President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump says inviting Russia to G7 ‘a question of common sense’ Pentagon chief does not support invoking Insurrection Act Dershowitz: Does President Trump have power to declare martial law? MORE trails presumptive Democratic nominee Joe BidenJoe BidenPoll: Majority ‘sympathetic’ to protesters, disapprove of Trump’s response In a year like no other, we’ll hold the election of our lifetime The Hill’s Morning Report – Protesters’ defiance met with calls to listen MORE in Ohio, Wisconsin and Arizona, according to surveys from Fox News released Wednesday.

Trump won all three states in 2016, and few believed until recently that Ohio might be in play.

The Fox News poll of the Buckeye State found Biden at 45 percent and Trump at 43 percent, which is within the survey’s 3.5 percentage point margin of error.

Trump carried Ohio by 8 points in 2016, and most Democrats had abandoned any hope that the onetime presidential bellwether might be up for grabs in 2020.

The Trump campaign recently put money behind an ad campaign in Ohio in an effort to bolster the president’s standing there.

The survey found that voters in Ohio trust Trump over Biden on the economy by an 11-point margin. But voters trust Biden by 13 points on the issue of race relations, which has moved to the forefront amid the protests sweeping the nation following the death of George Floyd.

Biden also leads by 6 points on the question of who is better equipped to handle the coronavirus pandemic.

The Arizona poll found Biden leading Trump 46 percent to 42 percent.

Trump won Arizona by 4 points in 2016. The Grand Canyon State has gone for the Democratic presidential nominee only once in the past 70 years, but it has become more purple since 2018 as suburban voters in the densely populated areas around Phoenix have gravitated away from the GOP.    

The survey also found Sen. Martha McSallyMartha Elizabeth McSallyThe Hill’s Campaign Report: Minneapolis protests rock the nation Democrats gear up to hit GOP senators on DACA Pence names new press secretary MORE (R-Ariz.) trailing her Democratic challenger Mark Kelly by 13 points. In 2018, Kyrsten Sinema became the first Democratic senator from Arizona in more than two decades.

The Arizona Senate race is a critical contest that could determine the balance of power in the chamber as Democrats seek to win back a majority.

The final Fox News poll found Biden opening up a 9-point lead in Wisconsin, which Trump won only narrowly in 2016.

Trump was first GOP presidential candidate in decades to carry Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Democrats have been bullish about their chances of winning back Michigan and Pennsylvania, but many have been skeptical about their chances of winning back Wisconsin, with its predominantly white electorate.

The Wisconsin Fox News poll found Trump and Biden statistically tied on the economy, with Biden leading by double-digit margins on race relations and the pandemic.

The Fox News survey of 803 voters in Ohio was conducted between May 30 and June 2 and has a 3.5 percentage point margin of error. The survey of 801 Wisconsin voters has a 3.5 percentage point margin of error, and the survey of 1,002 Arizona voters has a 3 percentage point margin of error.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/501058-fox-news-polls-trump-trails-biden-in-ohio-arizona-and-wisconsin

London(CNN) The police killing of George Floyd has resonated around the world. In London — some 4,000 miles from where Floyd died in Minnesota — thousands of protesters gathered on Wednesday to show solidarity with mourning Americans.

It was a peaceful Black Lives Matter demonstration in Hyde Park, where protesters of many different racial and cultural backgrounds chanted Floyd’s name through their face masks, demanding justice. Several protesters shared their outrage over the killing to CNN, drawing parallels with their own experiences, and expressed dismay about US President Donald Trump’s reaction to the protests.

Geovane Silva, 21

“There’s racism everywhere, and we have to fight it. I don’t just mean white people against black people. Racism is racism, and that’s what we have to fight. We have to be just one, human beings, we just need to be one. We all breathe the same air, we all bleed the same color.

“When I saw what happened to George Floyd, I cried. Man, I cried, because someone is being killed for just looking like me. He did nothing wrong, absolutely nothing wrong, and even if he did, there’s ways to deal with that. Why do other people get ways to deal with that but we don’t? The only way to deal with us is through violence. Why? We are not savages, we are not animals — we are people, like everyone else, and we deserve to be free.

“We can’t have people being scared when reaching for their wallets in their car. We can’t have people being scared when they are raided at home by the police and being killed. We can’t have people being scared of being on the street, not doing nothing, just standing on the street and the police come and finds a reason to shoot you and to kill you and to take your breath. (…)

“It’s not the first time. Five years ago we were yelling the same thing — ‘I can’t breathe.’ Why do we still have to do it today? It makes no sense. How can this still be? Why can’t people understand we are one? Why so much hate?

“This is way bigger than just America, it’s way bigger than George Floyd. It’s way bigger than just one cop killing a black man — it’s about injustice.”

Cleo Charlery, 26

“I tried to avoid watching the George Floyd video, but it got to a point where I couldn’t, so I looked and I felt so broken. I felt enraged with anger. I have a daughter, my partner’s black, I’ve got black siblings. It could have happened to anyone, any of my family members, so I was enraged with anger. I cried, then I started sharing everything I felt on social media.

“I’m tired of it. I’m tired of everyone screaming ‘black lives matter’— come on, this is common sense now. We are equal, just like everyone else. We should be, do you understand? We should have rights like everyone else. But it appears in America, and in the UK, we have no rights when it comes to justice.

“The difference is, I feel in the UK they know how to hide it pretty good, while in America, no one cares. They’ll let you know they’re racist. They don’t care about it. Where in the UK everyone is hiding it, but it comes out unconsciously, so I think that the UK is just as bad as America. (…)

“In terms of Trump. I’m so tired of him. I feel like he’s gaslighting the entire situation and calling a war on black people.”

Kingsley Daniels, 24

“I’m not protesting just for me. I’m thinking about the future, for the next generation. My kids, our grandkids, trying to make sure they can do whatever they want in life, and not have prejudice against them. Not have to work 10 times as hard as a white man, just to get a job they didn’t know they deserved, that they put blood sweat and tears into.

“I want my kids, anyone’s kids, any black men, black women, anyone who wants to do anything with their lives, that they can do it. They don’t have to worry about prejudice, or worry about ‘If I walk out of the house, am I going to make it home tonight? Can I go to another country to see what it’s like? If I do, will I make it home?’

“One of my dreams is to end up in New York and work there for a living. But now I have to put that on hold and think carefully because I don’t want to go out there and not make it home. So I’m doing this now to make sure all of our kids, and the next generations after and after and after, they can be at peace and not have to worry. Parents don’t have to worry about their kids not coming home. Parents are already worry about that here in London because of knife crime.

“Trump’s reaction to all this shows he’s a joke. He’s actually a joke. The fact that they call him a president is a joke. He’s not a president. He’s not ruling nothing. He’s a man who doesn’t know how to hold his tongue, how to think before he speaks, and does not care about anyone other than his pockets and himself.”

Gail Lewis, 69

“I’m here today for George Floyd. I’m here for Breonna Taylor. I’m here for all the murders that have happened in the States and here in London. I’m 69 years old … and I’m here because of the continuing anti-blackness in this country, as well as the USA, and the connections between us here and in the USA and all of the Americas.

“And the need to protest every way in which black life is made valueless, in every way, through murder and state violence, through white supremacist violence, and also through the most demeaning of factors: Through the names our children are subjected to, through the idea the jobs that we do are not valued, and therefore we get more subject to the coronavirus and die more — in every way. The need to protest that here in this country, in solidarity, but also to make transformation in this racist society as well.

“When I was a young adolescent protesting, there would be a few of us, in this very park, just 10 or 12. Now today, I see this number of people for black life. Not for anything else, but for black life. That is a huge transformation. It makes me cry.

“It makes me cry both to see it, to see the commitment to black life, and it makes me cry because we have to be here.”

Ola Soetan, 26

“Sometimes you can be walking down the road and the cops will search you for no reason. That happened to me in Ireland, where I used to live. I’ve lived here in London now for eight months and I see people get racially profiled. They’re wrongly accused because of their skin color. It’s not fair.

“It’s frustrating, because there’s no justice, the evidence is right there but they always try to defend them. Like with George Floyd, they’re leaning on someone’s neck, and they’re trying to defend them. You can’t defend them. They’re human beings, you know. How can you do that when they’re begging for their life? As a human being, if you see someone suffering?

“You can’t bring them back, they’re gone. All the police are the same. They say there are good cops, but if you see a bad cop do something and you don’t call them out, you’re the same as them, because you’re keeping quiet. If I see someone do something bad, I’ll speak out. Everyone should be treated equally.

“If it weren’t for social media, we wouldn’t know the truth.”

Meisha Francesco, 20

“Growing up as a young black person, especially as I’ve come up in a white area, I think it’s important to make sure that racism does stop, and that everyone gets looked at as a person. I’ve come here today to show my support and to make sure we do get looked at as equal people.

“In the US, I think it’s obviously very disgusting. People shouldn’t have to worry about going out because they’re going to get killed because of the color of their skin. You see people who are white doing the same things and it’s not a problem, but people look at the color of your skin and if they’re black, they automatically think ‘That’s a criminal and they don’t deserve to live,’ and that’s bad, very bad.

“In the UK I feel it’s obviously not as bad as in the US, but there is definitely stuff that doesn’t get spoken about. I feel like when people go for jobs, people need to be looked at as a person and not the color of their skin, which is a problem here. In workplaces, in schools, even just in a large group, you get noticed for being black.

“The more people who come out against racism, the more changes they’ll have to make.”

Happy Idehen Hill, 32

“We came to protest against police brutality, against black people, mostly. They’ve been brutal to all races, but it’s been obvious that the black race has been affected mostly, so we’re just here to protest that and demand change to the system. It just needs to change.

“I think in America, it’s totally different than here in the UK. Here in the UK, racism is less than when I lived in Spain. You feel it. Some people, they don’t come to your face and say it. The way they treat you differently, maybe when you’re at work.

“The reason we brought our son Xander here is I just want him to be part of history. I think everything is going to change after this. and I’m hopeful it’s going to change. Our forefathers have done it before, and this is another kind of change we’re going to experience, so we just want him to be part of that.”

Source Article from https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/06/03/uk/black-lives-matter-protest-london-george-floyd-gbr-intl/index.html

(CNN) Former Secretary of Defense James Mattis on Wednesday castigated President Donald Trump as “the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people” in a forceful rebuke of his former boss as nationwide protests have intensified over the death of George Floyd.

“Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us,” Mattis said in a statement obtained by CNN.

“We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.”

READ: Former Defense Secretary Mattis’ statement on Trump and protests

His pointed remarks follow more than a week of nationwide protests across the country calling for justice for Floyd, a black man who was killed last week by a white police officer in Minneapolis. In response, Trump earlier this week declared himself “your president of law and order” and vowed to return order to American streets using the military if widespread violence isn’t quelled.

The comments from Mattis are a significant moment for a man who has kept mostly silent since leaving the administration. The retired Marine general had been pressed many times to comment on Trump, troop policies, the Pentagon, and other current events and had always refused because he didn’t want to get involved and be a contradictory voice to the troops. Instead, Mattis always insisted he had said everything he wanted to say in his resignation letter.

And until a few days ago he had privately held to that view, but Mattis has become so distressed by the events of the last week that his views on speaking out changed.

The remarks will be a significant moment for many service members who idolize the former defense secretary, who — despite a career based on loyalty and respect for the military chain-of-command — is sending troops the message that the country can unite without the President’s lead.

The President responded to Mattis in a series of tweets Wednesday night.

“Probably the only thing Barack Obama and I have in common is that we both had the honor of firing Jim Mattis, the world’s most overrated General. I asked for his letter of resignation, & felt great about. His nickname was ‘Chaos’, which I didn’t like, & changed it to ‘Mad Dog,’ ” Trump said on Twitter.

“His primary strength was not military, but rather personal public relations. I gave him a new life, things to do, and battles to win, but he seldom ‘brought home the bacon’. I didn’t like his ‘leadership’ style or much else about him, and many others agree. Glad he is gone!”

A Trump campaign adviser took note of Trump’s affection for having generals in high-ranking positions early on in his administration, such as Mattis, former Homeland Security secretary and chief of staff John Kelly and former national security adviser retired Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster.

“Trump loved calling them ‘his generals,'” the adviser said.

“He loved his generals and now they’ve all turned on him,” the adviser added.

The adviser went on to note the Nazi reference in the statement — Mattis said, “The Nazi slogan for destroying us…was ‘Divide and Conquer.’ Our American answer is ‘In Union there is Strength.’ We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics” — was particularly pointed. “That will leave a mark,” the adviser said.

The message comes after days of increased military presence in Washington. National Guardsmen and federal law enforcement have been stationed around the nation’s capital in a show of force not seen in recent memory. Federal law enforcement officers violently broke up peaceful protests in front of the White House on Monday, apparently so Trump could stage a photo-op at a church across the street from Lafayette Square, where protesters had gathered.

The former secretary, who resigned from Trump’s Cabinet, also indirectly criticized current Defense Secretary Mark Esper’s use of the word “battlespace” in reference to American cities.

“We must reject any thinking of our cities as a ‘battlespace’ that our uniformed military is called upon to ‘dominate,'” Mattis said. “At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society.”

“It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them.”

His comments echo a growing discomfort from some in the Pentagon that began even before Trump announced that he is ready to deploy the military to enforce order inside the US.

“There is an intense desire for local law enforcement to be in charge,” a defense official told CNN, alluding to the laws that forbid the military from performing law enforcement roles inside the United States.

Esper on Wednesday acknowledged his use of the word “battlespace” was not meant to indicate any conflict with Americans, but claimed he used a military term of art. Esper also specifically rejected the use of active duty forces in a law enforcement role at this time — comments that put him on shaky ground with the White House.

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany would not directly answer Wednesday whether Trump still has confidence in Esper, saying instead, “as of right now Secretary Esper is still Secretary Esper.”

“With regard to whether the President has confidence, I would say if he loses confidence in Secretary Esper, I’m sure you all will be the first to know,” McEnany said during Wednesday’s press briefing.

“Should the President lose faith, we will all learn about that in the future,” she added.

But Mattis directed most of ire at Trump saying “Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.”

Trump on Wednesday evening softened his tone around sending the military into American cities, saying, “I don’t think we’ll have to,” before reiterating that he has “very strong powers to do it” in an interview with his former press secretary Sean Spicer.

Still, Mattis made clear that his blistering assessment of the President extends beyond any one issue.

“Only by adopting a new path—which means, in truth, returning to the original path of our founding ideals—will we again be a country admired and respected at home and abroad.”

This story has been updated with additional information Wednesday.

Source Article from https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/06/03/politics/mattis-statement-trump/index.html

Sen. John Kennedy said on Wednesday that New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo was correct when he said that New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio failed to handle the riots that broke out in the Big Apple.

“I’m really worried about the cops and the peaceful protesters and the businesses in New York,” Kennedy, R-La., told “America’s Newsroom.”

Kennedy continued, “And I don’t know what planet Mayor de Blasio parachuted in from, but I don’t see him carrying his happy a** down there, trying to protect people.”

“He needs help to protect everybody, the peaceful protesters, the cops, and the business owners and if he doesn’t realize he needs help, then he’s not qualified to run a hot dog stand as far as I am concerned,” Kennedy said.

WITH NYC UNDER ATTACK, DE BLASIO’S HANDLING OF NYPD FUELS LONG-RUNNING TENSIONS WITH POLICE

The two leaders have long had a difficult relationship, but it spilled out into the open on Tuesday after a night of rioting tore through the city, with Cuomo saying “the NYPD and the mayor did not do their job last night.”

“You have 38,000 NYPD people, it is the largest police department in the United States of America,” Cuomo said. “Use 38,000 people and protect property. Use the police, protect property and people. Look at the videos, it was a disgrace.”

That provoked a furious response from de Blasio, who has been a regular critic of the NYPD, but came out in defense of New York’s Finest and took a direct shot at Cuomo.

“He dishonored the men and women of the NYPD in an absolutely inappropriate way for any leader to do,” de Blasio said on 1010 Wins talk radio Tuesday.

“Any elected official who blames the NYPD while they were out there fighting in the streets to restore order, protect people – that’s disgraceful.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Kennedy said that de Blasio ought to listen to his governor, arguing that it’s obvious that the National Guard is needed in New York City.

“All you’ve got to do is look at Fifth Avenue for God’s sake. I mean, it’s horrible, and lawful protesting is as American as baseball. Men and women have died to protect that right in this country on the battlefield and off. But, if you don’t know the difference between peacefully protesting and rioting, then you tested positive for stupid.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/john-kennedy-de-blasio-not-qualified-run-hot-dog-stand

Three former Minneapolis police officers were charged Wednesday with aiding and abetting murder in connection with the death of George Floyd in their custody, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison announced Wednesday.

Derek Chauvin, a fourth former officer who had already been charged with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter, will now also be charged with second-degree murder, Ellison said.

“We are here today because George Floyd is not here,” Ellison, a Democrat, said at a news conference in St. Paul, Minnesota, announcing the charges. Ellison predicted that the prosecution of the officers could take months, and urged the public to be patient as his office builds cases.

“George Floyd mattered. He was loved. His family was important. His life had value. And we will seek justice for him and for you,” Ellison said. He noted that winning the cases “will not be an easy thing. Winning a conviction will be hard.”

“In order to be thorough, this is going to take months, and I do not know how many,” Ellison, a former U.S. representative who was deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee from 2017 to 2018, said. “But it is better to make sure we have a solid case, fully investigated, researched, before we go to trial, than to rush it. It will take a while and I can’t set a deadline on that.”

Chauvin, who is white, was charged Friday with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter after video footage emerged showing him kneeling on Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes as Floyd, a black man, lay handcuffed, crying out that he could not breathe. 

At one point during the arrest Floyd also told the officers that “I’m about to die,” according to the charging documents filed Wednesday.

The three ex-cops who had not yet been charged, Tou Thao, J. Alexander Kueng and Thomas Lane, assisted Chauvin in arresting Floyd on Memorial Day on suspicion that Floyd passed a counterfeit bill. All four officers were fired last week. 

Drew Evans, superintendent of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, appeared alongside Ellison and said that one of the officers charged Wednesday was in custody, and the other two were expected to be taken into custody later in the day.

He did not specify which of the three was already in custody. Chauvin has been in custody since last week. 

The video shows that Chauvin continued to keep his knee of Floyd’s neck even after Floyd became unresponsive. 

Floyd’s death has sparked widespread protests against police violence in dozens of cities across the country, with demonstrators and Floyd’s family calling for charges to be brought against Thao, Kueng and Lane.

The family also has demanded that Chauvin, 44, face a first-degree murder charge.

Ellison said that he did not allow public pressure to influence his decision-making. 

“We made these decisions based on the facts that we have gathered,” he said. 

Ben Crump, an attorney for the family, said in a statement earlier in the day that the family’s reaction to the charges was that it was “a bittersweet moment.” 

“We are deeply gratified that @AGEllison took decisive action, arresting & charging ALL the officers involved in #GeorgeFloyd’s death & upgrading the charge against Derek Chauvin to felony second-degree murder,” Crump wrote in a post on Twitter. 

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/03/3-more-cops-charged-in-george-floyd-death-other-officers-murder-charge-upgraded.html

Subscribe to The Washington Post on YouTube: https://wapo.st/2QOdcqK

Follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/washingtonpost
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/washingtonp…
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/washingtonpost/

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6Rblcf4Nig

Facebook’s leadership must reconsider their policies regarding political speech, beginning by fact-checking politicians and explicitly labeling harmful posts.

As early employees on teams across the company, we authored the original Community Standards, contributed code to products that gave voice to people and public figures, and helped to create a company culture around connection and freedom of expression.

We grew up at Facebook, but it is no longer ours.

The Facebook we joined designed products to empower people and policies to protect them. The goal was to allow as much expression as possible unless it would explicitly do harm. We disagreed often, but we all understood that keeping people safe was the right thing to do. Now, it seems, that commitment has changed.

We no longer work at Facebook, but we do not disclaim it. We also no longer recognize it. We remain proud of what we built, grateful for the opportunity, and hopeful for the positive force it can become. But none of that means we have to be quiet. In fact, we have a responsibility to speak up.

Today, Facebook’s leadership interprets freedom of expression to mean that they should do nothing — or very nearly nothing — to interfere in political discourse. They have decided that elected officials should be held to a lower standard than those they govern. One set of rules for you, and another for any politician, from your local mayor to the President of the United States. This exposes two fundamental problems:

First, Facebook’s behavior doesn’t match the stated goal of avoiding any political censorship. Facebook already is acting, as Mark Zuckerberg put it on Friday, as the “arbiter of truth.” It monitors speech all the time when it adds warnings to links, downranks content to reduce its spread, and fact checks political speech from non-politicians.

This is a betrayal of the ideals Facebook claims. The company we joined valued giving individuals a voice as loud as their government’s — protecting the powerless rather than the powerful.

Facebook now turns that goal on its head. It claims that providing warnings about a politician’s speech is inappropriate, but removing content from citizens is acceptable, even if both are saying the same thing. That is not a noble stand for freedom. It is incoherent, and worse, it is cowardly. Facebook should be holding politicians to a higher standard than their constituents.

Second, since Facebook’s inception, researchers have learned a lot more about group psychology and the dynamics of mass persuasion. Thanks to work done by the Dangerous Speech Project and many others, we understand the power words have to increase the likelihood of violence. We know the speech of the powerful matters most of all. It establishes norms, creates a permission structure, and implicitly authorizes violence, all of which is made worse by algorithmic amplification. Facebook’s leadership has spoken with these experts, with advocates, and with organizers, yet they still seem committed to granting the powerful free rein.

So what do we make of this? If all speech by politicians is newsworthy and all newsworthy speech is inviolable, then there is no line the most powerful people in the world cannot cross on the largest platform in the world — or at least none that the platform is willing to enforce.

President Trump’s post on Friday not only threatens violence by the state against its citizens, it also sends a signal to millions who take cues from the President. Facebook’s policy allows that post to stand alone. In an age of live-streamed shootings, Facebook should know the danger of this better than most. Trump’s rhetoric, steeped in the history of American racism, targeted people whom Facebook would not allow to repeat his words back to him.

It is our shared heartbreak that motivates this letter. We are devastated to see something we built and something we believed would make the world a better place lose its way so profoundly. We understand it is hard to answer these questions at scale, but it was also hard to build the platform that created these problems. There is a responsibility to solve them, and solving hard problems is what Facebook is good at.

To current employees who are speaking up: we see you, we support you, and we want to help. We hope you will continue to ask yourselves the question that hangs on posters in each of Facebook’s offices: “What would you do if you weren’t afraid?”

To Mark: we know that you think deeply about these issues, but we also know that Facebook must work to regain the public’s trust. Facebook isn’t neutral, and it never has been. Making the world more open and connected, strengthening communities, giving everyone a voice — these are not neutral ideas. Fact-checking is not censorship. Labeling a call to violence is not authoritarianism. Please reconsider your position.

Proceed and be bold.

Sincerely, some of your earliest employees:

Meredith Chin, Adam Conner, Natalie Ponte, Jon Warman, Dave Willner, on behalf of Ezra Callahan, Chris Putnam, Bob Trahan, Natalie Trahan, Ben Blumenrose, Jocelyn Blumenrose, Bobby Goodlatte, Simon Axten, Brandee Barker, Doug Fraser, Krista Kobeski, Warren Hanes, Caitlin O’Farrell Gallagher, Jake Brill, Carolyn Abram, Jamie Patterson, Abdus-Salam DeVaul, Scott Fortin, Bobby Kellogg, Tanja Balde, Alex Vichinsky, Matt Fernandez, Elizabeth Linder, Mike Ferrier, Jamie Patterson, Brian Sutorius, Amy Karasavas, Kathleen Estreich, Claudia Park

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/technology/facebook-trump-employees-letter.html

Sen. John Kennedy on Wednesday called for answers about the FBI’s misconduct during its investigation of the alleged Trump campaign’s ties to Russian election interference.

“What we’re going to try to do with Mr. Rosenstein today is get straight to the answers,” Kennedy, R-La., told “America’s Newsroom.”

Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein testified Wednesday that he would not have signed a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant renewal for former Trump campaign aide Carter Page had he known about the since-revealed misconduct surrounding those warrants — while faulting the FBI for its handling of the documents.

“I’m a pretty simple guy, I like straight answers and breakfast food and what I want to know from the former deputy attorney general is, What happened? Why did it happen? What do you know? Why didn’t he know and what in God’s name are we going to do about it because all of these chuckleheads have really hurt the premier law enforcement institution in all of human history.”

“That is the FBI,” Kennedy added.

TRUMP SIGNS SOCIAL MEDIA EXECUTIVE ORDER THAT CALLS FOR REMOVAL OF LIABILITY PROTECTIONS OVER ‘CENSORING’

Rosenstein confirmed that he signed a FISA warrant renewal application for Page during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he was the first witness as part of the panel’s fresh investigation into the origins of the Russia probe.

“If you knew then what you know now, would you have signed the warrant application?” committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., asked Rosenstein.

“No, I would not,” Rosenstein said.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Rosenstein, in his opening statement, defended his own actions related to the FISA warrant, saying that “every application I approved appeared to be justified based on the facts it alleged.” Rosenstein implicitly pointed the finger at the FBI for since-revealed problems in that process.

“The FBI was supposed to be following protocols to ensure that every fact was verified,” Rosenstein said, going on to cite Justice Department inspector general findings last year revealing that the FBI actually “was not following the written protocols and that ‘significant errors’ appeared in applications filed in connection with the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/john-kennedy-rosenstein-hearing-fbi-chuckleheads

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany holds a press briefing.
» Subscribe to NBC News: http://nbcnews.to/SubscribeToNBC
» Watch more NBC video: http://bit.ly/MoreNBCNews

NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.

Connect with NBC News Online!
NBC News App: https://apps.nbcnews.com/mobile
Breaking News Alerts: https://link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/bre…
Visit NBCNews.Com: http://nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
Find NBC News on Facebook: http://nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
Follow NBC News on Twitter: http://nbcnews.to/FollowNBC
Follow NBC News on Instagram: http://nbcnews.to/InstaNBC

White House Holds Press Briefing | NBC News

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt_-knDgiy4

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Mark Esper told reporters at the Pentagon on Wednesday that he does not support invoking the Insurrection Act, a law from 1807 that would allow President Donald Trump to deploy active-duty U.S. troops to respond to civil unrest in cities across the country.

“I say this not only as Secretary of Defense, but also as a former soldier and a former member of the National Guard, the option to use active-duty forces in a law enforcement role should only be used as a matter of last resort, and only in the most urgent and dire situations. We are not in one of those situations now,” Esper said.

“I do not support invoking the Insurrection Act,” he added.

Meanwhile, NBC News, citing two White House officials, reported that Trump is backing off the idea of invoking the act, at least for now.

“It has always been an option and remains an option,” an official told NBC. This person said things have improved “because of the influx of National Guard and the president’s pressure on governors.”

But Esper’s remarks reportedly angered Trump and his aides at the White House, according to Bloomberg News.

The outlet, citing Trump aides, said the White House viewed Esper’s remarks as out of line. Bloomberg said the aides didn’t expect Trump to fire Esper.

A senior administration official later told NBC News that Esper’s comments “were not well received” inside the White House.

Esper was meeting with Trump on Wednesday afternoon in a previously scheduled sitdown. 

The protests, some of which have turned violent and led to looting, were triggered by the death last month of George Floyd, a black man. He died while a Minneapolis police officer, who has since been charged with murder, held his knee on Floyd’s neck for more than eight minutes. Floyd was unarmed. Protesters have been demanding that three officers who witnessed the death also be charged. All four officers involved have been fired.

Esper’s remarks come on the heels of his decision to fly 1,600 active-duty Army soldiers from Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Drum in New York to the Washington area. The troops, who are “postured” on military bases near the District of Columbia, have so far not taken part in any support to “civil authority operations,” the Pentagon said in a Tuesday night statement.

During a White House address Monday night, Trump stopped short of invoking the Insurrection Act but threatened to deploy active-duty U.S. military if states failed to quell demonstrations.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/03/esper-does-not-support-invoking-the-insurrection-act.html

Former President George W. Bush called Tuesday for peace and empathy following the “brutal suffocation” of George Floyd, an African-American man who died in police custody last week, and declared it was “time for America to examine our tragic failures.” 

In arare public statement, Bush said he and former first lady Laura Bush were “anguished” by Floyd’s death and “disturbed by the injustice and fear that suffocate our country.” 

Bush said they had “resisted the urge to speak out, because this is not the time for us to lecture. It is time for us to listen.” 

“It remains a shocking failure that many African-Americans, especially young African-American men, are harassed and threatened in their own country,” Bush said.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/06/03/george-floyd-george-w-bush-anguished-brutal-suffocation/3132800001/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/03/politics/donald-trump-bunker/index.html

“I do not consider the investigation to be corrupt, but I certainly understand the president’s frustration given the outcome,” Rosenstein told senators, referencing Mueller’s conclusions as part of his nearly two-year investigation.

In his opening statement, which was obtained by POLITICO in advance of his Senate testimony, Rosenstein said it was necessary to appoint a special counsel after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey because “I was concerned that the public would not have confidence in the investigation.”

He said Comey’s immediate replacement atop the FBI, Andrew McCabe, was “not the right person to lead” that probe. He later said McCabe was “not fully candid with me” and “certainly wasn’t forthcoming,” in particular because McCabe did not share with him Comey’s memos about his conversations with Trump for at least a week after becoming acting director.

“I decided that appointing a Special Counsel was the best way to complete the investigation appropriately and promote public confidence in its conclusions,” Rosenstein said.

The hearing is the first of what is likely to be several as part of the committee’s Republican-led investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation. Trump has cheered the probe, while Democrats have said it is an improper use of the Senate’s oversight authority — and one intended to boost the president’s re-election bid.

The former Justice Department No. 2 also defended his role as the supervisor of Mueller’s investigation, telling senators that he “established a supervisory chain of command” and that he and “highly qualified department attorneys” regularly met with Mueller’s team to review investigate recommendations and “to approve significant steps.”

His remarks are meant to reassure Republicans in particular, who have criticized the appointment of a special counsel in light of Mueller’s findings — namely, that he could not establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives.

Rosenstein also defended his role in efforts to seek surveillance warrants on Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser. Those applications, which were approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court, were the subject of an inspector general investigation which found that there were significant errors and omissions in the applications.

In his opening statement, Rosenstein laid the blame on the FBI, essentially asserting that he was duped.

“Every application that I approved appeared to be justified based on the facts it alleged, and the FBI was supposed to be following protocols to ensure that every fact was verified,” he said, later adding that he would not have signed the fourth and final application to surveil Page if he knew what he knows today.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the chairman of the committee, lambasted FBI leadership over the genesis and management of the probe into Russian election interference.

“There are millions of Americans pretty upset about this,” Graham said. “There are people on our side of the aisle who believe that this investigation, Crossfire Hurricane, was one of the most corrupt, biased criminal investigations in the history of the FBI, and we would like to see something done about it.”

“We’re going to be talking about how it got off the rails, who’s responsible for it getting off the rails, and making sure that they’re punished appropriately and the system is changed so that in the future no other candidate for president, no other sitting president has to go through this,” he added.

Graham zeroed in on the use of the Steele dossier — a series of reports from a former British intelligence officer that he produced while working for a firm contracting with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign — in an FBI application to surveil Page.

“What kind of country is this?” Graham asked. “What happens to people who do that?”

Graham also pressed Rosenstein on a memo he wrote in August 2017 detailing the scope of Mueller’s probe. When he wrote the memo, Rosenstein said, the department had “suspicions” about potential coordination between members of Trump World and the Kremlin. Mueller ultimately found no evidence of such coordination.

“There was no there there in August 2017,” Graham said, arguing that Mueller’s team defined the scope of their own investigation. “Do you agree with that general statement or not?”

“I agree with that general statement,” Rosenstein replied.

The hearing became heated at times, especially as Democrats dismissed the legitimacy of re-litigating the Russia investigation. Their dismissal of the committee’s GOP-helmed probe led Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to compare the actions of the Obama administration to those of Richard Nixon.

“By any measure, what the Obama-Biden administration did in 2016 and 2017 makes everything Richard Nixon even contemplated pale in comparison,” Cruz said, prompting a fiery response from Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who said Obama left the White House with “grace.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/03/rod-rosenstein-testimony-russia-probe-298253

Video of George Floyd’s last conscious moments horrified the nation, spurring protests that have led to curfews and National Guard interventions in many large cities.

But for the black community in Minneapolis — where Mr. Floyd died after an officer pressed a knee into his neck for 8 minutes 46 seconds — seeing the police use some measure of force is disturbingly common.

About 20 percent of Minneapolis’s population of 430,000 is black. But when the police get physical — with kicks, neck holds, punches, shoves, takedowns, Mace, Tasers or other forms of muscle — nearly 60 percent of the time the person subject to that force is black. And that is according to the city’s own figures.


Police shootings and use of force against black people in Minneapolis since 2015





Number of times police

used force against black

people per block

10

50

100

200

Thurman Blevins

June 2018

CAMDEN

NORTHEAST

Mario Benjamin

August 2019

NEAR NORTH

Jamar Clark

November 2015

UNIVERSITY

CENTRAL

Mississippi River

CALHOUN-ISLES

PHILLIPS

LONGFELLOW

Bde

Maka

Ska

POWDERHORN

Where officers

pinned George Floyd

Lake

Harriet

SOUTHWEST

Lake

Nokomis

NOKOMIS

Police shootings of black people

Share of population that is black

Fatal

Nonfatal

20%

40%

60%

Number of times police used force

against black people per block

10

50

100

200

Police shootings of black people

Fatal

Nonfatal

Thomas Blevins

June 2018

Mario Benjamin

August 2019

Jamar Clark

November 2015

Where officers

pinned George Floyd

Share of population that is black

20%

40%

60%

Number of times police used force

against black people per block

Police shootings of black people

Fatal

Nonfatal

10

50

100

200

Share of population that is black

Thurman Blevins

June 2018

20%

40%

60%

More than one-fourth of all uses of force were in the northwestern parts of the city.

CAMDEN

NORTHEAST

Mario Benjamin

August 2019

NEAR NORTH

Jamar Clark

November 2015

UNIVERSITY

The downtown area accounts for an additional one-third of uses of force.

CENTRAL

Mississippi River

CALHOUN-ISLES

PHILLIPS

LONGFELLOW

Bde Maka Ska

POWDERHORN

Where officers

pinned George Floyd

Lake Harriet

SOUTHWEST

Lake

Nokomis

NOKOMIS

Number of times police used force

against black people per block

Police shootings of black people

Fatal

Nonfatal

Share of population that is black

10

50

100

200

Thurman Blevins

June 2018

20%

40%

60%

More than one-fourth of all uses of force were in the northwestern parts of the city.

CAMDEN

NORTHEAST

Mario Benjamin

August 2019

NEAR NORTH

Jamar Clark

November 2015

UNIVERSITY

The downtown area accounts for an additional one-third of uses of force.

CENTRAL

Mississippi River

CALHOUN-ISLES

PHILLIPS

LONGFELLOW

Bde Maka Ska

POWDERHORN

Where officers

pinned George Floyd

Lake Harriet

SOUTHWEST

Lake

Nokomis

NOKOMIS

Community leaders say the frequency with which the police use force against black residents helps explain a fury in the city that goes beyond Mr. Floyd’s death, which the medical examiner ruled a homicide.

Since 2015, the Minneapolis police have documented using force about 11,500 times. For at least 6,650 acts of force, the subject of that force was black.

By comparison, the police have used force about 2,750 times against white people, who make up about 60 percent of the population.

All of that means that the police in Minneapolis used force against black people at a rate at least seven times that of white people during the past five years.

Those figures reflect the total number of acts of force used by the Minneapolis police since 2015. So if an officer slapped, punched and body-pinned one person during the same scuffle, that may be counted as three separate acts of force. There have been about 5,000 total episodes since 2015 in which the police used at least one act of force on someone.

The disparities in the use of force in Minneapolis parallel large racial gaps in vital measures in the city, like income, education and unemployment, said David Schultz, a professor at Hamline University in St. Paul who has studied local police tactics for two decades.

“It just mirrors the disparities of so many other things in which Minneapolis comes in very badly,” Mr. Schultz said.

When he taught a course years ago on potential liability officers face in the line of duty, Mr. Schultz said, he would describe Minneapolis as “a living laboratory on everything you shouldn’t do when it comes to police use of force.”


Police-reported uses of force in Minneapolis by year





3,000

Uses of

force in

2019

2,000

41%

All others

1,000

59%

Black

people

0

’10

’15

’19

3,000

Uses of

force in

2019

2,000

41%

All others

1,000

59%

Black

people

’10

’15

’19

Mr. Schultz credits the current police chief, Medaria Arradondo, for seeking improvements but said that in a lot of respects the department still operates like it did decades ago.

“We have a pattern that goes back at least a generation,” Mr. Schultz said.

The protests in Minneapolis have also been fueled by memories of several black men killed by police officers who either never faced charges or were acquitted. They include Jamar Clark, 24, shot in Minneapolis in 2015 after, prosecutors said, he tried to grab an officer’s gun; Thurman Blevins, 31, shot in Minneapolis in 2018 as he yelled, “Please don’t shoot me,” while he ran through an alley; and Philando Castile, 32, whose girlfriend live-streamed the aftermath of his 2016 shooting by police in the suburb of St. Anthony.

The officer seen in the video pressing a knee into Mr. Floyd’s neck, Derek Chauvin, was fired from the force and charged with manslaughter and third-degree murder. Minneapolis police officials did not respond to questions about the type of force he used.

The city’s use-of-force policy covers chokeholds, which apply direct pressure to the front of the neck, but those are considered deadly force to be used only in the most extreme circumstances. Neck restraints are also part of the policy, but those are explicitly defined only as putting direct pressure on the side of the neck — and not the trachea.

“Unconscious neck restraints,” in which an officer is trying to render someone unconscious, have been used 44 times in the past five years — 27 of those on black people.

For years, experts say, many police departments around the country have sought to move away from neck restraints and chokeholds that might constrict the airway as being just too risky.


Types of force used by Minneapolis police





TYPE OF FORCE

SHARE USED ON BLACK PEOPLE

TOTAL

Gunpoint display

68%

171

Chemical irritants

66%

1,748

Neck restraints

66%

258

Improvised weapon

64%

115

Dogs

61%

77

Body-weight pin

60%

3,630

Taser

60%

785

Takedowns, joint locks

59%

1,820

Restraint techniques

59%

127

Hitting

58%

2,159

Other methods

56%

110

SHARE USED ON

BLACK PEOPLE

TYPE OF FORCE

TOTAL

Gunpoint display

68%

171

Chemical irritants

66%

1,748

Neck restraints

66%

258

Improvised weapon

64%

115

Dogs

61%

77

Body-weight pin

60%

3,630

Taser

60%

785

Takedowns, joint locks

59%

1,820

Restraint techniques

59%

127

Hitting

58%

2,159

Other methods

56%

110

Dave Bicking, a former member of the Minneapolis civilian police review authority, said the tactic used on Mr. Floyd was not a neck restraint under city policy because it resulted in pressure to the front of Mr. Floyd’s neck.

If anything, he said, it was an unlawful type of body-weight pin, a category that is the most frequently deployed type of force in the city: Since 2015, body-weight pinning has been used about 2,200 times against black people, more than twice the number of times it was used against whites.

Mr. Bicking, a board member of Communities United Against Police Brutality, a Minnesota-based group, said that since 2012 more than 2,600 civilian complaints have been filed against Minneapolis police officers.

Other investigations have led to some officers’ being terminated or disciplined — like Mohamed Noor, the officer who killed an Australian woman in 2017 and was later fired and convicted of third-degree murder.

But, Mr. Bicking said, in only a dozen cases involving 15 officers has any discipline resulted from a civilian complaint alleging misconduct. The worst punishment, he said, was 40 hours of unpaid suspension.

“That’s a week’s unpaid vacation,” said Mr. Bicking, who contends that the city has abjectly failed to discipline wayward officers, which he said contributed to last week’s tragedy. He noted that the former officer now charged with Mr. Floyd’s murder had faced at least 17 complaints.

“If discipline had been consistent and appropriate, Derek Chauvin would have either been a much better officer, or would have been off the force,” he said. “If discipline had been done the way it should be done, there is virtually no chance George Floyd would be dead now.”

The city’s use-of-force numbers almost certainly understate the true number of times force is used on the streets, Mr. Bicking said. But he added that even the official reported data go a long way to explain the anger in Minneapolis.

“This has been years and years in the making,” he said. “George Floyd was just the spark.”

Fears that the Minneapolis police may have an uncontrollable problem appeared to prod state officials into action Tuesday. The governor, Tim Walz, a Democrat, said the State Department of Human Rights launched an investigation into whether the police department “engaged in systemic discriminatory practices towards people of color” over the past decade. One possible outcome: a court-enforced decree requiring major changes in how the force operates.

Announcing the inquiry, Governor Walz pledged to “use every tool at our disposal to deconstruct generations of systemic racism in our state.”

While some activists believe the Minneapolis department is one of the worst-behaving urban forces in the country, comparative national numbers on use of force are hard to come by.

According to Philip M. Stinson, a criminologist at Bowling Green State University, some of the most thorough U.S. data comes from a study by the Justice Department published in November 2015: The study found that 3.5 percent of black people said they had been subject to nonfatal force — or the threat of such force — during their most recent contact with the police, compared with 1.4 percent of white people.

Minneapolis police officials did not respond to questions about their data and use-of-force rates. In other places, studies have shown disparate treatment of black people, such as in searches during traffic stops. Some law enforcement officials have reasoned that since high-crime areas are often disproportionately populated by black residents, it is no surprise that black residents would be subject to more police encounters. (The same studies have also shown that black drivers, when searched, possessed contraband no more often than white drivers.)

The Minneapolis data shows that most use of force happens in areas where more black people live. Although crime rates are higher in those areas, black people are also subject to police force more often than white people in some mostly white and wealthy neighborhoods, though the total number of episodes in those areas is small.

Mr. Stinson, who is also a former police officer, said he believes that at some point during the arrest of Mr. Floyd, the restraint applied to him became “intentional premeditated murder.”

“In my experience, applying pressure to somebody’s neck in that fashion is always understood to be the application of deadly force,” Mr. Stinson said.

But equally revealing in the video, he said, was that other officers failed to intercede, despite knowing they were being filmed. He said that suggests the same thing that the use-of-force data also suggest: That police in the city “routinely beat the hell out of black men.”

“Whatever that officer was doing was condoned by his colleagues,” Mr. Stinson said. “They didn’t seem surprised by it at all. It was business as usual.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/03/us/minneapolis-police-use-of-force.html

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/02/politics/steve-king-iowa-primary-election/index.html

The head of a prominent New York City police union told “The Ingraham Angle” Tuesday that President Trump should consider sending federal personnel to prevent more rioting and looting in America’s biggest city.

“NYPD is losing the city of New York and we have no leadership in the city of New York right now, from City Hall to the brass of the NYPD,”  New York Sergeants Benevolent Association President Ed Mullins told Laura Ingraham. “The men and women are being pelted with rocks, bricks, cars [are] lit on fire. And this is continuous. We have a curfew that’s been implemented tonight at eight o’clock and everyone is still out rioting in the streets in New York.”

CUOMO CALLS NYC PROTESTS ‘COUNTERPRODUCTIVE’ TO SLOWING CORONAVIRUS SPREAD

“President Trump is watching it. I am asking the president to please, please immediately send federal personnel to New York City and monitor what is going on,” Mullins said. “If Governor Cuomo does not implement the National Guard immediately, then the federal government is going to have to step in.”

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio announced earlier Tuesday that an 8 p.m. curfew for the city will be extended through the end of the week following another night of looting, destruction and “vicious attacks on police officers.”

Mullins told Ingraham that the NYPD was “more than capable” of handling the unrest, but added that local leaders have held them back.

“Our hands are being tied,” Mullins said. “The rank and file members of all ranks have sent me numerous emails, letters, text messages, photos of New York City …  being destroyed. We have no leadership coming from City Hall. We are being told to stand down.”

“We have a city that is being destroyed. The public that lives there is in fear for their own lives,” Mullins said. “I’m receiving videos, photographs, license plates of looters from citizens of the city of New York while cops are being pelted.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Mullins said the commissioner and chiefs of the NYPD are too afraid to let their officers do their job.

“Mayor de Blasio is not allowing the NYPD to do their job,” Mullins said. “The commissioner, the chiefs of the NYPD are too afraid to let the men and women keep control of the city. History has shown that you must enforce the laws.”

Fox News’ Adam Shaw and Greg Norman contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/ed-mullins-nypd-losing-new-york-city

There are good ways — and there are less good ways — to be a white ally right now. Do take cues from black leaders and create space for their voices to be heard. Don’t think a performative emotional post on Instagram about your knowledge of racism does the trick. Do not center your feelings during this time of social unrest — an uprising that’s about racist violence against black Americans.

“Antiracism is about doing and not just knowing,” said Leslie Mac, an activist and a community organizer.

In light of the widespread protests against police brutality in recent days, there has been much conversation about what it means for white Americans to enact antiracism in their everyday lives — not just when there is unrest across the country. Because while the protests are directly tied to the killing of George Floyd, a 46-year-old black man, in Minneapolis on May 25, they are also an expression of widespread anguish within the black community. Centuries of inequality and racism have brought to bear acutely horrific consequences for black Americans in 2020. The global pandemic has disproportionately sickened and killed black people, and the accompanying economic crisis has done outsized damage to people of color. In recent weeks, multiple stories of black people killed by white violence and police have hit the news.

In turn, allyship and antiracism have become popular terms among white Americans wanting to help out. But what do they mean, and how does one really undertake them?

“Allyship is language, and being a co-conspirator is about doing the work,” said Ben O’Keefe, an activist and former senior aide to Sen. Elizabeth Warren. “It’s taking on the issue of racism and oppression as your own issue, even though you’ll never truly understand the damage that it does.”

I spoke with three activists about what it means to be an ally and what cues white Americans should be taking. Their thoughts, edited for length and clarity, are below:

Ben O’Keefe, former senior aide to Sen. Elizabeth Warren

One thing that’s really important here is that we define what we’re talking about when we discuss being an ally, because it’s a term that many supposedly woke white folks wear now like this badge of honor, but the term doesn’t really hold its weight always. We need people to be co-conspirators, and when I say that, I say that because allyship has become this emotional performance — well-intended as it may be, it’s still sort of a pontification of their allyship and their emotions and their sadness. It’s become performative.

Allyship is language, and being a co-conspirator is about doing the work. It’s taking on the issue of racism and oppression as your own issue, even though you’ll never truly understand the damage that it does.

There are a few important things to think about as we’re having that conversation. Don’t put your burden of your sadness or your fear onto your black friends or onto black leaders that you follow, because the truth is it’s not the job of black people to educate you or to make you comfortable. Antiracism isn’t comfortable, just like racism isn’t comfortable for black people and people of color.

Listen more than you speak. Do your research. Ignorance by very definition is a lack of knowledge, so the only way to break down ignorance and your ignorance and the ignorance of others is through education. It’s really important to learn the history of the struggle you’re putting yourself into, to learn about the systems of oppression that exist and how you’re complicit in them, and then, again, remember that it’s not our job to educate you. It’s not hard to educate yourself. You can literally google it.

Around the protests, how you show up is incredibly important. When white people show up to protests for the Movement for Black Lives, they are our guests. They are new for this. This might be exciting to them now, but this has been something that we have been living for generations and fighting for generations. So, you are showing up, and we’re happy to have you, you are our guests.

A white person’s job at a protest isn’t to spray paint “Black Lives Matter” on a building. It’s not to destroy stuff. It’s not to loot stores. Their job is not to mess with the cops and throw stuff. Their job at that protest, what they are there to do, is to do everything they can in their power to put their bodies between the bodies of black people and police. They should know if they’re there that they have the privilege of at least knowing that there will be more action taken if they die than if a black person does. Because not only is it disrespectful to disrupt our protests, but it actually is also doing direct harm to the black lives that these folks are supposed to be there to try to protect.

When you turn on cable news right now, what you hear is that black folks are burning buildings down and looting stores, all these terrible things. And we’re hearing the president say, if they loot, we shoot. And if you turn on Twitter for different stories, there’s an entirely different reality in which countless times it’s white people who are doing this provocation, who are escalating this, and it’s not them who are suffering the consequences, both physically there in person and with tear gas and pepper spray thrown in our faces, but also they’re not doing service to the narrative that we’re trying to build. They’re continuing to give fodder that will be used and is currently being used against black people.

If you show up to a protest, you’re there to be an ally, you can say. You are there to listen and to learn and to follow the leadership of the black folks, to follow the leadership of the marginalized.

If you could only see my DMs right now, they’re flooded with well-intended wishes of, “How are you doing?” But let me be clear, asking a black person how they’re doing right now is bullshit, because you know how they’re doing. We’re doing terrible. We’re struggling. If you’re struggling, we’re struggling more. And the performance of reaching out to show that you’re there doesn’t matter if the intention is the gratification that comes from it.

You can reach out and say, “Hey, I can’t imagine what you’re going through, I’m here if you need it.” Because instead what often we get is this emotional outreach of, “I’m so sad, I’ve been crying all day, I’m really struggling.” And it becomes this really selfish thing where it’s like, wow, if you, a white person, are sad and scared, ask how a black person feels. They’re going out knowing that they could die as they protest the death of another, and we’ve just seen that again, another black death, [David McAtee, a restaurant owner who was shot and killed in Louisville, Kentucky, on Sunday].

It’s very crucial that people respect the black folks around them and not look to the black folks in your life for condolence, for support. You’re not impressing us by doing the bare minimum. This is the way it should be. It’s not impressive that you care. You can check in and that’s fine, but there’s a way to do it, but it’s to acknowledge that you’re there and take the lead of that person on how they want to reach out to you.

One thing that I’ll add as we’re talking about allyship is that part of being an ally is taking a deep breath and getting past the shame and the guilt that you’re carrying, because white people who are alive today did not create racism. They didn’t choose to live in a white supremacist country, and they didn’t choose to exist in the world that we do today. But what they can do is choose to admit that they benefit from racism and acknowledge that they have the power to change the conditions, and that’s crucial, because this isn’t a blame game.

When we have frank conversations about black lives and the role that every white person plays in systemic oppression, it’s not an insult, it’s not an attack, it’s a reality. And so we can ignore reality or we can face reality, because only when we face that — only when we give ourselves permission to forgive ourselves, to look forward from this day forward for permission to become better partners and co-conspirators in the movement, permission to educate yourself, permission to grow — that is being a good ally. We don’t need you to carry the burden of your privilege. We need you acknowledge it and to use your privilege, promote good, and to fight oppression. And I feel like we’re dealing with this space in which so many people are just finally starting to realize something that so many of us have known for so long. I appreciate that, and I understand the pain and fear because I’ve been living it every day of my life. But we don’t have time for you to reconcile with your emotion.

This is time for you to forgive yourself, to acknowledge your complicity and to do something about it, to move on and to make good.

Leslie Mac, an activist and community organizer

Give your time, talent, and treasure to black-led organizations and black leaders that are doing front-line work in your area. I don’t even think it’s a matter of looking to other cities that might be more in the news — there are black people, black organizations, black organizers wherever you are that are doing the difficult work of fighting for black liberation and against state violence. You need to find out who’s doing that work where you are and figure out what they need and do your best to meet those needs.

Another thing that I would want white people to be doing right now in this moment is to get clear on what being an antiracist means, which is very different than conversations around learning about racism or understanding privilege. This is very specific to action and what changes you make in your life that affect your community in positive ways.

The biggest calls from organizers around the country right now is to defund the police, and so the things that white people can do with the powers that they hold — that their black counterparts do not — includes pressuring electeds around defunding the police. Get clear about where money is going in your community. Do you know how much money is going to police in your area? In the current budget? The one that is probably going to be passed very soon? And what cuts were made in order to make sure that that money wasn’t touched? Arts programs, schools, health care, social services — these are all the areas that every city has taken from in order not to touch the money that goes to policing.

We are in the midst of a global pandemic that is hitting black and brown communities worse than any others. And we’re watching tax dollars be used on the streets to brutalize people, money that was never employed to ensure the safety of people in the midst of this pandemic. I would challenge white people to lift that up — we just watched the government tell us they can’t do anything for us about Covid. They can’t help us economically in any significant ways, they can’t help us for health care, they can’t help us with our rent, mortgages, all of the things that people are struggling with right now. Unemployment is increasing. We have no personal protective equipment for our front-line health care workers and pretty much Avenger-level body armor for police officers to brutalize protesters.

Lastly, they should always center the voices and causes of black, indigenous, and people of color, both online and in their local communities, and amplify their stories and their demands to speak out. It’s also important to be cognizant of how detrimental it is when they lead with how they’re feeling in moments like this. It’s an easy thing to get sucked into, because white supremacy culture teaches white people that their feelings are the most important thing.

So it’s critical right now for them to rein themselves in. If they have feelings to share, they don’t spew that on social media, they definitely do not empty that into the mentions or texts or messages with people of color and black people in their lives. If they need to, they should be creating spaces for themselves to do that that don’t put that burden on those that are most directly affected by what’s happening right now.

Antiracism is about doing and not just knowing. I think that we have had a very long period of time — I would say from Trayvon Martin’s murder up until now — of a lot of white people getting very educated about white supremacy, about how systems function, but they have a position that knowledge is the end result, the goal. “Oh, I know about it, so I’m antiracist.”

But being an antiracist is an action, it’s a verb. It’s not something that you just learn and you stop, it’s about how you change your behavior every day, every week, every month, every year to move your community, your family, yourself toward a more just and equitable society.

Molly Sweeney, organizing director at 482 Forward, an education organizing network in Detroit

For me, being a white ally in this moment means a few things. I think No. 1, it means listening deeply to the needs and asks of leaders of color in your community. Two, it means committing yourself to this work and the work of undoing white supremacy within you and within the systems around you. And it means not dipping in and dipping out just because the moment feels urgent to you now. It means committing yourself to this work ongoing and showing up, not just in these moments that are on the news but day to day.

And I think the challenge for us white people right now is the constant challenge that we need to live with, which is reflection on how white supremacy is using us as tools in our family systems, in our communities, in our schools, in our police departments, and how we’re constantly asking ourselves what we can do as white people to break those systems down and to evolve and learn, how to be different in our white skin.

[As a white person,] I’ve described my journey as an antiracist as I’m a poisonous snake — not inherently bad, but I carry a poison that can kill, and I need to do everything in my power every day not to bite people of color, and I need to, just like a snake, shed my skin, not that I can get rid of my white skin but shed the embedded white supremacy that lives with me and in my community.

And that’s not easy work. It means changing everything about what we’ve always known.

Join your local antiracist group, like SURJ, Showing Up for Racial Justice. Seek out places where white people are doing work to unpack the way they show up in movements for racial justice. And funding — put your money where your mouth is. Fund movements that are led by people of color that are fighting racism and all the ways that it shows up in our society, in our schools. If you’re raising white kids, talk to them about race right now.

There are lots of small things people can do right now. But then there are bigger things. It’s really taking a look at your entire life. Are you talking to your uncles, aunts, your family about race? Are you asking questions about police departments in your town? Have you pulled the racial data? Are police wearing body cameras? Are they disproportionately pulling over black people? Organize parents at your schools to look at the curriculum and what’s being taught about the history of our country.


Support Vox’s explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2020/6/2/21278123/being-an-ally-racism-george-floyd-protests-white-people

Facebook Inc. Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg told staff at a companywide meeting that he won’t change his mind about a decision to leave up posts shared by President Trump last week that many workers believed violated the company’s policies against violent rhetoric.

At an all-hands meeting via video chat Tuesday, Zuckerberg took questions from employees, many of whom have publicly voiced dismay that the Trump posts, which seemed to threaten that looters would be shot, were still visible on Facebook’s service. Zuckerberg told workers that he and other members of the company’s policy team could not justify the post as clearly inciting violence, which means it didn’t break Facebook’s rules, according to two people who attended the meeting.

Zuckerberg added that Facebook is exploring whether the company should change the policy, or come up with other ways to flag violating posts besides taking them down entirely, one person said.

On Friday, the president had posted a message with the words “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” in response to protests over the death in police custody of George Floyd, an unarmed black man, in Minneapolis.

The same posts were also shared to rival social network Twitter Inc., which then added a warning and filter to the messages. A number of Facebook employees, including some senior figures, have criticized the company’s approach, challenging Zuckerberg’s decision to leave the posts up, and on Monday some workers participated in a virtual walkout in protest.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-06-02/mark-zuckerberg-defends-decision-on-trump-posts-to-facebook-employees

On Monday evening, over the course of 48 minutes, Donald Trump put on a show that may have changed America, yet again. It involved an overture to the nation, a physical attack on Americans and a Bible. It began suddenly, in the Rose Garden, with a statement about “law and order” and “dangerous thugs.” The president promised justice for the family of George Floyd, whose death in the custody of Minneapolis police last week triggered nationwide protests, looting and violence, and a roiling debate about who we are and what we hope to become.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2020/06/03/dc-protest-george-floyd-white-house/