Defense Secretary Mark Esper says he was given no notice before President Donald Trump led him and other senior administration officials to St. John’s Episcopal Church for a widely criticized photo opportunity.

“I thought I was going to do two things: to see some damage and to talk to the troops,” Esper said Tuesday night in an exclusive interview with NBC News.

Esper said he believed they were going to observe the vandalized bathroom in Lafayette Square, which is near the church.

“I didn’t know where I was going,” Esper said. “I wanted to see how much damage actually happened.”

A Pentagon spokesman later told NBC News that Esper was aware the church was one of the locations where he would be viewing damage. The spokesman reiterated that Esper didn’t know the president was going to use it as a photo opportunity.

Esper gave the interview a few hours after NBC News reported that he and Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were caught by surprise when Trump led them to the church for a staged visit.

Esper and Milley were among a group of White House officials and aides who followed Trump as he walked from the White House to the historic church after officers in riot gear cleared the area of peaceful protesters.

“Their understanding is they were going into Lafayette Park to review the efforts of the troops,” a defense official said.

Milley and Esper were on their way to the FBI’s Washington field office to monitor protests with Attorney General William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray when they were diverted to the White House to update the president. After the briefing, Trump delivered an address in the Rose Garden in which he threatened to deploy the military to quell the unrest over the police-involved death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

Trump ended the speech by saying he was going to pay his respects “to a very, very special place,” but he did not elaborate.

The official said Trump, who held up a Bible for a photo op outside the church, did not walk out of the White House with it, so they had no warning. Esper and Milley were also not aware that the officers used tear gas to force the protesters out of the area, the official said.

“They were not aware that Park Police and law enforcement made the decision to clear the square,” the official said.

In the interview Tuesday night, Esper said he had “no idea” about the plans to disperse the crowd. He added that he was eager to speak to members of the National Guard to thank them for their service.

“I am very proud of the National Guard,” Esper said.

He noted that the Guard members had been called in to help in the COVID-19 response and to prepare for hurricanes and then were asked to don riot gear days later.

“I wanted to go out and thank these young men and women,” Esper said.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Trump’s visit to St. John’s Church came a day after it was vandalized amid chaotic demonstrations triggered by Floyd’s death.

The photo op sparked outrage from lawmakers and religious leaders, including the Rt. Rev. Mariann Budde, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington.

Full coverage of George Floyd’s death and protests around the country

Budde said Trump’s staged visit to St. John’s “was an abuse of the spiritual tools and symbols of our traditions and of our sacred space.”

“He didn’t come to church to pray. He didn’t come to church to offer condolences to those who are grieving,” Budde said Tuesday in an interview with Craig Melvin on NBC’s “TODAY” show. “He didn’t come to commit to healing our nation, all the things that we would expect and long for from the highest leader in the land.”

Several former military officials criticized Milley for appearing on the streets of Washington in combat fatigues amid mass protests.

Sources told NBC News that Trump’s unannounced walk to the church “was his idea” because he “wanted the visual.” The president was frustrated by news reports that Secret Service officers ushered him to the White House bunker during Friday night’s unrest, the sources said.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-s-church-photo-op-took-defense-secretary-esper-gen-n1222391

Nearly 24 hours after law enforcement used force to push peaceful demonstrators away from the White House to make way for presidential photo op, the US Park Police offered a statement on its involvement — and it raises a lot more questions than it answers.

On Monday, Park Police — along with members of the US Secret Service and the National Guard — dispersed a large crowd of protesters using what reporters and other witnesses on the ground said was tear gas and rubber bullets, harming demonstrators and journalists alike.

Minutes later, President Donald Trump gave a brief speech in the White House Rose Garden then walked through an emptied Lafayette Square to a nearby church to take pictures with a Bible.

Video of the chaotic scene spread quickly on social media and news outlets, sparking outrage. On Tuesday afternoon, the US Park Police (USPP) responded to the criticisms.

“At approximately 6:33 pm, violent protestors on H Street NW began throwing projectiles including bricks, frozen water bottles and caustic liquids,” acting Chief Gregory Monahan said in the official statement. “Intelligence had revealed calls for violence against the police, and officers found caches of glass bottles, baseball bats and metal poles hidden along the street.”

“No tear gas was used by USPP officers or other assisting law enforcement partners to close the area at Lafayette Park,” he continued.

To be clear: Monahan is claiming the protesters amassed near the White House were “violent,” that they were perhaps plotting some kind of attack of their own, and that no federal officials whatsoever used tear gas to disperse the demonstration.

But the problem is all the available evidence, from numerous videos taken at the scene to reports from witnesses and journalists who were on the ground at the time, shows otherwise.

Why the Park Police’s statement is dubious

Let’s start with Monahan’s claim that the protesters were “violent” because they were throwing projectiles at law enforcement.

According to multiple reporters who were on the ground documenting the events, the protests were entirely peaceful. “We didn’t see projectiles thrown at police. Certainly no bricks or ‘caustic liquids,’” Alexander Marquardt, a CNN reporter who was at Lafayette Square that evening, tweeted on Tuesday.

In fact, in this Reuters video taken of nearly the entire scene, there are no violent instances of what the Park Police statement describes (other than some expletives and insults lobbed at law enforcement).

Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser also publicly stated that the demonstrators protested peacefully.

It’s unclear, then, what the Park Police is referencing. Perhaps it’s an exaggeration of what an unnamed Justice Department official told the Washington Post on Tuesday: that some crowd members passed rocks among themselves and threw a bottle in the direction of Attorney General Bill Barr. Barr, a top Trump ally, was surveying the scene and reportedly personally ordered law enforcement to push the protesters back.

There’s also no direct evidence that protesters were hiding caches of weapons — glass bottles, bats, and metal poles, according to the statement — to use against law enforcement. If there are images showing that such items were indeed found on the site of the demonstration, as the Park Police claim, they haven’t been shared with the public.

Finally, there’s the assertion that Park Police and other law enforcement personnel involved that evening didn’t use tear gas to clear the square.

This has become one of the most contentious points in the entire saga, even though Monahan acknowledges in the statement that the officers did use smoke canisters and pepper balls (pepper spray projectiles) against the protesters.

“Tear gas” is a broad term, often defined as a synthetic chemical irritant. Pepper spray is a naturally derived chemical irritant that causes many effects similar to that of common types of tear gas, including temporary blindness and a burning sensation in the nose. Which means that, even if tear gas was technically not used — a claim that isn’t settled fact for reasons I’ll get into in a minute — police still used a very similar chemical weapon against peaceful protesters.

Still, facts matter, so the question of whether they used tear gas or not is important.

Nathan Baca, a reporter for WUSA9 in Washington, DC, picked up a canister used during the Monday assault. It’s not a smoke canister, but it does launch “OC” gas which “Causes same tears, tight breath and comes out green,” he reported.

Other journalists who covered the protests in person that evening say without a doubt that law enforcement used tear gas, a chemical irritant that can cause those exposed to it to want to vomit.

And activists seen throughout the Reuters video also complain they were directly hit with tear gas.

Moreover, Washington Post reporters at the demonstration, including metro reporter Rebecca Tan, photographed National Guard members (though not Park Police officers) wearing gas masks, “moments before authorities started firing.” That certainly suggests they were preparing to deploy tear gas.

The Trump reelection campaign, though, is sticking with the Park Police, asking reporters — including me — to “retract and correct” published stories that say tear gas was used. (Vox is not retracting its reporting at this time.)

“It’s said that a lie can get halfway around the world before the truth can get its pants on. This tear gas lie is proof of that,” Tim Murtaugh, the Trump campaign’s communications director, said in a Tuesday evening statement.

The Park Police has a lot more explaining to do. Monahan’s statement by itself doesn’t clear up any of the main contention points. But what it does do is further confirm that Park Police felt it was necessary to respond to the protests with violence — all so Trump could have a photo op.

That, perhaps more than dubious claims in the official statement, is the most damning part of all.


Support Vox’s explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2020/6/2/21278559/tear-gas-white-house-protest-park-police

Rep. Steve King, shown here during a news conference in August 2019, faced criticism for his comments on abortion, including when he questioned whether there would be “any population of the world left” if not for births due to rape and incest.

Charlie Neibergall/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Charlie Neibergall/AP

Rep. Steve King, shown here during a news conference in August 2019, faced criticism for his comments on abortion, including when he questioned whether there would be “any population of the world left” if not for births due to rape and incest.

Charlie Neibergall/AP

After years of incendiary comments on race and other issues that lost him the support of many Republican Party leaders, conservative Iowa Rep. Steve King has lost his bid for reelection to a primary challenge by GOP state Sen. Randy Feenstra, The Associated Press projects.

“I am truly humbled by the outpouring of support over the past 17 months that made tonight possible and I thank Congressman King for his decades of public service,” Feenstra said in a statement. “As we turn to the general election, I will remain focused on my plans to deliver results for the families, farmers and communities of Iowa. But first, we must make sure this seat doesn’t land in the hands of Nancy Pelosi and her liberal allies in Congress. Tomorrow, we get back to work.”

First elected in 2002, King faced the toughest primary campaign of his career in Iowa’s 4th Congressional District, trailing in the polls with a limited cash supply and minimal advertising. He faced an onslaught of challengers feeding off of his vulnerability due to inflammatory rhetoric.

His primary opponents focused on an argument that King is unable to effectively represent the interests of his constituents since being stripped of House committee assignments last year, rather than focusing on his history of controversial statements.

Loading…

“The 4th District needs a seat at the table, an effective conservative voice,” stressed Feenstra in a May debate hosted by WHO-TV.

Feenstra represented the most likely threat to King’s reelection, raising $925,849 this cycle, compared to King’s $330,000, according to the Center For Responsive Politics.

Also challenging King were former Irwin Mayor Bret Richards, former state representative and Woodbury County supervisor Jeremy Taylor and real estate developer Steve Reeder. All had similar platforms: opposing abortion rights, securing the southern U.S. border and supporting gun owners’ views of the Second Amendment.

The writing may have been on the wall for King, who President Trump once dubbed “the world’s most conservative human being.” In his last general election, he scraped by with a margin of just 3% of the vote in his bright red district against Democrat J.D. Scholten, a paralegal and former minor league baseball pitcher.

Scholten’s progress at nearly flipping the northwest district, which is home to Sioux City and Ames, prompted this crowded Republican primary with challengers painting King, 71, as ineffective and offering themselves up as a viable conservative alternative without the reputation of being a toxic thorn in the GOP’s side.

Scholten is returning for a second swing at the seat this year and ended up without any competition in the Democratic primary.

Not only did Feenstra raise more than King in the first quarter, he also garnered the high-profile endorsements of former Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, the National Right to Life Committee and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The latter released an ad criticizing King for inaction.

“When we’ve needed him most, Steve King has let us down. He got kicked off the agriculture committee, hurting our farmers, and hasn’t written a single farming bill that passed Congress,” the ad proclaimed.

Many top Iowa Republicans have abandoned King this cycle, seeing it as an unnecessary risk to maintaining control of the district, with King’s controversial record considered a distraction to the conservative cause and a possible threat to the reelection Sen. Joni Ernst.

Last year, King wondered out loud to The New York Times why “white nationalist” and “white supremacist” are considered offensive terms. King was widely rebuked by party leadership and stripped from key committee assignments, including his place on the House Agriculture Committee, a panel of particular importance to his home state. King did support a House resolution condemning his comments that was passed nearly unanimously in 2019.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely wades into actions by House Republicans, released a statement at the time calling King’s statements “unworthy of his elected position.”

“If he doesn’t understand why ‘white supremacy’ is offensive, he should find another line of work,” McConnell wrote.

King issued a public statement shortly after the interview was published, defending himself by saying he wasn’t an advocate for white nationalism but rather supports “western civilization’s values.”

It hardly marked the first time his explosive comments made the news.

In 2008, he said terrorists would “be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than they did on September 11” if Barack Obama were elected president.

He’s also made incendiary comments on multiculturalism, immigration and abortion, falsely expressing skepticism that a woman could get pregnant as a result of rape or incest.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/06/03/865823546/iowa-rep-steve-king-ousted-in-gop-primary-ap-projects

Doctors and public health experts will tell you that, compared to white Americans, African American people die prematurely and disproportionately of many ills: heart disease, stroke, COVID-19, police violence.

The proximate causes of these early deaths vary. But there is a sameness to the pattern, experts say, and a common source of the skewed statistics.

Racism — not in its overt, name-calling form, but the kind woven deeply into the nation’s institutions — harms the 44 million Americans who identify as black and potentially shortens their lives, according to those who study racial inequities in health. For some, including Minnesotan George Floyd, it causes premature death in minutes. For others, a lifetime of disadvantage takes its toll in subtler ways.

“At the end of the day, racism is the original sin here,” said Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Assn. “Racism attacks people’s physical and mental health,” he said. It’s “an ongoing public health crisis that needs our attention now.”

And in the midst of a pandemic, Benjamin and others fear that as crowds fill the streets to protest yet another police killing of an unarmed black man, people of color will again bear the disproportionate brunt of renewed infections.

Sign up for the latest news, best stories and what they mean for you, plus answers to your questions.

It is an agonizing trade-off, they acknowledge. But it’s hardly a choice.

“I’ve spent the last several months of my life imploring and exhorting people to protect themselves, to reduce the spread of this virus and save lives,” said Dr. Clyde W. Yancy, a cardiologist at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine who is African American. But after Floyd’s death under the knee of Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, he said, “it dawned on me that my greatest risk is not COVID-19. It’s the color of my skin.”

Dr. Atheendar Venkataramani, an internist and health policy researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, has plumbed the power of despair to erode the health of specific American populations. He was part of a team that assessed changes in the mental health of Americans who lived in states where at least one unarmed black man had been killed by police.

In the three months following these deaths, the team found a measurable drop in mental health among black Americans — and the more deaths there were, the greater the effect. Mental health did not suffer in cases when police killed a black person with a weapon.

The mental health of white Americans was not associated with fatal police encounters involving either armed or unarmed black Americans. The findings were published in 2018 in the medical journal the Lancet.

“It’s not like we’re giving them a choice here,” Venkataramani said of the latest spasm of protests. The neglect of African Americans’ economic, social and health problems has been “so pernicious, so ingrained and so predictable,” he added, “how could you not be out there calling attention to these issues?”

In medical language, racism, including the kind baked into so many U.S. institutions, is a toxin. Just like polluted air, chronic stress and malnutrition — all of which often flow from racial injustice — its effect is corrosive.

An African American baby born in 2017 has a life expectancy that’s 3.5 years shorter than that of a white baby. If current inequities persist, the black baby will be nearly 2.5 times more likely to live in poverty, almost twice as likely to leave school before getting a high school diploma and more than six times as likely to be incarcerated than the white one.

Along the way, the average African American will live in poorer housing, have less access to healthy foods and be more exposed to environmental pollutants and violent crime than his or her white counterpart. He or she is more likely to suffer from obesity, asthma, diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure.

Despite this, studies show that many physicians discount the ills reported by African American patients, engendering a mistrust that often discourages them from seeking prompt medical care.

In recent months, inequities like these have contributed to starkly higher coronavirus casualties among African Americans than white Americans. An analysis of survey data from Johns Hopkins University found that coronavirus infection rates were three times higher in counties with predominantly black populations than in predominantly white ones, and COVID-19 death rates were six times higher.

In both California and New York, African American adults have been overrepresented among COVID-19 deaths by a factor of two. In Michigan, their share of COVID-19 deaths is three times greater than their share of the population.

Bridget Goosby, a University of Texas sociologist who studies health disparities, said the COVID-19 pandemic has left many African American communities in a particularly depleted state.

The “essential worker” designation of many low-wage jobs filled by people of color — delivery drivers, hospital workers, grocery store clerks — had set the stage for many to feel unfairly exposed to danger.

For many, that sense was deepened by stories like those of Deborah Gatewood, an African American phlebotomist in Detroit who died after the hospital where she had worked for 31 years denied her a coronavirus test four separate times, and of Brittany Bruner-Ringo, an African American nurse who was ordered to admit a visibly sick patient to an upscale dementia care center in Los Angeles and died of COVID-19 one month later.

It took months for many states to begin collecting data that confirmed a widely held suspicion: that the pandemic was taking a far heavier toll on blacks than on whites.

Then, in mid-May, data from New York City’s Police Department revealed that 93% of their arrests made to enforce social distancing rules were of black and Latinos. Meanwhile, armed white protesters calling for their states’ “liberation” were hailed by President Trump.

Amid so much loss of life, many of the places African Americans would normally turn to for comfort and strength — including churches and beauty shops — have been closed by the pandemic, Goosby said. Even extended families have been kept apart.

“There’s a collective grief,” she said. “And you’re already deprived of having this social net, of being able to grieve with people. You don’t feel like your grief is acknowledged, or that anything has changed.”

Into this tinderbox of pain, throw the match of Floyd’s graphically documented killing.

To anyone who has been paying attention, “nothing about this is surprising,” Goosby said.

In a recent essay in the Journal of the American Medical Assn., Yancy wrote that COVID-19’s heavy toll on African Americans had brought forth a long-awaited “moment of ethical reckoning.”

The United States “has needed a trigger to fully address healthcare disparities,” he wrote. “COVID-19 may be that bellwether event.”

Now the country’s ethical reckoning is more urgent than ever.

“How does a civil society — if indeed we are civil — respond not only to disproportionate suffering but also to a legacy of injustice?” Yancy said. “We will soon know the character of our populace.”

In spite of recent events, he insisted that he remains an optimist.

“One can only hope,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-06-02/cause-of-death-covid-19-police-violence-or-racism

One day after former President Barack Obama called on Americans to “a president, a Congress, a U.S. Justice Department, and a federal judiciary that actually recognize the ongoing, corrosive role that racism plays in our society and want to do something about it,” his predecessor, George W. Bush has weighed in on the death of George Floyd and racism in America with an open letter posted to social media.

“Laura and I are anguished by the brutal suffocation of George Floyd,” Bush began before saying he was reluctant to speak out.

“It remains a shocking failure that many African Americans, especially young African American men, are harassed and threatened in their own country,” continued the former president.

Bush then stated that protests are “a strength” of America, before offering criticism of those opposing them.

“Those who set out to silence those voices do not understand the meaning of America,” said the president, “or how it becomes a better place.”

“America’s greatest challenge,” Bush continued, “has long been to unite people of very different backgrounds into a single nation of justice and opportunity. The doctrine and habits of racial superiority, which once nearly split our country, still threaten our Union. The answers to American problems are found by living up to American ideals.”

Shortly after Bush posted the open letter, President Donald Trump pinned a post at the top of his Twitter feed that referenced former presidents. It read in part: “My Admin has done more for the Black Community than any President since Abraham Lincoln.”

Bush’s full statement is below.

Statement by President George W. Bush:

Laura and I are anguished by the brutal suffocation of George Floyd and disturbed by the injustice and fear that suffocate our country. Yet we have resisted the urge to speak out, because this is not the time for us to lecture. It is time for us to listen. It is time for America to examine our tragic failures — and as we do, we will also see some of our redeeming strengths.

It remains a shocking failure that many African Americans, especially young African American men, are harassed and threatened in their own country. It is a strength when protesters, protected by responsible law enforcement, march for a better future. This tragedy — in a long series of similar tragedies — raises a long overdue question: How do we end systemic racism in our society? The only way to see ourselves in a true light is to listen to the voices of so many who are hurting and grieving. Those who set out to silence those voices do not understand the meaning of America — or how it becomes a better place.

America’s greatest challenge has long been to unite people of very different backgrounds into a single nation of justice and opportunity. The doctrine and habits of racial superiority, which once nearly split our country, still threaten our Union. The answers to American problems are found by living up to American ideals — to the fundamental truth that all human beings are created equal and endowed by God withcertain rights. We have often underestimated how radical that quest really is, and how our cherished principles challenge systems of intended or assumed injustice. The heroes of America — from Frederick Douglass, to Harriet Tubman, to Abraham Lincoln, to Martin Luther King, Jr. — are heroes of unity. Their calling has never been for the fainthearted. They often revealed the nation’s disturbing bigotry and exploitation — stains on our character sometimes difficult for the American majority to examine. We can only see the reality of America’s need by seeing it through the eyes of the threatened, oppressed, and disenfranchised.

That is exactly where we now stand. Many doubt the justice of our country, and with good reason. Black people see the repeated violation of their rights without an urgent and adequate response from American institutions. We know that lasting justice will only come by peaceful means. Looting is not liberation, and destruction is not progress. But we also know that lasting peace in our communities requires truly equal justice. The rule of law ultimately depends on the fairness and legitimacy of the legal system. And achieving justice for all is the duty of all.

This will require a consistent, courageous, and creative effort. We serve our neighbors best when we try to understand their experience. We love our neighbors as ourselves when we treat them as equals, in both protection and compassion. There is a better way — the way of empathy, and shared commitment, and bold action, and a peace rooted in justice. I am confident that together, Americans will choose the better way.

Source Article from https://deadline.com/2020/06/george-w-bush-george-floyd-racism-shocking-failure-letter-1202949681/

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti (D), who has been the target of sharp criticism by activists for his handling of protests in the city against police brutality, knelt with protesters on Tuesday as demonstrators urged him to defund the city’s police department.

Garcetti knelt with the crowd at City Hall amid chants of “Defund the police!” Demonstrators separately gathered outside his home and urged him to defund the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD).

Protests have called for Garcetti to fire LAPD Police Chief Michel Moore, who provoked widespread backlash when he claimed the death of George Floyd in police custody was “on [looters’] hands as much as it is those officers.” Moore later apologized.

“A black face should not be a sentence to die, nor to be homeless, nor to be sick, nor to be under-employed, nor to be under-educated,” Garcetti said. “We need a country that listens.”

Demonstrators on Tuesday afternoon emphasized the need to keep the protests peaceful, with one man calling for protesters approaching a line of officers near one intersection to turn back, according to The Los Angeles Times. The vast majority of unrest, looting or property damage amid the protests has occurred after dark.

Garcetti was not present for the protests at his official residence, where actor Kendrick Sampson of HBO’s “Insecure” led a chant of “Whose streets? Our streets!”

“I don’t feel like the Mayor takes this as important as it should be,” John Sinclair of Los Angeles told the L.A. Daily News. “Police brutality is obviously a problem, they just need to see it as a problem.”

Protests have occurred in most major cities and all 50 states since Floyd’s death in Minneapolis last week. Floyd, a black man, died after officer Derek Chauvin knelt on the back of his neck for several minutes despite Floyd’s pleas that he could not breathe. Chauvin has been arrested on charges of third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/500835-los-angeles-mayor-kneels-with-protesters

Mr. King, 71, claimed during the campaign that Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the House Republican leader, had privately pledged to help him regain his committee assignments. But Mr. McCarthy denied having said any such thing, adding that if the Republican Steering Committee, which decides on committee roles, met again to weigh in on Mr. King, he would not win back his posts.

Even before facing Republican discipline in the House in January 2019 after the Times interview, Mr. King was in electoral trouble. He just barely won re-election in 2018 over Mr. Scholten, a former professional baseball player, by three percentage points — in a district Mr. Trump carried by nearly 30 points.

Just before the election, the head of the Republican House campaign arm, Representative Steve Stivers of Ohio, issued a highly unusual rebuke of Mr. King for his endorsement of the Toronto mayoral candidate, Faith Goldy, who has espoused white nationalism, and for comments seeming to embrace the “Great Replacement,” a far-right conspiracy theory. “We must stand up against white supremacy and hate in all forms, and I strongly condemn this behavior,” Mr. Stivers said at the time.

A paradox of Mr. King’s career is that, in his anti-immigrant language and policies, he was years ahead of Mr. Trump, who won the presidency by stirring fears about nonwhite immigrants.

Well before Mr. Trump promised to build a wall on the southwest border, Mr. King, who founded an earth-moving company, stood on the House floor and showed off a model of a 12-foot border wall of his own design.

Soon after Mr. Trump took office, he invited Mr. King — who even then was snubbed by establishment Republicans like the former House speaker John A. Boehner — to the Oval Office. The president boasted to Mr. King of having supported him, and raised money for him during an Iowa visit in 2014, Mr. King told The Times.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/us/politics/steve-king-iowa-primary.html

Protesters across the country have been demanding police reform since the death of George Floyd, who died after being restrained by Minneapolis police officers on Memorial Day.

John Minchillo/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

John Minchillo/AP

Protesters across the country have been demanding police reform since the death of George Floyd, who died after being restrained by Minneapolis police officers on Memorial Day.

John Minchillo/AP

Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan announced on Tuesday the state’s Department of Human Rights is launching an investigation into the Minneapolis Police Department’s practices and policies over the last decade.

The department filed a discrimination complaint against the police, which has come under fire since the death of George Floyd after then-Officer Derek Chauvin pressed his knee into the man’s neck for more than eight minutes.

Chauvin was subsequently fired and charged with third-degree murder and manslaughter.

At least three other officers participated in Floyd’s arrest and restraint, but they all ignored the 46-year-old’s pleas for help as he narrated his own death. None of the officers has been charged.

Floyd’s videotaped death has sparked widespread protests across the country with demonstrators calling for police reform among other social justice changes.

“This is not a friendly action, but this is the necessary action,” Flanagan told NPR.

She added the human rights department will “use their investigatory authority as a tool to support the city and their efforts to make deep, systematic change.”

Flanagan said change “is so deeply needed so that people can feel safe in their communities and know that they are protected by law enforcement instead of fearing law enforcement.”

“We’ve got a really incredible state — if you’re white. If you are a person of color, if you are indigenous, if you are an immigrant or refugee, the opposite is true. There are historical entrenched disparities in education and health care and housing and wealth and nearly every single aspect of life here.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/06/02/868404644/minnesota-files-discrimination-complaint-against-minneapolis-police-department

WASHINGTON — Republican senators struggled Tuesday to address President Donald Trump’s harsh response to peaceful protesters who gathered outside the White House on Monday night, with many dodging questions about whether the tactics were too much or amounted to an abuse of power that infringed on people’s First Amendment rights.

“I didn’t really see it,” said Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., when asked about the events of Monday night.

“I’m late for lunch,” said Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio.

“I don’t have a comment,” said Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan.

There were exceptions. Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., put out a written statement criticizing the president’s visit Monday to historic St. John’s Episcopal Church, saying he’s “against clearing out a peaceful protest for a photo up that treats the Word of God as a political prop.”

And at an event hosted by Politico on Tuesday morning, Tim Scott of South Carolina, the lone African American Republican in the Senate, said the president shouldn’t have aggressively cleared the protesters.

“But obviously, if your question is should you use tear gas to clear a path so the president can go have a photo op, the answer is no,” Scott said. But later in the day, when NBC News asked him about the president’s response, Scott said he had “said too much.”

And some senators offered full-throated defenses of the president, with Steve Daines, R-Mont., thanking the president for his leadership and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, denouncing protesters outside the White House as the people who were abusing power, not police.

But the scattered responses underscored just how difficult Trump’s actions are for Republicans seeking re-election in November. The approach of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., illustrated the dilemma they’re in: They can’t be seen on television criticizing the president for fear he’ll attack them, but they’re also struggling to defend him.

McConnell declined an opportunity to address Trump’s handling of the latest crisis, saying that he wouldn’t comment on whether the president was exhibiting the leadership the country needs and that he’s “not going to critique other people’s performances.”

He instead focused on trying to express empathy for peaceful protesters and leaders in his hometown, Louisville, where the death of Breonna Taylor in her home in March has also sparked grief and anger.

McConnell’s comments came after a weekly closed-door lunch for Senate Republicans at which Pat Roberts of Kansas said George Floyd, the black man who died in Minneapolis police custody last week, and the protests weren’t discussed. Instead, they spoke about pending nominations, the coronavirus pandemic and the Paycheck Protection Program.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, criticized the president, refusing to say whether she’d vote for him November “out of respect” for the deep political divisions roiling the country. She said she’s not sure whether her Republican colleagues are focusing on the pain the country is feeling right now.

“I’m not quite sure if we are focused on the right things right now,” Murkowski said, adding that the president isn’t delivering the leadership the country needs. “I think tone is really, really important right now. And I do not believe that the tone coming from the president right now is helping. It’s not helping me as a leader.”

The No. 2 Senate Republican, John Thune of South Dakota, said on “PBS NewsHour” that he hopes the president shows an “appreciation for the frustration, the anger, the anxiety that people are feeling” and “just being willing to listen.”

The president’s photo op in front of St. John’s Church, which was damaged in protests this week, was widely panned among Democrats and scorn by a few Republicans who subtly pointed out that a president who never goes to church and isn’t known to read the Bible brandished a Bible after protesters were moved violently.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who has an uphill battle for re-election in her swing state, said the president looked “unsympathetic” and “insensitive” in front of St. John’s, saying it’s a church she believes he has attended just one time.

“The president ought to be trying to calm a nation, pledge to right historic wrongs and be a steady influence. I don’t think he was last night,” Collins said, adding that it was “painful” to watch protesters being tear-gassed so the president could walk across the street.

Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., said it was odd for the president to wield a Bible the way he did. “I don’t think I’ve ever been to an event where I’ve stood outside a building and held up a Bible like that before, and I’m a person who reads the Bible every day,” he said.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

Criticizing the president often comes with huge risks for Republicans, who can see their voter bases of support slip away with a single critical tweet by the president. After a tumultuous six to nine months in 2017 when the president and the Republican Congress were in conflict, most Republicans resigned themselves to the fact that they would have to keep quiet or tread softly if they disagreed with the president.

And the formula has mostly been successful. Republicans have confirmed a record number of conservative judges and passed the largest tax cut in a generation.

But that strategy is being tested with a nation in the grips of several crises.

Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., a close ally of the president’s, demurred when asked whether Trump was doing a good job, but he said he’s “trying.”

It was hard to find a Republican supportive of the president’s threat to send in the armed military across the country. While Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., has been advocating for the move for days, most Republicans said states should be left in charge to address the looting.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who has announced that he will hold a hearing on police tactics in the Judiciary Committee, said: “Generally speaking, the military does not like getting in a position of having to police within the United States using force against fellow Americans. That should be the last resort, not the first resort.”

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-republicans-struggle-respond-trump-s-actions-protests-n1222726

Twenty-four hours after his chief of police, Michel Moore, ignited anger with comments equating looters with the officers in whose care George Floyd died, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti faced the media.

Earlier in the day, at a police commission public comment session, Chief Moore and Mayor Garcetti were excoriated by angry Angelenos, who called for both of them to resign.

Asked Tuesday evening if he still had confidence in Moore, Garcetti responded, “I’ve known this man’s heart for decades. When I heard him say what he said I knew that he did not mean it…It was wrong. I’m glad he quickly corrected it and further corrected it was well.”

The mayor said he would not be making any announcements on Tuesday but, if he thought Moore had meant what he said, Garcetti promised, “he would no longer be chief of police.”

“This is immensely difficult work,” said the mayor. “I want to thank the police officers who are out there on the line.”

As for his proposed city budget, which has come under fire after critics pointed out that a massive $1.8 billion is allocated to police, Garcetti said, “I hear what people are saying out there. The next couple days I hope to show what we can do to make sure…those things are reflected in our dollars.”

“Justice is never given, it is earned,” continued the mayor. “It falls on elected officials to not just speak, but to act.”

Garcetti said he had “hope” for Los Angeles. “I am so proud of this city,” he said. “We aren’t where we want to be, but we aren’t where we used to be…This is moment of hope and opportunity.”

“To African Americans in this city, I want to say, ‘I hear you,’” said the mayor. “I want to talk from my heart to, and about, black Angelenos…At the end of the day, this story is about the pain that they carry.”

“My simple pledge to you,” said Garcetti. “I look forward to the day when we get rid of the curfew, when we loose the helmets, when we get rid of the national guard.”

To get there, intoned the mayor, “We have two choices Los Angeles. We have hopelessness…or we have hope.”

Garcetti then called for a “Summer of peace this summer in Los Angeles.”

“Tomorrow the sun will rise above Los Angeles,” said the mayor. “I have a choice to make, and I choose to build.”

“Hopelessness is not an option.”

Earlier in the day, the mayor’s home in Hancock Park was the scene of a protest by hundreds of protesters holding signs demanding Moore’s ouster.

Garcetti joined protesters downtown and took a knee with them. “I felt a little couped up today, so I went outside.”

That came after the mayor didn’t show up to a live feedback session held by the police commission, at which Chief Moore was excoriated by angry L.A. residents. Residents who not only repeatedly called for the chief’s ouster, but called out Garcetti for his absence.

Erik Pederson contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://deadline.com/2020/06/garcetti-eric-mayor-los-angeles-michel-more-police-chief-1202949749/

But “it remains a shocking failure that many African Americans, especially young African American men, are harassed and threatened in their own country,” Bush said, as he argued that “the doctrine and habits of racial superiority, which once nearly split our country, still threaten our Union” today.

Bush expressed support for the protests that have sprung up all over the world. At times, the events have descended into violence, with some protesters setting fire to and looting businesses, while clashing with law enforcement officers who have fired tear gas and rubber bullets at demonstrators and members of the media covering the events.

The former president denounced the violence, asserting that “looting is not liberation, and destruction is not progress,” and that “lasting justice will only come by peaceful means.”

“We also know that lasting peace in our communities requires truly equal justice,” he added.

His comments stand in stark contrast to those of the current occupant of the White House.

President Donald Trump has faced criticism over the past few days for centering his public remarks on instances of violence and looting rather than addressing the root cause of the protests — disparities in law enforcement and inequities in the criminal justice system. On Monday, Trump urged state and local leaders to call in the National Guard to “dominate” protesters, and threatened to go over their heads and deploy the military to clamp down on the demonstrations if he deemed their efforts insufficient.

Unlike the current president, who has derided and dismissed protesters as “lowlifes,” “thugs” or anti-fascist operatives, Bush acknowledged the deeply rooted nature of protesters’ concerns, an injustice that he said would require “a consistent, courageous and creative effort” to rectify.

“This tragedy — in a long series of similar tragedies — raises a long overdue question: How do we end systemic racism in our society?” he said. Bush then appeared to take a veiled dig at Trump and the complaints leveled at him by critics. “The only way to see ourselves in a true light is to listen to the voices of so many who are hurting and grieving. Those who set out to silence those voices do not understand the meaning of America — or how it becomes a better place.”

“Many doubt the justice of our country, and with good reason,” he continued. “Black people see the repeated violation of their rights without an urgent and adequate response from American institutions.”

While Trump on Monday heralded the rule of law during a Rose Garden address announcing his threat to unleash the military on protesters, and dubbed himself “your president of law and order,” Bush on Tuesday noted that such a concept “ultimately depends on the fairness and legitimacy of the legal system.”

“There is a better way — the way of empathy, and shared commitment, and bold action, and a peace rooted in justice,” he said. “I am confident that together, Americans will choose the better way.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/02/george-w-bush-protest-297133

The seventh day of protests nationwide brought no rest for those demanding change, with thousands filling the streets from New York to Los Angeles. Kris Van Cleave has the latest.

Subscribe to the “CBS Evening News” Channel HERE: http://bit.ly/1S7Dhik
Watch Full Episodes of the “CBS Evening News” HERE: http://cbsn.ws/23XekKA
Watch the latest installment of “On the Road,” only on the “CBS Evening News,” HERE: http://cbsn.ws/23XwqMH
Follow “CBS Evening News” on Instagram: http://bit.ly/1T8icTO
Like “CBS Evening News” on Facebook HERE: http://on.fb.me/1KxYobb
Follow the “CBS Evening News” on Twitter HERE: http://bit.ly/1O3dTTe
Follow the “CBS Evening News” on Google+ HERE: http://bit.ly/1Qs0aam

Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8

Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! http://bit.ly/1OQA29B


The “CBS Evening News” premiered as a half-hour broadcast on Sept. 2, 1963. Check local listings for CBS Evening News broadcast times.

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8G2uv5kfe0

Chief Terence Monahan, the highest-ranking uniformed officer, told The New York Post on Tuesday that he was outraged by Governor Cuomo’s criticism and defended the department’s handling of the unrest.

“I’m watching my men and women out there dealing with stuff that no cop should ever have to deal with — bricks, bottles, rocks,” Chief Monahan said.

In the evening, a spokesman for the governor walked back parts of Mr. Cuomo’s remarks about the police, saying he respected the rank and file but questioned Mr. de Blasio’s management and deployment of the 36,000 officers. “Why isn’t at least half of the force on the streets protecting public safety with looting going on across the city?” the aide, Richard Azzopardi, said.

Some decisions departed from past practice, experts on crowd control said. The city did not deploy plainclothes anti-crime officers during the Manhattan demonstrations to spot people throwing bricks or committing other crimes, a city official said. Mounted units were not used for crowd control either, and the demonstrators were allowed to roam relatively freely rather than being channeled onto certain routes.

Some officers blamed the ensuing chaos on indecisive leadership. “It seems like we have lost control,” said one city detective, also speaking on the condition of anonymity. “It’s apparent that there’s no direction.”

Another detective, who, like his colleagues, spoke on the condition that he not be named, said he did not believe that orders had been issued for officers to refrain from confronting looters. But he said officers had been instructed to “keep yourself safe,” and may have waited in some cases to engage with looters.

“It’s dangerous, especially if you don’t have a lot of police in the immediate area,” he said.

Brian Higgins, an expert on crowd control who teaches at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, said the police department should not be playing catch-up with looters a week into the demonstrations.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/nyregion/nyc-looting-protests-nypd.html

Biden earlier Tuesday called the civil unrest across the nation a “wake-up call” for America. 

He also criticized Trump for the president’s response to the protests, which included threatening to send the military to cities and states that do not control unrest related to the protests.

“Look, the presidency is a big job. Nobody will get everything right. And I won’t either. But I promise you this. I won’t traffic in fear and division,” Biden said.

“I won’t fan the flames of hate. I will seek to heal the racial wounds that have long plagued this country — not use them for political gain.”

Crump and other lawyers for Floyd’s family on Monday called for Chauvin to be charged with first-degree murder on the heels of an independent autopsy that found that Floyd died from asphyxiation as a result of sustained pressure on his neck and back.

Antonio Romanucci, one of those lawyers, said the autopsy commissioned by the family also justifies criminal charges being filed against the other three officers, who “knew that they were applying restraints that could or would cause death.”

The Hennepin County, Minnesota, Medical Examiner’s Office later Monday released updated findings of its official autopsy, which like the independent autopsy ruled Floyd’s death a homicide, albeit with a different cause of death.

The ME’s office said that Floyd died from cardiopulmonary arrest complicated by police restraining him and compressing his neck.

The ME’s autopsy noted “other significant conditions” in Floyd, which included “arteriosclerotic and hypertensive heart disease; fentanyl intoxication; recent methamphetamine use.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/02/joe-biden-will-attend-george-floyd-funeral-lawyer-says.html

In an internal video call with Facebook employees on Tuesday viewed by Recode, CEO Mark Zuckerberg doubled down on his controversial decision to take no action on a post last week from President Donald Trump. In the post, Trump referred to the ongoing protests in the US against racism and police brutality and said, “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.”

Facebook’s handling of Trump’s post — which included language similar to what segregationists used when referring to black protesters in the civil rights era — has divided employees at Facebook and prompted them to openly criticize Zuckerberg in a way they never have before. Around 400 employees staged a virtual walkout of work on Monday, at least two employees have resigned in protest, others have threatened to resign, and several senior-level managers have publicly disagreed with Zuckerberg’s stance — calling for him to take down or otherwise moderate Trump’s post, as Facebook’s competitor Twitter already has.

This tension spilled over into the Tuesday Q&A meeting that around 25,000 employees tuned into — with several employees’ posing questions that were highly critical of the company’s actions and policies, and scrutinized whether the company is listening to racially diverse voices in its upper ranks.

“I knew that the stakes were very high on this, and knew a lot of people would be upset if we made the decision to leave it up,” Zuckerberg said on the call. He went on to say that after reviewing the implications of Trump’s statement, he decided that “the right action for where we are right now is to leave this up.”

Zuckerberg said that he did a thorough analysis of the history around the apparent reference in Trump’s post, which he called “troubling,” but ultimately did not find it to be an incitement of violence under Facebook’s policies.

“We basically concluded after the research and after everything I’ve read and all the different folks that I’ve talked to that the reference is clearly to aggressive policing — maybe excessive policing — but it has no history of being read as a dog whistle for vigilante supporters to take justice into their own hands,” Zuckerberg said on the call. He also said that, overall, Facebook still reserves the right to moderate Trump.

“This isn’t a case where [Trump] is allowed to say anything he wants, or that we let government officials or policy makers say anything they want.”

Facebook has largely avoided moderating Trump’s posts on its platform. In March, however, after Recode and other outlets reported on deceptive advertisements that made a Trump campaign questionnaire appear to be the official 2020 census, Facebook removed these ads from its platform.

After opening the call, Zuckerberg went on to take questions from a preselected list, with employees asking questions via videoconference. In one of several tense exchanges, an employee asked Zuckerberg to confirm how many black people were involved in Zuckerberg’s final decision not to take down Trump’s post. Zuckerberg’s answer: just one person (Facebook’s global diversity officer, Maxine Williams). Zuckerberg said only about six people were involved in the decision-making process, including Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg and policy VP Joel Kaplan, who has come under scrutiny for reportedly stymieing efforts to reduce polarization on the platform and openly supporting Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh during his controversial Senate hearings.

The employee pressed why Facebook’s head of integrity, Guy Rosen, who is tasked with overseeing efforts around general user safety on the platform, wasn’t in the final group of decision-makers.

In response, Zuckerberg appeared to stumble with his reasoning, first saying that he wasn’t sure if Rosen was a part of the final decision. He then saying that he wasn’t, but that ultimately Rosen is responsible for building and enforcing policies overall and not this particular decision.

“I don’t think it’s great that we’re not super clear on whether the VP of integrity was included on a matter of voter suppression and societal violence,” the employee said on the videoconference.

“How can we trust Facebook leadership if you show us a lack of transparency?” asked another employee.

When asked about the criticism Facebook faced in the meeting, a spokesperson for the company sent Recode the following statement:

“Open and honest discussion has always been a part of Facebook’s culture. Mark had an open discussion with employees today, as he has regularly over the years. He’s grateful for their feedback.”

In an acknowledgement of employees’ anger over the situation, Zuckerberg outlined several areas of self-designated improvement for Facebook on the call, including being more transparent around the decision-making process for moderating contentious posts.

Most notably, Zuckerberg said the company is considering adding labels to posts by world leaders that incite violence, instead of simply leaving them up or taking them down. He also said that since the US may be entering a “prolonged period of civil unrest,” they may change their policy on what kind of announcements government leaders can make about state violence, such as excessive use of police force.

While Zuckerberg was at times conciliatory, his tone was defensive of Facebook’s stance not to make what he views as knee-jerk decisions against content that people could find personally offensive. He said even if they do change their policies around moderating potentially violent political speech like Trump’s post, it would not happen overnight.

“These policies have to be developed,” Zuckerberg said. There’s “no way we can do something like that on the fly.”

That brings up the question of why Facebook isn’t more prepared to moderate political speech that pushes the boundaries of its platform’s rules on inciting and glorifying violence. Since the 2016 US presidential election, how Facebook moderates content has come under fire, and the company has promised to do better. Its long-awaited independent oversight board meant to review controversial cases like Trump’s post still hasn’t officially launched; meanwhile, the next US presidential election is less than six months away.

On the call, Zuckerberg acknowledged that this is only the beginning of employee discussion on the company’s handling of the very real controversies coming its way around race, politics, and police violence.

“I know we’re going to keep talking about this, some of the issues, they’re deep and they’re not going to go away any time soon,” Zuckerberg said.


Support Vox’s explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/2/21278405/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-internal-employee-q-a-defend-moderate-trump-looting-shooting-post

Los Angeles County extended its sweeping curfew for a third day on Tuesday as protests over police brutality and the death of George Floyd continued across Southern California.

The curfew will be in effect from 6 p.m. Tuesday until 6 a.m. Wednesday, officials said.

The order to keep people at home comes after the Los Angeles Police Department’s Hollywood Division made more arrests Monday than on any single day in history in response to protests that devolved into a series of looting incidents, mostly in Van Nuys and Hollywood.

Officers took at least 585 people into custody Monday. Most arrests were for curfew violations, but officers detained 20 people on suspicion of looting and impounded 50 vehicles, a law enforcement source told The Times on Tuesday.

Authorities had taken approximately 2,500 people into custody between Friday and Tuesday morning after a mix of peaceful protests and property destruction rocked downtown, the Fairfax District, Van Nuys and Hollywood, according to LAPD Chief Michel Moore.

“Each day has seen the continuation of peaceful protests, but we have seen instances of burglaries and looting of businesses in various parts of the city,” Moore said. “For the first time in decades, every sworn member of the Los Angeles Police Department is working. Days off have been canceled.”

Booking records reviewed by The Times show the vast majority of those arrested in L.A. County on looting, vandalism and burglary charges are county residents, seeming to refute perceptions of “outside agitators” coming in to fuel unrest.

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia blamed looting and nearly 100 small fires in his city on organized criminals unaffiliated with peaceful protests.

“It’s pretty clear, given the type of activity and how organized the activity was, there is a strategy going city to city and doing this criminal work,” Garcia said this week. The damage to small business owners, he said, was unacceptable.

Demonstrations large and small continued Tuesday throughout California as protests ignited by Floyd’s death showed no signs of slowing.

An independent autopsy commissioned by Floyd’s family this week found he died of asphyxiation caused by neck and back compression after a Minneapolis police officer pinned him to the ground with a knee on the handcuffed man’s neck for several minutes.

Hundreds of protesters, many holding signs, gathered at Hollywood Boulevard and Vine Street late Tuesday morning. After a few minutes, the group began walking through the streets of Hollywood, where they approached a line of several dozen officers holding batons. The officers blocked the crowd’s advance.

“Let us walk,” the crowd yelled. Chants of “I can’t breathe” and “No justice, no peace” echoed throughout.

Aijshia Moody, 30, was among the crowd, holding a cardboard sign that read, “Am I next?” Her brother is 14 years old and has often dealt with racial profiling in Pacoima where they live, she said.

“He can’t even get on his skateboard,” she said, adding that she’s dealt with racism throughout her life. “That’s why I’m here.”

Walking alongside the crush of protesters, community organizer Pete White briefly stopped in front of a Chase bank branch to snap a photo of a scrawled message: “Chase yo dreams.” Nearby, Kendrick Lamar’s “Alright” and N.W.A’s “F— tha Police” blasted from a speaker.

“State violence brings me out here today,” said White, who turned 49 Tuesday.

“We see the signs that say ‘Justice for George Floyd,’ but also, when you see the kaleidoscope of faces, it’s justice for immigrants, it’s justice in thinking that housing is a human right,” said White, a South L.A. resident and founder of the Los Angeles Community Action Network.

There is no peace without justice, he added.

“How do you get justice? By making sure you defund the police and take all of those resources and put it in schooling, put it in services, in housing, in universal healthcare,” White said. “We’re saying we don’t need another commission, another study or implicit bias training. We’ve been there and the same thing keeps happening. Again and again.”

In addition to the countywide curfew, three cities in L.A. County have opted to extend their own curfews through at least Wednesday morning.

Beverly Hills will be under curfew from 1 p.m. Tuesday till 5:30 a.m. Wednesday. Police will be “actively patrolling” the city, including residential areas, officials said.

“I know we are all feeling a great sense of uncertainty tonight,” Beverly Hills Mayor Lester Friedman wrote in a statement. “We are grateful to the National Guard and our mutual aid partners from several neighboring agencies for helping us to keep our community safe.”

In Torrance, officials have imposed a curfew from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. daily for as long as L.A. County is under a state of emergency. Los Angeles city officials and Gov. Gavin Newsom declared the emergency shortly before midnight Sunday after protests in the Fairfax District turned violent and widespread looting erupted.

In Santa Monica, where several businesses were vandalized and looted on Sunday, a curfew went into effect at 2 p.m. Tuesday and will last till 5:30 a.m. Wednesday.

Santa Monica police made 41 arrests Monday after taking 438 people into custody Sunday. The city also recorded 347 damage reports, including 84 for graffiti, with the majority affecting retail businesses. More than 150 buildings sustained significant damage, city officials said Tuesday.

“If you were out around our city Monday morning, as I was, you know our streets were full of residents with brooms and sweepers. Volunteers cleaned graffiti off walls. The resilient spirit of our city was evident everywhere. Even after the shocking events of Sunday, it is again great to be a Santa Monican,” Mayor Kevin McKeown said.

Under the curfews, people are prohibited from being on streets and sidewalks or in parks and other public spaces. The restrictions do not apply to law enforcement, first responders, people traveling to and from work, or individuals seeking medical care. While the county curfew applies to all cities and unincorporated areas, individual cities can impose stricter limits.

After peaceful protests across the region, the situation escalated in Hollywood and Van Nuys on Monday evening when numerous stores were looted.

Newsom implored Californians to show empathy to one another in his first news conference since he deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles early Sunday, marking the third time in more than half a century that troops had responded to unrest in the city over violence against a black person in police custody.

“You’ve lost patience. So have I. You are right to feel wronged. You are right to feel the way you are feeling,” Newsom said to protesters, adding: “Society has a responsibility to you to be better, and to do better.”

Just after 1 p.m. in Hollywood, dozens of activists chanted, “Take a knee” at members of the National Guard. After several minutes, at least two Guardsmen complied.

The crowd cheered.

Other protesters encountered a line of police officers and began chanting, “Walk with us,” and “Let us walk.” The group was trying to reach another crowd of demonstrators farther up Hollywood Boulevard, past Cherokee Avenue.

The marchers were met with a line of at least 20 LAPD officers who wouldn’t let them pass. As the group neared the line, their hands up, police began raising their batons to hold them back.

One protester placed a white flower in an officer’s pocket. The officer threw it to the ground.

A segment of the protest hit a snag later Tuesday afternoon as part of the crowd that had gathered near Ivar Avenue and Hollywood Boulevard surrounded police.

The confrontation came after law enforcement received a radio call about armed looters, authorities said. Protesters began throwing bottles and sticks in response to a growing police presence. Officers then fired rubber bullets.

As police pushed the crowd down Ivar, they confronted two women in a red pickup. The driver did not want to stop or put her keys on the dashboard as police tried to pass by, officers said. She was quickly detained.

“We don’t need a confrontation,” one officer later said into megaphone. “Leave the area.”

“Get out of the street, you can continue with your peaceful protest,” he continued.

Another officer, who declined to give his name, acknowledged that the protest had mostly been peaceful.

“Just a few people who ruin it for everybody else,” he said.

Heaven Bouldin had been demonstrating for several hours as curfew neared.

At 25, she said, she has been protesting for 10 years.

“I’m tired, I’m tired, I’m tired,” she said, holding a sign that read, “Stop killing black people.”

“My people have been getting killed for the last 200 years. We’re in 2020 and we still can’t bring an end to this,” she said. “Somebody has to do something.”

On North Cahuenga Boulevard in Hollywood, police were standing in a line blocking the road as a crowd chanted and screamed at them. One woman shouted: “All of you … are found guilty. You violent criminals. All of this because y’all don’t want to stop killing black people. You treacherous snakes!”

One officer, using a megaphone, approached the protesters to announce that they were standing in a line to protect businesses that had been looted.

“We understand why you’re here,” the officer said before assuming his position in the line again.

When the crowd began chanting, “Take a knee! Take a knee!” at the officers, the woman screamed, “We will not take a knee!” and charged toward officers, the yellow caution tape stopping her. “Back up sis!” A young woman told her.

The woman explained, emotionally, why they should not ask the officers for a knee. “I’ve been doing this longer than you’ve been alive,” she said. “Y’all are stupid…. They already took a knee … and they took a life. This don’t look like that to you?” she said, taking a knee herself and raising her fist in the air. “Y’all are … ignorant. This ain’t a time to take a knee.”

The crowd stopped the chant, then started a new one: “Say his name! George Floyd!”

The afternoon was filled with similar moments. Protesters were angry and faced officers and National Guard members throughout Hollywood, but the demonstrations remained largely peaceful.

On Sunset and Vine, two large groups of protesters cheered on each side of Sunset as they joined together, blocking the intersection. Honks and the revving of engines were incessant, and hip hop and rap music sounded throughout the intersection.

Times staff writers Richard Winton, James Queally, Matthew Ormseth, Laura J. Nelson, Gustavo Arellano, Seema Mehta, Taryn Luna, Luke Money, Alene Tchekmedyian, Julia Wick, Jaclyn Cosgrove and Anita Chabria contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-06-02/more-looting-more-arrests-amid-peaceful-protests-in-l-a

Authorities clear Lafayette Park in Washington, D.C., on Monday, while across the street at the White House, President Trump said he would send the military to U.S. cities if local officials don’t end unrest.

Alex Brandon/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Alex Brandon/AP

Authorities clear Lafayette Park in Washington, D.C., on Monday, while across the street at the White House, President Trump said he would send the military to U.S. cities if local officials don’t end unrest.

Alex Brandon/AP

Democratic leaders in Congress inveighed Tuesday against what they described as a push by President Trump to use the U.S. military for cracking down on nationwide protests triggered by George Floyd’s death last week in Minneapolis while he was in police custody.

“Violence has no place and violence must be addressed,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told NPR’s All Things Considered. “But there is no reason for the U.S. military to be called out for this.”

Pelosi was referring to a threat Trump made Monday evening in the Rose Garden at the White House.

“If a city or a state refuses to take the actions that are necessary to defend the life and property of their residents,” Trump declared in a brief statement, “then I will deploy the United States military and quickly solve the problem for them.”

As the president spoke, federal officers in riot gear near the White House launched tear gas and pepper spray at peaceful protesters. Shortly thereafter, Trump strode through a park cleared of the demonstrators to pose with a Bible in front of St. John’s Church, leading a group of officials that included Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“Walking like lapdogs behind a five-time draft dodging coward who is more interested in looking like a leader than actually being one,” Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., who lost both legs in combat as a military helicopter pilot in Iraq, said of Esper and Milley, “sends a horrifying message to our troops — including our black and brown troops — that our military’s leaders will not protect them from unlawful orders.”

In a statement on Twitter, Duckworth added, “We cannot allow any Commander in Chief to put our Armed Forces’ reputation as the last institution Americans can trust and respect at risk by using them unlawfully and putting them in a position of exacerbating the divisions driving our union apart. … Threatening military force and imprisonment against Americans exercising their Constitutional rights is not Presidential, it’s tin-pot dictatorial.”

But Trump does appear to have the power unilaterally to dispatch active-duty soldiers to trouble spots in the United States.

The 1807 Insurrection Act authorizes a U.S. president to deploy military forces for domestic emergencies. The law was updated in 2006 to include natural disasters and terrorist attacks as grounds for sending federal troops to restore order.

While condemning looting and vandalism that rocked Providence, R.I., on Monday evening, U.S. Sen. Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat, called Trump’s threats to use military force against American citizens “irresponsible and destablizing.”

“The job of bringing calm will take law enforcement and the community working together,” Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in an emailed statement Tuesday. “It will not come from recklessly invoking the Insurrection Act.”

The Democratic chairman of the House Armed Services Committee told reporters Tuesday he plans to convene an in-person congressional hearing next week to press the Pentagon’s top two officials on Trump’s possible invocation of the Insurrection Act.

“We need to hear from Chairman Milley and Secretary Esper as to exactly how they intend to use the U.S. military trying to deal with this domestic crisis,” U.S. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., said on a video conference call. “If the president is basically threatening to use the U.S. military to go in and enforce the law in U.S. cities, that runs the risk of an extreme escalation in violence and of a hugely disruptive practice.”

Asked about Milley wearing camouflage fatigues in public Monday night, Smith said the nation’s highest military officer may have misread the message being sent.

“The optics of him being in uniform out there might not have been so bad if we didn’t have the president out there talking about going to war with the country and using the military and using overwhelming force,” Smith said of Milley.

In a conference call Monday, Trump told the nation’s governors that Milley was “a fighter, a war hero, a lot of victories and no losses and he hates to see the way it’s being handled in the various states, and I just put him in charge.”

Milley, whom Trump said was on the call, said nothing.

But a senior Pentagon official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said later that the Insurrection Act had not been invoked by Trump and insisted that Milley’s role and authorities have not changed.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/06/02/868338367/dont-send-u-s-military-to-protests-hill-democrats-warn-trump