Jon Ossoff, a Georgia Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, greets a supporter with an elbow bump at a drive-through event to pick up yard signs last month in Alpharetta, Ga. Ossoff is in a runoff with Republican David Perdue, the incumbent, for the U.S. Senate.

Austin McAfee/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Austin McAfee/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

Jon Ossoff, a Georgia Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, greets a supporter with an elbow bump at a drive-through event to pick up yard signs last month in Alpharetta, Ga. Ossoff is in a runoff with Republican David Perdue, the incumbent, for the U.S. Senate.

Austin McAfee/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

There was still an hour to go before Vice President Pence took the stage to stump for Georgia’s two incumbent U.S. senators, Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue. Both Republicans are fighting to hold onto their seats against Democratic challengers, with a runoff election set for Jan. 5.

But Pence was clearly the celebrity draw at this Nov. 20 campaign event in Canton, an Atlanta suburb. People were so eager to see him that parking spots were scarce and a long line of cars snaked through the parking lot of a community college. Some drivers jumped the curb and parked in the grass.

Hundreds of people, many unmasked, had to undergo temperature checks before boarding large coach buses for a short ride down the road to the rally site. It took place in a large open space outside of a conference center, but people stood close together, with little physical distancing.

Next month’s runoff in Georgia was triggered after no candidate in either Senate race won more than 50% of the vote in the Nov. 3 general election.

In the midst of the coronavirus pandemic and with the fate of the Affordable Care Act in question, Republicans are hoping the two incumbents can hang on to their seats, and thus preserve their party’s control of the Senate, by a 50-48 margin.

But if the two Democratic challengers, the Rev. Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff, both win their runoffs, it will allow Democrats to take narrow control of the Senate, with the help of Vice President-elect Kamala Harris as a tiebreaker.

Yana De Moraes had come to the rally from another Atlanta suburb, Buford. She’s uninsured, and, after a recent hospital stay, had been thinking a lot about how expensive medical care can be.

“We would like our health care costs lowered, so it could be more affordable,” she said, with a rueful laugh. “So you don’t get another heart attack while you’re getting a bill!”

De Moraes added she’d also like to see better price controls on prescription drugs to stop pharmaceutical companies from “robbing American people.”

Vice President Pence waves to supporters during a Nov. 20 rally in Canton, Ga. Pence appeared alongside U.S. Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue. The Republican incumbents are defending their seats in a Jan. 5 runoff.

Jason Armond /Los Angeles Times via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jason Armond /Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Vice President Pence waves to supporters during a Nov. 20 rally in Canton, Ga. Pence appeared alongside U.S. Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue. The Republican incumbents are defending their seats in a Jan. 5 runoff.

Jason Armond /Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Other voters said they were just looking for any kind of change, ideally one that involves less government involvement in health care.

Barry Brown had made the 40-mile drive from his home in Atlanta for the rally. He’s retired but too young to qualify for Medicare, so he has Obamacare insurance, which he affords with the help of a federal subsidy.

“It sort of works. It’s better than nothing,” Brown said. “I would like to see an improved health care situation. I don’t know what that will be, so maybe they’ll mention that today. I’m hoping so.”

But Brown didn’t get the answers he was looking for.

At the rally, Loeffler made only brief mention of her health care plan, which focuses on reducing drug prices and giving people access to insurance options that cost less but offer fewer benefits.

When it was his turn to speak, Perdue didn’t talk much about health care either, though he did take a shot at Obamacare, which he’s voted multiple times to overturn.

“Remember a little thing called the Affordable Care Act? You think that was done bipartisan?” Perdue asked the crowd. “No! It was done with a supermajority! Can you imagine what they’re gonna do if they get control of the Senate?”

This has been typical for how the two Republicans handled health care as they campaigned throughout the state.

It’s common to hear them stoke fears about what Democrats could do if they win the Senate. It’s not common to hear them talk about health care despite their potential voters’ interest in the issue.

Their Democrat challengers, however, have been all over health care in their own speeches.

The Rev. Raphael Warnock kicks off his runoff campaign Nov. 12 to try to unseat Loeffler. Warnock leads Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta and has been politically active in the fight to expand Medicaid to uninsured Georgians.

Sam Whitehead/WABE


hide caption

toggle caption

Sam Whitehead/WABE

The Rev. Raphael Warnock kicks off his runoff campaign Nov. 12 to try to unseat Loeffler. Warnock leads Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta and has been politically active in the fight to expand Medicaid to uninsured Georgians.

Sam Whitehead/WABE

Warnock opened his runoff campaign to unseat Loeffler with a modestly attended Nov. 12 event that focused entirely on health care. So did Ossoff in his bid to win Perdue’s seat.

“This is why these Senate runoffs are so vital,” Ossoff said at a small, physically distanced event Nov. 10 in the shadow of the Georgia Capitol in Atlanta.

Ossoff and Warnock support adding a public insurance option to the Affordable Care Act. They also have emphasized the role Democrats will play in resurrecting key parts of the law if the U.S. Supreme Court decides to overturn it. The justices are set to make a ruling next year.

“If the Supreme Court strikes down the Affordable Care Act, it will be up to Congress to decide how to legislate such that preexisting conditions remain covered,” Ossoff said.

Democratic voters such as Janel Green connect with that message. She’s from the nearby suburb of Decatur and is fighting breast cancer — for the second time. Green is worried that if the protections in the Affordable Care Act disappear, her private health insurance might try to deny her coverage.

“I have to worry about whether or not next year in open enrollment that I won’t be discriminated against, that I won’t have limits that would then potentially end my life,” she said.

More than one-quarter of Georgians have preexisting conditions that could make it hard to get coverage if the Affordable Care Act is struck down, according to an analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation.

That possibility is also driving Atlanta resident Herschel Jones to get involved in the runoff. On a recent weekday morning he dropped by an Ossoff campaign office to pick up a yard sign.

Jones, who has diabetes, is insured through the Department of Veterans Affairs. He said everyone deserves access to health care.

“It’s a main issue, because the Affordable Care Act benefits all those individuals who might have preexisting conditions,” Jones said.

One reason why Ossoff and Warnock are running so much harder on health care than Perdue and Loeffler is because that strategy paid off for Democrats in the general election, said Ken Thorpe, a health policy professor at Emory University.

President-elect Joe Biden can thank independent voters for his win in Georgia, Thorpe said, and they were drawn to him because of his promise to uphold Obamacare.

“The threat of potentially losing health insurance in the midst of this pandemic turned out to be probably the major defining issue in the election,” he said.

Polling in the days leading up to the Nov. 3 election showed Democrats were motivated on the issues of health care and the coronavirus pandemic.

If Democrats want to win these Senate runoffs in Georgia, Thorpe said, they’ll need to continue to stay focused on those issues. That emphasis could help them attract additional moderate voters as well as provide the motivation to entice those in the party base to come out again and cast ballots for a second time.

“The health care issue is the probably main motivating factor that’s gonna get Democrats and independents to the polls,” he continued.

But in a state that’s traditionally favored Republicans in runoff races, even with a strong health care message, it’ll be tough for Ossoff and Warnock to break that trend and unseat the Republicans, Thorpe said.

This story comes from NPR’s reporting partnership with WABE and Kaiser Health News.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/12/19/947792137/in-georgia-runoffs-dems-are-running-hard-on-health-care-republicans-not-so-much

WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) — Congress passed a two-day stopgap spending bill Friday night, averting a partial government shutdown and buying yet more time for frustratingly slow endgame negotiations on an almost $1 trillion COVID-19 economic relief package.

The virus aid talks remained on track, both sides said, but closing out final disagreements was proving difficult. Weekend sessions were on tap, and House leaders hoped for a vote on Sunday on the massive package, which wraps much of Capitol Hill’s unfinished 2020 business into a take-it-or-leave-it behemoth that promises to be a foot thick — or more.

The House passed the temporary funding bill by a 320-60 vote. The Senate approved it by voice vote almost immediately afterward, sending it to President Donald Trump.

The House adjourned Friday evening shortly after passing the stopgap measure; Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland) said negotiators are still working toward an agreement, and there will be no House votes Saturday as the earliest anticipated vote on the COVID-19 relief package or omnibus spending bill would be 1 p.m. EST Sunday.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said early in the day he was “even more optimistic now than I was last night,” but Democrats launched a concerted campaign to block an effort by Republicans to rein in emergency Federal Reserve lending powers. They said the GOP proposal would deprive President-elect Joe Biden of crucial tools to manage the economy.

Believing a deal could be reached Friday “would be a triumph of hope over experience,” said a downbeat No. 2 Senate Republican, John Thune of South Dakota.

Funding for the government was to lapse at midnight, and a partial, low-impact shutdown would ensue if Congress failed to pass the stopgap spending bill. All essential federal workers would remain on the job, and most government offices would be closed on the weekend anyway.

The two-day stopgap bill could have been stopped by a single senator voicing an objection, but the most likely Republican to do so, Josh Hawley of Missouri, announced he would not block the measure after receiving assurances that direct payments for individuals were included in the broader measure.

Democrats came out swinging at a key obstacle: a provision by conservative Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., that would close down more than $400 billion in potential Federal Reserve lending powers established under a relief bill in March. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin is shutting down the programs at the end of December, but Toomey’s language goes further, by barring the Fed from restarting the lending next year, and Democrats say the provision would tie Biden’s hands and put the economy at risk.

“As we navigate through an unprecedented economic crisis, it is in the interests of the American people to maintain the Fed’s ability to respond quickly and forcefully,” said Biden economic adviser Brian Deese. “Undermining that authority could mean less lending to Main Street businesses, higher unemployment and greater economic pain across the nation.”

The key Fed programs at issue provided loans to small and mid-sized businesses and bought state and local government bonds, making it easier for those governments to borrow, at a time when their finances are under pressure from the pandemic.

The Fed would need the support of the Treasury Department to restart the programs, which Biden’s Treasury secretary nominee, Janet Yellen, a former Fed chair, would likely provide. Treasury could also provide funds to backstop those programs without congressional approval and could ease the lending requirements. That could encourage more lending under the programs, which have seen only limited use so far.

The battle obscured progress on other elements of the hoped-for agreement. After being bogged down for much of Thursday, negotiators turned more optimistic, though the complexity of finalizing the remaining issues and drafting agreements in precise legislative form was proving daunting.

The central elements appeared in place: more than $300 billion in aid to businesses; a $300-per-week bonus federal jobless benefit and renewal of soon-to-expire state benefits; $600 direct payments to individuals; vaccine distribution funds and money for renters, schools, the Postal Service and people needing food aid.

Lawmakers were told to expect to be in session and voting this weekend.

The delays weren’t unusual for legislation of this size and importance, but lawmakers are eager to leave Washington for the holidays and are getting antsy.

The pending bill is the first significant legislative response to the pandemic since the landmark CARES Act passed virtually unanimously in March, delivering $1.8 trillion in aid, more generous $600 per week bonus jobless benefits and $1,200 direct payments to individuals.

The CARES legislation passed at a moment of great uncertainty and unprecedented shutdowns aimed at stopping the coronavirus, but after that, many Republicans focused more on loosening social and economic restrictions as the key to recovery instead of more taxpayer-funded aid.

Now, Republicans are motivated chiefly to extend business subsidies and some jobless benefits, and provide money for schools and vaccines. Democrats have focused on bigger economic stimulus measures and more help for those struggling economically during the pandemic. The urgency was underscored Thursday by the weekly unemployment numbers, which revealed that 885,000 people applied for jobless benefits last week, the highest weekly total since September.

The emerging package falls well short of the $2 trillion-plus Democrats were demanding this fall before the election, but Biden is eager for an aid package to prop up the economy and help the jobless and poor. While he says more economic stimulus will be needed early next year, some Republicans say the current package may be the last.

“If we address the critical needs right now, and things improve next year as the vaccine gets out there and the economy starts to pick up again, you know, there may be less of a need,” said Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.

Most economists, however, strongly support additional economic stimulus as necessary to keep businesses and households afloat through what is widely anticipated to be a tough winter. Many forecast the economy could shrink in the first three months of 2021 without more help. Standard & Poor’s said in a report Tuesday that the economy would be 1.5 percentage points smaller in 2021 without more aid.

The details were still being worked out, but the measure includes a second round of “paycheck protection” payments to especially hard-hit businesses, $25 billion to help struggling renters with their payments, $45 billion for airlines and transit systems, a temporary 15% or so increase in food stamp benefits, additional farm subsidies, and a $10 billion bailout for the Postal Service.

The emerging package would combine the $900 billion in COVID-19 relief with a $1.4 trillion government-wide funding bill. Then there are numerous unrelated add-ons that are catching a ride, known as “ash and trash” in appropriations panel shorthand.

A key breakthrough occurred earlier this week when Democrats agreed to drop their much-sought $160 billion state and local government aid package in exchange for McConnell abandoning a key priority of his own — a liability shield for businesses and other institutions like universities fearing COVID-19 lawsuits.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.woodtv.com/news/stimulus-check-update-congress-passes-2-day-bill-to-avoid-shutdown-as-covid-relief-talks-continue/

  • President Donald Trump has been among the most controversial occupants of the White House in US history. 
  • Trump’s one-term presidency will have an enduring impact on the US. 
  • Looking at the numbers surrounding Trump’s tenure provides important context and perspective on his accomplishments and failures. 
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

President Donald Trump’s presidency is coming to a close after he was defeated by President-elect Joe Biden in the 2020 election. 

Trump’s tenure has been tumultuous and historic. He’s one of just three presidents to be impeached, and is the first commander-in-chief in nearly three decades to not win reelection. 

Historians and political scientists will be analyzing and discussing Trump’s presidency for years to come. 

Though numbers and data don’t offer a full picture of a president’s legacy, they can provide perspective and serve as a useful reference point in terms of what a president has accomplished.

Below are many of the defining numbers from Trump’s presidency. It’s not an exhaustive list, but does capture much of what took place during his tenure. 

Trump’s presidency — by the numbers:

Popular votes in 2016: 62,985,106 (45.9%)

Electoral votes in 2016: 306 (but 304 ultimately voted for him)

Popular votes in 2020: 74,222,957 (46.8%)

Electoral votes in 2020: 232

Bills signed: 660

Vetoes: 8

Vetoes overridden: 0

Executive orders: 202

Pardons: 28

Commutations: 16

Federal judges confirmed: 233 

Supreme Court justices confirmed: 3

News conferences (up to November): 88

Average number of news conferences per year: 22.96

Average unemployment rate (2017): 4.35%

Average unemployment rate (2018): 3.89%

Average unemployment rate (2019): 3.67%

Average unemployment rate (2020 — up to November): 8.20%

Average GDP (2017-2019): $20.498 trillion

2017 deficit: $666 billion

2018 deficit: $779 billion

2019 deficit: $984 billion

2020 deficit: $3.13 trillion

Reported COVID-19 cases: Over 17.2 million

Reported COVID-19 deaths: Over 311,000

In-person rallies held during the pandemic (declared on March 11): 3

Estimated number of migrant children separated from their parents: 5,400

Refugee resettlement cap (fiscal year 2018): 45,000

Refugee resettlement cap (fiscal year 2019): 30,000

Refugee resettlement cap (fiscal year 2020): 18,000

Refugee resettlement cap (fiscal year 2021): 15,000 (a historic low)

Federal executions: 10

Sentenced prisoners per 100,000 US residents (2017): 440

Sentenced prisoners per 100,000 US residents (2018): 431

Sentenced prisoners per 100,000 US residents (2019): 419

US military spending (2017): $610 billion

US military spending (2018): $649 billion

US military spending (2019): $732 billion

Countries visited: 26

Trips abroad: 32

Estimated number of days Trump spent at his properties as president: 419

Estimated number of days Trump visited a golf course while president: 316

Amount Trump properties raked in via taxpayers and the president’s supporters: At least $8.1 million

False claims (as of 9/11/20): 23,035

Cabinet departures: 24

Turnover rate among top positions within the executive office of the president: 91% (65 in total)

Tweets (not including retweets) as president: 16,343

Tweets (including retweets) as president: 25,875

Unless otherwise noted, the above numbers are as of December 18. This article will be updated after Trump leaves office.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-historic-and-chaotic-presidency-by-the-numbers-2020-12

WASHINGTON – Tensions between President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team and political appointees at the Pentagon erupted on Friday over acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller’s abrupt decision Thursday to cancel transition team meetings with Pentagon officials for the rest of the year.

In a statement Friday, Miller claimed that the Biden transition and the Department of Defense would be taking a “mutually agreed upon holiday pause,” and restart meetings and briefings in the new year.

But a spokesman for the Biden transition team said that no such mutual agreement had ever existed.

“Let me be clear: there was no mutually agreed upon holiday break,” transition spokesman Yohannes Abraham told reporters on Friday afternoon. “In fact, we think it’s important that briefings and other engagements continue during this period, as there’s no time to spare.”

The abrupt suspension of meetings caught Defense Department officials by surprise, according to Axios, which first reported the news of Miller’s decision.

A spokesman for the Department of Defense did not reply to a request for comment from CNBC on the conflicting accounts from Miller and Biden transition officials.

But Abraham left little doubt about how frustrated the Biden team is with top Pentagon officials, who they see as having refused so far to fully cooperate with the transition. “There have been many agencies and departments that have facilitated the exchange of information and meetings over the past few weeks,” said Abraham. “But there have been pockets of recalcitrance, and DoD is one of them.”

Miller, however, insisted that at no time had the Pentagon “canceled or declined any interview” with Biden transition officials. He said the department “will continue to provide all required support to the Agency Review Team to keep our nation and her citizens safe.”

The Biden team said they hoped the Defense Department would reverse its decision. “In terms of when meetings will resume, meetings and requests for information, which are substantively interchangeable, it’s our hope and expectation that that will happen immediately,” said Abraham.

Miller was scheduled to meet with President Donald Trump on Friday afternoon, the only publicly announced event on Trump’s schedule for the day.

Miller was named acting secretary of Defense on Nov. 9, after Trump abruptly fired Defense Secretary Mark Esper.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/18/rift-between-biden-transition-and-pe.html

Vice President Mike Pence‘s announcement that members of the U.S. Space Force would be known as Guardians hit some social media users like a rocket on Friday.

The sixth branch of the U.S. Armed Forces, the Space Force was established by President Donald Trump in 2019. Trump said the Space Force would help the U.S. achieve superiority in space, which he called the “world’s newest warfighting domain.” After Pence’s announcement, fans of comic books and the Marvel Cinematic Universe ribbed the nomenclature on Twitter for apparently co-opting the name of the Guardians of the Galaxy series.

“It was my honor to announce today, that the men and women of the Space Force will be known as GUARDIANS!” Pence tweeted, adding “#SemperSupra,” the Space Force’s Latin motto which translates to “always above.”

Rock musician Peter Frampton criticized both the name and Trump in a Friday tweet.

“I LOVE this movie but love nothing abt Space Force with rip off badge from StarTrek this is pitiful,” Frampton wrote. “Do we need a special branch of the military for this? It’s all about tv shows for Mr Orange. Wait unless we can slip him into a parallel universe using The string cheese theory?”

Former Director of the United States Office of Government Ethics Walter Shaub asked for clarification on the name.

“I want to be sure to use their full title accurately, so has there been any word on whether they are Earth Guardians, Space Guardians or Guardians of the Galaxy?” Shaub asked. “And what is being done to keep the other services from calling them Trekkies?”

Vice President Mike Pence revealed on Friday that members of the U.S. Space Force would be collectively known as ‘Guardians.’
Spencer Platt/Getty

MSNBC producer Andrew Paul Joyce tweeted that he looked forward to Guardian-related television advertising.

“Can’t wait until the first time I see a USAA ad with a Space Force “Guardian” explaining why they get discounted home and auto insurance for their space service,” Joyce wrote.

According to the Space Force website, the name was chosen after a “yearlong process that produced hundreds of submissions and research involving space professionals and members of the general public.”

Podcast host and columnist Dan Savage expressed incredulity at the described procedure involved in choosing the name.

“Hundreds of submissions and one screening of Guardians of the Galaxy at the White House,” Savage tweeted.

“Proud to announce I will be a Space Force Mess Hall Guardian,” tweeted screenwriter Dan Hernandez. “Such an honor to be selected to test all space food.”

James Gunn, director of the Guardians of the Galaxy films, appeared to point his comment at Pence. “Can we sue this dork?” Gunn tweeted.

Despite the comments about the collective name of Space Force members, there are roughly 16,000 Guardians currently working under the Space Force umbrella. The first 7 enlistees into the Space Force graduated from basic training at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland in Texas in December.

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/james-gunn-peter-frampton-other-celebs-react-space-force-troops-being-named-guardians-1556102

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2020/12/18/president-trump-melania-don-matching-tuxedos-final-christmas-photo/3969324001/

President Trump late Friday night signed the continuing resolution that will fund the federal government through Dec. 21 and temporarily avert a partial shutdown.

Why it matters: The 48-hour stopgap will also give lawmakers the weekend to resolve outstanding issues with a $900 billion coronavirus relief package and $1.4 trillion long-term spending deal.

Context: This is the second continuing resolution Congress has needed to pass this month because lawmakers could not compromise. The first was passed last week.

  • But congressional leaders set and blew past Friday’s deadline to work out their differences, even though lawmakers have said for days they were closing in on a deal.

The big picture: Stimulus negotiations were hindered on Friday with debate over the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending powers.

  • Some Republicans, including Sen. Patrick Toomey (Pa.), want to reduce the Fed’s emergency lending programs as part of a stimulus deal, while Democrats fear the GOP is attempting to reduce the Fed’s authority before the Biden administration takes over.

Lawmakers also disagree on the proposed $600 direct payments to Americans as part of the stimulus bill.

What to watch: House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said the chamber would not hold votes on any legislation until Sunday afternoon.

Source Article from https://www.axios.com/congress-two-day-funding-bill-government-shutdown-60be9e20-b288-4ea6-95d7-1fd1f7c8584a.html

Updated 10:03 PM ET, Fri December 18, 2020

(CNN)Since the Thanksgiving holiday, California has faced a surge of Covid-19 infections unparalleled across the United States, leading to continued daily record highs in hospitalizations and deaths.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/18/us/california-covid-surge-alarming-rise/index.html

The Arizona Republican Party continues to deny President-elect Joe Biden’s win in the Grand Canyon state, even after its 11 electors for Biden cast their ballots and sent the certification to Congress on Dec. 14.

As a result, a divide is widening between the activist, right-leaning faction and the establishment moderates in the state’s GOP amid baseless accusations of election fraud by some Republicans and Trump allies — accusations which have been dismissed by judges in several court cases.

The clash within the Republican Party isn’t likely to dissipate anytime soon, and those contrarian stances, like challenging Biden’s win, within the party may even be a political strategy to energize some groups of voters, experts say.

“This election is far from over,” Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward said in a video posted on Twitter Tuesday morning . “Anyone who is telling you differently, whether it’s in the media, whether it’s the Democrat talking heads or whether it’s the Republican establishment, is just avoiding the facts.”

But when it comes to facts, the nation’s top attorney disagreed. The Justice Department uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that would tip the results of the presidential election, Attorney General William Barr said.

Voters in Arizona generally split their tickets; voting for Biden and Democrat Sen. Mark Kelly at the top of the ballot, and re-electing Republicans down the ballot. Any claims brought by the party or the president’s allies have been thrown out in court, and the party is now pursuing audits through subpoena power enacted by members of the Republican-led state legislature.

She’s been challenging the election in unsuccessful courtroom battles and criticizing fellow Republican, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, who has defended the state’s election integrity in the face of pushback from Ward and President Donald Trump.

Despite Monday’s Electoral College votes for Biden, Ward, who is a Trump elector, and other GOP electors in Arizona still met to cast unofficial ballots for the president– and 27 members of the Arizona state legislature penned a joint resolution calling on Congress to accept those ballots, rather than the ones signed and certified by Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.

James Strickland, an associate professor of political science at Arizona State University, said that Republicans’ insistence on challenging election results might be a political strategy for future elections.

“There seem to be many people within the party who genuinely have questions about election processes, but filing lawsuits also may be an electoral strategy for 2022 and 2024,” Strickland said about election fraud claims. “Doing so may allow party officials to claim that they are pursuing all available options, thereby encouraging donors and other supporters to remain involved and, importantly, turn out to vote in those future elections.”

“Angry voters tend to turn out,” he added. “If the party leadership is indeed pursuing the fraud claims to achieve a political benefit, then this would suggest that they believe a sizable enough portion of their supporters will appreciate and reward those efforts.”

The president has used his courtroom battles as a massive post-election fundraising mechanism. The Trump campaign and the GOP raised at least $170 million since Election Day, ABC News reported Dec. 1.

Arizona-based Republican strategist Chuck Coughlin said that the election fraud accusations have created a tough road for members who don’t support those claims.

“They’ve hung on to this election fraud thing that is a presidential narrative that goes back to the Iowa primaries. When [Trump] lost to Ted Cruz, he said that he’s just unwilling to accept any electoral outcome that he doesn’t win,” Coughlin said.

As in other battleground states across the country, challenges to election results in Arizona are propelled by false claims of apparent fraud. Republicans recently counted a win after the state Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Maricopa County in order to conduct a forensic audit of its voting machines and two recent suits thrown out by courts in Arizona have been appealed, one to the U.S. Supreme Court and the other to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Overall, Trump and his allies filed nearly 60 lawsuits as part of the effort to overturn the results of the election, nearly all of which have since been dismissed by judges, often with sharply worded rulings. At least six suits were filed in Arizona alone. Last week, the United States Supreme Court rejected a bid led by Texas and supported by Trump to throw out votes from four swing states — a significant blow to the effort to get the courts to overturn the results of the election. Secretaries of state across the country told ABC News last month that there was no evidence of widespread election fraud, and post-election audits of voting machines returned miniscule differences in the vote count.

Despite the lack of success in the courts, dissension in the ranks continued to bubble over following Ducey’s involvement in Arizona’s election certification process.

According to Coughlin, these types of battles aren’t uncommon in Arizona. He said there’s a faction of the party which has “consistently been anti-establishment, libertarian-leaning Republicans who dominate insider politics.”

“It’s the narrow base of the Republican party that it operates from. And elected officials who don’t have a broader base of support are vulnerable to that. McCain back in the day was the only one that could withstand it, and nobody else has that kind of broad base support. Clearly the governor doesn’t have that,” he said.

Ducey has drawn the ire of Trump, who wondered publicly on Twitter what the governor’s “rush” was to certify the results. The governor became a target of Trump and his allies following Arizona’s election certification. All of Arizona’s 15 counties, led by Republicans and Democrats, canvassed and certified their own elections, which were then sent to Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs and her office for further statewide audits. Only then, weeks after the election on Nov. 30, did Ducey participate in a certification of the statewide results alongside Hobbs and Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich.

While Ducey certified results, a meeting led by Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis continued to sow doubt about the election. It was attended by some state legislators and newly reelected members of Congress, including Reps. Paul Gosar and Andy Biggs, who were all presented with baseless conspiracy theories of election fraud in Arizona.

Coughlin said it is no surprise that the party has turned its criticism on Ducey in light of Trump’s loss.

“There isn’t any other narrative than the Trump narrative,” Coughlin told ABC News. “If you try and break away from that narrative at all, you see what happens. The first victim of that was Jeff Flake, the second victim was John McCain.”

“It’s you either step in line, and you follow whatever the president says, including overthrowing the legitimate elections, or you’re gonna face the ire of everybody else who’s still on the train,” he added.

Strickland said he thinks it is too early to say whether or not the Republican party will be able to work past the Trump era in the coming years.

“I imagine that Donald Trump will continue to have influence within the Republican Party, and that he might be a kingmaker in 2024, if he chooses not to run for president himself. Going forward, I imagine that the success of local political officials who have associated themselves with the fraud cases will depend on Trump’s popularity within the Republican Party,” Strickland said.

Republicans across the country have campaigned for legislatures in battleground states to convene and grant a new slate of electors to cast ballots for Trump instead of Biden, which is not allowed by the Arizona Constitution.

Ducey has all but denied calls for a special session, saying he would see the legislature on Jan. 11, when its next session is set to begin.

House Speaker Russell Bowers also eventually shut down the idea of convening the legislature, saying he would not authorize a special session and pointing to Arizona’s Constitution and the lack of substantial evidence presented by Giuliani and Ellis.

His resistance to bringing the legislature into session, in part, started calls for members of the statehouse not to vote for Bowers for Speaker of the House in the next session.

Coughlin said the public quarrels are the “burning down of your own house.”

“They don’t care because this is part of the party that puts the party ahead of country,” he said. “If you don’t believe the Trump message of division, then you’re not a Republican. You know, you’re a ‘RINO’ and it’s a very narrow place to build a party from. Arguably it’s incapable of winning a statewide election in Arizona.”

ABC News’ Olivia Rubin contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/arizona-gop-leaders-quarrel-election-results-impact-partys/story?id=74625518

Many in the media wanted to talk to Christopher Krebs, the nation’s former top cybersecurity official, when he disputed President Trump’s unproven allegations of voter fraud.

But his name appears to come up less frequently now that his former agency is being scrutinized in the wake of an apparent Russian cyber attack that began in March but was only publicly revealed this week.

Krebs headed the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) until Trump fired him in November. He had called the 2020 election “the most secure in American history” and said there was no evidence of changed, deleted, lost or otherwise compromised votes.

RUSSIA HACK CLAIMS: WHAT IS THE CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE AGENCY?

He garnered a lot of media coverage for contradicting the president, appearing on a slew of television news programs.

Christopher Krebs, former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, testifies before a Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee hearing to discuss election security and the 2020 election process on Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2020, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP)

“Christopher Krebs defended election integrity. Trump fired him,” read a PBS News Hour headline. He even appeared on CBS’ “60 Minutes” in late November, where he was asked about his dismissal.

But although the former CISA chief was also at the head of the federal government’s cyberdefense operation, tasked with “securing federal networks” and “protecting critical infrastructure,” his name appears to come up less in connection with the breach.

On Tuesday, CNN published an op-ed he authored, in which he addressed election integrity and cybersecurity in general but not the type of hacking that befell the federal government under his watch.

“As I said in a news briefing, Election Day was ‘just another Tuesday on the Internet,’” he wrote. “Normal sorts of scanning and probing were happening, but we did not see any successful attacks or damaging disruptions.”

Yet hackers were arms deep in a slew of federal agencies. The infiltration, believed to have been conducted by the Russians, appears to have compromised the Departments of Energy, State, Defense, Homeland Security, Treasury and Commerce. His name did not appear in CNN’s story about CISA and the hack published Thursday.

RUSSIA’S SUSPECTED HACKING OPERATION TARGETED 5 US AGENCIES, 18K ENTITITES

The New York Times published an op-ed from former homeland security adviser Thomas Bossert Wednesday that made no mention of Krebs, although he called CISA’s response to the hack “sadly insufficient and woefully too late.”

Krebs, on Twitter, said he had “the utmost confidence” in CISA’s ability to respond the hack. He could not immediately be reached for comment.

“I’m sorry I’m not still there with them, but they know how to do this,” he wrote.

On Wednesday, Krebs testified before the Senate’s Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, where the hack was barely mentioned. And Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service, known as the SVR, believed to be behind both the new government hack and the breach of the Democratic National Committee’s servers back in 2016.

ROMNEY SLAMS WHITE HOUSE’S ‘INEXCUSABLE SILENCE’ ON RUSSIAN CYBER ATTACKS 

Federal cyberdefense falls under the purview of CISA, as part of the Department of Homeland Security. President Trump signed a law establishing the agency in 2018 to succeed the National Protection and Programs Directorate. Krebs was its first director.

Just days before Election Day, Krebs posted a video to CISA’s YouTube channel predicting that while foreign actors could likely not change vote totals or “hack” the elections, they would still try to undermine public confidence in the electoral process through rumors.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

“Don’t overreact to claims that exaggerate the importance of insignificant events,” he urged American voters, foreshadowing the short-lived “SharpieGate” scandal. “Be prepared for efforts that call into question the legitimacy of the election.”

Fox News’ Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/christoper-krebs-cisa-trump-media-hack-elections

President-elect Joe Biden speaks during a drive-in rally for U.S. Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and the Rev. Raphael Warnock this week in Atlanta.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

President-elect Joe Biden speaks during a drive-in rally for U.S. Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and the Rev. Raphael Warnock this week in Atlanta.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team said Friday that the Defense Department had canceled meetings and asked that the department reverse its decision.

Earlier on Friday, President Trump’s acting defense secretary, Chris Miller, said in a statement that some meetings planned for Friday had been rescheduled, and said there was a “mutually agreed upon holiday pause” on transition meetings. Miller said the department would continue to provide “all required support” to Biden’s review team, noting it had already “supported 139 interview sessions” with “more than 200 personnel, 161 requests for information, and thousands of pages of non-public and classified documents.”

Miller said the priority for the next two weeks would be responding to “essential requests for information” on Operation Warp Speed and COVID-19 “to guarantee a flawless transition.”

But Yohannes Abraham, executive director of Biden’s transition team, told reporters at a briefing that “there was no mutually agreed upon holiday break” and said there was no time to spare because of the delay in the start of the transition process. He said that career staff at the department and others have been helpful, but “there have been pockets of recalcitrance” among political staff, including at the Defense Department.

A U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly told NPR’s Tom Bowman that the canceled meetings were spurred by the Pentagon General Counsel’s Office, which is required to be in every transition meeting. The counsel’s office also has other duties and told Miller that it can’t do everything, the official said. So Miller decided to postpone the dozen or so meetings slated for Friday until January. The official said both the Biden and Trump camps agreed to a break.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/biden-transition-updates/2020/12/18/948116210/biden-team-trump-defense-officials-spar-over-transition-meetings

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/18/mitt-romney-slams-white-house-silence-and-inaction-after-cyberattack/3954338001/

Members of the new US space force will be known as “guardians”, Vice-President Mike Pence announced on Friday, at a ceremony to mark the first birthday of the newest branch of the US armed forces, one of Donald Trump’s signature policy initiatives.

“It is my honour,” Pence said, “on behalf of the president of the United States, to announce that henceforth the men and women of the United States Space Force will be known as guardians.

“Soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines and guardians will be defending our nation for generations to come.”

On Twitter, the space force said: “The opportunity to name a force is a momentous responsibility. Guardians is a name with a long history in space operations, tracing back to the original command motto of Air Force Space Command in 1983, ‘Guardians of the High Frontier.’

“The name Guardians connects our proud heritage and culture to the important mission we execute 24/7, protecting the people and interest of the US and its allies.

“Guardians. #SemperSupra!”

The force’s Latin motto, adopted in July, means: “Always above.”

Pence’s announcement came on the same day Mike Hopkins, a US astronaut aboard the International Space Station, was transferred from the air force into the space force. Gen Jay Raymond, chief of space operations, said the new force was “beyond excited” to welcome its first astronaut.

Nonetheless, Pence’s announcement prompted familiar mirth on social media. As Military.com put it: “Space enthusiasts and military members were quick to point out the name Guardians evokes the Marvel Comics’ Guardians of the Galaxy film franchise, about a motley crew of superheroes in space.”

With the Trump administration on its way out of power, the future of the space force seems uncertain. The Associated Press put it delicately: “President-elect Joe Biden has yet to reveal his plans for the space force in the next administration.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/18/space-force-guardians-mike-pence-us-military

WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) — The House and Senate passed a two-day stopgap spending bill Friday night to avert a partial government shutdown. The short term measure, which is now headed to President Trump’s desk, bought time for frustratingly slow endgame negotiations on an almost $1 trillion COVID-19 economic relief package.

The House passed the temporary funding bill by a 320-60 vote as frustrated lawmakers headed for a weekend session. The Senate passed the resolution by a voice vote Friday evening.

The House adjourned Friday evening shortly after passing the stopgap measure; Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland) said negotiators are still working toward an agreement, and there will be no House votes Saturday as the earliest anticipated vote on the COVID-19 relief package or omnibus spending bill would be 1 p.m. EST Sunday.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said early in the day he was “even more optimistic now than I was last night,” but Democrats launched a concerted campaign to block an effort by Republicans to rein in emergency Federal Reserve lending powers. They said the GOP proposal would deprive President-elect Joe Biden of crucial tools to manage the economy.

Believing a deal could be reached Friday “would be a triumph of hope over experience,” said a downbeat No. 2 Senate Republican, John Thune of South Dakota.

Funding for the government was to lapse at midnight, and a partial, low-impact shutdown would ensue if Congress failed to pass the stopgap spending bill. All essential federal workers would remain on the job, and most government offices would be closed on the weekend anyway.

The two-day stopgap bill could have been stopped by a single senator voicing an objection, but the most likely Republican to do so, Josh Hawley of Missouri, announced he would not block the measure after receiving assurances that direct payments for individuals were included in the broader measure.

Democrats came out swinging at a key obstacle: a provision by conservative Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., that would close down more than $400 billion in potential Federal Reserve lending powers established under a relief bill in March. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin is shutting down the programs at the end of December, but Toomey’s language goes further, by barring the Fed from restarting the lending next year, and Democrats say the provision would tie Biden’s hands and put the economy at risk.

“As we navigate through an unprecedented economic crisis, it is in the interests of the American people to maintain the Fed’s ability to respond quickly and forcefully,” said Biden economic adviser Brian Deese. “Undermining that authority could mean less lending to Main Street businesses, higher unemployment and greater economic pain across the nation.”

The key Fed programs at issue provided loans to small and mid-sized businesses and bought state and local government bonds, making it easier for those governments to borrow, at a time when their finances are under pressure from the pandemic.

The Fed would need the support of the Treasury Department to restart the programs, which Biden’s Treasury secretary nominee, Janet Yellen, a former Fed chair, would likely provide. Treasury could also provide funds to backstop those programs without congressional approval and could ease the lending requirements. That could encourage more lending under the programs, which have seen only limited use so far.

The battle obscured progress on other elements of the hoped-for agreement. After being bogged down for much of Thursday, negotiators turned more optimistic, though the complexity of finalizing the remaining issues and drafting agreements in precise legislative form was proving daunting.

The central elements appeared in place: more than $300 billion in aid to businesses; a $300-per-week bonus federal jobless benefit and renewal of soon-to-expire state benefits; $600 direct payments to individuals; vaccine distribution funds and money for renters, schools, the Postal Service and people needing food aid.

Lawmakers were told to expect to be in session and voting this weekend.

The delays weren’t unusual for legislation of this size and importance, but lawmakers are eager to leave Washington for the holidays and are getting antsy.

The pending bill is the first significant legislative response to the pandemic since the landmark CARES Act passed virtually unanimously in March, delivering $1.8 trillion in aid, more generous $600 per week bonus jobless benefits and $1,200 direct payments to individuals.

The CARES legislation passed at a moment of great uncertainty and unprecedented shutdowns aimed at stopping the coronavirus, but after that, many Republicans focused more on loosening social and economic restrictions as the key to recovery instead of more taxpayer-funded aid.

Now, Republicans are motivated chiefly to extend business subsidies and some jobless benefits, and provide money for schools and vaccines. Democrats have focused on bigger economic stimulus measures and more help for those struggling economically during the pandemic. The urgency was underscored Thursday by the weekly unemployment numbers, which revealed that 885,000 people applied for jobless benefits last week, the highest weekly total since September.

The emerging package falls well short of the $2 trillion-plus Democrats were demanding this fall before the election, but Biden is eager for an aid package to prop up the economy and help the jobless and poor. While he says more economic stimulus will be needed early next year, some Republicans say the current package may be the last.

“If we address the critical needs right now, and things improve next year as the vaccine gets out there and the economy starts to pick up again, you know, there may be less of a need,” said Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.

Most economists, however, strongly support additional economic stimulus as necessary to keep businesses and households afloat through what is widely anticipated to be a tough winter. Many forecast the economy could shrink in the first three months of 2021 without more help. Standard & Poor’s said in a report Tuesday that the economy would be 1.5 percentage points smaller in 2021 without more aid.

The details were still being worked out, but the measure includes a second round of “paycheck protection” payments to especially hard-hit businesses, $25 billion to help struggling renters with their payments, $45 billion for airlines and transit systems, a temporary 15% or so increase in food stamp benefits, additional farm subsidies, and a $10 billion bailout for the Postal Service.

The emerging package would combine the $900 billion in COVID-19 relief with a $1.4 trillion government-wide funding bill. Then there are numerous unrelated add-ons that are catching a ride, known as “ash and trash” in appropriations panel shorthand.

A key breakthrough occurred earlier this week when Democrats agreed to drop their much-sought $160 billion state and local government aid package in exchange for McConnell abandoning a key priority of his own — a liability shield for businesses and other institutions like universities fearing COVID-19 lawsuits.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://myfox8.com/news/stimulus-check-update-house-passes-2-day-bill-to-avoid-shutdown-as-covid-relief-talks-continue/

Blaming a faulty algorithm, Stanford Health Care apologized Friday for a plan that left nearly all 1,300 of its young front-line doctors out of the first round of coronavirus vaccinations. The Palo Alto, Calif., medical center promised an immediate fix that would move the physicians into the first wave of inoculations.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/12/18/stanford-hospital-protest-covid-vaccine/

The Arizona Republican Party continues to deny President-elect Joe Biden’s win in the Grand Canyon state, even after its 11 electors for Biden cast their ballots and sent the certification to Congress on Dec. 14.

As a result, a divide is widening between the activist, right-leaning faction and the establishment moderates in the state’s GOP amid baseless accusations of election fraud by some Republicans and Trump allies — accusations which have been dismissed by judges in several court cases.

The clash within the Republican Party isn’t likely to dissipate anytime soon, and those contrarian stances, like challenging Biden’s win, within the party may even be a political strategy to energize some groups of voters, experts say.

“This election is far from over,” Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward said in a video posted on Twitter Tuesday morning . “Anyone who is telling you differently, whether it’s in the media, whether it’s the Democrat talking heads or whether it’s the Republican establishment, is just avoiding the facts.”

But when it comes to facts, the nation’s top attorney disagreed. The Justice Department uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that would tip the results of the presidential election, Attorney General William Barr said.

Voters in Arizona generally split their tickets; voting for Biden and Democrat Sen. Mark Kelly at the top of the ballot, and re-electing Republicans down the ballot. Any claims brought by the party or the president’s allies have been thrown out in court, and the party is now pursuing audits through subpoena power enacted by members of the Republican-led state legislature.

She’s been challenging the election in unsuccessful courtroom battles and criticizing fellow Republican, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, who has defended the state’s election integrity in the face of pushback from Ward and President Donald Trump.

Despite Monday’s Electoral College votes for Biden, Ward, who is a Trump elector, and other GOP electors in Arizona still met to cast unofficial ballots for the president– and 27 members of the Arizona state legislature penned a joint resolution calling on Congress to accept those ballots, rather than the ones signed and certified by Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.

James Strickland, an associate professor of political science at Arizona State University, said that Republicans’ insistence on challenging election results might be a political strategy for future elections.

“There seem to be many people within the party who genuinely have questions about election processes, but filing lawsuits also may be an electoral strategy for 2022 and 2024,” Strickland said about election fraud claims. “Doing so may allow party officials to claim that they are pursuing all available options, thereby encouraging donors and other supporters to remain involved and, importantly, turn out to vote in those future elections.”

“Angry voters tend to turn out,” he added. “If the party leadership is indeed pursuing the fraud claims to achieve a political benefit, then this would suggest that they believe a sizable enough portion of their supporters will appreciate and reward those efforts.”

The president has used his courtroom battles as a massive post-election fundraising mechanism. The Trump campaign and the GOP raised at least $170 million since Election Day, ABC News reported Dec. 1.

Arizona-based Republican strategist Chuck Coughlin said that the election fraud accusations have created a tough road for members who don’t support those claims.

“They’ve hung on to this election fraud thing that is a presidential narrative that goes back to the Iowa primaries. When [Trump] lost to Ted Cruz, he said that he’s just unwilling to accept any electoral outcome that he doesn’t win,” Coughlin said.

As in other battleground states across the country, challenges to election results in Arizona are propelled by false claims of apparent fraud. Republicans recently counted a win after the state Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Maricopa County in order to conduct a forensic audit of its voting machines and two recent suits thrown out by courts in Arizona have been appealed, one to the U.S. Supreme Court and the other to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Overall, Trump and his allies filed nearly 60 lawsuits as part of the effort to overturn the results of the election, nearly all of which have since been dismissed by judges, often with sharply worded rulings. At least six suits were filed in Arizona alone. Last week, the United States Supreme Court rejected a bid led by Texas and supported by Trump to throw out votes from four swing states — a significant blow to the effort to get the courts to overturn the results of the election. Secretaries of state across the country told ABC News last month that there was no evidence of widespread election fraud, and post-election audits of voting machines returned miniscule differences in the vote count.

Despite the lack of success in the courts, dissension in the ranks continued to bubble over following Ducey’s involvement in Arizona’s election certification process.

According to Coughlin, these types of battles aren’t uncommon in Arizona. He said there’s a faction of the party which has “consistently been anti-establishment, libertarian-leaning Republicans who dominate insider politics.”

“It’s the narrow base of the Republican party that it operates from. And elected officials who don’t have a broader base of support are vulnerable to that. McCain back in the day was the only one that could withstand it, and nobody else has that kind of broad base support. Clearly the governor doesn’t have that,” he said.

Ducey has drawn the ire of Trump, who wondered publicly on Twitter what the governor’s “rush” was to certify the results. The governor became a target of Trump and his allies following Arizona’s election certification. All of Arizona’s 15 counties, led by Republicans and Democrats, canvassed and certified their own elections, which were then sent to Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs and her office for further statewide audits. Only then, weeks after the election on Nov. 30, did Ducey participate in a certification of the statewide results alongside Hobbs and Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich.

While Ducey certified results, a meeting led by Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis continued to sow doubt about the election. It was attended by some state legislators and newly reelected members of Congress, including Reps. Paul Gosar and Andy Biggs, who were all presented with baseless conspiracy theories of election fraud in Arizona.

Coughlin said it is no surprise that the party has turned its criticism on Ducey in light of Trump’s loss.

“There isn’t any other narrative than the Trump narrative,” Coughlin told ABC News. “If you try and break away from that narrative at all, you see what happens. The first victim of that was Jeff Flake, the second victim was John McCain.”

“It’s you either step in line, and you follow whatever the president says, including overthrowing the legitimate elections, or you’re gonna face the ire of everybody else who’s still on the train,” he added.

Strickland said he thinks it is too early to say whether or not the Republican party will be able to work past the Trump era in the coming years.

“I imagine that Donald Trump will continue to have influence within the Republican Party, and that he might be a kingmaker in 2024, if he chooses not to run for president himself. Going forward, I imagine that the success of local political officials who have associated themselves with the fraud cases will depend on Trump’s popularity within the Republican Party,” Strickland said.

Republicans across the country have campaigned for legislatures in battleground states to convene and grant a new slate of electors to cast ballots for Trump instead of Biden, which is not allowed by the Arizona Constitution.

Ducey has all but denied calls for a special session, saying he would see the legislature on Jan. 11, when its next session is set to begin.

House Speaker Russell Bowers also eventually shut down the idea of convening the legislature, saying he would not authorize a special session and pointing to Arizona’s Constitution and the lack of substantial evidence presented by Giuliani and Ellis.

His resistance to bringing the legislature into session, in part, started calls for members of the statehouse not to vote for Bowers for Speaker of the House in the next session.

Coughlin said the public quarrels are the “burning down of your own house.”

“They don’t care because this is part of the party that puts the party ahead of country,” he said. “If you don’t believe the Trump message of division, then you’re not a Republican. You know, you’re a ‘RINO’ and it’s a very narrow place to build a party from. Arguably it’s incapable of winning a statewide election in Arizona.”

ABC News’ Olivia Rubin contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/arizona-gop-leaders-quarrel-election-results-impact-partys/story?id=74625518

  • President Donald Trump has been among the most controversial occupants of the White House in US history. 
  • Trump’s one-term presidency will have an enduring impact on the US. 
  • Looking at the numbers surrounding Trump’s tenure provides important context and perspective on his accomplishments and failures. 
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

President Donald Trump’s presidency is coming to a close after he was defeated by President-elect Joe Biden in the 2020 election. 

Trump’s tenure has been tumultuous and historic. He’s one of just three presidents to be impeached, and is the first commander-in-chief in nearly three decades to not win reelection. 

Historians and political scientists will be analyzing and discussing Trump’s presidency for years to come. 

Though numbers and data don’t offer a full picture of a president’s legacy, they can provide perspective and serve as a useful reference point in terms of what a president has accomplished.

Below are many of the defining numbers from Trump’s presidency. It’s not an exhaustive list, but does capture much of what took place during his tenure. 

Trump’s presidency — by the numbers:

Popular votes in 2016: 62,985,106 (45.9%)

Electoral votes in 2016: 306 (but 304 ultimately voted for him)

Popular votes in 2020: 74,222,957 (46.8%)

Electoral votes in 2020: 232

Bills signed: 660

Vetoes: 8

Vetoes overridden: 0

Executive orders: 202

Pardons: 28

Commutations: 16

Federal judges confirmed: 233 

Supreme Court justices confirmed: 3

News conferences (up to November): 88

Average number of news conferences per year: 22.96

Average unemployment rate (2017): 4.35%

Average unemployment rate (2018): 3.89%

Average unemployment rate (2019): 3.67%

Average unemployment rate (2020 — up to November): 8.20%

Average GDP (2017-2019): $20.498 trillion

2017 deficit: $666 billion

2018 deficit: $779 billion

2019 deficit: $984 billion

2020 deficit: $3.13 trillion

Reported COVID-19 cases: Over 17.2 million

Reported COVID-19 deaths: Over 311,000

In-person rallies held during the pandemic (declared on March 11): 3

Estimated number of migrant children separated from their parents: 5,400

Refugee resettlement cap (fiscal year 2018): 45,000

Refugee resettlement cap (fiscal year 2019): 30,000

Refugee resettlement cap (fiscal year 2020): 18,000

Refugee resettlement cap (fiscal year 2021): 15,000 (a historic low)

Federal executions: 10

Sentenced prisoners per 100,000 US residents (2017): 440

Sentenced prisoners per 100,000 US residents (2018): 431

Sentenced prisoners per 100,000 US residents (2019): 419

US military spending (2017): $610 billion

US military spending (2018): $649 billion

US military spending (2019): $732 billion

Countries visited: 26

Trips abroad: 32

Estimated number of days Trump spent at his properties as president: 419

Estimated number of days Trump visited a golf course while president: 316

Amount Trump properties raked in via taxpayers and the president’s supporters: At least $8.1 million

False claims (as of 9/11/20): 23,035

Cabinet departures: 24

Turnover rate among top positions within the executive office of the president: 91% (65 in total)

Tweets (not including retweets) as president: 16,343

Tweets (including retweets) as president: 25,875

Unless otherwise noted, the above numbers are as of December 18. This article will be updated after Trump leaves office.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-historic-and-chaotic-presidency-by-the-numbers-2020-12