Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., called out fellow Democrats standing in the way of abolishing the Senate filibuster, implying her party must get tougher to take on Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Omar, a progressive Squad member, said Democrats can’t repeat the mistakes of former President Barack Obama’s administration by failing to deliver sweeping reforms when they last had full control over Congress and the White House. 

“Democrats can’t repeat the mistake of 2009, we must abolish the filibuster & move legislation that helps us deliver progress for the American people,” Omar tweeted Wednesday. “Let’s grow a backbone.”

The Minnesota Democrat was replying to a statement made by McConnell in Kentucky on Wednesday where he said in clear terms that his priority is taking down President Biden and Democrats: “100 percent of my focus is on stopping this new administration,” McConnell said. 

ILHAN OMAR TO REINTRODUCE BILL CREATING NEW FEDERAL BOARD TO INDEPENDENTLY INVESTIGATE POLICE MISCONDUCT

Biden has come under criticism from Republicans for launching his administration with talk of building bridges but instead deciding to go it alone on his priorities – like a massive $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief law that got no GOP support. 

But Omar and other Democrats have blamed the lack of GOP cooperation on political obstruction that McConnell’s comments encapsulate. 

“Please stop asking us about bipartisanship when this is what the leader of the other party is focused on,” Omar tweeted in response to McConnell’s statement. 

U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) introduces Democratic 2020 U.S. presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) at a campaign event in Nashua, New Hampshire, U.S., December 13, 2019.  REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz – RC2PUD9RWMHC
(Reuters)

McConnell’s statement was reminiscent of his comments in 2010 to the National Journal in advance of Obama’s first mid-term elections. “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president,” McConnell said at the time. 

Biden seemed to brush off McConnell’s pledge Wednesday at the White House and tried to strike a conciliatory tone toward McConnell’s quest to win back power. 

MCCONNELL DODGES QUESTIONS ABOUT LIZ CHENEY

“Look, he said that in our last administration with Barack — he was going to stop everything — and I was able to get a lot done with him,” Biden said. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., speaks during a news conference at Kroger Field in Lexington, Ky., Monday, April 5, 2021. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)

Democrats have the slimmest of majorities in the House and the Senate as Republicans are well-positioned to regain some power in Congress in 2022. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

So with the window of opportunity closing, progressives are putting pressure on moderate Democrats like Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona to abolish the legislative filibuster. Doing so would allow Democrats to pass ambitious priorities like voting rights legislation, D.C. statehood and police reform with a simple majority vote. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ilhan-omar-democrats-mitch-mcconnell

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., called out fellow Democrats standing in the way of abolishing the Senate filibuster, implying her party must get tougher to take on Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Omar, a progressive Squad member, said Democrats can’t repeat the mistakes of former President Barack Obama’s administration by failing to deliver sweeping reforms when they last had full control over Congress and the White House. 

“Democrats can’t repeat the mistake of 2009, we must abolish the filibuster & move legislation that helps us deliver progress for the American people,” Omar tweeted Wednesday. “Let’s grow a backbone.”

The Minnesota Democrat was replying to a statement made by McConnell in Kentucky on Wednesday where he said in clear terms that his priority is taking down President Biden and Democrats: “100 percent of my focus is on stopping this new administration,” McConnell said. 

ILHAN OMAR TO REINTRODUCE BILL CREATING NEW FEDERAL BOARD TO INDEPENDENTLY INVESTIGATE POLICE MISCONDUCT

Biden has come under criticism from Republicans for launching his administration with talk of building bridges but instead deciding to go it alone on his priorities – like a massive $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief law that got no GOP support. 

But Omar and other Democrats have blamed the lack of GOP cooperation on political obstruction that McConnell’s comments encapsulate. 

“Please stop asking us about bipartisanship when this is what the leader of the other party is focused on,” Omar tweeted in response to McConnell’s statement. 

U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) introduces Democratic 2020 U.S. presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) at a campaign event in Nashua, New Hampshire, U.S., December 13, 2019.  REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz – RC2PUD9RWMHC
(Reuters)

McConnell’s statement was reminiscent of his comments in 2010 to the National Journal in advance of Obama’s first mid-term elections. “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president,” McConnell said at the time. 

Biden seemed to brush off McConnell’s pledge Wednesday at the White House and tried to strike a conciliatory tone toward McConnell’s quest to win back power. 

MCCONNELL DODGES QUESTIONS ABOUT LIZ CHENEY

“Look, he said that in our last administration with Barack — he was going to stop everything — and I was able to get a lot done with him,” Biden said. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., speaks during a news conference at Kroger Field in Lexington, Ky., Monday, April 5, 2021. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)

Democrats have the slimmest of majorities in the House and the Senate as Republicans are well-positioned to regain some power in Congress in 2022. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

So with the window of opportunity closing, progressives are putting pressure on moderate Democrats like Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona to abolish the legislative filibuster. Doing so would allow Democrats to pass ambitious priorities like voting rights legislation, D.C. statehood and police reform with a simple majority vote. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ilhan-omar-democrats-mitch-mcconnell

Medical workers wait to vaccinate people at a pop-up COVID-19 vaccination clinic last month in Hollandale, Miss.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Medical workers wait to vaccinate people at a pop-up COVID-19 vaccination clinic last month in Hollandale, Miss.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

A new study estimates that the number of people who have died of COVID-19 in the U.S. is more than 900,000, a number 57% higher than official figures.

Worldwide, the study’s authors say, the COVID-19 death count is nearing 7 million, more than double the reported number of 3.24 million.

The analysis comes from researchers at the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, who looked at excess mortality from March 2020 through May 3, 2021, compared it with what would be expected in a typical nonpandemic year, then adjusted those figures to account for a handful of other pandemic-related factors.

The final count only estimates deaths “caused directly by the SARS-CoV-2 virus,” according to the study’s authors. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes COVID-19.

Researchers estimated dramatic undercounts in countries such as India, Mexico and Russia, where they said the official death counts are some 400,000 too low in each country. In some countries — including Japan, Egypt and several Central Asian nations — the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation’s death toll estimate is more than 10 times higher than reported totals.

“The analysis just shows how challenging it has been during the pandemic to accurately track the deaths — and actually, transmission — of COVID. And by focusing in on the total COVID death rate, I think we bring to light just how much greater the impact of COVID has been already and may be in the future,” said Dr. Christopher Murray, who heads the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

The group reached its estimates by calculating excess mortality based on a variety of sources, including official death statistics from various countries, as well as academic studies of other locations.

Then, it examined other mortality factors influenced by the pandemic. For example, some of the extra deaths were caused by increased opioid overdoses or deferred health care. On the other hand, the dramatic reduction in flu cases last winter and a modest drop in deaths caused by injury resulted in lower mortality in those categories than usual.

Researchers at UW ultimately concluded that the extra deaths not directly caused by COVID-19 were effectively offset by the other reductions in death rates, leaving them to attribute all of the net excess deaths to the coronavirus.

“When you put all that together, we conclude that the best way, the closest estimate, for the true COVID death is still excess mortality, because some of those things are on the positive side, other factors are on the negative side,” Murray said.

A worker sprays disinfectant inside a temporary quarantine center for COVID-19 patients this week in Hyderabad, India. Researchers estimate more than 400,000 people have died of COVID-19 in India than has been officially reported.

Noah Seelam/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Noah Seelam/AFP via Getty Images

A worker sprays disinfectant inside a temporary quarantine center for COVID-19 patients this week in Hyderabad, India. Researchers estimate more than 400,000 people have died of COVID-19 in India than has been officially reported.

Noah Seelam/AFP via Getty Images

Experts are in agreement that official reports of COVID-19 deaths undercount the true death toll of the virus. Some countries only report deaths that take place in hospitals, or only when patients are confirmed to have been infected; others have poor health care access altogether.

“We see, for example, that when health systems get hit hard with individuals with COVID, understandably they devote their time to trying to take care of patients,” Murray said.

Because of that, many academics have sought to estimate a true COVID-19 death rate to understand better how the disease spreads.

The revised statistical model used by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation team produced numbers larger than many other analyses, raising some eyebrows in the scientific community.

“I think that the overall message of this (that deaths have been substantially undercounted and in some places more than others) is likely sound, but the absolute numbers are less so for a lot of reasons,” said William Hanage, an epidemiologist at Harvard University, in an email to NPR.

Last month, a group of researchers at Virginia Commonwealth University published a study in the medical journal JAMA that examined excess mortality rates in the U.S. through December.

While that team similarly found the number of excess deaths far exceeded the official COVID-19 death toll, it disagreed that the gap could be blamed entirely on COVID-19 and not other causes.

“Their estimate of excess deaths is enormous and inconsistent with our research and others,” said Dr. Steven Woolf, who led the Virginia Commonwealth team. “There are a lot of assumptions and educated guesses built into their model.”

Other researchers applauded the UW study, calling the researchers’ effort to produce a global model important, especially in identifying countries with small reported outbreaks but larger estimates of a true death toll, which could indicate the virus is spreading more widely than previously thought.

“We need to better understand the impact of COVID across the globe so that countries can understand the trajectory of the pandemic and figure out where to deploy additional resources, like testing supplies and vaccines to stop the spread,” said Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins.

Researchers at UW also released an updated forecast for the COVID-19 death count worldwide, estimating that roughly 2.5 million more people will die of COVID-19 between now and Sept. 1, driven in part by the dramatic surge of cases in India.

In the United States, researchers estimated roughly 44,000 more people will die of COVID-19 by September.

NPR science correspondent Rob Stein contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/05/06/994287048/new-study-estimates-more-than-900-000-people-have-died-of-covid-19-in-u-s

The media have noticeably taken Rep. Liz Cheney’s, R-Wyo., side in her current battle with Republican colleagues who are seeking to oust her from her position as House Republican Conference chair following a series of critical comments about former President Donald Trump.

“She’s standing tall,” CNN anchor Poppy Harlow said of Cheney on “CNN Newsroom” on Thursday. 

Harlow, her co-anchor Jim Sciutto, and their CNN panel lavished praise on Cheney, with POLITICO congressional reporter Melanie Zanona marveling that the congresswoman is now “on the verge of becoming a woman in exile in the GOP.” But, Zanona said, Cheney “is doing what she believes is right for the country.”

“They’re trying to silence her and tell her to shut up,” Zanona later said of the Republicans, with Harlow nodding along and saying, “that’s a great point.”

Similarly, CNN political pundit Sophia Nelson penned a blunt USA Today piece entitled, “”Rep. Liz Cheney is courageous while Republican men are profiles in cowardice.”

BIDEN, WHEN ASKED ABOUT LIZ CHENEY, SAYS ‘I DON’T UNDERSTAND THE REPUBLICANS’

And perhaps most notably, the Washington Post gave Cheney a platform to speak her mind and double down on her condemnation of Trump, accusing him of stoking the violence that occurred on Capitol Hill on January 6.

“While embracing or ignoring Trump’s statements might seem attractive to some for fundraising and political purposes, that approach will do profound long-term damage to our party and our country,” Cheney wrote in her op-ed. “Trump has never expressed remorse or regret for the attack of Jan. 6 and now suggests that our elections, and our legal and constitutional system, cannot be trusted to do the will of the people.” 

Former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, who served in the George W. Bush administration and recalls very well how the media treated them back then, said he never thought he’d live to see the day when the press put a Cheney on a pedestal.

REPUBLICANS INCREASINGLY VOCAL ABOUT HOLDING ANOTHER CHENEY VOTE SOON

Fox News host Howard Kurtz said the media’s sudden admiration for Cheney is making his head spin as well.

Fox News contributor and The Hill’s Joe Concha said he had a theory for the media’s change of heart – one that has been proven a few times over the past few years.

“Liz Cheney is the newest ‘It Girl.’ If you’re a Republican and go against your own party on X, Y, Z, you get the same love John McCain and Mitt Romney and Adam Kinzinger received when they did same as useful ‘It Guys’ at various times.,” Concha told Fox News. “Kinda ironic when you think about the fact that the media patently loathed Dick Cheney when he was George W. Bush’s vice president. But this is just how it works.” 

Rep. Cheney was more than just critical of Trump after the Capitol riot – she was also one of 10 House Republicans to vote to impeach the president for “incitement of insurrection.” Amid the calls for her removal as the No. 3 Republican in the House, Cheney warned the Party that they need to be wary of listening to the “Trump cult of personality.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio recently told Fox News that the votes are there to remove Cheney from her leadership position next week.

“I can’t imagine that they will continue to support her in that leadership position,” former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows agreed.

Republicans are eyeing Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-NY, as Cheney’s replacement. She has already received Trump’s endorsement.

Of the GOP’s favored candidate, CNN pundits suggested that the Republicans are only choosing Stefanik because they need another female lawmaker to save face for ousting Cheney.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/liz-cheney-media-darling-cnn-trump-republicans

President Joe Biden will visit Louisiana today, stopping in Lake Charles first and then heading to New Orleans. The trip is part of his promotion of an infrastructure plan.

Biden is expected to touchdown in Lake Charles at 12:15 p.m. and in New Orleans at 3:20 p.m.

Officials declined to release any details about traffic measures and planned road closures. During previous presidential visits in New Orleans, authorities have done rolling closures on the interstate 30 minutes to an hour before the presidential motorcade is on the move.

As part of his promotion of the $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan, President Joe Biden is making a couple of stops in Louisiana on Thursday to…

Drivers should also plan for closures on the surface streets near Biden’s destinations in Lake Charles and New Orleans.

Biden’s schedule 

Here’s his public schedule from the White House (all in Central time):

9:10 a.m.: Biden departs the White House en route to Joint Base Andrews 

9:30 a.m.: Biden departs Joint Base Andrews en route to Lake Charles

12:15 p.m.: Biden arrives in Lake Charles at Chennault International Airport

1:25 p.m.: Biden delivers remarks near Calcasieu River Bridge

2:30 p.m.: Biden departs Lake Charles en route to New Orleans

3:20 p.m.: Biden arrives in New Orleans at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport

4:20 p.m.: Biden tours Carrollton Water Plant

President Joe Biden has argued his wide-ranging, $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan is a solution to decades of underinvestment in roads, pipes…

5:40 p.m.: Biden departs New Orleans via MSY 

7:45 p.m.: Biden arrives at Joint Base Andrews

8:05 p.m.: Biden arrives at the White House 

Live updates from Louisiana

The Times-Picayune and The Advocate have reporters covering Biden’s appearances in Lake Charles and New Orleans. Follow their updates below.

Can’t see live updates? Click here.

Staff writer Katelyn Umholtz contributed to this story.

Purchases made via links on our site may earn us an affiliate commission


Source Article from https://www.nola.com/news/politics/article_b20af06c-ae6d-11eb-a27b-8b93402fe206.html

Arizona Republicans are examining whether there is bamboo fiber in ballots that were used in the 2020 election, an activist assisting with the ongoing audit of the ballots told reporters this week. The latest claim underscores how rightwing conspiracy theories continue to fuel doubt about the results of the results.

“There’s accusation that 40,000 ballots were flown in to Arizona and it was stuffed into the box and it came from the south-east part of the world, Asia, and what they’re doing is to find out whether there’s bamboo in the paper,” John Brakey, a longtime election audit advocate, told reporters.

Brakey told reporters he didn’t personally believe auditors would find bamboo fibers.

“I do think it’s somewhat of a waste of time, but it will help unhinge people,” Brakey said on Wednesday. “They’re not gonna find bamboo … If they do, I think we need to know, don’t you?”

The search for bamboo fibers illustrates how the latest GOP audit of all 2.1m ballots cast in Maricopa county, home to a majority of Arizona voters, is elevating absurd claims about the 2020 election. After election day, rightwing activists falsely claimed that China had imported ballots to tip the election for Biden and that those ballots could be identified because there was bamboo in the paper. Earlier, workers were using UV lights to examine ballots; while the purpose of doing so was never clear, there was a conspiracy theory after the election that Trump had watermarked ballots (the UV examinations have stopped).

There are about a dozen tables on the audit floor at Veterans Memorial Coliseum where auditors are taking pictures of ballots and then running them under microscopic cameras that are supposed to provide high-quality images of the ballots. Those images are supposed to help auditors verify the authenticity of the ballots by allowing them to examine fibers, as well as folds in the paper and ink marks on ballots.

Experts have expressed concern about whether this method is a reliable way of identifying fraud.

Ken Bennett, the liaison between the auditors and the Arizona senate, said in an interview he wasn’t sure if auditors were looking for bamboo fibers specifically.

“I think that’s more of a euphemism for saying ‘we’re looking for everything related to the paper so that we can verify that the ballots are authentic,’” he told the Guardian. “They’re looking for folds in the paper. They’re looking for where the ovals are marked, is there a little bit of an indentation or was the mark made by a Xerox machine? It’s just kind of a general expression for ‘we’re checking the paper and the folds and everything to make sure that these are authentic ballots.’”

The comment came amid increasing scrutiny of the audit, which many experts say is not credible and will only further undermine confidence in the 2020 race. The justice department sent a letter to the Arizona senate president, Karen Fann, on Wednesday expressing concern that the audit may be running afoul of federal laws regarding ballot custody and voter intimidation (during a separate part of the audit, workers will reportedly knock on voters’ door to confirm their 2020 vote).

Katie Hobbs, Arizona’s top election official, sent a letter to Bennett on Wednesday expressing concern over how the audit is being run. She claimed that auditors did not have a clear process for tallying ballots, left laptops unattended, and clear procedures were not in place to hire unbiased counters. “Either do it right, or don’t do it at all,” she wrote.

One of the people who spread the lie about China dumping ballots, according to Slate, was Javon Pulitzer, a treasure hunter and inventor, who is reportedly assisting with the Maricopa county audit. Though it’s not clear in what capacity Pulitzer is assisting, Brakey told reporters on Tuesday that the machines capturing the microscopic images of the ballots were linked to Pulitzer. “This guy is nuts,” he said. “He’s a fraudster … It’s ridiculous that we’re doing some of this.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/06/arizona-republicans-bamboo-ballots-audit-2020

The media have noticeably taken Rep. Liz Cheney’s, R-Wyo., side in her current battle with Republican colleagues who are seeking to oust her from her position as House Republican Conference chair following a series of critical comments about former President Donald Trump.

“She’s standing tall,” CNN anchor Poppy Harlow said of Cheney on “CNN Newsroom” on Thursday. 

Harlow, her co-anchor Jim Sciutto, and their CNN panel lavished praise on Cheney, with POLITICO congressional reporter Melanie Zanona marveling that the congresswoman is now “on the verge of becoming a woman in exile in the GOP.” But, Zanona said, Cheney “is doing what she believes is right for the country.”

“They’re trying to silence her and tell her to shut up,” Zanona later said of the Republicans, with Harlow nodding along and saying, “that’s a great point.”

Similarly, CNN political pundit Sophia Nelson penned a blunt USA Today piece entitled, “”Rep. Liz Cheney is courageous while Republican men are profiles in cowardice.”

BIDEN, WHEN ASKED ABOUT LIZ CHENEY, SAYS ‘I DON’T UNDERSTAND THE REPUBLICANS’

And perhaps most notably, the Washington Post gave Cheney a platform to speak her mind and double down on her condemnation of Trump, accusing him of stoking the violence that occurred on Capitol Hill on January 6.

“While embracing or ignoring Trump’s statements might seem attractive to some for fundraising and political purposes, that approach will do profound long-term damage to our party and our country,” Cheney wrote in her op-ed. “Trump has never expressed remorse or regret for the attack of Jan. 6 and now suggests that our elections, and our legal and constitutional system, cannot be trusted to do the will of the people.” 

Former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, who served in the George W. Bush administration and recalls very well how the media treated them back then, said he never thought he’d live to see the day when the press put a Cheney on a pedestal.

REPUBLICANS INCREASINGLY VOCAL ABOUT HOLDING ANOTHER CHENEY VOTE SOON

Fox News host Howard Kurtz said the media’s sudden admiration for Cheney is making his head spin as well.

Fox News contributor and The Hill’s Joe Concha said he had a theory for the media’s change of heart – one that has been proven a few times over the past few years.

“Liz Cheney is the newest ‘It Girl.’ If you’re a Republican and go against your own party on X, Y, Z, you get the same love John McCain and Mitt Romney and Adam Kinzinger received when they did same as useful ‘It Guys’ at various times.,” Concha told Fox News. “Kinda ironic when you think about the fact that the media patently loathed Dick Cheney when he was George W. Bush’s vice president. But this is just how it works.” 

Rep. Cheney was more than just critical of Trump after the Capitol riot – she was also one of 10 House Republicans to vote to impeach the president for “incitement of insurrection.” Amid the calls for her removal as the No. 3 Republican in the House, Cheney warned the Party that they need to be wary of listening to the “Trump cult of personality.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio recently told Fox News that the votes are there to remove Cheney from her leadership position next week.

“I can’t imagine that they will continue to support her in that leadership position,” former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows agreed.

Republicans are eyeing Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-NY, as Cheney’s replacement. She has already received Trump’s endorsement.

Of the GOP’s favored candidate, CNN pundits suggested that the Republicans are only choosing Stefanik because they need another female lawmaker to save face for ousting Cheney.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/liz-cheney-media-darling-cnn-trump-republicans





5.01pm EDT17:01

Today so far

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2021/may/06/liz-cheney-republicans-trump-politics-live

  • A new Twitter account associated with Donald Trump was suspended.
  • The account, @DJTDesk, was suspended for violating Twitter’s policies.
  • Twitter barred Trump from the site earlier this year after the Capitol insurrection.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Twitter blocked former President Donald Trump’s latest attempt to get back on the social-media site.

A new account called @DJTDesk on Thursday morning said it had been suspended for violating Twitter’s rules.

Twitter suspended @DJTDesk, an account associated with Trump’s new website.

Twitter


In a statement to Insider, a Twitter spokesperson said, “As stated in our ban evasion policy, we’ll take enforcement action on accounts whose apparent intent is to replace or promote content affiliated with a suspended account.”

The bio of the account, which appeared to be created on Wednesday, said: “Posts copied from Save America on behalf of the 45th POTUS; Originally composed via https://DonaldJTrump.com/Desk. *Note: Not Donald J. Trump Tweeting.”

Twitter suspended Trump’s account in January after the deadly insurrection at the US Capitol, citing “the risk of further incitement of violence.”

After losing access to his personal account, Trump posted tweets from different accounts before they were also shut down. He resorted to emailing press releases that often read like tweets. He told Fox News last month that he didn’t miss Twitter, which he said was “very boring,” and that his press releases were more elegant anyway.

The latest Twitter account was an extension of Trump’s new website, From the Desk of Donald J. Trump, launched on Tuesday. On the site, he’s shared tweet-like statements that his followers can share on social media.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment on the Twitter suspension.

Read more: Trump advisors expect ex-president’s Twitter alternative to run on a new platform built by Brad Parscale

After the insurrection, Trump was also barred from Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.

The Facebook Oversight Board on Wednesday upheld the platform’s decision to suspend Trump. But the board took issue with Facebook’s “indefinite” suspension, telling it to reevaluate and decide in six months whether to restore, temporarily suspend, or permanently bar him.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/from-the-desk-of-donald-trump-twitter-account-suspended-djtdesk-2021-5

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/06/politics/desantis-signs-florida-bill-voting-restrictions/index.html

France joined the United States on Thursday in supporting an easing of patent and other protections on COVID-19 vaccines that could help poorer countries get more doses and speed the end of the pandemic. While the backing from two countries with major drug makers is important, many obstacles remain.

The move to support waiving intellectual property protections on vaccines under World Trade Organization rules marked a dramatic shift for the United States — and drew cheers from activists, complaints from Big Pharma, and a lot of questions about what comes next. Washington had previously lined up with many other developed nations opposed to the idea floated by India and South Africa in October.

Attention is now turning to those richer nations, notably in the European Union — and France was the first to voice its support.

MODERNA’S COVID-19 BOOSTER VACCINE SHOWS PROMISE AGAINST VARIANTS, COMPANY SAYS

“I completely favor this opening up of the intellectual property,” French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday on a visit to a vaccine center.

But he also expressed doubt — as the pharmaceutical companies have — that the measure would be the panacea some hope. Even if patents are waived, he said, drug makers in places like Africa currently are not equipped to make COVID-19 vaccines — so donations of doses should be prioritized instead.

Another key hurdle remains: Any any single country could block a decision at the WTO, a Geneva-based trade body of 164 member states, to agree to a waiver.

The EU Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said the 27-nation bloc was ready to talk about the U.S. proposal — but cagily remained noncommittal for now.

“We are ready to discuss how the U.S. proposal for waiver on intellectual property protection for COVID vaccines could help” end the crisis, she said in a video address. “In the short run, however, we call upon all vaccine producing countries to allow exports and to avoid measures that disrupt supply chains.”

That echoed the position of the global pharmaceutical industry, which insists a faster solution would be for rich countries that have vaccine stockpiles to start sharing them with poorer ones.

The industry insists that production of coronavirus vaccines is complicated and can’t be ramped up by easing intellectual property protections. Instead, it insists that reducing bottlenecks in supply chains and a scarcity of ingredients that go into vaccines are the more pressing issues for now.

“A waiver is the simple but the wrong answer to what is a complex problem,” said the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations. “Waiving patents of COVID-19 vaccines will not increase production nor provide practical solutions needed to battle this global health crisis.”

The industry also says an IP waiver will do more harm than good in the long run by reducing the incentives that push innovators to make tremendous leaps, as they did with the vaccines that have been churned out in a blistering, unprecedented speed to help fight COVID-19.

Supporters say a waiver would be important because it would allow manufacturers around the world to get access to the recipes for making the life-saving vaccines as well as the ingredients. They point to unused capacity — factories that could churn out vaccines but can’t because of the intellectual property protections.

Some critics say developing countries have been seeking to water down those protections for years — long before the pandemic — and say it’s not clear that there are any manufacturers standing by that are ready or able to produce COVID-19 vaccines. They note that the vaccines currently on the market can be incredibly difficult to make, and the know-how is a bigger obstacle to ramping up manufacturing.

Many experts and advocacy groups say any such waiver would need to be followed up by transferring the required technology to developing countries, too.

Intellectual property expert Shyam Balganesh, a professor at Columbia Law School, said a waiver would remove “a lot of the bureaucracy” around WTO rules, but it would only go so far because of other bottlenecks in the manufacturing and distribution of vaccines.

FDA REVIEWING PFIZER COVID-19 VACCINE REQUEST FOR KIDS ‘AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE’

In closed-door WTO talks last month, the EU, Britain and Switzerland said upending or undermining IP rights was a “no-go” because those rights helped contribute to expanding production of COVID-19 vaccines, according to a Geneva trade official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

Norway’s Foreign Minister, Ine Eriksen Soereide, last month warned against “this type of experimental trade policy” during the pandemic when “we should rather be concerned with practical solutions that give us more vaccines.”

After the Biden announcement, Eve Geddie, Director of Amnesty International’s EU Office, called on Europe now to “put everyone’s health and human rights before private profit” and add its support to the waiver idea.

“Today, Europe wakes up to a new political reality that its position on hoarding the rights to make COVID-19 vaccines is now untenable,” she said.

She was but one voice among civil society, progressive groups and international institutions that were euphoric about the Biden administration’s stance, which marks a nearly complete reversal in U.S. policy under the Trump administration that was critical of both the WTO and the World Health Organization.

“A waiver of patents for #COVID19 vaccines & medicines could change the game for Africa, unlocking millions more vaccine doses & saving countless lives. We commend the leadership shown by South Africa, India & the United States, & urge others to back them,” WHO Africa chief Matshidiso Moeti tweeted.

Just over 20 million vaccine doses have been administered across the African continent, which counts some 1.3 billion people.

Gavi, the vaccine alliance that is co-leading the U.N.-backed effort to get shots to countries where they are needed, also welcomed the U.S. decision and an American commitment to also boost production of the raw materials that go into vaccines and are in short supply.

Doctors Without Borders, an advocacy group also known as Medecins Sans Frontieres that sends health workers to countries in need, said many low-income countries where it operates have only received 0.3% of the global supply of coronavirus vaccines.

“MSF applauds the U.S. government’s bold decision to support the waiving of intellectual property on COVID-19 vaccines during this time of unprecedented global need,” said Avril Benoît, executive director of MSF-USA.

She said any waiver should apply not just to vaccines, but other medical tools for COVID-19, including treatments for infected people and testing systems.

There is precedent. In 2003, WTO members agreed to waive patent rights and allow poorer countries to import generic treatments for HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis.

Many hope for a historic replay to fight COVID-19.

CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE

The Africa CDC director, John Nkengasong, told reporters: “We believe that when the history of this pandemic is written, history will remember the move by the U.S. government as doing the right thing at the right time.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/health/support-ip-waiver-covid-19-vaccines-snags-remain

Happy Thursday,

I’m writing from Phoenix, where I’m spending the week covering a remarkable GOP audit of the 2020 election in Maricopa county, home to the majority of Arizona’s registered voters.

The audit, which is unprecedented in US elections, is being watched with alarm around the country. Experts say it is a non-credible effort to fuel doubts about the 2020 race. And there’s some evidence similar efforts could pop up elsewhere.

Maricopa county has already conducted multiple audits of the 2020 race and confirmed the results. The firm hired by the GOP-controlled Arizona senate has little experience in election audits, and experts are deeply concerned its methodology is unreliable and will only lead to more doubt about the results of the 2020 race in Arizona. The CEO of the firm, called Cyber Ninjas, supported baseless conspiracy theories about the election. The effort also appears to be receiving considerable outside funding from Trump allies who tried to assist in his efforts to overthrow the election results.

The audit is taking place in a coliseum on McDowell Road here in Phoenix that used to be home to the Suns, the city’s basketball team (its nickname is the Madhouse on McDowell). For all the attention around the audit, the thing that stood out to me the most when I watched it up close on Tuesday was how slow and sleepy things were. Of the 46 tables in the arena, less than half were filled with people counting. Ken Bennett, a former Arizona secretary of state who is serving as the senate’s liaison to the audit, said officials hoped to have more counters in the arena soon, but temporary workers were undergoing background checks.

Audit counters are divided into several teams and wear colored shirts to denote which they are a part of (there’s pink, blue, green and yellow). Three members of each team are at each table and mark down what’s on the ballot as it rotates on a lazy susan around the table. The whole process isn’t quick – I timed one table counting 29 ballots in three minutes on Tuesday.

Once a batch of ballots is counted, a designated person at the table makes sure the tallies of all three counters match. The ballots then are moved over to a second station, where workers photograph them and put them through a device resembling a scanner. The purpose of this station appears to be to verify the authenticity of the ballots. It reportedly relies on dubious technology from Jovan Pulitzer, an election conspiracy-theory advocate, that purports to verify the authenticity of ballots by checking the paper folds and ink. Auditors are also reportedly looking for traces of bamboo in the ballot paper, an echo of a baseless conspiracy theory that ballots were smuggled in from Asia. Even some people helping with the audit are skeptical of Pulitzer’s technology.

“This guy is nuts,” John Brakey, an election transparency advocate who was brought in to help with the audit, told reporters on Tuesday. “He’s a fraudster … It’s ridiculous that we’re doing some of this.”

Outside the stadium, I noticed a small tent with about five supporters that had signs supporting the audit. It was surrounded by signs that said “expose voter fraud” and that labeled the Republican-controlled Maricopa county board of supervisors, which objected to the audit, “enemies of the nation”. I sat down in one of the lawn chairs they had set up and asked them what exactly they hoped the audit would achieve, especially since the county had already audited the ballots.

“We are pretty certain that Biden did win something. He won the most out of state votes, he won the most non-registered votes, he won the most double votes and people out of state, and all of that,” said Kelly Johnson, a retired lawyer from Huntington, California, who traveled to Phoenix to support the audit. There’s no evidence of Arizona or elsewhere of widespread voter fraud or other malfeasance.

I followed up by asking Johnson if he would accept Biden won Arizona and the election if the audit showed that was true. “Personally, yes,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/06/i-watched-arizonas-unprecedented-election-audit-heres-whats-happening

Meanwhile, No 10 said, in a call with Jersey officials, Prime Minister Boris Johnson had given his “unequivocal support” for the island and confirmed that the two Royal Navy vessels would “remain in place to monitor the situation as a precautionary measure”.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-57011376

A jury convicted two American friends Wednesday in the 2019 slaying of a police officer in a tragic unraveling of a small time drug deal gone bad, sentencing them to the maximum life in prison.

The jury of two judges and six civilians deliberated more than 12 hours before delivering the verdicts against Finnegan Lee Elder, 21, and Gabriel Natale-Hjorth, 20, handing them Italy’s stiffest sentence.

Elder and Natale-Hjorth were found guilty of all charges: homicide, attempted extortion, assault, resisting a public official and carrying an attack-style knife without just cause. There was a gasp in the Rome courtroom as the presiding judge, Marina Finiti, read the verdict.

Prosecutors alleged that Elder stabbed Vice Brigadier Mario Cerciello Rega 11 times with a knife that he brought with him on his trip to Europe from California and that Natale-Hjorth helped him hide the knife in their hotel room. Under Italian law, an accomplice in an alleged murder can also be charged with murder even without materially doing the slaying.

The July 26, 2019 killing of the officer in the storied Carabinieri paramilitary police corps shocked Italy. Cerciello Rega, 35, was mourned as a national hero.

The slain officer’s widow, who held a photo of her dead husband while waiting for the verdict, broke down in tears and hugged his brother, Paolo.

“His integrity was defended,” Rosa Maria Esilio said outside the courtroom, between sobs. “He was everyone’s son, everyone’s Carabinieri. He was a marvelous husband, he was a marvelous man, a servant of the state who merited respect and honor.”

The defendants were led immediately out of the courtroom after the verdicts were read. As Elder was being walked out, his father, Ethan Elder, called out, “Finnegan, I love you.” Both of his parents looked stunned.

Elder’s lawyer, Renato Borzone, called the verdict against his client “a disgrace for Italy.” Natale-Hjorth’s lawyer, Fabio Alonzi, said he was speechless.

For the brief final hearing before deliberations Wednesday, the two Californians were allowed out of steel-barred defendant cages inside the courtroom to sit with their lawyers before the case went to the jury.

“I’m stressed,” Elder said to one of his lawyers. Elder fingered a crucifix he wears on a chain around his neck and kissed it before the jury went out. He also turned to his codefendant, Natale-Hjorth, and held the crucifix toward him through a glass partition, motioning heavenward.

Elder and his father crossed their fingers toward each other for good luck after the jury went into chambers.

Natale-Hjorth was greeted by his father and Italian uncle, who were present for the deliberations.

Finnegan Lee Elder listens as the verdict is read, in the trial for the slaying of an Italian plainclothes police officer in summer 2019, in Rome, Wednesday, May 5, 2021. 

Gregorio Borgia / AP


Cerciello Rega had recently returned from a honeymoon when he was assigned along with his partner, officer Andrea Varriale, to follow up on a reported extortion attempt. They went in plainclothes, and didn’t carry their service pistols.

Prosecutors contend the young Americans concocted a plot involving a stolen bag and cellphone after their failed attempt to buy cocaine with 80 euros ($96) in Rome’s Trastevere nightlife district. Natale-Hjorth and Elder testified they had paid for the cocaine but didn’t receive it.

Both defendants contended they acted in self-defense.

During the trial, which began on February 26, 2020, the Americans told the court they thought that Cerciello Rega and Varriale were thugs or mobsters out to assault them on a dark, deserted street. The officers wore casual summer clothes and not uniforms, and the defendants insisted the officers never showed police badges.

Varriale, who suffered a back injury in a scuffle with Natale-Hjorth while his partner was grappling with Elder, testified that the officers did identify themselves as Carabinieri.

At the time of the slaying, Elder was 19 and traveling through Europe without his family, while Natale-Hjorth, then 18, was spending the summer vacation with his Italian grandparents, who live near Rome. Former schoolmates from the San Francisco Bay area, the two had met up in Rome for what was supposed to be couple of days of sightseeing and nights out.

Prosecutors alleged that Elder thrust a seven-inch military-style attack knife repeatedly into Cerciello Rega, who bled profusely, like a “fountain,” Varriale had testified, and died shortly after in hospital.

Elder told the court that the heavy-set Cerciello Rega, scuffling with him, was on top of him on the ground, and he feared that he was being strangled. Elder said he pulled out the knife and stabbed him to avoid being killed, and when the officer didn’t immediately let him go, he stabbed again.

After the stabbing, the Americans ran to their hotel room, where, according to Natale-Hjorth, Elder cleaned the knife and then asked him to hide it. Natale-Hjorth testified that he hid the knife behind a ceiling panel in their room, where it was discovered hours later by police.

The defendants had told the court that several hours before the stabbing, they attempted to buy cocaine in the Trastevere nightlife district of Rome. With the intervention of a go-between, they paid a dealer, but instead of cocaine they received an aspirin-like tablet.

Before Natale-Hjorth could confront the dealer, a separate Carabinieri patrol in the neighborhood intervened, and all scattered. The Americans snatched the go-between’s knapsack in reprisal, and used a cellphone that was inside to set up a meeting with the goal of exchanging the bag and the phone for the cash they had lost in the bad drug deal.

From practically its start, the trial largely boiled down to the word of Varriale against that of the young American visitors. The victim’s widow would sit in the front row, often clutching a photo of her husband. Photos of the newlyweds, with Cerciello Rega in his dress uniform, after their wedding, were widely displayed in Italian media after the slaying.

As the trial neared its end, Elder’s lawyer, Borzone, argued that deep-set psychiatric problems, including a constant fear of being attacked, figured in the fatal stabbing. Borzone told the court his client saw a world filled with enemies due to psychiatric problems and that something “short-circuited” when Elder was confronted by the officer.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/americans-kill-police-officer-italy-life-prison-finnegan-elder/

Katherine Tai, the U.S. trade representative, announced the administration’s position on Wednesday afternoon as the pandemic continued to spiral in India and South America.

“This is a global health crisis, and the extraordinary circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic call for extraordinary measures,” she said in a statement. “The administration believes strongly in intellectual property protections, but in service of ending this pandemic, supports the waiver of those protections for Covid-19 vaccines.”

Any proposal on waiving patents would require unanimous approval by W.T.O. members, so European Union support is necessary. But even if the proposal passes, it could make little difference to vaccine availability in the short run.

Eighty-three percent of shots that have been administered worldwide have been in high- and upper-middle-income countries. Just 0.2 percent of doses have been administered in low-income countries. In North America, 48 out of 100 adults have received at least one dose of a vaccine; the figure is 31 per 100 adults in Europe. In Africa, it is 1.3, according to figures compiled by Our World in Data.

Ms. von der Leyen on Thursday once again stated the European Union’s belief that “no one is safe until everyone is safe” in the fight against the pandemic.

That notion, she said, was as true for the continent of Europe as it was for the world. She said she could not imagine what it would have meant if some countries in the European Union secured vaccines while others went without.

“Economically it would have made no sense whatsoever with such an integrated single market,” she said. “And politically it would have torn our union apart.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/06/world/europe/coronavirus-vaccine-patent-eu.html

Donald Trump used to be everywhere on social media — but lately, it feels like he’s nowhere.

Many have noted just how little people have been talking about Trump — from cable news to Google searches — since he lost the election and was kicked off Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube four months ago.

New data Recode obtained from social media measurement firms Zignal Labs and CrowdTangle shows just how drastic the drop in conversation about Trump has been.

Mentions of Trump went down by 34 percent on Twitter and 23 percent on Facebook the week after he was banned from both platforms following the Capitol riot on January 6. Since then, Trump mentions have continued to decline around 90 percent on both platforms from where they were the week of the riots. (That decline may be even greater than what the current data reflects on Twitter because it doesn’t include retweets and tweets from accounts that have since been deleted, like Trump’s.)

Of course, it’s impossible to divorce the decline in the Trump conversation from the fact that he’s no longer president. It’s natural for people to talk less about a world leader once he or she is no longer in office. Even before the bans, mentions of Trump had started to drop after he lost the election. But Trump wasn’t an ordinary president, and he’d made it very clear he planned to continue being present in political discourse after his loss — as evidenced by his posts inciting Capitol rioters.

Still, the steep decline of mentions in recent months shows just how the president who once set a national political agenda with his around-the-clock social media posts has been relegated to lesser relevance on the mainstream internet, and in conversation more broadly. Now that the Facebook oversight board has extended Trump’s Facebook ban six more months, that dampening will likely continue.

What the data shows

During his four years in office, Trump was one of the most active and influential figures on social media, often setting off global news cycles with a single 140-character tweet. And even after Trump lost the election, he was able to garner unparalleled social media attention as he perpetuated baseless conspiracy theories about the election results.

But everything changed when a crowd stormed the US Capitol in early January as Trump encouraged his followers to overturn the result of the election. Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube then took the unprecedented step of kicking the then-sitting US president off their services.

Recode asked Zignal Labs and Facebook-owned CrowdTangle for data about Trump’s social media mentions to better understand his social media presence over time, and how his social media suspensions impacted that presence.

On Twitter, Trump garnered nearly 50 million mentions in the week beginning January 3, the week of the Capitol riots, according to data from Zignal, which searched for “Trump” as a keyword or hashtag. The following week, after Trump was banned, mentions dropped to around 30 million and have continued to decline precipitously. In the last month, that number has shrunk to around 3 million mentions per week — or roughly the level it was at in 2016, before Trump became president.

“While Donald Trump is still a heavily discussed figure on Twitter, his suspension in January has had a significant impact on the volume of mentions of his name on the platform,” said Jennifer Granston, chief customer officer and head of insights at Zignal Labs. “In the nearly five months since the permanent suspension of his account, there have been 151 million mentions of his name on Twitter. For context, during just the week of the 2020 presidential election, his name accumulated 56 million mentions.”

Screenshot of CrowdTangle data on Facebook interactions — “Likes,” reactions, comments, and shares — with posts including “Trump” over time.

On Facebook, the week that included Election Day 2020 had the highest number of interactions, with 427 million “Likes,” reactions, comments, and shares on posts by Trump or including the word “Trump” on Facebook pages, public groups, and verified profiles. That spiked again to around 300 million the week of the Capitol riot but has since declined to levels below any seen in the past year — around 30 million a week. CrowdTangle’s data, as of publication, includes engagement with Trump’s account that has happened after he was banned from posting.

Again, it’s not entirely surprising that a lame-duck president would start to fade from public discussion.

But Trump was an exception. Even after his mentions and presence on social media had begun to decline post-election, he rallied his social media followers in a drastic rebound. In early January, Trump capitalized on the “#stopthesteal” social media campaign to attempt to overturn the results of the election and once again dominate discussion on Twitter.

One of the reasons the conversation about Trump finally dropped off is because, at the same time they banned Trump, social media companies also cracked down on major far-right groups that bolstered discussion of Trump online, like “#stopthesteal,” QAnon, boogaloo, and Proud Boys. For example, about a week after banning Trump, Twitter suspended more than 70,000 QAnon accounts popular among Trump loyalists.

With Trump off Twitter, that also meant people couldn’t retweet or reply to him — key ways he often became central to the public conversation on social media. When his account went away, there was less for people to react to — either positively or negatively.

“While there are certainly many contributing factors, now that users no longer have the ability to engage with his account, mentions of Trump’s name have shown a steady decline,” said Zignal’s Granston.

It’s impossible to say exactly how much social media companies’ bans on Trump — versus the natural course of events when a politician loses — were responsible for the drop in chatter about him. But it’s important to remember just how crucial social media was to Trump’s success in the first place. He was the Twitter president, and he used social media to build his campaign, push policy, and recruit supporters.

It’s also important to note that Trump still has an audience on other platforms, like his new cable news networks of choice, One America News and Newsmax. And his supporters still have robust communities like Facebook groups and pages and MAGA-oriented Twitter accounts. Trump has also said he would build his own social media platform, but so far his efforts seem more like a blog than anything like Twitter or Facebook.

But it’s clear that the ban had a serious effect on the volume of conversation about Trump on mainstream platforms, even if we can’t exactly measure how much.

Why Trump’s social media ban matters

The decision to ban Trump from social media was one of the most challenging and controversial ones that social media companies have made to date — and they avoided making this decision until after he’d been voted out of office.

Twitter and Facebook made it clear over the past four years that they did not want to ban the president. In the past, even when Trump violated these companies’ rules on harmful speech, they resisted taking down his account or taking much action at all against his rule-breaking posts, saying that it was in the public interest to keep his posts up. During Trump’s term, companies created a “newsworthiness” exception solidifying this reasoning.

In the runup to the election, companies did start to take modest action against certain content that contained misinformation about voting and Covid-19.

Meanwhile, conservatives have long made unfounded accusations that they were censored by social media companies. In turn, social media companies have tried to prove they were neutral platforms.

Everything changed when Trump lost the election and refused to concede — and egged on increasingly violent protests in the US Capitol. There was a clear, immediate, and physical threat to the stability of US democracy.

Now, that danger is seemingly less immediate, and there’s a debate about whether Trump should be brought back, or if social media companies should have indefinitely banned him at all. Proponents of the ban argue that if Trump is brought back onto the platforms, he could stoke civil unrest. And they point to how much misinformation on social media has declined after companies banned Trump and his allies — by as much as 73 percent, according to a January analysis by Zignal and reported by the Washington Post.

But opponents of the bans say that social media companies should not have the power to silence a former world leader, no matter how controversial his speech, and they worry about the precedent that sets for future bans.

The impact of these bans is going to be further discussed in the months to come.

On Wednesday, the company’s newly created oversight board, which has been called its “Supreme Court,” ruled that Facebook was correct to suspend Trump’s account in the short term but that the company needs to come up with clearer reasoning and a timeline around whether it wants to continue the ban.

The oversight board’s decision underscored that the debate around how social media companies should handle Trump will continue without any clear answers for the foreseeable future. One thing we do know now is the numbers show these bans have a clear impact.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/recode/22421396/donald-trump-social-media-ban-facebook-twitter-decrease-drop-impact-youtube

COLUMBIA, S.C. – As Mike Pence discussed his tenure as vice president with some 500 religious Republicans in South Carolina, some listeners couldn’t help but wonder if they were seeing a preview of coming attractions.

“I said to my husband, ‘Did you think this was a trial run for a campaign speech?’ ” said Beth Atwater, an attorney from Lexington, S.C., who attended Pence’s speech before the Palmetto Family Council last week.

Republicans across the country are pondering Pence’s chances of becoming president – thanks in part to the man who remains at the heart of Republican politics and made Pence vice president in the first place: Donald J. Trump.

Trump and some allies still criticize Pence for refusing Trump’s demands that he help overturn his election loss of Joe Biden. The Jan. 6 insurrection by pro-Trump rioters at the U.S. Capitol put Pence’s very life in danger.

Yet Republicans who want the party to move on from Trump see the former vice president as part of the problem – a loyalist who too often enabled the then-president.

Pence hasn’t said he’s running for president. But he raised eyebrows with his re-emergence in public in South Carolina, home of a key GOP primary in 2024. He also has an events line up in the coming months that looks like an attempt to appeal to Trump voters without alienating their leader.

Building a base for a presidential run is always challenging, Republicans said, but Pence’s predicament is unique.

“I just don’t see the path,” said Denver Riggleman, a former GOP congressman from Virginia and now an outspoken critic of Trump.

More: Praise for Trump, attacks on Biden, silence on Jan. 6: Mike Pence makes first speech since leaving office in pivotal SC

More: Mike Pence faces biggest loyalty test in announcing Trump’s loss during a special session of Congress

Making the moves

Pence is one of several Republicans making the kinds of moves one does when exploring a presidential run.

The former vice president has created a political committee, Advancing American Freedom, to promote and defend the policies of the Trump-Pence administration. It has run web ads featuring Pence on issues like border security.

Young America’s Foundation, a conservative group, has announced that Pence will give the keynote address at its National Conservative Student Conference in August in Houston. Like other hopefuls, Pence plans to campaign for Republican candidates in the 2022 congressional races. 

The former vice president is also writing an autobiography scheduled to be published in 2023, a year before the presidential election.

In deciding where to make his first first speech since leaving office, Pence picked South Carolina – home of the first-in-the-South primary that has been pivotal in past Republican nomination battles.

This Friday, Pence will attend an early cattle call of potential Republican candidates not named Trump.

Texas Republicans have organized a private meeting of donors to hear from eight potential candidates: Pence, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and U.S. senators Tom Cotton, Marco Rubio, Tim Scott and Rick Scott.

Sarah Longwell, a GOP strategist who in 2020 ran a group called Republican Voters Against Trump, said Pence’s challenges in a 2024 race are many.

“Number one, Trump is going to attack him as insufficiently loyal,” she said. Trump voters who believe his lie that the election was stolen will blame Pence.

Republicans who want to shed Trump see Pence as complicit in the administration’s actions, including the drawn-out protests of the election.

Said Longwell: “People who love Trump don’t like him, and people who hate Trump don’t like him.”

‘A Christian, a Conservative, a Republican – in that order’

During his half-hour speech in a downtown Columbia ballroom last week, Pence said that serving alongside Trump was “the greatest honor of my life,” though he didn’t mention the ex-president’s name that much. He spoke more about the administration’s record, and criticized the Biden administration over issues like immigration, spending, taxes, abortion, and religious freedom.

In his opening, Pence recited a standard self-description: “I’m a Christian, a conservative, and a Republican – in that order.”

While vice presidents often find it hard to emerge from the shadow of the presidents they served, the job has become a stepping stone toward the Oval Office. Richard Nixon, George H.W. Bush and Joe Biden managed to get themselves elected to the presidency as former vice presidents. Hubert Humphrey (1968), Walter Mondale (1984) and Al Gore (2000) won the Democratic nominations, but fell short in the general elections.

None of those former veeps, however, faced the kind of obstacle within their own party that Pence has in Trump.

Like other hopefuls, Pence has to answer one question first: Will he run if Trump does? The former president said he is considering another race in 2024, but won’t make any kind of announcement until after the 2022 congressional races.

Normally, a former vice president would be in “the top spot” for the next election, but “in a Trump GOP, it is more complicated,” said Mike DuHaime, former political director for the Republican National Committee.

Despite Pence’s “fealty over the four years,” DuHamie said, “Trump may have forever damaged his reputation with Trump supporters by calling him out during the election lie and the Capitol riot on Jan. 6.”

Pence, who frequently talks about his religious faith, does have support from at least one important Republican constituency: Evangelical voters like the ones who saw him speak at the Palmetto Family Council.

Tim Miller, a former Republican political strategist who saw Pence in Columbia, said he has “a base of support with evangelicals, which is better than most have, but can he expand out of that?”

Members of Trump’s “Make America Great Again” caucus may well remain suspicious.

“Hard to imagine the MAGA voters are ever going to love him,” Miller said.

‘He did the right thing … And it’s going to cost him.’

One of Pence’s biggest hurdles to a potential run isn’t just his association with Trump, but Trump’s own criticisms of him. 

At a Republican donor conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Fla., Trump said he was still “disappointed” that Pence did not move to block the counting of electoral votes from states that went for Biden.

More: Republican unity? Not so much. Donald Trump goes off-script, hits McConnell, Pence, others

More: Former Vice President Mike Pence signs double book deal; first release is his autobiography

And in statement this week attacking U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney, Trump said the election result would have been different “had Mike Pence referred the information on six states (only need two) back to State Legislatures.”

Trump also denounced his vice president at the Jan. 6 rally that preceded the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Some Trump supporters roamed the hall of the Capitol saying they were looking for Pence, and denounced him as a traitor.

Riggleman, the former congressman from Virginia, said he has seen Trump-Pence yard signs in his district with the vice president’s name painted over or otherwise vandalized.

He likes Pence, and believes the former vice president acted honorably in refusing to interfere with the Electoral College count on Jan. 6, saying “he did the right thing for the country that day. And it’s going to cost him.”

But one thing potentially working in Pence’s favor: Few people are paying attention to the Republican presidential race.

Jenny Beth Martin, honorary chairman of Tea Party Patriots Action, said reporters and political activists are interested in the early jockeying, but most Americans are worried about things like having schooled opened after the COVID pandemic.

And when the time for attention comes, she added, “the grassroots would want to know first and foremost whether Trump is going to want to run.”

‘A long time away’ 

At the Columbia Convention Center, South Carolina Republicans said they believe compatriots in their state and elsewhere – places like Iowa and New Hampshire – will judge Pence on his merits. But they are intrigued by how Pence might navigate the issue of Trump.

Kelly Ross, who works for a non-profit company in Greenville, S.C., said a lot of Pence’s base of voters is different than Trump’s base, and that the election “is a long time away” in any event.

Others said the Pence-Trump dispute over Jan. 6 will mean little to Republicans in 2024.

“I think people forget things and get over them and move on to what’s best for the country,” said Cathy Wells, a housewife from Lexington.

In short, many said: We’ll have to wait and see.

“It’s kind of hard to tell,” said Atwater, the attorney from Lexington. “You know, politics changes so quickly.”

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/2021/05/06/pence-running-president-will-have-contend-trump/4893895001/