ASHWAUBENON – Green Bay police confirmed a suspect is in custody after reports of an active shooter situation at the area of the Oneida Casino and Radisson Hotel and Conference Center. 

Multiple law enforcement agencies responded about 7:30 p.m. Saturday. Airport Drive was closed as police secured the area.

Oneida Casino, 2020 Airport Drive, is operated by the Oneida Nation.

Bobbi Webster, Oneida Nation public relations director, said her understanding was that somebody was shot, but she didn’t know how many and couldn’t immediately provide further details.

“I do not believe the shooter is active anymore, but the situation is active, because (law enforcement is) there and still clearing the property.”

Source Article from https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/2021/05/01/shooting-reported-near-oneida-casino-roads-blocked-police-scene/4911055001/

“His statement clearly reflects his intent to keep enforcing the hostile policy toward the DPRK as it had been done by the U.S. for over half a century,” Kwon Jong Gun, a senior North Korean Foreign Ministry official, said in a statement. DPRK stands for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the North’s official name.

“It is certain that the U.S. chief executive made a big blunder in the light of the present-day viewpoint,” Kwon said. “Now that the keynote of the U.S. new DPRK policy has become clear, we will be compelled to press for corresponding measures, and with time the U.S. will find itself in a very grave situation.”

Kwon still didn’t specify what steps North Korea would take, and his statement could be seen as an effort to apply pressure on the Biden administration as it’s shaping up its North Korea policy.

Kwon’s statement didn’t mention Psaki’s comments.

After performing a series of high-profile nuclear and missile tests in 2016-17, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un launched summit diplomacy with Trump on the future of his growing nuclear arsenal. But that diplomacy remains stalled for about two years over differences in how much sanctions relief North Korea could win in return for limited denuclearization steps.

In January, Kim threatened to enlarge his nuclear arsenal and build more high-tech weapons targeting the U.S. mainland, saying the fate of bilateral ties would depend on whether it abandons its hostile policy.

Despite testing its short-range ballistic missile in March, the first launches in a year, North Korea has maintained a self-imposed moratorium on nuclear and long-range missile tests since it entered talks with Trump three years ago.

“If Pyongyang agrees to working-level talks, the starting point of negotiations would be a freeze of North Korean testing and development of nuclear capabilities and delivery systems,” Leif-Eric Easley, a professor at Ewha University in Seoul, said. “If, on the other hand, Kim shuns diplomacy and opts for provocative tests, Washington will likely expand sanctions enforcement and military exercises with allies.”

On Sunday, Kim’s powerful sister, Kim Yo Jong, slammed South Korea over recent anti-Pyongyang leaflets that were sent by balloons across the border by a group of defectors in the South. The group’s leader, Park Sang-hak, said Friday he sent 500,000 leaflets last week, in a defiance of a new South Korean law that criminalizes such action.

“We regard the maneuvers committed by the human waste in the South as a serious provocation against our state and will look into corresponding action,” Kim Yo Jong said in a statement. She accused the South Korean government of “winking at” the leaflets.

South Korean officials earlier said they were checking if Park truly floated the leaflets and that they would deal with the case in line with the law.

Easley said the two back-to-back North Korean statements Sunday show that “Pyongyang is trying to drive a wedge between South Korea and the United States” ahead of the May 21 summit between Biden and South Korean President Moon Jae-in.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/nkorea-warns-us-grave-situation-biden-speech-77443536

Some liberal pundits have labeled Black Republicans as racists solely based on the political party they represent. 

The most recent example came Thursday when late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel mocked Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., saying the senator, who recently made headlines for his response to President Biden’s address before Congress, “let the American people know the Republican Party isn’t racist.”

Scott said in his Wednesday night rebuttal to the president that America is “not a racist country,” sparking backlash from some Democrats on social media.

However, prominent Democrats including Biden himself, Vice President Kamala Harris and House Majority Whip Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., agree with Scott, arguing that while the nation itself is not racist, it can improve its institutions and attitudes.

Kimmel mocked the South Carolina senator on his late night TV show.

“Every Black Republican senator got together to let the American people know the Republican Party isn’t racist,” Kimmel said, “and then Tim promptly returned to the sensory deprivation egg he calls home.”

While Kimmel criticized Republicans for the party’s low Black representation in the Senate, there are only two Black Democratic Senators: Cory Booker of New Jersey and Raphael Warnock of Georgia. There have been only 11 Black Senators in U.S. history, among them Harris of California and former President Barack Obama of Illinois.

Kimmel, who has previously apologized for donning blackface to mock NBA star Karl Malone, received some criticism from right-leaning social media users following his show, but his comments were not unique.

MSNBC PANEL DEFENDS ‘UNCLE TIM’ SLUR, SUGGESTS TIM SCOTT ‘DOESN’T KNOW WHAT RACISM IS’

“Uncle Tim” trended on Twitter after Scott’s speech Wednesday, a play on the “Uncle Tom” slur for Black people viewed as overly deferential to White people.

The term isn’t new to Scott.  The Vermont newspaper, Barre-Montpelier Times-Argus, published a cartoon by Jeff Danziger last August titled “Uncle Tim’s Cabin,” portraying Scott sitting outside a cabin with a Trump sign planted in his yard.

The slur has also been used against other prominent Black Republicans.

MSNBC’s Joy Reid, who is Black, referred to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as “Uncle Clarence” while discussing the 2020 presidential election.

“The View” co-host Sunny Hostin, who is Black, said she was disappointed to see Scott “used” on Wednesday, and her co-host Joy Behar, who is White, said Scott didn’t “understand” the difference between a racist country and systemic racism.

CLARENCE THOMAS IN NEW DOCUMENTARY: I WAS THE ‘WRONG BLACK GUY’ AND HAD ‘TO BE DESTROYED’

“Yes, maybe it’s not a racist country. Maybe Americans, the majority, are not racist. But we live in a country with systemic racism,” Behar said on the show. “The fact that Tim Scott cannot acknowledge this is appalling. How can you go out there and say that when you just said two minutes ago that you were the object and the victim of discrimination?”

During his rebuttal speech, Scott discussed his many experiences with discrimination and specifically mentioned the names he has been called by liberals, including “Uncle Tom” and the “N-word.” 

Behar took heat from former GOP congressional candidate Kimberly Klacik on “The View” in September when hosts engaged Klacik, a Baltimore native, in a heated discussion about former President Donald Trump’s admission to veteran journalist Bob Woodward of wanting to “downplay” the severity of COVID-19 early on and whether it “cost lives.”

“First of all, I think that we didn’t handle the pandemic as a country great as a whole,” Klacik said. “This is why I talk about bringing the biotech industry right back to the Baltimore city port. We’ve allowed a lot of jobs and manufacturing to go overseas thanks to NAFTA in the Bill Clinton administration and that’s why [Trump’s] pulling it back.”

Behar wasn’t satisfied with her response.

“Excuse me, I have to say something to you,” the co-host said. “He told Bob Woodward that it was a very serious issue and it’s airborne and that it was terrible. And then he went out and told the American people, ‘Don’t wear masks, it’s all going to go away.’ You have to put some blame on your president. I’m sorry, you’re putting it on something extraneous here. Talk to the point, please.”

Klacik responded: “Is this the same Joy that paraded in blackface not too long ago? C’mon, Joy, I don’t think you should be asking these questions.”

“That’s not true,” Behar said. “Excuse me, excuse me! The Black community had my back. They know that that was not blackface, that was a homage.”

JOY BEHAR SAYS TIM SCOTT DOESN’T ‘UNDERSTAND’ THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RACIST COUNTRY, SYSTEMIC RACISM

Nearly a year earlier, Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron — the first Black Republican elected statewide — was blasted by the Kentucky Herald Leader during his race in 2019.

“This is what the @HeraldLeader — a “tolerant,” left-leaning newspaper — thinks about black folks who dare to be Republican. You’re a racist following the KKK unless you hate @realDonaldTrump,” he tweeted in response to a comic by illustrator Joel Pett published in the newspaper depicting Trump as a KKK member and Cameron holding his robe.

“Let’s make history on [Nov. 5] and show we don’t take orders from the elites anymore,” he added.

Courier-Journal columnist and Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Joseph Gerth echoed that same narrative in a Friday op-ed targeting Cameron.

“Good news for all the racists out there who claim they’re not racists and for those who claim the system hasn’t been set up to benefit white people. Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron has their backs,” he wrote.

GEORGIA STATE REP. VERNON JONES ANNOUNCES HE’S JOINING REPUBLICAN PARTY

Gerth noted that Cameron “says there is no such thing as systemic racism in America,” adding: “I’m not sure what America he lives in or what kind of Pollyanna world he resides, but Cameron’s reality clearly doesn’t reflect what those who open their eyes to the truth see.”

In another recent example, North Carolina Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson told The Washington Examiner that local news outlet WRAL crossed a line when it published a February cartoon by cartoonist Dennis Draughon depicting Republican members of the North Carolina State Board of Education on which Robinson serves as KKK members.

“This depiction of me and other Republican board members was done by a news outlet here in North Carolina that says it prides itself [on] delivering fair, balanced news and providing a service to the people, where they’re trying to get information that’s valuable to their readers in understanding policy issues that are important to them,” Robinson told the Examiner.

He continued: “In other words, WRAL has said that they stand against bigotry, that they stand against racism, that they stand against inaccuracies. Then, they post a cartoon that is not only bigoted but also historically inaccurate.”

REPUBLICAN MARK ROBINSON ‘SERIOUSLY CONSIDERING’ NC SENATE RUN

Robinson said he would have left the image “alone” had it “been done by some private individual on Facebook” or Instagram, but the public nature of the cartoon published by a major news outlet, he is “holding WRAL to their standards.”

Seth Effron, opinion editor for Capitol Broadcasting Company, issued a statement saying cartoons are meant to be “creative and provocative, u sing hyperbole and satire.”

“The editorial cartoon by Dennis Draughon is meant to point out that these members of the State Board are trying to wipe out from the social studies curriculum the record of racism which includes the Klan and the segregationist practices that were imposed in our state and nation’s history,” Effron said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Robinson told the Examiner that portraying members of the GOP, “which is the party that is responsible for ending slavery and for ending Jim Crow,” as the KKK “is blatantly, historically inaccurate.”

“The Republican Party … was formed partly to stand up against the evils of slavery,” he said. “To depict us, GOP members of the state school board, as racist because we are diametrically opposed to these standards, it is historically inaccurate. What’s more, it’s just wrong. It’s wrong in every way that you can think of.”

Fox News’ David Rutz and Joseph Wulfson contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/u

“)),c=l(y[i.size_id].split(“x”).map(function(e){return Number(e)}),2),s.width=c[0],s.height=c[1]),s.rubiconTargeting=(Array.isArray(i.targeting)?i.targeting:[]).reduce(function(e,t){return e[t.key]=t.values[0],e},{rpfl_elemid:f.adUnitCode}),t.push(s)):r.logError(“Rubicon: bidRequest undefined at index position:”.concat(o),n,e),t},[]).sort(function(e,t){return(t.cpm||0)-(e.cpm||0)})},getUserSyncs:function(e,t,n,r){if(!D&&e.iframeEnabled){var i=””;return n&&”string”==typeof n.consentString&&(“boolean”==typeof n.gdprApplies?i+=”?gdpr=”.concat(Number(n.gdprApplies),”&gdpr_consent=”).concat(n.consentString):i+=”?gdpr_consent=”.concat(n.consentString)),r&&(i+=””.concat(i?”&”:”?”,”us_privacy=”).concat(encodeURIComponent(r))),D=!0,{type:”iframe”,url:”https://”.concat(b.syncHost||”eus”,”.rubiconproject.com/usync.html”)+i}}},transformBidParams:function(e){return r.convertTypes({accountId:”number”,siteId:”number”,zoneId:”number”},e)}};function h(e,t){var n=o.b.getConfig(“pageUrl”);n=e.params.referrer?e.params.referrer:n||t.refererInfo.referer;return e.params.secure?n.replace(/^http:/i,”https:”):n}function _(e,t){var n=e.params;if(“video”===t){var i=[];return n.video&&n.video.playerWidth&&n.video.playerHeight?i=[n.video.playerWidth,n.video.playerHeight]:Array.isArray(r.deepAccess(e,”mediaTypes.video.playerSize”))&&1===e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length?i=e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0]:Array.isArray(e.sizes)&&0e.length)&&(t=e.length);for(var n=0,r=new Array(t);n’;var i,o}},h=function(e){var t=0=e&&t.innerWidthe.length)&&(t=e.length);for(var n=0,r=new Array(t);ne.length)&&(t=e.length);for(var n=0,r=new Array(t);n=e.length?{done:!0}:{done:!1,value:e[r++]}},e:function(e){throw e},f:i}}throw new TypeError(“Invalid attempt to iterate non-iterable instance.\nIn order to be iterable, non-array objects must have a [Symbol.iterator]() method.”)}var o,a=!0,s=!1;return{s:function(){n=e[Symbol.iterator]()},n:function(){var e=n.next();return a=e.done,e},e:function(e){s=!0,o=e},f:function(){try{a||null==n.return||n.return()}finally{if(s)throw o}}}}(o);try{for(u.s();!(a=u.n()).done;){var f=a.value;01e3*e.config.storage.refreshInSeconds),!i||s||r||null!=(d=n)&&d!==B(t)?o=e.submodule.getId(e.config,t,i):”function”==typeof e.submodule.extendId&&(o=e.submodule.extendId(e.config,t,i)),c.isPlainObject(o)&&(o.id&&(U(e,o.id),i=o.id),”function”==typeof o.callback&&(e.callback=o.callback)),i&&(e.idObj=e.submodule.decode(i,e.config))):e.config.value?e.idObj=e.config.value:(u=e.submodule.getId(e.config,t,void 0),c.isPlainObject(u)&&(“function”==typeof u.callback&&(e.callback=u.callback),u.id&&(e.idObj=e.submodule.decode(u.id,e.config))))}function Y(){var e,t,n,r=(e=D,t=j,Array.isArray(e)?e.reduce(function(e,n){return!n||c.isEmptyStr(n.name)||(!n.storage||c.isEmptyStr(n.storage.type)||c.isEmptyStr(n.storage.name)||-1===t.indexOf(n.storage.type))&&!c.isPlainObject(n.value)&&(n.storage||n.value)||e.push(n),e},[]):[]);r.length&&(n=k.filter(function(e){return!i()(P,function(t){return t.name===e.name})}),P=n.map(function(e){var t=i()(r,function(t){return t.name===e.name});return e.findRootDomain=z,t?{submodule:e,config:t,callback:void 0,idObj:void 0}:null}).filter(function(e){return null!==e}),!x&&P.length&&(Object(u.a)().requestBids.before(G,40),c.logInfo(“”.concat(S,” – usersync config updated for “).concat(P.length,” submodules: “),P.map(function(e){return e.submodule.name})),x=!0))}function $(e){i()(k,function(t){return t.name===e.name})||(k.push(e),Y())}function X(e){P=[],x=!(D=[]),y=void 0,-1!==(j=[w.localStorageIsEnabled()?O:null,w.cookiesAreEnabled()?A:null].filter(function(e){return null!==e})).indexOf(A)&&w.getCookie(C)?c.logInfo(“”.concat(S,” – opt-out cookie found, exit module”)):-1!==j.indexOf(O)&&w.getDataFromLocalStorage(C)?c.logInfo(“”.concat(S,” – opt-out localStorage found, exit module”)):(e.getConfig(function(e){var t=e.userSync;t&&t.userIds&&(D=t.userIds,h=c.isNumber(t.syncDelay)?t.syncDelay:I,_=c.isNumber(t.auctionDelay)?t.auctionDelay:E,Y())}),Object(u.a)().getUserIds=V,Object(u.a)().getUserIdsAsEids=K,Object(u.a)().refreshUserIds=H)}X(o.b),Object(p.c)(“userId”,$)}},[894]),pbjs.processQueue();
}, {}];
window.modules[“visibility.legacy”] = [function(require,module,exports){“use strict”;DS.service(“$visibility”,[“$document”,”$window”,”_throttle”,”Eventify”,function(e,t,n,i){var o,r,h=[];function s(e,t){return et?e:t}function d(e,t,n){!e.preload&&e.preloadThreshhold&&function(e,t,n,i){return t.top=e.shownThreshold&&!e.seen?(e.seen=!0,setTimeout(function(){e.trigger(“shown”,new r(“shown”,t))},15)):(!n||i1&&(h+=e(r,Math.floor(n/o),i-1,o)),h},this.getVerticallyVisiblePixels=f,this.getViewportHeight=function(){return t.innerHeight||e.documentElement.clientHeight||e.body.clientHeight},this.getViewportWidth=function(){return t.innerWidth||e.documentElement.clientWidth||e.body.clientWidth},this.isElementNotHidden=u,this.isElementInViewport=function(n){var i=n.getBoundingClientRect();return i.top>=0&&i.left>=0&&i.bottom= o.length) return { done: true }; return { done: false, value: o[i++] }; }, e: function e(_e) { throw _e; }, f: F }; } throw new TypeError(“Invalid attempt to iterate non-iterable instance.\nIn order to be iterable, non-array objects must have a [Symbol.iterator]() method.”); } var normalCompletion = true, didErr = false, err; return { s: function s() { it = o[Symbol.iterator](); }, n: function n() { var step = it.next(); normalCompletion = step.done; return step; }, e: function e(_e2) { didErr = true; err = _e2; }, f: function f() { try { if (!normalCompletion && it.return != null) it.return(); } finally { if (didErr) throw err; } } }; }

function _unsupportedIterableToArray(o, minLen) { if (!o) return; if (typeof o === “string”) return _arrayLikeToArray(o, minLen); var n = Object.prototype.toString.call(o).slice(8, -1); if (n === “Object” && o.constructor) n = o.constructor.name; if (n === “Map” || n === “Set”) return Array.from(o); if (n === “Arguments” || /^(?:Ui|I)nt(?:8|16|32)(?:Clamped)?Array$/.test(n)) return _arrayLikeToArray(o, minLen); }

function _arrayLikeToArray(arr, len) { if (len == null || len > arr.length) len = arr.length; for (var i = 0, arr2 = new Array(len); i

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/05/nearman-oregon-lawmaker-charges-rioters-state-capitol.html

Minnesota’s state demographer, Susan Brower (center), walks with Dean Goldberg, donning a blue cape and black mask as “Census Man,” through the 2019 Minnesota State Fair in St. Paul, Minn., to encourage residents to participate in the national head count.

Victor Thorstenson/Minnesota Department of Administration


hide caption

toggle caption

Victor Thorstenson/Minnesota Department of Administration

Minnesota’s state demographer, Susan Brower (center), walks with Dean Goldberg, donning a blue cape and black mask as “Census Man,” through the 2019 Minnesota State Fair in St. Paul, Minn., to encourage residents to participate in the national head count.

Victor Thorstenson/Minnesota Department of Administration

This week, Minnesota’s state demographer finally got the numbers she’s spent years waiting for.

“I didn’t expect to be as nervous as I eventually was as they were unveiling these numbers,” says Susan Brower, who was among those glued to the Census Bureau’s livestream about the first set of 2020 census results that determine how many seats in Congress and votes in the Electoral College each state gets for the next decade.

Texts and emails started rolling into Brower’s phone soon after the bureau confirmed that Minnesota would hold onto the eight seats it currently has in the U.S. House of Representatives.

And after doing some math, Brower uncovered how that almost didn’t happen.

“We found that had Minnesota counted 26 fewer residents that we would have lost that eighth congressional district,” Brower says. “I knew it was going to be very tight, but I just didn’t think it could possibly come out to be that close.”

Small Census Numbers Can Make A Big Difference

One small change in a state’s census numbers can make a big difference in the ranking system Congress adopted after the 1940 count for determining each state’s share of 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Here are the four smallest numbers of additional residents states would have needed to rise above the cutoff after the last seat was assigned and gain an additional seat:

89: New York, 2020 census
231: Oregon, 1970 census
856: Utah, 2000 census
5,692: Michigan, 1940 census

Two for the census history books

In fact, 26 people was the closest margin that secured a congressional seat for a state since Congress approved, after the 1940 national head count, the current formula for turning census numbers into a method for reallocating the 435 seats for voting members of the House.

Each state gets at least one seat, and the rest are assigned one by one according to the states’ priority rankings, which factor in their latest population counts.

“What I tell people is that it is not only what our population turns out to be, but it also relies on what every other state’s population is,” Brower says about explaining how this method of equal proportions works. “There is not any one population target or threshold that we’re trying to meet. It really depends on where we fall relative to other states’ populations.”

Based on the 2020 census results, New York fell right below Minnesota in the rankings, making it one of the seven states that lost a seat.

But that would not have happened if New York’s count included 89 more residents, a new record for the smallest number of additional residents a state would have needed in their census numbers to pick up the last assigned House seat.

The jaw-dropping result has drawn skepticism from New York’s governor.

“Do I think it was accurate to within 89? No,” Gov. Andrew Cuomo said during a press conference in Johnson City, N.Y., the day after the census numbers were released. “And we’re looking at legal options because when you’re talking about 89, I mean that could be a minor mistake in counting, right?”

The “very little” we know about the count’s accuracy

New York would not be the first state in history to file a lawsuit over how House seats have been reallocated. Over the decades, it’s become a go-to option for some states that have lost political clout after the head count.

But it might be a while before we see any court action. The bureau is still months away from releasing the more detailed data in the second set of 2020 census results, which are expected by Aug. 16 and, census experts say, will say more about how well the count turned out. The American Statistical Association is expected to put out an independent analysis of the numbers in June, and starting in December, the bureau is releasing its estimates of undercounting and overcounting.

The Census Bureau’s acting director, Ron Jarmin, has acknowledged that “no census is perfect,” but the bureau’s career officials are confident that the numbers meet their “high data quality standards.”

“We would not be releasing them to you otherwise,” said Jarmin during the virtual announcement by the U.S. government’s largest statistical agency.

Outside the bureau, some census watchers are holding their judgment for now.

“At this point, we actually know very little about the accuracy of the overall count,” says Arturo Vargas, CEO of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund, who has served on one of the bureau’s committees of outside advisers. “It could have been a mistake that the Census Bureau missed 89 people, and on the other hand, there were some estimates that suggest that there were more people counted by the Census Bureau in the state of New York than were expected.”

Still, he adds, the bureau has struggled decade after decade with getting complete and accurate counts of people of color, people with lower incomes and immigrants.

“All those populations historically have been undercounted as compared to populations that are white, wealthier and higher educated,” Vargas says.

Five hands and one finger

Last year’s census was one of the country’s most complicated head counts. The bureau counted people living in the U.S. through gathering responses online, over the phone and by paper. Door knockers tried to conduct in-person interviews with unresponsive households and sometimes relied on what their neighbors or landlords knew to get them counted. The bureau also increased its use of government records to help complete the tally.

The challenges brought on by the coronavirus pandemic, plus the Trump administration’s failed push for a citizenship question and last-minute decision to cut short counting, have all exacerbated concerns about the numbers, which the bureau delayed releasing in order to run more quality checks.

“There really isn’t anything we can do at the moment to change the numbers for apportionment or even change the numbers for redistricting. What we all need to do is to scrutinize future evaluations of the census,” Vargas says, adding that it’s not too early to start preparing for the 2030 census.

Looking ahead to the next count, Brower, the state demographer, says she’s thinking about how to keep drumming up participation in Minnesota, which had the highest self-response rate out of all the states last year.

To try to motivate others, Brower used to repeat the state’s margin that saved it from losing a House seat after the 2010 count.

“We used to say, ‘just over 8,000,’ ” Brower says. “Now, we’ll be almost counting on our hands.”

That’s five hands and one finger, to be exact, for the 26 Minnesotans who in the 2020 census made all the difference.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/01/991671730/how-26-people-in-the-census-count-helped-minnesota-beat-new-york-for-a-house-sea

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/05/01/covid-news-us-restrict-india-flights-who-green-lights-new-vaccine/4896058001/

The campaign to add Washington, DC, as the 51st state always faced low odds in the Senate, but now the bill has its first Democratic detractor — Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

In a radio interview with West Virginia’s MetroNews Talkline Friday, Manchin threw cold water on the thus-far-unified Democratic effort to approve DC statehood. Legislation to add the District of Columbia as the 51st state passed the House last week on a strictly party-line vote, sending the bill to the Senate.

“If Congress wants to make DC a state, it should propose a constitutional amendment,” Manchin said. “Let the people of America vote.”

In the 50-50 Senate, where any bill would need 60 votes to clear procedural hurdles, the bill was likely on its way to death by filibuster anyway. But the loss of Manchin — who has also vocally stood in the way of Democrats’ plans to reform the filibuster and implement a $15 minimum wage, and President Joe Biden’s federal spending and taxation plans — stings for statehood advocates and progressives alike.

Currently, 46 Senate Democrats have come out in favor of the bill, according to the Washington Post, and it has Biden’s support. Three have yet to take a stance, though one, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) previously co-sponsored a DC statehood bill. And Manchin is the only Democrat in the “no” column.

Republicans appear united in their opposition to the bill. In 2019, then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called Democratic efforts to add DC and Puerto Rico as states “full-bore socialism.”

Manchin argued that reports from the Justice Department under the Reagan and Carter administrations demonstrate that DC must be added as a state by constitutional amendment. He pointed to the 23rd Amendment, ratified in 1961, which permitted DC residents the right to vote in presidential elections and granted it three electoral votes in the Electoral College, as standing in the way of statehood via congressional action.

He went on to say he would not support unilateral congressional action on the issue, and said he would “tell his friends” that the matter would end up in the Supreme Court if they pursue a congressional path.

“Every legal scholar has told us that,” Manchin said. “So why not do it in the right way and let the people see if they want to change?”

All existing 50 states were added to the union via an act of Congress.

Proponents of DC statehood, including Democratic Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC’s only representative — though nonvoting — in Congress, told Politico in a statement that Congress did not need to repeal the 23rd Amendment in order to make DC a state.

Norton also took a shot at Manchin in an interview with the Washington Post, saying she had never counted on him for support, but instead was counting on electing more Democrats in order to diminish his influence.

Stasha Rhodes, the president of DC statehood advocacy group 51 for 51, framed the issue in a statement as one of racial justice, and pushed back against Manchin’s logic.

“No member of the Senate should deny voting rights to 700,000 mostly Black and Brown Washingtonians based on a flimsy understanding of the Constitution and American history,” Rhodes said. “A DC statehood law is clearly consistent with the Constitution and the 23rd Amendment.”

But despite the voting rights and racial justice arguments for statehood, the debate surrounding it has become about partisan power — something that Manchin surely knows. As Vox’s Jerusalem Demsas has reported:

Democrats’ narrow majority was able to pass statehood legislation when it came to the House floor but now it goes to the Senate — where bills go to die via filibuster.

Despite the myriad ways statehood would benefit DC residents, the political debate has been defined by the reality that two more Democratic senators would likely be added to the Senate if DC were to become the 51st state. According to the Brookings Institution, since 2000, the Democratic presidential nominee has captured, on average, over 89 percent of the vote in Washington, DC.

In a statement to Vox, a spokesperson for Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE), the Senate bill’s sponsor, said the 23rd Amendment was not an impediment to DC statehood and that he remained optimistic about the bill’s chances, despite the severe obstacles.

“Sen. Carper remains actively engaged with colleagues on both sides of the aisle and is confident this can reach the finish line by the end of this Congress,” his spokesperson said. “With a record amount of Senate co-sponsors and support from the House and White House, Sen. Carper feels that the stars are aligning to right this historic injustice.”

But without Manchin, let alone 10 Republicans, it looks like adding a 51st star to the American flag will remain elusive.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2021/5/1/22413869/joe-manchin-washington-dc-statehood-democrat

Rep. Mike Nearman, R-Polk County, chats with fellow representatives on the House floor on April 11, 2019, at the Capitol in Salem, Ore. He faces criminal charges after allowing far-right demonstrators to breach the state Capitol in December 2020.

Kaylee Domzalski/OPB


hide caption

toggle caption

Kaylee Domzalski/OPB

Rep. Mike Nearman, R-Polk County, chats with fellow representatives on the House floor on April 11, 2019, at the Capitol in Salem, Ore. He faces criminal charges after allowing far-right demonstrators to breach the state Capitol in December 2020.

Kaylee Domzalski/OPB

Oregon state Rep. Mike Nearman, the Polk County Republican who allowed far-right demonstrators to breach the state Capitol in December, now faces criminal charges.

According to court records, Nearman has been charged with first-degree official misconduct, a class A misdemeanor, and second degree criminal trespass, a class C misdemeanor.

The decision to charge Nearman follows a monthslong investigation by state police that began Dec. 21. As lawmakers met in a special legislative session to take up COVID-19 relief that day, surveillance footage showed Nearman exiting the locked Capitol building into a throng of protesters who were trying to get inside the statehouse. In doing so, he appeared to purposefully grant entrance to far right groups demanding an end to ongoing restrictions related to COVID-19.

Security camera footage shows state Rep. Mike Nearman opening the doors to the Oregon State Capitol building for far-right protesters on Dec. 21, 2020. Credit: Oregon State Legislature

Shortly after that breach, demonstrators scuffled with state troopers and Salem police. One man is accused of spraying officers with bear mace, allowing the crowd to make their way further into the building. Several people were arrested before the Capitol was cleared, and members of the crowd went on to shatter glass doors and assault journalists outside the building. Nearman, meanwhile, promptly walked around the building and entered on the opposite side.

At least three people who participated in the Salem protest went on to participate in the attack on the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Nearman did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.

Court documents filed by the Marion County District Attorneys Office spell out the charges.

Under the official misconduct charge, prosecutors stated that on Dec. 21, Nearman “being a public servant, did unlawfully and knowingly perform an act which constituted an unauthorize exercise of his official duties with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm another.”

Prosecutors also stated under the trespassing charge that Nearman, “constituting part of a common scheme or plan,” unlawfully aided and abetted “another to unlawfully and knowingly enter and remain in and upon the premises of the Oregon State Capitol.”

Nearman is required to appear in Marion County Court at 9 a.m. May 11, according to court documents. Failure to appear, documents state, will result in a warrant for his arrest.

The charges announced Friday are just one facet of the repercussions Nearman faces from the incident.

Democratic lawmakers in January filed a formal complaint, accusing Nearman of putting lawmakers, staff members and law enforcement officers in danger with his actions.

“He let a group of rioters enter the Capitol, despite his knowledge that only authorized personnel are allowed in the building due to the COVID-19 pandemic,” the complaint said, calling Nearman’s actions “completely unacceptable, reckless, and so severe that it will affect people’s ability to feel safe working in the Capitol or even for the legislature.”

The complaint requires an investigation into whether Nearman’s actions broke workplace rules, a determination that would ultimately be made by a House committee evenly split between Democrats and Republicans. Nearman could face consequences ranging from counseling to expulsion if lawmakers conclude he violated legislative policy.

It’s not clear when the matter could come before the Oregon House Conduct Committee for a hearing.

While that process plays out, Nearman has seen his ability to impact bills during the Legislative session severely diminished. He’s been removed from all of his former legislative committees, and agreed to turn in his Capitol access badge and provide 24-hours notice before coming to the building. Nearman has still regularly appeared at House floor sessions.

The lawmaker also faces a rather large bill. In early March, the Legislative Assembly invoiced Nearman more than $2,700 for repairs following the December incursion. But the body has limited options for forcing Nearman to pay the tab. He had not responded to the invoice as of Thursday, interim legislative administrator Brett Hanes said.

Nearman has not said much about his role in the breach, but in a statement in January he emphasized his belief that the Capitol should be open to the general public, a position many of his Republican colleagues agree with. The building has been closed since March 2020, leading lawmakers to hold hearings and take testimony virtually during three subsequent special sessions and this year’s regular legislative session.

“I don’t condone violence nor participate in it,” Nearman’s statement said. “I do think that when Article IV, Section 14 of the Oregon Constitution says that the legislative proceedings shall be ‘open,’ it means open, and as anyone who has spent the last nine months staring at a screen doing virtual meetings will tell you, it’s not the same thing as being open.”

Surveillance video captured Dec. 21 at the Oregon State Capitol shows a crowd of protesters trying to fight their way past Oregon State Police troopers.

Oregon State Police


hide caption

toggle caption

Oregon State Police

Surveillance video captured Dec. 21 at the Oregon State Capitol shows a crowd of protesters trying to fight their way past Oregon State Police troopers.

Oregon State Police

Nearman suggested in the statement he was the victim of a political attack, and that he was being subjected to “mob justice.”

After charges emerged Friday, House Speaker Tina Kotek, D-Portland, reiterated her belief that Nearman should resign his seat.

“Rep. Nearman put every person in the Capitol in serious danger and created fear among Capitol staff and legislators,” Kotek said in a statement to OPB. “I called on him to resign in January and renew my call in light of today’s charges.”

While Democrats and left-leaning groups have railed against Nearman, his Republican colleagues have had little to say about his actions. In one of her only statements on the matter, House Republican Leader Christine Drazan of Canby said in January she’d support the result of a criminal investigation.

“If the investigation finds that actions taken were criminal, legislators are not above the law and will be held responsible,” Drazan’s statement said. “As we affirm the need for due process and the right of the public to fully engage in the work of the legislature, we commit to protect public safety and hold accountable to those who would willfully undermine that commitment.”

Drazan was not immediately available Friday to answer questions about whether Nearman’s role among House Republicans would change in light of the charges, a spokesman said.

One of the most conservative Republicans in the House, Nearman has been a lawmaker since 2015. In that time, he’s been tied repeatedly to right-wing demonstrations. In 2017, his then-legislative aide gave a gun to a convicted felon, who then brought it to a pro-Trump demonstration at the Capitol, the Oregonian/OregonLive reported. Court records show the aide, Angela Roman, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in the incident.

Nearman’s dedication to right-wing causes has not flagged, despite his recent controversy. On Saturday, he’s slated to appear at a Salem rally in support of gun rights alongside former congressional candidate and QAnon conspiracy theory supporter Jo Rae Perkins, according to a flyer for the event.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/01/992713857/oregon-lawmaker-who-opened-state-capitol-to-far-right-protesters-faces-charges

Eli Broad, the billionaire philanthropist, contemporary art collector and entrepreneur who co-founded homebuilding pioneer Kaufman and Broad Inc. and launched financial services giant SunAmerica Inc., died Friday in Los Angeles. He was 87.

Suzi Emmerling, a spokeswoman for the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, confirmed his death to The Associated Press. Emmerling said Broad died at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center after a long illness. No services have been announced.

The New York Times first reported his death.

“As a businessman Eli saw around corners, as a philanthropist he saw the problems in the world and tried to fix them, as a citizen he saw the possibility in our shared community, and as a husband, father and friend he saw the potential in each of us,” Gerun Riley, president of The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, said in a statement Friday.

‘THE RIFLEMAN’ STAR JOHNNY CRAWFORD DEAD AT 75

Billionaire Eli Broad, who died Friday, is seen in Los Angeles, Jan. 6, 2011. (Associated Press)

It was Broad (pronounced brohd) who provided much of the money and willpower used to reshape Los Angeles’ once moribund downtown into a burgeoning area of expensive lofts, fancy dining establishments and civic structures like the landmark Walt Disney Concert Hall. He opened his own eponymous contemporary art museum and art lending library, the Broad, in 2015 in the city’s downtown next to Disney Hall.

“Eli Broad, simply put, was L.A.’s most influential private citizen of his generation,” Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said on Twitter. “He loved this city as deeply as anyone I have ever known.”

As a young accountant in the 1950s, Broad saw opportunity in the booming real estate market. He quit his job and partnered with developer Donald Kaufman and began building starter homes for first-time buyers eager to claim their slice of the American Dream. The company eventually became KB Home, one of the most successful home developers in the nation.

Nearly 30 years later, Broad spotted opportunity once more and transformed the company’s insurance arm into a retirement savings conglomerate that catered to the financial needs of aging baby boomers.

In the process, Broad became one of the nation’s wealthiest men, with a financial net worth estimated by Forbes magazine Friday at $6.9 billion.

Eli Broad, founder of The Broad museum, arrives with his wife Edythe at the museum’s opening in Los Angeles, Sept. 17, 2015. (Associated Press)

He also gained a reputation for being a driven, tenacious dealmaker.

“If you play it safe all of the time, you don’t get very far,” Broad told Investor’s Business Daily in 2005.

Outside work, Broad used his wealth and status to bring about civic, educational, scientific and cultural improvement projects, particularly in Los Angeles. The New York native had moved to the city’s tony Brentwood section in 1963. His charitable foundations donated millions to such projects, particularly those aimed at improving public education, and established endowments at several universities across the nation.

In the 1990s, Broad led the campaign to help raise money to build the Frank Gehry-designed Walt Disney Concert Hall and was a major underwriter of Los Angeles’ Museum of Contemporary Art, among other institutions. An avid art hound since the 1960s, Broad had a collection estimated to be worth $500 million in 2003.

In 1984, he established the Broad Art Foundation to lend works from his collection for public viewing.

A decade later, he famously purchased Roy Lichtenstein’s “I … I’m Sorry” for $2.5 million at an auction with a credit card and donated the more than 2 million frequent flier points he racked up to students at the California Institute for the Arts. In 2008, with his money, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art opened its new Broad Contemporary Art Museum featuring works from Broad’s collection.

Broad also exercised considerable political muscle. A Democrat, he led the push to lure the party’s national convention in 2000 to Los Angeles. He sometimes split with his party, however, most notably in 1972 when, disillusioned with Sen. George McGovern’s campaign, he served as co-chair of Democrats for Nixon.

Years after Nixon resigned the presidency in disgrace, Broad told Los Angeles Magazine that his efforts on Nixon’s behalf were something “I hate to admit to.” But it wasn’t the last time he would support a Republican. He also backed his close friend, former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan, with whom he shared a mutual vision of public school reform.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) lauded Broad and his wife, Edythe, for their philanthropic efforts.

“Their leadership to support our schools, advance scientific and medical research and ensure that all have access to the arts leaves a lasting and remarkable legacy,” Pelosi said in a statement. “Our entire nation is particularly indebted to the Broads for their commitment to supporting the arts, which they knew to be an essential, unifying force in the world.”

The son of Lithuanian immigrants, Broad was born June 6, 1933, in New York City but raised in Detroit. His father was a house painter and small business owner.

Broad earned his undergraduate degree from Michigan State University in 1954. In 1991, he endowed the university’s Eli Broad College of Business and Eli Broad Graduate School of Management.

At 20, he passed Michigan’s certified public accountant exam, becoming the youngest person at the time to do so. The following year, he married his hometown sweetheart, Edythe. The couple had two sons, Jeffrey and Gary. His wife and sons survive him, according to The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation.

Eager to leave school and start his career, Broad began working for several clients, including Kaufman. Soon Broad took note of the real estate market and began studying the field, reading industry journals and using his accounting know-how to analyze the business. He gradually became convinced there was money to be made.

In 1957, at the age of 23, he went into business with Kaufman, selling homes in the suburbs of Detroit. The first homes sold for about $12,000, about 10 percent less than competitors because they were built without customary basements and in about half the time.

Kaufman and Broad took their approach West, first to Arizona then California. They relocated the company’s corporate headquarters to Los Angeles in 1963, two years after it became the first homebuilder to go public.

In 1971, Broad bought an insurance company as a hedge against the boom and bust cycles of the housing market. As he had done prior to venturing into real estate, Broad began doing research on the insurance market and saw financial planning for retirees as a better business. He began shifting the subsidiary’s focus toward selling annuities and other retirement savings products.

The company was renamed SunAmerica in 1989, with Broad as its chairman and chief executive. In 1998, New York-based American International Group acquired SunAmerica for $16.5 billion.

Two years later, Broad stepped down as chief, but retained the title of chairman.

“I will do the things that I enjoy doing and things that I could have the most value with rather than doing the day-to-day things,” Broad told The Associated Press at the time. “I like to work. Right now I probably work 80 hours a week. … I still see myself working close to 40 hours at SunAmerica/AIG and maybe 40 hours at other things.”

In recent years, Broad spent much of his time engaged in philanthropic work through his foundations, advocating for public education reform, promoting the rebirth of Los Angeles’ downtown as a commercial and residential center and other causes.

In 1999, the Broads founded the Broad Education Foundation, with the goal of improving urban public education. The foundation committed more than $500 million toward the cause in its first five years.

Broad took a CEO’s approach, believing that troubled schools often could be vastly improved if they were better managed by their principals.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“These are huge enterprises,” Broad said of urban school districts in an interview with Forbes magazine in 2003. “You don’t start at the bottom. You start at the top.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/eli-broad-billionaire-entrepreneur-who-reshaped-la-dead-87

“We will see a lot of lawsuits,” said Kathay Feng, the national redistricting director at the good government group Common Cause, chuckling at a question about how much litigation there will be this redistricting cycle. Redistricting, she said, “is always a breeding ground for people who are discontent with the results.”

But the litigation is starting well before the results are clear, and what is unusual this year is the focus on exactly what data is used and when it is released. Data from the decennial census has been delayed for months, due in part to the pandemic and the Trump administration’s handling of the count.

Apportionment data — the topline numbers that determine the number of House seats each state gets — was statutorily required to be released by Dec. 31, 2020, but it just arrived on Monday. Redistricting data, the more granular data that includes demographic information over small geographic areas, is not expected until later this summer.

That delay has upended the redistricting process in dozens of states that have deadlines that are incompatible with the new release calendar, which has sent states scrambling to the courts for relief.

The delay could also have a downstream effect on lawsuits that challenge the eventual map lines once they’re drawn.

“There’s a decent chance that a number of them won’t get resolved before the 2022 election,” said Jason Torchinsky, who is general counsel to the National Republican Redistricting Trust. “So the courts are going to either have to basically say ‘you filed late and I can’t issue any orders that affect 2022,’ or a court is going to have to really rush through to change something if it wants to affect 2022.”

So far, California asked for and received a redistricting extension from state courts last year, while Michigan redistricting officials recently asked courts to extend their redistricting window. Other states have sued the Census Bureau to try to force an earlier release of redistricting data.

Ohio was the first state to file a case, which was dismissed by federal district court, a decision the state appealed. Alabama also filed a federal lawsuit challenging both the release schedule and the use of “differential privacy,” a process that will blur demographic data on small geographic levels. The Census Bureau says it is necessary to protect any one individual from being identified, but mapmakers fear it makes the data functionally unusable.

Other states are considering using data other than the decennial count to draw their map lines — including data from the American Community Survey, another Census Bureau product that is independent of the decennial count and is based on a survey instead of a hard count, which would almost assuredly spawn legal challenges.

“It’s not that the ACS data is in itself wrong, but it is like grabbing a pair of sunglasses when you need to read the fine print,” Feng said. “It is not going to give you the sharp focus you need.”

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo also said he was “looking at legal options” after his state lost out on an additional House seat on Monday by 89 people. But courts have not acted on similar cases in the past, redistricting attorneys say, while noting the pandemic has introduced a new dimension of uncertainty.

“Courts or other processes are set up to treat that data as authoritative,” said Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the conservative Cato Institute who was appointed a co-chair of Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan’s advisory redistricting commission. “If I were a judge, I would be very reluctant to open a door … [that] inevitably is going to invite litigation and disputes, in other states and other census cycles, for a multiplicity of reasons.”

Going forward, major Supreme Court rulings issued over the last decade will shape challenges to the maps themselves: Shelby County v. Holder, which effectively ended the requirement that some states have map lines cleared by the Department of Justice or federal judges to ensure there’s no racial discrimination; and Rucho v. Common Cause, which held that the federal judiciary had no jurisdiction to police partisan gerrymandering, as opposed to racial gerrymandering.

“I think the Shelby County decision is a real impediment,” former Attorney General Eric Holder, who now spearheads the Democratic Party’s redistricting efforts, said in a Tuesday briefing. “It takes away a legal tool that the Biden Justice Department could have to protect voters.”

Plaintiffs can still bring racial gerrymandering cases in federal courts, but the success of state-based challenges to partisan maps over the last decade could point to the future of redistricting cases.

Thirty states have constitutions or laws with clauses protecting “free and equal” elections, which anti-gerrymandering advocates have used to fight partisan maps in several states, said Ben Williams, a redistricting specialist at the nonpartisan National Conference of State Legislatures. “I would imagine that you’ll see more of [those challenges] this decade, and that’ll be the biggest change. And then it just becomes a question of, are courts favorable to these claims?”

Democrats have gotten an early start on filing redistricting lawsuits. Marc Elias, who is the party’s most prominent elections attorney, and the National Redistricting Action Fund, an arm of the Holder-led National Democratic Redistricting Committee, backed three lawsuits in Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Louisiana — states where Republicans control one or both houses of the legislature but Democrats hold the governorship. The suits urged the courts to step in if (or when) there is an impasse in the mapmaking process.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/01/redistricting-lawsuits-485161

California Gov. Gavin Newsom will address the Democratic Party faithful Saturday as he mounts a campaign to keep his job.

His address to thousands of activists at the California Democratic Party’s annual convention, held virtually, comes on the heels of state elections officials announcing that a preliminary count shows the recall effort against him has enough signatures to make the ballot.

Voters will get the chance in the all-but-certain election this fall to decide whether the first-term Democrat should be booted from office before his term ends. Delegates at the convention are some of the party’s most hardworking organizers, who can knock on doors, make phone calls or provide a cheering section at rallies for Democratic candidates.

“The governor can speak and remind everyone why we supported him to be governor and why he won with an overwhelmingly majority,” said Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, a fellow Democrat. To the party activists, Republicans are trying to sabotage Newsom and “that is what will ultimately create the organizational support to defeat the recall.”

CALIFORNIA PLANS EARLY RELEASE FOR 76,000 PRISON INMATE– INCLUDING VIOLENT FELONS

Vice President Kamala Harris also is set to deliver remarks, an exciting moment for Democrats who helped her rise through California’s political ranks, from San Francisco district attorney to state attorney general to U.S. senator, before she was chosen by Joe Biden for his presidential ticket.

The annual gathering, which began Thursday, serves as a forum to debate policy, endorse candidates and otherwise energize party members. With no other major contests on the state ballot this year, Newsom’s expected fall recall election will be one of the highest profile races in California and the nation.

“Being prepared to organize against and defeat a Republican recall of Gov. Gavin Newsom is going to be an important part of our conversation,” California Democratic Party Chairman Rusty Hicks said of the weekend activities.

Hicks, just reelected as party chair, said the convention will stay focused on California’s emergence out of the pandemic, including efforts to vaccinate millions of people, get schools reopened and support small businesses.

Newsom’s political fate will depend in part on how people feel about his handling of the pandemic and whether schools and businesses remain open by election time.

Republicans have blasted him over school and business closures, though recent polling shows the majority of voters support his handling of schools and the economy.

FILE – In this Sept. 15, 2020, file photo, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, left, and then Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., talk as they asses the damage during the Creek Fire at Pine Ridge Elementary in Auberry, Calif. Harris will address California Democratic Party activists on Saturday, May 1, 2021, her first time speaking at the party’s annual convention as the second highest office holder in the country. (AP Photo/Gary Kazanjian, File)

CALIFORNIA MAYORS WANT $20 BILLION FOR HOMELESS CRISIS OVER NEXT 5 YEARS

In the recall, voters will be asked two questions: Should Newsom be recalled and who should replace him? He cannot run on the second ballot. Votes for that question will only be tallied if more than half of voters want Newsom gone.

Former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer, businessman John Cox, former congressman Doug Ose and reality TV star Caitlyn Jenner are among the Republicans running to replace him.

For now Democrats are united behind Newsom. The governor has depicted the recall as an attack by former President Donald Trump’s supporters on California’s progressive values, an argument that is proving salient among Democrats.

Christine Pelosi, the outgoing chair of the state party’s women’s caucus and the daughter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, said Democrats are excited to defend the state’s progressive ideals. But she said Democrats have to show people what they are for and stay focused on how they will help people recover from the pandemic.

“Our concern is that people won’t vote if they don’t think we’re speaking to the realities of their lives,” Pelosi said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Beyond Newsom and Harris, delegates will hear Saturday from former Gov. Jerry Brown, Pelosi, former Sen. Barbara Boxer and Sen. Alex Padilla, who Newsom appointed to replace Harris.

Padilla will be up for election in 2022.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who infrequently attends state party conventions, will not deliver remarks. She’s faced heightened criticism and scrutiny about her fitness for office and she’s never been beloved by the party’s progressive activists. In 2018, they endorsed her challenger.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-democrats-convention-newsom-recall

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/05/01/indias-second-covid-wave-new-variant-and-what-we-know/4895091001/

Prosecutors are asking a judge to give Derek Chauvin a more severe penalty than state guidelines call for when he is sentenced in June for George Floyd’s death, arguing in court documents filed Friday that Floyd was particularly vulnerable and that Chauvin abused his authority as a police officer.

Defense attorney Eric Nelson is opposing a tougher sentence, saying the state has failed to prove that those aggravating factors, among others, existed when Chauvin arrested Floyd on May 25.

Chauvin, who is white, was convicted last week of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter for pressing his knee against Floyd’s neck for 9 1/2 minutes as the Black man said he couldn’t breathe and went motionless.

FILE – In this April 18, 2021 file image from video, defense attorney Eric Nelson gives closing arguments in Minneapolis, Minn. during the trial of former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin for the 2020 death of George Floyd. (Court TV via AP, Pool, File)

In this image from video, Hennepin County Judge Peter Cahill dresses the court after the judge put the trial into the hands of the jury. Monday, April 19, 2021, in the trial of Chauvin, in the May 25, 2020, death of George Floyd at the Hennepin County Courthouse in Minneapolis, Minn. (Court TV via AP, Pool)

GEORGE FLOYD MURAL COVERED UP IN PHOENIX; DREW COMPLAINT IT ‘CELEBRATES WHITE VIOLENCE’

Even though he was found guilty of three counts, under Minnesota statutes he’ll only be sentenced on the most serious one — second-degree murder. While that count carries a maximum sentence of 40 years, experts say he won’t get that much.

Prosecutors did not specify how much time they would seek for Chauvin.

Under Minnesota sentencing guidelines, the presumptive sentence for second-degree unintentional murder for someone with no criminal record like Chauvin would be 12 1/2 years. Judges can sentence someone to as little as 10 years and eight months or as much as 15 years and still be within the advisory guideline range. To go above that, Judge Peter Cahill would have to find that there were “aggravating factors,” and even if those are found, legal experts have said Chauvin would likely not face more than 30 years.

In legal briefs filed Friday, prosecutors said Chauvin should be sentenced above the guideline range because Floyd was particularly vulnerable with his hands cuffed behind his back as he was face-down on the ground, and that he was intoxicated. They noted that Chauvin held his position even after Floyd became unresponsive and officers knew he had no pulse.

Prosecutors also said Chauvin treated Floyd with particular cruelty during the lengthy restraint, saying Chauvin inflicted gratuitous pain and caused psychological distress to Floyd and to bystanders.

“Defendant continued to maintain his position atop Mr. Floyd even as Mr. Floyd cried out that he was in pain, even as Mr. Floyd exclaimed 27 times that he could not breathe, and even as Mr. Floyd said that Defendant’s actions were killing him,” prosecutors wrote. They added that he stayed in position as Floyd cried out for his mother, stopped speaking and lost consciousness.

“Defendant thus did not just inflict physical pain. He caused Mr. Floyd psychological distress during the final moments of his life, leaving Mr. Floyd helpless as he squeezed the last vestiges of life out of Mr. Floyd’s body,” prosecutors wrote.

FILE – In this April 15, 2021, file image from video, prosecutor Jerry Blackwell speaks as Hennepin County Judge Peter Cahill discusses motions before the court in the trial of former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin for the 2020 death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minn. (Court TV via AP, Pool, File)

FILE – In this April 19, 2021 file image from police body camera video George Floyd responds to police after they approached his car outside Cup Foods in Minneapolis, on May 25, 2020. The image was shown as prosecutor Steve Schleicher gave closing arguments at the Hennepin County Courthouse in Minneapolis, in the trial of former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin, who is charged in the May 25 death of Floyd. (Court TV via AP, Pool, File)

CHAUVIN, EX-OFFICERS IN GEORGE FLOYD’S CASE COULD BE FEDERALLY INDICTED ON CIVIL RIGHTS CHARGE: REPORT

They also said that Chauvin abused his position of authority as a police officer, committed his crime as part of a group of three or more people, and that he pinned Floyd down in the presence of children — including a 9-year-old girl who testified at trial that watching the restraint made her “sad and kind of mad.”

Nelson disagreed, writing that “Mr. Chauvin entered into the officers’ encounter with Mr. Floyd with legal authority to assist in effecting the lawful arrest of an actively-resisting criminal suspect. Mr. Chauvin was authorized, under Minnesota law, to use reasonable force to do so.”

Nelson said Floyd was not particularly vulnerable, saying he was a large man who was struggling with officers. He wrote that courts have typically found particular vulnerability if the victims are young, or perhaps sleeping, when a crime occurs.

Nelson also said Floyd was not treated with particular cruelty, saying that there is no evidence that the assault perpetrated by Chauvin involved gratuitous pain that’s not usually associated with second-degree murder.

“The assault of Mr. Floyd occurred in the course of a very short time, involved no threats or taunting, such as putting a gun to his head and pulling the trigger … and ended when EMS finally responded to officers’ calls,” Nelson wrote.

He also said the state hasn’t proven that any of the other officers actively participated in the crime for which Chauvin was convicted. Those officers are scheduled to face trial on aiding and abetting charges in August. He also wrote that the presence of children in this case is different from cases in which children might be witnessing a crime in a home and unable to leave.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

And, he said, the state failed to prove that Chauvin’s role as a police officer was an aggravating factor, saying that Floyd’s struggle with officers showed that Chauvin’s authority was irrelevant to Floyd.

Cahill has said he will review the attorneys’ written arguments before determining whether aggravating factors exist that would warrant a tougher sentence.

No matter what sentence Chauvin gets, in Minnesota it’s presumed that a defendant with good behavior will serve two-thirds of the penalty in prison and the rest on supervised release, commonly known as parole.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/prosecutors-higher-sentence-chauvin-floyd-death

People wait in line to vote in Texas’s Tarrant County in October 2020. Voters in the state’s 6th Congressional District are casting ballots in a special election that concludes Saturday.

Montinique Monroe/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Montinique Monroe/Getty Images

People wait in line to vote in Texas’s Tarrant County in October 2020. Voters in the state’s 6th Congressional District are casting ballots in a special election that concludes Saturday.

Montinique Monroe/Getty Images

Texans around Dallas will go to the polls on Saturday to fill the seat of the late Rep. Ron Wright, deciding between a field of 23 candidates — including Wright’s widow — to replace the Republican in the state’s 6th Congressional District.

Wright, a second-term congressman, died in February after being diagnosed with the coronavirus. He was the first sitting member of Congress to have died of the virus.

Now, the race to fill his seat has become one of the year’s most closely watched contests, representing the changing demographics of many suburban congressional districts in the South, and the influence of former President Donald Trump.

Recent polls show Susan Wright, wife of the late congressman, narrowly leading the pack. But neither she nor the next leading candidate, Democrat Jana Lynne Sanchez, appear set to capture the majority of votes required to win the seat outright.

If no candidate receives more than 50% of the vote, the top two vote-getters will go head-to-head in a runoff.

Trump has endorsed Wright in the race, giving her a much-desired boost among conservatives. But the district has trended more blue in recent years.

Last year, according to Ballotpedia, Trump won the district by just 3 percentage points as Ron Wright won it by 9 points.

While Susan Wright and other Republicans are tying themselves to the former president, the field also includes an anti-Trump GOP candidate, Michael Wood.

Wright on Friday reached out to federal law enforcement after her campaign learned of robocalls baselessly alleging she had killed her husband. “There’s not a sewer too deep that some politicians won’t plumb,” she said in a statement.

Early voting for the contest started April 19.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/01/992128639/texans-vote-to-fill-seat-left-by-congressman-who-died-after-coronavirus-diagnosi

People walk near the Wall Street Charging Bull statue on July 23, 2020, in New York City. Stocks have rallied during President Biden’s first 100 days even as he has promised to raise taxes on corporations and wealthy investors and to go tougher on Wall Street.

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

People walk near the Wall Street Charging Bull statue on July 23, 2020, in New York City. Stocks have rallied during President Biden’s first 100 days even as he has promised to raise taxes on corporations and wealthy investors and to go tougher on Wall Street.

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

President Biden wants to raise taxes on corporations and wealthy investors. His top market regulator has promised a tougher approach. And leading Democrats who control Congress are proud adversaries of moguls and money managers.

So, how has the stock market responded?

With a rally that has sent the S&P 500 to an 11% surge in Biden’s first 100 days, the best performance by the various versions of the index since Franklin Delano Roosevelt started his first term in 1933, according to an NPR analysis of S&P data.

“The stock market is on fire,” says Greg Valliere, Chief U.S. Policy Strategist at AGF Investments. “It has astonished veteran observers, and it may have a ways to go.”

Loading…

So what explains the rally?

For many experts, it boils down to the U.S. economy.

President Biden’s administration has overseen a rapid rollout of vaccines and passed a $1.9 trillion stimulus plan that poured more money into households and businesses even after Congress had already passed trillions of dollars in stimulus.

Those two developments have led Americans to open their wallets again and businesses to reopen, turbocharging the U.S. economy.

Data on Thursday showed the economy grew at an annual 6.4% rate in the first quarter, while companies such as Apple and Tesla have recently posted blowout earnings.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve has committed to keeping interest rates low for the foreseeable future, and the central bank continues to buy billions of dollars worth of bonds, providing a powerful signal to investors.

“These last hundred days have been about as good as we’ve ever seen,” says Ryan Detrick, Chief Market Strategist at LPL Financial. “There’s the fiscal policy, the monetary policy, but the truth is, it comes down to the economy, and we have opened up, and that is a big reason why stocks have done so well.”

All this has helped to offset some of the president’s proposals that are less popular on Wall Street.

In his speech to a joint session on Wednesday, Biden unveiled a bold vision of big government that will require trillions of dollars in spending. He intends to pay for it by raising taxes on corporations and millionaires, including the rate wealthy investors pay on profits from the sale of assets such as stocks, as well as by closing loopholes.

“It’s time for corporate America and the wealthiest one percent of Americans to pay their fair share,” Biden said. “What I’ve proposed is fair. It’s fiscally responsible.”

Meanwhile, new Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler is an experienced regulator who previously headed the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under President Obama and is known for a tougher approach to Wall Street.

And key committees that oversee the financial world are now overseen by lawmakers such as Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., who are widely seen as less friendly to Wall Street, while other progressive lawmakers such as Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass, are expected to have prominent voices.

But an economy that many experts see headed to its best annual growth since 1984 has a way of coloring things, according to experts. After all, investors recognize that a proposal – to change the tax code or raise taxes – still needs to pass a Congress where Democrats hold only a slim majority.

“Unless [Biden] did something insane, the table was set for this market,” says Jonathan Golub, Chief U.S. Equity Strategist and Head of Quantitative Research at Credit Suisse.

“I don’t see anything which changes this over the intermediate term,” he adds.

But there are more serious risks for Wall Street.

From the beginning of the pandemic, investors and economists have said the virus will determine how quickly the economy recovers. And despite the increasing vaccination rates, there is still concern about variants.

There’s also the prospect of rising inflation. Manufacturers are being hit hard by supply constraints, leading companies such as Proctor & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark to raise prices.

Meanwhile, the Fed has continued to insist an expected uptick in inflation will be manageable, but concerns remain the central bank may need to raise interest rates to counter the impact of rising prices.

And at the end, markets have always been cyclical. Sometimes they go up, and sometimes they go down. According to Golub at Credit Suisse, what ends up stopping the record-setting run in markets may be something as simple as time.

“You know, trees don’t grow to the sky,” he says. “Once we get past the second and third quarter of this year, things are going to progressively slow down back to normal.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/01/992167670/biden-wants-to-go-tough-on-wall-street-the-response-the-best-rally-since-fdr