letter requests that administration officials preserve all records related to the firing and turn that information over to the Democrats’ committees by Friday.

Asked about the removal on CBS’ Face The Nation Sunday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., conceded that “the president has the right to fire any federal employee,” but said the decision was “typical of the White House, announcing something that is very unsavory” late on a Friday.

Some Republicans criticized the move too.

Maine Sen. Susan Collins voiced concern on Twitter, saying, “The President has not provided the kind of justification for the removal of IG Linick required by [a 2008] law.”

Utah Sen. Mitt Romney said in a tweet that the firings of multiple inspectors general were “unprecedented,” and “doing so without good cause chills the independence essential to their purpose.”

Romney was the lone Republican to vote for Trump’s impeachment in his Senate trial.

Bill Richardson, a Democrat and former ambassador to the United Nations, was asked about the role of inspectors general on NPR’s Weekend Edition Sunday.

“You have to respect their independence,” he said. “They don’t work for you; they work for the public, for the Congress, for openness. And this is being violated massively in this administration.”

In early April, Trump fired the intelligence community’s inspector general. He then removed the head of the group charged with overseeing a $2 trillion coronavirus relief package. And early this month, he moved to replace a watchdog at the Department of Health and Human Services who reported on hospital shortages of medical supplies.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/05/17/857589529/democrats-launch-probe-of-trumps-firing-of-state-department-inspector-general

Polis, who previously served as a member of the Colorado State Board of Education, said his administration is working with school districts on “schedules that have less interactions, that can slow the spread when there’s an inevitable outbreak.”

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican who has won praise for his coronavirus response, also emphasized the need to facilitate social distancing in schools, while expressing more tempered expectations about school reopenings.

“What I have asked the schools to do is to assume they’re going back, but to come up with all kinds of alternatives,” DeWine said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “Assume, if you’re back, for example, how do you achieve some sort of distancing?”

“But we hope to be open in August, when school starts back up in most places in Ohio, but we don’t know yet, frankly.” DeWine added.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom struck a similar tone in a separate interview on CNN, calling the question of school reopening a “difficult one to answer in absolute terms.”

“I think some schools will not be. Many schools will be,” the Democratic governor said. “There’s nuance. But we are moving forward, in hope and expectation that we can start that school year very strategically and methodically, again, based upon the health as a prime frame of reference in terms of those decisions.”

Governors have struggled over how to see to it that children continue to learn but also remain healthy — and also don’t lead others to become infected.

Colorado’s Polis suggested changes to schools would be likely. He said “maybe 10-20 percent of parents” will want to keep their kids out of school in the fall, until they’re more confident in the safety of returning to in-person learning, which Polis said could have a positive effect on reducing crowding in school buildings.

Pressed by Wallace on whether children will face setbacks in their educational attainment due to this spring’s abrupt transition to remote learning, Polis said: “There’s really no excuses in the business of education.”

“I made that very clear to our superintendents, I hope other governors across the nation are doing that,” he added. “You need that social side, right, and it’s a little bit harder to get that social side in an online setting. But academically, there are no excuses for every kid not to be able to accomplish their grade-level work.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/17/colorado-school-openings-262874

Laura Ingraham appeared “Watters’ World” Saturday to discuss the “unmasking” of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

“I think when you when you go back and you remember how absolutely flawed the Democrats were after [President] Trump won in November 2016. I mean, they had the fireworks ready for Hillary [Clinton]. They had chosen basically her entire Cabinet,” Ingraham told host Jesse Watters. “And so they were just gobsmacked by what had happened.”

Several top Obama administration officials had purportedly requested to “unmask” the identity of the former national security adviser, according to a list of names from the controversial process made public on Wednesday.

READ THE DOCUMENTS

Ingraham told Watters that Obama officials were trying to avoid getting caught up in future investigations.

“They were obviously looking for the second installment of the insurance policy to try to do something to counter what they knew was coming, which was someone is going to drain the swamp… someone who is probably going to find out what they were up to the previous eight years, which was not a whole lot of good,” Ingraham said.

“The Ingraham Angle” host put forth that former President Barack Obama was irked by President Trump and feared being “exposed.”

“[Obama] really doesn’t like to be questioned. And Trump got under his skin big-time. And I think he, they all knew Trump was going to expose them. They just knew it,” Ingraham said. “And they couldn’t let that happen. At least they thought they could blunt the force. And so that’s what [put] the political ambush in motion.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Ingraham said that another Trump win in November would be a “repudiation” of the Obama legacy.

“If in November, Trump — after this horrific pandemic and all the carnage, economic carnage, human loss, losses, all of it we’ve seen — if he manages to beat them again, then maybe they’ll still be around,” Ingraham said. “But that will be a deep arbitration of progressivism and frankly, another repudiation of the Obama legacy.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/laura-ingraham-obama-administration-officials-targeted-flynn-blunt-the-force

In his second commencement speech of 2020, former President Barack Obama implored graduating high schoolers to be brave in the face of the coronavirus pandemic, and to reject old ways of doing things while working together to solve pressing problems, from economic inequality to the climate crisis.

“If the world’s gonna get better, it’s gonna be up to you,” Obama said during the television special “Graduate Together” on Saturday. “Leave behind all the old ways of thinking that divide us — sexism, racial prejudice, status, greed. And set the world on a different path.”

The speech followed one Obama delivered to graduates of historically black colleges and universities in which he offered both pointed criticisms of the Trump administration — specifically that “this pandemic has fully finally torn back the curtain on the idea that so many of the folks in charge know what they’re doing” — and his signature optimistic rhetoric.

Saturday evening’s remarks also contained a few gentle rebukes of the Trump administration, with the former president telling the graduates that adults “don’t have all the answers. A lot of them aren’t even asking the right questions,” and that “things are so screwed up” because “a lot of so-called grownups — including some with fancy titles and important jobs” do “what’s convenient, what’s easy” rather than what is right. But the speech’s focus was on inspiring the graduates to use the pandemic as an opportunity to improve both themselves and their countries.

“Your graduation marks your passage into adulthood,” Obama said, noting that passage can be frightening, but arguing that with adulthood comes new agency. “With all the challenges this country faces right now, nobody can tell you, ‘No, you’re too young to understand.’ Or, ‘This is how it’s always been done.’ Because with so much uncertainty, with everything suddenly up for grabs, this is your generation’s world to shape.”

Read the full rush transcript of Obama’s speech below:


Hi, everybody! Aniyah, thank you for that beautiful introduction. I could not be prouder of everything you’ve done in your time with the Obama Foundation. And, of course, I couldn’t be prouder of all of you in the graduating class of 2020. As well as the teachers, and the coaches, and most of all, parents and family who guided you along the way.

Now, graduating is a big achievement under any circumstances. Some of you have had to overcome serious obstacles along the way. Whether it was an illness, or a parent losing a job, or living in a neighborhood where people too often count you out. Along with the usual challenges of growing up, all of you have had to deal with the added pressures of social media, reports of school shootings, and the specter of climate change. And then, just as you’re about to celebrate having made it through, just as you’ve been looking forward to proms and senior nights, graduation ceremonies, and — let’s face it — a whole bunch of parties, the world has turned upside down by a global pandemic. And as much as I’m sure you love your parents, I’ll bet that being stuck at home with them and playing board games or watching Tiger King on TV is not exactly how you envisioned the last few months of your senior year.

Now, I’ll be honest with you. The disappointments of missing a live graduation, those will pass pretty quick. I don’t remember much of my own high school graduation. I know that not having to sit there and listen to a commencement speaker isn’t all that bad. Mine usually go on way too long. Also, not that many people look great in those caps. Especially if you have big ears like me. And you’ll have plenty of time to catch up with your friends once the immediate public health crisis is over. But what remains true is that your graduation marks your passage into adulthood. The time when you begin to take charge of your own life. It’s when you get to decide what’s important to you — what kind of career you want to pursue. Who you want to build a family with. The values you want to live by. And given the current state of the world, that may be kind of scary.

If you planned on going away to college, getting dropped off at campus in the fall, that’s no longer a given. If you were planning to work while going to school, finding that first job is going to be tougher. Even families that are relatively well-off are dealing with massive uncertainty. Those who were struggling before, they’re hanging on by a thread. All of which means that you’re going to have to grow up faster than some generations.

This pandemic has shaken up the status quo and laid bare a lot of our country’s deep-seated problems. From massive economic inequality, to ongoing racial disparities, to a lack of basic health care for people who need it. It’s woken a lot of young people up to the fact that the old ways of doing things just don’t work. And it doesn’t matter how much money you make, if everyone around you is hungry and sick. And that our society and democracy only work when we think not just about ourselves, but about each other.

It’s also pulled the curtain back on another hard truth, something that we all have to eventually accept once our childhood comes to an end. You know all those adults that you used to think were in charge and knew what they were doing? Turns out they don’t have all the answers. A lot of them aren’t even asking the right questions. So, if the world’s gonna get better, it’s gonna be up to you. That realization may be kind of intimidating, but I hope it’s also inspiring. With all the challenges this country faces right now, nobody can tell you, “No, you’re too young to understand.” Or, “This is how it’s always been done.” Because with so much uncertainty, with everything suddenly up for grabs, this is your generation’s world to shape.

Since I’m one of the old guys, I won’t tell you what to do with this power that rests in your hands. But I’ll leave you with three quick pieces of advice — first, don’t be afraid. America’s gone through tough times before. Slavery, civil war, famine, disease, the Great Depression, and 9/11. And each time, we came out stronger. Usually because a new generation — young people like you — learned from past mistakes and figured out how to make things better.

Second, do what you think is right. Doing what feels good — what’s convenient, what’s easy — that’s how little kids think. Unfortunately a lot of so-called grownups — including some with fancy titles and important jobs — still think that way, which is why things are so screwed up. I hope that instead, you decide to ground yourself in values that last. Like honesty, hard work, responsibility, fairness, generosity, respect for others. You won’t get it right every time, you’ll make mistakes like we all do. But if you listen to the truth that’s inside yourself — even when it’s hard, even when it’s inconvenient — people will notice. They’ll gravitate towards you, and you’ll be part of the solution instead of part of the problem.

And finally, build a community. No one does big things by themselves. Right now, when people are scared, it’s easy to be cynical and say, “Let me just look out for myself or my family or people who look or think or pray like me.” But if we’re gonna get through these difficult times, if we’re gonna create a world where everybody has opportunities to find a job and afford college, if we’re gonna save the environment and defeat future pandemics, then we’re gonna have to do it together.

So be alive to one another’s struggles. Stand up for one another’s rights. Leave behind all the old ways of thinking that divide us — sexism, racial prejudice, status, greed. And set the world on a different path. When you need help, Michelle and I have made it the mission of our foundation to give young people like you the skills and support to lead in your own communities. And to connect you with other young leaders around the country and around the globe. But, the truth is, you don’t need us to tell you what to do, because in so many ways, you’ve already started to lead.

Congratulations, class of 2020. Keep making us proud.


Support Vox’s explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/5/16/21261285/obama-graduate-together-2020-address-transcript