Caitlyn Jenner emphasized some standard conservative positions on the economy and blocking illegal entry into the U.S., but eschewed more hardline positions. | Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP, File

OAKLAND — Reality TV star Caitlyn Jenner portrayed herself as a fiscal conservative and social liberal in a Monday CNN conversation that marked her second national TV interview since she launched her California gubernatorial recall campaign last month.

Jenner emphasized some standard conservative positions on the economy and blocking illegal entry into the U.S., but eschewed more hardline positions. She initially pushed back when reporter Dana Bash called her a Republican, saying she was “kind of on the Republican side.” Jenner is a registered Republican voter in Los Angeles County.

“I don’t like labels, you know,” Jenner said. “I’m me. OK? This is how I do it. Just because I have conservative economic philosophy, that’s the only thing that the Republicans are kind of on that I’m on. But I don’t know, maybe you call me a Libertarian, maybe you call me the middle. I really don’t know because when it comes to social issues, I’m much more progressive, much more liberal.”

Jenner supported former President Donald Trump’s election in 2016 before criticizing him in 2018 on transgender issues. Despite reports that Trump is considering a 2024 run, Jenner said in the interview that “we’re in a post-Trump era.” But it took multiple questions for her to say, “No, I believe in the system” when she was asked if she thought President Joe Biden did not win the 2020 election.

Jenner gave the impression of a candidate still sorting through her political positions. She said she has been meeting with advisers from the fiscally conservative Hoover Institution at Stanford University to get up to speed on California issues. The interview aired Monday night but was taped earlier at her home in Malibu.

She aligned herself with the Republican mainstream by saying she opposed new taxes, warning against illegal immigration and decrying what she called excessive environmental regulations. But she also seemed to embrace somewhat more moderate positions by advocating for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and saying she would follow the advice of Kim Kardashian, her former wife’s daughter, on criminal justice reform.

As she competes for attention with other Republican candidates — including former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer, businessman John Cox and former Rep. Doug Ose — Jenner has been pressed to provide more details on her policy positions after she declared in late April she will run in the recall against Gov. Gavin Newsom.

She has already released a campaign platform of rejecting tax increases and pushing the Legislature to more regularly review and discard regulations, cementing her conservative economic views. She wants to prod local governments to accelerate housing construction, a tactic that Newsom has embraced. She elaborated on that in her CNN interview by criticizing the California Environmental Quality Act, which critics have long derided for stalling development.

“I would freeze taxes. I would freeze regulations,” Jenner said.

Jenner broke with Newsom on environmental policy by saying she would “probably not” support a 2018 California law that sets a goal for the state to have 100 percent zero emissions energy by 2045. She said the market should determine when that shift occurs.

“Fossil fuel will eventually leave,” Jenner said, but “for the time being, fossil fuels are around.”

Asked which experts she’s met with, Jenner only mentioned “Lee” at the Hoover Institution. The think tank has become a well-worn stop for Republican gubernatorial candidates over the years; former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger tapped former Secretary of State and Hoover scholar George Shultz as an economic adviser during his 2003 recall campaign.

Lee Ohanian, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a UCLA economics professor, confirmed to POLITICO on Monday night that he was the “Lee” in question. Jenner praised him as “so smart” and “like my new best friend.” Ohanian said he met with her by Zoom after her campaign approached him for his views on housing affordability and other issues.

“We spoke about common sense reforms to the California Environmental Quality Act … which as you probably know has been used in some legitimate ways but perhaps in some other ways to try to delay building,” he said.

Ohanian is not an official campaign adviser but is “informally speaking with her,” as Hoover invites any political candidates to do. He’s also informally speaking with Faulconer’s campaign on economic issues, “and I’d be happy to chat with Gavin Newsom if he’s so inclined.”

On criminal justice reform, Jenner changed her tone in the CNN interview after having previously assailed “Gavin’s District Attorneys” on Twitter, setting herself against progressive reformers. She said she would follow the guidance of Kardashian, who has advocated for more lenient sentencing.

Jenner last week told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that she supports Trump’s wall along the southern border. But she also hinted in the same interview that she sympathizes with undocumented immigrants already living in the U.S.

Asked if California’s 1.75 million undocumented immigrants should have a path to citizenship, Jenner told CNN, “I would hope so.’’ Saying she is “for legal immigration,” Jenner added she was inspired to run for governor by some of the current upheaval on the border, which she said included “kids in cages.”

She declared she was “absolutely” in favor of citizenship for many undocumented people, saying “I have met some wonderful people who have come to this country,” though she added “the bad ones” with criminal records should be deported.

Recent polling show a robust majority of California voters, include more than two-thirds of Republican likely voters, support creating a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who are living in the country if they complete requirements like paying back taxes.

Nevertheless, after a preview of her CNN interview hit social media, Jenner took to Twitter to reassure GOP voters that she was still strongly in favor of Trump policies on immigration. “I am for LEGAL immigration. I strongly support the wall and I oppose open borders,” she tweeted. “As Gov, I will end CA being a sanctuary state and I would see violent criminals deported immediately.”

Jenner did not address the fact that as governor, she would have limited power over the issue, since California’s sanctuary state status is the result of legislation that has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. California governors do not have the power to unilaterally repeal laws.

Jenner’s appearance on CNN came after a rough campaign rollout in which she was criticized for a website that originally failed to provide any policy policy positions. Then comments she made last week on “Hannity” went viral and were mocked by comedians after she lamented that a neighboring private plane owner at her airport hangar is abandoning California because he “can’t take” seeing people experiencing homelessness anymore.

Jenner, 71, is a wealthy political newcomer who became a celebrity nearly five decades ago with a gold medal win in the 1976 Olympic decathlon. But she’s also spent years on reality TV’s “Keeping Up With the Kardashians” and has become a high-profile transgender rights activist.

Sources say the reality TV star has been meeting with supporters and GOP activists, and is involved in fundraising. But so far, the candidate has done no public events and just one interview with California media about her drive to lead the nation’s most populous state.

She said in the Monday interview that her famous children “are not involved whatsoever in this.” Jenner said she told them “I am not going to ask you for one tweet. I’m not going to ask you for one thing. You guys live your life.”

In that sit-down with the Los Angeles Times last week, Jenner said she was curious as to how her gubernatorial campaign would be met by the public and the press.

“Here I am, little Caitlyn. I’ve lived my life authentically for the last six years. I’ve never been happier,” she said. “Things have never been better. And I never could have done this in my old life.”

Ben Leonard contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2021/05/10/jenner-im-kind-of-a-republican-says-were-in-post-trump-era-1381278

A growing number of Republican-led states are rejecting increased unemployment benefits meant to help Americans during the coronavirus pandemic, a move they say will help business owners who can’t find staff. But President Joe Biden said Monday that the enhanced federal benefits aren’t why people aren’t going back to work.

“The line has been because of the generous unemployment benefits, that it’s a major factor in labor shortages. Americans want to work. Americans want to work.” Biden said at the White House on Monday. “I think the people claiming Americans won’t work even if they find a good and fair opportunity underestimate the American people.” 

Anyone collecting unemployment who is offered a “suitable job” must take that job or lose unemployment benefits, Biden said, with several exceptions that mean people do not have to choose between their safety and a paycheck. 

But officials in Montana, South Carolina and Arkansas have announced they will exit the program by the end of June. Montana Governor Greg Gianforte said the “vast expansion of federal unemployment benefits is now doing more harm than good.” 

Arizona’s governor reinstated some requirements waived during the pandemic for unemployed workers to receive benefits. Vermont’s work search requirements for those receiving benefits were also reinstated as of this week.

And other states are pondering similar measures, in light of the Friday report from the Department of Labor showing that the economy added 266,000 jobs in April, far fewer than the 1 million experts expected. 

On Sunday, Utah Governor Spencer Cox told CNN he thinks exiting pandemic-related unemployment benefits is a good idea, arguing the recent lower-than-expected jobs report is “what happens when we pay people not to work.” 

But the president disagreed, saying Monday there are still 8 million fewer jobs than when the pandemic started. He called those benefits a “lifeline.” The American Rescue Plan passed in March extended $300 unemployment benefits through early September.

“We’ll insist that the law is followed with respect to benefits,” Biden said Monday. “But we’re not going to turn our backs on our fellow Americans.”

Several studies have examined the connection between benefits and unemployed people returning to work. In February, a study by JPMorgan Chase Institute found little evidence that increased benefits discouraged people from returning to the job. It found after Congress boosted supplemental insurance to $600 last spring at the onset of the pandemic, many jobless workers who received the money returned to work before the supplement expired.

Speaking at the White House press briefing Friday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen also claimed data does not support the argument that increased unemployment benefits are leading to a workforce shortage. She said when they looked at states and sectors where supplemental benefits were high, there weren’t lower job finding rates as the argument would suggest, and in fact it was the “exact opposite.”

A separate study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago looking at unemployment insurance and job searching using data from 2013 through 2019 found those receiving unemployment benefits search more intensely for work over those not receiving benefits and once benefits drop off, search efforts drop steeply.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Monday “bigger factors” are keeping people home than increased unemployment benefits. She said vaccination rates, childcare and school reopenings all have an impact. And employers, she said, need to pay a “livable working wage.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-unemployment-benefits-states-pushback/

Despite Cheney voting in line with former President Donald Trump’s agenda 92.9% of the time, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has said he supports replacing her with New York Rep. Elise Stefanik. After the January 6 insurrection, Cheney voted to impeach Trump while Stefanik voted against.

The events of the past few months stand in stark contrast to Cheney’s decades-long career where she served the GOP in roles that ranged from the Department of State to guest hosting on Fox News.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/10/politics/liz-cheney-gop-career-timeline/index.html

Israel’s army on Monday said it launched airstrikes on Gaza in response to rockets fired by Hamas militants after hundreds of Palestinians were hurt in clashes with Israeli police at a religious site in Jerusalem.

Israeli army spokesman Jonathan Conricus told reporters that Israeli forces had targeted “a Hamas military operative,” while Hamas sources in Gaza confirmed to AFP that one of their commanders had been killed.

Streaks of light are seen as Israel’s Iron Dome anti-missile system intercepts rockets launched from the Gaza Strip towards Israel, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel, on Monday, May 10, 2021.

AMIR COHEN / REUTERS


Palestinian authorities earlier on Monday said the Israeli airstrikes had killed 20 civilians, including nine children. 

As of Monday night, roughly 150 rockets had been fired from Gaza, with “dozens” being intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome defense system, according to the Israel Defense Forces.

Confrontations between Israeli security forces and protesters have been escalating for weeks. The clashes started at the beginning of Ramadan, almost a month ago, when Israeli police put up barriers to stop people sitting in the Damascus Gate plaza, a popular gathering area during Ramadan. Young Palestinians protested what they saw as Israeli authorities disrupting their religious and social traditions.

Then on April 16, the first Friday of Ramadan, tensions escalated further when Israel imposed a 10,000-person limit on prayers at the al-Aqsa Mosque. Tens of thousands of Palestinians were turned away.

Meanwhile, there had been demonstrations over another simmering dispute: An Israeli plan to evict several Palestinian families from their homes in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood in East Jerusalem, to allow Jewish settlers to move in.

The unrest erupted into serious violence over the weekend, and it got worse on Monday. The Palestinian Red Crescent said 331 Palestinians were injured in a crackdown on worshipers at al-Aqsa mosque on Monday alone. Seven people were left in critical condition, according to the medical group.

A camera operator falls as an Israeli police officer runs after him during clashes with Palestinians at the compound that houses al-Aqsa Mosque, known to Muslims as Noble Sanctuary and to Jews as Temple Mount, in Jerusalem’s Old City on May 10, 2021.

AMMAR AWAD/REUTERS


Israeli authorities said 30 police officers were injured Monday.

The al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem’s Old City is one of the holiest sites in Islam, but it has long been under Israeli control. Palestinian protesters put up a makeshift barrier at the entrance, walling themselves in, and threw stones at Israeli police. Officers responded with tear gas and stun grenades.

On Monday, an Israeli car crashed into Palestinian protesters near the mosque. Witnesses said protesters had surrounded the vehicle and pelted it with stones before it veered off the road, but incredibly nobody was killed.

An Israeli police officer holds his weapon as he stands in front of an injured Israeli driver moments after witnesses said his car crashed into a Palestinian on a sidewalk during stone-throwing clashes near Lion’s Gate, just outside Jerusalem’s Old City on May 10, 2021.

ILAN ROSENBERG/REUTERS


In an effort to calm things down, Israeli authorities announced that Jews would be barred from visiting the area near al-Aqsa, a site that is also sacred to them. The officials were trying to head off more violence on what is an incendiary date: Many Israelis celebrate May 10 as Jerusalem Day, which marks the capture of East Jerusalem from Jordan during the 1967 Mideast War. They see it as the day their capital was reunited. 

Palestinians, on the other hand, lament it as the occasion of an illegal seizure of land where they one day hope to establish their own capital city. The seizure of East Jerusalem has never been recognized by the international community.  

Amid the tension, Israeli police decided on Monday to allow a march commemorating Jerusalem Day to go ahead, but not through the Damascus Gate as planned. The entry point to Jerusalem’s Old City has frequently been a flashpoint.

Jordan and other Arab nations in the region have condemned both the planned evictions in East Jerusalem and the Israeli security forces’ heavy-handed response to the protests.

Tunisia called for an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council on Monday to discuss the violence, and Jordan’s Foreign Minister Ayman al-Safadi was to meet U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to discuss security in the region, with a focus on the current escalations in Jerusalem, the Jordanian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

A Palestinian woman reacts during scuffles with Israeli security forces amid Israeli-Palestinian tension as Israel marks Jerusalem Day, near Damascus Gate, outside Jerusalem’s Old City on May 10, 2021.

RONEN ZVULUN/REUTERS


The Palestinian Authority’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, meanwhile, issued a statement condemning “in the strongest terms the bloodied campaign of repression and the continuous crackdown by the Israeli forces against our fellow Jerusalemites, in their attempt to empty al-Aqsa compound from Palestinians.”

The ministry called on the UN Security Council “to provide international protection for our people, as a legitimate moral and legal right and duty,” and urged President Biden’s administration in Washington “to free itself from the frameworks and limitations set by the previous administration in dealing with the rights and suffering of our people.”

Other Palestinian factions, however, including armed groups, issued an ultimatum on Monday warning Israel to withdraw its security forces from al-Aqsa and Sheikh Jarrah, and to release all those detained during the recent clashes, or face violence. 

Even the other political authority in the Palestinian Territories issued a warning, rather than a plea for international support. Hamas Politburo chief Ismail Haniyeh said the Palestinian resistance to Israel’s occupation would escalate to prevent the evictions in East Jerusalem.

“The resistance is ready and will not stand idle,” Haniyeh said. “Our word will be the final word in the battle if the occupation does not back away and put an end to its satanic plans.”

Israel appeared to take the threats seriously, and its security forces were bracing for possible attacks from the Gaza Strip.   

Khaled Wassef contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-gaza-violence-palestinians-wounded-2021-05-10/

President Biden enjoys widespread job approval, as Americans’ optimism about the future continues to climb, according to a poll released Monday by The Associated Press and NORC.

Sixty-three percent of Americans said they approved of the work Biden was doing as president, while just 36 percent disapproved. That spread of 27 percentage points represents the widest approval margin in an A.P./NORC poll since Mr. Biden took office.

The president continued to receive broadly positive marks for his handling of the coronavirus pandemic, with seven in 10 respondents expressing approval. His approach to health care policy got a thumbs-up from 62 percent of Americans, and 54 percent approved of his work on foreign policy.

Fifty-seven percent of Americans said they approved of the job he was doing on the economy, while just 42 percent disapproved — although the poll was conducted from April 29 to May 3, before the administration released a disappointing April jobs report showing that the country was missing its targets on employment.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/10/us/politics/ap-poll.html

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Oakland, Calif., on Monday where he announced a new round of $600 stimulus checks residents making up to $75,000 a year. Newsom also announced a projected $75.7 billion budget surplus compared to last year’s projected $54.3 billion shortfall.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Oakland, Calif., on Monday where he announced a new round of $600 stimulus checks residents making up to $75,000 a year. Newsom also announced a projected $75.7 billion budget surplus compared to last year’s projected $54.3 billion shortfall.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

A year after slashing spending to fill a record-breaking deficit spurred by the pandemic, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is eyeing a massive surplus and hopes to send out a second, larger round of stimulus checks to residents.

“It’s a remarkable, remarkable turnaround,” Newsom said in an interview with All Things Considered Monday.

California’s progressive tax structure means the state budget suffered early in the pandemic but quickly rebounded, bolstered by capital gains taxes and high-income earners who’ve seen their wealth grow over the past year.

Newsom, who will likely face a recall election later this year, announced a plan to send billions of dollars back to taxpayers. If approved, the state would give $600 checks to workers who earn up to $75,000 annually, with $500 bonuses for tax filers with dependents and undocumented families.

Newsom said 80% of the state’s workers and two-thirds of all residents would benefit from the plan.

State law requires that taxpayers get a rebate when a budget surplus hits a certain size, which has only happened once in California in more than 40 years. A spokesperson for the California Department of Finance said the numbers for this year’s state budget won’t be finalized until 2023.

Newsom said his stimulus proposal, which totals just under $12 billion in relief, goes “well above and beyond what is projected to be required” by the law. He claimed it is “the largest tax relief year-over-year in U.S. history as well, not just California history.”

Several Republican lawmakers called Newsom’s proposal the “recall refund,” noting the governor announced the plan weeks after state officials confirmed the petition to recall him has enough valid signatures to go before voters.

State Sen. Scott Wilk used the hashtag #RecallRebate in a tweet calling out the governor’s plan.

Newsom has denied the timing of the stimulus plan is tied to his political future and painted the recall effort as one funded and pushed by Republicans.

“It is a Republican-backed recall period, full stop,” he said.

“To the extent that people rightfully and understandably were stressed and anxious over the last year because of this pandemic-induced recession and all the struggle, I completely respect and understand why some may have filled out a petition. But at the end of the day, this is what it is, a Republican-backed recall.”

Lawmakers need to sign off on the stimulus plan but leaders of the budget committee attended the announcement in support, signaling it will pass.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/10/995624284/facing-a-recall-and-a-massive-surplus-gov-newsom-proposes-more-stimulus-checks

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Capitol Police force was hobbled by inadequate intelligence gathering ahead of the Jan. 6 siege, the department’s watchdog told Congress on Monday, alarming lawmakers who are concerned for their own safety amid rising threats against members of Congress.

Capitol Police Inspector General Michael Bolton testified in the first of three House hearings this week on what went wrong during the Jan. 6 insurrection. Lawmakers are investigating the riots as they contemplate overhauling security, and Bolton has recommended that the Capitol Police create a new stand-alone division that would gather intelligence about threats and protect members similar to the way the U.S. Secret Service protects the president.

Many lawmakers are receiving threats and worry for their safety after the U.S. Capitol was so easily breached on Jan. 6 by supporters of then-President Donald Trump who wanted to overturn the election. The rioters were hunting for lawmakers, calling out House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and then-Vice President Mike Pence by name as they roamed the building and members fled the House and Senate. In a statement Friday, the Capitol Police said that there has been a 107% increase in threats against members of Congress this year compared to 2020 and “provided the unique threat environment we currently live in, the Department is confident the number of cases will continue to increase.”

A new inspector general report, one of several Bolton is preparing in response to the insurrection, said the department “has experienced issues” because of the increase in threats over the last five years and recommended the force hire more agents who are dedicated to assessing threats.

Bolton said there were multiple deficiencies that led to a lack of communication and guidance ahead of the siege. He said the department’s guidance on counterintelligence was “outdated or vague” — some so ancient that it referred to Blackberry communication devices, which are now rarely used.

“A stand-alone entity, with a defined mission dedicated to countersurveillance activities in support of protecting the Congressional Community, would improve the Department’s ability to identify and disrupt individuals or groups intent on engaging in illegal activity directed at the Congressional Community and its legislative process,” the report says, according to a summary released by the House Administration Committee ahead of the hearing. Bolton has not released the full report.

Bolton told the panel that the Capitol Police is in the process of opening up two regional offices so it can better protect lawmakers at home. The department confirmed that on Monday, saying they will be opening up offices in San Francisco and Tampa, Florida.

Illinois Rep. Rodney Davis, the top Republican on the committee, said he hopes they open up more offices around the country and prosecute more people who are making the threats. He noted that he has received threats himself — a man was arrested in 2019 for threatening to shoot him.

“So I know firsthand that these threats are real, and that the people making these threats intend to act on them,” Davis said. “I do believe a truly more aggressive enforcement stance, more arrests and more prosecutions of those who make violent threats and intend to carry them out would be a very strong deterrent.”

In Friday’s statement, the Capitol Police said they have already taken “significant steps” to improve counterintelligence and agreed that a stand-alone intelligence division would be helpful, but said they’d need more money to achieve it. The statement said the Capitol Police have about 30 agents and analysts doing the same job as more than 100 in the Secret Service, while the Capitol Police had 9,000 cases in 2020 and the Secret Service had 8,000.

The House is also scheduled to hear this week from former acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller, who will testify about his role in approving National Guard troops during the insurrection. The troops did not arrive until several hours after the riots began, a subject that has attracted intense interest in Congress.

Miller is expected to appear Wednesday before the House Oversight Committee alongside former acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and District of Columbia Police Chief Robert Contee III. All three were part of frantic meetings that day as Capitol Police begged for backup.

Army and Pentagon leaders have repeatedly denied any efforts to delay the Guard response. Miller denied in a Vice News interview in March that the response was unduly slow, saying, “It comes back to understanding how the military works.” He said “this isn’t a video game,” adding “it’s not ‘Black Ops Call of Duty.’”

In a statement ahead of the hearing, House Oversight and Reform Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., said Congress and the American people “still have many unanswered questions” about why more wasn’t done about threats of violence from right-wing extremists before the attack.

“Our hearing will provide the American people the first opportunity to hear from top Trump Administration officials about the catastrophic intelligence and security failures that enabled this unprecedented terrorist attack on our nation’s Capitol,” Maloney said in a statement.

The House Administration Committee will also hear this week from Christopher Failla, the inspector general for the architect of the Capitol, who is one of three officials sitting on a board that oversees the Capitol Police.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat and chair of the House Appropriations Committee, said last week that a $2 billion supplemental spending bill that the House is expected to take up soon will have a focus on increased training, intelligence analysis and capabilities for the police force.

___

Associated Press writer Michael Balsamo contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/michael-pence-donald-trump-capitol-siege-police-government-and-politics-810cfd679c125cd31b18ed91f95e1678

President Joe Biden said in a speech on Monday that Americans receiving unemployment benefits must either take a job that is “suitable” or lose their benefits, as he encouraged states to reinstate a pre-pandemic policy of requiring people to search for work.

“We’re going to make it clear that anyone collecting unemployment who is offered a suitable job must take the job or lose their unemployment benefits,” Biden said at the White House.

According to a White House fact sheet released after the speech, the Department of Labor will “reaffirm longstanding” unemployment-insurance requirements to ensure that states, workers, and employers understand the rules regarding the benefits.

The Department of Labor will also issue a letter to states reaffirming that people receiving benefits cannot turn down a suitable job to continue receiving their benefits.

Experts said these job-seeking guidelines were in place before the pandemic, and states scrapped them last year as the economy crashed, which caused a surge in unemployment. While the economic situation is improving, those experts said factors like a lack of childcare and school closures were keeping some people out of the workforce.

“On the whole, the Biden Administration is moving to return UI slowly like the rest of the economy to its” pre-pandemic rules, Andrew Stettner, an unemployment expert at the Century Foundation, said in emailed comments to Insider.

“Advocates are concerned that policy makers ensure that no workers are cut of off benefits because they cannot find affordable child care, and the reinstatement of work search requirements raises the stakes for this type of protections,” he added.

This announcement came after a jobs report last week that fell significantly short of expectations, with Republican lawmakers casting the blame on too-generous unemployment benefits disincentivizing Americans from returning to work.

While Biden said in his speech that “we don’t see much evidence” of benefits hurting job growth, his remarks suggested he was listening to GOP criticism on the issue.

Since the start of the pandemic, Republicans and businesspeople have criticized expanded unemployment insurance — inserted into March 2020’s CARES Act by Democrats in the House — as too generous. While the $600 federal unemployment addition to weekly benefits expired last year, Congress reinstated it in December at $300 a week, which Biden extended through September 6 as part of the stimulus law in March.

The US Chamber of Commerce called for an end to the benefits in the wake of the April jobs numbers, but Democrats like Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont said on Twitter that “workers desperately need” the benefits. 

While states waived their unemployment-benefits work requirements at the start of the pandemic, 39 of them have already started, or are planning to, reimpose them.

Biden said: “We’ll insist that the law is followed with respect to benefits, but we’re not going to turn our backs on our fellow Americans.”

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/unemployment-biden-labor-shortage-job-seeking-policy-2021-5

The Biden administration on Monday began to distribute $350 billion to state and local governments from his $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill — with $12.7 billion going to New York state alone and billions more flowing to cities and counties.

New York City is getting $4.3 billion.

But the money comes with strings attached — the Treasury Department has a list of “eligible uses” that states and localities must adhere to.

Officials said the funds must be spent on public health, to counteract the negative economic effects of the pandemic, to replace lost public sector revenue, to provide bonus pay for essential workers and for water, sewer or broadband internet projects.

The amount of money going to New York’s state government wasn’t a surprise. It is consistent with what was projected before President Biden’s stimulus bill was passed by majority Democrats — with no Republican support — in March.

Construction workers make infrastructure repairs at the intersection of Church Avenue and Coney Island Avenue in the Flatbush neighborhood of Brooklyn on April 6, 2021.
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Each of New York’s cities and counties also get a windfall of cash. In addition to the Big Apple’s $4.3 billion, Albany gets $80 million and Buffalo gets $331 million. Additional funding for boroughs — from a pool allocated for each county in the state — pushes New York City’s total appropriation close to $6 billion.

“It’s exciting” said Mayor Bill de Blasio’s spokesman Bill Neidhardt about the launch. He added that the mayor planned his executive budget around the funds.  

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who was influential in crafting the stimulus bill, called the Treasury Department on Monday to urge the quick distribution of funds to New York, his spokesman Angelo Roefaro told The Post.

“After fighting this pandemic on the frontlines, state and local governments in New York and across the country were loud and clear: they needed help and they needed it quickly to keep frontline workers on the job and prevent brutal service cuts,” Schumer said in a statement.

“The Treasury Department’s flexible guidance is just what is needed to help get states and municipalities the resources and funding they need to prevent layoffs, to keep essential services running, and to keep our Main Streets alive and able to rebound as we increase vaccinations and emerge from the pandemic,” Schumer said.

Biden administration officials told reporters that restrictions announced on Monday are meant to ensure that the will of Congress is upheld in putting the funds toward relevant uses.

People wait inside Manhattan’s Javits Center in NYC for a COVID-19 shot.
Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Republicans last year blocked some state and local aid, arguing it amounted to a bailout of poorly run Democratic states that had long-running deficits, citing New York as an example.

Funds cannot be used by states to finance tax cuts or make pension fund deposits, the Treasury Department said. They also cannot pay for long-planned infrastructure projects unrelated to water and broadband. The use of funds must be reported to the federal government.

Workers on the site of a sewer line replacement project in Queens on April 15, 2021.
EPA/JUSTIN LANE

On a background call with reporters, an official said the funds can be used through 2024 — and there could be broad justifications invoking racial disparities, such as in health and education, if those gaps worsened during the pandemic.

But the rules broadly mean that governments can only offset financial holes in budgets that were created by COVID-19, officials said.

Two members of the fire department wheel a COVID-19 patient into an ambulance in NYC.
obert Nickelsberg/Getty Images

The “eligible uses” are broad enough, however, that states like California that are reporting budget surpluses can still use their money. An official told reporters on a background call that the Golden State, for example, could put its $27 billion toward addressing homelessness.

The local government funds will be delivered in two tranches. Half will be delivered this month and another batch will come in 12 months, even though that’s after the pandemic is expected to end in the US.

A woman receives her second shot in NYC.
Stephen Yang

For states, the delivery is more complicated and states with lower rates of unemployment must wait to receive half of their funds.

“States that have experienced a net increase in the unemployment rate of more than 2 percentage points from February 2020 to the latest available data as of the date of certification will receive their full allocation of funds in a single payment; other states will receive funds in two equal tranches,” the Treasury Department said.

Carl Campanile contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/05/10/feds-have-12-7b-for-ny-state-4-3b-for-nyc-in-covid-stimulus/

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration expanded the emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to include adolescents 12 through 15 years of age. The FDA amended the EUA originally issued on Dec. 11, 2020 for administration in individuals 16 years of age and older.

“The FDA’s expansion of the emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to include adolescents 12 through 15 years of age is a significant step in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D. “Today’s action allows for a younger population to be protected from COVID-19, bringing us closer to returning to a sense of normalcy and to ending the pandemic. Parents and guardians can rest assured that the agency undertook a rigorous and thorough review of all available data, as we have with all of our COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorizations.”

From March 1, 2020 through April 30, 2021, approximately 1.5 million COVID-19 cases in individuals 11 to 17 years of age have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Children and adolescents generally have a milder COVID-19 disease course as compared to adults. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is administered as a series of two doses, three weeks apart, the same dosage and dosing regimen for 16 years of age and older.

The FDA has determined that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has met the statutory criteria to amend the EUA, and that the known and potential benefits of this vaccine in individuals 12 years of age and older outweigh the known and potential risks, supporting the vaccine’s use in this population. 

“Having a vaccine authorized for a younger population is a critical step in continuing to lessen the immense public health burden caused by the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “With science guiding our evaluation and decision-making process, the FDA can assure the public and medical community that the available data meet our rigorous standards to support the emergency use of this vaccine in the adolescent population 12 years of age and older.”

The FDA has updated the Fact Sheets for Healthcare Providers Administering the Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) and for Recipients and Caregivers with information to reflect the use of the vaccine in the adolescent population, including the benefits and risks of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.

The EUA amendment for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was issued to Pfizer Inc. The issuance of an EUA is not an FDA approval (licensure) of a vaccine. The EUA will be effective until the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of the emergency use of drugs and biologics for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 is terminated, and may be revised or revoked if it is determined the EUA no longer meets the statutory criteria for issuance or to protect public health or safety.

FDA Evaluation of Available Safety Data

The available safety data to support the EUA in adolescents down to 12 years of age, include 2,260 participants ages 12 through 15 years old enrolled in an ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in the United States. Of these, 1,131 adolescent participants received the vaccine and 1,129 received a saline placebo. More than half of the participants were followed for safety for at least two months following the second dose.

The most commonly reported side effects in the adolescent clinical trial participants, which typically lasted 1-3 days, were pain at the injection site, tiredness, headache, chills, muscle pain, fever and joint pain. With the exception of pain at the injection site, more adolescents reported these side effects after the second dose than after the first dose, so it is important for vaccination providers and recipients to expect that there may be some side effects after either dose, but even more so after the second dose. The side effects in adolescents were consistent with those reported in clinical trial participants 16 years of age and older. It is important to note that as a general matter, while some individuals experience side effects following any vaccination, not every individual’s experience will be the same and some people may not experience side effects.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine should not be given to anyone with a known history of a severe allergic reaction, including anaphylaxis—to any component of the vaccine. Since its authorization for emergency use, rare severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, have been reported following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in some recipients.

FDA Evaluation of Available Effectiveness Data

The effectiveness data to support the EUA in adolescents down to 12 years of age is based on immunogenicity and an analysis of COVID-19 cases. The immune response to the vaccine in 190 participants, 12 through 15 years of age, was compared to the immune response of 170 participants, 16 through 25 years of age. In this analysis, the immune response of adolescents was non-inferior to (at least as good as) the immune response of the older participants. An analysis of cases of COVID-19 occurring among participants, 12 through 15 years of age, seven days after the second dose was also conducted. In this analysis, among participants without evidence of prior infection with SARS-CoV-2, no cases of COVID-19 occurred among 1,005 vaccine recipients and 16 cases of COVID-19 occurred among 978 placebo recipients; the vaccine was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19. At this time, there are limited data to address whether the vaccine can prevent transmission of the virus from person to person. In addition, at this time, data are not available to determine how long the vaccine will provide protection.

Ongoing Safety Monitoring

As part of the original EUA request, Pfizer Inc. submitted a plan to continue monitoring the safety of the vaccine as it is used under EUA. This plan has been updated to include the newly authorized adolescent population, and includes longer-term safety follow-up for participants enrolled in ongoing clinical trials, as well as other activities aimed at monitoring the safety of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and ensuring that any safety concerns are identified and evaluated in a timely manner.

It is mandatory for Pfizer Inc. and vaccination providers to report the following to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: all vaccine administration errors, serious adverse events, cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death.


Related Information

###

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.


Source Article from https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-emergency-use

Weeks of violence in Jerusalem, sparked by Israel’s attempt to evict several Palestinian families from their homes in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of East Jerusalem, have Democrats, activists, and experts calling on President Joe Biden to speak out forcefully against the American ally’s actions.

The problem is he and top members of his team are unlikely to — potentially missing an opportunity to stem the violence and avert a broader conflict.

For decades, Israeli pro-settler organizations have aimed to push Palestinians in East Jerusalem out of their homes, dismantle their dwellings, and replace them with hundreds of housing units for Jews. It’s long been a source of simmering tension, and the anger grew to a boil in April as eviction cases continued in Israeli courts, leading Israeli police to increase their presence around the city and tussle with Palestinian protesters.

The standoff has produced troubling scenes, such as Israeli police on Saturday blocking buses of Palestinians traveling to pray at the al-Aqsa Mosque, Islam’s third-holiest site, for the holiest night of Ramadan.

But there was nothing like the crescendo of violence seen on Monday.

Far-right Israelis planned to march through the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem’s Old City, a provocative annual tradition that celebrates the Israeli capture of East Jerusalem in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — a day known in Israel as Jerusalem Day. But Palestinians don’t like the event because they claim East Jerusalem, which Israel annexed, as the future capital of their sovereign state.

Anger at the parade led to intensified conflict between Palestinians and Israeli authorities.

On Monday morning at al-Aqsa Mosque, stone-throwing Palestinians took on Israeli police firing rubber bullets and stun grenades. Roughly 330 Palestinians were injured, local health officials said, with 250 hospitalized from the fight.

Then, on Monday evening, Hamas, the Islamist militant group that has ruled Gaza since 2007, fired seven rockets into Israel — with some even setting off air raid sirens in Jerusalem. One rocket reportedly fell just to the west of the capital, damaging some houses.

The threat of rocket fire was so real that Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, had to evacuate while in the middle of a session.

Abu Obeida, a spokesperson for Hamas’s military wing, said the rocket attack was retaliation for what he called Israel’s “crimes and aggression.”

“This is a message the enemy has to understand well,” he continued. Hamas had given Israel until 6 pm local time to move its police forces out of the Aqsa mosque compound.

Health officials in Gaza afterward said explosions in the region killed 20 people, including three children, and injured around 65 others. The Israeli military later confirmed it had carried out strikes in Gaza.

Though militants in Gaza sporadically fire rockets into Israel and are met in turn by Israeli airstrikes, the current tensions have some worried this latest exchange could be the beginning of a larger fight.

In a speech, Netanyahu accused Hamas of having crossed a “red line” with the latest rocket attacks and promised a tough response. “Whoever attacks us will pay a heavy price,” he said, warning that the fight could “continue for a while.”

The Biden administration has said it’s concerned about the violence in Israel and denounced Hamas’s rocket attacks as an “unacceptable escalation.” But some are calling on Biden to take a more forceful stance and condemn Israel’s actions in East Jerusalem.

That might not happen, though, as experts note the political costs of calling out Israel far outweigh the benefits of sticking to the president’s nominally human rights-centered foreign policy.

Biden wants human rights at the center of his foreign policy. Israel is a test.

In February, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the Biden administration would place human rights at the “center” of US foreign policy. “The United States is committed to a world in which human rights are protected, their defenders are celebrated, and those who commit human rights abuses are held accountable,” he said.

Calling out Israel’s attempted eviction of Palestinians is the perfect time to show the administration means what it says, experts say.

“The world is watching; this issue is important,” said Shibley Telhami, the Anwar Sadat professor for peace and development at the University of Maryland. “The administration needs to show it isn’t all talk. They have to demonstrate this principle when it’s hard, not when it’s politically costless.”

The US has already made statements on the issue. Last Friday, State Department spokesperson Ned Price said, “We call on Israeli and Palestinian officials to act decisively to deescalate tensions and bring a halt to the violence.” Two days later, the White House published a readout of National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan’s call with his Israeli counterpart in which he said the administration has “serious concerns about the events in Jerusalem.”

But that’s too small a gesture for many, who say it’d be more significant for Biden — or at the very least Blinken or Sullivan — to denounce Israel’s actions on camera.

J Street, an Israel-focused liberal advocacy group, released a Monday statement urging the Biden administration “to make clear publicly that Israeli efforts to evict and displace Palestinian families in East Jerusalem and the West Bank are completely unacceptable to the United States, as is the continued use of intimidation and violent, excessive force against Palestinian protesters and worshipers — especially during Ramadan.”

Some Democrats in Congress are also putting pressure on Biden.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, tweeted on Saturday: “If the Biden Administration puts the rule of law and human rights at the heart of its foreign policy, this is not a moment for tepid statements.” He also linked to a statement by the United Nations high commissioner for human rights that said the evictions could be a “war crime.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), a progressive leader in Congress, tweeted something similar: “The United States must speak out strongly against the violence by government-allied Israeli extremists in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, and make clear that the evictions of Palestinian families must not go forward.

Lawmakers in the House, including “Squad” members Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, and Rashida Tlaib — a Palestinian American — also backed the Palestinian cause.

Biden and other prominent members of his administration so far haven’t openly blasted Israel, instead choosing to condemn the actions of both sides. The University of Maryland’s Telhami said there were good reasons for that, namely that Biden needs Jerusalem’s support to reenter the Iran nuclear deal and the fact that the Israeli-Palestinian issue isn’t top of mind for most Americans.

Still, he said, “the problem here is the public profile. When something like this happens, you have to put your foot down.”

But the administration is unlikely to, the Middle East Institute’s Khaled Elgindy told me. If they were going to denounce the Israeli government harshly, he said “they would’ve done it by now. Why would they suddenly have a moment of clarity?”

Experts said there were other ways Washington could rebuke Jerusalem, such as sanctioning Israel or curbing weapons sales, but none expect any of that will happen. When it comes to the US defending human rights, “Palestine is usually the exception,” said Elgindy, who served as an adviser to Palestinian leadership from 2004 to 2009. “Who’s going to push the Israelis on human rights? It’s not going to be the US.”

While inaction is expected, it’s no less problematic, he continued. With no one forcefully and openly calling for an end to the violence, the situation “could very quickly escalate to something that looks like 2014.” A fight that year between Israel and Hamas saw more than 2,100 Palestinians and 71 Israelis killed while over 10,000 people — mostly Palestinians — sustained injuries.

If that happens, Elgindy concluded, the US “will have no choice but to get involved.” The irony there is it’s possible Biden’s inaction now could see him wade deeper into a growing conflict down the line.

Israel is already showing no sign of backing down. “Israel has no other choice but to defend its citizens from these indiscriminate attacks,” Gilad Erdan, Israel’s ambassador to the US, said in a Monday statement.

And neither is Hamas. Obeida, the spokesperson, said more attacks will come if Israel goes into the Aqsa mosque area again or evicts Palestinian families.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2021/5/10/22428819/israel-palestine-jerusalem-mosque-violence-biden

Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed a second round of $600 state stimulus checks on Monday to hasten California’s recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, hoping to expand the payments from low-income residents to also include middle-class families, and noting that doing so would ensure benefits for 2 out of 3 state residents.

The proposal to deliver $8 billion in new cash payments to millions of Californians is part of a $100-billion economic stimulus plan made possible in part by a budget that has swelled with a significant windfall of tax revenues, a surplus the governor put at $75.7 billion.

Newsom also proposed $5 billion to double rental assistance to get 100% of back rent paid for those who have fallen behind, along with as much as $2 billion in direct payments to pay down utility bills, proposals that were supported by legislative leaders on Monday.

“Direct stimulus checks going into people’s pockets and direct relief — that’s meaningful,” Newsom said during a visit to the Unity Council, a nonprofit social equity development corporation in the Fruitvale neighborhood of Oakland.

Under the governor’s proposal, which still requires approval from the Legislature during state budget negotiations, households earning up to $75,000 in adjusted gross income will be able to receive $600 direct payments if they did not receive a payment in the first round this year. State officials said the expanded program, when combined with the first round of state stimulus checks, would provide financial assistance to two-thirds of Californians.

Newsom said the state stimulus proposal represents the largest state tax rebate in U.S. history.

In addition to the $600 stimulus checks for eligible Californians, the governor is proposing that families with children get an additional $500, along with $500 in direct payments to immigrant families without legal status.

“We recognize the acuity of stress associated with back rent and we recognize the acuity of stress as it relates to gas, electric and water bills,” Newsom said. “We can keep people housed. We can keep people warm and safe, and make sure that they are getting the kind of resources that they deserve during this very challenging period of time.”

In January, the Legislature extended a moratorium on evictions through June 30 for those who pay at least 25% of their rent each month, offering to pay landlords 80% of the total amount of rent in arrears between April 2020 and March 2021 as long as landlords agree to forgive the remaining 20% and not pursue evictions.

The governor’s new proposal would provide funds to cover the remaining unpaid rent for low-income tenants.

The proposal was a relief to Tom Bannon, chief executive of California Apartment Assn., which represents landlords.

“Many of our members have provided housing for more than a year without compensation,” Bannon said. “We thank the governor for understanding the difficulties that both tenants and rental property owners have endured during the pandemic.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom will roll out this week what his advisors say is a $100-billion “California Comeback Plan,” beginning with $8 billion in cash payments to millions of the state’s residents.

The stimulus payments are part of what Newsom is calling a California Comeback Plan, pitched as he fights back against a Republican-led campaign to recall him from office. State election officials recently announced that proponents of the recall have turned in a sufficient number of signatures to trigger a special election in which voters could remove Newsom from office this fall.

Millions of Californians lost jobs or income since the pandemic began more than a year ago and the state ordered businesses to restrict operations and people to stay home. As vaccines and social distancing have significantly reduced the spread of the coronavirus, the state is poised to reopen much of its economy by June 15.

Still, many Californians are still struggling to pay rent and cover other expenses.

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf welcomed the new round of financial help, which she said is “an unprecedented moment where government is coming to the aid of those who need it the most.”

“Oakland is a city that has been hit hard by this pandemic,” she said. “Direct aid to people is what is going to get our economy roaring back.”

Newsom’s proposal is also supported by Chris Iglesias, CEO of the Unity Council.

“We are not going to leave anybody behind during this pandemic,” Iglesias said at the news conference. “We need that recovery.”

However, Newsom drew criticism Monday from Republicans, including former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer, one of the candidates running in the recall election.

Californians need permanent, real tax relief, not just one-time stimulus checks,” Faulconer said.

Assemblyman James Gallagher (R-Yuba City), whose lawsuit challenging Newsom’s use of executive powers during the pandemic was rejected by an appeals court this month, said he is generally supportive of what he called the “recall refund.”

“The California government has surplus revenue and putting this money back into the hands of taxpayers is the right thing to do,” Gallagher said. “It’s really the least Newsom could do considering the devastation caused to jobs and small businesses, the failure to provide timely unemployment assistance.”

This would be the second round of state stimulus checks proposed by the governor. In February, the governor signed legislation to provide low-income Californians with $2.3 billion in state stimulus checks. The money was provided for residents, including those earning $30,000 a year or less who receive the state earned income tax credit. It also went to people who file tax returns with an individual taxpayer identification number but who don’t have a Social Security number, the bulk of whom are immigrants in the country illegally.

Crafted by Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders last week, the pandemic assistance plan also includes $4 billion in grants, tax breaks and fee waivers for small businesses.

More Coverage

“They were left out of the federal supports. They will not be left out of the support coming from the state,” Newsom said of including people in the country illegally in the state stimulus program.

Families that file with an identification number and receive CalEITC have been eligible for up to $1,200 in the first round. The state said this month that so far 2.5 million Golden State Stimulus payments worth $1.6 billion have been issued.

“We passed the recovery package to get money into the pockets of Californians who were hit hardest by this pandemic, and that’s exactly what the Golden State Stimulus is doing,” Newsom said on May 6, noting that some Californians have not yet filed their 2020 taxes and may still qualify.

State officials said the cash payments were triggered in part by a 1979 voter-approved state constitutional amendment that requires tax rebates when revenues exceed a cap on government spending. That appropriations limit, loosened by subsequent ballot measures, has been significantly higher than state spending levels for the better part of the last four decades — allowing lawmakers to exclude billions of dollars in spending from the final calculation.

This year, awash in cash from a tax windfall and facing a historic slowdown in population growth used to determine the maximum spending allowed, the Newsom administration projects $16 billion in excess revenue. By law, half of that must go to public schools and the other half to taxpayer rebates — in this case, targeted toward middle-class adults and families.

The projected windfall is largely the result of strong capital gains on investments earned by California’s wealthiest taxpayers. The taxes paid by the top 1% of the state’s earners have accounted for as much as half of all income tax revenue in some years.

“That budget surplus is going back to the most vulnerable Californians, the ones who need help the most,” said Assemblyman Phil Ting (D-San Francisco), chairman of the Assembly Budget Committee, who joined the governor at the news conference in Oakland.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-10/gavin-newsom-new-stimulus-checks-californians-rent-assistance

A World Health Organization official said Monday it is reclassifying the highly contagious triple-mutant Covid variant spreading in India as a “variant of concern,” indicating that it’s become a global health threat.

Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO’s technical lead for Covid-19, said the agency will provide more details in its weekly situation report on the pandemic Tuesday but added that the variant, known as B.1.617, has been found in preliminary studies to spread more easily than the original virus and there is some evidence it may able to evade some of the protections provided by vaccines. The shots, however, are still considered effective.

“And as such we are classifying this as a variant of concern at the global level,” she said during a press conference. “Even though there is increased transmissibility demonstrated by some preliminary studies, we need much more information about this virus variant in this lineage in all of the sub lineages, so we need more sequencing, targeted sequencing to be done.”

The WHO said last week it was closely following at least 10 coronavirus variants across the world, including the B.1.617. The variant was previously labeled a “variant of interest” as more studies were needed to completely understand its significance, Van Kerkhove said.

“What it means for anybody at home is any of the SARS-CoV-2 viruses circulating can infect you and spread and everything in that sense is of concern,” she said Monday. “So, all of us at home, no matter where we live, no matter what virus is circulating, we need to make sure that we take all of the measures at hand to prevent ourselves from getting sick.”

A variant can be labeled as “of concern” if it has been shown to be more contagious, more deadly or more resistant to current vaccines and treatments, according to the WHO.

The group issued a clarification Monday to their earlier remarks, saying that current data shows the existing Covid-19 vaccines “remain effective at preventing disease and death in people infected with this variant.”

The international organization has already designated three other variants with the classification: B.1.1.7, which was first detected in the U.K. and is the most prevalent variant currently circulating throughout the U.S.; B.1.351, first detected in South Africa, and the P.1 variant, first detected in Brazil.

B.1.617 has three sublineages, Van Kerkhove said, that will be described in the situation report Tuesday.

The variant is believed by some to be behind the latest wave of infections in India.

The country is averaging about 3,879 Covid deaths per day, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University, though media reports indicate the official figure is being understated. It has reported an average of about 391,000 new cases per day over the past seven days — up about 4% from a week ago, Johns Hopkins University data shows.

The variant has since spread to other countries, including the United States.

— CNBC’s Rich Mendez contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/10/who-classifies-triple-mutant-covid-variant-from-india-as-global-health-risk-.html

With over one-third of U.S. adults fully vaccinated against coronavirus and the seven-day average for new infections substantially down from winter-time peaks, Dr. Anthony Fauci and former FDA commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb suggest it’s time to ease indoor mask guidance. 

While the CDC updated its mask guidance last month, advising fully vaccinated populations can go without masks outdoors except in crowded settings, the agency still says fully vaccinated people should wear masks indoors around unvaccinated people from multiple households, and in indoor public settings like movie theaters, malls, museums and restaurants. The agency also recently published a brief indicating small virus droplets can travel more than six feet under certain conditions, posing a risk for infection. 

ABOUT 20 CASES OF INDIAN CORONAVIRUS VARIANT DETECTED IN FRANCE

However, Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and chief medical adviser to President Biden, said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” he believes Gottlieb is correct in saying the country could see a shift in indoor mask guidance, and the guidance should be more “liberal” as the vaccination drive continues.

“No I think so, I think you’re going to probably see that as we go along and as more people get vaccinated,” Fauci told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. “The CDC will be, almost in real-time George, updating their recommendations and their guidelines. We do need to start being more liberal as we get more people vaccinated.”

“As you get more people vaccinated, the number of cases per day will absolutely go down. We’re averaging about 43,000 a day, we’ve got to get it much, much lower than that. When that gets lower, the risk of any infection indoor or outdoor diminishes dramatically,” he said. 

The CDC did not respond to Fox News’ request for comment Monday morning.

In a separate interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Fauci suggested people could opt to don masks seasonally to tamp down on the flu.

COVID-19 VACCINE DESERTS: SOME COUNTRIES HAVE NO SHOTS AT ALL

“It is conceivable that as we go on a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory borne diseases.”

Jeffrey Zients, the White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator, during an interview Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” was more conservative in his response. The outlet’s Jake Tapper noted growing frustrations among “journalists and some health experts” that “overly cautious” mask guidance could undermine confidence in “a light at the end of the tunnel.”

“I think everyone is tired, and wearing a mask can be a pain but we’re getting there and the light at the end of the tunnel is brighter and brighter,” Zients said. “Let’s keep up our guard, let’s follow the CDC guidance. And the CDC guidance across time will allow vaccinated people more and more privileges to take off that mask.”

GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Meanwhile, Gottlieb told CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sunday that vaccinations and immunity from prior COVID-19 infection will “substantially” drive down risks of COVID-19.

“We’re at the point right now where we can start lifting these ordinances and allowing people to resume normal activity, certainly outdoors we shouldn’t be putting limits on gatherings anymore, we should be encouraging people to go outside,” Gottlieb said. “In the states where prevalence is low, vaccination rates are high and we have good testing in place and we’re identifying infections, I think we can start lifting these restrictions indoors as well on a broad basis.”

Gottlieb told CNBC’s Shepard Smith last week that a lifting of CDC indoor mask mandates now amid improved case counts would help “preserve the credibility of public health officials” if the provisions need to be re-introduced during winter-time outbreaks.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/health/cdc-could-ease-coronavirus-indoor-mask-guidance-fauci-gottlieb

Undercover Israeli security force members arrest a Palestinian protester at Damascus Gate in Jerusalem on Monday.

Ilia Yefimovich/dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Ilia Yefimovich/dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images

Undercover Israeli security force members arrest a Palestinian protester at Damascus Gate in Jerusalem on Monday.

Ilia Yefimovich/dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images

JERUSALEM — A new round of violence in Jerusalem left more than 300 Palestinians wounded Monday as Israeli police used stun grenades, rubber-coated bullets and water cannons in clashes centering on the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, located on what Muslims call Haram al-Sharif and Jews call the Temple Mount.

More than a dozen police officers were also hurt.

Fallout from the intense clashes prompted organizers to cancel the annual Jerusalem Day march through the Old City, which marks Israel’s capture of East Jerusalem in the Six-Day War of 1967. They did so after the government barred Jewish nationalists from marching through Palestinian areas of the city.

Yaakov Novik, a march organizer, said it was the first time in decades that officials prevented them from marching through Damascus Gate, a major entry point to the Old City and a Palestinian gathering area.

“It is succumbing to terror,” Novik told NPR.

The shift in plans came as the Palestinian Red Crescent emergency medical service said more than 300 Palestinians were wounded Monday in clashes with police in Jerusalem, bringing the total number of injured in recent days to about 600. The majority of those hurt received hospital treatment. At least seven suffered serious wounds.

The Israel Defense Forces said a “barrage of rockets” was fired toward southern Israel from Gaza on Monday, triggering alarms in both Jerusalem and the nearby city of Beit Shemesh. The IDF said an anti-tank missile fired from Gaza left an Israeli civilian “lightly injured.”

Israel responded with air strikes on targets in Gaza, killing three Hamas militants in a targeted attack, according to the IDF. Al Jazeera quoted local health officials as reporting nine people, including three children, were killed.

More violence had been predicted to come later Monday, when Jewish religious nationalists and youths were poised to walk in the annual Flag March — part of the Jerusalem Day celebrations.

“Jerusalem is currently a powder keg that could explode,” Amos Gilad, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, told Army Radio on Monday, according to local media outlets, as he urged officials to cancel the march.

After new violence erupted on Monday, Israeli political and security officials decided to redirect Flag March participants away from their annual route through Palestinian neighborhoods of the Old City, instead rerouting it through the Jewish quarter.

Late Sunday, police sprayed foul-smelling water on Palestinian boys and youths who were gathering, some throwing water bottles.

The U.S. and other international entities are urging both sides to deescalate tensions and halt the violence.

“We are extremely concerned about ongoing confrontations in Jerusalem, including on the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount and in Sheikh Jarrah,” a State Department spokesman said Friday, referring to Palestinian areas of Jerusalem.

But the violence continued on Saturday as skirmishes broke out with police outside the mosque, where tens of thousands of Muslims had gathered for the Night of Destiny. The holy night, also called the Night of Power, marks the day when the Quran was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad.

Even before Jerusalem Day, Palestinians have been upset by Israeli police tactics during Ramadan. The holy month of fasting and prayer, which ends this week, has routinely been marred by nighttime skirmishes among Palestinians, police and anti-Arab Jewish gangs. Palestinians call the police actions an affront; police have said their goal was to assert crowd control.

Some Israeli commentators have accused new police leadership of an excessive response, saying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is focused on his own political survival in Israel’s fraught political landscape.

With Jerusalem on edge, Israeli authorities have postponed a court hearing that could force some Palestinians to turn over their homes in the city to a Jewish settler group. In that long-running dispute, the settlers claim ownership rights stemming from a land purchase in the 1800s. But many Palestinians have lived there for decades after being displaced during the 1948 war that immediately followed Israel’s creation.

The U.S. has expressed concerns about those possible evictions because Jewish settler groups are motivated ideologically to establish a Jewish majority in Palestinian areas.

NPR’s Bill Chappell reported from Washington, D.C.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/10/995417561/300-more-palestinians-wounded-in-new-violence-jerusalem-day-march-is-canceled

Washington — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy on Sunday formally threw his weight behind Congresswoman Elise Stefanik of New York in her bid to replace Congresswoman Liz Cheney as the third-ranking Republican in the House.

In an interview on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” McCarthy, a California Republican, was asked if he supports Stefanik for the job of House Republican Conference chair, to which he replied, “Yes, I do.” 

“We need a conference that’s united,” he said. “That’s why we need a conference chair that is delivering that message, day in and day out, and uniting the nation, to make sure that we are on the right footing going forward.”

Following the minority leader’s endorsement, Stefanik tweeted to thank him for his support.

“Together, as one team, we will stand up for the American people and #FIREPelosi in 2022,” she tweeted.

McCarthy joins former President Donald Trump and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise in publicly backing Stefanik to serve in House Republican leadership. While Cheney survived an earlier attempt to oust her from the position of conference chair, GOP lawmakers are set to vote in the coming days on whether to replace her as tensions between the Wyoming Republican and Republican leaders have risen over her continued criticisms of Mr. Trump.

The upcoming vote marks a crucial point in the internal battle in the House Republican conference over the future of the party and its loyalty to the former president, who continues to falsely claim the presidential election was stolen.

Cheney, who joined nine other House Republicans in voting to impeach Mr. Trump for incitement of the insurrection on January 6, has urged the GOP to banish the former president from the party due to his role in the Capitol assault and for continuing to perpetuate the lie that President Biden did not legitimately win the 2020 election.

But House GOP leaders have further embraced the former president, with McCarthy and Scalise separately meeting with Mr. Trump at his private South Florida club, Mar-a-Lago, and McCarthy calling for unity among Republicans as they seek to win back the House majority in 2022. Last week, the California Republican told Fox News rank-and-file lawmakers have expressed concerns to him about Cheney’s ability to “carry out the message” and successfully do her job as conference chair.

While McCarthy initially said Mr. Trump “bears responsibility” for the January 6 assault on the Capitol, which led to the deaths of five people, he has since backtracked on his comments.

Few Republicans have publicly come to Cheney’s defense in recent weeks as the intraparty battle reached a fever pitch. GOP Utah Senator Mitt Romney, who voted to convict Mr. Trump in his Senate impeachment trial, took to Twitter last week to show support for Cheney.

“Every person of conscience draws a line beyond which they will not go: Liz Cheney refuses to lie,” he tweeted. “As one of my Republican Senate colleagues said to me following my impeachment vote: ‘I wouldn’t want to be a member of a group that punished someone for following their conscience.'”

Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, too, has continued to stand behind Cheney and said in an interview on “Face the Nation” on Sunday that Republicans have to decide whether they want to perpetuate Mr. Trump’s lie that the 2020 election was stolen.

“This is why you have this real battle right now in the party, this idea of let’s just put our differences aside and be unified. You cannot unify truth with lies,” he said. “The lie is that the election was stolen. The truth is Joe Biden beat Donald Trump. And I’m sorry that 74 million people voted for Donald Trump. They weren’t disenfranchised. They were simply outnumbered and as a party let’s focus on now, how do we go out and win more people.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/liz-cheney-republican-leadership-elise-stefanik-kevin-mccarthy/