Illinois’ exponential coronavirus explosion took yet another record-breaking step up Friday as public health officials announced 15,415 more people have tested positive for COVID-19.

That’s almost 3,000 more infections than were reported a day earlier, and it’s the fourth straight day the state has reported an all-time high case count. Eight months into the pandemic, the state’s 25 highest daily caseloads have all come in the past four weeks.

The latest cases were confirmed among 106,540 tests submitted to the Illinois Department of Public Health, raising the average statewide testing positivity rate over the past week to 13.2%.

That number has almost tripled over the last month, suggesting the virus is spreading more rampantly than it has since the state weathered its first — much smaller — peak of the pandemic in mid-May.

While leaders in Chicago and suburban Cook County have issued stay-at-home advisories amid the violent viral flareup, Gov. J.B. Pritzker has said a full-on stay-at-home order for the entire state “seems like where we are heading.”

Graph not displaying properly? Click here.

The Illinois Department of Public Health also reported 27 more deaths attributed to the virus, including seven Chicago-area residents, raising the state’s death toll to 10,504.

Since March, nearly 552,000 people have tested positive for the virus in Illinois, about 4.4% of the population. Roughly 40% of all cases have surfaced in the last month alone.

Hospitals across the state are bracing for a devastating surge of coronavirus patients as they continue to admit the most coronavirus patients they’ve ever seen. On Thursday night, 5,362 beds were taken up by COVID-19 patients, an increase of 104 people from the previous night. Some hospitals are already approaching capacity.

All but six of Illinois’ 102 counties are considered to be at a coronavirus warning level, including the entire Chicago area.

The Cook County stay-at-home advisory was issued Friday, after the state guidance and the advisory issued for Chicago by Mayor Lori Lightfoot on Thursday.

Cook County’s advisory, which takes effect at 6 a.m. Monday and lasts at least 30 days, cautions residents to “refrain from any nonessential activities and stay home.” Among the activities considered essential are work, school, coronavirus testing, getting a flu shot and shopping for groceries.

Any other nonessential gatherings and travel should be put on hold, officials say, including vacations, social calls and, yes, holiday celebrations.

“Now more than ever, we must come together to stay apart,” the county’s senior medical officer, Dr. Rachel Rubin, said in a statement. “We know limiting gatherings with friends and family can be hard, but we also know that virtual celebrations will save lives.”

County officials are also calling on employers “to reestablish telework protocols for staff who are able to work from home.” The advisory does not call for closures of nonessential businesses.

More than 99,000 people in Cook County have contracted the virus so far, accounting for almost 20% of all the cases logged in the state during the pandemic. The county’s average testing positivity rate has more than doubled over a span of about three weeks to 15%.

On Thursday, Pritzker said that “if things don’t take a turn in the coming days, we will quickly reach the point when some form of a mandatory stay-at-home order is all that will be left,” to address the crisis. The governor is scheduled to deliver another COVID-19 briefing Friday afternoon.

As always, residents are urged to wear masks over their faces and noses, to maintain 6 feet of social distance and to regularly wash their hands with soap and warm water.

Residents seeking more information can call the Cook County Department of Public Health’s COVID-19 hotline at (708) 836-4755 or email ccdph.covid19@cookcountyhhs.org.

Source Article from https://chicago.suntimes.com/coronavirus/2020/11/13/21563938/illinois-coronavirus-update-cook-county-stay-home-advisory-covid-19-cases-deaths-nov-13

EXCLUSIVE: Republican Sen. David Perdue of Georgia is spotlighting a well-publicized comment made by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in the first TV of his runoff campaign against his Democratic challenger, Jon Ossoff.

And the spot – shared first with Fox News – charges that, if elected, Ossoff would help Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “radically change America.”

SENATE REPUBLICANS TOUT ‘MAJOR INVESTMENT’ IN GEORGIA RUNOFF ELECTIONS

The runoff elections for both of Georgia’s Republican-held Senate seats will take place on Jan. 5, and they will determine whether the GOP holds on to its majority in the chamber, or if the Democrats will control both houses of Congress in addition to the White House.

The spot, which the Perdue campaign said will start running Friday statewide on broadcast, cable and satellite TV, features comments Schumer made a week ago, when he said, “Now, we take Georgia. Then, we change America.”

“You heard him. Chuck Schumer is trying to use Georgia to take the Senate majority and radically change America,” the narrator in the ad charges. “The Schumer, Pelosi, Ossoff change? Defund police. Voting rights for illegal immigrants. Washington, D.C. as the 51st state.”

The commercial then includes a clip of Ossoff saying that “change is coming to America” before warning, “Believe them. Vote Perdue to stop them.”

Campaign manager Ben Fry told Fox News that “the only way to save America is to save the Republican majority in the Senate by reelecting David Perdue.”

Republican candidate for Senate Sen. David Perdue and his wife Bonnie during a campaign stop at Peachtree Dekalb Airport Monday, Nov. 2, 2020, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

The spot by the Perdue campaign is the latest to spotlight Schumer’s comments. The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), which is the reelection arm of the Senate GOP, went up with a web video last weekend immediately after the Schumer clip went viral.

INCOMING NRSC CHAIR SCOTT TAKES AIM AT SCHUMER IN NEW SPOT

And a commercial that started running on TV this week in Georgia – that stars incoming NRSC chair Sen. Rick Scott of Florida – also showcases the Schumer clip. Scott will campaign in Georgia on Friday with both Perdue and appointed Sen. Kelly Loeffler, the Republican candidate in the state’s other Senate runoff election.

Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate Jon Ossoff speaks during a news conference on Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2020, in Atlanta. He is facing Republican Sen. David Perdue, a top Trump ally, in a Jan. 5, 2021 runoff. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

Democrats, meanwhile, are taking aim at Perdue and Loeffler over their strong support of President Trump.

“The Georgia Republican ticket is made up of a pair of corrupt, out-of-touch politicians who profited off of the pandemic and will stop at nothing to take away Georgians’ health care. It’s clear that David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler aren’t ready for primetime and we’re focused on exposing their records in the months to come,” said J.B. Poersch, president of Senate Majority PAC, the top outside group backing Senate Democratic incumbents and candidates.

Ossoff – in his first runoff add – doesn’t mention Perdue by name and doesn’t overtly criticize Republicans. But in the commercial – which went up on the airwaves last week – the Democratic nominee indirectly repeats his main argument that Perdue’s botched the response to the coronavirus pandemic.

“The path to recovery is clear. First, we listen to medical experts to control this virus. Then we shore up our economy with stronger support for small business and tax relief for working families,” Ossoff says to camera in the spot. “And it’s time for a historic infrastructure plan to get people back to work and invest in our future. We need leaders who bring us together to get this done.”

GEORGIA SENATE RUNOFF ELECTIONS DRAW POTENTIAL GOP 2024 WHITE HOUSE HOPEFULS

The GOP – which held a 53-47 majority heading into the 2020 elections – faced a challenging electoral map. But the Democrats’ hopes of capturing a solid Senate majority in last week’s elections were dashed as Republicans overperformed.

The current balance of power coming out of the elections is 50 Republicans and 48 Democrats. That means the Democrats must win both of Georgia’s runoff elections to make it a 50-50 Senate, in which Vice President-elect Kamala Harris would be the tie-breaking vote, giving her party a razor-thin majority in the chamber.

In Georgia, where state law dictates a runoff if no candidate reaches 50% of the vote, Perdue narrowly missed out on avoiding a runoff. He currently stands at 49.75% in the count, with nearly all votes counted. Ossoff, trails by roughly 87,000 votes.

THE LATEST ELECTION RESULTS FROM FOX NEWS

In the other race, Loeffler – who captured nearly 26% of the vote in a whopping 20-candidate special election to fill the final two years of the term of former GOP Sen. Johnny Isakson – is facing off against Democrat Raphael Warnock, who won nearly 33% of the vote.

Both parties and outside groups are pouring massive amounts of money and resources into the twin runoff elections.

 

 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/perdue-ties-ossoff-to-schumer-and-pelosi-in-his-first-georgia-runoff-ad

While some, including President Donald Trump, have said increased testing is driving the rise in cases, the data doesn’t bear that out. The seven-day average of new tests on Thursday was over 1.4 million, up by about 8.3% compared with a week ago, according to a CNBC analysis of COVID Tracking Project data. The rise in cases far outpaces that, with a week-over-week rise of more than 32%, on an average weekly basis.

And the so-called positivity rate has been increasing, too. Epidemiologists say the percent of positive tests can be a helpful figure to determine whether an outbreak is expanding and whether an area is conducting enough testing. In the U.S., the seven-day average positivity rate rose to 9.1% from 7.2% a week ago, according to Hopkins data.

The surge of the virus is beginning to overwhelm hospitals in some areas. Dr. Alan Kaplan, CEO of UW Health at the University of Wisconsin, said Thursday his system’s hospitals are overwhelmed in both rural and urban communities.

“We are short of staff all times, either because they have Covid or they have some other illness and we need to rule out Covid before we bring them back to work,” he said on “Squawk on the Street.” “There is no surplus now.”

— Charts by CNBC’s Nate Rattner.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/13/us-reports-record-153400-new-covid-cases-as-dr-fauci-urges-americans-to-be-careful-it-is-not-futile.html

Times Insider explains who we are and what we do, and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together.

Last Sunday, the United States reported its 10 millionth case of the coronavirus, with the last million added in the preceding 10 days. Covid-19 hospitalizations hit a new high this week, and new daily cases passed 160,000 for the first time on Thursday. Throughout the pandemic, the science and health reporter Donald G. McNeil Jr. has been at the forefront of The New York Times’s coverage and was recently awarded the 2020 John Chancellor Award for Excellence in Journalism by the Columbia Journalism School. In this edited interview, he talked about the new wave of infections.

There’s a lot of optimism around Pfizer’s announcement on Monday, which suggested its mRNA-based vaccine could be more than 90 percent effective. What should we make of this? Is it too soon to rejoice?

No, I’d say a little rejoicing is in order. The F.D.A. has said it would accept a vaccine that was only 50 percent effective, which is worse than some year’s flu shots, so everyone’s expectations were lowered. This is pretty great. Plus, we were already pretty sure that mRNA vaccines would be harmless. With this type of vaccine, you’re injecting just a short stretch of the virus’s genome packed into a tiny ball of fat with a mild electric charge. In contrast, some vaccines use a whole virus that is killed or weakened and is more likely to cause bad reactions.

Pfizer actually said its vaccine is at least 90 percent effective. We need to be cautious: That was its news release, rather than the actual data, which scientists will want to examine. But I’ve read previous news releases from Big Pharma companies and compared them to the data issued later, and they’ve been honest.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/13/insider/virus-donald-mcneil.html

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., took it upon herself to help boost women’s numbers in a party dominated by white men.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., took it upon herself to help boost women’s numbers in a party dominated by white men.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Minnesota’s sprawling, rural 7th Congressional District has been represented by conservative Democrat Collin Peterson for 30 years. It was considered one of Democrats’ most vulnerable seats going into this year’s election, and the GOP flipped it when Michelle Fischbach won by 13 points.

Rep.-elect Fischbach credited one particular Republican with helping her win: Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York.​

“Whenever advice was needed, I always was able to call and talk to her about whatever kinds of bumps or things you would run into,” Fischbach said. “But in addition to that, she provided fundraising and dollars to the campaign, which is so important.”

Now, Fischbach is one of a record 35 Republican women who will serve in Congress next year, breaking the previous record of 30 and a sharp increase from the 13 GOP women elected to the House of Representatives in 2018.

This year’s number could still grow as more races are called. The Republican Party is celebrating that as a win, just two years after Democrats had their own record-setting year electing women.

Stefanik’s role in 2020

Stefanik has become the face of efforts to boost Republican women in Congress. She was in charge of recruitment for House Republicans in 2018, an abysmal year for GOP women. Among the 13 women elected to the House from the Republican Party in the midterms, there was just one nonincumbent candidate.

After that, Stefanik clashed with National Republican Congressional Committee chair Tom Emmer over whether the party should do more to boost women in primaries. Emmer told a reporter that would be a “mistake.” Stefanik, for her part, focused her energy on building up her leadership PAC, E-PAC.

Her committee promoted more than two dozen candidates and gave $415,000 to Republican women, including Fischbach.

Stefanik credits the candidates with their wins, but she also feels that she played a key role.

“What I believe is different this cycle is I publicly made this a priority for the Republicans I served with in Congress,” Stefanik said. “I very publicly said at the end of the midterms in 2018 that we needed to do better.”

A giant partisan gender gap

Even while setting a new record, the GOP is set to have around one-third the number of women that Democrats will have in Congress next session, according to data compiled by Rutgers University’s Center for American Women and Politics.

Republicans will also have around one-tenth Democrats’ number of women of color. (Those numbers may yet shift somewhat as several races have yet to be called.)

Altogether, according to the latest numbers, that means women will account for nearly 40% of Democrats on Capitol Hill, compared with less than 15% on the Republican side.

In that light, University of Virginia political science professor Jennifer Lawless explained why she thinks GOP women’s success this year is important.

“​It’s a big deal in that the Republicans have demonstrated that when they make some effort to recruit female candidates, they see an increase in women’s representation,” Lawless said. “But we haven’t not known that. Since the 1980s, when women run for office, whether as Democrats or Republicans, we know that they’re as likely as men to win elections.”

Lawless pointed out that Republican groups like E-PAC, though growing, are dwarfed by groups on the Democratic side like EMILY’s List, which recruits and promotes Democratic women who support abortion rights.

Changing candidates for a changed GOP

The crop of Republican candidates this year was different from past years, not just quantitatively but qualitatively, according to Republican pollster Christine Matthews.

That’s because of longer-term partisan demographic realignment, with women — and particularly college-educated women — increasingly identifying as Democrats. It’s a trend that may in fact be related to increasing polarization.

Matthews says that realignment has changed which women run and what issues they run on.

“As, increasingly, college-educated women and men are leaving the Republican Party to becoming more rural, more non-college educated, male, [and] older, one way to appeal to that type of electorate is not anymore to be the Chamber of Commerce Republican woman, but to be the Second Amendment Republican woman,” she said.

Among the women who won this year are Georgia’s Marjorie Taylor Greene and Colorado’s Lauren Boebert, who not only ran on opposition to gun control, but have in the past expressed support for the baseless, far-right conspiracy theory QAnon. (E-PAC, for its part, lists Boebert but not Greene among its promoted candidates.)

“Identity politics” in the GOP

Promoting women politicians in particular can mean walking a tricky line in the GOP. Republican voters often say they are voting for the best candidate, regardless of gender or race.

And there were echoes of that when NPR asked Emmer, the National Republican Congressional Committee chair, if celebrating women’s victories qualifies as so-called “identity politics.”

“These people are not going to be great representatives just because of their gender, their race. These are people with incredible backgrounds,” he said. “And I’ll tell you that we wanted the best candidates. That’s what we were looking for across this country.”

On the other hand, while Stefanik stressed that she worked to back high-quality candidates, she also stressed that it’s important for the party to try to make its lawmakers look more like the party itself. She also believes she’s proven something to her party leadership.​

“I was really proud that [Minority Leader] Kevin McCarthy, [Minority Whip] Steve Scalise and many of my male colleagues embraced this effort, including Tom Emmer, who learned pretty quickly that it’s important to prioritize recruitment of women candidates and nontraditional candidates,” she said.

It’s not clear what this will mean for how Congress legislates. Recent research has cast doubt on the popular view that women candidates are more bipartisan than men.

And while there’s limited evidence that women legislators tend to focus on different issues than men, it remains to be seen what effect a bigger number of women will have on the GOP’s actions. Lawmakers, like voters, vote based on party, not gender.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/11/13/934249216/how-a-record-number-of-republican-women-got-elected-to-congress

Federal election infrastructure officials said in a joint statement on Thursday that the 2020 election was the “most secure in American history.” Meanwhile, President-elect Biden picked up 11 more Electoral College votes as CBS News projected he had won Arizona, giving him a 73 vote margin over President Trump and putting him well over the 270 electoral vote threshold with a total of 290 projected votes. 

President Trump continued to spread baseless claims of widespread voter fraud in key battleground states. Mr. Trump on Thursday had still not conceded, and advisers confirmed to CBS News that he has openly discussed running for president again in 2024. While no decisions have been made, one Trump adviser familiar with conversations with the president told CBS News that his allies were working to keep his options open as they plot his political future.

High-ranking Republican senators said Thursday that Mr. Biden should begin receiving intelligence briefings. GOP Senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the most senior GOP senator, and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a close ally of Mr. Trump’s, separately told reporters on Capitol Hill that they believe Mr. Biden should be receiving the high-level briefings. South Dakota Senator John Thune, the second highest-ranking Republican in the upper chamber, said it “makes sense” for the president-elect to be briefed on the nation’s most sensitive intelligence.

“As these election challenges play out in court, I don’t have a problem with, and I think it’s important from a national security standpoint, continuity,” Thune said. “And you’ve seen other members suggesting that.”

Texas Senator John Cornyn told reporters he believes the information “needs to be communicated in some way.”

“I just don’t know of any justification for withholding the briefing,” he said, adding that if Mr. Biden “does win in the end, I think they need to be able to hit the ground running.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/2020-election-most-secure-history-dhs/

POLITICO Dispatch: November 13

Over the next couple months, Joe Biden needs to put together a team to help him rebuild a shattered economy, fight a global pandemic and recover from one of the most polarizing elections in U.S. history. Sounds easy, right? POLITICO’s Megan Cassella breaks down who is in contention for some of the toughest jobs in the nation.

“It would be a real modernizing of the first ladyship … to have the president’s spouse live the kind of life that the majority of women live, which is working outside the home professionally,” said Ohio University professor Katherine Jellison, who studies first ladies.

Jill Biden has assured union members that teachers will have a “seat at the table” in a Biden administration, and she said her husband will want to appoint an Education secretary who is an educator with public school experience and who will fight for the right to organize and collectively bargain.

“Joe knows that the best policies don’t come from … politics,” she said during an October fundraiser with NEA members. “They come from educators like us.”

Jill Biden held several events with teachers unions during the campaign, and NEA President Becky Pringle said she fully expects those conversations to continue, with the first lady working directly with educators and discussing developments throughout the administration.

“With Joe we get Jill,” Pringle said in an interview before the election. “She understands how we, as a profession, have to have that professional authority and respect to actually do the jobs that we were professionally trained to do.”

A likely GOP-led Senate and Republican gains in the House will make it harder for Joe Biden to fulfill his labor agenda. “I am concerned about it,” said Randi Weingarten, president of the 1.7 million-member American Federation of Teachers.

Even so, Jill Biden’s ascent is a lift to educators who promoted the campaign, from AFT’s multistate, get-out-the-vote bus tour to NEA’s digital organizing, phone banking, texting, virtual rallies and car caravans.

“Imagine, just imagine someone living in the White House, who has been where we are, and completely understands our needs and concerns,” said Stephanie Ingram, a fourth grade teacher and president of the Delaware State Education Association, during the NEA fundraiser.

Biden has spent more than three decades teaching — in community colleges, high schools and at an adolescent psychiatric hospital. She delivered her Democratic National Convention speech in August from a classroom at Brandywine High School in Wilmington where she taught English in the early 1990s.

“For American educators, this is a great day for you all,” Joe Biden said during his victory speech Saturday. “You’re going to have one of your own in the White House.”

Jill Biden wrote that she never intended to make a statement as the first second lady to continue her career with a full-time job. Her advisers thought it would be too much. One asked if she was crazy. “I just wanted to do the thing I love best,” she wrote in her 2019 memoir, “Where the Light Enters.” Her husband’s response: “Of course you should.”

She describes living a “double life” in her memoir, “caught between State receptions and midterm exams.” Biden told NEA members during the fundraiser that she found her “niche” teaching at a community college, with students from “all different walks of life.” But she was never interested in letting them know her identity.

When students asked if she was Joe Biden’s wife, she would tell them that he’s a relative. “Or if I get pushed I say, ‘you know, I’m your English teacher,’” she told NPR in 2013, adding that she has a separate role as a professor. “That’s who I want to be. I want to be Dr. B, their English teacher, and I think they like that, quite frankly.”

According to her top tags on RateMyProfessors.com, Biden gives her students “good feedback” and is “respected” and “inspirational,” but she’s also a “tough grader” who gives “lots of homework.”

While financial disclosures show Biden continued taking a paycheck while serving as second lady, the campaign did not respond when asked if she would take one come January.

At the White House, former President Barack Obama tapped her to help promote community colleges, traveling the country to different campuses and job training and completion programs.

“The only reason she’s here is because her college president gave her permission to miss class,” Obama said a decade ago at a White House Summit on Community Colleges. “And this morning, between appearing on the Today Show, receiving briefings from her staff and hosting the summit, she was actually grading papers in her White House office.”

Biden in 2015 became the chair of the independent College Promise Advisory Board, which promotes at least two years of free community college. She continued that work until the spring of last year, when her husband launched his 2020 bid.

When the nonpartisan College Promise campaign kicked off, it identified 53 College Promise programs across the nation. Today there are programs across 47 states, including 30 that are statewide, said Martha Kanter, CEO of the nonprofit.

“She was visionary about it,” said Kanter, a former undersecretary of Education during the Obama administration. “She knew that without an education beyond high school, this country would not be prosperous.”

Obama’s push for federal legislation to offer two years of tuition-free community college never made it through Congress, but Joe Biden plans to revive that effort. His plan also calls for eliminating tuition at four-year public universities for students from families making $125,000 or less.

Having Jill Biden as first lady ensures the administration won’t lose sight of the importance of community colleges and the need to ensure that they’re affordable and adequately funded, said Debbie Cochrane, executive vice president of The Institute for College Access & Success.

“As we enter what could end up being a devastating recession, that’s hugely important,” she said. “Community colleges are one of the single biggest levers we have for economic mobility in the country. So supporting them adequately is what will help us recover from this time.”

Jill Biden has different ways of getting a message across, from Post-it notes to her husband on the bathroom mirror to a more creative approach. She describes in her memoir how she angrily marched through her living room in a bikini with the word “No” penned on her stomach as party leaders tried to get her husband to run for president in 2003. The family had already decided against it.

He didn’t run.

Teachers expect her to be influential on their behalf in the White House. “She’s in his ear,” Pringle said. “Anyone that has a spouse knows how influential that is. … Any spouse of a teacher experiences that because they live that life, because teachers bring it home.”

Her opinions on education will have “some heft,” but Joe Biden is more likely to rely on his team of advisers for education policy decisions, said Jeffrey Henig, director of the politics and education program for the Teachers College at Columbia University.

“I think her influence would be more as an informed sounding board whom he trusts completely rather than as a policy maven,” he said.

Former Delaware Gov. Jack Markell, a Democrat from her home state, said governors heard most from Jill Biden as second lady about policies to ease burdens on military families. Markell described her as a “policy expert” but said, “I think what is most remarkable about her is that she brings to every conversation the very practical, what is going to be the effect on this family, this person, and what is it that we as public servants can do to make it easier for these families?”

During the campaign, Biden earned a reputation as her husband’s bouncer after twice helping eject protesters from rallies.“You can take the girl out of Philly…,” she tweeted after one of the incidents.

Biden grew up mostly in the Philadelphia suburbs — roots she played up often during the campaign. “My summers were spent watching the Phillies with my dad and waitressing at the shore,” she said at a rally with teachers unions outside Upper Moreland High School, her alma mater. She arrived at the school wearing a blazer, but she ditched it for an Upper Moreland hoodie the school gave her with “Dr. Jill” written on the back, Pringle said.

Biden has two master’s degrees, one as an education reading specialist and another in English, according to her memoir. Her doctorate in educational leadership is from the University of Delaware in 2007, and her dissertation focused on maximizing student retention in community colleges.

But she is also known for her pranks. One notable maneuver involved cramming herself inside an overhead bin on Air Force Two, just to give someone a scare. It apparently worked.

“She’s not your average grandmother,” Naomi Biden, one of Biden’s grandchildren, said in Jill Biden’s convention introduction video. “She’s the grandmother who wakes you up at, like, what was it? 5 a.m. on Christmas Eve to go SoulCycling. … When she goes on a run, sometimes she’ll find, like, a dead snake and she’ll pick it up and put it in a bag and she’ll use it to scare someone.”

For Biden, April 25, 2019, started with her husband announcing he was running for president. Then, she was off to teach class and collect research papers, she wrote on her Instagram account.

Biden took a leave of absence from the Northern Virginia Community College in January because of the campaign, but she kept an eye on returning next year, completing online-teaching training and certification.

“I’m still trying to figure things out,” she told Vogue in September. “I have a lot more sympathy for [my students] when I get back into the classroom, knowing just how tough it is.”

Rebecca Rainey and Eleanor Mueller contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/12/jill-biden-first-lady-professor-436363

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot faced intense backlash Thursday for her recent round of lockdown orders, which came days after she joined large crowds celebrating Joe Biden‘s election victory. 

Amid national spikes of coronavirus cases, the Windy City’s top Democrat announced a 30-day stay-at-home advisory that will take effect Monday. 

The advisory calls on all Chicagoans to do the following: “Stay home unless for essential reasons, Stop having guests over — including family members you do not live with, Avoid non-essential travel, Cancel traditional Thanksgiving plans,” Lightfoot summarized on Twitter. 

CHICAGO MAYOR ISSUES NEW STAY AT HOME ORDER, OFFICIALS ADVISE RESIDENTS TO CANCEL THANKSGIVING

The orders suggest Lightfoot has been taking the coronavirus outbreak seriously. But just last Saturday, she was seen maskless while touting the projected victory of President-elect Biden in a video she shared on her Twitter account. 

“This is a great day for our city. This is a great day for our country. We get to take our democracy back,” Lightfoot exclaimed into a megaphone causing the crowd around her to cheer. 

The video shows a mask dangling from one of Lightfoot’s ears as the people surrounding her failing to practice social distancing guidelines. 

Critics took notice of what they considered to be blatant hypocrisy. 

“People couldn’t be with their loved ones in their final moments on this earth, families couldn’t hold funerals and grieve together, churches were closed under threat of penalty, but Lori Lightfoot can flout all the rules and scream into a megaphone,” radio host Dana Loesch reacted. 

“Democratic Hypocrisy – Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot joins thousands in the streets to praise Joe Biden; 1-week later she issues an order telling people to stay home, stop having guests over, and cancel traditional Thanksgiving plans,” Washington Examiner contributor Mark Vargas said.

CNN DOESN’T SOUND ALARM OF COVID ‘SUPERSPREADERS’ AS THOUSANDS CELEBRATE BIDEN WIN IN THE STREETS

“4 days after Mayor Lightfoot addressed a huge crowd (maskless) to celebrate election results, she announced a stay-at-home advisory for Chicago. Numbers are out of control, the advisory might be smart! But needlessly hurt her credibility with this,” Dispatch reporter Declan Garvey tweeted. 

“Whoa who is this unmasked speaker shouting into a super spreader event crowd? Someone call security!” attorney Harmeet Dhillon exclaimed. 

“This is OK but Thanksgiving isn’t? Again it’s the disgusting hypocrisy of America’s political leadership that has contributed to a lack of trust in health guidances at the exact moment that trust is needed. The Crowds Good / Crowds Bad stance depending on politics has cost lives,” Washington Examiner reporter Jerry Dunleavy summarized. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Chicago mayor’s office did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/chicago-mayors-lockdown-orders-canceling-of-thanksgiving-draw-pushback

In his lawsuit seeking to block the grand jury subpoena, Mr. Trump’s lawyers quoted 2018 campaign statements by the attorney general, Letitia James, a Democrat, saying they were part of a “campaign to harass the president.”

They cited one statement, for example, in which she said Mr. Trump should worry because “we’re all closing in on him.”

Last year, Ms. James’s office opened a civil fraud investigation into Mr. Trump’s businesses. As recently as last month, Mr. Trump’s son Eric, after months of delays, was questioned under oath by the office’s lawyers.

Rebecca Roiphe, a former assistant district attorney in Manhattan who teaches legal ethics and criminal law at New York Law School, said Ms. James’s earlier statements made it appear there was some truth to the accusation that people who were investigating Mr. Trump were “at least capitalizing on that from a political perspective.”

The only way for Mr. Vance to avoid that perception, Professor Roiphe said, was “to have a rock-solid case with overwhelming evidence, which will help convince the public that they’re holding the former president accountable for criminal acts.”

Ms. James, in response to criticism from Mr. Trump last year, tweeted that her office “will follow the facts of any case, wherever they lead.” She added: “Make no mistake: No one is above the law, not even the President.”

One thing seems likely: Defending against a white-collar investigation, even as a former president, will be challenging, stressful and disruptive for Mr. Trump, said Daniel R. Alonso, who was Mr. Vance’s top deputy from 2010 to 2014 and is now in private practice.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/13/nyregion/trump-vance-grand-jury.html

President-elect Joe Biden speaks Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2020, at The Queen theater in Wilmington, Delaware.

Carolyn Kaster/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Carolyn Kaster/AP

President-elect Joe Biden speaks Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2020, at The Queen theater in Wilmington, Delaware.

Carolyn Kaster/AP

When Joe Biden addressed the nation for the first time as president-elect, he said that his victory was supported by “the broadest and most diverse coalition in history.”

Now, Biden is facing high expectations from one big and especially diverse segment of that coalition — young voters who appear to have turned out for him in record numbers, particularly young progressives who now say they want to see him deliver on their priorities.

“At the end of the day, youth turnout was through the roof, and we’re probably looking at, when all the ballots are tallied, the highest youth vote turnout ever,” said Ben Wessel, the executive director of NextGen America, a progressive group aimed at turning out young voters, many of whom have been engaged in major social movements around gun laws, climate change and race and justice.

“I think the role of these activist movements getting young people off the streets and into the polling place, it can’t be ignored,” Wessel added. “Young people are coming into the fray and realizing that they have a responsibility to fix some of the problems in our country.”

According to an analysis by the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement at Tufts University, somewhere between 50% and 52% of eligible voters under the age of 30 cast a ballot in this year’s election. That analysis is based on votes counted by Nov. 9, and researchers say that number may rise. At the same point in 2016, CIRCLE estimated youth voter turnout at between 42% and 44%.

Young voters overall, according to CIRCLE’s analysis, preferred Biden over Trump by a 25-point margin (61% to 36%), and young people of color were especially key to Biden’s victory. While white voters under the age of 30 backed Biden by a slim margin, young people of color overwhelmingly supported Biden’s campaign and were decisive in several electoral battlegrounds.

“President-elect Biden does have a mandate with young people. Most young people who voted voted for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris,” said Maxwell Frost, the national organizing director of the student-led group March For Our Lives. “So we expect him to use that bully pulpit and use his presidency… to educate millions of people on our issues and set an agenda that will set the foundation for change.”

There is a sense of urgency among young progressives, mixed with hope that the incoming administration will be more receptive to their issues. They’ve pointed to instances in which Biden has shifted left on issues like forgiving student debt and climate, as well as the joint policy task forces that Biden announced with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders at the conclusion of the Democratic primary campaign.

Varshini Prakash, a co-founder of the Sunrise Movement, a youth-led activist group that supports the Green New Deal, was a member of the climate focused task force. While she credits Biden with bringing young people and progressives to the table, she also said that “we can’t make the same mistake that the climate movement made with Barack Obama in 2008.”

“We have got to be out on the offensive on day one,” she said, implying that was not the case 12 years ago.

To that end, Sunrise along with Justice Democrats, the group founded after 2016 that helped elect Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, are already publicly exerting pressure on the incoming administration to appoint progressives to top government jobs.

The groups are calling on Biden to appoint progressive leaders like Sanders and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren to key cabinet posts. The groups also want the incoming administration to create a “White House Office of Climate Mobilization” to coordinate action across the federal government.

Managing expectations

The public pressure campaign on the incoming administration and push for accountability comes as these young progressives are reckoning their hopes for a Senate majority, an outcome dependent on winning two Senate runoff elections in Georgia in January.

It’s not yet clear how far Senate Republicans would be willing to go to derail Biden Cabinet picks viewed by members of the GOP as too far left. The landscape for passing sweeping legislation will be equally challenging. But Prakash said that even if Republicans retain control of the Senate, Biden must still be accountable to the groups that helped deliver him the White House.

“We’ve also got to be clear with Joe Biden that even if he doesn’t have the Senate, that is not an excuse to not do everything in his power to address the climate crisis,” she said.

Others acknowledged that the ambitious policy goals, appointments and judicial nominations many progressives had been hoping for, had there been sweeping victories for Democrats up and down the ballot, may well be out of reach.

“Managing expectations doesn’t change what we fight for, it doesn’t change who we are,” said Frost, the national organizing director of March For Our Lives. “It just means we understand the landscape, and we understand that we might not get everything we want. But it doesn’t mean that we don’t fight for it.”

Wessel, the executive director of NextGen America, warned that if the Biden administration does not pursue progressive priorities, there’s a risk that a generation of young people who have been spurred to civic action may become disengaged.

“While we know the Biden administration can do a lot with the power of the pen on Day 1, and a lot of it is about restoring some of the Obama-era policies, if that’s the end of the pushing, you’re going to demotivate young people for a decade,” he said. “So Day 1, great, bring back all the Obama stuff. Day 2? Time to be bold.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/11/13/934289531/young-progressives-who-backed-biden-plan-to-press-him-for-action

Donald Trump has unleashed a torrent of tweets denouncing Fox News, accusing the network of having forgotten “what made them successful, what got them there”.

“They forgot the Golden Goose,” Trump wrote in a tweet posted at midday on Thursday:

Donald J. Trump
(@realDonaldTrump)

.@FoxNews daytime ratings have completely collapsed. Weekend daytime even WORSE. Very sad to watch this happen, but they forgot what made them successful, what got them there. They forgot the Golden Goose. The biggest difference between the 2016 Election, and 2020, was @FoxNews!


November 12, 2020

The tirade was posted after the president, who has refused to acknowledge his election loss to Democratic nominee Joe Biden, retweeted multiple comments from supporters, many of which expressed the view that they would instead be relying on right-wing cable channel and website Newsmax.

Late on Thursday, the top story on Newsmax.com was headlined “Sen. Ted Cruz to Newsmax TV: ‘Media Don’t Get to Decide Presidency’.”

Among Trump’s retweets was one by a user called “Appalachian Christian”, who said: “Suit yourself Left Fox 4 NewsMaxxxxx.”

Fox was one of the first news organisations to call the state of Arizona for Biden and has warned its readers that Trump’s claims of victory are false.

On Monday night, Fox host Neil Cavuto cut away from a campaign event hosted by the White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany at the Republican National Committee headquarters when McEnany said that Trump’s campaign team “wanted every legal vote to be counted”.


‘Whoa’: Fox News cuts off Kayleigh McEnany for ‘illegal votes’ spiel – video

“Whoa, whoa, whoa – I just think we have to be very clear. She’s charging the other side as welcoming fraud and welcoming illegal voting. Unless she has more details to back that up, I can’t in good countenance continue to show you this,” Cavuto said from the studio.

Trump on Monday claimed without evidence that the network’s “ratings have completely collapsed.”

Trump’s embrace of Newsmax has however translated into a ratings boost, with viewership jumping from an average of 65,000 people before the election to 800,000 viewers of its prime time shows this week, according to Nielsen data quoted in the New York Times, which reports that the NewsMax app was the fourth most popular on the Apple App Store on Thursday.

Later on Thursday, however, Trump tweeted his praise for two Fox hosts, both long-time Trump loyalists, touting a “must see” segment by commentator Sean Hannity and a “confirming and powerful piece” by Fox Business Network anchor Lou Dobbs.


Can Joe Biden and Kamala Harris unite America after Trump? – video explainer

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/13/donald-trump-attacks-fox-news-they-forgot-the-golden-goose

“The voters of Pennsylvania have spoken,” Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar said in her request to have the Trump case dismissed. “The counties are busy finishing the tabulation of those votes and the Secretary is preparing to certify the results. The Court should deny Plaintiff’s desperate and unfounded attempt to interfere with that process.”

Boockvar’s motion to dismiss came as the Trump campaign asked U.S. District Judge Matthew W. Brann, an Obama appointee, to impose a temporary restraining order “barring (the state) from certifying the results of the November 3, 2020 General election.”

The Trump campaign said it needs to halt the certification process to give the court time to rule before the state hits the deadline of Dec. 8 to present its results to Congress. They argue that if the vote count continues, the results will be certified before the court can rule.

“Plaintiffs could lose their opportunity for meaningful relief entirely if the vote total is certified, since it is not clear what remedies would remain after that point,” Trump campaign lawyers write in their memo.

Biden leads the vote count in Pennsylvania by more than 53,500 votes — outside the margin that would permit a recount.

The competing filings arrived in one of the most closely watched cases in the nation as the Trump campaign has sought to undo the results of the 2020 vote based on unfounded allegations that irregularities and fraud marred the process. The Trump case asks the court to invalidate mail-in ballots in the state’s heavily Democratic urban jurisdictions on the grounds that state elections officials treated mail-in voters differently than those who cast ballots in person.

“Nothing less than the integrity of the 2020 presidential election is at stake in this action,” the Trump campaign argued.

A succession of civil rights and public interest legal groups have lined up to fight against the president’s suit, calling it an unjust attempt to deprive voters of their rights. Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro told ABC News Thursday that the president is simply trying to sow doubt in the election process.

“I can tell you that there’s a pattern of behavior which is typically some outrageous claim, followed up by a presidential tweet, sometimes followed up by a filing in court, and always filed followed up by a defeat for them in court,” Shapiro said.

In the Trump campaign filing Thursday, there was far less emphasis on fraud than in initial filings. The president’s team instead focused its argument on the assertion that poll watchers were unable to “meaningfully observe” the count​ and therefore 600,000 ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties should be invalidated. They said that claim — though it has been widely refuted — throws the vote counts in all 67 counties into question because tens of thousands of technically deficient ballots, which could have been spotted by observers, should never have been counted.

Boockvar, by contrast, argued Thursday that the court should dismiss the case because they say it is comprised of generalized grievances, built on conjecture and require “multiple leaps of logic.” Boockvar’s filing says claims that the polls were “over-run with fraud has already been rejected as purely speculative and legally unsupportable.”

“Plaintiffs’ suggestion that there is a federal constitutional due process right for a political representative to stand a certain number of feet away from government employees counting ballots is unsupported in the law and would transform the role of the federal judiciary in monitoring state-run elections,” Boockvar’s filing argued.

Boockvar said that the Trump campaign’s request to completely stop certification of the election is “substantially disproportionate” to its allegations and that it would result in the disenfranchisement of “nearly 7 million Pennsylvanians.”

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-team-pennsylvania-election-officials-clash-federal-court/story?id=74182918