Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/news/2020/11/24/utah-red-rock-country-metal-monolith-discovered-remote-area/6405523002/

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/11/24/covid-news-nfl-mask-mandate-los-angeles-maryland/6398149002/

Zhanon Morales, 30, of Philadelphia raises a fist during a Nov. 5 voting rights rally. President Trump’s campaign unsuccessfully used spurious claims of voter fraud to invalidate votes in Philadelphia and other largely Black cities.

Rebecca Blackwell/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Rebecca Blackwell/AP

Zhanon Morales, 30, of Philadelphia raises a fist during a Nov. 5 voting rights rally. President Trump’s campaign unsuccessfully used spurious claims of voter fraud to invalidate votes in Philadelphia and other largely Black cities.

Rebecca Blackwell/AP

When Joe Biden thanked Black voters in his first remarks as president-elect, he credited them with lifting his campaign from its lowest point during the Democratic primaries.

“You’ve always had my back, and I’ll have yours,” he promised.

While Biden won Black voters overwhelmingly across the country, they were key to his victories in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia — places where President Trump and his allies have been targeting ballots in cities with large Black populations in an attempt to overturn the president’s defeat and retain power.

Trump’s campaign and his allies have presented no real evidence of widespread voter fraud or other impropriety in any of these cities, and they have faced multiple defeats in court. But the persistence of the president and loyal Republicans has alarmed Black leaders, civil rights activists and historians who see an unprecedented attempt to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters, many of them Black.

The president’s campaign has denied racial motivations in its lawsuits, saying that its recount strategy is not targeting Black voters.

Jenna Ellis, the Trump campaign’s senior legal adviser, said in a statement to NPR that “every American deserves to know that our elections are conducted in a legal manner, no matter who they are or where they live.”

“That’s our only goal: to ensure safe, secure, and fair elections,” Ellis added. “That’s what our Constitution requires.”

But Bob Bauer, a senior legal adviser to the Biden campaign, said the Trump campaign’s “targeting of the African American community is not subtle. It is extraordinary” and that “it’s quite remarkable how brazen it is.”

“This is straight out, discriminatory behavior,” Bauer told reporters on Friday.

A group of Michigan voters has also filed a lawsuit against Trump and his campaign, arguing that “defendants are openly seeking to disenfranchise Black voters,” including those in Detroit.

The plaintiffs, who are represented by lawyers from the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, allege that the Trump campaign has attempted mass voter suppression by pressuring election officials into not certifying the election results in their state, and that Trump’s apparent attempt to pressure Michigan election officials and state lawmakers was a violation of the provision against voter intimidation included in the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Defendants’ tactics repeat the worst abuses in our nation’s history, as Black Americans were denied a voice in American democracy for most of the first two centuries of the Republic.” the lawsuit said.

Trump and his allies have made similar efforts in Pennsylvania, with false claims about widespread voter fraud in Philadelphia. There have been charges leveled against the electoral process in Atlanta as the political universe is focused on Georgia ahead of two runoff elections that will determine control of the U.S. Senate. In Wisconsin, the Trump campaign has called for a recount of ballots in the diverse, large counties of Milwaukee and Dane, which put Biden over the top there, but the Trump campaign did not ask for recounts in the rest of the state’s whiter counties.

To many civil rights advocates, this is another grim chapter in what they see as an expansive, decades-long effort by Republicans to gain more power by suppressing the votes of people of color.

“It is difficult for me to think of another president in modern time who has literally driven a national scheme to disenfranchise Black voters and other voters of color en masse, in the way that we see with these post-election lawsuits,” said Kristin Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. She said there was “racial motivation” in Trump’s focus on cities like Detroit, Philadelphia and Atlanta.

Trump’s attempts hit a significant roadblock on Monday as Michigan’s state canvassing board certified Biden’s victory with one of the board’s two Republican members abstaining.

Derrick Johnson, the president of the NAACP, called that action “appalling.” He pointed out that the Trump campaign was aided by supporters and allies across the country in his failed efforts to reverse Biden’s victory.

“It’s only because of the environment that was created by this president to defy the rule of law, to destroy customs and practices, and to really push people toward a sense of tribalism that’s not in our economic interest, that’s not in the interest of democracy, for his own selfish and self-reflecting outcome,” Johnson said in an interview. “And it’s unfortunate that there have been so many people willing to put their character, their integrity at stake for such activity.”

Andra Gillespie, a political science professor at Emory University, said voter suppression is typically thought of as rules or practices that, when put in place, have the impact of making people of color less likely to vote than their white counterparts.

The effort that Trump is undertaking, she said, is a new type of attempted voter suppression in which the president is attempting to invalidate ballots that have already been counted.

“I think he has targeted heavily African American cities because they happen to be heavily Democratic cities, and if he’s going to invalidate enough votes to turn the election in his favor, this would actually be the best place to do it,” Gillespie said.

Trump’s attempt to overturn the election result comes at the end of an election season in which the nation elected its first Black vice president, California Sen. Kamala Harris. It also comes at the end of the year where many voters, particularly voters of color, faced unprecedented obstacles to cast ballots due to the coronavirus pandemic.

With the election challenges serving as a sort of punctuation mark on all of that, Clarke said, “I think this will stand out in the history books as one of the darkest moments in our nation’s history.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/11/24/938187233/trump-push-to-invalidate-votes-in-heavily-black-cities-alarms-civil-rights-group

The General Services Administration has declared president-elect Joe Biden the apparent winner of the US election, clearing the way for the formal transition from Donald Trump’s administration to begin after weeks of delay.

The GSA said on Monday that it had determined that Biden was the winner of the 3 November race after weeks of Trump refusing to concede and violating the traditions of the transition of power at the White House.

Trump said on Twitter he had directed his team to cooperate on the transition, but vowed to continue fighting the election results, despite the lack of evidence of widespread voter fraud. Hours later, he said: “Will never concede to fake ballots & ‘Dominion’.”

Emily Murphy, who heads the GSA, said she made the determination based on “the law” and “facts.”

“Please know that I came to my decision independently, based on the law and available facts. I was never directly or indirectly pressured by any executive branch official including those who work at the White House or GSA with regard to the substance or timing of my decision,” Murphy wrote in a letter to Biden.

Murphy had faced growing pressure from Democrats and some Republicans to allow the transition to begin, as Trump’s efforts to challenge the results in numerous battleground states failed.

A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Saturday tossed a Trump campaign lawsuit that sought to prevent certification in that state. And on Monday, Michigan certified Biden’s victory, despite an unprecedented push by the president last week to undermine that move to allow for an audit of ballots in Wayne county, where Biden won by more than 330,000 votes.

GSA certification is a process that in typical election years occurs without fanfare or discussion shortly after the race is called by major news outlets.

Murphy’s refusal to declare Biden the winner weeks after the election prevented the transition team of Biden and Vice president-elect Kamala Harris from accessing federal funding and meeting with government officials to prepare for inauguration on 20 January.

The delay was particularly concerning given the urgent and unprecedented tasks facing the federal government amid a significantly worsening pandemic and economic crisis. The US must also begin work to prepare a national rollout of Covid-19 vaccines. There were also major concerns about the potential national security implications of a delayed transition, which blocked Biden from accessing classified briefings.

After Murphy’s letter was made public, Trump tweeted, “We will keep up the good fight and I believe we will prevail! Nevertheless, in the best interest of our country, I am recommending that Emily and her team do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols, and have told my team to do the same.”

The Trump legal team dismissed the certification as “simply a procedural step” and insisted it would fight on.

Yohannes Abraham, executive director of the Biden transition, said in a statement Monday that the move by the GSA “is a needed step to begin tackling the challenges facing our nation, including getting the pandemic under control and our economy back on track”.

He added: “In the days ahead, transition officials will begin meeting with federal officials to discuss the pandemic response, have a full accounting of our national security interests, and gain complete understanding of the Trump administration’s efforts to hollow out government agencies.”

With GSA permitting the formal transition to start, more Republicans started to acknowledge the reality that Biden is president-elect.

“President Trump’s legal team has not presented evidence of the massive fraud which would have had to be present to overturn the election,” said Bill Cassidy, a Republican senator from Louisiana. “I voted for President Trump but Joe Biden won.”

A majority of GOP senators have refused to recognize Biden’s win, arguing that Trump should be allowed to pursue his cases in court, despite the lack of evidence of any widespread fraud that would change the outcome of the race. Since the Associated Press and other news organizations across the country declared Biden the winner on 7 November, five days after polls closed, Trump and his allies have continued to spread misinformation and baseless conspiracy theories, seeking to undermine the legitimacy of mail-in voting and falsely asserting that the election was “stolen”.

Audits, recounts and the Trump campaign’s court cases, however, have resulted in no meaningful changes to the election results, and in some cases, Biden’s lead has only increased. Judges repeatedly thr ew out the Trump campaign team’s cases.

But the false accusations of fraud did lead some election officials to seek to delay certification of the vote. The city commissioner’s office in Philadelphia, where counting took days, reported facing death threats, and Trump supporters have staged protests outside election offices across the US.

Murphy’s letter came on the same day that Biden announced his selection for several key cabinet roles. The president-elect said he would be nominating Tony Blinken as secretary of state, Jake Sullivan as national security adviser and John Kerry as “climate tsar”, suggesting a return to the priorities of the Obama era.

Biden also selected Alejandro Mayorkas for homeland security secretary. If he is confirmed, he would be the first Latino and migrant to have the position. He has further chosen Avril Haines to be the first female director of national intelligence and Janet Yellen to be the country’s first female treasury secretary.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/24/trump-transition-biden-general-services-administration

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2020/11/23/trump-appeals-federal-ruling-tossing-pennsylvania-election-challenge/6397943002/

“Do I think he’s more left of center than I would like? Yes,” Mr. Sweet said, adding, “There’s no question he’s qualified for the job, period.”

Rand Beers, a former acting secretary of homeland security in the Obama administration, said Mr. Biden’s pick made it clear that while immigration would be an early focus for the department, the new administration would also bolster its other responsibilities, such as cybersecurity and natural disasters.

Mr. Beers said Mr. Mayorkas balanced a vigilance of security threats with an interest in helping immigrants in need, pointing to his work vetting visa applications for Iraqis who assisted the U.S. military. Mr. Beers said Mr. Mayorkas pushed his teams to undergo exhaustive reviews of intelligence reports to scout for communications between applicants and suspected terrorists.

“He basically took that seriously and said we can’t ignore these reports but we also can’t assume the level of contact,” Mr. Beers said. “He’s thoughtful, he’s analytical and he’s humane.”

At the Homeland Security Department, Mr. Mayorkas led the agency’s response to the Ebola and Zika outbreaks, experience extremely relevant to this moment, the Biden transition team said on Monday. As homeland security secretary, Mr. Mayorkas would oversee the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which has played a prime role in helping state governments combat the coronavirus pandemic.

“He has seen all effects of Covid-19 in all segments of the economy and affecting all kinds of people, and he has been immersed in this for months,” said Jamie Gorelick, a partner at his law firm, WilmerHale, and former deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration. Ms. Gorelick tapped Mr. Mayorkas to lead the law firm’s coronavirus task force for clients.

Mr. Mayorkas has also been paying close attention to Mr. Trump’s efforts to overhaul the immigration system, Ms. Gorelick said.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/23/us/politics/biden-mayorkas-homeland-security.html

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (Cap News Services) – Florida is on track to become the third state in the country to hit one million cases of COVID-19, likely within the next week. Across Florida, mayors and others are growing frustrated by their lack of enforcement power of pandemic policies.

When the pandemic began, Governor Ron DeSantis shied away from enacting certain across the board pandemic policies like a face mask mandate, instead favoring local control.

“Each region in Florida is very distinct and some of these things may need to be approached a little bit differently,” said DeSanits in March.

But as State Representative Carlos Guillermo Smith explains, that local control was largely stripped away in the Governor’s most recent pandemic executive order.

“Now local leaders feel handcuffed because Governor DeSantis signed an executive order saying that they were not allowed to enforce their own mask mandate,” said Smith. “Governor DeSantis needs to lead or he needs to get out of the way,”

As cases rise across the country, 31 states have enacted tighter COVID restrictions in recent weeks. Florida has not.

Now Mayors in Miami, Miami-Dade, St Petersburg and county commissioners in Palm Beach are asking for Gov. DeSantis to return some of the local control they were given at the start of the pandemic.

The Florida League of Cities also weighed in telling us in a statement: “We believe the Governor should allow cities to take the actions they believe are necessary to protect their citizens. When our state and local governments work together, we are better equipped to manage this public health crises.” 

Health professionals with Physicians for Social Responsibility prefer statewide action over a patchwork of local regulations.

“This virus is like a bird. The bird doesn’t recognize when it flies from Tallahassee to Thomasville that it’s entered another state,” said Dr. Howard Kessler.

Gov. DeSantis has been absent from the public eye for nearly three weeks now, only releasing a YouTube video touting the rollout of a vaccine by the end of the year.

LATEST ON THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC:

Source Article from https://www.wfla.com/community/health/coronavirus/lead-or-get-out-of-the-way-florida-mayors-voice-frustrations-as-state-nears-1m-covid-19-cases/

Feinstein added that she planned to focus her attention on combating climate change and the coronavirus pandemic.

Members of her own party had expressed concern before Barrett’s hearing that the 87-year-old wouldn’t be aggressive enough. Her approach to the battle over filling the seat left by the late Ruth Bader Ginsberg soon confirmed many Democrats’ fears, particularly after she praised Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) for his handling of the process and gave him a hug at the conclusion.

Shortly after the hearings, several liberal groups called on her to resign from her position. One of those groups, Demand Justice, applauded her decision to step down.

“This was a necessary step if Democrats are ever going to meaningfully confront the damage Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell have done to the federal judiciary,” said Brian Fallon, executive director of Demand Justice. “Going forward, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee must be led by someone who will not wishfully cling to a bygone era of civility and decorum that Republicans abandoned long ago.”

After the hearings, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he had a “long and serious” talk with Feinstein. Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is next in line for the job, followed by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).

Durbin announced his interest in the post later Monday evening.

“I intend to seek the top Democratic position on the Judiciary Committee in the 117th Congress,” he said. “We have to roll up our sleeves and get to work on undoing the damage of the last four years and protecting fundamental civil and human rights.”

Some of Feinstein’s colleagues praised her tenure following her announcement. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, said Feinstein “has been a steadfast and strong voice for the rule of law against an administration that continually jeopardized it” and said he looked forward to continuing to work with her.

Schumer said he was “deeply grateful” for Feinstein’s leadership on the committee, adding, “I know Senator Feinstein will continue her work as one of the nation’s leading advocates for women’s and voting rights, gun safety reform, civil liberties, health care, and the rights of immigrants who are yearning to become citizens of this great country.”

Should Democrats win the Senate in two Georgia runoffs, the Judiciary Committee chairmanship would be an exceedingly important job for the party. But even if the Democrats don’t prevail there, the ranking member job will require pressuring Republicans to move President-elect Joe Biden’s nominations.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/23/dianne-feinstein-step-down-senate-judiciary-439836

The Board of State Canvassers certified Michigan’s November general election results Monday.

The board, made up of two Republicans and two Democrats, met Nov. 23 to make the vote count official after all 83 Michigan counties certified their election results, which include Joe Biden’s 2.8% statewide victory over President Donald Trump. The state certification of the more than 5.5 million ballots cast comes after Trump and his attorneys and supporters persistently called for delaying certification. Board of State Canvasser Norman Shinkle abstained from the vote. The other three board members all voted in favor of certifying.

Aaron Van Langevelde, a Republican canvasser and an attorney for the House Republican Caucus, said the board doesn’t have many options outside of performing its duty to certify the election.

“This board must respect authority entrusted to it and follow the law as it is written. We must not attempt to exercise power we do not have,” Van Langevelde said. “We have a clear legal duty to certify the results of the election. We cannot and should not go beyond that.”

More: With the world watching, a Republican state canvasser helps make Biden’s win in Michigan official

Christopher Thomas, a former Michigan Elections Director who came out of retirement to help oversee Detroit’s election process, took questions from the board and said the canvassers don’t have the authority to conduct or order investigations or audits of the count before certification.

Shinkle, a Republican canvasser, inquired whether the board could adjourn without taking a vote.

“I believe Wayne County’s certification needs to be looked at. I believe there were serious problems with it,” Shinkle said.

Thomas said the board may adjourn and wait for corrections to returns, but members must have a reason to do so, and with all Michigan counties having certified their results, he argued there would be no legal basis for declining to immediately certify.

“You can’t vote ‘no’. There is no ‘no’ in these circumstances… You’re the endgame of the statewide elections for 2020,” Thomas said.

Related: Chatfield warns of ‘constitutional crisis’ day before state board meets to certify election

Certifying the election is historically a routine sign-off by the board, but after members of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers last week initially voted against certification, and then were contacted by the president after ultimately voting to certify their results, speculation arose over the possibility that the state board might decline certification.

Trump last week also hosted the state’s most influential GOP lawmakers, House Speaker Lee Chatfield, R-Levering, and Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, R-Clark Lake, at the White House.

Chatfield and Shirkey both said Trump didn’t ask lawmakers to “break the law” or “interfere” with the election.

Laura Cox, the Michigan Republican Party Chair, asked the board to delay certifying the votes.

“There are too many questions, too many numeric anomalies. We need to remove the distrust and sense of procedural disenfranchisement,” Cox said.

Trump and members of the Republican National Committee have filed several lawsuits asking the courts to intervene in Michigan’s election by stopping the certification of results until an audit has been conducted. Michigan law doesn’t allow audits to be performed until election results are certified.

Charles Spies, who represents Senate candidate John James, said the meeting should be adjourned until Wayne County’s results are audited.

“Our position isn’t that this election shouldn’t be certified, but the Board of State Canvassers should only do that when it is confident that the results it is certifying are correct,” Spies said.

Van Langevelde, who was an assistant prosecutor for Branch County, said he’s spent a lot of time reviewing the state’s elections and it doesn’t give the board authority to conduct an audit.

“I think the law is on my side here, we have no authority to request an audit or delay or block the certification,” Van Langevelde said.

Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has said an audit will be conducted after certification of results to explore problems with unbalanced precinct records that appeared in Wayne County and elsewhere in the state, indicating some errors by poll workers, but not in numbers that would impact the outcome of the election. A jammed tabulator or a person signing in to vote and leaving before casting their ballot can result in imbalance.

Related: Michigan legislative leaders after meeting with Trump: ‘we will follow the law’

“We have seen positive indications of Detroit’s accuracy and accountability,” Thomas said. “Detroit’s voters were given the opportunity to vote safely and I’m pleased with what’s occurred.“

City of Detroit Clerk Janice Winfrey said using electronic poll books and having election workers process ballots in shifts resulted in fewer mistakes. The city managed to reduce its percentage of imbalanced precincts compared to the August primary, 75%, to 70% in the November general election. Winfrey responded to Shinkle’s inquiry about why there weren’t more Republicans working in Detroit, stating people may have waited too long to apply and go through training.

“We do all of this so we can eliminate as much human error as possible, but as humans, we all make mistakes,” Winfrey said.

More on MLive:

6 reasons that allegations of Michigan election fraud defy common sense

Michigan’s Republican leaders are meeting with Trump. Experts call any attempt to sway the election ‘absolute chaos’

Wayne County canvasser explains her opposition to certifying election results

Source Article from https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/2020/11/board-of-canvassers-certifies-michigans-election-results-in-3-1-vote.html

Ownership of the bookstore led to community organizing work, which led Ms. Haines to Georgetown University Law Center, where she discovered international legal work.

While she is a former C.I.A. deputy director, Ms. Haines does not have a long career of working directly for intelligence agencies. Still, she has deep experience overseeing covert programs, leading White House Situation Room discussions of national security problems and translating intelligence issues for political leaders in the White House.

Ms. Haines had been selected to return to the State Department, chosen for the legal adviser’s job, when Mr. Brennan made her his deputy after he was confirmed to lead the C.I.A. in 2013. Mr. Brennan, a career C.I.A. officer, said he wanted an outsider to help him.

“She is not an ideologue by any means,” he said. “She is probably going to be criticized by people at different ends of the spectrum, but she has a very practical and pragmatic view.”

Some human rights organizations expressed worries that Mr. Biden’s choice of Ms. Haines signaled a return to the Obama administration’s national security policies rather than exploring more liberal alternatives. Progressive groups long argued that the Obama administration’s counterterrorism programs amounted to extrajudicial killings and were illegal under international law.

“My concerns about her are more my concerns about the Obama administration,” said Andrea J. Prasow, the deputy Washington director of Human Rights Watch. “With these cabinet picks, we are returning to the previous administration instead of making bold and forward-leaning picks.”

In her Senate confirmation, Ms. Haines is likely to face questions about the drone program and how under her watch the C.I.A. worked with lawmakers investigating the agency’s interrogation program. At the time, senators accused the C.I.A. of breaking into computers they were using to conduct their oversight, setting off a bitter feud between lawmakers and the agency.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/23/us/politics/biden-haines-national-intelligence.html

On Sunday, one of the team’s members, conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell, was effectively fired after suggesting — again without any proof — that the Republican governor and secretary of state of Georgia were part of a plot to rig the election for Biden.

Powell’s ouster came days after she made similarly over-the-top claims at a press conference at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington.

Trump has complained to White House aides and outside allies about how Giuliani and Powell conducted themselves at that event, NBC reported.

On Sunday before Powell got the axe, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a close Trump ally and former top federal prosecutor, called the president’s legal team a “national embarrassment.”

But when asked why Trump doesn’t fire Giuliani and other attorneys who remain on the team, a person familiar with the president’s thinking gave a profane shoulder shrug of an answer.

“Who the f— knows?” that person said to NBC News.

For now, Giuliani has kept his job as the president’s point man on the election challenge, even after a week in which he gave a widely derided argument in Pennsylvania federal court, only to see a judge on Saturday issue a scathing dismissal of the campaign’s vote challenge lawsuit.

Giuliani, who was once a top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, also presided over the press conference at RNC headquarters, where he stood and watched Powell promote the campaign’s most far-fetched vote fraud allegations to date.

At that event, Giuliani perspired so heavily that sweat apparently blackened from hair dye conspicuously ran down his cheeks as he made baseless allegations of electoral skullduggery.

Trump, who is obsessed with television and the personal appearances of people on it, was not happy with Giuliani’s look at the press conference, a person familiar with the president’s reaction told NBC News.

Also still on the Trump campaign team is senior legal advisor Jenna Ellis.

Within hours of the Trump campaign suffering its major defeat in the Pennsylvania election case Saturday night, Ellis tweeted that respected Republican pollster Frank Luntz had “MicroPenis Syndrome.”

Luntz’s sin was linking to a tweet from Ellis last week that suggested Giuliani, a former New York City mayor, was getting on swimmingly with the judge in the case.

“Best parody account on Twitter,” Luntz had japed.

“You media morons are all laughing at @RudyGiuliani, but he appears to have already established a great rapport with the judge, who is currently offering recommendations on martini bars for Team Trump in open court,” Ellis had written.

A spokesman for Trump’s campaign had no immediate comment on NBC News’ reporting.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/23/trump-fears-giuliani-and-other-biden-vote-challenge-lawyers-are-fools.html

A California grand jury has indicted Apple’s head of global security on charges that he tried to bribe Santa Clara County officials to procure firearms (CCW) licenses, according to a news release. Santa Clara district attorney Jeff Rosen alleges that Thomas Moyer offered 200 iPads — worth about $70,000 — to Capt. James Jensen and Undersheriff Rick Sung in the Santa Clara County sheriff’s office, in exchange for four concealed firearms licenses for Apple employees.

The charges came after a two-year investigation. “In the case of four CCW licenses withheld from Apple employees, Undersheriff Sung and Cpt. Jensen managed to extract from Thomas Moyer a promise that Apple would donate iPads to the Sheriff’s Office,” Rosen said in the news release. The iPads were never delivered, according to Rosen’s office, because Sung and Moyer became aware in 2019 that the district attorney was executing a search warrant for the sheriff department’s CCW records.

Moyer’s attorney, Ed Swanson, said in a statement emailed to The Verge that his client is innocent of the charges filed against him, adding he believed Moyer was “collateral damage” in a dispute between the Santa Clara sheriff and district attorneys’ offices. “He did nothing wrong and has acted with the highest integrity throughout his career,” Swanson said. “We have no doubt he will be acquitted at trial.”

According to Bloomberg News, Moyer has been at Apple for about 15 years and has been its head of global security since November 2018. He wrote a memo in 2018 warning Apple employees about the potential consequences of leaking information to the media, which he wrote “can become part of your personal and professional identity forever.”

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday.

Source Article from https://www.theverge.com/2020/11/23/21611525/apple-ipads-bribes-concealed-gun-permits-security-head-accused-santa-clara

As Fed chair, she gave important speeches — including one at the storied annual conference in Jackson Hole, Wyo. — advocating continued watchfulness and wariness when it came to financial overhauls instituted after the 2008 crisis. She has struck a concerned tone about regulatory rollbacks under the Trump administration.

“It is certainly appropriate to simplify regulations that impose unnecessary burdens, particularly on small community banks,” she said in 2019. “But I’m greatly concerned that the regulatory work needed to address financial stability risk has stalled. There have been some worrisome reversals.”

Ms. Yellen is a Keynesian economist, which means she believes markets have imperfections and sometimes need to be rerouted or kick-started by government intervention.

She is, however, relatively moderate on many topics, including trade. Mr. Akerlof, her husband, recalled in a 2001 biographical note that when he met her: “Not only did our personalities mesh perfectly, but we have also always been in all but perfect agreement about macroeconomics. Our lone disagreement is that she is a bit more supportive of free trade than I.”

She has been a clear champion of continued government support for workers and businesses as the pandemic saps the economy.

“While the pandemic is still seriously affecting the economy, we need to continue extraordinary fiscal support,” Ms. Yellen said in a Bloomberg Television interview in October.

She has also been a major influence on leading officials at the Fed. John C. Williams, who worked for her in San Francisco, now leads the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Mary C. Daly, who now leads the San Francisco Fed, cites Ms. Yellen as a key mentor.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/23/business/economy/janet-yellen-treasury-secretary.html

The appeal appears to be as much of a long shot as the case on which it is based. But it could speed up what the Trump campaign says is its plan to get the case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The court quickly granted the Trump campaign’s request for an emergency expedited review, and ordered the campaign to submit its legal brief laying out its arguments for the appeal by 4 p.m. ET Monday. Briefs by defendants in the case, whol include Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, are due by the same time Tuesday.

“The Court will advise if oral argument desired,” a notice in the case’s docket says.

The campaign later said in another filing that will be filing a request for an emergency temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to block the effect of the state’s likely certification of a win for Biden.

The filings came a day after Trump’s two leading campaign lawyers, Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, effectively fired a third member of the team, Sidney Powell, after she made bizarre claims that included suggesting that Georgia’s Republican governor and secretary of state were part of a conspiracy to rig the election there for Biden.

“Sidney Powell is practicing law on her own. She is not a member of the Trump Legal Team. She is also not a lawyer for the President in his personal capacity,” Giuliani and Ellis said, a week after Trump boasted on Twitter about Powell being part of the campaign legal team.

Giuliani last week made a court appearance in U.S. District Court in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, where he argued that Trump was the victim of fraudulent votes. He also said the campaign’s lawsuit trying to block the certification of votes in the state was not alleging fraud.

Giuliani said a claim in the original lawsuit was mistakenly removed by other lawyers, and said it would be added back in a revised lawsuit.

On Saturday, the judge in that case, Matthew Brann, dismissed Giuliani’s argument in a scathing decision that compared the Trump’s campaign’s allegations to “Frankenstein’s monster.”

Brann, a Republican appointed by President Barack Obama, said the campaign gave him “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by the evidence.”

In the appeal of Brann’s decision filed Monday, the campaign refers to Trump as “Presidential Donald J. Trump,” instead of as “President Donald J. Trump” as one normally would in a legal case.

That apparent slip is contained in the line alleging that Democratic officials in Pennsylvania “engaged in an intentional scheme to count defective mail ballots which they knew would favor Joseph Biden over Presidential Donald J. Trump.”

Elsewhere in the filing, the campaign’s lawyers underscore the significance of their claim while undermining the rules of grammar: “This action is of nationwide importance because of the consequences of flawed election processes on the election for the President of the United States in the Commonwealth could turn the election in favor of either candidate.”

Appeals typically ask appellate judges to overturn a lower-court decision or, at minimum, request a so-called stay that would block the ruling from taking effect.

In this case, Brann’s decision would allow Pennsylvania’s counties to certify its election results by Monday’s deadline. Those results are set to confirm Democratic former vice president Biden’s win in the state.

But the Trump campaign does not ask the 3rd Circuit to stay Brann’s ruling, or even overturn it.

Instead, the campaign asked the appeals court to consider a second revision of the original lawsuit in the case, which raises additional allegations about the voting processes in the state.

“Plaintiffs believe that the Second Amended Complaint cures any deficiencies noted by the District Court regarding, [among others things], standing, equal protection, and remedy because its allegations are very different than those” in the campaign’s first amended complaint, which Brann dismissed.

The appeal noted that the campaign is not waiving any claim that Brann’s decision was wrongly decided, and offered to provide the appeals court any briefs to make such a claim if asked to do so.

The Trump campaign and its allies have lost or voluntarily withdrawn more than 30 state and federal court cases around the nation as part of an effort to invalidate enough ballots, in enough locales to effectively reverse Biden’s projected win in the Electoral College.

Saturday’s loss in Pennsylvania and the withdrawal two days earlier of a federal lawsuit in Michigan made that effort even more unlikely to succeed than it already was.

Biden is projected to win 306 electoral votes, 36 more than is needed to win the White House.

In another pending long-shot case, Pennsylvania Republicans, including Rep. Mike Kelly, filed a complaint in Commonwealth Court seeking to stop certain kinds of mail-in ballots from being included in the state’s final tally.

The plaintiffs seek to block the certification of the election in the state, claiming that mail-in ballots cast under an allegedly “unconstitutional” law signed last year by Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, cannot be counted.

The law, Act 77, expanded access for Pennsylvania voters to cast mail-in ballots without an excuse.

After the lawsuit was filed, observers quickly pointed out that Act 77 passed a GOP-controlled Pennsylvania state legislature in 2019 with overwhelming support.

“It’s kind of a hail Mary when there’s no time left on the clock,” Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. Jon Fetterman told the KDKA, the Pittsburgh radio station.

“They are actively suing a Republican bill that would dismantle Republican control in our entire statehouse,” Democrat Fetterman said.

On Sunday, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Trump ally, called the campaign’s legal team a “national embarrassment,” saying the attorneys have failed to present evidence of the widespread fraud they claim denied Trump reelection.

Christie is one of a growing number of Republicans who say Trump should concede the election.

But the president has refused to do so.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/23/trump-appeals-pennsylvania-vote-case-seeking-to-block-biden-.html