The 27 European Union governments have reached a breakthrough agreement over new fiscal stimulus, following marathon talks in Brussels that lasted four days.

The European Commission, the executive arm of the EU, has been tasked with tapping financial markets to raise an unprecedented 750 billion euros ($857 billion). The funds will be distributed among the countries and sectors most impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, and will take the form of grants and loans. 

European Council President Charles Michel said early Tuesday that he believes this deal will be seen as a “pivotal moment” for Europe.

“Europe, as a whole, has now a big chance to come out stronger from the crisis,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also said.

The heads of state had been locked in talks since Friday morning to discuss the proposed fund and the EU’s next budget. However, deep differences on how to divide the amount between grants and loans, how to oversee its investment and how to link it with the EU’s democratic values prolonged the talks into one of the longest EU summits in history.

In the end, they agreed to distribute 390 billion euros, out of the total 750 billion fund, in the form of grants — a significant reduction from an initial proposal made by France and Germany in May for 500 billion euros of grants. The EU also agreed that net debt issuance will end in 2026 and that they will repay all the new debt by 2058.

In the meantime, member states will also have to develop plans outlining how they will invest the new funds. These so-called Reform and Recovery plans will have to be approved by their European counterparts, by qualified majority — rather than by unanimity as had been insisted upon by the Netherlands at one point. 

In addition to the recovery fund, the EU said its next budget, which will fund initiatives between 2021 and 2027, will total 1.074 trillion euros. The two combined bring upcoming investments to the level of 1.824 trillion euros.

“This recovery fund will help us to almost double the European budget for the years to come,” French President Emmanuel Macron said Tuesday morning.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/21/eu-leaders-reach-a-breakthrough-on-the-regions-recovery-fund.html

WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice on Tuesday accused two Chinese nationals, who it said were working on behalf of the Chinese government, of stealing trade secrets and hacking into computer systems of firms working on the Covid-19 vaccine.

According to the 11-count indictment, Li Xiaoyu, 34, and Dong Jiazhi, 33, conducted a global hacking campaign for more than a decade. The indictment alleges that the defendants were able to successfully steal terabytes of data from the United States as well as Australia, Belgium, Germany, Japan, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Spain, South Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom. 

The DOJ said in a statement that high-tech manufacturing processes, gaming software, solar energy engineering, pharmaceuticals and defense industries were among those targeted in the hack.

A California technology and defense company, a Maryland technology and manufacturing company, the Department of Energy’s Hanford site in Washington, a Texas engineering firm, a Virginia defense contractor, a Massachusetts software firm, a California gaming software company and several U.S. drugmakers were among the 13 U.S. businesses that were targeted, the DOJ said.

“In at least one instance, the hackers sought to extort cryptocurrency from a victim entity, by threatening to release the victim’s stolen source code on the Internet. More recently, the defendants probed for vulnerabilities in computer networks of companies developing Covid-19 vaccines, testing technology, and treatments,” the DOJ statement said.

The news comes amid a global race to create a vaccine for the coronavirus, which originated in China late last year before spreading across the globe, infecting millions. More than 140,000 people have died from the virus in the United States, according to a tally from Johns Hopkins University.

“China has now taken its place, alongside Russia, Iran and North Korea, in that shameful club of nations that provide a safe haven for cybercriminals in exchange for those criminals being ‘on-call’ to work for the benefit of the state, here to feed the Chinese Communist party’s insatiable hunger for American and other non-Chinese companies’ hard-earned intellectual property, including Covid-19 research,” John Demers, assistant attorney general for national security, said Tuesday.

In order to conceal their efforts, the DOJ alleges, the hackers packaged victim data in encrypted Roshal Archive compressed files; changed the names of the files, victim documents and system time stamps; and concealed programs and documents. The defendants revictimized companies, government entities, and organizations from which they had previously stolen data.

The defendants are each charged with:

  • one count of conspiracy to commit computer fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison,
  • one count of conspiracy to commit theft of trade secrets, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison,
  • one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison,
  • one count of unauthorized access of a computer, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, and
  • seven counts of aggravated identity theft, which each carries a mandatory sentence of two non-consecutive years in prison.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The latest revelation comes on the heels of a string of speeches made by Trump administration officials blasting China’s use of espionage and cyberattacks to steal intellectual property from American businesses. In blistering remarks earlier this month, FBI Director Chris Wray said Chinese tactics have created “one of the largest transfers of wealth in human history.”

U.S. officials have long complained that Chinese intellectual property theft has cost the economy billions of dollars in revenue and thousands of jobs and that it threatens national security. Beijing maintains that it does not engage in intellectual property theft.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/21/us-charges-chinese-nationals-for-coronavirus-vaccine-hacking-scheme-other-crimes.html

WASHINGTON – Missouri Governor Mike Parson, a Republican, downplayed the risk for children who may contract the coronavirus from classrooms during school reopenings, insisting “they’re going to get over it.” 

“These kids have got to get back to school,” Parson said in an interview Friday with radio host Marc Cox on KFTK. “They’re at the lowest risk possible. And if they do get COVID-19, which they will — and they will when they go to school — they’re not going to the hospitals. They’re not going to have to sit in doctor’s offices. They’re going to go home and they’re going to get over it.” 

“We gotta move on,” he continued. “We can’t just let this thing stop us in our tracks.”

More:‘Science should not stand in the way’ of schools reopening, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany says

His comments come during a nationwide debate over school reopenings as the pandemic continues to rage across the United States. 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/07/20/missouri-gov-mike-parson-says-kids-get-over-covid-19/5474557002/

The United States is failing to report vital information on Covid-19 that could help track the spread of the disease and prevent the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans, according to the first comprehensive review of the nation’s coronavirus data.

The report, Tracking Covid-19 in the United States, paints a bleak picture of the country’s response to the disease. Five months into the pandemic, the essential intelligence that would allow public health authorities to get to grips with the virus is still not being compiled in usable form.

That includes critical data on testing, contact tracing, new cases and deaths.

What the authors call “life-and-death information” is being pulled together haphazardly by individual states in a way that is “inconsistent, incomplete and inaccessible in most locations”. Without such intelligence the country is effectively walking blind, with very little chance of getting “our children to school in the fall, ourselves back to work, our economy restarted, and preventing tens of thousands of deaths”.

The review has been carried out by Resolve to Save Lives, a part of the global health group Vital Strategies. It is led by Tom Frieden, the former director of the main US public health agency, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Frieden lays the blame for the parlous and deadly state of data-keeping squarely on Donald Trump. Presenting the report, he said that the chaotic picture was the product of “the failure of national leadership. The US is flying blind in our effort to curb the spread of Covid-19.”

He added that the “lack of common standards, definitions, and accountability reflects the absence of national strategy, plan, leadership, communication or organization and results in a cacophony of confusing data”.

Resolve to Save Lives collaborated with leading US health organisations, including the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the American Public Health Association, to produce a checklist of 15 essential data points in the fight against Covid-19. Among the categories that must be recorded if the disease is to be contained are real-time reporting of people presenting with Covid-like symptoms, new confirmed cases, hospitalisations, deaths and contact tracing.

What the authors discovered makes shocking reading, even for a country that has repeatedly generated grim headlines since the pandemic began. Across all states, only 40% of the essential data points are being monitored and reported to the public.

More than half of the critical information is still going entirely unreported – depriving political leaders of the weapons they need to fight the virus. In the case of 11 out of the 15 essential data points, not a single state was reporting them correctly; and in a further nine of the categories more than half of the states are failing to report any information on them at all.

Most alarming is contact tracing, a technique for isolating infected individuals that most experts agree is central to any attempt to control the pandemic. The report found that the information shared on contact tracing was “abysmal”, with not a single state reporting the turnaround time for diagnostic test results and only two states recording how long it took contact tracers to interview people who tested positive to identify others they may have infected.

The lack of a federal strategy to fight Covid-19 has been evident in the US from early on. The authors point out that many countries such as Germany, Senegal and South Korea have introduced national Covid-19 dashboards that standardize data and make it easy for health experts to track and combat the virus.

By contrast, Trump has encouraged the proliferation of chaos and confusion at state level by barring aggressive federal action. Since the first case of coronavirus was reported in Washington state on 20 January, the US president has used his considerable powers to undermine a science and data-driven fight against the disease.

He has frequently predicted the virus would “disappear” of its own accord, most recently in his Fox News Sunday interview with Chris Wallace this weekend.



Medical technicians perform Covid-19 tests in Austin last week. Critical data on testing is still not being compiled in a usable form. Photograph: Bob Daemmrich/Zuma Wire/Rex/Shutterstock

Under his anti-scientific approach, Trump has tried to block new funding for the CDC and for coronavirus testing which he claims falsely is responsible for the huge increase in cases across many states. He has also presided over a smear campaign against Anthony Fauci, the top infectious diseases expert in the US.

By consistently resisting an aggressive federal attack on the virus, and offloading responsibility – and he hopes, political accountability – for the unfolding calamity on to the states, Trump has created the conditions for the current surge of infection across huge swaths of the country.

The impact in terms of lives lost or disrupted is plainly cast in the latest atrocious figures that show the number of confirmed cases at 3.8m nationwide and rising in 40 out of 50 states. More than 140,000 Americans have died so far – almost twice the number recorded by the next most affected country, Brazil.

Ultimately, the lack of consistent nationwide intelligence matters for two reasons – it makes the job of isolating and controlling the disease more difficult, and it leaves the public clueless as to the severity of the threat that surrounds them. Two groups of citizens are put especially at risk as a result of the dearth of data – older people in nursing homes and African Americans.

The report notes that a third of states are still not reporting any data on outbreaks of Covid-19 in facilities with contained populations such as nursing homes, homeless shelters, and prisons and jails. That poses a major risk to life as more than 40% of deaths in the US have been in long-term care facilities including nursing homes.

States are also failing to report real-time data on the demographic breakdown of the disease, notably for race and ethnicity. Black Americans have borne the brunt of the pandemic, dying at almost three times the rate of white Americans.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/21/coronavirus-data-flying-blind-trump-us-failure

Image copyright
Getty Images

President Donald Trump has threatened to send more federal law enforcement officers to major US cities to control ongoing protests.

Mr Trump on Monday criticised a number of cities run by “liberal Democrats”, including Chicago and New York, saying their leaders were afraid to act.

He said officers sent to Oregon had done a “fantastic job” restoring order amid days of protests in Portland.

Democrats accuse Mr Trump of trying to rally his Conservative base.

President Trump, a Republican, has been trailing in opinion polls behind his Democratic rival, Joe Biden, ahead of November’s election.

Last month, Mr Trump declared himself the “president of law and order” in the wake of widespread protests over the death in police custody of African-American man George Floyd.

What has Trump said?

Speaking at the White House on Monday, Mr Trump reiterated his call for law and order.

Media captionPortland protests: Calls for federal troops to leave US city

“We’re sending law enforcement,” he told reporters. “We can’t let this happen to the cities.”

He specifically named New York City, Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, Baltimore and Oakland in discussing problems with violence.

“We’re not going to let this happen in our country, all run by liberal Democrats.”

Mr Trump also praised the controversial federal law enforcement efforts in Portland. The city has seen protests against police brutality since George Floyd’s death in Minnesota in May.

What’s the background?

Mr Trump deployed the personnel to the US west coast city two weeks ago to quell civil unrest.

Some officers have used unmarked cars and worn military-style camouflage on the streets, sparking condemnation from Democrats and activists.

Local officials say the federal officers are making matters worse and have called for them to leave.

State leaders have also demanded that Mr Trump remove the personnel from Portland, accusing him of escalating the situation as a political stunt in an election year.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

A group of mothers stood between protesters and federal officers in Portland

But Mr Trump said Oregon’s governor, Portland’s mayor and other state lawmakers were scared of the “anarchists”.

“They’re afraid of these people,” he said. “That’s the reason they don’t want us to help them.”

He added: “[Federal officers] have been there three days and they really have done a fantastic job in a very short period of time, no problem. They grab a lot of people and jail the leaders. These are anarchists.”

Where are the officers from?

The officers are part of a new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) unit made up of people from the US Marshals Service and Customs and Border Protection.

They have been deployed under an executive order protecting statues, signed by Mr Trump last month. That order allows federal officers to be deployed without the permission of individual US states.

DHS is also planning to deploy some 150 agents to Chicago this week, the Chicago Tribune reported on Monday. The agents will reportedly assist other federal law enforcement officers and Chicago police in fighting crime.

The president has long accused Chicago’s leaders of failing to control violent crime in the Illinois city, where just last weekend police said 64 people were shot, 11 fatally.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot had earlier said she was concerned about Mr Trump deploying federal officers to the city. She said she had spoken with Portland’s mayor on Sunday “to get a sense of what’s happened there”.

“We don’t need federal agents without any insignia taking people off the streets and holding them, I think, unlawfully,” Ms Lightfoot said.

Oregon’s attorney general has filed a lawsuit against the federal government for allegedly unlawfully detaining protesters and violating their constitutional rights of assembly and due process.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53481383

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – European Union leaders clinched an “historic” deal on a massive stimulus plan for their coronavirus-throttled economies in the early hours of Tuesday, after a fractious summit lasting almost five days.

The agreement paves the way for the European Commission, the EU’s executive, to raise billions of euros on capital markets on behalf of all 27 states, an unprecedented act of solidarity in almost seven decades of European integration.

Summit chairman Charles Michel called the accord, reached at a 5.15 a.m. (0315 GMT), “a pivotal moment” for Europe.

Many had warned that a failed summit amid the coronavirus pandemic would have put the bloc’s viability in serious doubt after years of economic crisis and Britain’s recent departure.

Stock markets across the European Union opened higher on Tuesday and the euro touched a four-month high of $1.1470.

“This agreement sends a concrete signal that Europe is a force for action,” a jubilant Michel told reporters.

French President Emmanuel Macron, who spearheaded a push for the deal with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, hailed it as “truly historic”.

Leaders hope the 750 billion euro ($857.33 billion) recovery fund and its related 1.1 trillion euro 2021-2017 budget will help repair the continent’s deepest recession since World War Two after the coronavirus outbreak shut down economies.

While strong in symbolism, the deal came at the cost of cuts to proposed investment in climate-friendly funds and did not set conditions for disbursements to countries, such as Hungary and Poland, seen as breaching democratic values.

In an unwieldy club of 27, each with veto power, the summit also exposed faultlines across the bloc that are likely to hinder future decision-making on money as richer northern countries resisted helping out the poorer south.

The Netherlands led a group of “frugal” states with Austria, Sweden, Denmark and Finland, insisting that aid to Italy, Spain and other Mediterranean countries that took the brunt of the pandemic should be mainly in loans, not in non-repayable grants.

“There were a few clashes, but that’s all part of the game,” said Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, describing a “warm” relationship with his Italian counterpart, Giuseppe Conte.

But Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said the frugals’ negotiating power was here to stay, suggesting Europe’s traditional Franco-German engine will be challenged.

ALMOST A SUMMIT RECORD

Frictions peaked on Sunday night as Macron lost his temper with the frugals, diplomats said, and Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki branded them “stingy, egotistic states”.

The bickering spun the summit out, making it the EU’s second-ever longest, just 20 minutes short of a record set in 2000 in Nice, according to Rutte. “We would have broken the record at 6:05, but we ended at 5.45,” he said.

Under the compromise, the Commission will borrow 750 billion euros using its triple-A debt rating, disbursing 390 billion in grants – less than the originally targeted 500 billion – and 360 billion in cheap loans.

Given the difficulties, talk of Europe’s ‘Hamilton’ moment – hailed as such by German Finance Minister Olaf Scholz on Monday in reference to Alexander Hamilton’s decision to federalise debts of U.S. states in 1790 – is overblown.

The summit deal does not set the EU on the path towards a U.S.-style fiscal union, although some see it as a first step.

Rutte’s negotiations won an “emergency brake” to temporarily stop transfers of money from the recovery fund if an EU state was seen as not meeting reform conditions tied to the money.

Slideshow (4 Images)

The frugals also secured larger rebates from the next EU budget, a payback mechanism first won by Britain in the 1980s and which France had hoped to phase out after Brexit.

The recovery plan now faces a potentially difficult passage through the European Parliament and it must be ratified by all EU states. The first money will likely not reach the real economy before the middle of next year, economists say.

Additional reporting by Reuters bureaux, Writing by John Chalmers and Robin Emmott; Editing by Michael Perry, Jon Boyle and Nick Macfie

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-summit/eu-reaches-deal-on-post-pandemic-recovery-after-marathon-summit-idUSKCN24M0DF

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is throwing a big wrench into negotiations between the White House and Senate Republicans over the next coronavirus relief bill by demanding a payroll tax cut be included and funding for testing be reduced or cut completely.

Leaving meetings on Capitol Hill Monday night, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said that the payroll tax cut is in the yet-to-be released bill despite Republican senators saying they don’t think it’s good policy.

“Not a fan of that, I’ve made that pretty clear,” Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the second-ranking Republican in the Senate, said of the payroll tax cut proposal. “I don’t think it’s something that changes anyone’s behavior and has trust fund implications. I just think there are better ways to do it.”

Republicans are trying to get on the same page before they start negotiating with Democrats before they leave for a month-long August recess.

Republican senators also denounced any attempt by the White House to cut funding for coronavirus testing.

“My view is, we should do whatever we need to do to make sure we have adequate tests,” Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, chairman of the Health Committee, said. “All roads to open school, opening, going back to work, child care, lead through testing.

Mnuchin said that funding for schools is coming in at more than $70 billion and that might be allocated for schools that reopen.

McConnell on the Senate floor called his not-yet-finalized proposal “a good starting place” and said it could be released “as soon as this week.”

Mnuchin and Meadows met with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy at the White House earlier Monday. They met with Alexander and Sens. Roy Blunt of Missouri and Richard Shelby of Alabama Monday evening on a variety of proposals — specifically a way forward on school funding.

The White House negotiators will be back on the Hill on Tuesday to brief all Senate Republicans as well as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer on the other side of the Capitol.

Here’s where negotiations stand as of Monday night:

Payroll tax cut: Trump and the administration will have a lot of convincing to do among skeptical Senate Republicans who are less than committal to the idea of a payroll tax cut.

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas called it “problematic,” while Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa said “It might create political problems but it creates a public relations problem.”

But White House officials assured reporters in the Capitol that the proposal is already in the bill.

“That plans to be in it… I mean, that’s part of the proposal,” Meadows stressed. “It’s in the bill,” Mnuchin said.

Thune gave the proposal a reality check: “I would say that it is a big priority, as you know, for the President. And so his advocates Mnuchin and Meadows and others, I think, will probably try and ensure that it’s at least included in the first draft. Put it that way,” Thune said, laughing.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told NBC News he does support the tax cut being “means-tested.” Asked what other senators in his conference support it, Graham laughed and said “Good question.”

Funds for testing: Senate Republicans are pushing back on the administration’s idea to cut funding for coronavirus testing.

“Well, I think that’s a that’s going to be a priority for our members, for sure,” Thune said. Alexander told reporters “I believe that we should fund testing as generously as it needs to be funded.”

Blunt, who has been working with Alexander to increase testing capabilities, told reporters “I just think that’s wrong” to cut funding, citing a new rapid test the National Institutes of Health is working on that will need increased funding in the next bill. “It’s going to take more money to quickly focus in on those tests and have them ready, by the time, hopefully, by the time school starts,” he said.

Meanwhile, Meadows told reporters “How would they even know what funding for testing is?” when told Republican senators want to increase funds.

More money for reopening schools: After meeting with Alexander, Blunt and Shelby, Mnuchin told NBC News “Schools was a very big component” of their discussion but that he was “not going to talk about specifics, but it is a lot of money,” Asked how much funding will be included in the bill, Mnuchin said upwards of $70 billion “would be a good guess.”

Alexander and Blunt said they believe funding for testing is directly correlated to reopening schools.

Trump threatened earlier to withhold funds for schools if they didn’t reopen. Asked if funding for schools should be conditioned on reopening, Alexander did not answer. Blunt told reporters he doesn’t want to penalize schools that choose not to reopen, but thinks that schools that do open back up will need more funding.

Meadows told reporters “We’ll be briefing you all tomorrow” when asked if money will be conditioned on schools reopening.

Increased unemployment benefits: Republicans aren’t a fan of extending the $600 per week increased unemployment payments and neither is the administration, but Democrats are pushing for it.

“Obviously it will be a negotiation between the Republicans, Democrats and the White House,” Thune said. “ I can’t imagine a scenario where extending it at the current level would happen.”

Stimulus checks: Republicans are torn over more direct payments, but the administration wants it.

“Nothing is final. But I suspect that there will, there’s a high level of interest in doing something more to help people, particularly on the lower end of the income scale,” Thune said. “But I think the last version of this cost somewhere on the order of $300 billion, and there’ll be a plug in there to help people and whether that’s payroll tax, or, you know, the direct checks, checks, or what form that takes, I’m not sure.”

Grassley favors stimulus checks over payroll tax cuts.

“I think once a person has a check in his hand, x number of dollars will be $1,200 or $1,000, I don’t know. But I think that’s going to do more economic good than if we dribble out $30 every paycheck,” he said. “Because people are going to notice and take some action as a result. So I hope all of this is being done in regard to the economic necessity.”

Liability protections: Legal protections for schools, colleges, charities, businesses and frontline health care workers and employers who follow public health guidelines will all but certainly be included in the Republican plan.

“We don’t need an epidemic of lawsuits on the heels of a pandemic,” McConnell said Monday.morning.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/trump-throws-wrench-coronavirus-bill-negotiations-senate-republicans-n1234433

President Trump on Monday tweeted a photo of himself in a face mask and said it was patriotic to wear one amid the coronavirus pandemic.

“We are United in our effort to defeat the Invisible China Virus, and many people say that it is Patriotic to wear a face mask when you can’t socially distance. There is nobody more Patriotic than me, your favorite President!” Trump tweeted.

The message follows months of Trump avoiding being seen in public wearing a mask, as he touted a message of reopening the economy following business closures in March and April.

Senior Republicans recently have urged more people to wear masks, arguing it can allow businesses to reopen safely and curb a rise in infections across the South and the Southwest.

The image of Trump appears to be from a visit to the Walter Reed military hospital near Washington this month. Trump won rave reviews on social media for his appearance in a dark blue mask with a presidential seal in gold.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2020/07/20/trump-tweets-patriotic-photo-of-himself-wearing-a-mask/

Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf slammed Portland’s mayor and his “completely irresponsible” comment that members of his department and other federal agents are “sharply escalating the situation” in the city.

“The facts don’t lie and the facts are that these violent anarchists and extremists were violent well before DHS surged federal assets into Portland,” Wolf told “Fox & Friends” on Monday, the morning after the 53rd consecutive night of protests in Oregon’s largest city.

Over the weekend rioters broke into the Portland Police Association building and set it on fire, as demonstrations over the death of George Floyd intensified for another night, according to Portland Police.

President Trump has denounced the violent demonstrations in Portland and the Trump administration has enlisted federal agents, including the U.S. Marshals Special Operations Group, to protect federal property.

The unrest had frustrated Mayor Ted Wheeler, a Democrat, and other local officials who had said a small group of violent activists was drowning out the message of peaceful protesters. Wheeler also said the presence of federal law enforcement in Portland was exacerbating the situation.

Wheeler said Friday, “Keep your troops in your own buildings, or have them leave our city.”

“The words and actions from President Trump and the Department of Homeland Security have shown that this is an attack on our democracy,” Wheeler added.

Speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, Wheeler doubled down on his statements.

“The president has a complete misunderstanding of cause and effect,” Wheeler said. “What’s happening here is we have dozens, if not hundreds of federal troops descending upon our city and what they’re doing is they are sharply escalating the situation. Their presence here is actually leading to more violence and more vandalism.”

“We haven’t asked them here. In fact we want them to leave,” he added, calling the intervention, which he said is “a blatant abuse of police tactics by the federal government” and the Trump administration, “a direct threat to our democracy.”

Wheeler went on to say, “We’re all telling the Trump administration to stop the rhetoric, take these people out of our city, they are not helping us, they are hurting us.”

HUCKABEE SLAMS OREGON GOVERNOR

In response, Wolf said, “I believe it’s a completely irresponsible comment.”

“What we know is, before July Fourth, where we saw an escalation of violence in Portland, before that time there was violence ongoing and DHS had very few officers in the city,” he explained.

“At the end of the day we’re going to protect the courthouse and we’re going to protect our law enforcement officers there,” he went on to say,

Wolf pointed out that there have been “over 50 nights of violent activity targeting federal facilities and federal law enforcement officers,” and added that “it needs to stop.”

“DHS is not going to back down from our responsibilities,” he continued. “We are not escalating, we are protecting … federal facilities.”

He noted that “it’s our job” to protect federal property.

“It’s what Congress told us to do time and time again and so we’re going to do that,” Wolf said. “We’re going to investigate and we’re going to hold those accountable. We’re going to arrest them and hold those accountable that are doing this destruction.”

Oregon Public Broadcasting reported last week that some agents had been driving around in unmarked vans and snatching protesters from streets, not near federal property, without identifying themselves.

Tensions also escalated after an officer with the Marshals Service fired a less-lethal round at a protester’s head earlier this month, critically injuring him.

Responding to criticism, Wolf said “local leaders in Portland have fostered this environment that allows” people to “attack the courthouse” and do “violent” and “destructive” acts “night after night after night.”

“They congregate around midnight and they go until about 4:00 to 4:30 a.m. every single night [for] over 50 nights, while the Portland leaders there do nothing about it,” Wolf said.

He stressed that DHS officers and other federal agents are protecting federal property and as they come across people performing criminal acts, “we’re going to investigate and we’re going to arrest them and we have the authority to do that.”

“We’re not trying to escalate, we’re trying to hold those folks accountable,” he explained. “What we’re not going to do is allow them to attack a courthouse and then simply step across the street on to city property and say you can’t touch me. That’s not how this works.”

Wolf noted that “almost all of our activity has taken place in the one, two or three blocks around that courthouse and will continue to do so.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“There are other parts of city and other parts of Portland that are having destructive acts taking place. DHS is not anywhere near that,” Wolf said. “We’re focused on protecting federal facilities, that is our mission and we’re going to continue to do that.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/dhs-chad-wolf-portland-mayor-feds-unrest

Gov. Gavin Newsom Monday refuted a report that he personally appealed to President Trump in order to obtain federal aid in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

The New York Times reported over the weekend that in earlier stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, Gov. Newsom was told that if he wanted the federal government to help the state obtain the swabs needed for testing, he would have to ask Trump himself and thank him.

According to the report, Newsom made the call as requested. Newsom later that day gave Trump credit during a news conference for the “substantial increase in supply.”

“It’s not true,” Newsom said during a news conference Monday. “To the extent we were able to procure those swabs, we were grateful and I expressed gratitude, but no one told me to express it.”

Newsom added that he is grateful to Trump’s administration for the help in procuring the swabs and additional front-line personnel. “Anybody that is willing to help this state, I’m going to express deep gratitude for that help,” he said.

However, the governor also took aim at the president, claiming “We need a national strategy” and that California needs more support when it comes to contact tracing and enforcing isolation and social-distancing protocols.

“We certainly look forward to being able to complement those efforts if and when they materialize,” Newsom said.

Trump says federal law enforcement could be headed to Oakland

Further contributing to hostility between California and the Capitol, Trump on Monday said he may send federal law enforcement to several cities such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia — and Oakland.

“Oakland is a mess,” the president said. “We’re not going to let this happen in our country. All run by liberal democrats. More federal law enforcement, I can tell you that.”

Trump then asserted that politicians in those regions are “afraid” of protestors, who he referred to as “anarchists.”

Asked if he had heard anything from federal officials about federal troops being sent to Oakland, Newsom said, “The answer is no, and we would reject it.”

Source Article from https://www.mercurynews.com/gov-newsom-refutes-report-that-he-had-to-ask-and-thank-trump-for-coronavirus-aid

Mark and Patricia McCloskey of St. Louis who brandished firearms outside their home were charged on Monday with unlawful use of a weapon, a class E felony.

Laurie Skrivan/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/TNS via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Laurie Skrivan/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/TNS via Getty Images

Mark and Patricia McCloskey of St. Louis who brandished firearms outside their home were charged on Monday with unlawful use of a weapon, a class E felony.

Laurie Skrivan/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/TNS via Getty Images

The white husband and wife who menaced Black Lives Matter protesters by brandishing guns as the demonstrators marched through the couple’s wealthy St. Louis community are facing felony charges.

Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner announced her office filed charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey on Monday for unlawful use of a weapon. It is a class E felony.

“It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St. Louis,” Gardner said in a statement.

“We must protect the right to peacefully protest, and any attempt to chill it through intimidation will not be tolerated,” she continued.

The incident, which took place on June 28 and was captured on video, has drawn ire from Black Lives Matter supporters and praise from Second Amendment activists.

The images of the white couple standing in front of their mansion, with her aiming a handgun at the mostly Black crowd, and him clutching a long barreled gun, flooded social media and all major news outlets almost immediately. The confrontation has stoked a heated partisan debate over the rights and protections of protesters.

The McCloskeys, who are both personal injury attorneys, have repeatedly stated they were frightened of the passing anti-racism demonstrators, calling the nonviolent group a “mob.”

The couple have said they feared for their lives and acted to protect their property. They also accused demonstrators of ignoring “No Trespassing” signs and knocking down an iron gate.

One of the protest leaders has contested their version of events, saying the gate was already open and no protesters damaged it.

Joel Schwartz, the attorney representing the McCloskey’s, did not immediately respond to NPR’s request for comment.

However Schwartz released a statement saying that the charges “are disheartening as I unequivocally believe no crime was committed.”

“I, along with my clients, support the First Amendment right of every citizen to have their voice and opinion heard,” Schwartz said.

“This right, however, must be balanced with the Second Amendment and Missouri law, which entitle each of us to protect our home and family from potential threats,” he added.

In the interim, Missouri Gov. Mike Parson said he would likely pardon the couple if they were charged.

On Monday, Gardener stated that she is committed to reducing the unnecessary involvement of the courts.

“I am open to recommending the McCloskey’s participate in one of my office’s diversion programs,” she said.

“I believe this would serve as a fair resolution to this matter.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial-justice/2020/07/20/893345005/st-louis-prosecutor-charges-white-couple-with-threatening-protesters-with-guns

Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf slammed Portland’s mayor and his “completely irresponsible” comment that members of his department and other federal agents are “sharply escalating the situation” in the city.

“The facts don’t lie and the facts are that these violent anarchists and extremists were violent well before DHS surged federal assets into Portland,” Wolf told “Fox & Friends” on Monday, the morning after the 53rd consecutive night of protests in Oregon’s largest city.

Over the weekend rioters broke into the Portland Police Association building and set it on fire, as demonstrations over the death of George Floyd intensified for another night, according to Portland Police.

President Trump has denounced the violent demonstrations in Portland and the Trump administration has enlisted federal agents, including the U.S. Marshals Special Operations Group, to protect federal property.

The unrest had frustrated Mayor Ted Wheeler, a Democrat, and other local officials who had said a small group of violent activists was drowning out the message of peaceful protesters. Wheeler also said the presence of federal law enforcement in Portland was exacerbating the situation.

Wheeler said Friday, “Keep your troops in your own buildings, or have them leave our city.”

“The words and actions from President Trump and the Department of Homeland Security have shown that this is an attack on our democracy,” Wheeler added.

Speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, Wheeler doubled down on his statements.

“The president has a complete misunderstanding of cause and effect,” Wheeler said. “What’s happening here is we have dozens, if not hundreds of federal troops descending upon our city and what they’re doing is they are sharply escalating the situation. Their presence here is actually leading to more violence and more vandalism.”

“We haven’t asked them here. In fact we want them to leave,” he added, calling the intervention, which he said is “a blatant abuse of police tactics by the federal government” and the Trump administration, “a direct threat to our democracy.”

Wheeler went on to say, “We’re all telling the Trump administration to stop the rhetoric, take these people out of our city, they are not helping us, they are hurting us.”

HUCKABEE SLAMS OREGON GOVERNOR

In response, Wolf said, “I believe it’s a completely irresponsible comment.”

“What we know is, before July Fourth, where we saw an escalation of violence in Portland, before that time there was violence ongoing and DHS had very few officers in the city,” he explained.

“At the end of the day we’re going to protect the courthouse and we’re going to protect our law enforcement officers there,” he went on to say,

Wolf pointed out that there have been “over 50 nights of violent activity targeting federal facilities and federal law enforcement officers,” and added that “it needs to stop.”

“DHS is not going to back down from our responsibilities,” he continued. “We are not escalating, we are protecting … federal facilities.”

He noted that “it’s our job” to protect federal property.

“It’s what Congress told us to do time and time again and so we’re going to do that,” Wolf said. “We’re going to investigate and we’re going to hold those accountable. We’re going to arrest them and hold those accountable that are doing this destruction.”

Oregon Public Broadcasting reported last week that some agents had been driving around in unmarked vans and snatching protesters from streets, not near federal property, without identifying themselves.

Tensions also escalated after an officer with the Marshals Service fired a less-lethal round at a protester’s head earlier this month, critically injuring him.

Responding to criticism, Wolf said “local leaders in Portland have fostered this environment that allows” people to “attack the courthouse” and do “violent” and “destructive” acts “night after night after night.”

“They congregate around midnight and they go until about 4:00 to 4:30 a.m. every single night [for] over 50 nights, while the Portland leaders there do nothing about it,” Wolf said.

He stressed that DHS officers and other federal agents are protecting federal property and as they come across people performing criminal acts, “we’re going to investigate and we’re going to arrest them and we have the authority to do that.”

“We’re not trying to escalate, we’re trying to hold those folks accountable,” he explained. “What we’re not going to do is allow them to attack a courthouse and then simply step across the street on to city property and say you can’t touch me. That’s not how this works.”

Wolf noted that “almost all of our activity has taken place in the one, two or three blocks around that courthouse and will continue to do so.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“There are other parts of city and other parts of Portland that are having destructive acts taking place. DHS is not anywhere near that,” Wolf said. “We’re focused on protecting federal facilities, that is our mission and we’re going to continue to do that.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/dhs-chad-wolf-portland-mayor-feds-unrest

The judge ran upstairs from the basement when she heard a scream and the gunshots.

The judge’s husband, Mark Anderl, 63, was in the hospital in stable condition, Mr. Salas said. The couple’s son and only child, Daniel Anderl, 20, died from a gunshot wound to the heart.

Daniel Anderl was about to start his junior year at Catholic University of America in Washington and was interested in pursuing a legal career as his parents had.

“It’s surreal,” Mr. Salas said. “He was a vibrant, young, good-looking man. He had so much promise.”

The F.B.I. has been conducting the investigation with the U.S. marshals alongside other federal and local authorities. A spokesman for FedEx said in a statement that the company was “fully cooperating with the authorities in their investigation.”

Two law enforcement officials, cautioning that the investigation was in its earliest stages, said federal authorities were examining whether Mr. Den Hollander might be linked to the July 11 killing of another men’s rights lawyer, Marc Angelucci, in San Bernardino County, Calif.

Mr. Angelucci was shot at his front door by a gunman wearing a FedEx uniform, one of the officials said.

Judge Salas, 51, is the first Hispanic woman to serve as a federal judge in New Jersey. President Barack Obama nominated her to the United States District Court for New Jersey in 2010. She had previously served as a magistrate judge and an assistant federal public defender.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/20/nyregion/esther-salas.html

The Trump administration has been consulting the former government lawyer who wrote the legal justification for waterboarding on how the president might try to rule by decree.

John Yoo told the Guardian he has been talking to White House officials about his view that a recent supreme court ruling on immigration would allow Trump to issue executive orders on whether to apply existing federal laws.

“If the court really believes what it just did, then it just handed President Trump a great deal of power, too,” Yoo, a professor at Berkeley Law, said.

“The supreme court has said President Obama could [choose not to] enforce immigration laws for about 2 million cases. And why can’t the Trump administration do something similar with immigration – create its own … program, but it could do it in areas beyond that, like healthcare, tax policy, criminal justice, inner city policy. I talked to them a fair amount about cities, because of the disorder.”

In a Fox News Sunday interview, Trump declared he would try to use that interpretation to try to force through decrees on healthcare, immigration and “various other plans” over the coming month. The White House consultations with Yoo were first reported by the Axios news website.

Constitutional scholars and human rights activists have also pointed to the deployment of paramilitary federal forces against protesters in Portland as a sign that Trump is ready to use this broad interpretation of presidential powers as a means to suppress basic constitutional rights.

“This is how it begins,” Laurence Tribe, a Harvard constitutional law professor, wrote on Twitter. “The dictatorial hunger for power is insatiable. If ever there was a time for peaceful civil disobedience, that time is upon us.”

Yoo became notorious for a legal memo he drafted in August 2002, when he was deputy assistant attorney general in the justice department’s office of legal counsel.

It stated: “Necessity or self-defense may justify interrogation methods that might violate” the criminal prohibition on torture.

Memos drafted by Yoo were used for justifying waterboarding and other forms of torture on terrorism suspects at CIA “black sites” around the world.

Asked if he now regretted his memos, Yoo replied: “I’m still not exactly sure about how far the CIA took its interrogation methods but I think if they stayed within the outlines of the legal memos, I think they weren’t violating American law.”

In a book titled Defender in Chief, due to be published next week, Yoo argues that Trump was fighting to restore the powers of the presidency, in a way that would have been approved by the framers of the US constitution.

“They wanted each branch to have certain constitutional weapons and then they wanted them to fight. And so they wanted the president to try to expand his powers but they expected also Congress to keep fighting with the President,” he said.

In a June article in the National Review, he wrote that a supreme court decision that blocked Trump’s attempt to repeal Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals programme, known as Daca and established by executive order, meant Trump could do the same thing to achieve his policy goals.

Daca suspended deportations of undocumented migrants who arrived in the US as children. As an example of what Trump might achieve in the same way, Yoo suggested the president could declare a national right to carry firearms openly, in conflict with many state laws.

“He could declare that he would not enforce federal firearms laws,” Yoo wrote, “and that a new ‘Trump permit’ would free any holder of state and local gun-control restrictions.

“Even if Trump knew that his scheme lacked legal authority, he could get away with it for the length of his presidency,” he said. In a telephone interview, he added: “According to the supreme court, the president can now choose to under-enforce the law in certain areas and it can’t be undone by his successor unless that successor goes through this onerous thing called the Administrative Procedure Act, which usually takes one to two years.”

Constitutional scholars have rejected Yoo’s arguments as ignoring limits on the executive powers of the president imposed by the founders, who were determined to prevent the rise of a tyrant.

Tribe called Yoo’s interpretation of the Daca ruling “indefensible”.

He added: “I fear that this lawless administration will take full advantage of the fact that judicial wheels grind slowly and that it will be difficult to keep up with the many ways Trump, aided and abetted by Bill Barr as attorney general and Chad Wolf as acting head of homeland security, can usurp congressional powers and abridge fundamental rights in the immigration space in particular but also in matters of public health and safety.”

On the deployment of federal paramilitary units against Portland, Yoo said he did not know enough of the facts to deem whether it was an abuse of executive power.

“It has to be really reasonably related to protecting federal buildings,” he said. “If it’s just graffiti, that’s not enough. It really depends on what the facts are.”

Alka Pradhan, a defence counsel in the 9/11 terrorism cases against inmates in the Guantánamo Bay prison camp, said: “John Yoo’s so-called reasoning has always been based on ‘What can the president get away with?’ rather than ‘What is the purpose and letter of the law?’

“That is not legal reasoning, it’s inherently tyrannical and anti-democratic.”

Pradhan and other defence lawyers in the pre-trial hearings at the Guantánamo Bay military tribunal have argued that the use of torture against their clients, made possible by Yoo’s 2002 memo, invalidated much of the case against them.

“The fact that John Yoo is employed and free to opine on legal matters is an example of the culture of impunity in the United States,” she said.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/20/trump-john-yoo-lawyer-torture-waterboarding

Media captionMissouri couple points guns at protesters

A husband and wife have been charged with unlawful use of a weapon for pointing guns at demonstrators outside their home in St Louis, Missouri.

Lawyers Mark and Patricia McCloskey drew guns on racial justice protesters marching through the grounds of their $1.15m mansion last month.

The couple said they armed themselves because they felt threatened.

But St Louis’ top prosecutor said their actions had risked creating violence at an otherwise peaceful protest.

“It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St Louis,” said Kim Gardner, who is the city’s the first black circuit attorney.

“We must protect the right to peacefully protest, and any attempt to chill it through intimidation will not be tolerated,” she added.

The McCloskeys also face a charge of fourth-degree assault.

The couple’s lawyer, Joel Schwartz, called the decision to press charges “disheartening as I unequivocally believe no crime was committed”.

The couple, both personal injury attorneys who live on a private street, have said they were within their rights to defend their property.

Missouri Governor Mike Parson has said he was prepared to exercise his pardon powers if prosecutors brought criminal charges in the case.

“I don’t think they’re going to spend any time in jail,” the Republican told a local radio station last week.

When he was a legislator, the governor co-wrote Missouri’s “castle doctrine” law that justifies deadly force for those who are defending their homes from intruders.

Video footage showed Mr McCloskey, 63, and his wife, 61, draw firearms as demonstrators marched past their mansion to the home of St Louis Mayor Lyda Krewson to call for her resignation on 28 June.

The mayor had infuriated activists by reading out on Facebook Live the names and addresses of people advocating for defunding police.

The McCloskeys’ legal team has said two or three white protesters had threatened the couple and their property.

According to a police report on the incident, the couple said a large group of people had broken through an iron gate marked with “No Trespassing” and “Private Street” signs. One of the protest leaders maintained the gate was already open.

The march was part of a nationwide wave of demonstrations over police brutality and racism prompted by the alleged killing of an unarmed black man, George Floyd, by a white policeman.

Ms Gardner is recommending that the husband and wife participate in a “diversion programme” designed to reduce unnecessary involvement with the courts.

It could see them ordered to take part in community service or a remedial course.

Class E felonies like unlawful use of a weapon can carry prison sentences of up to four years.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53481537

Washington — With the coronavirus crisis worsening in more than 40 states and the District of Columbia, President Trump and Republican leaders met Monday to outline their priorities for another federal relief package that is expected to carry a price tag of at least $1 trillion.

Mr. Trump gathered in the Oval Office on Monday with Vice President Mike Pence, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy to discuss the broad contours of a next legislative package, known as “phase 4” legislation, which they intend to discuss with GOP senators on Tuesday.

“Kids in school, jobs and health care is the theme of the proposal that we hope to come together and present to our Republicans,” McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, told reporters.

Republicans plan to push for tax credits for personal protective equipment and that incentivize businesses to bring workers back, while extending a revised version of the enhanced unemployment benefits that are set to expire this month. The proposal also includes an injection of money to states for education to ensure schools can reopen safely, Mnuchin said. The next package is expected to include liability protections for schools, universities and businesses, a top priority for McConnell.

“We don’t need an epidemic of lawsuits on the heels of the pandemic we’re already struggling with,” McConnell said.

While GOP leaders did not mention the possibility of a payroll tax cut, Mr. Trump said the issue is “very important” to him.

“We’re working on it, and I don’t think there’s too much dispute as to the level of importance,” the president said, adding that a payroll tax cut is one of roughly 10 elements being discussed for the next relief bill.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell listens to President Trump talk to reporters while hosting Republican congressional leaders and members of his Cabinet in the Oval Office at the White House on Monday, July 20, 2020.

Doug Mills / Getty Images


Discussions between the Trump administration and Republican congressional leaders have been ongoing for the last two weeks. In addition to meeting with Senate Republicans on Tuesday to provide them with a full briefing on the next relief package, Mnuchin said administration officials are also going to begin reaching out to Democrats to begin negotiations.

“The focus is really about kids and jobs and vaccines,” he said, adding that the Trump administration’s goal is to have a vaccine developed for emergency use by the year’s end.

Lawmakers are returning to Washington this week after a two-week recess, and the next measure under consideration would be the fifth passed by Congress in response to the coronavirus crisis, a tally that includes a bill extending a program providing loans to small businesses. So far, lawmakers have approved more than $3 trillion in coronavirus relief through bills to provide direct payments to Americans, boost unemployment benefits and establish the small business loan program.

“We’ve spent an unprecedented amount of money,” Mnuchin said. “The good news is a lot of the $3 trillion we still have left to put in the economy and put back to work.”

In May, the Democrat-led House passed its own $3 trillion coronavirus relief bill, which provided federal aid to state and local governments, hazard pay for frontline workers, student debt forgiveness and boosted Medicaid and Medicare. The package, however, failed to gain traction in the GOP-led Senate, and the White House dismissed the measure as “unacceptable.”

While negotiations between congressional leaders and the Trump administration have yet to begin, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warned in a letter to his Democratic colleagues Monday that Senate Republicans “are drafting legislation that comes up short in a number of vital areas.”

Sticking points that he cited include extending the enhanced unemployment benefits of $600 per week that were included in an earlier relief bill, as well as over federal assistance for state and local governments, investments in communities of color hit hard by the coronavirus, and hazard pay.

“Democrats will need to fight hard for these important provisions,” Schumer, a Democrat from New York, wrote. 

Mnuchin said in the Oval Office the Trump administration is committed to passing legislation that protects those who are unemployed before the end of the month and said its number one issue is to craft a “technical fix” for the benefits to ensure people are not paid more to stay at home than they would receive in wages.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-relief-bill-phase-4-trump-republicans-1-trillion/

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a House request to expedite litigation over President Trump’s financial records, further dimming Democratic hopes that congressional investigators could obtain the materials prior to November’s election.

The unsigned order, issued Monday, provided no explanation. But the action underscored the court’s distinction between the House inquiry, which is intended to inform lawmakers’ oversight of banking, ethics and national security legislation, and a separate criminal investigation by New York state prosecutors that seeks many of the same records.

On Friday, the court granted a joint request filed by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. and Mr. Trump to expedite the follow-up proceedings over the state subpoena to the president’s accounting firm, Mazars USA LLP.

Normally, Supreme Court decisions take effect 25 days after they are issued. Friday’s order, signed by Chief Justice John Roberts, set aside that period in the New York case; Monday’s order denied similar treatment for the House case. Only Justice Sonia Sotomayor said she would have granted the House request.

Mr. Vance is investigating potential state crimes linked to hush-money payments made to two women who claimed to have had extramarital affairs with Mr. Trump. The president’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to federal crimes related to the payments, which charging documents said were intended to suppress information damaging to Mr. Trump’s political campaign. Mr. Trump has denied wrongdoing, and his attorneys indicated they would raise additional arguments in federal district court in an attempt to quash the criminal inquiry.

Earlier this month, by a 7-2 vote, the Supreme Court held that Mr. Trump had no constitutional immunity from the state criminal subpoena, nor could he require the district attorney to surmount extra hurdles to pursue his investigation. The decision left Mr. Trump largely in the same position as any individual seeking to end a grand jury investigation.

By the same vote, however, the court held that Congress must demonstrate particular reasons why it needs information from Mr. Trump’s own records to inform the legislative process. Chief Justice Roberts, who wrote both decisions, suggested that a criminal investigation into specific allegations of misconduct had greater need for the records and posed less of a threat of political motivation than a fact-finding inquiry from a coordinate branch of government.

In its motion, the House noted that the 116th Congress will expire on Jan. 3, 2021. The “window of opportunity to litigate the remands in these cases, then obtain and review the subpoenaed documents, evaluate their significance to potential or pending legislation, draft such legislation or amendments, and shepherd that legislation through the bicameral process diminishes by the day,” the chamber argued.

In response, Mr. Trump’s lawyers told the court there was no reason to expedite the process. “The Committees cannot identify any pending legislative proposal to which the President’s records are relevant—let alone urgently needed,” they wrote.

Write to Jess Bravin at jess.bravin@wsj.com

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-rejects-lawmakers-plea-to-speed-litigation-over-trumps-taxes-11595276340

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said on Monday that though other officials have requested the help of federal law enforcement to deter violence, Portland, Ore., is lagging in that respect.

“What we’ve seen in Portland, however, is a mayor who is unwilling to admit that he lost control of his city,” McEnany told “Outnumbered Overtime.”

McEnany continued, “A mayor who is saying, I don’t need the help of federal law enforcement, while you have these rioters trying to burn down a courthouse, set a police building on fire, hurl pigs feet, attack officers and threaten police officers and citizens alike,” McEnany said.

TED CRUZ BLASTS DEMOCRATS FOR ‘FACILITATING AND CHEERING’ VIOLENT PROTESTS IN PORTLAND

The city commissioner in Portland, Ore., has called on Mayor Ted Wheeler to surrender authority over the police department, accusing him “putting our community in danger.”

In a series of statements and Twitter messages, City Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty accused the Portland Police Bureau – which Wheeler oversees – of collaborating with the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in what she described as an “aggressive clampdown of peaceful protest.”

In one post, Hardesty refers to federal officers as “45’s goon squad” – an apparent reference to President Trump, the nation’s 45th president.

Hardesty’s remarks came Friday and Saturday, as Oregon’s largest city was in its second month of nightly unrest since the May 25 death of George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

McEnany said Kansas City has applied the “cooperative model” when working with the federal government.

“The DOJ announced Operation Legend. That was named after Legend Tallipharoah, a 4-year-old boy who lost his life. He was shot while sleeping … The governor there was cooperative and said, ‘I need the help of federal authorities,’ and we’ve been there. The DOJ has been there to help and assist. ATF and the FBI and other entities. That’s the cooperative model.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/kayleigh-mcenany-portland-mayor-refusing-to-admit-hes-lost-control-of-city