Warnock’s comments Sunday echoed a larger theme in his continued campaign against appointed GOP Sen. Kelly Loeffler. As he and fellow Democrat Jon Ossoff — who is in his own runoff with Sen. David Perdue — jostle for seats in the upper chamber, both candidates are redirecting focus from the national stage to Georgia voters and their health care.
The pair of January runoff elections will decide control of the Senate. If Warnock and Ossoff come out on top, Democrats have a 50-50 Senate with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris breaking ties. Should they lose, Democrats are relegated once again to the minority, with a Republican Senate standing in the way of President-elect Joe Biden’s ambitious agenda.
Warnock expressed optimism Sunday at his odds of winning the race.
“I finished first, handily, far ahead of a candidate who is the wealthiest member of Congress, who poured millions of dollars into this race. And we finished in a strong position,” Warnock said.
“There is no question in my mind that, as Georgians hear about my commitment to access to affordable health care, the dignity of work, the work I have been doing for years, standing up for ordinary people, we will prevail come Jan. 5.”
Conservative commentators blamed so-called antifa for harassing Trump supporters, a sentiment echoed multiple times by the president himself Sunday morning.
“Antifa SCUM ran for the hills today when they tried attacking the people at the Trump Rally, because those people aggressively fought back. Antifa waited until tonight, when 99% were gone, to attack innocent #MAGA People. DC Police, get going — do your job and don’t hold back!!!” Trump posted on Facebook.
Antifa, short for anti-fascist, is a decentralized movement that protests against the far-right, with some occasionally resorting to violence. The far-right and some Republicans have repeatedly fear-mongered about the group in a bid to denigrate all anti-racism protesters.
During the march, the largely maskless pro-Trump supporters pushed the president’s false rhetoric of an unfair election with signs reading “Stop The Steal.” They also continued the president’s attacks on the US voting system, President-elect Joe Biden, and public health expert Anthony Fauci.
Among the attendees were right-wing figures including Alex Jones, MyPillow founder and CEO Mike Lindell, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, a supporter of the QAnon mass delusion who was recently elected to the US House of Representatives. All three gave speeches incorrectly claiming Trump had been re-elected and falsely accusing Democrats of trying to steal the election.
In addition to the march in DC, a “Stop The Steal” protest in Sacramento Saturday stirred up clashes between Proud Boys and counterprotesters as well, according to ABC. No serious injuries were reported.
Warnock’s comments Sunday echoed a larger theme in his continued campaign against appointed GOP Sen. Kelly Loeffler. As he and fellow Democrat Jon Ossoff — who is in his own runoff with Sen. David Perdue — jostle for seats in the upper chamber, both candidates are redirecting focus from the national stage to Georgia voters and their health care.
The pair of January runoff elections will decide control of the Senate. If Warnock and Ossoff come out on top, Democrats have a 50-50 Senate with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris breaking ties. Should they lose, Democrats are relegated once again to the minority, with a Republican Senate standing in the way of President-elect Joe Biden’s ambitious agenda.
Warnock expressed optimism Sunday at his odds of winning the race.
“I finished first, handily, far ahead of a candidate who is the wealthiest member of Congress, who poured millions of dollars into this race. And we finished in a strong position,” Warnock said.
“There is no question in my mind that, as Georgians hear about my commitment to access to affordable health care, the dignity of work, the work I have been doing for years, standing up for ordinary people, we will prevail come Jan. 5.”
After several thousand supporters of President Donald Trump protested the election results and marched to the Supreme Court, nighttime clashes with counterdemonstrators led to fistfights, at least one stabbing and more than 20 arrests.
Several other cities on Saturday also saw gatherings of Trump supporters unwilling to accept Democrat Joe Biden’s Electoral College and popular vote victory as legitimate. Cries of “Stop the Steal” and “Count Every Vote” rang out despite a lack of evidence of voter fraud or other problems that could reverse the result.
The demonstrations in the nation’s capital went from tense to violent during the night and early Sunday. Videos posted on social media showed fights, projectiles and clubs as Trump backers sparred with those demanding they take their MAGA hats and banners and leave. Police said they made 21 arrests on a variety of charges, including assault and weapons possession, and recovered eight firearms. Four officers were injured. No arrest has been made in the stabbing, and the victim was hospitalized with non-life threatening injuries.
Trump himself had given an approving nod to the gathering Saturday morning by sending his motorcade through streets lined with supporters before rolling on to his Virginia golf club. People chanted “USA, USA” and “four more years,” and many carried American flags and signs to show their displeasure with the vote tally and insistence that, as Trump has baselessly asserted, fraud was the reason.
“I just want to keep up his spirits and let him know we support him,” said one loyalist, Anthony Whittaker of Winchester, Virginia. He was outside the Supreme Court, where a few thousand assembled after a march along Pennsylvania Avenue from Freedom Plaza, near the White House.
A broad coalition of top government and industry officials has declared that the Nov. 3 voting and the following count unfolded smoothly with no more than the usual minor hiccups — “the most secure in American history,” they said, repudiating Trump’s efforts to undermine the integrity of the contest.
In Delray Beach, Florida, several hundred people marched, some carrying signs reading “Count every vote” and “We cannot live under a Marxist government.” In Lansing, Michigan, protesters gathered at the Capitol to hear speakers cast doubt on results that showed Biden winning the state by more than 140,000 votes. Phoenix police estimated 1,500 people gathered outside the Arizona Capitol to protest Biden’s narrow victory in the state. Protesters in Salem, Oregon, gathered at the Capitol.
Among the speakers in Washington was a Georgia Republican newly elected to the U.S. House. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has expressed racist views and support for QAnon conspiracy theories, urged people to march peacefully toward the Supreme Court.
The marchers included members of the Proud Boys, a neo-fascist group known for street brawling with ideological opponents at political rallies.
Multiple confrontations appeared later in the day as small groups of Trump supporters attempted to enter the area around Black Lives Matter Plaza, about a block from the White House, where several hundred anti-Trump demonstrators had gathered.
In a pattern that kept repeating itself, those Trump supporters who approached the area were harassed, doused with water and saw their MAGA hats and pro-Trump flags snatched and burned, amid cheers. As night fell, multiple police lines kept the two sides apart.
Videos posted on social media showed some demonstrators and counterdemonstrators trading shoves, punches and slaps. A man with a bullhorn yelling “Get out of here!” was shoved and pushed to the street by a man who was then surrounded by several people and shoved and punched until he fell face first into the street. Bloody and dazed, he was picked up and walked to a police officer.
The “Million MAGA March” was heavily promoted on social media, raising concerns that it could spark conflict with anti-Trump demonstrators, who have gathered near the White House in Black Lives Matter Plaza for weeks.
In preparation, police closed off wide swaths of downtown, where many stores and offices have been boarded up since Election Day. Chris Rodriguez, director of the city’s Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency, said the police were experienced at keeping the peace.
The issues that Trump’s campaign and its allies have pointed to are typical in every election: problems with signatures, secrecy envelopes and postal marks on mail-in ballots, as well as the potential for a small number of ballots miscast or lost. With Biden leading Trump by wide margins in key battleground states, none of those issues would have any impact on the outcome of the election.
A former administration official, Sebastian Gorka, whipped up the crowd by the Supreme Court by saying, “We can win because he did win.” But, he added, “It’s going to be tough.”
Dr. Vivek Murthy, pictured in 2016, is the co-chair of President-elect Biden’s coronavirus advisory board.
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images
Dr. Vivek Murthy, pictured in 2016, is the co-chair of President-elect Biden’s coronavirus advisory board.
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images
The Trump administration has not cooperated with President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team, and top Biden officials say the incoming president is limited in what he can do before his team takes the reins. Still, Biden’s coronavirus advisory board co-chair Vivek Murthy says they’re doing everything they can to ensure plans are ready to go on Inauguration Day — including stronger mask requirements.
Biden has already called for implementing mask mandates nationwide. Where mandates don’t exist, Biden will make direct pleas to governors and mayors to put them in place, Murthy said in an interview with NPR’s Weekend Edition.
“The worse this pandemic gets, there are more leaders, elected leaders, who are coming around to the fact that as unpalatable as these mandates might be, they are important and they actually work,” Murthy said.
Different parts of the country are dealing with the pandemic in their own ways, and that lack of uniformity in restrictions isn’t helpful, the former surgeon general said. For instance, “We don’t have a uniform national alert system that tells communities at what level to start implementing restrictions based on important indicators,” Murthy said.
What is clear, he said, is that strict lockdowns aren’t always necessary if people comply with less restrictive measures.
“I think the more important way for us to think about restrictions is not as a switch that we flip up and down, but more as a dial that we increase and decrease as the situation dictates.”
The severe lockdowns that much of the country faced in the spring were essentially a “blunt axe,” Murthy said. “We did that in part because we didn’t know a lot about the virus in the spring that we know now.”
Overly severe restrictions not only lead to weakened compliance, Murthy said, but also disrupt schooling, work and actually lead to “very little public health gain.”
Health experts say that once a vaccine becomes available, about three quarters of the population will have to take it to really protect the public — a goal that Murthy called “ambitious but achievable.”
“It’s not going to be easy. And it’s going to take not only an adequate supply of the vaccine, but it’s going to take perhaps one of the most important but challenging elements too, which is public trust.”
Americans have a complicated relationship with vaccines. The flu vaccine, for instance, is only taken by about half of Americans. But Murthy pointed to other vaccines that have better compliance — like the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine, which states require children to get before they can attend school.
Murthy said he did not anticipate having to make a COVID-19 vaccine a legal requirement, arguing such a mandate won’t be necessary once people recognize that the vaccine is “based on science and not politics.”
“What we’ve got to do is help people understand that the urgency they’re feeling in their lives as they look at these numbers go up, that that urgency can be addressed actually by a vaccine that we hope to have available in the next few months. But it’s going to be a Herculean effort.”
Meanwhile, the current president has taken a more hands-off role in dealing with the latest surge, even as case counts reach record highs. Trump hasn’t attended a coronavirus task force meeting in at least five months, task force member Adm. Brett Giroir confirmed to ABC’s This Week on Sunday.
“There’s not that much that Joe Biden can do right now to change things,” said President-elect Biden’s newly named chief of staff, Ron Klain, in an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday. “All Americans, and our state and local governments, need to step up right now. If the president and the administration’s not going to lead, that’s where the leadership has to come from. That will change on January 20, but right now we have a crisis that’s getting worse.”
Klain noted that Biden’s advisors will have meetings this week with drug makers to discuss the progress of their vaccine efforts. But the mechanics of manufacture and distribution is even more important, Klain said. “That really lies with folks at the Health and Human Services Department,” he said. “We need to be talking to them as quickly as possible.”
Warnock’s comments Sunday echoed a larger theme in his continued campaign against appointed GOP Sen. Kelly Loeffler. As he and fellow Democrat Jon Ossoff — who is in his own runoff with Sen. David Perdue — jostle for seats in the upper chamber, both candidates are redirecting focus from the national stage to Georgia voters and their health care.
The pair of January runoff elections will decide control of the Senate. If Warnock and Ossoff come out on top, Democrats have a 50-50 Senate with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris breaking ties. Should they lose, Democrats are relegated once again to the minority, with a Republican Senate standing in the way of President-elect Joe Biden’s ambitious agenda.
Warnock expressed optimism Sunday at his odds of winning the race.
“I finished first, handily, far ahead of a candidate who is the wealthiest member of Congress, who poured millions of dollars into this race. And we finished in a strong position,” Warnock said.
“There is no question in my mind that, as Georgians hear about my commitment to access to affordable health care, the dignity of work, the work I have been doing for years, standing up for ordinary people, we will prevail come Jan. 5.”
Barack Obama would not take a position in Joe Biden’s cabinet if the president-elect offered it – because if he did, he fears, Michelle Obama would leave him.
The 44th president made the remark in an interview with CBS Sunday Morning, two days ahead of publication of his memoir, A Promised Land. He was due to speak to CBS again, for 60 Minutes, on Sunday night.
Biden, Obama’s vice-president from 2009 to 2017, is preparing to become the 46th president in January, having defeated Donald Trump at the polls.
Asked how he will help Biden, Obama said: “He doesn’t need my advice, and I will help him in any ways that I can. Now, I’m not planning to suddenly work on the White House staff or something.”
Susan Rice and Michelle Flournoy are among Obama administration veterans reportedly being considered for key posts under Biden.
Asked if he would consider a cabinet position, Obama said: “There are some things I would not be doing because Michelle would leave me. She’d be like, what? You’re doing what?”
In his book, Obama considers what his meteoric rise to the US Senate and then the White House meant for his marriage to Michelle and family life with their daughters, Sasha and Malia.
“My career in politics, with its prolonged absences, had made it even tougher” for his wife to pursue her own law career, he writes. “More than once Michelle had decided not to pursue an opportunity that excited her but would have demanded too much time away from the girls.
“… With my election [as president] she’d been forced to give up a job with real impact for a role [as first lady] that – in its original design, at least – was far too small for her gifts.”
The Obamas’ literary gifts have at least paid off. A Promised Land is part of a reported $65m deal with Penguin Random House that also covered Becoming, Michelle Obama’s memoir, released in 2018, and which has sold more than 10m copies. The former president is expected to produce a second volume.
He also discussed the first with Oprah Winfrey, for Apple TV in an interview scheduled to broadcast in full on Tuesday.
In a released clip, Obama told Winfrey he and Michelle “went through our rough patches in the White House, as she’s written about, she’s talked about. But I tell you that the thing that I think we were good about was talking stuff through, never losing fundamental love and respect for each other, and prioritising our kids.”
Another passage of Obama’s CBS interview might have had resonance for the current president, had he been watching.
Obama discussed what it is like to have the luxurious trappings of office, in this instance the presidential motorcade, inevitably taken away.
“I’m driving along,” Obama said, laughing. “I’m still not driving, but [I’m] in the car. I’m in the car in the backseat and I’m looking at my iPad or something. And suddenly, we stop and I’m like, ‘What’s going on?’ There’s a red light. There’s a car right next to us. Some kids are eating a burrito or something in the backseat.
Several hundred thousand white supremacists, q-anon conspiracy theorists, neonazis, and Trump supporters held a march in Washington, DC demanding the overturn of the 2020 election of Joe Biden to the presidency, on Saturday, 14 November 2020. (Photo
WASHINGTON – A man is suffering from multiple stab wounds and at least 21 other people face criminal charges in the nation’s capital after Saturday’s “Million MAGA March” in support of President Donald Trump.
D.C. police say they recovered seven guns and are tending to two wounded officers following the rally decrying the results of this month’s presidential election.
Police had made 10 arrests as of Saturday afternoon. The rowdy scene escalated to violence after sundown:
Advertisement
Police tell FOX 5 that a demonstrator at yesterday’s rally was stabbed around 8:12 p.m. near 10th St. and New York Ave. NW. The victim was hospitalized with non-life threatening injuries. No arrests have been made.
As of Sunday morning, President Trump had yet to concede the 2020 election despite being projected to fall well short of President-Elect Joe Biden in the Electoral College.
FOX 5’s Stephanie Ramirez reported on Saturday’s unrest during FOX 5 On The Hill this Sunday morning:
One stabbed, many arrested during overnight MAGA protests
FOX 5’s Stephanie Ramirez reports following a night of violent protests by President Trump’s supporters.
The tension from Saturday night appeared to spill into Sunday morning near Black Lives Matter Plaza.
FOX 5 was there as a few Trump supporters became more agitated, attempting to rip down the several Black Lives Matters signs and posters hanging from the Lafayette Square fence raised along H St. NW over the summer.
This location has been a flashpoint for pro-Trump protesters and counter-protesters. Trump supporters were seen at least three different times since Friday trying to rip down signage from the fence.
Those who oppose the president tied to block Trump supporters from pulling down the signs with their bodies as police yelled at them not to place their hands on anyone. Those protecting the fence yelled back at police for allowing Trump supporters to tear down the signs.
“We want to be able to see our White House and with all this garbage on the fence, we can’t see it,” said one woman, donning a “Make America Great Again” American flag ski cap.
More officers were called to the scene ended up moving most of the public away from the fence. Police then taped-off the area in an attempt to diffuse the confrontation.
“It’s sad that they ripping down those signs,” said a man who identified himself as a D.C. resident. That man then turned his head to yell toward the Trump supporters, some of whom were smiling while recording on their cell phones.
“For what reason?” the man shouted, “Those signs got nothing to do with your president losing.”
This was the Sunday morning that followed a few violent outbursts in downtown DC that resulted in over 20 arrests. It was not immediately clear on Sunday morning what the political affiliations of those arrested are.
The president, in a nod to his supporters, tweeted late Saturday night, referencing those out in the unrest as “ANTIFA SCUM” and “innocent #MAGA People.”
FOX 5’s camera captured members of both political affiliations confronting one another. Members of the “Proud Boys” were also seen involved in the confrontations.
The night of unrest followed massive, mostly peaceful demonstrations under the banner of the “Million MAGA March,” even though protesters continued false claims of widespread voter fraud.
Federal and State election officials continue to say there is no evidence of such.
Amir Weiner, in from New York for the march, was walking with his family around Black Lives Matter Plaza on Sunday morning.
“It was cool to see, first of all peaceful protest, I know all the stuff happened towards the end of the night,” Weiner said.“Until it gets to the courts, once it gets to the courts and they say, ‘You know what, it’s over,’ I would surrender the white flag and say its’ over.”
“Well how would it go to the Supreme Court? There’s no legal basis for it,” countered a woman who would only give her first name as ‘Jerry.’
She also said that“I think they’re delusional about that. You have to have a basis to go, you know, to the Appellate courts, the Supreme Court and it simply isn’t there.”
“I think it’s sad that we’re in such turmoil. I mean they have the right to their opinion, I don’t understand it I don’t agree with it,” added “Jerry.”
“I think that the temperature needs to cool down in this country,” said Royal Taylor, visiting from Richmond, VA.
D.C. police told FOX 5 they were not aware of any significant demonstrations planned for Sunday, but the department did maintain its heavy police presence on Sunday.
Allies to President Donald Trump are exploring the possibility of acquiring and investing in conservative outlet Newsmax to set up a competitor to the Fox News Channel, the Wall Street Journal reported.
There are ongoing discussions between Newsmax and Hicks Equity Partners, an investment firm connected to the Republican National Committee.
CNN reported that Fox News viewers have been navigating over to Newsmax after the network declared Biden was the winner.
Allies to President Donald Trump are exploring the possibility of acquiring and investing in conservative outlet Newsmax to set up a competitor to the Fox News Channel, the Wall Street Journal reported.
There are ongoing discussions between Newsmax and Hicks Equity Partners, an investment firm connected to the Republican National Committee, according to the Journal. The deal would include a video-streaming service.
Media pundits believe regular Fox News viewers have been navigating over to Newsmax after the network declared Biden was the winner.
Business Insider called the race for Joe Biden on Friday, November 6, but Trump so far has refused to concede. Instead, he’s been blasting Biden’s victory and pushing baseless assertions that the former vice president won because of voter fraud.
Newsmax has been backing Trump up on these unsubstantiated claims. The outlet has even begun to take aim at Fox News, criticizing its hosts for going against Trump’s claim that the election results in favor of Biden are not valid.
Trump himself has turned against Fox News, an outlet he once championed as the antithesis to the “fake news media” he constantly rails against.
“.@FoxNews daytime ratings have completely collapsed,” Trump wrote last week. “Weekend daytime even WORSE. Very sad to watch this happen, but they forgot what made them successful, what got them there. They forgot the Golden Goose. The biggest difference between the 2016 Election, and 2020, was @FoxNews!”
It’s not clear whether the Newsmax deal has been solidified yet.
But since the week of the election, the outlet has received a sharp boost of 156% to its viewership, according to the Wall Street Journal. Last week, Newsmax counted 1 million viewers during prime-time TV hours, the Journal reported.
When reached for comment, Fox News referred Business Insider to its November 3 earnings call, in which Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch said, “We love competition.”
“We have always on thrived with competition,” Murdoch said. “And we have strong competition now. I would say the only difference today versus some years ago, as our audience has grown and our reach has grown, we see our competition as no longer only cable news providers, but also as the traditional broadcast networks. And, as you know, Fox News has been the number one network, including broadcast networks now, as I mentioned, through from Labor Day through to election day.”
The Trump campaign and Newsmax did not yet respond to Business Insider’s request for comment.
Vice President-elect Kamala Harris speaks on Nov. 7 in Wilmington, Del.
Andrew Harnik/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Andrew Harnik/AP
Vice President-elect Kamala Harris speaks on Nov. 7 in Wilmington, Del.
Andrew Harnik/AP
To many people it’s a giant leap forward for womankind. But to others, the historic election of the nation’s first female and woman of color to be vice president is a long-overdue step, and a reminder of how much more of the road still lies ahead.
New York marketing executive Wendy Salz is one of several women who spoke with NPR four years ago, after Hillary Clinton lost her bid to become the nation’s first female president. When this year’s race was called for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, she was so overjoyed, she screamed, sobbed and cheered.
“My God. How fabulous is that,” she exclaimed, a little calmer, but still thrilled, days later. Harris’ election, she said, “is reinforcing the ability to dream and to achieve in the next coming generations.”
Her 25-year-old daughter, Moira Johnston, was also thrilled to hear the news. She was jumping up and down at work, high-fiving, crying and sharing champagne with friends. “We’re kind of pushing open a door that was slammed in our faces,” she said.
Wendy Salz and her daughter Moira Johnston were devastated in 2016 when Hillary Clinton lost her bid to become the nation’s first female president. This year they rejoiced when Kamala Harris was elected to become the first woman vice president.
Tovia Smith/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Tovia Smith/NPR
Wendy Salz and her daughter Moira Johnston were devastated in 2016 when Hillary Clinton lost her bid to become the nation’s first female president. This year they rejoiced when Kamala Harris was elected to become the first woman vice president.
Tovia Smith/NPR
Their tears of joy were a far cry from their sobs of despondency on election night in 2016. They had gathered for what was supposed to be a celebration at Wellesley College, Salz’s and Johnston’s alma mater as well as Clinton’s. Cupcakes were topped with shards of sugar glass, and toy hammers were set out for what they thought was the imminent shattering of the ultimate glass ceiling. But by the end of the night, the only thing shattered was their hopes.
“It was just complete and utter despair,” recalls Johnston.
“That night is still so vivid. It was heartbreaking,” said 27-year-old Kathleen Zhu, another Wellesley alum who was wailing that night. “It was like the county validated a divider and turned its back on an intelligent woman. And I feel like so much of that was so sexist and so misogynist.”
“Deep sense of relief, but not exactly exuberance”
So, this year, when the nation elected its first female vice president who’s also Black and South Asian, Zhu felt a deep sense of relief, but not exactly exuberance. But Zhu, an Asian woman herself, said she still did not see it as a moment to rejoice in how far women have come.
“Oh my God, no! Not at all. I don’t think this is a sweet victory,” she said. “Look at how close the vote was. This was not a sweeping victory.” To Zhu, it was also a disappointment to see Harris in the No. 2 slot. “I guess people are [saying they can] accept a woman as vice president but not as president,” she said.
Kathleen Zhu sobbed unconsolably in 2016, after learning Clinton would not be elected the nation’s first female president. Now Zhu’s relieved to see Harris become the first woman elected vice president.
Tovia Smith/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Tovia Smith/NPR
Kathleen Zhu sobbed unconsolably in 2016, after learning Clinton would not be elected the nation’s first female president. Now Zhu’s relieved to see Harris become the first woman elected vice president.
Tovia Smith/NPR
The past four years have left her much more jaded than she was in 2016. Back then, even in the depth of her despair on election night, she insisted women had to only “wake up the next morning, put on our pantsuits, and fight on.”
Nothing, she thought back then, was beyond reach.
“I was definitely was naïve,” she sighed, recalling it this week.
Today, she says, she tends to be less focused on how far women have come, and more tuned in to how much of the glass is left to be filled. Since she left the “bubble” of her super-supportive “women-can-do-anything” all-women’s college, she said, reality has hit hard. She has encountered everything from little indignities, like being presumed to be a nurse while training to be a doctor, to much bigger challenges, like when she came forward with a complaint of sexual assault, and, as she put it, “No one believed me.”
“It was very eye-opening,” she said. “I got the message loud and clear. Now I recognize how difficult it is. It’s made me grow up a lot.”
“A country that doesn’t see a place for me”
Another Wellesley graduate, 24-year-old investment analyst Sydney Robertson, also felt more somber than celebratory about Harris becoming vice president-elect.
In retrospect, she said, she too, was living under a “delusion” in 2016, that the nation had made much more progress toward race and gender equity than it actually had. As a Black woman, she said, it was devastating to see how many Americans were voting for a man known for his racist, and sexist comments.
“I look at a country that doesn’t see a place for me,” she said, weeping that night in 2016, “when quite honestly, my ancestors built it.”
The four years since then, she said, have only catalyzed the hate and division in the country, leaving her feeling even less welcome and more fearful. Now, she said, she knows better, and does not expect the election of a woman vice president to make sexism or misogyny disappear, any more than eight years of a Black president eradicated racism.
“I think that this past four years just put a flashlight on something that was always there, and Trump is just a reflection of the country — and not the opposite,” she said. “It’s clear that we’re not as far away from that ugly truth of America as a lot of people thought we were.”
“We are reenergized”
But as disheartening as it is, Robertson said, it has also left her feeling emboldened to press on.
“Four years ago, I felt like I was being pushed out of the way, and there was no place for me,” she said. “The way I feel now is that it’s my job to take up space in the country that I think I deserve. And I will just force it to be done.”
Wendy Salz feels the same resolve. “We are reenergized,” she said. “Our sleeves are rolled up.”
But at 59, she bristles at suggestions that Harris’ election is anything less than epochal, and cause for jubilation. It may be a generational thing, she said, but she can’t help but rejoice in the part of the glass that is full.
“It’s much more ingrained in who we are that this is a major, major, major accomplishment,” she said. “Every step forward” must be celebrated, she said.
No one should be saying, “It’s only vice president,” she said, but rather, “Thank God, we made it this far.”
President Donald Trump has urged police in Washington, D.C., to not “hold back” on protesters who disrupted the so-called “Million MAGA March” this weekend, raising further fears the president is encouraging violence against his political opponents.
Thousands of Trump supporters marched in Washington Saturday, calling for the result of this month’s presidential election to be overturned. The demonstrators echoed false claims by the Trump campaign and its allies of widespread electoral fraud against the president, which they say illegally handed President-Elect Joe Biden victory.
Clashes erupted between counter-protesters and rally attendees on Saturday night. At least 20 people were arrested throughout the day, according to The Washington Post, including four people on gun charges. Two police officers were injured and a man in his 20s was in a critical condition having been stabbed in the back.
Footage from the scene showed people wearing clothes associated with the white supremacist Proud Boys group—which Trump refused to condemn during a presidential debate—clashing with Black Lives Matter racial justice demonstrators and anti-fascist protesters; broadly referred to as “Antifa” but incorrectly defined by Trump and others as a centralized organization.
“ANTIFA SCUM ran for the hills today when they tried attacking the people at the Trump Rally, because those people aggressively fought back,” Trump wrote on Twitter Saturday.
“Antifa waited until tonight, when 99% were gone, to attack innocent #MAGA People. DC Police, get going — do your job and don’t hold back!!!”
The president also shared a tweet from far-right activist Andy Ngo showing counter-protesters assaulting a Trump supporter at the march, knocking him to the ground. Video posted by other users showed that the victim had earlier attacked counter-protesters.
“Human Radical Left garbage did this,” Trump said alongside Ngo’s video. “Being arrested now!”
There is no evidence to support the widespread electoral fraud that protesters marched against on Saturday. Election officials have said there is no evidence of irregularities that could have changed the result. Biden is due to be inaugurated on January 20 regardless of Trump’s legal challenges.
He will do so having received the largest number of votes for any presidential candidate in history. Trump received the second most in history, a reflection of the unusually high turnout in this month’s election.
Trump’s refusal to accept the result is preventing Biden’s transition team from using funds and access normally reserved for an incoming administration.
Observers have warned this will undermine the transition of power and potentially threaten national security, particularly as the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic runs rampant through the U.S. with Thanksgiving and Christmas looming.
Barack Obama would not take a position in Joe Biden’s cabinet if the president-elect offered it – because if he did, he fears, Michelle Obama would leave him.
The 44th president made the remark in an interview with CBS Sunday Morning, two days ahead of publication of his memoir, A Promised Land. He was due to speak to CBS again, for 60 Minutes, on Sunday night.
Biden, Obama’s vice-president from 2009 to 2017, is preparing to become the 46th president in January, having defeated Donald Trump at the polls.
Asked how he will help Biden, Obama said: “He doesn’t need my advice, and I will help him in any ways that I can. Now, I’m not planning to suddenly work on the White House staff or something.”
Susan Rice and Michelle Flournoy are among Obama administration veterans reportedly being considered for key posts under Biden.
Asked if he would consider a cabinet position, Obama said: “There are some things I would not be doing because Michelle would leave me. She’d be like, what? You’re doing what?”
In his book, Obama considers what his meteoric rise to the US Senate and then the White House meant for his marriage to Michelle and family life with their daughters, Sasha and Malia.
“My career in politics, with its prolonged absences, had made it even tougher” for his wife to pursue her own law career, he writes. “More than once Michelle had decided not to pursue an opportunity that excited her but would have demanded too much time away from the girls.
“… With my election [as president] she’d been forced to give up a job with real impact for a role [as first lady] that – in its original design, at least – was far too small for her gifts.”
The Obamas’ literary gifts have at least paid off. A Promised Land is part of a reported $65m deal with Penguin Random House that also covered Becoming, Michelle Obama’s memoir, released in 2018, and which has sold more than 10m copies. The former president is expected to produce a second volume.
Another passage of Obama’s CBS interview might have had resonance for the current president, had he been watching.
Obama discussed what it is like to have the luxurious trappings of office, in this instance the presidential motorcade, inevitably taken away.
“I’m driving along,” Obama said, laughing. “I’m still not driving, but [I’m] in the car. I’m in the car in the backseat and I’m looking at my iPad or something. And suddenly, we stop and I’m like, ‘What’s going on?’ There’s a red light. There’s a car right next to us. Some kids are eating a burrito or something in the backseat.
WASHINGTON – Several elections across the country still hadn’t been decided when the blame game started.
House Democrats were stunned by their losses after weeks of forecasting had predicted a big win on Election Day. Whispers of leadership change swirled, and House lawmakers soon moved from privately bashing one another to a public airing of grievances on social media and in the media.
It’s not a new fight, the battle waged between progressives and moderates over the vision of the Democratic Party. But this time around, moderates are emboldened. After spending the past few years working in the background as progressives became a leading voice in the party, moderates came out swinging after Election Day losses.
Moderates, who helped Democrats take the House in 2018 and saw their colleagues ousted in key districts this year, not only demanded changes within the party apparatus but loudly issued warnings that Democrats will lose power in the 2022 midterm elections should they not make changes. Progressives fiercely dismiss that notion.
“For any organization, any team have been successful, you have to have unity,” said Rep. Cindy Axne, the only Democrat to win a federal race in Iowa so far this year. (One race is yet to be called). “The No. 1 thing is you all have to be focused on the mission, and the way that you’re going to go about getting there is having the same strategy to get there. When you don’t have that, unity is gone and it makes it a lot more difficult. So I do have concerns.”
The bickering over incremental progress versus bold changes has taken new form. Democrats find themselves not only quarreling about the disappointing results of the election, but they already are butting heads on the path forward, leaving in the crossfire both the legislative agenda in the Biden administration and changes needed to make Democratic gains in the next election.
USA TODAY interviewed key Democratic lawmakers from different factions of the party about the path forward, what needs to change to win areas President Donald Trump turned red and the legislation that could muster support from both sides of the aisle.
Moderates emboldened in fight against progressive policies
Intraparty disputes have become almost routine, often sprung from two important developments for Democrats in the past five years: Sen. Bernie Sanders’ popular presidential runs, that inspired a new generation of progressive activists, and the arrival of new progressives, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., after the 2018 midterms.
Moderates, many from swing districts or states, often focus on local issues that don’t always draw the spotlight and boast of working across the aisle to enact more incremental changes in larger policy. Progressives, on the other hand, have advocated more sweeping change, calling for Democrats to be bold on urgent issues affecting their constituents, such as climate change, access to health care and criminal justice reform.
But unlike past fights over the direction of the party, the next year marks a new moment for Democrats as they take control of the White House, forcing Biden to navigate through deeply rooted beliefs in both branches of the party.
Moderate Democrats who have seen their colleagues ousted by Republicans were quick to point fingers. They argued that Republican attacks linking members to socialism and the “defund the police” movement were a death knell, and they blamed some progressive members for loudly backing those ideas.
Just days after the election, House Democrats huddled on a phone call that featured yelling and tears. Rep. Abigail Spanberger, a moderate Democrat from Virginia who eked out a victory, told the rest of her conference that Democrats needed to learn a lesson from the losses or “we will be f—ing torn apart in 2022.”
In the days that followed, the argument moved to the pages of The New York Times, where Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democratic socialist, argued that poor outreach and digital campaigning sunk moderates in swing districts. In turn, Rep. Conor Lamb, a Pennsylvania moderate who fended off a Republican challenger, responded that unpopular progressive messaging, such as defunding the police and talk of socialism, lost Democrats seats and could lose the House majority in the future.
Progressives have bristled at the blame laid at their feet.
“We have to be very, very careful in pointing those fingers, and we need to just look at the data as it comes in,” said Rep. Pramila Jayapal, a Washington Democrat who co-chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
Many of the accusations hurled at progressives were not supported by evidence, she argued, pointing out that incumbent Democrats who ran in swing districts and supported “Medicare for All” ended up winning their reelection bids.
Moderates have similarly taken issue with assessments by progressives over the losses, notably after Ocasio-Cortez said some swing-district Democrats were “sitting ducks” because of poor voter outreach and digital campaigning.
They argued that progressives in very liberal districts are out of touch with voters in their areas who don’t support many progressive policies but rather want a Washington that works together to enact change.
“Obviously, we all need to sit down and have a big family meeting to get a better understanding of what these districts are like,” said Axne, D-Iowa. “A lot of people make assumptions about who can win where when they have absolutely no clue what it’s like here on the ground.”
Sen. Joe Manchin, one of the few remaining red-state Democrats who has been a vocal opponent of many progressive policies, said the fighting was a “shame” because “there’s enough room to have every good idea put on the table.”
But, he said, proposals such as defunding the police are “so far out of the mainstream” – policies he and other Democrats could never support. “That’s when I said ‘Defund my butt!’,” a reference to a tweet that drew the ire of Ocasio-Cortez.
What Democrats across both spectrums say needs to change
Manchin echoed his fellow Democrats, saying the election displayed clear issues the party needs to address.
“When you have someone with the flaws that President Trump had, after four years of us seeing those flaws, and they walk into the voting booth and they say, ‘Well, that’s better than the other side, so I’ll go for him anyway,’ something’s wrong,” Manchin said. “It should not have been a close election in any way, shape or form.”
At the top of his list for change was Democrats making a stronger case on the economy.
“When you don’t have a message on the economy, (voters) believe that that (Democratic) brand basically is more concerned and interested in people that don’t work or won’t work, more so than the people that do work and will work,” he said. “There’s a problem.”
Across the board, moderates stressed that the best path forward was helping Biden get a legislative agenda through Congress and compromising with Republicans. Many stressed the need for progressives to tone down their rhetoric and for swing-district Democrats to better connect with voters back home in hopes that GOP attacks aiming to tie them to far-left policy wouldn’t stick.
Congresswoman-elect Carolyn Bourdeaux of Georgia, one of the only Democrats to flip a district this year, said Republican attacks tying her to Medicare for All and defunding the police did not work because she was “clear on where my feet are planted.” She doesn’t support either and stressed the need for Democrats to take a district-by-district approach.
Axne credited her win in Iowa to the connections she built in her district. She stressed that Democrats needed to examine voting trends among rural residents and examine why Democrats lost so many over the years.
“We continue to ignore them. I didn’t ignore them. And that’s why I’m sitting here, because their voices are valuable. They deserve to be heard and they’re important for this country’s success,” Axne said.
Progressives have offered their own remedies. Ocasio-Cortez argued in The Times that Democrats as a whole need to “understand that we are not the enemy. And that their base is not the enemy.”
She stressed the need for different factions of the party to work together and “use the assets from everyone at the party.” Specifically, Ocasio-Cortez highlighted the need for Democrats to invest more online in digital advertising and outreach.
“These folks are pointing toward Republican messaging that they feel killed them, right? But why were you so vulnerable to that attack?” Ocasio-Cortez said in The Times. “If you’re not door-knocking, if you’re not on the internet, if your main points of reliance are TV and mail, then you’re not running a campaign on all cylinders. I just don’t see how anyone could be making ideological claims when they didn’t run a full-fledged campaign.”
Progressives such as Jayapal and Rep. Mark Pocan, both of whom co-chair the progressive caucus, were more subdued about immediate changes in Democrats’ approach. Both said a deep dive into voter data would display more about what went wrong this cycle and what changes were needed, something the House Democrats’ campaign arm has already promised it would do.
But both agreed Trump is an outlier in politics that likely had a greater impact than polling could predict and his removal from the White House could change things significantly in the next cycle.
“I do think – we all do – that the anomaly really is that Donald Trump has been historically odd to the political system,” Pocan said.
Jayapal added that far-left ideas and organizing boosted voter turnout in critical swing states and in cities like Detroit, Philadelphia and Atlanta that led to Biden’s win.
Democrats’ losses this cycle were “tough,” she said, but she noted Republicans and Trump had been “working every day since he came into office to organize on the ground, to invest in real infrastructure, different kinds of media that reach people.” Democrats did not necessarily anticipate the kind of turnout Trump would drive, nor did they organize as consistently over the course of the year because of the coronavirus pandemic.
How will Biden weather a fractured party?
Biden ran as a moderate, someone known for making deals across the aisle. But since he left the Senate at the beginning of 2009, a lot has changed. Partisanship is deep-rooted, even in the Senate, which has historically been known for its members’ ability to strike a deal. The number of red-state Democrats has dwindled. Only three Democratic senators represent states won by Trump in 2020.
And while leaders on both sides of the aisle have said they hope to get bipartisan deals across the finish line, Biden could be the first president in more than 30 years to take office without control over both chambers of Congress. Democrats still have a chance to take control of Congress if they win both Senate seats in Georgia in a January runoff, though it will be a tough feat in a state turning purple with a history of backing Republicans.
“I think the country spoke pretty loudly in this last election that they want us to work together,” said Rep. Josh Gottheimer, who co-chairs the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus. “I believe there was a lot of ticket-splitting and a lot of voters who said we want to turn the page on the White House, but we want a check (on a purely Democratic agenda.)”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi downplayed concerns that her smaller majority in the House and the likelihood of the Senate remaining in Republican hands would mean a less aggressive legislative agenda.
“We still have the power of the majority, but on top of that, our leverage and our power is greatly enhanced by having a Democratic president in the White House,” Pelosi said Friday at a news conference.
Besides Senate Republicans possibly standing in the way, Biden will have to navigate the demands of progressives, some known to reject proposals backed by party leadership over concerns they did not go far enough. The Progressive Caucus, which counted close to 100 members in the last Congress, will expand its numbers in the next Congress and could flex its muscle as one of the largest voting blocs in House.
Moderates expressed anxiety that the far-left flank of the party could make it difficult for them to get things done.
“I am somebody who believes progress is better than purity,” said Rep. Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla. “This whole idea that somehow focusing on what can be done is not bold is incorrect. In my opinion, bold is getting things done.”
Progressives say their goals have not changed and didn’t deny there could be members who vote against legislation if it didn’t go far enough.
“Are we always going to try to move things to be bigger and bolder? Likely,” Pocan said, arguing not many bills were likely to move through Congress because of expected Republican control of the Senate. Instead, Pocan said, most changes would occur by executive action. Other progressives were confident they would be able to move forward on legislative priorities.
Congressman-elect Mondaire Jones said progressives could be patient, calling progressivism ” long-suffering work.”
But another progressive freshman from New York, Congressman-elect Jamaal Bowman, said progressive priorities like COVID-19 relief, Medicare for All, public housing investment and the Green New Deal were “demands of the American people” that Biden needs to respond to.
“Democrats – moderates and progressives alike – need to be ready to hold him accountable,” he said.
Biden, for his part, has struck an ambitious tone. He said Tuesday that he wanted to work with Congress “to dramatically ramp up health care protections, get America to universal coverage, and lower health care costs as soon as humanly possible.”
A New York federal judge ruled Saturday that Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf hasn’t been leading the agency legally and that his suspension this summer of new applications for the Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals program was invalid, NBC and other news agencies are reporting.
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration wrongly tried to end protections under DACA, the Obama-era program that offers protections from deportation certain people brought into the U.S. illegally as children. Wolf nonetheless on July 28 issued a memo suspended acceptance of new DACA applications and restricting renewals to one year instead of two.
Judge Nicholas Garaufis said details of his ruling would be hashed out in court conferences, NBC reported.
Homeland Security officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment, NBC reported.
Karen Tumlin, a lawyer in the case and director of the Los Angeles-based Justice Action Center, told NBC that the ruling means, “the effort in the Wolf memo to gut the DACA program is overturned.”
Tumlin told the network that ruling applies to more than a million people, including more recent applicants and those seeking two-year renewals for protection under DACA.
“This is really a hopeful day for a lot of young people across the country,” she told the network.
Nominated but not yet approved
Although President Donald Trump formally nominated Wolf for the job in summer, Wolf has yet to get a full vote in the Senate, keeping his role as “acting.” In his ruling, Garaufis cited the Government Accountability Office, which wrote in a report to Congress in August that Wolf was the beneficiary of an “invalid order of succession,” NBC reported.
The judge described an illegitimate shuffling of leadership chairs at the Department of Homeland Security, the agency responsible for immigration enforcement, for the predicament of Wolf’s leadership and that of his predecessor, Kevin McAleenan, the network reported.
“Based on the plain text of the operative order of succession,” NBC reported Garaufis as writing, “neither Mr. McAleenan nor, in turn, Mr. Wolf, possessed statutory authority to serve as Acting Secretary. Therefore the Wolf Memorandum was not an exercise of legal authority.”
The ruling is part of an ongoing case with DACA recipient Martín Jonathan Batalla Vidal serving as the lead plaintiff in a six-plaintiff case against Wolf and the Department of Homeland Security, NBC reported. The suit initially challenged the state of Texas’ attempt to thwart DACA.
Wolf, who grew up in Plano, developed air travel policies for the Transportation Security Administration and was a lobbyist before landing at DHS, where he rose through the ranks, eventually becoming chief of staff to former DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.
He was appointed acting secretary last year.
Role in family separation policy
Wolf has been no stranger to controvery while at DHS. As Nielsen’s chief of staff, he was instrumental in the zero-tolerance border crackdown in 2018 that led to the separation of at least 4,000 immigrant children from their parents — though he has tried to downplay his involvement.
At his confirmation hearing last June, Wolf testified that he was not involved in the development of the policy, and only learned of it in April 2018, weeks before it was announced.
But that claim was contradicted by internal emails from late 2017 that NBC uncovered last year. The emails showed that Wolf included family separation as No. 2 on a list of 16 policy recommendations to curb immigration at the southern border.
Wolf sent the list to Gene Hamilton, counselor to then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and the recommendation took effect in May 2018.
Alleging facts with no connection to the defendants being sued.
Forces backing Republican President Donald Trump have filed at least five lawsuits in state and federal courts in Michigan seeking to delay or stop the state’s certification of 16 electoral votes for Democratic President-elect Joe Biden.
With every Michigander’s vote cast and counted in the presidential contest, showing Biden defeating Trump by close to 150,000 votes according to the unofficial tally, elections workers statewide are now undertaking the tedious process of officially certifying the vote and converting the state’s popular vote into the state’s Electoral College votes. That process relies on local and state election officials meeting a series of tight deadlines and fulfilling their legal duties. And derailing this process appears to be a goal the lawsuits all share.
The suits could create significant complications if they produced court orders delaying certification of election results in key Michigan counties beyond Tuesday’s deadline, or dragged out thecertification of statewide results beyond the Dec. 8 “safe harbor” date by which Congress is required to accept Michigan’s electoral votes.
But the suits have been marked by unusual legal missteps and repeated judicial setbacks. Some analysts say it is difficult to discern a coherent strategy, other than to seek to undermine overall confidence in the elections process.
“I’ve heard some folks describing it as throwing a lot of stuff against the wall and hoping something sticks. It seems to be instead throwing nothing against the wall and hoping something sticks,” said Steven Liedel, a Lansing attorney who counts state constitutional law among his specialties and served as chief counsel to former Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm.
“I think some judges ought to start issuing some sanctions” against attorneys filing the suits, said Bob LaBrant, a longtime GOP strategist and former general counsel for the Michigan Chamber of Commerce.
In the five lawsuits filed since the election:
The injunctions or other requested relief were quickly rejected by judges in three of the cases, though some appeals are pending.
Michigan Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens, in a Nov. 6 ruling that rejected the Trump campaign’s call for a halt to the counting of absentee ballots in Detroit, said key allegations in the suit were inadmissible hearsay and the campaign wrongly sued Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson over issues controlled not by her, but by local officials.
When it first sought to appeal Stephens’ ruling, the Trump campaign was told by the Michigan Court of Appeals that its submission was rejected as “defective” because it lacked four required documents, including a copy of Stephens’ order it sought to appeal.
In dismissing a suit Friday brought by activist lawyer David Kallman on behalf of two voters, Wayne County Circuit Judge Timothy Kenny said allegations in the suit were largely “generalized speculation” fueled by misinformation, or “simply are not credible” when balanced against other evidence.
On Nov. 6, in denying an injunction requested in an earlier suit brought by the nonprofit Election Integrity Fund and Republican poll challenger Sarah Stoddard, Kenny again cited “mere speculation,” the plaintiffs’ misunderstanding of state election law, and “no evidence to support accusations of voter fraud.”
Last Tuesday, the Trump campaign accidentally sued Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson in the U.S. Court of Claims, a court reserved for federal contract disputes, patent cases, Indian claims and suits related to military pay, among other items, but not election cases. The same suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, where it will now be decided.
Though two of the five suits were successfully filed in federal court, none belong there, according to one expert. Edward Foley, a professor of constitutional law at Ohio State University, said the Electoral Count Act of 1887 gives states the opportunity to resolve such issues themselves and, especially given the tight time frame to meet the Electoral College deadline, for a federal judge to intervene “destabilizes the entire concept of states allowing its own rules and procedures and tribunals to achieve resolution.”
A federal lawsuit filed Nov. 11, backed by True the Vote, a nonprofit with Tea Party roots that says it fights voter fraud, named as defendants a man who resigned from the Ingham County Board of Canvassers in October. Although it seeks to delay certification of results in Washtenaw and Ingham counties, as well as in Wayne County, the suit contains onlyonespecific allegation related to Washtenaw County and none related to Ingham County.
But the True the Vote federal lawsuit does cite a temporary scrambling of unofficial vote totals in Antrim County, in northern Michigan. State officials say the glitch in Antrim, which for a short time showed Biden winning a GOP county, was the result of aone-off human error by the Republican clerk. Antrim is not a defendant in any of the cases.
On Friday, Trump placed his personal attorney, former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, in charge of all the election lawsuits and public communications related to them, the New York Times reported.
Not coincidentally, the counties targeted in the suits are solidly Democratic ones that provided the the biggest vote margins for Biden.
Though all three counties are defendants in one of the lawsuits, nearly all of the allegations relate exclusively to Detroit and Wayne County. All the suits repeat allegations aboutlack of access for Republican challengers, boxes of ballots mysteriously appearing, voters’ names being entered into the system with bogus dates of birth, and ballots being run through tabulating machines multiple times. Judges have rejected those claims, saying they lack specifics and are not credible, are contradicted by more solid testimony, and, in many cases, reflect a lack of understanding of state law or what the challenger was actually witnessing.
Late Friday, the Michigan conference of the NAACP sought to intervene in Trump’s federal lawsuit challenging the vote count in Detroit and Wayne County, calling the suit “an all-out attack on votes cast by Black voters” and an “attempt to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands.”
In addition to undermining public confidence in the integrity of the election results, the lawsuits, in theory, have the potential to delay certification of election results in Wayne, Ingham and Washtenaw counties where Biden topped Trump by a combined total of more than 470,000 votes. Each county has a board of canvassers composed of two Democrats and two Republicans, and a 2-2 vote would send the certification issue to the four-member Board of State Canvassers, which has a similar partisan composition, for resolution.
But Washtenaw certified its results in a 4-0 vote Thursday, Ingham was expected to do so Monday, and Wayne is on track to certify Tuesday, officials said. In all, at least 49 of Michigan’s counties have certified their results, according to the Secretary of State’s Office.
Sam Bagenstos, a U-M law professor who was a Democratic nominee to the Michigan Supreme Court in 2018, said the True the Vote federal lawsuit “picked the big Democratic jurisdictions and said, ‘Let’s invalidate all the votes of the people there.’ It’s outrageous and anti-democratic and it’s based on nothing in terms of the allegations,” he said.
Experts agreed that the lawsuits are unlikely to hold up in court or achieve what may be their unstated goal: derailing the certification process.Members of county boards of canvassers, whether they are Republicans or Democrats, would be violating their duties if they refused to certify based on flimsy evidence of fraud. Every member of the board of canvassers present during the canvass of the election is required to certify the final results. If a county board fails to certify the results of any election by Nov. 17, the Board of State Canvassers would step in to certify the county’s results. Any member of the State Board of Canvassers who fails to certify the final statewide results could be taken to court and ordered to certify the election, Bagenstos said.
“It does seem to me that what’s going on here is an effort to delegitimize the election, to throw up a bunch of mud and make people think there was something wrong with how the election was conducted and to delay the certification,” Bagenstos said. “I don’t think any of this is going to work” because “every time they recycle these allegations they just get debunked again and again.”
James Bopp Jr., the Indiana attorney behind the True the Vote federal lawsuit brought on behalf of four Michigan voters, said his case is “radically different” than the four others filed in Michigan by the Trump campaign and conservative groups.
Bopp, a veteran election and campaign finance lawyer who was the member of former President George W. Bush’s team credited with developing the successful legal argument in the famous Bush v. Gore case after the 2000 election, told the Free Press on Friday he is using the same “vote dilution” argument in the Michigan case that he made with respect to Florida in Bush v. Gore.
He acknowledged he sued in Wayne, Washtenaw and Ingham because that is where the most Democratic votes were cast, not because rampant fraud is alleged in all three counties.
“What the complaint does is set out a course of conduct and anecdotal evidence that would give rise to a suspicion that there were illegal votes cast in the election that should be investigated,” Bopp said.
For results to be certified under those circumstances, “voters’ valid, legal votes will be unconstitutionally diluted by illegal votes,” he said.
On Thursday, Bopp asked U.S. District Judge Janet Neff to order complete poll book records, showing everyone who voted by absentee ballot or in person, turned over to his team on an expedited basis so they can complete a data analysis showing how many illegal votes were cast.
Liedel said he does not expect Bopp to have any more success than other lawyers challenging Michigan’s results.
“I don’t know what their motivations may be, but these out-of-state lawyers are trashing Michigan’s election process without actual evidence,” he said.
“A lot of lawyers go to law school because they’re not interested in math. But for election lawyers the core issue is always the math. The person with the most votes wins. And math is a very stubborn thing.”
This is a widget area - If you go to "Appearance" in your WP-Admin you can change the content of this box in "Widgets", or you can remove this box completely under "Theme Options"