Last night, the House of Representatives passed the Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions Act, or the HEROES Act, by a vote of 208-199. The sweeping $3 trillion legislation was dismissed by Senate Republicans with Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, deriding it as a “big laundry list of pet priorities.” The “grab bag” bill included many provisions seemingly disconnected from stabilizing the economic effects of the coronavirus pandemic, such as ones related to cannabis banking. For a messaging bill meant to outline Democratic priorities, the HEROES Act is as notable for what it omits as for what it includes.

No Paycheck Guarantee Act

Spearheaded by Representative Pramila Jayapal and the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the Paycheck Guarantee Act would have guaranteed 100 percent coverage of workers’ wages up to $90,000 a year. The sponsors argued that given the economic carnage inflicted by coronavirus, Congress needed to “think bigger” and offer “workers as well as businesses, nonprofits and local governments of all sizes a better path forward in this uncertain environment.”

Interestingly, an analysis by Moody’s chief economist, Mark Zandi, estimated that the net costs of the program would be $654 billion over six months, which is actually less than the two rounds of small business loans approved by Congress as part of the Paycheck Protection Program. Another interesting feature of the proposal would have taken out banks as the intermediary to disburse payments, instead facilitating payments straight from the IRS to employers.

Exclusion of the Paycheck Guarantee Act led to a mini-rebellion with progressives initially threatening to vote against the HEROES Act. Most members eventually fell in line with Speaker Nancy Pelosi and voted in favor of the HEROES bill.

No Recurring $2,000 Monthly Stimulus Checks

The HEROES Act included a proposal for a second round of direct payments to Americans – $1,200 for an individual, $2,400 for joint filers, and $1,200 for up to three dependents. This one-time infusion of cash would provide relief to many Americans who exhausted their funds from the first round of stimulus payments, received a lower amount than anticipated, or are still waiting to receive it.

Pelosi and Democrats chose the single-payment route instead of a recurring stimulus payment that would have provided ongoing relief for up to 12 months. Representatives Ro Khanna and Tim Ryan had introduced The Emergency Money for the People Act, which had attracted increasing support from other House Democrats. Other similar proposals were introduced by Pramila Jayapal and Rashida Tlaib in the House as well as by counterparts in the Senate, including a proposal by Ed Markey, Kamala Harris, and Bernie Sanders that would provide a monthly $2,000 check to those struggling to make ends meet during the COVID-19 pandemic. “A single check is not sufficient for households that are struggling during this health and economic crisis.” said Senator Markey. “Americans need more than just one payment.”

No Automatic Stabilizers

As argued in a previous column, “there is a looming disconnect between the sluggish speed of recovery and the duration of unemployment benefits that were included in the $2 trillion CARES Act passed by Congress.” This problem could have been solved through the use of automatic stabilizers, which would have tied federal aid to economic conditions. Use of stabilizers would have removed the need to continuously pass additional legislation for more aid, instead, automatically extending aid, such as enhanced unemployment insurance, until the economy recovers.

The Worker Relief and Security Act, introduced by Senators Michael Bennet and Jack Reed, along with Representative Don Beyer, aimed to align relief with the span of the COVID-19 pandemic as opposed to allowing benefits to lapse after a fixed period of time. However, this proposal, along with automatic stabilizers of any kind, were left out of the HEROES Act passed by the House. Instead, the bill would simply extend the enhanced unemployment benefits through January, 2021.

No Improvements To Get Funds To Individuals Quicker and More Accurately

Problems with the CARES Act weren’t limited to eligibility or duration of funding, they also involved executional mistakes. The process of delivering funds to individuals and small businesses was riddled with friction and complexity. Many individuals have still not received their stimulus checks from the CARES Act. Others received checks, but for a lower amount than expected and are being told by the IRS that they won’t be able to receive the difference until 2021 when they file their taxes. Instead of spending over 1,800 pages on futile proposals, many not germane to the coronavirus pandemic, it would have behooved Democrats to develop proposals to deliver funds more quickly and more accurately to Americans.

Further Coronavirus-Related Reading:

Get My Payment: IRS Formally Addresses What To Do If Your Stimulus Check Amount Was Wrong

New Proposal Would Extend $600 Unemployment Benefit Indefinitely Until Coronavirus Crisis Ends

IRS Explains Why Your Stimulus Check Payment May Be Different Amount Than Anticipated

9 Potential Hacks To Escape IRS “Payment Status Not Available” Purgatory And Track Your Stimulus Check

Proposal: $5,000 Stimulus Check In Exchange For Slightly Delayed Social Security Benefits

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/shaharziv/2020/05/16/heroes-act-passes-house-omits-2000-recurring-stimulus-checks-and-other-notable-items/

Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox. Sign up here.

Arlington National Cemetery will remain closed to the public this Memorial Day in order to abide by coronavirus restrictions, officials announced Friday.

Families of fallen military service members buried in the cemetery will be permitted to visit the graves of their loved ones, but tours are also not allowed at this time.

SPACE FORCE FLAG UNVEILED IN OVAL OFFICE, PRESENTED TO TRUMP

“We are expecting several thousand family pass holders to visit their loved ones’ graves this Memorial Day weekend,” said Charles Alexander Jr., superintendent of Arlington National Cemetery. “Protecting the health of our employees, service members, contractors and our visitors is paramount.”

Family members are expected to wear a face mask and adhere to social-distancing regulations.

The national cemetery has been closed to the public during the coronavirus pandemic. There have not been plans announced as to when the cemetery will reopen to everyone.

US BLAMES ISIS BRANCH FOR AFGHANISTAN HOSPITAL ATTACK THAT KILLED 2 NEWBORNS

“Arlington National Cemetery continues to monitor health and safety conditions and will promptly inform the public with any updates or changes to our operating status. Resuming more routine operations will be deliberate and conditions based as we abide by DOD [Department of Defense] regulations and CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] guidelines,” Alexander said.

There will be “multimedia virtual visitation” that the public can utilize on the Arlington National Cemetery’s official website and on social media, in lieu of attending in person.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

“For 152 years, the American public has come to know Arlington National Cemetery as the place to remember those who sacrificed many times before us and those who will make the sacrifice in the future,” Karen Durham-Aguilera, executive director of the Office of Army Cemeteries, and Arlington National Cemetery said in a statement Friday.

“During this holiday and every day, Arlington National Cemetery represents the American people for past, present and future generations by laying to rest those few who have served our nation with dignity and honor, while immersing guests in the cemetery’s living history.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/arlington-national-cemetery-close-memorial-day-coronavirus

The U.S. House of Representatives just passed the HEROES Act – a massive, $3 trillion stimulus bill. The bill is designed to provide broad financial relief to individuals, businesses, nonprofit organizations, and state and local governments who have been hit hard by the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. Senate leadership has already declared the bill “dead on arrival,” and the President has promised to veto it.

Student Loan Relief Provided by the HEROES Act

House progressives had originally pushed for $30,000 in across-the-board student loan forgiveness. The released version of the bill reduced the forgiveness, but still provided meaningful student loan student relief, including the following:

  • $10,000 in federal student loan forgiveness;
  • $10,000 in private student loan forgiveness;
  • An extension of the CARES Act suspension of payments, interest, and collections on government-held federal student loans through September of 2021, and an expansion of those protections to include commercially-held FFEL-program federal student loans as well as Perkins loans.
  • A fix to Public Service Loan Forgiveness that would allow payments made on previously-consolidated federal student loans to potentially count towards the 120 qualifying monthly payments required for the program.

Push to Limit Student Loan Forgiveness

Democratic House leaders, concerned about the ballooning cost of the bill, made a last-minute push to amend and limit the student loan forgiveness provisions of the Act. The amendment restricts eligibility for student loan forgiveness to those who are “economically distressed.” The Amendment defines this as someone who, as of March 12, 2020 (just prior to the national emergency declaration), met one of the following criteria:

  • They were delinquent or in default on their student loan;
  • They were in an economic hardship deferment or forbearance on their student loan;
  • They were in an income-driven repayment plan with a monthly payment amount of $0/month.

Consumer advocates, concerned that many student loan borrowers may have difficulty recovering from the economic collapse, expressed disappointment at the reduced student loan forgiveness benefits. However, the bill still provides substantial relief to many student loan borrowers.

What Else Is In The Bill?

The HEROES Act also includes numerous other economic relief provisions, including the following:

  • Additional direct cash payments to households, including $1,200 per individual earning up to $75,000 per year. Families with dependent children could receive up to $6,000.
  • An extension of enhanced unemployment benefits (which is an additional $600 per week) to January 2021. 
  • Hazard pay for essential workers.
  • Housing assistance to help renters and homeowners with rent and mortgage payments.
  • Debt collection relief.
  • Direct financial relief to state, local, and tribal governments.
  • Billions of dollars dedicated to Coronavirus testing and contact tracing initiatives.

What’s Next?

Now that the bill has passed the House, it will be sent to the Senate. In order for a bill to become law, it must pass both the House and the Senate, and then be signed by the President.

Senate leadership has already described the HEROES Act as “dead on arrival,” before the final version even passed. The Senate is not likely to return to Washington until sometime in June, so no quick action will be taken. The President has also indicated that he opposes the House bill. However, the Democratic House leadership views the passage of this bill as an important negotiating step in crafting a final stimulus bill that can win over sufficient votes in both chambers of Congress to become law.

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2020/05/15/house-passes-heroes-act-with-limits-on-student-loan-relief–whats-next/

Likening it to the national push to build the atomic bomb during World War II, President Trump on Friday announced Operation Warp Speed, a government coordinating effort aimed at securing a coronavirus vaccine by the end of the year.

“Operation Warp Speed, that means big and it means fast,” Trump said from the White House Rose Garden. “A massive scientific and industrial, logistic endeavor unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project.”

Its objective is to finish developing and then manufacture and distribute a proven coronavirus vaccine as fast as possible.

“We’d love to see if we can do it prior to the end of the year,” Trump said. “I think we’re going to have some very good results coming out very quickly.”

Vaccine ethics:To find a coronavirus vaccine, can we ethically infect people with a disease with no cure?

The presentation was short on details but noted the initiative is evaluating roughly 100 vaccine candidates from all over the world and has identified more than 14 believed to be the most promising. Officials are working to narrow the list still further. 

“We have some really interesting choices to be made,” Trump said.

The government is providing support and resources to safely expedite trials on those vaccine candidates, “moving on at record, record, record speed,” the President said.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/05/15/coronavirus-operation-warp-speed-could-deliver-vaccine-years-end-trump/5199969002/

House Democrats passed a $3 trillion coronavirus relief bill on Friday night despite Senate Republicans and President Trump declaring the so-called Heroes Act dead on arrival.

Republican House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California complained that the 1,800-page bill was “the largest bill in the history of Congress” — and that it was unfurled this week without a committee hearing.

Democrats defended the bill, arguing that Republican foot-dragging forced them to move ahead with a unilateral proposal.

“There is pain. There is suffering. There is death throughout the land. Congress must act to provide relief to the American people,” said Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus.

The bill passed with 14 left-wing and centrist Democrats voting “no” and a single Republican — Rep. Peter King of New York — voting in favor.

Before passing the bill, Democrats authorized proxy voting for future legislation and defeated a GOP push to ban illegal immigrants from getting stimulus checks.

Congress previously passed four major coronavirus relief packages after laborious late-night negotiations between Democrats and White House representatives.

After passing the fourth major package last month, Republicans had said they wanted to pause for reflection and criticized proposed state bailouts.

The new relief bill includes almost $1 trillion in funding for state and local governments, which Republicans including Trump are wary of granting.

It would authorize another round of stimulus checks up to $1,200, create a $200 billion “heroes fund” giving hazard pay to medical workers, allocate $175 billion to rent and mortgage aid and spend $75 billion on virus testing and contact tracing.

The bill also would extend the $600-per-week federal boost in unemployment insurance payments through January 2021. The boost currently runs through July.

Additional items include a boost in food stamps payments expected to cost $10 billion, a $25 billion bailout for the Postal Service, $3.6 billion for state elections offices and $5.5 billion for expanding high-speed internet to libraries and homes.

The bill also proposes new funds for the Census and health insurance programs.

The bill would give relief to wealthy residents of high-tax states like New York by waiving the $10,000 cap on the federal State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction for 2020 and 2021.

Republican opposed provisions they said steer funds toward abortions and away from deporting illegal immigrants.

In a reflection of the wide-ranging priorities included in the package, the bill would authorize banks to work with state-legal cannabis businesses.

“This really is an exercise in legislative futility,” said Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), who managed House floor debate for Republicans. “It would make more to sense in my view, Madam Speaker, to send it straight to Santa Claus.”

Although Democratic leaders are pushing Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to allow a vote, even some Democrats acknowledge the bill is a starting point for negotiations.

“Every one of [the coronavirus bills] has started out with a proposal that then has been negotiated to reach bipartisan support,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) told The Post.

McConnell on Friday vowed the House bill was going nowhere.

The Heroes Act “reads like the speaker of the House pasted together random ideas from her most liberal members and slapped the word ‘coronavirus’ on top of it,” McConnell said.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2020/05/15/house-democrats-pass-doomed-3t-coronavirus-relief-bill/

President Donald Trump fired the State Department Inspector General Steve Linick on Friday in a move Democrats condemned as an “unlawful act of retaliation” for starting an investigation into Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

Trump confirmed the decision to remove Linick, the latest government watchdog to be fired by the administration in recent months, in a letter sent to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“As is the case with regard to other positions where I, as President, have the power of appointment, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, it is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as Inspector General,” Trump wrote. “That is no longer the case with regard to this Inspector General.”

As first reported by Politico, Linick will be replaced by Stephen Akard, the current Director of the Office of Foreign Missions.

Akard is also a close ally of Mike Pence and worked as the chief of staff for the Indiana Economic Development Corporation when the Vice President was the state’s governor.

“I can confirm that Mr. Linick was fired,” a State Department spokesperson told to Newsweek. “The State Department is happy to announce that Ambassador Stephen J. Akard will now lead the Office of the Inspector General at the State Department… and we look forward to him leading the Office of the Inspector General.”

The State Department did not give a reason for Linick‘s dismissal.

In a statement, Rep. Eliot L. Engel, chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, said Linick‘s removal arrived after he opened an investigation into Pompeo for alleged abuse of power.

“This firing is the outrageous act of a President trying to protect one of his most loyal supporters, the Secretary of State, from accountability,” Engel said. “I have learned that the Office of the Inspector General had opened an investigation into Secretary Pompeo. Mr. Linick‘s firing amid such a probe strongly suggests that this is an unlawful act of retaliation.

“This President believes he is above the law. As he systematically removes the official independent watchdogs from the Executive Branch, the work of the Committee on Foreign Affairs becomes that much more critical. In the days ahead, I will be looking into this matter in greater detail, and I will press the State Department for answers.”

Linick—who played a small role in Trump’s impeachment trial after providing House members documents that the president’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, gave to the State Department—is the latest inspector general to be fired late by Trump.

In April 3, Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson was also dismissed what critics argued was retaliation for his handling of the whistleblower report regarding Trump’s phone call to Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelenskiy, which triggered the impeachment proceedings against him.

Four days later, Trump fired Glenn Fine, acting Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Defense, who was tasked with overseeing the $2.2 trillion in spending for coronavirus relief.

On May 1, Trump also fired Christi Grimm from her role in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (OIG), after authoring a report detailing a lack of testing and personal protective equipment (PPE) amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Pelosi said that the firing shows that Trump has “accelerated his dangerous pattern of retaliation” against public servants investigating his administration.

“Inspector General Linick was punished for honorably performing his duty to protect the Constitution and our national security, as required by the law and by his oath,” she added.

“The President must cease his pattern of reprisal and retaliation against the public servants who are working to keep Americans safe, particularly during this time of global emergency.”

Sen. Bob Menendez also called Linick‘s ouster “shameful.”

“Another late Friday night attack on independence, accountability, and career officials,” Menendez tweeted. “At this point, the president’s paralyzing fear of any oversight is undeniable.”

The State Department has been contacted for further comment.

p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
content: none
}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/trump-steve-linick-mike-pompeo-investigation-fired-1504548

Likening it to the national push to build the atomic bomb during World War II, President Trump on Friday announced Operation Warp Speed, a government coordinating effort aimed at securing a coronavirus vaccine by the end of the year.

“Operation Warp Speed, that means big and it means fast,” Trump said from the White House Rose Garden. “A massive scientific and industrial, logistic endeavor unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project.”

Its objective is to finish developing and then manufacture and distribute a proven coronavirus vaccine as fast as possible.

“We’d love to see if we can do it prior to the end of the year,” Trump said. “I think we’re going to have some very good results coming out very quickly.”

Vaccine ethics:To find a coronavirus vaccine, can we ethically infect people with a disease with no cure?

The presentation was short on details but noted the initiative is evaluating roughly 100 vaccine candidates from all over the world and has identified more than 14 believed to be the most promising. Officials are working to narrow the list still further. 

“We have some really interesting choices to be made,” Trump said.

The government is providing support and resources to safely expedite trials on those vaccine candidates, “moving on at record, record, record speed,” the President said.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/05/15/coronavirus-operation-warp-speed-could-deliver-vaccine-years-end-trump/5199969002/

House Democrats on Friday passed a $3 trillion coronavirus relief package, unprecedented spending Senate Republicans have pledged to block as the major parties struggle to find a path forward on the pandemic response.

The chamber also approved voting by proxy and remote committee work. The rules changes, major moves for a tradition-bound institution, aim to make it easier for representatives to conduct business from outside of Washington during the crisis. 

The House passed the rescue legislation in a close 208-199 vote, as Democrats saw defections from both the left and right flanks of the party. Fourteen Democrats voted against the bill and one Republican supported it. 

The bill includes:

  • Nearly $1 trillion for cash-strapped state and local governments
  • $200 billion for hazard pay for essential workers
  • $75 billion for Covid-19 testing efforts
  • An extension of the $600 per week federal unemployment insurance benefit through January (it is currently set to go through July)
  • $175 billion in rent, mortgage and utility assistance
  • A 15% increase in the maximum Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefit 
  • Repeal of the $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions for two years, which would help certain states’ budget crunch but benefit higher-income taxpayers most
  • Expanded mail-in ballot access, which Republicans oppose
  • Relief funds for the U.S. Postal Service 
  • $10 billion in emergency small business disaster assistance grants
  • Subsidies and a special Affordable Care Act enrollment period for people who lose employer-sponsored health coverage

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has made it clear he has no interest in taking up the proposal. On Thursday, he said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “published an 1,800-page seasonal catalog of left-wing oddities and called it a coronavirus relief bill.” The White House threatened to veto the legislation before the House voted. 

Pelosi, a California Democrat, has characterized her party’s bill as an opening offer in what she hopes will become negotiations with Republicans on another round of fiscal relief. On Friday, she criticized Republicans who said they want to wait to pass more aid. 

“Do you think this virus is taking a pause?” she asked. “Do you think that the rent takes a pause?  Do you think that putting food on the table or the hunger that comes if you can’t takes a pause?”

While the president opposed the Democratic plan, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany indicated this week that he would back another relief bill. 

Two administration officials told CNBC that the White House would likely support another round of direct payments — a popular piece of the unprecedented emergency spending law passed in March.

McConnell has called for liability protections for doctors and businesses as part of any future legislation the Senate passes. Democrats have generally criticized such a provision. 

After Democrats passed the bill Friday, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s office told members not to expect votes next week. The House is set to be in session on May 27 and 28. 

The pandemic continues to ravage the country. The U.S. now has more than 1.4 million cases, and the disease has killed more than 86,000 Americans, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

More than 36 million people have filed jobless claims since the crisis started.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/15/coronavirus-updates-house-passes-3-trillion-relief-package.html

Trump’s move infuriated Democrats who say he’s trying to circumvent oversight of his administration, undermining the ability of other branches to hold him accountable. The move follows Trump’s anger at being impeached, but it also comes as the White House struggles to combat the coronavirus pandemic just months before the presidential election.

“The president’s late-night, weekend firing of the State Department inspector general has accelerated his dangerous pattern of retaliation against the patriotic public servants charged with conducting oversight on behalf of the American people,” Pelosi said in an statement. “Inspector General Linick was punished for honorably performing his duty to protect the Constitution and our national security, as required by the law and by his oath.”

Rep. Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, called Linick’s dismissal an “outrageous act of a president trying to protect one of his most loyal supporters, the secretary of State, from accountability.”

Engel claimed: “I have learned that the Office of the Inspector General had opened an investigation into Secretary Pompeo. Mr. Linick’s firing amid such a probe strongly suggests that this is an unlawful act of retaliation.”

A Democratic congressional aide said Linick had launched an investigation into Pompeo’s alleged misuse of a political appointee to perform personal tasks for him and Mrs. Pompeo. The State Department did not respond to an inquiry about the allegation.

Linick played a minor role in the House of Representatives’ impeachment proceedings against Trump, ferrying a trove of documents to lawmakers that had been provided to the State Department by Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer.

A State Department spokesperson said that Amb. Stephen Akard, a former career Foreign Service officer, “will now lead the Office of the Inspector General at the State Department” in an acting capacity.

Akard had in 2017 been nominated to serve as the director general of the Foreign Service, a high-ranking human resources role.

That nomination upset veteran U.S. diplomats, who said Akard lacked the long tenure of service usually required for such a prestigious position. The American Academy of Diplomacy even wrote an unusual letter opposing his nomination.

Akard’s nomination as director general was eventually withdrawn, but he was later tapped for a different role, leading the Office of Foreign Missions, for which he was confirmed in September 2019.

Before joining the Trump administration, Akard was chief of staff for the Indiana Economic Development Corporation under then-governor Pence.

Linick is well-respected at the State Department, and his office stays busy, regularly churning out a range of inspections, audits and other types of reports.

His departure is likely to further deepen morale problems that have festered at State since the start of the Trump administration, when many career diplomats found themselves shunted aside and cast as a “deep state” bent on undermining Trump.

Two of Linick’s most-read reports over the past year involved alleged retaliation by Trump political appointees against career employees.

Sen. Bob Menendez (D-New Jersey), the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called Linick’s ouster “shameful.”

“Another late Friday night attack on independence, accountability, and career officials,” Menendez tweeted. “At this point, the president’s paralyzing fear of any oversight is undeniable.”

Trump has removed a number of federal watchdogs in the last few months, including Health and Human Services Inspector General Christi Grimm, who issued a report critical of the administration’s response to the coronavirus pandemic; and the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, whose handling of a whistleblower report ultimately led to Trump’s impeachment.

Separately, Trump also notified Congress on Friday of his intent to nominate Eric Soskin, a Justice Department trial counsel who has been involved in some hot-button immigration and civil rights cases, to be inspector general of the Department of Transportation. Soskin has worked in the Justice Department’s federal programs division as senior trial counsel for 14 years, according to a White House announcement.

Calvin Scovel retired as DOT inspector general earlier this year, after 13 years in the job.

Andrew Desiderio, Kyle Cheney and Brianna Gurciullo contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/15/state-department-inspector-general-fired-261536

“There is a need for coordination, and a new czar can coordinate industry, the White House, HHS, NIH, BARDA” and other agencies within the Health and Human Services Department, said a senior HHS official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to discuss the subject. But “to bring in a total outsider, with no government experience, that’s a tall order in a crisis.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/05/15/trump-coronavirus-vaccine-january/

The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday narrowly passed legislation to appropriate another $3 trillion to combat the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

But approved along mostly party lines, the HEROES Act is largely a messaging bill from Democrats that will not advance in the GOP-controlled Senate in its current form. It remains to be seen when—or if—future relief will come for the more than 36 million Americans who have filed for unemployment benefits in the past two months.

Republicans on Capitol Hill have advocated for a “pause” in dolling out more money amid skyrocketing deficits. This despite some in the Trump administration, such as Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, warning more action may be needed to avoid lasting economic harm to a once-booming economy that is now in Depression-era status. It “could be costly,” Powell said this week, “but worth it if it helps avoid long-term damage and leaves us with a stronger recovery.”

Still, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Fox News Thursday labeled the HEROES Act a “parade of absurdities that can hardly be taken seriously.” On the House floor Friday, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) called it a “socialist wish list.” Lawmakers have already approved roughly $3 trillion in federal assistance since the onset of the pandemic, not including the cost of Friday’s legislation.

The 1,800-page bill narrowly passed 208-199, with 14 Democrats and one Republican crossing party lines.

The package includes an exhaustive list of items, most prominently a second round of $1,200 checks for individuals and up to $6,000 for families; $1 trillion in state and local aid; an expansion of the $600 federal unemployment payments; hazard pay for essential workers worth $200 billion; and $175 billion in rent, mortgage and utility relief.

“Let’s take a ‘pause’? Do you think this virus is taking a pause? Do you think that the rent takes a pause? Do you think that putting food on the table, or the hunger that comes if you can’t, takes a pause?” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said on the floor. “The hardship of losing a job doesn’t take a pause or, tragically, losing a loved one doesn’t take a pause… We don’t end this by pausing in the fight.”

The package also includes $75 billion to increase testing, contact tracing and treatment; $10 billion of emergency grants for small businesses; a special enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act; a 15 percent boost to food stamps; and additional resources for vote-by-mail for the November elections and the U.S. Postal Service.

But within the $3 trillion piece of legislation were items that Republicans—and even some Democrats—considered unrelated to the pandemic, such as measures for the marijuana industry, aid for lobbyists and the repeal of a cap on deductions for state and local taxes (known as SALT) that overwhelmingly benefits the wealthy.

“Inside [Pelosi’s] HEROES Act, which she continues to twist arms to try to get as many Democrats as she can to vote for, the focus is on bills they dreamed of before COVID even existed,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) told reporters. “It is her own dream with a liberal view of her party with no input from either side knowing that it’s going nowhere.”

Indeed, Democratic House leadership did not consult with Republicans or the White House. And 14 Democrats, most of whom were moderates in swing districts, chose to buck the party and cross the aisle to vote against the bill.

But one Republican defected from his party: Peter King of New York.

“I’m not breaking from the party. I’m just doing what I think is essential for my district, the state and the country,” the retiring lawmaker told Newsweek, citing the state and local aid as the most crucial component. “I’m opposed to 90 percent of extraneous matters in there. But this is the only vehicle to get state and local funding to the Senate. I don’t trust McConnell.”

McConnell drew scathing criticism from King last month when the Kentucky Republican suggested states may need to go bankrupt rather than the federal government providing more aid.

McCarthy pushed back on King’s support for the legislation, which he’s labeled a “wish list.”

“This will not save New York,” McCarthy said. “It will not help the country itself.”

p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
content: none
}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/house-democrats-narrowly-pass-another-massive-stimulus-worth-3-trillion-1504491

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s press briefing in the White House Rose Garden on Friday was set to the tune of blaring truck horns nearby. But the honks weren’t “the sign of love” for the president that he said they were.

“Those are truckers that are with us all the way,” Trump said as he made an announcement about coronavirus vaccines. “They’re protesting in favor of President Trump as opposed to against.” 

The horns honked as Trump held his briefing to announce “Operation Warp Speed,” an effort to get a COVID-19 vaccine into production and distribution by the end of this year. He paused to acknowledge them.

“That’s the sign of love, not the sign of your typical protest,” Trump said. “So I want to thank our great truckers, they like me and I like them.”

‘If we stop, the world stops’:Truckers brave coronavirus outbreak to deliver goods.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/15/truckers-protest-trump-called-honking-sign-love/5202722002/

J.C. Penney, weighed down by debt and battered by the coronavirus, has filed for bankruptcy.

Sales at J.C. Penney have fallen annually since 2016. Its roughly 860-store footprint is less than a quarter of its store base in 2001. The company’s nearly $11 billion in sales for the last fiscal year are almost a third of its sales that same year.

The Plano, Texas-based retailer, which was founded more than a century ago, employed roughly 90,000 full- and part-time workers as of February. 

“The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for our families, our loved ones, our communities, and our country. As a result, the American retail industry has experienced a profoundly different new reality, requiring JCPenney to make difficult decisions in running our business to protect the safety of our associates and customers and the future of our company,” CEO Jill Soltau said in a statement.

“Until this pandemic struck, we had made significant progress rebuilding our company under our Plan for Renewal strategy – and our efforts had already begun to pay off,” Soltau’s statement said. “While we had been working in parallel on options to strengthen our balance sheet and extend our financial runway, the closure of our stores due to the pandemic necessitated a more fulsome review to include the elimination of outstanding debt.”

The retailer said it has commitments for $900 million in financing from its existing first lien lenders to fund bankruptcy, which includes $450 million of new money. It had approximately $500 million in cash on hand as of the Chapter 11 filing date.

In bankruptcy, the retailer said it will “reduce its store footprint” in phases. It will disclose specific store details and timing in the coming weeks. CNBC previously reported that the retailer is making plans to close 180-200 stores.

J.C. Penney said in a release it will open select stores and continue to offer contact-free curbside pickup service at all open stores. Its eCommerce distribution will continue to fulfill online orders, and customer care centers are answering inquiries as usual.

It said it will continue to work toward a strategy to refocus on stores heralded by Soltau in efforts to continue its attempted turnaround in bankruptcy. That will include “reestablishing the fundamentals of retail, re-envisioning its merchandise offerings, and rolling out new innovations.” 

J.C. Penney joins fellow department store chains Neiman Marcus and Stage Stores as victims of the pandemic, which has forced their doors shut and exacerbated problems that existed before the virus started spreading. Department stores have struggled to maintain a foothold in U.S. retail. Brands have sidestepped them by selling to shoppers directly. Online retailers have lured shoppers away from malls in which many department stores are based.  

The retailer dates back to 1913, when James Penney converted a chain of 34 stores into the J.C. Penney company. J.C. Penney offered rural America their first depot, providing farmers and others a one-stop-shop to buy essential goods at bargain prices. By 1928, it worked its store base up to 1,000 stores — a year before the company went public, and the Great Depression.By 1994, the retailer had $20.4 billion in retail sales, with net income nearing $1 billion.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/15/jc-penney-bankruptcy-filing.html

A masked Dr. Anthony Fauci joins President Trump as he delivers remarks about the coronavirus vaccine development Friday in the Rose Garden.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

A masked Dr. Anthony Fauci joins President Trump as he delivers remarks about the coronavirus vaccine development Friday in the Rose Garden.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

President Trump on Friday unveiled more details of “Operation Warp Speed” – an effort to accelerate the development of a vaccine and medical treatments for the coronavirus by January.

“We’re looking to get it by the end of the year if we can, maybe before,” Trump said as top medical, military and Cabinet officials, many of them wearing face masks, joined him in the Rose Garden.

Trump compared the effort to the Manhattan Project – the World War II effort to build the first nuclear weapon.

“That means big and it means fast,” Trump said. “We have the military totally involved.”

Experts have noted that a timeline of even 12 to 18 months is optimistic. The first Food and Drug Administration-approved vaccine for the Ebola virus was not until December 2019 despite a peak in outbreaks between 2014 and 2016.

At present there are 14 promising vaccine candidates, Trump said, noting that it would be “risky” and “expensive,” but that the federal government plans to invest in manufacturing the top candidates even before they are approved to eliminate any delay once approval happens.

Trump confirmed the names of leaders of the project. As NPR reported Thursday, former GlaxoSmithKline executive Moncef Slaoui will be the chief adviser to the effort. Slaoui’s long career at the company included the chairmanship of GlaxoSmithKline’s global vaccines division. He also was on the board of Moderna, a company with a coronavirus vaccine candidate. Moderna announced Friday that Slaoui has resigned from the board.

Gen. Gustave Perna, commander of the U.S. Army Materiel Command, will be the chief operating officer of the program.

Trump said the United States would work with other countries — even China — on the project to develop, manufacture and distribute a vaccine quickly.

“They’re viewing us as the leader, and the relationship with other countries on solving this problem has been incredible,” he said.

“We’ll be very happy if they are able to do it,” Trump said, speaking generally about other countries working on vaccines for the virus. “We have no ego when it comes to this.”

The government will also ramp up production of vaccine supplies such as storage facilities, vials and syringes. Trump said the military would deploy “every truck, plane and soldier” to distribute the vaccine quickly once available.

Trump’s remarks in the Rose Garden were accompanied by loud honking from nearby protesting truckers. “That’s the sign of love, not the sign of your typical protest,” the president said.

The truckers have been protesting for nearly two weeks against what they say are low pay rates, neither against nor in support of Trump. The group has requested a meeting with the president, according to media reports.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/15/857014274/trump-touts-operation-warp-speed-coronavirus-vaccine-effort

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/15/politics/concerns-cdc-counting-systems/

This week the House proposed the HEROES Act, a wide-ranging, $3 trillion stimulus bill that some members of Congress have likened to a “wishlist” more than a proposal. The bill is over 1800 pages long and includes numerous provisions designed to help taxpayers and businesses during the pandemic.

Included was another one-time stimulus check in the amount of $1,200 for individual taxpayers and up to $6,000 for families. There are many other provisions that you can read about here.

Even if approved by the House, this massive stimulus bill isn’t likely to make it any further, as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared it “dead on arrival” in the Senate. 

In response, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated this bill is, “open to negotiation.”

It is possible the bill could be modified or portions of it resurrected in a new bill. Of notable interest are some changes to the stimulus check program compared to the Economic Impact Payments found in the CARES Act.

Notably, the HEROES Act identified and corrected some perceived shortcomings in the CARES Act. Now that those issues have been formally identified, it may be much easier to package them into a new stimulus bill. It is also worth examining the current stimulus check proposals to see what members of Congress are considering as some of these proposals may trickle down to any future stimulus check program.

Your Next Stimulus Check Could be a Monthly Check, but it’s Unlikely

There have been three separate stimulus proposals that are calling for monthly checks of up to $2,000 per person and additional payments for dependents. You can read about these different stimulus check proposals here.

The monthly stimulus check proposals have received a lot of press, but they are unlikely to be passed in their present form due to the sheer cost of the programs. Estimates put the cost of those programs in the range of $3 trillion up to $10 trillion.

The sticker shock alone will most likely prevent these from being passed.

Your Next Stimulus Check Will Most Likely Be a One-Time Payment

The CARES Act provided a one-time, $1,200 Economic Impact Payment. If we see another stimulus payment, it will likely be a similar one-time payment. The IRS did a commendable job getting out the initial batch of stimulus payments, but there are still millions of payments left to process, and some of those could take months

Starting a new stimulus payment program could potentially have many people getting their first two checks before some people get their first. Add an ongoing monthly check to the mix and you’re asking for problems.

More People Might Be Eligible for a Second Stimulus Check

The CARES Act limited eligibility based on several factors, including whether or not the taxpayer had a Social Security Number, their age, and their income. 

There were some unpopular consequences of these rules, specifically as they relate to having a Social Security Number (SSN) and the age limits. The HEROES Act corrects these issues and would extend benefits to an estimated 4.3 million adults and 3.5 million children.

Social Security Number: The CARES Act required recipients to have an SSN but it prohibited payments from being made to those with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN). This blocked stimulus payments for married couples filing jointly if one member had an ITIN, even if the other individual had an SSN. The HEROES Act would correct this issue and make a stimulus payment to the individual with the SSN, but not the person with the ITIN. Any future stimulus payment may have the same provision. 

Dependent Age Limitations: The CARES Act limited stimulus payments to dependents ages 16 and under. Those who were ages 17 and up were not eligible for a stimulus payment. This includes high schoolers, college-age students and adult dependents. The HEROES Act changed the language to “qualifying dependents,” meaning anyone who can be claimed as a dependent on your tax return. Several other stimulus check proposals have similar language. This could open up payments to millions of additional recipients if the next stimulus payment bill includes similar language.

The Stimulus Payments Most Likely Won’t be Offset, Garnished, or Withheld for Child Support

The CARES Act included language that prohibited the stimulus checks from being garnished for back taxes, federal debts, and certain other obligations. However, it did not prohibit the funds from being garnished for child support or certain other debts. The HEROES Act and other current proposals include language that would prohibit future stimulus payments from being offset, withheld, or garnished. 

Families May Be Eligible for Larger Checks

The CARES Act provided a $500 payment for eligible children ages 16 and under. The HEROES Act calls for a $1,200 payment per qualified dependent, up to three dependents. This means families could be eligible for up to $6,000 in stimulus payments. 

Some of the other proposals, such as the Emergency Money for the People Act would provide a $2,000 monthly check for everyone over the age of 16 making less than $130,000 per year, and an additional $500 per dependent for up to 3 dependents. Other stimulus proposals call for monthly checks with $2,000 for both the taxpayer and dependents. All of the current proposals are more generous for families than the stimulus check passed under the CARES Act.

The Next Stimulus Check Program May Include Retroactive Changes to the CARES Act – Granting Millions of People Checks They Were Initially Ineligible For

The HEROES Act included language that would make retroactive changes to the CARES Act, opening the door for millions of excluded recipients to receive a stimulus check. This primarily applies to married couples in which one partner had an ITIN or were dependents ages 17 and up.

How Likely Are These Changes – And Will We Get Another Stimulus Check?

All of the changes in this article have been taken from current stimulus check proposals. That means they are on the radar and may be implemented in any future stimulus check bill that passes. 

The bigger question is if or when we will see a new stimulus payment bill be passed. The HEROES Act is already facing pushback from the Republican-controlled Senate and isn’t likely to be passed in its current form.

Likewise, the three monthly stimulus check proposals that would provide a $2,000 monthly stimulus payment are unlikely to pass due to their sheer cost (anywhere from $3 – $10 trillion).

Providing additional financial support to the American public is a hot-topic issue right now and we may see another stimulus bill passed. However, any future stimulus check proposal will need to be a bipartisan effort that strips down the overall scope of the proposal in order for it to be passed.

Related Coverage on Forbes:

Stimulus Payment Round 2: A Rundown Of 5 Current Stimulus Proposals

$2,000 Monthly Stimulus Check? 5 Reasons It May Not Happen

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanguina/2020/05/15/what-your-next-stimulus-check-might-look-like/

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany was grilled Friday about a lingering question of its coronavirus response: Why didn’t it refill the national stockpile of medical supplies in the three years since President Donald Trump has been in office?

After McEnany repeated Trump’s frequent claim — that his predecessor Barack Obama left the “cupboards” bare of the strategic supply needed to fight a pandemic — she was then asked why the president didn’t act to refill it in the time he’s been in office.

While McEnany insisted that the president “immediately went into action” when it was necessary to get supplies for healthcare workers, NBC News Digital senior correspondent Shannon Pettypiece asked whether there was any effort to replenish the supply before January 2020, when the coronavirus outbreak began.

McEnany said Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar told her that “when we got to the federal government we were on the brink, we were in very hostile confrontations with several powers because of the Obama administration’s foreign policy. And there were real bioterrorism threats. And that was there immediate threat that the administration focused on in terms of the stockpile.”

Earlier this month, ABC News’ David Muir asked Trump why the administration didn’t replenish the stockpile while he was in office.

“Well, to be honest, I have a lot things going on,” Trump responded. “We had a lot of people that refused to allow the country to be successful. They wasted a lot of time on Russia, Russia, Russia that turned out to be a total hoax. And then they did Ukraine, Ukraine, and that was a total hoax. Then they impeached the president of the United States for absolutely no reason.”

Trump’s claim that his predecessor left the stockpile depleted also has been challenged. Factcheck.org called it false, Politifact deemed it mostly false, and the Washington Post Fact Checker said it was misleading, with the caveat that Trump might have been referring to a lack of N95 masks specifically.

McEnany, though, tried to turn the focus to the Trump administration’s efforts this year, which she said were “extraordinary.” She insisted that they “transitioned as quickly as possible and filled the empty cupboards left by President Obama.”

The concerns over the administration’s preparedness took on new relevance this week after Rick Bright, a former official at the Department of Health and Human Services, testified before a congressional committee that his warnings in January and February of the need for ventilators, masks and other supplies went unheeded.

Chanel Rion, chief White House correspondent for One America News Network, known for its pro-Trump coverage, asked McEnany whether the Obama administration advised the Trump administration of the depletion of the national stockpile.

“It’s a really good question,” McEnany said. “Not to my knowledge. To my knowledge the two things President Obama warned about were North Korea and Michael Flynn. What I do know if this. The Obama administration wasn’t throwing ventilators into the stockpile. They were unmasking Lt. General Michael Flynn in the waning days of the administration.”

Flynn was Trump’s former national security adviser. The Justice Department recently moved to drop its prosecution of Flynn, even though he plead guilty to lying to the FBI about the nature of his conversation with the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, in late December, 2016. According to Trump, Flynn was fired just weeks into his term for lying about that conversation to Vice President Mike Pence and then-Press Secretary Sean Spicer.

But in recent days, Trump has tried to advance what he calls “Obamagate,” or the claim that his predecessor worked to undermine his administration via Flynn and the Russia investigation in general.

McEnany groused that there “hasn’t been a lot of journalistic curiosity” over the Flynn story. CBS News correspondent had asked her about Trump’s suggestion that people should be jailed over the Flynn prosecution. “What crime was committed and in what way?” Portnoy asked.

McEnany said that there were a number of questions that have been raised about the activities of the Obama administration, but specifically denounced a “criminal leak” to the press of Flynn’s call to Kislyak.

Earlier in the week, Trump was asked what crime his predecessor has committed, and he said, “You know what the crime is. The crime is very obvious to everybody. All you have to do is read the newspapers, except yours.”

But a number of reporters say that the story still lacks evidence that a crime was committed and that, as of now, it is more of a catchy name for a conspiracy theory.

 

Source Article from https://deadline.com/2020/05/donald-trump-barack-obama-coronavirus-national-stockpile-1202936028/

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Nelson Teich, left, and Jair Bolsonaro during his swearing-in ceremony less than a month ago

Brazil’s health minister has resigned after less than a month in the job following disagreements over the government’s handling of the country’s escalating coronavirus crisis.

Nelson Teich had criticised a decree issued by President Jair Bolsonaro allowing gyms and beauty parlours to reopen.

However, he gave no reason for his resignation at a press conference.

His predecessor was sacked after disagreeing with Mr Bolsonaro.

The far-right president continues to oppose lockdown measures.

He has downplayed the virus as “a little flu” and has said the spread of Covid-19 is inevitable, attracting global criticism.

Brazil has recently surged past Germany and France in terms of its coronavirus caseload, becoming one of the world’s hotspots with more than 218,000 cases and a record 15,305 in the last 24 hours. The latest daily figures also showed 824 new deaths recorded, bringing the official death toll to 14,817.

Media captionThe BBC’s South America correspondent Katy Watson looks at how Bolsonaro has responded to the virus in Brazil

Why did the minister resign?

At his news conference, Mr Teich did not reveal why he had stepped down. He just thanked President Bolsonaro for giving him the chance to serve as a minister and praised healthcare workers.

But he has clashed with the president over several aspects of how the government has dealt with the spiralling epidemic.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Mr Teich (right) clashed with the president over his handling of the crisis

He disagreed with the president’s desire to widely use chloroquine as a treatment. The drug has gained widespread attention although the World Health Organization (WHO) says there’s no definitive evidence it works.

Mr Teich also butted heads with the president over plans to open up the economy, saying last week that he was not consulted ahead of an order that paved the way for gyms, beauty salons and hairdressers to reopen.

But disagreements over how chloroquine should be used was the final straw, the Globo newspaper reported.

He is second health minister to leave the post in under a month. Luiz Henrique Mandetta was fired in April after President Bolsonaro publicly criticised him for urging people to observe social distancing and stay indoors.

To lose one health minister was awkward, but to lose two in less than a month is not only embarrassing for Jair Bolsonaro but deeply worrying for Brazil.

The country has become the latest coronavirus hotspot and rather than politicians trying to tackle it together, the pandemic has turned political and the leader of the country is failing to provide direction for a population which really needs it.

Nelson Teich didn’t give any reasons for his departure, merely saying “life is full of decisions and I decided to leave” – but he didn’t see eye-to-eye with his boss on the use of chloroquine and his health ministry was excluded this week when Jair Bolsonaro decided to include beauty salons, hairdressers and gyms as essential services.

It appears the job of health minister to Jair Bolsonaro is a thankless task at the moment – but it’s a difficult job vacancy at the worst-possible time in Brazil.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-52682358

U.S. Space Force senior enlisted adviser Chief Master Sgt. Roger Towberman presents the Space Force Flag to President Trump on Friday in the Oval Office.

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

U.S. Space Force senior enlisted adviser Chief Master Sgt. Roger Towberman presents the Space Force Flag to President Trump on Friday in the Oval Office.

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump held an Oval Office ceremony Friday to sign the 2020 Armed Forces Day Proclamation and unveil the official flag of the Space Force, the newest military branch.

Standing alongside senior leaders of the military, Trump called the unfurling a “very special moment.”

“We’ve worked very hard on this and it’s so important from a defensive standpoint, from an offensive standpoint, from every standpoint there is,” Trump said.

The flag design comes from the seal of the Space Force, which was approved by the president in January. It sparked some Star Trek fan outrage for what some people have called its similarity to a logo in the science fiction franchise.

According to the White House, the dark blue and white of the flag is meant to represent the “vast recesses of outer space” and includes a elliptical orbit with three large stars meant to symbolize the branch’s purpose: “organizing, training and equipping” Space Force troopers, in the language of the Pentagon.

The Space Force was created in part to protect strategic American space infrastructure, including communications, navigation and spy satellites, from adversaries such as Russia and China.

“As you know, China, Russia, perhaps others, started off a lot sooner than us,” Trump said. “We should have started this a long time ago, but we’ve made up for it in spades. We have developed some of the most incredible weapons anyone’s ever seen. And it’s moving along very rapidly.”

Trump teased what he called a new weapon that could attack at such a high speed it would overwhelm an enemy’s defenses.

“We have, I call it the ‘super-duper missile.’ And I heard the other night [it’s] 17 times faster than what they have right now,” Trump said.

It wasn’t immediately clear what missile the president was describing, but the U.S. and other advanced powers are known to be developing new hypersonic weapons, designed to race at many times the speed of sound.

Trump was joined by Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, who praised the president for his efforts to push the new organization within the Defense Department.

“With the establishment of Space Force and establishment of Space Command, the United States is now doing what it needs to do to protect our assets in space and ensure that space remains the heavens by which we not only protect America, but we sustain our economy, we sustain our commercial capabilities, we sustain Americans’ way of life,” Esper said.

Trump officially created Space Force, the sixth branch of the U.S. Armed Services, in December. It’s the first new military service since the Air Force was created in 1947.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/05/15/857092718/trump-unveiling-space-force-flag-touts-what-he-calls-new-super-duper-missile