Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/10/covid-stimulus-updates-house-verge-passing-joe-bidens-bill/6924862002/

After President Joe Biden signed executive orders ending several “zero-tolerance” anti-immigration policies instated by former Republican President Donald Trump, a surge of immigrants have begun arriving along the U.S. southern border. Some wearing t-shirts that read, “Biden Let Us In.”

In response, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has deployed the Texas Guard, a state military force, to crack down on any associated cartels and human smuggling. The brewing confrontation will test Biden just as he and the Democratic-led Congress prepare to introduce comprehensive immigration reform, a key campaign promise.

Video footage shot Monday at the San Ysidro crossing port in Tijuana, Baja California state—just south of the California border—showed a group of migrants, some of them wearing the “Biden Let Us In” t-shirts.

While it’s unclear where the migrants got the shirts, similar shirts are available on several websites. The English-language apparel seemingly strives to send a message directly to Biden, Democrats and the English-speaking Americans—a protest message pressuring Biden to make good on his promise to create a more humane immigration system.

But before Biden can deliver, his administration will have to address the growing unrest between immigrants and leaders of southern states.

“Today I met with Border Patrol Officers,” Abbott wrote in a Tuesday afternoon tweet. “Last year, they apprehended about 90,000 people crossing the border illegally in the RGV (Rio Grand Valley). This year that number already exceed 100,000.”

Today I met with Border Patrol Officers

Last year they apprehended about 90,000 people crossing the border illegally in the RGV.

This year that number already exceed 100,000.

I deployed @TexasGuard & DPS to crack down on cartels & human smuggling.https://t.co/lxpnjsZYAW

— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) March 10, 2021

Abbott blamed the surge on Biden’s rollback of Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy in a Tuesday interview with Fox News. The policy required migrants claiming asylum at the border to stay in Mexico while awaiting court hearings.

“The Border Patrol officers told me themselves, they informed the Biden administration about this all along,” Abbott said. “The Biden administration has known exactly what was going to happen if they refuse to continue to implement the policies that were previously in place.”

An annual surge of immigrants typically arrive at the U.S. southern border each spring as the weather warms. The surge mostly contains young people and families fleeing violence and poor living conditions in Central and South American countries, according to Sarah Sherman-Stokes, an immigration lawyer and professor at the Boston University School of Law.

Migrants awaiting their trials in Mexican border towns live in “inhumane” conditions and are “preyed upon by criminal organizations,” a spokesman for Doctors Without Borders told Border Report on Tuesday. Drug cartel operatives recruit or kidnap migrants, holding them for ransom and murdering them if their families don’t comply.

Immigrants at the southern US border, some wearing t-shirts that read “Biden Let Us In,” seem ready to test Democratic Joe Biden’s immigration policies after Biden rolled back hardline immigration policies put in place by former Republican President Donald Trump..In this photo, immigrants hold a demonstration demanding clearer United States migration policies, at San Ysidro crossing port in Tijuana, Baja California state, Mexico on March 2, 2021. Thousands of migrants out of the Migrant Protection Protocol (MPP) program are stranded along the US-Mexico border without knowing when or how they will be able to start their migratory process with US authorities.
Guillermo Arias / AFP

Biden now faces a tough choice as he’s criticized by the right for allegedly facilitating “open borders” and blasted by the left for allegedly continuing the inhumane treatment of migrants.

On February 12, the Biden administration pledged to begin processing nearly 25,000 of the estimated 70,000 asylum seekers forced to wait in Mexico due to Trump’s 2019 Migration Protection Protocols (MPP) program.

Biden ended enrollments in the MPP program—also known as “Remain in Mexico”—and established new guidelines requiring migrants to register for a court hearing online or via phone. Before their court hearings, asylum seekers must get tested for COVID-19 in Mexico and then appear at a U.S. port of entry on a specific date, Reuters reported.

Soon after the White House announced its changes to the MPP program, however, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said that migrants should not respond by flocking to the U.S. border.

“Individuals who are not eligible under this initial phase should wait for further instructions and not travel to the border,” Mayorkas said in a statement. “Due to the current pandemic, restrictions at the border remain in place and will be enforced.”

Mayorkas’ statement showed the delicate balance the Biden administration must strike. The more humane his administration’s immigration policies are, the more likely they are to attract further migration.

Immigration reform advocates have also been pressuring Biden to end or change another Trump-era program known as Title 42. Instated by Trump on March 2020 as an ostensible COVID-19 prevention measure, the order allows U.S. authorities to rapidly deport any immigrants caught trying to cross the southern border.

Over 400,000 migrants have been expelled under Title 42, Reuters reported, some of them repeat offenders who were counted twice. Critics say that the order denies due process to asylum seekers. Biden hasn’t said whether he will end it.

How Biden handles the surge could set the tone for the eventual legislative debate on comprehensive immigration reform.

Biden’s US Citizenship Act of 2021 represents the most sweeping modern reforms to the nation’s immigration system. It provides an eight-year path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants while making asylum, immigrant worker protections, green cards and visas more accessible.

The legislation also contains proposals addressing foreign social issues that drive migration and additional funding for technology and infrastructure at points of entry. However, the bill doesn’t address border security or interior enforcement measures meant to discourage immigration.

As such, it may have trouble attracting the 10 Republican senators it will need to become law, especially if a humanitarian crisis breaks out along the border before bill negotiations formally begin.

“You need to take care of the current situation before there’s a surge in the coming months in order to keep the politics, especially in the Senate, out of the way in order to pass policy,” Jose Parra, a former senior advisor to former U.S. Senator Harry Reid, told Newsweek.

Newsweek contacted the White House for comment.

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/texas-guard-deployed-migrants-some-biden-t-shirts-flood-border-states-1574978

A man sought in the killings of four people in New Mexico and one in New Jersey was arrested Wednesday morning in St. Louis, the U.S. Marshals Service said.

Investigators were seeking Sean Lannon in connection with a slaying Monday in East Greenwich, New Jersey. The 47-year-old also is a person of interest in the deaths of his ex-wife and three men whose bodies were found last week in a vehicle at a New Mexico airport garage.

Authorities considered Lannon armed and dangerous, and the marshals service had offered a $5,000 reward for information leading to his arrest. They didn’t immediately offer details on what led them to Lannon Wednesday.

The Gloucester County prosecutor’s office had said Lannon may have been driving a 2018 blue Honda CRV and was possibly seen Monday afternoon in Camden, New Jersey.

He was charged with burglary and possession of a weapon after allegedly forcing entry into a home Monday in Elk Township, New Jersey, the prosecutor’s office said. In a statement Wednesday, Acting Gloucester County Prosecutor Christine Hoffman said upgraded charges against Lannon “are forthcoming.”

Meanwhile, Lannon is a person of interest in the deaths of his ex-wife and three men whose bodies were found last week in a vehicle at the Albuquerque International Sunport garage, police said.

Albuquerque police said three of the people were reported missing since January from Grants, about 80 miles (130 kilometers) west of the city.

Authorities have said that the bodies of Jennifer Lannon, 39, Matthew Miller, 21, Jesten Mata, 40, and Randal Apostalon, 60, were found inside a car parked on the top level of the garage on Friday. The condition of the bodies and cause of death were not immediately clear.

“There’s a lot of aspects to this. We’re still finding out information as we’re going forward with this investigation. There are some things we can not release at this time,” Grants police Lt. David Chavez said.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/homicide-new-mexico-woodbury-new-jersey-ef0272ca5e35907e76715e8212c8d388

  • Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene delayed congressional business by forcing a vote to adjourn the House.
  • Wednesday’s move pushed back the scheduled vote on Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 stimulus package.
  • Republicans are frustrated with Greene’s machinations and 41 GOP lawmakers voted against her motion.
  • Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on Wednesday once again used procedural tactics to hold up congressional business — this time to delay the House vote on President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus stimulus package.

The Georgia Republican called for a motion to adjourn the House just as the chamber prepared to begin debate on the COVID-19 bill. The move forced every Congress member to cast a vote to keep the House in session, a lengthy process that pushed back the scheduled vote on the stimulus legislation.

“I just made a motion to adjourn to stop Congress from passing the $1.9 trillion dollar massive woke progressive Democrat wish list,” Greene tweeted. “The GOP has messaged against this ridiculous bill. We should do everything to stop it. Pay attention if Rs vote to adjourn. Or with the Dems.”

Democrats and many Republicans, however, are fed up with Greene’s disruptions. Her motion was unsuccessful and struck down in a 149-235 vote, with 41 GOP members voting against it.

“Unfortunately some Republicans are voting with Democrats to continue business as usual,” Greene tweeted after the vote.

The freshman firebrand has halted the day’s work on several occasions since she was stripped from her committee assignments last month. House Democrats removed Greene from the Education and Labor and Budget committees to rebuke her past social media activity peddling in controversial and racist comments as well as her support for conspiracy theories and political violence. 

Greene has sought to strike back at Democrats and exercise her limited power in any way she can, such as forcing votes to adjourn the House. But Republicans are growing increasingly frustrated with her ongoing scheme. 

“It’s a pain in the a–,” Republican Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan told CNN

Democrats, who are in the majority, are considering ways to prevent Greene from continuing her interference. Rep. David Cicilline of Rhode Island told reporters on Wednesday that he may propose a rule to bar lawmakers not on committees from calling motions to adjourn.

“I’m dead serious,” Cicilline said, per CBS News.

“It’s unconscionable that they are doing everything they can to try to, again, delay getting aid to the people, including their constituents who are in desperate need,” Democratic Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts told Reuters‘ Susan Cornwell on Wednesday.

The House is likely to pass the massive economic relief package on Wednesday, sending the bill over to Biden’s desk for his signature. So far it’s unclear whether any Republicans, who claim to have been shut out of the negotiating process, will support the legislation, which includes $1,400 direct payments to Americans, extended unemployment benefits, vaccine funding, and other measures.  

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-forces-congress-delay-vote-covid-19-bill-2021-3

On Monday, heavy rainfall over the Kaupakalua Reservoir in Maui sparked fears of overtopping of the dam, prompting downstream evacuations and the closure of the Hana Highway. West Wailuaiki on northeast Maui picked up 19.21 inches of rain through late Tuesday, while Puu Kukui, a 5,788-foot-high volcano on western Maui, recorded 11.32 inches.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2021/03/10/hawaii-flash-flooding-emergency/

The Biden administration on Tuesday stopped enforcing the 2019 “public charge” restrictions on green cards, unraveling the centerpiece of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to restrict legal immigration. 

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said his department had halted the implementation of the 2019 “public charge” regulation following the reinstatement of a federal court order blocking the Trump-era policy. Earlier on Tuesday, the Justice Department notified courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, that it would no longer defend the Trump administration’s public charge regulation. 

Advocates had strongly denounced the policy, which granted U.S. officials broader discretion to reject green card applications from immigrants the government found were relying — or at risk of relying — on public benefits, like food stamps.

“The 2019 public charge rule was not in keeping with our nation’s values,” Mayorkas said in a statement. “It penalized those who access health benefits and other government services available to them.”

Last month, President Biden instructed the Department of Homeland Security to review the public charge rule and other Trump-era limits on legal immigration. On Tuesday, DHS said it had determined as part of the review that defending the rule against the flurry of lawsuits it garnered from states, local jurisdictions and advocacy groups was “neither in the public interest nor an efficient use of limited government resources.”

Soon after the Justice Department’s actions, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal of one of the district court rulings against the green card restrictions, restoring the suspension of the policy. 

DHS said Tuesday it would revert to Clinton-era rules that instructed officials to only deem immigrants public charges if they were receiving government cash benefits or long-term institutionalized care.

“Under the 1999 interim field guidance, DHS will not consider a person’s receipt of Medicaid (except for Medicaid for long-term institutionalization), public housing, or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits as part of the public charge inadmissibility determination,” the department said in a statement.

DHS also noted, as the Trump administration did last spring, that vaccination and other medical treatment for the coronavirus would not be considered in public charge determinations.

The “public charge” term was first included in U.S. law in the early 1880s, when the federal government started regulating immigration, including by banning most Chinese immigrants under the premise that they “endangered the good order” of American communities.

The Trump administration expanded the definition of the term, which effectively means being deemed an economic burden on the country, by broadening the types and amount of government aid that would count against immigrants seeking to become lawful permanent residents. It argued the changes supported “self-sufficiency” among immigrants in the U.S.

Advocates, however, asserted the Trump-era requirements amounted to a wealth test that deterred low-income immigrants, including children who are U.S. citizens who are not subject to the rules, from accessing critical programs, like food stamps. According to a report published last month by the Urban Institute, over 13% of adults in immigrant households reported foregoing government aid in 2020 because of fear it would jeopardize their immigration cases.  

“Quite simply, today, fewer children will go hungry and more families will get the medical care they desperately need,” New York Attorney General Letitia James, who had challenged the Trump-era public charge rule, said in a statement.

Mayorkas said DHS would continue to review the Trump administration’s regulation. 

Olivia Golden, executive director of the Center for Law and Social Policy, praised Tuesday’s actions. But she urged the Biden administration to formally rescind the 2019 rule and increase public awareness about the policy reversal “to ensure that immigrant families know they can safely get the care and help they need.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/immigration-public-charge-rule-enforcement-stopped-by-biden-administration/

One Democratic lawmaker is expected to vote with Republicans when the House of Representatives holds its final vote on President Joe Biden‘s $1.9 trillion stimulus bill on Wednesday morning.

The House on Tuesday evening voted largely along party lines—219-210—to pass a procedural motion to book two hours of debate starting at 9 a.m. on Wednesday for the bill, before the final vote. A lone Democrat, Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, stood with Republicans in opposing the decision to advance the legislation.

Golden and Kurt Schrader of Oregon were the only two House Democrats to vote against the initial legislation when it first passed the House last month.

The Senate passed the American Rescue Plan on Saturday after Democrats in the chamber agreed to drop the $15 minimum wage hike, lower the income threshold for the $1,400 direct payments and reduce weekly unemployment benefits from $400 to $300. After the House passes the amended bill tomorrow, Biden said he would immediately sign it into law so Americans can start receiving their checks this month.

The U.S. Capitol building exterior is seen at sunset on March 8, 2021 in Washington, DC.
Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images

Schrader has decided that he will change course and vote for the bill on Wednesday after his initial vote. In an announcement, Schrader explained that he now believes that the help it would bring to the people of Oregon would far outweigh his concerns about the size and scope of the package.

Golden, who has criticized the bill for including “unnecessary and untimely spending,” is expected to be the only defector.

Newsweek reached out to Golden’s representatives for comment.

House Majority Whip James Clyburn of South Carolina on Tuesday told MSNBC that he expected the bill to be sent to Biden’s desk by the end of the week and the first batch of $1,400 checks could be delivered to Americans next week.

“We want to get this bill to the president for his signature before the end of the week,” said Clyburn. “I’m very hopeful that by the beginning of next week, some relief can be realized. As you know, there’s a process that we have to go through. The president can’t just toss the money out once he signs the bill.”

Under the bill, individuals earning under $75,000 and heads of households with incomes of up to $112,000 will receive the full $1,400. Couples earning less than $150,000 will receive $2,800 and people will get a further $1,400 for any eligible dependents. Individuals earning less than $80,000 will get a lesser payment and those earning over the threshold will be completely phased out.

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/1400-stimulus-checks-expected-pass-congress-wednesday-morning-one-democrat-opposing-1574960

WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) — The $1.9 trillion federal pandemic relief package is just days, if not hours, away from hitting President Joe Biden’s desk, meaning your next relief check is all but on the way.

At this point, the House is expected to give final approval this week. That’s the last step before getting Biden’s signature and making the deal official.

So when could you start to see the money? It’s possible some people connected to the IRS through direct deposit could see payments as soon as next week.

With two rounds of checks already going out since the beginning of the pandemic, the Treasury Department already has the process and workflow in place. Based on the last round of $600 payments, it’s likely funds could go out in a matter of days. However, this will be the first time money has been distributed under the Biden administration.

The new president has been willing to commit to the idea of payments starting this month.

“That means the mortgage can get paid. That means the child can stay in community college. That means maintaining the health insurance you have,” Biden said. “It’s going to make a big difference in so many lives in this country.”

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday that the administration is doing everything in its power to expedite payments. As such, the Treasury is working to get more payments to taxpayers by direct deposit. The agency will be able to send direct deposit payments to those who have their information on file from 2019 or 2020 tax filings or who provided it through other programs.

The $1.9 trillion legislation package provides a direct payment of $1,400 for a single taxpayer, or $2,800 for a married couple that files jointly, plus $1,400 per dependent. Individuals earning up to $75,000 would get the full amount, as would married couples with incomes up to $150,000.

The size of the check would shrink for those making slightly more, with a hard cut-off at $80,000 for individuals and $160,000 for married couples.

Biden estimates that 85% of Americans will be eligible for the payment. Some groups that were not eligible for prior payments — such as dependent college students and disabled adults — are now eligible.

Biden’s signature will not appear on the checks, a move his predecessor made that was criticized as a delay in getting payments out.

new poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows that 30% of Americans say their current household income remains lower than it was when the pandemic began.

The IRS and the Treasury Department began to issue the last round of payments by both direct deposit and check in only a matter of days after the outlays became law in late December.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://kdvr.com/news/money/third-stimulus-checks-how-soon-will-you-get-1400/

“The declaration supports the state’s efforts to provide quick and efficient relief of suffering, damage, and losses caused by flooding and other effects of the heavy rains,” the governor said.

Source Article from https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2021/03/10/governor-issues-emergency-declaration-help-counties-respond-severe-flooding/

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson on Tuesday signed into law a bill banning nearly all abortions in the state, a sweeping measure that supporters hope will force the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

Andrew Demillo/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Demillo/AP

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson on Tuesday signed into law a bill banning nearly all abortions in the state, a sweeping measure that supporters hope will force the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

Andrew Demillo/AP

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson on Tuesday signed into law one of the country’s most restrictive abortion bans, a measure supporters hope will force the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its 1973 decision sanctioning the procedure.

Under Senate Bill 6, abortion would only be allowed in cases where it’s necessary to save the life or preserve the health of the fetus or mother. The law does not allow any exceptions in situations of rape or incest — a line that anti-abortion rights activists and lawmakers have supported in the past.

Performing or attempting to perform an abortion is considered an unclassified felony under the measure. Anyone convicted under the law could face a fine up to $100,000 or face a prison sentence.

The measure’s supporters expect the law to be challenged by abortion rights activists. It’s future is uncertain, as similar attempts to restrict access to abortion services in Ohio, Georgia, and Alabama in the last two years have failed after federal courts struck down local laws.

But that’s no matter, according to Hutchinson. He said Tuesday the goal of the legislation is to bring the fight over abortion to the Supreme Court.

“SB6 is in contradiction of binding precedents of the U.S. Supreme Court, but it is the intent of the legislation to set the stage for the Supreme Court overturning current case law,” Hutchinson said in a statement. “I would have preferred the legislation to include the exceptions for rape and incest, which has been my consistent view, and such exceptions would increase the chances for a review by the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Republican lawmakers across the country have been emboldened by last year’s confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. Lawmakers in Texas and Tennessee have also pushed new abortion restrictions believing a conservative majority at the nation’s highest court will strike down the landmark abortion decision, Roe v. Wade.

But abortion rights activists are keen for a court fight as well.

Holly Dickson, the executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas said, “Abortion is legal in all 50 states, including Arkansas, and we’ll fight as long as it takes to keep it that way. Governor Hutchinson: we’ll see you in court.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/03/10/975546070/arkansas-passes-near-total-abortion-ban-as-lawmakers-push-for-supreme-court-case

(AP) – As the latest federal pandemic relief package makes its way to President Joe Biden’s desk, Americans may be wondering when the benefits will reach them.

The $1.9 trillion known as the “American Rescue Plan” is massive, both in size and scope. It includes direct payments to most Americans, aid to small businesses, financial help for schools and much more to help the country recover from the financial ravages of the pandemic.

The house is expected to give its final approval early this week and then it heads to Biden for his signature. The timing of its passage is crucial — most notably because some pandemic unemployment benefits will be coming to an end on Sunday.

Millions of taxpayers could begin see direct benefits almost immediately, some later this month and others taking several months to accomplish.

Some things to know about the plan’s key components:

___

RELIEF CHECKS

The legislation provides a direct payment of $1,400 for a single taxpayer, or $2,800 for a married couple that files jointly, plus $1,400 per dependent. Individuals earning up to $75,000 would get the full amount, as would married couples with incomes up to $150,000.

The size of the check would shrink for those making slightly more, with a hard cut-off at $80,000 for individuals and $160,000 for married couples.

Biden estimates that 85% of Americans will be eligible for the payment. Some groups that were not eligible for prior payments — such as dependent college students and disabled adults — are now eligible.

Biden said the goal is to send out the payments starting this month.

“That means the mortgage can get paid. That means the child can stay in community college. That means maintaining the health insurance you have,” Biden said. “It’s going to make a big difference in so many of lives in this country.”

A new poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows that 30% of Americans say their current household income remains lower than it was when the pandemic began.

The IRS and the Treasury Department began to issue the last round of payments by both direct deposit and check in only a matter of days after the outlays became law in late December.

___

UNEMPLOYMENT

Expanded unemployment benefits from the federal government would be extended through Sept. 6 at $300 a week. That’s on top of payments from state unemployment insurance program.

Despite a modest recovery, millions of Americans remain unemployed. The plan would also extend two key pandemic programs, which benefit about 11.8 million Americans.

These pandemic unemployment benefits were set to expire Sunday, so if there is a delay in the bill’s passage there could be a gap in benefits. But the National Employment Law Project anticipates if things are finalized this week, states and existing beneficiaries likely won’t see any interruption in payments.

The first $10,200 of jobless benefits would be non-taxable for households with incomes under $150,000 but only for benefits from 2020. The IRS will have to issue guidelines on how to put this into practice.

Additionally, the measures provides a 100% subsidy of COBRA health insurance premiums to ensure that the laid-off workers can remain on their employer health plans at no cost from April 1 through the end of September.

___

TAX BREAKS

The package contains a number of valuable tax breaks. One of the most notable is an increase in the tax credit that taxpayers can claim for dependent children.

Under current law, most taxpayers can reduce their federal income tax bill by up to $2,000 per child. The bill would increase the tax break to $3,000 for every child age 6 to 17 and $3,600 for every child under the age of 6.

Families would get the full credit regardless of how little they make in a year.

The aim is to deliver the money, which is an advance payment on the tax credit, in smaller monthly payments instead of one larger lump sum.

The exact timing of when this money would arrive is still unclear. If the Treasury determines that a monthly payment isn’t feasible, then the payments are to be made as frequently as possible.

Elaine Maag, principal research associate in the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said monthly payments could begin as soon as July but if the government opts for a quarterly payments it take until could fall.

Add in the $1,400 checks and other items in the proposal, and the legislation would reduce the number of children living in poverty by more than half, according to the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University.

The bill also significantly expands the Earned Income Tax Credit for 2021 by making it available to people without children. The credit for low and moderate-income adults would be worth $543 to $1,502, depending on income and filing status.

The benefit of the EITC would not be felt until taxpayers file their returns for the 2021 tax year, which would typically be in the beginning of 2022.

The plan does not include student loan forgiveness, but it does allow for any income from the forgiveness of student loans be to be tax-free from 2021 through 2025.

___

AP congressional reporter Kevin Freking in Washington contributed to this report.

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Source Article from https://www.wcax.com/2021/03/09/when-to-expect-payments-other-benefits-from-relief-package/

Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott blamed the Biden administration for what he called a “self-inflicted” influx of migrants at the southern border by reversing the immigration policies implemented under former President Donald Trump.

During a visit to the border on Tuesday, Abbott told “America Reports” co-hosts Sandra Smith and John Roberts that the president knew “exactly what was going to happen,” and accused the White House of refusing to acknowledge responsibility for the crisis.

“It is a self-inflicted wound because going back to what the Border Patrol officers told me themselves, they informed the Biden administration about this all along, and the Biden administration has known exactly what was going to happen if they refuse to continue to implement the policies that were previously in place,” Abbott said.

The governor blamed the overwhelming surge at the border on Biden’s rollback of Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy, which returns migrants claiming asylum at the border to Mexico to await their hearings.

BORDER NUMBERS EXPECTED TO SHOW WAVE AS MIGRANT CHILDREN IN CUSTODY TRIPLES, BIDEN DHS ASKS FOR HELP 

“These two policy changes is what has led to the influx that we’ve seen,” Abbott argued. “One is the elimination of the ‘Remain in Mexico’ protocol, and that is what suddenly allowed so many people to come back in. The other is the policy of, if people do come across the border, they will be returned to whatever country they came from.”

Abbott quoted troubling numbers from Border Patrol officials, who claim to have already apprehended more migrants this year than in all of 2020.

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION LETS CHILD MIGRANT CENTERS EXPAND TO 100% CAPACITY AMID SURGE IN NUMBERS

According to their estimate, 90,000 people were apprehended last year in the Rio Grande sector alone, Abbott said. In the first three months of 2021, nearly 108,000 people have been apprehended in the sector.

Abbott’s warning comes as White House press secretary Jen Psaki maintained Tuesday that a “majority” of people who arrive at the border are turned away, repeating past statements meant to assure that a more lax border policy was not allowing free entry to migrants.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Psaki was again reluctant to label the situation at the border as a “crisis,” but Abbott warned that unless Biden implements aggressive changes and acknowledges the critical nature of the situation, the country is facing a “total disaster” in the coming months.

“Remember, this is a low-number month of the year. The people coming across the border will increase dramatically,” he said. “We’re probably on scale to have maybe up to a million people cross our border, the Texas border, this year. So this is going to be a turn into a total disaster if the Biden administration does not step up and begin implementing stronger measures.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/greg-abbott-biden-border-surge-self-inflicted

The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, has hailed the massive $1.9tn Covid relief bill as “historic” and “transformative” as the House stood poised to give the legislation final approval with a vote on Wednesday morning.

Joe Biden, who will mark a year since the pandemic brought shutdowns across the nation with a primetime speech on Thursday, has said he will sign the bill as soon as it lands on his desk.

The House vote on the bill, which includes checks for most American households, comes after the Senate passed a modestly reworked version of the package on Saturday and will clinch Biden’s most significant early legislative achievement.

“It’s a remarkable, historic, transformative piece of legislation, which goes a very long way to crushing the virus and solving our economic crisis,” Pelosi said during a press conference with senior Democrats on Tuesday afternoon, who took turns extolling what they said was the historic nature of the legislation and its impact on reducing poverty in America. “I’m so excited, I just can’t hide it,” she added.

Several Democratic leaders compared it to the passage of the Affordable Care Act, saying the plan would not only “crush” the virus and the economic fallout but would look forward to tackle longstanding racial and gender inequalities in the economy.

Smiling under her mask, Pelosi expressed full confidence that Democrats had the votes to pass the bill.

Asked about possible defections from progressive members disappointed that the Senate had narrowed a version of the bill, initially proposed by Biden and passed by the House, Pelosi shook her head and said “no” repeatedly. The bill would head to Biden’s desk after the vote on Wednesday, she said.

Besides the fresh round of stimulus checks, the bill also extends emergency jobless benefits to early September, instead of 14 March. It spends huge amounts on Covid-19 vaccines, testing and treatments, while also aiding state and local governments and schools, assisting small businesses and providing major expansions of tax breaks and programs for lower- and middle-income families.

Progressives suffered setbacks, especially the Senate’s removal of a gradual minimum wage increase to $15 hourly by 2025. But the measure carries so many Democratic priorities that final passage was not in doubt, despite the party’s narrow 10-vote House majority.

Meanwhile a hefty majority of Americans – 70% – say they are in favor of the coronavirus relief package. Only a third of Americans said the legislation is too costly, according to a poll from Pew research.

Biden has said he will not be attaching his signature to the $1,400 relief checks that are expected to be mailed soon, a break with his predecessor who last year had “President Donald J Trump” printed on the economic impact payments approved by Congress.

The next round of paper checks will bear the signature of a career official at the treasury department’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service, the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, said at a Tuesday briefing.

Psaki said the goal was to get the payments out quickly instead of branding them as coming from Biden.

“This is not about him, this is about the American people getting relief,” Psaki said.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/09/biden-coronavirus-relief-bill-pelosi-congress

Seen here during a 2020 news conference, Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., is the lead House sponsor of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which passed the House on Tuesday.

Samuel Corum/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Seen here during a 2020 news conference, Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., is the lead House sponsor of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which passed the House on Tuesday.

Samuel Corum/Getty Images

House Democrats have approved a bill that would provide protections for workers trying to organize, a measure that is the labor movement’s single biggest legislative priority in this Congress.

The bill passed Tuesday with a 225-206 vote, with five Republicans joining Democrats in favor of it. The bill is unlikely to advance in the Senate, given a lack of Republican support for the legislation.

Union leaders say the Protecting the Right to Organize Act — PRO Act — would finally begin to level a playing field they say is unfairly tilted toward big business and management, making union organizing drives and elections unreasonably difficult.

“The PRO Act would protect and empower workers to exercise our freedom to organize a bargain,” Richard Trumka, the president of the AFL-CIO, told NPR in a recent interview. “It’s a game changer. If you really want to correct inequality in this country — wages and wealth inequality, opportunity and inequality of power — passing the PRO Act is absolutely essential to doing that.”

The bill passed the Democratic-controlled House when it was introduced last year, but it was never taken up by the then-GOP majority Senate. This time, Democrats narrowly control the Senate, but not by enough votes to overcome a filibuster, which means the measure is likely dead once again.

President Biden — a close ally of labor who earlier this month came out forcefully in support of Amazon workers’ union drive in Alabama — backs the legislation.

“Nearly 60 million Americans would join a union if they get a chance, but too many employers and states prevent them from doing so through anti-union attacks,” Biden said in a statement on Tuesday. “They know that without unions, they can run the table on workers — union and non-union alike.”

Big business groups are lined up against the measure.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce says the act would “undermine worker rights, ensnare employers in unrelated labor disputes, disrupt the economy, and force individual Americans to pay union dues regardless of their wishes.”

The National Retail Federation has called it “the worst bill in Congress.”

Here are five provisions in the PRO Act:

1. So-called right-to-work laws in more than two dozen states allow workers in union-represented workplaces to opt out of the union, and not pay union dues. At the same time, such workers are still covered under the wage and benefits provisions of the union contract. The PRO Act would allow unions to override such laws and collect dues from those who opt out, in order to cover the cost of collective bargaining and administration of the contract.

2. Employee interference and influence in union elections would be forbidden. Company-sponsored meetings — with mandatory attendance — are often used to lobby against a union organizing drive. Such meetings would be illegal. Additionally, employees would be able to cast a ballot in union organizing elections at a location away from company property.

3. Often, even successful union organizing drives fail to result in an agreement on a first contract between labor and management. The PRO Act would remedy that by allowing newly certified unions to seek arbitration and mediation to settle such impasses in negotiations.

4. The law would prevent an employer from using its employee’s immigration status against them when determining the terms of their employment.

5. It would establish monetary penalties for companies and executives that violate workers’ rights. Corporate directors and other officers of the company could also be held liable.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/03/09/975259434/house-democrats-pass-bill-that-would-protect-worker-organizing-efforts

It could be a Morning in America moment that further turbocharges an economy already primed to pop, reduces economic inequality and lofts Biden to the kind of economic hero status enjoyed by the likes of Franklin Delano Roosevelt after the Depression and Ronald Reagan in the boom-time 1980s.

Or it could be a fiery accelerant for global markets as gas prices surge, home prices jump, speculative assets soar and investors increasingly fear the kind of sharp inflation spike that can hit with remarkable speed if the government pours too much gasoline on an already warming economy.

It will be a moment of glory for Biden when he signs the new relief act in the coming days, the centerpiece of his early agenda. But a sunny ending is not fully guaranteed, with the nation taking an almost entirely new path on managing the economy.

“If it works out well, Biden will be viewed as a hero and he’ll deserve it,” said Len Burman, a Syracuse University economist and co-founder of the Tax Policy Center. “This is the first time that we’ve ever really provided enough stimulus and the risk is that it will be too much. And inflation is a real risk. But if it works out badly, at least we’ll know the result of a grand experiment like this.”

The imminent enactment of Biden’s American Rescue Plan comes as the economy is already showing signs of reviving with Covid vaccinations accelerating and states lifting more restrictions.

The economy created a surprisingly high 379,000 jobs in February, with expectations for much higher numbers ahead as bars and restaurants reopen and Americans begin to travel again in far higher numbers.

Chief executive confidence recently hit a 17-year high as companies prepare for a return to something close to a normal economy later this year. Small business confidence is also rising though at a more cautious pace. Consumers in the world’s largest economies are also sitting on nearly $3 trillion in extra cash piled up during the virus lockdowns, meaning demand for everything from travel to cars to new merchandise is likely to rise even further.

Signs of inflation are already popping up around the country with gas prices soaring and likely to go higher. New and used car prices are also spiking as are home prices in many markets, creating worry among policy makers about people getting priced out.

And then there are the long-lofty equity markets and largely speculative assets like Bitcoin that continue to rocket amid record low interest rates and giant infusions of cash into the system from the Federal Reserve and Congress.

The Nasdaq raced ahead over 400 points on Tuesday, or nearly 4 percent, in the latest fit of market euphoria. GameStop, the “meme stock” propelled by chatroom traders, rose nearly 27 percent and electric car maker Tesla soared nearly 20 percent.

Millions of Americans soon will be getting thousands of dollars in stimulus payments along with expanded unemployment benefits, an enormous expansion of child tax credits, far more generous health care subsidies and targeted relief for smaller businesses, particularly those owned by people of color and women.

Progressives cheer all of these things as major advances that will both boost the economy in the near term and possibly make a dent in economic inequality that only grew worse during Covid.

And many economists also note that the need among huge swaths of Americans for more relief is still very much alive. The nation remains around 11 million short of the number of jobs that would have existed absent the Covid lockdowns. The jobless rate remains elevated at 6.2 percent and would be closer to 10 percent if the millions who left the workforce during Covid — a figure dominated by women — were included.

While Republicans almost uniformly complain the Covid package is far too large and wasteful, economists mostly take a more measured tone.

There is certainly a chance it is too large, they say, and could lead to sharp price spikes and quicker Fed interest-rate hikes. Tech stocks, meme shares and crypto assets all could take hits. But that might not necessarily be a bad thing if bubbles deflate slowly and not all at once.

“There really is no choice but to provide this kind of support, and we’ve been living with sub-optimal inflation for almost two decades,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. “Bring on the inflation. Let’s see it before we worry about it. And interest rates are too low, anyway. Investors are not at all prepared for higher rates and inflation.”

“Markets are frothy,” Zandi added. “And it would not be bad to take some starch out of them sooner rather than later before these bubbles can inflate much further.”

That is the most sanguine view of the new shower of cash about to cascade down on America: A gentle readjustment in markets, slightly higher interest rates in the economy and much lower unemployment alongside a sharp reduction in economic inequality. It’s the Biden dream scenario.

The more worrisome outlook is that a massive glut of consumer savings — padded with yet more stimulus checks and a concluding pandemic — will create a massive demand spike with nowhere near enough supply to meet it. That would mean sharp price increases that could force the Fed into multiple rate hikes sooner than anticipated.

Such a campaign of hikes would make borrowing costs far more expensive for consumers at the same time as their purchasing power declines. It would also make the cost of servicing the ballooning national debt much higher and possibly stomp on Biden’s hopes for a multitrillion-dollar stimulus package, one that already faces some tough opposition from Republicans.

“Our debt is clearly on a totally unsustainable path and we simply don’t know that rates are going to stay this low forever,” said Burman. “If markets got the idea that the U.S. was no longer that safe of a haven, rates could go up very quickly. That is not a ‘right now’ problem. And it makes sense to invest in smart things right now. But it can become a problem.”

Even before new stimulus, economists expected very robust growth in 2021 as the nation — hopefully — escapes the Covid tractor beam. Adding the new stimulus has estimates for gross domestic product growth for the year around 7 percent or even higher, figures not seen since the 1980s.

That growth could lift people out of poverty, drive up wages in a non-inflationary way and vault Biden to economic hero status. Or it could spark the kind of inflation that vaporizes consumers’ buying power and invites crushing rates hikes from the Fed.

“There are clearly policy makers — in particular those on the left — who have forgotten how damaging inflation can be,” Steven Ricchiuto, U.S. chief Economist for Mizuho Securities, said in a note to clients. He added that he was not all that worried about it — at least for now.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/09/biden-economy-coronavirus-stimulus-474860

Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California Democrat facing a recall effort, tried to strike a positive tone during his Tuesday State of the State address, and– without mentioning the push– seemed to make his case for his job.

As of Monday, Recall Gavin Newsom has collected 1.95 million unverified signatures. A total of 1.5 million verified signatures are needed for the recall to move forward. The Associated Press called Newsom’s speech “perhaps the most important” of his political life, but a special election seems to be increasingly likely.

BERNIE SANDERS CLAIMS GAVIN NEWSOM FACES RECALL FOR ‘TELLING PEOPLE TO WEAR MASKS’

Newsom called some of his critics “naysayers and doomsayers,” and tried to write off some of the claims as “partisan political power grabs.”

Newsom’s popularity dropped since the beginning of the pandemic. He faced criticism from state Republicans who bristled at what they saw as the implementation of business-killing lockdowns. Newsom’s decision to attend a party at the French Laundry last November had serious political ramifications.

Kevin Faulconer, the former San Diego mayor and Republican gubernatorial candidate, issued a video prior to Newsom’s speech and said it is clear that “this crisis exceeds the current governor’s ability to deal with it.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“California needs a comeback,” the statement said. “But the only comeback Gavin Newsom is focused on is his own.”

He said that, as a former mayor, he understands that “crises are inevitable” and it’s “how you deal with them that matters.” But he said even with almost unlimited emergency powers, Newsom failed to deliver.

Newsom held the State of the State at Dodger Stadium to symbolize the state’s COVID-19 death toll—54,395—which is about the seating capacity at the famed ballpark, according to Fox 11.

The report said that Newsom said the state’s death rate is among the lowest per capita in the country. He reportedly claimed that the state averages 134 deaths per 100,000 residents. He said the national average is about 158 deaths per 100,000.

“I remain determined,” he said. “And I just want you to know, we’re not going to change course just because of a few naysayers and doomsayers. So the California critics out there who are promoting partisan political power grabs with outdated prejudices and rejecting everything that makes California truly great, we say this, we will not be distracted from getting shots in arms and our economy booming again. This is a fight for California’s future.” 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/newsom-seems-to-defend-himself-against-recall-effort-during-state-of-the-state-address

**Stimulus payments for mothers? The video above discusses.**

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden will not be attaching his signature to the $1,400 relief checks that are expected to be mailed soon — a break with his predecessor who last year had “President Donald J. Trump” printed on the economic impact payments approved by Congress.

The next round of paper checks will bear the signature of a career official at the Treasury Department’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said at a Tuesday briefing.

House Democratic leaders said Tuesday that they have the votes to give final congressional approval to Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill. Passage has not been in serious question, but the leaders’ confidence underscored the unity Democrats have shown during the effort.

The vote on that bill, which includes the checks for most American households, is set for Wednesday. House approval, four days after the Senate passed a modestly reworked version of the package, will clinch Biden’s most significant early legislative achievement.

Psaki said the goal was to get the payments out quickly instead of branding them as coming from Biden.

“This is not about him, this is about the American people getting relief,” Psaki said.

Trump insisted last April after more than $2 trillion in coronavirus aid was approved that his name be on the $1,200 relief checks — a first for any president. The real estate tycoon and media personality famously plastered his name on skyscrapers, steaks, menswear, a board game, bottled water, vodka and a real estate training program that he labeled as “Trump University.”

At the time the checks were released, the former president said, “I’m sure people will be very happy to get a big, fat, beautiful check and my name is on it.”

Besides those checks, the overall bill also extends emergency jobless benefits to early September, instead of expiring on March 14. It spends huge amounts on COVID-19 vaccines, testing and treatments, while also aiding state and local governments and schools, assisting small businesses and providing major expansions of tax breaks and programs for lower- and middle-income families.

Progressives suffered setbacks, especially the Senate’s removal of a gradual minimum wage increase to $15 hourly by 2025. But the measure carries so many Democratic priorities that final passage was not in doubt, despite the party’s narrow 10-vote House majority.

“There’s not going to be a problem” with the vote, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters Tuesday.

Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., his party’s No. 3 House leader and chief vote counter, was even more precise. He noted that Oregon Rep. Kurt Schrader, one of just two Democrats who opposed an initial version of the bill that the House approved last month, has said he’ll support it now because it provides “lifeline” aid for so many people.

“We lost two the first time,” Clyburn said. “I think we have at least cut it in half.”

The only other Democrat who opposed the measure last month was Maine Rep. Jared Golden.

Source Article from https://fox8.com/news/white-house-biden-wont-put-his-name-on-third-stimulus-checks-unlike-trump/