LANSING, Mich. (WILX) – Today, Michigan Speaker of the House Lee Chatfield wrote a letter to Governor Gretchen Whitmer criticizing her response to the recent plot to kidnap her on Thursday, October 8.

Many were shocked to hear about the plot to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer announced on Thursday, October 8.

Since that day, politicians have gone back and forth on the matter, including the Governor herself, going as far as to blame President Donald Trump.

Just two days after the announcement, Michigan Speaker of the House Lee Chatfield wrote a letter to the Governor regarding the plot to kidnap Governor Whitmer.

The letter reads as follows:

“Governor Whitmer,

We need to cooperate more. A better message needs to be sent. And now that a couple days have gone by since the plot to attack us both has passed, there are several points that I believe need to be made and questions that need to be asked.

Why weren’t we in the Legislature warned of the plot to take hostages at the Capitol? The plot by these terrorists was against us, too. Why weren’t House sergeants warned? You knew, and we weren’t even given a warning. We had people working in the building every day doing essential work, and their lives matter, too.

I am also alarmed the Lieutenant Governor recently blamed Michigan Republicans for the evil plans of these unstable men. That accusation is inflammatory and untrue, and it does nothing to solve this problem. You chose to blame President Trump instead. The truth is, I started getting death threats to my family at my home the day you said my legislative actions would kill people. Please realize that.

But you should also know that others in the Legislature have been threatened, too. They’ve received threats, letters and calls to their homes. These threats have been to both Republicans and Democrats, but they aren’t given security. They don’t have the state resources to build million dollar fences at their homes. And we were also targeted in these evil plots. That’s why to overcome this, it will take a unified message and not political talking points or partisan finger pointing. It will take leadership.

Now, I’ve been critical of many of your decisions this year during COVID-19. I’ll admit that. I’ve agreed with some decisions, too. It’s important we have these debates. It makes us stronger. It ensures all voices in our state are heard. It’s how our process was designed to work. But we need to do it the right way. Blanket, partisan blame is wrong. It simply further divides us and causes more political strife.

Hatred and violence are wrong, and that’s why I’ve continually denounced it. And I agree, it’s time to tone down the partisan rhetoric and turn “the heat down” as you’ve said. Will you do the same for President Trump? You’ve arguably been his biggest critic this year in the country. You even fundraised this week off this plot, now making it political, which is sad.

Will the Lieutenant Governor turn it down with the entire Republican Party, millions of whom are his constituents? This wasn’t standing tall. It was cheap. We can do this, but we have to make this decision together. Let’s back up our words with actions.

Please know that I am praying for the good health and constant safety of you and your family. I hope you are of mine too. And I hope you will truly and finally allow us to work together to protect the lives and livelihoods of everyone who calls Michigan home. I’m ready. I hope you are, too.”

Copyright 2020 WILX. All rights reserved.

Source Article from https://www.wilx.com/2020/10/10/michigan-speaker-of-the-house-writes-letter-to-governor-whitmer-regarding-plot/

CREOLE: What’s left of a white fence surrounds a house, possibly ravaged by a previous hurricane, in the Creole, La. area, seen from the air Saturday, Oct. 10, 2020, after Hurricane Delta passed through the area the day before.

Source Article from https://www.theadvocate.com/acadiana/multimedia/photos/collection_94453d32-0b19-11eb-83f0-d312054ff57f.html

Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court has gone a decade without acting on a major case concerning the Second Amendment, an issue that could receive rare attention in the future by the high court should Judge Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed to the bench in the coming weeks.

    ‘);$vidEndSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–active’);}};CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;var configObj = {thumb: ‘none’,video: ‘politics/2020/07/27/john-roberts-supreme-court-liberals-second-amendment-biskupic-newday-vpx.cnn’,width: ‘100%’,height: ‘100%’,section: ‘domestic’,profile: ‘expansion’,network: ‘cnn’,markupId: ‘body-text_21’,theoplayer: {allowNativeFullscreen: true},adsection: ‘const-article-inpage’,frameWidth: ‘100%’,frameHeight: ‘100%’,posterImageOverride: {“mini”:{“width”:220,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200723124122-20200717-scotus-roberts-legacy-v2-small-169.jpg”,”height”:124},”xsmall”:{“width”:300,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200723124122-20200717-scotus-roberts-legacy-v2-medium-plus-169.jpg”,”height”:173},”small”:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”http://www.noticiasdodia.onlinenewsbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/200723124122-20200717-scotus-roberts-legacy-v2-large-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”medium”:{“width”:780,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200723124122-20200717-scotus-roberts-legacy-v2-exlarge-169.jpg”,”height”:438},”large”:{“width”:1100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200723124122-20200717-scotus-roberts-legacy-v2-super-169.jpg”,”height”:619},”full16x9″:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200723124122-20200717-scotus-roberts-legacy-v2-full-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”mini1x1″:{“width”:100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200723124122-20200717-scotus-roberts-legacy-v2-small-11.jpg”,”height”:100}}},autoStartVideo = false,isVideoReplayClicked = false,callbackObj,containerEl,currentVideoCollection = [],currentVideoCollectionId = ”,isLivePlayer = false,mediaMetadataCallbacks,mobilePinnedView = null,moveToNextTimeout,mutePlayerEnabled = false,nextVideoId = ”,nextVideoUrl = ”,turnOnFlashMessaging = false,videoPinner,videoEndSlateImpl;if (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === false) {autoStartVideo = false;if (autoStartVideo === true) {if (turnOnFlashMessaging === true) {autoStartVideo = false;containerEl = jQuery(document.getElementById(configObj.markupId));CNN.VideoPlayer.showFlashSlate(containerEl);} else {CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = true;}}}configObj.autostart = CNN.Features.enableAutoplayBlock ? false : autoStartVideo;CNN.VideoPlayer.setPlayerProperties(configObj.markupId, autoStartVideo, isLivePlayer, isVideoReplayClicked, mutePlayerEnabled);CNN.VideoPlayer.setFirstVideoInCollection(currentVideoCollection, configObj.markupId);videoEndSlateImpl = new CNN.VideoEndSlate(‘body-text_21’);function findNextVideo(currentVideoId) {var i,vidObj;if (currentVideoId && jQuery.isArray(currentVideoCollection) && currentVideoCollection.length > 0) {for (i = 0; i 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.showEndSlateForContainer();if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.disable();}}}}callbackObj = {onPlayerReady: function (containerId) {var playerInstance,containerClassId = ‘#’ + containerId;CNN.VideoPlayer.handleInitialExpandableVideoState(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, CNN.pageVis.isDocumentVisible());if (CNN.Features.enableMobileWebFloatingPlayer &&Modernizr &&(Modernizr.phone || Modernizr.mobile || Modernizr.tablet) &&CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibraryName(containerId) === ‘fave’ &&jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length > 0 &&CNN.contentModel.pageType === ‘article’) {playerInstance = FAVE.player.getInstance(containerId);mobilePinnedView = new CNN.MobilePinnedView({element: jQuery(containerClassId),enabled: false,transition: CNN.MobileWebFloatingPlayer.transition,onPin: function () {playerInstance.hideUI();},onUnpin: function () {playerInstance.showUI();},onPlayerClick: function () {if (mobilePinnedView) {playerInstance.enterFullscreen();playerInstance.showUI();}},onDismiss: function() {CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer.disable();playerInstance.pause();}});/* Storing pinned view on CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer So that all players can see the single pinned player */CNN.Videx = CNN.Videx || {};CNN.Videx.mobile = CNN.Videx.mobile || {};CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer = mobilePinnedView;}if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length) {videoPinner = new CNN.VideoPinner(containerClassId);videoPinner.init();} else {CNN.VideoPlayer.hideThumbnail(containerId);}}},onContentEntryLoad: function(containerId, playerId, contentid, isQueue) {CNN.VideoPlayer.showSpinner(containerId);},onContentPause: function (containerId, playerId, videoId, paused) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, paused);}},onContentMetadata: function (containerId, playerId, metadata, contentId, duration, width, height) {var endSlateLen = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0).length;CNN.VideoSourceUtils.updateSource(containerId, metadata);if (endSlateLen > 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.fetchAndShowRecommendedVideos(metadata);}},onAdPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType) {/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays an Ad */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onAdPause: function (containerId, playerId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType, instance, isAdPause) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, isAdPause);}},onTrackingFullscreen: function (containerId, PlayerId, dataObj) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleFullscreenChange(containerId, dataObj);if (mobilePinnedView &&typeof dataObj === ‘object’ &&FAVE.Utils.os === ‘iOS’ && !dataObj.fullscreen) {jQuery(document).scrollTop(mobilePinnedView.getScrollPosition());playerInstance.hideUI();}},onContentPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, event) {var playerInstance,prevVideoId;if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreEpicAds’);}clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onContentReplayRequest: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);var $endSlate = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0);if ($endSlate.length > 0) {$endSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–active’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’);}}}},onContentBegin: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.enable();}/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays a video. */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.mutePlayer(containerId);if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘removeEpicAds’);}CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoSourceUtils.clearSource(containerId);jQuery(document).triggerVideoContentStarted();},onContentComplete: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreFreewheel’);}navigateToNextVideo(contentId, containerId);},onContentEnd: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(false);}}},onCVPVisibilityChange: function (containerId, cvpId, visible) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, visible);}};if (typeof configObj.context !== ‘string’ || configObj.context.length 0) {configObj.adsection = window.ssid;}CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibrary(configObj, callbackObj, isLivePlayer);});CNN.INJECTOR.scriptComplete(‘videodemanddust’);

    Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/10/politics/barrett-second-amendment-supreme-court/index.html

    The CDC says that most patients should isolate for at least 10 days after the start of their symptoms, and can end isolation at or beyond that point when their symptoms ebb and they have gone at least 24 hours without a fever. But some severely ill patients may need to isolate for at least 20 days, the agency says.

    Early in his illness, the president was given oxygen treatment as well as dexamethasone, a steroid normally reserved for severely ill Covid-19 patients with lung damage.

    Conley also said the president’s medical team could not find any evidence that the coronavirus is replicating in his body, and the amount of virus present in Trump’s body has decreased over time.

    But Conley did not say whether the president had tested negative for the virus, which could still be present in his body. And there is no FDA-authorized or approved test that can tell when a person is no longer contagious, making it hard to gauge the reliability of the tests that Conley cited in his memo.

    The latest information still leaves out some crucial information for judging Trump’s health — such as the condition of his lungs, and whether he has any lingering damage from the virus.

    Over the course of his infection, Trump received a combination of treatments that few if any other coronavirus patients have taken together. Although the FDA has authorized broad emergency use of one drug — the antiviral remdesivir — and dexamethasone has been on the market for decades, Trump also received an unproven antibody treatment made by Regeneron.

    Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/10/trump-infection-risk-conley-428538

    Democratic nominee Joe Biden said the only way he could lose the 2020 election was through “chicanery,” before later adding he would accept the results of the election. 

    “Make sure to vote,” the former vice president told voters at a campaign stop in Pennsylvania, “Because the only way we lose this is by the chicanery going on relative to polling places.”

    Biden said that President Trump was trying to discourage voting by casting doubt on mail-in ballot security and telling supporters to “go to polls and watch very carefully” on Election Day.

    TRUMP SAYS BIDEN WILL ATTEMPT TO ‘STEAL’ PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 

    Before leaving Pennsylvania, Biden clarified his comments to reporters. He said his remarks were  “taken a little out of context,” adding, “I’m going to accept the outcome of this election, period.”

    “What I was referencing is the attempts that are made to try to influence and scare people from voting. You should not pay attention to them,” the Democratic nominee continued. 

    Biden has repeatedly said Trump would try to “steal” victory if he didn’t win the election. 

    The Biden campaign has recruited hundreds of lawyers and volunteers to oversee Election Day and prevent chaos. 

    When asked if he would accept a peaceful transfer of power at the first presidential debate, Trump deferred, instead decrying widespread mail-in voting. 

    TRUMP BLASTS BALLOTS WHEN ASKED ABOUT ELECTION AFTERMATH

    Before that, a reporter pressed the president previously. “Win, lose or draw in this election, will you commit here today for a peaceful transferal of power after the election?” 

    “We’re going to have to see what happens,” Trump said during the White House news conference. “You know that I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Get rid of the ballots and you’ll have a very peaceful — there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation,” Trump said, referring to mail-in ballots. “The ballots are out of control. You know it, and you know who knows it better than anyone else? The Democrats know it better than anyone else.”

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-chicanery-polls-only-way-he-could-lose-election

    Michigan Speaker of the House Lee Chatfield is criticizing Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for not warning legislators about the alleged plot to abduct the governor, kill police officers and attack the state Capitol in Lansing.

    Chatfield, R-Levering, called out Whitmer in a series of tweets Saturday, Oct. 10, for failing to notify Capitol lawmakers who, according to the FBI, were also under threat by the state militia group known as the Wolverine Watchmen. He asked the governor to “cooperate more” with state legislators and “tone down partisan rhetoric.”

    State and federal officials have charged 13 men with various offenses related to the alleged coup plotted against Whitmer, an elaborate scheme that involved months of planning and even rehearsals to kidnap the governor from her vacation home.

    Seven of the suspects are facing charges on the state level, while the other six are federally charged.

    RELATED: What we know about the militia members charged in kidnapping plot against Michigan governor

    Whitmer knew of the kidnapping plot for weeks, she told CNN this week, adding that she couldn’t discuss many details about her security. The governor’s family was reportedly moved around for protection at times because of the severity of the threats, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has said.

    But Chatfield said Whitmer and her family weren’t the only ones under threat by the alleged plot.

    “Why weren’t we warned of the plot to take hostages at the Capitol?” Chatfield wrote in a tweet. “The plot by these terrorists was against us too. Why weren’t House sergeants warned? You knew and we weren’t even given a warning. We had people working in the building and their lives matter too.”

    Zack Pohl, communications director for Whitmer, said in an email that Chatfield should bring his concerns to those who handled the investigation, instead of the governor.

    “If the Speaker has concerns with this successful law enforcement operation, he should direct them to the FBI and President Trump’s Department of Justice, which was in command,” Pohl said in a prepared statement to MLive.

    But Chatfield claimed Whitmer did have some authority to notify those who were threatened in the alleged plot.

    “This was also an investigation by (Michigan State Police), which the Governor controls,” Chatfield tweeted. “Our law enforcement agencies weren’t notified. We were there nearly every day. That’s a problem.”

    The FBI conducted a joint investigation with Michigan State Police that led to state terrorism charges filed against six of seven men tied to the kidnapping plot, according the Michigan Attorney General’s Office.

    In the series of seven tweets on Saturday, Chatfield said both Democrats and Republicans were threatened by the kidnapping plot and called for lawmakers across the aisle to come together.

    “Others in the legislature have been threatened too,” he wrote. “We were targeted in these evil plots too. That’s why to overcome this, it will take a unified message and not political talking points or partisan finger pointing.”

    “I’ve been critical of many of (the governor’s) decisions this year. I admit. It’s important we have these debates. It makes us stronger. It ensures all voices of our state are heard. But we need to do it the right way. Blanket blame is wrong. It divides and causes more partisan strife.”

    Chatfield cited recent comments from Whitmer and Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist against President Donald Trump and Michigan Republican lawmakers as examples of “blanket blame.”

    Whitmer this week said Trump’s rhetoric has served a “rallying cry” for extremist groups when he “refused to condemn white supremacists and hate groups like these two Michigan militia groups,” Whitmer said.

    “When our leaders speak, their words matter. They carry weight,” Whitmer said. “When our leaders meet with, encourage, or fraternize with domestic terrorists, they legitimize their actions and they are complicit. When they stoke and contribute to hate speech, they are complicit.”

    RELATED: ‘Words matter’ from leaders like President Trump, Gov. Whitmer says after kidnapping plot revealed

    In a Friday morning appearance on CNN Newsroom, Gilchrist also raised concerns against Trump, who he said is spreading dangerous rhetoric.

    “The plot that was thwarted shows you that groups will continue to answer the call of the president for violence and division,” Gilchrist said.

    Chatfield chastised comments by Whitmer and Gilchrist and said “it’s time to tone the partisan rhetoric” down in his tweets.

    The governor’s spokesperson told MLive Whitmer “won’t be distracted by the Speaker’s partisan attacks.”

    “She remains focused on bringing Michiganders together to keep people safe and save lives,” Pohl wrote in an emailed statement. “We are not going to comment on an ongoing criminal investigation.”

    More on MLive:

    Accused Michigan terrorists found natural home among anti-Whitmer sentiment promoted by far right

    Sheriff who shared stage with militia defends their rights but not alleged governor kidnapping plot

    Michigan men charged in kidnapping plot trained with guns, explosives, neighbors say

    Northern Michigan town grapples with plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer from local vacation home

    Plot to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer prompts renewed calls to ban guns in Michigan Capitol building

    Source Article from https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/2020/10/michigan-house-speaker-criticizes-governor-for-not-warning-lawmakers-of-alleged-kidnapping-plot.html

    AUSTIN (Texas Tribune) — Texas counties are currently blocked from setting up multiple drop-off locations for absentee ballots heading into the Nov. 3 general election due to a temporary order from the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. That order came hours after top Texas officials on Saturday again sought to limit drop-off locations some voters use during the coronavirus pandemic.

    The federal appeals court’s order sets up a likely last-minute legal battle over absentee voting in Texas as mail-in ballots are already being collected and early voting is set to begin Tuesday.

    Attorney General Ken Paxton filed an emergency stay Saturday, seeking to halt a federal judge’s ruling from Friday night that said Texas counties can have multiple absentee ballot drop-off locations. U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman’s ruling blocked Gov. Greg Abbott‘s recent order that sought to limit counties to just one such location.

    Saying the district court’s injunction “usurp[s] the power of the governing state authority,” Paxton requested that the U.S. 5th Circuit of Appeals stay the lower court’s ruling no later than 9 a.m. Tuesday, pending an appeal.

    “I commend the Fifth Circuit for temporarily staying the district court’s unlawful injunction while it considers our request for a full stay pending appeal. This ensures that the Governor’s Proclamation remains in effect,” said Paxton after the ruling was issued.

    Texas voters must present an approved form of identification to deliver their mail-in ballots, and they may not turn in any one else’s ballot. But Abbott claimed the limits on drop-off locations were necessary to ensure election integrity, even though he provided no evidence that the drop-off sites enable voter fraud, which experts say is rare.

    The governor’s claims echoed ongoing attempts by Republican President Donald Trump and other GOP leaders this year to sow doubt over the reliability of voting by mail. But even as Texas Republicans have resisted or fought the expansion of voters using mail-in ballots during the coronavirus pandemic, they’ve also urged their own voters to fill out applications for such ballots.

    Those GOP attempts to undermine confidence in voting by mail has left Texas voters in a blur of cognitive dissonance during an election in which an unprecedented number of Texas voters have requested mail-in ballots, former Vice President Joe Biden is outperforming past Democratic nominees’ margins in Texas and Democrats are optimistic about taking control of the Texas House for the first time since 2002.

    Democrats labeled Abbott’s order voter suppression in a state that has repeatedly been knocked in federal court for intentionally discriminating against voters of color.

    “Cutting these mail-in voting locations was wrong and done solely to attempt to steal the election from the rising Texas electorate,” said Gilberto Hinojosa, chair of the Texas Democratic Party. “A county, like Harris County, with more than 4.7 million Texans should have more than one hand delivery location. Limiting counties like Harris is a desperate Republican attempt to hold onto power.”

    Texas remains one of only a handful of states that don’t allow for universal mail-in voting during the pandemic. To qualify to vote by mail, voters must be 65 or older, be confined in jail but otherwise eligible, be out of the county for the election period, or cite a disability or illness. The Texas Supreme Court has said that lack of immunity to the coronavirus does not itself constitute a disability, but voters may consider that alongside their medical histories to decide whether they qualify. Abbott’s order required all but one of each county’s drop-off locations to close and allowed political parties to install poll watchers to observe the process.

    Pitman’s Friday ruling said the governor’s directive confused voters and restricted voter access. With an unprecedented number of Texas voters requesting mail-in ballots during the coronavirus pandemic, and concerns about the reliability of the U.S. Postal Service, some large, Democratic counties had set up numerous locations to accept the ballots before Abbott’s order.

    “By limiting ballot return centers to one per county,” Pitman wrote, “older and disabled voters living in Texas’s largest and most populous counties must travel further distances to more crowded ballot return centers where they would be at an increased risk of being infected by the coronavirus in order to exercise their right to vote and have it counted.”

    But in his request for a stay, Paxton argued that Abbott’s order applied to a “small subset of voters who are eligible to vote by mail and could rely on the postal service yet simply prefer to hand-deliver their marked ballot.”

    Voting rights advocates and civic groups quickly sued Abbott in federal court over his order, arguing it was based on invalid security concerns and places an unconstitutional and unequal burden on the right to vote.

    The Texas and national League of United Latin American Citizens, the League of Women Voters of Texas and two Texas voters filed suit the night of Abbott’s order, and another lawsuit was filed the next day by the Texas Alliance for Retired Americans, the get-out-the-vote group Bigtent Creative and a 65-year-old voter.

    Paxton argued the Texas Secretary of State is likely to succeed on appeal for at least four reasons, including that the district court improperly interfered with state election rules on the eve of an election and that it lacked jurisdiction because plaintiffs lack standing.

    A stay, he said, would not “irreparably harm plaintiffs” because voters will have more options to vote in the upcoming election than what would be ordinarily permitted by Texas law. Earlier this year, Abbott extended the early voting period for the November election and also allowed people using absentee or mail-in ballots to drop them off before Election Day.

    While a spokesperson for the governor did not answer questions on how allowing multiple locations for ballot delivery might lead to fraud, according to Paxton’s filing, it had become clear that counties including Harris, Travis and Fort Bend, that had recently announced plans to open multiple mail-in-ballot delivery locations wouldn’t provide “adequate election security, including poll watchers.” These “inconsistencies,” he said, “introduced a risk to ballot integrity, such as by increasing the possibility of ballot harvesting.”

    Harris County, the state’s most populous and home to Houston, had designated a dozen ballot drop-off locations in clerk offices across the county’s roughly 1,700 square miles, and had already begun collecting them. In Travis County, which includes Austin, officials had designated four locations where voters could deliver their ballots.

    It was a move that seemingly had initial approval from the state of Texas. One day before Abbott’s limiting proclamation, Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins said Harris County’s multiple drop-off locations were legal in a filing related to another voting lawsuit. Nothing in Texas election law says that multiple drop-off locations cannot be used, Hawkins told the Texas Supreme Court, and “accordingly, the Secretary of State has advised local officials that the Legislature has permitted ballots to be returned to any early-voting clerk office.”

    The Texas Democratic Party had called Friday’s ruling a “common sense order [that] followed well-established law and stopped the governor from making up election rules after the election started.”

    The Texas Supreme Court ruled this week against several GOP officials who pushed to keep early voting to a two-week period during the pandemic. But the state’s highest civil court also ruled this week that Harris County elections officials could not send out mail-in ballot applications to all of the county’s 2.4 million registered voters.

    This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at www.texastribune.org.  The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans – and engages with them – about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

    Source Article from https://www.kxan.com/news/us-politics/election/texas-counties-temporarily-blocked-from-offering-multiple-mail-in-ballot-drop-off-locations/

    WASHINGTON — Details of the Trump administration’s $1.8 trillion offer to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for Covid-19 relief legislation obtained by NBC News reveal that they have moved closer to the Democrats’ position — but major hurdles still remain.

    The new offer increases the topline number, adds money for food, mortgage, and rental assistance, increases the amount for federal response to the pandemic, unemployment insurance, and direct payments to Americans.

    Pelosi, D-Calif., told her members in a letter Saturday morning that the proposal is “insufficient.”

    And on the other side of the Capitol, Senate Republicans on Saturday expressed their deep displeasure with the administration’s price tag of nearly $2 trillion in a phone call with Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, according to three sources familiar with the phone call.

    Any deal would have to pass the Republican-led Senate and time is running out with just over three weeks until Election Day.

    The administration’s beefed-up offer comes after a week of contradictory and shifting comments from the president. After being unengaged in negotiations for months, he unexpectedly instructed Mnuchin via tweet to immediately stop negotiations with Pelosi, shocking both Republicans and Democrats and allowing Democrats to blame him for Americans not seeing relief, he tweeted two days later that he wants a “big” comprehensive bill.

    The $1.8 trillion proposal presented by Mnuchin to Pelosi is not just an increase of $200 billion from his last offer but also includes an increase in some of the Democrats’ top preferences. It mirrors, in many ways, the bipartisan House Problem Solvers Caucus stimulus bill released during a period of stalled negotiations.

    It also provides an increase of state and local funds to $300 billion. It’s an agenda item Democrats have demanded that President Donald Trump had previously opposed, calling it a bailout to Democratic states. Pelosi, however, calls it “sadly inadequate.”

    The administration offers to expand federal unemployment insurance of $400 per week until mid-January, 2021, and retroactive to Sept. 12. The Democrats are still demanding $600 per week.

    It adds $15 billion for food assistance, $60 billion for mortgage and rental assistance, and $25 billion for student loan forgiveness — all Democratic priorities.

    “This proposal amounted to one step forward, two steps back,” Pelosi wrote to her members. “When the President talks about wanting a bigger relief package, his proposal appears to mean that he wants more money at his discretion to grant or withhold, rather than agreeing on language prescribing how we honor our workers, crush the virus and put money in the pockets of workers.”

    While the administration has greatly increased the amount of funding for testing, vaccine development, vaccine distribution, and money for providers — totaling $175 billion — Pelosi has objected to the president’s allocation for a federal response to Covid-19, which she implies that the administration hasn’t altered in this proposal.

    Some of the major sticking points revolve around the assistance for children and families. The current proposal provides $150 billion for education. Democrats have been wanting more and they want money to go to schools regardless of whether they are teaching students in classrooms, in a hybrid setting, or remotely. It’s unclear if the latest administration proposal offers distinctions for funding.

    Democrats had been demanding an expansion of child-related tax credits

    Instead of an expansion of the EITC, the administration proposed increasing the direct stimulus payments for children. For couples making $150,000, the administration is offering $1,000 per child, up from $500.

    In her letter to her colleagues, Pelosi said the administration would eliminate the $4,000 refundable Child Tax Credit and Dependent Care Tax Credit that she is demanding and was part of the HEROES Act passed by House Democrats in May.

    Pelosi also notes that the administration still hasn’t moved above $25 billion for direct assistance for child care, which Pelosi calls “totally inadequate.”

    The administration offer includes $91 billion for an Employee Retention Tax Credit, which is meant to incentivize employers to keep their workers on payroll. And they are demanding liability protections for business, which Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said must be included in any legislation to be brought up in the Senate.

    It also includes $10 billion of new funding for the postal service, $20 billion for airlines and $20 billion for the lodging industry.

    There is, however, no direct funding for restaurants, which could be an issue of contention. Instead, it offers workers the ability to write off their restaurant meals while at work and it alters some of the requirements for the Paycheck Protection Program loan to make it more appealing to restaurants.

    And in less controversial items, the measure provides $300 billion for PPP loans for small businesses, which includes $135 billion in previously unallocated money from the first tranche of the program.

    While negotiations continue, Senate Republicans remain an obstacle. On a conference call with Mnuchin and Meadows, they expressed their opposition to the $1.8 trillion relief bill currently being negotiated. They don’t like either the top-line price tag or some of the policies, according to two sources whose bosses were on the call.

    One of the policy issues the Republicans disagreed with is the Democrats’ demand to expand Obamacare in the relief bill, according to another source. They say the Democrats want to provide the maximum amount of subsidy to any new enrollee in the Affordable Care Act, which the Trump administration is trying to strike down entirely.

    The members “hated” the bill, according to one of the sources.

    Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/trump-administration-s-latest-covid-relief-proposal-dems-gets-closer-n1242835

    Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/10/10/trump-holds-first-white-house-event-since-testing-positive-covid-19/5952907002/

    Senate Republicans joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in opposing the Trump administration’s latest coronavirus stimulus proposal during a conference call on Saturday.

    Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin put forward a $1.8 trillion offer on Friday, the administration’s most generous plan to date. But in less than 24 hours, the offer had been rejected by both sides of the political aisle. A previous White House proposal offered $1.6 trillion.

    An unnamed Republican told the Associated Press that GOP Senators called Mnuchin’s new plan too expensive and out of touch with conservative values during a conference call this morning. The source spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the private nature of the call.

    President Donald Trump has pushed for more stimulus relief to be passed before Election Day in recent weeks. His stance on the matter is expected as, according to political analysts, another coronavirus stimulus package would help his chances of re-election. “Covid Relief Negotiations are moving along. Go Big!” the president tweeted on Friday.

    While some Republican Senators—including Lindsey Graham of South Carolina—supported going big, other file-and-rank members of the party—such as Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Rick Scott of Florida—refused to back legislation that would provide so generously to Americans.

    Pelosi also rejected the president’s latest proposal, calling it “one step forward, two steps back.” In a letter to Democratic colleagues Saturday, the Speaker insisted that Mnuchin’s plan was “insufficient in meeting families’ needs.”

    “When the President talks about wanting a bigger relief package, his proposal appears to mean that he wants more money at his discretion to grant or withhold, rather than agreeing on language prescribing how we honor our workers, crush the virus and put money in the pockets of workers,” the top Democrat wrote.

    Additionally, she informed her party that all parties still disagree “on many priorities.”

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Friday expressed pessimism about another bill before Election Day. “I think it’s unlikely in the next three weeks,” said the Republican leader.

    Pelosi, however, remains hopeful that a deal could be struck soon. “Despite these unaddressed concerns, I remain hopeful that yesterday’s developments will move us closer to an agreement on a relief package that addresses the health and economic crisis facing America’s families,” she wrote in the letter.

    Trump suddenly ended relief talks in a series of tweets on Tuesday, where he said he had “instructed my representatives to stop negotiating until after the election.” But the president changed his mind later that day and urged House Democrats to consider pushing through standalone relief bills.

    Newsweek reached out to the Treasury Department for comment.

    p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
    content: none
    }]]>

    Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/senate-republicans-join-pelosi-opposing-trump-administrations-18-trillion-stimulus-offer-1538100

    U.S. District Court Judge Robert Pitman ordered on Friday that the state is barred from implementing or enforcing the Republican governor’s order, arguing that it would put vulnerable voters at risk. Those eligible to vote early by mail in Texas must be 65 years or older, be sick or disabled, be out of their county on voting days or be confined in jail but otherwise eligible.

    “By limiting ballot return centers to one per county, older and disabled voters living in Texas’s largest and most populous counties must travel further distances to more crowded ballot return centers where they would be at an increased risk of being infected by the coronavirus in order to exercise their right to vote and have it counted,” Pitman wrote.

    The judge also wrote that voters run the risk of disenfranchisement “if the USPS is unable to deliver their ballots in time.”

    Pitman issued the injunction against Abbott’s Oct. 1 proclamation, which limited the number of locations where eligible voters could deliver their mail-in ballots to a single early voting clerk’s office, regardless of county size, effective the following day. For Harris County — which is larger than the state of Rhode Island — that meant 11 such locations had to close. In Travis County, three closed, and so on for the state’s 254 counties.

    Abbott said the move would bolster security and “help stop attempts at illegal voting,” while Democrats, election officials and voting rights advocates charged it would result in confusion and voter suppression, with voting already underway in Texas. The state also argued that concerns about USPS delays were based on “subjective fear.”

    On Saturday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed an emergency appeal in an attempt to halt the judge’s order.

    “The district court’s order undermines our election security, disrupts the democratic process, and will only lead to voter confusion. It cannot stand,” Paxton said in a statement. “Mail-in ballots are particularly vulnerable to fraud. Protections that ensure their security must be upheld and my office will continue to fight for safe, free and fair elections.”

    The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), a civil rights group that sued the state, called the governor’s proclamation a “blatant act of discrimination.”

    “Governor Greg Abbott is trying to prey on the fear of the pandemic which will keep Hispanics from wanting to risk their lives by going to the polls in person,” LULAC president Domingo Garcia said in a statement issued Friday. “Instead, they and many other qualified, legal voters prefer to safeguard their well-being by dropping off their ballot at authorized locations near them and today’s injunction guarantees they will be able to do so.”

    Texas Democratic Party Chair Gilberto Hinojosa championed the judge’s order as “common sense,” saying in a statement that it “stopped the governor from making up election rules after the election started.”

    Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins called the injunction a “victory for voting rights.”

    “Seniors and voters with disabilities across Harris County need these drop-off locations to deliver their mail ballots safely and conveniently during the global pandemic,” Hollins said in a statement. “We shouldn’t be playing politics with voters’ lives.”

    Abbott’s Oct. 1 proclamation modified a July 27 order — which waived a state law limiting hand-delivery of mail-in ballots on Election Day — and added six more days of early in-person voting.

    President Donald Trump has frequently attacked voting by mail, repeating unsubstantiated claims that there will be widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election due to mail-in ballots, which are expected to increase due to the coronavirus pandemic.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation said it has not seen a “coordinated national voter fraud effort during a major election.”

    Hand-delivering mail-in ballots has also been an issue in the battleground state of Ohio, where a move to add ballot drop boxes is tied up in court.

    ABC News’ Matt Foster contributed to this report.

    Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/judge-blocks-texas-governors-order-limiting-number-ballot/story?id=73539644

    In this May 2020 photo, a voter casts her mail-in ballot at in a drop box in West Chester, Pa., prior to the primary election. On Saturday a federal judge blocked a Trump campaign lawsuit to limit the use of drop boxes in the state.

    Matt Rourke/AP


    hide caption

    toggle caption

    Matt Rourke/AP

    In this May 2020 photo, a voter casts her mail-in ballot at in a drop box in West Chester, Pa., prior to the primary election. On Saturday a federal judge blocked a Trump campaign lawsuit to limit the use of drop boxes in the state.

    Matt Rourke/AP

    A federal judge in Pennsylvania has thrown out a lawsuit by the Trump campaign that tried to limit the battleground state’s use of drop boxes in the current presidential election.

    The lawsuit also challenged the Pennsylvania secretary of state’s guidance that mail-in ballots shouldn’t be rejected if the voter’s signature doesn’t match the one on file, and a state restriction that poll watchers be residents of the county where they are assigned.

    All of these claims turned on a common theme: the idea that without sufficient security measures, people might commit voter fraud. The campaign argued that that fraud would then “dilute” lawfully cast votes, in violation of the state and U.S. constitutions.

    In reality, voter fraud is extremely rare, though Trump has repeated baseless claims about it being widespread.

    U.S. District Court Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan, who wrote the opinion, was reluctant to second-guess the judgment of the state legislature and election officials.

    “Perhaps Plaintiffs are right that guards should be placed near drop boxes, signature-analysis experts should examine every mail-in ballot, poll watchers should be able to man any poll regardless of location, and other security improvements should be made,” Ranjan wrote. “But the job of an unelected federal judge isn’t to suggest election improvements, especially when those improvements contradict the reasoned judgment of democratically elected officials.”

    Ultimately the court found that the election regulations furthered important state interests without significantly burdening any right to vote, and were therefore constitutional.

    In his 138-page ruling, the judge — a Trump appointee — also noted that the Trump campaign had offered no hard evidence that voter fraud would actually occur. Instead, Ranjan wrote, the campaign had simply provided a series of “speculative” assumptions: They assume that “potential fraudsters” might try to fill drop boxes with forged ballots, and that the election security measures in place won’t work to prevent that fraud.

    “All of these assumptions could end up being true and these events could theoretically happen,” Ranjan wrote. “But so could many things.” Speculation, Ranjan concluded, isn’t enough to let the plaintiffs bring their case.

    “Today is another loss for Republicans’ effort to make voting more difficult and a victory for democracy and the millions of Pennsylvania voters who will vote by mail,” Marc Elias, a Democratic election lawyer, told The New York Times. “This court joins a chorus of other courts in rejecting the false claims of fraud Trump and the Republicans continue to advance for cynical political reasons.”

    NPR member station WHYY explains that the drop boxes, first used in this year’s primary, were deployed to keep up with unprecedented demand for mail-in voting. The Trump campaign sued the state and each county board of elections over the drop boxes and other election rules in June.

    Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, called Saturday’s ruling “a win for voters and our democracy.”

    The Trump campaign plans to appeal the decision.

    “We’ve continued the fight against the Democrats’ completely unmonitored, unsecure drop boxes in the federal courts,” the campaign’s general counsel, Matthew Morgan, told the Times. “Clearly, we disagree with the Western District’s decision on unsecure drop boxes, and President Trump’s team will immediately file an appeal.”

    The decision comes just a day after a federal judge in Texas blocked a plan to limit drop boxes to one per county. The Republican governor, Greg Abbott, said it was an election security measure to prevent fraud. Democrats accused him of trying to suppress the vote.

    Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/10/10/922673818/judge-blocks-trump-campaign-attempt-to-limit-use-of-drop-boxes-in-pennsylvania

    Rickey Kanter, from Mequon, Wis., pleaded guilty in 2011 to a single count of mail fraud for selling therapeutic shoe inserts that he misrepresented as Medicare-approved through his “Dr. Comfort” business. He was sentenced to a year and one day in prison, ordered to pay $50,000 and to reimburse Medicare over $27 million in a related civil settlement.

    Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-barrett-gun-laws/2020/10/10/3845995e-0976-11eb-9be6-cf25fb429f1a_story.html

    LANSING, Mich. – Controversy at the Michigan State Capitol continues after an already troubling week, amid the alleged domestic terrorism plot to kidnap the governor.

    The Michigan Speaker of the House is criticizing Gov. Gretchen Whitmer on how she handled the situation.

    RELATED: Letter criticizes Michigan governor for not warning legislature about domestic terror plot

    It’s safe to say it has been a busy and scary week at the Michigan State’s Capitol building, especially after the FBI stopped alleged threats to kidnap the governor. Saturday, Michigan Speaker of the House Lee Chatfield, spoke out about the threats, “I think the plot was evil, plotted by evil men and it needs to be condemned. It was wrong and these White Nationalists need to be put in prison.”

    Lee is now criticizing how Whitmer handled the situation, “But what I would tell you is this, there were multiple threats, one against the governor and one against those that work in the capitol. We were in the capitol, every single day and our local law enforcement agencies, were not given notification by the state police or the FBI, and I think that’s a problem,” said Chatfield.

    A spokesperson from Gov. Whitmer’s Office responded with this statement, “The governor won’t be distracted by the Speaker’s partisan attacks. She remains focused on bringing Michiganders together to keep people safe and save lives. We are not going to comment on an ongoing criminal investigation.If the Speaker has concerns with this successful law enforcement operation, he should direct them to the FBI and President Trump’s Department of Justice, which was in command.”

    I asked Chatfield should the governor be to blame for MSP and Federal Law Enforcement not notifying local agencies?

    He responded, “What I can tell you is that the FBI notified Michigan State Police and that is under the control of the governor.”

    Read the entire letter here

    “We need to cooperate more. A better message needs to be sent. And now that a couple days have gone by since the plot to attack us both has passed, there are several points that I believe need to be made and questions that need to be asked.

    Why weren’t we in the Legislature warned of the plot to take hostages at the Capitol? The plot by these terrorists was against us, too. Why weren’t House sergeants warned? You knew, and we weren’t even given a warning. We had people working in the building every day doing essential work, and their lives matter, too.

    I am also alarmed the Lieutenant Governor recently blamed Michigan Republicans for the evil plans of these unstable men. That accusation is inflammatory and untrue, and it does nothing to solve this problem. You chose to blame President Trump instead. The truth is, I started getting death threats to my family at my home the day you said my legislative actions would kill people. Please realize that.

    But you should also know that others in the Legislature have been threatened, too. They’ve received threats, letters and calls to their homes. These threats have been to both Republicans and Democrats, but they aren’t given security. They don’t have the state resources to build million dollar fences at their homes. And we were also targeted in these evil plots. That’s why to overcome this, it will take a unified message and not political talking points or partisan finger pointing. It will take leadership.

    Now, I’ve been critical of many of your decisions this year during COVID-19. I’ll admit that. I’ve agreed with some decisions, too. It’s important we have these debates. It makes us stronger. It ensures all voices in our state are heard. It’s how our process was designed to work. But we need to do it the right way. Blanket, partisan blame is wrong. It simply further divides us and causes more political strife.

    Hatred and violence are wrong, and that’s why I’ve continually denounced it. And I agree, it’s time to tone down the partisan rhetoric and turn “the heat down” as you’ve said. Will you do the same for President Trump? You’ve arguably been his biggest critic this year in the country. You even fundraised this week off this plot, now making it political, which is sad.

    Will the Lieutenant Governor turn it down with the entire Republican Party, millions of whom are his constituents? This wasn’t standing tall. It was cheap. We can do this, but we have to make this decision together. Let’s back up our words with actions.

    Please know that I am praying for the good health and constant safety of you and your family. I hope you are of mine too. And I hope you will truly and finally allow us to work together to protect the lives and livelihoods of everyone who calls Michigan home. I’m ready. I hope you are, too.”

    The letter was followed by a series of Tweets by Chatfiled on the topic.

    RELATED

    Source Article from https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2020/10/10/michigan-house-speaker-questions-response-to-alleged-terrorist-plot-against-governor-capitol/

    President Donald Trump gave a “peaceful protest” campaign speech Saturday from the White House as he continues his coronavirus recovery, telling Black and Latino supporters “you have to have police support you.”

    Trump ridiculed former Vice President Joe Biden and Democrats during the “Blexit” campaign rally organized by Candace Owens and former Arizona police officer Brandon Tatum. Their Blexit Foundation touts itself as a movement encouraging minorities to leave the Democratic Party.

    His repeated calls for “law and order” were paired with searing criticisms that Biden has “betrayed” Black and Hispanic Americans during his decades in office. Chants of “USA” echoed across the White House lawn as Trump said minority communities are rejecting “radical socialism” and a “nationwide crusade against” police officers that he claimed was being led by Biden.

    Trump said his “pro-police” campaign is necessary in order for Blacks and Latinos in cities across the U.S. to feel safe under urban Democratic leaders.

    “Sleepy Joe Biden, he’s betrayed Black and Latino Americans, if you think he can run this country you’re wrong. For half a century. We’ve got to vote these people into oblivion, got to get rid of them, so bad for our country,” Trump said. “Black and Latino Americans are rejecting the radical socialist left and embracing our pro-jobs, pro-worker, pro-police—we have to have law and order—and pro-American agenda. I want to thank the Blexit Foundation for organizing this event.”

    “In order to protect the lives of Black Americans and all Americans, you have to have your police support you,” Trump continued. “If the left gains power they will launch a nationwide crusade against law enforcement, which they’re already doing.”

    Trump claimed manufacturing and other jobs in states including Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, North Dakota and Texas will disappear from minority communities if Biden is elected president. He said that Democrats have run every major city for “100 years.”

    The president’s official Saturday schedule described the rally as a “peaceful protest for law and order” amid his continued self-isolation after being infected with COVID-19 and spending several days in Walter Reed hospital last week. Thousands of people were expected to attend but photographs showed a few hundred attendees.

    “First off I’m feeling great, how is everybody doing? Thank you so much for all of your prayers,” Trump said to the hundreds of supporters in attendance. He repeatedly thanked the co-founders of the Blexit Foundation, whose name is taken from the conservative British movement to withdraw from the European Union.

    “We cannot allow our country to become a socialist nation. That’s what will happen—or worse,” Trump said, adding that “we will have law enforcement watching” for fraud on Election Day.

    Trump repeatedly touted his “Platinum Plan” for Black Americans, which the Biden campaign last week ridiculed in a statement: “Trump lied about the danger of COVID-19 and failed to contain the virus and tens of thousands of Black Americans have lost their lives. More than 1.5 million additional Black Americans are unemployed than at the same time last year and 400,000 small businesses have closed because of the economic fallout,” said Kamau Marshall, strategic communications director for Biden for President.

    The Biden campaign noted Trump referred to Black Lives Matter as a “symbol of hate” in remarks earlier this year.

    Trump went on to say coronavirus cases are “going to disappear” after some “flare-ups” in the very near future. He highlighted that the southern border wall with Mexico is now “380 miles long” and “will soon be finished.”

    p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
    content: none
    }]]>

    Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/trump-makes-law-order-pitch-black-latino-voters-blexit-white-house-speech-1538088

    Senator Lindsey Graham, right, and his challenger, Jaime Harrison, debating in Columbia, S.C., last week.Credit…Joshua Boucher/The State, via Associated Press

    Senator Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican whose embrace of President Trump threatens to sweep him from what was once a safe conservative seat, declared that Black people “can go anywhere in this state” as long as they are “conservative, not liberal,” during a candidate’s forum on Friday night.

    The “go anywhere” remark came after Mr. Graham touted his friendship with the state’s other Republican senator, Tim Scott, who is Black — and after Mr. Graham said that a candidate of any color could succeed in South Carolina, provided the person shared the state’s “values.”

    Friday’s event was supposed to be the second shared-stage debate, a much-anticipated showdown between Mr. Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, and his strong, well-funded Democratic challenger Jaime Harrison, a state Democratic Party official, who is Black.

    Instead, that format was scrapped at the last minute on Friday after Mr. Graham refused a request by his Democratic challenger to take a coronavirus test before their joint appearance, and Mr. Harrison refused to share the same space with him.

    Instead of a debate on Friday, Mr. Graham and Mr. Harrison, who is tied or slightly trailing his opponent in recent polls, answered questions from a panel of moderators in back-to-back 30-minute sessions in Spartanburg that largely focused on the coronavirus pandemic and racial issues.

    When the topic turned to the issue of police brutality, Mr. Graham said he backed some police reforms, opined that the officers who killed George Floyd in Minneapolis “should pay a price,” then claimed that the demonstrations that followed Mr. Floyd’s killing constituted “a war” on police.

    Mr. Graham went on to say that he believed Black candidates, and those from immigrant communities, had a major role to play as long as they reflected “the values” of the state.

    “Do I believe that South Carolina is a racist state? No,” Mr. Graham said.

    “I am asking every African-American out there, look at my record,” he added, referring to his support of historically black colleges and universities. “I care about everybody, if you are a young African-American, an immigrant, you can go anywhere in this state, you just need to be conservative, not liberal.”

    It was not clear what Mr. Graham meant by his remarks. An email to a spokesman on Saturday was not immediately returned.

    For his part, Mr. Harrison hammered away on Mr. Graham, calling him “out of touch” and accusing him of prioritizing the confirmation of a new Supreme Court justice over passing a stimulus bill.

    On Thursday, Mr. Harrison, who has a pre-existing medical condition, said that he would not participate in a second debate with Mr. Graham unless everyone involved was tested. Mr. Graham had been in the proximity of at least two Republican senators who have tested positive for the coronavirus last week, and Mr. Harrison said he would not “allow politics to put my family, my campaign staff, Senator Graham’s staff, and members of the media at unnecessary risk.”

    Democrats spent Friday speculating that Mr. Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was refusing to take a test because he was worried a positive result would imperil his ability to convene Supreme Court confirmation hearings set to begin on Monday.

    “This election is not about just the virus,” Mr. Graham said on Friday night, echoing the comments of other endangered Republican opponents who are being dragged down by Mr. Trump’s handling of the pandemic.

    Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/10/us/trump-vs-biden

    On a conference call Saturday morning with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, the Republicans were wary of the overall price tag of the bill and expressed opposition to a number of specific provisions, including an expansion of Affordable Care Act tax credits they say raises concerns about taxpayer funding of abortions. Democrats dispute that interpretation of the provision, but nonetheless it amounts to a poison pill for many Republicans, the people said.

    Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2020/10/10/prospects-more-stimulus-checks-covid-relief-fade-latest-offer-trump-draws-opposition-republicans-democrats/

    BARRY COUNTY, Mich. – Two men charged in the kidnapping plot against Gov. Gretchen Whitmer have ties to a Michigan sheriff.

    Suspects Michael and William Null who are brothers have been spotted protesting against Whitmer next to Barry County Sheriff, Dar Leaf.

    William Null was seen on stage with the sheriff at a protest against the governor’s stay-at-home order in Grand Rapids this May.

    Leaf says he has no regrets about sharing the stage with him.

    While being asked about the situation in an interview Leaf said, “It is just a charge, and they say a plot to kidnap and you got to remember that. Are they trying to kidnap? Because a lot of people are angry with the governor, and they want her arrested. So are they trying to arrest or was it a kidnap attempt?”

    The sheriff did say he feels for the governor and that no one should be threatened with violence.

    New Today: Speaker of the House Lee Chatfield pens letter criticizing for not warning legislature about domestic terror plot

    RELATED

    Source Article from https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2020/10/10/michigan-sheriff-spotted-at-rally-with-men-charged-in-scheme-to-kidnap-kill-governor/

    The Commission on Presidential Debates has decided to cancel the second debate, which had been scheduled for Thursday, October 15, the nonpartisan group announced on Friday. The commission said it will now focus on preparations for the October 22 debate. 

    The commission had unilaterally decided to make the October 15 debate a virtual one for health and safety reasons after President Trump tested positive for the coronavirus. The Trump campaign refused to participate in a virtual debate. Mr. Trump is still recovering from COVID-19, and a number of his top aides have also become infected. 

    “It is now apparent there will be no debate on October 15, and the CPD will turn its attention to preparations for the final presidential debate scheduled for October 22,” the commission said in a statement. 

    Officials with the nonpartisan entity responsible for organizing every televised debate between presidential contenders since 1988 began informing campaign officials Friday afternoon.  

    Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/second-presidential-debate-canceled-commission/