India’s southern state of Tamil Nadu announced new lockdown measures on Saturday as officials reported a nationwide record number of single-day COVID-19 deaths as cases continue to surge.

India’s health ministry reported 4,187 fatalities over the past 24 hours, taking the overall death toll to just under 240,000. Cases rose by 401,078, increasing the total since the start of the pandemic to 21.9 million.

Officials in Tamil Nadu said the state-wide lockdown would begin on Monday and last until May 24. Shops and other businesses will be allowed to open on Saturday and Sunday to give residents time to prepare for the sweeping shutdown.

Neighbouring Karnataka, home to India’s tech capital Bengaluru, announced late on Friday it was extending movement restrictions, also until May 24.

The second wave of the coronavirus pandemic in India has brought the country’s healthcare system to the brink of collapse, with a scarcity of hospital beds and oxygen.

Morgues and crematoriums have struggled to handle the number of dead and makeshift funeral pyres burn in parks and car parks.

Medical experts say the real numbers of COVID-19 cases and fatalities are likely to be far higher than official tallies.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-posts-record-daily-rise-covid-19-deaths-case-numbers-surge-2021-05-08/

The Washington Post oped, penned by 10 former defense secreters.

House Republican Conference Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) — who is facing possible ouster from her leadership position next week — quietly orchestrated a Washington Post op-ed by 10 living former defense secretaries cautioning that then-President Trump might attempt to politicize the military, according to a report. 

Th op-ed, published three days before the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, was signed by Trump’s former Defense Secretary James Mattis, as well as Cheney’s father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and fellow ex-Pentgagon chiefs Ashton Carter, William Cohen, Mark Esper, Robert Gates, Chuck Hagel, Leon Panetta, William Perry and Donald Rumsfeld.

“’She was the one who generated it, because she was so worried about what Trump might do,’ Eric Edelman, a friend of Cheney’s and former adviser to her father, told the New Yorker. “It speaks to the degree that she was concerned about the threat to our democracy that Trump represented.”

Cheney has hammered Trump over his claims of election fraud.
Corbis via Getty Images

The joint Washington Post opinion piece called for the Trump administration to move forward with a peaceful transfer of power, strongly urging against involving military officials in their efforts to refute the election results

“As senior Defense Department leaders have noted, ‘there’s no role for the U.S. military in determining the outcome of a U.S. election,’” the op-ed said.

Mark Esper was Defense Secretary from 2019-2020.
Alex Brandon, File/AP

“Efforts to involve the U.S. armed forces in resolving election disputes would take us into dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional territory. Civilian and military officials who direct or carry out such measures would be accountable, including potentially facing criminal penalties, for the grave consequences of their actions on our republic.

The Wyoming Republican — who has repeatedly hammered Trump for his claims he won the 2020 election — also circulated a 21-page memo ahead of the certification of the election urging colleagues not to challenge the results, the magazine reports. 

“Such objections set an exceptionally dangerous precedent, threatening to steal states’ explicit constitutional responsibility for choosing the President and bestowing it instead on Congress. This is directly at odds with the Constitution’s clear text and our core beliefs as Republicans,” the memo said

Former Vice President Dick Cheney was among those who put his name on the Op-Ed.
Kamran Jebreili/AP

But despite her calls, 147 congressional Republicans — 138 in the House and seven in the Senate— objected to the certification of at least one state.

The news of her efforts on the op-ed comes just days ahead of the House Republican conference’s vote to remove her from her post with conservatives alleging her “Never Trump” hinders her ability to message for the conference. 

And it could well be the final nail in her coffin, politically, as the GOP appears set to shift further toward a Trump-led party heading into the 2022 midterm elections.

Leon Panetta was both Defense Secretary and CIA Director during President Obama’s tenure.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, told “Fox News Primetime” Wednesday that “the votes are there” to remove Cheney as House Republican Conference chair.

And Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) — the former chair of the moderate Tuesday Group who later because one of Trump’s most vocal defenders during the first impeachment proceedings — appears to be the likely successor to Cheney.

Cheney survived a vote to remove her from the leadership back in February, shortly after her decision to vote in favor of impeaching the president for inciting the riot at the Capitol, which resulted in multiple fatalities.

House Republican Conference Chair Liz Cheney quietly orchestrated a Washington Post op-ed by 10 living former defense secretaries cautioning former-President Donald Trump, according to a report.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

While she overwhelmingly prevailed in the first vote, GOP lawmakers said the climate has shifted, with a sizable number of her House colleagues voicing grievances about her continued rebukes of Trump, with her critics alleging it is hindering her ability to lead their messaging efforts.

Cheney’s ouster has the support of other members of the leadership team, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, the latter of which endorsed Stefanik shortly after Trump this week.

Mattis served as one of Trump’s defense secretaries.
Getty Images

The House Republican conference is expected to hold the vote on May 12.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/05/07/pal-says-liz-cheney-planned-anti-trump-op-ed-by-10-defense-secretaries/

China has urged United Nations member states not to attend an event planned next week by Germany, the United States and Britain on the repression of Uyghur Muslims and other minorities in Xinjiang, according to a note seen by Reuters on Friday.

“It is a politically-motivated event,” China’s U.N. mission wrote in the note, dated Thursday. “We request your mission NOT to participate in this anti-China event.”

China charged that the organizers of the event, which also include several other European states along with Australia and Canada, use “human rights issues as a political tool to interfere in China’s internal affairs like Xinjiang, to create division and turbulence and disrupt China’s development.”

“They are obsessed with provoking confrontation with China,” the note said, adding that “the provocative event can only lead to more confrontation.”

The Chinese mission to the United Nations did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The ambassadors of the United States, Germany and Britain are due to address the virtual U.N. event on Wednesday, along with Human Rights Watch Executive Director Ken Roth and Amnesty International Secretary General Agnes Callamard.

The aim of the event is to “discuss how the U.N. system, member states and civil society can support and advocate for the human rights of members of ethnic Turkic communities in Xinjiang,” according to an invitation.

Western states and rights groups have accused authorities in Xinjiang of detaining and torturing Uyghurs in camps, which the United States has described as genocide. In January, Washington banned the import of cotton and tomato products from Xinjiang over allegations of forced labor.

Beijing denies the accusations and describes the camps as vocational training centers to combat religious extremism.

“Beijing has been trying for years to bully governments into silence but that strategy has failed miserably, as more and states step forward to voice horror and revulsion at China’s crimes against Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslims,” Human Rights Watch U.N. director Louis Charbonneau said on Friday.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/china/exclusive-china-urges-un-states-not-attend-xinjiang-event-next-week-2021-05-07/

California’s population fell by nearly one-half of a percentage point last year, its first decline in at least 120 years, according to data released Friday.

The nation’s most populous state lost 182,083 people during 2020, the California Department of Finance said, bringing the total to 39.47 million. It attributed the decline to pandemic-related trends including increased deaths, less immigration and fewer births.

But the drop comes as California’s population growth had already plateaued before the pandemic, due to a yearslong decline in the birthrate and rising migration to other states. More people have left California for other states than the opposite for all but two of the last 30 years and beginning in 2018, net domestic out-migration outpaced net international migration.

“We believe that we will be back to a positive [growth] rate” in 2021, said H.D. Palmer, a spokesman for the Department of Finance. “Not a booming rate, to be sure, but a slightly positive rate.”

California, which was the epicenter of the nation’s surge in Covid-19 cases for much of the winter, experienced a 19% increase in the average death rate last year, according to the finance department. To date, 61,027 Californians have died of Covid-19.

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-population-declines-for-first-time-in-more-than-a-century-11620416887

Biden, speaking from the East Room of the White House, argued that the jobs report underscored the need for the multitrillion-dollar recovery package enacted earlier this year, as well as the huge spending proposals the president has laid out in recent weeks.

“This month’s job numbers show we are on the right track,” Biden said. “We still have a long way to go. My laser focus is on growing the nation’s economy and creating jobs.”

Biden’s remarks were crafted as an apparent rebuttal to conservatives who blamed the disappointing numbers on the juiced-up unemployment benefits put in place during the Covid-19 pandemic, which they said have deterred people from seeking work, and the friction caused by schools not being fully opened in many parts of the country.

Biden recognized that “some employers are having trouble filling jobs,” but dismissed the idea that the supplemental jobless benefits were at fault.

“No, nothing measurable,” Biden told a reporter following his remarks in response to a question on whether the enhanced benefits have incentivized people to stay out of the workforce.

Liberals have argued that employers are contributing to the problem by not offering higher wages and sufficient safety protections to attract workers to fill the open positions.

Biden’s comments echoed those of Labor Secretary Marty Walsh, who made the rounds on cable news channels earlier Friday to cast the jobs numbers in a favorable light and defend the administration’s economic policies.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told reporters Friday that “it’s clear that there are people who are not ready and able to go back into the labor force,” citing child care needs and concerns about the risk posed by the coronavirus. She said she believes those are what’s holding back the economic rebound.

“I don’t think that the additional unemployment compensation is really the factor that’s making the difference,” Yellen said.

She added that economic officials believe the U.S. will reach full employment “next year,” and that while they are anticipating an uptick in inflation in the near term “I really doubt we’re going to see an inflationary cycle.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/07/biden-jobs-report-reaction-485724

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-07/biden-lifts-secrecy-of-white-house-visitor-logs-cloaked-by-trump

At least two states will soon kick workers off pandemic-era programs that expanded and raised unemployment benefits.

The governors of Montana and South Carolina announced this week that they are ending their participation in the federal programs at the end of June.

The American Rescue Plan makes that aid available through Sept. 6.

The programs, in place since March last year, pay funds to the long-term unemployed; offer a $300 weekly supplement to benefits; and issue aid to the self-employed, gig workers and others who don’t typically qualify for state assistance.

The state directives come as the U.S. unemployment rate rose unexpectedly, to 6.1% in April, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said Friday.

The governors, both Republicans, blamed the unemployment programs for keeping workers home and causing a labor shortage.

“What was intended to be a short-term financial assistance for the vulnerable and displaced during the height of the pandemic has turned into a dangerous federal entitlement, incentivizing and paying workers to stay at home rather than encouraging them to return to the workplace,” South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster said Thursday.

Lost income support

Montana and South Carolina will exit the programs June 27 and 30, respectively.

Some labor experts fear they’ll be the first of many early exits among Republican-led states, which may leave thousands without income support to pay monthly bills.

More from Personal Finance:
Despite dismal jobs report, teenagers looking for summer work are in luck
29% of unemployed Americans have been jobless over a year
Here’s who would benefit most from student loan forgiveness

“It’s just breathtakingly terrible economics,” Heidi Shierholz, director of policy at the Economic Policy Institute and former chief economist at the Department of Labor from 2014 to 2017, said in a tweet.

“It will cause enormous suffering of those whose benefits are cut off, and damage state economies by turning away federal money that is providing fiscal support,” she added.

More than 150,000 people in Montana and South Carolina are poised to lose their benefits early as a result of the cutoff, according to a CNBC analysis of Labor Department data. At least 51,000 will see their benefits reduced.

More than 16 million Americans are still collecting jobless aid — a number that’s gradually falling but remains far higher than the roughly 2 million pre-pandemic.

April jobs report

“The disappointing jobs report makes it clear that paying people not to work is dampening what should be a stronger jobs market,” the Chamber said Friday.

Congressional Republicans used a similar argument when a $600-a-week CARES Act unemployment supplement was in place. At that time, economists didn’t find evidence the enhanced pay was keeping people from looking for work.

Unique Covid dynamics

Some economists believe criticisms of the unemployment programs currently in place are premature.

For one, businesses may not be paying wages high enough to attract workers to available jobs, they said.

The unique dynamics of the Covid recession — not extra unemployment aid — are also likely the bigger problem, the economists said.

“It is really not helpful to blame the unemployed and lowest paid worker for what is happening,” Diane Swonk, chief economist at Grant Thornton, said on Twitter.

Parents may have to remain home to care for children learning from home, childcare centers remain closed and grandparents may not be able to help out to the same extent as they once did, attributable partly to the higher death rate among seniors, Swonk said.

Fear of the virus may remain, too. Coronavirus infections are falling but remain high (more than 40,000 daily) and some Covid “long haulers” with persistent symptoms may not be able to return to work yet, Swonk added.

“It is fanciful to believe we can flip a switch and return to [the] world we left given the detour we have taken,” she said. “Some changes triggered by the pandemic will be long lasting.”

Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte is replacing the unemployment programs with a one-time $1,200 return-to-work bonus. Workers will get the payment if they had an active unemployment claim as of May 4 and work four full weeks.

It doesn’t appear South Carolina is offering a similar incentive.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/07/montana-south-carolina-ending-participation-in-fed-unemployment-programs.html

Sinopharm and Sinovac are producing about 12 million doses a day, just a little over the 10 million doses that China hopes to administer daily to meet the domestic target. The companies would have to produce roughly 500 million additional doses to meet the demands of other countries, according to a calculation of data provided by Bridge Consulting, a Beijing-based consultancy focused on China’s impact on global health.

The vaccine shortage in China underscores the complexity of rolling out a mass vaccination campaign for the world’s most populous nation while also trying to execute an ambitious export program. Companies involved in the vaccine supply chain, such as those making syringes, are working overtime.

“The whole world is short of this vaccine,” said a Sinovac spokesman, Pearson Liu. “The demand is just too great.”

To mitigate the shortfall, Chinese officials said those getting vaccinated in China could delay getting their second shot by as long as eight weeks, or they could combine the same type of vaccine from different companies. They have said the shortage should ease by June.

Andrea Taylor, who analyzes global data on vaccines at the Duke Global Health Institute, called the potential addition of two Chinese vaccines into the Covax program a “game changer.”

“The situation right now is just so desperate for low and lower middle income countries that any doses we can get out are worth mobilizing,” Ms. Taylor said. “Having potentially two options coming from China could really change the landscape of what’s possible over the next few months.”

China’s vaccines have been rolled out to more than 80 countries, but they have faced significant skepticism, in part because the companies have not released Phase 3 clinical trial data for scientists to independently assess the vaccines’ efficacy rates. An advisory group to the W.H.O. published the data this week.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/07/business/economy/china-sinopharm-vaccine-who.html

A federal grand jury has indicted all four former Minneapolis police officers involved with the killing of George Floyd in May 2020, including Derek Chauvin, who was convicted on murder and manslaughter charges last month.

The multicount indictment from the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, accuses Chauvin along with Thomas Lane, J. Kueng and Tou Thao of violating Floyd’s constitutional rights.

All of the men were charged with failing to administer first aid to Floyd as Chauvin kneeled on his neck for more than nine minutes.

Additionally, Chauvin, Kueng and Thao are charged with violating Floyd’s right to be free from unreasonable seizure and excessive force.

Chauvin was the first white police officer in Minnesota to be convicted of murdering a Black person, and many in the country saw the high-profile trial as a referendum on policing in the U.S.

Multiple Minneapolis police officers, including the city’s police chief, testified against Chauvin during the trial — a rarity in police misconduct cases and a possible indication that his trial could move the needle on police reform. 

Floyd’s death was a catalyst for nationwide Black Lives Matter protests that dominated the country last summer.

The indictment announced Friday states that the offenses violated the U.S. Code known as the “color of law” statute, something that Democrats in Congress have sought to change through the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act.

The important provision prohibits law enforcement officers willfully depriving “a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.”

Under the George Floyd bill, which would implement sweeping national reforms to policing, “willfully” would be changed to “knowingly or recklessly,” and the scope of the statute would also broaden.

The proposed change as well as the legislation’s slashing of qualified immunity are viewed as the largest roadblocks to Republican support for the bill.

Lane, Kueng and Thao are set to stand trial on state criminal charges of aiding and abetting murder and manslaughter in August. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/552323-grand-jury-indicts-4-ex-police-officers-in-george-floyds-death

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden said Friday that April’s lower than expected job growth reveals that the U.S. economy is still struggling to recover from the Covid pandemic, and that his massive infrastructure and family support bills are needed now more than ever.

“This month’s job numbers show we are on the right track,” said Biden. “But we still have a long way to go. My laser focus is on growing the nation’s economy and creating jobs. My laser focus is on vaccinating, and my laser focus is on one more thing: making sure that hard working people in this country are no longer left out in the cold.”

Hours before Biden spoke, the Labor Department reported that hiring slowed dramatically in April, with nonfarm payrolls increasing by a much less than expected 266,000 and the unemployment rate rose to 6.1% amid an escalating shortage of available workers.

Dow Jones estimates had been for 1 million new jobs and an unemployment rate of 5.8%.

Many economists had been expecting an even higher jobs number amid signs that the U.S. economy was roaring back to life.

Biden said the slow pace of recovery served to rebut critics of the administration’s Covid relief efforts.

“Some critics said we didn’t need the American Rescue Plan, that this economy would just heal itself. Today’s report just underscores, in my view, how vital the actions we are taking are,” the president said. “Our efforts are starting to work, but the climb is steep, and we have a long way to go.”

The lower-than-expected job growth could strengthen the Biden administration’s argument to Congress that the president’s $4 trillion jobs and families plans are needed to help the U.S. economy fully recover from the pandemic. 

Biden’s infrastructure bill, dubbed the American Jobs Plan, would spend $2.3 trillion on rebuilding the nation’s transportation infrastructure and create millions of jobs for workers without a college degree. 

The second piece of his domestic agenda, the American Families Plan, would dedicate another $1.8 trillion to fund universal prekindergarten, offering free community college to every American and subsidizing child care, among other proposals.

Biden intends to fund his economic recovery packages by increasing the corporate tax rate, raising taxes on the very rich, closing loopholes and increasing IRS enforcement.

And while the president hopes to win some bipartisan support for the bills, Republicans in Congress have already said that raising taxes is a red line they won’t cross. 

Negotiations are ongoing, however, and a group of Republican senators is expected to visit the White House in coming days to meet with the president about potential areas of compromise.

The labor shortage debate

The weak jobs recovery also reflects what many economists say is a labor shortage across multiple sectors.

“I think this is just as much about a shortage in labor supply as it is about a shortage of labor demand,” Jason Furman, an economist at Harvard University and a former Obama administration advisor, told CNBC. “If you look at April, it appears that there were about 1.1 unemployed workers for every job opening. So there are a lot of jobs out there, there is just still not a lot of labor supply.”

Republicans and some employers have blamed the labor shortage on what they say are overly generous unemployment benefits that were approved by Congress as part of the broad pandemic relief package.

Specifically, they point to a $300 per week federal unemployment bonus above and beyond what states provide, which is set to expire in September.

“I told you weeks ago that in Florida I hear from small business everyday that they can’t hire people because the government is paying them to not go back to work,” Republican Sen. Marco Rubio tweeted on Friday.

Biden rejected that argument. “Today’s report is a rebuttal to loose talk that Americans just don’t want to work,” he said.

“What this report shows is that there’s a much bigger problem: It is that our economy still has 8 million fewer jobs than when this pandemic started.”

The president also said the impact of unemployment benefits on labor markets was “nothing measurable.”

Census data taken in recent weeks suggests the closures of day-care centers and schools have forced millions of Americans to stay home and care for children or oversee online learning.

According to a Census Household Pulse surveys taken in late March, 6.3 million people reported that they were not working because they needed to care for a child not in a school or day care. Another 2.1 million were caring for an older person.

An additional 4.1 million Americans said they were not working because of concerns about getting or spreading Covid.

— CNBC’s Jeff Cox contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/07/weak-jobs-report-shows-the-need-for-massive-jobs-and-families-bills-biden-says.html

After an all-night session, the Texas state House passed a GOP-backed measure that would bar public officials from sending out mail-in ballot applications without prior requests for them and implement strict rules on the number of voting machines at polling places in major cities.

The bill was moved forward by an 81-64 vote at approximately 3 a.m. following an all-night session led by Democrats’ opposition to the proposal.

The state Senate has approved a separate measure that also limits early voting rules and bans drive-through voting.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbot (R) has expressed support for signing an election reform bill, meaning a form of the legislation is likely to become Texas law. The House bill will have to be reconciled with the Senate bill before a measure can go to Abbot’s desk for his possible signature.

Texas is one of several states that is considering or has already approved changes to voting laws after the tumultuous election of 2020, where mail-in voting skyrocketed amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Former President TrumpDonald TrumpVeteran accused in alleged border wall scheme faces new charges Arizona Republicans to brush off DOJ concern about election audit FEC drops investigation into Trump hush money payments MORE has repeatedly made baseless accusations that the presidential election was stolen from him. Those cries led to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, which interrupted Congress’s largely ceremonial certification of the Electoral College results.

While no evidence has emerged of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, the complaints have led a number of GOP legislatures across the country to take steps similar to the Texas House bill.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantisRon DeSantisFlorida’s new voting law immediately hit with lawsuits The Hill’s 12:30 Report – Presented by ExxonMobil – Florida’s restrictive voting bill signed into law Pollster Frank Luntz: ‘I would bet on’ Trump being 2024 GOP nominee MORE (R) signed legislation into law on Friday that would limit voter access to absentee ballot drop boxes used by most Florida counties, implement stricter voter ID mandates for absentee voting and institute a requirement that voters who want to cast absentee ballots submit new requests every election cycle instead of every four years.

Georgia earlier this year also approved a new law on voting that sparked controversy and complaints from Democrats and President BidenJoe BidenAtlanta mayor won’t run for reelection South Carolina governor to end pandemic unemployment benefits in June Airplane pollution set to soar with post-pandemic travel boom MORE. Major League Baseball moved its All-Star Game from Atlanta in protest of the new law, which critics said could suppress Democratic votes.

Biden narrowly won Georgia in the presidential race last year, and on Jan. 5, two Democrats won runoff Senate races in the state.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/552122-texas-house-passes-controversial-voting-bill

Facebook’s Oversight Board says the company, led by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, must take responsibility for its decisions.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Facebook’s Oversight Board says the company, led by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, must take responsibility for its decisions.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Facebook has almost 2 billion daily users, annual revenue that rivals some countries’ gross domestic product, and even its own version of a Supreme Court: the Oversight Board, which the company created to review its toughest decisions on what people can post on its platforms.

This week, the board faced its biggest test to date when it ruled on whether Facebook should let former President Donald Trump back on its social network.

The board upheld the company’s decision to remove Trump after the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol — finding he had broken Facebook’s rules about praising violence — but it criticized the indefinite suspension and kicked the case back to the company either to ban Trump permanently or set a time frame for when he can return.

Former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt, a board co-chair, even called the company “a bit lazy” for failing to set a specific penalty in the first place.

Facebook said it’s now considering the ruling and will determine a “clear and proportionate” action.

The board’s response in this case may have been more than Facebook was counting on when it set up the advisory body. But the decision — and the public response to it this week — reveals just how big a challenge Facebook’s scale and power present to anyone who wants to hold the company to account.

“They can’t invent penalties as they go along”

In many respects, the decision the board handed down is more about Facebook than it is about Trump.

The board zeroed in on something critics have said for a long time: The way Facebook enforces its rules can seem arbitrary. It’s often unclear what rules are being applied and why.

When it came to Trump, the board said that an indefinite suspension appeared nowhere in its rule book and violates principles of freedom of expression.

“What we are telling Facebook is that they can’t invent penalties as they go along. They have to stick to their own rules,” Thorning-Schmidt said in an interview with Axios.

She said that kind of arbitrary decision, made on the fly, has helped fuel claims that Facebook is biased.

“We will only get rid of this talk that Facebook is leaning towards certain political opinions when we get to a stage when all decisions on Facebook and Instagram are taken with transparency and clarity and where all users are judged by the same standard,” she said.

Casting doubt on Facebook’s “newsworthiness” policy

The board also pushed Facebook to be more transparent about how it treats political leaders and other high-profile accounts in a set of broader recommendations.

The board said the company should generally apply its rules equally, no matter whether the user is the president or an average citizen.

But it acknowledged that people with big audiences, such as politicians or celebrities, can cause outsize harm — and said Facebook should act more quickly when those users break the rules.

That’s different from how Facebook — and Twitter for that matter — currently treat politicians and other public figures. Both companies have carve-outs from their rules in matters of public interest, and Facebook’s CEO has said the company should err on the side of allowing more political speech. In practice, that meant it appeared Trump was able to get away with posting things that may have gotten the average Facebook user banned.

The board said Facebook should do a better job explaining its “newsworthiness” policy and how it applies to “influential accounts.” Under that policy, Facebook doesn’t take down posts that break its rules if the company thinks they are “newsworthy and in the public interest.” (Facebook said it never applied this policy to any of Trump’s posts.)

The board said the opaqueness of the newsworthiness policy makes it seem like Facebook “may be unduly influenced by political or commercial considerations”— in other words, that it’s dodging criticism from Republicans or looking out for the bottom line.

“The board’s job is to make sure that Facebook is doing its job”

The board’s criticism didn’t stop at Facebook’s imposing what it called a “vague, standardless penalty.” It slammed the company for trying to outsource its final verdict on Trump.

“Facebook has a responsibility to its users and to its community and to the broader public to make its own decisions,” Jamal Greene, another board co-chair and constitutional law professor at Columbia, said Thursday during an Aspen Institute event.

“The board’s job is to make sure that Facebook is doing its job,” he said.

Tensions between the board’s view of the scope of its role and Facebook’s were also evident in the board’s revelation that the company wouldn’t answer seven of the 46 questions it asked about the Trump case.

The questions Facebook refused to answer included how its own design and algorithms might have amplified the reach of Trump’s posts and contributed to the Capitol assault.

“The ones that the company refused to answer to are precisely related to what happened before Jan. 6,” Julie Owono, an oversight board member and executive director of the digital rights group Internet Sans Frontières, said at the Aspen Institute event.

“Our decision says that you cannot make such an important decision, such a serious decision for freedom of expression, freedom of speech, without the adequate context.”

“They’re acting like they’re bigger than government”

Critics have seized on these shortcomings — such as the board’s inability to force Facebook to answer questions it doesn’t want to, and its lack of any legal or enforcement authority — to make the case that the board is little more than a fig leaf for Facebook’s lack of accountability.

For many people across the political spectrum, the decision this week confirmed whatever opinions they already held.

Lawmakers seized on the opportunity. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., promised to “rein in big tech power over our speech” if Republicans regain control of the chamber.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said she was glad Trump would not return to Facebook but renewed her call to break up Silicon Valley giants. “I don’t think that Facebook ought to have this kind of power,” she told Cheddar News. “We need to break up these giant tech companies, and Facebook is one of them. They are crushing competition and in cases like Facebook, they’re acting like they’re bigger than government.”

Rashad Robinson, president of the civil rights group Color Of Change, told NPR the board is a “distraction” from what needs to be done to force change at Facebook: congressional regulation of tech giants and their powerful leaders, such as Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

“The question will be, will our elected officials step up and stop allowing this unaccountable single billionaire person to have this type of outsized power in our democracy and our economy and our media?” he said.

But as unhappy as critics are with executives such as Zuckerberg and Twitter’s Jack Dorsey making hard calls about online speech, there is resistance to the idea the government should get involved.

Oversight Board co-chair Thorning-Schmidt said she was concerned about autocratic governments stifling free expression online.

“This [Oversight Board] might not be the perfect solution, but it is much better than Facebook doing it themselves or a government taking these decisions,” she told Axios. “It might not be a perfect setup, but I challenge anyone to come up with a setup that is better.”

Editor’s note: Facebook is among NPR’s financial supporters.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/07/994436847/what-we-learned-about-facebook-from-trump-decision

Bottoms, 51, who was elected mayor of Georgia’s capital in 2017, gained a national profile in the wake of last year’s unrest following the death of Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis. She was praised for a forceful, personal appeal to protesters, including some whom had begun vandalizing property in Atlanta’s downtown. “This is not a protest … This is chaos. A protest has purpose.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/georgia-democrats-atlanta-mayor/2021/05/07/34c3bf9e-af2b-11eb-acd3-24b44a57093a_story.html

  • The US military and others are tracking a Chinese rocket piece due to re-enter the atmosphere soon.
  • Experts have highlighted a huge swathe of the planet where the rocket could come down.
  • Some say it will re-enter over Turkmenistan Sunday, but estimates differ by thousands of miles.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Experts are tracking a large section of a Chinese rocket which is due to re-enter the atmosphere in the next two days or so.

As the impact gets closer, calculations about the time and location of the debris re-entry are likely to improve. Until then, estimates will “continue to vary wildly,” according to the US military. 

It is very difficult to predict where the rocket will land because it is thought to be making its descent in an uncontrolled way

Space-Track, a website run by the 18th Space Control Squadron, a branch of the US military that tracks space debris, said in a tweet on Friday that the rocket will reenter around 11:13 PM UTC, or 7:13 PM ET, on Saturday.

According to the coordinates given in the tweet, the rocket would fall over Turkmenistan.

These estimates will “continue to vary wildly,” Space-Track said, until it becomes clear when exactly the rocket will reach the atmosphere. 

On Thursday, it predicted the rocket would land in the middle of the Indian Ocean

That is because the rocket currently hurtling around the Earth on an orbit at about 18,000 mph, as it lowers towards the Earth at around 0.3 mph, Harvard Astronomer Jonathan McDowell said in a tweet

That means if the estimates of when the rocket would reach the atmosphere are off by even a half an hour, the rocket could be almost on the other side of the Earth. 

As of early Friday, the margin of error for Space-Track’s estimate was at least 18 hours either way.

Another body tracking the rocket, the Aerospace Corporation, a not-for profit-company that receives US funding, predicted on Thursday that the rocket would reenter the atmosphere on May 9 at 3:43 AM UTC, which is Sunday, at 11:43 PM, ET time. 

The rocket could hit the atmosphere anywhere along the yellow lines in the map above at that time, they say.

So far, the only certainty is that the rocket would re-enter the atmosphere within a latitude of 41.5 degrees north and south of the equator, which covers an area as far north as New York City, and as far south as New Zealand. 

The “exact entry point of the rocket into the Earth’s atmosphere cannot be pinpointed until within hours of its reentry,” US Space Command, a branch of the US military that is tracking the object, said in a statement on Tuesday

The Space-Track Twitter page said it would publish estimates daily.

The object that is being tracked is the core module of a Long March 5B rocket that was launched by China on April 29.

Common practice is for these types of objects to fall back to Earth without reaching orbit, which makes it easier to predict where they will fall, Aerospace Corporation said in a blog post

But the core module of the Chinese rocket reached orbit, and is now circling the Earth on an elliptical pattern, slowly being pulled closer and closer to the atmosphere, Aerospace Corporation said

The object, which is thought to be around 22 tons, should mostly disintegrate upon reentry, but experts are concerned that some debris could survive and reach the surface of the Earth

A spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry said on Friday that because of the design of the rocket, the vast majority of the devices will be burnt up and there is “a very low probability” of its re-entry causing harm.

Chinese authorities plan to release information about the timing of the rocket’s re-entry in “a timely manner,” he said, according to the Associated Press

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/possible-impact-for-out-of-control-china-rocket-unpredictable-2021-5

WASHINGTON – Rep. Liz Cheney, the House Republican Conference chair from Wyoming, is in hot water with her party. Her refusal to accept former President Donald Trump’s false claims the 2020 election was stolen is angering her Republican colleagues and putting her leadership role at risk.

Major party leaders are dissatisfied with her. Trump and No. 2 House Republican Rep. Steve Scalise want her replaced with Rep. Elise Stefanik, and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said House Republicans told him they’re worried about her “ability to carry out the job.”

If Cheney loses her position as the third-ranking House Republican, it would cause more than just a major shakeup in GOP congressional leadership – it would further signal the party’s interest in keeping Trump and his wing of the GOP front and center as they try to flip Democratic control of Congress and push against President Joe Biden.

Cheney herself cast it in more stark terms, writing a blistering Washington Post editorial Wednesday in which she framed the Republican Party as “at a turning point” in whether it will choose “truth and fidelity to the Constitution” or the “cult of personality” of Trump.

Liz Cheney:Trump, No. 2 House Republican Steve Scalise throw support behind Elise Stefanik for Liz Cheney’s leadership post

The Republican caucus was expected to meet Wednesday behind closed doors, though Scalise spokeswoman Lauren Fine said no formal vote or discussion on Cheney’s future has been announced. 

But the wave of criticism has drawn out support for Stefanik, a pro-Trump Republican who gained wide recognition over her staunch support of the former president during his first impeachment.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/05/07/liz-cheney-republicans-want-her-out-but-what-it-means/4956597001/

Republican state Rep. Briscoe Cain, center, stands with co-sponsors as he answers questions and speaks in favor of an election bill, in the House Chamber at the Capitol in Austin, Texas, on Thursday.

Eric Gay/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Eric Gay/AP

Republican state Rep. Briscoe Cain, center, stands with co-sponsors as he answers questions and speaks in favor of an election bill, in the House Chamber at the Capitol in Austin, Texas, on Thursday.

Eric Gay/AP

Texas legislators approved new, more restrictive state election rules after a session that lasted from Thursday night into the early morning hours of Friday. The GOP-backed state Senate bill passed the House at 3 a.m. (4 a.m. ET) after hours of debate over Democratic-proposed amendments.

The House version of the bill, which differs significantly from what passed the state Senate, will now go to a conference committee to resolve the differences.

The bill would make it a felony to provide a voter with an application to vote by mail if they hadn’t requested one, or to use any public funds to facilitate the third-party distribution of mail-in voting applications.

The ability for polling place “watchers” to be present throughout the election day is also expanded under the bill. It sets a high bar for when such observers can be taken out of the polling place. The bill states they can be removed “only if the watcher engages in activity that would constitute an offense related to the conduct of the election.”

The bill was criticized by Democrats, progressive groups and voting rights advocates as a “voter suppression bill.” Republicans such as state Rep. Jeff Leach view it as “sensible election integrity legislation that ensures and protects full access to the ballot box.” The bill, he tweeted shortly after 4:30 a.m. (5:30 a.m. ET), cracks down on “illegal activity” undermining elections, echoing the false claims that elections last November were not secure.

The proposal is one of a long list of state election laws working their way through Republican-led state legislatures following former President Donald Trump’s false claims of voting fraud in the November presidential election. On Thursday, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a similar election bill.

Democrats say that efforts to further restrict mail-in and early voting is a direct response to actions that led to high turnout during the 2020 elections, helping them succeed at the ballot box.

Last month, major corporations with offices in Texas spoke out against these legislative proposals. Corporate heavy hitters American Airlines, which is located in Fort Worth, and Dell Technologies, headquartered in Round Rock, criticized the effort, calling for equitable access to voting.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/07/994542161/after-all-night-session-texas-house-approves-new-gop-backed-election-law

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis not only broke from decades of precedent on Thursday when he blocked all news outlets except Fox News from covering the signing of a voting bill into law. He also may have violated the U.S. Constitution.

That’s the opinion of First Amendment experts who told the Tampa Bay Times it is illegal for DeSantis to hand-pick which media can cover a public proceeding.

“The law leaves no question as to the impropriety of banning certain media while allowing only friendly media,” said Pamela Marsh, executive director of the First Amendment Foundation, an organization that advocates for open government and represents news organizations, including the Tampa Bay Times and the Miami Herald. “That is viewpoint and content discrimination.”

Decades of precedent in federal courts have affirmed that elected officials cannot block certain news outlets from reporting on public events just because they don’t like the coverage.

In Louisiana in the 1980s, a local mayor attempted to exclude reporters from a certain newspaper from major press conferences. The newspaper sued. A federal court called the mayor’s actions “the essence of censorship forbidden by the First Amendment and so abhorred by the founding fathers,” and the newspaper won.

In 2007, an Ohio federal judge ruled against the mayor of Toledo, who had stopped notifying a local radio station of the mayor’s news conferences. The mayor’s office also blocked one of the station’s reporters from attending. The court said the mayor was attempting to “manage the news by manipulating who comes to hear what’s to be said and therefore who reports it. ” It required that the reporter be given access.

DeSantis visited West Palm Beach on Thursday to sign a controversial bill that made it more difficult to vote by mail in Florida. In his three years in office, DeSantis has frequently held similar signing ceremonies, and they are open for journalists to attend. This time, reporters and television crews that showed up to cover the signing were turned away by the governor’s staff.

The signing, however, was carried live on Fox & Friends, the conservative network’s morning show, during a 7 minute and 30-second segment. DeSantis later said he gave Fox News an “exclusive,” a term that media types and politicos use for granting a story or interview to a single outlet or reporter.

Because the bill signing was a “public proceeding,” DeSantis should not have been able to limit which news outlets could cover it, said Clay Calvert, a University of Florida law professor and director of the school’s First Amendment Project.

People who don’t have a cable subscription or who don’t watch that network wouldn’t have seen it.

“Unless you’re watching Fox, you’re going to be denied access to information,” Calvert said. “That’s troubling regardless of the First Amendment issues.”

In addition to DeSantis, several elected officials joined him in West Palm Beach for the bill signing, including Lt. Gov. Jeanette Núñez and the bill’s sponsors, Rep. Blaise Ingoglia and Sen. Dennis Baxley. Members of a local fan club for former President Donald Trump were also in attendance.

DeSantis defended only letting Fox & Friends in the room because it was aired on national television. His office did not respond to requests for comment on the First Amendment concerns.

“We did a wonderful bill signing for this great elections bill,” DeSantis said. “It was live on national television. We were happy to give them the exclusive on that. That’s broadcast to millions of people.”

Fox & Friends averages about 1.1 million viewers nationwide. Florida’s voting age population is nearly 17 million.

Fox said it did not ask DeSantis’ office for the special treatment. In a statement to the Tampa Bay Times, the network said, “FOX & Friends did not request or mandate that the May 6th event and interview with Gov. Ron DeSantis be exclusive to FOX News Media entities.”

Later, the network clarified that its producers weren’t aware that DeSantis was going to sign the bill on camera. He was booked Thursday for “an interview and not as a live bill signing.”

This is not the first time DeSantis’ administration has clashed with news organizations on access. When the coronavirus first arrived, DeSantis’s administration waited 24 hours to tell the public about a known case in Florida. Throughout the pandemic, DeSantis’ office has withheld data and reports on the outbreak from reporters, only releasing the information after news outlets sued.

Thursday’s news conference also highlights how much DeSantis has relied on Fox News to amplify his message and grow his national brand. He is a frequent guest on the show’s prime time programs, whose hosts often heap praise on the Republican governor.

And the network has in turn welcomed DeSantis, one of the most popular figures in the GOP, as often as he’s available. Hours after a national firestorm over DeSantis’ appearance on Fox & Friends, he sat down for another interview on the network, this time with Sean Hannity.

Edward Birk, a Jacksonville-based First Amendment attorney, said elected officials can grant exclusive arrangements with certain news organizations but they cannot exclude media from a public event.

“Regardless whether it violates the First Amendment, which it may,” Birk said, “it’s bad government.”

Times/Herald reporter Lawrence Mower contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2021/05/07/did-desantis-violate-first-amendment-with-fox-news-only-bill-signing/

Hugh Lewis, who models space debris at Southampton University, UK, noted that more than 60 years of spaceflight had left a large legacy of junk in orbit. The responsibility for this litter rests on several countries, but principally Russia and the US.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57013540