Sign up for the Guardian Today US newsletter

One woman was arrested after allegedly driving her car into a crowd of Black Lives Matter protesters in Manhattan Friday afternoon, injuring six, the New York police department (NYPD) said.

A group of marchers had taken to the streets to protest against the federal immigration authorities detaining people, and in particular to highlight a group of detainees that have resorted to a hunger strike in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) federal detention in New Jersey.

The car charged forward in a terrifying, lightning-quick sequence of events where eyewitnesses said protesters were sent “flying” and people were screaming and running in panic.

The woman in the car, Kathleen Casillo, has been charged with reckless endangerment. Casillo, 52, was released early Saturday and is due in court on 22 February, authorities said.

The NYPD said that they received a 911 call at 4.08 pm saying “multiple pedestrians struck” at the intersection of 39th Street and Third Avenue in the Murray Hill neighborhood of Manhattan’s midtown east.

When officers arrived at the scene, they encountered injured pedestrians whom they described as “conscious and alert in the roadway”. A preliminary police investigation revealed that the pedestrians hit were among those who had been protesting in the street, police said.

Accounts posted to social media recalled an alarming scene. Some said a stopped car, which police described as a black 2019 BMW sedan, was surrounded by protesters before suddenly lurching into the crowd – knocking over people and bicycles.

One video seemed to show a small group of protesters gathered around the sedan as it slowly neared the intersection, with one person apparently leaning over the front of the car Casillo was driving.

Then the car suddenly accelerated, knocking aside those blocking it, as well as people in the intersection as it sped forward for several yards.

Video taken from another side shows people running away, with one person falling over as the sedan shoves through. According to the Reuters news agency, there were around 50 people in the crowd.



Protest signs are seen on the ground after a car struck multiple people at a protest, 11 December 2020 in New York City. Photograph: Michael M Santiago/Getty Images

Tom Ella, who recorded one of the videos showing this incident, claimed he heard the engine roar and then saw the car speed up.

“Just watching them actually hit people, it’s traumatizing, it’s horrifying,” he remarked.

Christian Resseguie, of Manhattan, told the New York Times that the group was chanting “Free them all, Free them now” about Ice detainees when he heard a vehicle rushing behind him. Suddenly, he realized that demonstrators were scattered across the intersection.

“I saw lacerations, broken bones,” he reportedly said. Resseguie claimed that those most impacted by the crash were the cyclists handling traffic control during the protest.

Immigration detainees in several locations have resorted to hunger strikes to highlight their plight and attempt to secure release and, prior, better conditions, representation and exercising of human rights in line with US and international laws. They are also protesting the increased risk of contracting coronavirus while detained.

Sofia Vickerman, of Denver, Colorado, reported that people and bicycles were thrown into the air when the car struck the crowd.

“I hear people screaming in the front, I look behind me, the woman is plowing through,” said Vickerman, who was part of the protest. “I see bodies flying.”

Vickerman stated that the protest had started in Times Square and was meant to bring attention to several immigation detainees in New Jersey, who are on a hunger strike.

A Reuters photographer who was present confirmed that the protest was conducted in solidarity with nine undocumented people held by Ice. The agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the hunger strike.

This incident is among several between New York City protesters and vehicles since demonstrations against systemic racism, police brutality and racist government policies in the US began in late spring.

In May, two NYPD patrol cars rammed into a group of protesters in Brooklyn. The New York City mayor, Bill de Blasio, voiced concerns about the incident, but maintained that it was an acceptable use of force given the context, the Times reported.

About one week later, a man was arrested in Brooklyn for allegedly driving over at least one person when bicycle-riding demonstrators gathered around his car.

An SUV hit bicycle-riding protesters on 42nd Street in July. The driver was not arrested or charged, according to Gothamist.

An agitator in September drove a car into a crowd of BLM protesters in Times Square. This driver reportedly did not face charges either.

There have been similar incidents between protesters and cars elsewhere in the US since BLM protests began. Between 27 May and 5 September, there were at least 104.

Ninety-six involved civilian drivers and eight involved law enforcement, USA Today reported, citing data from an anti-terrorism researcher.

The researcher, Ari Weil, told CNN that 43 of those incidents were found to have malicious intent. Weil opined that internet memes had celebrated, and prompted, these attacks.

The NYPD also arrested a protester, Nicolle L Besuden, on charges of obstruction of governmental administration and disorderly conduct, following Friday’s incident.

They alleged that Besuden interfered with paramedics as they tried administering medical treatment.

Casillo could not immediately be reached at three phone numbers associated with her name.

It’s unclear whether she has an attorney. An attorney who appears to represent Besuden in another case did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/12/arrest-new-york-black-lives-matter-protesters-injured

Iranian journalist Ruhollah Zam, whose reporting helped spur large anti-government protests, was executed by Iran on Saturday morning, according to reports by state media.

Zam, 47, was found guilty of “corruption on earth” and sentenced to death in June 2020. The sentence was upheld by Iran’s Supreme Court on Tuesday this week, shortly before his execution.

The vague charge of “corruption on earth” is often used “in cases involving espionage or attempts to overthrow Iran’s government,” Al Jazeera reported Saturday.

Zam ran the site Amad News and coordinated a Telegram channel, both of which helped spread information during a wave of anti-regime protests that shook Iran in 2017 and 2018. He was living abroad in Paris at the time, but returned to the Middle East in 2019 and was arrested in Iraq by members of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

It’s unclear exactly why Zam returned to the region, but Karim Sadjadpour, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, tweeted Saturday that Zam was “reportedly lured to Iraq (from France), kidnapped, taken back to Iran, and tortured into confession. He leaves behind a wife and two daughters.”

Zam’s execution has drawn international condemnation.

The international human rights group Amnesty International argued Zam’s conviction stemmed from a “grossly unfair trial” and his execution — by hanging — was rushed following the Supreme Court ruling in a “reprehensible bid to avoid an international campaign to save his life.”

“With the execution of Roohollah Zam, Iranian authorities join the company of criminal gangs and violent extremists who silence journalists by murdering them,” Committee to Protect Journalists program coordinator Sherif Mansour said in a statement Saturday. “This is a monstrous and shameful act, and one which the international community must not let pass unnoticed.”

It’s been a tumultuous three years in Iran

Zam primarily drew the ire of the Iranian regime for his role in a spate of protests almost three years ago. According to the CPJ, he used Amad News and Telegram to spread “embarrassing information about Iranian officials and the timings and locations of protests.”

As Vox’s Zack Beauchamp explained in 2018 when the protests were at their height, the demonstrations were sparked by outrage over the price of basic goods — specifically, eggs — but quickly morphed into something far larger, coming to encompass a wide range of frustrations with Iran’s government.

The protests began in Iran’s second-largest city, Mashhad, but gained momentum and reach as more and more people joined in. According to Beauchamp:

These newcomers shifted the tone of the protest blaming [Iranian President Hassan Rouhani] for the poor economic performance to blaming the Iranian government and political system more broadly.

Then the protests began spreading to dozens of towns and cities across Iran. By January 2, protests had been recorded “in nearly every province” in the country, according to the Associated Press. And these protests were targeting not just the Rouhani presidency but the Islamic Republic itself — chanting, “Death to the dictator” (referring to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei), and, “Death to the Revolutionary Guard,” referring to Iran’s security forces. They’ve also called out the government’s support for the Assad regime, questioning why Iran is spending money there when there are problems at home.

All told, tens of thousands of people across the country turned out to protest against the theocratic Iranian regime, and at least 21 people were killed by security forces.

President Donald Trump — who has consistently taken a hard line against Iran and withdrew the US from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, better known as the Iran nuclear deal — tweeted in support of the protests at the time.

“The great Iranian people have been repressed for many years,” he said. “They are hungry for food & for freedom. Along with human rights, the wealth of Iran is being looted. TIME FOR CHANGE!”

The protests eventually subsided in January 2018, but remain among the largest the country has seen since the 2009 Green Movement, which demanded democratic reforms.

At the time, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, blamed the 2018 protests on the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. All three countries, as well as a handful of others, were mentioned in a filmed “apology” — very likely a coerced apology — Zam made, that was shared by Iran’s Tasnim News Agency after the journalist was arrested.

Zam fled Iran after the Green Movement protests, which were catalyzed by Iran’s June 2009 presidential election. He was granted asylum in France and lived there until his capture by Iran in 2019.

Recently, Iran has been wracked by even more protests — first over a sharp hike to fuel prices in 2019, and then following the 2020 destruction of a Ukrainian jetliner flying out of Tehran by Iranian security forces.

The country has also faced external pressures: Just last month, Iran’s top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, was assassinated, driving regional tensions even higher. President-elect Joe Biden has indicated that he plans to reenter the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran — first negotiated by President Barack Obama while Biden was vice president — once he takes office, but Fakhrizadeh’s death has been seen by some analysts as making even a moderate rapprochement between the US and Iran more difficult to achieve.

It’s unclear what impact, if any, Zam’s execution will have on Iran’s already poor international reputation. The country is a notorious human rights abuser and executed wrestler Navid Afkari in September this year for the alleged murder of a security guard during the same 2018 protests.

“If I am executed, I want you to know that an innocent person, even though he tried and fought with all his strength to be heard, was executed,” Afkari said before his death.

The US, in the midst of its own spate of executions — some of prisoners of questionable guilt — has signaled of late that it intends to continue to apply pressure on Iran, particularly on nuclear issues. And in its statement Saturday, Amnesty International called for the global community to take action.

“The world must not stand by in silence as the Iranian authorities take their already horrific attacks on the right to life and freedom [of] expression to unprecedented levels,” the group said. “We call on the international community, including member states of the UN Human Rights Council and the EU, to take immediate action to pressure the Iranian authorities to halt their escalating use of the death penalty as a weapon of political repression.”

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2020/12/12/22171194/irans-execution-journalist-ruhollah-zam

Source Article from https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/12/wisconsin-supreme-court-hears-trump-lawsuit/6521387002/

The media and the American people should have known about the federal investigation into President-elect Joe Biden‘s son Hunter prior to last month’s presidential election, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said on Friday.

“The American people want to know what the heck went on here,” the House Judiciary Committee ranking member told “The Ingraham Angle.” 

“We had Tony Bobulinski, who is an eyewitness to these events. Tony Bobulinski, who has emails, documents that show that the ‘big guy’ is Joe Biden, and no one in the press does anything and no one in the Justice Department tells us that there’s been a two-year investigation going on,” Jordan said. “We called for it back then.”

Jordan spoke hours after the elder Biden expressed support for his son in his first public comment on the matter since the presidential transition team disclosed that the 50-year-old Hunter’s “tax affairs” were under federal investigation.

JOE BIDEN BREAKS SILENCE ON HUNTER FOR FIRST TIME SINCE FEDERAL TAX INVESTIGATION SURFACED

Reporters shouted questions at the president-elect as he left the stage at an event to introduce several Cabinet nominees in Wilmington, Del. Biden ignored a question from Fox News’ Peter Doocy about whether Hunter Biden had committed a crime, but responded when asked if he had spoken to his son since the investigation was made public.

“I’m proud of my son,” Biden said as he exited the stage.

Earlier Friday, the transition team’s weely virtual press briefing passed without a single question regarding the investigation. The Biden-Harris team has not commented on the situation beyond its initial statement.

Hunter Biden disclosed earlier this week that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Delaware had undertaken an active investigation into his tax history. The investigation began in 2018, a source with knowledge of the situation told Fox News.

Jordan stressed that while the president-elect’s son’s financial dealings were an “important issue” ahead of the election, the matter was not probed by the media and was hidden by Democratic lawmakers. Jordan added that the Democratic Party had opted for a “compromised candidate” in Joe Biden.

“The fact that we didn’t know this important issue about a candidate for the highest office in the land before Election Day, before Americans make a decision —and as you rightly point out, before the Democrats made a decision in their primary —  the fact that we didn’t know this is just wrong,” Jordan told host Laura Ingraham.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“You can’t tell me that no one in the media in October knew that the Justice Department was investigating Hunter Biden,” he added. “That Justice Department, [over] the time they were investigating the president over the last four years, there was leak after leak after leak, but no one in the media knew that this was actually happening?

“You know they did, and the fact that they didn’t cover that … that is a huge story that he’s been under investigation … for two years. That to me is another thing that is so wrong about what took place and what the American people didn’t understand, that they would’ve liked to have known before they made the decision, before they went and voted on November 3rd.”

Fox News’ Thomas Barrabi contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jim-jordan-hunter-biden-investigation-voters-media

TERRE HAUTE, Ind. (AP) — The Trump administration continued its unprecedented series of post-election federal executions Friday by putting to death a Louisiana truck driver who severely abused his 2-year-old daughter for weeks in 2002, then killed her by slamming her head repeatedly against a truck’s windows and dashboard.

Alfred Bourgeois, 56, was pronounced dead at 8:21 p.m. Eastern time at a federal prison in Terre Haute, Indiana. His lawyers had argued he had an IQ that put him in the intellectually disabled category, saying that should have made him ineligible for the death penalty.

In his last words, Bourgeois, strapped to a gurney, offered no apology and instead struck a deeply defiant tone, insisting that he neither killed nor sexually abused his baby girl.

“I ask God to forgive all those who plotted and schemed against me, and planted false evidence,” he said. He added: “I did not commit this crime.”

Later, the girl’s relatives of released a joint statement calling Bourgeois “a monster.”



This June 27, 2020 photo provided by Nueces County Sheriff’s Office in Corpus Christi, Texas, shows Alfred Bourgeois. The Trump administration plans to continue its unprecedented series of post-election federal executions Friday, Dec. 11, 2020, by putting to death Bourgeois, a Louisiana truck driver who severely abused his 2-year-old daughter for weeks in 2002, then killed her by slamming her head against a truck’s windows and dashboard. (Nueces County Sheriff’s Office via AP)




“None of us thought she would return from (visiting Bourgeois) in a casket,” it said. “It should not have taken 18 years to receive justice for our angel.”

Bourgeois was the 10th federal death-row inmate put to death since federal executions resumed under President Donald Trump in July after a 17-year hiatus. He was the second federal prisoner executed this week, with three more executions planned in January.

The last time the number of civilians executed federally was in the double digits in a year was under President Grover Cleveland, with 14 in 1896.

As a lethal injection of pentobarbital began flowing through IVs into both of his arms, Bourgeois tilted his head to look at his spiritual adviser in a corner of the death chamber clutching a Bible. Bourgeois gave him a thumbs-up sign, and his spiritual adviser raised his thumb in reply.

Seconds later, Bourgeois peered up toward the glass dividing him from the media and other witnesses in adjoining rooms, and then grimaced and furrowed his eyebrows. He began to exhale rhythmically, and his stomach started to quiver uncontrollably. After five minutes, the heaving of his stomach stopped and his entire body became still. He did not move for about 20 minutes before he was pronounced dead.

Bourgeois had met with his spiritual adviser earlier Friday as he sought to come to terms with the possibility of dying, one of his lawyers, Shawn Nolan, told The Associated Press hours before the execution. He said Bourgeois had been “praying for redemption.”

St. Tammany Parish prosecutors haven’t tried a capital case in 11 years

Bourgeois took up drawing in prison, including doing renditions of members of his legal team. Nolan said he had a good disciplinary record on death row.

The series of executions under Trump since Election Day, the first in late November, is also the first time in more than 130 years that federal executions have occurred during a lame-duck period. Cleveland also was the last president to do that.

Bourgeois’ lawyers said the apparent hurry by Trump, a Republican, to get executions in before the Jan. 20 inauguration of death-penalty foe Joe Biden, a Democrat, deprived their client his rights to exhaust his legal options.

The Justice Department gave Bourgeois just 21 days notice he was to be executed under protocols that slashed the required notice period from 90 days, Nolan said.

“To rush these executions during the pandemic and everything else, makes absolutely no sense,” he said.

On Thursday, Brandon Bernard was put to death for his part in a 1999 killing of a religious couple from Iowa after he and other teenage members of a gang abducted and robbed Todd and Stacie Bagley in Texas. Bernard, who was 18 at the time of the killings, was a rare execution of a person who was in his teens when his crime was committed.

Just a day after Judge G. Michael Canaday won in a landslide to keep his seat on the district court bench in Calcasieu Parish, the Louisiana S…

Reality TV star Kim Kardashian West had appealed to Trump to commute Bernard’s sentence to life, citing, among other things, remorse Bernard expressed over years.

Bourgeois’ crimes stood out as for their brutality.

According to court filings, he gained temporary custody of the child, referred to in court papers only as “JG,” after a 2002 paternity suit from a Texas woman. He was living in Louisiana with his wife and their two children.

Over the next month, Bourgeois repeatedly whipped the girl with an electrical cord, burned her feet with a cigarette lighter and hit her in the head with a plastic baseball bat — then refused to seek medical treatment for her. Prosecutors said he sexually abused her, too.

Her toilet training enraged Bourgeois and he sometimes forced her to sleep on a training toilet.

It was during a trucking run to Corpus Christi, Texas, that he killed the toddler. Angered that a toilet-training pot tipped over in his truck cabin, he grabbed her inside the truck by her shoulders and slammed her head on the windows and dashboard four times.

When she lost consciousness, Bourgeois’ wife pleaded for him to get help and he told her to tell first responders she was hurt falling from the truck. She died the next day in a hospital of brain injuries.

After his 2004 conviction, a judge rejected claims stemming from his alleged intellectual disability, noting he didn’t receive that diagnosis until after his death sentence.

Bourgeois’ lawyers didn’t argue that he should have been acquitted or should not have been handed a stiff sentence, just that he shouldn’t be executed, Nolan said.

___

Follow Michael Tarm on Twitter at https://twitter.com/mtarm



Source Article from https://www.nola.com/news/courts/article_e8ec07a8-3c83-11eb-a94d-abfbe2aaa80f.html

On the same day the state announced indoor dining will be suspended starting this upcoming week, the city has issued new guidelines about outdoor dining and snow removal this winter, clarifying when restaurants will or will not be allowed to stay open during inclement weather.

The Department of Sanitation will issue two kinds of advisories this winter: Winter Operation Advisory will happen when some snow, ice or winter weather is in the forecast, but is generally under an inch of total accumulation. A Snow Alert will be issued when an inch or more of snow or ice is in the forecast.

During a Winter Operations Advisory, restaurants can continue to serve food outdoors as long as restaurants take steps to protect diners, staff and property. That includes using snow sticks to increase visibility; regularly removing snow and ice from sidewalks, and clearing paths to crosswalks if applicable; and keeping fire hydrants accessible. They also note that it is illegal to push snow into the street, but may be placed at the curbline.

If a Snow Alert is issued, restaurants must close, and all tables and chairs should be removed or secured, electric heaters should be removed, and the tops of structures should be removed, if possible. If 12 inches or more of snow is expected in the forecast, restaurants are expected to “remove or consolidate structures, including barriers, to take up as little space as possible.”

The DOT also noted that because there are fewer sanitation workers this year due to pandemic cuts, there will be a decrease in garbage pickup whenever there’s major snow: “Remember, the Sanitation Worker who collects trash and recycling is the SAME Sanitation Worker who prepares the equipment and salts and plows streets—and the Department can’t do both functions at the same time,” they say. “Trash and recycling pickup will be affected as our collection trucks become snow plows—and as plows turn back to collection trucks post-storm.”

The new guidance on outdoor dining comes at a crucial point for the city’s restaurant industry. On Friday, Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that indoor dining would be shut down in the five boroughs starting Monday because of concerns over rising hospitalization rates amidst a surge in COVID-19 cases recently.

“In New York City, you put the CDC caution on indoor dining together with the rate of transmission and the density and the crowding, that is a bad situation,” Cuomo said during a press conference Friday. “The hospitalizations have continued to increase in NYC. We said we would watch it, and if the hospitalization rate didn’t stabilize we would close indoor dining. It has not.”

Since the end of September, city restaurants have been allowed to be open indoors at 25% capacity, less than the 50% capacity permitted in other parts of the state. Owners have said that takeout and outdoor dining, while popular, would not be enough to sustain their businesses through the winter.

Knowing that indoor dining might be placed on pause, restaurants have been scrambling to come up with ways to attract customers to dine outdoors in the colder weather. That includes buying heaters, constructing various tents and adding plastic bubbles, and trying to get New Yorkers to “think of it like you’re actually going out to tailgate, so dress appropriately.”

Source Article from https://gothamist.com/food/city-issues-new-guidelines-outdoor-dining-and-snow-removal

A Tennessee man has been arrested in the fatal shooting of a Nashville intensive care nurse

Devaunte Lewis Hill, 21, was charged with criminal homicide in Caitlyn Kaufman’s death, the Metro Nashville Police Department tweeted on Friday. The 26-year-old healthcare worker was shot during her commute to St. Thomas West Hospital on Dec. 3.

NASHVILLE ICU NURSE AND ‘HEALTH CARE HERO’ SHOT AND KILLED ON WAY TO WORK

According to The Associated Press, a Metro Parks police officer found Kaufman’s gray Mazda CX-5 SUV on the right shoulder of Interstate 440 at 8:52 p.m. and stopped, believing it to be a single-car crash site. She died at the scene.

A tip led the Metro Nashville Police Department to Hill’s East Nashville apartment complex, where he was arrested without incident, according to Chief John Drake.

“Without going into detail, which I cannot do at this point, he gave a statement implicating himself in Caitlyn’s murder,” Drake told WSMV

The Tennessean reported Friday that data from Hill’s cell phone provider placed his phone on Interstate 440 at the time of the shooting.

Dickerson told reporters in a news conference that Hill and Kaufman did not know each other, but no motive has been announced.

It was not immediately clear whether Hill has an attorney. He is being held without bond.

Drake said a more than $65,000 reward may have encouraged residents to give information to police.

“Those who knew Caitlyn Kaufman witnessed the overwhelming compassion and kindness she showed for each person she cared for and worked alongside,” Saint Thomas West Hospital said in a statement.

A memorial service for Kaufman is set in her Western Pennsylvania hometown at 7 p.m. on Saturday.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Kaufman’s mother, Diane Kaufman, told The Tennessean that she felt relieved police had caught Hill.

“If it weren’t for the generosity of the Nashville community, I fear it wouldn’t have ever happened this quickly,” she said. “I think I’m still in shock. I was in shock with the shooting, but now I’m in shock with the arrest. I’m just so thankful.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/man-arrested-in-connection-with-killing-of-nashville-icu-nurse

On Friday, Trump’s campaign appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court.

The appeal says Russell is not qualified to judge an election case under state law because she is a resident of Fulton County and an active judge – not a judge on senior status. Because of that and other miscues it says occurred at the county court, the appeal asks the Supreme Court to rule on the merits of its case before Monday.

Among other things, the lawsuit says tens of thousands of people voted illegally in Georgia. Such claims came under fire at a state legislative hearing last week, when a lawmaker said she found that several voters who allegedly cast fraudulent ballots were, in fact, legally registered voters. U.S. Attorney General William Barr and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger have said their investigators have found no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Raffensperger is the defendant in the Trump lawsuit. His office could not immediately be reached for comment Saturday.

Source Article from https://www.ajc.com/politics/election/trump-appeals-election-lawsuit-to-georgia-supreme-court/YBVWPYGQGZBXBCXXM2N6AG3474/

When the autumn COVID-19 surge erupted more than a month ago, the epicenter was once again Los Angeles County, where the large population of essential workers and others living in densely populated neighborhoods made the region particularly vulnerable to the rapid spread of infections.

But now, Southern California’s more suburban counties are rapidly catching up, fueled by Thanksgiving gatherings that have pushed coronavirus cases and hospitalizations to unprecedented levels and left hospital intensive care units at critical levels.

The numbers of people hospitalized for COVID-19 in Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties have all doubled since the week of Thanksgiving, according to a Times analysis.

The suburban counties are also tallying record levels of new daily infections — all substantially worse than the summer surge, and in many cases, at a rate of increase worse than L.A. County. While L.A. County has seen its latest average daily number of cases nearly triple from its summer peak, counties in even worse shape relative to their summer highs include Ventura, San Bernardino and San Diego counties.

Riverside County is in the worst shape relative to its summer maximum, more than quadrupling its average daily number of cases from its peak in August. On Thursday, Riverside recorded an average of nearly 3,500 cases a day over the past week, far worse than the comparable peak of nearly 800 in August.

On a per-capita basis, L.A. County has tallied more coronavirus cases per 100,000 residents over the last week than Ventura, San Diego and Orange counties but fewer than Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

Intensive care unit capacity continued to deteriorate across Southern California, with availability in Southern California falling to 6.2% from 7.7% a day earlier.

“The velocity of the increase — or the steepness of the curve — is much more prominent now than it was earlier,” said Dr. Robert Kim-Farley, medical epidemiologist and infectious diseases expert at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health.

“I think that it is a result of the widespread transmission that was occurring over the Thanksgiving holidays such that so many people — either asymptomatic or presymptomatic people — were spreading the disease not only among themselves but within their own families,” Kim-Farley said.

That’s why it is so important for Californians to follow the stay-at-home order as much as possible in the coming weeks, Kim-Farley said, to contain the spread of the highly contagious virus and prevent even worse calamity as winter begins. Unless current trends change, the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation forecasts that California’s cumulative COVID-19 death toll could more than double by the end of winter to more than 50,000. More than 20,700 Californians infected with the coronavirus have died.

It may take even longer to begin seeing average daily coronavirus cases start to flatten compared to the spring surge, Kim-Farley said, because there are now so many households battling the virus. For the next week or two, there will be more household members coming down with the disease, infected by roommates or relatives who left their home during Thanksgiving.

Orange County officials this week said the healthcare system faced an unprecedented “crisis” as coronavirus patients streamed into hospitals. There were more than 1,100 coronavirus-positive patients hospitalized countywide; 265 people were in intensive care, according to the latest available data.

“At the current rate of deterioration, the EMS system may collapse unless emergency directives are implemented now,” Dr. Carl Schultz, emergency medical services director for the county Health Care Agency, wrote in a memo this week to hospitals and ambulance and paramedic providers.

Some immediate steps, he said, include allowing ambulances to travel longer distances to take patients to hospitals that can accept them, and permitting them to take a patient to another hospital if they’ve been waiting outside with the patient for more than an hour. Hospitals also should consider activating their surge plans, establishing alternate treatment areas and canceling elective surgeries, he added.

Dr. Clayton Chau, Orange County’s health officer and Health Care Agency director, also encouraged residents “who can get services through urgent care, can get services through their primary care physician [to] please go ahead and do so, and not just show up to the emergency room.”

Orange County, however, is far from an outlier as medical systems across the state feel intense pressure. Californians are testing positive for and falling ill and dying from COVID-19 at unprecedented levels. The state has averaged nearly 29,000 new coronavirus cases a day and about 150 daily deaths over the last week.

The timing and acceleration of the surge indicate that many ignored officials’ and experts’ calls to eschew traveling and gathering for Thanksgiving — a potentially chilling prospect, given the wider winter holiday season is in full swing.

The state has responded by placing a new stay-at-home order on Southern California and the Central Valley. Some parts of the Bay Area have also voluntarily joined the restrictions, which now are in place for 36 million Californians. The order suspends outdoor restaurant dining, bans most gatherings, prohibits hotel use for leisure and tourism, limits most retail capacity to 20%, and shuts down hair salons, nail salons, cardrooms, museums, zoos, aquariums, theaters, wineries and overnight stays at campgrounds.

Los Angeles County reached another alarming milestone Friday, when the case count surged dramatically in a single day by 13,507 — breaking the all-time single-day record, yet again — which pushed the county’s cumulative cases beyond 500,000.

“We’re seeing daily numbers of cases and hospitalizations that we’ve not experienced and, frankly, did not anticipate,” said L.A. County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer. “Our intensive care unit bed capacity continues to drop. We’re on a very dangerous track to seeing unprecedented and catastrophic suffering and death.”

As of Thursday, the most recent day for which complete data are available, there were 3,850 COVID-19 patients hospitalized countywide, including 856 in the ICU — both records.

The number of people hospitalized in L.A. County with coronavirus infections has doubled since Thanksgiving and quadrupled since a month ago, when there were 942.

“The best thing we can all do right now is stay in our homes whenever possible and away from people we don’t live with,” Ferrer said during a briefing Friday.

Officials fear the situation will only worsen as more people who may have been exposed during the Thanksgiving holiday become sick. There is still hope that the new stay-at-home order will make a difference, but it will take weeks before it’s known whether people are following the rules and if the effects become apparent.

“We cannot undo what’s already been done, and collectively, we’re going to all pay a very high price for the actions we were taking in the past,” Ferrer said.

At this point, she added, “it’s not a question of if we’ll see a large increase of hospitalizations and deaths” but a question of how severe the numbers will get.

Officials have often said that rising numbers of infections lead to increased hospitalizations two to three weeks later. Two weeks ago, L.A. County was seeing an average of 4,500 new coronavirus cases per day. That wave is fueling the current record-high hospitalization numbers.

Should the same proportion hold, the recent average caseload of 13,500 new infections per day will trigger a tidal wave two weeks from now — possibly doubling the number of people in L.A. County hospitals to 7,300, including nearly 1,700 in intensive care.

There are only about 2,100 ICU adult beds across all county hospitals, according to Ferrer.

“We are at a very critical juncture in the pandemic due to the fact that we have come so close to overcapacity of our ICU beds,” Kim-Farley said. “And that’s why it’s imperative for everyone to follow the guidelines and directions of public health officials, so that we don’t have a situation where loved ones are dying of COVID or, for that matter, of other serious illnesses, without having a ‘room at the inn’ in hospital and ICU beds.”

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-12-12/l-a-orange-counties-in-crisis-as-covid-19-cases-hospitalizations-hit-record

As President-elect Joe Biden crafts his Cabinet and White House team of advisers, he has pledged to make it the most diverse team in history. But in his picks so far, there is one thing that most of his team will have in common: previous service in the Obama administration.

Loading…

Biden, who was Obama’s vice president, has emphasized his personal relationships with many of these advisers. And he also has highlighted that he wants people who are “ready on Day 1” to help him lead the country’s recovery from the coronavirus pandemic.

“Each of these nominees are forward-thinking, crisis-tested and experienced,” said transition spokesperson Sean Savett, “They are ready to quickly use the levers of government to make meaningful differences in the lives of Americans.”

It’s not unusual to pick top advisers from an earlier White House because they know the ropes, said Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, who has studied administrations back to President Ronald Reagan. And Biden’s team members will face a completely different set of challenges than they did last time around, she said.

“We are certainly not in an era right now where it’s status quo. We have a pandemic on our hands. The economy is faltering. We have really high racial tension in our country. I don’t think it was like that in 2009,” she said.

But progressives make the same case: It isn’t 2009 anymore, and fresh faces and perspectives are needed to tackle huge problems including climate change and racial justice. Progressive activists have redoubled their efforts to urge Biden to made some bolder picks to fills his remaining Cabinet spots for attorney general, climate and energy posts, education, transportation and labor.

“We weren’t in the greatest place … before Donald Trump took office,” said Cori Bush, a progressive Democrat who became the first Black woman elected to Congress from Missouri in November.

“We have some amazing people that are doing wonderful work … all across this country,” Bush told reporters, saying that Biden had missed an opportunity “to bring some of those things that they’ve been working on in their organizations, in their communities, in their businesses, to this place — because we have to do a lot of work.”

NPR congressional correspondent Susan Davis contributed to this story.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/biden-transition-updates/2020/12/12/945627799/what-most-biden-picks-have-in-common-time-in-obama-administration

The US supreme court has unanimously rejected a baseless lawsuit filed by Texas seeking to overturn the presidential election result, dealing the biggest blow yet to Donald Trump’s assault on democracy.

In a brief, one page order, all nine justices on America’s highest court dismissed the longshot effort to throw out the vote counts in four states that the president lost: Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The decision hammers another nail in the coffin of Trump’s increasingly desperate effort to subvert the will of the people and deny Joe Biden the presidency.

The suit filed by Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general, sought to invalidate the results in four swing states, asking the court to extend the deadline for election certification so alleged voting irregularities could be investigated.

It was backed by Donald Trump, 17 other states and 126 Republicans in the House of Representatives – more than half the caucus – including the House minority leader, Kevin McCarthy of California, and the minority whip, Steve Scalise of Louisiana.

Trump had long expressed hope that a disputed election would go before the supreme court, to which he appointed three justices during his term, ensuring a 6-3 conservative majority. Earlier on Friday he tweeted: “If the Supreme Court shows great Wisdom and Courage, the American People will win perhaps the most important case in history, and our Electoral Process will be respected again!”

But hours later, his hopes of a political miracle were all but extinguished. The supreme court wrote: “The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”

Officials in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Wisconsin had derided the suit as a publicity stunt. More than 20 other attorneys general from states including California and Virginia also filed a brief on Thursday urging the court to reject the case.

Josh Shapiro, the attorney general of Pennsylvania, welcomed the court’s ruling. “Our nation’s highest court saw through this seditious abuse of our electoral process,” he tweeted. “This swift denial should make anyone contemplating further attacks on our election think twice.”

The supreme court has dealt a major blow to Donald Trump’s longshot bid to overturn the election results. Photograph: Patrick Semansky/AP

Democrats in Congress also expressed gratitude. Eric Swalwell of California tweeted: “The Supreme Court, a mix of conservative and liberal members, united to defend your vote against @realDonaldTrumpand his democracy deniers in Congress.”

And Senator Ben Sasse, one of relatively few Republicans to acknowledge Biden’s victory, signalled that it was time for the party and government to move on. He said: “Since Election Night, a lot of people have been confusing voters by spinning Kenyan Birther-type, ‘Chavez rigged the election from the grave’ conspiracy theories, but every American who cares about the rule of law should take comfort that the Supreme Court – including all three of President Trump’s picks – closed the book on the nonsense.”

Courts have dismissed numerous of lawsuits and appeals by the Trump campaign and its allies in various states. William Barr, the attorney general and a staunch Trump ally, has said the justice department uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the election.

Saturday will mark the 20th anniversary of the court resolving the 2000 election in Republican George W Bush’s favour but that was a much closer contest that came down to one state: Florida. Biden gained 306 votes in the electoral college – the same as Trump in 2016 – and leads the national popular vote by 7m.

Some Democrats have accused Trump and his Republican backers of sedition. Chris Murphy, a senator for Connecticut, said in a floor speech on Friday: “Those who are pushing to make Donald Trump president for a second term, no matter the outcome of the election, are engaged in a treachery against their nation.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/11/supreme-court-rejects-trump-backed-texas-lawsuit-aiming-to-overturn-election-results

Los Angeles Times columnist Erika Smith is urging Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., to resign so that California Gov. Gavin Newsom can appoint a “Black or Latino” Democrat in her place. 

Feinstein was hit with a damning report from The New Yorker that alleged accusations of her “cognitive decline,” which followed severe backlash she received from the left for the hug she gave her colleague, Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., after the confirmation hearings of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett. 

ORLANDO SENTINEL APOLOGIZES FOR ENDORSING GOP CONGRESSMAN AFTER HE BACKS TEXAS ELECTION LAWSUIT

In a piece published in Feinstein’s homestate paper on Thursday, Smith suggested that Newsom should be filling two vacant Senate seats instead of just the one replacing Vice President-elect Kamala Harris, which means he can appoint both a Black and Latino to the Senate instead of sacrificing one for the other. 

“Representation does matter, and the more I listen to Black and Latino leaders demand it on behalf of a state that is becoming more diverse every year, the less I understand why our senior senator is still in office, blocking progress,” Smith wrote. “At 87 years old, Feinstein is the oldest member of the U.S. Senate, a member of the Silent Generation in a state dominated by people under 40. She is a wealthy woman in a state overrun with poverty, and the homelessness that too often accompanies it.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The columnist explained, “Given all of this, it would make perfect sense for Feinstein to be selfless and retire early with California’s gratitude for a distinguished career. Now is absolutely the time to be an ally to communities of color and let another younger lawmaker represent the evolving values of this state. For to adequately address the many long-standing, race-based disparities in everything from healthcare to housing, California needs a Black senator and a Latino senator.”

While her current term doesn’t end until 2025, Feinstein has already signaled that she will step down as the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Commitee. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/la-times-columnist-urges-dianne-feinstein-to-resign-so-newsom-can-appoint-black-or-latino-senator

Congressional leaders vowed to move ahead on the bill — which affirms automatic 3% pay raises for U.S. troops and authorizes other military programs — despite the veto threat.

A total of 140 Republicans joined 195 Democrats to back the bill in the House.

Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, a member of the House Republican leadership, urged Trump not to follow through on his veto threat, but added that if he does veto it, “We should override.″

If Trump vetoes the bill, “we will come back to vote to override,” said Rep. Adam Smith, D-Washington, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/senate-passes-defense-authorization-bill-with-veto-proof-majority/OS6NBY5TZNFTTOMHON7JFXYEUE/

The 340-character cipher was sent to the San Francisco Chronicle in 1969 as the Zodiac Killer, named so because many of his messages had astrological symbols and references, terrorized northern California. The still-unknown Zodiac Killer murdered five people and injured two others. However, he claimed to have killed more than 30 people.

Source Article from https://www.kgw.com/article/news/crime/the-final-zodiac-killer-cipher-has-been-cracked-after-more-than-50-years/283-9b14d1d8-1053-4906-b585-506e5dfcec67

The media and the American people should have known about the federal investigation into President-elect Joe Biden‘s son Hunter prior to last month’s presidential election, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said on Friday.

“The American people want to know what the heck went on here,” the House Judiciary Committee ranking member told “The Ingraham Angle.” 

“We had Tony Bobulinski, who is an eyewitness to these events. Tony Bobulinski, who has emails, documents that show that the ‘big guy’ is Joe Biden, and no one in the press does anything and no one in the Justice Department tells us that there’s been a two-year investigation going on,” Jordan said. “We called for it back then.”

Jordan spoke hours after the elder Biden expressed support for his son in his first public comment on the matter since the presidential transition team disclosed that the 50-year-old Hunter’s “tax affairs” were under federal investigation.

JOE BIDEN BREAKS SILENCE ON HUNTER FOR FIRST TIME SINCE FEDERAL TAX INVESTIGATION SURFACED

Reporters shouted questions at the president-elect as he left the stage at an event to introduce several Cabinet nominees in Wilmington, Del. Biden ignored a question from Fox News’ Peter Doocy about whether Hunter Biden had committed a crime, but responded when asked if he had spoken to his son since the investigation was made public.

“I’m proud of my son,” Biden said as he exited the stage.

Earlier Friday, the transition team’s weely virtual press briefing passed without a single question regarding the investigation. The Biden-Harris team has not commented on the situation beyond its initial statement.

Hunter Biden disclosed earlier this week that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Delaware had undertaken an active investigation into his tax history. The investigation began in 2018, a source with knowledge of the situation told Fox News.

Jordan stressed that while the president-elect’s son’s financial dealings were an “important issue” ahead of the election, the matter was not probed by the media and was hidden by Democratic lawmakers. Jordan added that the Democratic Party had opted for a “compromised candidate” in Joe Biden.

“The fact that we didn’t know this important issue about a candidate for the highest office in the land before Election Day, before Americans make a decision —and as you rightly point out, before the Democrats made a decision in their primary —  the fact that we didn’t know this is just wrong,” Jordan told host Laura Ingraham.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“You can’t tell me that no one in the media in October knew that the Justice Department was investigating Hunter Biden,” he added. “That Justice Department, [over] the time they were investigating the president over the last four years, there was leak after leak after leak, but no one in the media knew that this was actually happening?

“You know they did, and the fact that they didn’t cover that … that is a huge story that he’s been under investigation … for two years. That to me is another thing that is so wrong about what took place and what the American people didn’t understand, that they would’ve liked to have known before they made the decision, before they went and voted on November 3rd.”

Fox News’ Thomas Barrabi contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jim-jordan-hunter-biden-investigation-voters-media

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued the first emergency use authorization (EUA) for a vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. The emergency use authorization allows the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to be distributed in the U.S.

“The FDA’s authorization for emergency use of the first COVID-19 vaccine is a significant milestone in battling this devastating pandemic that has affected so many families in the United States and around the world,” said FDA Commissioner Stephen M. Hahn, M.D. “Today’s action follows an open and transparent review process that included input from independent scientific and public health experts and a thorough evaluation by the agency’s career scientists to ensure this vaccine met FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality needed to support emergency use authorization. The tireless work to develop a new vaccine to prevent this novel, serious, and life-threatening disease in an expedited timeframe after its emergence is a true testament to scientific innovation and public-private collaboration worldwide.” 

The FDA has determined that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has met the statutory criteria for issuance of an EUA. The totality of the available data provides clear evidence that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may be effective in preventing COVID-19. The data also support that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks, supporting the vaccine’s use in millions of people 16 years of age and older, including healthy individuals. In making this determination, the FDA can assure the public and medical community that it has conducted a thorough evaluation of the available safety, effectiveness and manufacturing quality information.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine contains messenger RNA (mRNA), which is genetic material. The vaccine contains a small piece of the SARS-CoV-2 virus’s mRNA that instructs cells in the body to make the virus’s distinctive “spike” protein. When a person receives this vaccine, their body produces copies of the spike protein, which does not cause disease, but triggers the immune system to learn to react defensively, producing an immune response against SARS-CoV-2.    

“While not an FDA approval, today’s emergency use authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine holds the promise to alter the course of this pandemic in the United States,” said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “With science guiding our decision-making, the available safety and effectiveness data support the authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine because the vaccine’s known and potential benefits clearly outweigh its known and potential risks. The data provided by the sponsor have met the FDA’s expectations as conveyed in our June and October guidance documents. Efforts to speed vaccine development have not sacrificed scientific standards or the integrity of our vaccine evaluation process. The FDA’s review process also included public and independent review from members of the agency’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. Today’s achievement is ultimately a testament to the commitment of our career scientists and physicians, who worked tirelessly to thoroughly evaluate the data and information for this vaccine.”

FDA Evaluation of Available Safety Data

Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is administered as a series of two doses, three weeks apart. The available safety data to support the EUA include 37,586 of the participants enrolled in an ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled international study, the majority of whom are U.S. participants. These participants, 18,801 of whom received the vaccine and 18,785 of whom received saline placebo, were followed for a median of two months after receiving the second dose. The most commonly reported side effects, which typically lasted several days, were pain at the injection site, tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, joint pain, and fever. Of note, more people experienced these side effects after the second dose than after the first dose, so it is important for vaccination providers and recipients to expect that there may be some side effects after either dose, but even more so after the second dose. 

It is mandatory for Pfizer Inc. and vaccination providers to report the following to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: all vaccine administration errors, serious adverse events, cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS), and cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death.

FDA Evaluation of Available Effectiveness Data 

The effectiveness data to support the EUA include an analysis of 36,523 participants in the ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled international study, the majority of whom are U.S. participants, who did not have evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection through seven days after the second dose. Among these participants, 18,198 received the vaccine and 18,325 received placebo. The vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease among these clinical trial participants with eight COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group and 162 in the placebo group. Of these 170 COVID-19 cases, one in the vaccine group and three in the placebo group were classified as severe. At this time, data are not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection, nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person. 

The EUA Process

On the basis of the determination by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services on February 4, 2020, that there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad, and then issued declarations that  circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of unapproved products, the FDA may issue an EUA to allow unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent COVID-19 when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. 

The issuance of an EUA is different than an FDA approval (licensure) of a vaccine. In determining whether to issue an EUA for a product, the FDA evaluates the available evidence and assesses any known or potential risks and any known or potential benefits, and if the benefit-risk assessment is favorable, the product is made available during the emergency. Once a manufacturer submits an EUA request for a COVID-19 vaccine to the FDA, the agency then evaluates the request and determines whether the relevant statutory criteria are met, taking into account the totality of the scientific evidence about the vaccine that is available to the FDA.

The EUA also requires that fact sheets that provide important information, including dosing instructions, and information about the benefits and risks of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, be made available to vaccination providers and vaccine recipients.

The company has submitted a pharmacovigilance plan to FDA to monitor the safety of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. The pharmacovigilance plan includes a plan to complete longer-term safety follow-up for participants enrolled in ongoing clinical trials. The pharmacovigilance plan also includes other activities aimed at monitoring the safety profile of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and ensuring that any safety concerns are identified and evaluated in a timely manner.

The FDA also expects manufacturers whose COVID-19 vaccines are authorized under an EUA to continue their clinical trials to obtain additional safety and effectiveness information and pursue approval (licensure).

The EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was issued to Pfizer Inc. The EUA will be effective until the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of the emergency use of drugs and biologics for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 is terminated, and may be revised or revoked if it is determined the EUA no longer meets the statutory criteria for issuance.

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.

###



Related Information

Source Article from https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19