The CDC’s web page for data on available hospital and ICU beds has added a note that reads: “Data displayed on this page was submitted directly to CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and does not include data submitted to other entities contracted by or within the federal government.”

“We don’t have this critical indicator anymore,” Panchadsaram said. “The intent of just switching the data streams towards HHS, that’s fine. But you got to keep the data that you’re sharing publicly still available and up to date.”

Panchadsaram said he and his team, which includes researchers from the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy and from Resolve to Save Lives, a public health initiative led by former CDC director Dr. Tom Frieden, have been tracking the data since April. 

Panchadsaram thinks of the project as something of a “progress bar” as they grade different states on the overall progress they’ve made in fighting Covid-19. Available hospital beds and ICU capacity is a key indicator they use to assess state performance, he added.

“It’s disappointing. It happened a lot quicker than expected,” he said. “The picture that we’re presenting to the world is incomplete.”

Other coronavirus researchers and public health specialists expressed concern because the policy change was announced so suddenly in the midst of a public health crisis that appears to be worsening.

Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University, which runs one of the most popular third-party coronavirus data dashboards, said the policy change won’t impact the Hopkins site because they’ve managed to source their data directly from states. She added, however, that the policy change raises questions about the transparency of the data and the role of the CDC in the ongoing U.S. response.

“What worries me is that we seem to be pushing rather suddenly in the midst of what feels like a very urgent time in terms of surging cases that we’re seeing across the country,” she told CNBC. “The question is, what are we going to lose in this transition, and in particular at a moment where we really don’t want to lose any ability to understand what’s happening in hospitals.”

Nuzzo expressed concern that the administration didn’t appear to fully plan out how the transition in data reporting would work and didn’t give hospitals or researchers a warning about the change or how it might affect them. 

“I think it’s reasonable to worry that it could lead to erosion of capacities at a moment where we very much can’t afford to lose any abilities at this point,” she added. “I don’t fully understand how it’s going to work. That in and of itself is problematic.”

Dr. Jen Kates, senior vice president and director of global health and HIV policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation, echoed Nuzzo’s concerns about the speed with which the decision has become policy. She added that the Trump administration has politicized the public health crisis for months, so the policy change raises concerns about the integrity of the data as well.

“It’s been such a critical source of information for everyone, for states, for researchers, for reporters, for the public to try to understand what’s happening,” she said. “The last thing you want is for data to be politicized. It just raises that concern. Will data being at HHS create a more politicized use of it, or maybe not. But again, it’s a concern that’s been raised.”

President Donald Trump and his administration have come under fire during the pandemic from critics who say the White House is undermining the country’s public health professionals. Last week, Trump criticized the CDC’s guidelines on reopening schools as too tough and expensive, and Vice President Mike Pence said the agency would issue additional recommendations.

“There’s been concerns raised about when CDC has the leeway to offer its advice as a public health agency, really based on the evidence and the data, and there’s been several examples where we’re not clear that that’s been the case,” Kates said. “I think that is a concern that many have; is there any political significance to this change?”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/16/us-coronavirus-data-has-already-disappeared-after-trump-administration-shifted-control-from-cdc-to-hhs.html

JoAnn Cunningham spoke on her own behalf before Judge Robert Wilbrandt went into recess until 1:30 p.m. on Friday, when Wilbrandt will return with a sentence.

“I had the privilege of having AJ as a son,” Cunningham began. “I love him, I miss him and there’s nothing I wouldn’t do to bring him back. … Anyone who truly knows me knows how much I love being a mother more than anything in the world. Being a mother defines me. My children gave me a purpose. I miss all of them so much.”

She spoke of AJ as “smart, brilliant, handsome … courageous, driven and absolutely loved..”

She said his favorite donuts were chocolate sprinkles, favorite color is green and favorite toy was Legos.

“There is a great sorrow in my heart. I will never be able to justify anything nor do I want to,” Cunningham said. “I spent the majority of my life on autopilot, hanging on by a thread … I had become a stranger to myself …. nobody will ever understand unless they have walked a mile in my shoes. … I was mentally unavailable, even to myself.”

Then she finished her statements.

“I would give my life to have AJ back. This is something I will never escape from.”

– Jon Styf

3:30 p.m.

McHenry County State’s Attorney Patrick Kenneally gave his closing argument first, talking about JoAnn Cunningham’s interview at the Crystal Lake Police Department after AJ Freund was reported missing, though Cunningham already reportedly knew he was already dead.

She was “neither frantic nor hysterical” he said.

“She looks right at the video camera and begins to recite the “Our Father” …. Anything to keep others from knowing who she is and what she had done.”

Then he described AJ’s death.

“She had beaten this little boy to the edge of death … locked in his room. He had to endure the bleak process of death all by himself,” Kenneally said.

Kenneally then described the process of AJ’s death, from the beating to the swelling brain while he was cold and locked in his room, choking and ingesting his own blood.

“The pain and trauma to AJ’s little body proved too much … mercifully, he died,” Kenneally said. “5 years old, locked in a room, wet … totally and profoundly alone.”

Then Kenneally described the cost of AJ’s death.

“When we think about the harm, it goes well beyond the brutality he endured on April 14, 2019,” Kenneally said. “The real harm, the real injury caused by AJ’s death is limitless. AJ is irreplaceable. Nothing that we can do will bring him back …. This wasn’t a quiet, peaceful death … blow after unrelenting blow, all while being buffeted by freezing cold water all while his mother screamed in his face.”

“She hasn’t been sitting here crying for AJ, she has been sitting her crying for herself,” Kenneally said. “… it’s evil.”

Kenneally then pleaded for the maximum sentence allowed, 60 years.

– Jon Styf

2:45 p.m.

Dr. Robert Meyer, a mental health expert, met with Cunningham three times and determined that she has “Cluster B personality disorder.”

He said this is a character disorder which includes anti-social, narcissistic borderline personality. People with this disorder typically have impulse control problems and extreme mood issues. She also meets the guidelines for stimulus abuse disorder.

Meyer said Cunningham suffered a rape and emotional abuse at a young age and exhibits extreme rage, attachment issues and a lack of being able to trust.

Meyer said Cunningham described physical relations with Freund as “disgusting” and that her relationship with him from the beginning when she was 29 and he was 54 revolved around drugs.

Meyer said Cunningham “became somewhat obedient“ to Freund and that she “found him to be a hollow person.”

She described Freund as “not there, not connected in any way,” Meyer said.

She said the relationship “all revolved around drugs” and that Cunningham carried with her “an ongoing feeling of abandonment.”

Meyer found the relationship between the couple and Nowicki, who lived in the home with them during the time she became pregnant with their daughter, as “unusual.”

He said Freund “tolerated” the relationship between Cunningham and Nowicki even getting them a hotel room at one point.

Cunningham suffered from rage and in almost every relationship prior to the death of her son a “great deal of pain emerged in almost every relationship.”

Meyer said Cunningham had an anti-social personality disorder, and would use the opioids to “cope with turmoil in her head, she numbed herself, and she didn’t use Adderall as prescribed,” Meyer said.

Meyer said she started using Adderall in at least 2012 and by 2015 she was abusing it.

Drug abuse can lead to rage and lack of human empathy, the doctor said. But the vast majority of drug abusers do not kill their children, he said.

Though Cunningham’s prescription was 20 to 40 milligrams once a day, she was up to 120 milligrams “if not more everyday” at the time of AJ’s death, the doctor said. 

“People who are abusing Adderall often times become highly aggressive and have violent outbursts,” Meyer said.

– Amanda Marrazzo

2 p.m.

AJ Freund’s former foster mother, who has custody now of his younger siblings, spoke from the heart about the pain her family has endured and her thoughts on AJ’s death and its lasting impact.

She described picking up AJ from the hospital at four months old and maintaining custody until he was 18 months old, when AJ’s biological parents took over custody.

“He was compassionate,” she said. “He was the most perfect little boy.”

She stated that AJ was not defiant to them. After AJ’s parents took over custody, the foster mother continued to see AJ. But, eventually, JoAnn Cunningham told them that they would a bad influence on AJ.

“She said that AJ would act out when he returned.”

JoAnn also said that it was too much that three family members were there with him at all times.

“We wanted to be with him as much as we could. We were a loving family.”

After answering questions from the state’s attorney’s office, the mother read a statement.

“It’s almost too difficult for words … Before AJ died, I never stopped trying.”

She spoke of triggers in daily life that brought back the trauma of AJ’s death and how difficult life with be for AJ’s siblings, who will change their last names to avoid a stigma.

“I believe (his brother) will be in therapy the rest of his life. … When (his sister) is old enough, she will learn of this incredible tragedy …. even doing a family tree for a school project could bring feelings out.”

“I will do my best to help him make sense of the insensible,” she said. “We want to give (AJ’s brother) the most normal life possible.”

The foster mother then closed her statement by saying “We miss AJ every single day.”

– Jon Styf

1:40 p.m.

The afternoon started with Dr. Mark Witeck, forensic pathologist.

Witeck has described the injuries he found in an April 25, 2019, autopsy of AJ Freund. He fully described the injuries he found on AJ’s body during the examination and the blunt force trauma that was his cause of death.

He said the boy had abrasions and contusions all over his head and from his head to his lower legs as well as on his buttocks. 

Witeck said the boy suffered from broken ribs and a swollen brain the result of blunt force trauma.

He said during the physical abuse he would have felt pain but once he fell unconscious he would have been out of pain.

AJ’s brain was swollen to the point that it caused his death. Many of the injuries were described as consistent with being hit by a shower head.

“He’s received multiple injuries to the head, his brain is swelling,” Witeck said. The brain crushed itself into the skull to the point that is shut the rest of his body down, Witeck said.

“It’s a pretty bad case. Not the worst I’ve seen, but it’s pretty bad,” Witeck said comparing it to other cases of child abuse he has seen.

– Amanda Marrazzo and Jon Styf

12:50 p.m.

The court broke for an hour-long recess at noon, and will return to at 1:15 p.m.

The tone in the courtroom has been tense and somber, with 11 of AJ’s family members seated directly behind the defense table. Cunningham entered the courtroom accompanied by a McHenry County correctional officer, her blond hair pulled back into two tight braids. She appeared to be wearing a ring with a cross on her left ring finger and had tissues packed into the pocket of her orange jail shirt.

Throughout the hearing, Cunningham sat almost motionless, but for her wringing hands, next to her public defenders. She seemed to become most upset, wiping away visible tears, upon hearing her own voice on camera yelling at and berating AJ. During a video that was played in the courtroom, Cunningham told AJ she was recording him on her cellphone to show the boy’s father later.

She also wept quietly under her face mask when prosecutors played a video of a remote jail visit with her then-fiance, Daniel Nowicki. During the call, AJ told Nowicki “I love you,” evoking tears and sniffling from Cunningham in the courtroom.

Nowicki was petitioning for custody the child he fathered with Cunningham, and whom Cunningham gave birth to while in Custody. Nowicki, however, died of a drug overdose last summer while custody hearings were ongoing.

12:10 p.m.

After Crystal Lake Police Chief James Black spoke about the staff it took to conduct the investigation, court went into recess until 1:15 p.m.

JoAnn is wearing a cross ring on her left hand wedding ring finger and has tissue shoved into the pocket of her jailhouse orange shirt.

– Jon Styf and Amanda Marrazzo

11:50 a.m.

In the days prior to the fake 911 call – after AJ was killed – the couple exchanged texts about Easter egg decorations, baskets, shopping for a new TV and AJ’s behavior and how they planned to help him 

On April 17, after AJ was already dead, Freund writes to Cunningham that they will figure out how best to handle AJ’s behavior.

“We will figure it out,” he wrote. “With God’s help. Let’s keep praying.” He then wrote “Have a … blessed day. I’ll see you tonight. Give the boys a kiss and hug for me.”

Cunningham also writes asking if they can buy a TV from the pawn shop that weekend so she and the boys “can watch movies in bed.”

She also writes “the boys have been so good today” but that AJ had a couple of incidents.

– Amanda Marrazzo

11:30 a.m.

In the hours and days before the fake 911 call the couple exchanged multiple text messages depicting a seemingly normal life with children.

Messages from Freund such as “How are you and the boys doing today? I hope you are playing outside.”

And others from Cunningham saying she is researching a psychiatrist to help with AJ’s ODD (oppositional defiant disorder) and thanking Drew for all he has done and God.

Prosecutors then played a video of Cunningham in police questioning whispering/praying her son comes home.

She then is questioned and tells the officer Freund asked if she knew where he was and she said no.

She said she looked in and around the house and Freund went to the gas station and to a nearby school looking for him. 

She said AJ gets into things so she locks his door at night. She said she is surprised he would leave the house without his jacket because “he is anal retentive.”

Cunningham is sobbing saying maybe he thinks he is “gonna get in trouble.” She said as she looked around the house and yard for him she would say out loud that he would not be in trouble.

Then she asked the officer “Is anyone in the house in case he comes home?”

In earlier testimony, an officer who came to the home after the fake 911 call said the house was filthy. He also said he found it odd that Cunningham was talking with a friend and laughing while he searched the house for AJ.

– Amanda Marrazzo

11:05 a.m.

Officer Brian Burr of the Crystal Lake Police Department, who went to the Dole Avenue home after Andrew Freund’s 911 call, discussed what he found at the home that day, on April 18, 2018, after AJ was reported missing.

The odor in the home stood out to Burr.

“I was just overwhelmed with how it smelled and the condition of the house,” Burr said.

He then went through a series of photos taken at the home that day throughout the home and outside. One item photographed outside was a bag of used syringes.

The most notable items in the photos were a chain lock and padlock outside of AJ’s room, seemingly meant to lock AJ in his room. There were also locks on the windows in the room and a combination lock on the closet in AJ’s room.

There was also a small toilet inside of the room.

– Jon Styf

10:50 a.m.

Dr. Ashok Mehta, a neonatologist who worked at Centegra Hospital in Woodstock in October 2013, testified that AJ was born with heroin in his system and that he showed signs of withdrawal when he was born.

Assistant State’s Attorney Randi Gara read a statement from Dr. Barbara Knox stated AJ died and showed signs of malnutrition and was a victim of chronic physical and psychological child abuse.

– Amanda Marrazzo

10:30 a.m.

Court went into recess after the state played several audio tapes of AJ Freund arguing with JoAnn Cunningham on March 27, 2019, which is around 14 days before his death. Cunningham was crying in the courtroom as the audio played and family could be seen behind her doing the same.

The main discussion in the audio was between JoAnn and AJ with AJ saying that he would like to have bad people do bad things to JoAnn so that she and his younger brother would leave him with their dad.

“I don’t want a family,” AJ could be heard saying.

“You don’t have one,” she responded. “Do you really think (your dad) would choose you over me and (your brother? …. Shut up!”

She could be heard asking AJ multiple times why he wanted her to go away.

“Why do you want those bad people to hurt me?” JoAnn said.

“So I don’t ever see you again,” AJ responded.

JoAnn asked multiple times who AJ would tell to hurt her.

“There’s no way we could get in trouble,” JoAnn said. “Who would you go tell on us to get us in trouble? What would you do? What is your grand plan? How would you get us in trouble? With who? With what people?”

“By bad people, really bad people,” AJ said.

– Jon Styf

9:45 a.m.

The testimony started off with the testimony of Crystal Lake police officer Kimberly Shipbaugh, who said on Dec. 18, 2018, she was dispatched the parking lot of a Taco Bell in Crystal Lake where she met with Cunningham who was in her car with AJ and his younger brother.

She said the children were not wearing any shoes. Cunningham said she had been “robbed” at her home referring to someone allegedly stealing her prescription pills from her, the officer testified.

The officer returned back to the home on Dole Avenue which she described as in “not good” condition, parts of the ceiling and floors were missing, bags of clothes were piled up around the house, missing and smelling of feces.  The kids were “being kids” running around the house, watching TV. The officer saw a softball-sized bruise on AJ who was wearing a diaper and when she asked him where it came from Cunningham knelt down to AJ’s ear and said “Lucy the dog did that to you right?”

Later that day, she took him to an emergency room at the direction of police before going home.

Dr. JoEllen Channon testified that she took AJ to a separate room away from his mom and asked where the bruise came from and he said he was spanked and hit with a belt and that it was not someone in his family and he got quiet and repeated the story about the dog.

She stopped the interview and said she wanted DCFS to get a forensic interview. She said Carlos Acosta, a DCFS employee said that was not possible at the time.

“We did not want AJ to leave with JoAnn that day,” the doctor testified.

Assistant State’s Attorney Randi Freese then played a video of a remote online jail house meeting between Cunningham and Daniel Nowicki – the father of her then unborn daughter whom she gave birth to in jail after her arrest.

AJ and his younger brother are in the video. Those present in the courtroom heard AJ’s little voice talking to Nowicki asking where he is and why. AJ and Nowicki have a friendly exchange.

“What’s up buddy,” Nowicki says to AJ. “Hi AJ.”

AJ says “I love you.” To which Nowicki replies “I love you too buddy. I’ll see you soon.”

During the playing of this video in court, Cunningham kept her face down and was crying and wiping her face.

In the video, AJ’s small voice is heard telling Nowicki “I love you,” Nowicki, who has since died of a drug overdose replies “I love you too buddy, I’ll see you soon.”

Nowicki can be heard speaking to AJ Freund and his younger brother.

“I’m in the jail. I’m in jail buddy,” Nowicki said.

Cunningham brought up going into a program called “Focused Priorities” after his release, which involved spending 40 days in the wilderness.

“What the (expletive) do I want that for? We’ve got the kids. How are we going to do 40 days in the wilderness with two children?” the late Nowicki said.

Nowicki closed the meeting by telling the children “I’ll see you soon, alright?”

The exchange between AJ and Nowicki was far more loving than what the courtroom heard next. Prosecutors played three recordings where Cunningham is heard berating her son, swearing at him, calling him a liar. The child is heard crying and saying he doesn’t want a family anymore and does not want anyone around him.

– Jon Styf and Amanda Marrazzo

9:30 a.m.

Before the first witness took the stand, McHenry County State’s Attorney Patrick Kenneally read statements of fact into the court record from witnesses not present including neighbors.

One neighbor described a snowy evening when she saw Cunningham’s car running in the driveway. She walked over to see the younger sibling strapped in a chair and AJ pop his head out, and said “boo,” surprising her.

The neighbor heard arguing inside the home and AJ said his mommy and daddy were fighting and they were off to a hotel. Cunningham said to the neighbor “Better not (explective) … call the cops on us … leave me the (expletive) alone.”

Other neighbors stated that in the years prior to his death they had seen AJ with dark bruises, dark black eyes, cuts and scrapes on him. Many times his parents said that he had been hurt falling down the stairs.

One Halloween a neighbor said AJ had bandages on him and thought it was part of his Halloween costume. Later it was discovered that he had been burned by hot boiling water which Cunningham said spilled on him on accident.

Next on the stand were Crystal Lake Police Department Officer Kimberley Shipbaugh, who was the officer on scene when a bruise was found on AJ Freund’s hip on Dec. 18, 2018 after meeting the family at the Crystal Lake Taco Bell.

The second witness on the stand was emergency room doctor JoEllen Channon, who saw AJ at the hospital and looked at the bruise that same day.

– Amanda Marrazzo and Jon Styf

9:15 a.m.

Prior to the hearing, McHenry County Judge Robert Wilbrandt gave instructions to the small group in the courtroom and said the courtroom has been thoroughly cleaned and sanitized, warned people not to leave they wouldn’t be let back in, no assigned seats or reserving of seats except for press coverage, judge and all others in the wearing mask and said masks must be warn at all times for safety of everyone.

– Amanda Marrazzo

9 a.m.

Prior to the hearing beginning court administrator Dan Wallis warned the group of about 30 sitting six-feet away in the overflow room against any outbursts or court security would escort them out and they would not be allowed back in tomorrow.

McHenry County Judge Robert Wilbrandt entered the courtroom at 9:04 a.m. Northwest Herald reporter Katie Smith is the pool reporter in the courtroom and Daily Herald photographer John Starks is there as the pool still photographer along with WGN’s Ted Parra.

– Amanda Marrazzo

8:15 a.m. Thursday

The jury assembly room is serving as overflow for the sentencing hearing. Eight members of the media and about 36 total seats are in the room.

Katie Smith is in the courtroom but won’t have her cellphone available for use during the sentencing.

There are about eight seats reserved for the FBI in the room as well. The FBI worked directly with the Crystal Lake Police Department throughout this case, soon after the missing person report. State Rep. Steve Reick, R-Woodstock, is also here.

Sheriff Bill Prim arrived just as the proceedings began in the jury assembly area.

– Jon Styf

• Check back throughout the hearing Thursday and Friday for live updates.

Source Article from https://www.nwherald.com/2020/07/16/updates-joann-cunningham-sentencing-in-death-of-aj-freund/aple7hw/

WASHINGTON – Firefighters extinguished the blaze Thursday that had raged aboard the USS Bonhomme Richard for four days at its pier in San Diego, the Navy announced.

Damage to the ship, a small aircraft carrier that ferries Marines to battle, appears extensive, with gaping holes in its deck and damage to its superstructure. Rear Adm. Philip Sobeck said the ship’s fate is unclear.

“We do not know the extent of the damage,” said Sobeck, commander of Expeditionary Strike Group 3. “It is too early to make any predictions or promises of what the future of the ship will be.”

The cause of the fire is unknown, and the investigation won’t be launched until crews verify that hot spots don’t remain, he said.

Navy, federal and local firefighters worked to contain the blaze, which began Sunday in a huge cargo area. Fed by building materials, the fire reached 1,000 degrees and forced firefighters to work in shifts to recover from the heat. Helicopters dumped more than 1,500 buckets of water on the ship’s deck and tugs poured water onto its hull to cool it enough to allow firefighting crews to contain the fire.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/07/16/fire-extinguished-navys-bonhomme-richard-after-four-days/5453829002/

“He’s not demoted,” Gidley added of Parscale. “What Brad is focusing on is the digital strategy.”

Parscale, who managed Trump’s digital advertising during the 2016 campaign, has “built something no one thought possible, raising money at clips that are at historic levels,” Gidley said, while Stepien, “in his own right, [is] smart, very talented, very politically savvy.”

The campaign’s staff “knows both of them. They love both of them. They love working with both of them,” Gidley said. “And so Brad’s going to focus on one thing, Bill’s going to focus on the other. But both are working toward victory for the American people, and that means a victory for Donald Trump.”

The abrupt leadership shakeup less than four months before November’s general election comes after a series of difficult weeks for the Trump campaign. The president headlined a rally in Tulsa, Okla., last month with a sea of empty seats and has faced continued criticism for his response to the coronavirus pandemic and racial unrest.

Several surveys show Trump significantly trailing former Vice President Joe Biden, his presumptive Democratic opponent, among voters nationally and in the swing states Trump captured in 2016 to win office.

Biden maintains an 11-point national lead over Trump, according to an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll published Wednesday, and a Quinnipiac University poll released the same day reported Biden ahead nationally by 15 percentage points.

“I wouldn’t buy those polls,” Gidley said Thursday of the surveys, claiming without evidence that they “are weighted towards Democrats.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/16/trump-spokesman-brad-parscale-firing-365891

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/politics-101/507609-white-house-defends-trump-over-atlanta-mayors-mask-accusations

Marrero, who initially handled the lawsuit, had ordered both parties to detail whether litigation would continue. As a result of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Trump is barred only from bringing up the presidential immunity issue, which is now considered settled. He could argue instead that Vance’s request to Mazars is too broad, amounting to a “fishing expedition,” or that it was issued in “bad faith” with an ulterior motive, the filing says, citing the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-tax-returns/2020/07/15/3d37531a-c6b1-11ea-b037-f9711f89ee46_story.html

A volunteer receives a shot in a clinical trial for a potential coronavirus vaccine. U.S. intelligence officials say Russian hackers are attempting to break into U.S. health care organizations working on a vaccine.

Ted S. Warren/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ted S. Warren/AP

A volunteer receives a shot in a clinical trial for a potential coronavirus vaccine. U.S. intelligence officials say Russian hackers are attempting to break into U.S. health care organizations working on a vaccine.

Ted S. Warren/AP

The National Security Agency, as well as its counterparts in Britain and Canada, all said Thursday that they’re seeing persistent attempts by Russian hackers to break into organizations working on a potential coronavirus vaccine.

The Western intelligence agencies say they believe the hackers are part of the Russian group informally known as Cozy Bear. The intelligence agencies refer to it as APT29.

That group has been linked to Russian intelligence and was blamed for hacking Democratic Party emails in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

“APT29 has a long history of targeting governmental, diplomatic, think-tank, health care and energy organizations for intelligence gain so we encourage everyone to take this threat seriously,” said Anne Neuberger, the NSA’s cybersecurity director.

Russia denied the accusation.

“We can say one thing — Russia has nothing at all to do with these attempts,” Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin, was quoted as saying by the state-run Tass news agency.

The Western intelligence agencies did not name any of the organizations being targeted. In addition, there was no word on whether the hackers had obtained any information, or what they might do with any such information.

But for several months now, the U.S. and others have been warning health care organizations to safeguard all sensitive information related to a potential vaccine.

“We are imploring all those research facilities and hospitals and pharmaceutical companies that are doing really great research to do everything in their power to protect it,” Bill Evanina, the director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, told NPR in May.

Prior to Thursday’s announcement, U.S. officials had already been warning about China, which has has a long track record of stealing Western intellectual property.

“We have the full expectation that China will do everything in their power to obtain any viable research that we are conducting here in the U.S.,” Evanina said back in May. “That will be in line with their capabilities and intent the last decade plus, and we are expecting them to continue to do so.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/07/16/891834251/u-s-says-russian-hackers-are-trying-to-steal-covid-19-vaccine-research

Biden’s lead is widening over Trump nationally

A Quinnipiac poll of registered voters nationwide published Wednesday found Biden with a 15-point lead over Trump, with Biden receiving 52 percent of support, compared to Trump’s 37 percent. Compare that to Quinnipiac’s June poll, which found Biden with a much tighter 49 percent to 41 percent lead.

Advertisement



“There is no upside, no silver lining, no encouraging trend hidden somewhere in this survey for the president,” said Quinnipiac polling analyst Tim Malloy in a press release.

The Quinnipiac poll of 1,273 registered voters, which had a 2.8 percent margin of error, was among two major polls out this week that surveyed voters nationwide. The other one, from NBC News and the Wall Street Journal, found Biden up 51 percent to 40 percent, an 11-point margin. That poll surveyed 900 registered voters and had a margin of error of 3.3 percent.

Setting aside individual surveys, the polling average from the website FiveThirtyEight, which factors in results from several polls, shows Biden up by about nine points as of Thursday morning.

Trump’s performance on issues like the coronavirus and racial inequality are hurting him

The Quinnipiac poll found that Biden also holds double digit leads over Trump when it comes to handling the coronavirus pandemic and racial inequality, two issues respondents said they will weigh when choosing whom to vote for. Respondents said they thought Biden would do a better job handling the pandemic than Trump, 59 percent to 35 percent ― a 24 point difference. On which candidate would better handle racial inequality, the difference was even more stark: 62 percent said Biden while just 30 percent said Trump, a difference of 32 points.

Advertisement



Respondents overall said they were unhappy with the direction the nation is going: 56 percent said they were “very dissatisfied” with how things are going, while just 24 percent reported being very or somewhat satisfied.

Drilling down, Trump keeps picking fights on issues unpopular with most voters

When Trump replaced his campaign manager, a donor to the president’s campaign told the Wall Street Journal that he hoped the new head of the campaign could rein in some of Trump’s tweets. And this week’s polls show why: The issues Trump’s White House has focused on in recent weeks, like protecting symbols of the Confederacy or criticizing public health officials, are deeply unpopular.

Nearly two-thirds of voters in the Quinnipiac poll said they thought Trump was hurting efforts to slow the spread of coronavirus and trusted Dr. Anthony Fauci. That finding comes as White House aides just spent several days attacking Fauci’s credibility. On top of that, the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found respondents were twice as likely to support a candidate who prioritized slowing the spread of coronavirus over one who prioritized reopening businesses.

Advertisement



On race issues, the majority of respondents think the Confederate flag is a symbol of racism and support removing Confederate statues from public spaces, according to the Quinnipiac poll, even as Trump has repeatedly defended such statues, and said this week the Confederate flag was a symbol of “freedom of speech.”




Christina Prignano can be reached at christina.prignano@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @cprignano.

Source Article from https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/07/16/nation/two-national-polls-this-week-shed-light-why-trump-may-be-shaking-up-his-campaign/

WASHINGTON – Peter Navarro, a senior trade adviser to President Donald Trump, has taken aim at Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert and a member of the president’s coronavirus task force.

Navarro wrote an opinion piece in USA TODAY that was initially published Tuesday night – and then the next morning in print – as an “opposing view” to a newspaper editorial that hailed Fauci a “national treasure” and that said efforts by President Donald Trump or his team to muzzle Fauci would be hazardous.

Bill Sternberg, USA TODAY’s editorial page editor, said editors approached Navarro about writing the opposing view. The newspaper has a tradition of offering opposing views to its editorials. Some of the comments Navarro made echoed ones he had made earlier about Fauci.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/07/15/fact-check-trump-adviser-navarro-claims-fauci-misleading/5443826002/

“I am pleased to announce that Bill Stepien has been promoted to the role of Trump campaign manager,” Mr. Trump said in a statement. “Brad Parscale, who has been with me for a very long time and has led our tremendous digital and data strategies, will remain in that role, while being a senior adviser to the campaign. Both were heavily involved in our historic 2016 win, and I look forward to having a big and very important second win together.”

Mr. Trump is often described as his own campaign manager, and his political operation, which is overseen by Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and a senior White House adviser, has been tailored to his desires.

In recent weeks, as the Trump team has tried to regain its footing, Mr. Trump brought back Jason Miller, a communications and political strategist who was a key figure on his 2016 campaign. The president also elevated Mr. Stepien, who had been a top adviser, to deputy campaign manager in May, giving him a more expansive role in operations. Mr. Stepien maintains a low profile, which Mr. Trump prefers, and something Mr. Parscale did not do.

Mr. Miller and Mr. Stepien have been working closely with another 2016 veteran, Hope Hicks, a senior adviser to Mr. Trump in the White House who handles his schedule. Another veteran of 2016 whom Mr. Trump likes, Susie Wiles, a Florida-based Republican operative, was recently brought back to the campaign.

A person familiar with the planning said there might still be another addition to the team, such as a campaign chairman.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/15/us/politics/trump-campaign-brad-parscale.html

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/16/us/nypd-three-injured-protesters-chief/index.html

Donald Trump is replacing his campaign manager Brad Parscale, the contentious figure leading the president’s re-election efforts for the last two years, in a major shakeup of campaign staff.

Parscale will be demoted to senior adviser, and Bill Stepien, the deputy campaign manager, will take over the top position. Trump made the announcement on Facebook on Wednesday evening, with Twitter temporarily unavailable due to a hacking.

Parscale has been under pressure since June after failing to materialize the hundreds of thousands of supporters at Trump’s campaign rally in Tulsa that he initially touted. At the time, the president’s daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner were reportedly “pissed” that Parscale had promised huge crowds after only 6,200 turned up.

The reshuffle comes as Trump lags behind in polls, trailing his Democratic opponent Joe Biden by 15-points in a Quinnipiac national poll released Wednesday. The Trump administration’s chaotic, ineffectual response to the coronavirus pandemic, which has killed more than 137,000 Americans, and the plummeting of the national economy appear to have triggered a dip in his approval ratings.

Parscale, who has headed the campaign since February 2018, was recommended for the job by Kushner. He had no background in politics prior to joining the Trump campaign, and his tenure has been plagued with allegations that he is unduly profiting off the campaign. Even prior to joining the Trump 2020 effort, Parscale’s companies had earned nearly $40m from various Trump election committees, according to a HuffPost analysis of Federal Election Commission filings.

In a Facebook post on Wednesday evening, Trump wrote: “I am pleased to announce that Bill Stepien has been promoted to the role of Trump Campaign Manager. Brad Parscale, who has been with me for a very long time and has led our tremendous digital and data strategies, will remain in that role.”

Stepien, who was the campaign field director for Trump in 2016, was formerly a top aide to Chris Christie, the former New Jersey governor and a one-time presidential candidate.

Parscale’s grasp of social media, and the campaign’s misleading, clickbait campaigns on Facebook have made him a notorious figure. In a Washington Post interview, Parscale recalled that during the last election cycle, he told Kushner if Trump “wants to be the next president, he has got to harness Facebook. Give me the power, and I can help you win.”

Like Trump, Parscale has often exaggerated his qualifications and dramatized his life story. He has described himself as a “farm boy from Kansas”, when he actually grew up in the suburbs.

“He’s an over-promoted troll,” Charlie Sykes, the author of How the Right Lost Its Mind, told the Guardian in January.

Parscale, a fan of The Apprentice, told the Guardian’s David Smith in January: “I always just saw myself as kind of a CEO, as a business leader. I just wanted to be successful. I was always wanting to adapt but I knew I wanted more.”

Having earned the trust of Trump and his family, he has also recently drawn the president’s ire. Trump reportedly berated Parscale and threatened a lawsuit amid sinking poll numbers in April, according to CNN. Trump later denied that he had shouted at Parscale.

Trump has frequently tired of his campaign managers – he fired two campaign managers in 2016 before installing Kellyanne Conway, who now works as a White House counsellor.

When asked for comment on the staffing shakeup, the Trump campaign directed the Guardian to Trump’s Facebook statement. Parscale did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/15/donald-trump-brad-parscale-replaced-campaign-shakeup

WASHINGTON – Peter Navarro, a senior trade adviser to President Donald Trump, has taken aim at Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert and a member of the president’s coronavirus task force.

Navarro wrote an opinion piece in USA TODAY that was initially published Tuesday night – and then the next morning in print – as an “opposing view” to a newspaper editorial that hailed Fauci a “national treasure” and that said efforts by President Donald Trump or his team to muzzle Fauci would be hazardous.

Bill Sternberg, USA TODAY’s editorial page editor, said editors approached Navarro about writing the opposing view. The newspaper has a tradition of offering opposing views to its editorials. Some of the comments Navarro made echoed ones he had made earlier about Fauci.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/07/15/fact-check-trump-adviser-navarro-claims-fauci-misleading/5443826002/

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Brad Parscale will remain part of Trump’s campaign

Facing a tough re-election battle, US President Donald Trump has replaced his campaign manager.

Mr Trump said he had substituted Bill Stepien, a field director for his 2016 campaign, in place of Brad Parscale.

Mr Parscale – who was reportedly blamed by Mr Trump’s inner circle for a poorly attended rally in Oklahoma last month – will stay on as senior adviser.

Opinion polls show the president is trailing his Democratic challenger Joe Biden ahead of November’s election.

Mr Trump’s statement on Facebook on Wednesday evening said: “Brad Parscale, who has been with me for a very long time and has led our tremendous digital and data strategies, will remain in that role, while being a Senior Advisor to the campaign.”

Mr Parscale is said to have found himself sidelined in recent weeks after the president’s comeback rally in Tulsa flopped.

Mr Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner, both White House advisers, are reported to have blamed Mr Parscale for the debacle.

Mr Parscale had boasted that more than one million people registered to attend, but fewer than 6,200 showed up at the arena, the local fire department said.

After the rally, Mr Parscale went on Twitter to blame a blocked security gate, protesters and the media for the disappointing turnout.

His role as a Trump strategist has apparently proved lucrative for the 44-year-old, who last year reportedly bought a $2.4m waterside mansion in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

Mr Parscale, a brash figure who served as a warm-up act for Mr Trump at rallies, was appointed campaign manager in February 2018.

The BBC’s US partner CBS News reported recently that Mr Parscale did not even vote in the 2016 election, citing his difficulty in obtaining a postal ballot while working at Trump Tower in New York City.

He was Mr Trump’s fourth campaign manager, following Kellyanne Conway, Paul Manafort and Corey Lewandowski.

His replacement, Mr Stepien, was a former aide to ex-New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.

Mr Stepien’s name came up in the so-called Bridgegate scandal that was widely perceived to have scuppered Mr Christie’s presidential ambitions.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53426285

CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield said Wednesday on a conference call with reporters that states were told to stop sending hospital information to the National Healthcare Safety Network site, the CDC’s system for gathering data, beginning Wednesday. He added that the decision was made in conjunction the CDC.

“In order to meet the needs for flexibility of data gathering, CDC has agreed to remove the National Health Safety Network from the collection process in order to streamline reporting,” he said. “This has no effect on CDCs ability to use data and continue to churn out daily data, the MMWRs and the guidance that we publish.”

Caputo said the change in policy will allow the U.S. to collect more complete data and to do so more quickly. He added that the CDC will still “participate in this streamlined all-of-government response,” but they will no longer control the data reporting element. 

“Today, the CDC still provides data from only 85 percent of hospitals; the President’s COVID response requires 100 percent to report,” Caputo said. “Today, the CDC still has at least a week lag in reporting hospital data; America requires it in real time.”

Jose Arrieta, chief information officer for HHS, said on Wednesday’s conference call that despite the change in reporting systems, the government will continue to release data occasionally to the public through the CDC. Arrieta said the HHS data was initially for analysis and policy decisions rather than for the general public, but said some of the data is released publicly through the CDC.

He added that HHS is working to make more of its data publicly available.

“We’ve been focused on collecting data so that we could perform analysis and allocate resources in an effective manner,” he said, adding that some data is released through the CDC. “There is a possibility that that we could do it at a larger scale… That’s the ultimate vision.”

Dr. Janis Orlowski, who serves on the working group formed by White House health advisor Dr. Deborah Birx to improve the national data reporting system, said the group was formed because the administration was concerned that some hospitals were misreporting or failing to report critical Covid-19 information to the CDC.

Orlowski, chief health care officer at the Association of American Medical Colleges, said most hospitals were doing their best to report up-to-date information but many were inundated with redundant requests from separate agencies.

“Because [hospitals] were reporting into agencies, and using different portals for the data to be submitted, and besides the portals, they could report to the state, as you can imagine, this became a data issue of how do you coordinate all this,” she said. “So our job became see, can we simplify the reporting process.”

Orlowski said Birx and other administration officials gave their word to the working group, which includes CDC staff, that the change wouldn’t hamper the quality or transparency of the data. However, she said she doesn’t know whether outside researchers, like universities that are tracking the outbreak, will have the same access to the data as before.

“They had verbally told us that transparency would remain,” she said. “And so those of us who are on the working group didn’t see this as the CDC being cut out.”

Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb said “the data is still going to be shared with CDC.” He said Wednesday that there has been frustration over the CDC’s data reporting, but that the administration may have been better off fixing those issues within the CDC, rather than trying “to re-create the wheel.”

“I think they would have been better served probably investing in what CDC is doing and the CDC systems because CDC is a better repository for information,” he said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “They have the scientific expertise to cull this data in a way that no other agency does.”

Dr. Bill Winkenwerder, who served as assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs under President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2007, said the decision is a function of an outdated data reporting system that has been under-invested in for year. He said he doesn’t think it’s fair to characterize the decision as necessarily political.

“The key point is the HHS and the White House need this data quickly to coordinate a whole host of decisions that are not made at the CDC level,” Winkenwerder told CNBC. “The one-week lag that was described — that is a long time. Every day counts, so I can understand why they need and want that information.”

HHS needs accurate data quickly so it can make potentially life-saving decisions, such as allocating the nation’s limited supply of remdesivir, the only drug that’s authorized for emergency use in the U.S. to treat Covid-19. He added that it’s crucial for this data to be transparently shared with other agencies and with the public, but he’s glad the reporting system is being overhauled.

“Hopefully once this Covid pandemic is at least more under control or once we get a vaccine, we absolutely need to invest more in updating our data aggregation systems,” Winkenwerder said. “Whatever they can do to fix the data in the interim is great. Long term, it needs to be improved in general.”

President Donald Trump and his administration have come under fire during the pandemic from critics who say the White House is undermining the country’s public health professionals. Last week, Trump criticized the CDC’s guidelines on reopening schools as too tough and expensive and Vice President Mike Pence said the agency would issue additional recommendations.

“As the president said today, we just don’t want the guidance to be too tough,” Pence told reporters last week. “That’s why the CDC will be issuing more guidance going forward, because we know each school system has unique capabilities and different facilities.”

On Tuesday, four former CDC directors wrote in an op-ed published in The Washington Post that the U.S. faces “two opponents” in its efforts to reopen the country: Covid-19 and politicians and others attempting to undermine the CDC. 

“It is not unusual for CDC guidelines to be changed or amended during a clearance process that moves through multiple agencies and the White House. But it is extraordinary for guidelines to be undermined after their release,” wrote the former CDC directors: Tom Frieden, who served under former President Barack Obama; Jeffrey Koplan, who served under former Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush; David Satcher, who served under Clinton; and Richard Besser, who served under Obama.

“Through last week, and into Monday, the administration continued to cast public doubt on the agency’s recommendations and role in informing and guiding the nation’s pandemic response,” they said.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/15/trump-administration-changes-its-process-for-collecting-and-reporting-us-coronavirus-hospital-data.html

Over the past couple of months, the world has received more evidence that face masks really can play a crucial role in the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic.

It’s a significant shift from earlier this year, when the evidence for mask-wearing was so weak that government authorities and public health experts publicly cast doubts on face coverings as a preventive measure against the coronavirus. Worried about the low supply of masks for health care workers, Surgeon General Jerome Adams, among others, said the public should “STOP BUYING MASKS!”

That changed when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finally recommended in April that the general public use masks, particularly in places where social distancing is hard to achieve. Government officials and experts cited a “precautionary principle,” arguing that an unproven benefit was worth it since the potential harms and costs of mask-wearing are so low.

Since then, scientists have done much more research on whether masks work, with new studies coming out over the past few months.

The research increasingly favors both individual mask-wearing and policies requiring universal masking. It suggests that masks not only help stop the spread of the coronavirus — by preventing the spread of virus-containing droplets that people spit out when they talk, sing, laugh, cough, sneeze, and so on — but that policies requiring masks work to significantly slow community transmission.

“The evidence on masks is getting better and better,” Ashish Jha, faculty director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, told me. “None of it is bomb-proof evidence. It’s not a large randomized trial. But given that that’s unlikely to come … we’re now at a point where it’s really, very good evidence.”

The research doesn’t mean that masks allow for reckless behavior: Other precautions, from hand-washing to physical distancing, are still crucial in the fight against Covid-19. But it does show that masks, coupled with other precautions, help.

The growing research for masks also shows how important it is to be adaptable in a fast-moving disease outbreak. There’s still a lot about the coronavirus we just don’t know, such as whether kids widely transmit the virus and what forms of social distancing are most effective. How well a society does against Covid-19 could come down to how quickly it reacts and adapts to new evidence as we get it.

“This is a landscape that’s rapidly changing,” Jade Pagkas-Bather, an infectious diseases expert and doctor at the University of Chicago, told me. “We didn’t have the knowledge we have today that we had a few months ago. That’s why things are confusing.”

With masks, the evidence still isn’t totally definitive — science can be a very slow-moving process. But it’s increasingly pointing in one direction: During this pandemic, we all should wear a mask whenever we go out in public.

The latest research on masks, summarized

Since the CDC’s recommendation for the public to wear masks, several studies have come out indicating the recommendation was the right choice. Some research has gone further, indicating a mandate — not just a recommendation — for mask-wearing could be effective.

Here’s a list of some of these studies, which deploy a wide range of methodologies across a variety of settings:

  • A review of the research in The Lancet concluded that for the general public, “face masks are associated with protection, even in non-health-care settings, with either disposable surgical masks or reusable 12–16-layer cotton ones.” The review also backed the use of eye protection, physical distancing, and hand hygiene, among other measures, and cautioned that masks alone do not fully supplant the benefits of these other precautions.
  • A review of the research in International Journal of Nursing Studies found that “community mask use by well people could be beneficial, particularly for COVID-19, where transmission may be pre-symptomatic.” It’s unclear, though, how much of this benefit comes from masks protecting the wearer versus protecting those exposed to the wearer.
  • A study in Health Affairs found state mandates to wear masks helped reduce the spread of the coronavirus. The researchers concluded that “as many as 230,000–450,000 cases may have been averted due to these mandates by May 22,” though they cautioned that this was merely an approximation and sensitive to methodological changes in how it’s calculated.
  • A study from the nonprofit research institute IZA found that Germany’s local and regional mask mandates “reduced the cumulative number of registered Covid-19 cases between 2.3% and 13% over a period of 10 days after they became compulsory” and “the daily growth rate of reported infections by around 40%.”
  • A study in BMJ Global Health found the use of masks in households in Beijing was associated with less spread of Covid-19. Specifically, households in which people used masks before the first person to get infected showed symptoms were “79% effective in reducing transmission.”
  • A study from the CDC found that Navy service members on the USS Theodore Roosevelt, which experienced a large Covid-19 outbreak, were less likely to get infected if they reported using a mask. “Use of face coverings and other preventive measures could mitigate transmission,” the researchers concluded.

This list is not comprehensive. Many, many more studies — not just on masks, but on Covid-19 in general — are coming out on a weekly basis. The cited studies simply help give an idea of where the research is headed.

Overall, the studies indicate that masks reduce the transmission of the coronavirus and other respiratory diseases by the general public. They work in community settings, but appear to work in household settings, too. Cloth masks are effective for the general public, although surgical masks and respirators are likely better — but more research is needed on this front.

The research compounds some of the recent anecdotal evidence we’ve seen, too. The Black Lives Matter protests, where mask-wearing by protesters was widespread, didn’t seem to cause a significant spike in infections. In several Asian countries where mask use has long been widespread, like South Korea and Japan, masks seemed to play a role in reducing transmission as well.

“It’s definitely hard to miss that relationship — that the countries with widespread mask-wearing seem to have it better under control,” Linsey Marr, an environmental engineer at Virginia Tech who studies airborne particles, told me. She added that she “wouldn’t be surprised” if masks turn out to be even more effective than some of the evidence already suggests.

There are still gaps in the research, but experts say it’s strong enough

The studies aren’t perfect. They’re on the cutting edge of a fast-moving issue, potentially making them more prone to errors and corrections over time. Many aren’t peer-reviewed, a process that could catch problems. The studies can be underpowered — meaning they might not have enough subjects for statistically significant findings — and they often can’t fully isolate the effect of masks versus other widely adopted actions against Covid-19. Some simply find correlations, but whether the associations are truly cause-and-effect is unclear.

The large reviews of the research in The Lancet and International Journal of Nursing Studies caution that more research on masks is needed, particularly to tease out the effect of masks in households versus community versus health care settings, and how effective cloth masks are compared to surgical masks compared to respirators.

The studies also emphasize that masks don’t fully replace the need for other precautions against Covid-19. So even with a mask, everyone should continue to wash their hands, keep 6 feet from others, and avoid large gatherings, particularly indoors. While masks appear to be a net good, researchers also caution that there needs to be further study on how they may enable reckless behaviors by making people feel invincible or less vulnerable.

There have also been some deeply flawed studies. One study in Annals of Internal Medicine with findings that went against masks was retracted, and another in PNAS that backed the use of masks has come under fire for allegedly shoddy methods.

The research also doesn’t yet provide conclusive evidence for how masks work. While much of the CDC’s messaging has focused on how wearing a masks prevents people from infecting others, the research suggests — and some experts believe — that masks do offer at least some protection from infection for the wearer.

Masks also may encourage positive behavioral changes. One researcher found wearing a mask appeared to get people to physically distance farther from him, which could further prevent the spread of the coronavirus.

But that’s something, along with just about everything else related to masks and Covid-19, that still needs to be studied further.

“There is some evidence,” George Wehby, a health policy expert at the University of Iowa who’s studied the effect of mask mandates, told me. “At the same time there’s definitely room for more understanding on both the lab-based studies … but also more on the policy side.”

Still, he added, “There is more and more indication of effectiveness rather than lack of effectiveness.”

Raina MacIntyre, who heads the Biosecurity Research Program at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, and has conducted many studies on masks, told me that “using the precautionary principle is warranted.”

Even if the evidence isn’t definitive, there’s enough of it to suggest that it’s better to be safe than sorry and recommend the use of masks. With Covid-19, we know the virus spreads through droplets that fly through the air — and, at least in some cases, likely linger for some time — before reaching another host. Masks block at least some of those droplets, creating a literal physical barrier from infection.

Further bolstering this is the very low cost of masks. Masks are fairly cheap, and can be made by simply cutting up a shirt. For the vast majority of people, there’s no risk to wearing a mask, and it’s at worst a bit uncomfortable. So even if the gains are small — though they in fact appear to be quite large — then using a mask would win out in a cost-benefit analysis.

The net benefit is even wider when comparing it to societal costs. “The cost of masking versus intensive care unit space, there’s an astronomical gap between the costs of those two interventions,” Pagkas-Bather said.

It’s important to remember the scope of the problem here, with half a year of the Covid-19 pandemic already killing more Americans than multiple years of the opioid epidemic, gun violence, or car crashes. A mere 5 percent reduction in deaths would have saved at least 7,000 people in the US alone over the past seven months — and many more to come.

We’re still learning a lot about the coronavirus and how to respond to it

The situation with masks and the evidence for them shows how quickly things can change in the midst of a fast-moving disease outbreak. In just a few months, the US has gone from no government recommendations and wide expert skepticism of masks to embracing them.

Experts caution that this kind of situation is going to happen again and again with Covid-19. There’s simply going to be a lot of uncertainty with the coronavirus for some time, even after we’ve — hopefully — vanquished it with a vaccine. This is a virus that’s new to humans, causing a pandemic of the likes that modern society hasn’t seen. We’re still learning, for example, just how airborne the coronavirus is, if children widely spread it, what kinds of medical treatments work against it, and whether immunity is long-lasting.

Given how new this all is, experts say the public and its leaders need to be ready to act on changing evidence, and officials shouldn’t be criticized too harshly for adapting on the fly. “It’s never too late to say the right thing,” Wehby said.

So while it’s unfortunate that the CDC and surgeon general worked against public mask use at first, and they arguably moved too slowly, it’s also good that they rigorously reviewed the research and embraced change once they felt there was enough evidence to do so. It’s the kind of model that everyone should be encouraged to follow.

There’s still a more philosophical debate about what the government can and should tell people to do. But experts say it’s important to acknowledge the trade-offs — in terms of not just deaths, but the broader effects of the pandemic on normal life and the economy.

“People say, ‘It’s a free country. I can do what I want.’ I get that. Americans are very individualistic,” Marr said. “But right now, with the economy shut down, if we wear masks, that would give us the freedom to reopen the economy more while not overwhelming hospitals.”

Given that, most experts I spoke to were bullish on masks — arguing that different levels of government should not only educate and persuade people to wear masks, but even flat-out mandate masks in public spaces. The research, at least, increasingly backs such steps.

“It’s a good way to curb transmission,” Pagkas-Bather said. “Especially if we’re going to open up economies, open up public spaces, and encourage people to live as closely to how they did pre-pandemic — which is what it seems like the nation is moving toward.”


Support Vox’s explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21299527/masks-coronavirus-covid-19-studies-research-evidence

President Donald Trump on Wednesday finalized a rollback to the country’s landmark environmental law, the National Environmental Policy Act, by speeding up approval for federal projects like pipelines, highways and power plants. 

NEPA was signed into law by President Richard Nixon 50 years ago and requires federal agencies to consider the environmental consequences of infrastructure projects before they are approved. The law has also been vital in allowing communities to weigh in on how such projects impact climate change and their own health and safety. 

In a major victory for the energy industry, the administration’s changes will aim to decrease the number of infrastructure projects that will be subject to NEPA review, effectively shortening long permit processes that have historically delayed projects. 

Trump made the announcement at the UPS Hapeville Airport Hub in Atlanta, Georgia. The president pointed to some U.S. infrastructure projects that have been delayed due to extensive litigation and permit processes: “All of that ends today,” he said. “We’re doing something very dramatic.”

The move is the latest effort from the Trump administration to roll back a slew of environmental regulations in place to combat accelerating climate change and protect natural habitats from drilling and development. The administration has so far rolled back more than 100 environmental rules, and previously announced its intent to weaken NEPA in January. 

Environmentalists swiftly condemned Trump’s announcement, arguing that the decision curtail the public’s right to have a say in the development of pipelines and other projects in their neighborhoods and disproportionately affects poor and minority communities, many of whom live in areas with higher rates of pollution.

“The Trump administration’s anti-environment agenda is a racist agenda. Dismantling NEPA is a blatant attempt to silence the working class communities of color who are resisting the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure into their communities,” said Lisa Ramsden, senior climate campaigner of Greenpeace USA. 

Gina McCarthy, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the administration’s roll back of NEPA is a clear effort to allow industries to more easily pollute communities and limits the ability of communities to have input on projects. 

“People have a right to weigh in before a highway project tears up their neighborhood or a pipeline goes through their backyard,” McCarthy said in a statement. “Steamrolling their concerns will mean more polluted air, more contaminated water, more health threats and more environmental destruction.”

“Now more than ever our leaders should be helping people breathe easier, not handing out favors to oil drillers, pipeline developers and other polluters,” McCarthy said. 

However, Republican officials and the oil and gas industry have long complained of lengthy, burdensome approval process for projects that are often under scrutiny of environmental groups. 

The American Petroleum Institute was one of the industry groups that was urging the administration last year to modernize and speed up NEPA reviews in a way that “strengthens our economy and enhances environmental stewardship.”

The move to dismantle NEPA will likely be challenged in court and also comes before the November election. Under a different administration, Congress could potentially put an end to Trump’s weakening of NEPA by a majority vote and the president’s signature. Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, who recently unveiled a $2 trillion climate change plan, has vowed to reverse Trump’s environmental rollbacks. 

“This may be the single biggest giveaway to polluters in the past 40 years,” said Brett Hartl, government affairs director at the Center for Biological Diversity.

“NEPA’s dismantling is a win for corruption, a win for polluters, and a win for those that profit off the destruction of our planet,” Hartl said. “Everyone else loses.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/15/trump-to-weaken-national-environmental-policy-act.html

A display of Mary Trump’s new book about her uncle. A judge freed President Trump’s niece this week from a restraining order restricting her from discussing the book.

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

A display of Mary Trump’s new book about her uncle. A judge freed President Trump’s niece this week from a restraining order restricting her from discussing the book.

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

In an extended conversation with NPR on Wednesday, Mary Trump said her grandfather and family patriarch Fred Trump rewarded ruthlessness and dismissed any interests outside of the family real estate business, contributing to what she now views as an unfitness on President Trump’s part to hold the office of the White House.

“It’s kind of ironic in the sense that the traits my grandfather came to value in Donald were the traits that were a result of my grandfather’s maltreatment of Donald,” she said. “The bullying, the tendency not to care about other people’s feelings, the willingness to cheat, lie to get what he wanted. And eventually … my grandfather started to see a kindred spirit. Somebody who could advance his agenda.”

Mary Trump, the president’s only niece, describes an abusive and neglectful upbringing suffered by her father and uncles at the hand of Fred Trump, and said she will be supporting her uncle’s rival, Joe Biden, in the 2020 election.

A trained psychologist living in New York, she was promoting her highly anticipated new book, Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man.

In the book, Mary Trump describes how her grandfather’s relentless business ambition was passed down to Donald Trump.

“Honest work was never demanded of him, and no matter how badly he failed, he was rewarded in ways that are almost unfathomable. He continues to be protected from his own disasters in the White House,” she writes in the tell-all.

“But now the stakes are far higher than they’ve ever been before; they are literally life and death. Unlike any previous time in his life, Donald’s failings cannot be hidden or ignored because they threaten us all.”

The White House has repeatedly dismissed the book as a money grab by the president’s niece.

“The president describes the relationship he had with his father as warm and said his father was very good to him,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Matthews said earlier this month.

“He said his father was loving and not at all hard on him as a child. Also, the absurd SAT allegation is completely false,” Matthews said, referring to a claim in the book that the president cheated on the SAT by paying someone else to take the exam on his behalf.

The book, which was released Tuesday, is the second high-profile expose of the president this summer. In June, former national security adviser John Bolton won a legal battle to publish a review of his time at the president’s right hand.

Robert Trump, the president’s younger brother, sought to have a court block Mary Trump’s book release and her promotion of it. A New York judge on Monday freed Mary Trump from an existing gag order restricting her from discussing the book. A separate and earlier court ruling had already allowed the publishing house Simon & Schuster to move forward with producing the account.

Mary Trump said that while she is not afraid to speak freely about her family history, she felt there were risks associated with talking about the president unfavorably.

“Realistically speaking, Donald has a position with which comes an enormous amount of power,” she said in the Wednesday interview. “He has a following which has proven to be fairly fanatical. And from what I’ve seen, anybody who comes forward to speak truth to power or fulfill their obligations to uphold and defend the Constitution, if that clashes with Donald’s agenda, they do not fare well.”

“It’s a very divisive world we’re living in at the moment. And I understand that what I’m doing will be misinterpreted — sometimes willfully misinterpreted. And I just need to be careful.”

Mary Trump also offered her opinion of the president’s mental fitness.

“If you’re in a room with him for two minutes and you’re paying attention, you know that he’s not doing well,” she alleged. “Psychologically, he’s absolutely unfit. Emotionally, psychologically, he is absolutely unfit.”

Mary Trump did not speak in an official capacity as a psychologist. Mental health professionals typically refrain from diagnosing public figures they have not examined.

Asked whether she would be backing her uncle in the upcoming Nov. 3 general election, Mary Trump said she would support former Vice President Joe Biden.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/07/15/891381918/mary-trump-describes-abusive-trump-family-home-says-she-will-vote-biden-2020