Media captionDr Anthony Fauci: “It’s not helpful” to give signals about not wearing a mask

Top US virus researcher Dr Anthony Fauci has called President Donald Trump’s sharing of a video which included claims masks are not needed to fight Covid-19 “not helpful”.

The video promotes a drug widely disproven to be effective in treating Covid-19.

Dr Fauci’s interview with the BBC’s Katty Kay comes as the US is about to hit 150,000 deaths due to the pandemic.

The virus continues to spread rapidly in the US as states lock down again.

President Trump was among social media users who shared video on social media late on Monday of a group called America’s Frontline Doctors advocating hydroxychloroquine as a Covid-19 treatment and saying that masks and shutdowns are not effective in combating coronavirus.

Facebook and Twitter removed the video, flagging it as misinformation, but not before more than 17 million people had viewed it.

The speaker in the video also alleged that there was a conspiracy to prevent the world from learning of a coronavirus “cure” that was being led “by Fauci & the Democrats to perpetuate Covid deaths to hurt Trump”. On Tuesday, Dr Fauci denied “misleading the American public under any circumstances”.

What did Dr Fauci say?

“This issue of tweeting and retweeting is something that I’ve never understood or gotten involved in,” Dr Fauci told BBC News on Wednesday.

“But I can tell you, you’d have to say it’s not helpful if people get signals about not wearing masks when we are trying to get people to universally wear masks.”

“My feeling about what we should do with masks is very very clearly understood by everyone including those in the White House,” added Dr Fauci, who serves on the White House coronavirus task force and has directed the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984.

Asked about Mr Trump’s promotion of hydroxychloroquine – a drug Mr Trump himself says he took to ward off the virus – Dr Fauci said it would not be “productive or helpful for me to be making judges [sic] on right or wrong”.

“We know that every single good study – and by good study I mean randomised control study in which the data are firm and believable – has shown that hydroxychloroquine is not effective in the treatment of Covid-19,” he said.

Last month, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cautioned against using the drug to treat coronavirus patients, following reports of “serious heart rhythm problems” and other health issues.

Studies commissioned by the WHO, the US National Institutes of Health and other researchers around the world have found no evidence that hydroxychloroquine – when used with or without the antibiotic azithromycin, as repeatedly recommended by President Trump – helps treat coronavirus.

Media captionUS President Trump on Dr Fauci’s approval rating: “Nobody likes me”

‘Red zone’

A 26 July report from the White House coronavirus taskforce identified 21 states as being in the “red zone”, meaning that they had reported more than 100 new cases per 100,000 residents in the past week.

Twenty-eight states are in the “yellow zone”. Vermont is the only state in the green, with fewer than 10 cases per 100,000 people in the past week.

The report calls for further closures by state governors to contain the spread of the outbreak.

Media caption‘We’re still waiting at home for them to come back’

Covid ‘cure’

The video retweeted by Mr Trump showed doctors speaking outside the US Supreme Court building at an event organised by Tea Party Patriots Action, a group that has helped fund a pro-Trump political action committee.

In the video, Dr Stella Immanuel, a doctor from Houston, says she has successfully treated 350 coronavirus patients “and counting” with hydroxychloroquine.

The president said on Tuesday: “I think they’re very respected doctors. There was a woman who was spectacular in her statements about it.”

Media captionThe lost six weeks when the US failed to control the virus

According to the Daily Beast, Dr Immanuel has previously claimed the government is run by “reptilians” and that scientists are developing a vaccine to stop people being religious, among other bizarre views.

America’s Frontline Doctors’ founder Simone Gold accused social media companies of censorship for removing the hydroxychloroquine video.

“Treatment options for COVID-19 should be debated, and spoken about among our colleagues in the medical field,” she tweeted. “They should never, however, be censored and silenced.”

Media caption‘We already lost prom and graduation…’

How is Mr Trump’s relationship with Dr Fauci?

Late on Monday, Mr Trump also retweeted several tweets critical of Dr Fauci. But in Tuesday’s briefing the president denied he was criticising the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, insisting: “I get along with him very well.”

But he criticised Dr Fauci’s high popularity, telling reporters “Nobody likes me.”

“He’s got this high approval rating, so why don’t I have a high approval rating… with respect to the virus?” he asked.

Media captionWhy the US struggled with its reopening

The US now has more than 4.3 million reported cases of Covid-19.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53587527

Millions of Americans have been struggling financially since COVID-19 took hold in the U.S., pushing the economy deep into a recession. In March, the CARES Act was signed into law, and it did a number of key things to help provide relief to those negatively impacted by the pandemic. Namely, it provided direct stimulus checks and boosted unemployment benefits by $600 a week.

But the consensus has been that Americans need additional relief beyond what the CARES Act provided for, and so lawmakers have been busy trying to come up with a second proposal. On Monday, Republicans revealed their new stimulus deal, known as the HEALS (Health, Economic, Assistance, Liability Protection, and Schools) Act, and its more notable provisions include providing a second $1,200 stimulus payment to eligible Americans and boosting weekly unemployment benefits, albeit not at the same $600 rate jobless folks have been privy to these past few months. But buried inside the HEALS Act is another provision that could help struggling businesses survive the pandemic while also putting more money into business owners’ pockets.

Image source: Getty Images.

A tax break in the making

Dining establishments have been hammered by the COVID-19 outbreak, and as of July 10, more than 15,700 had already permanently closed their doors. As such, the HEALS Act is looking to allow business owners to fully deduct the cost of business meals on their taxes in an effort to encourage more people to support restaurants when they need it the most.

Right now, business-related meals are eligible for a 50% tax deduction — meaning, business owners can write off 50% of their meal costs. By increasing that deduction to 100%, the hope is that restaurant revenue will rise so that these business can avoid closures, and also, so that some of the millions of food service employees who have lost their jobs during the pandemic will perhaps get rehired.

Right now, in some parts of the country, restaurants are limited to outdoor seating only. In other parts, indoor dining is permissible at very limited capacity. The result? Even restaurants that are “busy” may be losing money as they struggle to pay their overhead costs while only seeing a fraction of the business they’re used to. By pumping money into these establishments, the hope is also that more can avoid permanent closures.

In addition to providing a better tax break for business meals, the HEALS Act is also seeking to roll out a second round of Paycheck Protection Program loans. During the first round, any business with up to 500 employees could apply for a forgivable loan provided it was experiencing economic uncertainty due to the pandemic. This second round, however, will only be applicable to businesses with 300 employees or fewer, and those that can prove that they’ve seen at least a 50% decline in revenue. Seeing as how a lot of restaurants have taken a beating, there’s a good chance that if the HEALS Act is passed, dining establishments will have no problem qualifying for a second, much-needed PPP round.

Source Article from https://www.fool.com/taxes/2020/07/29/republicans-new-coronavirus-relief-package-contain.aspx

Cecily Myart-Cruz, president of the United Teachers Los Angeles union, said she understood the benefits — she watched her own son engage with teachers online during the spring shutdown — but she argued that a full school day over video would not be feasible for either students or teachers (although some private schools have embraced it).

“You’re not going to see people engaged,” she said. “Kids will turn off to that.”

The union’s priorities, Ms. Myart-Cruz said, include ensuring that remote mental health counseling is available to students, and that teachers are reimbursed for work-from-home expenses such as upgrading their internet connections.

In the Sacramento City Unified School District, a history of mistrust between the union and administration has led to a series of repeated breakdowns in talks during the pandemic.

The district will open in a remote-only mode on Sept. 3, and has proposed that lessons delivered live over video or audio should be recorded for families to access at times that are convenient for them. But the union has objected, arguing that recording lessons could be a violation of privacy for educators, students and families, because their likenesses could be posted and viewed without their explicit permission.

In the spring, the union argued in favor of providing more paper materials to students, making the case that it was unfair to lean into high-tech learning when some students lacked laptops and internet access.

Across the country, it is likely that most students will experience a mix of online and in-person education this academic year, sometimes during the same week. That means that teachers will need to do two very different jobs: teach in classrooms and online.

:not(:first-child){margin-left:5px;}.css-5gimkt{font-family:nyt-franklin,helvetica,arial,sans-serif;font-size:0.8125rem;font-weight:700;-webkit-letter-spacing:0.03em;-moz-letter-spacing:0.03em;-ms-letter-spacing:0.03em;letter-spacing:0.03em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#333;}.css-5gimkt:after{content:’Collapse’;}.css-rdoyk0{-webkit-transition:all 0.5s ease;transition:all 0.5s ease;-webkit-transform:rotate(180deg);-ms-transform:rotate(180deg);transform:rotate(180deg);}.css-eb027h{max-height:5000px;-webkit-transition:max-height 0.5s ease;transition:max-height 0.5s ease;}.css-6mllg9{-webkit-transition:all 0.5s ease;transition:all 0.5s ease;position:relative;opacity:0;}.css-6mllg9:before{content:”;background-image:linear-gradient(180deg,transparent,#ffffff);background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(270deg,rgba(255,255,255,0),#ffffff);height:80px;width:100%;position:absolute;bottom:0px;pointer-events:none;}#masthead-bar-one{display:none;}#masthead-bar-one{display:none;}.css-1lev2qo{background-color:white;margin:30px 40px;max-width:510px;}@media (min-width:740px){.css-1lev2qo{margin:40px auto;}}.css-1lev2qo a{color:#326891;-webkit-text-decoration:none;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:2px solid #ccd9e3;}.css-1lev2qo a:visited{color:#333;-webkit-text-decoration:none;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:2px solid #ddd;}.css-1lev2qo a:hover{border-bottom:none;}.css-1lev2qo[data-truncated] .css-rdoyk0{-webkit-transform:rotate(0deg);-ms-transform:rotate(0deg);transform:rotate(0deg);}.css-1lev2qo[data-truncated] .css-eb027h{max-height:300px;overflow:hidden;-webkit-transition:none;transition:none;}.css-1lev2qo[data-truncated] .css-5gimkt:after{content:’See more’;}.css-1lev2qo[data-truncated] .css-6mllg9{opacity:1;}.css-a8d9oz{border-top:5px solid #121212;border-bottom:2px solid #121212;margin:0 auto;padding:5px 0 0;overflow:hidden;}]]>

Districts without collective bargaining, like Marietta, Ga., have more flexibility over assigning teachers’ roles, and plan to staff their remote learning programs with educators who have demonstrated skill in engaging students online.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/29/us/teacher-union-school-reopening-coronavirus.html

President Donald Trump‘s executive orders aimed at lowering U.S. prescription drug costs will cause “enormous destruction” as the pharmaceutical industry races to develop vaccines and treatments for the coronavirus, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla told investors Tuesday.

Trump on Friday signed four executive orders designed to bring U.S. drug prices at least on par with their costs overseas.

“Overall, I’m disappointed with this executive order,” Bourla said during a conference call discussing the company’s second-quarter earnings. “They pose enormous destruction in a time when the industry needs to be completely focused on developing a potential Covid-19 vaccine or treatment.”

Company spokeswoman Amy Rose later emailed CNBC to clarify that Bourla actually said the orders were an “enormous distraction” for drugmakers working on coronavirus vaccines and that several services “mis-transcribed” the word as “destruction.” A transcript service from data provider FactSet provided a third interpretation of his comments. FactSet quoted Bourla, who is Greek and speaks with an accent, as saying the new orders would create “enormous disruption” in the industry. CNBC stands by the original quote.

Trump has made lowering drug costs one of his key health-care issues early in his term. But drug pricing has taken a backseat over the last year as the Trump administration has shifted its focus to other priorities such as the teen vaping epidemic and now the coronavirus. The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America called the executive orders a “reckless distraction.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/28/pfizer-ceo-says-trumps-executive-orders-overhauling-us-drug-pricing-will-cause-enormous-destruction.html

Some come early and leave before the atmosphere turns and the trouble begins. Others sit out the peaceful demonstration and arrive in time for the nightly showdown to the beat of drummers rallying Portland’s ad hoc force of protesters against “Trump’s troops”.

But each evening follows the same broad ritual in downtown Portland in support of Black Lives Matter and against Donald Trump’s deployment of federal paramilitaries even as the protests have swelled to draw in organized groups of mothers, military veterans and first time demonstrators pushed too far by the president.

The peaceful protest against racial injustice that gets going around dusk typically evolves toward midnight into a staged confrontation with officers from the border patrol, US Marshals Service and other agencies deployed for the unusual task of facing down popular anger on American streets.

Each side accuses the other of provoking the fight, and therefore both claim to be defending themselves.

Television pictures of the skirmishes – the federal forces in camouflage firing waves of teargas and baton rounds, and looking very much like military invaders; the demonstrators in gas masks and helmets, some with large homemade shields, more resembling an insurgency – are open to interpretation.

Photo collage

Fox News selectively presents them as evidence Portland is a “war zone” in which the protesters arsenal includes flares, fireworks and lasers aimed at the federal officers eyes. Some protesters use the language of war too, describing tear gas as “chemical warfare”, the federal agents as an “occupying army” and quoting the Geneva conventions in accusing the authorities of war crimes for shooting demonstrators in the head with baton rounds.

But the theatre of the intense staged street battles is actually confined to a few square blocks of downtown Portland and obscures the growth of the protests from the issue of racial justice and the federal intervention’s unleashing of anger over four years of Trump’s rule.

The flashpoint was the sight of the federal paramilitaries without identification abducting protesters in unmarked vans and the violence meted out by officers against a US navy veteran who was demonstrating peacefully.

But the demonstrations have now become a focal point of anger at a president indifferent to the coronavirus death toll, tens of millions driven into unemployment, and an environmental emergency. There is also growing fear that America’s democracy is under threat.

Jean McNeil, a machinist, travelled from neighboring Washington state to join the demonstration outside the Portland courthouse where the federal paramilitaries are based.

“Honestly, I support Black Lives Matters but that’s not what got me here. I wanted to stand up to Trump. It feels to me like that’s what it’s really about for a lot of people here. We’re sick of this man and the damage he’s done, and this is the moment to stand up for our democracy because Trump is going to do everything he can between now and November to steal the election,” he said.



A Black Lives Matter protester carries an American flag as teargas fills the air outside the Mark O Hatfield United States courthouse in Portland. Photograph: Noah Berger/AP

Lydia, a Teamsters union organizer who, like many protesters fearful of arrest, chose to give only her first name, agreed.

“People are out here for multiple reasons in addition to sending a message about Black Lives Matter. It’s about making sure that we have protected our right to protest and engage in free speech. It’s anger at Trump and his presidency and how much it’s really eroded our environmental protections, protections on the job for people, the economy is tanked,” she said.

Democratic political leaders in Oregon have accused Trump of politicizing the use of federal forces to provoke conflict in order to portray himself as a law and order president. Trump has said he will send thousands more officers into other cities, such as Chicago to combat gun violence, in a move widely interpreted as an attempt to stir unrest across the country as a distraction from his failure to address the pandemic and its economic consequences.

If so, the president is unlikely to be displeased that his intervention in Portland has reinvigorated the protests and escalated the confrontation between demonstrators and federal officers.

With neither side ready to back down, and the Trump administration preparing to send dozens more officers to Portland, there is growing concern that the nightly battles are playing into the president’s hands.

The head of the Portland branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , E D Mondainé, said he feared BLM in the city was being coopted by “privileged white people” and that “empty battles” were serving the agenda of a president baiting protesters to light the fuse on a racist backlash across the country before the election.

“We cannot let teargas and rubber bullets define the moment that we’re in now,” he said.

Others see it differently. Teressa Raiford, the African American head of Don’t Shoot Portland, dismissed Mondainé’s criticisms as “propaganda”.



A demonstrator shouts slogans using a bullhorn next to a group of military veterans during a Black Lives Matter protest in Portland. Photograph: Marcio José Sánchez/AP

“He’s a part of the problem because he’s part of the political power,” she said.

Some of the protesters are not without their doubts. They acknowledge that Trump is exploiting the demonstrations but say his intervention cannot go unchallenged.

A US Navy veteran, who gave his name only as John, said he had not been on the demonstrations before the federal intervention but was brought out by federal officers beating a Navy veteran, Christopher David, who was protesting peacefully.

“He did nothing other than asked that question and he got beat up. I saw the video. I said, that’s enough,” he said. “If Trump utilizes federal troops against the people, and I consider myself representing the people here, that’s the beginning of the end I think of a democracy. I’m very worry about the condition of our democracy, the health of our democracy.”

Lydia, the union organizer, also acknowledged that Trump is exploiting the violence of the protests, but said it will not get him what he wants.

“ If he were really interested in sending the feds into support states, he would send them in to help provide medical care for people during a pandemic,” she said. “Instead he sends them here as a political stunt to just try to rattle the cages of his supporters who are deathly afraid of liberal or progressive ideology around a whole host of issues. This is just a scare tactic. It’s the last gasps of a losing president.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/29/portland-protests-trump-blm-covid-19-economy

Sen. Rob Portman on Wednesday urged Congress to come to an agreement on the federal unemployment insurance supplement, telling CNBC that a solution needs to be in place this week. 

“If we do nothing because we end up in a partisan gridlock here and both sides go to their corners, the people who get hurt are the workers because the $600 will end,” the Ohio Republican said on “Squawk Box.”  “There’s a cliff, and we can’t let that happen so we need to do something before Friday.” 

In their roughly $1 trillion coronavirus relief plan released Monday, Senate Republicans proposed a reduced benefit of $200 a week through September. The GOP plan then proposes to replace it with a different formula that would cap total state and federal unemployment benefits at 70% of lost wages. 

The $600-per-week boost — on top of state-level benefits — is technically on the books until Friday. But because of a technicality with unemployment programs, states have stopped paying it out to the millions of Americans receiving jobless benefits. 

Republicans contend the $600 weekly benefit, which was instituted as part of the $2.2 trillion CARES Act passed in March, can act as a deterrent for some workers to return to the job because they might make more on unemployment insurance than before the pandemic. 

Democrats in Washington want to extend the $600 benefit at least into next year, arguing the assistance is still necessary to help laid-off workers weather perhaps the worst economic crisis in the U.S. since the Great Depression. 

Portman’s comments Wednesday came shortly after a new CNBC/Change Research poll of voters in six swing states found that 62% of respondents were in favor of extending the $600-per-week federal unemployment insurance. 

Portman, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said he felt “very strongly” about the need for congressional action this week on the unemployment enhancement 

“We cannot allow us to go through a period where there is no employment insurance going out to people. Six hundred dollars to zero is not a good option,” Portman said. “But again, there are practical solutions here.” 

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/29/sen-rob-portman-congress-must-act-on-unemployment-benefit-by-friday.html

(Reuters) – A half-dozen U.S. states in the South and West reported one-day records for coronavirus deaths on Tuesday and cases in Texas passed the 400,000 mark as California health officials said Latinos made up more than half its cases.

Arkansas, California, Florida, Montana, Oregon and Texas each reported record spikes in fatalities.

In the United States more than 1,300 lives were lost nation wide on Tuesday, the biggest one-day increase since May, according to a Reuters tally.

California health officials said Latinos, who make up just over a third of the most populous U.S. state, account for 56% of COVID-19 infections and 46% of deaths. Cases are soaring in the Central Valley agricultural region, with its heavily Latino population, overwhelming hospitals. The state on Tuesday reported 171 deaths.

Florida saw 191 coronavirus deaths in the prior 24 hours, the state health department said.

Texas added more than 6,000 new cases on Monday, pushing its total to 401,477, according to a Reuters tally. Only three other states – California, Florida and New York – have more than 400,000 total cases. The four are the most populous U.S. states.

California and Texas both reported decreases in overall hospitalizations as Dr. Anthony Fauci, a top U.S. infectious diseases expert, saw signs the surge could be peaking in the South and West while other areas were on the cusp of new outbreaks.

Fauci said early indications showed the percentage of positive coronavirus tests rising in Ohio, Indiana, Tennessee and Kentucky.

TEACHERS’ UNION FIGHTS

The rise in U.S. deaths and infections has dampened early hopes the country was past the worst of an economic crisis that has decimated businesses and put millions of Americans out of work.

The trend has fueled a bitter debate over the reopening of schools in the coming weeks. President Donald Trump and members of his administration have pushed for students to return to class, while some teachers and local officials have called for online learning.

“We will fight on all fronts for the safety of students and their educators,” Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, said during the union’s virtual convention on Tuesday. “It’s the 11th hour; we need the resources now.”

The Texas Education Agency, the state’s overseer of public education, said it would deny funding to schools that delay in-person classes because of orders by local health authorities related to the pandemic.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued guidance that health authorities cannot impose “blanket” school closures for coronavirus prevention. Any such decision is up to school officials, he said.

Local health leaders in the biggest metropolitan areas in Texas, including Houston and Dallas, have recently ordered the postponement of in-person classes.

In Washington, some Republicans in the U.S. Senate pushed back against their own party’s $1 trillion coronavirus relief proposal the day after it was unveiled by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, weighing on U.S. stocks.

“I’m not for borrowing another trillion dollars,” Republican Senator Rand Paul told reporters.

Democrats have rejected the plan as too limited compared with their $3 trillion proposal that passed the House of Representatives in May. Some Republicans called it too expensive.

Trump said on Tuesday he did not support everything in the Senate Republican coronavirus relief legislation but would not elaborate.

“There are also things that I very much support,” he told a White House briefing. “But we’ll be negotiating.”

Trump also groused about Fauci’s high approval ratings and joked “nobody likes me” as he struggles to improve his standing with voters over his handling of the coronavirus pandemic.

Slideshow (4 Images)

“It can only be my personality,” said Trump.

(GRAPHIC: Tracking the novel coronavirus in the U.S. – here)

(GRAPHIC: Where coronavirus cases are rising in the United States – here)

Reporting by Susan Heavey, Daniel Trotta, Patricia Zengerle, David Morgan, Lisa Shumaker, Maria Caspani, Brendan O’Brien, Sharon Bernstein and Dan Whitcomb; Writing by Paul Simao and Dan Whitcomb; Editing by Leslie Adler and Christian Schmollinger

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa/six-us-states-see-record-covid-19-deaths-latinos-hit-hard-in-california-idUSKCN24T2AM

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, defended playing a video montage that showed violence in cities across America during a hearing where Attorney General William Barr testified.

“I mean, the video speaks for itself,” Jordan told “Special Report” guest host Shannon Bream Tuesday after accusing Democrats on the panel of wanting to “censor Republican members … just like the hard left wants to censor conservatives around the country.”

The video, which Jordan played during his opening statement, included several mainstream media members referring to recent protests as “peaceful” and dismissing reports of violence amid images of burning buildings and attacks on law enforcement.

DON LEMON, CHUCK TODD MAKE CAMEOS AT BARR HEARING AS JORDAN PLAYS VIDEO OF ‘PEACEFUL’ PROTESTERS

“I want to thank you for defending law enforcement,” Jordan told Barr, “for pointing out what a crazy idea this ‘defund the police’ policy … whatever you want to call it, is, and standing up for the rule of law.”

The House Freedom Caucus member echoed that statement on “Special Report” Tuesday evening, telling Bream, “the attorney general is enforcing the rule of law.

“And if Democrats want to try to blame the attorney general for what is happening in Democrat-run cities that have been Democrat-run for years and years — I think the last time there was an elected Republican in Portland was 1956. They want to try to blame the administration for that. They’re just flat out wrong.”

Tuesday’s hearing was tense as Barr sparred with Democratic lawmakers who criticized him on issues ranging from voting rights to the government’s response to protests in Portland to the Justice Department’s handling of investigations into associates of President Trump.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

At one point Barr sarcastically called Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., a “class act” when he was denied a short break.

“That’s the treatment the Democrats give the Attorney General of the United States,” Jordan said. “It is wrong, and the American people saw it for what it was.”

Fox News’ Andrew O’Reilly and Brian Flood contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/jordan-defends-montage-protest-violence-barr-hearing

A majority, or 62%, of voters in those states support extending the $600 per week enhanced federal unemployment insurance, the poll found. Only 36% oppose continuing the benefit, which states stopped paying out last week. 

The survey found widespread support in the swing states for other stimulus spending measures, as well. Four in 5 respondents said they back another direct payment of up to $1,200 for people making less than $99,000. Only 18% oppose another round of checks. 

More than two-thirds of voters — 68% — support relief for state and local governments facing budget shortfalls due to the pandemic, versus 28% who oppose the aid, the poll found. Only 32% of respondents back giving corporations immunity from lawsuits related to Covid-19, while 58% oppose such protections, according to the survey. 

The poll surveyed 2,565 likely voters in the six states from Friday through Sunday. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.9 percentage points. 

As Congress finds itself divided over how much money to spend to try to combat the health and economic crises created by the coronavirus, the poll shows strong support for more federal stimulus. The unemployment insurance extension, assistance for states and municipalities and a liability shield for businesses and doctors are among the thorniest issues officials need to resolve in talks between Republicans and Democrats. 

Negotiators hope to craft a pandemic aid bill that can pass the Republican-held Senate and Democratic-controlled House. The GOP unveiled its opening offer on Monday. Talks then started between the Trump administration and the top congressional Democrats, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. 

The Republican legislation would slash the extra federal unemployment benefit to $200 per week, on top of what recipients get from states, through September. It would then shift to a 70% replacement of an individual’s previous wages. 

The GOP contends the $600 per week benefit deters people from returning to work because many recipients make more money at home than they otherwise would have. Democrats want to extend the benefit at least into next year, saying the government should not cut off income at a time when roughly 30 million people are still receiving some form of unemployment insurance. 

The GOP plan for direct payments largely mirrors the one Congress passed in March as part of a $2 trillion rescue package. It would send up to $1,200 to individuals and $2,400 to couples who make less than $198,000. It would also provide $500 per dependent, regardless of age. 

The Republican proposal would not allocate any new aid to states and municipalities, instead giving them more flexibility in how they spend relief money approved earlier this year. House Democrats included nearly $1 trillion in state and local assistance in the bill they passed in May. 

In addition, it calls for liability protections for businesses, doctors and schools except for cases of “gross negligence” or “willful misconduct” as they try to operate during the pandemic. Democrats have generally opposed legal immunity for companies.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has called the provision a “red line” in discussions.

The negotiations have already taken on a more bitter tone than talks that led to relief packages earlier this year, in part due to the fact that the presidential and Senate elections are just over three months away. 

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/29/coronavirus-stimulus-voters-support-enhanced-unemployment-cnbcchange-poll-finds.html

If your day doesn’t start until you’re up to speed on the latest headlines, then let us introduce you to your new favorite morning fix. Sign up here for the ‘5 Things’ newsletter.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/29/us/five-things-july-29-trnd/index.html

As college students and professors decide whether to head back to class, and as universities weigh how and whether to reopen, the coronavirus is already on campus.

A New York Times survey of every public four-year college in the country, as well as every private institution that competes in Division I sports or is a member of an elite group of research universities, revealed at least 6,300 cases tied to about 270 colleges over the course of the pandemic. And the new academic year has not even begun at most schools.


Confirmed coronavirus cases on college campuses

More than 50 cases

11-50 cases

4-10 cases

Fewer than 4 cases

Outbreaks have emerged on Greek Row this summer at the University of Washington, where at least 136 residents were infected, and at Harris-Stowe State University in St. Louis, where administrators were re-evaluating their plans for fall after eight administrative workers tested positive.

The virus has turned up in a science building at Western Carolina, on the football team at Clemson and among employees at the University of Denver.

At Appalachian State in North Carolina, at least 41 construction workers have tested positive while working on campus buildings. The Times has identified at least 14 coronavirus-related deaths at colleges.



Search for a school

The list includes public, four-year universities in the United States, as well as private colleges that compete in Division I sports or are members of an elite group of research universities. Only schools that reported cases are shown.

Collapse list

Cases

Location

Weekly local cases per capita

Show all


There is no standardized reporting method for coronavirus cases and deaths at colleges, and the information is not being publicly tracked at a national level. Of nearly 1,000 institutions contacted by The Times, some had already posted case information online, some provided full or partial numbers and others refused to answer basic questions, citing privacy concerns. Hundreds of colleges did not respond at all.

Still, the Times survey represents the most comprehensive look at the toll the virus has already taken on the country’s colleges and universities.

Coronavirus infections on campuses might go unnoticed if not for reporting by academic institutions themselves because they do not always show up in official state or countywide tallies, which generally exclude people who have permanent addresses elsewhere, as students often do.

The Times survey included four-year public schools in the United States, some of which are subject to public records laws, that are members of the Association of American Universities or that compete at the highest level of college sports. It has not yet expanded to include hundreds of other institutions, including most private schools and community colleges, where students, faculty and staff are struggling with the same difficult decisions.

Among the colleges that provided information, many offered no details about who contracted the virus, when they became ill or whether a case was connected to a larger outbreak. It is possible that some of the cases were identified months ago, in the early days of the outbreak in the United States before in-person learning was cut short, and that others involved students and employees who had not been on campus recently.

Return to Campus

This data, which is almost certainly an undercount, shows the risks colleges face as they prepare for a school year in the midst of a pandemic. But because universities vary widely in size, and because some refused to provide information, comparing case totals from campus to campus may not provide a full picture of the relative risk.

What is clear is that despite months of planning for a safe return to class, and despite drastic changes to campus life, the virus is already spreading widely at universities.

Some institutions, like the California State University system, have moved most fall classes online. Others, including those in the Patriot League and Ivy League, have decided to not hold fall sports. But many institutions still plan to welcome freshmen to campus in the coming days, to hold in-person classes and to host sporting events.


Plans for Fall Instruction

The chart shows how schools with reported coronavirus cases plan to offer instruction for the fall semester, according to a database from The Chronicle of Higher Education. Hover or tap the circles to see the schools.

More than 50 cases

11-50 cases

4-10 cases

Fewer than 4 cases

At the University of Texas at Austin, where more than 440 students and employees have tested positive since the spring, in-person classes will be capped at 40 percent of capacity and final exams will be taken online.

At Peru State College in Nebraska, where there have been no known cases, classes are expected to resume on schedule, but with stepped-up cleaning procedures and a recommendation for dorm residents to wear masks in common areas.

The University of Georgia has announced plans for in-person classes despite rising deaths from the virus in the state. The university has recorded at least 390 infections involving students, faculty and staff.

O’Bryan Moore, a senior at the school, said he was worried about the safety of his classmates and teachers. He said he was skeptical that students would widely follow guidelines to wear masks once they return in August.

“There is no way I can see this ending without outbreaks on campus,” said Mr. Moore, who is studying to become a park ranger.

Mr. Moore said that online classes have not been as effective as in-person classes, but that he still hoped the university would change its plans for students to return to campus.

“I think we should remain online for this semester, even if it’ll hurt my education,” he said. “Because it’s the right thing to do.”

As students have started trickling back onto campuses in recent weeks, the early returns have been troubling. After 10 students tested positive this month at West Virginia University, officials pledged to deep-clean the places on campus where they had been. At Kansas State University, off-season football workouts were paused last month after an outbreak on the team.

Athletic Departments at High Risk

Many of the first arrivals on campus have been athletes hoping to compete this fall. A separate Times survey of the 130 universities that compete at the highest level of Division I football revealed more than 630 cases on 68 campuses among athletes, coaches and other employees.


As universities make plans for the fall semester — online, in person, or a mix of the two — administrators have had to weigh shifting public health guidance and financial and academic concerns, as well as the difficult reality that some students and faculty members are likely to test positive no matter how classes are held.

“There is simply no way to completely eliminate risk, whether we are in-person or online,” Martha E. Pollack, the president of Cornell, wrote in a letter explaining the decision to bring students back to campus.

Are There Coronavirus Cases on Your Campus?


Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/28/us/covid-19-colleges-universities.html

WASHINGTON — Russian intelligence operatives are using a trio of English-language websites to spread disinformation about the coronavirus pandemic, seeking to exploit a crisis that America is struggling to contain ahead of the presidential election in November, U.S. officials said Tuesday.

Two Russians who have held senior roles in Moscow’s military intelligence service known as the GRU have been identified as responsible for a disinformation effort directed at American and Western audiences, U.S. government officials said. They spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The information had previously been classified, but officials said it had been downgraded so they could more freely discuss it. Officials said they were doing so now to sound the alarm about the particular websites and to expose a connection between the sites and Russian intelligence.

Between late May and early July, one of the officials said, a trio of websites published about 150 articles about the pandemic response, including coverage aimed at propping up Russia and denigrating the U.S.

Among the headlines that caught the attention of U.S. officials are “Russia’s Counter COVID-19 Aid to America Advances Case for Détente,” which suggested that Russia had given urgent and substantial aid to the U.S. to fight the pandemic, and “Beijing Believes COVID-19 is a Biological Weapon.”

The disclosure comes as the spread of disinformation, including by Russia, is an urgent concern heading into November’s presidential election as U.S. officials look to avoid a repeat of the 2016 contest, when Russia launched a covert social media campaign to divide American public opinion to favor then-candidate Donald Trump. The country’s chief counterintelligence official warned in a public statement Friday about Russia’s continued use of internet trolls to advance their goals.

Even apart from politics, the twin crises buffeting the country and much of the world — the pandemic and race relations and protests — have offered fertile territory for misinformation or outfight falsehoods.

Officials described the disinformation as part of an ongoing and persistent Russian effort to cause confusion. They did not say whether the effort was directly related to the November election, though some of the coverage on the websites appeared to denigrate Trump’s Democratic challenger, Joe Biden. The stories call to mind Russian efforts from 2016 to exacerbate race relations in America and drive corruption allegations against U.S. political figures.

U.S. officials on Tuesday singled out a news agency, InfoRos.ru, that operates a trio of websites InfoRos.ru, Infobrics.org and OneWorld.press — that they say have leveraged the pandemic to promote anti-Western objectives and to spread disinformation.

The sites promote their narratives in a sophisticated but insidious effort that officials liken to money laundering, where stories in well-written English — and often with pro-Russian sentiment and anti-U.S. sentiment — are cycled through other news sources to conceal their origin and enhance the legitimacy of the information.

The sites also amplify stories that originate elsewhere, the government officials said.

The sites focus on contemporary politics as well. A headline Tuesday on InfoRos.ru about the unrest roiling major American cities read “Chaos in the Blue Cities,” accompanying a story that lamented how New Yorkers who grew up in the tough-on-crime approach of Mayors Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg “must adapt to life in high-crime urban areas.”

Another story carried the headline of “Ukrainian Trap for Biden,” and claimed that “Ukrainegate” — a reference to stories surrounding Biden’s son Hunter’s former ties to a Ukraine gas company — “keeps unfolding with renewed vigors.”

Two individuals who have also held leadership roles at InfoRos, identified Tuesday as Denis Valeryevich Tyurin and Aleksandr Gennadyevich Starunskiy, have previously served in a GRU unit specializing in military psychological intelligence and maintain deep contacts there, the officials said.

InfoRos and One World’s ties to the Russian state have attracted scrutiny in the past from European disinformation analysts.

In 2019, a European Union task force that studies disinformation campaigns identified One World as “a new addition to the pantheon of Moscow-based disinformation outlets.” The task force noted that One World’s content often parrots the Russian state agenda on issues including the war in Syria.

A report published last month by a second, nongovernmental organization, Brussels-based EU DisinfoLab, examined links between InfoRos and One World to Russian military intelligence. The researchers identified technical clues tying their websites to Russia and identified some financial connections between InfoRos and the government.

“InfoRos is evolving in a shady grey zone, where regular information activities are mixed with more controversial actions that could be quite possibly linked to the Russian state’s information operations,” the report’s authors concluded.

On its English-language Facebook page, InfoRos describes itself as an “Information agency: world through the eyes of Russia.”

Associated Press writer David Klepper in Providence, Ri.I., contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.snopes.com/ap/2020/07/28/russia-spreading-disinformation/

Some experts, like Michael T. Osterholm, the director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, argue that only a nationwide lockdown can completely contain the virus now. Other researchers think that is politically impossible, but emphasize that localities must be free to act quickly and enforce strong measures with support from their state capitols.

Danielle Allen, the director of Harvard University’s Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, which has issued pandemic response plans, said that finding less than one case per 100,000 people means a community should continue testing, contact tracing and isolating cases — with financial support for those who need it.

Up to 25 cases per 100,000 requires greater restrictions, like closing bars and limiting gatherings. Above that number, authorities should issue stay-at-home orders, she said.

Testing must be focused, not just offered at convenient parking lots, experts said, and it should be most intense in institutions like nursing homes, prisons, factories or other places at risk of superspreading events.

Testing must be free in places where people are poor or uninsured, such as public housing projects, Native American reservations and churches and grocery stores in impoverished neighborhoods.

None of this will be possible unless the nation’s capacity for testing, a continuing disaster, is greatly expanded. By the end of summer, the administration hopes to start using “pooling,” in which tests are combined in batches to speed up the process.

But the method only works in communities with lower infection rates, where large numbers of pooled tests turn up relatively few positive results. It fails where the virus has spread everywhere, because too many batches turn up positive results that require retesting.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/29/health/coronavirus-future-america.html

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (left) and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer are among those thought to be on Joe Biden’s vice presidential shortlist.

Craig Fritz and Michigan Office of the Governor via AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Craig Fritz and Michigan Office of the Governor via AP

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (left) and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer are among those thought to be on Joe Biden’s vice presidential shortlist.

Craig Fritz and Michigan Office of the Governor via AP

One of a series of reports looking at Joe Biden’s potential running mates

As the coronavirus spread across the country in March, President Trump held a conference call with the nation’s governors and reportedly told them they should try to find their own supplies of ventilators and respirators.

Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan’s Democratic governor, said she couldn’t believe it.

“To hear the leader of the federal government telling us to work around the federal government because it’s too slow is just kind of mind-boggling, to be honest,” Whitmer told MSNBC.

Trump fired back on Twitter, saying “‘Half’ Whitmer … doesn’t have a clue.” And later, as the death toll in Michigan mounted, Trump said he told Vice President Pence to ignore governors who don’t show enough appreciation. “Don’t call the woman in Michigan,” he said from the White House briefing room.

The back and forth thrust Whitmer — a former Michigan Senate minority leader who has only been leading her state since early 2019 — into the national spotlight.

It also previewed an ongoing theme of this pandemic — a debate over who should take the lead in managing the crisis.

Now, Whitmer and another governor confronting the pandemic at the state level, Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, are two of the candidates reportedly said to be on Joe Biden’s vice presidential shortlist. The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee said Tuesday that he plans to announce his pick next week.

Lujan Grisham was New Mexico’s health secretary before three terms in Congress, where she was chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and then became governor in 2019.

Lujan Grisham had dealt with a flu outbreak as health secretary, and so she started preparing for the coronavirus when it spread abroad in January, rushing to secure testing supplies. She also issued early lockdown orders when there were just a few cases in New Mexico.

Lujan Grisham puts on her face mask when not speaking during an April 15 update on the COVID-19 outbreak in the state.

Eddie Moore/Albuquerque Journal via AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Eddie Moore/Albuquerque Journal via AP

Still, she said she was surprised by the lack of a national strategy.

“In my wildest dreams I would not be spending my own specific time finding testing supplies, and the right manufacturers, getting swabs and then chasing PPE,” she recently told The Washington Post.

The dynamic was unprecedented, said Kathleen Sebelius, the former Kansas governor who was secretary of health and human services under former President Barack Obama and was vetted for the vice presidency in 2008.

“All governors found themselves in a very unique position, with a federal government who didn’t want responsibility, so over and over again, governors have stepped into this vacuum,” she said.

Governors seen “taking action”

Former Michigan Gov. Jim Blanchard said that’s why it’s the perfect moment to put a governor on Biden’s ticket. He is close with the Biden campaign and has advised several vice presidential searches for Democratic nominees.

“You know, until the virus, governors were in the shadows of government,” he said. “It’s been the senators who get all the attention because they’re on all the cable shows every night.”

But Blanchard said that’s changed. He said Whitmer and many other governors have shown calm under fire that has projected a stark contrast with Trump — one that could be useful for the Biden campaign.

“Because it shows they’re doing things,” he said. “They care. They’re taking action. They’re not sitting around abdicating responsibility and finding someone to blame.”

Dr. Shauna Ryder Diggs, one of Michigan’s representatives to the Democratic National Committee and a regent at the University of Michigan, said her patients have noticed the disconnect.

“People are starting to think more about leadership at the top,” she said, “so they see the leadership they had from Gov. Whitmer and the state of Michigan, and now they’re wondering if the same leadership out of Washington had taken place, perhaps [coronavirus outbreaks] wouldn’t have been in these other states in July, almost August.”

On top of the pandemic, governors have faced an economic crisis and protests over police brutality and racial injustice. The protests have amplified calls for Biden to select a Black woman for his running mate.

Ryder Diggs said Whitmer, who’s white, responded to the protests with empathy.

“I’m an African American woman and Gov. Whitmer, she’s able to have honest conversations on race, and I think those interpersonal relationships she’s able to have with all people, to feel that pain, and understand what those protests were really about,” she said.

Seeking advantages with a running mate

Protesters march outside the Michigan state Capitol in Lansing on May 20, denouncing Whitmer’s coronavirus closures.

Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images

Protesters march outside the Michigan state Capitol in Lansing on May 20, denouncing Whitmer’s coronavirus closures.

Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images

In battleground Michigan, approval of Trump’s handling of the coronavirus is under water. Whitmer’s, though, has remained high despite protests and lawsuits over social distancing orders and her use of emergency powers.

According to a recent survey, 63% of Michiganders approved of Whitmer’s handling of the coronavirus, compared with 41% for Trump.

Whitmer flipped the governor’s mansion blue in 2018, winning by 9 percentage points, and some Democrats think she could help bring home Michigan and other “blue wall” states.

But Zach Gorchow, executive editor of Gongwer, a news service that covers state politics in Lansing, said he is doubtful that adding a Michigander to the ticket would have the kind of impact on Midwestern voters that some Democratic strategists hope.

“Michigan Democrats already seem to be ready to walk across hot coals to unseat Trump, and I don’t think adding Gretchen Whitmer to the ticket really changes that,” he said.

Whitmer has faced blowback from Republicans for spending too much time taking interviews in the national media — a critique that would only be exacerbated if she were to seek higher office.

For both governors, campaigning while managing crises on multiple fronts could also prove both politically and practically challenging. Plus, they carry the baggage of having ordered sometimes-unpopular closures and social distancing rules.

Stephanie Garcia Richard, the New Mexico commissioner of public lands and a Lujan Grisham ally, said the governor has made the right decisions, even when they’re unpopular. Recently, Lujan Grisham had to walk back reopening indoor dining as cases of the coronavirus rose again. The New Mexico Restaurant Association sued, but the state Supreme Court has so far upheld the closures.

“And not to say that was an easy thing for her to do,” Garcia Richard said. “There will be businesses that will not recover, that we will lose, permanently, but Americans look to their leaders to do the right thing under pressure.”

While Whitmer could bring a geographic advantage to the ticket, Lujan Grisham could attract another bloc of voters. She’s the first Democratic Latina governor in the country.

Gabriel Sanchez, a professor at the University of New Mexico and principal at the research group Latino Decisions, said Democrats often overlook Latino voters.

“I think this is also an opportunity not just to address 2020, but the long-term electoral map,” he said. “Having a Latino on … the ticket might solidify Texas flipping not only soon but potentially for the long term.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/07/29/896168899/as-states-take-pandemic-lead-biden-is-said-to-weigh-at-least-2-governors-for-vp

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, defended playing a video montage that showed violence in cities across America during a hearing where Attorney General William Barr testified.

“I mean, the video speaks for itself,” Jordan told “Special Report” guest host Shannon Bream Tuesday after accusing Democrats on the panel of wanting to “censor Republican members … just like the hard left wants to censor conservatives around the country.”

The video, which Jordan played during his opening statement, included several mainstream media members referring to recent protests as “peaceful” and dismissing reports of violence amid images of burning buildings and attacks on law enforcement.

DON LEMON, CHUCK TODD MAKE CAMEOS AT BARR HEARING AS JORDAN PLAYS VIDEO OF ‘PEACEFUL’ PROTESTERS

“I want to thank you for defending law enforcement,” Jordan told Barr, “for pointing out what a crazy idea this ‘defund the police’ policy … whatever you want to call it, is, and standing up for the rule of law.”

The House Freedom Caucus member echoed that statement on “Special Report” Tuesday evening, telling Bream, “the attorney general is enforcing the rule of law.

“And if Democrats want to try to blame the attorney general for what is happening in Democrat-run cities that have been Democrat-run for years and years — I think the last time there was an elected Republican in Portland was 1956. They want to try to blame the administration for that. They’re just flat out wrong.”

Tuesday’s hearing was tense as Barr sparred with Democratic lawmakers who criticized him on issues ranging from voting rights to the government’s response to protests in Portland to the Justice Department’s handling of investigations into associates of President Trump.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

At one point Barr sarcastically called Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., a “class act” when he was denied a short break.

“That’s the treatment the Democrats give the Attorney General of the United States,” Jordan said. “It is wrong, and the American people saw it for what it was.”

Fox News’ Andrew O’Reilly and Brian Flood contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/jordan-defends-montage-protest-violence-barr-hearing

A variety of MSNBC and CNN hosts made cameos during Attorney General William Barr’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday when Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, used his opening statement to put an emphasis on mainstream media’s efforts to paint sometimes violent protesters as “peaceful.”

“I want to thank you for defending law enforcement, for pointing out what a crazy idea this defund the police policy … whatever you want to call it, is, and standing up for the rule of law,” Jordan said. “We have a video we want to show that gets right to this point.”

JONATHAN TURLEY. BLASTS CNN’S BRIAN STELTER OVER SANDMANN RETWEET 

Jordan then played a powerful video montage featuring a variety of mainstream media members referring to recent protests as “peaceful,” which included everyone from CNN’s Don Lemon to NBC News’ Chuck Todd dismissing violence amid images of burning buildings and attacks on law enforcement.

The video — which irked House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. — featured MSNBC host Ali Velshi famously declaring he was covering a “mostly a protest” despite a building burning right behind him.

“It is not, generally speaking, unruly,” Velshi said.

Rachel Maddow, Chris Cuomo and Willie Geist also appeared in the Republican exhibit.

The words “peaceful protest” were uttered by more than a dozen pundits before footage of the widow of retired St. Louis police Capt. David Dorn speaking about her husband’s tragic death began.

Dorn was murdered amid riots and looting on June 2 while working to protect a pawn shop. His widow spoke about the senseless death as additional footage of law enforcement officers being attacked by protesters played as part of Jordan’s video.

Barr looked on as the dramatic footage was played, portraying chaos in many of America’s major cities since George Floyd was killed in police custody in May.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

When the video ended, Nadler, snarked, “I hope that Mr. Jordan will never complain about the length of my opening statement.”

Nadler then complained the video was not within the committe’s protocol.

“Without objection, I am going to insert committee’s audio-visual policy into the record of this hearing, and note that the minority did not give the 48 hours notice required,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/don-lemon-chuck-todd-barr-hearing-jim-jordan