CNN was hammered Thursday for accusing Texas Gov. Greg Abbott of claiming “without evidence” that migrants could expose Texans to coronavirus, after officials said this week more than 100 illegal immigrants had tested positive and been allowed to freely travel.

“The Biden administration has been releasing immigrants in south Texas that have been exposing Texans to Covid,” Abbott, a Republican, told CNBC.

“After relaxing state Covid restrictions this week, Abbott alleged, without evidence, that migrants coming into Texas are exposing the state’s residents to the coronavirus,” CNN reported.

108 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS RELEASED BY BORDER PATROL IN TEXAS TEST POSITIVE FOR CORONAVIRUS, OFFICIALS SAY

Yet multiple outlets, including CNN in the same article it accused Abbott of making a baseless claim, reported more than 100 illegal immigrants released following their arrival at the border tested positive for coronavirus.

Felipe Romero, an official in Brownsville, Texas, told Fox News that the 108 positives represent 6.3% of the number of total migrants who have been rapid-tested at the city’s main bus station, where they are being released by the Border Patrol.

He added that Brownsville did not have the authority to prevent those who tested positive from traveling elsewhere.

ARIZONA SHERIFF SAYS BIDEN HALTING BORDER WALL CONSTRUCTION LEFT AREA WIDE OPEN FOR CARTELS

Critics of CNN’s framing blasted the outlet on Twitter, with one conservative user calling it “one of the more dishonest articles I’ve seen in some time.”

CNN headlined its partisan story, “Texas Gov. Abbott stalled federal offer to test migrants then blamed them for spreading Covid.” The lack of concern over migrants potentially spreading coronavirus seemed incongruent with CNN’s scolding of Abbott this week for fully opening up the state and reversing its mask mandate.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

President Biden referred to Texas and Mississippi revoking their mask mandates as “Neanderthal thinking.”

Fox News’ Greg Norman and Griff Jenkins contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-dishonest-texas-governor-fabricated-migrants-coronavirus

Mr. Chauvin’s lawyer, Eric J. Nelson, could appeal the ruling to the Minnesota Supreme Court.

Third-degree murder was the first charge Mr. Chauvin faced after he was arrested in the days following Mr. Floyd’s death on May 25. At the time, the charge prompted an outcry from both activists and lawyers, who said Mr. Chauvin should face a more severe charge and that a third-degree murder charge did not fit the circumstances of Mr. Floyd’s death.

Third-degree murder in Minnesota, they noted, has long been understood as an act — “evinced with a depraved mind,” according to the statute — that is dangerous to a group of people, rather than one person. An often cited example is a suspect who fires a gun randomly into a passing train, or someone who drives a car in to a crowd. In addition, drug dealers have often been prosecuted with third-degree murder in Minnesota when one of their customers dies of an overdose.

Going by that interpretation of third-degree murder, Judge Peter A. Cahill, who is presiding over Mr. Chauvin’s trial, dismissed the charge last fall and upheld the other charges.

But a recent decision by the Court of Appeals in a separate case appeared to reshape the interpretation of third-degree murder. Upholding a conviction of third-degree murder for Mohamed Noor, a former police officer who shot and killed a woman while on duty, the court determined that third-degree murder could be applied in a case in which the suspect’s actions were dangerous to a single person.

Judge Cahill said he disagreed with that appeals court decision when prosecutors recently sought to reintroduce the third-degree murder charge, which carries up to 25 years in prison if convicted, and that it was not binding because the Minnesota Supreme Court could still overturn it.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/05/us/derek-chauvin-third-degree-murder.html

According to a financial disclosure form filed by Klein, he was appointed as a staff assistant in the State Department on Jan. 22, 2017, days after Trump was sworn in as president. He worked as a special assistant in the Office of Brazilian and Southern Cone Affairs, where he was paid $66,510, according to a ProPublica database of Trump appointees and the criminal complaint.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/03/05/trump-federico-klein-capitol-riot/

Rep. Eric Swalwell, one of the House prosecutors during Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial, filed a lawsuit Friday against the former president, alleging he incited the deadly invasion of the U.S. Capitol.

The civil lawsuit from Swalwell, D-Calif., also accuses Donald Trump Jr., Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., of being “wholly responsible for the injury and destruction” caused by the mob.

Swalwell’s 65-page lawsuit accuses the defendants of conspiring to block President Joe Biden’s election victory, inciting the Jan. 6 riot, aiding and abetting common-law assault, committing bias-related crimes, intentionally inflicting emotional distress and negligence.

The congressman demands a trial by jury in U.S. District Court in Washington.

The Senate last month acquitted Trump of one article of inciting the insurrection at the Capitol, which resulted in five deaths and forced a joint session of Congress into hiding.

Before the pro-Trump mob stormed the building, Trump held a rally outside the White House, where he repeated a slew of unfounded election-theft conspiracy claims and heaped pressure on Republicans to reject Biden’s victory. Trump Jr., Giuliani and Brooks also spoke at the “Stop the Steal” rally.

House managers, led by Jamie Raskin, D-Md., argued that Trump directly fomented the violence exhibited by his supporters. They failed to persuade two-thirds of the Senate, which is split between Republicans and Democrats, to vote to convict the former president.

Asked for comment on the lawsuit, Trump spokesman Jason Miller replied with a string of insults about Swalwell and accused him of “attacking our greatest President with yet another witch hunt.”

Giuliani did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the suit. Swalwell’s legal complaint repeatedly points out that Giuliani declared, “Let’s have trial by combat!” in his speech to the pre-riot rally crowd on Jan. 6.

The lawsuit also cites comments made during that rally by Brooks. The Alabama congressman “told the crowd to start ‘kicking ass,'” the court filing says, “and he spoke with reverence, at a purportedly peaceful demonstration, of how ‘our ancestors sacrificed their blood, sweat, their tears, their fortunes, and sometimes their lives,’ before shouting at the crowd ‘Are you willing to do the same?!'”

Swalwell’s lawsuit argues that Brooks “intended these words as a threat of violence or intimidation to block the certification vote from even occurring and/or to coerce members of Congress to disregard the results of the election.”

Brooks, in a statement to CNBC, said “I make no apologies whatsoever for fighting for accurate and honest elections.”

“In sum, I wear Communist-sympathizer Swalwell’s scurrilous and malicious lawsuit like a badge of courage,” Brooks’ statement said. “Under no circumstances will Swalwell, or any other Socialist, stop me from fighting for America.”

Swalwell’s legal action is the second lawsuit from a sitting member of Congress to blame Trump for inciting the deadly riot.

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and the NAACP last month filed their own suit against Trump and Giuliani, accusing them of conspiring to stop Congress from confirming Biden’s win.

Both lawsuits cite sections of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, intended to protect against political violence and intimidation.

Thompson’s lawsuit also names as defendants the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, two groups whose members are known to have been among the thousands who stormed the Capitol complex.

Swalwell’s lawsuit argues that the mob attacked the Capitol “as a direct and foreseeable consequence of the Defendants’ false and incendiary allegations of fraud and theft, and in direct response to the Defendants’ express calls for violence at the rally.”

The managers had made the same argument in Trump’s second impeachment trial, much of which centered around whether it was constitutional to convict a former president. Many Republicans focused on that procedural issue, rather than try to defend Trump’s conduct explicitly.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said after the trial that Trump is “still liable for everything he did while he was in office.”

“He didn’t get away with anything, yet,” said McConnell, who voted to acquit Trump.

Read Swalwell’s legal complaint against Trump, Trump Jr., Giuliani and Brooks:

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/05/eric-swalwell-sues-trump-giuliani-for-inciting-capitol-riot.html

Washington — The Senate will begin debate over President Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package on Friday morning, kicking off a flurry of activity aimed at getting a final bill to the president’s desk before several key relief programs expire on March 14. The 628-page bill enjoys support from all 50 Senate Democrats, but Republicans are aiming to make its passage as difficult as possible by forcing votes on a dozens of amendments in a grueling process that could extend into the weekend. 

The so-called “vote-a-rama” will serve as a test of the ability of newly minted Senate Majority Chuck Schumer to keep his caucus in line.

A vote on the motion to proceed to 20 hours of debate succeeded in a party-line vote on Thursday afternoon, with Vice President Kamala Harris breaking the 50-50 tie. Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska who had said she is undecided about whether she will vote for final passage, voted against moving forward with debate.

GOP Senator Ron Johnson immediately asked the Senate clerk to read the entire bill aloud, a process that took almost eleven hours and had to be completed before the debate could begin. The Senate adjourned shortly after 2 a.m. Friday, and is scheduled to reconvene later in the morning.

“We all know this will merely delay the inevitable. It will accomplish little more than a few sore throats for the Senate clerks who work very hard day in, day out to help the Senate function,” Schumer said in a speech on the Senate floor Thursday, before the bill was read. “We Democrats want America to hear what’s in the plan. And if the senator from Wisconsin wants to read it, let everybody listen, because it has overwhelming support.”

The bill is broadly popular, with recent polling showing that a majority of Americans support it, particularly the provision that provides $1,400 in direct checks to earners making under $75,000.

“The Senate is going to move forward with the bill. No matter how long it takes, the Senate is going to stay in session to finish the bill this week. The American people deserve nothing less,” Schumer said.

Both parties will have up to 10 hours each to debate the bill, although it is unclear whether all 20 hours will be necessary.

The House passed a version of the bill last week, but the measure considered by the Senate is slightly different. Democrats were still finalizing the bill shortly before the vote to begin debate on Thursday afternoon. 

Some recently added measures, according to a Senate Democratic aide, include $510 million for FEMA and $750 million for states and communities impacted by job and revenue loss in the tourism, travel and outdoor recreation sectors. Another provision sets aside funding for education, including $1.25 billion for evidence-based summer enrichment, $1.25 billion for after school programs and $3 billion for education technology. It would also make COVID-19 student loan relief tax-free.

Congress is using the budget reconciliation process to pass the bill, which limits time for debate and allows legislation to pass with a simple majority, a workaround that avoids the 60-vote threshold that most bills require to advance in the Senate. If every Democrat supports the final bill, with Harris casting a tie-breaking vote, it would pass without any Republican support.

But Republicans are critical of the size of the bill and frustrated that Democrats are using the reconciliation process, arguing that they are taking a partisan route rather than working across the aisle. Democrats reply that they don’t need to waste time negotiating with Republicans to reach the 60-vote threshold and pass a smaller package.

In retaliation, Republican senators aim to make the debate and amendment process politically painful for Democrats. The most excruciating part of the process is the “vote-a-rama,” wherein senators will vote on dozens of amendments in quick succession. “Vote-a-ramas” typically take several hours, often ending early in the morning. Johnson told reporters Thursday that he was setting up a three-shift schedule to ensure that “all the amendments that are offered are actually voted on,” possibly extending the “vote-a-rama” for several more hours.

“It seems like we’ve always offered a couple of hundred amendments on the Republican side. You get a couple of those voted on and people tire out. I’m just setting up a process that keeps us from tiring out,” Johnson said. Johnson has also suggested reading out every amendment, which could extend the process for days.

However, it’s unclear how popular this strategy will be with his fellow Republicans. GOP Senator James Lankford told reporters that Republicans would “make decisions as we go” to determine how long senators would be voting on amendments.

“At some point, there has to be an end. And we’re trying to be able to determine what that end is,” Lankford said.

Senator John Thune, the minority whip, told reporters that the “vote-a-rama” could go on for an “indefinite” amount of time. He said it was “possible” that the Senate clerks would finish reading the bill at around midnight, and the Senate would go home to sleep while the debate clock was ticking. Then they could return to Senate on Friday with a few hours of debate left, followed by the “vote-a-rama.”

“That seems reasonable, seems possible. Requires some level of cooperation,” Thune said.

The “vote-a-rama” process allows the minority party to force the majority to go on the record with politically painful votes. However, amendments require support from a simple majority to be added to the bill, and most amendments proposed by Republicans are expected to fail.

“My guess is it’s not likely that many of our amendments will get any Democrat support, so I think it’s very unlikely that that any Republicans will support the final bill,” GOP Senator Mitt Romney said.

The Senate parliamentarian ruled last week that the Senate could not include a provision raising the minimum wage to $15 under budget reconciliation rules, but Senator Bernie Sanders has said he will introduce an amendment to do so during the “vote-a-rama.” Sanders also announced Thursday that he would offer an amendment to raise the tipped minimum wage, which is currently $2.12, to $14.75 over seven years. However, some Democrats have expressed opposition to raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour, meaning the amendment may fail.

Jack Turman contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-relief-bill-senate-debate-amdendment-vote-a-rama/

Two firefighters loaned to Washington for the day were the only medics on the Capitol steps Jan. 6, trying to triage injured officers as they watched the angry mob swell and attack police working to protect Congress.

Law enforcement agents were “being pulled into the crowd and trampled, assaulted with scaffolding materials, and/or bear maced by protesters,” wrote Arlington County firefighter Taylor Blunt in an after-action memo. Some couldn’t walk, and had to be dragged to safety.

Even the attackers sought medical help, and Blunt and his colleague Nathan Waterfall treated those who were passing out or had been hit. But some “feigned illness to remain behind police lines,” Blunt wrote.

The memo is one of hundreds of emails, texts, photos and documents obtained by The Associated Press. Taken together, the materials shed new light on the sprawling patchwork of law enforcement agencies that tried to stop the siege and the lack of coordination and inadequate planning that stymied their efforts.

The AP obtained the materials through 35 Freedom of Information Act requests to law enforcement agencies that responded to the Capitol insurrection.

“We were among the first mutual aid teams to arrive and were critical to begin the process of driving protestors off the Capitol,” wrote Blunt.

Five people died in the attack, including a police officer. Two other officers killed themselves after. There were hundreds of injuries and more than 300 people, including members of extremist groups Proud Boys and Oathkeepers, have been charged with federal crimes. Federal agents are still investigating and hundreds more suspects are at large. Justice Department officials have said they may charge some with sedition.

The Arlington firefighters ended up at the Capitol because, two days earlier, Washington Metro Police Chief Robert J. Contee had formally asked the Arlington County Police Department, along with police departments from Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in Maryland, and Arlington County in Virginia, to lend them some officers trained for protests and riots, according to the documents.

Arlington’s acting police chief Andy Penn said they’d send help for the “planned and unplanned first amendment activities,” according to emails.

At the time, the Capitol Police department had issued a security assessment warning that militia members, white supremacists and other extremists were heading to Washington to target Congress in what they saw as a “last stand” to support President Donald Trump.

Federal agencies not responding were also preparing for potential violence. On Jan. 4, U.S. Customs and Border Protection said staff should try to telework for the week.

Two days later, it was 3:39 p.m. when Penn emailed county officials that he had “just been notified” that Arlington officers were responding to the Capitol attack and had been absorbed into the overall response led by Capitol Police.

That was almost 90 minutes after the mob first busted into the Capitol and more than an hour after the medics began treating injured police on the steps.

Members of Congress, who were locked down or rushed to safety that day as the attackers approached the House and Senate chambers, are holding hearings this week to get to the bottom of what went wrong with the law enforcement response that allowed the crowd to enter and ransack the Capitol building.

One question they are looking to answer is why the Capitol Police didn’t have more help on hand early in the day, before the rally near the White House devolved into insurrection at the Capitol.

The emails obtained by AP — hastily written and including misspellings and incomplete sentences — show that nearby police agencies were alerted two days earlier that there might be trouble and were prepared to help.

The night before the breach, after hours of rallies and speeches across the city, Federal Protective Service officers, who protect federal property, had noticed protesters trying to camp out on federal property and were “being vigilant for any suspicious activity,” according to an email from the agency.

They were expecting large crowds, and by the next morning they were monitoring them closely.

At 9:45 a.m. a protective service liaison to the Capitol Police wrote, “Good morning Sir, what I have is the Ellipse is permitted for 30k but they expecting for there to be much more. Freedom Plaza original permit was 5k and it was raised to 30k, the permit outside Sylven Theater is permitted for 15K.”

The agents were particularly interested in the right wing extremist group, Proud Boys. They noted how many were in Washington, that they were staying at a downtown hotel, and what they planned.

In a briefing at noon on that day, just as Trump was encouraging supporters to “ fight like hell,” a Federal Protective Service email said about 300 Proud Boys were at the U.S. Capitol.

“No incidents at this time,” the email said. But then it warned, “The Proud Boys are threatening to shut down the water system in the downtown area, which includes government facilities.”

The email noted there was a man in a tree with what appeared to be a rifle near the Ellipse, and about 25,000 people were around the White House, including some who were hiding bags in bushes outside the building.

“Together we stand!” the officer signed off.

About 20 minutes later, a protective service officer whose name was redacted sent an email that read, “POTUS is encouraging the protesters to march to capitol grounds and continue protesting there.” POTUS stands for president of the United States.

In a series of emails that followed, protective service officers messages offered a blow-by-blow account of the march to the Capitol from the rally where Trump spoke.

“Protesters moving towards the capitol down Pennsylvania, Constitution and Madison in numbers estimated 10-15,000,” read an email sent at 12:28 p.m.

The officers tracked them across the city and at 12:57 p.m. a message read, “Large group just breached the USCP barricade on the West Front,” referring to the Capitol Police barriers on west side of the Capitol Building.

About a half hour later, they reported several police officers were injured, and then at 2:14 a message screamed “CAPITOL HAS BEEN BREACHED. PROTESTERS ARE NOW INSIDE THE CAPITOL.” Two minutes later they reported the House and Senate chambers were being locked down.

“Shots fired 2nd floor house side inside the capitol,” read a message at 2:45, probably the moment when a Capitol Police officer fatally shot Ashli Babbitt, a Trump supporter who tried to hurl herself through a broken interior window into the Speaker’s Lobby just outside the House chamber where lawmakers were taking cover.

Intelligence agents used Facebook to monitor dozens of protests planned for Jan. 6 and beyond, according to emails. These rallies had names such as the “Yugest Trump Parade of All (45 Exclamation Points)!,” “Fight for President Trump and Your Rights,” and “Wild Protest for Donald Trump (The Republican Mandate).” Some events were permitted, others were not.

Officers in the Virginia suburb of Vienna were already on edge two days before the Capitol breach after a video of a small, half-hour protest at the home of Republican Sen. Josh Hawley __ a Trump supporter __ attracted more than 100,000 pageviews.

“They claim they are coming back tonight,” Vienna Deputy Chief Daniel Janickey said in Jan. 5 emails to Fairfax County officials.

“WE will have some officers out there tonight monitoring in case (the) group shows up,” Janickey wrote. “Hawley and his staff have hired armed private security for (the) next 48 hours.”

Those protesters didn’t return. But within 24 hours, Fairfax County, Virginia, officials realized their Washington counterparts had much more trouble on their hands.

At 3:10 p.m. on Jan. 6, Fairfax County’s deputy county executive, Dave Rohrer, emailed more than 25 county officials: “Subject: Awareness – Police Mutual Aid Request U.S. Capitol Police.”

That was about two hours after the first windows had been broken.

The U.S. Capitol had been breached, he said.

“It is obvious to me based on my experience and knowledge that an emergency exists,” said Rohrer. He said he had authorized the Fairfax County Police Department to send Civil Disturbance Unit officers and commanders “to assist gaining control for safety reasons.”

He added that they were monitoring the deployment closely. The redacted email refers to an early June episode when police from several jurisdictions used tear gas to violently break up a peaceful and legal protest in Lafayette Square, across the street from the White House.

On Jan. 6, Rohrer said he reminded commanders on the scene “that they are to cease operations if at any point they determine they are being used in an inappropriate, unethical, illegal manner, or are not under a competent authority… Maintaining life safety, regaining and establishing a safe perimeter, etc., should be the initial focus.”

Just 12 minutes later, Rohrer had an update: They were suspending any fire, rescue or emergency service transportation to hospitals in the District of Columbia and “upgrading response and command structure.”

For hours, Fairfax County’s police monitored Metro stations and acted as back up to Washington police, according to the emails. They were also checking with hotels where some in the mob were staying. Rohrer noted that many had been staying in Alexandria and Arlington..

The hotels “reported some problems with crowds and disorderly conduct the past few nights,” he said.

That evening, at 8:31 p.m., a Federal Protective Service memo alerted “there is a report of an armed militia group headed to dc from west Virginia. Query ongoing.”

As midnight approached, Rohrer emailed again. Although the Capitol was quiet, “Intel will be monitored throughout the night and, unfortunately, PD and US Capitol Police are investigating several threats targeting residences of Capitol VIPs or family members received late tonight.”

By Jan. 7, Fairfax County Police Department Major Shawn Bennett was bristling at former Capitol Police Chief Terry Gainer’s critique of the police response.

“Gainer throws a lot of shame but he doesn’t offer any answers to what ‘specifically’ he would have done differently to keep the initial group from breaking down the barriers,” emailed Bennett.

Also on Jan. 7, Fairfax County Executive Bryan Hill was thanking his staff.

“Our Police Department’s Civil Disturbance Unit answered the call yesterday, and as much as I hated to activate you, it was an activation to preserve our republic,” he wrote. “I am hopeful we will never again see what we witnessed yesterday, but I am most hopeful that yesterday’s events will galvanize our county and our nation as we do our best to vaccinate, maintain calm and create a sense of unity.”

___

Associated Press writers Colleen Long in Washington and Garance Burke in San Francisco contributed to this story.

___

Contact AP’s Global Investigations team at investigative@ap.org.

___

This story has been corrected to show Terry Gainer is a former Capitol Police chief, not the current Capitol Police chief.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/docs-expose-depth-january-6-capitol-siege-chaos-fd3204574c11e453be8fb4e3c81258c3

While hundreds of police, then Vice President Mike Pence, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and others “were put in mortal danger, and as the seat of American Democracy was desecrated by the insurgent mob,” the complaint contended, Trump was reported by those close to him as being “delighted,” “borderline enthusiastic,” and “confused about why other people on his team weren’t as excited as he was.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/house-members-sue-trump-capitol-riot/2021/03/05/905b3a20-7cf5-11eb-85cd-9b7fa90c8873_story.html

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is finalizing guidance aimed at clarifying what Americans who have received COVID-19 vaccines should and shouldn’t do, according to two sources at the agency familiar with its drafting. 

The upcoming guidance, first reported by Politico, is expected to include that fully vaccinated individuals should be able to gather in small groups with other people who have also been vaccinated. The CDC currently does not recommend in-person gatherings with the general public, saying “gathering virtually or with the people you live with is the safest choice.” 

Even for people who have been fully vaccinated, other mitigation measures will still be recommended, including wearing a mask in public and social distancing.

A source at the CDC who is familiar with the guidance confirms that it won’t be released Thursday, when it was expected to be. There was no word on when it would be issued.     

At the White House COVID-19 response briefing Monday, President Biden’s chief medical adviser, Dr. Anthony Fauci, previewed the guidance by saying that small gatherings among people who are “doubly vaccinated” are low risk — “so low that you would not have to wear a mask, that you could have a good social gathering within the home.” 

Both Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines require two doses; Johnson & Johnson‘s will only require one shot. That vaccine received an Emergency Use Authorization from the Food and Drug Administration over the weekend and doses are beginning to be administered this week.


“A Shot of Hope: Vaccine Questions Answered”

01:01:52

The guidance comes as the nation is at a crossroads in its fight against the virus. In the last month, average daily cases nationwide have fallen more than 50%, according to data from Johns Hopkins University, but that progress has plateaued. In the last week, data from the CDC indicates average new cases have ticked up nearly 2%. 

CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said at Monday’s briefing that she remained “deeply concerned about a potential shift in the trajectory of the pandemic.” States around the country, including New York, Massachusetts and Arkansas, are loosening COVID-related restrictions on businesses, adding to fears that the U.S. could be letting its guard down too early. On Tuesday, Texas became the third state to rescind its statewide mask mandate in recent days, joining Montana and Iowa. 

At the same time, the pace of vaccinations continues to increase, and with more Americans vaccinated, the need for new guidance on what this population can safely do has grown. But Walensky stressed that now is not the time to resume travel or disregard other safety measures. 

“The goal in those first 100 days has always been to sort of make sure that we are in a place to be out of this pandemic,” she said. “At 70,000 cases per day, we’re not in that place right now.”


“A Shot of Hope”: Getting the vaccine

17:02

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cdc-guidelines-after-covid-vaccine/

Top advisers to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo influenced state health officials to remove data from a public report that showed coronavirus-related nursing-home deaths in the state had exceeded numbers previously acknowledged by the administration, a bombshell report says.

Details about the July report were disclosed Thursday night in a story first published by The Wall Street Journal.

The final report focused only on nursing-home residents who died inside those facilities and did not include nursing-home residents who were transferred to hospitals after becoming sick, the Journal reported.

That means the state’s reported tally of 6,432 nursing-home resident deaths was significantly lower than the actual nursing-home death toll, sources with knowledge of the state report’s preparation told the newspaper.

State officials now place the nursing-home and long-term-care facility death toll in New York at more than 15,000 residents, the Journal reported. The number represents deaths since March 2020 of residents confirmed to have contracted the coronavirus or presumed to have contracted it, the report said.

NEW YORKERS SAY CUOMO SHOULDN’T RESIGN, BUT HIS APPROVAL RATING PLUMMETS

Cuomo has defended his administration’s actions regarding the nursing-home deaths, saying state officials had followed federal guidance and worked to manage hospital capacity as the virus spread, the Journal reported.

The July report was produced after state lawmakers and families of people who died raised questions about a March 25, 2020, directive from the state Health Department about the policies regarding nursing-home patients and the coronavirus – a directive that critics claimed may have fostered the spread of the virus.

Then on Feb. 10 of this year, Cuomo aide Melissa DeRosa told state lawmakers that state officials delayed releasing nursing-home data last year, fearing at the time it might spark a federal investigation from the Trump administration. The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division had begun seeking data from New York and other states last August, the Journal reported.

After the Journal’s story appeared Thursday night, at least two members of the Cuomo administration issued statements in defense of the administration’s actions.

Beth Garvey, a special counsel and senior adviser to Cuomo, claimed that “out-of-facility data” – meaning the deaths in hospitals – was omitted from the July report after the state Department of Health “could not confirm it had been adequately verified.”

“This did not change the conclusion of the report, which was and is that the March 25 order was ‘not a driver of nursing home infections or fatalities.’”

She added: “COVID Task Force officials did not request that the report conclude the March 25 order played no role; in fact Task Force Members, knowing the report needed to withstand rigorous public scrutiny were very cautious to not overstate the statistical analysis presented in the report. Overall, ensuring public confidence in the conclusion was the ultimate goal of DOH and the COVID Task Force in issuing the report.”

Gary Holmes, a spokesman for the state Department of Health, issued the following statement, referring to the state’s July report and to Howard Zucker, the state’s health commisssioner:

“This report, which establishes that the March 25 advisory was not a driver of nursing home deaths, was a collaborative process between DOH and the COVID task force. The report’s purpose was to ensure the public had a clear non-political evaluation for how COVID entered nursing homes at the height of the pandemic. All data sets reviewed came to a common conclusion – that spread from staff was likely the primary driver that introduced COVID into these nursing homes. While early versions of the report included out of facility deaths, the COVID task force was not satisfied that the data had been verified against hospital data and so the final report used only data for in facility deaths, which was disclosed in the report. While the out of facility deaths were held aside for verification, the conclusions were supported by both data sets. DOH was comfortable with the final report and believes fully in its conclusion that the primary driver that introduced COVID into the nursing homes was spread brought in by staff. Even Bill Hammond of the conservative think tank Empire Center found that the March 25 advisory was not a primary driver of COVID in nursing homes. The decision was made to initially release the report without the out of facility data and to later update the report to include the out of facility deaths. This was done in February and as Dr. Zucker had testified to the legislature, the conclusions remained the same as in July.” 

The Journal’s report also drew a reaction from Democratic New York Assemblyman Ron Kim, who previously alleged that Cuomo had threatened him for speaking out against the governor’s handling of the state’s nursing homes.

“This is criminal,” Kim wrote on Twitter. “The Gov’s top advisors pushed state health officials to strip a public report of the data showing more nursing home deaths. The changes Cuomo’s aides made to the report reveal that they had the fuller accounting of NH deaths as early as the summer of 2020.”

Reports of discrepancies in the tally of coronavirus-related deaths in the state’s nursing homes have sparked severe criticism against Cuomo, who initially drew national praise for his handling of the coronavirus – despite New York state being a U.S. epicenter for its deadly spread.

Now the nursing-home reports are being coupled with allegations of sexual harassment against the 63-year-old third-term Democrat, who is facing increasingly bipartisan calls for his resignation — as well as a planned investigation by New York’s attorney general.

The Journal’s story about the nursing-home data was published on the same evening that the “CBS Evening News” aired an interview with Charlotte Bennett, one of at least three women who have made sexual misconduct allegations against Cuomo.

CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE

During that interview, Bennett – a 25-year-old former aide to Cuomo — suggested that positive media coverage of Cuomo’s handling of the coronavirus may have boosted his ego.

“I think he felt like he was untouchable in a lot of ways,” Bennett told Nora O’Donnell of CBS.

Bennett accused Cuomo of “trying to sleep with me,” while two other women – Lindsey Boylan and Anna Ruch – have also accused him of inappropriate comments and behavior.

Cuomo, at a Wednesday news conference, denied intentionally mistreating the women. He apologized, saying he now realized his comments had an unintended effect, and claimed he “learned an important lesson” but had no plans to leave office.

Fox News’ Michael Ruiz contributed to this story.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cuomo-advisers-altered-report-on-coronavirus-nursing-home-deaths-wsj

The White House has defended Joe Biden’s criticism of the Republican governors of Texas and Mississippi, after the president called their decisions to end mask mandates “Neanderthal thinking”.

Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, emphasized that the president was comparing the governors’ actions to “the behavior of a Neanderthal, just to be very clear, the behavior”. She also said Biden’s comments were “a reflection of his frustration” about Americans not following public health guidance to limit their risk of contracting coronavirus.

“I don’t think his view on mask wearing is a secret,” Psaki said at the Thursday White House briefing. “And I’m certain when he speaks with them next, he will convey that directly.”

The US president had said on Wednesday that the country was on the “cusp of being able to fundamentally change the nature of this disease” with the distribution of vaccines and added: “The last thing we need is Neanderthal thinking that in the meantime, everything’s fine.”

The Texas governor Greg Abbott hit back at Biden on Wednesday, telling CNBC that the comment was “not the type of word that a president should be using”. Abbott, who has often been criticized for his anti-immigrant rhetoric, then accused the president of “releasing illegal immigrants into our communities who had Covid,” calling it a “Neanderthal-type approach to dealing with the Covid situation”.

Addressing Abbott’s comments on Thursday, Psaki said: “We’re about facts around here. That is not factual.” She added that it was also the responsibility of state and local governments to test-and-trace.

Abbott appeared to be referencing recent reporting from Telemundo, which found that some migrants released by border patrol in Brownsville, Texas, subsequently tested positive for Covid-19. Since the city started testing in January, 108 migrants had tested positive, roughly 6% of all those who took a test, the report said.

Abbott’s move to reopen Texas and drop its mask mandate goes against advice from top US health officials, who have repeatedly urged states not to completely lift Covid-19 restrictions as they warned of a potential fourth surge in coronavirus cases fueled by new variants.

“We’ve been very clear that now is not the time to release all restrictions. The next month or two is really pivotal,” said Dr Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), on Wednesday.

The president on Tuesday announced that the US expects to have enough coronavirus vaccines for all adults by the end of May, two months earlier than anticipated, as his administration announced that the drugmaker Merck would help produce rival Johnson & Johnson’s shot that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last weekend for emergency use.

But officials in many states have been easing restrictions, some far more than others. Abbott moved to lift his state’s mask-wearing mandate and a host of other limitations, while Mississippi also rescinded its mask mandate beginning on Wednesday.

Michigan’s Democratic governor Gretchen Whitmer eased capacity limits on restaurants and public and residential gatherings. New York announced that arts and entertainment could resume indoors, at 33% capacity, in April. In Massachusetts, Governor Charlie Baker said residents should continue to wear masks in public, but it was time for more limits on businesses to be eased.

Texas will be the most populous US state that does not require residents to wear face coverings.

The mayor of the state’s largest city, Houston, disagreed with the move. “It’s a step in the wrong direction, unless the governor is trying to deflect what happened a little more than two weeks ago with the winter storm,” Sylvester Turner said, adding: “I’m very disappointed … it makes no sense.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/04/biden-mask-mandate-texas-neanderthal-thinking-greg-abbott

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/05/covid-19-mask-mandates-lift-biden-faces-limits-bully-pulpit/6921836002/

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/05/covid-19-mask-mandates-lift-biden-faces-limits-bully-pulpit/6921836002/

The US Senate voted on Thursday to proceed with H.R. 1319, which is the budget reconciliation bill that includes President Joe Biden’s proposed $1.9 trillion plan.

The vote passed 51-50 in a strictly party-line vote with Vice President Kamala Harris arriving to provide the tie-breaking vote.

Following Thursday’s vote, Sen. Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, objected to the bill being dispensed, which meant that Senate clerks will read the legislation in its entirety. The reading of the bill is expected to go well into the night.

“By the way I feel bad for the clerks that are going to have to read it, but it’s, it’s just important, you know?” Johnson said. “So often, we rush these massive bills that are hundreds, if not thousands of pages long. You don’t have time. Nobody has time to read them and so you start considering something that you haven’t even read. So at a minimum, somebody ought to read it and this will give everybody time.”

Sen. Mitt Romney, who has been seen more recently as a swing vote within the Senate, agreed with Johnson’s rationale.

“What I see he’s doing is making sure we communicate very clearly that the $1.9 trillion plan has good objectives, but it’s massively misdirected, but a lot of the spending is not going to where it’s needed, that it’s wasteful, that it’s adding debt to our next generations,” Romney said. “And, and Senator Johnson wants to make sure that the people understand that on both sides of the aisle.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer accepted Johnson’s attempt to slow the bill’s progress.

“We are delighted that the Senator from Wisconsin wants to give the American people another opportunity to hear what’s in the American Rescue Plan,” Schumer said. “We Democrats want America to hear what’s in the plan. And if the Senator from Wisconsin wants to read it, let everybody listen because it has overwhelming support.”

Once the reading is done, the Senate is expected to debate the bill on Friday, with a vote expected on late Friday or Saturday.

But there is some urgency to getting the bill passed.

The Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation is scheduled to expire in two weeks, but some may be eligible to receive benefits into early April under current guidelines.

The Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation extended unemployment benefits to those whose benefits expired. It also provides benefits to those who generally wouldn’t be able to access unemployment compensation, such as gig workers.

The stimulus bill includes $1,400 checks for most Americans making less than $75,000 a year. It also includes $1,400 for eligible dependents. The proposal increases the child tax credit to $3,000 per year ($3,600 for children under age 6). And it extends enhanced unemployment benefits through September.

The bill also replenishes funds for small business grants, and adds nearly $130 billion for schools to retain staff and implement social distancing protocols.

Democrats are touting the bill as a way to safely help students return to the classroom. There is $140 billion earmarked in the bill for schools, some of which will go toward personal protective equipment and pandemic-related expenses. Some of the funds, however, are set to be used to help schools avoid layoffs from decreased tax revenue.

“About 95% of that funding won’t even go out this fiscal year, 95% of the school funding in this bill won’t go out this year, and this is an emergency package?” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said. “That’s why they are pushing economic policies that would drag down our recovery.”

Source Article from https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/national/vp-harris-casts-tie-breaking-vote-stimulus-bill-gets-senate-reading

State health officials could see from the data that a significant number of residents died after being transferred to hospitals. The state health commissioner, Dr. Howard Zucker, had been aware as early as June that officials in his department believed the data was good enough to include in the report, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions.

But Dr. Zucker testified to lawmakers in early August that the department was still auditing the numbers and could not release them. State Senator Gustavo Rivera, the chair of the health committee, suggested during the hearing that the data was being withheld to improve the governor’s image.

“That’s a problem, bro,” Mr. Rivera told Dr. Zucker. “It seems, sir, that, in this case, you are choosing to define it differently so that you can look better.”

In a statement issued on Thursday, Gary Holmes, a spokesman for the Health Department, echoed Ms. Garvey’s words, disputing that the numbers had been ready in time for the report and saying said that, regardless, they would not have changed its conclusions.

Dr. Eleanor Adams was the Health Department’s lead on the report, but her draft was substantially rewritten by Mr. Malatras, now the chancellor of the State University of New York system. He was among a number of officials and former advisers temporarily recruited by Mr. Cuomo to assist with the pandemic response.

The back-and-forth went well beyond the usual process of the governor’s office suggesting edits to an agency report, and became “intense” at times, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions.

Health officials felt the governor’s office, whose opinion was conveyed by Mr. Malatras, wanted to simplify too much. They worried it was no longer a true scientific report, but feared for their jobs if they did not go along.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/04/nyregion/cuomo-nursing-home-deaths.html

Texas Lt. Gov Dan Patrick, R., slammed Joe Biden’sNeanderthal thinking” comment on lifting COVID-19 restrictions on “The Faulkner Focus” on Thursday, calling the president a “hypocrite.”

Biden took a swipe at Republican governors in Texas and Mississippi Wednesday, accusing them of “Neanderthal thinking” following their decision to reverse coronavirus safety policies, including mask mandates.

“How dare him attack Texas for our policies when he is allowing the border to be overrun by people coming in here by the hundreds, by the thousands and testing positive and coming on a bus to your state wherever you happen to live in the United States of America,” Patrick said. “What a hypocrite.”

WHITE HOUSE ‘PROTECTING’ BIDEN BY NOT SCHEDULING PRESS CONFERENCES: KARL ROVE

More than 100 illegal immigrants released by the Border Patrol into Texas since January have tested positive for COVID-19 following their arrival, officials on the U.S.-Mexico border told Fox News. 

Felipe Romero, a spokesperson for Brownsville, said Wednesday the 108 positives represent 6.3% of the number of total migrants who have been rapid-tested at the city’s main bus station, where they are being released by the Border Patrol. Rapid testing of the individuals began there on Jan. 25. 

He added Brownsville does not have the authority to prevent those who test positive from traveling elsewhere in the U.S. and is advising them to quarantine, follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and socially distance. 

TEXAS GOV. ABBOTT ANNOUNCES PLAN TO FULLY REOPEN BUSINESSES, END STATE MASK MANDATE

Sources at the White House told Fox News on Wednesday it is aware of instances where individuals may continue to travel despite testing positive and being told to quarantine, yet the federal guidance remains for them to isolate.

“What I would call ‘Neanderthal thinking’ would be Governor [Gavin] Newsom in California telling his people not to come out of their cave for a year,” Patrick said.  “I would call ‘Neanderthal thinking’ the Democrat Governor [Andrew] Cuomo of New York sending patients with COVID to nursing homes where he covered up 12,000 people dying.”

He added, “I would call ‘Neanderthal thinking’ of allowing people to cross the border illegally with COVID.”

Patrick went on to say that Biden “didn’t look at the facts,” noting 15 other states don’t have a mask mandate. He added people were still encouraged to socially distance.

“We just joined that group,” he said. “We’re not telling people not to wear masks. We’re just removing a mandate.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

A Biden spokesperson did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.

Fox News’ Caitlin McFall, Greg Norman, Peter Doocy and Griff Jenkins contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-bidens-neanderthal-covid-restrictions

Gov. Gavin Newsom said in Stockton Thursday that a new plan to set aside vaccine doses for people who live in disproportionally impacted communities would help confront COVID-19 inequities and also help the state in its reopening efforts.

He said the state’s plan to set aside 40% of all vaccine doses for people who live in neighborhoods most vulnerable to impacts from the pandemic would “make real progress.”

“We’re not meeting our goals,” Newsom said of the state’s current efforts that partner with 337 community organizations.

“We have to be bolder and we have to go bigger in terms of our resolve and our commitment,” he said.

The doses will be spread out among 400 ZIP codes with about 8 million people eligible for shots, Dr. Mark Ghaly, the state’s health and human services secretary, said on Wednesday.

“With vaccines still scarce, we must target vaccines strategically to maximally reduce transmission, protect our healthcare delivery system and save lives,” Ghaly said in a briefing.

Many of the neighborhoods are concentrated in Los Angeles County and the Central Valley, which have had among the highest rates of infection. The areas are considered most vulnerable based on metrics such as household income, education level, housing status and access to transportation.

While race and ethnicity are not explicit factors in designating vaccinations, the 400 vulnerable ZIP codes overlap heavily with neighborhoods with higher populations of Blacks, Latinos and Asian and Pacific Islanders, officials said.

Once 2 million vaccine doses are given out in those neighborhoods, the state will make it easier for counties to move through reopening tiers that dictate business and school reopenings.

Right now, a county can move from the most restrictive purple tier to the lower red tier based on several metrics, including having seven or fewer new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people per day over a period of several weeks. That metric will change to 10 new cases or fewer. In the red tier, businesses such as restaurants and gyms can open for indoor services at limited capacity.

Also in the red tier, schools that want to access new state funding must provide in-person learning for students in transitional kindergarten through grade six and at least one grade each in middle and high school.

About 1.6 million vaccine doses already have been given to people in those 400 ZIP codes, and the state will hit the 2 million mark in the next week or two, officials said.

Once the state gives out 4 million doses in those neighborhoods, it will revise the metrics for getting into the even less restrictive orange and yellow tiers.

Newsom said while visiting Stribley Community Center on Thursday that the state’s test positivity rate had fallen to 2.1% from 6.1% a month ago. New COVID-19 cases were just over 3,500 on Thursday, down from more than 13,000 a month ago, he said.

–KCRA 3 contributed to this story.

Source Article from https://www.kcra.com/article/gov-newsom-san-joaquin-county-covid-19-health-inequities/35728004

Yesenia Cardona, 23, (pictured) from Guatemala was among 13 migrants who died in a deadly car crash on Tuesday after illegally crossing the border from Mexico

A 23-year-old victim in Tuesday’s horror crash in California involving an SUV carrying 25 people over the Mexican border and a semi-truck was traveling with her mother from Guatemala, her family has revealed.

Yesenia Cardona and Berlin Cardona, 47, left Guatemala over a month ago and had last contacted their family in the United States on Monday when they reached Mexicali, the Mexican city bordering Calexico.

In the early hours of Tuesday morning, they were among 44 people who illegally slipped through a 10 ft gap in the US-Mexican border fence before the Ford Expedition they were traveling in pulled in front of the truck at an intersection causing the fatal crash.

Yesenia died in her mother’s arms, her family said, after passengers of the SUV were flung from the vehicle onto the road in the sudden impact.

Thirteen people were killed in the deadly collision including Yesenia and the 22-year-old driver of the SUV who has been identified as a Mexican national from Mexicali.

Another thirteen were injured including her mother Berlin and the 68-year-old truck driver who is from California.  

As of Thursday, eight people remain in hospital. A female teen remains unconscious and authorities have been unable to establish her identify or nationality.

It was one of the deadliest crashes involving migrants sneaking into the U.S.

Scroll down 

Yesenia was traveling with her mother, Berlin, (pictured together) as they crossed the border

Yesenia’s family said she worked for a finance company in Guatemala but that her family had been struggling for money due to the pandemic. The 23-year-old is pictured above

Yesenia died in her mother’s arms, her family said. Berlin (right) was also injured in the crash

The cause of the crash and the reason why the SUV driver pulled into the intersection in front of the truck is still not known.

An investigation into human smuggling is now underway after it was revealed that the Ford SUV had been modified and the back seats taken out so more than two dozen people could be crammed inside.

Another SUV carrying 19 people had snuck across the border through the gap at the same time but set on fire for unknown reasons a short time later.

Border patrol agents responding to the call about the fire found the group hiding behind a nearby bush and they were all taken into custody.

 

Ten of the people in the crashed SUV were Mexican, the consulate in Calexico said, and Guatemalan authorities confirmed that at least three nationals were also passengers – the Cardonas and another 22-year-old woman who was injured in the crash.

Of the Mexican nationals, three were from the state of Oaxaca, three from Michoacán, and one each from the states of Baja California, Guerrero, Morelos, and Nayarit.

All of the victims have not yet been identified.

Yesenia’s uncle’s Rudy Dominguez has admitted that she and her mother entered the U.S. illegally but claimed that they did so for a better life and because they did not want to die in Guatemala.

‘We don’t want to die in our country,’ Dominguez told NBC San Diego. ‘That’s why we take this type of risk.’

He said he did not know the details of their journey but that his sister is devastated at her daughter’s death and that the last moments they shared together were in the back of the SUV.

In the early hours of Tuesday morning, they were among 44 people who illegally slipped through a 10 ft gap in the US-Mexican border fence before the Ford Expedition they were traveling in pulled in front of the truck at an intersection causing the fatal crash (pictured)

The SUV had slipped through this gap in the border fence on Tuesday morning

Yesenia’s uncle’s Rudy Dominguez admitted that she and her mother entered the U.S. illegally but claimed that they did so for a better life and because they did not want to die in Guatemala

‘It’s so hard,’ Dominguez said. ‘I mean, it’s so many things [going] on in our brain, and I don’t know how she will handle this.’

‘We take a chance,’ he added. ‘We don’t want to die over there. We take a chance to come here and see our dream come true.’

Yesenia’s friend Jasmín Solares told Univision that the 23-year-old was traveling to the U.S. for a better life.

She claimed that she had also crossed to the U.S. in a similar fashion nine years ago.

Timeline of 44 migrants crossing U.S. border through gap in fence ahead of fatal crash

5.56 am Tuesday: Agents patrolling the Calexico area alerted that a red Suburban was on fire near Interstate 8 and State Route 115 

6.05 am: Agents find a 10-foot hole in the border fence near Gordon’s Well exit/Schneider’s Bride area, 30 miles east of Highway 115.

6.06 am: Border Patrol Agents reviewed surveillance footage which yielded images of two different vehicles leaving the area in proximity of the fence breach.

6.30 am: Agents assisting with the burning red Suburban encountered 19 individuals hiding in the brush nearby and determined they had entered the country illegally through the breach in the border fence.

7.05 am: Border Patrol assistance requested to SUV crash where 25 more people who crossed the border where identified.  

‘So, they also put me in a truck like that and they put me on my knees looking down and after that they put another person with their feet open to where I was looking from the front and then they would put another in the same position mine,’ Solares claimed. 

‘(We were) dying of pain because a lot of people were on top of us.’

Another uncle of Yesenia’s, Eedy Ivan who still lives in Guatelama said that ‘she didn’t deserve this’.

He told NBC Palm Springs that Yesenia had been working for a finance company but that her family had been struggling even more for money since the pandemic hit.

He says that his niece did not share with him that she planned to cross the border.

‘I just can’t believe it,’ he said. ‘It’s hard to believe that she’s gone.’

‘I don’t get it. She was a sweet girl who was full of life and with purpose. She went to college and had a job.

‘Living in Guatemala is tremendously hard,’ he added. ‘She never told me or anyone of her plans to cross. I never heard it from her.’

‘If I could talk to her now, I would beg her not to go. Those would be my words: Don’t go!’

Authorities have not yet released the identities of the victims in Tuesday’s crash as they work to inform the families, some of whom are in the U.S.

The truck driver has been named as Joe Beltran, 68, from El Centro. He was taken to the hospital with serious injuries.

The men and women in the SUV ranged in age from 15 to 53, and those who survived had injuries that were minor to severe, including fractures and head trauma, officials said.

In total, paramedics took 11 people to area hospitals, police said. At least two are still being treated for life-threatening injuries.

Five of the people injured in the crash were in San Diego area hospitals Thursday, including two Mexican adults in stable condition and a male teen, also from Mexico.

Three other migrants, including two adults from Mexico and the unconscious girl, were hospitalized in Palm Springs.

One of the adults has tested positive for COVID-19.

Construction equipment is used to fix a border fence after two vehicles crossed into the US on Tuesday morning. One of the vehicles, an SUV carrying 25 people, was involved in a collision that was one of the deadliest crashes involving migrants sneaking into the U.S.

US Customs and Border Protection revealed on Wednesday that the Mexican migrants involved in the crash had entered the country illegally through this gap in the border fence

Border Patrol is still working to track down the families of those who crossed the border. There were 19 people in a second car who were taken into custody after the car set on fire

Four Mexican nationals were released from hospital in El Centro on Tuesday but were not taken into custody of U.S. immigration or border officials.

Investigators were trying to determine if the victims of the crash were immigrants or farm workers.

‘All are suspected to have entered the U.S. illegally,’ US Border and Customs Protection said in a statement. ‘Border Patrol is investigating the smuggling events.’

The crash occurred around 6:15 a.m. under a clear, sunny sky at an intersection just outside the community of Holtville, about 11 miles north of the border.

Authorities said the tractor-trailer was heading north on a highway when the SUV pulled in front of it from a road with a stop sign.

It is not clear if the SUV ran the stop sign or had stopped before entering the highway. How fast both vehicles were going also wasn’t yet known.

Less than an hour before hand, the vehicle had slipped through the hole in the border fence.

The site of the crash is in southeastern California, about 10 miles east of El Centro and about 11 miles north of the Mexican border. The SUV had crossed the border illegally that morning

A spokesperson for Customs and Border Protection said that CBP personnel were not involved in the collision and the SUV was not being chased despite having just crossed the border

‘All are suspected to have entered the U.S. illegally,’ Custom Patrol said in a statement of the 25 people crammed into the SUV. ‘Border Patrol is investigating the smuggling events’ 

The impact of the crash ejected several passengers from the vehicle (car seat pictured above)

Border Patrol’s El Centro sector released pictures of the 10-foot breach in the International Boundary Fence on Wednesday, as it revealed that surveillance footage picked up the SUV and a Chevrolet Suburban driving through the gap before 6am Tuesday.

Photos show a panel of eight steel poles was lifted out and left on the ground in the desert next to an old tire and other debris.

That section of the fence, consisting of steel bars 18 feet tall, was installed in 2009, some eight years before the Trump administration took office calling for a border wall.

The Border Patrol said its agents were not pursuing the vehicle before the wreck.

‘Initial investigation into the origins of the vehicles indicate a potential nexus to the aforementioned breach in the border wall. Human smugglers have proven time and again they have little regard for human life,’ Gregory Bovino, the Border Patrol’s El Centro sector chief said in a statement Wednesday.

‘Those who may be contemplating crossing the border illegally should pause to think of the dangers that all too often end in tragedy, tragedies our Border Patrol Agents and first responders are unfortunately very familiar with.’

‘We pray for the accident victims and their families during this difficult time,’ he added.

It was also confirmed on Wednesday that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has opened a human smuggling investigation into Tuesday’s horror crash.

In a statement, an ICE spokesperson confirmed to DailyMail.com that ‘Special agents from Homeland Security Investigations San Diego responded [to the scene] … and have initiated a human smuggling investigation.’

ICE declined to comment further at to what led the agency to believe human trafficking was suspected, adding that additional details aren’t being released at this time.

The Mexican Consulate said any family members who need assistance can call (760) 455-2140. Offices in San Bernardino and San Diego can help with translation services if needed, the consulate said.

Source Article from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9327773/Guatemalan-woman-23-died-moms-arms-horror-SUV-crash-sneaking-border.html

Klein worked for a time in the State Department’s Office of Brazilian and Southern Cone Affairs before being transferred to the office that handles Freedom of Information Act requests, according to a former colleague who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

On Trump’s 2016 campaign, Klein — also known as Freddie — worked as a “tech analyst,” according to Federal Election Commission records. He earned $15,000 there, according to a financial disclosure he filed when he joined the State Department. He was paid an additional $5,000 by the campaign in 2017, the FEC records show.

An individual by the same name also worked briefly on Capitol Hill about two decades ago, for the House Small Business Committee and as an intern for Sen. George Allen (R-Va.).

The alleged presence of a Trump political appointee at the riot may tie those events more closely to the president, although there is already ample evidence that many of those charged were inspired by Trump’s false claims about widespread election fraud and by his call for supporters to descend on Washington on Jan. 6 for events that he promised would be “wild.”

Klein’s mother, Cecilia, said in a telephone interview on Thursday evening that she and her son discussed the Jan. 6 events a few weeks ago and that he confirmed he had been in Washington that day.

“As far as I know, he was on the Mall. That’s what he told me,” Cecilia Klein said.

She said she came away from the conversation with the impression that her son had not entered the Capitol, but she could not recall whether he specifically denied that. “I’m not sure he used those words,” she said.

Cecilia Klein, a retired trade official and economist, said she and her son rarely talk politics or discuss Trump because she and her son have starkly different views.

“Fred’s politics burn a little hot,” she said, “but I’ve never known him to violate the law. … While I believe, as he said, he was on the Mall that day, I don’t have any evidence, nor will I ever ask him, unless he tells me, where he was after he was on the Mall.”

Federico Klein served as a Marine in Iraq, his mother said. He held a top-secret clearance from 2014 to 2019, issued by the Defense Department, according to his LinkedIn page.

Before joining the 2016 Trump campaign, Klein worked as a researcher for the conservative Family Research Council and served as a Republican state convention delegate in Virginia, according to his LinkedIn page. He graduated from George Mason University in 2002.

Klein did not respond to voicemail and text messages seeking comment on Thursday.

More than 300 people have now been charged in federal court for events related to the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. The charges in the cases range from misdemeanor offenses, like entering a restricted area, to obstruction of Congress and assault on a police officer with a dangerous weapon.

Kyle Cheney contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/04/trump-appointee-arrested-for-capitol-riot-473825

“I can just sit back and say, ‘I don’t want to have anything to do with it, it’s a bill that spends too much and it doesn’t help in a targeted way’,” Murkowski said. But instead, she explained, “I’ve got to look at it from the perspective of ‘all right, it might not pass with my support. But if it’s going to pass, are there ways that it can be shaped’?’”

Asked about the Alaskan on Thursday, Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), the No. 3 GOP leader, dug out a paper clipping of a Washington Post story about Murkowski.

“Sen. McConnell has been very clear on that, for all Republicans. The goal is to present a united front against this massive spending bill,” Barrasso said. “It’s my hope that every Republican would vote no at a time we’re in a 50-50 Senate.”

Murkowski is unique, however, and so is her home of Alaska. The state is suffering economically, the pandemic has exacerbated the state’s woes, and she’s complained repeatedly that Biden’s less fossil fuel-friendly energy policies are hurting Alaskans. Moreover, her state changed its primary system recently to dilute the possibility of a conservative or Trump-inspired challenger, giving her room to legislate from the middle.

The centrist senator has held talks with the Biden administration about her state’s unique situation for several days now. She also cast a committee vote to support Rep. Deb Haaland (D-N.M.) to be Interior secretary on Thursday, even after her party portrayed Haaland’s energy policies as radical and despite some of her own policy reservations about the nomination.

But the $1.9 trillion stimulus bill is a much bigger matter than Haaland. And Murkowski’s approach to it is clearly on GOP leaders’ minds.

“Her vote’s her vote, but I’m hopeful she’ll be there. And I think all of our members are going to [oppose the bill] in the end,” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the No. 2 GOP leader.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who is leading opposition to the bill, said he has his “fingers crossed” that Murkowski joins the opposition. Technically Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) is also not a hard no, although she is unlikely to support the bill.

Murkowski called herself “listening Lisa” on Wednesday, admitting she was torn over what to do about the Covid legislation and talking to members in both parties. The moderate Republican is frustrated that Democrats have ignored bipartisan entreaties and written a bill that isn’t more narrowly focused on coronavirus relief spending.

Yet Murkowski also has acknowledged that her state is in a perilous situation that complicates the straightforward partisan calculus involved in opposing the massive recovery measure. She said she wants Democrats to make the case for why the bill is good for Alaska and clearly wants some changes to the legislation.

“We’re a 50-50 Senate. I am not in the majority, but it’s a pretty close divide, so I want to make sure that I can still be an effective lawmaker for my state — majority or minority,” she said on Thursday. “But the way that I do it is to talk to people and tell them what we got going on.”

The Alaska senator can be tough to read and even harder to predict. She voted against repealing Obamacare, opposed Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation and supported Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett — even as she railed against the process used to confirm Barrett.

Neera Tanden and the Biden administration lobbied Murkowski hard on her vote as Tanden fought to become Biden’s budget chief, a nomination that was pulled earlier this week. Much of their discussions centered on Alaska.

But in comparison to previous moments of uncertainty about Murkowski, Republicans are nudging her more directly to stay in their corner on the coronavirus bill.

“I hope that she would. Obviously, it’s a pretty toxic bill,” said Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.). “Alaska’s definitely a unique state, to say the least. But it is still part of a $2 trillion consequence, long-term, for the whole country.”

“We all look at our own states. And none of us begrudge the fact that she will look at that. We are hopeful that she will decide the amount of bad in the bill is enough to where she will decide it’s not appropriate to support it,” said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.).

The Biden administration’s rejection of 10 GOP senators’ entreaties for an aisle-crossing negotiation “has a part to play in this,” Rounds added.

But so too does local politics. Murkowski is up for reelection in 2022, and she is keen on standing up for the interests of her state. And to anyone that asks she’ll tell you: Alaska needs help.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/04/gop-murkowski-biden-covid-bill-473665