Newly released bodycam video shows a black man being stunned, dragged and punched by Louisiana state troopers before he died in custody following a high-speed chase.

“I’m your brother! I’m scared! I’m scared!” Ronald Greene, 49, can be heard telling the white officers as he was zapped with a stun gun after failing to pull over for an unspecified traffic violation outside of Monroe.

Footage of the arrest on May 10, 2019, was obtained by the Associated Press after authorities refused to release it for two years.

In the full 46-minute clip, one trooper can be seen wrestling the unarmed Greene to the ground, putting him in a chokehold and punching him in the face while another can be heard calling him a “stupid motherf——.”

“I’m sorry!” Greene can be heard wailing as another trooper uses a stun gun on his backside and warns, “Look, you’re going to get it again if you don’t put your f—king hands behind your back!” 

The footage also shows Greene briefly being dragged facedown by another trooper after his legs had been shackled and his hands cuffed behind him.

An officer seen dragging Ronald Greene after his arrest.
Louisiana State Police via AP
This image from video from Louisiana State Trooper Dakota DeMoss’ body-worn camera shows troopers holding up Ronald Greene before paramedics arrived on May 10, 2019, outside Monroe, Louisiana.
Louisiana State Police via AP
Troopers holding Ronald Greene before paramedics arrived.
Louisiana State Police via AP
An officer pushing Ronald Greene down on the ground with his foot.
Louisiana State Police via AP

He is then left unattended, facedown and moaning for more than nine minutes, as the troopers used sanitizer wipes to get the blood off their hands and faces, video shows.

“I hope this guy ain’t got f—king AIDS,” one of the troopers can be heard saying.

Several minutes later, Greene is seen limp, unresponsive and bleeding from his head and face. 

It’s unclear what exactly caused Greene’s death, but the case has drawn backlash — after authorities initially said Greene died when he crashed his vehicle into a tree.

His family has also filed a federal wrongful-death lawsuit alleging troopers “brutalized” him and “left him beaten, bloodied and in cardiac arrest.”

Greene’s mother, Mona Hardin, on Wednesday blasted the troopers.

“They murdered him. It was set out, it was planned,” she said. “He didn’t have a chance. Ronnie didn’t have a chance. He wasn’t going to live to tell about it.”

Lee Merritt, an attorney representing Greene’s family, said the footage “has some of the same hallmarks of the George Floyd video, the length of it, the sheer brutality of it.”

“He apologized in an attempt to surrender,” Merritt said.

Family members of Ronald Greene listen to speakers as demonstrators gather in Washington, DC, on Aug. 28, 2020.
Michael M. Santiago/Pool via AP
Louisiana Master Trooper Kory York was suspended without pay for kicking and dragging Ronald Greene (pictured).
Courtesy of the Greene family via AP
Mona Hardin (center left at podium), mother of Ronald Greene, speaks at a news conference outside the Louisiana Capitol.
AP Photo/Dorthy Ray

Louisiana State Police declined to comment on the footage, saying the “premature public release of investigative files and video evidence in this case is not authorized and … undermines the investigative process and compromises the fair and impartial outcome.”

With Post wires

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/05/20/troopers-stun-and-drag-black-man-before-his-death-video/

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies this month during a Senate hearing at the U.S. Capitol.

Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies this month during a Senate hearing at the U.S. Capitol.

Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief medical adviser to President Biden, says that he expects COVID-19 vaccinations to open up to younger children in the coming months.

He said Wednesday that children at least as young as 4 “would likely be able to get vaccinated by the time we reach the end of calendar year 2021 and at the latest, into the first quarter of 2022.”

When asked during an Axios virtual event whether he would recommend the shots for young children, he responded, “Absolutely. If I had grandchildren, I would certainly recommend they get vaccinated.”

Earlier this month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention endorsed the use of the Pfizer vaccine for children as young as 12, allowing the nationwide vaccination campaign to expand to adolescents.

Pfizer was the first vaccine manufacturer to gain emergency use authorization for 12- to 15-year-olds in the United States. Both Pfizer and Moderna are conducting clinical trials of their vaccines in groups of kids as young as 6 months.

Pfizer has said previously it expects to ask the Food and Drug Administration for emergency use authorization of its vaccine for children younger than 12 by September at the earliest. A request for the youngest group, infants and toddlers, would likely come several months later.

Amid vast disparities in vaccine distribution between countries, global health experts are grappling with how to prioritize vaccines for kids in the U.S. compared with more vulnerable populations in other countries.

“The question becomes, how do we best use the vaccines that are available right now around the world?” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove of the World Health Organization told NPR.

“It’s a very difficult question, but we can’t have groups that are at lower risk being vaccinated before those who are most at risk, caring for COVID patients in other parts of the world,” she added. Ultimately, she said that high-income countries must share vaccines with other nations, as well as vaccinate children, to help get out of the pandemic.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/05/20/998533237/fauci-says-he-expects-vaccines-for-younger-children-by-end-of-year-or-early-2022

Lori Lightfoot had her work cut out for her when she became mayor of Chicago in 2019, running as a progressive Democrat and outsider who would bring big change to City Hall. Among her early challenges: a troubled police department, deep financial problems, entrenched inequality, a teacher strike and a president who liked to pile on via Twitter.

Then the job got really difficult.

Lightfoot acknowledged this week that she hasn’t accomplished much of what she hoped when she replaced former Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel as mayor of the nation’s third-largest city, promising to do the job better. The pandemic and protests over police violence upended many of those plans, she said, adding she is “unbelievably proud” of what her administration has done.

But as she reaches the halfway point of her four-year term on Thursday, she faces an abundance of critics over her performance, and hundreds of people plan to protest near her home. Lightfoot drew new scrutiny this week by announcing that she would do one-on-one interviews about her tenure so far only with journalists of color because of the “overwhelming whiteness and maleness” of city media.

LEO TERRELL SLAMS CHICAGO’S LIGHTFOOD FOR IMPLEMENTING SYSTEMIC RACISM: SHE’S ‘RACIST REGARDLESS OF HER COLOR’

Lightfoot’s struggles have ignited new questions over whether big city mayors’ problems these days mostly lie with flawed officeholders who overpromise or with the job itself. Some cities, especially Chicago, now seem to stagger from one mayor under attack to the next.

“The reality is, I’m the mayor. I’m the target,” said Lightfoot, 58, who is Chicago’s first Black woman and first openly gay mayor. “People are unhappy, people are angry. And criticism comes with the job.”

Lightfoot is dealing with limitations that have confronted other progressive Democrats elected in recent years as cities have grown more left-leaning — as to what political or legal power they actually have to get things done, said Richard Schragger, a University of Virginia law professor who has written about mayoral powers.

What these mayors want to do requires approval from state government or is constrained by the political realities of representing sometimes millions of people with different interests. A progressive mayor whose supporters have called for defunding police, for example, enters office with a slightly hostile relationship to police, even as the mayor needs to rely on officers to police the city or help implement reforms.

“They’re operating in an environment where making change is really hard,” Schragger said.

As for the campaign promises? “It’s very hard to run on a platform of ‘I’ll do what I can within the constraints that restrain me.'”

The pandemic highlighted some of the handicaps faced by Democratic mayors in states controlled by Republican governors. In Texas, for example, the Democratic mayor of Houston wanted to keep a mask requirement in place, but Republican Gov. Greg Abbott lifted the mask mandate statewide. But roadblocks exist even when mayors, governors and Legislatures are controlled by the same party. In New York, Mayor Bill de Blasio tried for years to raise taxes on the highest earners but met with resistance from a fellow Democrat, Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

Lightfoot has clashed with Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker. He recently signed union-backed legislation regarding firefighter pensions despite Lightfoot’s objection that it would add to Chicago’s financial stresses. She blasted the move as typical Springfield lawmakers “cutting backroom deals.”

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot speaks at City Hall on April 8, 2020, during the coronavirus pandemic. A local report said Lightfoot has quietly lobbied against efforts to end qualified immunity for police officers. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

TUCKER CARLSON: EQUITY IS RACISM, BIGOTRY, PREJUDICE, AND HATRED

Chicago Public Schools, which serves some 300,000 students and has a roughly $8 billion budget, has been a particular problem for Lightfoot, with its shaky finances and academic shortcomings — one of the inherited issues she was supposed to improve. The mayor controls the district through an appointed school board, but she has tussled repeatedly with the Chicago Teachers Union, which backed Lightfoot’s Democratic opponent in the 2019 mayoral runoff.

Democratic lawmakers in the state capital are backing a plan to wrest control away from the mayor’s office and create an elected school board in Chicago. Lightfoot, who said during the campaign she would support an elected board, is now pushing instead for a board with some elected but most appointed.

Cassandra Kaczocha, a mother of two who lives on Chicago’s North Side, was an early supporter of Lightfoot and voted for her over roughly a dozen other candidates, calling her “the anti-Rahm.” Emanuel was criticized as too hard-charging and business friendly at the expense of working class and poor residents. Lightfoot talked about equity and listened to people, Kaczocha said.

Now, her shift on the school board issue is the kind of broken promise that Kaczocha can’t accept.

“I thought she’d govern like she campaigned, and we didn’t get that,” she said. “We got a very dictatorial style of governing, just like we did with Rahm, and it’s disappointing.”

Lightfoot has also angered activists by opposing a plan for civilian oversight of the police department and over news that her administration spent roughly $280 million of COVID relief funds to cover the cost of police personnel, including for security at COVID-related sites.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Meanwhile, gun violence in the city has increased. She’s also seen a number of top staff leave her administration, including most recently the head of Chicago Public Schools.

Lightfoot is touting the things she has been able to accomplish, including battling COVID and providing vaccines “in a data-driven and equitable manner” and working with businesses and philanthropic groups to invest in certain neighborhoods on the city’s south and west sides. Her team’s work saved lives, she said.

“No easy decisions, not one, but I’m proud of the work that we’ve done,” Lightfoot said. “I go to sleep at night comforted in the knowledge that every day I have worked my tail off for the residents of this city and I will continue to every day.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/chicago-mayor-faces-dashed-hopes-backers

The resolution aims to halt the planned sale to Israel by the Biden administration of JDAMs, or Joint Direct Attack Munitions, and Small Diameter Bombs, as the worst hostilities in years continue between Israel and Hamas. The resolution needs only a simple majority to pass the Senate; but if it were to be vetoed by President Joe Biden, it would need a two-thirds majority in both chambers to take effect.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/20/sen-bernie-sanders-introduce-resolution-disapproval-735-million-us-arms-sale-israel/

  • Thirty-five House Republicans voted for an investigation into the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
  • Republicans critical of President Trump’s role in the events broke ranks to vote for the probe.
  • The vote underscores the division within the GOP over Trump’s influence on the party’s direction.
  • Sign up for the 10 Things in Politics daily newsletter.

Thirty-five House Republicans on Wednesday voted in favor of a bill to establish a commission to investigate the January 6 attack on the Capitol.

Former President Donald Trump this week urged Republican lawmakers to oppose it, saying in a statement: “Republicans must get much tougher and much smarter, and stop being used by the Radical Left.”

The result underscores the ongoing division within the GOP over Trump’s role in and influence over the party’s direction, with many Republicans who had criticized the former president for his role in the events of January 6 — including Rep. Liz Cheney — breaking ranks to vote in favor of establishing a commission.

The bill passed by a vote of 252-175 and was opposed by GOP leadership, Insider’s Grace Panetta and Charles Davis reported.

Read more: Trump, Pelosi, and other fundraising juggernauts just got put on notice that they could be breaking the law with their spammy fundraising gimmicks

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy spoke out against the bill, saying the commission “does not examine interrelated forms of political violence in America,” and House Republican leadership on Tuesday also tried to pressure GOP lawmakers to vote against it, Punchbowl News reported.

The 35 House Republicans who broke ranks to vote in favor of the bill, GovTrack.us showed:

  • French Hill, Arkansas
  • Steve Womack, Arkansas
  • David Valadao, California
  • Carlos Gimenez, Florida
  • Maria Salazar, Florida
  • Mike Simpson, Idaho
  • Rodney Davis, Illinois
  • Adam Kinzinger, Illinois
  • Trey Hollingsworth, Indiana
  • Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Iowa
  • Meijer Peter, Michigan
  • Fred Upton, Michigan
  • Michael Guest, Mississippi
  • Jeff Fortenberry, Nebraska
  • Don Bacon, Nebraska
  • Chris Smith, New Jersey
  • Andrew Garbarino, New York
  • Tom Reed, New York
  • John Katko, New York
  • Chris Jacobs, New York
  • David Joyce, Ohio
  • Anthony Gonzalez, Ohio
  • Stephanie Bice, Oklahoma
  • Cliff Bentz, Oregon
  • Brian Fitzpatrick, Pennsylvania
  • Tom Rice, South Carolina
  • Dusty Johnson, South Dakota
  • Van Taylor, Texas
  • Tony Gonzales, Texas
  • Blake Moore, Utah
  • John Curtis, Utah
  • Jaime Herrera Beutler, Washington
  • Dan Newhouse, Washington
  • David McKinley, West Virginia
  • Liz Cheney, Wyoming

“I’m happy to put a light on all the facts and timelines,” said Rep. Don Bacon, ABC News reported, before his vote in favor of the bill. The list was first reported by CNN.

The bill is meant to establish a 10-member bipartisan commission to investigate the January 6 riot and publish a report by December 31 with “findings regarding the facts and causes of the attack.” Five members are expected to be chosen by Democratic leaders in the House and five members are expected to be chosen by GOP leaders.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/35-house-republicans-who-voted-for-january-6-commission-2021-5

Former President Trump’s long-serving chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, has been under criminal investigation by New York Attorney General Letitia James for several months, sources familiar with the matter told ABC News.

The investigation, the sources said, began with a referral from state tax authorities several months ago and involved Weisselberg’s compensation by the Trump Organization and whether taxes were properly paid.

Weisselberg, who has not been accused of any wrongdoing, has faced a similar investigation from Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, who has sought to flip Weisselberg into a cooperating witness against Trump and the company, sources have said.

Weisselberg’s former daughter-in-law, Jennifer Weisselberg, has been interviewed by the district attorney’s office, she told ABC News, and was asked about everything from school tuition, the family apartment and several cars.

“Some of the questions that they were asking were regarding Allen’s compensation at the apartment at Trump Place on Riverside Boulevard,” Jennifer Weisselberg told ABC News in an interview earlier this month.

Two members of the attorney general’s office recently joined the DA’s team, giving them a window into otherwise secret grand jury evidence and testimony.

The attorney general’s office revealed the collaboration in a statement late Tuesday, saying it was now investigating Trump in a “criminal capacity,” though any charges would be filed by the district attorney’s office.

Trump, in a statement Wednesday, called James and Vance “Democrat offices… consumed with this political and partisan Witch Hunt.”

In March, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office subpoenaed the personal financial records of Weisselberg, two sources familiar with the matter confirmed to ABC News, and Weisselberg, who has worked for former President Trump for decades has been a focus of the DA’s investigation into the financial dealings of the former president, his family and company.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-cfo-faces-criminal-inquiry-sources/story?id=77799386

CHICAGO — To mark the second anniversary of her swearing-in, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot announced Tuesday that she would only grant one-on-one interviews to Black and Brown journalists.

She defended her decision during her one and one with WGN’s Tahman Bradley.

“I’m thinking in this one day when we are looking at the two-year anniversary of my inauguration, as a woman of color, as a lesbian, it’s important to me that diversity is put front in center,” Lightfoot said.

The move infuriated the mostly white City Hall press corps.

The outrage exploded on Twitter. One Latino newspaper reporter wrote he agreed to the sit-down but backed out to make a point.

“If I as the black woman mayor, the first ever, don’t challenge us, the collective us, to do better, to really make sure that in every institution it reflects the diversity, nuance and texture, the shame on me,” Lightfoot said.

Lightfoot is known to clash with opponents or those who question her. Reporting on leaked emails revealed the mayor upset about critical reporting and commentary canceled her Chicago Tribune subscription.

When asked if this was payback Lightfoot said, “It has nothing to do with that. The facts are the facts. Look at the people who cover City Hall.”

Political analyst Charles Thomas knows the City Hall beat well, as a former television political reporter. He says although newsroom diversity is an important topic, he questions the mayor’s timing.

“This is a distraction,” he said. “Instead of talking about crime, talking about disarray in her administration, talking about education, talking about city finances, we’re talking about this.”

Tahman Bradley will have much more on his one-on-one in which he and Lightfoot discussed police reform, an elected school board, COVID’s impact on business and much more later today on the WGN News

Source Article from https://wgntv.com/news/politics/mayor-lightfoot-defends-granting-interviews-to-only-black-and-brown-journalists/

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies during a hearing at the U.S. Capitol earlier this month.

Jim Lo Scalzo/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jim Lo Scalzo/AP

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies during a hearing at the U.S. Capitol earlier this month.

Jim Lo Scalzo/AP

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief medical adviser to President Biden, says that he expects COVID-19 vaccinations to open up to younger children in the coming months.

He said Wednesday that children at least as young as four “would likely be able to get vaccinated by the time we reach the end of calendar year 2021 and at the latest, into the first quarter of 2022.”

When asked during an Axios virtual event whether he would recommend the shots for young children, he responded, “Absolutely. If I had grandchildren, I would certainly recommend they get vaccinated.”

Earlier this month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention endorsed the use of the Pfizer vaccine for children as young as 12, allowing the nationwide vaccination campaign to expand to adolescents.

Pfizer was the first vaccine manufacturer to gain emergency use authorization for 12 to 15-year-olds in the United States. Both Pfizer and Moderna are conducting clinical trials of their vaccines in groups of kids as young as six months.

Pfizer has said previously that it expects to ask the Food and Drug Administration for emergency use authorization of its vaccine for children younger than 12 by September at the earliest. A request for the youngest group, infants and toddlers, would likely come several months later.

Amid vast disparities in vaccine distribution between countries, global health experts are grappling with how to prioritize vaccines for kids in the U.S. compared to more vulnerable populations in other countries.

“The question becomes, how do we best use the vaccines that are available right now around the world?” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove of the World Health Organization told NPR.

“It’s a very difficult question, but we can’t have groups that are at lower risk being vaccinated before those who are most at risk, caring for COVID patients in other parts of the world,” she added. Ultimately, she said that high income countries must share vaccines with other nations, as well as vaccinate children, to help get out of the pandemic.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/05/20/998533237/fauci-says-he-expects-vaccines-for-younger-children-by-end-of-year-or-early-2022

Delicious pasta in Florence, a walk down the Champs-Élysées in Paris, or a beautiful sunset on one of the Greek islands — tourism in Europe is looking to get back to normal this summer.

EU countries officially agreed on Thursday to welcome foreign travelers who have received one of the coronavirus vaccines approved by European regulators. So far, these include the vaccines from Pfizer and BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. Vaccinated people will be allowed to enter the bloc, if they’ve received the last recommended dose at least 14 days before their arrival in the EU.

Ultimately, each member state will decide when to reopen its borders and to whom. Therefore, each government from the 27 nations will decide whether to completely lift quarantine measures and/or testing for international visitors.

Children who are excluded from vaccination can travel to the bloc with their family, if they’ve had a negative test no more than 72 hours before arrival.

Though it remains to be seen how each EU nation will welcome foreign travelers, the agreement at the EU level is a welcome step by the battered tourism industry.

“We know that consumers want to be able to travel this summer and so we welcome that European countries could enable those who are vaccinated could travel without the need for testing,” a spokesperson for the airline easyJet told CNBC via email.

“It is of course important that this is implemented in a simple way to ensure it is easy for passengers,” the same spokesperson said.

The EU decision could be particularly important for British tourists, who are now outside of the EU and represent one of the most important markets for tourism-reliant EU nations. In addition, people in the United States, Israel and other highly vaccinated parts of the world are also likely to benefit from the EU’s stance.

Up until now, the EU was only assessing a country’s coronavirus infection rate to decide whether visitors should be allowed in. But the bloc is also now relaxing this rule and more citizens from more countries will get the greenlight.  

But, Brussels is also conscious that the health situation might change due to new variants of the virus.

As a result, EU countries have also agreed on a new “emergency break,” meaning that if the epidemiological situation in one nation deteriorates, then they will be able to impose travel restrictions from that country quickly.

Travel and leisure stocks in Europe closed higher by 1.5% on Thursday.

Stephen Furlong, senior analyst at wealth management firm Davy, told CNBC that the EU’s decision was broadly expected by market players, hence the muted stock reaction.

“It is still not clear whether the U.S. is opening to Europe,” he said, regarding one of the main uncertainties for international travel this summer, while predicting that he doesn’t expect “consumers will travel in scale.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/20/europe-is-welcoming-vaccinated-tourists-this-summer.html

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/05/20/israel-unleashes-strikes-gaza/5179254001/

The New York attorney general’s office has reportedly been investigating a longtime top Trump Organization executive’s taxes in a criminal capacity for several months.

CNN reported Wednesday that New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) has been probing the personal taxes of Allen WeisselbergAllen Howard WeisselbergNY AG was probing Trump Organization CFO’s taxes for months: report New York prosecutors investigating Trump Organization in a ‘criminal capacity’ Prosecutors subpoena NYC school in pursuit of info from Trump confidant: report MORE, chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, for months, according to people familiar with the investigation. The probe is reportedly being overseen by a small unit in the attorney general’s office that has the power to bring criminal charges.

The investigation is centered on Weisselberg as an individual, sources told CNN, but it could be expanded to include actions he has taken at the Trump Organization.

Weisselberg has overseen the Trump Organization’s finances for 40 years, according to CNN.

Weisselberg is also part of the Manhattan district attorney’s office’s investigation into the Trump Organization. According to CNN, prosecutors at that office, led by Cy Vance Jr., are probing his role at the Trump Organization, his personal finances and benefits given to his son Barry, who is also a longtime employee at the Trump Organization.

Vance’s office is reportedly coordinating with James’s office on the criminal investigation involving Weisselberg.

Weisselberg has not be charged with any wrongdoing, the network noted.

Investigators are reportedly trying to uncover leverage that could persuade Weisselberg to cooperate with authorities, CNN reported, citing people familiar with the investigation.

Weisselberg’s potential cooperation could increase pressure on Trump, his family and his organization.

CNN noted that Weisselberg recently added to his legal team, bringing on Bryan Skarlatos, a tax specialist and criminal defense lawyer.

A spokesperson for James said the attorney general does not have a comment at this time.

James’s office announced on Tuesday that it is now investigating the Trump Organization in a “criminal capacity” in addition to a “civil capacity.”

Her office is working with Vance’s office to determine if the organization inflated the value of its properties to lenders and insurers and if it paid the appropriate amount of taxes.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/554477-ny-ag-was-probing-trump-organization-cfos-taxes-for-months

  • The House voted on Wednesday to create a bipartisan commission to study the January 6 insurrection.
  • Only 35 Republicans voted in favor of the bill, with GOP leadership expressing opposition.
  • Rep. Tim Ryan gave an impassioned speech after the vote, ripping into those who voted against it.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Rep. Tim Ryan of Ohio ripped into House Republicans who voted against creating a commission to investigate the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol.

Speaking from the House floor on Wednesday after the vote, the Democrat thanked the GOP members who supported the commission and accused the rest of “incoherence” and of not “living in reality.”

“Holy cow! Incoherence! No idea what you’re talking about,” Ryan began.

Read more: Secret Service protection would follow Donald Trump if he goes to prison, former agents say

He then compared the multiple investigations carried out by House Republicans into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over the 2012 Benghazi attack to their disinterest in investigating the Capitol attack.

“We have people scaling the Capitol, hitting the Capitol police with lead pipes across the head, and we can’t get bipartisanship,” he shouted. “What else has to happen in this country?”

 

Ryan also said votes against the commission were “a slap in the face to every rank and file cop in the United States.”

He concluded: “If we’re going to take on China, if we’re going to rebuild the country, if we’re going to reverse climate change, we need two political parties in this country that are both living in reality, and you ain’t one of them!”

The House passed a bill Wednesday to create a bipartisan commission to investigate the insurrection in a 252-175 vote, with 35 Republicans voting in favor. Republican leadership in the House and Senate have publicly opposed the bill.

The commission will be made up of five Republicans and five Democrats, and will have the ability to issue subpoenas for relevant information concerning the insurrection.

Have a news tip? Contact this reporter at kvlamis@insider.com.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/tim-ryan-rips-into-republicans-voting-against-january-6-commission-2021-5

Demonstrators in support of former President Donald Trump gather on May 1 outside the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix, where a controversial 2020 general election review was set to begin. Trump has heartily supported the audit.

Courtney Pedroza/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtney Pedroza/Getty Images

Demonstrators in support of former President Donald Trump gather on May 1 outside the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix, where a controversial 2020 general election review was set to begin. Trump has heartily supported the audit.

Courtney Pedroza/Getty Images

With Twitter taken away from him, former President Donald Trump has been largely out of the spotlight and unable to drive news narratives the way he did when he was president and on social media.

But Trump continues to have great influence with Republican elected leaders because of his continued popularity with the GOP base.

And he’s ramping up the messages he’s sending for all to see on the blog-like portion of his post-presidency website. What’s he focused on? Relitigating his election loss.

An analysis of Trump’s posts on the site shows that his entries have spiked so far this month and that overall a plurality of the statements have mentioned his 2020 election loss or baseless claims of fraud or have cited efforts at relitigating the results.

One focus for the former president has been the controversial election review that continues in Arizona. And the messages come as that state and other Republican-led states, like Georgia, have enacted new voting restrictions.

Loading…

By the numbers, here’s a look at the kinds of posts that Trump has put out, through midday Wednesday:

  • 83 total posts, dating back to late March (The blog portion of his site launched May 4, but other posts — statements from his Save America PAC — were then added.)
  • 30 mention the 2020 election or reviews of it, or about 36% of the total
  • 18 about endorsements
  • 10 about Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo.
  • 9 have included policy criticisms of President Biden

Jan. 6 commission and Cheney

It’s clear where Trump’s focus is. He wants to continue to influence the GOP message and be a kingmaker. Given his current front-runner status for the 2024 presidential nomination and his popularity within the Republican Party, he’s well situated to do that.

And Republican elected officials appear to be listening.

On Wednesday, the House passed a measure to create a 9/11-style commission to examine the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol. The bill passed with all Democrats and a few dozen Republicans supporting it. But Republican House leadership formally opposed it and urged conference members to vote against it. (Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell also opposes the measure.)

“Given the political misdirections that have marred this process, given the now duplicative and potentially counterproductive nature of this effort,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said in a statement Tuesday, “and given the Speaker’s shortsighted scope that does not examine interrelated forms of political violence in America, I cannot support this legislation.”

That’s right in line with what Trump said later the same day on his website.

“Republicans in the House and Senate should not approve the Democrat trap of the January 6 Commission,” he wrote. “It is just more partisan unfairness and unless the murders, riots, and fire bombings in Portland, Minneapolis, Seattle, Chicago, and New York are also going to be studied, this discussion should be ended immediately.”

On Jan. 6, as the violence was unfolding, McCarthy phoned Trump, urging him to call for calm. On the House floor, McCarthy voiced disapproval of Trump’s actions that day, but since then, he has done an about-face. McCarthy met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida, posing for a photo together.

And after initially backing Cheney to stay in leadership, McCarthy later joined ranks with those calling for her ouster.

Cheney voted for Trump’s impeachment and has continued to speak out against the former president, his baseless claims about the election and his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection. Cheney was voted out of conference leadership last week.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/20/998352776/out-of-the-spotlight-trump-continues-to-command-the-republican-message

The U.S. has opposed a United Nations resolution that calls for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas saying it would interfere with efforts by the Biden administration to de-escalate the situation.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations told The Associated Press “we’ve been clear and consistent that we are focused on intensive diplomatic efforts under way to bring an end to the violence and that we will not support actions that we believe undermine efforts to de-escalate.”

The resolution was drafted by France, according to AP.

The U.S. had blocked at least four attempts to issue a press statement calling for a ceasefire, AP noted.

It requires nine votes as opposed to press statements, which require 15 members. 

According to Reuters, the U.N. sough to call for an immediate cessation of hostilities, and condemn “the indiscriminate firing of rockets against civilian areas.” The resolution also urged protection of civilians and reviving the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians.

The U.S. has condemned the violence in Gaza. President BidenJoe BidenIsrael-Hamas ceasefire could come as soon as Friday: report US opposes UN resolution calling on Israel-Gaza ceasefire Parents of 54 migrant children found after separation under Trump administration MORE has expressed support for a ceasefire.

Biden has spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin NetanyahuBenjamin (Bibi) NetanyahuMORE four times since May 10. In the most recent call Wednesday, Biden said he expects “significant de-escalation” of violence, and hopes to put the two sides “on the path to a ceasefire.”

But after the call, Netanyahu said he is “determined to continue” military operations against Hamas, adding “I am determined to continue this operation until its objective is achieved: to restore the calm and security to you, citizens of Israel.”

The Palestinian Health Ministry said Wednesday that 227 Palestinians had been killed, including 64 children, 38 women and 17 elderly people. Another 1,620 had been injured.

Mark Lowcock, the UN Under Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, said in a statement on Tuesday that hostilities have displaced over 58,000 Palestinians.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/international/middle-east-north-africa/554483-us-opposes-un-resolution-calling-on-israel-gaza

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., wears a mask as she departs a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., wears a mask as she departs a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The debate over masks has returned to the House floor.

As an increasing number of Republicans express frustration that they have to continue to wear masks on the floor of the chamber, a GOP-led resolution to change the House’s guidance on masks was tabled on Wednesday evening.

Their effort comes after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week eased its guidelines on face coverings, saying that those who have received a full course of a COVID-19 vaccine are mostly free to go maskless indoors and out, except where required by law and local regulations.

That guidance, which the CDC says is scientifically sound, was the cause of much confusion across the country over the weekend.

Many House Republicans say the chamber is no longer following science on the pandemic and use of masks.

Tuesday kicked off the fight in what has become a cultural touchpoint between the more-mask-embracing political left and rightwing skeptics of the coronavirus and its spread.

During an evening vote, nearly a dozen Republicans staged a mini rebellion and removed their masks on the House floor. Three were slapped with $500 fines for their second offense.

The cost of noncompliance goes up to $2,500 with subsequent offenses, and fines are automatically withdrawn from offending members’ paychecks — a rule championed by a perennial GOP foil, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

On Wednesday, led by Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Republicans introduced an ultimately doomed resolution to scrap the chamber’s mask rules.

“The continued House mask mandate hinders the ability of the House to properly and effectively conduct the people’s business,” the GOP resolution reads, citing the new CDC recommendations.

Signees write of the low likelihood that vaccinated members could pass the virus to others, and say that “those who have not yet received the vaccine pose no real threat to those who have been vaccinated.”

The motion requests that Congress’ attending physician, Dr. Brian Monahan, “take timely action to provide updated mask wearing guidance applicable to the Hall of the House of Representatives” for members and staff who have been vaccinated.

But in a Wednesday memo, Monahan reiterated the current rules stipulating that House members continue to mask up when in the chamber, and said that rule would remain unchanged until all members had been vaccinated.

Pelosi, in Wednesday remarks on the House floor, reminded members of that rule and scolded those who refused to adhere to the mandate.

“The chair expects members to conduct themselves in appropriate decorum in the House chamber at all times. That includes proper attire, behavior that is respectful of other members and of our staff, and adherence to mask requirements and other safety protocols, intended to protect all of those present in the Hall of the House,” she said.

Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin was less diplomatic in his assessment of Republicans who were fighting the mandate.

Speaking on Tuesday evening after the mask removal demonstration, Raskin said: “One hundred percent of the Democrats had been vaccinated, and if we had 100% of the members vaccinated, we could all take our masks off.”

“We should be protesting them.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/19/998419931/democrats-and-republicans-square-off-over-house-mask-mandate

  • The New York AG’s office said its investigation into the Trump Organization is criminal in nature.
  • The unusual announcement could help shake out more cooperating witnesses, legal experts say.
  • By working closely with the Manhattan DA, the NYAG signaled a low chance of legal turf fights.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

The New York Attorney General’s unusual announcement that its investigation into the Trump Organization is now criminal could be part of a strategy to shake loose more cooperating witnesses, according to legal experts.

Late Tuesday night, a spokesperson for the attorney general’s office first told CNN that its investigation was being conducted “in a criminal capacity.”

The spokesperson also said prosecutors were working with the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, which has so far been running its own separate investigation into former president Donald Trump’s and the Trump Organization’s finances.

“We have informed the Trump Organization that our investigation into the organization is no longer purely civil in nature,” Fabien Levy, New York State Attorney General Letitia James’s press secretary, told Insider. “We are now actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity, along with the Manhattan DA.”

The statement struck legal observers as unusual.

The New York Attorney General’s and Manhattan District Attorney’s offices rarely make public comments about the progress of ongoing investigations — unless they’re highlighting some victory in court. Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. commented on winning Supreme Court cases to subpoena Trump’s tax documents, and New York Attorney General Letitia James addressed the subpoena of Eric Trump. Both offices declined Insider’s requests for comment beyond Levy’s statement.

An attorney representing Jennifer Weisselberg, a cooperating witness in both investigations who was married to the son of the Trump Organization’s CFO, said he had already been in contact with attorneys from the criminal division of James’ office.

Duncan Levin told Insider the notion that James’ investigation was criminal in nature “did not come as news” to him, nor was it news that her attorneys were teaming up with Vance’s.

“They’ve told us previously that they’re coordinating their efforts with the DA’s office,” he said. “We understand that they’re in touch with each other and that they’re coordinating their investigations together. We’ve known that for a while.”

Shaking loose more cooperating witnesses

Prosecutors in both offices are said to be examining whether the former president or his company committed financial crimes by keeping two sets of books: one that presented a rosy portrait of finances to secure favorable insurance and loan terms, and another that showed more dire figures in order to evade taxes.

Jeff Robbins, a former attorney for the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, oversaw money-laundering probes as a federal prosecutor. He said the statement from James’ office was likely designed to “shake loose” more people in Trump’s orbit who could cooperate.

Michael Cohen leaves federal court on Aug. 21, 2018, in New York.

AP Photo/Mary Altaffer


Some potential witnesses or cooperators may have decided there was limited risk in ignoring prosecutors’ phone calls in a civil investigation; there’s a bigger risk if they don’t cooperate with a criminal investigation, he said.

“One possible calculation in making this announcement yesterday is to announce to those people: ‘You know what, the time for standing on the sidelines is over,'” Robbins, now the co-chair of the Congressional Investigations practice at Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, told Insider.

High-profile people in Trump’s orbit already know that prosecutors have been seeking their cooperation. Michael Cohen, for example, has testified around a dozen times for the Manhattan District Attorney’s office. Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization CFO, appears to have rebuffed requests for cooperation.

But peripheral figures — former rank-and-file employees, tax preparers, insurance analysts, accountants — can still be helpful for prosecutors, according to Randy Zelin, a professor at Cornell Law School and white-collar criminal defense attorney at Wilk Auslander LLP. He said Tuesday’s announcement could bring them out of the shadows.

“The announcement is meant to do a couple of things, the most important of which just to continue to shake people up,” Zelin told Insider. “Anyone who in Trump’s orbit hearing that announcement is probably, aside from the sphincter tightening, they’re immediately on the phone with their lawyer.”

Robbing Trump and his company of a strategy to challenge potential charges

It’s not clear whether the Manhattan DA or New York AG will bring charges and, if they do, what those charges may be. Prosecutors could charge Trump personally; charge only the Trump Organization; charge certain executives; or they may not bring charges at all.

In a 909-word statement Wednesday, Trump derided the investigations as illegitimate and politically motivated.

The announcement of closer cooperation between the two offices could make it harder for Trump or the Trump Organization to evade litigation, however.

Defendants often try to dismiss or delay court proceedings based on jurisdictional issues. Vance’s office may have the authority to bring certain charges that James’s office doesn’t, and vice versa.

Donald Trump boards the elevator in Trump Tower in 2017.

DOMINICK REUTER/AFP via Getty Images


It’s common for defendants to argue the prosecutor who brought a case doesn’t have the authority to do so, and ask a judge to dismiss the case on those grounds. Prosecutors also sometimes try to take credit for major cases by claiming they have the sole authority to bring charges.

But the announcement that James’ office is working with Vance’s suggests they’ve worked out jurisdictional turfs between themselves, Zelin told Insider, making it less likely that Trump or his company can tie up their potential cases in the courts.

“There are times when there’s a clash of egos. And there are times when egos get put aside and there’s enough for everyone,” Zelin said. “I think here — when you’re talking about going after the former president of the United States, which in and of itself is going to be a daunting task — the agencies are very happy to say, OK, let’s divide and conquer here.”

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-attorney-general-criminal-trump-investigation-flip-cooperating-witnesses-2021-5

“For a person with a normal menstrual cycle, that is only two weeks after a missed period,” Dyana Limon-Mercado, executive director of Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, said in a statement. “When you factor in the time it takes to confirm a pregnancy, consider your options and make a decision, schedule an appointment and comply with all the restrictions politicians have already put in place for patients and providers, a six-week ban essentially bans abortion outright.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/05/19/texas-abortion-law-abbott/

All indications are that GOP voters are united and energized and the party is doing what’s necessary to make Kevin McCarthy speaker in January 2023, which would instantly squash the never-very-plausible talk of Joe Biden being the next FDR or LBJ.

The foundation of the GOP’s unity, of course, is that Donald Trump, with a very brief exception of the immediate aftermath of January 6, effortlessly maintained his control of the GOP. The anticipated civil war came and went with barely a shot fired.

Cheney is certainly a casualty, although she is now less a leader of a significant faction of the party and more a voice crying in the wilderness. That is an honorable role, and she may well be vindicated in the fullness of time (and deserves to be on the merits).

But the party will pay no electoral price for the drama over her leadership role, or, likely, for its continued loyalty to Trump.

Despite Trump’s grip, he’s not front and center for the average voter. He isn’t president and he isn’t on the ballot anywhere. Republicans aren’t going to be running next November on relitigating the 2020 election or January 6. The focus inevitably will be on Biden and his agenda, which will loom much larger than anything the former president can do from Mar-a-Lago.

The Democratic polling outfit Democracy Corps just did a survey of 2022 battlegrounds that confirmed for Republicans this general picture. Fully three-quarters of the GOP are Trump loyalists or Trump-aligned. As Stanley Greenberg writes in a memo about the poll, among Republicans, “the percent scoring 10, the highest level of interest in the election, has fallen from 84 to 68 percent. But Democrats’ engagement fell from 85 percent to 57 percent.”

Greenberg calls the GOP base “uniquely unified and engaged.”

More evidence is the boffo fundraising by the National Republican Campaign Committee so far. It raised $33.7 million in the first quarter, a bit less than the Democrats, but the Democrats have an overhang of debt. Meanwhile, GOP candidate recruitment is ahead of the pace of prior midterm cycles, whereas Democrats are seeing worrisome retirements.

It’s not as though there’s a high bar for the GOP. Republicans need to flip only six seats in the House, when in the post-World War II era the president’s party has lost on average 27 seats in midterm elections.

With the margin so slim, even a marked overperformance, say, where Biden matches George H.W. Bush’s feat in 1990 of holding losses to eight seats, wouldn’t be enough to save the House.

On top of this, the playing field is tilting the GOP’s way. Reapportionment gave more seats to states where Republicans predominate and fewer to states where Democrats predominate. Based on their strength in state legislatures, Republicans also have the upper hand in redistricting, including in Texas, Florida and Ohio.

The Biden theory is that $6 trillion in spending will deliver a roaring economy that will take the edge off typical midterm losses. But the latest jobs and inflation numbers show that it might not be so simple, and there is considerable doubt whether Biden can get his spending. Democrats may find themselves in the same dispiriting position as Trump-era Republicans after John McCain’s thumbs-down on Obamacare—controlling the elected branches of Washington, but largely stymied on substance.

Greenberg derives some comfort from his belief that, in contrast to 2020, “this time, Democrats cannot fail to see how early Trump’s party is fully engaged with its ongoing culture war, focused on crime, open borders, and defunding the police.”

Yet there is no indication of any effort to seriously defuse these issues. Biden’s polices have needlessly created a crisis at the border, and murder rates continue to climb in major cities, even as much of the left still talks of the police as if it’s a racist occupying force.

There are miles to go before November 2022. Biden might find a way to thread the needle of cooperating with Republicans on infrastructure and police reform without alienating his own base, and unforeseen events always take a hand.

But the story of 2021 is emphatically not a Republican meltdown. Despite what you read, the GOP stands a good chance to end its bout in the wilderness after two short years.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/05/19/the-gop-future-is-bright-489684